Front. Mar. Sci. Frontiers in Marine Science Front. Mar. Sci. 2296-7745 Frontiers Media S.A. 10.3389/fmars.2023.1205418 Marine Science Correction Corrigendum: Integrating information from semi-structured interviews into management strategy evaluation: a case study for Southeast United States marine fisheries Damiano Matthew 1 * Wager Bethany 1 † Rocco Alex 1 † Shertzer Kyle W. 2 † Murray Grant D. 3 † Cao Jie 1 1 Department of Applied Ecology, Center for Marine Sciences and Technology, North Carolina State University, Morehead City, NC, United States 2 National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Beaufort Laboratory, Southeast Fisheries Science Center, Beaufort, NC, United States 3 Duke University Marine Lab, Nicholas School of the Environment, Beaufort, NC, United States

Edited and Reviewed by: Kate Brooks, Deakin University, Australia

*Correspondence: Matthew Damiano, mddamian@ncsu.edu

†These authors have contributed equally to this work

 16 05 2023 2023 10 1205418 13 04 2023 24 04 2023 Copyright © 2023 Damiano, Wager, Rocco, Shertzer, Murray and Cao 2023 Damiano, Wager, Rocco, Shertzer, Murray and Cao

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

 A Corrigendum on Integrating information from semi-structured interviews into management strategy evaluation: a case study for Southeast United States marine fisheries by Damiano M, Wager B, Rocco A, Shertzer KW, Murray GD and Cao J (2022) Front. Mar. Sci. 9:1063260. doi: 10.3389/fmars.2022.1063260 marine resource management fishers’ knowledge management strategy evaluation experiential knowledge ecosystem approach management section-in-acceptance Marine Fisheries, Aquaculture and Living Resources

Error in Figure

Table Legend

In the published article, there was an error in the legend for Figure 1 as published. Conceptual objectives group “F” was labeled “E”. The corrected legend appears below.

Tallied responses to Interview Question 2 which asks fishers to identify their top three conceptual objectives from a list provided by the interviewer. Conceptual objectives were ranked 1st, 2nd, or 3rd by commercial fishers (left) and recreational fishers (right) for black sea bass (red) and cobia (blue). Options for ranking were (A) “Catching the greatest number of pounds,” (B) “Catching the greatest number of fish,” (C) “Catching the largest size fish,” (D) “Maximizing the length of the season,” (E) “Conservation of the resource,” and (F) “Increased access or opportunity within the fishery.”.

In the published article, there was an error in the legend for Figure 2 as published. Preferred management measure group “F” was labeled “E”. The corrected legend appears below.

Tallied responses to Interview Question 3 which asks fishers to identify their top three management measures from a list provided by the interviewer. Management measures were ranked 1st, 2nd, or 3rd by commercial fishers (left) and recreational fishers (right) for black sea bass (red) and cobia (blue). Options for ranking were (A) “Changing the vessel/trip or bag limits,” (B) “Changing the size limits,” (C) “Changing the size limits to a slot limit,” (D) “Seasonal closures,” (E) “In-season adjustments to vessel/trip or bag limits,” and (F) “Changing catch limit allocation among sectors.”.

In the published article, there was an error in Table 3 as published. The performance metric referring to a proxy for season length reads “catch rates,” when it should be “exploitation rates”. The corrected Table 3 and its caption appear below.

Conceptual objectives and performance metrics derived from participants’ responses to interview questions.

Type of Objective Species Conceptual Objective Performance Metric
Commercial Fishing Black sea bass Catch the greatest number of pounds Changes in median of average catch
Recreational Black sea bass Catch the greatest number of pounds Changes in the median of average catch
Recreational Black sea bass Catch the largest fish Proportion of legal-sized fish in the population
Recreational Black sea bass Maximize the length of the season Changes in exploitation rates as a proxy for season length
Recreational and Commercial Fishing Black sea bass Reduce discards Magnitude of discards
Commercial Fishing Cobia Maximize the length of the season Changes in exploitation rates as a proxy for season length
Recreational Fishing Cobia Maximize the length of the season Changes in exploitation rates as a proxy for season length
Recreational Fishing Cobia Catch the largest fish Proportion of legal-sized fish in the population
Conservation Black sea bass/Cobia Maintain SSB above MSST % of simulations in which SSB remains above MSST

The authors apologize for these errors and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.