<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xml:lang="EN" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" article-type="research-article">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Mar. Sci.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Marine Science</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Mar. Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">2296-7745</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmars.2021.751790</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Marine Science</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Population, Reproductive and Fishery Dynamics of Spotted Box Crab (<italic>Calappa philargius</italic>), a New Claw-Only Fishery Species, in the Southern Taiwan Strait, China</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Lin</surname> <given-names>Bai-an</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1422820/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Jiang</surname> <given-names>Yan</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn002"><sup>&#x2020;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1262261/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Boenish</surname> <given-names>Robert</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/747002/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>Qing</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1032635/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Min</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001"><sup>&#x002A;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1032305/overview"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1"><sup>1</sup><institution>State Key Laboratory of Marine Environmental Science, College of Ocean and Earth Sciences, Xiamen University</institution>, <addr-line>Xiamen</addr-line>, <country>China</country></aff>
<aff id="aff2"><sup>2</sup><institution>Environmental Defense Fund</institution>, <addr-line>Boston, MA</addr-line>, <country>United States</country></aff>
<aff id="aff3"><sup>3</sup><institution>Dongshan Swire Marine Station, College of Ocean and Earth Sciences, Xiamen University</institution>, <addr-line>Xiamen</addr-line>, <country>China</country></aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by"><p>Edited by: Brett W. Molony, Oceans and Atmosphere (CSIRO), Australia</p></fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by"><p>Reviewed by: Khor Waiho, University of Malaysia Terengganu, Malaysia; Hao Zhen Lin, Dalian Ocean University, China</p></fn>
<corresp id="c001">&#x002A;Correspondence: Min Liu, <email>minliuxm@xmu.edu.cn</email></corresp>
<fn fn-type="present-address" id="fn002"><p><sup>&#x2020;</sup>Present address: Yan Jiang, State Key Laboratory of Marine Pollution, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon, Hong Kong, SAR China</p></fn>
<fn fn-type="other" id="fn004"><p>This article was submitted to Marine Fisheries, Aquaculture and Living Resources, a section of the journal Frontiers in Marine Science</p></fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>21</day>
<month>10</month>
<year>2021</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2021</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>8</volume>
<elocation-id>751790</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>02</day>
<month>08</month>
<year>2021</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>28</day>
<month>09</month>
<year>2021</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x00A9; 2021 Lin, Jiang, Boenish, Xu and Liu.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2021</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Lin, Jiang, Boenish, Xu and Liu</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p></license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>The spotted box crab <italic>Calappa philargius</italic> (Calappidae) is an increasingly consumed species in China, mainly sourced from a claw-only fishery. Being a not well-characterized species in the literature, this study is warranted to inform sustainable management approaches. Here we report on the first in-depth overview on biology and fishery dynamics of <italic>C. philargius</italic> in the southern Taiwan Strait of China. Whole body crabs (<italic>N</italic> = 1,009) were collected monthly from January to December 2019 from trawlers, operating in the southern Taiwan Strait; sample collection was absent from May to July because of the national fishing moratorium regulation. Sex ratio, growth pattern, size at maturity and fecundity were estimated. The overall male: female ratio was 1: 1.47, significantly differing from the 1: 1 (<italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.01); monthly sex ratio variations were also significant (<italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.01), suggesting possible seasonal sexual segregation. We found the carapace widths (CW) of males were significantly larger than those of females (<italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.01). Based on the occurrence and percentages of berried females, we identified twin spawning events in January&#x2013;April and August&#x2013;October with the overall peak occurring in February. Size at 50% female maturity was 11.47 cm CW. Female absolute fecundity was significantly related to CW via a power function relationship (<italic>N</italic> = 14, <italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.01). The estimated average claw yield was 36.28 &#x00B1; 3.07% of the whole body weight (<italic>N</italic> = 95), irrespective of sex and size (<italic>p</italic> &#x003E; 0.5). Capture and trade data of <italic>C. philargius</italic> using trawl and trap fishing gears were documented to characterize claw-only fishery dynamics for future research and sustainable use.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>Calappidae</kwd>
<kwd>crab fisheries</kwd>
<kwd>fecundity</kwd>
<kwd>sex ratio</kwd>
<kwd>spawning season</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<counts>
<fig-count count="9"/>
<table-count count="5"/>
<equation-count count="0"/>
<ref-count count="56"/>
<page-count count="12"/>
<word-count count="7541"/>
</counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec sec-type="intro" id="S1">
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Claw-only crab fisheries have been developed since the 1970s and are commonly considered as renewable fisheries. Typically, after the collection of claws on board, the declawed live bodies are released. This fishery mode includes the red crab <italic>Chaceon affinis</italic> (Geryonidae) in the Northeast Atlantic (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Robinson, 2008</xref>), the brown crab <italic>Cancer pagurus</italic> (Cancridae) in Ireland (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Fahy et al., 2004</xref>), the stone crabs <italic>Menippe</italic> spp. (Menippidae) in the United States (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">Savage and Sullivan, 1978</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Duermit et al., 2017</xref>), Jonah crab <italic>Cancer borealis</italic> (Cancridae) in the United States (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Goldstein and Carloni, 2021</xref>), and the European fiddler crab <italic>Uca tangeri</italic> (synonyms of <italic>Afruca tangeri</italic>) (Ocypodidae) for males only in southern Portugal (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Oliveira et al., 2000</xref>), all mainly caught in trap fisheries. However, the proportion of crabs that regenerate claws and re-enter commercial landings is minimal; for example, only 7&#x2013;13% regenerated claws entered the <italic>M. mercenaria</italic> fishery in Florida, the United States (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">Simonson and Hochberg, 1986</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">Wilber, 1995</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Muller et al., 2011</xref>). The mortality rate associated with two-claw removal is high in <italic>M. mercenaria</italic> and <italic>C. borealis</italic>, 28&#x2013;100% and 70%, respectively, and higher with increasing temperatures under laboratory conditions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Davis et al., 1978</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">Simonson and Hochberg, 1986</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Gandy et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Goldstein and Carloni, 2021</xref>). The estimated mortality rate for single-claw removal in <italic>M. mercenaria</italic> and <italic>C. borealis</italic> is reduced around 35&#x2013;50% compared to two-claw removal in the fishery (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Davis et al., 1978</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Duermit et al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Goldstein and Carloni, 2021</xref>). However, voluntary adherence to one-claw fishing regulations is not universal, and the seasonal closure to protect spawning stocks can be a better management measure (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Duermit et al., 2017</xref>).</p>
<p>China is one of the most important crab fisheries nations, contributing to more than 40% of total global marine crab capture production (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Lin et al., 2021</xref>). Available Chinese national marine crab capture fishery yield statistics date back to 1987. Since 2003, these data have been divided into finer taxonomic resolution. National crab yield exceeded 800,000 t in 2014, and has since exhibited a gradual decline. More than 80% of the domestic Chinese crab yield is from species in the family Portunidae. With the change from target fisheries to multispecies fisheries and the overexploitation of traditionally important food crab species in China (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Kang et al., 2018</xref>) and the increasing demands for crab consumption, some non-traditional food crab species are becoming utilized in China, such as the spanner crab <italic>Ranina ranina</italic> (Raninidae), the box crabs <italic>Calappa</italic> species (Calappidae), and the stone crabs <italic>Menippe</italic> and <italic>Etisus</italic> species (Xanthoidae) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Ng, 1998</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Jiang and Yu, 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">Shao et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Liu and Lin, 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Lin et al., 2021</xref>). Furthermore, traditional Chinese crab pastes, made from small-size species from families Ocypodidae, Sesarmidae, and Varunidae, have been promoted through food documentaries and Wechat/online retail markets.</p>
<p>The box crab <italic>Calappa philargius</italic> is widely distributed in the Indo-Pacific Oceans from Australia and Thailand to Korea and Japan, and commonly found in southern China (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Dai et al., 1986</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Ng, 1998</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B53">Wisespongpand et al., 2016</xref>). In China, it usually inhabits nearshore shallow waters (10&#x2013;100 m) on sandy and muddy bottoms, and mainly feeds on mollusks and hermit crabs (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Dai et al., 1986</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Ng, 1998</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">Shao et al., 2015</xref>). The species can be caught in trawl, trap, and gill net fisheries in the southern East China Sea and South China Sea. Historically, <italic>C. philargius</italic> was considered a non-food crab and typically discarded at sea (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Ng, 1998</xref>). In less than one decade since, however, claw-only consumption of <italic>C. philargius</italic> is becoming popular in domestic markets (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Liu and Lin, 2019</xref>). As a newly developing, claw-only fishery in China, the biology and fishery dynamics of <italic>C. philargius</italic> are poorly known.</p>
<p>In the southern Taiwan Strait of China, <italic>C. philargius</italic> is a common crab species in both trawl and trap catches (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Liu and Lin, 2019</xref>). In 2019, we conducted the first <italic>in situ</italic> study to improve the understanding of <italic>C. philargius</italic> population structure, sex ratio, size variation, reproductive biology in terms of size at maturity, spawning season and fecundity, and basic fishery dynamics including claw yield, capture production and proportion in both trawl and trap fisheries. The results will provide crucial data for further stock assessment and data-limited fishery management for this newly developing claw-only crab fishery species in China.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S2" sec-type="materials|methods">
<title>Materials and Methods</title>
<sec id="S2.SS1">
<title><italic>Calappa philargius</italic> Collection</title>
<p>Commercial bottom trawl and trap vessels from Dongshan County (Fujian Province, China) operate exclusively in the fishing grounds of the southern Taiwan Strait (21.50&#x2013;24.50&#x00B0; N, 116.00&#x2013;119.00&#x00B0; E) (see <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2</xref> in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Lin et al., 2021</xref>). Monthly sampling of whole body crabs was conducted during January&#x2013;April 2019 and August&#x2013;December 2019 at the landing ports of Dongshan County. Owing to the national annual summer fishing moratorium regulation (i.e., no trawl fishing permitted from May 1st to August 15th, and no trap fishing from May 1st to August 1st) in China, no crabs were available for sampling spanning May&#x2013;July 2019.</p>
<fig id="F1" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 1</label>
<caption><p><italic>Calappa philargius</italic>. <bold>(A)</bold> Fresh whole body crabs from trawl fishery. <bold>(B)</bold> Claw-only landings from trap fishery. <bold>(C)</bold> Cleaned bodies.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fmars-08-751790-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig id="F2" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 2</label>
<caption><p><bold>(A)</bold> Dorsal view of <italic>Calappa philargius</italic> for carapace width (CW) and carapace length (CL) measurements. Sex determination by abdomen morphology: <bold>(B)</bold> female and <bold>(C)</bold> male. <bold>(D)</bold> Yellow eggs, <bold>(E)</bold> orange-red eggs and <bold>(F)</bold> brown eggs measurement under a microscope.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fmars-08-751790-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Approximate 15&#x2013;35 kg (about 1&#x2013;2 baskets) <italic>C. philargius</italic> samples were randomly collected from at least five bottom trawl vessels in each sampling month (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1A</xref>). About 1 kg of &#x201C;feed-grade fish&#x201D; (see definition in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B55">Zhang et al., 2020</xref>) from the same trawl vessels were also collected to obtain smaller <italic>C. philargius</italic> samples. All samples were transferred to Dongshan Swire Marine Station (Xiamen University) for further analysis.</p>
<p>No <italic>C. philargius</italic> samples were collected from trap vessels because they typically only land the large first-paired claws (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1B</xref>); the declawed live hard bodies were discarded at sea.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S2.SS2">
<title>Crab Measurement and Examination</title>
<p>For every whole body crab collected, carapace width (CW, to 0.1 cm), carapace length (CL, to 0.1 cm), and body weight (BW, wet weight, to 0.01 g) were measured (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2A</xref>). Based on abdomen morphology, sexes were determined, and berried females were considered fully mature (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figures 2B,C</xref>). Consistent with literature on other similar crabs, embryonic developmental stages from early to late were noted by the yellow, orange-red and brown coloration, respectively (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Arshad et al., 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Hisam et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Lin et al., 2021</xref>).</p>
<p>Female fecundity, defined as the number of eggs carried by a female, was estimated empirically following standard methodologies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Lin et al., 2021</xref>). The absolute fecundity (<italic>Fa</italic>) was calculated as: <italic>Fa</italic> = <italic>W</italic> <sup>&#x2217;</sup> <italic>m</italic>/<italic>n</italic>, where <italic>W</italic> is the total weight of the whole egg mass for a female, <italic>m</italic> is the average weight of the five egg sub-samples (approximate 0.02 g per sub-sample), and <italic>n</italic> is the average number of eggs from the five sub-samples (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Johnson et al., 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">Soundarapandian et al., 2013</xref>). The relative fecundity (<italic>Fr</italic>) was calculated as: <italic>Fr</italic> = <italic>Fa</italic>/<italic>CW</italic> and <italic>Fr</italic> = <italic>Fa</italic>/<italic>BW</italic>. Egg diameters (to 1 &#x03BC;m) from different colors (5 individuals for yellow eggs, 5 individuals for orange-red eggs, and 4 individuals for brown eggs) were randomly measured using a Leica M165 FC fluorescence stereo microscope (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figures 2D&#x2013;F</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S2.SS3">
<title>Crab Capture Data Collection</title>
<p>Information on the total capture production (kg/vessel), <italic>C. philargius</italic> production (kg/vessel), and the number of fishing days at sea (days/vessel) was collected in the landing ports from the same trawl vessels during monthly sampling. Data collection was through captain and crew interviews, landing port estimation directly (i.e., landing volumes by species or species group level), and trade notebooks (i.e., captain&#x2019;s wholesale information including weight and price on the per-trip level documented for revenue purposes).</p>
<p>Information collected from the trap vessels was comparable to that of the trawl vessels. However, due to the claw-only characteristics in trap vessel landings, <italic>C. philargius</italic> capture production (kg/vessel) was back-calculated from claw production estimation (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1B</xref>). Briefly, both female and male whole body crabs were randomly selected after measurement and examination above. The claw yield (%) per crab was calculated as: <italic>W</italic><sub><italic>claws</italic></sub>/<italic>BW</italic> <sup>&#x2217;</sup> 100, where <italic>W</italic><sub><italic>claws</italic></sub> is the wet weight of the paired claws, which are typically broken off proximal of the merus. Then, the average claw yield (%) of <italic>C. philargius</italic> was calculated. Finally, whole crab capture production of <italic>C. philargius</italic> from trap vessels was estimated by dividing the total claw landings (kg) by the claw yield percentage.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S2.SS4">
<title>Data Analyses</title>
<p>The percentage of berried females each month, irrespective of egg coloration, was calculated as: the number of berried females/the total number of females <sup>&#x2217;</sup> 100. The spawning season was defined as the months with berried females, and the peak spawning season was defined as the month(s) with at least 50% of berried females (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Sadovy, 1996</xref>).</p>
<p>We estimated the size at 50% female maturity (<italic>CW</italic><sub>50</sub>) by fitting a logistic regression (probity link) to the percentage of berried females in 0.5 cm CW size bins using females from the peak spawning month determined above.</p>
<p>Differences in sex ratio from 1: 1 monthly and overall were analyzed by student&#x2019;s <italic>t</italic>-test. Differences in sizes (CW) of females and males monthly and overall were analyzed via one-way ANOVA and non-parametric analysis (Mann-Whitney <italic>U</italic>-test). The relationships of CW&#x2014;BW, CW&#x2014;CL, Fa&#x2014;CW, and Fa&#x2014;BW were all analyzed via one-way ANCOVA. The statistical analyses were conducted using R (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">R Core Team, 2020</xref>), SPSS 13.1 and Microsoft Excel 2019 software, by setting statistical significance at the level of <italic>p</italic> &#x2264; 0.05.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="results" id="S3">
<title>Results</title>
<sec id="S3.SS1">
<title>Population Structure</title>
<p>A total of 1,009 whole body crabs with 408 males and 601 females were collected from trawl vessels; 58&#x2013;183 crabs each month (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>). The overall male: female ratio was 1: 1.47 (&#x03C7;<sup>2</sup> = 36.54, df = 1, <italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.01). Significant monthly differences (<italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.01) from a 1: 1 ratio were observed from January, February, August, October, and November. For the rest of the sampling months there were no significant differences from an equal sex ratio (<italic>p</italic> &#x003E; 0.05). Data showed a significant male-bias in August 2019, and a significant female-bias in January, February, October, and November 2019 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3</xref>). CWs in the trawl landings ranged from 1.8 to 15.7 cm (12.12 &#x00B1; 1.66 cm CW, mean &#x00B1; SD, <italic>N</italic> = 408) for males, and 1.2&#x2013;16.0 cm (11.60 &#x00B1; 1.63 cm, <italic>N</italic> = 601) for females (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4</xref>). Males were mainly landed in size classes between 11.0 and 14.9 cm CW (80.15%) and females between 9.0 and 13.9 cm CW (91.18%), determined by the size frequencies &#x003E; 10% (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4</xref>). Males were significantly larger than females in CW (<italic>t</italic> = 4.23, df = 1,007, <italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.01). Monthly variations in sizes of males (<italic>F</italic> = 4.80, df = 407, <italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.01) and females (<italic>F</italic> = 6.95, df = 600, <italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.01) were also significant (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>). Smaller crabs &#x003C; 5 cm CW were found in feed-grade fish samples in August (1.2 cm CW, <italic>N</italic> = 1), October (3.2&#x2013;4.5 cm CW, <italic>N</italic> = 3), and December (1.8 cm CW, <italic>N</italic> = 1).</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T1">
<label>TABLE 1</label>
<caption><p>The variation of mean, maximum and minimum values of carapace width (CW, cm) and body weight (BW, g) of <italic>Calappa philargius</italic> sampled from January to December 2019 by trawl vessels in the southern Taiwan Strait, China.</p></caption>
<table cellspacing="5" cellpadding="5" frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>January</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>February</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>March</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>April</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>August</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>September</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>October</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>November</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>December</bold></td>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="justify" colspan="10"><bold>Male</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Sample size</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">24</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">31</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">25</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">85</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">63</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">46</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">71</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">57</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">CW (range, mean &#x00B1; SD)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7.9&#x2013;14.2 11.42 &#x00B1; 1.78</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8.3&#x2013;13.8 11.22 &#x00B1; 2.08</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8.1&#x2013;14.7 11.63 &#x00B1; 1.79</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">9.7&#x2013;14.7 12.42 &#x00B1; 1.35</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">10.6&#x2013;13.8 12.08 &#x00B1; 0.81</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8.5&#x2013;14.8 12.36 &#x00B1; 1.39</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">9.8&#x2013;15.2 12.86 &#x00B1; 1.17</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7.0&#x2013;15.7 11.47 &#x00B1; 2.22</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.8&#x2013;15.2 12.63 &#x00B1; 1.94</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">CL (range, mean &#x00B1; SD)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.1&#x2013;9.2 7.38 &#x00B1; 1.17</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.4&#x2013;9.2 7.80 &#x00B1; 1.40</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.6&#x2013;11.0 8.69 &#x00B1; 1.21</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7.8&#x2013;10.4 9.10 &#x00B1; 0.72</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8.1&#x2013;10.6 9.21 &#x00B1; 0.57</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7.0&#x2013;11.2 9.44 &#x00B1; 0.92</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7.7&#x2013;11.2 9.75 &#x00B1; 0.74</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.0&#x2013;11.5 8.58 &#x00B1; 1.38</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.6&#x2013;11.0 8.91 &#x00B1; 1.29</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">BW (range, mean &#x00B1; SD)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">86.6&#x2013;379.5 222.23 &#x00B1; 82.54</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">84.1&#x2013;314.2 203.18 &#x00B1; 86.67</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">73.8&#x2013;375.1 211.06 &#x00B1; 81.00</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">133.3&#x2013;370.3 247.85 &#x00B1; 65.37</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">127.0&#x2013;330.1 232.45 &#x00B1; 45.83</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">83.8&#x2013;388.3 235.23 &#x00B1; 67.43</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">116.5&#x2013;433.4 262.58 &#x00B1; 67.79</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">46.6&#x2013;652.1 188.14 &#x00B1; 114.8</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.1&#x2013;370.2 243.44 &#x00B1; 72.76</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="justify" colspan="10"><bold>Female</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Sample size</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">71</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">58</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">47</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">33</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">48</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">56</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">101</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">112</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">75</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">CW (range, mean &#x00B1; SD)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8.36&#x2013;13.6 11.43 &#x00B1; 1.18</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7.8&#x2013;14.3 12.02 &#x00B1; 1.38</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7.8&#x2013;14.3 11.12 &#x00B1; 1.67</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">9.6&#x2013;14.5 12.09 &#x00B1; 1.10</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.2&#x2013;13.2 11.60 &#x00B1; 1.71</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">9.1&#x2013;14.3 11.74 &#x00B1; 1.13</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.2&#x2013;15.1 12.06 &#x00B1; 1.81</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.3&#x2013;14.5 10.96 &#x00B1; 1.76</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">9.3&#x2013;16.0 12.35 &#x00B1; 1.44</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">CL (range, mean &#x00B1; SD)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.9&#x2013;8.8 7.55 &#x00B1; 0.68</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.6&#x2013;11.0 8.48 &#x00B1; 0.96</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.3&#x2013;11.2 8.60 &#x00B1; 1.19</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7.3&#x2013;10.9 9.16 &#x00B1; 0.86</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.9&#x2013;10.7 9.34 &#x00B1; 1.37</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7.2&#x2013;11.2 9.57 &#x00B1; 0.93</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.4&#x2013;12.2 9.69 &#x00B1; 1.46</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.5&#x2013;11.1 8.47 &#x00B1; 1.25</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7.3&#x2013;11.1 8.96 &#x00B1; 0.96</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">BW (range, mean &#x00B1; SD)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">93.3&#x2013;350.8 236.93 &#x00B1; 57.68</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">69.2&#x2013;466.2 260.63 &#x00B1; 85.55</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">64.8&#x2013;345.7 184.42 &#x00B1; 73.72</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">144.9&#x2013;425.9 261.18 &#x00B1; 65.12</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.8&#x2013;327.1 221.88 &#x00B1; 53.13</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">75.4&#x2013;338.9 217.88 &#x00B1; 58.08</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.2&#x2013;453.1 235.68 &#x00B1; 75.42</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">29.1&#x2013;334.5 151.43 &#x00B1; 72.67</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">98.2&#x2013;473.5 218.17 &#x00B1; 69.67</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn><p><italic>No samples in May&#x2013;July 2019.</italic></p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<fig id="F3" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 3</label>
<caption><p>Percentages of <italic>Calappa philargius</italic> males and females monthly from January to December 2019. No samples in May&#x2013;July 2019. Numbers above the bars referred to sample sizes.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fmars-08-751790-g003.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig id="F4" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 4</label>
<caption><p>Size (carapace width, cm) frequency (%) of <italic>Calappa philargius</italic> males (<italic>N</italic> = 408) and females (<italic>N</italic> = 601), collected from January to December 2019. No samples in May&#x2013;July 2019. Vertical lines indicate the average sizes of males and females.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fmars-08-751790-g004.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>The sex specific CW&#x2014;BW relationships were not different significantly (<italic>F</italic> = 0.776, df = 1, <italic>p</italic> &#x003E; 0.05). The regression coefficient <italic>b</italic> of <italic>C. philargius</italic> differed significantly (<italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.01) from isometric growth (<italic>b</italic> = 3), with both males and females exhibiting negative growth allometry (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5A</xref> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref>). The CW&#x2014;CL relationships between females and males were significantly different (<italic>F</italic> = 3.875, df = 1, <italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.05) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5B</xref>). The CW&#x2014;CL relationships were highly correlated for males (<italic>R</italic><sup>2</sup> = 0.8329, <italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.01) and females (<italic>R</italic><sup>2</sup> = 0.7158, <italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.01).</p>
<fig id="F5" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 5</label>
<caption><p><bold>(A)</bold> Body weight (BW) and carapace width (CW) relationship, and <bold>(B)</bold> carapace length (CL) and carapace width (CW) relationship for <italic>Calappa philargius</italic> males (<italic>N</italic> = 408) and females (<italic>N</italic> = 601).</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fmars-08-751790-g005.tif"/>
</fig>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T2">
<label>TABLE 2</label>
<caption><p>Regression equations and estimated parameters of length&#x2013;weight relationships for <italic>Calappa philargius</italic> by sex sampled in the southern Taiwan Strait, China.</p></caption>
<table cellspacing="5" cellpadding="5" frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><bold>Sex</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>y-variable (BW, g)</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>x-variable (CW, cm)</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>Regression equation</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>N</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>a<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t2fn1"><sup>a</sup></xref></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><italic>b</italic><xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t2fn1"><sup>b</sup></xref></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>R<sup>2</sup><xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t2fn1"><sup>c</sup></xref></bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>Allometry</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><italic>t</italic> (<italic>b</italic> = 3)<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="t2fn1"><sup>d</sup></xref></bold></td>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Male</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.1&#x2013;652.1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.6&#x2013;15.7</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">BW = 0.2087 CW<sup>2</sup>.<sup>7843</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">408</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.2087</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.7843</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.8896</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2212;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.01</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">logBW = 2.1572 logCW&#x2014;0.0012</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Female</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.8&#x2013;473.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.9&#x2013;16.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">BW = 0.3998 CW<sup>2</sup>.<sup>5349</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">601</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.3998</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.5349</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.8012</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2212;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.01</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">logBW = 2.1646 logCW&#x2014;0.003</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn id="t2fn1"><p><italic>BW, body weight; CW, carapace width. <sup>a</sup>Constant. <sup>b</sup>Regression coefficient. <sup>c</sup>Coefficient of determination. <sup>d</sup>Student&#x2019;s t-test when comparing b-value with 3.</italic></p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="S3.SS2">
<title>Reproductive Dynamics</title>
<p>A total of 112 berried females were collected (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure 6A</xref>). Two spawning seasons were determined, in January&#x2013;April and in August&#x2013;October, with the peak spawning month occurring in February (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure 6B</xref>). It is unclear to what extent spawning occurs in May&#x2013;July due to lack of data.</p>
<fig id="F6" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 6</label>
<caption><p><bold>(A)</bold> Percentages of <italic>Calappa philargius</italic> berried females (<italic>N</italic> = 112) by month and egg color, and <bold>(B)</bold> percentages of berried females (irrespective of egg coloration) by month from January to December 2019. No samples in May&#x2013;July 2019. Numbers above the bars referred to sample sizes (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">Table 3</xref>).</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fmars-08-751790-g006.tif"/>
</fig>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T3">
<label>TABLE 3</label>
<caption><p>Body size variation of <italic>Calappa philargius</italic> berried females, sampled from January to December 2019 by trawl vessels in the southern Taiwan Strait, China.</p></caption>
<table cellspacing="5" cellpadding="5" frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>January</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>February</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>March</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>April</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>August</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>September</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>October</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>November</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>December</bold></td>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Total females</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">71</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">58</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">47</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">33</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">48</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">56</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">101</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">112</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">75</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Berried females</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">12</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">37</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">10</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">13</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">9</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">14</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">16</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Average body size (CW, cm)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">11.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">12.2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">12.6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">12.4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">11.9</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">12.1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">12.3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2212;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">13.5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Body size range (CW, cm)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">10.1&#x2013;12.6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">9.9&#x2013;14.3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">11.3&#x2013;14.3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">11.0&#x2013;14.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">11.0&#x2013;13.2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">10.4&#x2013;13.8</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">10.8&#x2013;15.1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2212;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">13.5</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn><p><italic>No samples in May&#x2013;July 2019. CW, carapace width; &#x2212;, no applicable.</italic></p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>The minimum and maximum sizes for berried females were 9.9 cm CW (7.1 cm CL) found in February and 15.1 cm CW (11.8 cm CL) in October, respectively (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">Table 3</xref>). The <italic>CW</italic><sub>50</sub> for females was estimated as 11.47 cm CW (8.7 cm CL) based on females sampled in the peak spawning month, February (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">Figure 7</xref>). The dominant size classes for berried females were 11.0&#x2013;13.9 cm CW (86.61%). Small berried females (&#x003C; 11.0 cm CW) were mainly caught in February.</p>
<fig id="F7" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 7</label>
<caption><p>Size (carapace width, CW) at 50% female maturity for <italic>Calappa philargius</italic> based on all females sampled from the peak spawning month, February 2019 (<italic>N</italic> = 64). Bootstrapped 95% confidence intervals shown with dashed lines (<italic>N</italic> = 9,999).</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fmars-08-751790-g007.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>From the sampled ovigerous females, 14 were selected to estimate fecundity (<italic>Fa</italic>) (10.0&#x2013;12.4 cm CW), 5 with yellow eggs, 5 with orange-red eggs, and 4 with brown eggs. <italic>Fa</italic> ranged between 441,742 and 1,025,607 eggs (734,947 &#x00B1; 181,397, <italic>N</italic> = 14), and <italic>Fr</italic> ranged between 42,071 and 82,710 eggs cm<sup>&#x2013;1</sup> CW (63,417 &#x00B1; 12,486, <italic>N</italic> = 14), and between 2,227 and 4,232 eggs g<sup>&#x2013;1</sup> BW (3,159 &#x00B1; 534, <italic>N</italic> = 14). A significant power relationship was found between <italic>Fa</italic> and CW (<italic>R</italic><sup>2</sup> = 0.83, <italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.01) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8">Figure 8</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F8" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 8</label>
<caption><p>Absolute fecundity (<italic>Fa</italic>) and size (carapace width, CW) relationship for <italic>Calappa philargius</italic> (<italic>N</italic> = 14). Bootstrapped 95% confidence intervals shown with dashed lines (<italic>N</italic> = 9,999).</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fmars-08-751790-g008.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Egg diameters were 210&#x2013;418 &#x03BC;m (332 &#x00B1; 29, <italic>N</italic> = 145), with 312 &#x00B1; 23 &#x03BC;m for yellow eggs (<italic>N</italic> = 49), 327 &#x00B1; 22 &#x03BC;m for orange-red eggs (<italic>N</italic> = 53) and 362 &#x00B1; 18 &#x03BC;m for brown eggs (<italic>N</italic> = 43). Egg diameters were significantly different among three embryonic developmental stages, increased with the increase of embryonic development (<italic>F</italic> = 64.50, df = 142, <italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.01).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S3.SS3">
<title>Capture Fishery Dynamics and Marketing</title>
<p>All 95 <italic>C. philargius</italic> samples collected in January 2019, i.e., 71 females (8.3&#x2013;13.6 cm CW) and 24 males (7.9&#x2013;14.2 cm CW), were used for the claw yield assessment. The claw yield ranged between 28.45% and 44.60% of the total wet body weight (36.28 &#x00B1; 3.07%, <italic>N</italic> = 95), and showed no significant difference between sexes (<italic>t</italic> = 3.63, df = 93, <italic>p</italic> &#x003E; 0.5). The claw yield also showed no difference with CW (<italic>F</italic> = 0.044, df = 93, <italic>p</italic> &#x003E; 0.5). The average claw yield of 36.28% was used to estimate the <italic>C. philargius</italic> capture production in the trap fishery below.</p>
<p>From January to December in 2019, we surveyed a total of 127 vessels (77 trawl vessels and 50 trap vessels) at the landing ports of Dongshan County, all operating in the southern Taiwan Strait (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T4">Tables 4</xref>, <xref ref-type="table" rid="T5">5</xref>). The estimated total capture production of <italic>C. philargius</italic> was 1,652 t; 63.65% from the 77 trawl vessels and 36.35% from the 50 trap vessels. Trawl vessels usually spent 3&#x2013;12 days at sea per trip, while trap vessels operated longer at sea, usually 20&#x2013;30 days per trip. However, trap vessel catches were delivered to transfer vessels approximately every 1&#x2013;11 days. The CPUEs (kg day<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>) of <italic>C. philargius</italic> were significantly higher in the trap fishery than the trawl fishery (Z = 2.782, <italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.01). In trawl fishery, the CPUEs were mainly &#x003C; 10 kg day<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>, while in trap fishery, the CPUE averaged &#x003E; 25 kg day<sup>&#x2013;1</sup> in January, April and September&#x2013;December. <italic>C. philargius</italic> was less significant in the trawl fishery in terms of capture volume (wet weight, kg), all &#x003C; 4% and mainly &#x003C; 1%. <italic>C. philargius</italic> made up a substantial component of the total capture production in the trap fishery, e.g., about 13.7% in January and 25.6% in April.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T4">
<label>TABLE 4</label>
<caption><p>Fishing days at sea per trip, catch per unit effort (CPUE, kg day<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>) (total and <italic>Calappa philargius</italic>), and proportions (%) of <italic>C. philargius</italic> productions in the total capture productions of the trawl fishery from January to December 2019 in the southern Taiwan Strait, China.</p></caption>
<table cellspacing="5" cellpadding="5" frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><bold>Survey month</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>No. of trawl vessels surveyed</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>Fishing days at sea</bold> <bold>(days/trip/vessel)</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>CPUE</bold> <bold>(kg day<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>)</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>CPUE of <italic>C. philargius</italic></bold> <bold>(kg day<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>)</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><italic>C. philargius</italic> proportion (%)</bold></td>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">January</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.9 (3&#x2013;6)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">960.2 (656.0&#x2013;1338.7)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.88 (0.0&#x2013;3.3)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.001 (0.0&#x2013;0.3)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">February</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.9 (4&#x2013;8)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1055.3 (628.3&#x2013;1475.3)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.68 (0.0&#x2013;13.3)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.25 (0.0&#x2013;2.1)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">March</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7.3 (5&#x2013;9)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">620.4 (273.7&#x2013;941.2)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.09 (0.0&#x2013;10.7)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.66 (0.0&#x2013;2.4)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">April</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">10</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7.2 (5&#x2013;9)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">934.1 (324.0&#x2013;1895)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.08 (0.0&#x2013;10.0)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.22 (0.0&#x2013;1.0)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">August</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">11</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.1 (5&#x2013;7)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1813.3 (1330.0&#x2013;2917.7)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.36 (0.0&#x2013;9.0)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.19 (0.0&#x2013;0.5)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">September</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">9</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7.4 (5&#x2013;10)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1444.3 (974.3&#x2013;2305.3)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">15.45 (1.9&#x2013;30.0)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.07 (0.2&#x2013;2.1)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">October</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">10</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8.9 (8&#x2013;10)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1101.4 (808.4&#x2013;1580.2)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">9.61 (0.0&#x2013;30.0)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.87 (0.0&#x2013;3.6)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">November</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">10</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7.6 (4&#x2013;10)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">949.9 (739.0&#x2013;1207.9)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.38 (0.0&#x2013;10.0)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.57 (0.0&#x2013;1.3)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">December</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8.7 (7&#x2013;12)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1129.5 (812.7&#x2013;1397.1)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.18 (0.0&#x2013;7.5)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.37 (0.0&#x2013;0.6)</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn><p><italic>No samples in May&#x2013;July 2019. Data (average and range) from the number of trawl vessels surveyed monthly.</italic></p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T5">
<label>TABLE 5</label>
<caption><p>Fishing days at sea per trip, catch per unit effort (CPUE, kg day<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>) (total and <italic>Calappa philargius</italic>), and proportions (%) of <italic>C. philargius</italic> productions in the total capture productions of the trap fishery from January to December 2019 in the southern Taiwan Strait, China.</p></caption>
<table cellspacing="5" cellpadding="5" frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><bold>Survey month</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>No. of trap vessels surveyed</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>Fishing days at sea</bold> <bold>(days/trip/vessel)</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>CPUE</bold> <bold>(kg day</bold><sup>&#x2013;</sup><bold><sup>1</sup>)</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>CPUE of <italic>C. philargius</italic></bold> <bold>(kg</bold> <bold>day</bold> <sup>&#x2013;</sup><bold><sup>1</sup>)</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold><italic>C. philargius</italic> proportion (%)</bold></td>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">January</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.3 (3&#x2013;6)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">704.4 (453.8&#x2013;1206.5)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">96.8 (33&#x2013;346.7)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">13.7 (6.4&#x2013;28.7)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">February</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.0 (1&#x2013;10)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">314.6 (171.3&#x2013;1480)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.9 (0.0&#x2013;11.0)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.5 (0.0&#x2013;4.4)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">March</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.0 (2&#x2013;4)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">119.1 (67.8&#x2013;158)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.7 (0.0&#x2013;18.3)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.1 (0.0&#x2013;13.1)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">April</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.0 (2&#x2013;6)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">359.4 (245.0&#x2013;702.5)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">91.9 (53.3&#x2013;207.5)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">25.6 (21.8&#x2013;29.5)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">August</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.3 (3&#x2013;13)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">767.7 (666.0&#x2013;1031)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">11.5 (0.0&#x2013;40.7)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.5 (0.0&#x2013;5.9)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">September</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.9 (3&#x2013;8)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">618.8 (400.0&#x2013;869.2)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">46.7 (6.7&#x2013;78.8)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7.5 (1.0&#x2013;18.4)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">October</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7.3 (4&#x2013;10)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">361.3 (222.6&#x2013;503.5)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">28.1 (12.8&#x2013;66.2)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7.8 (5.0&#x2013;18.5)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">November</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.4 (3&#x2013;10)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">391.8 (279.4&#x2013;542.2)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">27.4 (0.0&#x2013;55.0)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7.0 (0.0&#x2013;12.2)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">December</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.3 (1&#x2013;11)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">497.5 (319.1&#x2013;1138.1)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">49.7 (3.8&#x2013;201.2)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">10.0 (0.3&#x2013;37.0)</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn><p><italic>No samples in May&#x2013;July 2019. Data (average and range) from the number of trap vessels surveyed monthly. The estimation of C. philargius capture production was back-calculated from claw production estimation (36.28%).</italic></p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>Based on captain, crew, and trader interviews at the landing ports of Dongshan County, the Chinese <italic>C. philargius</italic> claw market is largely domestic and has developed in less than one decade. In Dongshan County, the wholesale price for whole <italic>C. philargius</italic> caught from the trawl fishery is commonly around 6 RMB kg<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>, which is typically further processed into claws (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1A</xref>). The wholesale price of claws (processed on board) from the trap fishery is typically around 14 RMB kg<sup>&#x2013;1</sup> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1B</xref>). The claw price is nearly double in the wet and night food markets.</p>
<p>Since 2019, the domestic consumption market for <italic>C. philargius</italic> has continued to expand. Hard cleaned bodies of <italic>C. philargius</italic> are delivered to inland tourism cities of China (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1C</xref>), and commonly cooked as spicy cuisine. Live whole crabs are also becoming popular in local provincial markets, particularly for dining on the ripe ovaries. The wholesale price of live whole crabs is around 10 RMB kg<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="discussion" id="S4">
<title>Discussion</title>
<sec id="S4.SS1">
<title>Population Structure</title>
<p>Marine crustaceans commonly have a skewed sex-ratio, and the existence of sex-specific habit segregation and single-sex migration may explain the phenomenon (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">Wenner, 1972</xref>). The overall sex ratio of <italic>C. philargius</italic> habiting in the southern Taiwan Strait showed a strong predominance of females (<italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.01), collected by trawlers; monthly variation from the 1: 1 was also observed (<italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.01) in January, February, August, October, and November. The same overall female-bias trend was also reported for <italic>C. philargius</italic> in Thailand, collected by gill nets (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B53">Wisespongpand et al., 2016</xref>). In <italic>C. philargius</italic>, a strong female-bias occurred in the peak spawning month (February), suggesting that <italic>C. philargius</italic> females may also migrate from deeper waters to spawn nearshore. A recent study on <italic>M. haanii</italic> from the same fishing grounds showed a similar pattern, i.e., a strong female-bias in peak spawning months (February and March) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Lin et al., 2021</xref>).</p>
<p>Crabs often show sexual size dimorphism. Males of <italic>C. philargius</italic> were significantly larger than females in CW (<italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.01). The pattern of sexual size dimorphism, however, is largely species specific. For example, <italic>Callinectes danae</italic>, <italic>C. sapidus</italic>, <italic>C. philargius</italic>, <italic>Chaceon macphersoni</italic>, <italic>Chaceon affinis</italic>, <italic>Chionoecetes tanneri</italic>, <italic>Cancer borealis Johngarthia lagostoma</italic>, <italic>M. haanii</italic>, <italic>Platyxanthus crenulatus</italic>, and <italic>Ranina ranina</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Krajangdara and Watanabe, 2005</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Hartnoll et al., 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Sforza et al., 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Keller et al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Groeneveld et al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Farias et al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Biscoito et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Jivoff et al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">Truesdale, 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Lin et al., 2021</xref>; this study) are female-biased in terms of sexual size dimorphism whereas <italic>Cancer pagurus</italic>, <italic>P. sanguinolentus</italic>, and <italic>P. trituberculatus</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Oh, 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">Yang et al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">&#x00D6;ndes et al., 2017</xref>) are male-biased. Meanwhile, sexual size dimorphism could also exhibit spatial variation within the same species. For instance, <italic>Scylla olivacea</italic>, <italic>S. paramamosain</italic>, and <italic>S. tranquebarica</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Ikhwanuddin et al., 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">Waiho et al., 2016</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Fazhan et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Rouf et al., 2021</xref>). Therefore, sexual size dimorphism in crabs merits further investigation.</p>
<p>Sexual selection in decapod crustacean fisheries can influence both sex ratio and sexual size dimorphism in the population (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Orensanz et al., 1998</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Fenberg and Roy, 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Albor&#x00E9;s et al., 2019</xref>). For instance, the earlier fishery regulation for larger <italic>C. affinis</italic> males in the Northeast Atlantic eventually resulted in the change of sex ratio (female: male) from 1.24: 1 to 2.08: 1 and variation shifting from males being larger, to females being larger after 30 years of heavy exploitation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Wahle et al., 2008</xref>). For the claw-only <italic>C. philargius</italic> fishery, large males are preferred in trade due to large claws and quality of meat. As a newly developing claw-only fishery, <italic>C. philargius</italic> males are significantly larger than females in CW with female-bias sex ratio (female: male = 1.47: 1) in the southern Taiwan Strait. Intensive and continuous fishing pressure may be changing the population structure of <italic>C. philargius</italic> in southern Taiwan Strait. Long term population monitoring for <italic>C. philargius</italic> is needed to evaluate the sex ratio and size variation pattern by sex under sexual selection fishery that is largely driven by specific claw-only market demand.</p>
<p>The sex specific CW&#x2014;BW relationships were consistent (<italic>p</italic> &#x003E; 0.05); however, we found sex-specific CW&#x2014;CL relationships were significantly different (<italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.05), i.e., females were typified by a more rounded and less oval carapace shape (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5B</xref>). Size difference by sexes may reflect their difference in growth rates during different developmental stages or be associated with female fecundity. In <italic>C. philargius</italic>, females and males showed an intersection at 8.6 cm CW, where at that point females may input their energy in growing for maturation, particularly for increasing CL, as a larger carapace size is able to accommodate more eggs (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Oh, 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">Yang et al., 2014</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S4.SS2">
<title>Reproduction</title>
<p>Studies in the southern Chinese waters suggest there is a common spawning season in February&#x2013;April for many crabs, e.g., <italic>C. philargius</italic> (this study), the red swimming crab <italic>Monomia haanii</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Lin et al., 2021</xref>), the blue swimming crab <italic>Portunus pelagicus</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Liu et al., 2014</xref>), and the three-spot swimming crab <italic>P. sanguinolentus</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">Yang et al., 2014</xref>). However, it is unclear to what extent spawning takes place into May&#x2013;July for all the aforementioned species, because the national annual summer fishing moratorium regulation typically disallows fishing and biological sampling. Some crabs demonstrate long spawning seasons, e.g., the ghost crab <italic>Ocypode retundata</italic> with one spawning season from May to October in the Persian Gulf (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Naderi et al., 2018</xref>), and <italic>P. pelagicus</italic> from November through July in southeastern Australia (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Johnson et al., 2010</xref>). For <italic>C. philargius</italic>, there could be a continuous spring&#x2013;summer&#x2013;autumn spawning period (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure 6</xref>). Several small <italic>C. philargius</italic> juveniles (1.2&#x2013;4.5 cm CW) were found in feed-grade fish samples in August, October and December, suggesting they were hatched in the summer closure period (May&#x2013;July). On the other hand, no small juveniles found in January to April, supporting that <italic>C. philargius</italic> stops spawning activities in winter (November and December) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure 6</xref>). An extended spawning season in <italic>C. philargius</italic> might increase the number of breeding clutches to enhance the population recruitment. In the future, <italic>C. philargius</italic> samples from the missing months (May &#x2013;July), and gonad examination before egg ovulation are needed to further understand this developing claw-only fishery in China.</p>
<p>The logistic estimation of <italic>CW</italic><sub>50</sub> for <italic>C. philargius</italic> showed an imperfect curve without 100% mature groups in larger female sizes. Two possible factors may lead to this result. First, some berried females may be discarded at sea because of their light meat weight and poor meat quality. Second, the logistic estimation does not extend to those mature females with fully developed ovaries inside the carapace which have not yet released eggs and attached them to their pleopods.</p>
<p>Fecundities of decapod crustaceans often have positive linear or power function correlation with body size or body weight (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Erdman and Blake, 1988</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Hisam et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Lin et al., 2021</xref>). <italic>Fa</italic> had a strong power correlation with CW (<italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.01) in <italic>C. philargius</italic>, similar to <italic>M. haanii</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Lin et al., 2021</xref>), <italic>O. punctatus</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Jiang and Yu, 2012</xref>), <italic>O. rotundata</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Naderi et al., 2018</xref>), and <italic>P. sanguinolentus</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">Yang et al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9">Figure 9</xref>). For <italic>Fr</italic>, <italic>C. philargius</italic> has higher <italic>Fr</italic> than some swimming crabs, such as <italic>M. haanii</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Lin et al., 2021</xref>), <italic>P. sanquinolentus</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">Yang et al., 2014</xref>), and <italic>O. rotundata</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Naderi et al., 2018</xref>), but smaller than <italic>O. punctatus</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Jiang and Yu, 2012</xref>). <italic>C. philargius</italic> females carry egg mass on their narrow pleopods ventrally, and the elongated pleopod appendages result in the capacity to bear more eggs in one clutch (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2B</xref>). <italic>Fa</italic> of the same species may show large variation in different regions. For example, <italic>Fa</italic> of <italic>C. philargius</italic> caught in the southern Taiwan Strait (734,946 &#x00B1; 181,396 eggs) is higher than that in Thailand (average 307,714 eggs) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B53">Wisespongpand et al., 2016</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F9" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 9</label>
<caption><p>Comparison of the absolute fecundity (<italic>Fa</italic>, eggs/female) and size (carapace width, CW) relationship of crabs studied.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fmars-08-751790-g009.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="S4.SS3">
<title>Claw-Only Fishery</title>
<p>There are some debates on the biological merits of claw-only fishery development. On one hand, a claw-only fishery can sustain crab capture production while causing less mortality than traditional crustacean fisheries. It is believed that at least some declawed crabs do survive and grow after their return to sea, and therefore regain possible breeding opportunities and re-enter into the fisheries. Clearly, declawed females expend energy on claw regeneration, which may negatively impact reproductive success and shorter spawning seasons (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">Savage and Sullivan, 1978</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Hogan and Griffen, 2007</xref>). For males, a declawed status may negatively affect breeding success through reducing an individual&#x2019;s competitive prowess as well as by compromising defensive ability (higher natural mortality) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Duermit et al., 2015</xref>).</p>
<p>In practice, only 7&#x2013;13% regenerated claws entered the <italic>M. mercenaria</italic> market fishery in Florida, the United States (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">Simonson and Hochberg, 1986</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">Wilber, 1995</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Muller et al., 2011</xref>). The mortality rate associated with two-claw removal is high in <italic>M. mercenaria</italic> and <italic>C. borealis</italic>, ranging from 28 to 100% and 70%, respectively, and higher with increasing temperatures under laboratory conditions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Davis et al., 1978</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">Simonson and Hochberg, 1986</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Gandy et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Goldstein and Carloni, 2021</xref>). The recent developing one-claw fishing regulations on <italic>M. mercenaria</italic> and <italic>C. borealis</italic> showed an around 35&#x2013;50% reduction in mortality rate when compared to two-claw removal in the fishery (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Davis et al., 1978</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Duermit et al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Goldstein and Carloni, 2021</xref>). However, the application of one-claw fishing strategy in practice is difficult to monitor and highly depends on voluntary adherence (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Duermit et al., 2017</xref>). The impacts of one-claw and two-claw removal fisheries of <italic>C. philargius</italic> merit further investigation on feeding ability, survival rate, claw regeneration, mating success, and rates of re-entrance into a fishery for further management consideration and policy-making.</p>
<p>Obtaining the claw yield (%) contributes significantly to estimate the <italic>C. philargius</italic> capture productions in the field surveys. The average claw yield for <italic>C. philargius</italic> was 36.28%, which is higher than that of <italic>C. affinis</italic> (15% in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Robinson, 2008</xref>), but lower than those of <italic>U. tangeri</italic> (40% in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Crane, 1975</xref>) and <italic>M. mercenaria</italic> (50% in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Davis et al., 1978</xref>). Capture productions of <italic>C. philargius</italic> in the southern Taiwan Strait varies by fishing gear and month. The production proportions of <italic>C. philargius</italic> were generally less than 1% of the total catches in trawl fishery, but made up a considerable portion (&#x003E; 10%) of the trap fishery landings (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T4">Tables 4</xref>, <xref ref-type="table" rid="T5">5</xref>).</p>
<p>Higher <italic>C. philargius</italic> catches occurred in September and October in the trawl fishery, and in January, April and December for the trap fishery. One possible explanation is the differences in fishing zones in the southern Taiwan Strait by fishing gears over time and potential migration behavior in <italic>C. philargius</italic> during their life history. Among the <italic>C. philargius</italic> trawl catches in the southern Taiwan Strait, about 95% individuals were &#x2265; 9.0 cm CW, and about 75% individuals &#x2265; 11.0 cm CW. Individuals &#x003C; 9.0 cm CW are usually discarded at sea in both trawl and trap fisheries based on interviews because of the low prices offered for small claws. Based on our estimated <italic>CW</italic><sub>50</sub> (11.47 cm CW and 8.7 cm CL), at least 25% of our sampled <italic>C. philargius</italic> catch was sexually immature.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S4.SS4">
<title>Fishery Management</title>
<p>To date, only one national and two provincial (Zhejiang and Fujian Provinces) regulations have been implemented in China on the minimum catch sizes and landing proportions of juveniles. Collectively, these cover 36 commercially important species including 28 fin fishes, two shrimps, four crabs, and two cephalopods.<sup><xref ref-type="fn" rid="footnote1">1</xref></sup>, <sup><xref ref-type="fn" rid="footnote2">2</xref></sup>, <sup><xref ref-type="fn" rid="footnote3">3</xref></sup> Currently, there are landing prohibitions on <italic>P. trituberculatus</italic> juveniles (individuals &#x003C; 70 g) and berried females as well as bans on sale in food markets in Zhejiang Province between April 1st and September 16th, i.e., throughout the entire national summer fishing moratorium period.<sup><xref ref-type="fn" rid="footnote4">4</xref></sup> This management strategy could also be suggested to apply to other crab species in China for protecting the spawning populations during the peak spawning seasons.</p>
<p>As a newly developing claw-only fishery for <italic>C. philargius</italic>, no management measures are set for the species except the general national summer fishing moratorium. However, the critical peak spawning months (February and April) for <italic>C. philargius</italic> fall outside of the national summer fishing moratorium. About 60% of <italic>C. philargius</italic> catches in the trawl fishery are females, and moreover, high female trawl catches occurred in the highest peak spawning month, February, indicating high exploitation of spawning female stocks. Recently, a seasonal spawning closure has been proposed in lieu of the one claw fishing regulation based on biological and practical tradeoffs between strategies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Duermit et al., 2017</xref>). For <italic>C. philargius</italic>, February needs to be considered in the spawning seasonal closure measure.</p>
<p>A recent bioeconomic models reviewed that simple regulatory measure adjustments to the <italic>M. haanii</italic> fishery in the southern Taiwan Strait, the same fishing areas as <italic>C. philargius</italic>, can provide multiple biological and economic benefits (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Boenish et al., 2021</xref>). Furthermore, a total allowable catch (TAC) pilot project for the <italic>P. trituberculatus</italic> fishery in Zhejiang Province is evaluating the utility of e-logbooks to improve response time and monitoring accuracy for Chinese crab fisheries (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">Zhu et al., 2021</xref>).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="conclusion" id="S5">
<title>Conclusion</title>
<p>In conclusion, the current national fishing moratorium regulation, i.e., season closure in May-July, is not enough for <italic>C. philargius</italic> stock protection because its peak spawning month (February) and dual spawning seasons (January&#x2013;April and August&#x2013;October) are vulnerable to high fishing pressure. Management strategies, such as TAC, the spawning season closure, fishing input control by reducing the number of fishing vessels, and IUU fishing monitoring, should be considered as parts of a long-term comprehensive sustainable management plan. Significant outcomes of this study will help to evaluate strategies for the processing sector, domestic trade and ultimately fishery sustainability for <italic>C. philargius</italic>.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="data-availability" id="S6">
<title>Data Availability Statement</title>
<p>The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S7">
<title>Ethics Statement</title>
<p>The animal study was reviewed and approved by the Xiamen University of China.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S8">
<title>Author Contributions</title>
<p>B-AL and YJ wrote the first draft. ML and RB revised the manuscript. B-AL, YJ, and RB performed the data analyses. B-AL, YJ, QX, and ML conducted commercial sampling, interviews, and measurement. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="COI-statement" id="conf1">
<title>Conflict of Interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="disclaimer" id="h58">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s Note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec sec-type="funding-information" id="S9">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>This study was funded by the National Fisheries Institute&#x2019;s (NFI) Red Crab Council and Ocean Outcomes (O2) of United States, and Qingdao Marine Conservation Society (QMCS) of China. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript.</p>
</sec>
<ack>
<p>We thank Dongshan Swire Marine Station, Xiamen University (XMU) for facility and logistics support, and undergraduates and postgraduates from XMU and fishermen for laboratory and field assist.</p>
</ack>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Albor&#x00E9;s</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Garc&#x00ED;a-Soler</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fern&#x00E1;ndez</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Reproductive biology of the slipper lobster <italic>Scyllarus arctus</italic> in Galicia (NW Spain): implications for fisheries management.</article-title> <source><italic>Fish. Res.</italic></source> <volume>212</volume> <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>11</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fishres.2018.12.001</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B2"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Arshad</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Efrizal</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kamarudin</surname> <given-names>M. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Saad</surname> <given-names>C. R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Study on fecundity, embryology and larval development of blue swimming crab <italic>Portunus pelagicus</italic> (Linnaeus, 1758) under laboratory conditions.</article-title> <source><italic>Res. J. Fish. Hydrobiol.</italic></source> <volume>1</volume> <fpage>35</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>44</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B3"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Biscoito</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Freitas</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pajuelo</surname> <given-names>J. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Triay-Portella</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Santana</surname> <given-names>J. I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Costa</surname> <given-names>A. L.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Sex structure, depth distribution, intermoult period and reproductive pattern of the deep-sea red crab <italic>Chaceon affinis (Brachyura. Geryonidae) in two populations in the north-eastern Atlantic.</italic></article-title> <source><italic>Deep Sea Res. 1</italic></source> <volume>95</volume> <fpage>99</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>114</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.dsr.2014.10.010</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B4"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Boenish</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lin</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kritzer</surname> <given-names>J. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wilberg</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shen</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jiang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>A bioeconomic approach towards improved fishery management of <italic>Monomia haanii</italic> in the southern Taiwan Strait, China.</article-title> <source><italic>Fish. Res.</italic></source> <volume>240</volume>:<fpage>105969</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fishres.2021.105969</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B5"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Crane</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1975</year>). <source><italic>Fiddler Crabs Of The World (Ocypodidae: Genus Uca</italic>)</source>. <publisher-loc>Princeton, NJ</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Princeton University Press</publisher-name>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B6"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dai</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Song</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1986</year>). <source><italic>Marine Crabs of China.</italic></source> <publisher-loc>Beijing</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Ocean Press</publisher-name>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B7"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Davis</surname> <given-names>G. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Baughman</surname> <given-names>D. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chapman</surname> <given-names>J. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>MacArthur</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Price</surname> <given-names>A. C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1978</year>). <source><italic>Mortality Associated With Declawing Stone Crabs, Menippe Mercenaria.</italic> South Florida Research Center Report T-522</source>. <publisher-loc>Florida, FL</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>U.S. National Park Service</publisher-name>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B8"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Duermit</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kingsley-Smith</surname> <given-names>P. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wilber</surname> <given-names>D. H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>The consequences of claw removal on stone crabs <italic>Menippe</italic> spp. and the ecological and fishery implications.</article-title> <source><italic>N. Am. J. Fish. Manag.</italic></source> <volume>35</volume> <fpage>895</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>905</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/02755947.2015.1064836</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B9"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Duermit</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shervette</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Whitaker</surname> <given-names>J. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kingsley-Smith</surname> <given-names>P. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wilber</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>A field assessment of claw removal impacts on the movement and survival of stone crabs <italic>Menippe</italic> spp.</article-title> <source><italic>Fish. Res.</italic></source> <volume>193</volume> <fpage>43</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>50</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fishres.2017.03.019</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B10"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Erdman</surname> <given-names>R. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Blake</surname> <given-names>N. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1988</year>). <article-title>Reproductive ecology of female golden crabs, <italic>Geryon fenneri</italic> Manning and Holthuis, from southeastern Florida.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Crustac. Biol.</italic></source> <volume>8</volume> <fpage>392</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>400</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2307/1548278</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B11"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Fahy</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hickey</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Perella</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hervas</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Carroll</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Andray</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <source><italic>Bionomics of Brown Crab Cancer Pagurus In The South East Ireland Inshore Fishery</italic>. Irish Fisheries Investigations No. 12</source>. <publisher-loc>Ireland</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Marine Institute</publisher-name>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B12"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Farias</surname> <given-names>N. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Luppi</surname> <given-names>T. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Spivak</surname> <given-names>E. D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Habitat use, relative growth and size at maturity of the purple stone crab <italic>Platyxanthus crenulatus</italic> (<italic>Decapoda: Brachyura</italic>), calculated under different models.</article-title> <source><italic>Sci. Mar.</italic></source> <volume>78</volume> <fpage>567</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>578</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3989/scimar.04108.10A</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33311142</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B13"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Fazhan</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Waiho</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fujaya</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rukminasari</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ma</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ikhwanuddin</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Sexual dimorphism in mud crabs: a tale of three sympatric <italic>Scylla</italic> species.</article-title> <source><italic>PeerJ</italic></source> <volume>9</volume>:<fpage>e10936</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7717/peerj.10936</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33954025</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B14"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Fenberg</surname> <given-names>P. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Roy</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Ecological and evolutionary consequences of size-selective harvesting: how much do we know?</article-title> <source><italic>Mol. Ecol.</italic></source> <volume>17</volume> <fpage>209</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>220</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03522.x</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17868288</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B15"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gandy</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Crowley</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chagaris</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Crawford</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>The effect of temperature on release mortality of declawed <italic>Menippe mercenaria</italic> in the Florida stone crab fishery.</article-title> <source><italic>Bull. Mar. Sci.</italic></source> <volume>92</volume> <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>15</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5343/bms.2015.1036</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33755469</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B16"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Goldstein</surname> <given-names>J. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Carloni</surname> <given-names>T. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Assessing the implications of live claw removal on Jonah crab (<italic>Cancer borealis</italic>), an emerging fishery in the Northwest Atlantic.</article-title> <source><italic>Fish. Res.</italic></source> <volume>243</volume>:<fpage>106046</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fishres.2021.106046</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B17"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Groeneveld</surname> <given-names>J. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Everett</surname> <given-names>B. I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fennessy</surname> <given-names>S. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kirkman</surname> <given-names>S. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Santos</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Robertson</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Spatial distribution patterns, abundance and population structure of deep-sea crab <italic>Chaceon macphersoni</italic>, based on complementary analyses of trap and trawl data.</article-title> <source><italic>Mar. Freshw. Res.</italic></source> <volume>64</volume> <fpage>507</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>517</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1071/MF12263</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B18"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hartnoll</surname> <given-names>R. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Broderick</surname> <given-names>A. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Godley</surname> <given-names>B. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Saunders</surname> <given-names>K. E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Population structure of the land crab <italic>Johngarthia lagostoma</italic> on Ascension Island.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Crustac. Biol.</italic></source> <volume>29</volume> <fpage>57</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>61</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1651/08-2992.1</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B19"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hisam</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hajisamae</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ikhwanuddin</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Aziz</surname> <given-names>N. A. N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Naimullah</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hassan</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Study on the reproductive biology of the blue swimming crab, <italic>Portunus pelagicus</italic> females from Pattani coastal waters, Thailand.</article-title> <source><italic>AACL Bioflux</italic></source> <volume>11</volume> <fpage>1776</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1791</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B20"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hogan</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Griffen</surname> <given-names>B. D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>The dietary and reproductive consequences of fishery-related claw removal for the stone crab <italic>Menippe</italic> spp.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Shellfish Res.</italic></source> <volume>33</volume> <fpage>795</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>804</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2983/035.033.0314</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B21"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ikhwanuddin</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Azmie</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Juariah</surname> <given-names>H. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zakaria</surname> <given-names>M. Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ambak</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Biological information and population features of mud crab, genus <italic>Scylla</italic> from mangrove areas of Sarawak, Malaysia.</article-title> <source><italic>Fish. Res.</italic></source> <volume>108</volume> <fpage>299</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>306</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fishres.2011.01.001</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B22"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jiang</surname> <given-names>X. Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>C. G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Reproductive biology of <italic>Ovalipes punctatus</italic> in the East China Sea.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Zhejiang Ocean Univ.</italic></source> <volume>31</volume> <fpage>285</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>289</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B23"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jivoff</surname> <given-names>P. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Smith</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sodi</surname> <given-names>V. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vanmorter</surname> <given-names>S. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Faugno</surname> <given-names>K. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Werda</surname> <given-names>A. L.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Population structure of adult blue crabs, <italic>Callinectes sapidus</italic>, in relation to physical characteristics in barnegat Bay, New Jersey.</article-title> <source><italic>Estuaries Coast</italic></source> <volume>40</volume> <fpage>235</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>250</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s12237-016-0127-8</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B24"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Johnson</surname> <given-names>D. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gray</surname> <given-names>C. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Macbeth</surname> <given-names>W. G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Reproductive biology of <italic>Portunus pelagicus</italic> in a south-east Australian estuary.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Crustac. Biol.</italic></source> <volume>30</volume> <fpage>200</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>205</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1651/08-3076.1</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B25"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kang</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>X. X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yan</surname> <given-names>Y. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Han</surname> <given-names>C. C.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Fisheries in Chinese seas: what can we learn from controversial official fisheries statistics?</article-title> <source><italic>Rev. Fish Biol. Fish.</italic></source> <volume>28</volume> <fpage>503</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>519</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11160-018-9518-1</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B26"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Keller</surname> <given-names>A. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Harms</surname> <given-names>J. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Buchanan</surname> <given-names>J. C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Distribution, biomass and size of grooved tanner crabs (<italic>Chionoecetes tanneri</italic>) from annual bottom trawl surveys (2003-2010) along the U.S. west coast (Washington to California).</article-title> <source><italic>Deep Sea Res. 1</italic></source> <volume>67</volume> <fpage>44</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>54</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.dsr.2012.05.002</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B27"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Krajangdara</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Watanabe</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Growth and reproduction of the red frog crab, <italic>Ranina ranina</italic> (Linnaeus, 1758), in the Andaman Sea off Thailand.</article-title> <source><italic>Fish. Sci.</italic></source> <volume>71</volume> <fpage>20</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>28</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1444-2906.2005.00926.x</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B28"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lin</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Boenish</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kritzer</surname> <given-names>J. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jiang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Reproductive dynamics of a swimming crab (<italic>Monomia haanii</italic>) in the world&#x2019;s crab basket.</article-title> <source><italic>Fish. Res.</italic></source> <volume>236</volume>:<fpage>105828</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fishres.2020.105828</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B29"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lin</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <source><italic>Chinese Red Swimming Crab (Portunus Haanii) Fishery Improvement Project (FIP) in</italic> Zhangzhou City, Fujian Province, China (August 2018-April 2019)</source>. <publisher-loc>Mainland</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Xiamen University</publisher-name>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B30"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yan</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cheng</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Size distribution and monthly variation of ovarian development for the female blue swimmer crab, <italic>Portunus pelagicus</italic> in Beibu Gulf, off south China.</article-title> <source><italic>Sci. Mar.</italic></source> <volume>78</volume> <fpage>257</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>268</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3989/scimar.03919.24A</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33311142</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B31"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Muller</surname> <given-names>R. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chagaris</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bert</surname> <given-names>T. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Crawford</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gandy</surname> <given-names>R. L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <source><italic>The 2011 Stock Assessment Update For The Stone Crab, Menippe</italic> Spp., fishery in Florida</source>. <publisher-loc>Florida, FL</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, IHR 2011-003</publisher-name>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B32"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Naderi</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Abbas</surname> <given-names>S. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pazooki</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hedayati</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zare</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lastra</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Reproductive biology of the ghost crab, <italic>Ocypode rotundata</italic> Miers, 1882 (Decapoda, Ocypodidae) at Qeshm Island, Persian Gulf.</article-title> <source><italic>Crustaceana</italic></source> <volume>91</volume> <fpage>1039</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1059</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1163/15685403-00003804</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B33"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ng</surname> <given-names>P. K. L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1998</year>). &#x201C;<article-title>Crabs</article-title>,&#x201D; in <source><italic>FAO Species Identification Guide For Fishery Purposes. The Living Marine Resources Of The Western Central Pacific. Cephalopods, crustaceans, holothurians and sharks</italic></source>, <volume>Vol. 2</volume> <role>eds</role> <person-group person-group-type="editor"><name><surname>Carpenter</surname> <given-names>K. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Niem</surname> <given-names>V. H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<publisher-loc>Rome</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Food and Agriculture Organization</publisher-name>), <fpage>1045</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1155</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B34"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Oh</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Population biology of the swimming crab <italic>Portunus trituberculatus</italic> (Miers, 1876) (Decapoda, Brachyura) on the western coast of Korea, Yellow Sea.</article-title> <source><italic>Crustaceana</italic></source> <volume>84</volume> <fpage>1251</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1267</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1163/001121611X586675</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B35"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Oliveira</surname> <given-names>R. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Machado</surname> <given-names>J. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jord&#x00E3;o</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Burford</surname> <given-names>F. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Latruffe</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>McGregor</surname> <given-names>P. K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2000</year>). <article-title>Human exploitation of male fiddler crab claws: behavioural consequences and implications for conservation.</article-title> <source><italic>Anim. Conserv.</italic></source> <volume>3</volume> <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>5</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1469-1795.2000.tb00081.x</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B36"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>&#x00D6;ndes</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Emmerson</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kaiser</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Murray</surname> <given-names>L. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kennington</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>The catch characteristics and population structure of the brown crab (<italic>Cancer pagurus</italic>) fishery in the Isle of Man, Irish Sea.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. U.K.</italic></source> <volume>99</volume> <fpage>119</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>133</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1017/S0025315417001849</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B37"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Orensanz</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Armstrong</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Armstrong</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hilborn</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1998</year>). <article-title>Crustacean resources are vulnerable to serial depletion-the multifaceted decline of crab and shrimp fisheries in the Greater Gulf of Alaska.</article-title> <source><italic>Rev. Fish Biol. Fish.</italic></source> <volume>8</volume> <fpage>117</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>176</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1023/A:1008891412756</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B38"><citation citation-type="journal"><collab>R Core Team</collab> (<year>2020</year>). <source><italic>R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing.</italic></source> <publisher-loc>Vienna</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>R Foundation for Statistical Computing.</publisher-name> Available online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.R-project.org/">http://www.R-project.org/</ext-link></citation></ref>
<ref id="B39"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Robinson</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Minimum landing size for Northeast Atlantic stocks of deep-water red crab, <italic>Chaceon affinis</italic> (Milne Edward and Bouvier, 1894).</article-title> <source><italic>ICES J. Mar. Sci.</italic></source> <volume>65</volume> <fpage>148</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>154</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/icesjms/fsm189</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B40"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rouf</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shahriar</surname> <given-names>S. I. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Antu</surname> <given-names>A.-H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Siddiqui</surname> <given-names>M. N.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Population parameters of the orange mud crab <italic>Scylla olivacea</italic> (Herbst, 1796) from the Sundarban mangrove forest in Bangladesh.</article-title> <source><italic>Heliyon</italic></source> <volume>7</volume>:<fpage>e06223</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06223</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33659747</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B41"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sadovy</surname> <given-names>Y. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1996</year>). <source><italic>Reproduction Of Reef Fishery Species</italic></source>, <role>eds</role> <person-group person-group-type="editor"><name><surname>Polunin</surname> <given-names>N. V. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Roberts</surname> <given-names>C. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<publisher-loc>London</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Reef Fisheries. Chapman &#x0026; Hall</publisher-name>), <fpage>15</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>59</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/978-94-015-8779-2_2</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B42"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Savage</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sullivan</surname> <given-names>J. R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1978</year>). <source><italic>Growth And Claw Regeneration Of The Stone Crab, Menippe Mercenaria.</italic></source> <publisher-loc>Florida, FL</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Florida Marine Research Publications</publisher-name>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B43"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sforza</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nalesso</surname> <given-names>R. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Joyeux</surname> <given-names>J. C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Distribution and population structure of <italic>Callinectes danae</italic> (decapoda: Portunidae) in a tropical Brazilian estuary.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Crustacean Biol.</italic></source> <volume>30</volume> <fpage>597</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>606</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1651/09-3223.1</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B44"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Shao</surname> <given-names>K. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chang</surname> <given-names>J. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jeng</surname> <given-names>M. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tu</surname> <given-names>T. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ho</surname> <given-names>C. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chiu</surname> <given-names>Y. W.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <source><italic>A Guide Book Of Common Economic Aquatic Animals And Plant In Taiwan.</italic></source> <publisher-loc>Taiwan</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Fishery Agency, Council of Agriculture</publisher-name>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B45"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Simonson</surname> <given-names>J. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hochberg</surname> <given-names>R. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1986</year>). <article-title>Effects of air exposure and claw breaks on survival of stone crabs <italic>Menippe mercenaria</italic>.</article-title> <source><italic>Trans. Am. Fish. Soc.</italic></source> <volume>115</volume> <fpage>471</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>477</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1577/1548-8659(1986)115&#x003C;471:EOAEAC&#x003E;2.0.CO;2</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B46"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Soundarapandian</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Varadharajan</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Boopathi</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Reproductive biology of the commercially important Portunid crab, <italic>Portunus sanguinolentus</italic> (Herbst).</article-title> <source><italic>J. Mar. Sci. Res. Dev.</italic></source> <volume>3</volume> <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>9</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4172/2155-9910.1000124</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B47"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Truesdale</surname> <given-names>C. L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <source><italic>Fishery and biological characteristics of Jonah crab (Cancer borealis) in Rhode Island Sound.</italic> Open Access Master&#x2019;s Theses</source>, (<publisher-loc>University of Rhode Island</publisher-loc>), aer1206. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fishres.2018.10.030</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B48"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wahle</surname> <given-names>R. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bergeron</surname> <given-names>C. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chute</surname> <given-names>A. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jacobson</surname> <given-names>L. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>The Northwest Atlantic deep-sea red crab (<italic>Chaceon quinquedens</italic>) population before and after the onset of harvesting.</article-title> <source><italic>ICES J. Mar. Sci.</italic></source> <volume>65</volume> <fpage>862</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>872</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/icesjms/fsn058</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B49"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Waiho</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fazhan</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ikhwanuddin</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Size distribution, length&#x2013;weight relationship and size at the onset of sexual maturity of the orange mud crab. <italic>Scylla olivacea</italic>, in Malaysian waters.</article-title> <source><italic>Mar. Biol. Res.</italic></source> <volume>12</volume> <fpage>726</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>738</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/17451000.2016.1200726</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B50"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Waiho</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ikhwanuddin</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Abualreesh</surname> <given-names>M. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shu-Chien</surname> <given-names>A. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ishak</surname> <given-names>S. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jalilah</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Intra- and interspecific variation in sexual dimorphism patterns of mud crab genus <italic>Scylla</italic> along the equatorial region.</article-title> <source><italic>Front. Mar. Sci.</italic></source> <volume>8</volume>:<fpage>690836</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmars.2021.690836</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B51"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wenner</surname> <given-names>A. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1972</year>). <article-title>Sex ratio as a function of size in marine Crustacea.</article-title> <source><italic>Am. Nat.</italic></source> <volume>106</volume> <fpage>32</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>50</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1086/282774</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B52"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wilber</surname> <given-names>D. H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1995</year>). <article-title>Claw regeneration among north Florida stone crabs (genus <italic>Menippe</italic>) and its implications to the southwest Florida fishery.</article-title> <source><italic>Bull. Mar. Sci.</italic></source> <volume>56</volume> <fpage>296</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>302</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B53"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wisespongpand</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jaingam</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Thamrongnawasawat</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Khaodon</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). &#x201C;<article-title>Life history of shame-faced crab <italic>Calappa philargius</italic> (Linnaeus, 1758) and shellfish feeding behavior. Abstract from conference poster: Agricultural Innovation for Global Value Chain</article-title>,&#x201D; in <source><italic>Proceedings of 54th Kasetsart University Annual Conference, 2-5 February 2016, Kasetsart University, Thailand. Vol. 1, Plants, Animals, Veterinary Medicine, Fisheries, Agricultural Extension and Home Economics 2016 pp.922-930 ref.12. (Accession number <ext-link ext-link-type="DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank" xlink:href="20163376083">20163376083</ext-link>)</italic></source>, <publisher-loc>Thailand</publisher-loc>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B54"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>C. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>H. X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yan</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Population structure, morphometric analysis and reproductive biology of <italic>Portunus sanguinolentus</italic> (Herbst, 1783) (<italic>Decapoda: Brachyura: Portunidae</italic>) in Honghai Bay. South China Sea.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Crustac. Biol.</italic></source> <volume>34</volume> <fpage>722</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>730</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1163/1937240X-00002273</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B55"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sadovy de Mitcheson</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cao</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Leadbitter</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Newton</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Fishing for feed in China: facts, impacts and implications.</article-title> <source><italic>Fish Fish.</italic></source> <volume>21</volume> <fpage>47</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>62</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/faf.12414</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B56"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>W. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lu</surname> <given-names>Z. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dai</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lu</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Z. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>Y. D.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Transition to timely and accurate reporting: an evaluation of monitoring programs for China&#x2019;s first Total Allowable Catch (TAC) pilot fishery.</article-title> <source><italic>Mar. Policy</italic></source> <volume>129</volume>:<fpage>104503</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.marpol.2021.104503</pub-id></citation></ref>
</ref-list>
<fn-group>
<fn id="footnote1">
<label>1</label>
<p><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://hyyyj.fujian.gov.cn/">http://hyyyj.fujian.gov.cn/</ext-link></p></fn>
<fn id="footnote2">
<label>2</label>
<p><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.zj.gov.cn/">http://www.zj.gov.cn/</ext-link></p></fn>
<fn id="footnote3">
<label>3</label>
<p><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.moa.gov.cn/">http://www.moa.gov.cn/</ext-link></p></fn>
<fn id="footnote4">
<label>4</label>
<p><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://nynct.zj.gov.cn/art/2021/2/26/art_1694969_58931103.html">http://nynct.zj.gov.cn/art/2021/2/26/art_1694969_58931103.html</ext-link></p></fn>
</fn-group>
</back>
</article>