<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Mar. Sci.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Marine Science</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Mar. Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">2296-7745</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmars.2017.00029</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Marine Science</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Strong and Dynamic Benthic-Pelagic Coupling and Feedbacks in a Coastal Upwelling System (Peruvian Shelf)</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name><surname>Dale</surname> <given-names>Andrew W.</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn001"><sup>&#x0002A;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/178273/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Graco</surname> <given-names>Michelle</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Wallmann</surname> <given-names>Klaus</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1"><sup>1</sup><institution>GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel</institution> <country>Kiel, Germany</country></aff>
<aff id="aff2"><sup>2</sup><institution>Instituto del Mar del Per&#x000FA;</institution> <country>Callao, Peru</country></aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by"><p>Edited by: Phyllis Lam, University of Southampton, UK</p></fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by"><p>Reviewed by: Perran Cook, Monash University, Australia; Arthur Capet, National Research Council, Italy; Matthias Egger, Aarhus University, Denmark</p></fn>
<fn fn-type="corresp" id="fn001"><p>&#x0002A;Correspondence: Andrew W. Dale <email>adale&#x00040;geomar.de</email></p></fn>
<fn fn-type="other" id="fn002"><p>This article was submitted to Marine Biogeochemistry, a section of the journal Frontiers in Marine Science</p></fn></author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>09</day>
<month>02</month>
<year>2017</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2017</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>4</volume>
<elocation-id>29</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>27</day>
<month>10</month>
<year>2016</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>24</day>
<month>01</month>
<year>2017</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x000A9; 2017 Dale, Graco and Wallmann.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2017</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Dale, Graco and Wallmann</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p></license>
</permissions>
<abstract><p>Monthly time-series data (1998&#x02013;2009) of bottom water oxygen, nitrate and nitrite concentrations from the outer shelf (150 m water depth) in the oxygen minimum zone offshore Peru were coupled to a layered biogeochemical sediment model to investigate benthic-pelagic coupling over multi-annual time scales. The model includes the mineralization of four reactive pools of particulate organic carbon (POC) with lifetimes of 0.13, 1.3, 20, and 1700 year that were constrained using empirical data. Total POC rain rates to the seafloor were derived from satellite based estimates of primary production. Solute fluxes and concentrations in sediment porewater showed highly dynamic behavior over the course of a typical year. Conversion of fixed N to N<sub>2</sub> by denitrification varied from 1.1 mmol m<sup>&#x02212;2</sup> d<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> of N in winter to 1.8 mmol m<sup>&#x02212;2</sup> d<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> of N in summer with a long term mean N loss for the shelf of 1.5 mmol m<sup>&#x02212;2</sup> d<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> of N. Fixed N loss across the whole time-series agreed very well with a previously-published vertically-integrated sediment model for coupling the benthic and pelagic N cycle in regional and global models. Dissimilatory nitrate reduction to ammonium (DNRA) emerges as a major process in the benthic N cycle, producing on average 1.9 mmol m<sup>&#x02212;2</sup> d<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> of ammonium: more than twice the rate of ammonification of organic nitrogen. The model predicts sulfide emissions from the sediment of up to 1 mmol m<sup>&#x02212;2</sup> d<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> when POC rain rate exceeds 20 mmol m<sup>&#x02212;2</sup> d<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>, in agreement with past observations of benthic sulfide fluxes and sulfide plume distributions in the water column. This study demonstrates that sediments on the Peruvian shelf are not static repositories that are independent of changes taking place in the water column. Our results strongly suggest the shelf sediments must exert an important feedback on biogeochemical processes in the overlying waters, and should be considered in regional model studies.</p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>Peru</kwd>
<kwd>model</kwd>
<kwd>oxygen minimum zone</kwd>
<kwd>denitrification</kwd>
<kwd>DNRA</kwd>
<kwd><italic>Thioploca</italic></kwd>
<kwd>time-series</kwd>
<kwd>sediment</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<counts>
<fig-count count="7"/>
<table-count count="3"/>
<equation-count count="10"/>
<ref-count count="70"/>
<page-count count="17"/>
<word-count count="13037"/>
</counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec sec-type="intro" id="s1">
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>The recycling and burial of biogenic material in continental margin sediments plays a key role in the regulation of ocean chemistry (Walsh, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B67">1991</xref>). It is generally accepted that the rate of benthic remineralization of organic debris is strongly coupled to primary production and undergoes pronounced seasonality. This is not only true for the shelves and margins, but for the deep-sea too, which receives pulses of phytodetritus following the spring bloom (Billet et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">1983</xref>; Lampitt, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">1985</xref>). Proper consideration of seafloor recycling in ocean biogeochemical models and the linkages with water column tracer fields is becoming increasingly recognized as an important step in model validation and prediction (Kriest and Oschlies, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">2013</xref>).</p>
<p>In environments experiencing strong interannual variability in bottom water redox conditions and carbon rain rates, benthic feedbacks may be difficult to predict without the application of sediment biogeochemical models. Non-steady state dynamics have been implemented into diagenetic models to study the seasonal evolution of benthic remineralization and fluxes across the sediment-water interface (Martin and Bender, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">1988</xref>; Klump and Martens, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">1989</xref>; Soetaert et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B58">1996</xref>; Fossing et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">2004</xref>; Dale et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">2013</xref>). The advent of sophisticated modeling tools along with an expanding set of physico-biogeochemical time-series data from the water column and satellite sensors makes it possible to construct well constrained benthic models for accurately predicting the exchange of redox sensitive elements between the sediments and the ocean.</p>
<p>The Peruvian margin (Eastern Tropical South Pacific) is one such system that undergoes pronounced seasonal variability in biogeochemical and physical properties of the water column. This is mainly caused by variability in the intensity of upwelling-favorable winds and the delivery of nutrient&#x02013;rich Equatorial Subsurface Water (ESSW) that fuels phytoplankton production there (Pennington et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">2006</xref>; Chavez et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">2008</xref>; Chaigneau et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">2013</xref>; Graco et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">2016</xref>). Primary productivity ranges from 1.8 to 5.2 g C m<sup>&#x02212;2</sup> d<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> (Pennington et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">2006</xref>; Qui&#x000F1;ones et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B53">2010</xref>) and leads to a permanent oxygen minimum zone (OMZ) where dissolved oxygen concentrations are essentially zero (Thamdrup et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B64">2012</xref>; Ulloa et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B65">2012</xref>). On the shelf, however, bottom water redox conditions can be highly variable as a result of respiration in the water column plus the interaction of climatic variability and equatorial forcing associated with El Ni&#x000F1;o events and the passage of coastal trapped waves (Guti&#x000E9;rrez et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">2008</xref>; Graco et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">2016</xref>). This rather extreme setting should lead to strong and variable feedbacks between the sediment and water column.</p>
<p>In this study, monthly data (1998&#x02013;2009) from the water column at a time-series station (150 m water depth) on the continental shelf offshore Peru are used in conjunction with satellite-derived organic matter rain rates to predict the response of sediment biogeochemistry to natural variability in the overlying waters. The benthic feedbacks are determined using a diagenetic model with a focus on the carbon, nitrogen and sulfur cycles. It is our objective to demonstrate and quantify benthic remineralization under natural conditions on the Peruvian margin and highlight the scale of variability that can be expected. The model is also used to derive a function for predicting daily benthic fixed N loss (to N<sub>2</sub>) and reduction of nitrate (to ammonium) in regional biogeochemical models of the Peruvian upwelling and similar low oxygen systems. We conclude that proper consideration of benthic processes ought to be considered in regional models of the Peruvian margin, and margins in general, in order to fully understand and quantify nutrient turnover in the overlying water column.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2">
<title>Site description</title>
<p>The time-series station is located 20 nautical miles offshore at a water depth of 150 m (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">1A</xref>). Monthly vertical profiles of temperature, salinity, oxygen and nutrients (nitrate, nitrite, phosphate and silicate) have been measured there by the Instituto del Mar del Per&#x000FA; (IMARPE) between 1996 and 2009 (Graco et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">2016</xref>). The station is located in a main upwelling cell that experiences maximum primary production in the austral summer (February&#x02013;April, low upwelling), hereafter termed &#x0201C;summer,&#x0201D; and lower productivity in austral winter (July&#x02013;September, high upwelling), hereafter termed &#x0201C;winter&#x0201D; (Echevin et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">2008</xref>). An example of satellite derived chlorophyll a in the wider region during one of our research campaigns (January 2013) clearly shows the elevated values along the coastal margin where upwelling strength is greatest (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">1B</xref>). Highest rates of primary productivity are 6 months out of phase with upwelling intensity due to several factors including light limitation as a result of the deepening of the mixed layer during the upwelling period (Echevin et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">2008</xref>; Qui&#x000F1;ones et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B53">2010</xref>). Data from the time-series station show that the vertical extent of the OMZ exhibits significant variability at different time scales due to El Ni&#x000F1;o and the passage of coastal trapped waves (Graco et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">2016</xref>). The 22 &#x003BC;M upper boundary of the OMZ usually resides at 20&#x02013;40 m during the high productivity season, deepening to 70 m in winter (Graco et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">2016</xref>). During El Ni&#x000F1;o, bottom waters can become ventilated down to 100 m or more (Levin et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">2002</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F1" position="float">
<label>Figure 1</label>
<caption><p><bold>(A)</bold> Peru margin and sampling locations. The location of the IMARPE time-series station (150 m water depth, red symbol) and the sampling stations at 11&#x000B0;S and 12&#x000B0;S (black symbols) where organic carbon rain rates were determined by Dale et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">2015</xref>) are indicated (see Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">3C</xref>). Monthly satellite data (1/6 degree resolution) were used to determine mean PP and EP fluxes for the ocean area shown (77 to 79&#x000B0;W and 10.5 to 13&#x000B0;S). <bold>(B)</bold> Chlorophyll <italic>a</italic> data (mg m<sup>&#x02212;3</sup>) for January 2013 from the Aqua MODIS satellite (OCx algorithm) for the Eastern Tropical Pacific accessed in December 2016 from the Ocean Biology Processing Group (OBPG) of NASA Goddard Space Flight Center (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://oceancolor.gsfc.nasa.gov/cms/">https://oceancolor.gsfc.nasa.gov/cms/</ext-link>). The white box shows the approximate position of the transects in <bold>(A)</bold>.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmars-04-00029-g0001.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Sediments nearby the time-series station are diatomaceous, rapidly accumulating muds displaying high rates of microbial sulfate reduction (Suess et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B62">1987</xref>; Fossing, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">1990</xref>; B&#x000F6;ning et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">2004</xref>). Surface particulate organic carbon (POC) content is high in the OMZ (15 to 20 wt.%) with lower values (5 to 10 wt.%) on the shelf and in deep waters (B&#x000F6;ning et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">2004</xref>). &#x003B4;<sup>13</sup>C analysis and other geochemical indicators confirm that the organic matter at this latitude is almost entirely of marine origin (Arthur et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">1998</xref>; Levin et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">2002</xref>).</p>
<p>The sediments down to around 400 m are highly reducing and colonized by dense, centimeter-thick mats of gelatinous sheaths containing microbial filaments of the large sulfur oxidizing bacteria <italic>Thioploca</italic> spp. (Gallardo, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">1977</xref>; Henrichs and Farrington, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">1984</xref>; Schulz et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">1996</xref>; Guti&#x000E9;rrez et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">2008</xref>). These bacteria glide vertically through the sediments to access sulfide which they oxidize using nitrate stored within intracellular vacuoles (J&#x000F8;rgensen and Gallardo, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">1999</xref>). Nitrate reduction by <italic>Thioploca</italic> using sulfide leads to ammonium as the end product (i.e., dissimilatory nitrate reduction to ammonium, DNRA, Otte et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">1999</xref>; Graco et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">2001</xref>). The ammonium produced leaks out of the sediment and fuels water column N loss by anammox (Kalvelage et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">2013</xref>). Biological oxidation of sulfide is a major sink for sulfide in Peruvian shelf sediments (Bohlen et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">2011</xref>; Dale et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">2016</xref>). Bacterial biomass can be diminished if electron acceptors in the bottom water are depleted or if large amounts of organic matter are deposited on the sea bed (Guti&#x000E9;rrez et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">2008</xref>). Consequently, at these times, sulfide is able to bypass the microbial filter and escape to the bottom water (Schunck et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">2013</xref>; Sommer et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B61">2016</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3">
<title>Model</title>
<p>The numerical model is based on a previous diagenetic model used to investigate the response of benthic N fluxes to temporal anoxia and nitrate depletion in the water column on the Peruvian shelf (Dale et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">2016</xref>). The model couples reaction and transport in a vertically-resolved 1-D framework for the upper 50 cm of sediment. It considers 9 solutes and particulate organic carbon. Transport processes included are sediment burial, compaction, molecular diffusion and low rates of biodiffusion (bioturbation). Uptake and intracellular storage of nitrate by <italic>Thioploca</italic> is also considered. Further model details on these aspects can be found in the <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Material</xref>.</p>
<p>We used previous steady state models of the benthic N cycle on the Peruvian shelf to parameterize the model (Bohlen et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">2011</xref>; Dale et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">2016</xref>). There is uncertainty in applying the same parameterization to a non-steady state scenario since, as will become clear later, sediment geochemistry shows considerable temporal variability. Benthic fluxes and porewater concentration data are available at 11&#x000B0;S and 12&#x000B0;S from summer 2008 and 2013, respectively, and permit some constraint on the rates of modeled processes (Bohlen et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">2011</xref>; Sommer et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B61">2016</xref>). Importantly, however, the reactivity of organic matter in the sediment is not arbitrarily assigned based on literature values, but is carefully tailored to the Peruvian shelf, as described below.</p>
<sec>
<title>POC degradation</title>
<p>The rain rate of particulate organic carbon (POC) to the sediment surface and its degradation in the sediment drives all the biogeochemical processes taking place in the model. The depth and rate where POC mineralization occurs will affect the distribution of solutes in sediment porewaters, their turnover rates and the flux of solutes between the sediment and the ocean. It is therefore critical to describe POC degradation as accurately as possible.</p>
<p>Bulk POC can be envisaged as a continuum of reactive particulate fractions, each having its own discrete first-order rate constant (Middelburg, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">1989</xref>; Boudreau and Ruddick, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">1991</xref>). In the steady state version of our model, the reactivity of bulk POC pool is constrained directly from the ammonium (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>NH</mml:mtext><mml:mn>4</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x0002B;</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) profile and decreases smoothly with depth in the sediment, that is, as a reactive continuum (Bohlen et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">2011</xref>; Dale et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">2016</xref>). However, this approach is not suitable for non-steady state applications because of complications in defining the boundary conditions for a single POC pool whose reactivity decreases with sediment depth (i.e., over time). It is thus necessary to define several POC fractions, or &#x0201C;G,&#x0201D; that capture the spectrum of our known bulk reactivity on the Peruvian margin; otherwise known as the multi-G model (J&#x000F8;rgensen, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">1978</xref>).</p>
<p>Our aim is to parameterize a multi-G model consisting of several POC fractions, <italic>i</italic>, each being degraded with a rate constant k<sub>G<italic>i</italic></sub>. The fluxes of each fraction to the seafloor and the rate constants were constrained using the known distribution of POC degradation rate with depth in sediments on the Peruvian margin (RPOC). In the first step, the RPOC profile was obtained from the average model-derived RPOC profile from 3 stations (128, 142, and 195 m) on the outer shelf at 12&#x000B0;S which neighbor the time-series station (Dale et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">2016</xref>). POC degradation at each of these stations was tightly constrained in that study using porewater data, POC content and benthic fluxes of dissolved inorganic carbon and nitrogen. The average RPOC profile for these stations is shown in Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">2A</xref> (dotted red curve). RPOC decreases by three orders of magnitude over the upper 20 cm, reflecting rapid respiration of the labile organic components.</p>
<fig id="F2" position="float">
<label>Figure 2</label>
<caption><p><bold>Extraction of a multi-G model (four fractions) from the known POC degradation rate profile. (A)</bold> The dotted red curve shows the modeled POC degradation rate in the upper 20 cm of sediment predicted using the mean rate profile of POC degradation (RPOC) from the outer shelf (Dale et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">2016</xref>). <bold>(B)</bold> The dotted red curve shows the corresponding POC content for the RPOC profile in (A). The dashed black curves in <bold>(A,B)</bold> show the individual fractions whose total (solid black lines) matches the bulk property distributions. Rate constants and fractions are given in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">1</xref>.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmars-04-00029-g0002.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>The second step is to use this rate profile to predict the corresponding POC content. The POC content <italic>and</italic> the rate profile are both needed in the subsequent step to fully constrain the parameters of the multi-G model. To achieve this, the RPOC profile was used as a forcing function in a steady state 1-D reaction-transport model that considers POC degradation as well as burial with compaction and bioturbation in the upper 20 cm. The model simply calculates the POC content for the imposed RPOC profile, POC rain rate and transport processes. The rain rate was taken as 17 mmol m<sup>&#x02212;2</sup> d<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> (204 mg m<sup>&#x02212;2</sup> d<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>), which is the average rain rate determined for the outer shelf stations (Dale et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">2015</xref>). From the same study, the sediment accumulation rate and bioturbation coefficient were determined by radiotracer measurements to be 0.15 cm year<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> and 2 cm<sup>2</sup> year<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>, respectively. The resulting simulated surface POC content of 5.7 wt.% (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">2B</xref>, dotted red curve) is close to the measured value on the outer shelf of 7.5 &#x000B1; 3.2 wt.% (Dale et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">2015</xref>). The carbon burial efficiency is 50%, which is well within the range of 24&#x02013;74% determined for these stations based on measured POC accumulation rates and <italic>in situ</italic> flux measurements of dissolved inorganic carbon.</p>
<p>Finally, in step 3, the multi-G model was fit to the RPOC and POC profiles using a reaction-transport model with several discrete POC fractions, employing identical sediment accumulation and bioturbation rates as in step 2. We found that a model with 4 POC fractions was adequate to give optimal fits to both profiles over the sediment depth range (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">2</xref>, dashed lines and Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">1</xref>). Fewer fractions were insufficient, and more fractions introduce additional and unwarranted parameter uncertainty. As an initial model constraint, we chose a value of k<sub>G1</sub> &#x0003D; 8 year<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> and k<sub>G2</sub> &#x0003D; 0.8 year<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> for the two most reactive fractions (POC1 and POC2) based on degradation experiments of fresh phytodetritus under anoxic conditions (Westrich and Berner, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B68">1984</xref>). These appear to be satisfyingly appropriate for this setting (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">2</xref>). The two remaining rate constants were constrained solely from the RPOC and POC profiles. The results show that around 35% of the POC pool is highly reactive (POC1) with a further 10% attributed to POC2. The corresponding lifetimes (1/k<sub>G<italic>i</italic></sub>) of these fractions are 0.13 and 1.3 year. Around half of the organic material is barely degradable on the time-scales of interest to this study (POC4), with a lifetime of 1700 years, with a smaller fraction (6%) attributed to POC3 with a lifetime of 20 years. Only the least reactive fraction survives below ca. 10 cm, and is thus mainly responsible for the 50% carbon burial efficiency in the OMZ (Dale et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">2015</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T1">
<label>Table 1</label>
<caption><p><bold>Best fit parameters of the multi-G model</bold>.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead><tr>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Fraction</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Rate constant (year<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>)</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Lifetime, 1/k (year)</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>% Total</bold></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">POC1</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">k<sub>G1</sub> &#x0003D; 8</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.13</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">35</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">POC2</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">k<sub>G2</sub> &#x0003D; 0.8</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">10</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">POC3</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">k<sub>G3</sub> &#x0003D; 0.05</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">20</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">POC4</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">k<sub>G4</sub> &#x0003D; 0.0006</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1700</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">49</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<p>It is important to note that the rate constants and POC fractions derived from this procedure bear additional uncertainties since they have been derived using RPOC profiles that are assumed to be in steady state but which clearly are not (see <bold>Figure 4</bold> in Results). The reader should therefore be aware that our POC kinetics, especially of the more reactive fractions, probably better reflect the summer situation from which the RPOC profiles were derived, rather than winter. We would require data on the temporal variability in benthic mineralization to minimize this uncertainty.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Benthic N cycle</title>
<p>The current model contains a more complete N cycle than the non-steady state version developed previously (Dale et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">2016</xref>). Mass balances, model calculations and biogeochemical observations suggest that sulfide (H<sub>2</sub>S) oxidation to sulfate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2"><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>SO</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>4</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x02212;</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:math></inline-formula>) coupled to nitrate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext><mml:mn>3</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x02212;</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) reduction by vacuolated <italic>Thioploca</italic> spp. is a major process in Peruvian shelf sediments (Henrichs and Farrington, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">1984</xref>; Fossing et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">1995</xref>; Huettel et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">1996</xref>; Otte et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">1999</xref>; Bohlen et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">2011</xref>). This process, DNRA, can be described as (Zopfi et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B70">2001</xref>):</p>
<disp-formula id="E1"><label>(1)</label><mml:math id="M4"><mml:mtable class="eqnarray" columnalign="right center left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mi>&#x0201C;</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>BNO</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mi>&#x0201D;</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x0002B;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>H</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x0002B;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>H</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mi>O</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x02192;</mml:mo><mml:mtext>&#x000A0;&#x000A0;</mml:mtext><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>NH</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>4</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x0002B;</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>&#x0002B;</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>SO</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>4</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>
<p>where &#x0201C;B<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext><mml:mn>3</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x02212;</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>&#x0201D; denotes <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext><mml:mn>3</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x02212;</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> stored within vacuolated bacteria. Being motile, <italic>Thioploca</italic> can directly access the bottom water <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext><mml:mn>3</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x02212;</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reservoir by extending their filaments through the benthic boundary layer (Huettel et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">1996</xref>). Enhanced transport of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext><mml:mn>3</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x02212;</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> into the sediment by <italic>Thioploca</italic> is simulated in the model (Dale et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">2016</xref>), and this leads to an increase in the intracellular biological <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext><mml:mn>3</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x02212;</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> pool (see <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Material</xref>). Reduction of B<inline-formula><mml:math id="M10"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext><mml:mn>3</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x02212;</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during DNRA is simulated as a first-order loss term, where the rate constant was set to 30 year<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>, equal to a mean lifetime of around 2 weeks. This value was determined from the observed decrease in the intracellular <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext><mml:mn>3</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x02212;</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> pool during a period when <italic>Thioploca</italic> were surviving on their internal reserves (Dale et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">2016</xref>). Simulated B<inline-formula><mml:math id="M12"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext><mml:mn>3</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x02212;</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations are reported on a porewater basis, that is, the equivalent concentration of the internal B<inline-formula><mml:math id="M13"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext><mml:mn>3</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x02212;</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> pool if it were distributed evenly in the porewater. The surface B<inline-formula><mml:math id="M14"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext><mml:mn>3</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x02212;</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> content is used as a boundary condition in the model and was scaled to bottom water <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext><mml:mn>3</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x02212;</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations as described in the <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Material</xref>.</p>
<p>On the Peruvian shelf, DNRA may produce more <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>NH</mml:mtext><mml:mn>4</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x0002B;</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the sediment than ammonification:</p>
<disp-formula id="E2"><label>(2)</label><mml:math id="M17"><mml:mtable class="eqnarray" columnalign="right center left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>C</mml:mtext><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>H</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mi>O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>N</mml:mtext><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>H</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>&#x0002B;</mml:mo><mml:mi>&#x0201C;</mml:mi><mml:mtext>oxidant</mml:mtext><mml:mi>&#x0201D;</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x02192;</mml:mo><mml:mtext>&#x000A0;&#x000A0;</mml:mtext><mml:mi>&#x0201C;</mml:mi><mml:mtext>reductant</mml:mtext><mml:mi>&#x0201D;</mml:mi></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mo>&#x0002B;</mml:mo><mml:mtext>DIC</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&#x0002B;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>r</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>NC</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mtext>&#x000A0;</mml:mtext><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>NH</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>4</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x0002B;</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>&#x0002B;</mml:mo><mml:mi>&#x003A3;</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>H</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x0002B;</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>
<p>where CH<sub>2</sub>O represents POC of zero oxidation state and r<sub>NC</sub> is the molar N-to-C ratio that links organic N, defined above as a NH<sub>3</sub> moiety, to POC degradation. Organic phosphorus and phosphorus dynamics in general are not considered. The role of <italic>Thioploca</italic> on P dynamics in these settings is not well understood (Lomnitz et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">2016</xref>), and will be addressed in a forthcoming manuscript. Mineralization of POC by an oxidant thus produces <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>NH</mml:mtext><mml:mn>4</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x0002B;</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in addition to reducing equivalents and dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC) and a net change in protons (&#x003A3;H<sup>&#x0002B;</sup>). Acid-base speciation is not dealt with explicitly in this model. POC mineralization pathways include aerobic respiration, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext><mml:mn>3</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x02212;</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reduction to nitrite (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M20"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext><mml:mn>2</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x02212;</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), denitrification of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext><mml:mn>2</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x02212;</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to N<sub>2</sub>, and sulfate reduction. Methanogenesis and metal oxide reduction are unimportant in surface sediments on the Peruvian shelf (Dale et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">2016</xref>).</p>
<p>Initial simulations at the time-series station using the above-derived rate constant for DNRA showed that this process alone cannot completely diminish the benthic H<sub>2</sub>S flux because the rates of sulfate reduction are so high. Given that no benthic H<sub>2</sub>S flux was detected on the shelf at 150 m (Sommer et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B61">2016</xref>), an additional H<sub>2</sub>S removal process was required in the model to prevent its escape to the water column. An immediate increase in H<sub>2</sub>S concentration inside benthic chambers when <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext><mml:mn>3</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x02212;</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext><mml:mn>2</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x02212;</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fell below 0.5 &#x003BC;M (Dale et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">2016</xref>) indicates that H<sub>2</sub>S removal may be coupled to the reduction of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext><mml:mn>3</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x02212;</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and/or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext><mml:mn>2</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x02212;</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, that is, chemoautotrophic denitrification, CD (Lam and Kuypers, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">2011</xref>):</p>
<disp-formula id="E3"><label>(3)</label><mml:math id="M26"><mml:mtable class="eqnarray" columnalign="right center left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mn>8</mml:mn><mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>&#x0002B;</mml:mo><mml:mn>5</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>H</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x02192;</mml:mo><mml:mtext>&#x000A0;&#x000A0;</mml:mtext><mml:mn>4</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>N</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>&#x0002B;</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mn>5</mml:mn><mml:mtext>SO</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>4</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>&#x0002B;</mml:mo><mml:mn>4</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>H</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mi>O</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x0002B;</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn><mml:mtext>H</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x0002B;</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>
<disp-formula id="E4"><label>(4)</label><mml:math id="M27"><mml:mtable class="eqnarray" columnalign="right center left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mn>8</mml:mn><mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>&#x0002B;</mml:mo><mml:mn>3</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>H</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x0002B;</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn><mml:mtext>H</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x0002B;</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>&#x02192;</mml:mo><mml:mtext>&#x000A0;&#x000A0;</mml:mtext><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mn>4</mml:mn><mml:mtext>N</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>&#x0002B;</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mn>3</mml:mn><mml:mtext>SO</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>4</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>&#x0002B;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mn>4</mml:mn><mml:mtext>H</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mi>O</mml:mi></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>
<p>We ruled out <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>NH</mml:mtext><mml:mn>4</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x0002B;</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as the end product of this reaction since the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>NH</mml:mtext><mml:mn>4</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x0002B;</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> budget is already well constrained by benthic chamber fluxes and porewater concentrations (Dale et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">2016</xref>). The microorganisms that mediate CD are assumed to be non-vacuolated and non-motile and so rely on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext><mml:mn>3</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x02212;</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext><mml:mn>2</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x02212;</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> that diffuses into the sediment or produced <italic>in situ</italic> by nitrification. These aspects are discussed further later on.</p>
<p>Heterotrophic denitrification (HD) produces N<sub>2</sub> during the oxidation of POC using <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext><mml:mn>2</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x02212;</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>:</p>
<disp-formula id="E5"><label>(5)</label><mml:math id="M33"><mml:mtable class="eqnarray" columnalign="right center left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>C</mml:mtext><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>H</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mi>O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>&#x0002B;</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mn>4</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn>3</mml:mn><mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>&#x02192;</mml:mo><mml:mtext>&#x000A0;&#x000A0;DIC</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&#x0002B;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn>3</mml:mn><mml:mtext>N</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mo>&#x0002B;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>r</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>NC</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mtext>&#x000A0;</mml:mtext><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>NH</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>4</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x0002B;</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>&#x0002B;</mml:mo><mml:mi>&#x003A3;</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>H</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x0002B;</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>
<p>The rate of HD is determined directly from the rate of POC degradation (see <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Material</xref>).</p>
<p>Finally, anammox is the other reaction in the model that leads to fixed N loss to N<sub>2</sub>:</p>
<disp-formula id="E6"><label>(6)</label><mml:math id="M34"><mml:mtable class="eqnarray" columnalign="right center left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>NH</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>4</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x0002B;</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>&#x0002B;</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>&#x02192;</mml:mo><mml:mtext>&#x000A0;&#x000A0;</mml:mtext><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>N</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>&#x0002B;</mml:mo><mml:mn>2</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>H</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mi>O</mml:mi></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>
<p>Other processes included are aerobic nitrification of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>NH</mml:mtext><mml:mn>4</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x0002B;</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext><mml:mn>2</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x02212;</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and aerobic oxidation of H<sub>2</sub>S. We do not consider precipitation of particulate S in the current model. For typical particulate S content on the shelf of 1.5 wt.% and sediment mass accumulation rate of 1 g m<sup>&#x02212;2</sup> d<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> (Suits and Arthur, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B63">2000</xref>; Scholz et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B55">2011</xref>; Dale et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">2016</xref>), S burial amounts to ca. 0.4 mmol m<sup>&#x02212;2</sup> d<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>, equivalent to around 15% of sulfate reduction (see Results).</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Dynamic model boundary conditions</title>
<sec>
<title>POC rain rate (RRPOC)</title>
<p>Organic carbon rain rates were estimated for the IMARPE time-series site from satellite-based primary production (PP) and export production (EP). PP was calculated using the Vertically Generalized Production Model as a function of satellite-derived chlorophyll, available light, and the photosynthetic efficiency (Behrenfeld and Falkowski, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">1997</xref>). Monthly averaged PP data on a 1/6 degree resolution for the Peruvian margin between 77 and 79&#x000B0;W and 10.5 and 13&#x000B0;S (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">1A</xref>) were downloaded in February 2016 from the Oregon State University Ocean Productivity Center (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.science.oregonstate.edu/ocean.productivity/index.php">http://www.science.oregonstate.edu/ocean.productivity/index.php</ext-link>). To cover the period of the IMARPE time-series sampling (January 1998 to December 2009), PP were derived using data from the SeaWiFS (1998&#x02013;2007) and MODIS sensors (2002&#x02013;2009).</p>
<p>PP shows considerable seasonal variability (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">3A</xref>) with highest values in summer (February&#x02013;April) and lowest values in winter (July&#x02013;September). MODIS derived productivity data are on average ca. 25% higher than SeaWiFS data over the period 2003&#x02013;2008 where data from both sensors are available (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">3A</xref>). This discrepancy can be traced back to the variability in the chlorophyll concentrations rather than SST. SeaWiFS mean monthly chlorophyll concentrations in the Peruvian coastal zone have been shown to underestimate the measured <italic>in situ</italic> concentrations by as much as 100% (Echevin et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">2008</xref>). This implies that MODIS derived satellite data may be more accurate than SeaWiFS for this geographical region. These authors further remark that the SeaWiFS algorithm used to calculate surface chlorophyll tends to underestimate the high concentrations in coastal zones, citing Hooker and McClain (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">2000</xref>). They also note that frequent nearshore cloud coverage, especially in winter, could cause an improper quantification of the intense surface blooms. Thus, the two data sets were aligned by increasing the SeaWiFS productivity by a factor of 1.25, resulting in a mean PP of 2.7 &#x000B1; 1.2 g C m<sup>&#x02212;2</sup> d<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> for the time period 1998 to 2015 that is in good agreement with observations of 1.8 to 5.2 g C m<sup>&#x02212;2</sup> d<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> based on ship-collected PP estimates (Pennington et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">2006</xref>; Qui&#x000F1;ones et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B53">2010</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F3" position="float">
<label>Figure 3</label>
<caption><p><bold>Derived variables and boundary conditions used to run the benthic model. (A)</bold> Monthly averaged primary production derived using SeaWiFS and MODIS satellite data, <bold>(B)</bold> Monthly averaged export production, and <bold>(C)</bold> Monthly averaged and climatological (long-term daily mean) organic carbon rain rates. PP and EP are averaged over the ocean area shown in Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">1</xref> whereas RRPOC is adjusted to fit the data (blue squares) from the shelf. The latter are equal to 15 mmol m<sup>&#x02212;2</sup> d<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> at St. 1 in Bohlen et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">2011</xref>) for November 2008 and an average of 17 mmol m<sup>&#x02212;2</sup> d<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> at St. 3, 4, and 5 in Dale et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">2015</xref>) for January 2013 (the mean chlorophyll a concentrations for January 2013 are shown in Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">1B</xref>). The shaded bar in <bold>(C)</bold> shows the time period over which the model is executed. <bold>(D&#x02013;F)</bold> Show the concentrations of temporally-variable dissolved species in the bottom water (&#x003BC;M).</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmars-04-00029-g0003.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>The spatially resolved monthly PP estimates were used to determine EP at each grid point using the <italic>pe</italic>-ratio that gives the fraction of PP exported out of the euphotic zone (Equation 1b in Dunne et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">2005</xref>). This empirical function requires sea surface temperature (SST), chlorophyll concentration and euphotic depth as input variables and is valid for a <italic>pe</italic> range of 0.04&#x02013;0.72. <italic>pe</italic>-ratios that fell below this range were set to 0.04 (<italic>pe</italic> ratios did not exceed 0.72). The <italic>pe</italic>-ratio data corresponding to the MODIS data were calculated from monthly MODIS SST and chlorophyll concentrations downloaded from the Ocean Productivity Center. Similarly, the adjusted SeaWiFS chlorophyll data were used for the corresponding SeaWiFS <italic>pe</italic> ratio, whereas SST was determined using AVHRR data (NOAA). Euphotic depths were calculated directly from chlorophyll concentrations following Morel and Berthon (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">1989</xref>). <italic>pe</italic>-ratios were always below 0.26 due to warm surface waters (16&#x02013;24&#x000B0;C). This is consistent with observations that most PP in the Humboldt system is mineralized in the euphotic zone (Qui&#x000F1;ones et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B53">2010</xref> and references therein).</p>
<p>Export production using the MODIS and adjusted SeaWiFS productivity data is shown in Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">3B</xref>. Mean EP between 1998 and 2015 is 340 &#x000B1; 290 mg C m<sup>&#x02212;2</sup> d<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>. Very low EP coincided with periods of warm water masses and low chlorophyll concentrations (not shown). These conditions were established, for example, in late 1998 during the strongly positive ENSO (Guti&#x000E9;rrez et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">2008</xref>; Qui&#x000F1;ones et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B53">2010</xref>). The EP data were then used to determine the organic carbon rain rate to the seafloor (RRPOC). Yet, given that the EP data in Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">3B</xref> represent the average of the shelf and upper slope (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">1A</xref>), they are not directly applicable to the time-series station at 150 m. RRPOC data at 150 m were thus obtained by linearly adjusting the whole EP time-series data downwards linearly until the data coincided with the two known RRPOC data points that are available for the outer shelf stations at 11&#x000B0;S and 12&#x000B0;S (blue squares in Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">3C</xref>). The application of empirical functions, such as the Martin curve (Martin et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">1987</xref>), are probably not suitable alternatives to determine rain rates on the shelf due to lateral advection of particles (Arthur et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">1998</xref>). The adjusted RRPOC ranges between 13 and 680 mg m<sup>&#x02212;2</sup> d<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>, with mean summer values (237 &#x000B1; 142 mg m<sup>&#x02212;2</sup> d<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>) being 6-fold higher as those in winter (40 &#x000B1; 31 mg m<sup>&#x02212;2</sup> d<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>) and with a long term average of 134 &#x000B1; 115 mg m<sup>&#x02212;2</sup> d<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>. The years 2004, 2005, 2011, and 2014 are noteworthy since the RRPOC was considerably higher than the climatological rain rate (red curve), which is the daily average of all data. The monthly RRPOC data, interpolated linearly, were imposed as a time-variable boundary condition for total POC deposition flux in the benthic model. The fluxes of the four POC fractions vary with the rain rate in the proportions given in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">1</xref>.</p>
<p>Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">2</xref> provides and overview of the pelagic POC fluxes for the period between 1998 and 2010 where IMARPE data is available. Average PP, EP and RRPOC are 2744 &#x000B1; 1153 mg m<sup>&#x02212;2</sup> d<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>, 316 &#x000B1; 256 mg m<sup>&#x02212;2</sup> d<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>, and 124 &#x000B1; 101 mg m<sup>&#x02212;2</sup> d<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>, respectively. These numbers show that shelf sediments at Peru capture up to 40% of the EP and 5% of PP, and thus likely provide an important feedback to water column biogeochemistry.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T2">
<label>Table 2</label>
<caption><p><bold>Summary of mean POC fluxes (in mg m<sup>&#x02212;2</sup> d<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>) for the Peruvian margin at the time-series station for the period 1998&#x02013;2010</bold>.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead><tr>
<th/>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Primary production</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Export production</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Rain rate</bold></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Summer (February&#x02013;April)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3828 &#x000B1; 978</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">525 &#x000B1; 295</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">206 &#x000B1; 116</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Winter (July&#x02013;September)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1506 &#x000B1; 348</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">93 &#x000B1; 56</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">37 &#x000B1; 22</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Annual mean</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2744 &#x000B1; 1153</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">316 &#x000B1; 256</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">124 &#x000B1; 101</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Bottom water chemistry</title>
<p>Concentrations of dissolved oxygen and nutrients (O<sub>2</sub>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext><mml:mn>3</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x02212;</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext><mml:mn>2</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x02212;</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in the water column at the IMARPE time-series station show enormous temporal variability that cannot be explained by seasonality alone (Guti&#x000E9;rrez et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">2008</xref>; Graco et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">2016</xref>). Concentrations often range by several tens of micromolar on a monthly basis. This variability is partly driven by biological factors such as phytodetrital sedimentation and decay as well as physical factors such as the poleward propagation of coastal trapped waves, which are stronger and more frequent during El Ni&#x000F1;o (Guti&#x000E9;rrez et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">2008</xref>). These waves deepen the pycnocline and ventilate the bottom waters, as can be seen by the high O<sub>2</sub> levels during the strong 1997/1998 El Ni&#x000F1;o and the weaker warm event in 2002/2003 (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">3D</xref>; Graco et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">2016</xref>). We extracted monthly data of O<sub>2</sub>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext><mml:mn>3</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x02212;</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext><mml:mn>2</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x02212;</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from the lowest water column sampling depth (90 or 140 m) to use as upper (seawater) boundary conditions in the benthic model (Figures <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">3D&#x02013;F</xref>). Approximately half the data are from 90 m, where O<sub>2</sub> concentrations are on average a factor of 2 higher than those at 140 m (&#x0007E;16 vs. 8 &#x003BC;M). O<sub>2</sub> data from 90 m were thus reduced by a factor of two for the implementation of the boundary condition. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext><mml:mn>3</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x02212;</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext><mml:mn>2</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x02212;</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations between 90 and 140 m showed no statistical differences (two tailed <italic>t</italic>-test, <italic>p</italic> &#x0003E; 0.05). Occasional monthly gaps in the database (max. 8 data points) were filled using linear interpolation between adjacent data points. The solute time-series&#x00027; were linearly interpolated for implementation as boundary conditions in the model. Concentrations of all other solutes were set to fixed concentrations (see <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Material</xref>). This latter assumption does not significantly affect the model results.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Model spin-up</title>
<p>Model results are shown for the 12 year period between 1 January 1998 and 31 December 2009 when bottom water chemistry and rain rate data are simultaneously available. Prior to this, the model was spun-up to generate a realistic initial condition. The mean RRPOC data for the first 3 years (1998&#x02013;2000, Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">3C</xref>) was used to derive seasonally-cycling profiles of the POC fractions. At the same time, constant bottom water concentrations equivalent to 3 &#x003BC;M of O<sub>2</sub>, 14 &#x003BC;M of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext><mml:mn>3</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x02212;</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and 2 &#x003BC;M of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext><mml:mn>2</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x02212;</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were imposed. It should be noted that porewater concentrations nonetheless vary over time in this initialization step due to the seasonal variability in rain rate.</p>
<p>The initial condition is only an approximation of reality since time-series rain rate estimates prior to 1998 are unavailable. However, the uncertainty created at the start of the simulation (1 January 1998) will be limited by the fact that the lifetime of almost half of the POC is around 1 year or less, and the other half is mostly refractive on the time scales relevant to the simulated sediment column (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">1</xref>). The reactive fractions will mainly determine the reactivity of the surface sediments and the solute flux across the sediment-water interface. Specifying the initial condition for O<sub>2</sub>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M55"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext><mml:mn>3</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x02212;</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext><mml:mn>2</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x02212;</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is less critical since their distribution is limited to the surface millimeters or centimeters and their residence time in the porewater is on the order of hours. All initial concentration profiles for 1 January 1998 were taken from the final day (31 December) of the spin-up simulation.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="results" id="s4">
<title>Results</title>
<sec>
<title>Sediment geochemistry</title>
<p>Selected geochemical profiles from the final year of the simulation are shown to illustrate the intra-annual dynamicity of the sediments (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">4</xref>). The model results agree well with observations made close to the time-series station in summer 2013 (Dale et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">2016</xref>). The reactive POC fractions (1 and 2) show clear seasonal variability due to their high reactivity. With increasingly refractivity, less variability is observed. The variability in POC content is linked to the rate of POC degradation which varies by an order of magnitude in the surface layers (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">4B</xref>). Dissolved O<sub>2</sub>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext><mml:mn>3</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x02212;</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext><mml:mn>2</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x02212;</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> show pronounced variability in the upper millimeters caused both by the changing bottom water concentrations and the input of labile organic matter (Figures <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">4C&#x02013;E</xref>). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext><mml:mn>3</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x02212;</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext><mml:mn>2</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x02212;</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations also occasionally show subsurface peaks. Further model simulations with constant O<sub>2</sub> boundary conditions (not shown) indicate that these peaks are driven by nitrification when O<sub>2</sub> is available in the bottom water, rather than changes in bottom water <inline-formula><mml:math id="M61"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext><mml:mn>3</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x02212;</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M62"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext><mml:mn>2</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x02212;</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The results demonstrate that down-core measurements of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext><mml:mn>3</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x02212;</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> using microsensors (e.g., Glud et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">2009</xref>) from a single time point could not be used to accurately extrapolate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext><mml:mn>3</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x02212;</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes over an annual cycle at this site.</p>
<fig id="F4" position="float">
<label>Figure 4</label>
<caption><p><bold>Sediment profiles of (A)</bold> POC, <bold>(B)</bold> POC mineralization, <bold>(C)</bold> O<sub>2</sub>, <bold>(D)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext><mml:mn>3</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x02212;</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <bold>(E)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext><mml:mn>2</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x02212;</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <bold>(F)</bold> DIC, <bold>(G)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>NH</mml:mtext><mml:mn>4</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x0002B;</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <bold>(H)</bold> H<sub>2</sub>S, and <bold>(I)</bold> biological nitrate, B<inline-formula><mml:math id="M48"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext><mml:mn>3</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x02212;</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The profiles are extracted from the last simulation year (2009) at monthly time intervals. In <bold>(A)</bold> the different POC fractions 1&#x02013;3 are labeled. The most refractive fraction POC4 barely changes down-core and is not shown for clarity. The model simulates down to 50 cm, and only the upper portions of sediment are shown here (note different depth scales).</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmars-04-00029-g0004.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Pronounced temporal variability is even seen in the solutes that have constant boundary conditions (Figures <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">4F&#x02013;H</xref>). Yet, whereas the variability in DIC concentrations is only due to the seasonality in rain rate and POC degradation, the profiles of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>NH</mml:mtext><mml:mn>4</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x0002B;</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> show more variability since they are modified by biological <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext><mml:mn>3</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x02212;</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> transport and reduction by <italic>Thioploca</italic> (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">4I</xref>). The effect of anammox and nitrification on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>NH</mml:mtext><mml:mn>4</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x0002B;</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations is limited to the surface 0.5 cm where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext><mml:mn>3</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x02212;</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext><mml:mn>2</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x02212;</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are available.</p>
<p>Finally, the model predicts a lack of H<sub>2</sub>S in the upper 3 cm except for a small subsurface peak in H<sub>2</sub>S of ca. 20 &#x003BC;M that is also apparent in porewater measurements made at 101 and 128 m water depth (Dale et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">2016</xref>). This reflects extremely high rates of POC respiration by sulfate reduction and, at the same time, very efficient microbial H<sub>2</sub>S oxidation, but not quite enough to completely eliminate H<sub>2</sub>S in the top centimeter.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Benthic fluxes and mineralization processes</title>
<p>Solute fluxes across the sediment surface demonstrate high temporal variability (Figures <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">5A&#x02013;F</xref> and Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">3</xref>). O<sub>2</sub> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext><mml:mn>3</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x02212;</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes show no obvious trends because their rate of sediment uptake is largely determined by their bottom water concentrations which are highly variable due to displacement and exchange of shelf waters (Graco et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">2016</xref>). O<sub>2</sub> flux was highest in 1998 (&#x02212;4.0 mmol m<sup>&#x02212;2</sup> d<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>) when bottom waters became ventilated during a strong El Ni&#x000F1;o event. It should be noted that during our fieldwork in 2008 and 2013 the O<sub>2</sub> flux was essentially zero on the shelf because bottom water O<sub>2</sub> levels were below detection limit (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">3</xref>, Dale et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">2016</xref>). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext><mml:mn>2</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x02212;</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake by the sediment tends to be higher in summer due to elevated POC flux (&#x02212;0.3 mmol m<sup>&#x02212;2</sup> d<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>) in combination with abundant <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext><mml:mn>2</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x02212;</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the bottom water. During winter, the rain rate is diminished and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext><mml:mn>2</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x02212;</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes are more directed toward the water column (0.2 mmol m<sup>&#x02212;2</sup> d<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>). Fluxes of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>NH</mml:mtext><mml:mn>4</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x0002B;</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and DIC show the same seasonal trends as POC rain rate with highest values in summer and lowest in winter.</p>
<fig id="F5" position="float">
<label>Figure 5</label>
<caption><p><bold>Simulated benthic fluxes (left)</bold> and depth-integrated rates <bold>(right</bold>) on the Peruvian shelf extracted at bi-weekly intervals and interpolated linearly. Positive fluxes denote release from the sediment to the water column and vice versa. <bold>(A)</bold> O<sub>2</sub>, <bold>(B)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext><mml:mn>3</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x02212;</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> including uptake by nitrate-storing bacteria, <bold>(C)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext><mml:mn>2</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x02212;</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <bold>(D)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>NH</mml:mtext><mml:mn>4</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x0002B;</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <bold>(E)</bold> DIC, and <bold>(F)</bold> H<sub>2</sub>S. All fluxes are in in mmol m<sup>&#x02212;2</sup> d<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>. <bold>(G)</bold> shows the net N balance (&#x003A3;N) equal to the sum of fluxes <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext><mml:mn>3</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x02212;</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> &#x0002B; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext><mml:mn>2</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x02212;</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> &#x0002B; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>NH</mml:mtext><mml:mn>4</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x0002B;</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> &#x0002B; 2 &#x000D7; N<sub>2</sub> &#x0002B; R<sub><italic>AMF</italic></sub> in mmol m<sup>&#x02212;2</sup> d<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>. <bold>(H)</bold> POC mineralization (mmol m<sup>&#x02212;2</sup> d<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> of C), <bold>(I)</bold> Sulfate reduction (mmol m<sup>&#x02212;2</sup> d<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> of S), where the right axis is the fraction of POC mineralized by sulfate reduction (black curve). <bold>(J)</bold> Anammox (mmol m<sup>&#x02212;2</sup> d<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> of N), <bold>(K)</bold> Chemoautotrophic denitrification (mmol m<sup>&#x02212;2</sup> d<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> of N), <bold>(L)</bold> Heterotrophic denitrification (mmol m<sup>&#x02212;2</sup> d<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> of N), <bold>(M)</bold> DNRA (mmol m<sup>&#x02212;2</sup> d<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> of N) and ammonification (mmol m<sup>&#x02212;2</sup> d<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> of N) (black curve), and <bold>(N)</bold> total fixed N loss (mmol m<sup>&#x02212;2</sup> d<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> of N) by anammox and denitrification [Equations (3) to (6)]. The vertical dashed lines show the time of maximum rain rate for each year.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmars-04-00029-g0005.tif"/>
</fig>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T3">
<label>Table 3</label>
<caption><p><bold>Mean (&#x000B1; 1 standard deviation, &#x003C3;), modeled and measured fluxes and depth-integrated rates (upper 50 cm)</bold>.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead><tr>
<th/>
<th valign="top" align="center" colspan="2" style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;"><bold>Annual</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center" colspan="2" style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;"><bold>Summer</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center" colspan="2" style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;"><bold>Winter</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center" colspan="2" style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;"><bold>Measured<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN1"><sup>a</sup></xref></bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Source<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN2"><sup>b</sup></xref></bold></th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th/>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Mean</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>&#x003C3;</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Mean</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>&#x003C3;</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Mean</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>&#x003C3;</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Mean</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>&#x003C3;</bold></th>
<th/>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" colspan="10" style="background-color:#bbbdc0"><bold>FLUX AT SURFACE (mmol m<sup>&#x02212;2</sup> d<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>)<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN3"><sup>c</sup></xref></bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">POC (&#x0003D; RRPOC)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">10.4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8.4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">17.2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">9.6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.8</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">15.7</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7.8</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">O<sub>2</sub></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;1.4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;1.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.7</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;1.3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">bdl</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M75"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>NH</mml:mtext><mml:mn>4</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x0002B;</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.9</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.7</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">DIC</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.7</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7.3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.7</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">10.6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">H<sub>2</sub>S</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">N<sub>2</sub></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.8</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.9</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M76"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext><mml:mn>2</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x02212;</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;0.1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;0.3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;1.1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M77"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext><mml:mn>3</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x02212;</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (includes B<inline-formula><mml:math id="M78"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext><mml:mn>3</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x02212;</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;2.6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.8</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;3.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.9</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;1.8</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;2.2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" colspan="10" style="background-color:#bbbdc0"><bold>RATE (mmol m<sup>&#x02212;2</sup> d<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>)<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN4"><sup>d</sup></xref></bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">POC mineralization (C)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.7</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7.4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.9</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.9</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">10.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8.8</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Sulfate reduction (S)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02013;</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Ammonification (N)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.9</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02013;</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Fixed N loss (N)<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN5"><sup>e</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.8</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02013;</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">CD (N)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02013;</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">HD (N)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.7</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02013;</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Anammox (N)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02013;</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Nitrification (N)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.8</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.7</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.9</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.3</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">DNRA (N, S)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.9</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.9</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.9</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02013;</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">% H<sub>2</sub>S oxidized by DNRA</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">81</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8.3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">76</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">10.2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">88</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02013;</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Aerobic H<sub>2</sub>S oxidation</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.0</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn id="TN1"><label>a</label><p><italic>Measured data are averages for the outer shelf stations at 12&#x000B0;S during January 2013 (St. 3, 4, and 5 in Dale et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">2016</xref>; Sommer et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B61">2016</xref>). bdl &#x0003D; below detection limit</italic>.</p></fn>
<fn id="TN2"><label>b</label><p><italic>Measured data sources: 1 &#x0003D; Dale et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">2016</xref>), 2 &#x0003D; Sommer et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B61">2016</xref>)</italic></p></fn>
<fn id="TN3"><label>c</label><p><italic>Key variables only. Positive fluxes are out of the sediment and vice versa. Fluxes of N species are in mmol m<sup>-2</sup> d<sup>-1</sup> of N</italic>.</p></fn>
<fn id="TN4"><label>d</label><p><italic>Depth-integrated rates (0&#x02013;20 cm). The rate corresponds to the element in parenthesis</italic>.</p></fn>
<fn id="TN5"><label>e</label><p><italic>Total rate of fixed N conversion to N<sub>2</sub></italic>.</p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>The model predicts negligible efflux of H<sub>2</sub>S (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">5F</xref>) which is in line with observations on the shelf in summer (Bohlen et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">2011</xref>; Sommer et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B61">2016</xref>). Notable H<sub>2</sub>S release events up to 1.0 mmol m<sup>&#x02212;2</sup> d<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> were predicted during early summer in other years (e.g., 2006) and at the end of summer in 1999. These emissions coincide with periods of elevated carbon rain rate, demonstrating a direct link between carbon input and H<sub>2</sub>S release.</p>
<p>Organic matter mineralization in the sediment shows regular seasonal patterns driven by organic matter input (Figures <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">5H&#x02013;N</xref>). Mean POC degradation is 5.7 mmol m<sup>&#x02212;2</sup> d<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>, and ranges between a minimum of 2.6 mmol m<sup>&#x02212;2</sup> d<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> in August 1998 during the strong El Ni&#x000F1;o event to 14.0 mmol m<sup>&#x02212;2</sup> d<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> in April 2004. Summer and winter averages for the whole period are 7.4 and 3.9 mmol m<sup>&#x02212;2</sup> d<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>, respectively (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">3</xref>). On average, 83% of the POC is respired by sulfate reduction, with a mean rate of 2.4 mmol m<sup>&#x02212;2</sup> d<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> of S (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">5I</xref>, Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">3</xref>). Furthermore, 81% of the H<sub>2</sub>S is consumed by DNRA, with the remainder either escaping the sediment by diffusion or oxidized by chemoautotrophic denitrification (CD). As for DNRA, CD acts as an important barrier for H<sub>2</sub>S emissions and a sink for fixed N (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M79"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext><mml:mn>3</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x02212;</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext><mml:mn>2</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x02212;</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The maximum CD rates occurred in 2004 to 2006 when rain rate and sulfate reduction were highest. Heterotrophic denitrification is equivalent to around 15% of CD. Both these processes contribute to N loss, which increases from 1.1 mmol m<sup>&#x02212;2</sup> d<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> in winter to 1.8 mmol m<sup>&#x02212;2</sup> d<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> in summer, with a mean of 1.5 mmol m<sup>&#x02212;2</sup> d<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">5N</xref>; Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">3</xref>). These are similar to rates in sediments in the OMZ offshore Chile measured by Far&#x000ED;as et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">2004</xref>) and to those determined by mass balance at Peru (Bohlen et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">2011</xref>; Dale et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">2016</xref>; Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">3</xref>). In contrast, DNRA conserves fixed N in the system and produces twice as much <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>NH</mml:mtext><mml:mn>4</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x0002B;</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as ammonification (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">5M</xref>). Given that anammox consumes around one-third of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>NH</mml:mtext><mml:mn>4</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x0002B;</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> produced by ammonification and DNRA (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">3</xref>), most of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>NH</mml:mtext><mml:mn>4</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x0002B;</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> diffuses out of the sediment and enters the water column. This is important for the system-wide N balance, because <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>NH</mml:mtext><mml:mn>4</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x0002B;</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> production by DNRA can be an important driver for N loss in the water column by anammox (Kalvelage et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">2013</xref>).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="discussion" id="s5">
<title>Discussion</title>
<sec>
<title>Sediment feedbacks on the peruvian shelf</title>
<p>The intra-annual biogeochemistry of the Peruvian upwelling system is well-recognized, resulting from strong seasonality in the intensity of upwelling, primary production and hydrodynamic factors (Pennington et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">2006</xref>; Echevin et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">2008</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">2014</xref>; Guti&#x000E9;rrez et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">2008</xref>; Graco et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">2016</xref>). Yet, the corresponding variability in sediment biogeochemistry on the Peruvian shelf is only just beginning to be appreciated. This has been demonstrated here by coupling water column time-series data to an empirical diagenetic model. Time-series data provide invaluable boundary conditions for sediment models that allow the strength and direction of benthic-pelagic feedbacks to be quantified (e.g., Fossing et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">2004</xref>; Dale et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">2013</xref>). We have shown that the sediments on the Peruvian shelf are not static repositories that are independent of changes taking place in the water column. Rather, benthic reaction rates and fluxes vary several-fold over the course of the year in concert with upwelling and organic carbon rain rate. Considerable temporal variability in benthic feedbacks has been observed in the adjacent upwelling zone further south in Conception Bay (Chile); a site also characterized by microbial mat communities (Graco et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">2001</xref>; Far&#x000ED;as et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">2004</xref>). A well-defined coupling between the benthos and water column is probably true for continental shelves in general and deeper waters too (Martin and Bender, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">1988</xref>; Soetaert et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B58">1996</xref>).</p>
<p>It is interesting to note that the seasonality in benthic biogeochemical reactions is greatly attenuated with regard to the input of organic matter to the sediment. This is illustrated by the rate of POC degradation, which is around two times higher in summer than winter whereas the rain rate is five to six times higher (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">3</xref>). Benthic DIC fluxes are similarly attenuated. The maximum DIC flux also slightly lags behind the maximum rain rate by around 3&#x02013;4 weeks (vertical lines, Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">5E</xref>). This lag is also apparent in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>NH</mml:mtext><mml:mn>4</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x0002B;</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and H<sub>2</sub>S flux as well as in the POC degradation rate (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">5H</xref>). Clearly, then, the POC rain rate to the seafloor does not exclusively determine the benthic solute fluxes at any given time.</p>
<p>These temporal lags have implications for the benthic N balance too. Under steady state conditions, the net sum of the dissolved N fluxes and ammonification across the sediment surface should equal zero. This mass balance, plotted as &#x003A3;N in Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">5G</xref>, demonstrates that an imbalance of a few mmol m<sup>&#x02212;2</sup> d<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> on a month-by-month basis is the norm rather than the exception. There is no obvious seasonal trend, with positive and negative &#x003A3;N occurring in both summer and winter. Maximum deviations from steady state occurred in summer 1999 when &#x003A3;N increased to ca. 4 mmol m<sup>&#x02212;2</sup> d<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>. Similar N imbalances based on single time point measurements have been observed on the outer Peruvian shelf (Sommer et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B61">2016</xref>) and in the California Borderland basins (Chong et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">2012</xref>).</p>
<p>The chief causes of the N imbalance are ammonification and DNRA. The former process directly depends on the rate of organic matter mineralization whereas the latter indirectly depends on organic matter mineralization via the rate of H<sub>2</sub>S production by sulfate reduction. Organic matter that falls to the seafloor is not instantaneously mineralized, but decays over time according to the derived rate constants in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">1</xref>. The seasonality in rain rate thus leads to temporal storage of solids and solutes in the sediment and, consequently, biogeochemical reactions (Martin and Bender, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">1988</xref>). Similar deviations from steady state have been reported for sites with transient development of bacterial mats of filamentous <italic>Beggiatoa</italic> spp. and subsequent release of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>NH</mml:mtext><mml:mn>4</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x0002B;</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> associated with DNRA (Graco et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">2001</xref>).</p>
<p>More generally, the model provides a rough idea of the uncertainty in benthic turnover rates that are derived from single time point measurements. For instance, if benthic DIC fluxes collected in summer are used to determine total benthic respiration rates using mass balances or modeling (e.g., Bohlen et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">2011</xref>; Dale et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">2016</xref>), Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">5E</xref> and Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">3</xref> inform us that the derived rates will have a 30% margin of error (deviation from annual mean). The error using data from winter rises to around 40%. This is greater than the typical uncertainty in measured fluxes due to sediment heterogeneity and experimental artifacts (Hammond et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">2004</xref>; Sommer et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B61">2016</xref>).</p>
<p>Perhaps one of the most important results from the entire modeling exercise is that the sediments must exert a strong feedback on the nutrient cycles in the water column. For example, benthic N loss at the time-series site (1.5 mmol m<sup>&#x02212;2</sup> d<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>; Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">3</xref>) is up to 20% of water column N loss by anammox reported for 140 m water depth at a site close to the time-series station (6.2 mmol m<sup>&#x02212;2</sup> d<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>; Hamersley et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">2007</xref>). Furthermore, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>NH</mml:mtext><mml:mn>4</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x0002B;</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> produced by DNRA can easily cover the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>NH</mml:mtext><mml:mn>4</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x0002B;</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> required by anammox in the water column (Dale et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">2016</xref>). Sediments thus likely play an important direct and indirect role in the pelagic fixed N budget. These basic feedbacks need to be considered in regional models of the Peruvian system. Later on, we suggest ways in which this can be achieved.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Microbiological control of sulfur emissions</title>
<p>Reports of benthic emissions of H<sub>2</sub>S on the Peruvian margin are rare (Schunck et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">2013</xref>). Benthic chambers deployed so far on the shelf have only measured H<sub>2</sub>S release where the sediments receive massive amounts of phytodetritus (&#x0003E;60 mmol m<sup>&#x02212;2</sup> d<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> of C) and where bottom waters are depleted in electron acceptors (Sommer et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B61">2016</xref>). At a station close to the time-series station managed by IMARPE and at a similar water depth (150 m), no H<sub>2</sub>S emissions were detected (Sommer et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B61">2016</xref>). To simulate this in our model, an efficient sink of H<sub>2</sub>S in addition to DNRA was required because the rate constant of DNRA was pre-determined based on observed temporal decreases in the B<inline-formula><mml:math id="M89"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext><mml:mn>3</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x02212;</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> pool (see section Model). An immediate increase in H<sub>2</sub>S concentrations inside benthic chambers following depletion of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext><mml:mn>3</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x02212;</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext><mml:mn>2</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x02212;</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to below 0.5 &#x003BC;M further alludes to second pathway of H<sub>2</sub>S removal coupled to the reduction of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext><mml:mn>3</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x02212;</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and/or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext><mml:mn>2</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x02212;</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Dale et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">2016</xref>). Such an immediate increase may not be expected of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext><mml:mn>3</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x02212;</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-storing microbial communities that can continue to respire H<sub>2</sub>S in the short-term absence of electron acceptors.</p>
<p>In the present model, this sink was assumed to be chemotrophic denitrification (CD) coupled to H<sub>2</sub>S oxidation by non-vacuolated bacteria [Equation (3) and (4)]. It would seem reasonable that chemoautotrophic denitrifying bacteria are present and able to compete with <italic>Thioploca</italic> for H<sub>2</sub>S in the organic-rich anoxic Peruvian muds displaying high rates of sulfate reduction (Fossing et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">2004</xref>). These bacteria have been isolated in OMZs and the reaction is highly favorable energetically (Lam and Kuypers, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">2011</xref>). Other H<sub>2</sub>S removal processes do not greatly help to close the mass balance. Aerobic H<sub>2</sub>S oxidation is negligible (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">3</xref>), and burial of particulate sulfur (e.g., pyrite) was not considered since, as mentioned (Section Benthic N Cycle), it can only sequester around 15% of total H<sub>2</sub>S production. Although, this is roughly the same as the fraction of H<sub>2</sub>S consumed by CD, we infer from the immediate increase in H<sub>2</sub>S concentrations inside benthic chambers when <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext><mml:mn>3</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x02212;</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>/<inline-formula><mml:math id="M96"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext><mml:mn>2</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x02212;</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations fall below 0.5 &#x003BC;M that the sink must be occurring directly at the sediment-water interface (Dale et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">2016</xref>). It is questionable whether the precipitation of iron sulfides will be thermodynamically favorable at the sediment-water interface due to low reactant concentrations and the presence of potential oxidants for reduced sulfur such as O<sub>2</sub> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext><mml:mn>3</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x02212;</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Rickard, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">1997</xref>). Although, the role of sedimentary CD has not yet been quantified in the field, the model has identified an additional process in the benthic S cycle that may turn out to be just as important as DNRA in maintaining a H<sub>2</sub>S-free water column.</p>
<p>Nonetheless, as mentioned, benthic microorganisms are unable to consume H<sub>2</sub>S completely when rain rates are exceptional, as seen by the peaks in H<sub>2</sub>S emissions (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">5F</xref>). The peak in summer 2009 coincides with the largest sulfidic event ever measured in the water column on the Peruvian margin (Schunck et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">2013</xref>). These authors further attributed the H<sub>2</sub>S plume to benthic H<sub>2</sub>S release, and estimated a benthic H<sub>2</sub>S source of around 2 mmol m<sup>&#x02212;2</sup> d<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> on the middle shelf at 100 m water depth. This is in agreement with the present model prediction (0.4 mmol m<sup>&#x02212;2</sup> d<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>) when one considers that organic matter mineralization at 100 m is a factor of 3&#x02013;4 higher than at 150 m (Dale et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">2015</xref>). The model results suggest that large-scale H<sub>2</sub>S emission events may occur more regularly than currently presumed and may have gone undetected in 2004, 2005, and 2006 (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">5F</xref>). Furthermore, given that H<sub>2</sub>S release appears at times when primary production exceeds ca. 20 mmol m<sup>&#x02212;2</sup> d<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> (c.f. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">3A</xref>), satellite-derived data could be used as an early warning system to predict sulfidic events on the Peruvian margin. The feasibility of this idea is certainly worth further investigation, especially given the importance of the fishery sector to the Peruvian economy.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Benthic-pelagic coupling and N loss on the margin</title>
<p>Denitrification in continental margin sediments constitutes the largest sink of fixed N in the ocean today (Gruber, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">2008</xref>). Although, sediments underlying oxygen deficient waters account for less than 1% of the total seafloor, globally they account for 10% of benthic N loss (Bohlen et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">2012</xref>). On average, 1 mole of fixed N is transformed to N<sub>2</sub> for every 4 moles of POC oxidized at the time-series station (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">3</xref>), compared to a ratio of 1:10 in oxic shelf settings (Middelburg et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">1996</xref>; Bohlen et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">2012</xref>). As explained above, benthic denitrification must modulate the biogeochemistry of the water column on the Peruvian shelf. Given that N loss limits productivity, regional and global biogeochemical models that simulate oxygen deficient waters need to be able to predict benthic N loss accurately.</p>
<p>Several approaches of varying complexity exist to couple benthic and pelagic models (reviewed by Soetaert et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B59">2000</xref>). At the one end, time-dependent, vertically-resolved diagenetic models, such as the one presented here, can be coupled to a water column biogeochemistry model (e.g., Archer et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">2002</xref>). In practice, this approach is seldom used due to the excessive computational demands and parameterization required. At the other end, over-simplified approaches that include the specification of fixed or reflective sea floor boundary conditions in ocean models inadequately capture the diagenetic transformations of organic matter and benthic sources and sinks. Intermediate complexity approaches, such as vertically-integrated sediment models, are a pragmatic alternative. These allow sediment fluxes to be parameterized using zero-dimensional time-dependent approaches (i.e., a single box) at the lower ocean boundary, or by the implementation of transfer functions to predict the immediate response of sediments to changes occurring at the sediment-seawater boundary. These models can be derived from statistical analysis of vertically-resolved benthic models or be purely empirical in nature (Middelburg et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">1996</xref>; Soetaert et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B59">2000</xref>; Capet et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">2016</xref>).</p>
<p>An example of an empirical transfer function for predicting fixed N loss in global models has been developed by Bohlen et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">2012</xref>). Here, denitrification (all N<sub>2</sub> production pathways in mmol m<sup>&#x02212;2</sup> d<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> of N) can be predicted from the POC rain rate (mmol m<sup>&#x02212;2</sup> d<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> of C) and the bottom water concentrations of O<sub>2</sub> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext><mml:mn>3</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x02212;</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in &#x003BC;M:</p>
<disp-formula id="E7"><label>(7)</label><mml:math id="M99"><mml:mtable columnalign="left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>N&#x000A0;loss&#x000A0;</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mtext>&#x000A0;</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mtext>&#x000A0;</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&#x0002B;</mml:mo><mml:mtext>&#x000A0;</mml:mtext><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mtext>&#x000A0;</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&#x000D7;</mml:mo><mml:mtext>&#x000A0;</mml:mtext><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>O</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x000D7;</mml:mo><mml:mtext>&#x000A0;RRPOC</mml:mtext></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>
<p>where <italic>a</italic> (0.060), <italic>b</italic> (0.19) and <italic>c</italic> (0.99) are constants determined from a global database of measured benthic O<sub>2</sub> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext><mml:mn>3</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x02212;</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes and rain rates. The function has been coupled to Earth System Models to predict benthic denitrification in the modern ocean (e.g., Somes et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B60">2013</xref>; Yang and Gruber, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B69">2016</xref>). The function is also dynamic in the sense that N loss responds instantaneously to changes in the boundary conditions, but does not consider the storage of solutes and particulates in sediments.</p>
<p>For the application of Equation (7) to the Peruvian margin, RRPOC has to be adjusted to account for the elevated carbon burial efficiency (CBE) in sediments under anoxic waters. The more carbon buried, the less degradation and thus less N<sub>2</sub> loss. Previously, the CBE was shown to be 50% for sediments within the OMZ (section POC Degradation and Dale et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">2015</xref>). RRPOC was thus corrected by multiplying by the factor 1&#x02212; CBE/100:</p>
<disp-formula id="E8"><label>(8)</label><mml:math id="M101"><mml:mtable columnalign="left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>N&#x000A0;loss&#x000A0;</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mtext>&#x000A0;</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mtext>&#x000A0;</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&#x0002B;</mml:mo><mml:mtext>&#x000A0;</mml:mtext><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mtext>&#x000A0;</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&#x000D7;</mml:mo><mml:mtext>&#x000A0;</mml:mtext><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>O</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x000D7;</mml:mo><mml:mtext>&#x000A0;RRPOC</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&#x000D7;</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1</mml:mn><mml:mtext>&#x000A0;</mml:mtext><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mtext>&#x000A0;</mml:mtext><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>CBE</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>
<p>Fixed N loss predicted using Equation (8) is shown alongside the N loss from the numerical model in Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">6</xref> jointly with the resultant residuals. The two approaches show a very good agreement; only during periods when the POC rain rate rises above ca. 25 mmol m<sup>&#x02212;2</sup> d<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> does Equation (8) over-predict the N loss by more than two standard deviations (2&#x003C3;) of the residuals, such as in 2004 and 2005. This is probably because extreme settings such as the Peruvian shelf that display high rates of DNRA at the expense of denitrification are not well represented in the database used to derive the transfer function. Nonetheless, over the whole time-series, the models agree to within 30%, which is within the empirical uncertainty of the transfer function (Bohlen et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">2012</xref>). The model could be further generalized by making CBE a function of, for example, rain rate (Dunne et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">2007</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F6" position="float">
<label>Figure 6</label>
<caption><p><bold>The upper panel shows total fixed N loss (mmol m<sup>&#x02212;2</sup> d<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> of N) on the Peruvian shelf from Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">5N</xref> (red curve) and the results of the transfer function (Equation 8, black curve)</bold>. The blue curve is the transfer function with the rain rate filtered by a 4 month moving average (Equation 9). The lower panel shows corresponding residuals from the two functions compared to the model with control limits, &#x000B1;2&#x003C3; (dotted lines).</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmars-04-00029-g0006.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>It can nonetheless be seen that the yearly maxima in N loss predicted by Equation (8) precede the model result by 1 to 2 months (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">6</xref>). This is due to the time lag between POC deposition and organic matter mineralization. An improved transfer function can be formulated that considers these lags by filtering RRPOC using a low pass moving average:</p>
<disp-formula id="E9"><label>(9)</label><mml:math id="M102"><mml:mtable class="eqnarray" columnalign="right center left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>N&#x000A0;loss&#x000A0;</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mtext>&#x000A0;</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mtext>&#x000A0;</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&#x0002B;</mml:mo><mml:mtext>&#x000A0;</mml:mtext><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mtext>&#x000A0;</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&#x000D7;</mml:mo><mml:mtext>&#x000A0;</mml:mtext><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>O</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x000D7;</mml:mo><mml:mtext>&#x000A0;</mml:mtext><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:munderover accentunder="false" accent="false"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x02211;</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>i&#x000A0;</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mtext>&#x000A0;</mml:mtext><mml:mn>0</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>&#x000A0;</mml:mtext><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mtext>&#x000A0;</mml:mtext><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:munderover></mml:mstyle><mml:mtext>RRPOC</mml:mtext><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mo>&#x000D7;</mml:mo><mml:mtext>&#x000A0;</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1</mml:mn><mml:mtext>&#x000A0;</mml:mtext><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mtext>&#x000A0;</mml:mtext><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>CBE</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>
<p>where <italic>n</italic> denotes the number of months, <italic>i</italic>, over which the moving average was applied. Best results were found for <italic>n</italic> &#x0003D; 4 (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">6</xref>, blue curve), for which the mean and standard deviation of the N loss (1.3 &#x000B1; 0.8 mmol m<sup>&#x02212;2</sup> d<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>) are within excellent agreement of the model result (1.5 &#x000B1; 0.5 mmol m<sup>&#x02212;2</sup> d<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>). The 4 month filter captures much of the variability induced by the reactivity of the POC1 and POC2 fractions (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">1</xref>) as well as the time required for molecules to diffuse over the upper 10 cm in response to the changes in rain rate.</p>
<p>On the one hand, these are important results since they show that these functions can be coupled to dynamic regional biogeochemical models of the Peru system such as the Regional Ocean Modeling System (e.g., Vergara et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B66">2016</xref>). On the other hand, it is perhaps surprising that the N loss predicted by the vertically&#x02013;resolved and&#x02014;integrated models agree so well. Nitrogen loss in the numerical model depends on the temporally-variable vertical distribution of organic matter and dissolved species and hence their rates of advective and diffusive transport in the sediment column. The history of the previous boundary conditions is thus entrained in the numerical model. The transfer functions, in contrast, retain no memory of past conditions; only the instantaneous rain rate and bottom water concentrations are important. This is partly compensated for in Equation (9) by the low pass filter on the rain rate. Storage of POC seems not to greatly affect the predictive capability of the functions because the most labile carbon pool, with a lifetime of a few weeks, constitutes a large fraction of bulk POC (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">1</xref>). Furthermore, almost all denitrification takes place within the upper 5 mm of the sediment (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">4C</xref>). The time scale for a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext><mml:mn>3</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x02212;</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molecule to diffuse across this distance is only a few hours, such that the relatively gradual changes of solute concentrations in the bottom water allow benthic denitrification to proceed in quasi-steady state. The accuracy of the transfer functions would begin to break down in situations where bottom water chemistry fluctuates on hourly time scales due to e.g., tides.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Challenges of predicting DNRA</title>
<p>Almost all of the N loss from the water column in the Eastern Tropical South Pacific occurs by anammox rather than heterotrophic denitrification (Hamersley et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">2007</xref>; Kalvelage et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">2013</xref>). Mass balance calculations suggest that around 40% of the N loss takes place within the coastal OMZ where water depths are &#x0003C;600 m (Kalvelage et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">2013</xref>). Moreover, it has been suggested that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>NH</mml:mtext><mml:mn>4</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x0002B;</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> production by <italic>Thioploca</italic> could contribute as much as 50% of the total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>NH</mml:mtext><mml:mn>4</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x0002B;</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidized by anammox (Dale et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">2016</xref>). This potentially important feedback linking the benthic and pelagic N cycle is thus focused on shallower waters. Its impact on the wider biogeochemistry of the Peruvian OMZ requires investigation using a regional model that accounts for N transformations in both the water column and sediments.</p>
<p>Analogous to Equation (9), a simple vertically-integrated model for benthic DNRA (mmol m<sup>&#x02212;2</sup> d<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> of N) can be proposed based on the model findings:</p>
<disp-formula id="E10"><label>(10)</label><mml:math id="M106"><mml:mtable class="eqnarray" columnalign="right center left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>DNRA&#x000A0;</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mtext>&#x000A0;</mml:mtext><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0</mml:mn><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mn>83</mml:mn><mml:mtext>&#x000A0;</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&#x000D7;</mml:mo><mml:mtext>&#x000A0;</mml:mtext><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x000D7;</mml:mo><mml:mtext>r</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>SC</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>&#x000D7;</mml:mo><mml:mtext>&#x000A0;</mml:mtext><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:munderover accentunder="false" accent="false"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x02211;</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>i&#x000A0;</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mtext>&#x000A0;</mml:mtext><mml:mn>0</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>&#x000A0;</mml:mtext><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mtext>&#x000A0;</mml:mtext><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:munderover></mml:mstyle><mml:mtext>RRPOC</mml:mtext><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mtext>&#x000A0;</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&#x000D7;</mml:mo><mml:mtext>&#x000A0;</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>CBE</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>
<p>where r<sub>SC</sub> is the sulfate-to-carbon ratio during POC respiration by sulfate reduction (0.5) and <italic>f</italic> is the mean fraction of H<sub>2</sub>S produced by sulfate reduction that is oxidized by DNRA (81%, Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">3</xref>). The coefficient 0.83 accounts for the fraction of POC respired by sulfate reduction at the time-series station (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">5I</xref>).</p>
<p>Results with this function, again with <italic>n</italic> &#x0003D; 4, show a very good agreement with the modeled DNRA rates (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">7</xref>). Bottom water <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext><mml:mn>3</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x02212;</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is not a variable in this function. DNRA is more sensitive to RRPOC than changes in bottom water <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext><mml:mn>3</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x02212;</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> because <italic>Thioploca</italic>, along with some species of <italic>Beggiatoaceae</italic> and <italic>Thiomargarita</italic>, are able to store <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext><mml:mn>3</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x02212;</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> within their vacuoles, and thus bridge periods where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext><mml:mn>3</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x02212;</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> availability is low or absent (Schulz et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">1996</xref>; Preisler et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">2007</xref>). The equation would be straightforward to implement as a lower water column boundary condition in a regional model. Applying the function from the shelf down to 400 m, where <italic>Thioploca</italic> are distributed (Mosch et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">2012</xref>; Sommer et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B61">2016</xref>), would allow a first-order estimate of benthic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext><mml:mn>3</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x02212;</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conversion to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>NH</mml:mtext><mml:mn>4</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x0002B;</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by <italic>Thioploca</italic> for the entire Peruvian margin to be determined, as well as the impact of benthic DNRA on water column N loss. Ideally, such an approach would also have to consider that the sediments north of 10&#x000B0;S and south of 15&#x000B0;S are sandy due to sediment winnowing by strong bottom currents (Suess et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B62">1987</xref>), and thus unlikely to support <italic>Thioploca</italic> communities.</p>
<fig id="F7" position="float">
<label>Figure 7</label>
<caption><p><bold>DNRA (mmol m<sup>&#x02212;2</sup> d<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> of N) on the Peruvian shelf from Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">5M</xref> (red curve) and predicted by the transfer function (Equation 10, blue curve)</bold>. The lower panel shows the residuals of the function compared to the model with control limits, &#x000B1;2&#x003C3; (dotted lines).</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmars-04-00029-g0007.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>One drawback of this approach is that the ecology of <italic>Thioploca</italic> is treated in a very simplified manner. Time-series analysis of <italic>Thioploca</italic> biomass at a nearby station (94 m water depth) between 1993 and 2006 showed that the bacteria are mostly present when O<sub>2</sub> levels are &#x0003C;20 &#x003BC;M but not anoxic (Guti&#x000E9;rrez et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">2008</xref>). These conditions characterize the period of the current model application, with the exception of the strong El Ni&#x000F1;o in 1998 when bottom waters became well ventilated for several months due to onshore intrusion of Subtropical Surface Water (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">3E</xref>; Graco et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">2016</xref>). Following this event, <italic>Thioploca</italic> biomass at the other site (Guti&#x000E9;rrez et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">2008</xref>) was diminished for 2&#x02013;3 years during which time the benthic biota became dominated by amphipods and polychaetes. Although, <italic>Thioploca</italic> biomass does not correlate statistically with O<sub>2</sub> concentrations (Guti&#x000E9;rrez et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">2008</xref>), the presence or absence of bacterial mats very likely depends on the occurrence of coastal trapped waves that depress the OMZ downwards and ventilate shelf sediments. The frequency of these waves increases during El Ni&#x000F1;o, and this sustained ventilation is believed to allow burrowing macrofaunal communities to be established at the expense of <italic>Thioploca</italic> (Guti&#x000E9;rrez et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">2008</xref>). Furthermore, <italic>Thioploca</italic> populations can be diminished during La Ni&#x000F1;a events when bottom waters stagnate and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext><mml:mn>3</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x02212;</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is exhausted, or following the sinking of massive plankton blooms that smother the seafloor biota (Graco et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">2001</xref>; Guti&#x000E9;rrez et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">2008</xref>). These extreme low frequency (e.g., ENSO) and high frequency forcings (e.g., bottom water stagnation) lead to complex dynamics of <italic>Thioploca</italic> biomass and DNRA that are not dealt with in the current model.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="conclusions" id="s6">
<title>Conclusions</title>
<p>Relatively little fieldwork effort has been directed to investigate the inter-annual and intra-annual fluxes of carbon, nutrients and other biologically important compounds across the marine sediment-water interface. In part, this is due to greater labor and cost investments demanded by sediment sampling compared to the water column. An alternative approach to quantify benthic-pelagic feedbacks is to couple water column time-series data to a diagenetic model that has been ground-truthed using data from the same locality. This was the approach taken in this study on the Peruvian margin. Water column data on the outer shelf were measured at the time-series station managed by the Instituto del Mar del Per&#x000FA; (IMARPE) and the benthic model was constrained using sediment geochemical data and benthic fluxes. The results allow the natural variability and time scales of benthic-pelagic feedbacks in carbon, nitrogen and sulfur cycling to be quantified. This type of analysis further permits the influence of the low frequency remote forcing, such as El Ni&#x000F1;o, on the sediment nutrient balance to be investigated.</p>
<p>An important finding from this work is that the sediments must provide a strong feedback on the biogeochemical cycles and productivity of the water column. Further, they are not static repositories that are independent of changes taking place in the water column. Benthic reaction rates and fluxes vary several-fold over the course of the year in concert with organic carbon rain rate. The level of variability observed is very likely typical for the continental margin, which emphasizes the importance of seasonality in sediment mineralization rates to system scale nutrients budgets. This work clearly demonstrates that water column biogeochemical models on the Peruvian margin require careful consideration of benthic feedbacks to correctly balance nutrient inventories. Biogeochemical models will inaccurately predict feedbacks from the sediment if the seafloor is treated as a simple reflective boundary or ignored altogether; a point made many years ago (Soetaert et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B59">2000</xref>). It would be instructive to quantify the role of sediments to nutrient budgets on the Peruvian margin using a regional 3-D physical-biogeochemical model. Important outstanding questions include the strength of benthic denitrification as a negative feedback on primary production and the role of ammonium production by <italic>Thioploca</italic> to water column N loss by anammox (another possible negative feedback). Similarly, the link between the N and S cycles in the sediments and the water column mediated by benthic biota and ephemeral sulfide emissions deserves further attention.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s7">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>AD: Designed the study and carried out the model simulations; MG: Provided the time-series nutrient data; AD, MG, and KW: Contributed to the writing and editing of the manuscript.</p>
<sec>
<title>Conflict of interest statement</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p></sec>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<ack><p>This research was funded by the Sonderforschungsbereich 754 &#x0201C;Climate&#x02014;Biogeochemistry Interactions in the Tropical Ocean&#x0201D; (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.sfb754.de">www.sfb754.de</ext-link>) which is supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft. We would like to thank three reviewers for their very positive commentaries and Dr. Phyllis Lam for the editorial handling of this manuscript.</p>
</ack>
<sec sec-type="supplementary-material" id="s8">
<title>Supplementary material</title>
<p>The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fmars.2017.00029/full#supplementary-material">http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fmars.2017.00029/full#supplementary-material</ext-link></p>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="DataSheet1.PDF" id="SM1" mimetype="application/pdf" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Archer</surname> <given-names>D. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Morford</surname> <given-names>J. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Emerson</surname> <given-names>S. R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>A model of suboxic sedimentary diagenesis suitable for automatic tuning and gridded global domains</article-title>. <source>Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles</source> <volume>16</volume>, <fpage>17&#x02013;1</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>17&#x02013;21</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1029/2000gb001288</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Arthur</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dean</surname> <given-names>W. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Laarkamp</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1998</year>). <article-title>Organic carbon accumulation and preservation in surface sediments on the Peru margin</article-title>. <source>Chem. Geol</source>. <volume>152</volume>, <fpage>273</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>286</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Behrenfeld</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Falkowski</surname> <given-names>P. G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1997</year>). <article-title>Photosynthetic rates derived from satellite-based chlorophyll concentration</article-title>. <source>Limnol. Oceanogr</source>. <volume>42</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>20</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Billet</surname> <given-names>D. S. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lampitt</surname> <given-names>R. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rice</surname> <given-names>A. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mantoura</surname> <given-names>R. F. C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1983</year>). <article-title>Seasonal sedimentation of phytoplankton to the deep-sea benthos</article-title>. <source>Nature</source> <volume>302</volume>, <fpage>520</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>522</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/302520a0</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bohlen</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dale</surname> <given-names>A. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sommer</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mosch</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hensen</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Noffke</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Benthic nitrogen cycling traversing the Peruvian oxygen minimum zone</article-title>. <source>Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta</source> <volume>75</volume>, <fpage>6094</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>6111</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.gca.2011.08.010</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bohlen</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dale</surname> <given-names>A. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wallmann</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Simple transfer functions for calculating benthic fixed nitrogen losses and C:N:P regeneration ratios in global biogeochemical models</article-title>. <source>Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles</source> <volume>26</volume>, <fpage>GB3029</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1029/2011gb004198</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>B&#x000F6;ning</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Brumsack</surname> <given-names>H. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>B&#x000F6;ttcher</surname> <given-names>M. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schnetger</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kriete</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kallmeyer</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>Geochemistry of Peruvian near-surface sediments</article-title>. <source>Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta</source> <volume>68</volume>, <fpage>4429</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>4451</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.gca.2004.04.027</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Boudreau</surname> <given-names>B. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ruddick</surname> <given-names>B. R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1991</year>). <article-title>On a reactive continuum representation of organic matter diagenesis</article-title>. <source>Am. J. Sci</source>. <volume>291</volume>, <fpage>507</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>538</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Capet</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Meysman</surname> <given-names>F. J. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Akoumianaki</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Soetaert</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gr&#x000E9;gorie</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Integrating sediment biogeochemistry into 3D oceanic models: a study of benthic-pelagic coupling in the Black Sea</article-title>. <source>Ocean Model</source>. <volume>101</volume>, <fpage>83</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>100</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ocemod.2016.03.006</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chaigneau</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dominguez</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vasquez</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Flores</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Grados</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Echevin</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Near-coastal circulation in the Northern Humboldt current system from shipboard ADCP data</article-title>. <source>J. Geophys. Res. Oceans</source> <volume>118</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>16</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/jgrc.20328</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chavez</surname> <given-names>F. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bertrand</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Guevara-Carrasco</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Soler</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>The northern Humboldt Current System: Brief history, present status and a view towards the future</article-title>. <source>Prog. Oceanogr</source>. <volume>79</volume>, <fpage>95</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>105</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.pocean.2008.10.012</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chong</surname> <given-names>L. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Prokopenko</surname> <given-names>M. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Berelson</surname> <given-names>W. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Townsend-Small</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>McManus</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Nitrogen cycling within suboxic and anoxic sediments from the continental margin of Western North America</article-title>. <source>Mar. Chem</source>. 128&#x02013;<volume>129</volume>, <fpage>13</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>25</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.marchem.2011.10.007</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dale</surname> <given-names>A. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bertics</surname> <given-names>V. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Treude</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sommer</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wallmann</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Modeling benthic-pelagic nutrient exchange processes and porewater distributions in a seasonally-hypoxic sediment: evidence for massive phosphate release by Beggiatoa?</article-title> <source>Biogeosciences</source> <volume>10</volume>, <fpage>629</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>651</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/bg-10-629-2013</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dale</surname> <given-names>A. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sommer</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lomnitz</surname> <given-names>U.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bourbonnais</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wallmann</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Biological nitrate transport in sediments on the Peruvian margin mitigates benthic sulfide emissions and drives pelagic N loss during stagnation events</article-title>. <source>Deep-Sea Res. Part I.</source> <volume>112</volume>, <fpage>123</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>136</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.dsr.2016.02.013</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dale</surname> <given-names>A. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sommer</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lomnitz</surname> <given-names>U.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Montes</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Treude</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liebetrau</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Organic carbon production, mineralisation and preservation on the Peruvian margin</article-title>. <source>Biogeosciences</source> <volume>12</volume>, <fpage>1537</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1559</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/bg-12-1537-2015</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dunne</surname> <given-names>J. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Armstrong</surname> <given-names>R. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gnnadesikan</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sarmiento</surname> <given-names>J. L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Empirical and mechanistic models for the particle export ratio</article-title>. <source>Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles</source> <volume>19</volume>, <fpage>GB4026</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1029/2004gb002390</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dunne</surname> <given-names>J. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sarmiento</surname> <given-names>J. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gnanadesikan</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>A synthesis of global particle export from the surface ocean and cycling through the ocean interior and on the seafloor</article-title>. <source>Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles</source> <volume>21</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>16</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1029/2006GB002907</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Echevin</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Albert</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>L&#x000E9;vy</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Graco</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Aumont</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pi&#x000E9;tri</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Intraseasonal variability of nearshore productivity in the Northern Humboldt current system: the role of coastal trapped waves</article-title>. <source>Cont. Shelf Res</source>. <volume>73</volume>, <fpage>14</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>30</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.csr.2013.11.015</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Echevin</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Aumont</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ledesma</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Flores</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>The seasonal cycle of surface chlorophyll in the Peruvian upwelling system: a modelling study</article-title>. <source>Prog. Oceanogr</source>. <volume>79</volume>, <fpage>167</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>176</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.pocean.2008.10.026</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Far&#x000ED;as</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Graco</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ulloa</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>Temporal variability of nitrogen cycling in continental-shelf sediments of the upwelling ecosystem off central Chile</article-title>. <source>Deep-Sea Res. Part II</source> <volume>51</volume>, <fpage>2491</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>2505</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.dsr2.2004.07.029</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Fossing</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1990</year>). <article-title>Sulfate reduction in shelf sediments in the upwelling region off Central Peru</article-title>. <source>Cont. Shelf Res</source>. <volume>10</volume>, <fpage>355</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>367</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0278-4343(90)90056-R</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<citation citation-type="other"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Fossing</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Berg</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Thamdrup</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rysgaard</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>S&#x000F8;rensen</surname> <given-names>H. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nielsen</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <source>A Model Set-Up for an Oxygen and Nutrient flux Model for Aarhus Bay (Denmark). National Environmental Research Institute, Denmark</source>. NERI Technical Report No. 483, <fpage>65</fpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Fossing</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gallardo</surname> <given-names>V. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>J&#x000F8;rgensen</surname> <given-names>B. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>H&#x000FC;ttel</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nielsen</surname> <given-names>L. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schulz</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>1995</year>). <article-title>Concentration and transport of nitrate by mat-forming sulphur bacterium <italic>Thioploca</italic></article-title>. <source>Nature</source> <volume>374</volume>, <fpage>713</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>715</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/374713a0</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gallardo</surname> <given-names>V. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1977</year>). <article-title>Large benthic microbial communities in sulphide biota under Peru-Chile subsurface countercurrent</article-title>. <source>Nature</source> <volume>268</volume>, <fpage>331</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>332</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/268331a0</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Glud</surname> <given-names>R. N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Thamdrup</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Stahl</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wenzhoefer</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Glud</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nomaki</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Nitrogen cycling in a deep ocean margin sediment (Sagami Bay, Japan)</article-title>. <source>Limnol. Oceanogr</source>. <volume>54</volume>, <fpage>723</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>734</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4319/lo.2009.54.3.0723</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Graco</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Far&#x000ED;as</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Molina</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Guti&#x000E9;rrez</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nielsen</surname> <given-names>L. P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2001</year>). <article-title>Massive developments of microbial mats following phytoplankton blooms in a naturally eutrophic bay: implications for nitrogen cycling</article-title>. <source>Limnol. Oceanogr</source>. <volume>46</volume>, <fpage>821</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>832</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4319/lo.2001.46.4.0821</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Graco</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Purca</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dewitte</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mor&#x000F3;n</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ledesma</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Flores</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>The OMZ and nutrients features as a signature of interannual and low frequency variability off the Peruvian upwelling system</article-title>. <source>Biogeosci. Discuss</source>. <fpage>1</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>36</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/bg-2015-567</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gruber</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>The Marine nitrogen cycle: overview and challenges</article-title>, in <source>Nitrogen in the Marine Environment</source>, eds <person-group person-group-type="editor"><name><surname>Capone</surname> <given-names>D. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bronk</surname> <given-names>D. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mulholland</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Carpenter</surname> <given-names>E. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<publisher-loc>Amsterdam</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Academic Press</publisher-name>), <fpage>1</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>50</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Guti&#x000E9;rrez</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Enr&#x000ED;quez</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Purca</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Quip&#x000FA;zcoa</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Marquina</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Flores</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Oxygenation episodes on the continental shelf of central Peru: remote forcing and benthic ecosystem response</article-title>. <source>Prog. Oceanogr</source>. <volume>79</volume>, <fpage>177</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>189</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.pocean.2008.10.025</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hamersley</surname> <given-names>M. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lavik</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Woebken</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rattray</surname> <given-names>J. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lam</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hopmans</surname> <given-names>E. C.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Anaerobic ammonium oxidation in the Peruvian oxygen minimum zone</article-title>. <source>Limnol. Oceanogr</source>. <volume>52</volume>, <fpage>923</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>933</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4319/lo.2007.52.3.0923</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hammond</surname> <given-names>D. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cummins</surname> <given-names>K. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>McManus</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Berelson</surname> <given-names>W. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Smith</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>Methods for measuring benthic nutrient flux on the California Margin: comparing shipboard core incubations to <italic>in situ</italic> lander results</article-title>. <source>Limnol. Oceanogr. Methods</source> <volume>2</volume>, <fpage>146</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>159</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4319/lom.2004.2.146</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Henrichs</surname> <given-names>S. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Farrington</surname> <given-names>J. W.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1984</year>). <article-title>Peru upwelling region sediments near 15os. 1. Remineralization and accumulation of organic matter</article-title>. <source>Limnol. Oceanogr</source>. <volume>29</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>19</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hooker</surname> <given-names>S. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>McClain</surname> <given-names>C. R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2000</year>). <article-title>The calibration and validation of SeaWiFS data</article-title>. <source>Prog. Oceanogr</source>. <volume>45</volume>, <fpage>427</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>465</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0079-6611(00)00012-4</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Huettel</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Forster</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kloser</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fossing</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1996</year>). <article-title>Vertical migration in the sediment-dwelling sulfur bacteria <italic>Thioploca</italic> spp. in overcoming diffusion limitations</article-title>. <source>Appl. Environ. Microbiol.</source> <volume>62</volume>, <fpage>1863</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1872</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16535328</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>J&#x000F8;rgensen</surname> <given-names>B. B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1978</year>). <article-title>A comparison of methods for the quantification of bacterial sulfate reduction in coastal marine sediments II. Calculation from mathematical models</article-title>. <source>Geomicrobiol. J</source>. <volume>1</volume>, <fpage>29</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>47</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B36">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>J&#x000F8;rgensen</surname> <given-names>B. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gallardo</surname> <given-names>V. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1999</year>). <article-title><italic>Thioploca</italic> spp.: filamentous sulfur bacteria with nitrate vacuoles</article-title>. <source>FEMS Microbiol. Ecol</source>. <volume>28</volume>, <fpage>301</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>313</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B37">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kalvelage</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lavik</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lam</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Contreras</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Arteaga</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>L&#x000F6;scher</surname> <given-names>C. R.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Nitrogen cycling driven by organic matter export in the South Pacific oxygen minimum zone</article-title>. <source>Nat. Geosci</source>. <volume>6</volume>, <fpage>228</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>234</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/ngeo1739</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B38">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Klump</surname> <given-names>J. V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Martens</surname> <given-names>C. S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1989</year>). <article-title>The seasonality of nutrient regeneration in an organic-rich coastal sediment: kinetic modeling of changing pore-water nutrient and sulfate distribution</article-title>. <source>Limnol. Oceanogr</source>. <volume>34</volume>, <fpage>559</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>577</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4319/lo.1989.34.3.0559</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B39">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kriest</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Oschlies</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Swept under the carpet: organic matter burial decreases global ocean biogeochemical model sensitivity to remineralization length scale</article-title>. <source>Biogeosciences</source> <volume>10</volume>, <fpage>8401</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>8422</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/bg-10-8401-2013</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B40">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lam</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kuypers</surname> <given-names>M. M. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Microbial nitrogen cycling processes in oxygen minimum zones</article-title>. <source>Ann. Rev. Mar. Sci</source>. <volume>3</volume>, <fpage>317</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>345</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1146/annurev-marine-120709-142814</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21329208</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B41">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lampitt</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1985</year>). <article-title>Evidence for the seasonal deposition of detritus to the deep-sea floor and its subsequent resuspension</article-title>. <source>Deep-Sea Res</source>. <volume>32</volume>, <fpage>885</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>897</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0198-0149(85)90034-2</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B42">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Levin</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Guti&#x000E9;rrez</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rathburn</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Neira</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sellanes</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Munoz</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>Benthic processes on the Peru margin: A transect across the oxygen minimum zone during the 1997-98 El Ni-o</article-title>. <source>Prog. Oceanogr</source>. <volume>53</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>27</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/s0079-6611(02)00022-8</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B43">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lomnitz</surname> <given-names>U.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sommer</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dale</surname> <given-names>A. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>L&#x000F6;scher</surname> <given-names>C. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Noffke</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wallmann</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Benthic phosphorus cycling in the Peruvian oxygen minimum zone</article-title>. <source>Biogeosciences</source> <volume>13</volume>, <fpage>1367</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1386</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/bg-13-1367-2016</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B44">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Martin</surname> <given-names>J. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Knauer</surname> <given-names>G. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Karl</surname> <given-names>D. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Broenkow</surname> <given-names>W. W.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1987</year>). <article-title>VERTEX: carbon cycling in the northeast Pacific</article-title>. <source>Deep-Sea Res</source>. <volume>34</volume>, <fpage>267</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>285</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0198-0149(87)90086-0</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B45">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Martin</surname> <given-names>W. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bender</surname> <given-names>M. L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1988</year>). <article-title>The variability of benthic fluxes and sedimentary remineralization rates in response to seasonally variable organic carbon rain rates in the deep sea: a modeling study</article-title>. <source>Am. J. Sci</source>. <volume>288</volume>, <fpage>561</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>574</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2475/ajs.288.6.561</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B46">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Middelburg</surname> <given-names>J. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1989</year>). <article-title>A simple rate model for organic matter decomposition in marine sediments</article-title>. <source>Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta</source> <volume>53</volume>, <fpage>1577</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1581</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B47">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Middelburg</surname> <given-names>J. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Soetaert</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Herman</surname> <given-names>P. M. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Heip</surname> <given-names>C. H. R. R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1996</year>). <article-title>Denitrification in marine sediments: a model study</article-title>. <source>Global Biogeochem. Cycles</source> <volume>10</volume>, <fpage>661</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>673</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B48">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Morel</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Berthon</surname> <given-names>J.-F.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1989</year>). <article-title>Surface pigments, algal biomass profiles, and potential production of the euphotic layer?: relationships reinvestigated view of remote-sensing applications</article-title>. <source>Limnol. Oceanogr</source>. <volume>34</volume>, <fpage>1545</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1562</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4319/lo.1989.34.8.1545</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B49">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mosch</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sommer</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dengler</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Noffke</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bohlen</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pfannkuche</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Factors influencing the distribution of epibenthic megafauna across the Peruvian oxygen minimum zone</article-title>. <source>Deep-Sea Res. Part I.</source> <volume>68</volume>, <fpage>123</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>135</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.dsr.2012.04.014</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B50">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Otte</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kuenen</surname> <given-names>J. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nielsen</surname> <given-names>L. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Paerl</surname> <given-names>H. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zopfi</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schulz</surname> <given-names>H. N.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>1999</year>). <article-title>Nitrogen, carbon, and sulfur metabolism in natural <italic>Thioploca</italic> samples</article-title>. <source>Appl. Environ. Microbiol.</source> <volume>65</volume>, <fpage>3148</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>3157</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10388716</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B51">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Pennington</surname> <given-names>J. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mahoney</surname> <given-names>K. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kuwahara</surname> <given-names>V. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kolber</surname> <given-names>D. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Calienes</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chavez</surname> <given-names>F. P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Primary production in the eastern tropical Pacific: a review</article-title>. <source>Prog. Oceanogr</source>. <volume>69</volume>, <fpage>285</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>317</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.pocean.2006.03.012</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B52">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Preisler</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>de Beer</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lichtschlag</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lavik</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Boetius</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>J&#x000F8;rgensen</surname> <given-names>B. B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Biological and chemical sulfide oxidation in a Beggiatoa inhabited marine sediment</article-title>. <source>ISME J</source>. <volume>1</volume>, <fpage>341</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>353</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/ismej.2007.50</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18043645</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B53">
<citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Qui&#x000F1;ones</surname> <given-names>R. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gutierrez</surname> <given-names>M. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Daneri</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Aguilar</surname> <given-names>D. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gonzalez</surname> <given-names>H. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chavez</surname> <given-names>F. P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>The Humboldt current system</article-title>, in <source>Carbon and Nutrient Fluxes in Continental Margins: A Global Synthesis</source>, eds <person-group person-group-type="editor"><name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>K. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Atkinson</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Qui-ones</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Talaue-McManus</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<publisher-loc>Berlin</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Springer-Verlag</publisher-name>), <fpage>44</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>64</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B54">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rickard</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1997</year>). <article-title>Kinetics of pyrite formation by the H2S oxidation of iron (II) monosulfide in aqueous solutions between 25 and 125&#x000B0;C: the rate equation</article-title>. <source>Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta</source> <volume>61</volume>, <fpage>115</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>134</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/s0016-7037(96)00322-5</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B55">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Scholz</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hensen</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Noffke</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rohde</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liebetrau</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wallmann</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Early diagenesis of redox-sensitive trace metals in the Peru upwelling area &#x02013; response to ENSO-related oxygen fluctuations in the water column</article-title>. <source>Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta</source> <volume>75</volume>, <fpage>7257</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>7276</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.gca.2011.08.007</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B56">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Schulz</surname> <given-names>H. N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>J&#x000F8;rgensen</surname> <given-names>B. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fossing</surname> <given-names>H. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ramsing</surname> <given-names>N. B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1996</year>). <article-title>Community structure of filamentous, sheath-building sulfur bacteria, Thioploca spp., off the Coast of Chile</article-title>. <source>Appl. Environ. Microbiol</source>. <volume>62</volume>, <fpage>1855</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1862</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16535327</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B57">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Schunck</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lavik</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Desai</surname> <given-names>D. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gro&#x000DF;kopf</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kalvelage</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>L&#x000F6;scher</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Giant hydrogen sulfide plume in the oxygen minimum zone off Peru supports chemolithoautotrophy</article-title>. <source>PLoS ONE</source> <volume>8</volume>:<fpage>e68661</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0068661</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23990875</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B58">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Soetaert</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Herman</surname> <given-names>P. M. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Middelburgl</surname> <given-names>J. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1996</year>). <article-title>Dynamic response of deep-sea sediments to seasonal variations: a model</article-title>. <source>Limnol. Oceanogr</source>. <volume>41</volume>, <fpage>1651</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1668</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B59">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Soetaert</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Middelburg</surname> <given-names>J. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Herman</surname> <given-names>P. M. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Buis</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2000</year>). <article-title>On the coupling of benthic and pelagic biogeochemical models</article-title>. <source>Earth-Sci. Rev</source>. <volume>51</volume>, <fpage>173</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>201</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0012-8252(00)00004-0</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B60">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Somes</surname> <given-names>C. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Oschlies</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schmittner</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Isotopic constraints on the pre-industrial oceanic nitrogen budget</article-title>. <source>Biogeosciences</source> <volume>10</volume>, <fpage>5889</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>5910</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/bg-10-5889-2013</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B61">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sommer</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gier</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Treude</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lomnitz</surname> <given-names>U.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dengler</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cardich</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Depletion of oxygen, nitrate and nitrite in the Peruvian oxygen minimum zone cause an imbalance of benthic nitrogen fluxes</article-title>. <source>Deep-Sea Res. Part I.</source> <volume>112</volume>, <fpage>113</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>122</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.dsr.2016.03.001</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B62">
<citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Suess</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kulm</surname> <given-names>L. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Killingly</surname> <given-names>J. S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1987</year>). <article-title>Coastal upwelling and a history of organic-rich mudstone deposition off Peru</article-title>, in <source>Marine Petroleum Source Rocks. Geological Society Special Publication No. 26</source>, eds <person-group person-group-type="editor"><name><surname>Brooks</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fleet</surname> <given-names>A. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<publisher-loc>London</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Blackwell Scientific</publisher-name>), <fpage>181</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>197</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B63">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Suits</surname> <given-names>N. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Arthur</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2000</year>). <article-title>Bacterial production of anomalously high dissolved sulfate concentrations in Peru slope sediments: steady-state sulfur oxidation, or transient response to end of El Nino?</article-title> <source>Deep-Sea Res. Part I.</source> <volume>47</volume>, <fpage>1829</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1853</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/s0967-0637(99)00120-x</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B64">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Thamdrup</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dalsgaard</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Revsbech</surname> <given-names>N. P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Widespread functional anoxia in the oxygen minimum zone of the Eastern South Pacific</article-title>. <source>Deep-Sea Res. Part I.</source> <volume>65</volume>, <fpage>36</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>45</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.dsr.2012.03.001</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B65">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ulloa</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Canfield</surname> <given-names>D. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Delong</surname> <given-names>E. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Letelier</surname> <given-names>R. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Stewart</surname> <given-names>F. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Microbial oceanography of anoxic oxygen minimum zones</article-title>. <source>Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A</source>. <volume>109</volume>, <fpage>15996</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>16003</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.1205009109</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22967509</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B66">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Vergara</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dewitte</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Montes</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gar&#x000E7;on</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ramos</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Paulmier</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Seasonal variability of the oxygen minimum zone off Peru in a high-resolution regional coupled model</article-title>. <source>Biogeosciences</source> <volume>13</volume>, <fpage>4389</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>4410</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/bg-13-4389-2016</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B67">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Walsh</surname> <given-names>J. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1991</year>). <article-title>Importance of continental margins in the marine biogeochemical cycling of carbon and nitrogen</article-title>. <source>Nature</source> <volume>350</volume>, <fpage>53</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>55</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/350053a0</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B68">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Westrich</surname> <given-names>J. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Berner</surname> <given-names>R. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1984</year>). <article-title>The role of sedimentary organic matter in bacterial sulfate reduction: the G model tested</article-title>. <source>Limnol. Oceanogr</source>. <volume>29</volume>, <fpage>236</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>249</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B69">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gruber</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>The anthropogenic perturbation of the marine nitrogen cycle by atmospheric deposition?: nitrogen cycle feedbacks and the 15N Haber-Bosch effect</article-title>. <source>Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles</source> <volume>30</volume>, <fpage>1418</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1440</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/2016GB005421</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B70">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zopfi</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kjaer</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nielsen</surname> <given-names>L. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>J&#x000F8;rgensen</surname> <given-names>B. B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2001</year>). <article-title>Ecology of Thioploca spp.: nitrate and sulfur storage in relation to chemical microgradients and influence of <italic>Thioploca</italic> spp. on the sedimentary nitrogen cycle</article-title>. <source>Appl. Environ. Microbiol</source>. <volume>67</volume>, <fpage>5530</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>5337</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/aem.67.12.5530-5537.2001</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11722903</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
