<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3-mathml3.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xml:lang="EN">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Insect Sci.</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Insect Science</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Insect Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">2673-8600</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/finsc.2026.1749736</article-id>
<article-version article-version-type="Version of Record" vocab="NISO-RP-8-2008"/>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Influence of egg traits on parasitism by <italic>Trichogramma chilonis</italic> Ishii, 1941 and <italic>Telenomus remus</italic> Nixon, 1937 against <italic>Spodoptera frugiperda</italic> (J.E. Smith, 1797)</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name><surname>Giri</surname><given-names>Kushal</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001"><sup>*</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/3285492/overview"/>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="conceptualization" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/">Conceptualization</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Data curation" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/">Data curation</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Formal analysis" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/">Formal analysis</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="investigation" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/">Investigation</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="methodology" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/">Methodology</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; original draft" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/">Writing &#x2013; original draft</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing</role>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name><surname>Pokhrel</surname><given-names>Min Raj</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001"><sup>*</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/3382756/overview"/>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="methodology" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/">Methodology</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="supervision" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/">Supervision</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="validation" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/validation/">Validation</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing</role>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Bhandari</surname><given-names>Ghanashyam</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/3383069/overview"/>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="methodology" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/">Methodology</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="resources" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/resources/">Resources</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="supervision" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/">Supervision</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing</role>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Department of Entomology, Agriculture and Forestry University</institution>, <city>Rampur</city>, <state>Bagmati</state>,&#xa0;<country country="np">Nepal</country></aff>
<aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>National Maize Research Program (NMRP), Nepal Agriculture Research Council (NARC)</institution>, <city>Rampur</city>, <state>Bagmati</state>,&#xa0;<country country="np">Nepal</country></aff>
<author-notes>
<corresp id="c001"><label>*</label>Correspondence: Kushal Giri, <email xlink:href="mailto:kushalgiri975@gmail.com">kushalgiri975@gmail.com</email>; Min Raj Pokhrel, <email xlink:href="mailto:mrpokharel@afu.edu.np">mrpokharel@afu.edu.np</email></corresp>
</author-notes>
<pub-date publication-format="electronic" date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2026-02-17">
<day>17</day>
<month>02</month>
<year>2026</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date publication-format="electronic" date-type="collection">
<year>2026</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>6</volume>
<elocation-id>1749736</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>19</day>
<month>11</month>
<year>2025</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>13</day>
<month>01</month>
<year>2026</year>
</date>
<date date-type="rev-recd">
<day>04</day>
<month>01</month>
<year>2026</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#xa9; 2026 Giri, Pokhrel and Bhandari.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2026</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Giri, Pokhrel and Bhandari</copyright-holder>
<license>
<ali:license_ref start_date="2026-02-17">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ali:license_ref>
<license-p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY)</ext-link>. The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</license-p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p><italic>Trichogramma chilonis</italic> Ishii, 1941 and <italic>Telenomus remus</italic> Nixon, 1937 are the most common egg parasitoids of fall armyworm (FAW), <italic>Spodoptera frugiperda</italic> (J.E. Smith, 1797) in maize growing areas. FAW lays single to multilayered egg which are covered with degrees of scale thickness. Here, we assessed the parasitism of both parasitoids over different FAW egg densities (single layered), egg mass scale coverage (multilayered), and the egg ages. Two laboratory experiments were conducted from May to November 2022 under controlled conditions (24.3 &#xb1; 0.8 &#xb0;C, 69.3 &#xb1; 2.2% RH). The first experiment, using a three-factor complete randomized design (CRD), involved two egg parasitoid species, single-layered eggs at three densities (20, 43, and 60 eggs), and three egg age groups (less than 12 hours, 24&#x2013;36 hours, and 48&#x2013;60 hours), each replicated three times. The second experiment involved two parasitoid species, multilayered eggs with three levels of egg scale coverage (fully covered, partially covered, uncovered), and three egg age groups, each replicated three times. <italic>T. remus</italic> exhibited significantly higher parasitism rates than <italic>T. chilonis</italic> in both single and multilayered egg masses. <italic>T. remus</italic> parasitized all egg groups uniformly, while <italic>T. chilonis</italic> struggled with fully covered egg masses. Parasitism percentage decreased with the age of the host eggs in both parasitoid species. <italic>T. remus</italic> showed a higher adult emergence percentage, regardless of egg scale covering but declined with increasing host egg age. The percentage of female progeny and development period were similar for both parasitoid species but decreased as egg density and egg age increased.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>fall armyworm</kwd>
<kwd>biocontrol agent</kwd>
<kwd>parasitism</kwd>
<kwd>egg scale covering</kwd>
<kwd>egg age</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<funding-group>
<funding-statement>The author(s) declared that financial support was not received for this work and/or its publication.</funding-statement>
</funding-group>
<counts>
<fig-count count="5"/>
<table-count count="2"/>
<equation-count count="0"/>
<ref-count count="42"/>
<page-count count="10"/>
<word-count count="5057"/>
</counts>
<custom-meta-group>
<custom-meta>
<meta-name>section-at-acceptance</meta-name>
<meta-value>Pest Management</meta-value>
</custom-meta>
</custom-meta-group>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="s1" sec-type="intro">
<label>1</label>
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>The fall armyworm (FAW), <italic>Spodoptera frugiperda</italic> (J.E. Smith, 1797), is an invasive pest species native to tropical and subtropical regions of the America (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">1</xref>). Until 2015, FAW restricted to its native range (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">2</xref>). Its outbreak was first recorded in Africa in early 2016 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">1</xref>) and in India in 2018 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">3</xref>). Then, it was officially documented in Nepal in 2019 in the Nawalpur district (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">4</xref>). This polyphagous and devastating nature of FAW threatens maize production systems and national food security (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">5</xref>). In Nepal, FAW has the potential to cause 20-25% damage to maize, resulting in a loss of approximately 0.5 million tons of total maize production, valued at around 200 million dollars (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">6</xref>). Given the conducive climatic conditions, uncontrolled FAW infestation could completely decimate maize crops (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">7</xref>). Various methods exist to tackle the FAW problems in maize at farmers level with major dominance of chemical measures (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">8</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">9</xref>). Their overuse has adverse effect on the environment, non-target organisms, and human health (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">10</xref>). Moreover, it triggers problems like resistance development, resurgence of pests, and the destruction of natural enemies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">11</xref>). Thus, there is a global need for environmentally friendly alternatives to address the FAW problem without harming the environment and human health (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">12</xref>).</p>
<p>Biological control is an eco-friendly approach to manage FAW (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">13</xref>). Being a self-propelling and self-perpetuating system, this method proves to be economic and sustainable in the long run (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">12</xref>). It contributes as an important component of the Integrated Pest Management (IPM) approach (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">14</xref>). This method in combination with various other control methods carries the potential to significantly decrease the amount of pesticides being used currently (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">15</xref>). It makes a use of predators, parasitoids, entomopathogens, and biopesticides that attack on specific pest stages (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">12</xref>). The use of natural enemies like parasitoids (egg and larval), predators and microorganisms, can be the best alternative to chemical insecticides for FAW suppression (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">2</xref>). Egg parasitoids can control pest which makes them a potential candidate in biological control (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">16</xref>). Besides, they can be easily mass-produced in small area using both natural and laboratory host (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">17</xref>). Field surveys at various parts of the world have recorded the presence of egg parasitoids (<italic>Trichogramma</italic> spp., and <italic>Telenomus</italic> spp.), larval parasitoids (<italic>Cotesia</italic> spp., <italic>Charops</italic> spp., and dipteran species), egg-larval parasitoid (<italic>Chelonus curvimaculatus</italic>), as well as entomopathogenic fungi (<italic>Beauveria bassiana</italic> and <italic>Metarhizium anisopliae</italic>) with proven efficiency against FAW (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">18</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">21</xref>). These biocontrol agents are easy to rear in the laboratory and suitable for field release (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">14</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">22</xref>). Among different biological control agents, eggs parasitoids are mostly explored and used against major agricultural pests (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">23</xref>). Among them, <italic>Trichogramma chilonis</italic> Ishii, 1941 and <italic>Telenomus remus</italic> Nixon, 1937 are proven to be the most promising egg parasitoids for FAW management (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">24</xref>) and have been recorded in different parts of Nepal (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">25</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">26</xref>).</p>
<p>Parasitism by egg parasitoids is influenced by various traits of host eggs (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">27</xref>). Egg density affects parasitism by influencing encounter rates with small to moderate densities enhancing the efficiency, whereas higher density reducing it due to competition and superparasitism (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">28</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">29</xref>). Host egg age also influences parasitoid preference and outcomes&#x2014;fresh host can lead to higher parasitism whereas older eggs with hardened chorion and developed embryo may limit parasitoids fitness (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">30</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">31</xref>). Scale covering on FAW egg massess acts as a physical barrier for the parasitoids like <italic>T. chilonis</italic> having short ovipositor (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">24</xref>), whereas <italic>T. remus</italic> are known for its ability to penetrate dense, scaly and multilayered egg masses (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">13</xref>).</p>
<p>Several studies have explored the parasitism of egg parasitoids under different conditions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">13</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">29</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">32</xref>), however, a comprehensive study of how these host egg traits&#x2014;egg density, scale cover, and egg age&#x2014;influence parasitism remains limited. Moreover, comparative assessments between <italic>T. chilonis</italic> and <italic>T. remus</italic> under these conditions are scarce, despite their co-existence and overlapping use in FAW biocontrol programs. In this study, we systematically assessed and compared the parasitism, adult emergence, percentage of female progeny, and developmental duration of <italic>T. chilonis</italic> and <italic>T. remus</italic> across different densities, scale covering, and age groups of FAW eggs under laboratory conditions.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2" sec-type="materials|methods">
<label>2</label>
<title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="s2_1">
<label>2.1</label>
<title>Experimental location</title>
<p>The experiments were conducted during the maize-growing season (May&#x2013;November 2022) under controlled laboratory conditions (mean temperature 24.3 &#xb1; 0.8 &#xb0;C and RH 69.3 &#xb1; 2.2%) at the Entomology Laboratory of the National Maize Research Program (NMRP), Rampur, Chitwan, Nepal (27&#xb0;39&#x2032;17&#x2033;N, 84&#xb0;21&#x2032;2&#x2033;E; 228 m above sea level).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_2">
<label>2.2</label>
<title>FAW colony establishment</title>
<p>Late-instar <italic>S. frugiperda</italic> larvae were collected from pesticide-free maize fields at NMRP and reared on fresh maize leaves in transparent plastic containers (19 x 14 x 7 cm<sup>3</sup>) for cohort-based rearing (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">33</xref>). Fresh green leaves were provided every one to two days, depending on their condition, until the larvae pupated. The pupae were collected daily and transferred to separate boxes (14 &#xd7; 10 &#xd7; 4 cm&#xb3;). This rearing process was repeated to ensure a continuous supply of pupae for adult emergence.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_3">
<label>2.3</label>
<title>Egg collection chamber</title>
<p>The adults after emergence were transferred to oviposition cages (30 &#xd7; 30 &#xd7; 30 cm3) supplied with water-soaked cotton, honey, and young maize plants for egg laying. The next morning, maize plants with eggs on their leaves were carefully removed. Leaves with egg masses were clipped and placed in a well-ventilated box. Medium-sized multilayered egg masses (roughly 100 eggs) were then selected and categorized into three groups based on scale covering: fully covered, partially covered, and uncovered. Similarly, single-layer egg masses were counted under a microscope using a fine camel hairbrush, and batches of 20, 40, and 60 eggs were prepared. This process was repeated every day to obtain eggs of different ages for each group. Finally, the eggs were glued onto cardboard pieces (3 &#xd7; 5 cm&#xb2;) to prepare standardized egg cards for the experiment.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_4">
<label>2.4</label>
<title>Laboratory rearing of egg parasitoids</title>
<p>A wild population of <italic>T. remus</italic> were collected from the NMRP maize field and a nucleus colony was established in the laboratory. FAW egg masses were randomly collected and checked for the presence of parasitoids. The unparasitized eggs yields only FAW larvae whereas, parasitized eggs produced few or no FAW larvae after 1&#x2013;3 days and adult parasitoids emerged after about 7&#x2013;10 days. The emerged parasitoids were supplied with a thin layer of honey as source of energy and later identified to confirm the species. To multiply them, fresh FAW egg masses (from egg collection chamber) were irradiated in a UV chamber for 15&#x2013;20 minutes to halt the development of embryo. The egg cards were then exposed to the test tube containing parasitoids at a ratio of one parasitoid per 20 eggs for 24 hours, with fresh FAW eggs supplied on alternate days until the parasitoids died, as described by Tefera et&#xa0;al. (2019) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">14</xref>). The parasitized egg masses were kept in separate test tube, and the process was repeated for 3&#x2013;4 generations. The parasitized egg masses (master&#x2019;s card) were prepared and refrigerated at 4&#x2013;6 &#xb0;C for 1&#x2013;2 days at parasitoid pupal stage. These master cards were then taken out each day to make sure that freshly emerged adult parasitoids are available for research every day.</p>
<p>The other species of egg parasitoid, <italic>T. chilonis</italic> was being successfully reared in the entomological division of NMRP, Rampur. Tricho-master cards (card with glued eggs of <italic>Corcyra cephalonica</italic> (Stainton, 1866) already parasitized by <italic>T. chilonis</italic>) were used to parasitize few fresh batches of FAW eggs. The parasitized egg masses were then used to parasitized and multiply other batches of eggs as explained for <italic>T. remus</italic> and after 3&#x2013;4 generations, multiple batches were made and refrigerated to ensure a continuous supply of new parasitoid every day in the laboratory.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_5">
<label>2.5</label>
<title>Parasitism at different egg densities and ages (Experiment 1)</title>
<p>In nature, egg parasitoids come across FAW eggs in different numbers and at different ages. The number of eggs depends on the age of the female FAW&#x2014;newly mated females lay many eggs, while older ones lay fewer. FAW eggs also hatch in about 3 days, so their age varies depending on the oviposition time. To study how these differences in egg number and age affect parasitism, two egg parasitoids&#x2014;<italic>T. chilonis</italic> and <italic>T. remus</italic>&#x2014;were tested on FAW eggs of three different densities (20, 40, and 60 eggs) and three age groups (less than 12 hours, 24&#x2013;36 hours, and 48&#x2013;60 hours old). The experiment was set up using a completely randomized design (CRD) with three replications. For each test, a one-day-old mated female parasitoid was placed inside a glass test tube (15 mm &#xd7; 100 mm). Data were collected on the proportion of parasitism, viable adult emergence, sex ratio (percentage of female progeny), and the developmental period of both parasitoid species.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_6">
<label>2.6</label>
<title>Parasitism at different egg scale covering and ages (Experiment 2)</title>
<p>Newly mated female lays egg mass with fully covered scale and, the proportion of scale decreases and old female lays eggs without scale covering. To study how these differences in egg scale covering and age affect parasitism, <italic>T. chilonis</italic> and <italic>T. remus</italic> were evaluated on FAW eggs of three different scale covering (Fully covered, partially covered, and uncovered) and three age groups (less than 12 hours, 24&#x2013;36 hours, and 48&#x2013;60 hours old). The experiment was also set up using a completely randomized design (CRD) with three replications. Uniform sized egg masses (nearly 100 &#xb1; 10) were kept in a test tube and a one-day-old mated female parasitoid was placed inside a glass test tube (15 mm &#xd7; 100 mm). Data were collected on the proportion of parasitism, viable adult emergence, sex ratio (percentage of female progeny), and the developmental period of both parasitoid species.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_7">
<label>2.7</label>
<title>Statistical analysis</title>
<p>All data were entered into MS Excel (Office 365) for basic analysis and graph generation. Normality and homogeneity were tested using the GVLMA package, and data not meeting ANOVA assumptions were arcsine-transformed. ANOVA was conducted in RStudio (v2022.03.1), and significant results were separated using Tukey&#x2019;s HSD at a 5% significance level. Univariate outliers present on the datasets were identified using box and whisker plot techniques. The influential outliers compromising and questioning the credibility of the result were handled by the variable deletion techniques i.e., data exclusion as explained by Mowbray et&#xa0;al. (2019) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">34</xref>). Data on percentage emergence of parasitoids, female progeny percentage and developmental period for experiment 2 were compromised because of the undefined value of <italic>T. chilonis</italic> on one variable (fully covered). The variable was excluded for the unbiased estimate of those parameters.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s3" sec-type="results">
<label>3</label>
<title>Results</title>
<sec id="s3_1">
<label>3.1</label>
<title>Parasitism across egg densities and host egg age</title>
<sec id="s3_1_1">
<label>3.1.1</label>
<title>Parasitism</title>
<p>Parasitism was significantly influenced by the parasitoid species, host egg density and egg age (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1"><bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold></xref>). Across all egg densities and egg ages, <italic>T. remus</italic> parasitized 75.8% of FAW eggs, which was statistically higher than <italic>T. chilonis</italic>, which parasitized 63.9% of the FAW eggs (F<sub>1,36</sub> = 72.49; p &lt; 0.05). Parasitism was also influenced by egg density. Egg masses with a density of 20 eggs had the highest parasitism (81.7%), which was significantly higher than those with 40 eggs (68.8%) and 60 eggs (59.3%) (F<sub>2</sub>,<sub>36</sub> = 91.29; p &lt; 0.05). Host egg age directly affected parasitism, regardless of the parasitoid species. Eggs less than 12 hours old had significantly higher parasitism (83.24%), followed by eggs aged 24&#x2013;36 hours (69.8%), and 48&#x2013;60 hours (56.6%) (F<sub>2</sub>,<sub>36</sub> = 121.04; p &lt; 0.05).</p>
<table-wrap id="T1" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;1</label>
<caption>
<p>Effect of parasitoid species, FAW egg density and egg age on parasitism, viable parasitoid emergence and developmental duration of parasitoids.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="left">Treatments</th>
<th valign="middle" align="left">Parasitism (%)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="left">Viable parasitoid emergence (%)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="left">Developmental duration (days)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" colspan="4" align="left">Parasitoids</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left"><italic>Trichogramma chilonis</italic></td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">63.95<sup>b</sup> &#xb1; 3.23 (53.72)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">69.52<sup>b</sup> &#xb1; 3.24 (57.21)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">9.8 &#xb1; 0.1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left"><italic>Telenomus remus</italic></td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">75.83<sup>a</sup> &#xb1; 2.65 (62.12)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">81.05<sup>a</sup> &#xb1; 2.16 (65.53)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">9.7 &#xb1; 0.1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">SEM (&#xb1;)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.70</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">1.34</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.09</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">MSD</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">2.00</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">3.83</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.26</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">F-test</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">72.49<sup>*</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">19.42<sup>*</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.08 <sup>NS</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" colspan="4" align="left">Egg density</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Twenty eggs</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">81.67<sup>a</sup> &#xb1; 2.89 (66.71)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">84.97<sup>a</sup> &#xb1; 1.96 (68.38)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">9.8 &#xb1; 0.1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Forty eggs</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">68.75<sup>b</sup> &#xb1; 3.14 (56.48)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">75.28<sup>b</sup> &#xb1; 3.33 (61.10)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">9.9 &#xb1; 0.1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Sixty eggs</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">59.26<sup>c</sup> &#xb1; 3.64 (50.58)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">65.60<sup>c</sup> &#xb1; 3.81 (54.77)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">9.6 &#xb1; 0.1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">SEm (&#xb1;)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.85</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">1.64</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.11</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">MSD</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">2.95</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">5.66</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.39</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">F-test</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">91.29<sup>*</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">17.65<sup>*</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">1.58<sup>NS</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" colspan="4" align="left">Egg age</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0&#x2013;12 hours old</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">83.24<sup>a &#xb1;</sup>2.49 (67.68)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">85.03<sup>a</sup> &#xb1; 1.82 (69.93)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">9.9 &#xb1; 0.1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">24&#x2013;36 hours old</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">69.81<sup>b</sup> &#xb1; 3.01 (57.15)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">72.18<sup>b</sup> &#xb1; 4.25 (59.90)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">9.8 &#xb1; 0.1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">48&#x2013;60 hours old</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">56.62<sup>c</sup> &#xb1; 3.20 (48.93)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">68.65<sup>b</sup> &#xb1; 3.22 (56.41)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">9.6 &#xb1; 0.1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">SEm (&#xb1;)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.85</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">1.64</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.11</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">MSD</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">2.95</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">5.66</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.39</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">F-test</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">121.04<sup>*</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">12.73<sup>*</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">2.58<sup>NS</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">CV (%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">6.26</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">11.31</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">4.83</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Grand mean</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">69.89</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">75.28</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">9.76</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>Means &#xb1; standard error followed by the same letter in the column do not differ according to Tukey test (&#x3b1;, 0.05); MSD, Minimum significant difference; CV (%), Coefficient of variation. Data in parenthesis are arcsine transformed values.</p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_1_2">
<label>3.1.2</label>
<title>Viable parasitoid adult emergence</title>
<p>The percentage of viable parasitoid adult emergence was significantly influenced by the parasitoid species, egg density, and the egg age (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1"><bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold></xref>). <italic>T. remus</italic> showed higher adult emergence (81.1%) compared to <italic>T. chilonis</italic> (69.5%) (F<sub>1,36</sub> = 19.42; p &lt; 0.05). Emergence percentages were highest in egg masses of 20-egg density (84.9%), followed by 40-egg density (75.3%) and 60-eggs (65.6%) (F<sub>2,36</sub> = 17.65; p &lt; 0.05). Similarly, emergence was significantly higher in eggs less than 12 hours old (85.03%), followed by eggs aged 24&#x2013;36 hours (72.18%) and 48&#x2013;60 hours (68.65%) (F<sub>2,36</sub> = 12.73; p &lt; 0.05).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_1_3">
<label>3.1.3</label>
<title>Sex ratio (Percentage of female progeny)</title>
<p>The average percentage of emerged female parasitoids in <italic>T. chilonis</italic> (72.73%) was statistically similar to that of <italic>T remus</italic> (73.20%) (F<sub>1,36</sub> = 0.19; p = 0.67). The percentage of female was significantly influenced by the interaction between egg density and egg age (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1"><bold>Figure&#xa0;1</bold></xref>; F<sub>4,36</sub> = 3.78; p = 0.01).</p>
<fig id="f1" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;1</label>
<caption>
<p>Percentage of female progeny of egg parasitoids as influenced by interaction between host egg density and egg age. The standard error bar with the same letter (s) over the bar are not significantly different from each other (Tukey HSD test, &#x3b1; = 0.05)</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="finsc-06-1749736-g001.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Bar chart showing the percentage of female progeny at different FAW egg densities (20, 40, 60) for eggs less than 12 hours old (blue), 24&#x2013;36 hours old (orange), and 48&#x2013;60 hours old (green). The highest percentage is seen for eggs less than 12 hours old at each density, decreasing with older egg groups. Error bars and statistical significance letters are included.</alt-text>
</graphic></fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_1_4">
<label>3.1.4</label>
<title>Developmental period</title>
<p>The developmental duration of the parasitoids was not significantly affected by parasitoid species, egg density, or egg age (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1"><bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold></xref>). The developmental period of <italic>T. chilonis</italic> was 9.8 days and 9.7 days for <italic>T. remus</italic> (F<sub>1,36</sub> = 0.08; p = 0.77). For both species, adult emerged after 9.8 days from 20-egg density, 9.9 days from 40-egg density and 9.6 days from 60-egg density (F<sub>2,36</sub> = 1.58; p = 0.22). Parasitoids emerged after 9.9 days from less than 12 hours old egg FAW eggs, 9.8 days from 24&#x2013;36 hours old eggs and 9.6 days from 48&#x2013;60 hours old eggs (F<sub>2,36</sub> = 2.58; p = 0.09).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_2">
<label>3.2</label>
<title>Parasitism across egg scale covering and host egg age</title>
<sec id="s3_2_1">
<label>3.2.1</label>
<title>Parasitism</title>
<p>Parasitism was significantly influenced by the three-way interaction among the parasitoid species, host egg scale coverage, and host egg age (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2"><bold>Figure&#xa0;2</bold></xref>; F<sub>4,36</sub> = 3.56, p = 0.02). The parasitism percentage was also affected by the interaction between parasitoid species and host egg scale covering (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3"><bold>Figure&#xa0;3</bold></xref>; F<sub>2,36</sub> = 160.46, p &lt; 0.001), as well as between parasitoid species and egg age (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4"><bold>Figure&#xa0;4</bold></xref>; F<sub>2,36</sub> = 43.06, p &lt; 0.05).</p>
<fig id="f2" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;2</label>
<caption>
<p>Parasitism percentage of egg parasitoids as influenced by interaction between parasitoid species and host egg age. The standard error bar with the same letter (s) over the bar are not significantly different from each other based on (Tukey HSD test, &#x3b1; = 0.05).</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="finsc-06-1749736-g002.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Bar chart showing parasitism percentage of Telenomus remus and Trichogramma chilonis against different coverage conditions and egg ages. For Telenomus remus, parasitism is highest at 0 to 12 hours and lowest at 48 to 60 hours, across fully covered, partially covered, and uncovered conditions. For Trichogramma chilonis, parasitism is significantly lower, especially when eggs are fully covered or partially covered. Highest values are recorded for uncovered eggs at 0 to 12 hours.</alt-text>
</graphic></fig>
<fig id="f3" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;3</label>
<caption>
<p>Parasitism percentage of egg parasitoids as influenced by interaction between parasitoid species and host egg scale covering. The standard error bar with the same letter (s) over the bar are not significantly different from each other (Tukey HSD test, &#x3b1; = 0.05).</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="finsc-06-1749736-g003.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Bar chart comparing parasitism percentages by Trichogramma chilonis and Telenomus remus on FAW egg masses with different coverage levels: fully covered, partially covered, and uncovered. Telenomus remus shows higher parasitism across all coverage levels, peaking at 70% in uncovered egg masses. Statistical significance is indicated by different letters.</alt-text>
</graphic></fig>
<fig id="f4" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;4</label>
<caption>
<p>Parasitism percentage of egg parasitoids as influenced by interaction between parasitoid species, host egg scale covering and host egg age. The standard error bar with the same letter (s) over the bar are not significantly different from each other (Tukey HSD test, &#x3b1; = 0.05).</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="finsc-06-1749736-g004.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Bar graph comparing parasitism percentages by Trichogramma chilonis and Telenomus remus across three age groups of host eggs: 0-12, 24-36, and 48-60 hours. Telenomus remus consistently shows higher parasitism, peaking at 0-12 hours. Error bars suggest variability in data.</alt-text>
</graphic></fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_2_2">
<label>3.2.2</label>
<title>Viable parasitoid adult emergence</title>
<p>The percentage of viable adult emergence was significantly influenced by the interaction between parasitoid species and host egg age (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5"><bold>Figure&#xa0;5</bold></xref>; F<sub>2,24</sub> = 6.22; p = 0.007) but not influenced by the egg scale covering (F<sub>1,24</sub> = 3.34; p = 0.08).</p>
<fig id="f5" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;5</label>
<caption>
<p>Viable parasitoid adult emergence percentage as influenced by interaction between parasitoid species, and host egg age. The standard error bar with the same letter (s) over the bar are not significantly different from each other (Tukey HSD test, &#x3b1; = 0.05).</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="finsc-06-1749736-g005.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Bar chart comparing viable progeny emergence percentages of Trichogramma chilonis and Telenomus remus at three FAW egg age intervals: 0-12, 24-36, and 48-60 hours old. Telenomus remus shows higher emergence at younger egg ages. Error bars indicate variability.</alt-text>
</graphic></fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_2_3">
<label>3.2.3</label>
<title>Sex ratio (Percentage of female progeny)</title>
<p>The percentage of emerged female was 73.19% for <italic>T. remus</italic> and 70.56% for <italic>T. chilonis</italic>, with no significant difference (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2"><bold>Table&#xa0;2</bold></xref>) (F<sub>1,24</sub> = 2.85; p = 0.10). Similarly, the percentage of emerged female was 72.66% in partially covered egg masses and 71.08% in uncovered egg masses for both parasitoid species, which were also statistically similar (F<sub>1,24</sub> = 0.81; p = 0.38). However, egg age positively affected the emerged female. Eggs less than 12 hours old (75.49%) and 24&#x2013;36 hours old (74.83%) produced significantly higher females than 48&#x2013;60 hours old eggs (65.30%) (F<sub>2</sub>,<sub>24</sub> = 16.10; p &lt; 0.05).</p>
<table-wrap id="T2" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;2</label>
<caption>
<p>Effect of parasitoid species, fall armyworm egg scale covering and egg age on percentage of female progeny and developmental duration of parasitoids.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="left">Treatments</th>
<th valign="middle" align="left">Percentage of<break/>female progeny</th>
<th valign="middle" align="left">Developmental<break/>duration (days)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" colspan="3" align="left">Parasitoids</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left"><italic>Trichogramma chilonis</italic></td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">70.56 &#xb1; 1.46 (57.25)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">9.89 &#xb1; 0.18</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left"><italic>Telenomus remus</italic></td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">73.18 &#xb1; 1.69 (58.99)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">9.72 &#xb1; 0.11</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">SEm (&#xb1;)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.73</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.15</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">MSD</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">2.13</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.44</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">F-test</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">2.85<sup>NS</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.60<sup>NS</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" colspan="3" align="left">Scale covering</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Fully covered</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2013;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Partially covered</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">72.66 &#xb1; 1.33 (58.57)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">9.67 &#xb1; 0.16</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Uncovered</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">71.08 &#xb1; 1.83 (57.65)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">9.94 &#xb1; 0.13</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">SEm (&#xb1;)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.73</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.15</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">MSD</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">2.13</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.44</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">F-test</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.81 <sup>NS</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">1.67<sup>NS</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" colspan="3" align="left">Egg age</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0&#x2013;12 hours old</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">75.49<sup>a</sup> &#xb1; 1.44 (60.43)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">9.83 &#xb1; 0.21</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">24&#x2013;36 hours old</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">74.83<sup>a</sup> &#xb1; 0.93 (59.93)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">9.91 &#xb1; 0.19</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">48&#x2013;60 hours old</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">65.30<sup>b</sup> &#xb1; 1.79 (53.99)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">9.67 &#xb1; 0.14</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">SEm (&#xb1;)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.89</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.19</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">MSD</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">2.61</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.54</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">F-test</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">16.1<sup>*</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.47<sup>NS</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">CV (%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">5.32</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">6.58</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Grand mean</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">71.87</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">9.80</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>Means &#xb1; standard error followed by the same letter in the column do not differ according to Tukey test (&#x3b1;, 0.05); MSD, Minimum significant difference; CV (%), Coefficient of variation. Data in parenthesis are arcsine transformed values; &#x2018;-&#x2019;, denotes the univariate outlier data excluded before analysis to maintain validity of the result.</p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_2_4">
<label>3.2.4</label>
<title>Developmental period</title>
<p>There was no significant influence of parasitoid species, FAW egg mass coverage and ages on developmental duration of parasitoids (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2"><bold>Table&#xa0;2</bold></xref>). The developmental days of <italic>T. chilonis</italic> was 9.9 days and for <italic>T. remus</italic> was 9.7 days. (F<sub>1,24</sub> = 0.60; p = 0.45). Similarly, the developmental duration was 9.9 days for uncovered eggs and 9.7 days for partially covered eggs for both parasitoid species (F<sub>1,24</sub> = 1.67; p = 0.21). Likewise, parasitoids emerge after 9.8 days in less than 12 hours old eggs, 9.9 days in 24&#x2013;36 hours old eggs, and 9.7 days in 48&#x2013;60 hours old eggs (F<sub>2,24</sub> = 0.47; p = 0.63).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s4" sec-type="discussion">
<label>4</label>
<title>Discussion</title>
<sec id="s4_1">
<label>4.1</label>
<title>Parasitism</title>
<p>This study aimed to evaluate the parasitism efficiency of <italic>T.&#xa0;remus</italic> and <italic>T. chilonis</italic> on <italic>S. frugiperda</italic> egg masses of varying structures and ages. Our finding demonstrated that <italic>T. remus</italic> exhibited significantly higher parasitism in both single and multilayered egg masses. Parasitism was higher for <italic>T. remus</italic> than <italic>T. chilonis</italic> in both single and multilayered egg masses, with the highest rates in single layered egg mass due to easier accessibility for parasitoids (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">28</xref>). The parasitism declines with egg mass layers and scale covering, reflecting the physical challenge of overcoming scales and penetrating deeper layers. These findings are supported by Beserra and Parra (2005) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">28</xref>), Jin et&#xa0;al. (2021) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">29</xref>), Mohamed (2021) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">35</xref>) and Mohamed et&#xa0;al. (2023) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">36</xref>), all of them confirmed the parasitism rates by different Trichogramma species decreased based on the number of egg mass layer.</p>
<p>The superior performance of <italic>T. remus</italic> is largely due to its robust and aggressive nature enabling it to overcome the physical barrier of scale coverings and penetrate deeper into multilayered egg masses (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">13</xref>). In contrast, <italic>T. chilonis</italic> was hindered by the scale covering, restricting it to parasitize only the upper layers or eggs on the edges (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">24</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">30</xref>).</p>
<p>Parasitism decreased with increasing host egg age due to depletion of nutrient and host embryo development, which rendered older eggs unsuitable for parasitoid development (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">31</xref>). Also, the egg scale covering harden with age, making it more challenging for parasitoids to penetrate through it (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">37</xref>). Although these results demonstrate <italic>T. remus&#x2019;s</italic> superiority over <italic>T. chilonis</italic> as a biocontrol agent, field complexities may not be fully captured by laboratory conditions. Future studies should evaluate their parasitic performance under natural conditions and investigate combined control methods that use both parasitoids.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4_2">
<label>4.2</label>
<title>Parasitoid adult emergence</title>
<p>This study investigated the emergence success of <italic>T. remus</italic> and <italic>T. chilonis</italic> from <italic>S. frugiperda</italic> egg masses of varying structures and ages. The results revealed significantly higher adult emergence percentage for <italic>T. remus</italic> compared to <italic>T. chilonis</italic>, which may be due to its stronger adaptation to <italic>S. frugiperda</italic> eggs. These findings are supported by Carneiro and Fernandes (2012) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">24</xref>), who also documented higher emergence rate of <italic>T. remus than T. pretiosum</italic> on similar host systems.</p>
<p>Parasitoids emergence is influenced by host egg age. As host egg age increased, emergence rates declined, indicating that older eggs likely became less suitable for parasitoid development. This is likely due to nutrient depletion and progressive host embryo development in older eggs, which fail to support parasitoid growth and lead to higher mortality before emergence &#x2014;a pattern also observed by Tuncbilek and Ayvaz (2003) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">31</xref>). The findings are also supported by Priyanka et&#xa0;al. (2023) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">32</xref>), who reported a decrease in parasitoid emergence with increasing host egg age. The emergence rates of both species were not significantly impacted by egg scale covering, suggesting this physical barrier does not hinder larval development after oviposition. This finding is supported by Laminou et&#xa0;al. (2020) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">13</xref>) and Mohamed et&#xa0;al. (2023), who reported no effects of FAW egg scale coverage on emergence of egg parasitoids. These results imply that fresh or young host eggs are suitable for mass rearing of parasitoids. Additionally, <italic>T. remus</italic> seems to be a good option for field release against <italic>S. frugiperda</italic>, particularly in cases where host egg age varies. Future research should validate these findings in the field and look into possible explanations for the developmental advantages of <italic>T. remus</italic> offspring over those of other species.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4_3">
<label>4.3</label>
<title>Sex ratio (Percentage of female progeny)</title>
<p>This study investigated the influence of host egg density, egg scale covering and egg age on the percentage of female progeny in two egg parasitoids, <italic>T. chilonis</italic> and <italic>T. remus</italic>. Our study reveals that the percentage of female progeny in both species of egg parasitoids are statistically similar. This finding is in consistent with the finding of Jin et&#xa0;al. (2021) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">29</xref>) and Chen et&#xa0;al. (2021) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">38</xref>), who too reported the average percentage of female progeny in <italic>T. chilonis</italic> and <italic>T. remus</italic> around 70 percent.</p>
<p>The proportion of female offspring decreased with increasing host egg densities. This might be explained by the fact that more unfertilized <italic>S. frugiperda</italic> eggs were parasitized in high-density environments, which probably produced more male progeny (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">29</xref>). Additionally, the percentage of female progeny declined with increasing egg age. This may be possibly due to declining egg quality and reduced resources in older eggs, which negatively impact the development of female parasitoids. This is supported by findings from Sun et&#xa0;al. (2021) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">30</xref>), who observed a drop in <italic>Trichogramma</italic> female progeny percentage from 82% to 69% as egg age increased from 0 to 2 days. Similarly, Priyanka et&#xa0;al. (2023) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">32</xref>) noted a reduction in <italic>T. remus</italic> female progeny from 66% to 64% as egg age increased from 24 to 48 hours. Our results demonstrate that the sex ratio of emerging parasitoids is significantly influenced by the age and density of the host egg. Because more females can increase the success of parasitism, this is beneficial for mass-rearing and biocontrol initiatives. These effects should be tested in other host-parasitoid systems and in the field.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4_4">
<label>4.4</label>
<title>Developmental period of parasitoids</title>
<p>This study investigated the influence of host egg density, egg scale covering and egg age on the developmental duration of two egg parasitoids, <italic>T. chilonis</italic> and <italic>T. remus</italic>. Our finding reveals that the developmental time from egg to adult remained consistent across both <italic>T. chilonis</italic> and <italic>T. remus</italic>, regardless of treatment conditions. This is supported by findings of Sultan et&#xa0;al. (2013) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">39</xref>) who reported a development period of 9.60 days for <italic>T. chilonis</italic>, while Oktaviani et&#xa0;al. (2021) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">40</xref>), observed a similar duration of 9.61 days for <italic>T. remus</italic>.</p>
<p>The reason behind this stability in developmental time may lie in the biology of the parasitoids. As noted by Bueno et&#xa0;al. (2008) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">41</xref>) these parasitoid species lay their eggs singly inside individual FAW eggs and superparasitism or multiple parasitism are rare (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">42</xref>). Therefore, each parasitoid larva develops independently within a single host egg, external factors such as egg density or the presence of scale covering do not appear to influence their development. Moreover, our findings are consistent with Priyanka et&#xa0;al. (2023) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">32</xref>), who recorded developmental durations of <italic>T. remus</italic> as 9.61 days on 24-hour-old eggs and 9.52 days on 48-hour-old eggs. These results further support the conclusion that the age of the host egg does not significantly impact the time required for parasitoid development. Although the developmental duration of these two parasitoids is consistent across different egg traits, the small sample size and laboratory setting necessitate larger field-based research to validate and generalize the findings.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s5" sec-type="conclusions">
<label>5</label>
<title>Conclusions</title>
<p>The higher parasitism of <italic>T. remus</italic> on multilayered and scaly egg masses of <italic>S. frugiperda</italic> indicates its potential as biological control agent for scaly egg masses. However, <italic>T. chilonis</italic> fails to overcome the layers and scales barrier of eggs of <italic>S. frugiperda</italic>. The parasitism of both parasitoid species decreases with the increasing age of host eggs, highlighting the importance of synchronization in augmentative biological control programs. For both species, laboratory mass production should coincide with the freshly laid fall armyworm eggs (within 24 hours) for efficient parasitism and sustainable female populations in the environment.</p>
<p>However, this study was conducted in lab condition using single female in single tube setup, which may not fully represent actual field situation. In field condition, parasitism is shaped by competition, host searching behavior, and heterogenous egg masses all of which can change parasitism compared to laboratory conditions. In addition, host egg scale coverage was measured qualitatively (fully covered, partially covered, uncovered) rather than quantitatively. Because &#x201c;partial&#x201d; versus &#x201c;full&#x201d; coverage can be subjective, and scale thickness may vary among egg masses, future studies should quantify scale coverage and thickness and validate parasitoid performance under semi-field and field conditions.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec id="s6" sec-type="data-availability">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1"><bold>Supplementary Material</bold></xref>. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author/s.</p></sec>
<sec id="s7" sec-type="ethics-statement">
<title>Ethics statement</title>
<p>The manuscript presents research on animals that do not require ethical approval for their study.</p></sec>
<sec id="s8" sec-type="author-contributions">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>KG: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing &#x2013; original draft, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing. MRP: Methodology, Supervision, Validation, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing. GB: Methodology, Resources, Supervision, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing.</p></sec>
<ack>
<title>Acknowledgments</title>
<p>We acknowledge National Maize Research Program (NMRP) for providing the laboratory and necessary equipment for the research. We would also like to acknowledge Agriculture and Forestry University (AFU), Rampur for the academic and research environment.</p>
</ack>
<sec id="s10" sec-type="COI-statement">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p></sec>
<sec id="s11" sec-type="ai-statement">
<title>Generative AI statement</title>
<p>The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.</p>
<p>Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.</p></sec>
<sec id="s12" sec-type="disclaimer">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors&#xa0;and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p></sec>
<sec id="s13" sec-type="supplementary-material">
<title>Supplementary material</title>
<p>The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/finsc.2026.1749736/full#supplementary-material">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/finsc.2026.1749736/full#supplementary-material</ext-link></p>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Table1.xlsx" id="SM1" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet"/></sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1">
<label>1</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Goergen</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Kumar</surname> <given-names>PL</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Sankung</surname> <given-names>SB</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Togola</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Tamo</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name>
</person-group>. 
<article-title>First report of outbreaks of the fall armyworm <italic>Spodoptera frugiperda</italic> (J. E. Smith) (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae), a new alien invasive pest in West and Central Africa</article-title>. <source>PloS One</source>. (<year>2016</year>) <volume>11</volume>:<fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>9</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0165632</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27788251</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<label>2</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Ogunfunmilayo</surname> <given-names>AO</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Kazeem</surname> <given-names>SA</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Idoko</surname> <given-names>JE</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Adebayo</surname> <given-names>RA</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Fayemi</surname> <given-names>EY</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Adedibu</surname> <given-names>OB</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. 
<article-title>Occurrence of natural enemies of fall armyworm, <italic>Spodoptera frugiperda</italic> (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in Nigeria</article-title>. <source>PloS One</source>. (<year>2021</year>) <volume>16</volume>:<fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>13</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0254328</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34252127</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<label>3</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Sharanabasappa</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Kalleshwarmy</surname> <given-names>CM</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Asokan</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Swamy</surname> <given-names>HM</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Maruti</surname> <given-names>MS</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Pavithra</surname> <given-names>HB</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. 
<article-title>First report of the Fall armyworm, <italic>Spodoptera frugiperda</italic> (J E Smith) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), an alien invasive pest on maize in India</article-title>. <source>Pest Manage Hortic Ecosys</source>. (<year>2018</year>) <volume>24</volume>:<page-range>23&#x2013;9</page-range>.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<label>4</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Bajracharya</surname> <given-names>ASR</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Bhat</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Sharma</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Shashank</surname> <given-names>PR</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Meshram</surname> <given-names>NM</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Hashmi</surname> <given-names>TR</given-names></name>
</person-group>. 
<article-title>First record of fall armyworm <italic>Spodoptera frugiperda</italic> (J. E. Smith) from Nepal</article-title>. <source>Indian J Entomol</source>. (<year>2019</year>) <volume>81</volume>:<page-range>635&#x2013;9</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5958/0974-8172.2019.00137.8</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<label>5</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Ghimire</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Bhetwal</surname> <given-names>N</given-names></name>
</person-group>. 
<article-title>FAW: An emerging threat to agriculture</article-title>. <source>Food Agri Econ Rev</source>. (<year>2021</year>) <volume>1</volume>:<fpage>93</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>100</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.26480/faer.02.2021.93.100</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<label>6</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="web">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Pradhan</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name>
</person-group>. <source>Collective efforts to fight fall armyworm in Nepal</source> (<year>2020</year>). Available online at: <uri xlink:href="https://www.cimmyt.org/news/collective-efforts-to-fight-fall-armyworm-in-Nepal/">https://www.cimmyt.org/news/collective-efforts-to-fight-fall-armyworm-in-Nepal/</uri> (Accessed <date-in-citation content-type="access-date">April 7, 2020</date-in-citation>).
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<label>7</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Sah</surname> <given-names>LP</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Lamichhaney</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name>
<name><surname>KC</surname> <given-names>HB</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Acharya</surname> <given-names>MC</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Humagain</surname> <given-names>SP</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Bhandari</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. 
<article-title>Fall armyworm (<italic>Spodoptera frugiperda</italic>) in maize: Current status and collaborative efforts for its management in Nepal</article-title>. <source>J Plant Prot Soc</source>. (<year>2020</year>) <volume>6</volume>:<fpage>53</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>64</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3126/jpps.v6i0.36472</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<label>8</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Matova</surname> <given-names>PM</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Kamutando</surname> <given-names>CN</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Magorokosho</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Kutywayo</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Gutsa</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Labuschagne</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name>
</person-group>. 
<article-title>Fall-armyworm invasion, control practices and prospects of breeding fall-armyworm- resistant maize in Sub-Saharan Africa</article-title>. <source>Crop Sci</source>. (<year>2020</year>) <volume>60</volume>:<page-range>2951&#x2013;70</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/csc2.20317</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33328691</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<label>9</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Mooventhan</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Baskaran</surname> <given-names>RKM</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Sridhar</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Kaushal</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Kumar</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name>
</person-group>. 
<article-title>Integrated Management of fall armyworm in maize</article-title>. <source>ICAR-National Inst Bio Stress Manag</source>. (<year>2019</year>), <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>24</lpage>.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<label>10</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Aktar</surname> <given-names>MW</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Sengupta</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Chowdhury</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name>
</person-group>. 
<article-title>Impact of pesticides use in agriculture: their benefits and hazards</article-title>. <source>Interdiscip Toxic</source>. (<year>2009</year>) <volume>2</volume>:<fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>12</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2478/v10102-009-0001-7</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21217838</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<label>11</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>El-Wakeil</surname> <given-names>N</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Gaafar</surname> <given-names>N</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Sallam</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Volkmar</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name>
</person-group>. 
<article-title>Side effects of insecticides on natural enemies and possibility of their integration in plant protection strategies</article-title>. In: 
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name><surname>Trdan</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name>
</person-group>, editor. <source>Insecticides - Development of safer and more effective technologies</source>. <publisher-loc>Slovenia</publisher-loc>: 
<publisher-name>IntechOpen</publisher-name> (<year>2013</year>). p. <fpage>3</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>56</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5772/3356</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<label>12</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Abbas</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Ullah</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Hafeez</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Han</surname> <given-names>X</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Dara</surname> <given-names>MZN</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Gul</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. 
<article-title>Biological control of fall armyworm</article-title>. <source>Spod Frugiperda Agron</source>. (<year>2022</year>) <volume>12</volume>:<elocation-id>2704</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/agronomy12112704</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<label>13</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Laminou</surname> <given-names>SA</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Ba</surname> <given-names>MN</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Karimoune</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Doumma</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Muniappan</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name>
</person-group>. 
<article-title>Parasitism of locally recruited egg parasitoids of the fall armyworm in Africa</article-title>. <source>Insects</source>. (<year>2020</year>) <volume>11</volume>:<fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>13</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/insects11070430</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32660082</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<label>14</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Tefera</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Goftishu</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Ba</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Muniappan</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name>
</person-group>. <source>A guide to biological control of fall armyworm in Africa using egg parasitoids</source>. <publisher-loc>Nairobi Kenya</publisher-loc>: 
<publisher-name>VT, icipe, HU and ICRISAT</publisher-name> (<year>2019</year>). Available online at: <uri xlink:href="http://34.250.91.188:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/1001">http://34.250.91.188:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/1001</uri> (Accessed <date-in-citation content-type="access-date">September, 2019</date-in-citation>).
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<label>15</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Ballal</surname> <given-names>CR</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Kandan</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Varshney</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Gupta</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Shylesha</surname> <given-names>AN</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Navik</surname> <given-names>OP</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. 
<article-title>Biological control for fall armyworm management in Asia</article-title>. In: 
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name><surname>Prasanna</surname> <given-names>BM</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Huesing</surname> <given-names>JE</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Peschke</surname> <given-names>VM</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Eddy</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name>
</person-group>, editors. <source>Armyworm in Asia: A guide for integrated pest management</source>. <publisher-loc>CDMX: Mexico</publisher-loc>: 
<publisher-name>CIMMYT</publisher-name> (<year>2021</year>). p. <page-range>114&#x2013;34</page-range>. Feed the Future.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<label>16</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Tamiru</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Khan</surname> <given-names>ZR</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Bruce</surname> <given-names>TJA</given-names></name>
</person-group>. 
<article-title>New directions for improving crop resistance to insects by breeding for egg induced defense</article-title>. <source>Curr Opin Insect Sci</source>. (<year>2015</year>) <volume>9</volume>:<page-range>51&#x2013;5</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cois.2015.02.011</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32846708</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<label>17</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Masry</surname> <given-names>SHD</given-names></name>
<name><surname>El-Wakeil</surname> <given-names>N</given-names></name>
</person-group>. 
<article-title>Egg parasitoid production and their role in controlling insect pests</article-title>. In: 
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name><surname>El-Wakeil</surname> <given-names>N</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Saleh</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Abu-hashim</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name>
</person-group>, editors. <source>Cottage industry of biocontrol agents and their applications</source>. <publisher-loc>Cham, Switzerland</publisher-loc>: 
<publisher-name>Springer</publisher-name> (<year>2020</year>). p. <fpage>3</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>47</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/978-3-030-33161-0_1</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<label>18</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Akutse</surname> <given-names>KS</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Kimemia</surname> <given-names>JW</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Ekesi</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Khamis</surname> <given-names>FM</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Ombura</surname> <given-names>OL</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Subramanian</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name>
</person-group>. 
<article-title>Ovicidal effects of entomopathogenic fungal isolates on the invasive fall armyworm <italic>Spodoptera frugiperda</italic> (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)</article-title>. <source>J Appl Entomol</source>. (<year>2019</year>) <volume>143</volume>:<fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>9</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/jen.12634</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<label>19</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Amadou</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Baoua</surname> <given-names>I</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Ba</surname> <given-names>MN</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Karimoune</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Muniappan</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name>
</person-group>. 
<article-title>Native parasitoids recruited by the invaded fall army worm in Niger</article-title>. <source>Indian J Entomol</source>. (<year>2020</year>) <volume>80</volume>:<page-range>1253&#x2013;4</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5958/0974-8172.2018.00338.3</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<label>20</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Kenis</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name>
<name><surname>du Plessis</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Van den Berg</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Ba</surname> <given-names>MN</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Goergen</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Kwadjo</surname> <given-names>KE</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. 
<article-title><italic>Telenomus remus</italic>, a candidate parasitoid for the biological control of <italic>Spodoptera frugiperda</italic> in Africa, is already present on the continent</article-title>. <source>Insects</source>. (<year>2019</year>) <volume>10</volume>:<elocation-id>92</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/insects10040092</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30934941</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<label>21</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Sisay</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Simiyu</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Malusi</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Likhayo</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Mendesil</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Elibariki</surname> <given-names>N</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. 
<article-title>First report of the fall armyworm, <italic>Spodoptera frugiperda</italic> (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), natural enemies from Africa</article-title>. <source>J Appl Entomol</source>. (<year>2018</year>) <volume>142</volume>:<page-range>800&#x2013;4</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/jen.12534</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<label>22</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Mahajan</surname> <given-names>RS</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Bhamare</surname> <given-names>VK</given-names></name>
</person-group>. 
<article-title>Parasitic efficiency of different egg parasitoids against invasive fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith)</article-title>. <source>J Biol Ctrl</source>. (<year>2023</year>) <volume>37</volume>:<page-range>265&#x2013;7</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18311/jbc/2023/35773</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<label>23</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Colmenarez</surname> <given-names>YC</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Corniani</surname> <given-names>N</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Jahnke</surname> <given-names>SM</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Sampaio</surname> <given-names>MV</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Vasquez</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name>
</person-group>. 
<article-title>Use of parasitoids as a biocontrol agent in the neotropical region: Challenges and potential</article-title>. In: 
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name><surname>Baimey</surname> <given-names>KH</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Hamamouch</surname> <given-names>N</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Kolombia</surname> <given-names>YA</given-names></name>
</person-group>, editors. <source>Horticultural crops</source>. <publisher-loc>London, UK</publisher-loc>: 
<publisher-name>IntechOpen</publisher-name> (<year>2020</year>). doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5772/intechopen.80720</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<label>24</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Carneiro</surname> <given-names>TR</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Fernandes</surname> <given-names>OA</given-names></name>
</person-group>. 
<article-title>Interspecific interaction between <italic>Telenomus remus</italic> (Hymenoptera: Platygastridae) and <italic>Trichogramma pretiosum</italic> (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) on <italic>Spodoptera frugiperda</italic> (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) eggs</article-title>. <source>Anais Da Academia Bras Cienc</source>. (<year>2012</year>) <volume>84</volume>:<page-range>1127&#x2013;35</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1590/S0001-37652012000400027</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23207708</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<label>25</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Elibariki</surname> <given-names>N</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Bajracharya</surname> <given-names>ASR</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Bhat</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Tefera</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Mottern</surname> <given-names>JL</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Evans</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. 
<article-title>Candidates for augmentative biological control of <italic>Spodoptera frugiperda</italic> (J.E. Smith) in Kenya, Tanzania and Nepal</article-title>. <source>Indian J Entomol</source>. (<year>2020</year>) <volume>82</volume>:<page-range>606&#x2013;8</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5958/0974-8172.2020.00088.7</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<label>26</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Hendery</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name>
</person-group>. 
<article-title>Fall armyworm in Nepal: The importance of early, targeted intervention</article-title>. In: <source>Entomology today</source>. <publisher-loc>Annapolis, USA</publisher-loc>: 
<publisher-name>Entomological Society of America (ESA)</publisher-name> (<year>2022</year>). Available online at: <uri xlink:href="https://entomologytoday.org/2022/08/09/fall-armyworm-Nepal-early-targeted-intervention/">https://entomologytoday.org/2022/08/09/fall-armyworm-Nepal-early-targeted-intervention/</uri> (Accessed <date-in-citation content-type="access-date">August 9, 2022</date-in-citation>).
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<label>27</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Mansfield</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Mills</surname> <given-names>NJ</given-names></name>
</person-group>. 
<article-title>Host egg characteristics, physiological host range, and parasitism following inundative releases of <italic>trichogramma</italic> platneri (Hymenoptera: trichogrammatidae) in walnut orchards</article-title>. <source>Environ Entomol</source>. (<year>2002</year>) <volume>31</volume>:<page-range>723&#x2013;31</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1603/0046-225X-31.4.723</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<label>28</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Beserra</surname> <given-names>EB</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Parra</surname> <given-names>JRP</given-names></name>
</person-group>. 
<article-title>Impact of the number of <italic>Spodoptera frugiperda</italic> egg layers on parasitism by <italic>Trichogramma atopovirilia</italic></article-title>. <source>Sci Agric</source>. (<year>2005</year>) <volume>62</volume>:<page-range>190&#x2013;3</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1590/S0103-90162005000200016</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<label>29</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Jin</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Lin</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Ma</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Hao</surname> <given-names>Z</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Han</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. 
<article-title>Biocontrol potential of <italic>Trichogramma</italic> sp<italic>ecies</italic> against <italic>Spodoptera frugiperda</italic> and their field efficacy in maize</article-title>. <source>Crop Protect</source>. (<year>2021</year>) <volume>150</volume>:<elocation-id>105790</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cropro.2021.105790</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<label>30</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>JW</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Hu</surname> <given-names>HY</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Nkunika</surname> <given-names>POY</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Dai</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>W</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Bao</surname> <given-names>HP</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. 
<article-title>Performance of two trichogrammatid species from Zambia on fall armyworm, <italic>Spodoptera frugiperda</italic> (J. E. Smith) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)</article-title>. <source>Insects</source>. (<year>2021</year>) <volume>12</volume>:<elocation-id>859</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/insects12100859</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34680627</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<label>31</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Tuncbilek</surname> <given-names>AS</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Ayvaz</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name>
</person-group>. 
<article-title>Influences of host age, sex ratio, population density and photoperiod on parasitism by <italic>Trichogramma evanescens</italic> (Westwood) (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae)</article-title>. <source>J Pest Sci</source>. (<year>2003</year>) <volume>76</volume>:<page-range>176&#x2013;80</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10340-003-0018-1</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<label>32</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Priyanka</surname> <given-names>SL</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Jeyarani</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Sathiah</surname> <given-names>N</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Mohankumar</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Nakkeeran</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name>
</person-group>. 
<article-title>Influence of host egg age on parasitic potential of the entomophagous, <italic>Telenomus remus</italic> Nixon (Hymenoptera: Scelionidae) against the fall armyworm, <italic>Spodoptera frugiperda</italic> (J.E. Smith) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) and investigations on the developmental biology and ultrastructure of egg parasitoid immature stages</article-title>. <source>Egypt J Biol Pest Ctrl</source>. (<year>2023</year>) <volume>33</volume>:<fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>16</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s41938-023-00676-1</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<label>33</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Mohamed</surname> <given-names>HO</given-names></name>
</person-group>. 
<article-title>Assessment of cohort laboratory rearing on performance and biology of the fall armyworm, <italic>Spodoptera frugiperda</italic> (J.E. Smith) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)</article-title>. <source>Int J Entomol Res</source>. (<year>2022</year>) <volume>7</volume>:<page-range>120 &#x2013;128</page-range>.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<label>34</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Mowbray</surname> <given-names>FI</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Fox-Wasylyshyn</surname> <given-names>SM</given-names></name>
<name><surname>El-Masri</surname> <given-names>MM</given-names></name>
</person-group>. 
<article-title>Univariate outliers: A conceptual overview for the nurse researcher</article-title>. <source>Can J Nurs Res</source>. (<year>2019</year>) <volume>51</volume>:<page-range>31&#x2013;7</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1177/0844562118786647</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29969044</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<label>35</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Mohamed</surname> <given-names>HO</given-names></name>
</person-group>. 
<article-title>Efficacy of the parasitoid, Trichogrammatoidea bactrae Nagaraja (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) on the cotton leafworm, Spodoptera littoralis (Boisd.)(Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) egg masses</article-title>. <source>Egypt J Biol Pest</source>. (<year>2021</year>) <volume>31</volume>:<fpage>20</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s41938-021-00363-z</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B36">
<label>36</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Mohamed</surname> <given-names>HO</given-names></name>
<name><surname>El-Heneidy</surname> <given-names>AH</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Dahi</surname> <given-names>HF</given-names></name>
</person-group>. 
<article-title>Impact of egg mass layers and scale thicknesses of the fall armyworm, <italic>Spodoptera frugiperda</italic> (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), on the parasitic performance of <italic>Trichogrammatoidea bactrae</italic> (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae)</article-title>. <source>Egypt J Biol Pest Ctrl</source>. (<year>2023</year>) <volume>33</volume>:<fpage>89</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s41938-023-00733-9</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B37">
<label>37</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Hou</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Ma</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>W</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Desnuex</surname> <given-names>N</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Nkunika</surname> <given-names>OY</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Bao</surname> <given-names>HP</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. 
<article-title><italic>Spodoptera frugiperda</italic> egg mass scale thickness modulates <italic>Trichogramma</italic> parasitoid performance</article-title>. <source>Entomol Gen</source>. (<year>2022</year>) <volume>42</volume>:<page-range>589&#x2013;96</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1127/entomologia/2022/1443</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B38">
<label>38</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>W</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Mao</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Brivio</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. 
<article-title>Evaluating the potential of using <italic>Spodoptera litura</italic> eggs for mass-rearing <italic>Telenomus remus</italic>, a promising egg parasitoid of <italic>Spodoptera frugiperda</italic></article-title>. <source>Insects</source>. (<year>2021</year>) <volume>12</volume>:<elocation-id>384</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/insects12050384</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33925853</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B39">
<label>39</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Sultan</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Khan</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Haq</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Mehmood</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Khattak</surname> <given-names>RZ</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Akhtar</surname> <given-names>N</given-names></name>
</person-group>. 
<article-title>Biological parameters of <italic>Trichogramma chilonis</italic> Ishii (Trichogrammatidae: Hymenoptera) feeding on <italic>Sitotroga cerealella</italic> eggs at three constant temperatures</article-title>. <source>Pakistan J Agric Res</source>. (<year>2013</year>) <volume>26</volume>:<fpage>65</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>70</lpage>.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B40">
<label>40</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Oktaviani</surname> <given-names>O</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Maryana</surname> <given-names>N</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Pudjianto</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name>
</person-group>. 
<article-title>Biology and life tables of <italic>Telenomus remus</italic> (Hymenoptera: Scelionidae) as parasitoid of <italic>Spodoptera frugiperda</italic> (J. E. Smith) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)</article-title>. <source>IOP Conf Ser: Earth Environ Sci</source>. (<year>2021</year>) <volume>948</volume>:<elocation-id>12041</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1088/1755-1315/948/1/012041</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B41">
<label>41</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Bueno</surname> <given-names>RC</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Carneiro</surname> <given-names>TR</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Pratissoli</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Bueno</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Farnendes</surname> <given-names>OA</given-names></name>
</person-group>. 
<article-title>Biology and thermal requirements of <italic>Telenomus remus</italic> reared on fall armyworm <italic>Spodoptera frugiperda</italic> eggs</article-title>. <source>Cienc Rur</source>. (<year>2008</year>) <volume>38</volume>:<fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>6</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1590/S0103-84782008000100001</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B42">
<label>42</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Goulart</surname> <given-names>MMP</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Bueno</surname> <given-names>AF</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Bueno</surname> <given-names>RCO</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Vieira</surname> <given-names>SS</given-names></name>
</person-group>. 
<article-title>Interaction between <italic>Telenomus remus</italic> and <italic>Trichogramma pretiosum</italic> in the management of <italic>Spodoptera</italic> spp</article-title>. <source>Rev Bras Entomol</source>. (<year>2011</year>) <volume>55</volume>:<page-range>121&#x2013;4</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1590/S0085-56262011000100019</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
<fn-group>
<fn id="n1" fn-type="custom" custom-type="edited-by">
<p>Edited by: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/525430">Salvatore Arpaia</ext-link>, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development (ENEA), Italy</p></fn>
<fn id="n2" fn-type="custom" custom-type="reviewed-by">
<p>Reviewed by: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2367292">Hend Omar Mohamed</ext-link>, Agricultural Research Center, Egypt</p>
<p><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/3298936">Renuka Mahajan</ext-link>, Pune MPKV, Rahuri, India</p></fn>
</fn-group>
</back>
</article>