<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3-mathml3.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xml:lang="EN">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Immunol.</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Immunology</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Immunol.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1664-3224</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fimmu.2026.1755933</article-id>
<article-version article-version-type="Version of Record" vocab="NISO-RP-8-2008"/>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Characterization and diversity of defense systems in <italic>Providencia</italic> pathogen</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author" equal-contrib="yes">
<name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>Xiaoyan</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn003"><sup>&#x2020;</sup></xref>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Data curation" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/">Data curation</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Funding acquisition" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/funding-acquisition/">Funding acquisition</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="investigation" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/">Investigation</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; original draft" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/">Writing &#x2013; original draft</role>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" equal-contrib="yes">
<name><surname>Zhao</surname><given-names>Yiyan</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn003"><sup>&#x2020;</sup></xref>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Data curation" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/">Data curation</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Funding acquisition" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/funding-acquisition/">Funding acquisition</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="methodology" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/">Methodology</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing</role>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" equal-contrib="yes">
<name><surname>Guo</surname><given-names>Xiang</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn003"><sup>&#x2020;</sup></xref>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Data curation" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/">Data curation</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Formal analysis" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/">Formal analysis</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="methodology" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/">Methodology</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing</role>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Bai</surname><given-names>Yuting</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="methodology" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/">Methodology</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing</role>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Jinping</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5"><sup>5</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001"><sup>*</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/3281483/overview"/>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="conceptualization" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/">Conceptualization</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Funding acquisition" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/funding-acquisition/">Funding acquisition</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="investigation" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/">Investigation</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing</role>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Department of Clinical Laboratory, Heping Branch, Shanxi Provincial People&#x2019;s Hospital</institution>, <city>Taiyuan</city>,&#xa0;<country country="cn">China</country></aff>
<aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Department of Blood Transfusion, Shanxi Provincial People&#x2019;s Hospital</institution>, <city>Taiyuan</city>,&#xa0;<country country="cn">China</country></aff>
<aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Shanxi Bethune Hospital, Shanxi Academy of Medical Sciences, Tongji Shanxi Hospital, Third Hospital of Shanxi Medical University</institution>, <city>Taiyuan</city>,&#xa0;<country country="cn">China</country></aff>
<aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Department of Energy Chemistry and Materials Engineering, Shanxi Institute of Energy</institution>, <city>Jinzhong</city>,&#xa0;<country country="cn">China</country></aff>
<aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>Department of Ultrasound, Beijing Chest Hospital, Capital Medical University &amp; Beijing Tuberculosis and Thoracic Tumor Research Institute</institution>, <city>Beijing</city>,&#xa0;<country country="cn">China</country></aff>
<author-notes>
<corresp id="c001"><label>*</label>Correspondence: Jinping Wang, <email xlink:href="mailto:13754813675@163.com">13754813675@163.com</email></corresp>
<fn fn-type="equal" id="fn003">
<p>&#x2020;These authors have contributed equally to this work</p></fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date publication-format="electronic" date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2026-02-12">
<day>12</day>
<month>02</month>
<year>2026</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date publication-format="electronic" date-type="collection">
<year>2026</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>17</volume>
<elocation-id>1755933</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>28</day>
<month>11</month>
<year>2025</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>26</day>
<month>01</month>
<year>2026</year>
</date>
<date date-type="rev-recd">
<day>15</day>
<month>01</month>
<year>2026</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#xa9; 2026 Li, Zhao, Guo, Bai and Wang.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2026</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Li, Zhao, Guo, Bai and Wang</copyright-holder>
<license>
<ali:license_ref start_date="2026-02-12">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ali:license_ref>
<license-p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY)</ext-link>. The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</license-p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<sec>
<title>Introduction</title>
<p><italic>Providencia</italic> species are emerging opportunistic pathogens associated with multidrug-resistant infections, yet their molecular defense mechanisms against phage or mobile genetic elements remain poorly characterized.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Methods</title>
<p>We present a comprehensive pan-genomic analysis of antiviral defense systems across 73 complete genomes (or chromosomes) of <italic>Providencia stuartii</italic> (n = 31) and <italic>Providencia rettgeri</italic> (n = 42), using DefenseFinder and CRISPRCasFinder. We further expanded analysis of contig/scaffold assemblies to confirm conservation of core defense profiles across assembly types. BacMGEnet was employed to derive spacer-MGE interaction networks. Phylogenetic reconstruction and gene gain and loss modeling were performed to assess evolutionary patterns. To validate functionality, we experimentally tested the anti-phage activity of Gabija and Septu in heterologous <italic>E. coli</italic> assays, including point mutation analysis of conserved residues.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Results</title>
<p>We reveal a diverse and complex defense repertoire dominated by restriction-modification systems and CRISPR-Cas Class 1 Type I-F, with significant contributions from toxin-antitoxin, GAPS2, PsyrTA, and Mokosh systems. Notably, defense genes are non-randomly distributed, often clustering into genomic islands suggestive of horizontal acquisition. Expanded analysis confirms conservation of core defense profiles across assembly types, supporting the utility of lower-quality data when complete genomes are scarce. Comparative analysis uncovers species-specific differences, with <italic>P. rettgeri</italic> harboring a higher abundance of non-CRISPR systems. BacMGEnet-derived spacer-MGE interaction networks further highlight species-specific dynamics, dense, hub-driven networks in <italic>P. stuartii</italic> versus sparser networks in <italic>P. rettgeri</italic>. Correlation analysis indicates potential associations between specific defense systems and virulence or antibiotic resistance genes. Phylogenetic reconstruction and gene gain and loss modeling further highlight dynamic evolutionary patterns. Both Gabija and Septu systems conferred robust, phage-specific protection; point mutations in conserved residues (GajA E465K and PtuB H53K) abolished defense.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>Our findings unveil a multi-layered, modular immune architecture in Providencia, providing crucial insights into its genome plasticity, phage resistance, and adaptation in clinical environments. This work establishes a foundation for understanding the role of defense systems in the evolution and pathogenicity of the <italic>Providencia</italic> genus.</p>
</sec>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>antibiotic resistance</kwd>
<kwd>CRISPR-Cas</kwd>
<kwd>defense systems</kwd>
<kwd>Gabija</kwd>
<kwd><italic>Providencia</italic></kwd>
<kwd>Septu</kwd>
<kwd>virulence factors</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<funding-group>
<funding-statement>The author(s) declared financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. This work was supported by Fundamental Research Program of Shanxi Province (202303021212349), Medical Key Research Project of Shanxi Province (2023XM038), the Basic Research Program of Shanxi Province (202403021212087), 2024 Annual &#x201c;Promising Candidates&#x201d; Cultivation Project for National Natural Science Foundation at Shanxi Bethune Hospital (2024GZRZ11).</funding-statement>
</funding-group>
<counts>
<fig-count count="9"/>
<table-count count="3"/>
<equation-count count="0"/>
<ref-count count="66"/>
<page-count count="22"/>
<word-count count="12290"/>
</counts>
<custom-meta-group>
<custom-meta>
<meta-name>section-at-acceptance</meta-name>
<meta-value>Microbial Immunology</meta-value>
</custom-meta>
</custom-meta-group>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="s1" sec-type="intro">
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>The rise of antimicrobial resistance among bacterial pathogens has emerged as one of the most pressing public health crises, profoundly undermining the efficacy of conventional antibiotics in clinical settings (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">1</xref>). Multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria, in particular, are increasingly implicated in severe nosocomial infections, including bloodstream infections, urinary tract infections, and sepsis, often leading to high morbidity, mortality, and substantial healthcare burdens worldwide (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">2</xref>). In this context, bacteriophage therapy, exploiting natural viruses that specifically infect bacteria, has re-emerged as a promising therapeutic alternative with the potential to circumvent traditional resistance mechanisms (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">3</xref>). However, the success of phage-based interventions is inherently constrained by the extensive and evolving arsenal of prokaryotic immune defenses that bacteria employ to resist mobile genetic elements (MGEs), including bacteriophages and plasmids (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">4</xref>). Far beyond the well-characterized CRISPR-Cas systems, recent genomic studies have uncovered a remarkable diversity of innate defense mechanisms in bacteria and archaea, many of which function analogously to eukaryotic cell-autonomous immunity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">5</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">6</xref>). Understanding the complexity, distribution, and evolutionary dynamics of these defense systems is therefore critical not only for advancing phage therapy but also for elucidating fundamental aspects of microbial survival and pathogenesis.</p>
<p>Over the past decade, our understanding of prokaryotic immune defense systems has undergone a transformative expansion, revealing an unexpectedly rich repertoire of mechanisms that protect bacteria against invasive genetic elements such as bacteriophages and plasmids (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">5</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">7</xref>). Traditionally dominated by the study of restriction-modification (RM) systems and CRISPR-Cas adaptive immunity, the field has now uncovered over 100 distinct families of defense systems, collectively referred to as &#x201c;bacterial innate immunity&#x201d;, that function through diverse biochemical strategies, including nuclease activation, membrane disruption, abortive infection, and programmed cell dormancy or death (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">8</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">9</xref>). Notably, many of these systems exhibit functional parallels to eukaryotic cell-autonomous immunity, such as the use of surveillance proteins that trigger effector responses upon detection of foreign nucleic acids, highlighting deep evolutionary conservation in host defense principles across domains of life (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">6</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">10</xref>). The discovery of systems like DISARM, Thoeris, Druantia, and Gabija, among others, underscores the complexity and modularity of bacterial anti-phage defenses, often organized in &#x201c;defense islands&#x201d; within microbial genomes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">11</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">12</xref>). Recently, Beavogui et&#xa0;al. introduced the concept of the &#x201c;defensome&#x201d; to designate the complete repertoire of bacterial defense systems, which constitutes a pan-immune system (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">13</xref>). Following its introduction, Cunha da Silva and Rossi further explored the defensome of <italic>Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae</italic>, revealing its complex interplay with MGEs (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">14</xref>). Investigating the pan-immune system is not only essential for understanding bacterial survival, genome stability, and evolutionary dynamics in competitive microbial ecosystems, but also holds profound implications for developing novel antimicrobial strategies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">15</xref>). A comprehensive characterization of these defense arsenals can inform the rational design of phage cocktails, guide the engineering of phages capable of overcoming host resistance, and uncover new molecular tools for biotechnology and medicine (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">15</xref>).</p>
<p>The genus <italic>Providencia</italic>, belonging to <italic>Proteae</italic> in the <italic>Enterobacteriaceae</italic> family, comprises Gram-negative, facultatively anaerobic, motile bacilli that are widely distributed in diverse environments, including soil, water, and the gastrointestinal tracts of humans and animals (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">16</xref>). As opportunistic pathogens, <italic>Providencia</italic> species, particularly <italic>P. stuartii</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">17</xref>) and <italic>P. rettgeri</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">18</xref>), have gained increasing recognition in clinical microbiology due to their association with healthcare-associated infections, especially among immunocompromised individuals, elderly patients, and those with prolonged hospitalization or indwelling medical devices such as urinary catheters (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">16</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">19</xref>). Notably, <italic>Providencia</italic> species exhibit intrinsic resistance to multiple antibiotics (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">20</xref>). More alarmingly, they have demonstrated a growing propensity to acquire MGEs harboring extended-spectrum &#x3b2;-lactamases and carbapenemases, leading to drug-resistant phenotypes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">21</xref>). This escalating antimicrobial resistance, combined with their ability to form biofilms on abiotic surfaces, enhances their persistence in hospital environments and limits therapeutic options, thereby underscoring the urgent need for alternative treatment strategies, including phage therapy (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">22</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">24</xref>).</p>
<p>Despite the growing clinical importance of <italic>Providencia</italic> pathogens, a comprehensive understanding of their anti-phage defense mechanisms remains largely unexplored. In particular, the diversity, genomic organization, and evolutionary dynamics of defense systems in <italic>P. stuartii</italic> and <italic>P. rettgeri</italic> have not been characterized (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">25</xref>). To address this, we conducted a comparative genomic analysis across the complete genome of <italic>Providencia</italic> isolates, with the primary aim of identifying and classifying the full repertoire of prokaryotic immune systems present in this genus. We also focused on the architecture and diversity of CRISPR-Cas loci and further investigated the co-occurrence and potential interplay between defense systems, virulence factors (VFs), and antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs). Additionally, through phylogeny-aware evolutionary modeling, we reconstructed gene gain and loss events across the <italic>Providencia</italic> phylogenomic tree to assess the selective pressures shaping the expansion and retention of defense-related modules. Our findings reveal the abundance and complexity of defense systems in <italic>Providencia</italic>. This study not only provides an overview of the immune defense landscape in <italic>Providencia</italic> pathogens but also offers crucial insights into their adaptive evolution and survival strategies.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2" sec-type="results">
<title>Results</title>
<sec id="s2_1">
<title>Occurrence of defense systems in <italic>Providencia</italic></title>
<p>To investigate the diversity and distribution of defense systems, we performed a comparative genomic analysis using complete genome sequences of clinically relevant bacterial species associated with sepsis and other severe infections. Genomes were retrieved from the NCBI GenBank database (as of 2025-12-29) and filtered to include only high-quality, closed, and complete genomes (or chromosomes) to ensure accurate identification and annotation of defense systems. A total of 73 <italic>Providencia</italic> strains were analyzed: 31 isolates of <italic>P. stuartii</italic> and 42 isolates of <italic>P. rettgeri</italic>. All accession numbers for the analyzed genomes are listed in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1"><bold>Supplementary Table&#xa0;1</bold></xref>, enabling reproducibility and further validation of our findings. For comparative purposes, we also included complete genomes from 13 additional sepsis-associated bacterial species across diverse taxonomic groups, including <italic>Clostridioides difficile, Staphylococcus aureus, Yersinia pestis, Mycobacterium tuberculosis</italic>, and <italic>Brucella</italic> spp., among others. This curated dataset allowed us to systematically compare the repertoire of defense systems across closely related and distantly related pathogens, with a particular focus on the exceptional immune complexity observed in <italic>Providencia</italic> species.</p>
<p>Statistical comparisons of defense system count between groups were performed using one-way ANOVA with Tukey&#x2019;s <italic>post hoc</italic> test (full details in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1"><bold>Supplementary Data 1</bold></xref>). As illustrated in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1"><bold>Figure&#xa0;1A</bold></xref>, <italic>Providencia</italic> exhibits one of the highest median counts of distinct defense system types among all sepsis-associated bacterial genera analyzed, with a median of approximately 7 systems per genome, exceeding those observed in <italic>Brucella, Mycobacterium</italic>, and <italic>Ralstonia</italic>, which show median values below 2 (<italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.001; see <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1"><bold>Supplementary Data 1</bold></xref> for full pairwise comparisons). Notably, the distribution of defense system richness in <italic>Providencia</italic> is not only elevated but also highly variable, as evidenced by the broad interquartile range (IQR) and the presence of several outliers reaching up to 12 distinct systems. In contrast, other clinically relevant genera such as <italic>Staphylococcus, Clostridium</italic>, and <italic>Yersinia</italic> display more moderate and less variable defense system profiles, with medians ranging from 3 to 6. At the species level (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1"><bold>Figure&#xa0;1B</bold></xref>), this trend is further reinforced: both <italic>P. stuartii</italic> and <italic>P. rettgeri</italic> consistently harbor a greater number of defense system types compared to most other sepsis-causing species. Remarkably, while <italic>P. rettgeri</italic> shows a slightly higher median count than <italic>P. stuartii</italic>, the two species are nearly indistinguishable in the total number of defense system per genome (<italic>p</italic> = 0.07), with both exhibiting substantial intra-species variation and frequent occurrences of genomes carrying more than 8 different defense systems. Statistical comparisons reveal significant differences between <italic>P. stuartii</italic> and <italic>P. rettgeri</italic> and most other species (<italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.05), with black asterisks indicating significance relative to <italic>P. stuartii</italic> and red asterisks indicating significance relative to <italic>P. rettgeri</italic>.</p>
<fig id="f1" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;1</label>
<caption>
<p>Comparative analysis of immune defense system diversity in <italic>Providencia</italic> and other clinically relevant pathogens. <bold>(A)</bold> Defense system type abundance across bacterial genera associated with sepsis. This panel compares the number of distinct defense system types identified in various bacterial genera known to cause nosocomial infections and sepsis. ***<italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.001 vs. <italic>Providencia</italic>; one-way ANOVA with Tukey&#x2019;s <italic>post hoc</italic> test. <bold>(B)</bold> Species-level comparison of defense system richness in <italic>Providencia</italic> and related pathogens. This panel expands the analysis to the species level, focusing on <italic>P. stuartii</italic> and <italic>P. rettgeri</italic>, the two most frequently isolated pathogenic species within the genus, and comparing them with representative species from other sepsis-associated genera. Each colored dot represents an individual genome from a given genus, with jitter applied to reduce overplotting and improve visual resolution. The red crossbars indicate the median (horizontal line) and interquartile range (vertical lines) of defense system counts per genus. The black * (<italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.05) denote significance vs. <italic>P. stuartii</italic>, red * (<italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.05) denote significance vs. <italic>P. rettgeri</italic> (one-way ANOVA with Tukey&#x2019;s <italic>post hoc</italic> test).</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fimmu-17-1755933-g001.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Scatter plots with superimposed mean and error bars comparing defense system type counts across bacterial genera (panel a) and species (panel b). Significant differences are indicated by asterisks, with detailed p-values provided for comparisons against reference groups.</alt-text>
</graphic></fig>
<p>To further resolve the architectural complexity of these immune systems, we analyzed the abundance of defense system subtypes, specific molecular variants within each system class (e.g., CRISPR-Cas type I-E, II-A; R-M Type I, II, etc.), across the same set of genomes. As shown in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1"><bold>Supplementary Figure&#xa0;1</bold></xref>, <italic>Providencia</italic> again stands out with the highest median subtype count (~8 subtypes per genome), surpassing all other genera (<italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.001). At the species level (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1"><bold>Supplementary Figure&#xa0;1B</bold></xref>), <italic>P. stuartii</italic> and <italic>P. rettgeri</italic> exhibit higher subtype richness compared to most other clinical pathogens, with some strains harboring over 10 distinct subtypes. Significant differences were observed between <italic>P. stuartii</italic> (or <italic>P. rettgeri</italic>) and most other species (<italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.05), marked by black and red asterisks, respectively; full statistical details are available in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1"><bold>Supplementary Data 1</bold></xref>. This elevated subtype diversity indicates not only a greater number of defense systems but also a broader functional repertoire, suggesting that <italic>Providencia</italic> may deploy a multi-layered, modular defense strategy against invading genetic elements.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_2">
<title>Characterization of defense systems in <italic>Providencia</italic></title>
<p>To gain deeper insight into the composition and prevalence of defense systems in <italic>Providencia</italic>, we performed a detailed profiling of immune mechanisms across all analyzed genomes of <italic>P. stuartii</italic> (n = 31) and <italic>P. rettgeri</italic> (n = 42). As shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2"><bold>Figures&#xa0;2A, B</bold></xref>, the most abundant defense system type in both species is the restriction-modification (RM) system, with 61 occurrences (20.75%) in <italic>P. stuartii</italic> and 77 occurrences (21.04%) in <italic>P. rettgeri</italic>, respectively, highlighting its fundamental role in innate immunity against foreign DNA. The CRISPR-Cas system is among the most abundant defense systems in both species, detected in 30 strains (10.20%) in <italic>P. stuartii</italic> and 14 strains (3.83%) in <italic>P. rettgeri</italic>, representing 10.73% and 11.99% of total defense systems, respectively. Other systems include GAPS2 (30, 10.20% in <italic>P. stuartii</italic>; 39, 10.66% in <italic>P. rettgeri</italic>) and Gabija (9, 3.06% in <italic>P. stuartii</italic>; 10, 2.73% in <italic>P. rettgeri</italic>), underscoring the presence of multiple non-CRISPR defense mechanisms. Notably, while RM and CRISPR-Cas systems are prevalent in both species, <italic>P. rettgeri</italic> exhibits higher counts of several non-CRISPR systems such as MazEF (39, 10.66%), Retron (15, 4.10%), and Lamassu-Fam (11, 3.01%), suggesting potential differences in evolutionary adaptation or niche-specific immune pressures. In contrast, <italic>P. stuartii</italic> shows greater representation of PsyrTA, Mokosh (18, 6.12%), and AbiE (9, 3.06%), indicating distinct immune prioritization between the two species. The full spectrum of defense systems is shown in the main panels (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2"><bold>Figures&#xa0;2A, B</bold></xref>), with inset plots detailing the composition of the &#x201c;Others&#x201d; category, which accounts for 13.27% in <italic>P. stuartii</italic> and 11.20% in <italic>P. rettgeri</italic>. This comprehensive view confirms the presence of numerous rare but functionally distinct systems, including ShosTA, Thoeris, pAgo, and Kiwa, with some occurring in only one or two strains, emphasizing the high degree of genomic heterogeneity and modular evolution within the genus. All raw counts and system classifications are provided in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1"><bold>Supplementary Data 2</bold></xref>. Together, these findings illustrate a complex, multi-layered defense architecture in <italic>Providencia</italic>, dominated by RM and CRISPR-Cas systems but enriched by a wide array of auxiliary immune mechanisms that likely contribute to phage resistance and genome stability in diverse environments.</p>
<fig id="f2" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;2</label>
<caption>
<p>Composition and distribution of immune defense systems in <italic>P. stuartii</italic> and <italic>P. rettgeri</italic>. <bold>(A)</bold> Defense system type distribution in <italic>P. stuartii</italic>. Bar plot showing counts (and percentages) of defense system types in <italic>P. stuartii</italic> complete genomes (n = 31). The main panel displays dominant systems, while the inset plot details the &#x201c;Others&#x201d; category (13.27% of systems). <bold>(B)</bold> Defense system type distribution in <italic>P. rettgeri</italic>. Bar plot showing counts (and percentages) of defense system types in <italic>P. rettgeri</italic> complete genomes (n = 42). The main panel displays dominant systems, while the inset plot details the &#x201c;Others&#x201d; category (11.20% of systems).</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fimmu-17-1755933-g002.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Bar graphs comparing the distribution of defense system types in Providencia stuartii (panel a) and Providencia rettgeri (panel b). Each color represents a different defense system type, with count values and percentages labeled beside each bar. Panel a shows RM and GAPS2 as most prevalent in P. stuartii, while panel b shows RM and MazEF most prevalent in P. rettgeri. Both panels list many diverse and less frequent systems, summarized under &#x201c;Others.&#x201d; Data is visually grouped to display variety and frequency of types within each species.</alt-text>
</graphic></fig>
<p>To expand the scope of our defense system profiling beyond complete genomes, we analyzed <italic>P. stuartii</italic> and <italic>P. rettgeri</italic> using additional genomic assemblies at the contig and scaffold levels, which are more widely available in public databases like NCBI. Specifically, we applied DefenseFinder to 429 contigs and 50 scaffolds of <italic>P. stuartii</italic>, and 334 contigs and 244 scaffolds of <italic>P. rettgeri</italic>. As shown in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1"><bold>Supplementary Figures&#xa0;2A&#x2013;D</bold></xref>, this broader dataset reveals a significantly higher total number of defense system occurrences due to increased genomic sampling. In <italic>P. stuartii</italic>, the most abundant systems across all contigs are RM (608, 15.31%) and Cas (429, 10.80%), followed by GAPS2 (425, 10.70%) and PsyrTA (409, 10.30%). Similarly, in <italic>P. rettgeri</italic>, RM (567, 18.50%) and GAPS2 (326, 10.64%) dominate, with MazEF (322, 10.51%) and Gabija (128, 4.18%) also highly represented. Notably, the relative abundance of major systems such as RM, Cas, GAPS2, and PsyrTA remains consistent across complete, contig and scaffold datasets, suggesting robust detection of prevalent defense mechanisms even in fragmented assemblies. While full-length genome assemblies are ideal for accurate defense system annotation, since correct gene order, operon structure, and strand orientation are critical for functional inference, the results from contig and scaffold data demonstrate that they can still capture dominant immune features. This suggests that such fragmented datasets may serve as useful proxies for preliminary assessments of defense system prevalence, particularly when complete genomes are scarce.</p>
<p>We next analyzed the distribution of defense system subtypes, offering a higher-resolution view of functional diversity. As shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3"><bold>Figures&#xa0;3A, B</bold></xref>, the most abundant subtype across both species is RM subtypes, exhibit substantial diversity, with RM_Type_I, RM_Type_II, RM_Type_IV, and et&#xa0;al. collectively accounting for more than 20% of all subtypes, reflecting a multi-layered DNA surveillance mechanism. Notably, the CRISPR-Cas system is represented almost exclusively by a single subtype: CAS_Class1-Subtype-I-F, across both species, with 30 occurrences (10.22%) in <italic>P. stuartii</italic> and 14 (3.83%) in <italic>P. rettgeri</italic>. This subtype dominates the CRISPR-Cas landscape, and no other known CRISPR subtypes such as I-E, II-A, or III-B, were detected in either species, indicating a highly focused evolutionary strategy for adaptive immunity in <italic>Providencia</italic>. Notably, the &#x201c;Others&#x201d; category accounts for 26 (8.84%) in <italic>P. stuartii</italic> and 54 (14.75%) in <italic>P. rettgeri</italic>, encompassing rare but functionally distinct variants such as PARIS_I, Thoeris_II, and DS-1, many of which appear in only one or two isolates. The full list of subtypes and their counts is provided in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1"><bold>Supplementary Data 2</bold></xref>. Together, these findings highlight a unique immune profile in <italic>Providencia</italic>: dominated by a narrow set of highly prevalent subtypes, yet enriched with a diverse array of auxiliary systems.</p>
<fig id="f3" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;3</label>
<caption>
<p>Composition and distribution of immune defense system subtypes in <italic>P. stuartii</italic> and <italic>P. rettgeri</italic>. <bold>(A)</bold> <italic>P. stuartii</italic> defense system subtype distribution. Bar plot showing counts (and percentages) of defense system subtypes in <italic>P. stuartii</italic> complete genomes (analyzed via DefenseFinder). Dominant subtypes include <italic>RM_Type-IV</italic> (23, 7.82%) and <italic>CAS_Class1-Subtype-I-F</italic> (30, 10.20%); the inset plot details the &#x201c;Others&#x201d; category (8.84% of subtypes). <bold>(B)</bold> <italic>P. rettgeri</italic> defense system subtype distribution. Bar plot showing counts (and percentages) of defense system subtypes in <italic>P. rettgeri</italic> complete genomes (analyzed via DefenseFinder). Dominant subtypes include <italic>RM_Type-I</italic> (45, 12.30%) and <italic>MazEF</italic> (39, 10.66%); the inset plot details the &#x201c;Others&#x201d; category (14.75% of subtypes).</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fimmu-17-1755933-g003.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Bar charts comparing defense system subtype distributions in Providencia stuartii (panel a) and Providencia rettgeri (panel b), with subtypes listed on the y-axes, counts on the x-axes, and color-coded bars representing count and percentage for each subtype.</alt-text>
</graphic></fig>
<p>To assess the consistency and comprehensiveness of subtype annotation, we performed an independent analysis using the PADLOC tool on the same set of complete genomes, complementing our prior DefenseFinder results. As shown in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1"><bold>Supplementary Figures&#xa0;3A, B</bold></xref>, PADLOC identifies a broadly similar profile of dominant defense systems, with RM types collectively being the most abundant subtype in both species. And cas_type_I-F1 also highly represented, confirming the robust detection of these major immune modules across platforms. This concordance supports the reliability of the core defense repertoire observed in our initial analysis. However, PADLOC also reveals several previously undetected or underrepresented systems, particularly within the DMS_other and PDC family, which are not annotated by DefenseFinder. While both tools agree on the dominance of RM and CRISPR-Cas systems, PADLOC&#x2019;s sensitivity to divergent or atypical architectures allows it to detect additional immune variants, highlighting the importance of multi-tool validation in defense system profiling. However, it should be noted that the PADLOC database has not been updated since its last release, and thus lacks recently characterized systems. Unlike DefenseFinder, which directly annotates both system types and subtypes, PADLOC outputs predictions exclusively at the subtype level, necessitating post grouping to reconstruct higher-order system categories.</p>
<p>To examine the inter-strain variation in immune defense systems, we analyzed the genomic composition and organization of defense system types across a representative subset of <italic>P. stuartii</italic> and <italic>P. rettgeri</italic> isolates. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4"><bold>Figures&#xa0;4A, B</bold></xref> show stacked bar charts depicting the number and types of defense system subtypes present in individual strains, revealing substantial heterogeneity in immune repertoire composition. For example, <italic>P. stuartii</italic> strain GCA_010669105 harbors 15 distinct subtypes, while other strains contain as few as 5, indicating significant variability in immune complexity even within the same species. Similarly, <italic>P. rettgeri</italic> strains exhibit diverse profiles, with some carrying up to 14 subtypes (e.g., GCA_0103188815), while others possess fewer than 4. Stacked bar charts illustrating all analyzed strains can be found in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1"><bold>Supplementary Figure&#xa0;4A</bold></xref> (<italic>P. stuartii</italic>) and <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1"><bold>4B</bold></xref> (<italic>P. rettgeri</italic>). The circular genome maps in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4"><bold>Figures&#xa0;4C, D</bold></xref> reveal the distribution of defense systems in the genomes of two strains. In <italic>P. stuartii</italic> GCA_010669105, three major defense-associated genomic islands (GIs) are evident: one near 1.2 Mb; another at ~1.7 Mb; and a third near 3.0 Mb. These clusters are characterized by co-directional gene transcription (indicated by red/blue arrows), consistent with operon-like organization. In contrast, most defense systems appear as isolated, singleton loci in <italic>P. rettgeri</italic> GCA_010318885; seems to be more randomly located in the genome. The presence of structured defense islands and dispersed systems may suggest a dual evolutionary strategy: one favoring stable, co-adapted gene clusters for robust immunity, and another allowing flexible, piecemeal adaptation to novel threats.</p>
<fig id="f4" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;4</label>
<caption>
<p>Genomic distribution and composition of defense system in selected <italic>P. stuartii</italic> and <italic>P. rettgeri</italic> strains. It illustrates the diversity and genomic organization of defense system subtypes across selected <italic>P. stuartii</italic> <bold>(a, c)</bold> and <italic>P. rettgeri</italic> <bold>(B, D)</bold> strains. <bold>(A, B)</bold> Present stacked bar charts showing the number of distinct defense system (subtypes) present in individual isolates, with each color representing a specific subtype as defined in the legend. The horizontal axis indicates the count of each system per strain, revealing substantial inter-strain variation in immune repertoire composition. <bold>(C, D)</bold> Display circular genome maps of representative strains, <italic>P. stuartii</italic> GCA_010669105 and <italic>P. rettgeri</italic> GCA_010318885, annotating all identified defense system at their genomic locations. Red and blue indicating genes transcribed in opposite directions of circular genome; typically, functional defense operons exhibit co-directional gene arrangement, suggesting coordinated expression.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fimmu-17-1755933-g004.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Panel a and b show horizontal stacked bar charts representing the presence and count of different defense systems across multiple Providencia stuartii and Providencia rettgeri genomes, with each color-coded for a specific system as indicated in the legend. Panel c and d contain circular genome maps with labeled defense systems for selected genomes, displaying the chromosomal locations and gene distribution in blue and red.</alt-text>
</graphic></fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_3">
<title>Diversity of CRISPR-Cas systems in <italic>Providencia</italic></title>
<p>The CRISPR-Cas system is a key component of adaptive immunity in bacteria, and its distribution across <italic>Providencia</italic> species reveals a striking pattern of both conservation and divergence. As shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5"><bold>Figures&#xa0;5A, B</bold></xref>, the presence of CRISPR-Cas systems varies significantly between <italic>P. stuartii</italic> and <italic>P. rettgeri</italic>. In <italic>P. stuartii</italic>, the system is nearly ubiquitous, with 30 out of 31 strains (96.77%) harboring at least one CRISPR array, whereas in <italic>P. rettgeri</italic>, only 15 out of 42 strains (35.71%) possess this defense mechanism, indicating a substantial difference in the prevalence of CRISPR-based immunity between the two species. Actually, this contrast is supported by the subtype-level analysis in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3"><bold>Figure&#xa0;3</bold></xref> and <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1"><bold>Supplementary Figures&#xa0;3A, B</bold></xref>, which shows that CAS_Class1-Subtype-I-F is the sole CRISPR-Cas subtype detected across all analyzed genomes (All data are provided in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1"><bold>Supplementary Data 3</bold></xref>). The exclusive dominance of this single subtype suggests a highly specialized evolutionary trajectory for adaptive immunity in <italic>Providencia</italic>. Notably, while both species carry the same subtype, its relative abundance differs markedly, indicating not only differential acquisition but also varying degrees of functional integration into the immune repertoire. These findings collectively highlight a unique CRISPR landscape in <italic>Providencia</italic>: characterized by a narrow specificity of Cas subtype and a pronounced species-level disparity in prevalence, suggesting distinct evolutionary strategies for phage defense.</p>
<fig id="f5" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;5</label>
<caption>
<p>Comparative analysis of CRISPR-Cas systems across <italic>P. stuartii</italic> and <italic>P. rettgeri</italic>. <bold>(A, B)</bold> Show pie charts depicting the proportion of strains harboring at least one CRISPR-Cas system, in <italic>P. stuartii</italic>. <bold>(C, D)</bold> Illustrate representative CRISPR-Cas loci from each species. In both cases, the systems are predominantly of Class 1, Subtype I-F, with conserved <italic>cas</italic> gene arrays, depicted as colored arrows proportional to their genomic length and orientation. The black vertical lines represent individual spacers within the repeat-spacer arrays, which encode sequence-specific immunity against phages and plasmids, contributing to adaptive defense diversity. <bold>(E)</bold> Presents a boxplot showing the distribution of CRISPR array counts across individual strains, with each colored point representing one genome and jitter applied to improve visualization. <bold>(F)</bold> displays a boxplot of spacer counts across all CRISPR-positive strains, with each colored point representing an individual strain and jitter applied for clarity. Each colored circle represents a single strain genome, while outliers are marked with open circles.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fimmu-17-1755933-g005.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Figure containing six panels: a) Pie chart showing 96.77% presence of a feature in Providencia stuartii; b) Pie chart showing 35.71% presence in Providencia rettgeri; c) Gene map of CRISPR-Cas genomic region in Providencia stuartii; d) Gene map of CRISPR-Cas genomic region in Providencia rettgeri; e) Boxplot indicating significantly higher CRISPR array counts in Providencia stuartii compared to Providencia rettgeri; f) Boxplot comparing spacer numbers between species, showing no significant difference.</alt-text>
</graphic></fig>
<p>At the genomic level, the architecture of the CRISPR system further distinguishes <italic>P. stuartii</italic> from <italic>P. rettgeri</italic>, despite both species typically encoding only a single copy of the core Cas operon. As illustrated in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5"><bold>Figures&#xa0;5C, D</bold></xref>, the Cas protein cluster, comprising <italic>cas1</italic>, <italic>cas3</italic>, and the other <italic>cas</italic> genes, is highly conserved in gene content and order across both species, consistent with the canonical Class 1 Type I-F system. However, the organization of CRISPR arrays relative to this Cas locus is different. In <italic>P. stuartii</italic>, multiple CRISPR arrays are often found dispersed across the chromosome, with some located near the Cas operon and others situated at distant genomic loci, up to several hundred kilobases away. This arrangement suggests that a single Cas complex may function with multiple spatially separated arrays,. In contrast, <italic>P. rettgeri</italic> strains exhibit a much more restricted configuration: CRISPR arrays are almost exclusively located immediately upstream or downstream of the Cas operon, forming a compact, self-contained unit. This localized architecture implies a more limited and tightly coupled system, where the Cas machinery acts primarily on a single or few adjacent arrays. The distinct genomic distribution of CRISPR repeats thus reinforces the functional divergence between the two species, not only is the CAS_Class1-I-F system more prevalent in <italic>P. stuartii</italic>, but its genomic integration also supports a more expansive and potentially flexible immune strategy.</p>
<p>The number and distribution of CRISPR arrays not only reflect the complexity of the immune system but may also influence spacer acquisition efficiency and system stability. While the structure of typical CRISPR arrays has been illustrated, whether all CRISPR arrays follow the same trend in terms of their distribution and quantity. To further evaluate the architectural diversity, we analyzed the number of CRISPR arrays per strain across all CRISPR-positive isolates (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5"><bold>Figure&#xa0;5E</bold></xref>). The boxplot reveals a difference between <italic>P. stuartii</italic> and <italic>P. rettgeri</italic>: while <italic>P. stuartii</italic> strains harbor 2 to 6 CRISPR arrays, with a median of 5 arrays per genome, <italic>P. rettgeri</italic> strains are predominantly limited to 2 arrays, with only a few exceptions reaching up to 3. Importantly, this multi-array architecture aligns with the dispersed genomic organization seen in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5"><bold>Figure&#xa0;5C</bold></xref>, where multiple CRISPR repeats are located at distant chromosomal positions. In contrast, the limited number of arrays in <italic>P. rettgeri</italic>, often clustered near the Cas operon, reflects a more streamlined and possibly less flexible immune configuration. Together, these results indicate that the expansion of CRISPR arrays is an important determinant of adaptive immunity capacity, and that <italic>P. stuartii</italic> has evolved a more complex and scalable system compared to <italic>P. rettgeri</italic>, reinforcing the notion of species-specific evolutionary trajectories in CRISPR-mediated defense.</p>
<p>Given that differences already exist between <italic>P. stuartii</italic> and <italic>P. rettgeri</italic> in terms of CRISPR system distribution and genomic structure, do these two species exhibit further differentiation at the functional level, specifically regarding the number and diversity of spacers. To assess the functional potential, we analyzed the number of spacers per strain across all CRISPR-positive isolates (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5"><bold>Figure&#xa0;5F</bold></xref>). The median spacer count in <italic>P. stuartii</italic> is much higher, approximately 35 spacers per strain, with a broad interquartile range and multiple strains exceeding 60 spacers, indicating not only a greater capacity to record past infections but also a more extensive immunological memory. In contrast, <italic>P. rettgeri</italic> strains exhibit a substantially lower median of ~25 spacers, with most strains clustering between 20 and 30, and only one outlier surpassing 70. Furthermore, the distribution of spacer counts in <italic>P. stuartii</italic> is more heterogeneous, whereas <italic>P. rettgeri</italic> displays a narrower and more uniform profile. This disparity suggests that <italic>P. stuartii</italic> not only maintains CRISPR-Cas systems at a higher frequency (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5"><bold>Figure&#xa0;5A</bold></xref>) and with greater genomic flexibility (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5"><bold>Figure&#xa0;5C</bold></xref>), but also accumulates spacers at an elevated rate, likely due to more frequent exposure to phages or more efficient spacer acquisition mechanisms.</p>
<p>CRISPR spacers serve as molecular memory of past encounters between bacteria and MGEs, with each spacer derived from a protospacer sequence in an invading phage or plasmid. By matching these spacers to known MGE databases (the BacMGEnet pipeline), we reconstructed spacer-MGE interaction networks for <italic>P. stuartii</italic> and <italic>P. rettgeri</italic>. In total, 546 unique spacers from <italic>P. stuartii</italic> and 363 from <italic>P. rettgeri</italic> were identified, of which 110 and 61 matched phages or plasmids, respectively. As shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6"><bold>Figures 6A, B</bold></xref>, the resulting networks reveal distinct patterns of spacer-MGE interactions. The green arrows in the <italic>P. stuartii</italic> spacer-MGE interaction network highlight two distinct clusters where multiple spacers from different strains converge on a single phage (yellow oval), indicating shared immunity against common viral threats. These highly connected hubs suggest that certain phages have repeatedly infected multiple <italic>P. stuartii</italic> strains, leading to the acquisition of identical or highly similar spacers. In contrast, the <italic>P. rettgeri</italic> network lacks such densely interconnected MGE nodes, with most phages linked to limited strains. These findings suggest that CRISPR-based immunity plays a key role in shaping bacterial population dynamics.</p>
<fig id="f6" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;6</label>
<caption>
<p>Spacer-mobile genetic element (MGE) interaction networks of <italic>P. stuartii</italic> and <italic>P. rettgeri.</italic> <bold>(a)</bold> Spacer-MGE interaction network of <italic>P. stuartii</italic>. Blue nodes represent CRISPR spacers, with red stars indicating unique spacers derived from the representative strain (GCA_050158205). Yellow ovals denote phages, and red ovals represent plasmids. An edge connects a spacer and an MGE if the spacer sequence matches a protospacer in the MGE (filter criteria: &gt;90% sequence identity, &gt;80% query coverage, e-value &lt;0.001). <bold>(b)</bold> Spacer-MGE interaction network of <italic>P. rettgeri</italic>. Nodes and edges follow the same color and definition conventions as <bold>(a)</bold>, with red stars marking spacers from the representative strain (GCA_010318885). All networks were constructed using the BacMGEnet pipeline, with non-redundant spacers and MGEs selected via a greedy algorithm, and visualized in Cytoscape.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fimmu-17-1755933-g006.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Panel a displays a network diagram of Providencia stuartii GCA_050158205 gene clusters, with red stars indicating the reference genome and colored shapes representing gene relationships. Panel b shows a circular network for Providencia rettgeri GCA_010318885, similarly annotated.</alt-text>
</graphic></fig>
<p>In addition, spacers enable the reconstruction of host-MGE interaction networks by linking bacterial strains to the phages or plasmids they have encountered. In our analysis, the <italic>P. stuartii</italic> network comprises 56 nodes: 18 host strains and 38 MGEs (37 phages and 1 plasmid); while the <italic>P. rettgeri</italic> network includes 40 nodes: 13 hosts and 27 MGEs (24 phages and 3 plasmids) (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1"><bold>Supplementary Figures 5A, B</bold></xref>). The <italic>P. stuartii</italic> network displays a highly interconnected architecture with numerous edges, indicating frequent and shared targeting of phages across multiple strains. By contrast, the <italic>P. rettgeri</italic> network is markedly sparser, with fewer connections and more isolated host-MGE pairs, consistent with its lower CRISPR array abundance and spacer diversity observed earlier. Notably, several <italic>P. stuartii</italic> strains interact with multiple phages, and certain phages are targeted by multiple hosts, suggesting the emergence of community-level immunity. Together, these distinctions underscore the value of network-based approaches in uncovering ecological and evolutionary dynamics of host-phage interactions and provide a foundation for future investigations into phage resistance mechanisms and the potential for precision phage therapy in <italic>Providencia</italic> infections.</p>
<p>Furthermore, the sequence characteristics, diversity, and structural stability of CRISPR repeats are not only the foundation of CRISPR system function but may also influence crRNA processing efficiency, Cas protein recognition ability, and overall immune activity. Analysis of repeat characteristics across <italic>Providencia</italic> genomes revealed diversity within both species (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1"><bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold></xref>). A total of 19 distinct repeat variants were identified, indicating that both species maintain multiple repeat types, potentially supporting functional heterogeneity among CRISPR loci. Notably, the number of spacers associated with each repeat type varies dramatically, from as few as 4 to over 300, reflecting differential expansion dynamics and highlighting that certain repeat loci are hotspots for spacer acquisition and immune memory accumulation. The predicted RNA secondary structures of representative repeats (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1"><bold>Supplementary Figures&#xa0;6</bold></xref>, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1"><bold>7</bold></xref>) further reveal their molecular architecture. Both <italic>P. stuartii</italic> and <italic>P. rettgeri</italic> repeats form stable stem-loop structures, consistent with the canonical hairpin required for Cas protein recognition and crRNA maturation.</p>
<table-wrap id="T1" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;1</label>
<caption>
<p>The characteristics of repeats in CRISPR array of <italic>Providencia</italic>.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="left">Species</th>
<th valign="middle" align="left">Consensus</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Length</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Spacer<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="fnT1_1"><sup>a</sup></xref></th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">MFE<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="fnT1_2"><sup>b</sup></xref> (kcal/mol)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" rowspan="10" align="left"><italic>Providencia rettgeri</italic></td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">GTTCACCGCCACACAGGCGGCTTAGAAA</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">28</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">39</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">-9.41</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">GTTCACCGCCATACAGGCGGCTTAGAAA</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">28</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">-9.30</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">GTTCACTGCCATACAGGCAGCTTAGAAA</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">28</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">30</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">-7.80</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">GTTCACTGCCATGCAGGCAGCTTAGAAA</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">28</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">32</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">-7.80</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">GTTCACTGCCGTATAGGCAGCTTAGAAA</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">28</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">117</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">-8.60</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">TTTCTAAGCCGCCTGTATGGCGGTGAAC</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">28</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">13</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">-11.30</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">TTTCTAAGCCGCCTGTGTGGCGGTGAAC</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">28</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">20</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">-11.30</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">TTTCTAAGCCGCCTGTGTGGCGGTGCAC</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">28</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">27</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">-11.30</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">TTTCTAAGCTGCCTATACGGCAGTGAAC</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">28</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">148</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">-9.10</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">TTTCTAAGCTGCCTGTATGGCAGTGAAC</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">28</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">16</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">-9.80</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" rowspan="12" align="left"><italic>Providencia stuartii</italic></td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">GGTGTACTGCCGTATAGGCAGCTTA</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">25</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">-8.60</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">GTGTACTGCCGCATAGGCAGCTTAGAAA</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">28</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">83</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">-8.60</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">GTGTACTGCCGTATAGGCAGCTTAGAAA</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">28</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">66</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">-8.60</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">GTGTACTGCCGTATAGGCAGCTTAGAAAA</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">29</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">9</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">-8.60</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">GTTCACTGCCGCATAGGCAGCTTAGAAA</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">28</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">73</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">-8.60</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">GTTCACTGCCGTATAGGCAGCTTAGAAA</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">28</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">314</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">-8.60</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">TTTCTAAGCTGCCTATACGGCAGTACAC</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">28</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">90</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">-9.60</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">TTTCTAAGCTGCCTATACGGCAGTGAAC</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">28</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">337</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">-9.10</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">TTTCTAAGCTGCCTATACGGCAGTGCACATAA</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">32</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">-9.10</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">TTTCTAAGCTGCCTATGCGGCAGTAAAC</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">28</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">8</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">-9.60</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">TTTCTAAGCTGCCTATGCGGCAGTACAC</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">28</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">52</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">-9.60</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">TTTCTAAGCTGCCTATGCGGCAGTGAAC</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">28</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">69</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">-9.10</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>MFE, minimum free energy.</p></fn>
<fn id="fnT1_1"><label>a</label>
<p>The number of spacers separated by the corresponding consensus repeats.</p></fn>
<fn id="fnT1_2"><label>b</label>
<p>The minimum free energy (MFE) corresponding to the optimal secondary structure of the corresponding consensus repeats.</p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_4">
<title>Correlation of defense systems and ARGs or VFs</title>
<p>In addition to immune defense systems, the pathogenic potential of <italic>Providencia</italic> species is critically shaped by two key genomic determinants: antibiotic ARGs and VFs. ARGs enable these bacteria to survive under antimicrobial pressure, posing significant challenges in clinical settings where treatment options may be limited. Meanwhile, VFs, such as adhesins, toxins, secretion systems, and iron acquisition systems, facilitate host colonization, tissue invasion, and immune evasion, thereby driving infection progression. The co-occurrence of defense systems with ARGs and VFs within the same genomic contexts can promote the coordinated dissemination of multiple adaptive traits through HGT, potentially giving rise to multidrug-resistant, highly virulent clones. Therefore, understanding the prevalence, diversity, and genomic localization of ARGs and VFs is essential for comprehensively characterizing the evolutionary and clinical significance of <italic>Providencia</italic> pathogens.</p>
<p>To investigate whether defense systems are associated with antimicrobial resistance and virulence, we performed correlation analyses between the total number of defense system types, CRISPR spacer count, ARG count, and VF count in <italic>P. stuartii</italic> and <italic>P. rettgeri</italic>, respectively (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f7"><bold>Figures&#xa0;7A</bold></xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f8"><bold>8A</bold></xref>, all data are provided in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1"><bold>Supplementary Data 4</bold></xref>). The results reveal species-specific patterns. In <italic>P. stuartii</italic>, a positive correlation is observed between the number of defense system types and ARGs (r = 0.59), suggesting that strains with more diverse immune repertoires tend to harbor a greater number of ARGs. The association is further described by a negative correlation between defense system diversity and VF count (r = &#x2212;0.82), indicating a potential trade-off between immune complexity and virulence gene acquisition. Notably, CRISPR spacer count shows a positive correlation with VF count (r = 0.90). In contrast, <italic>P. rettgeri</italic> exhibits a weaker but still positive correlation between defense types and ARGs (r = 0. 38), while showing a negative correlation with VFs (r = &#x2212;0.50). These findings suggest that although both species show some degree of integration between defense and resistance traits, <italic>P. stuartii</italic> displays a more pronounced pattern of co-enrichment of defense and resistance, coupled with a potential antagonism between immunity and virulence.</p>
<fig id="f7" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;7</label>
<caption>
<p>Correlation analysis between defense systems and antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs) or virulence factors (VFs) in <italic>P. stuartii</italic>. <bold>(A)</bold> Correlation heatmap showing pairwise relationships among key variables: total number of defense system types, CRISPR spacer count, ARG count, and VF count. <bold>(B, C)</bold> Display pairwise correlation matrices using the Phi coefficient, with circle size and color intensity reflecting the strength and direction of association. Only values with a <italic>p</italic>-value less than 0.1 are displayed in the figure.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fimmu-17-1755933-g007.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Heatmaps and correlation matrices summarize relationships in Providencia stuartii genomic features. Panel a shows a color-coded correlation matrix between defense types, CRISPR spacers, antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs), and virulent factors, with values ranging from negative to positive correlations. Panel b presents a bubble heatmap of pairwise correlations between specific ARGs and immune system components, where bubble size and color represent correlation strength and direction. Panel c displays a similar bubble heatmap for virulence factors (VFs) and immune system components, showing varying degrees of correlation as indicated by the color scale bar.</alt-text>
</graphic></fig>
<fig id="f8" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;8</label>
<caption>
<p>Correlation analysis between defense systems and antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs) or virulence factors (VFs) in <italic>P. rettgeri</italic>. <bold>(A)</bold> Correlation heatmap showing pairwise relationships among key variables: total number of defense system types, CRISPR spacer count, ARG count, and VF count. <bold>(B, C)</bold> Display pairwise correlation matrices using the Phi coefficient, with circle size and color intensity reflecting the strength and direction of association. Only values with a <italic>p</italic>-value less than 0.1 are displayed in the figure.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fimmu-17-1755933-g008.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Panel a presents a heatmap showing correlation coefficients among defense types, CRISPR spacers, antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs), and virulent factors in Providencia rettgeri, with color ranging from blue (negative) to red (positive). Panel b displays a bubble plot of pairwise correlations between specific ARGs and immune systems, with circle color and size indicating the phi coefficient strength. Panel c presents a similar bubble plot assessing pairwise correlations between virulence factors and immune systems, with the same color and size scheme indicating correlation values.</alt-text>
</graphic></fig>
<p>In <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f7"><bold>Figures&#xa0;7B, C</bold></xref>, we present the correlation analysis between some defense systems identified in <italic>P. stuartii</italic> and specific ARGs or VFs. Similarly, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f8"><bold>Figures&#xa0;8B, C</bold></xref> depict these relationships for <italic>P. rettgeri</italic>. Each point in the figures represents a pairwise comparison of a particular defense system with an individual ARG or VF, using the Phi coefficient to quantify the strength and direction of association. For <italic>P. stuartii</italic>, several defense systems exhibit strong correlations with certain ARGs, suggesting potential co-occurrence patterns within the genome. Conversely, a few defense systems display negative correlations hinting at possible antagonistic relationships or genetic linkage constraints. In <italic>P. rettgeri</italic>, the overall pattern is less pronounced but follows a similar trend, with weaker but still observable correlations between selected defense systems and both ARGs and VFs. These findings provide insight into the genomic architecture of defense, resistance, and virulence traits, highlighting the complex interplay among them.</p>
<p>While the pairwise correlation analyses reveal several statistically significant associations, these findings should be interpreted with caution due to underlying genomic architecture and evolutionary dynamics. Notably, ARGs are frequently observed in clusters, often co-occurring within MGEs such as plasmids, transposons, or integrative and conjugative elements. Consequently, the observed correlations between defense systems and ARGs could reflect genomic co-localization on shared mobile platforms, rather than a direct functional or selective linkage. Similarly, the negative correlation between defense systems and VFs may arise from genomic space constraints, fitness trade-offs, or differential niche adaptation, rather than direct antagonism. Therefore, while the statistical associations provide valuable hypotheses about potential interactions among defense, resistance, and virulence traits, they likely capture indirect signals shaped by genome plasticity and mobile element dynamics. To determine whether these correlations have true biological significance, future studies should integrate genomic context analysis, transcriptomic data, and experimental validation.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_5">
<title>Gain and loss of genes during the evolution of defense systems</title>
<p>The evolution of defense systems in bacteria is a dynamic process marked by both the gain and loss of gene families, which are critical for survival against foreign genetic elements such as bacteriophages and plasmids. Previous studies have highlighted that the acquisition of new defense mechanisms often occurs through HGT, enabling rapid adaptation to environmental pressures. Conversely, the loss of certain defense-related genes may be driven by fitness costs associated with maintaining these systems or due to changes in selective pressures over time. In this study, we calculated the gain and loss events within defense system gene families by employing comparative genomic analyses and ancestral state reconstruction methods. By understanding the dynamics of gene gain and loss, we can better comprehend how bacteria evolve their defensive capabilities in response to changing environments, providing insights into the complex interplay between microbial communities and their biotic and abiotic surroundings.</p>
<p>To investigate the evolutionary dynamics of defense systems in <italic>Providencia</italic>, we reconstructed gene gain and loss events across the phylogeny of <italic>P. stuartii</italic> and <italic>P. rettgeri</italic> using a phylogenomic framework. OrthoFinder was first employed to cluster protein-coding genes into orthogroups, enabling the inference of gene family presence/absence profiles across strains. Subsequently, the COUNT software was applied under a maximum-likelihood birth-death model to estimate per-gene-family rates of gain and loss, accounting for lineage-specific evolutionary processes. This approach allows for the modeling of gene content evolution by treating gains and losses along the branches of the species tree (All data are provided in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1"><bold>Supplementary Data 5</bold></xref>).</p>
<p>Our results reveal distinct evolutionary trajectories between defense systems and the whole genome in both species. In <italic>P. stuartii</italic>, defense systems exhibit experience a higher rate of gene gain (mean: 1.90 &#xd7; 10<sup>-2</sup>) compared to the whole genome (1.10 &#xd7; 10<sup>-2</sup>), yet they also undergo substantial gene loss (3.78 &#xd7; 10<sup>-2</sup>), which&#x2014;although slightly lower than the whole-genome loss rate (4.91 &#xd7; 10<sup>-2</sup>) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2"><bold>Table&#xa0;2</bold></xref>), resulting in a net loss trend. This suggests that while <italic>P. stuartii</italic> actively acquires new defense genes, it simultaneously discards others at a high rate, indicative of a dynamic, high-turnover immune arsenal. In contrast, <italic>P. rettgeri</italic> displays a higher average gain rate in defense systems, driven by an elevated gain rate (5.01 &#xd7; 10<sup>-2</sup>), nearly double its whole-genome gain (2.62 &#xd7; 10<sup>-2</sup>), and a low loss rate (5.96 &#xd7; 10<sup>-2</sup>), which is only about one-third of its genomic loss rate (1.74 &#xd7; 10<sup>-2</sup>) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T3"><bold>Table&#xa0;3</bold></xref>). This indicates that, unlike <italic>P. stuartii</italic>, <italic>P. rettgeri</italic> is undergoing expansion and stabilization of its defense repertoire, possibly reflecting stronger selective pressures to maintain diverse immunity mechanisms. Collectively, these findings demonstrate that defense systems in <italic>Providencia</italic> are subject to high evolutionary turnover, but with species-specific strategies: <italic>P. stuartii</italic> maintains a dynamic, high-turnover, replaceable defense repertoire, whereas <italic>P. rettgeri</italic> favors net acquisition and retention of defense genes. This divergence highlights the distinct evolutionary paths taken by these closely related pathogens in adapting their immune arsenals.</p>
<table-wrap id="T2" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;2</label>
<caption>
<p>Genome dynamics in defense systems in all studied <italic>Providencia stuartii</italic>.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" rowspan="2" align="left">Strain</th>
<th valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center">Defense system</th>
<th valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center">Whole genome</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Gain</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Loss</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Gain</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Loss</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">GCA000259175</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.92E-02</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.67E-02</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.00E-02</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5.97E-02</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">GCA000754345</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.49E-04</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.81E-04</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3.70E-03</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.66E-03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">GCA000783455</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">7.12E-02</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3.47E-02</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.44E-02</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5.03E-02</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">GCA001558855</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.01E-02</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">9.57E-02</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.93E-02</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">9.05E-02</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">GCA001888205</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">8.12E-03</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.06E-02</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.75E-02</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.10E-02</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">GCA002947315</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">7.27E-02</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">7.60E-02</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.81E-02</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">6.16E-02</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">GCA002983665</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5.22E-04</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.32E-02</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">7.18E-03</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.92E-02</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">GCA008693805</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.63E-02</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.79E-02</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.26E-02</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3.10E-02</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">GCA010320365</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.15E-03</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.56E-02</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">8.67E-03</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.97E-02</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">GCA010669105</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">8.73E-02</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.43E-02</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.16E-02</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3.20E-02</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">GCA016128115</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.49E-04</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.81E-04</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.99E-03</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.18E-02</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">GCA018128385</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.86E-02</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">6.49E-03</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.04E-03</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.95E-02</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">GCA023066315</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.94E-02</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3.37E-01</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">8.65E-03</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">6.25E-01</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">GCA023520575</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.63E-02</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5.72E-02</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3.67E-02</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5.16E-02</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">GCA023547145</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.81E-02</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.21E-01</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.27E-02</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5.48E-02</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">GCA023970715</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">9.69E-02</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.30E-01</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">6.11E-02</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.32E-01</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">GCA027286025</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3.37E-02</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">6.71E-02</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.36E-02</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">6.52E-02</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">GCA027286045</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.43E-09</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.80E-07</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3.39E-08</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.01E-07</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">GCA027286065</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">9.67E-09</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.01E-02</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.79E-03</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.43E-02</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">GCA029277825</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.99E-09</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.66E-08</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.44E-04</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.87E-04</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">GCA029277985</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">9.47E-07</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.45E-06</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3.40E-04</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.58E-03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">GCA029278185</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.99E-09</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.66E-08</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.49E-04</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.92E-04</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">GCA030179155</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.64E-03</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.87E-02</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.53E-02</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.41E-02</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">GCA035747985</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.75E-02</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.64E-02</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">8.68E-03</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3.91E-02</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">GCA038069215</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">9.30E-09</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.00E-06</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">8.50E-05</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">8.90E-04</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">GCA042165595</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">9.30E-09</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.00E-06</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">6.06E-03</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.43E-03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">GCA046116575</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.49E-03</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3.92E-02</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.07E-02</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.83E-02</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">GCA050158205</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5.65E-05</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5.31E-05</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5.90E-04</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.62E-03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">GCA051549715</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5.65E-05</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5.31E-05</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.35E-04</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.14E-03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">GCA963855485</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3.12E-07</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.38E-02</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">8.34E-04</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.96E-03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">GCA963855525</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.66E-02</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.14E-05</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.49E-03</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.30E-03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Average</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.90E-02</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3.78E-02</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.10E-02</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.91E-02</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<table-wrap id="T3" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;3</label>
<caption>
<p>Genome dynamics in defense systems in all studied <italic>Providencia rettgeri</italic>.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="left"/>
<th valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center">Defense system</th>
<th valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center">Whole genome</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="left">Strain</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Gain</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Loss</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Gain</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Loss</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">GCA000314835</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.36E-02</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.50E-04</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.98E-02</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.89E-02</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">GCA001874625</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">6.91E-02</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">7.63E-03</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">6.08E-02</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">6.90E-03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">GCA002984195</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.23E-01</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3.28E-04</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.56E-02</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.04E-02</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">GCA003204135</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3.60E-02</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">9.17E-03</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.20E-02</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.35E-02</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">GCA010318885</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.93E-01</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.16E-03</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.75E-02</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.07E-02</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">GCA010319105</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.38E-08</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.39E-07</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">9.77E-08</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.59E-04</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">GCA010319405</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.38E-08</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.39E-07</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.18E-04</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.44E-04</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">GCA010320145</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.02E-02</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">9.78E-03</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.93E-02</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.47E-02</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">GCA013255915</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.85E-08</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">6.23E-10</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.09E-08</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.10E-07</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">GCA013283975</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.70E-02</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.24E-02</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.79E-02</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3.09E-01</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">GCA013423885</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">7.70E-02</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.81E-02</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.63E-02</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">7.27E-03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">GCA013694385</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3.38E-04</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">8.02E-05</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.55E-02</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.70E-03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">GCA013702025</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5.18E-05</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.26E-06</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.02E-03</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.06E-03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">GCA013702245</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">6.00E-02</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">9.46E-03</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.46E-02</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.14E-02</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">GCA013702265</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.54E-01</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.53E-02</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5.30E-02</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">7.09E-02</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">GCA014394705</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.85E-08</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">6.23E-10</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.58E-03</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5.33E-09</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">GCA014489375</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">8.96E-02</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.26E-02</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3.23E-02</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.05E-02</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">GCA015571575</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">7.97E-02</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.66E-02</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.79E-02</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.13E-02</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">GCA016406205</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.55E-06</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5.39E-08</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.89E-04</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.61E-07</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">GCA018771265</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.55E-06</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5.39E-08</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.43E-06</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.24E-03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">GCA018861215</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.12E-08</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">8.68E-03</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.78E-03</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.45E-02</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">GCA018861235</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.19E-05</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.57E-08</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.79E-04</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3.31E-04</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">GCA018861255</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.20E-05</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">6.97E-09</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3.44E-04</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.28E-03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">GCA019047885</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">7.28E-02</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.75E-02</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.30E-02</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.47E-02</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">GCA019048105</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5.27E-02</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.65E-04</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.53E-02</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.89E-02</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">GCA019048545</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">7.00E-02</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.45E-03</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.55E-02</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">7.25E-03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">GCA019890815</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3.61E-02</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5.61E-04</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.73E-02</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">7.75E-03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">GCA020683065</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">6.72E-03</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.01E-03</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.33E-02</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">7.63E-03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">GCA020808945</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3.53E-02</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.42E-04</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3.69E-02</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.26E-03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">GCA020985345</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">6.80E-02</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.75E-03</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.34E-02</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.51E-03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">GCA022846595</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.54E-02</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.58E-05</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3.68E-02</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">7.89E-04</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">GCA023184555</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3.54E-02</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.31E-03</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.51E-02</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.63E-02</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">GCA023205015</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.37E-01</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.26E-03</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">7.60E-02</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3.16E-02</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">GCA023650895</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3.38E-04</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">8.02E-05</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5.92E-03</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.47E-03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">GCA025583505</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.22E-01</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.63E-04</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.61E-02</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.25E-02</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">GCA025916175</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.19E-01</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.60E-03</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.47E-02</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.67E-02</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">GCA029011985</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5.18E-05</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.26E-06</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.83E-03</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">6.05E-03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">GCA034330845</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5.79E-04</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">8.88E-05</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.78E-02</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.81E-03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">GCA038442735</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.21E-01</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5.93E-05</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">9.50E-02</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.70E-03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">GCA040208285</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.04E-01</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.18E-03</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.01E-02</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">7.54E-03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">GCA041075285</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.05E-01</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.87E-03</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.25E-02</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.00E-02</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">GCA042142345</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5.79E-04</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">8.88E-05</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.50E-02</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">7.89E-03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Average</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5.01E-02</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5.96E-03</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.62E-02</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.74E-02</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_6">
<title>Functional validation confirms anti-phage activity of <italic>Providencia</italic>-encoded Gabija and Septu systems</title>
<p>To experimentally test whether these computationally identified systems are functional, we selected two well characterized systems, Gabija from <italic>P. stuartii</italic> (GCA_010669105) and Septu from <italic>P. rettgeri</italic> (GCA_010318885), for heterologous expression and phage challenge assays in <italic>E. coli DH5 alpha</italic> (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1"><bold>Supplementary Data 6</bold></xref>).</p>
<p>Gabija and Septu were chosen for validation due to their well-characterized molecular mechanisms. Both systems have been extensively studied in <italic>E. coli</italic>, where they confer robust immunity against diverse phages through distinct abortive infection or DNA-targeting strategies. As shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f9"><bold>Figure&#xa0;9A</bold></xref>, the wild-type Gabija system from <italic>P. stuartii</italic> strongly inhibited plaque formation by T4 phage, confirming its anti-phage activity. Introducing a single point mutation (E465K) in the GajA subunit, a residue conserved in the predicted ATPase domain, significantly attenuated this defense. Similarly, the Septu system from <italic>P. rettgeri</italic> conferred potent resistance against T7 phage (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f9"><bold>Figure&#xa0;9B</bold></xref>), while the PtuB H53K mutant lost nearly all protective capacity. Broader phage profiling revealed that Gabija exhibited strong activity against T4 (+++), weak inhibition of T7 (+), and no effect on &#x3bb; phage (&#x2212;), whereas Septu was highly effective against T7 (+++) but inactive against both T4 and &#x3bb; (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f9"><bold>Figure&#xa0;9C</bold></xref>). These results demonstrate that <italic>Providencia</italic>-derived defense systems retain functionality in a heterologous host and display phage -specific activity patterns consistent with their known biological roles.</p>
<fig id="f9" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;9</label>
<caption>
<p>Functional validation of Gabija and Septu defense systems from <italic>Providencia</italic> against bacteriophages. <bold>(A)</bold> Phage T4 plaque assay showing the anti-phage activity of the Gabija system in <italic>P. stuartii</italic> (GCA_010669105). The wild-type (WT) Gabija system effectively restricts T4 phage propagation, as evidenced by reduced plaque formation at high dilutions. In contrast, the GajA E465K mutant exhibits significantly diminished defense activity, allowing increased plaque development. Control represents unmodified strain without defense system. <bold>(B)</bold> Phage T7 plaque assay demonstrating the function of the Septu system in <italic>P. rettgeri</italic> (GCA_010318885). The WT Septu system confers strong resistance to T7 phage, with minimal plaque formation across all dilutions. The PtuB H53A mutant shows loss of defense activity, resulting in robust plaque growth comparable to the control. Control indicates the absence of the Septu system. <bold>(C)</bold> Summary of defense activity for representative Gabija and Septu systems cloned into <italic>E</italic>. <italic>coli</italic>. Activity against <italic>Myoviridae</italic> (T4), <italic>Podoviridae</italic> (T7), and <italic>Siphoviridae</italic> (&#x3bb;) phages is indicated by +/&#x2212; signs: &#x201c;+&#x201d; denotes presence and number of &#x201c;+&#x201d; reflects relative strength of defense (+++, strong; +, moderate; &#x2212;, no activity).</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fimmu-17-1755933-g009.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Panel a displays a spot assay showing Providencia stuartii with control, Gabija wild-type, and Gabija E465K rows against serial dilutions of phage T4, where Gabija wild-type confers resistance. Panel b, a similar assay, displays Providencia rettgeri with control, Septu wild-type, and Septu H53A rows against phage T7, where Septu wild-type confers resistance. Panel c is a table summarizing defense activity for Gabija and Septu systems against myovirus T4, podovirus T7, and siphovirus Lambda in Escherichia coli, using plus signs to indicate defense strength.</alt-text>
</graphic></fig>
<p>Notably, although <italic>Providencia</italic> belongs to the <italic>Enterobacteriaceae</italic> family and shares close phylogenetic proximity with <italic>E. coli</italic>, the Gabija system from <italic>P. stuartii</italic> GCA_010669105 exhibits structural divergence. While core domains (e.g., TOPRIM in GajA) are conserved, the GajA protein is extended to 736 amino acids, with a longer C-terminal region than the well characterized homolog; however, we do not know whether the C-terminal has any function or not. This uncharacterized segment may reflect <italic>Providencia</italic>-specific adaptations. However, comprehensive functional dissection of such features requires phages naturally infecting <italic>Providencia</italic>, which are currently unavailable for us.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s3" sec-type="discussion">
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>This study presents a comparative genomic analysis of defense systems in <italic>P. stuartii</italic> and <italic>P. rettgeri</italic>, revealing species-specific patterns in their occurrence, diversity, and evolutionary dynamics. Both species possess a wide array of defense mechanisms, yet differ markedly in repertoire composition and genomic stability. <italic>P. stuartii</italic> exhibits a higher diversity of defense systems, greater evolutionary turnover, and stronger associations with ARGs. CRISPR-Cas systems are variably present and show structural divergence in spacer and repeat, suggesting functional differentiation between the two species. Notably, the relationships between defense systems, antibiotic resistance, and VFs are complex and context-dependent, indicative of intertwined evolutionary trajectories. Together, these findings highlight distinct adaptive strategies underlying bacterial immunity in these emerging opportunistic pathogens.</p>
<p>The defense arsenal of <italic>Providencia</italic> pathogens is characterized by a dominant core of RM and CRISPR-Cas systems accompanied by a diverse array of auxiliary mechanisms, reflecting a multi-layered strategy for combating MGEs (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">26</xref>). Cross-tool validation (DefenseFinder, PADLOC) and expanded assembly-level analysis (contigs, scaffolds) confirm the consistency of this core architecture: the overwhelming prevalence of RM systems in both <italic>P. stuartii</italic> and <italic>P. rettgeri</italic> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2"><bold>Figures&#xa0;2A, B</bold></xref>; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1"><bold>Supplementary Figures&#xa0;2A&#x2013;D</bold></xref>) aligns with their status as the most widespread prokaryotic defense mechanism, consistently reported across bacterial phyla as a primary barrier against foreign DNA (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">27</xref>). Similarly, the high abundance of CRISPR-Cas, particularly Class 1 Type I-F, mirrors findings in other pathogens, where this subtype is frequently associated with robust anti-phage activity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">28</xref>). Notably, the near-exclusive presence of Cas Type I-F in <italic>Providencia</italic> (detected by both tools), to the apparent exclusion of other common subtypes like I-E or II-A, suggests a specific evolutionary trajectory favoring a single, highly optimized adaptive immune system (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">29</xref>). The enrichment of non-CRISPR systems such as GAPS2, and RM further underscores the reliance on innate, often abortive infection-based defenses, which have been increasingly recognized for their synergistic potential with other systems (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">28</xref>). The clustering of defense genes into genomic islands (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4"><bold>Figures&#xa0;4C, D</bold></xref>), particularly in <italic>P. stuartii</italic>, echoes the concept of &#x201c;defense islands&#x201d; previously described in diverse bacteria, where co-localized systems may facilitate horizontal transfer and functional cooperation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">12</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">30</xref>). Expanded sampling via contig/scaffold data revealed that core defense system profiles (RM, CRISPR-Cas) are conserved across assembly types, though rare systems show greater variability, supporting the utility of contig/scaffold assemblies when complete genomes are scarce. Altogether, the composition and organization of defense systems in <italic>Providencia</italic> highlight a balance between conserved, core immunity and flexible, modular innovation, likely underpinning its resilience in clinical environments.</p>
<p>Despite the presence of CRISPR-Cas systems in a subset of strains, both <italic>P. stuartii</italic> and <italic>P. rettgeri</italic> exhibit remarkably limited diversity in effector architecture, harboring almost exclusively the Class 1, Type I-F system, a subtype commonly associated with plasmid-targeting activity and frequently found in Gram-negative <italic>Enterobacteriaceae</italic> family such as <italic>E. coli</italic> and <italic>Pectobacterium atrosepticum</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">31</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">32</xref>). This conserved subtype, paired with our BacMGEnet data, clarifies its functional role: Type I-F&#x2019;s dominance aligns with its plasmid/phage-targeting capacity, directly shaping <italic>Providencia</italic>&#x2019;s MGE interaction networks. Notably, while both species typically retain a single Cas operon, they differ significantly in the genomic organization of associated CRISPR arrays. In <italic>P. stuartii</italic>, multiple spatially separated arrays are often observed across the genome, potentially enabling broad surveillance through a single Cas machinery, a configuration reminiscent of &#x201c;isolated CRISPR arrays&#x201d; seen in <italic>E. coli</italic> and <italic>Salmonella</italic>, where distant repeats are processed by a common Cas complex (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">33</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">34</xref>). This dispersed architecture dovetails with <italic>P. stuartii</italic>&#x2019;s expanded spacer count: it likely enhances capture of diverse spacers, critical for navigating high-MGE clinical niches. In contrast, <italic>P. rettgeri</italic> predominantly features one or two arrays immediately adjacent to the <italic>cas</italic> genes, suggesting a more common pattern frequently evolved (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">33</xref>). This structural divergence may reflect differing evolutionary strategies: the dispersed architecture in <italic>P. stuartii</italic> could enhance adaptive potential by capturing diverse spacers from mobile elements, whereas the compact organization in <italic>P. rettgeri</italic> may favor regulatory simplicity and functional reliability. Such variation underscores that even within a conserved CRISPR type, genomic context and array topology play critical roles in shaping immune capability and evolutionary trajectory (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">33</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">35</xref>). Notably, the frequent loss or fragmentation of <italic>cas</italic> genes in both species parallels patterns seen in multidrug-resistant pathogens, where CRISPR absence correlates with increased acquisition of resistance, suggesting a selective disadvantage in high-antibiotic settings (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">36</xref>).</p>
<p>The spacer-MGE and host-MGE networks (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6"><bold>Figure&#xa0;6</bold></xref>; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1"><bold>Supplementary Figure&#xa0;5</bold></xref>) illuminate how <italic>Providencia</italic>&#x2019;s defense systems shape its ecological interaction, extending beyond individual strain immunity to community-level dynamics. The dense, hub-driven architecture of <italic>P. stuartii</italic>&#x2019;s network (shared spacers targeting common phages) aligns with its expanded defense system repertoire: frequent phage exposure (driving CRISPR spacer acquisition) likely selects for conserved anti-phage immunity across strains, a pattern consistent with hospital environments where phage predation is pervasive. In contrast, <italic>P. rettgeri</italic>&#x2019;s sparser network mirrors its reduced CRISPR diversity, suggesting either lower phage pressure or reliance on alternative defenses to mitigate MGE threats. More broadly, integrating defense system composition (RM, CRISPR subtypes) with interaction networks bridges molecular immunity to microbial community ecology, offering a model for studying how pathogens adapt their defenses to fluctuating MGE landscapes.</p>
<p>ARGs and VFs are key determinants of pathogen success and now could be served as prime targets of phage therapy, it is therefore imperative to clarify how these resistance and virulence determinants interplay with bacterial defense systems (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">37</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">39</xref>). The observed associations between defense system content and ARGs or VFs, align with growing evidence that bacterial immunity and resistance evolution are not independent processes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">40</xref>). In the groundwater defensome, the same mobile islands that deliver high-turnover accessory immune genes rarely carry antibiotic-resistance determinants, providing a natural example of an inverse link between defense-system load and ARG abundance (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">41</xref>). Similarly, Analysis of 13,000+ chromosomally integrated MGEs shows that defense-rich MGEs simultaneously carry fewer ARGs and fewer virulence genes, demonstrating a single inverse relationship that links high bacterial defense-system load to both reduced antibiotic-resistance potential and diminished virulence capacity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">42</xref>). Our observation of a positive correlation between defense systems and ARGs, contrary to these pan-environmental studies. This apparent discrepancy may stem from the critical influence of ecological and genomic context on bacterial evolutionary dynamics. Their results likely reflect environments with lower antibiotic pressure, where defense systems function primarily as barriers to uncontrolled genetic influx. In contrast, clinical and hospital-associated strains, frequently exposed to antibiotics, may experience co-selection of defense and resistance genes.</p>
<p>Gene gain and loss are fundamental drivers of prokaryotic genome evolution, shaping the adaptive potential of bacterial lineages by enabling rapid responses to environmental challenges (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">43</xref>). Comparative genomics reveals that defense systems are among the most dynamically evolving modules in prokaryotic genomes, subject to rapid gain and loss driven by the constant turnover of genetic parasites (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">44</xref>). This fluid architecture generates lineage-specific defense islands and continually reshapes the immunity landscape of bacteria and archaea (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">44</xref>). Defense systems experience rapid gain and loss via HGT, often co-mobilized with MGEs, which can transiently increase HGT rates rather than suppress them (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">45</xref>). Defense genes are among the most rapidly exchanged commodities in microbial genomes, exhibiting an average gain-and-loss flux 1.4-fold higher than the genomic background and recurring in the same locus through repeated, MGE-mediated birth-and-death events (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">46</xref>). In <italic>Ralstonia solanacearum</italic>, defense systems against phages and plasmids exhibit a dynamic evolutionary pattern characterized by a net gain of defense genes, contrasting with the overall trend of gene loss in the rest of the genome (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">47</xref>). Together, these findings establish that defense systems do not evolve under stable inheritance but instead follow a highly dynamic trajectory shaped by MGEs and host-parasite coevolution. In line with this broader evolutionary paradigm, our analysis of <italic>Providencia</italic> genomes reveals extensive gene turnover in defense systems, consistent with their classification as accessory genome components under strong diversifying selection. Notably, while both <italic>P. stuartii</italic> and <italic>P. rettgeri</italic> exhibit dynamics of gain and loss (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2"><bold>Tables&#xa0;2</bold></xref>, <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3"><bold>3</bold></xref>), the directionality of change differs between species: <italic>P. stuartii</italic> displays a high-turnover model, reflecting frequent replacement and remodeling of defense repertoires. In contrast, <italic>P. rettgeri</italic> shows a bias toward net gene gain, mirroring the expansionist pattern observed in <italic>Ralstonia solanacearum</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">47</xref>) and suggesting intensified selection for novel defense acquisition. This divergence underscores that closely related pathogens can adopt distinct evolutionary strategies, ranging from defense system recycling to sustained expansion. Thus, while the dynamic nature of defense systems is conserved across bacteria, the net outcome of their evolution is fine-tuned to lineage-specific ecological pressures.</p>
<p>While this study provides a comprehensive pan-genomic view of defense system in <italic>Providencia</italic>, several limitations still exist. First, the reliance on genomes and automated annotation may lead to incomplete or erroneous identification of defense loci, particularly for fragmented or divergent systems that require manual curation and functional validation. Second, the observed correlations between defense systems, ARGs, and VFs are based on genomic co-occurrence and do not establish causality. Experimental data, such as those provided by RNA-seq analyses, could be used to determine whether these systems are actively expressed under relevant environmental or host conditions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">48</xref>). Third, the evolutionary inferences drawn from phylogenetic comparative methods assume neutral background evolution, yet selection on linked sites or population structure could bias gain-loss reconstructions. Moreover, expanding comparative analyses to include closely related genera and diverse ecological niches could reveal broader principles governing the trade-offs between immunity, resistance, and virulence in opportunistic pathogens.</p>
<p>Our functional validation of <italic>Providencia</italic>-encoded Gabija and Septu systems not only confirms their anti-phage activity in a heterologous host but also situates our findings within the rapidly expanding landscape of prokaryotic innate immunity. The discovery of these two systems traces back to the landmark pangenomic screen by Doron et&#xa0;al. (2018), which first identified Gabija and Septu as widespread, previously uncharacterized defense modules clustered in genomic &#x201c;defense islands&#x201d; (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">49</xref>). Since then, structural and mechanistic studies have revealed that both systems operate through tightly regulated, multi-subunit complexes: Gabija functions as a nucleotide-sensing DNA endonuclease whose activity is unleashed upon phage-induced ATP/dNTP depletion (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">50</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">52</xref>), while Septu forms an inflammasome-like PtuA6:PtuB2 oligomer that degrades single-stranded DNA upon activation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B53">53</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">54</xref>). Our observation that point mutations in conserved residues, GajA E465K and PtuB H53K, abolish defense aligns with these models, as E465 resides within the ATPase/Toprim regulatory interface critical for Gabija activation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">52</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B55">55</xref>) and H53 likely contributes to PtuB&#x2019;s nuclease function or complex assembly (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B53">53</xref>).</p>
<p>Notably, despite high conservation of core domains, the <italic>P. stuartii</italic> Gabija system harbors a longer C-terminal region than its homologs reported. Given that GajB has been shown to modulate substrate specificity and enhance plasmid cleavage in other species (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">56</xref>), this extended region may fine-tune the immune response in <italic>Providencia</italic>. Intriguingly, recent work suggests Gabija discriminates self from non-self not by sequence motifs but by sensing the absence of host RecBCD-mediated DNA repair on linear phage genomes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">57</xref>); whether such a mechanism operates in <italic>Providencia</italic>, which possesses divergent DNA repair machinery, remains unknown.</p>
<p>Critically, our assays relied on model phages (T4, T7, &#x3bb;) in <italic>E. coli</italic>, which, while enabling initial validation, may overlook the full defensive repertoire of <italic>Providencia</italic>. Native phages co-evolving with <italic>Providencia</italic> could engage distinct evasion strategies (e.g., encoding Gad1-like anti-defense proteins that encapsulate Gabija (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">50</xref>)) or trigger alternative activation pathways. Moreover, emerging evidence shows that some defense systems, including Retron-Septu, are maintained in an inactive state until disassembly releases active effectors, suggesting that static heterologous expression may underestimate regulatory complexity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">54</xref>). Future work employing <italic>Providencia</italic>-specific phages, native expression contexts, and structural interrogation of <italic>Providencia</italic>-derived complexes will be essential to uncover whether these systems have evolved unique adaptations reflective of their ecological niche, particularly in clinical settings where phage pressure intersects with antibiotic selection.</p>
<p>This study highlights that defense systems in <italic>Providencia</italic> are not static genomic elements but dynamic components. Our findings reinforce the emerging view that microbial defense is not merely a binary trait but part of an integrated genomic ecosystem, in which interactions with MGEs drive the co-evolution of resistance, virulence, and immunity. As such, understanding the regulatory and evolutionary logic of defense systems may offer new avenues for predicting pathogen evolution and designing phage-based therapies. Future models of bacterial adaptation must therefore incorporate defense architecture as a key variable, bridging genomics, ecology, and function to unravel the full complexity of host-parasite arms races in the microbial world.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4" sec-type="materials|methods">
<title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="s4_1">
<title>Data collection</title>
<p>All complete genome sequences of <italic>P. stuartii</italic> and <italic>P. rettgeri</italic> were retrieved from the NCBI GenBank database (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/">https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/</ext-link>) in 2025-12-29. A total of 31 P<italic>. stuartii</italic> and 42 P<italic>. rettgeri</italic> isolates with complete genomes or chromosome available were included in this study. To broaden our analysis beyond complete genomes, we retrieved all publicly available genomic assemblies from NCBI, including contig- and scaffold-level sequences. This yielded 429 contigs and 50 scaffolds for <italic>P. stuartii</italic>, and 334 contigs and 244 scaffolds for <italic>P. rettgeri</italic>. All assemblies were processed with DefenseFinder under default parameters to identify and classify defense systems. Only complete genomes were selected for most analysis to ensure high genomic integrity and to minimize assembly-related artifacts in the identification and genomic context analysis of defense systems. All accession numbers for the analyzed genomes are provided in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1"><bold>Supplementary Table&#xa0;1</bold></xref>. For downstream analyses requiring different genomic formats (e.g., nucleotide sequences in FASTA, annotated features in GFF or GBK), corresponding files were downloaded directly from NCBI without re-annotation to maintain consistency with the reference records and to ensure reproducibility of the analyses. However, due to differences in file availability across NCBI repositories and formats, slight discrepancies in isolate representation may occur between individual bioinformatics workflows.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4_2">
<title>Identification and characterization of defense systems</title>
<p>Defense systems were identified using DefenseFinder (version 2.2) with default parameters, a widely used tool for the detection and classification of known antiviral defense systems in prokaryotic genomes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">27</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B58">58</xref>). The analysis was performed on the complete genome sequences of 31 P<italic>. stuartii</italic> and 42 P<italic>. rettgeri</italic> isolates. DefenseFinder was run for each isolate, and results were aggregated for comparative analysis. To visualize the distribution and composition of defense systems across strains, Python (v3.9) libraries such as pandas, matplotlib, and seaborn are used for data processing and plotting.</p>
<p>A complementary analysis using PADLOC (v2.0.0) on the same set of complete <italic>P. stuartii</italic> and <italic>P. rettgeri</italic> genomes previously analyzed with DefenseFinder (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B59">59</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B60">60</xref>). PADLOC was run under default settings to identify defense systems at the subtype level. Results from PADLOC were compared with DefenseFinder outputs to assess concordance in major system detection and to identify potentially missed or underrepresented immune modules.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4_3">
<title>Identification and characterization of CRISPR-Cas system</title>
<p>The CRISPR-Cas systems were identified using CRISPRCasFinder (v4.2.21) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B61">61</xref>) and CRISPRCasTyper (v1.3) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B62">62</xref>) with default parameters, run locally in command-line mode to enable batch processing. CRISPRCasFinder was used to detect both CRISPR arrays and associated <italic>cas</italic> genes across all complete genomes. Only CRISPR arrays with an evidence level of 3 or 4, indicating strong support based on repeat conservation and spacer length, were retained for downstream analysis to ensure high-confidence predictions. Genomic context analysis was performed to determine the physical linkage between CRISPR arrays and <italic>cas</italic> gene clusters. Manual curation was carried out using genome browsers and sequence inspection to confirm the boundaries of arrays and the orientation of flanking genes. The RNA secondary structures of the repeat sequences were predicted using the RNAfold WebServer (available at <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://rna.tbi.univie.ac.at/cgi-bin/RNAWebSuite/RNAfold.cgi">http://rna.tbi.univie.ac.at/cgi-bin/RNAWebSuite/RNAfold.cgi</ext-link>) with default settings. The minimum free energy (MFE) structure was used to assess the potential for stable stem-loop formation.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4_4">
<title>Spacer and MGE network analysis</title>
<p>To investigate the potential interactions between <italic>P. stuartii</italic> and <italic>P. rettgeri</italic> with MGEs (including phages and plasmids), the BacMGEnet computational pipeline (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://github.com/mgtools/BacMGEnet">https://github.com/mgtools/BacMGEnet</ext-link>) was employed in this study (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B63">63</xref>). Briefly, the downloaded genomic data of the two bacterial species was used as input. CRISPR arrays and associated spacers were identified using the integrated method, followed by redundancy removal with CD-HIT-EST to obtain unique spacers. These unique spacers were then queried against the multi-source MGE database (downloaded from BacMGEnet pipeline) integrated by BacMGEnet (encompassing phage databases such as GPD, MVP, RVDB, and mMGE, as well as plasmid databases including COMPASS and PLSDB) using BLASTN. Matches were filtered with criteria of &gt;90% sequence identity, &gt;80% query coverage, and e-value &lt;0.001 to identify potential MGEs containing corresponding protospacers. A greedy algorithm was applied to select non-redundant bacterial hosts and MGEs, which were used to construct Host-MGE and Spacer-MGE interaction networks. Network visualization along with manual verification were conducted using Cytoscape.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4_5">
<title>Correlation analysis of ARGs and VFs</title>
<p>To investigate the potential associations between defense systems and genomic features related to pathogenicity, VFs and ARGs were annotated for each <italic>Providencia</italic> genome using data retrieved from the gcPathogen database (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://nmdc.cn/gcpathogen/">https://nmdc.cn/gcpathogen/</ext-link>), a curated resource for pathogen-associated genes in bacterial genomes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B64">64</xref>). The presence and abundance of VFs and VRGs were matched to the corresponding isolates based on genome accession ids.</p>
<p>A pairwise correlation analysis was performed between the occurrence profiles of defense system and the presence of individual VFs and ARGs. The analysis was conducted using Phi coefficient (&#x3c6;), a measure of association for binary variables. To evaluate the association between the overall abundance of defense systems and ARGs/VFs, Spearman&#x2019;s rank correlation coefficient (&#x3c1;) was calculated to assess non-linear relationships, and the corresponding <italic>p</italic>-values were adjusted for multiple testing using the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure to control the false discovery rate (FDR). Correlations with an adjusted <italic>p</italic>-value &lt; 0.1 were considered suggestive of potential biological associations.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4_6">
<title>Gene gain and loss</title>
<p>To infer the evolutionary dynamics of defense system gene families in <italic>Providencia</italic>, we applied a probabilistic birth-and-death model implemented in COUNT v10.04 (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.iro.umontreal.ca/~csuros/gene_content/count.html">https://www.iro.umontreal.ca/~csuros/gene_content/count.html</ext-link>) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B65">65</xref>). The analysis was based on defense system-specific gene family clustering and a species tree inferred using OrthoFinder (v2.5.4) with default parameters (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B66">66</xref>). OrthoFinder was used to identify orthogroups from the proteomes of <italic>Providencia</italic> isolates (31 P<italic>. stuartii</italic> and 42 P<italic>. rettgeri</italic> strains available from NCBI GenBank), and the rooted species tree generated by OrthoFinder served as the phylogenetic framework for downstream ancestral state reconstruction. The gene family gain, loss, and duplication rates were estimated using the gain-loss-duplication model under a Poisson distribution, with rate variation across branches modeled using three discrete categories of the gamma distribution to account for heterogeneity in evolutionary rates. Similar results were obtained when using four gamma categories, confirming the robustness of the model. For optimization, 100 independent runs were performed to ensure convergence, with the likelihood threshold set at 0.1. Custom scripts were written in-house to quantify gains and losses of defense system families using COUNT-derived results; these scripts are available in the <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1"><bold>Supplementary Materials</bold></xref> (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1"><bold>Supplementary Data 7</bold></xref>). This combined OrthoFinder-COUNT approach enabled the reconstruction of ancestral gene content and the estimation of lineage-specific rates of defense system gene family evolution across the <italic>Providencia</italic> phylogeny.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4_7">
<title>Functional validation of Gabija and Septu defense systems</title>
<p>The Gabija and Septu anti-phage defense systems were identified in representative <italic>Providencia</italic> strains: Gabija from <italic>P. stuartii</italic> (GCA_010669105) and Septu from <italic>P. rettgeri</italic> (GCA_010318885). Full genomic coordinates, gene accession IDs, protein sequences, and complete DNA sequences of both systems are provided in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1"><bold>Supplementary Data 6</bold></xref>. For functional assays, the entire defense loci, including 500 bp upstream and 200 bp downstream of the coding regions, were chemically synthesized by Sangon Biotech Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China) and cloned into the low-copy-number plasmid vector pBR322 under native regulatory elements.</p>
<p>Site-directed mutagenesis was performed to generate loss-of-function variants: GajA E465K in the Gabija system and PtuB H53K in the Septu system. Mutations were introduced using the QuickMutation Site-Directed Mutagenesis Kit (Cat. No. D0206S, Beyotime Biotechnology, China), following the manufacturer&#x2019;s protocol. All constructs were verified by Sanger sequencing.</p>
<p>Wild-type and mutant defense constructs were transformed into Escherichia coli DH5&#x3b1; cells for phenotypic characterization. Phage plaque assays were conducted as follows: overnight cultures of DH5&#x3b1; harboring each construct were diluted 1:100 in LB medium and grown to mid-log phase (OD600 &#x2248; 0.5). Cells were mixed with serial dilutions (10<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> to 10<sup>&#x2212;7</sup>) of laboratory-maintained bacteriophages T4 (<italic>Myoviridae</italic>), T7 (<italic>Podoviridae</italic>), or &#x3bb; (<italic>Siphoviridae</italic>), incubated at 37 &#xb0;C for 15 min to allow phage adsorption, and then drop plated in agar overlays on LB agar plates. Plaques were visualized after overnight incubation at 37 &#xb0;C. Defense activity was presented based on plaque formation relative to empty-vector controls: &#x201c;&#x2212;&#x201d; indicates no restriction (plaque morphology identical to control), &#x201c;+&#x201d; denotes moderate reduction in plaque number or size, and &#x201c;+++&#x201d; represents strong inhibition (few or no plaques even at low phage dilutions).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4_8">
<title>Statistical comparisons of defense system</title>
<p>Statistical comparisons of defense system type/subtype counts across bacterial genera and species were conducted using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) to assess overall differences between groups. Where significant main effects were detected, Tukey&#x2019;s honest significant difference (HSD) <italic>post hoc</italic> test was applied to perform pairwise comparisons between <italic>Providencia</italic> (genus level), <italic>P. stuartii, P. rettgeri</italic> (species level), and other target taxa. Significance thresholds were set at <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.05 and <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.001. All statistical analyses were implemented in Python using the scipy and statsmodels packages. Full pairwise comparison results are provided in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1"><bold>Supplementary Data 1</bold></xref>.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec id="s5" sec-type="data-availability">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1"><bold>Supplementary Material</bold></xref>. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.</p></sec>
<sec id="s6" sec-type="author-contributions">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>XL: Data curation, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Writing &#x2013; original draft. YZ: Data curation, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing. XG: Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing. YB: Methodology, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing. JW: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing.</p></sec>
<sec id="s8" sec-type="COI-statement">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p></sec>
<sec id="s9" sec-type="ai-statement">
<title>Generative AI statement</title>
<p>The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.</p>
<p>Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.</p></sec>
<sec id="s10" sec-type="disclaimer">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p></sec>
<sec id="s11" sec-type="supplementary-material">
<title>Supplementary material</title>
<p>The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2026.1755933/full#supplementary-material">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2026.1755933/full#supplementary-material</ext-link></p>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="DataSheet1.zip" id="SM1" mimetype="application/zip"/>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="DataSheet2.zip" id="SM2" mimetype="application/zip"/></sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1">
<label>1</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>W</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Wushouer</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>X</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. 
<article-title>Changing climate and socioeconomic factors contribute to global antimicrobial resistance</article-title>. <source>Nat Med</source>. (<year>2025</year>) <volume>31</volume>:<page-range>1798&#x2013;808</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41591-025-03629-3</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">40295742</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<label>2</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Tamma</surname> <given-names>PD</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Heil</surname> <given-names>EL</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Justo</surname> <given-names>JA</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Mathers</surname> <given-names>AJ</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Satlin</surname> <given-names>MJ</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Bonomo</surname> <given-names>RA</given-names></name>
</person-group>. 
<article-title>Infectious diseases society of america 2024 guidance on the treatment of antimicrobial-resistant gram-negative infections</article-title>. <source>Clin Infect Dis</source>. (<year>2024</year>). doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/cid/ciae403</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">39108079</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<label>3</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Macesic</surname> <given-names>N</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Uhlemann</surname> <given-names>AC</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Peleg</surname> <given-names>AY</given-names></name>
</person-group>. 
<article-title>Multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacterial infections</article-title>. <source>Lancet</source>. (<year>2025</year>) <volume>7</volume>:<fpage>ciae403</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0140-6736(24)02081-6</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">39826970</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<label>4</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>N</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name>
<name><surname>He</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Jin</surname> <given-names>W</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. 
<article-title>Personalized bacteriophage therapy for chronic biliary tract Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections</article-title>. <source>hLife</source>. (<year>2025</year>) <volume>3</volume>:<page-range>275&#x2013;83</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.hlife.2025.03.004</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<label>5</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Georjon</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Bernheim</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name>
</person-group>. 
<article-title>The highly diverse antiphage defence systems of bacteria</article-title>. <source>Nat Rev Microbiol</source>. (<year>2023</year>) <volume>21</volume>:<fpage>686</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>700</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41579-023-00934-x</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">37460672</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<label>6</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Wein</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Sorek</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name>
</person-group>. 
<article-title>Bacterial origins of human cell-autonomous innate immune mechanisms</article-title>. <source>Nat Rev Immunol</source>. (<year>2022</year>) <volume>22</volume>:<page-range>629&#x2013;38</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41577-022-00705-4</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">35396464</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<label>7</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>X</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Shi</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name>
</person-group>. 
<article-title>The immune system of prokaryotes: potential applications and implications for gene editing</article-title>. <source>Biotechnol J</source>. (<year>2024</year>) <volume>19</volume>:<fpage>e2300352</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/biot.202300352</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">38403433</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<label>8</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Bernheim</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Sorek</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name>
</person-group>. 
<article-title>The pan-immune system of bacteria: antiviral defence as a community resource</article-title>. <source>Nat Rev Microbiol</source>. (<year>2020</year>) <volume>18</volume>:<page-range>113&#x2013;9</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41579-019-0278-2</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31695182</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<label>9</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Rousset</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name>
</person-group>. 
<article-title>Innate immunity: the bacterial connection</article-title>. <source>Trends Immunol</source>. (<year>2023</year>) <volume>44</volume>:<page-range>945&#x2013;53</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.it.2023.10.001</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">37919213</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<label>10</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Morehouse</surname> <given-names>BR</given-names></name>
</person-group>. 
<article-title>Phage defense origin of animal immunity</article-title>. <source>Curr Opin Microbiol</source>. (<year>2023</year>) <volume>73</volume>:<fpage>102295</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.mib.2023.102295</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">37011504</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<label>11</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Hochhauser</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Millman</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Sorek</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name>
</person-group>. 
<article-title>The defense island repertoire of the Escherichia coli pan-genome</article-title>. <source>PLoS Genet</source>. (<year>2023</year>) <volume>19</volume>:<elocation-id>e1010694</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pgen.1010694</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">37023146</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<label>12</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Makarova</surname> <given-names>KS</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Wolf</surname> <given-names>YI</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Snir</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Koonin</surname> <given-names>EV</given-names></name>
</person-group>. 
<article-title>Defense islands in bacterial and archaeal genomes and prediction of novel defense systems</article-title>. <source>J Bacteriol</source>. (<year>2011</year>) <volume>193</volume>:<page-range>6039&#x2013;56</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/JB.05535-11</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21908672</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<label>13</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Beavogui</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Lacroix</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Wiart</surname> <given-names>N</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Poulain</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Delmont</surname> <given-names>TO</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Paoli</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. 
<article-title>The defensome of complex bacterial communities</article-title>. <source>Nat Commun</source>. (<year>2024</year>) <volume>15</volume>:<fpage>2146</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41467-024-46489-0</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">38459056</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<label>14</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Da Silva</surname> <given-names>GC</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Rossi</surname> <given-names>CC</given-names></name>
</person-group>. 
<article-title>The arms race between <italic>actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae</italic> and its genetic environment: A comprehensive analysis of its defensome and mobile genetic elements</article-title>. <source>Mol Microbiol</source>. (<year>2025</year>) <volume>124</volume>:<fpage>40</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>53</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/mmi.15374</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">40317571</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<label>15</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Egido</surname> <given-names>JE</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Costa</surname> <given-names>AR</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Aparicio-Maldonado</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Haas</surname> <given-names>PJ</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Brouns</surname> <given-names>SJJ</given-names></name>
</person-group>. 
<article-title>Mechanisms and clinical importance of bacteriophage resistance</article-title>. <source>FEMS Microbiol Rev</source>. (<year>2022</year>) <volume>46</volume>:<fpage>fuab048</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/femsre/fuab048</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34558600</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<label>16</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Janda</surname> <given-names>JM</given-names></name>
</person-group>. 
<article-title>A group with emerging potential in the clinical and public health realms: the genus Providencia</article-title>. <source>Infect Dis (Lond)</source>. (<year>2025</year>) <volume>57</volume>:<fpage>699</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>725</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/23744235.2025.2509007</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">40439770</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<label>17</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Witteveen</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Hendrickx</surname> <given-names>APA</given-names></name>
</person-group>. 
<article-title>Providencia stuartii</article-title>. <source>Trends Microbiol</source>. (<year>2025</year>) <volume>33</volume>:<page-range>810&#x2013;1</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.tim.2025.02.009</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">40121130</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<label>18</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Vale</surname> <given-names>PF</given-names></name>
</person-group>. 
<article-title>Providencia rettgeri</article-title>. <source>Trends Microbiol</source>. (<year>2025</year>) <volume>33</volume>(<issue>12</issue>):<fpage>1354</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>5</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.tim.2025.04.013</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">40374466</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<label>19</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Dong</surname> <given-names>X</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Jia</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Xiang</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name>
</person-group>. 
<article-title>Genomic revisitation and reclassification of the genus Providencia</article-title>. <source>mSphere</source>. (<year>2024</year>) <volume>9</volume>:<elocation-id>e0073123</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/msphere.00731-23</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">38412041</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<label>20</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Malviya</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Kale-Pradhan</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Coyle</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Giuliano</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Johnson</surname> <given-names>LB</given-names></name>
</person-group>. 
<article-title>Clinical and drug resistance characteristics of providencia infections</article-title>. <source>Microorganisms</source>. (<year>2024</year>) <volume>12</volume>(<issue>10</issue>):<fpage>2085</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/microorganisms12102085</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">39458394</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<label>21</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Tumbarello</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name>
</person-group>. 
<article-title>ESBL-producing multidrug-resistant Providencia stuartii infections in a university hospital</article-title>. <source>J Antimicrobial Chemotherapy</source>. (<year>2004</year>) <volume>53</volume>:<page-range>277&#x2013;82</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jac/dkh047</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">14688041</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<label>22</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Rakov</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Ben Porat</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Alkalay-Oren</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Yerushalmy</surname> <given-names>O</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Abdalrhman</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Gronovich</surname> <given-names>N</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. 
<article-title>Targeting biofilm of MDR providencia stuartii by phages using a catheter model</article-title>. <source>Antibiotics (Basel)</source>. (<year>2021</year>) <volume>10</volume>(<issue>4</issue>):<fpage>375</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/antibiotics10040375</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33918377</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<label>23</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>X</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. 
<article-title>Biological characterization and genomic profiling of a novel Providencia phage isolated from farm effluents</article-title>. <source>Arch Virol</source>. (<year>2025</year>) <volume>170</volume>:<fpage>187</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00705-025-06373-8</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">40731076</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<label>24</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Mencke</surname> <given-names>JL</given-names></name>
<name><surname>He</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Filippov</surname> <given-names>AA</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Nikolich</surname> <given-names>MP</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Belew</surname> <given-names>AT</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Fouts</surname> <given-names>DE</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. 
<article-title>Identification and Characterization of vB_PreP_EPr2, a Lytic Bacteriophage of Pan-Drug Resistant Providencia rettgeri</article-title>. <source>Viruses</source>. (<year>2022</year>) <volume>14</volume>:<fpage>708</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/v14040708</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">35458437</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<label>25</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Yuan</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Wei</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Cheng</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Cheng</surname> <given-names>X</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Qian</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. 
<article-title>Comparative genomic analysis reveals genetic mechanisms of the variety of pathogenicity, antibiotic resistance, and environmental adaptation of providencia genus</article-title>. <source>Front Microbiol</source>. (<year>2020</year>) <volume>11</volume>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2020.572642</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33193173</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<label>26</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Agapov</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Baker</surname> <given-names>KS</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Bedekar</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Bhatia</surname> <given-names>RP</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Blower</surname> <given-names>TR</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Brockhurst</surname> <given-names>MA</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. 
<article-title>Multi-layered genome defences in bacteria</article-title>. <source>Curr Opin Microbiol</source>. (<year>2024</year>) <volume>78</volume>:<fpage>102436</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.mib.2024.102436</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">38368839</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<label>27</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Tesson</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Herve</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Mordret</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Touchon</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name>
<name><surname>d&#x2019;Humieres</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Cury</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. 
<article-title>Systematic and quantitative view of the antiviral arsenal of prokaryotes</article-title>. <source>Nat Commun</source>. (<year>2022</year>) <volume>13</volume>:<fpage>2561</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41467-022-30269-9</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">35538097</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<label>28</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Garushyants</surname> <given-names>SK</given-names></name>
<name><surname>van den Hurk</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Aparicio-Maldonado</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Kushwaha</surname> <given-names>SK</given-names></name>
<name><surname>King</surname> <given-names>CM</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. 
<article-title>Bacterial defense systems exhibit synergistic anti-phage activity</article-title>. <source>Cell Host Microbe</source>. (<year>2024</year>) <volume>32</volume>:<fpage>557</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>572.e6</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.chom.2024.01.015</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">38402614</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<label>29</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Koonin</surname> <given-names>EV</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Makarova</surname> <given-names>KS</given-names></name>
</person-group>. 
<article-title>Origins and evolution of CRISPR-Cas systems</article-title>. <source>Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci</source>. (<year>2019</year>) <volume>374</volume>:<fpage>20180087</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1098/rstb.2018.0087</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30905284</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<label>30</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Koonin</surname> <given-names>EV</given-names></name>
</person-group>. 
<article-title>Hunting for treasure chests in microbial defense islands</article-title>. <source>Mol Cell</source>. (<year>2018</year>) <volume>70</volume>:<page-range>761&#x2013;2</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.molcel.2018.05.025</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29883602</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<label>31</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Xue</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Sashital</surname> <given-names>DG</given-names></name>
</person-group>. 
<article-title>Mechanisms of type I-E and I-F CRISPR-cas systems in enterobacteriaceae</article-title>. <source>EcoSal Plus</source>. (<year>2019</year>) <volume>8</volume>(<issue>2</issue>). doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/ecosalplus.esp-0008-2018</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30724156</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<label>32</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Zheng</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Han</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Hao</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. 
<article-title>Endogenous type I CRISPR-cas: from foreign DNA defense to prokaryotic engineering</article-title>. <source>Front Bioeng Biotechnol</source>. (<year>2020</year>) <volume>8</volume>:<elocation-id>62</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fbioe.2020.00062</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32195227</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<label>33</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Shmakov</surname> <given-names>SA</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Utkina</surname> <given-names>I</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Wolf</surname> <given-names>YI</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Makarova</surname> <given-names>KS</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Severinov</surname> <given-names>KV</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Koonin</surname> <given-names>EV</given-names></name>
</person-group>. 
<article-title>CRISPR arrays away from cas genes</article-title>. <source>CRISPR J</source>. (<year>2020</year>) <volume>3</volume>:<page-range>535&#x2013;49</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1089/crispr.2020.0062</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33346707</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<label>34</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Q</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Ye</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name>
</person-group>. 
<article-title>Not all predicted CRISPR-Cas systems are equal: isolated cas genes and classes of CRISPR like elements</article-title>. <source>BMC Bioinf</source>. (<year>2017</year>) <volume>18</volume>:<fpage>92</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12859-017-1512-4</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28166719</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<label>35</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Westra</surname> <given-names>ER</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Dowling</surname> <given-names>AJ</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Broniewski</surname> <given-names>JM</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Van Houte</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name>
</person-group>. 
<article-title>Evolution and ecology of CRISPR</article-title>. <source>Annu Rev Ecology Evolution Systematics</source>. (<year>2016</year>) <volume>47</volume>:<page-range>307&#x2013;31</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-121415-032428</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B36">
<label>36</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Palmer</surname> <given-names>KL</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Gilmore</surname> <given-names>MS</given-names></name>
</person-group>. 
<article-title>Multidrug-resistant enterococci lack CRISPR-cas</article-title>. <source>mBio</source>. (<year>2010</year>) <volume>1</volume>(<issue>36</issue>):<elocation-id>e00227-10</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/mBio.00227-10</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21060735</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B37">
<label>37</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>De Melo</surname> <given-names>AG</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Morency</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Moineau</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name>
</person-group>. 
<article-title>Virulence-associated factors as targets for phage infection</article-title>. <source>Curr Opin Microbiol</source>. (<year>2024</year>) <volume>79</volume>:<fpage>102471</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.mib.2024.102471</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">38569419</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B38">
<label>38</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Orom&#xed;-Bosch</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Antani</surname> <given-names>JD</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Turner</surname> <given-names>PE</given-names></name>
</person-group>. 
<article-title>Developing phage therapy that overcomes the evolution of bacterial resistance</article-title>. <source>Annu Rev Virol</source>. (<year>2023</year>) <volume>10</volume>:<page-range>503&#x2013;24</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1146/annurev-virology-012423-110530</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">37268007</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B39">
<label>39</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Urban-Chmiel</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Marek</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Stepien-Pysniak</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Wieczorek</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Dec</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Nowaczek</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. 
<article-title>Antibiotic resistance in bacteria-A review</article-title>. <source>Antibiotics (Basel)</source>. (<year>2022</year>) <volume>11</volume>(<issue>8</issue>):<fpage>1079</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/antibiotics11081079</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">36009947</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B40">
<label>40</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Smith</surname> <given-names>WPJ</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Wucher</surname> <given-names>BR</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Nadell</surname> <given-names>CD</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Foster</surname> <given-names>KR</given-names></name>
</person-group>. 
<article-title>Bacterial defences: mechanisms, evolution and antimicrobial resistance</article-title>. <source>Nat Rev Microbiol</source>. (<year>2023</year>) <volume>21</volume>:<page-range>519&#x2013;34</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41579-023-00877-3</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">37095190</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B41">
<label>41</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>Z</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>T</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Deng</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Q</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Ni</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name>
</person-group>. 
<article-title>The defensome of prokaryotes in aquifers</article-title>. <source>Nat Commun</source>. (<year>2025</year>) <volume>16</volume>:<fpage>6482</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41467-025-61467-w</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">40659683</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B42">
<label>42</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Botelho</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name>
</person-group>. 
<article-title>Defense systems are pervasive across chromosomally integrated mobile genetic elements and are inversely correlated to virulence and antimicrobial resistance</article-title>. <source>Nucleic Acids Res</source>. (<year>2023</year>) <volume>51</volume>:<page-range>4385&#x2013;97</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/nar/gkad282</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">37078595</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B43">
<label>43</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Iranzo</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Wolf</surname> <given-names>YI</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Koonin</surname> <given-names>EV</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Sela</surname> <given-names>I</given-names></name>
</person-group>. 
<article-title>Gene gain and loss push prokaryotes beyond the homologous recombination barrier and accelerate genome sequence divergence</article-title>. <source>Nat Commun</source>. (<year>2019</year>) <volume>10</volume>:<fpage>5376</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41467-019-13429-2</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31772262</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B44">
<label>44</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Koonin</surname> <given-names>EV</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Makarova</surname> <given-names>KS</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Wolf</surname> <given-names>YI</given-names></name>
</person-group>. 
<article-title>Evolutionary genomics of defense systems in archaea and bacteria</article-title>. <source>Annu Rev Microbiol</source>. (<year>2017</year>) <volume>71</volume>:<page-range>233&#x2013;61</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1146/annurev-micro-090816-093830</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28657885</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B45">
<label>45</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Botelho</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Iranzo</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name>
</person-group>. 
<article-title>Timescale and genetic linkage explain the variable impact of defense systems on horizontal gene transfer</article-title>. <source>Genome Res</source>. (<year>2025</year>) <volume>35</volume>:<page-range>268&#x2013;78</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1101/gr.279300.124</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">39794121</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B46">
<label>46</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Puigbo</surname> <given-names>P</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Makarova</surname> <given-names>KS</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Kristensen</surname> <given-names>DM</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Wolf</surname> <given-names>YI</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Koonin</surname> <given-names>EV</given-names></name>
</person-group>. 
<article-title>Reconstruction of the evolution of microbial defense systems</article-title>. <source>BMC Evol Biol</source>. (<year>2017</year>) <volume>17</volume>:<fpage>94</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12862-017-0942-y</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28376755</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B47">
<label>47</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Castillo</surname> <given-names>JA</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Secaira-Morocho</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Maldonado</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Sarmiento</surname> <given-names>KN</given-names></name>
</person-group>. 
<article-title>Diversity and evolutionary dynamics of antiphage defense systems in ralstonia solanacearum species complex</article-title>. <source>Front Microbiol</source>. (<year>2020</year>) <volume>11</volume>:<elocation-id>961</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2020.00961</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32508782</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B48">
<label>48</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Cunha da Silva</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Rossi</surname> <given-names>CC</given-names></name>
</person-group>. 
<article-title>Defense systems and mobile elements in Staphylococcus haemolyticus: a genomic view of resistance dissemination</article-title>. <source>Microb Pathog</source>. (<year>2025</year>) <volume>206</volume>:<fpage>107808</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.micpath.2025.107808</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">40516885</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B49">
<label>49</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Doron</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Melamed</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Ofir</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Leavitt</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Lopatina</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Keren</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. 
<article-title>Systematic discovery of antiphage defense systems in the microbial pangenome</article-title>. <source>Science</source>. (<year>2018</year>) <volume>359</volume>(<issue>6397</issue>):<elocation-id>eaar4120</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/science.aar4120</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29371424</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B50">
<label>50</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Antine</surname> <given-names>SP</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Johnson</surname> <given-names>AG</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Mooney</surname> <given-names>SE</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Leavitt</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Mayer</surname> <given-names>ML</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Yirmiya</surname> <given-names>E</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. 
<article-title>Structural basis of Gabija anti-phage defence and viral immune evasion</article-title>. <source>Nature</source>. (<year>2024</year>) <volume>625</volume>:<page-range>360&#x2013;5</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41586-023-06855-2</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">37992757</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B51">
<label>51</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Cheng</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>H</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Lu</surname> <given-names>X</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Yan</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. 
<article-title>A nucleotide-sensing endonuclease from the Gabija bacterial defense system</article-title>. <source>Nucleic Acids Res</source>. (<year>2021</year>) <volume>49</volume>:<page-range>5216&#x2013;29</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/nar/gkab277</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33885789</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B52">
<label>52</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Cheng</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Z</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Yuan</surname> <given-names>W</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Xiao</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>X</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. 
<article-title>Structures and activation mechanism of the Gabija anti-phage system</article-title>. <source>Nature</source>. (<year>2024</year>) <volume>629</volume>:<page-range>467&#x2013;73</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41586-024-07270-x</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">38471529</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B53">
<label>53</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Shen</surname> <given-names>Z</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>XY</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Cleary</surname> <given-names>SP</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Xie</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. 
<article-title>PtuA and PtuB assemble into an inflammasome-like oligomer for anti-phage defense</article-title>. <source>Nat Struct Mol Biol</source>. (<year>2024</year>) <volume>31</volume>:<page-range>413&#x2013;23</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41594-023-01172-8</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">38177683</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B54">
<label>54</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Rish</surname> <given-names>AD</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Armbruster</surname> <given-names>EG</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Xie</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Loveland</surname> <given-names>AB</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Shen</surname> <given-names>Z</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. 
<article-title>Disassembly activates Retron-Septu for antiphage defense</article-title>. <source>Science</source>. (<year>2025</year>) <volume>389</volume>:<elocation-id>eadv3344</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/science.adv3344</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">40504952</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B55">
<label>55</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Huo</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Kong</surname> <given-names>L</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Xiao</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Du</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. 
<article-title>Structural and biochemical insights into the mechanism of the Gabija bacterial immunity system</article-title>. <source>Nat Commun</source>. (<year>2024</year>) <volume>15</volume>:<fpage>836</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41467-024-45173-7</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">38282040</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B56">
<label>56</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>XY</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Shen</surname> <given-names>Z</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Xie</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Greenwald</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Marathe</surname> <given-names>I</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Lin</surname> <given-names>Q</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. 
<article-title>Molecular basis of Gabija anti-phage supramolecular assemblies</article-title>. <source>Nat Struct Mol Biol</source>. (<year>2024</year>) <volume>31</volume>:<page-range>1243&#x2013;50</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41594-024-01283-w</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">38627580</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B57">
<label>57</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Hong</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Truta</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Talaie</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Smith</surname> <given-names>GR</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Bondy-Denomy</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name>
</person-group>. 
<article-title>Gabija restricts phages that antagonize a conserved host DNA repair complex</article-title>. <source>bioRxiv</source>. (<year>2025</year>). doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1101/2025.08.30.673261</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">40909725</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B58">
<label>58</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>N&#xe9;ron</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Denise</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Coluzzi</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Touchon</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Rocha</surname> <given-names>EPC</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Abby</surname> <given-names>SS</given-names></name>
</person-group>. 
<article-title>MacSyFinder v2: Improved modelling and search engine to identify molecular systems in genomes</article-title>. <source>Peer Community J</source>. (<year>2023</year>) <volume>3</volume>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.24072/pcjournal.250</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B59">
<label>59</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Payne</surname> <given-names>LJ</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Todeschini</surname> <given-names>TC</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Perry</surname> <given-names>BJ</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Ronson</surname> <given-names>CW</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Fineran</surname> <given-names>PC</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. 
<article-title>Identification and classification of antiviral defence systems in bacteria and archaea with PADLOC reveals new system types</article-title>. <source>Nucleic Acids Res</source>. (<year>2021</year>) <volume>49</volume>:<page-range>10868&#x2013;78</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/nar/gkab883</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34606606</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B60">
<label>60</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Payne</surname> <given-names>LJ</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Meaden</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Mestre</surname> <given-names>MR</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Palmer</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Toro</surname> <given-names>N</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Fineran</surname> <given-names>PC</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. 
<article-title>PADLOC: a web server for the identification of antiviral defence systems in microbial genomes</article-title>. <source>Nucleic Acids Res</source>. (<year>2022</year>) <volume>50</volume>:<page-range>W541&#x2013;50</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/nar/gkac400</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">35639517</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B61">
<label>61</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Couvin</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Bernheim</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Toffano-Nioche</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Touchon</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Michalik</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Neron</surname> <given-names>B</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. 
<article-title>CRISPRCasFinder, an update of CRISRFinder, includes a portable version, enhanced performance and integrates search for Cas proteins</article-title>. <source>Nucleic Acids Res</source>. (<year>2018</year>) <volume>46</volume>:<page-range>W246&#x2013;51</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/nar/gky425</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29790974</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B62">
<label>62</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Russel</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Pinilla-Redondo</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Mayo-Mu&#xf1;oz</surname> <given-names>D</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Shah</surname> <given-names>SA</given-names></name>
<name><surname>S&#xf8;rensen</surname> <given-names>SJ</given-names></name>
</person-group>. 
<article-title>CRISPRCasTyper: automated identification, annotation, and classification of CRISPR-cas loci</article-title>. <source>CRISPR J</source>. (<year>2020</year>) <volume>3</volume>:<page-range>462&#x2013;9</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1089/crispr.2020.0059</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33275853</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B63">
<label>63</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Monshizadeh</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Zomorodi</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Mortensen</surname> <given-names>K</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Ye</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name>
</person-group>. 
<article-title>Revealing bacteria-phage interactions in human microbiome through the CRISPR-Cas immune systems</article-title>. <source>Front Cell Infection Microbiol</source>. (<year>2022</year>) <volume>12</volume>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fcimb.2022.933516</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">36250060</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B64">
<label>64</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>C</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>Q</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Fan</surname> <given-names>G</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Nie</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Shen</surname> <given-names>Z</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. 
<article-title>gcPathogen: a comprehensive genomic resource of human pathogens for public health</article-title>. <source>Nucleic Acids Res</source>. (<year>2024</year>) <volume>52</volume>:<page-range>D714&#x2013;23</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/nar/gkad875</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">37850635</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B65">
<label>65</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Csuros</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name>
</person-group>. 
<article-title>Count: evolutionary analysis of phylogenetic profiles with parsimony and likelihood</article-title>. <source>Bioinformatics</source>. (<year>2010</year>) <volume>26</volume>:<page-range>1910&#x2013;2</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/bioinformatics/btq315</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20551134</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B66">
<label>66</label>
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Emms</surname> <given-names>DM</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Kelly</surname> <given-names>S</given-names></name>
</person-group>. 
<article-title>OrthoFinder: phylogenetic orthology inference for comparative genomics</article-title>. <source>Genome Biol</source>. (<year>2019</year>) <volume>20</volume>:<fpage>238</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s13059-019-1832-y</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31727128</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
<fn-group>
<fn id="n1" fn-type="custom" custom-type="edited-by">
<p>Edited by: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1623950">Renata Urban-Chmiel</ext-link>, University of Life Sciences of Lublin, Poland</p></fn>
<fn id="n2" fn-type="custom" custom-type="reviewed-by">
<p>Reviewed by: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/46399">Pedro H. Oliveira</ext-link>, Commissariat &#xe0; l&#x2019;Energie Atomique et aux Energies Alternatives (CEA), France</p>
<p><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1468812">Giarl&#xe3; Cunha da Silva</ext-link>, Universidade Federal de Vi&#xe7;osa, Brazil</p></fn>
</fn-group>
<fn-group>
<fn fn-type="abbr" id="abbrev1">
<label>Abbreviations:</label>
<p>MDR, multidrug resistance; RM, restriction-modification; GIs, genomic islands; VF, virulence factor; ARGs, antibiotic resistance genes; MGEs, mobile genetic elements; HGT, horizontal gene transfer.</p>
</fn>
</fn-group>
</back>
</article>