Edited by: Wenxue Ma, University of California, San Diego, United States
Reviewed by: Rong-Hua Tao, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, United States
*Correspondence: Changxin Huang,
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
In the published article, there was two error in affiliation(s) 2.
1. Instead of “3Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, 155 Hospital of Kaifeng City, Hangzhou, China”, it should be “3Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, 155 Hospital of Kaifeng City, Kaifeng, China”.
2. Instead of “4Department of Urology, Huaihe Hospital, Henan University, Kaifeng City, China”, it should be “4Department of Urology, Huaihe Hospital of Henan University, Kaifeng, China”.
In the published article, there was an error in the legend for
The percentages of T, B, and NK cells in the mixed cell population were analyzed by flow cytometry in the control group, which did not include the addition of peptides. The proportions of CD3+CD4+ double positive (CD4+ T cells), CD3+CD8+ double positive (CD8+ T cells), CD3-CD56 + (NK cells) and CD3-CD19 + (B cells) were 7.8%, 4.63%, 7.81% and 1.40%, respectively.
“The percentages of T, B, and NK cells in the mixed cell population were analyzed by flow cytometry in the control group, which did not include the addition of peptides. The proportions of CD3+CD4+ double positive (CD4+ T cells), CD3+CD8+ double positive (CD8+ T cells), CD3-CD56 + (NK cells) and CD3-CD19 + (B cells) were 7.8%, 4.63%, 7.81% and 1.40%, respectively.”
In the published article, there was an error in the
“This work was supported by grants from major science and technology project of Zhejiang Province, China (Project number: 2017C03053), the Hangzhou Science and Technology Development Program Project (Project number: 202004A21), Hangzhou Medical and Health Technology Project (Project number: A20220868), Hangzhou Biomedicine and Health Industry Development Support Project (Project number: 2022WJC030), and Henan Province Medical Science and Technology Research Program Project (Project number: LHGI20230440).”
In the published article, there were three errors.
1. A correction has been made to
“3. Neoantigen Peptides Promote CD4+, CD8+ T, and NK Cell Proliferation: After 14 days, flow cytometry showed higher percentages of CD4+ T (37.41% vs 7.8%), CD8+ T (16.67% vs 14.63%), and NK cells (33.09% vs 7.81%) in the experimental group, indicating that the neoantigen peptides induced proliferation of CD4+, CD8+ T cells, and NK cells.”
The corrected sentence appears below:
“3. Neoantigen Peptides Promote CD4+, CD8+ T, and NK Cell Proliferation: After 14 days, flow cytometry showed higher percentages of CD4+ T (37.41% vs 7.8%), CD8+ T (16.67% vs 4.63%), and NK cells (33.09% vs 7.81%) in the experimental group, indicating that the neoantigen peptides induced proliferation of CD4+, CD8+ T cells, and NK cells.”
2. A correction has been made to
“The proportions of CD3+CD4+ double positive (CD4+ T cells), CD3+CD8+ double positive (CD8+ T cells), CD3-CD56 + (NK cells) and CD3-CD19 + (B cells) were 7.8%, 14.63%, 7.81% and 1.40%, respectively.”
The corrected sentence appears below:
“The proportions of CD3+CD4+ double positive (CD4+ T cells), CD3+CD8+ double positive (CD8+ T cells), CD3-CD56 + (NK cells) and CD3-CD19 + (B cells) were 7.8%, 4.63%, 7.81% and 1.40%, respectively.”
3. A correction has been made to
“Immunogenicity quantification enabled determination of the relationship between a neoantigen’s immune effects and its HLA molecular affinity changes, as depicted in Chart 1.”
The corrected sentence appears below:
“Immunogenicity quantification enabled determination of the relationship between a neoantigen’s immune effects and its HLA molecular affinity changes, as depicted in Supplementary Material.”
The authors apologize for these errors and state that these do not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.