<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="EN">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Immunol.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Immunology</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Immunol.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">1664-3224</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fimmu.2024.1471317</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Immunology</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Cocktail vaccine for the management of <italic>Hyalomma anatolicum</italic> and <italic>Rhipicephalus microplus</italic>
</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Manjunathachar</surname>
<given-names>Haranahally Vasanthachar</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn003">
<sup>&#x2020;</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2803571"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/validation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/visualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/software/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kumar</surname>
<given-names>Binod</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn003">
<sup>&#x2020;</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1737966"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/software/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Parthasarathi</surname>
<given-names>Balasamudram Chandrasekhar</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1869277"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chigure</surname>
<given-names>Gajanan M.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn003">
<sup>&#x2020;</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2884594"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Saravanan</surname>
<given-names>Buddhi Chandrasekaran</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1250697"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/visualization/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sankar</surname>
<given-names>Muthu</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2360551"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Harish</surname>
<given-names>Darasaguppe Ramachandra</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn003">
<sup>&#x2020;</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1949708"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>de la Fuente</surname>
<given-names>Jos&#xe9;</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">
<sup>3</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4">
<sup>4</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/42307"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Ghosh</surname>
<given-names>Srikanta</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5">
<sup>5</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn001">
<sup>*</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn003">
<sup>&#x2020;</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1287223"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/funding-acquisition/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/project-administration/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/resources/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/validation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/visualization/"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
<institution>Entomology Laboratory, Division of Parasitology, Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR)- Indian Veterinary Research Institute (IVRI)-Izatnagar</institution>, <addr-line>Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh</addr-line>, <country>India</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
<institution>Division of Animal Biotechnology, Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR)-Indian Veterinary Research Institute (IVRI)-Izatnagar</institution>, <addr-line>Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh</addr-line>, <country>India</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff3">
<sup>3</sup>
<institution>SaBio, Instituto de Investigaci&#xf3;n en Recursos Cineg&#xe9;ticos (IREC), Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cient&#xed;ficas (CSIC), Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha (UCLM)-Junta de Comunidades de Castilla-La Mancha (JCCM)</institution>, <addr-line>Ciudad Real</addr-line>, <country>Spain</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff4">
<sup>4</sup>
<institution>Department of Veterinary Pathobiology, Center for Veterinary Health Sciences, Oklahoma State University</institution>, <addr-line>Stillwater, OK</addr-line>, <country>United States</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff5">
<sup>5</sup>
<institution>Indian Veterinary Research Institute (IVRI)-Eastern Regional Centre</institution>, <addr-line>Kolkata, West Bengal</addr-line>, <country>India</country>
</aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>Edited by: Venkatesh Kumaresan, University of Texas at San Antonio, United States</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>Reviewed by: Lu&#xed;s Fernando Parizi, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil</p>
<p>Lourena Costa, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Brazil</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="corresp" id="fn001">
<p>*Correspondence: Srikanta Ghosh, <email xlink:href="mailto:sghoshtick@gmail.com">sghoshtick@gmail.com</email>
</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="present-address" id="fn003">
<p>&#x2020;Present addresses: Haranahally Vasanthachar Manjunathachar, Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR)-National Institute of Traditional Medicine, Belagavi, Karnataka, India; Darasaguppe Ramachandra Harish, Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR)-National Institute of Traditional Medicine, Belagavi, Karnataka, India; Binod Kumar, Department of Veterinary Parasitology, College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Bihar Animal Science University, Kishnganj, Bihar, India; Gajanan M. Chigure, Department of Veterinary Parasitology, College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Maharashtra Animal and Fishery Sciences University, Parbhani, Maharashtra, India; Srikanta Ghosh, Parasitology Laboratory, Indian Veterinary Research Institute- Eastern Regional Station, Kolkata, West Bengal, India</p>
</fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>19</day>
<month>11</month>
<year>2024</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2024</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>15</volume>
<elocation-id>1471317</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>27</day>
<month>07</month>
<year>2024</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>21</day>
<month>10</month>
<year>2024</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#xa9; 2024 Manjunathachar, Kumar, Parthasarathi, Chigure, Saravanan, Sankar, Harish, de la Fuente and Ghosh</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2024</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Manjunathachar, Kumar, Parthasarathi, Chigure, Saravanan, Sankar, Harish, de la Fuente and Ghosh</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<sec>
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Globally, ticks rank second only to mosquitoes as vectors of deadly pathogens affecting humans and first in transmitting animal pathogens, presenting a significant challenge to human wellness and sustainability of livestock-based industries. Traditional tick control via chemical acaricides impacts on the environment and has led to the emergence of multi-acaricide-resistant tick populations. Use of immunoprophylactic, along with other components of integrated tick management, holds the potential to mitigate tick infestations in a sustainable manner. To control multi-species tick infestations, the concept of a cocktail vaccine comprising of more than one antigens has emerged as a viable solution due to the inconsistent efficacy of single antigen-based immunization protocol.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Methods</title>
<p>In this study, a dual antigen cocktail immunization protocol was developed targeting ferritin2 (FER2) and tropomyosin (TPM) proteins, which are associated with ticks&#x2019; essential cellular and physiological functions, like blood iron homeostasis and muscle contractions.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Results</title>
<p>Dual gene silencing of FER2 and TPM genes in <italic>Hyalomma anatolicum</italic> resulted in a 75.3% reduction in infested ticks, a 95.4% decrease in egg masses, and a complete loss of egg hatching when compared to control ticks. Microscopically, an altered ovarian cellular architecture, marked by vacuolation and reduced nucleus-to-cytoplasmic ratio were noted in the gene knocked down ticks. An immunization with cocktails of 300 &#xb5;g dose of each protein, rHaFER2 and rHaTPM was standardized in a rat model and was used to immunize cross-bred (<italic>Bos indicus</italic> x <italic>B. taurus</italic>) male cattle with Montanide ISA 50V2 adjuvant on days 0, 28, and 49. A significant (<italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.001) IgG and IgG2 antibody response was observed in the immunized animals with high IgG levels sustained until day 119 post-primary immunization, showing a 4.1-fold increase over the pre-immunization period. The animals were challenged with larvae and adults of <italic>H. anatolicum</italic> and larvae of <italic>Rhipicephalus microplus</italic>. Immunization with the cocktail antigen resulted an efficacy of 70% and 76% against <italic>H. anatolicum</italic> larvae and adults, respectively, and 54% against <italic>R. microplus</italic> infestations. Compared to single-antigen immunization, the immunization with cocktail antigens demonstrated higher protection against <italic>R. microplus</italic> and <italic>H. anatolicum</italic> ticks. The results advance the development of cocktail vaccines to control multiple tick species.</p>
</sec>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>RNAi</kwd>
<kwd>ferritin2 (FER2)</kwd>
<kwd>tropomyosin (TPM)</kwd>
<kwd>cocktail vaccine</kwd>
<kwd>
<italic>Hyalomma anatolicum</italic>
</kwd>
<kwd>
<italic>Rhipicephalus microplus</italic>
</kwd>
<kwd>cross-bred cattle</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<counts>
<fig-count count="4"/>
<table-count count="3"/>
<equation-count count="11"/>
<ref-count count="74"/>
<page-count count="14"/>
<word-count count="6921"/>
</counts>
<custom-meta-wrap>
<custom-meta>
<meta-name>section-in-acceptance</meta-name>
<meta-value>Vaccines and Molecular Therapeutics</meta-value>
</custom-meta>
</custom-meta-wrap>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="s1" sec-type="intro">
<label>1</label>
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Ticks are obligate blood-feeding ectoparasites of vertebrate hosts and act as vectors for various viral, bacterial, protozoans, rickettsial, and fungal pathogens impacting human and animal health globally (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">1</xref>). Ticks are second only to mosquitoes as vectors of human diseases and are the primary transmitters of many arthropod-borne diseases to livestock and companion animals (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">2</xref>). In the tropical and subtropical regions of the world, <italic>Rhipicephalus microplus</italic> and <italic>Hyalomma anatolicum</italic> ticks are considered as the most economically important species, significantly impacting the growth of the cattle industry by direct damage to animals and by transmitting a number of fatal pathogens viz., <italic>Babesia</italic> spp., <italic>Anaplasma</italic> spp., <italic>Theileria</italic> spp (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">3</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">4</xref>). Besides, these tick species are also transmitting fatal zoonotic pathogens causing Indian tick typhus (ITT), Kyasanur Forest Disease (KFD), and Crimean-Congo Hemorrhagic fever (CCHF), which are spreading to different parts of the globe (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">5</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">8</xref>). Globally, annual economic losses from ticks and tick-borne diseases (TTBDs) are estimated to be between $22-30 billion USD, highlighting their upward negative impact on human and animal health worldwide (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">9</xref>). Nevertheless, various attributing factors, <italic>viz</italic>, globalization, intensified transboundary trade activities, movement of hosts, climate change, and anthropogenically induced changes in land usage patterns, have significantly contributed to the rise in TTBDs worldwide (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">4</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">10</xref>).</p>
<p>Tick management is mainly based on repeated acaricide applications with limited efficacy and cause numerous effects on hosts, the environment, and public health (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">11</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">12</xref>). Misuse of different acaricide classes have led to the emergence of resistant tick populations in various parts of the world (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">12</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">15</xref>). Besides resistance, indiscriminate use of chemical acaricides has increased environmental pollutants and contaminated animal byproducts with chemical residues (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">16</xref>). Among alternative tick control strategies, the immunological approach is considered one of the most promising, being target-specific, eco- friendly, and economically sustainable (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">17</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">18</xref>). However, to date, only two vaccines (TickGARD&#x2122; and GAVAC&#x2122;) have been commercialized for reducing <italic>R. microplus</italic> infestations in cattle, offering limited cross-protection due to the tick genetic diversity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">17</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">19</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">21</xref>). Since then, numerous new tick protective antigens have been identified and tested against homologous challenges, with efficacy ranging from 47-90%. However, these antigens have shown limited cross-species protective efficacy (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">18</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">22</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">23</xref>). Dowall et&#xa0;al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">24</xref>) suggested that zoonotic tick-borne diseases like CCHF could be managed by developing and using commercially viable, potent cross-protective anti-tick vaccines as emphasized previously by other tick researchers (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">25</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">27</xref>). Earlier, Willadsen (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">28</xref>) opined that combining two or more antigens in a cocktail form would significantly increase the overall efficacy of immunization compared to immunization by a single antigen. Different multi-antigens immunization strategies such as immunization with cocktail of antigens, co-immunization, and immunization using chimeric antigens were advocated. Among the different strategies, the immunization using a cocktail of antigens of targeted tick species provided better efficacy than other strategies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">29</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">32</xref>). However, the identification of suitable antigens for the development of multicomponent vaccines conferring protective efficacy against multiple tick species remains a major challenge. Nonetheless, researchers are striving hard to develop protocol for inducing substantial humoral and/or cell-mediated immune response against multiple tick infestations following immunization. Few studies have shown that host immunoglobulins can cross the tick gut to the hemolymph and cells, leading to antibody-mediated cell lysis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">33</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">34</xref>). These findings have increased the possibility of targeting both intracellular and secretary molecules in vaccine development.</p>
<p>Blood intake is necessary for each tick to complete molting and female ticks to complete egg laying and fertility. Consequently, genes involved in the physiological processes of tick blood-feeding were targeted for anti-tick vaccine development (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">35</xref>). Accordingly, two molecules namely, Ferritin2 (FER2), gut specific secretory protein involved in iron homeostasis and expressed in all the tick stages and Tropomyosin (TPM), an actin associated salivary protein, play vital roles in muscle contraction by modulating the binding of myosin and highly conserved between tick species and other invertebrates were chosen in the current study (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">36</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">39</xref>). RNAi studies and immunization trials conducted by different tick research groups using these two antigens alone have shown promising anti-tick effects mainly by disrupting blood feeding, oviposition, and fecundity of ticks fed on immunized animals (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">36</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">37</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">39</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">40</xref>). Taking the leads from the previous experiments, the current study is focused on developing a cocktail vaccine formulation for better efficacy against homologous and heterologous challenge infestations.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2" sec-type="materials|methods">
<label>2</label>
<title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="s2_1">
<label>2.1</label>
<title>Ticks and experimental animals</title>
<p>The acaricide susceptible <italic>Hyalomma anatolicum</italic> (IVRI-II) and <italic>Rhipicephalus microplus</italic> (IVRI-I) strains maintained in the Entomology laboratory, Division of Parasitology, Indian Veterinary Research Institute (IVRI) were used as reference material. Cross bred bovine calves (<italic>Bos indicus</italic> X <italic>B. taurus</italic>) above six months of age were maintained at the large animal experimental shed of the division. The calves were maintained as per the approved guidelines laid down by the Committee for the Purpose of Control and Supervision of Experiments on Animals (CPCSEA) [No.F.26-1/2015-16/J.D(R)]. Similarly, healthy 1 to 1.5 kg New Zealand white rabbits and adult male Wistar rats (200&#x2013;250 g) were maintained in the small animal house of the division. Rabbits were used for rearing of <italic>H. anatolicum</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">41</xref>), while rats were used for the standardization of immunization dose. Rats and rabbits were maintained as per the guidelines of Institute Animal Ethics committee (IAEC) [No. F. 26-1/2015/JD (R)].</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_2">
<label>2.2</label>
<title>Double gene silencing and its impact on biology of ticks</title>
<p>Double gene silencing was carried out in <italic>H. anatolicum</italic> ticks as per the method of Nijhof et&#xa0;al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">42</xref>). Gene-specific primers were designed with consensus T7 promoter at the 5&#x2019; end for <italic>in vitro</italic> transcription and synthesis of <italic>Ha-FER2</italic> (KT924235) and <italic>Ha-TPM</italic> (KU297197) genes of <italic>H. anatolicum</italic>. The Luc dsRNA was used as RNAi control. Cloned bacterial plasmid containing <italic>FER2</italic> and <italic>TPM</italic> genes of <italic>H. anatolicum</italic> and luciferase from vector pGEM-luc (Promega, USA) were used as a template for amplification. The amplified products were purified before <italic>in vitro</italic> transcription and purification of dsRNA using MEGAscript<sup>&#xae;</sup> RNAi kit (Ambion, USA). Furthermore, the number of molecules per microliter was quantified using web based OligoCalc software (version 3.27) based on the molecular weight of dsRNA. Samples were aliquoted, labeled and stored at -20&#xb0;C for downstream processing. A group of 7&#x2013;10 days old 100 unfed females (4 replications of 25 each) of IVRI&#x2013;II strain ticks were inoculated with 0.5&#x2013;1 &#x3bc;l of dsRNA each (5-10 X 10<sup>11</sup> molecules/&#xb5;l) of <italic>FER2</italic> and <italic>TPM</italic> genes using a 10 &#xb5;l Hamilton syringe with 34G RN needle as described previously (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">39</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">43</xref>). Similarly, an equal number of ticks were inoculated with Luc dsRNA and designated as control groups. After inoculation, each tick was gently removed from the adhesive tape and placed in a 100 mL wide bottom container and the ticks were activated by blowing air in the container. The ticks were then incubated at 85% RH and 28&#xb0;C temperature for 24 hours and examined for their vigor and only active females were released along with equal number of male ticks on cross bred bovine calves using ear bags (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">41</xref>). Ear bags were examined 48 hours post-release of ticks. The effects of double gene silencing of <italic>H. anatolicum</italic> were calculated from three test replications based on the percentage of ticks successfully engorged, rejected, unable to engorge (UTE), mean engorgement weight and mean egg masses between the treated and control group as per the method of Kumar et&#xa0;al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">43</xref>). Post RNAi, genes were quantified using fully engorged and UTE ticks collected after 72 h and 96 h of release with the control group as well as normal ticks collected at same intervals. Fold change in gene expression between control and inoculated ticks was compared by one-way ANOVA and the Tukey tests against control at <italic>p</italic>&gt; 0.05 of significance.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_3">
<label>2.3</label>
<title>Processing of post RNAi <italic>H. anatolicum</italic> ticks for histological studies</title>
<p>Post RNAi, one batch (n = 25) of engorged ticks were dissected to collect the ovaries and processed as per the laboratory standardized protocol (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">44</xref>). Briefly, ticks were fixed on the dissection plate filled with paraffin after anesthetizing using thermal shock at 4&#xb0;C for 10 min. The dorsal cuticle was gently lifted from the anterior end and the attachments from visceral organs were removed under a dissecting microscope (Olympus microscope BX53, Japan). Then ovary was removed and transferred to chilled Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS), washed twice and then transferred to the fixative solution of 4% paraformaldehyde (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) for 24 hours. Tissues were cut into small pieces of 4-6 mm size and then dehydrated in ascending strength of ethanol (70, 80, 90 and 95%) for 15 minutes each at room temperature. Infiltration and embedding of ovarian tissue were done with JB-4 Embedding Kit (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) and transferred to polyethylene embedding BEEM<sup>&#xae;</sup> (Polysciences, Inc., USA) capsules filled with resin containing a catalyzer. After polymerization, tissues were sectioned (3 &#x3bc;m) using ultra-microtome (Leica EM UC7, Vienna) and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H &amp; E).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_4">
<label>2.4</label>
<title>Expression of rHaFER2 and rHaTPM recombinant proteins</title>
<p>The HaFER2 open reading frame (ORF) devoid of signal peptide and complete HaTPM proteins were expressed in <italic>E. cloni</italic>
<sup>&#xae;</sup> 10 G chemically competent cells (Lucigen, USA) using the pRham-N-His-SUMO-Kan expression vector (Lucigen, USA). Polyhistidine tagged (6&#xd7; Histag) containing rHaFER2 and rHaTPM proteins were purified under denaturation conditions by metal chelate affinity chromatography (Ni-NTA chromatography). The purified denatured proteins were refolded by dialysis against gradually decreasing concentrations of urea and concentrated using cut-off device (Pall filter, UK) and stored at -20&#xb0;C in the presence of cocktail protease inhibitor at the rate of 10 &#x3bc;l/ml (Amresco, USA). The reactivity of the rHaFER2 and rHaTPM proteins was determined through western blotting as described previously (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">39</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">45</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_5">
<label>2.5</label>
<title>Determination of immunization dose</title>
<p>The dose standardization protocol used for rHaTPM antigen was adopted (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">45</xref>). Briefly, rats (Wistar, adult male, 200&#x2013;250 g in weight) were divided randomly into six groups of five rats in each. The rHaFER2 and rHaTPM were mixed (1:1 ratio) with Montanide&#x2122; ISA 50 V2 ready to use adjuvant (SEPPIC, France) by homogenization. The animals of groups I, II, and III were immunized with 50, 100 and 150 &#x3bc;g of each protein in a cocktail on 0<sup>th</sup>, 14<sup>th</sup> and 28<sup>th</sup> day. At the same time, animals of groups IV, V, and VI received equal volume of adjuvant mixed with PBS and were designated as the control group. Antibody titers were monitored by indirect ELISA and compared between the immunized and control group of animals by ANOVA (<italic>p</italic>&lt; 0.05). For ELISA, antigen concentration and other variables were optimized through the checkerboard method. The primary antibodies were diluted serially from 1:200 to 1: 25,600 to determine antibody titer in each group of animals. The ELISA plates (F96 Maxisorp, Nunc, Roskide, Denmark) were coated with 100 &#xb5;l of carbonate buffer (pH 9.6) containing a specific concentration of rHaFER2 and rHaTPM and stored at 4&#xb0;C overnight. After washing with PBS-0.05% Tween 20 (PBS-T), each well was blocked with 100 &#x3bc;l of 5% skimmed milk in PBS-T at 37&#xb0;C for 2 h. The plates were incubated with 100 &#x3bc;l/well of rat sera diluted serially starting at 1:200 with blocking buffer and incubated at 37&#xb0;C for 2 h. The ELISA plates were washed thrice with PBS-T and 100 &#x3bc;l of 1:10000 dilution of HRP-conjugated rabbit anti-rat IgG (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) was loaded in each well and incubated at 37&#xb0;C for 2 h. After washing thrice, a 100 &#x3bc;l of o-phenylenediamine dihydrochloride (OPD) (Pierce, USA) in citrate buffer, pH 5.0 was loaded in each well and incubated for 15 min at RT. The optical density (OD) was read at 492 nm in an ELISA reader (Tecan Sunrise, Austria).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_6">
<label>2.6</label>
<title>Identification of native FER2 and TPM proteins in the developmental stages by western blotting</title>
<p>The presence of FER2 and TPM proteins in different developmental stages of <italic>H. anatolicum</italic> was determined using specific anti-FER2 and anti-TPM sera raised previously in rats immunized with the respective recombinant proteins and were available in the laboratory. Briefly, egg, larvae, unfed nymph, engorged nymph, unfed adult, partially fed females and fed males of IVRI-II strain were homogenized in cold 0.15 M PBS, 1 mM disodium EDTA, pH 7.2, containing cocktail protease inhibitors, filtered, sonicated and centrifuged at 15,000 rpm for 60 min at 4&#xb0;C as described earlier (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">46</xref>). The supernatants were designated as antigens of the respective stages. The protein concentration of the antigen was estimated by Bradford assay. The individual extract was resolved in 10% SDS-PAGE and transferred to a Nitrocellulose membrane (NCP). The membranes were processed sequentially by incubating with a primary antibody using rat anti-ferritin and anti-tropomyosin sera (1:500 dilutions) followed by peroxide-conjugated rabbit anti-rat IgG (1:2000 dilution, Sigma) and the chromogenic substance, DAB (diaminobenzidine). The reaction was stopped by washing the membranes thoroughly with distilled water. The image was captured and stored.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_7">
<label>2.7</label>
<title>Immunization and challenge study</title>
<p>Eight cross-bred bovine calves aged six to seven months were randomly divided in two groups of four animals in each group. A cocktail of antigens was then prepared by emulsifying both the antigens thoroughly with an equal volume of Montanide ISA 50V2 adjuvant (SEPPIC, France) to prepare a milky-white water-in-oil emulsion with a final concentration of 50 &#xb5;g of each antigen/ml. The cocktail of antigens was administered via deep intramuscular injection into the gluteal muscles on days 0, 28, and 49 at 2 mL/animal/dose. The control group of animals were immunized with 2 ml of PBS emulsified with the same adjuvant as the placebo. Two weeks after the second booster, all the animals were challenged with 15 pairs (1:1 male and female) of 7-10 days old unfed adults of <italic>H. anatolicum</italic> to each ear pinna using the ear bag method as described by Ghosh and Azhahianambi (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">41</xref>). Four weeks after the first challenge, each animal was challenged again with 10-12 days old larvae hatched from 50 mg eggs of both <italic>H. anatolicum</italic> and <italic>R. microplus.</italic> The ear bags were regularly checked and dropped larvae and adults were kept in BOD incubator, maintained at 28 &#xb0;C and 85% relative humidity (RH). Engorged larvae were maintained till molting to nymphs and engorged females till the end of egg laying. Immunization efficacy was measured based on the reduction of number of challenged larvae, molting and rejection percentage, engorgement weight and adult fertility rate (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">20</xref>). The immunization efficacy was calculated as per the following formula:</p>
<p>Against larvae</p>
<disp-formula>
<mml:math display="block" id="M1">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>E&#xa0;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mo>%</mml:mo>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>100</mml:mn>
<mml:mtext>&#xa0;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">[</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>CRT&#xa0;X&#xa0;CRM</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">]</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</disp-formula>
<disp-formula>
<mml:math display="block" id="M2">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtable>
<mml:mtr columnalign="left">
<mml:mtd columnalign="left">
<mml:mtext>Percentage&#xa0;reduction&#xa0;in&#xa0;challenged&#xa0;larvae&#xa0;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">[</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>DT&#xa0;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mo>%</mml:mo>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mtd>
</mml:mtr>
<mml:mtr columnalign="left">
<mml:mtd columnalign="left">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>100</mml:mn>
<mml:mtext>&#xa0;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mtext>NTV</mml:mtext>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">/</mml:mo>
<mml:mtext>NTC</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">]</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>;</mml:mo>
</mml:mtd>
</mml:mtr>
</mml:mtable>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</disp-formula>
<disp-formula>
<mml:math display="block" id="M3">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtable>
<mml:mtr columnalign="left">
<mml:mtd columnalign="left">
<mml:mtext>Percentage&#xa0;reduction&#xa0;in&#xa0;molting&#xa0;of&#xa0;engorged&#xa0;larvae&#xa0;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">[</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>MO&#xa0;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mo>%</mml:mo>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mtd>
</mml:mtr>
<mml:mtr columnalign="left">
<mml:mtd columnalign="left">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>100</mml:mn>
<mml:mtext>&#xa0;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mtext>MLI</mml:mtext>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">/</mml:mo>
<mml:mtext>MLC</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">]</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>;</mml:mo>
</mml:mtd>
</mml:mtr>
</mml:mtable>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</disp-formula>
<disp-formula>
<mml:math display="block" id="M4">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtable>
<mml:mtr columnalign="left">
<mml:mtd columnalign="left">
<mml:mtext>Percentage&#xa0;efficacy&#xa0;of&#xa0;antigen&#xa0;against&#xa0;larvae&#xa0;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>{</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>E&#xa0;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mo>%</mml:mo>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mtd>
</mml:mtr>
<mml:mtr columnalign="left">
<mml:mtd columnalign="left">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>100</mml:mn>
<mml:mtext>&#xa0;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">[</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>CRT</mml:mtext>
<mml:mo>&#xd7;</mml:mo>
<mml:mtext>CRM</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">]</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>}</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>;</mml:mo>
</mml:mtd>
</mml:mtr>
</mml:mtable>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</disp-formula>
<p>where, NTV &amp; NTC: number of larvae dropped from the immunized and control group of animals, respectively. MLI and MLC: number of engorged larvae molted to nymphs from immunized and control group of animals, respectively.</p>
<disp-formula>
<mml:math display="block" id="M5">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>CRT</mml:mtext>
<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
<mml:mtext>NTV</mml:mtext>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">/</mml:mo>
<mml:mtext>NTC&#xa0;and&#xa0;CRM</mml:mtext>
<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
<mml:mtext>MLI</mml:mtext>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">/</mml:mo>
<mml:mtext>MLC</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</disp-formula>
<p>CRT: CRT is the reduction in the number of larvae (NTV/NTC).</p>
<p>CRM: CRM is the reduction in number of engorged larvae molted to nymphs (MLI/MLC).</p>
<p>Against adults</p>
<disp-formula>
<mml:math display="block" id="M6">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>DT</mml:mtext>
<mml:mo>%</mml:mo>
<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>100</mml:mn>
<mml:mtext>&#xa0;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mtext>NTV</mml:mtext>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">/</mml:mo>
<mml:mtext>NTC</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</disp-formula>
<p>DT: reduction in females; NTV and NTC: number of females dropped from the immunized and control groups of animals, respectively.</p>
<disp-formula>
<mml:math display="block" id="M7">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>DO&#xa0;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mo>%</mml:mo>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>100</mml:mn>
<mml:mtext>&#xa0;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mtext>PATV</mml:mtext>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">/</mml:mo>
<mml:mtext>PATC</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</disp-formula>
<p>DO: reduction in egg masses; PATV and PATC: mean weight of egg masses of females fed on immunized and control group of animals, respectively.</p>
<disp-formula>
<mml:math display="block" id="M8">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>DR&#xa0;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mo>%</mml:mo>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>100</mml:mn>
<mml:mtext>&#xa0;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mtext>PMTV</mml:mtext>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">/</mml:mo>
<mml:mtext>PMTC</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</disp-formula>
<p>DR: reduction in mean weight of adult females; PMTV and PMTC: mean weight of adult females dropped from the immunized and control groups of animals, respectively.</p>
<disp-formula>
<mml:math display="block" id="M9">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>RF&#xa0;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mo>%</mml:mo>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>100</mml:mn>
<mml:mtext>&#xa0;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mtext>RIV</mml:mtext>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">/</mml:mo>
<mml:mtext>RIC</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</disp-formula>
<p>RF: reduction in adult fertility; RIV and RIC: mean RI of adult females dropped from the immunized and control groups of animals, respectively.</p>
<disp-formula>
<mml:math display="block" id="M10">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>Reproductive&#xa0;Index&#xa0;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>RI</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
<mml:mtext>Egg&#xa0;masses</mml:mtext>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">/</mml:mo>
<mml:mtext>engorge&#xa0;tick&#xa0;weight</mml:mtext>
<mml:mo>.</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</disp-formula>
<disp-formula>
<mml:math display="block" id="M11">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>E&#xa0;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mo>%</mml:mo>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>100</mml:mn>
<mml:mtext>&#xa0;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">[</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>CRT</mml:mtext>
<mml:mo>&#xd7;</mml:mo>
<mml:mtext>CRW</mml:mtext>
<mml:mo>&#xd7;</mml:mo>
<mml:mtext>CRI</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">]</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>.</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</disp-formula>
<p>E%: Percentage efficacy of antigens. CRT = NTV/NTC, CRW = PMTV/PMTC, and CRI= RIV/RIC is the reduction in tick fertility.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_8">
<label>2.8</label>
<title>Monitoring of immune responses</title>
<p>From all the animals, 2 ml of blood was collected aseptically during pre-immunization, immunization and post-immunization periods at different time intervals [pre-immunization, 17<sup>th</sup>, 27<sup>th</sup>, 40<sup>th</sup> 49<sup>th</sup>, 62<sup>nd</sup>, 102<sup>nd</sup> 119<sup>th</sup> and 139<sup>th</sup> day]. The serum was separated and stored at -20&#xb0;C for further analysis as described earlier (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">39</xref>). Briefly, each microwell was coated with 1&#x3bc;g/ml concentration of each of rHaFER2 and rHaTPM, sera dilution 1:800 for IgG and 1:400 for IgG2, and the secondary antibodies was diluted to 1:10,000. Peroxidase mediated color development was measured at 492 nm in an ELISA reader (Tecan, Austria). The mean optical density (OD) was calculated for each time point by grouping control and immunized animals.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_9">
<label>2.9</label>
<title>Statistical analysis</title>
<p>The one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with <italic>post-hoc</italic> Tukey HSD (Honestly Significant Difference) was used for analysis of differences at the gene transcript level, comparing the mean variation of entomological data of ticks fed on immunized group in comparison to control group of animals and for the mean antibody responses of calves in experimental and control groups at different time points. Significance at 5% level (<italic>p</italic>&#x2264; 0.05) was used to define differences in different parameters.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s3" sec-type="results">
<label>3</label>
<title>Results</title>
<sec id="s3_1">
<label>3.1</label>
<title>Double gene silencing effect on expression profile of the genes and its impact on feeding, survival and reproductive parameters of <italic>H. anatolicum</italic>
</title>
<p>A statistically significant (p &lt; 0.001) reduction in expression of <italic>FER2</italic> and <italic>TPM</italic> genes in the dsRNA inoculated ticks at 72, 96 hr of feeding, in UTE and in the engorged ticks were noted in comparison to Luc control group and in normal ticks (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1A</bold>
</xref>). A consistent suppression of <italic>FER2</italic> and <italic>TPM</italic> genes was recorded throughout the feeding period.</p>
<fig id="f1" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;1</label>
<caption>
<p>Post-double gene silencing effect on <italic>Hyalomma anatolicum</italic> IVRI-II strain. <bold>(A)</bold> Relative quantity of <italic>FER2</italic> and <italic>TPM</italic> genes transcript in dsRNA injected ticks vs normal and control (<italic>Luc</italic>-ds RNA) ticks [data were considered significantly different when <italic>p</italic>-value &#x2264;0.05, within the treatment group &amp; between treatment and control group (<italic>p</italic>&lt;0.001), Error bars represent the variability in gene expression across multiple replicates.UTE- Unable to engorge, Eng-engorged tick. A notable decrease in gene expression was observed at both 72 and 96 hours post treatment, indicating a sustained and progressive effect of gene silencing. Luc-dsRNA as a control shows no significant effect on gene expression, confirming the specificity of the gene silencing effect in the FER2 and TPM dsRNA-treated groups] <bold>(B)</bold> Depicting <italic>FER2&amp;TPM</italic> dsRNA injected <italic>H. anatolicum</italic> ticks attached on animal ear pinna. <bold>(C)</bold> Representative tick samples of <italic>Luc</italic>- dsRNA injected (No. 1 &amp; 4), <italic>FER2&amp;TPM</italic> dsRNA injected, ticks (No. 2 &amp; 3) depicting change in tick size, shape and color of ticks.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fimmu-15-1471317-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Physically, silenced ticks were smaller in size, and discolored compared to the control group of ticks (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;1B, C</bold>
</xref>). In silenced ticks, a remarkable 75.3 and 49.5% reduction in the number of engorged ticks and engorgement weight, respectively, were recorded. Interestingly, silenced ticks laid comparatively lesser egg masses than the control group of ticks and a 32.7% of the challenged ticks were UTE (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap id="T1" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;1</label>
<caption>
<p>Double gene silencing effect on the biology of <italic>H. anatolicum</italic>.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left">ds RNA group</th>
<th valign="top" align="left">LUC gene control</th>
<th valign="top" align="left">double gene silencing (FER2+ TPM)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Total No. of ticks injected</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">95</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">75</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Total No. of ticks released on animals</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">83</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">67</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Percentage of ticks engorged</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">58.8 &#xb1; 9.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">23.4 &#xb1; 5.9***</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Engorged weight (mg)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">447.8 &#xb1; 12.05</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">225 &#xb1; 22.3***</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Reduction in body weight (%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">49.5%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Egg masses (mg)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">225.9 &#xb1; 13.2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">10.4 &#xb1; 7.3***</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Reduction in egg masses (%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">95.4%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Percentage of ticks unable to engorge (UTE)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.8 &#xb1; 3.7</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">32.7 &#xb1; 6.5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Percentage of ticks rejected</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">32.9 &#xb1; 12.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">42.5 &#xb1; 3.2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Total reduction in ticks (%) (Rejection +UTE) &#xb1; SE</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">35.0 &#xb1; 8.6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">75.3 &#xb1; 8.2***</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>***<italic>p</italic>&lt;0.001 (in comparison to <italic>Luc</italic> control).</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>Sections of the ovary of silenced ticks revealed damaged plasma membrane, along with vacuolations at the periphery and at the oocyte pedicel junction of type I and II oocytes (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;2C, D</bold>
</xref>) in comparison to the tissue sections of normal tick ovary (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;2A, B</bold>
</xref>). In type III oocytes, the vacuolated areas were prominent near the germinal vesicles (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2E</bold>
</xref>). Most of the yolk granules in type III oocytes were negatively stained with hematoxylin and vacuolations were observed at the periphery (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2E</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<fig id="f2" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;2</label>
<caption>
<p>Comparative cellular changes in ovary (H&amp;E stained) of control (<italic>Luc</italic> dsRNA) and double gene (<italic>FER2</italic>&amp;<italic>TPM</italic>) silenced <italic>Hyalomma anatolicum</italic> ticks [Panels <bold>(A, B)</bold> are control, <bold>(C&#x2013;E)</bold> are double gene silenced ovaries. I, oocyte type-I; II, oocyte type-II; III, oocyte type-III; va, vacuolation; n, nucleus; p, pedicle].</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fimmu-15-1471317-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_2">
<label>3.2</label>
<title>Protein expression, localization of native proteins</title>
<p>The predicted mature protein coding sequence of <italic>FER2</italic> and <italic>TPM</italic> were expressed in E.cloni<sup>&#xae;</sup> chemically competent cells (Lucigen, USA) as ~35 kDa and 51 kDa fusion proteins, including 6x His tag. The expressed proteins were purified as rHaFER2 and rHaTPM (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>) and used for raising anti-rHaFER2 and rHaTPM sera in rats. The native FER2 and TPM proteins were detected in eggs, larvae, unfed nymphs, engorged nymphs, unfed adults and in engorged ticks (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<fig id="f3" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;3</label>
<caption>
<p>Expression and Western blot analysis of FER2 and TPM proteins. <bold>(A)</bold> SDS-PAGE profile of purified rHaFER2 and rHaTPM proteins of <italic>Hyalomma anatolicum</italic>; <bold>(B)</bold> Native FER2 in different developmental stages of <italic>H. anatolicum</italic> probed by rHaFER2 specific sera from rat. [M- Puregene marker, 1- egg, 2- Larvae, 3- Unfed nymph, 4- Fed nymph, 5- Unfed female, 6- Fed female]; <bold>(C)</bold> Native TPM in different developmental stages of <italic>H. anatolicum</italic> probed by rHaTPM specific sera from rat. [M- Puregene marker, 1- Larva, 2- Unfed nymph, 3- Fed nymph, 4- Unfed female, 5- Fed female, 6 &amp; 7-rTPM, 8- Egg. and rHaTPM].</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fimmu-15-1471317-g003.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_3">
<label>3.3</label>
<title>Immunization dose</title>
<p>The dose was determined based on number of fold rise in total IgG levels at maximum dilution (1: 12,800) of sera among the three groups of rats immunized with different doses of cocktail of proteins and was statistically analyzed. At the highest dilution (1: 12,800), a significant difference (p&lt;0.001) was recorded in group II in comparison to group I and III animals. The antibody response in all the three immunized groups was significantly higher in comparison to the control group (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">
<bold>Table&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>). Accordingly, the immunization dose for <italic>in vivo</italic> trial was selected as 300 &#xb5;g TD of each antigen.</p>
<table-wrap id="T2" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;2</label>
<caption>
<p>Comparison of mean IgG response in rats following inoculation with a cocktail of rHaFER2 and rHaTPM proteins in comparison to control group.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="center">Weeks of serum collection</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Group I<break/>(TD 150 &#xb5;g each antigen)<break/>Mean OD &#xb1; SE</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Group II (TD 300&#xb5;g each antigen)<break/>Mean OD &#xb1; SE</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Group III (TD 450 &#xb5;g each antigen)<break/>Mean OD &#xb1; SE</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Control Group<break/>Mean OD &#xb1; SE</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Before 2<sup>nd</sup> booster</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.103 &#xb1; 0.0013</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.217 &#xb1; 0.0015</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.165 &#xb1; 0.0024</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.16 <bold>&#xb1;</bold> 0.016</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">1<sup>st</sup> week of 2<sup>nd</sup> booster</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.152 &#xb1; 0.0018</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.591 &#xb1; 0.0083</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.384 &#xb1; 0.0043</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.162 <bold>&#xb1;</bold> 0.012</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">2<sup>nd</sup> week of 2<sup>nd</sup> booster</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.144 &#xb1; 0.0020</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.428 &#xb1; 0.0043***</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.381 &#xb1; 0.0066</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.106 &#xb1; 0.0002</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>*** Significant at <italic>p</italic>&lt;0.0001 in comparison to Group I and Group III animals on 6<sup>th</sup> week.</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_4">
<label>3.4</label>
<title>Immunization efficacy against challenge infestations</title>
<p>The experimental calves were active, feed and water intake were normal. The body temperatures were within the normal range, and no tick-borne infections were noticed in blood smear examinations throughout the experimental period of 139 days (data not shown).</p>
<p>Against <italic>H. anatolicum</italic>: Within 48 h of release, ticks started feeding on animals. Most of the engorged larvae dropped within 2 days of initiation of dropping from the control animals, while dropping of engorged larvae from the immunized animals lasted 4&#x2013;6 days after initiation. Significant (<italic>p &lt;</italic>0.01) reductions were noted in the dropping (43.16%) and molting (48.48%) percentages of larvae fed on the immunized group of animals in comparison to larvae fed on the control animals. The comparative post-challenge parameters, viz., the percentage reduction in the number of dropped larvae (DT %), the molting percentage (MO %), and the efficacy against larvae (E %) were determined as 43.16%, 48.46%, and 70.7%, respectively (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">
<bold>Table&#xa0;3A</bold>
</xref>). No statistical differences were observed in the mean number of adult ticks dropped from the immunized and control groups of animals. However, a significant (<italic>p &lt;</italic>0.001) reduction of 43.09% in the mean engorgement weight and egg masses (62.29%) laid by ticks fed on the immunized group of animals in comparison to ticks fed on the control group of animals were observed. The DT%, DR%, DO%, RF%, and E% were determined as 5.4%, 29.9%, 66.8%, 56.2%, and 76.2%, respectively (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">
<bold>Table&#xa0;3B</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap-group id="T3" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;3</label>
<caption>
<p>Mean&#xb1; SE efficacy of of calves immunized by the cocktails of rHaFER2 and rHaTPM proteins against challenge infestations of <italic>H. anatolicum</italic> IVRI-II larvae (A), adults (B) and <italic>R. microplus</italic> ticks (C).</p>
</caption>
<table-wrap>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" colspan="7" align="center">(A)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left">Challenge Infestation</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Group</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">No. of engorged larvae dropped</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">No. of larvae moulted to nymphs</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">DT%</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">MO%</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">E%</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" rowspan="3" align="left">
<italic>H. anatolicum</italic>
<break/>larvae</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Immunized</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">88.67 &#xb1; 4.2**</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">56&#xb1; 3.60**</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">43.16</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">48.46</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">70.70</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Control</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">156 &#xb1; 16.3</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">108.7 &#xb1; 7.4</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Reduction %</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">43.16</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">48.48</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<table-wrap>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" colspan="11" align="center">(B)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="left"/>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Group</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Tick dropped/animal</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Tick wt. (mg)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Egg wt.(mg)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">RI</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">DT%</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">DR %</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">DO %</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">RF%</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">E%</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" rowspan="4" align="left">
<italic>H. anatolicum</italic>
<break/>adults</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Immunized</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5.75 &#xb1; 0.48</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">240.2 &#xb1; 11.1***</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">92.8 &#xb1; 11.08***</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.38 &#xb1; 0.05***</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5.4</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">29.9</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">66.8</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">56.2</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">76.2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Control</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">8.25 &#xb1; 0.63</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">422.1&#xb1; 14.7</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">246.1 &#xb1; 10.02</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.58 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Reduction %</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">33.5</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">43.1</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">62.3</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">35.3</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<table-wrap>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" colspan="11" align="center">(C)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" rowspan="4" align="center">
<italic>R. microplus larvae</italic>
</td>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Group</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Tick Dropped/<break/>Animal</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Tick wt. (mg)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Egg wt.(mg)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">RI</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">DT%</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">DR %</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">DO %</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">RF%</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">E%</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Immunized</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">51.67 &#xb1; 8.8</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">96.46 &#xb1; 4.0*</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">47.43 &#xb1; 3.4*</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.49 &#xb1; 0.02*</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">18.1</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">24.8</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">42.4</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">24.7</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">53.6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Control</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">63.33 &#xb1; 2.3</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">131.1 &#xb1; 7.2</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">84.12 &#xb1; 3.33</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.65 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Reduction %</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">18.94</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">26.4</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">43.61</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">24.3</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>Significant at ** <italic>p &lt;</italic>0.01 *** <italic>p &lt;</italic>0.001 in comparison to the control group of animals.</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</table-wrap-group>
<p>Against <italic>R. microplus</italic>: The challenged larvae started feeding within 48 hrs of release. After 18&#x2013;19 days of feeding, engorged adults started to drop from all the animals. Significant reductions in the mean engorgement weight (<italic>p &lt;</italic>0.005) and mean egg masses (<italic>p &lt;</italic>0.05) of ticks collected from immunized group of animals in comparison to the control group of animals were noted. Consequently, due to the significant reduction in egg masses, the reproductive index was significantly (<italic>p &lt;</italic>0.05) reduced by 43.61%. The DT%, DR%, DO%, RF%, and E% were determined as 18.1%, 24.8.0%, 42.4%, 24.7%, and 53.6%, respectively (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">
<bold>Table&#xa0;3C</bold>
</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_5">
<label>3.5</label>
<title>Antibody responses</title>
<p>The immunization of animals stimulated the production of antibodies as early as 17<sup>th</sup> day post primary immunization (DPI), and the significant response persisted until the end of the experiment (139<sup>th</sup> DPI) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;4</bold>
</xref>). The mean optical density (OD) values of the sera collected on 17<sup>th</sup> and 49<sup>th</sup> DPI were 0.89 &#xb1; 0.04 and 1.90 &#xb1; 0.06, for IgG and 0.75 &#xb1; 0.02 and 1.57 &#xb1; 0.07 for IgG2, respectively, which was nearly 2.4-4.4 times higher than the control group of animals. After 120 DPI, a slight drop in IgG response was observed but the value was still 3.6 times higher than the pre-immunization value (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;4</bold>
</xref>). Similarly, the IgG2 level rose from 0.36 &#xb1; 0.4 to 1.69&#xb1; 0.12 in the immunized group of animals, which is almost 5-6 times higher in comparison to pre-immunization response and sustained till 139<sup>th</sup> DPI (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;4</bold>
</xref>). The IgG and IgG2 level titer remain at the base threshold level throughout the experimental period in control group of animals (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;4</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<fig id="f4" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;4</label>
<caption>
<p>Immune response in cross- bred bovine calves after immunization with cocktail (rHaFER2 &amp;rHaTPM) of proteins. Mean IgG and IgG2 response in calves immunized with cocktail of rHaFER-2 and rHaTPM proteins and control groups. (Syringe depicts time of immunization followed by two booster doses. Tick depicts the time of Ist and 2<sup>nd</sup> challenge with <italic>Hyalomma anatolicum</italic> and <italic>Rhipicephalus microplus</italic> larvae after immunization. [ns, not significant; *<italic>p</italic> &lt;0.05; **<italic>p</italic> &lt;0.01; ***<italic>p</italic> &lt;0.001 in comparison to the control group].</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fimmu-15-1471317-g004.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s4" sec-type="discussion">
<label>4</label>
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>Globally, TTBDs represent a growing burden with both re-emerging and newly emerging diseases posing threats to human and animal health (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">18</xref>). India, with the world&#x2019;s largest population of 192.52 million cattle and 109.85 million buffaloes is facing significant challenges in maintaining the dairy industry in a sustainable manner due to the perennial tick infestation problems (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">47</xref>). Since more than four decades, the management of TTBDs has been focused on repeated applications of acaricides and consequently, several reports of multi-acaricide resistance <italic>R. microplus</italic> have been published globally (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">12</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">48</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B55">55</xref>). Even though limited information is available on acaricide resistance in <italic>H. anatolicum</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">13</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">56</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">57</xref>), increasing level of resistance in <italic>H. anatolicum</italic> ticks collected from CCHF outbreak states of India viz., Gujarat and Rajasthan complicating the management of CCHFV infection in humans (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">54</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">57</xref>).</p>
<p>Inducing host immunity through vaccines against ticks and tick-borne pathogens is a cost-effective and efficient strategy to reduce the use of chemical pesticides and the risk of establishment and spread of acaricide resistant ticks (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">12</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">23</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">35</xref>). Immunization strategy, a key component of integrated tick management, was proved effective by the commercialization of TickGARD&#x2122; and Gavac&#x2122; vaccines in the 1990s for controlling <italic>R. microplus</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">33</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B58">58</xref>). Subsequently, new protective antigens were identified and characterized to manage multi-tick infestations and pathogen transmission (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">22</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">23</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">35</xref>). However, screening for highly effective antigens with cross-protective effects remains the main challenge in anti-tick vaccine research and development. Researchers confirmed that targets identified using <italic>in-silico</italic> analysis and RNAi technology are suitable for inclusion in multi-antigen vaccines (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">22</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B59">59</xref>).</p>
<p>As an obligatory blood-sucking ectoparasite, ticks have evolved a set of special survival mechanisms, including long duration of blood sucking, preventing blood coagulation in the body, and storing blood meals in the midgut (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">35</xref>). The anti-tick vaccines are targeted to develop strong antibody responses to the targeted antigens and ingesting antibodies by the feeding tick will interact with the target proteins in the tick and disrupt feeding, molting, and reproduction (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">23</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">35</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B60">60</xref>). Previously, silencing of <italic>FER2</italic> and <italic>TPM</italic> genes in tick resulted in a reduction of tick infestation (rejection + unable to engorged tick) by 61.3% and 70.2%, respectively, in comparison to <italic>LUC</italic>-gene control group was recorded (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">39</xref>). In the present study, dual gene silencing resulted in a higher reduction of 75.3% of the injected ticks fed on immunized calves. Only 23% of the gene silenced ticks engorged, and the egg-laying capacity was severely impacted (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>). The data clearly shows a synergistic property of the targets, thus, its suitability in cocktail vaccine development. Several studies have demonstrated the synergistic effect of double gene silencing in different tick species. For example, de la Fuente et&#xa0;al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B61">61</xref>) demonstrated that silencing of Subolesin (<italic>4D8</italic>) and <italic>Rs86</italic> genes of <italic>R. sanguineus</italic> ticks, resulted in 97% reductions in engorgement, 87% in tick weight, 41% survival rate and 100% oviposition. Rahman et&#xa0;al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B62">62</xref>) conducted an RNAi trial using Subolesin and Cystatin genes in <italic>Haemaphysalis longicornis</italic> and a significant reduction in egg masses and egg conversion ratio were recorded. Further, in the present study, the gene silencing effect on the ovary of the injected ticks were studied to understand the possible reasons for cessions of egg laying/reduction in egg mass production in injected ticks. Ultra-thin sections of the ovary of dsRNA injected ticks revealed damage of plasmic membrane and vacuolations in the different stages of ovaries compared to the ovary of control ticks (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;2C&#x2013;E</bold>
</xref>), as reported in the ovary of the acaricide-treated ticks (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">44</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B63">63</xref>). Since the ovaries of ticks were processed immediately after dropping from the animals, mostly 1<sup>st</sup> and 2<sup>nd</sup> stage oocytes were seen and the 3<sup>rd</sup> stage oocytes were observed occasionally. The presence of native FER-2 and TPM proteins in all the developmental stages of <italic>H. anatolicum</italic> ticks was confirmed through western blot analysis using specific anti-FER-2 and anti-TPM sera raised in rats immunized with the respective recombinant proteins. The data was consistent with the observation of Galay et&#xa0;al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B64">64</xref>), who demonstrated the presence of FER-2 protein in whole ticks and in the midgut of <italic>H. longicornis</italic>. The present study also indicated that the recombinant proteins, despite being expressed in a prokaryotic expression system, underwent minimal post-translational modifications and confirmed that, the antigens are expressed in all the developmental stages of the <italic>H. anatolicum</italic>.</p>
<p>Globally, multiple tick research groups have followed different strategies with varying levels of efficacy against challenge infestations. These include i), up to 70% efficacy using cocktail of antigens (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">29</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">32</xref>); (ii) up to 90% efficacy by co-immunization with two or more protective antigens (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">31</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B65">65</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B66">66</xref>); and (iii) &gt;60% efficacy using chimeric antigens as vaccines (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B67">67</xref>). Conversely, a single antigen immunization trial provided 64% protection against <italic>R. microplus</italic> challenge infestation in cattle following immunization with <italic>R. microplus</italic> Ferritin2 (RmFER2) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">36</xref>). Previously, we reported 51.7% and 63.7% protection against challenged larvae while 51.2% and 66.4% protection against challenged adults of <italic>H. anatolicum</italic>, respectively, following immunization of cross-bred calves with <italic>H. anatolicum</italic> rHaFER2 and rHaTPM, respectively (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">39</xref>). It was hypothesized that the cocktail vaccine consisting of multiple tick antigens can have better cross-protection potential (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">28</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">30</xref>). Subsequently, Schetters et&#xa0;al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">31</xref>) recorded 79% efficacy of Bm86 based vaccine against challenge infestation of <italic>R. microplus</italic> and <italic>R. annulatus</italic> whereas, in combination with Subolesin recorded an efficacy of 97%. Similarly, Almazan et&#xa0;al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">29</xref>) developed a cocktail formulation containing the <italic>Ixodes scapularis</italic> 4D8, 4F8, and 4E6 antigens and achieved an overall efficacy of 71%, with a 12-50% reduction in infestation and a 22-49% decrease in egg mass production. In an another study, Imamura et&#xa0;al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B68">68</xref>) reported a 61.4% reduction of engorgement of the challenged nymphs and an increase 28% of female and 43% male mortality using a cocktail of antigens containing <italic>R. appendiculatus</italic> serine protease inhibitors RAS-1 and RAS-2. Parizi et&#xa0;al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">30</xref>) formulated a cocktail of antigens comprising of Vitellin-degrading cysteine endopeptidase (VTDCE) and yolk pro-cathepsin (BYC) from <italic>R. microplus</italic> and Glutathione S- transferase of <italic>H. longicornis</italic> (GST-Hl). Immunization of animals resulted in a 61.6% reduction in overall tick population (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">30</xref>). Additionally, the cocktail vaccine composed of multiple parasite antigens demonstrated high protection levels against various parasites (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B68">68</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B71">71</xref>).</p>
<p>In the present study, immunized and control animals were challenged with larvae and adults of <italic>H. anatolicum</italic> and larvae of <italic>R. microplus</italic>. While larvae and adults of <italic>H. anatolicum</italic> immediately attached upon release to control animals, a notable delay in the attachment of challenged ticks was observed in the immunized animals, resulted in a mean efficacy of 70.7 and 76.2% against <italic>H. anatolicum</italic> larvae and adults, respectively. The delayed feeding could be attributed to the localization of TPM antibodies in the salivary glands and muscle fibers of various organs, and presence of ferritin2 antibodies in the gut and other tissues. The results showed a significant 43.09% reduction in the mean engorgement weight of adults followed by 62.29% reduction in mean egg masses laid by ticks fed on the immunized group of animals compared to the control group of animals (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">
<bold>Table&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<p>The efficacy of an immunogen depends not only on its type and quality of the antigens and adjuvant used but also on external factors, such as environmental conditions. Environmental factors like temperature, humidity, and tick population dynamics can significantly impact the vaccines performance. For instance, high temperatures may stress ticks, altering their feeding behavior and survival rates, while humidity affects tick activity and reproduction. Variations in tick population dynamics, including density and species composition, can also influence vaccine effectiveness. Fluctuations in local tick populations, driven by environmental changes or seasonal shifts, may alter exposure levels, thereby affecting the immune response in vaccinated cattle (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">17</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">22</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">33</xref>).</p>
<p>The cross-protection against <italic>R. microplus</italic> was comparatively less (53.6%) in comparison to protection observed against <italic>H. anatolicum</italic> but the protection data was comparable with the results obtained by different researchers using other antigens against heterologous challenge (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">19</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">20</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B72">72</xref>). The variations in cross-protective efficacy may be due to i) the differences in shared epitopes between <italic>H. anatolicum</italic> and <italic>R. microplus</italic> that can affect how the immune system recognizes and protects against different tick species, and ii) similar antigens may enhance protection through cross-reactive immune responses, while more distantly related species might elicit weaker immune reactions. To improve the relatively low cross-protection (53.6%) against <italic>R. microplus</italic>, we proposed some modifications in the experimental design to be taken up in the future research work. For example; i. Identification of better delivery system using engineered adjuvant capable to stimulate both humoral and cellular responses and exploration of alternative delivery routes, including intranasal and transdermal; ii. Identification and incorporation of additional or modified antigens that are conserved between different strains of <italic>H. anatolicum</italic> and <italic>R. microplus</italic> through epitope mapping; iii. Optimizing antigen combinations; iv. Implementing a prime-boost strategy to strengthen the immune response; and, v. Conducting longitudinal studies to evaluate the duration of protection.</p>
<p>Immunoglobulin G (IgG) is a key class of antibodies that includes four subclasses: IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, and IgG4. Each subclass has unique properties and functions. Carvalho et&#xa0;al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B73">73</xref>) reported an association between certain haplotypes of IgG2 with phenotypes of <italic>R. microplus</italic> infestations in cattle. Therefore, level of IgG2 may be indicated as development of tick resistance in host. In the present study, we analyzed both IgG and IgG2 to gain a thorough understanding of the immune response, as each provides important insights into different facets of antibody activity. Numerous immunization studies have established the role of the humoral antibody response in conferring immunity against ticks (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">30</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B58">58</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B65">65</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B72">72</xref>). Accordingly, IgG and IgG2 antibody response was monitored by indirect ELISA. The mean OD values of sera collected after the second booster dose were 1.90 &#xb1; 0.06 and 1.54 &#xb1; 0.02 for IgG and IgG2, respectively, which were nearly &gt;4.4 times higher than those in the control group of animals. Other researchers also reported a similar trend of high IgG antibody titers against Bm86 and Subolesin cocktail antigens in the immunization trial (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">31</xref>). De la Fuente et&#xa0;al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">33</xref>) reported an antibody titer cutoff of more than 1:640, indicating a damaging effect mediated by specific antibodies on ticks. The cocktail immunization successfully produced a higher antibody response against dual antigens (titer of 1: 6400) which impacted on the overall reduction of engorgement percentage, egg masses and reproductive index of ticks fed on immunized ticks. Besides, the damage observed in the ovary has limited the overall production of egg masses of ticks fed on immunized animals. The antibodies against TPM antigen are preferably bound to various muscle tissues in ticks, which impaired the feeding and egg laying capacity, possibly through complement-mediated lysis of the digestive cells of the challenged ticks. Although the current study was conducted with a minimum statistically significant number of cross-bred calves, the results&#xa0;will&#xa0;boost the confidence of researchers in developing a&#xa0;cocktail&#xa0;vaccine&#xa0;for the protection of animals against multi-tick infestations&#xa0;considering personalized vaccinology approaches and international collaborations (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B74">74</xref>).</p>
<p>In conclusion, the cocktail of HaFER2 and HaTPM antigens, combined with Montanide ISA 50V2 as an adjuvant, exhibited significant efficacy of 76.2% and 53.6% protection against <italic>H. anatolicum</italic> and <italic>R. microplus</italic> adult ticks. The protection was significantly correlated with the production of IgG response, highlighting the potential of FER2 and TPM antigens as promising candidates for developing a cocktail vaccine against these tick species. However, validation of the research output in field trials presents numerous challenges, such as environmental variability, animal health differences, and variability in tick-host interactions dynamics due to differences in frequency and intensity of tick bites in different management system. All of which can play role in vaccine efficacy. Additionally, logistical issues such as regulatory compliance and scalability needs to be addressed to achieve the optimum efficacy of immunization protocol in the filed situations in a sustainable manner.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec id="s5" sec-type="data-availability">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s6" sec-type="ethics-statement">
<title>Ethics statement</title>
<p>The animal study was approved by The Committee for the Purpose of Control and Supervision of Experiments on Animals (CPCSEA). The study was conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s7" sec-type="author-contributions">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>HM: Validation, Visualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Software, Writing &#x2013; original draft. BK: Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Software, Writing &#x2013; original draft. BP: Investigation, Methodology, Writing &#x2013; original draft. GC: Investigation, Methodology, Writing &#x2013; original draft. SB: Writing &#x2013; original draft, Data curation, Visualization. MS: Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing. DH: Methodology, Writing &#x2013; original draft. Jd: Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing. SG: Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing, Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Visualization.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s8" sec-type="funding-information">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. The work is supported by the infrastructure developed through funding from National Agricultural Science Fund of ICAR (NFBSFARA/BSA/4004/2013-14). The senior author is highly thankful to the Department of Science and Technology (DST), Government of India for providing INSPIRE fellowship for doctoral program at Indian Veterinary Research Institute (IVRI).</p>
</sec>
<ack>
<title>Acknowledgments</title>
<p>Authors are grateful to the Scientific body approved the national priority projects under National Agriculture Innovation Project and National Agriculture Science Fund. Special thanks to the national coordinator of the projects, Dr Amitabha Bandyopadhyay who guided the team to generate basic data set for tick research. We extend our deep heartfelt gratitude to the animals involved in this study. We are committed to ensuring their well-being and upholding the highest ethical standards in care and management.</p>
</ack>
<sec id="s9" sec-type="COI-statement">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s10" sec-type="disclaimer">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1">
<label>1</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Jones</surname> <given-names>KE</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Patel</surname> <given-names>NG</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Levy</surname> <given-names>MA</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Storeygard</surname> <given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Balk</surname> <given-names>D</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gittleman</surname> <given-names>JL</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Global trends in emerging infectious diseases</article-title>. <source>Nature</source>. (<year>2008</year>) <volume>451</volume>:<page-range>990&#x2013;3</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nature06536</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<label>2</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>de la Fuente</surname> <given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Estrada-Pe&#xf1;a</surname> <given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Venzal</surname> <given-names>JM</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kocan</surname> <given-names>KM</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sonenshine</surname> <given-names>DE</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Overview: ticks as vectors of pathogens that cause disease in humans and animals</article-title>. <source>Front Biosci</source>. (<year>2008</year>) <volume>13</volume>:<page-range>6938&#x2013;46</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2741/3200</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<label>3</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ghosh</surname> <given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Azhahianambi</surname> <given-names>PA</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yadav</surname> <given-names>MP</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Upcoming and future strategies of tick control: a review</article-title>. <source>J Vector Borne Dis</source>. (<year>2007</year>) <volume>44</volume>:<fpage>79</fpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<label>4</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kumar</surname> <given-names>B</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Manjunathachar</surname> <given-names>HV</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ghosh</surname> <given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>A review on Hyalomma species infestations on human and animals and progress on management strategies</article-title>. <source>Heliyon</source>. (<year>2020</year>) <volume>1</volume>:<elocation-id>6</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05675</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<label>5</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Spengler</surname> <given-names>JR</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bente</surname> <given-names>DA</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Crimean&#x2013;Congo hemorrhagic fever in Spain &#x2014; New arrival or silent resident</article-title>? <source>N Engl J Med</source>. (<year>2017</year>) 377:106. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1056/NEJMp1707436</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<label>6</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mourya</surname> <given-names>DT</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yadav</surname> <given-names>PD</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Patil</surname> <given-names>DY</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sahay</surname> <given-names>RR</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rahi</surname> <given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Experiences of Indian Council of Medical Research with tick-borne zoonotic infections: Kyasanur Forest disease &amp; Crimean-Congo haemorrhagic fever in India with One Health focus</article-title>. <source>Indian J Med Res</source>. (<year>2021</year>) <volume>153</volume>:<page-range>339&#x2013;47</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_532_21</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<label>7</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Manjunathachar</surname> <given-names>HV</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Raut</surname> <given-names>CG</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tiwari</surname> <given-names>P</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chouksey</surname> <given-names>V</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Barde</surname> <given-names>PV</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yadav</surname> <given-names>PD</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever virus prevalence in livestock of Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, Central India and its implications for public health</article-title>. <source>Res Vet Sci</source>. (<year>2024</year>) <volume>171</volume>:<elocation-id>105243</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.rvsc.2024.105243</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<label>8</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>de la Fuente</surname> <given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ghosh S Lempereur</surname> <given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Garrison</surname> <given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sprong</surname> <given-names>H</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lopez-Camacho</surname> <given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Maritz-Olivier</surname> <given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Interventions for the control of Crimean- Congo hemorrhagic fever and tick vectors</article-title>. <source>.NPJ Vaccines</source>. (<year>2024</year>) <volume>9</volume>:<fpage>181</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41541-024-00970-5</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<label>9</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lew-Tabor</surname> <given-names>AE</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Valle</surname> <given-names>MR</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>A review of reverse vaccinology approaches for the development of vaccines against ticks and tick-borne diseases</article-title>. <source>Ticks tick-borne Dis</source>. (<year>2016</year>) <volume>7</volume>:<page-range>573&#x2013;85</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ttbdis.2015.12.012</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<label>10</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Manjunathachar</surname> <given-names>HV</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Saravanan</surname> <given-names>BC</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kesavan</surname> <given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Karthik</surname> <given-names>K</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rathod</surname> <given-names>P</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gopi</surname> <given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Economic importance of ticks and their effective control strategies</article-title>. <source>Asian Pac J Trop Med</source>. (<year>2014</year>) <volume>4</volume>:<page-range>S770&#x2013;9</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S2222-1808(14)60725-8</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<label>11</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Agwunobi</surname> <given-names>DO</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>Z</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>A retrospective review on ixodid tick resistance against synthetic acaricides: implications and perspectives for future resistance prevention and mitigation</article-title>. <source>Pestic Biochem Physiol</source>. (<year>2021</year>) <volume>173</volume>:<elocation-id>104776</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.pestbp.2021.104776</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<label>12</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Evans</surname> <given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Madder</surname> <given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fourie</surname> <given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Halos</surname> <given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kumsa</surname> <given-names>B</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kimbita</surname> <given-names>E</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Acaricide resistance status of livestock ticks from East and West Africa and <italic>in vivo</italic> efficacy of acaricides to control them</article-title>. <source>Int J Parasitol Drugs Drug Resist</source>. (<year>2024</year>) <volume>25</volume>:<elocation-id>100541</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ijpddr.2024.100541</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<label>13</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Shyma</surname> <given-names>KP</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kumar</surname> <given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sharma</surname> <given-names>AK</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ray</surname> <given-names>DD</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ghosh</surname> <given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Acaricide resistance status in Indian isolates of <italic>Hyalomma anatolicum</italic>
</article-title>. <source>Exp Appl Acarol</source>. (<year>2012</year>) <volume>58</volume>:<page-range>471&#x2013;81</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10493-012-9592-3</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<label>14</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kumar</surname> <given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sharma</surname> <given-names>AK</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ghosh</surname> <given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Menace of acaricide resistance in cattle tick, <italic>Rhipicephalus microplus</italic> in India: Status and possible mitigation strategies</article-title>. <source>Vet Parasitol</source>. (<year>2020</year>) <volume>278</volume>:<elocation-id>108993</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.vetpar.2019.108993</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<label>15</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Dzemo</surname> <given-names>WD</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Thekisoe</surname> <given-names>O</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vudriko</surname> <given-names>P</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Development of acaricide resistance in tick populations of cattle: A systematic review and meta-analysis</article-title>. <source>Heliyon</source>. (<year>2022</year>) <volume>1</volume>:<elocation-id>8</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e08718</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<label>16</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Graf</surname> <given-names>JF</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gogolewski</surname> <given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Leach-Bing</surname> <given-names>N</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sabatini</surname> <given-names>GA</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Molento</surname> <given-names>MB</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bordin</surname> <given-names>EL</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Tick control: an industry point of view</article-title>. <source>Parasitology</source>. (<year>2004</year>) <volume>129</volume>:<page-range>S427&#x2013;42</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1017/S0031182004006079</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<label>17</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ndawula</surname> <given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>From bench to field: A guide to formulating and evaluating anti-tick vaccines delving beyond efficacy to effectiveness</article-title>. <source>Vaccines</source>. (<year>2021</year>) <volume>9</volume>:<elocation-id>1185</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/vaccines9101185</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<label>18</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>de la Fuente</surname> <given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mazuecos</surname> <given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Contreras</surname> <given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Innovative approaches for the control of ticks and tick-borne diseases</article-title>. <source>Ticks tick-borne Dis</source>. (<year>2023</year>) <volume>14</volume>:<elocation-id>102227</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ttbdis.2023.102227</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<label>19</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Perez-Perez</surname> <given-names>D</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bechara</surname> <given-names>GH</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>MaChado</surname> <given-names>RZ</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Andrade</surname> <given-names>GM</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Del Vecchio</surname> <given-names>RE</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pedroso</surname> <given-names>MS</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Efficacy of the Bm86 antigen against immature instars and adults of the dog tick <italic>Rhipicephalus sanguineus</italic> (Latreille, 1806) (Acari: Ixodidae)</article-title>. <source>Vet Parasitol</source>. (<year>2010</year>) <volume>167</volume>:<page-range>321&#x2013;6</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.vetpar.2009.09.034</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<label>20</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kumar</surname> <given-names>B</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Murugan</surname> <given-names>K</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ray</surname> <given-names>DD</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ghosh</surname> <given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Efficacy of rBm86 against <italic>Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus</italic> (IVRI-I line) and <italic>Hyalomma anatolicum anatolicum</italic> (IVRI-II line) infestations on bovine calves</article-title>. <source>Parasitol Res</source>. (<year>2012</year>) <volume>111</volume>:<page-range>629&#x2013;35</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00436-012-2879-9</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<label>21</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Parthasarathi</surname> <given-names>BC</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kumar</surname> <given-names>B</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nagar</surname> <given-names>G</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Manjunathachar</surname> <given-names>HV</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>de la Fuente</surname> <given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ghosh</surname> <given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Analysis of genetic diversity in Indian isolates of <italic>Rhipicephalus microplus</italic> based on <italic>bm86</italic> gene sequence</article-title>. <source>Vaccines</source>. (<year>2021</year>) <volume>9</volume>:<fpage>194</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00436-012-2879-9</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<label>22</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kabi</surname> <given-names>F</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dhikusooka</surname> <given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Matovu</surname> <given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mugerwa</surname> <given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kasaija</surname> <given-names>P</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Emudong</surname> <given-names>P</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Monitoring the Subolesin vaccine field trial for safer control of cattle ticks amidst increasing acaricide resistance in Uganda</article-title>. <source>Vaccines</source>. (<year>2022</year>) <volume>10</volume>:<elocation-id>1594</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/vaccines10101594</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<label>23</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Abbas</surname> <given-names>MN</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jmel</surname> <given-names>MA</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mekki</surname> <given-names>I</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dijkgraaf</surname> <given-names>I</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kotsyfakis</surname> <given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Recent advances in tick antigen discovery and anti-tick vaccine developmen</article-title>. <source>Int J MolSci</source>. (<year>2023</year>) <volume>24</volume>:<elocation-id>4969</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/ijms24054969</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<label>24</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Dowall</surname> <given-names>SD</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Carroll</surname> <given-names>MW</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hewson</surname> <given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Development of vaccines against Crimean-Congo haemorrhagic fever virus</article-title>. <source>Vaccine</source>. (<year>2017</year>) <volume>35</volume>:<page-range>6015&#x2013;23</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.05.031</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<label>25</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>de la Fuente</surname> <given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kocan</surname> <given-names>KM</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Strategies for development of vaccines for control of ixodid tick species</article-title>. <source>Parasite Immunol</source>. (<year>2006</year>) <volume>28</volume>:<page-range>275&#x2013;83</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-3024.2006.00828</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<label>26</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Willadsen</surname> <given-names>P</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Tick control: thoughts on a research agenda</article-title>. <source>Veterinary parasitology</source>. (<year>2006</year>) <volume>138</volume>:<page-range>161&#x2013;8</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.vetpar.2006.01.050</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<label>27</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ghosh</surname> <given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Azhahianambi</surname> <given-names>P</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>de la Fuente</surname> <given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Control of ticks of ruminants, with special emphasis on livestock farming systems in India: present and future possibilities for integrated control-a review</article-title>. <source>Exp Appl Acarol</source>. (<year>2006</year>) <volume>40</volume>:<fpage>49</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>66</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10493-006-9022-5</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<label>28</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Willadsen</surname> <given-names>P</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Antigen cocktails: valid hypothesis or unsubstantiated hope</article-title>? <source>Trends Parasitol</source>. (<year>2008</year>) <volume>24</volume>:<page-range>164&#x2013;7</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.pt.2008.01.005</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<label>29</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Almaz&#xe1;n</surname> <given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kocan</surname> <given-names>KM</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Blouin</surname> <given-names>EF</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>de la Fuente</surname> <given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Vaccination with recombinant tick antigens for the control of <italic>Ixodes scapularis</italic> adult infestations</article-title>. <source>Vaccine</source>. (<year>2005</year>) <volume>23</volume>:<page-range>5294&#x2013;8</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.vaccine.2005.08.004</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<label>30</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Parizi</surname> <given-names>LF</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Reck</surname> <given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Oldiges</surname> <given-names>DP</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Guizzo</surname> <given-names>MG</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Seixas</surname> <given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Logullo</surname> <given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Multi-antigenic vaccine against the cattle tick <italic>Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus</italic>: a field evaluation</article-title>. <source>Vaccine</source>. (<year>2012</year>) <volume>30</volume>:<page-range>6912&#x2013;7</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.08.078</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<label>31</label>
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Schetters</surname> <given-names>TPM</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jansen</surname> <given-names>T</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <source>Vaccine against Rhipicephalus Ticks</source>. <publisher-name>International Application Number: PCT/EP2014/056248 (2014). International Publication Number: WO2014/154847Al</publisher-name> (<year>2015</year>). Available at: <uri xlink:href="https://patentscope.wipo.int/search/en/detail.jsf?docId=WO2014154847">https://patentscope.wipo.int/search/en/detail.jsf?docId=WO2014154847</uri>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<label>32</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Olds</surname> <given-names>CL</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mwaura</surname> <given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Odongo</surname> <given-names>DO</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Scoles</surname> <given-names>GA</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bishop</surname> <given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Daubenberger</surname> <given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Induction of humoral immune response to multiple recombinant <italic>Rhipicephalus appendiculatus</italic> antigens and their effect on tick feeding success and pathogen transmission</article-title>. <source>Parasite Vectors</source>. (<year>2016</year>) <volume>9</volume>:<fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s13071-016-1774-0</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<label>33</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>de la Fuente</surname> <given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rodr&#xed;guez</surname> <given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Redondo</surname> <given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Montero</surname> <given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Garc&#xed;a-Garc&#xed;a</surname> <given-names>JC</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>M&#xe9;ndez</surname>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Field studies and cost-effectiveness analysis of vaccination with Gavac against the cattle tick <italic>Boophilus microplus</italic>
</article-title>. <source>Vaccine</source>. (<year>1998</year>) <volume>. 16</volume>:<page-range>366&#x2013;73</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/s0264-410x(97)00208-9</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<label>34</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Vaughan</surname> <given-names>JA</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sonenshine</surname> <given-names>DE</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Azad</surname> <given-names>AF</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Kinetics of ingested host immunoglobulin G in hemolymph and whole-body homogenates during nymphal development of <italic>Dermacentor variabilis</italic> and <italic>Ixodes scapularis</italic> ticks (Acari: Ixodidae)</article-title>. <source>Exp Appl Acarol</source>. (<year>2002</year>) <volume>27</volume>:<page-range>329&#x2013;40</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1023/A:1023347930746</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<label>35</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>H</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yue</surname> <given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ma</surname> <given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fan</surname> <given-names>X</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Evaluation of the immunoprotective effect of prokaryotic expression of <italic>Haemaphysalis fulvae</italic> tick salivary gland protein and ferritin 1</article-title>. <source>J Anim Husb Vet Med</source>. (<year>2024</year>) <volume>55</volume>:<page-range>688&#x2013;97</page-range>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B36">
<label>36</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hajdusek</surname> <given-names>O</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Almaz&#xe1;n</surname> <given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Loosova</surname> <given-names>G</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Villar</surname> <given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Canales</surname> <given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Grubhoffer</surname> <given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Characterization of ferritin 2 for the control of tick infestations</article-title>. <source>Vaccine</source>. (<year>2010</year>) <volume>28</volume>:<page-range>2993&#x2013;8</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.vaccine.2010.02.008</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B37">
<label>37</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Galay</surname> <given-names>RL</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Aung</surname> <given-names>KM</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Umemiya-Shirafuji</surname> <given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Maeda</surname> <given-names>H</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Matsuo</surname> <given-names>T</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kawaguchi</surname> <given-names>H</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Multiple ferritins are vital to successful blood feeding and reproduction of the hard tick</article-title>. <source>Haemaphysalis longicornis. J Exp Biol</source>. (<year>2013</year>) <volume>216</volume>:<page-range>1905&#x2013;15</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1242/jeb.081240</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B38">
<label>38</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ranjbar</surname> <given-names>MM</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gupta</surname> <given-names>SK</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ghorban</surname> <given-names>K</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nabian</surname> <given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sazmand</surname> <given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Taheri</surname> <given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Designing and modeling of complex DNA vaccine based on tropomyosin protein of <italic>Boophilus</italic> genus tick</article-title>. <source>Appl Biochem Biotechnol</source>. (<year>2015</year>) <volume>175</volume>:<page-range>323&#x2013;39</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s12010-014-1245-z</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B39">
<label>39</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Manjunathachar</surname> <given-names>HV</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kumar</surname> <given-names>B</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Saravanan</surname> <given-names>BC</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Choudhary</surname> <given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mohanty</surname> <given-names>AK</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nagar</surname> <given-names>G</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Identification and characterization of vaccine candidates against <italic>Hyalomma anatolicum</italic>&#x2014;Vector of CrimeanCongo haemorrhagic fever virus</article-title>. <source>Transbound Emerg Dis</source>. (<year>2019</year>) <volume>66</volume>:<page-range>422&#x2013;34</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/tbed.13038</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B40">
<label>40</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Tian</surname> <given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tian</surname> <given-names>Z</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Luo</surname> <given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xie</surname> <given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yin</surname> <given-names>H</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zeng</surname> <given-names>Q</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Identification of the tropomyosin (HL-Tm) in <italic>Haemaphysalis longicornis</italic>
</article-title>. <source>Vet Parasitol</source>. (<year>2015</year>) <volume>207</volume>:<page-range>318&#x2013;23</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.vetpar.2014.10.007</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B41">
<label>41</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ghosh</surname> <given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Azhahianambi</surname> <given-names>P</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Laboratory rearing of <italic>Theileria annulata</italic>-free <italic>Hyalomma anatolicum anatolicum</italic> ticks</article-title>. <source>Exp Appl Acarol</source>. (<year>2007</year>) <volume>43</volume>:<page-range>137&#x2013;46</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10493-007-9100-3</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B42">
<label>42</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Nijhof</surname> <given-names>AM</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Taoufik</surname> <given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>de la Fuente</surname> <given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kocan</surname> <given-names>KM</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>De Vries</surname> <given-names>E</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jongejan</surname> <given-names>F</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Gene silencing of the tick protective antigens, Bm86, Bm91 and subolesin, in the one-host tick <italic>Boophilus microplus</italic> by RNA interference</article-title>. <source>Int J Parasitol</source>. (<year>2007</year>) <volume>37</volume>:<page-range>653&#x2013;62</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ijpara.2006.11.005</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B43">
<label>43</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kumar</surname> <given-names>B</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Manjunathachar</surname> <given-names>HV</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nagar</surname> <given-names>G</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ravikumar</surname> <given-names>G</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>de la Fuente</surname> <given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Saravanan</surname> <given-names>BC</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Functional characterization of candidate antigens of <italic>Hyalomma anatolicum</italic> and evaluation of its cross-protective efficacy against <italic>Rhipicephalus microplus</italic>
</article-title>. <source>Vaccine</source>. (<year>2017</year>) <volume>35</volume>:<page-range>5682&#x2013;92</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.08.049</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B44">
<label>44</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ajithkumar</surname> <given-names>KG</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fular</surname> <given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chigure</surname> <given-names>G</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sharma</surname> <given-names>AK</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nagar</surname> <given-names>G</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Souza</surname> <given-names>FF</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Comparative impact of coumaphos, amitraz and plant extract of <italic>Ageratum conyzoides</italic> on the oogenesis of <italic>Rhipicephalus microplus</italic>
</article-title>. <source>Ticks Tick Borne Dis</source>. (<year>2019</year>) <volume>10</volume>:<page-range>1085&#x2013;95</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ttbdis.2019.06.003</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B45">
<label>45</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Manjunathachar</surname> <given-names>HV</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Saravanan</surname> <given-names>BC</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kumar</surname> <given-names>B</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ghosh</surname> <given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Expression and determination of immunization dose of recombinant tropomyosin protein of <italic>Hyalomma anatolicum</italic> for the development of anti-tick vaccine</article-title>. <source>Indian J Anim Res</source>. (<year>2017</year>) <volume>87</volume>:<page-range>275&#x2013;9</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.56093/ijans.v87i3.68841</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B46">
<label>46</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ghosh</surname> <given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Khan</surname> <given-names>MH</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Isolation of immunoreactive proteins from the larval extracts of <italic>Boophilus microplus</italic> and <italic>Hyalomma anatolicum anatolicum</italic>
</article-title>. <source>Indian J Anim Sci</source>. (<year>2000</year>), <fpage>70</fpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B47">
<label>47</label>
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<collab>20th Livestock Census-2019, All India Report. (2020)</collab>
</person-group>. <source>Department of Animal Husbandry and Dairying, ministry of fisheries animal husbandry and dairying</source>. <publisher-loc>New Delhi</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>government of India</publisher-name> (<year>2019</year>). p. <fpage>119</fpage>. Available at: <uri xlink:href="https://dahd.nic.in/ahs-division/20th-livestock-census-2019-all-India-report">https://dahd.nic.in/ahs-division/20th-livestock-census-2019-all-India-report</uri>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B48">
<label>48</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Miller</surname> <given-names>RJ</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Davey</surname> <given-names>RB</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>George</surname> <given-names>JE</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Modification of the food and agriculture organization larval packet test to measure amitraz-susceptibility against Ixodidae</article-title>. <source>J Med Entomol</source>. (<year>2002</year>) <volume>39</volume>:<page-range>645&#x2013;51</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1603/0022-2585-39.4.645</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B49">
<label>49</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>AY</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Davey</surname> <given-names>RB</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>George</surname> <given-names>JE</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Carbaryl resistance in Mexican strains of the southern cattle tick (Acari: Ixodidae)</article-title>. <source>J Econ Entomol</source>. (<year>2005</year>) <volume>98</volume>:<page-range>552&#x2013;6</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jee/98.2.552</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B50">
<label>50</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Castro-Janer</surname> <given-names>E</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Martins</surname> <given-names>JR</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mendes</surname> <given-names>MC</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Namindome</surname> <given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Klafke</surname> <given-names>GM</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schumaker</surname> <given-names>TT</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Diagnoses of fipronil resistance in Brazilian cattle ticks (<italic>Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus</italic>) using <italic>in vitro</italic> larval bioassays</article-title>. <source>Vet Parasitol</source>. (<year>2010</year>) <volume>173</volume>:<page-range>300&#x2013;6</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.vetpar.2010.06.036</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B51">
<label>51</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kumar</surname> <given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Paul</surname> <given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sharma</surname> <given-names>AK</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kumar</surname> <given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tewari</surname> <given-names>SS</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chaudhuri</surname> <given-names>P</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Diazinon resistant status in <italic>Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus</italic> collected from different agro-climatic regions of India</article-title>. <source>Vet Parasitol</source>. (<year>2011</year>) <volume>181</volume>:<page-range>274&#x2013;81</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.vetpar.2011.04.030</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B52">
<label>52</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Reck</surname> <given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Klafke</surname> <given-names>GM</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Webster</surname> <given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dall&#x2019;Agnol</surname> <given-names>B</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Scheffer</surname> <given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Souza</surname> <given-names>UA</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>First report of fluazuron resistance in <italic>Rhipicephalus microplus</italic>: a field tick population resistant to six classes of acaricides</article-title>. <source>Vet Parasitol</source>. (<year>2014</year>) <volume>201</volume>:<page-range>128&#x2013;36</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.vetpar.2014.01.012</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B53">
<label>53</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ghosh</surname> <given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kumar</surname> <given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nagar</surname> <given-names>G</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kumar</surname> <given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sharma</surname> <given-names>AK</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Srivastava</surname> <given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Survey of acaricides resistance status of <italic>Rhipiciphalus (Boophilus) microplus</italic> collected from selected places of Bihar, an eastern state of India</article-title>. <source>Ticks Tick Borne Dis</source>. (<year>2015</year>) <volume>6</volume>:<page-range>668&#x2013;75</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ttbdis.2015.05.013</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B54">
<label>54</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Gaur</surname> <given-names>RS</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sangwan</surname> <given-names>AK</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sangwan</surname> <given-names>N</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kumar</surname> <given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Acaricide resistance in <italic>Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus</italic> and <italic>Hyalomma anatolicum</italic> collected from Haryana and Rajasthan states of India</article-title>. <source>Ex. Appl Acarol</source>. (<year>2016</year>) <volume>69</volume>:<fpage>487</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>500</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10493-016-0046-1</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B55">
<label>55</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Klafke</surname> <given-names>G</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Webster</surname> <given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Agnol</surname> <given-names>BD</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pradel</surname> <given-names>E</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Silva</surname> <given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>de la Canal</surname> <given-names>LH</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Multiple resistance to acaricides in field populations of <italic>Rhipicephalus microplus</italic> from Rio Grande do Sul state, Southern Brazil</article-title>. <source>Ticks Tick Borne Dis</source>. (<year>2017</year>) <volume>8</volume>:<fpage>73</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>80</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ttbdis.2016.09.019</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B56">
<label>56</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Gupta</surname> <given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sangwan</surname> <given-names>N</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sangwan</surname> <given-names>AK</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gupta</surname> <given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kumar</surname> <given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Maan</surname> <given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Acaricide resistance status of deltamethrin and coumaphos in <italic>Hyalomma anatolicum</italic> ticks collected from different districts of Haryana</article-title>. <source>Exp Appl Acarol</source>. (<year>2024</year>) <volume>92</volume>:<page-range>809&#x2013;33</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10493-023-00894-0</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B57">
<label>57</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>NK</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gelot</surname> <given-names>IS</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jyoti</surname>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bhat</surname> <given-names>SA</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>H</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>V</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Detection of acaricidal resistance in <italic>Hyalomma anatolicum anatolicum</italic> from Banaskantha district, Gujarat</article-title>. <source>J Parasit Dis</source>. (<year>2015</year>) <volume>39</volume>:<page-range>563&#x2013;6</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s12639-013-0397-z</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B58">
<label>58</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kemp</surname> <given-names>DH</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pearson</surname> <given-names>RD</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gough</surname> <given-names>JM</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Willadsen</surname> <given-names>P</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Vaccination against <italic>Boophilus microplus</italic>: Localization of antigens on tick gut cells and their interaction with the host immune system</article-title>. <source>Exp Appl Acarol</source>. (<year>1989</year>) <volume>. 7</volume>:<fpage>43</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>58</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/BF01200452</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B59">
<label>59</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>de la Fuente</surname> <given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kocan</surname> <given-names>KM</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Almaz&#xe1;n</surname> <given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Blouin</surname> <given-names>EF</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>RNA interference for the study and genetic manipulation of ticks</article-title>. <source>Trends Parasitol</source>. (<year>2007</year>) <volume>23</volume>:<page-range>427&#x2013;33</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.pt.2007.07.002</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B60">
<label>60</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>de la Fuente</surname> <given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Moreno-Cid</surname> <given-names>JA</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Canales</surname> <given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Villar</surname> <given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>de la Lastra</surname> <given-names>JM</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kocan</surname> <given-names>KM</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Targeting arthropod subolesin/akirin for the development of a universal vaccine for control of vector infestations and pathogen transmission</article-title>. <source>Vet Parasitol</source>. (<year>2011</year>) <volume>181</volume>:<fpage>17</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>22</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.vetpar.2011.04.018</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B61">
<label>61</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>de la Fuente</surname> <given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Almaz&#xe1;n</surname> <given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Naranjo</surname> <given-names>V</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Blouin</surname> <given-names>EF</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kocan</surname> <given-names>KM</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Synergistic effect of silencing the expression of tick protective antigens 4D8 and Rs86 in <italic>Rhipicephalus sanguineus</italic> by RNA interference</article-title>. <source>Parasitol Res</source>. (<year>2006</year>) <volume>99</volume>:<page-range>108&#x2013;13</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00436-006-0132-0</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B62">
<label>62</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Rahman</surname> <given-names>MK</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Saiful Islam</surname> <given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>You</surname> <given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Impact of subolesin and cystatin knockdown by RNA interference in adult female <italic>Haemaphysalis longicornis</italic> (Acari: Ixodidae) on blood engorgement and reproduction</article-title>. <source>Insects</source>. (<year>2018</year>) <volume>9</volume>:<elocation-id>39</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/insects9020039</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B63">
<label>63</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Roma</surname> <given-names>GC</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Furquim</surname> <given-names>KC</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bechara</surname> <given-names>GH</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Camargo Mathias</surname> <given-names>MI</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Cytotoxic effects of permethrin in oocytes of <italic>Rhipicephalus sanguineus</italic> (Acari: Ixodidae) fully engorged females: I. Direct or indirect action of the acaricide in germ cells</article-title>? <source>Exp Appl Acarol</source>. (<year>2011</year>) <volume>53</volume>:<page-range>287&#x2013;99</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10493-010-9401-9</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B64">
<label>64</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Galay</surname> <given-names>RL</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Umemiya-Shirafuji</surname> <given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bacolod</surname> <given-names>ET</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Maeda</surname> <given-names>H</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kusakisako</surname> <given-names>K</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Koyama</surname> <given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Two kinds of ferritin protect ixodid ticks from iron overload and consequent oxidative stress</article-title>. <source>PloS One</source>. (<year>2014</year>) <volume>9</volume>:<elocation-id>e90661</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0090661</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B65">
<label>65</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>McKenna</surname> <given-names>RV</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Riding</surname> <given-names>GA</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jarmey</surname> <given-names>JM</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pearson</surname> <given-names>RD</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Willadsen</surname> <given-names>P</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Vaccination of cattle against the <italic>Boophilus microplus</italic> using a mucin-like membrane glycoprotein</article-title>. <source>Parasite Immunol</source>. (<year>1998</year>) <volume>20</volume>:<page-range>325&#x2013;36</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1046/j.1365-3024.1998.00149.x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B66">
<label>66</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Parthasarathi</surname> <given-names>BC</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kumar</surname> <given-names>B</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bhure</surname> <given-names>SK</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sharma</surname> <given-names>AK</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Manisha</surname>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nagar</surname> <given-names>G</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Co-immunization efficacy of recombinant antigens against <italic>Rhipicephalus microplus</italic> and <italic>Hyalomma anatolicum</italic> tick infestations</article-title>. <source>Pathogens</source>. (<year>2023</year>) <volume>12</volume>:<elocation-id>433</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/pathogens12030433</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B67">
<label>67</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Almaz&#xe1;n</surname> <given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Moreno-Cant&#xfa;</surname> <given-names>O</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Moreno-Cid</surname> <given-names>JA</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Galindo</surname> <given-names>RC</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Canales</surname> <given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Villar</surname> <given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Control of tick infestations in cattle vaccinated with bacterial membranes containing surface-exposed tick protective antigens</article-title>. <source>Vaccine</source>. (<year>2012</year>) <volume>30</volume>:<page-range>265&#x2013;72</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.10.102</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B68">
<label>68</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Imamura</surname> <given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Namangala</surname> <given-names>B</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tajima</surname> <given-names>T</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tembo</surname> <given-names>ME</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yasuda</surname> <given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ohashi</surname> <given-names>K</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Two serine protease inhibitors (serpins) that induce a bovine protective immune response against <italic>Rhipicephalus appendiculatus</italic> ticks</article-title>. <source>Vaccine</source>. (<year>2006</year>) <volume>24</volume>:<page-range>2230&#x2013;7</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.vaccine.2005.10.055</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B69">
<label>69</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wi&#x15b;niewski</surname> <given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>&#x141;api&#x144;ski</surname> <given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dani&#x142;owicz-Luebert</surname> <given-names>E</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jaros</surname> <given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>D&#x142;ugosz</surname> <given-names>E</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>W&#x119;drychowicz</surname> <given-names>H</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Vaccination with a cocktail of <italic>Ancylostoma ceylanicum</italic> recombinant antigens leads to worm burden reduction in hamsters</article-title>. <source>Acta Parasitol</source>. (<year>2016</year>) <volume>61</volume>:<page-range>556&#x2013;61</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1515/ap-2016-0074</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B70">
<label>70</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Picchio</surname> <given-names>MS</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>S&#xe1;nchez</surname> <given-names>VR</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Arcon</surname> <given-names>N</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Soto</surname> <given-names>AS</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Perrone Sibilia</surname> <given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Aldirico</surname> <given-names>MLA</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Vaccine potential of antigen cocktails composed of recombinant <italic>Toxoplasma gondii</italic> TgPI-1, ROP2 and GRA4 proteins against chronic toxoplasmosis in C3H mice</article-title>. <source>Exp Parasitol</source>. (<year>2018</year>) <volume>185</volume>:<fpage>62</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>70</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.exppara.2018.01.006</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B71">
<label>71</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Nisbet</surname> <given-names>AJ</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>McNeilly</surname> <given-names>TN</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Price</surname> <given-names>DRG</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Oliver</surname> <given-names>EM</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bartley</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mitchell</surname> <given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>The rational simplification of a recombinant cocktail vaccine to control the parasitic nematode Teladorsagia circumcincta</article-title>. <source>Int J Parasitol</source>. (<year>2019</year>) <volume>49</volume>:<page-range>257&#x2013;65</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ijpara.2018.10.006</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B72">
<label>72</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Rodr&#xed;guez-Valle</surname> <given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Taoufik</surname> <given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vald&#xe9;s</surname> <given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Montero</surname> <given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hassan</surname> <given-names>I</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hassan</surname> <given-names>SM</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Efficacy of <italic>Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus</italic> Bm86 against <italic>Hyalomma dromedarii</italic> and <italic>Amblyomma cajennense</italic> tick infestations in camels and cattle</article-title>. <source>Vaccine</source>. (<year>2012</year>) <volume>30</volume>:<page-range>3453&#x2013;8</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.03.020</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B73">
<label>73</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Carvalho</surname> <given-names>WA</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ianella</surname> <given-names>P</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Arnoldi</surname> <given-names>FG</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Caetano</surname> <given-names>AR</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Maruyama</surname> <given-names>SR</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ferreira</surname> <given-names>BR</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Haplotypes of the bovine IgG2 heavy gamma chain in tick-resistant and tick-susceptible breeds of cattle</article-title>. <source>Immunogenetics</source>. (<year>2011</year>) <volume>63</volume>:<page-range>319&#x2013;24</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00251-011-0515-y</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B74">
<label>74</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>de la Fuente</surname> <given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gort&#xe1;zar</surname> <given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Contreras</surname> <given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kabi</surname> <given-names>F</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kasaija</surname> <given-names>P</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mugerwa</surname> <given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Increasing access to biotech products for animal agriculture in Sub-Saharan Africa through partnerships</article-title>. <source>Nat Biotechnol</source>. (<year>2024</year>) <volume>42</volume>:<page-range>1013&#x2013;4</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41587-024-02300-5</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>