<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="EN">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Immunol.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Immunology</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Immunol.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">1664-3224</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fimmu.2023.1100499</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Immunology</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Fc&#x3b3;RI FG-loop functions as a pH sensitive switch for IgG binding and release</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lu</surname>
<given-names>Jinghua</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/635300"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Spencer</surname>
<given-names>Matthew</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2102242"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zou</surname>
<given-names>Zhongcheng</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Traver</surname>
<given-names>Maria</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2148078"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Brzostowski</surname>
<given-names>Joseph</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Sun</surname>
<given-names>Peter D.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn001">
<sup>*</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/600091"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
<institution>Structural Immunology Section, Lab of Immunogenetics, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health</institution>, <addr-line>Rockville, MD</addr-line>, <country>United States</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
<institution>Lymphocyte Activation Section, Lab of Immunogenetics, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health</institution>, <addr-line>Rockville, MD</addr-line>, <country>United States</country>
</aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>Edited by: Junjie Li, Kyushu University, Japan</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>Reviewed by: Pengwen Chen, The University of Tokyo, Japan; Yuki Mochida, Innovation Centre of NanoMedicine (iCONM), Japan</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="corresp" id="fn001">
<p>*Correspondence: Peter D. Sun, <email xlink:href="mailto:psun@niaid.nih.gov">psun@niaid.nih.gov</email>
</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="other" id="fn002">
<p>This article was submitted to Systems Immunology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Immunology</p>
</fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>06</day>
<month>02</month>
<year>2023</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2023</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>14</volume>
<elocation-id>1100499</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>24</day>
<month>11</month>
<year>2022</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>25</day>
<month>01</month>
<year>2023</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#xa9; 2023 Lu, Spencer, Zou, Traver, Brzostowski and Sun</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2023</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Lu, Spencer, Zou, Traver, Brzostowski and Sun</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>Understanding the molecular mechanism underlying the hierarchic binding between Fc&#x3b3;Rs and IgG antibodies is critical for therapeutic antibody engineering and Fc&#x3b3;R functions. The recent determination of crystal structures of Fc&#x3b3;RI-Fc complexes, however, resulted in two controversial mechanisms for the high affinity receptor binding to IgG. Here, we describe high resolution structures of a bovine FG-loop variant of Fc&#x3b3;RI in complex with the Fc fragment of IgG<sub>1</sub> crystallized in three different conditions at neutral pH, confirming the characteristic FG loop-Fc interaction is critical to the high affinity immunoglobulin binding. We showed that the Fc&#x3b3;RI D2-domain FG-loop functioned as a pH-sensing switch for IgG binding. Further live cell imaging of Fc&#x3b3;RI-mediated internalization of immune complexes showed a pH sensitive temporal-spatial antibody-antigen uptake and release. Taken together, we demonstrate that the structures of Fc&#x3b3;RI-Fc crystallized at neutral and acidic pH, respectively, represent the high and low affinity binding states of the receptor for IgG uptake and release. These results support a role for Fc&#x3b3;RI in antigen delivery, highlight the importance of Fc glycan in antibody binding to the high affinity receptor and provide new insights to future antibody engineering.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>human Fc&#x3b3;RI</kwd>
<kwd>antibody recognition</kwd>
<kwd>receptor FG-loop</kwd>
<kwd>Fc-glycan recognition</kwd>
<kwd>pH sensitive binding</kwd>
<kwd>live cell tracking of Fc&#x3b3;RI-antibody endocytosis</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<counts>
<fig-count count="8"/>
<table-count count="1"/>
<equation-count count="0"/>
<ref-count count="43"/>
<page-count count="12"/>
<word-count count="7457"/>
</counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="s1" sec-type="intro">
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Therapeutic IgG antibodies have been extensively developed during the past decades to treat various diseases, such as cancer, infectious diseases, allergies, and Alzheimer&#x2019;s diseases. Numerous investigations have been dedicated to reveal the mechanisms whereby therapeutic antibodies exert their biological effects. Among them, membrane bound Fc&#x3b3; receptors (Fc&#x3b3;Rs) are the key effectors and regulators of IgG mediated immune response due to the different characteristics of heterogeneous Fc&#x3b3;Rs. According to the binding affinities, Fc&#x3b3;Rs can be categorized as high or low affinity receptors and even a given Fc&#x3b3;R could bind to different IgG subclasses with different affinities. In addition, the glycosylation modifications of both Fc&#x3b3;Rs and IgGs modulate the binding affinities of their interactions. Upon binding of IgG/antigen complexes, Fc&#x3b3;Rs can initiate totally opposite cellular responses, which depend on the activating or inhibitory immunoreceptor tyrosine signaling motif that they bear or associate within the cytoplasm. Finally, the biological effect mediated by Fc&#x3b3;R-IgG binding is a temporal-spatial cellular process spanning from the cell surface to the intracellular endosome/phagosome. Owing to the rapid progress of bioengineering technology, therapeutic antibodies are also developed to have tailored binding properties and improved efficacy and half-lives. Altogether, the basis of therapeutic IgG antibody development and engineering relies heavily on the understanding of the molecular binding mechanisms of Fc&#x3b3;R-IgG interactions.</p>
<p>Although earlier structural studies described the binding mode between low affinity receptor and IgG, the structural mechanism underlying the high affinity Fc&#x3b3;RI-IgG binding remain unresolved. Among the known Fc&#x3b3;Rs, Fc&#x3b3;RI is the only receptor with high affinity to bind selective subclasses of IgG in monomeric form (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">1</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">4</xref>). The function of Fc&#x3b3;RI remains a conundrum as the receptor is thought to be saturated by high concentrations of circulating IgG. Yet, evidence supports roles for Fc&#x3b3;RI in antibody-mediated cellular responses (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">2</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">3</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">5</xref>). Unlike the low affinity Fc&#x3b3;RII and Fc&#x3b3;RIII, Fc&#x3b3;RI is not only broadly expressed on myeloid cells, but also an inflammatory receptor, whose expression is upregulated by IFN-&#x3b3; (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">6</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">8</xref>). In addition, deficiency of Fc&#x3b3;RI affected antibody-dependent responses (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">9</xref>). On the other hand, Fc&#x3b3;RI binding of pathogenic autoantibodies was shown to exacerbate some autoimmune conditions, such as rheumatoid arthritis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">10</xref>). Owing to its high affinity IgG binding, Fc&#x3b3;RI is also a target of antibody engineering to modulate its binding affinity to therapeutic antibodies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">11</xref>).</p>
<p>The structures of the extracellular domain of the high affinity IgG receptor Fc&#x3b3;RI in complex with IgG<sub>1</sub>-Fc have recently been published (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">12</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">14</xref>). These structures showed that the high affinity Fc&#x3b3;RI docked on IgG in a similar mode to those of the low affinity Fc&#x3b3;R receptors. Nevertheless, structural discrepancies led two contradicting structural mechanisms for the high affinity binding between Fc&#x3b3;RI and IgG (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">12</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">15</xref>). Further, assumptions were made to attribute the structural discrepancies to the crystallographic resolutions with the implication that the binding mechanism deduced from the lower resolution complex structure was incorrect (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">13</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">15</xref>). Given its unique high affinity IgG binding as well as its potential role in both antibody-mediated cellular humoral response and antibody engineering for immunotherapy, we attempted to resolve the conflicting high affinity binding mechanism proposed for Fc&#x3b3;RI. To address the crystallographic resolution-related discrepancy in proposed binding mechanisms, we determined a bovine FG-loop variant of Fc&#x3b3;RI in complex IgG<sub>1</sub>-Fc to 2.3-2.5 &#xc5; resolutions, demonstrating that the crystallographic resolution was not responsible for the structural discrepancies. This was further supported by mechanism-specific mutational analyses of the receptor. In addition to various crystallographic resolutions, the crystallization conditions among of the published Fc&#x3b3;RI-Fc complexes also differed. To probe if crystallization conditions influenced the receptor-ligand binding, we further carried out pH-dependent solution binding experiments between Fc&#x3b3;RI and IgG, and tracked an antibody-antigen complex internalization by the receptor during phagocytosis using confocal and live cell fluorescent imaging experiments. Taken together, these experiments reconciled the structural discrepancies in published Fc&#x3b3;RI-Fc structures and demonstrated the high and low affinity conformations in Fc&#x3b3;RI-IgG binding, were regulated by the receptor and Fc-glycan interactions in response to intracellular pH environment. Such cellular temporal-spatial binding and release of IgG by Fc&#x3b3;RI favors the involvement of the receptor in antigen presentation of small soluble immune complexes.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2" sec-type="results">
<title>Results</title>
<sec id="s2_1">
<title>Positively charged D2 domain FG-loop is unique to Fc&#x3b3;RI but not Fc&#x3b3;RII or Fc&#x3b3;RIII</title>
<p>All known Fc&#x3b3; receptors recognize the lower hinge region of IgG with their receptor D2 domain (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">15</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">16</xref>). The conserved receptor-Fc docking mode results in primarily two similar contact regions between Fc&#x3b3;R and the lower hinge regions of two IgG-Fc chains. In the case of Fc&#x3b3;RI, the lower hinge of IgG-Fc A chain, referred to as hinge A region, forms primarily hydrogen bond interactions with residues on strand C and C&#x2019; of Fc&#x3b3;RI, while the lower hinge of IgG-Fc B chain, referred to as hinge B region, forms mainly hydrophobic interactions that include the &#x201c;WPW&#x201d; sandwich between Pro 329 of Fc and Trp 104, Trp 127 of the receptor. Many of the receptor residues contacting hinge A and B of Fc are conserved between the high affinity Fc&#x3b3;RI and the low affinity Fc&#x3b3;RII, Fc&#x3b3;RIII, making it difficult to deduce the critical contacts responsible for the high affinity binding of Fc&#x3b3;RI. In addition to the conserved receptor contacts to hinge A and B of Fc, the Fc&#x3b3;RI D2 domain FG-loop, residues 171-176, was observed to form additional contacts with Fc in the Fc&#x3b3;RI-Fc complex structure by Lu et&#xa0;al (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">12</xref>). These FG-loop-mediated contacts, however, were not observed in the other two complexes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">13</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">14</xref>). Unique to the high affinity Fc&#x3b3;RI is the presence of three consecutive positively charged residues 173-175 in its FG-loop, which are not observed in the low affinity Fc&#x3b3;RII and Fc&#x3b3;RIII receptors (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1A</bold>
</xref>) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">12</xref>). The appearance of the charged residues is quite conserved in all mammalian Fc&#x3b3;RI with over 75% of amino acids being positively charged at each of the position 173, 174 and 175 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1B</bold>
</xref>). In comparison, Fc&#x3b3;RII and Fc&#x3b3;RIII carry no more than one positively charged residue in their corresponding sequences (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1B</bold>
</xref>). Further, the charged amino acids in Fc&#x3b3;RI FG-loop also exhibit residue preference. Arg and Lys occur equally (~36%-40% each) at position 173 with His counting for less than 2% of the sequences. In contrast, His is observed in over 50% of the sequences at position 174, followed by Arg (~15%) with Lys counting for ~5% of the sequences. Position 175 is dominated with Arg (~75% of the sequences). These results suggest the selective usage of positively charged amino acids in the high affinity receptor FG-loop is not random, rather a distinct feature with potential functional advantage. Indeed, the replacement of FG loop of Fc&#x3b3;RIII with Fc&#x3b3;RI FG loop dramatically increased the binding affinity of Fc&#x3b3;RIII to IgG<sub>1</sub> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">17</xref>). In addition, the mutations of these positively charged residues on Fc&#x3b3;RI FG loop to Ala or Glu significantly affected the high affinity interaction between Fc&#x3b3;RI and IgG (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">12</xref>).</p>
<fig id="f1" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;1</label>
<caption>
<p>Sequence analysis of FG loop residues in Fc&#x3b3;Rs D2 domain. <bold>(A)</bold> Logo display of FG loop residues among all Fc&#x3b3;Rs. <bold>(B)</bold> Usage of positively charged residues K,H,R, and other residues on FG loop. <bold>(C)</bold> Binding affinities of human and bovine H174R variant Fc&#x3b3;RI to human IgG<sub>1</sub>.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fimmu-14-1100499-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_2">
<title>Structure of Fc&#x3b3;RI H174R variant in complex with Fc</title>
<p>The recent publication of three Fc&#x3b3;RI-Fc complex structures yielded two conflicting mechanisms regarding to the main determinant of the receptor&#x2019;s high affinity IgG binding (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">12</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">13</xref>). While Lu et&#xa0;al. proposed the high affinity IgG binding resulted from unique interactions between Fc&#x3b3;RI D2 domain FG-loop and Fc, Kiyoshi et&#xa0;al. emphasized a hydrophobic packing between the receptor and Leu 235 of Fc as the high affinity IgG binding mechanism. To further resolve the conflicting mechanism, we examined sequence variants of the receptor D2 domain FG-loop assuming the high affinity IgG binding is retained by Fc&#x3b3;RI from other species. Since Arg is the second abundant amino acid at the FG-loop position 174 and is observed in bovine and ovine Fc&#x3b3;RI sequences, we generated a H174R mutant of human Fc&#x3b3;RI. Indeed, the H174R variant of Fc&#x3b3;RI bound to all IgG isotypes with similar affinity as the wildtype receptor (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1C</bold>
</xref>). We subsequently crystallized the bovine FG-loop variant of Fc&#x3b3;RI in complex with human IgG<sub>1</sub>-Fc in three different salt conditions at neutral pH (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Table S1</bold>
</xref>). All three crystal forms belonged to the same crystallographic lattice with similar unit cell dimensions and their structures were determined by molecular replacement to high resolutions between 2.3 and 2.5&#xc5;, respectively (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Table S1</bold>
</xref>). The three complex structures were nearly identical with root-mean-square (rms) deviations of 0.2-0.25 &#xc5; among them (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2A</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap id="T1" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;1</label>
<caption>
<p>Dissociation constants for Fc&#x3b3;R binding to IgG.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" rowspan="2" align="left">Fc&#x3b3;RI</th>
<th valign="top" colspan="4" align="center">Affinity (K<sub>D</sub>, nM)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="center">IgG<sub>1</sub>
</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">IgG<sub>2</sub>
</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">IgG<sub>3</sub>
</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">IgG<sub>4</sub>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">WT</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">13.0&#xb1;6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">41.0&#xb1;29.3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">28.6&#xb1;19.9</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">65.7&#xb1;53.0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">H174R</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">9.0&#xb1;4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">32.8&#xb1;12.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">24.2&#xb1;18.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">108.8&#xb1;54.7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">H174E</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">250.6&#xb1;115</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"/>
<td valign="top" align="left"/>
<td valign="top" align="left"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">K173A/H174A/R175A (AAA)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">180.0&#xb1;42</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"/>
<td valign="top" align="left"/>
<td valign="top" align="left"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">K173E/H174E/R175E (EEE)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">418 &#xb1; 198</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"/>
<td valign="top" align="left"/>
<td valign="top" align="left"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">V132L/Y176V</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">25.8&#xb1;28.2</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"/>
<td valign="top" align="left"/>
<td valign="top" align="left"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left" style="background-color:#7d7e7b">Fc&#x3b3;RIII</th>
<th valign="top" align="center" style="background-color:#7d7e7b">IgG<sub>1</sub>(K<sub>D</sub>, &#xb5;M)</th>
<th valign="top" align="left" style="background-color:#7d7e7b"/>
<th valign="top" align="left" style="background-color:#7d7e7b"/>
<th valign="top" align="left" style="background-color:#7d7e7b"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">WT</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.4&#xb1;9</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"/>
<td valign="top" align="left"/>
<td valign="top" align="left"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">L118V</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">14.7&#xb1;1.9</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"/>
<td valign="top" align="left"/>
<td valign="top" align="left"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">V163Y</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.4&#xb1;2.1</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"/>
<td valign="top" align="left"/>
<td valign="top" align="left"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">L118V/V163Y</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.8&#xb1;0.4</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"/>
<td valign="top" align="left"/>
<td valign="top" align="left"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left" style="background-color:#7d7e7b"/>
<th valign="top" colspan="4" align="center" style="background-color:#7d7e7b">pH-dependent binding to anti-BSA (K<sub>D</sub>, nM)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left"  style="background-color:#7d7e7b"/>
<th valign="top" align="center"  style="background-color:#7d7e7b">7.5</th>
<th valign="top" align="center"  style="background-color:#7d7e7b">4.6</th>
<th valign="top" align="center"  style="background-color:#7d7e7b">4.0</th>
<th valign="top" align="left"  style="background-color:#7d7e7b"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Fc&#x3b3;RI</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">13.5&#xb1;3.8</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">193&#xb1;176</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">ND</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">BSA</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7.8&#xb1;1.8</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">10.1&#xb1;14.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.8&#xb1;1.1</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"/>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<fig id="f2" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;2</label>
<caption>
<p>Structures of H174R Fc&#x3b3;RI in complex with IgG<sub>1</sub> Fc. <bold>(A)</bold> Structure superposition of three structures of Fc&#x3b3;RI H174R variant in complex with Fc (PDB code: 8DIR, 8DIN and 8DJ7). All structural alignments were based on D2 domain of Fc&#x3b3;RI. D1, D2 and D3 domain of Fc&#x3b3;RI were highlighted as cartoons in green, blue, and magenta, respectively. The Fc chain <bold>(A, B)</bold> were colored in orange and cyan, respectively, with glycosylation attached to Asn 297 shown in stick model. <bold>(B, D)</bold> Structures of individual Fc&#x3b3;RI-Fc complexes, 8DIR <bold>(B)</bold>, 4X4M <bold>(C)</bold> and 4W4O <bold>(D)</bold>. The acetate and Zn atom bound to H174 are shown in spheres. E-F) Interface contact region between Fc&#x3b3;RI D2 domain and Fc-A chain as observed in 8DIR <bold>(E)</bold> and 4W4O <bold>(F)</bold>. <bold>(G, H)</bold> Interface between H174R Fc&#x3b3;RI D2 domain and Fc-B chains observed in 8DIR <bold>(G)</bold> and 4W4O <bold>(H)</bold>. Fc&#x3b3;RI residues were shown as magenta sticks and labelled in black. Residues from Fc chains were shown as cyan or green sticks and labelled in red.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fimmu-14-1100499-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>The overall docking of Fc&#x3b3;RI H174R variant receptor on Fc closely resembles those previously observed (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">12</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">14</xref>) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;2B&#x2013;D</bold>
</xref>) in which the D2 domain of Fc&#x3b3;RI is wedged into the horseshoe opening of Fc to induce a conformational change in Fc from a symmetric to asymmetric dimer. The docking of Fc&#x3b3;RI on Fc is in fact the same as those observed in all low affinity Fc&#x3b3;RII- and Fc&#x3b3;RIII-Fc complex structures (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">18</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">21</xref>), further highlighting the common binding mode between Fc and Fc&#x3b3;Rs and their conserved interactions. In brief, the A chain of Fc interacts with the C-strand (Tyr 133 to Leu 136), C&#x2019;-strand (Lys 142 to His 148) and C&#x2019;E loop (His 148 to Trp 149) of Fc&#x3b3;RI D2-domain. The receptor forms primarily polar interactions with Fc residues at lower hinge A. These include 4 hydrogen bonds involving Asn 134, Lys 142, and His 148 of Fc&#x3b3;RI and one salt bridge between Lys 145 of Fc&#x3b3;RI and Glu 269 of Fc-A (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Table S2</bold>
</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;2E, F</bold>
</xref>). The B chain of Fc interacts with the receptor D1-D2 interdomain hinge region (Arg 102 to Trp 104) and BC loop (Trp 127 to Tyr 133) of the D2 domain (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;2G, H</bold>
</xref>). Trp 104 and Trp 127 of Fc&#x3b3;RI form a tryptophan sandwich with Pro 329 of Fc at the lower hinge-B contact region. This WPW sandwich is conserved in both high and low affinity Fc&#x3b3;Rs (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>). However, the overall interface area between the Fc&#x3b3;RI receptor and Fc is ~1270&#xc5;<sup>2</sup>, approximately 400-500 &#xc5;<sup>2</sup> more than those of low affinity Fc&#x3b3;RIII-Fc complexes. Most of the interface difference is the result of additional contacts between Fc&#x3b3;RI D2-domain FG loop and Fc.</p>
<fig id="f3" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;3</label>
<caption>
<p>Sequence alignment of Fc&#x3b3;R D2 domains. The interface residues in Fc&#x3b3;RI-Fc complex are shaded in cyan or blue. V132 and Y176 of Fc&#x3b3;RI are highlighted in the red box. They correspond to L118 and V163 in Fc&#x3b3;RIII.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fimmu-14-1100499-g003.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_3">
<title>Contacts between Fc&#x3b3;RI D2 domain FG-loop and Fc</title>
<p>All three structures crystallized at neutral pH with different salts contain well-defined electron densities at the interface between the receptor FG-loop and Fc (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;4A</bold>
</xref> and <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Figure S1</bold>
</xref>). Arg 174 on the receptor FG-loop forms two contacts with the B-chain of Fc, including a salt bridge to Asp 265 and a hydrogen-bond to the hydroxyl group of the second N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc labeled as residue NAG502) on the glycan associated with Asn 297 on the Fc (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;4B, D, E</bold>
</xref>). As the N-linked glycan on Asn 297 is conserved in all isotypes of IgG and the second GlcNAc is conserved in all N-linked glycans, the result shows a conserved Fc&#x3b3;RI-glycan interaction with all IgG isotypes. It is worth noting that a recent study of human Fc&#x3b3;RI binding to IgG<sub>1</sub> by hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry also supports the direct FG-loop and glycan interaction (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">22</xref>). These contacts between the FG-loop and Fc were not observed in complex structures by Kiyoshi et&#xa0;al. (PDB entry 4W4O) and Oganesyan et&#xa0;al. (PDB entry 4ZNE) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">13</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">14</xref>). In both structures, the receptor FG-loop is retracted ~2 &#xc5; away from the Fc. The FG-loop residue 174 was instead coordinated by a Zn ion and an acetate from the crystallization solution (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;4C</bold>
</xref> and <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Table S2</bold>
</xref>). The lack of direct contacts in 4W4O between Fc&#x3b3;RI FG-loop and Fc is also evident from the presence of numerous water molecules at the interface. While there are 5 water molecules observed between the receptor FG-loop and Fc in the current H174R complex, there are additional 11 water molecules in the same region of 4W4O (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;4F, G</bold>
</xref>). These additional water molecules form an extensive hydrogen-bond network in 4W4O, separating the receptor FG-loop from direct contacting with Fc. These results showed that the largest differences between the two complex structures (H174R-Fc and 4W4O) were the receptor FG-loop mediated Fc contacts. As the structure 4ZNE by Oganesyan et&#xa0;al. is essentially identical to that of Kiyoshi et&#xa0;al., all structural comparisons here refer to the structure by Kiyoshi et&#xa0;al.</p>
<fig id="f4" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;4</label>
<caption>
<p>Interactions between FG loop and Fc. <bold>(A)</bold> (2Fo-Fc) electron density map contoured at 1&#x3c3; showing R174 of Fc&#x3b3;RI forming salt-bridge and hydrogen bond contacts with D265 and glycan, respectively, on Fc. <bold>(B)</bold> Stick model depicting R174 contacting D265 and glycan on Fc in the H174R variant Fc&#x3b3;RI-Fc complex. <bold>(C)</bold> H174 in 4W4O is situated too far from D265 and glycan but instead is coordinated by a Zn ion. <bold>(D, E)</bold> Ligplot and cartoon drawing to illustrate the interactions from R174 of the receptor to D265 and glycans on Fc-B chain. <bold>(F, G)</bold> interactions between R174 and Fc observed in 8DIR <bold>(F)</bold> are replaced by water molecules in 4W4O <bold>(G)</bold>. <bold>(H, I)</bold> Contacts of Fc-B chain L235 with the receptor hydrophobic pocket as observed in 8DIR <bold>(H)</bold> and 4W4O <bold>(I)</bold>.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fimmu-14-1100499-g004.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_4">
<title>Fc&#x3b3;RI FG-loop residues determine the high affinity IgG binding</title>
<p>Furthermore, these FG-loop mediated Fc contacts are also unique to the high affinity receptor Fc&#x3b3;RI and are not present in the low affinity Fc-receptors. In addition, the FG-loop of human Fc&#x3b3;RI D2 domain is one amino acid shorter than those of the low affinity receptors (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">12</xref>). The replacement of the FG-loop in Fc&#x3b3;RIII with that of Fc&#x3b3;RI resulted in &gt; 10-fold increase in IgG<sub>1</sub> binding affinity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">17</xref>). When a valine residue was inserted into the Fc&#x3b3;RI FG-loop, it resulted in an 8-fold reduction in IgG<sub>1</sub> binding affinity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">17</xref>). When residues 173-175 (KHR) of the Fc&#x3b3;RI FG-loop were replaced with alanine, the KHR to AAA mutation resulted in a ~15-fold affinity reduction to 180nM in the receptor binding to IgG<sub>1</sub> (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>). The contribution of Fc&#x3b3;RI FG-loop charge to the receptor binding to IgG was evident when histidine 174 was replaced with Glu, resulting in a ~20-fold loss in IgG<sub>1</sub> binding (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>). Replacing all three positively charged KHR motif in the FG-loop with Glu (EEE mutant) resulted in ~40-fold loss in the receptor binding to IgG (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;5D</bold>
</xref>). Part of the additional affinity loss associated with the negatively charged EEE mutant is likely due to a repulsive interaction with Asp 265, a salt bridge partner of the FG-loop Arg 174. Conversely, when Asp 265 on the heavy chain of a human IgG<sub>1</sub> isotype anti-gp120 antibody, VRC01, was replaced with Arg, the D265R mutant VRC01 antibody bound to the wildtype Fc&#x3b3;RI with 1.16 &#xb5;M affinity, a ~100-fold loss compared to the 12 nM Fc&#x3b3;RI binding affinity of the wildtype VRC01 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;5A, B</bold>
</xref>). Thus, either replacing positively charged residues in the FG-loop of the receptor with negatively charged residues or replacing negatively charged Asp 265 of Fc with positively charged Arg dramatically reduced the receptor-ligand binding, supporting that the Fc&#x3b3;RI FG-loop determines the high affinity interaction with IgG.</p>
<fig id="f5" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;5</label>
<caption>
<p>Binding of wildtype or mutant recombinant Fc&#x3b3;RI and Fc&#x3b3;RIII to IgG<sub>1</sub>. <bold>(A, B)</bold> Biolayer interferometry (BLI) measurements of Fc&#x3b3;RI binding to the wildtype and D265R mutant of VRC01. <bold>(C, D)</bold> SPR measurements of Fc&#x3b3;RI V132L/Y176V <bold>(C)</bold> and <sup>173</sup>KHR<sup>175</sup> to <sup>173</sup>EEE<sup>175</sup> <bold>(D)</bold> mutants binding to IgG<sub>1</sub>. <bold>(E&#x2013;H)</bold> SPR measurements of Fc&#x3b3;RIII WT and mutants binding to IgG<sub>1</sub>.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fimmu-14-1100499-g005.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_5">
<title>Mutations of the receptor residues forming the hydrophobic core with lower hinge-B of Fc</title>
<p>As the receptor FG-loop made no direct contacts to Fc in the complex 4W4O, Kiyoshi et&#xa0;al. proposed a receptor-induced conformational change in the lower hinge region of Fc-B as the mechanism for the high affinity Fc&#x3b3;RI binding to IgG. This conformational change results in the insertion of Leu 235 into a hydrophobic pocket formed by Trp 104, Leu 105, Lys 130, Val 132, and Tyr 176 of Fc&#x3b3;RI (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;4H, I</bold>
</xref>) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">13</xref>). Three of the five hydrophobic pocket forming residues, Trp 104, Leu 105 and Lys 130, are conserved between the high affinity Fc&#x3b3;RI and the low affinity Fc&#x3b3;RIII. Val 132 and Tyr 176 are conserved only in Fc&#x3b3;RI sequences. Val 132 is replaced by Leu in all lower affinity Fc&#x3b3;RII and Fc&#x3b3;RIII sequences (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>). Tyr 176 is replaced by either Phe or Val in Fc&#x3b3;RIIA and Fc&#x3b3;RIII. Both Val 132 and Tyr 176 were proposed to be important for the receptor&#x2019;s high affinity IgG binding (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">13</xref>). To assess the potential contribution of the hydrophobic pocket to the high affinity IgG binding of Fc&#x3b3;RI, we performed mutational analyses to replace Val 132 and Tyr 176 of Fc&#x3b3;RI with their corresponding residues in Fc&#x3b3;RIII (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>), as well as to replace the corresponding Leu 118 and Val 163 in Fc&#x3b3;RIII with Val and Tyr, respectively, to construct a high affinity receptor-like hydrophobic core in the low affinity Fc&#x3b3;RIII.</p>
<p>The Fc&#x3b3;RI V132L/Y176V double mutant only exhibited a ~2-fold reduction in IgG binding affinity of 25.8&#xb1;28.2nM (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;5C</bold>
</xref>), less dramatic compared to the 15-30 fold reduction of the FG-loop mutants: H174E, AAA or EEE (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;5D</bold>
</xref> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>). Conversely, when Leu 118 and Val 163 in Fc&#x3b3;RIII were mutated to their corresponding Fc&#x3b3;RI residues, Val and Tyr, respectively, both the single mutants L118V and V163Y, as well as the double mutant L118V/V163Y resulted in equivalent or reduced IgG<sub>1</sub> binding affinity compared to that of the wildtype Fc&#x3b3;RIII (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;5E&#x2013;H</bold>
</xref> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>). In contrast, when the FG-loop in Fc&#x3b3;RIII was replaced with that of Fc&#x3b3;RI, it resulted ~15-fold improvement in IgG binding (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">17</xref>). The failure to gain IgG<sub>1</sub> binding affinity when the lower hinge-B hydrophobic core lining residues of Fc&#x3b3;RIII were mutated to those of Fc&#x3b3;RI suggests these lower hinge-B hydrophobic core lining residues are not critical for Fc&#x3b3;RI high affinity IgG binding. Scrutinization of the detailed interactions of L235 on Fc B chain with both Fc&#x3b3;RI and Fc&#x3b3;RIII reveals that the majority of VDW and hydrogen bonding interactions that involve L235 come from main chain atoms, suggesting that the N terminus of the Fc hinge functions as an anchor cable while the Fc adopts the asymmetric conformational changes to dock onto Fc&#x3b3;Rs. Indeed, effector cell bioassays showed engineered CD20 antibodies with L234A/L235A(LALA) mutations gave equivalent responses <italic>via</italic> Fc&#x3b3;RI but lost substantial activities with low affinity receptors Fc&#x3b3;RIIa and Fc&#x3b3;RIII. One additional mutation P329G in the conserved WPW sandwich (L234A/L235A/P329G) further abolished cellular responses with all the Fc&#x3b3; receptors, highlighting the contribution of hinge loop and WPW sandwich to the common binding mode between Fc&#x3b3;Rs and IgG antibodies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">23</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_6">
<title>High affinity Fc&#x3b3;RI and IgG binding is sensitive to pH</title>
<p>To reconcile the observed FG-loop structural differences in different Fc&#x3b3;RI-Fc complexes, we noticed differences in the crystallization conditions of all three published structures. The early Fc&#x3b3;RI-Fc complex by Lu et&#xa0;al. (4X4M) was crystallized in 10% PEG 8000, 50mM Li<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> and 10mM HEPES/pH 7.5 while the one by Kiyoshi et&#xa0;al. (4W4O) was crystallized in 0.1M sodium acetate, 0.1M zinc acetate, 4% 1,4-butanediol and 12% PEG 4000 at pH 4.6 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">12</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">13</xref>). The structure obtained by Oganesyan et&#xa0;al. (4ZNE) was crystallized into the same space group as that by Kiyoshi et&#xa0;al. under similar conditions of PEG 3350 and zinc acetate (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">13</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">14</xref>). The current bovine FG-loop variant and Fc complex was crystallized in 20% PEG3350 with 0.2 M of different salts at pH 6.6-7.5. Since the Fc&#x3b3;RI FG-loop residues in both complexes crystallized from zinc acetate did not contact Fc but instead showed the coordination of the FG-loop His 174 to zinc and acetate groups in Kiyoshi et&#xa0;al. (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;4G</bold>
</xref>), we reasoned that the presence of acetate competes with the FG-loop salt bridge to Asp 265 of Fc and hydrogen bond to the hydroxyl group on the second N-acetylglucosamine associated with Asn 297. As higher acetate concentration is usually associated with lower pH, we then investigated if Fc&#x3b3;RI-IgG interaction was sensitive to pH by measuring the binding affinities of recombinant Fc&#x3b3;RI to IgG<sub>1</sub> between pH 7.5-4 using BIAcore. Both the His and Arg 174 forms of Fc&#x3b3;RI bound to IgG<sub>1</sub> with ~10 nM affinity at neutral pH and remained high affinity binding to IgG above pH 5.5, but exhibited pH dependent affinity reduction below that (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;6A, B</bold>
</xref> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>). At pH 4.6 the receptor exhibited ~269 nM binding affinity for IgG<sub>1</sub>, similar to that of AAA and EEE mutant binding at neutral pH (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;6A</bold>
</xref>). No binding to IgG could be detected for Fc&#x3b3;RI at pH 4 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;6A, B</bold>
</xref>). As a comparison, we measured an antibody-antigen binding using bovine serum albumin (BSA) and anti-BSA rabbit polyclonal antibodies at both neutral and acidic pH conditions. Both BSA and Fc&#x3b3;RI bound to anti-BSA with similar high affinities of ~10 nM at neutral pH (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;6C</bold>
</xref>). While BSA binding to anti-BSA remained high affinity between pH 7.5 and 4, Fc&#x3b3;RI binding to anti-BSA showed the characteristic pH dependent affinity reduction (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;6C</bold>
</xref>), suggesting the pH dependent binding is a unique feature of Fc&#x3b3;RI. Since the binding affinity between IgG and Fc&#x3b3;RI is significantly lower at low pH, we conclude that the binding mode in the complexes crystallized at low pH represents a low affinity binding state of Fc&#x3b3;RI-IgG interaction due to the absence of the FG-loop and Fc interactions. Consistently, the IgG binding affinity of the FG-loop His 174 to Glu mutation (H174E) exhibited an earlier transition between pH 6-5 and was undetectable at pH 4.5 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;6B</bold>
</xref>). Similarly, both low affinity Fc&#x3b3;RIIa and Fc&#x3b3;RIII binding to IgG became undetectable at pH 4.6 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;6D</bold>
</xref>). All together, these results showed that FG-loop interaction with Fc determined the high affinity binding of Fc&#x3b3;RI to IgG at neutral pH and FG-loop could mediate a pH-dependent dissociation between Fc&#x3b3;RI and IgG.</p>
<fig id="f6" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;6</label>
<caption>
<p>pH sensitive binding between Fc&#x3b3;RI and IgG. <bold>(A)</bold> Binding of Fc&#x3b3;RI to IgG<sub>1</sub> at pH 7.5, 4.6 and 4.0. <bold>(B)</bold> pH-titration of the Fc&#x3b3;RI wildtype, H174R and H174E mutants binding to IgG<sub>1</sub>. <bold>(C)</bold> Binding of BSA and Fc&#x3b3;RI to rabbit polyclonal anti-BSA antibody at pH7.5, 4.6 and 4.0. <bold>(D)</bold> Binding of Fc&#x3b3;RII and Fc&#x3b3;RIII to IgG<sub>1</sub> at pH7 and 4.6.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fimmu-14-1100499-g006.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_7">
<title>Tracking Fc&#x3b3;RI-mediated release of antibody-antigen complex in cells</title>
<p>To this point, we combined high resolution structures of H174R Fc&#x3b3;RI variant/Fc complex with pH titration binding studies to reveal that previously published structures by Lu. et.al and Kiyoshi, et.al represented the high affinity and lower affinity binding of Fc&#x3b3;RI to IgG, respectively. The binding of Fc&#x3b3;RI to immune complexes leads to receptor endocytosis to late endosome and lysosome compartments for antigen presentation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">9</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">24</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">25</xref>). This effector function of Fc&#x3b3;RI is a continuous cellular process spanning from cell surface to intracellular organelles that undergoes pH changes from neutral pH to pH 4.5-5 inside lysosomes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">26</xref>). To assess the temporal-spatial interaction between Fc&#x3b3;RI and IgG during this biological process, we used bovine serum albumin (BSA) and polyclonal rabbit anti-BSA antibodies to form a model immune-complex and examined the Fc receptor-mediated internalization of BSA immune complex labeled with a pH sensitive fluorescence probe, pHrodo, in human monocyte derived macrophages by live cell fluorescence microscopy (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f7">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;7</bold>
</xref> and <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Movie S1</bold>
</xref>). As mentioned above, BSA/anti-BSA antibody interaction was stable between pH 7 and 4, whereas Fc&#x3b3;RI and anti-BSA interaction was pH sensitive, similar to that between Fc&#x3b3;RI and human IgG (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;6</bold>
</xref>). The dependence on the Fc receptor in the internalization of the immune complex was evident as the internalization of BSA was minimal in the absence of anti-BSA antibody and Fc&#x3b3;RI was distributed exclusively on the cell surface (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f7">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;7D, E</bold>
</xref> and <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Movie S2</bold>
</xref>). To quantify this dependence in cells, we carried out a colocalization analysis on time lapse images of live monocyte-derived macrophages, comparing the colocalization over time of Fc&#x3b3;RI, IgG, and pHrodo using the Manders Colocalization Coefficient (MCC), which is the percentage of overlapped signal in the channel and ranges from 0 (no colocalization) to 1 (total colocalization) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f7">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;7C</bold>
</xref>) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">27</xref>). Imaging started by addition of preformed pHrodo-BSA-anti-BSA-IgG complexes and Fc&#x3b3;RI antibody to the cell media. In the first ~5-10 minutes, Fc&#x3b3;RI and anti-BSA IgG were at peak overlap levels with little pHrodo fluorescence, indicating that Fc&#x3b3;RI interacted with anti-BSA IgG at neutral pH. For the next ~10-15 minutes following this initial period, pHrodo fluorescence increased rapidly, indicating a drop in the intra-organelle pH (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f7">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;7B</bold>
</xref>). During this transitional period, colocalization between anti-BSA and Fc&#x3b3;RI was high but began to decline, indicating Fc&#x3b3;RI-mediated internalization of immune complexes but increasing instability of the complex. Also, during this period, BSA/pHrodo demonstrated increasing overlap with anti-BSA IgG, indicating stable association of BSA-anti-BSA-IgG within increasingly acidic intracellular compartments. Following this transitional period, the overlap between Fc&#x3b3;RI and anti-BSA declined, indicating a pH sensitive dissociation between Fc&#x3b3;RI and IgG (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f7">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;7C</bold>
</xref>). Thus, our timelapse imaging of Fc&#x3b3;RI-mediated internalization of immune complexes in live cells demonstrates that the pH-dependent Fc&#x3b3;RI-IgG interaction mediates Fc&#x3b3;RI effector functions. The observed pH-sensitive interaction of the Fc&#x3b3;RI FG-loop to Fc suggests that the high affinity receptor FG-loop may function as a switch for immune-complex release in the low pH lysosomal compartment.</p>
<fig id="f7" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;7</label>
<caption>
<p>Temporal-spatial interaction between Fc&#x3b3;RI and IgG during internalization of immune complex (IC). <bold>(A)</bold> Time lapse of fluorescent images showing Fc&#x3b3;RI-mediated phagocytosis of IC by live monocyte-derived macrophages. The boxed area (10&#x3bc;m x 10 &#x3bc;m) was further enlarged to show the distribution of IgG(Alexa633), BSA(pHrodo) and Fc&#x3b3;RI(Alexa488) with a scale bar of 5&#x3bc;m. <bold>(B, D)</bold> Time-dependent fluorescent intensities of labeled Fc&#x3b3;RI, BSA and anti-BSA during Fc&#x3b3;RI-mediated internalization of BSA-anti-BSA immune complex <bold>(B)</bold> or its control without anti-BSA <bold>(D)</bold>. The fluorescence of pHrodo increased as the pH declined. More BSA are internalized in Fc&#x3b3;RI-mediated process <bold>(B)</bold> than spontaneous internalization <bold>(D)</bold>. <bold>(C&#x2013;E)</bold> Manders coefficient analyses of live cell images for colocalization between pairs of fluorescent probes during Fc&#x3b3;RI-mediated internalization of BSA-anti-BSA immune complex <bold>(C)</bold> or its control without anti-BSA <bold>(E)</bold>. Manders coefficients were calculated for pairwise colocalization between Fc&#x3b3;RI, BSApHrodo, and anti-BSA antibody with respect to either fluorescent probe. For example, Fc&#x3b3;RI-&#x3b1;-BSA refers to the percentage of Fc&#x3b3;RI (cyan) that colocalizes with anti-BSA (magenta), while &#x3b1;-BSA-Fc&#x3b3;RI is magenta-cyan and is the percentage of &#x3b1;-BSA that colocalizes with Fc&#x3b3;RI. While BSA and anti-BSA remain colocalized throughout the duration of the live cell imaging, Fc&#x3b3;RI showed optimal colocalization with anti-BSA at the beginning and dissociated at a later time. Fc&#x3b3;RI was stained by Alexa488 antibody(cyan), BSA protein was labeled with pHrodo(yellow), and anti-BSA antibody was labeled with Alexa633 (magenta).</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fimmu-14-1100499-g007.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_8">
<title>Antibody-antigen uptake and release by Fc&#x3b3;RI</title>
<p>Our work presented here supports a structural mechanism for immune complex uptake and release by the high affinity Fc&#x3b3;RI (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f8">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;8</bold>
</xref>). The uptake of immune complexes on the cell surface involves binding of Fc&#x3b3;RI to the lower hinge region of antibodies in a mode similar to the docking of antibodies to the low affinity Fc&#x3b3; receptors. The binding of antibody enables Fc&#x3b3;RI D2 domain FG-loop to engage Fc and its conserved glycan associated with Asn 297. These FG-loop and Fc interactions provide a high affinity receptor binding to immune-complexes. Upon internalization of the immune complex to lysosomal compartments, the low pH environment with increased concentrations of acetate promotes the receptor FG-loop binding to acetate and cations. Their synergistic effect would trigger the release of the FG-loop from Fc to allow Fc&#x3b3;RI to adopt a low-affinity binding mode as observed by Kiyoshi et&#xa0;al. in the lysosomal compartments. The subsequent loss of high affinity IgG binding to allow immune-complex dissociation from the receptor.</p>
<fig id="f8" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;8</label>
<caption>
<p>A cartoon showing the pH dependent IgG binding and release by Fc&#x3b3;RI.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fimmu-14-1100499-g008.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>The pH sensitive high affinity IgG binding is unique to Fc&#x3b3;RI and enables the receptor to capture small antibody-antigen complexes for internalization and antigen presentation. Unlike Fc&#x3b3;RI, the low affinity Fc&#x3b3;RII and Fc&#x3b3;RIII require binding avidity for their function and can only capture large, aggregated immune complexes for internalization and phagocytosis. The low affinity Fc receptors binding to smaller soluble oligomeric or monomeric immune complexes would result in early endosomal release rather than lysosomal delivery (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;6D</bold>
</xref>). For example, cartilage damage in experimental antigen-induced arthritis (AIA) using methylated BSA (mBSA) was largely dependent on Fc&#x3b3;RI but not Fc&#x3b3;RIII (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">28</xref>).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s3" sec-type="discussion">
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>The determination of several crystal structures of the high affinity human Fc&#x3b3;RI-Fc complexes offered a rare opportunity for insight into the function of the receptor. All complexes showed similar receptor-Fc docking modes, with the D1 and D2 domains of Fc&#x3b3;RI docking onto the lower hinge region of IgG-Fc in similar orientations as the respective D1 and D2 domains of all low affinity Fc&#x3b3; receptors. The main differences among these structures reside in the conformation of the D2 domain FG-loop: residues 171-176 of Fc&#x3b3;RI. The structural differences appear to be associated with their crystallization conditions. The complex structures presented here, as well as the previous one by Lu et&#xa0;al. (4X4M), were crystallized at neutral pH without acetate and both showed the FG-loop interacting with Fc and its glycans. While the receptor FG-loop in the current structures and 4X4M both formed a salt bridge with D265 of Fc-B and contacted the neighboring Fc glycan, the specific receptor-Fc pairing varied due to the H174R change. Arg 174 in the current structure forms both the salt bridge with D265 and the hydrogen-bond with the second GlcNAc on Fc-B. In the wildtype Fc&#x3b3;RI complex (4X4M), the salt bridge to D265 was formed by Lys 173 of Fc&#x3b3;RI while the glycan contact was mediated by His 174. In the structures by Kiyoshi et&#xa0;al. and Oganesyan et&#xa0;al., the corresponding FG-loop does not make direct contacts with Fc, and instead, is coordinated by Zn, acetate, and water molecules. Indeed, Fc&#x3b3;RI binding to IgG<sub>1</sub> is pH sensitive exhibiting ~10nM affinity at neutral pH when the FG-loop is engaged to Fc but reduced to ~200 nM affinity at pH 4.6 when the FG-loop is disconnected from Fc, suggesting the Fc&#x3b3;RI FG-loop improves the receptor-IgG affinity ~20-fold from 200nM to 10nM. This is also consistent with the IgG binding affinity of the FG-loop AAA mutant at neutral pH. In contrast, both the Fc&#x3b3;RI hydrophobic pocket, formed by Trp 104, Leu 105, Lys 130, Val 132 and Tyr 176, and its contacts with Leu 235 of Fc were nearly identical between complex structures solved at neutral and acidic pH (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;4H, I</bold>
</xref>), suggesting the hydrophobic contacts between Fc&#x3b3;RI and Leu 235 of Fc are not responsible for the pH dependent receptor-IgG binding.</p>
<p>To this end, the question of how Fc&#x3b3;RI gained its 100-fold IgG binding affinity over the low affinity Fc&#x3b3;RII and Fc&#x3b3;RIII has been settled. Our structural and mutational analyses suggest the presence of three primary structural components contributing to the high affinity Fc&#x3b3;RI binding to IgG. The most significant contribution to the high affinity Fc&#x3b3;R is the interaction between the positively charged Fc&#x3b3;RI D2-domain FG-loop and Fc as well as its associated glycan. These receptor FG-loop and Fc contacts contribute approximately 20-fold increase in IgG binding affinity over Fc&#x3b3;RIII. Second, Fc&#x3b3;RI forms better van der Waals contacts with Fc than Fc&#x3b3;RIII. There are three interfaces with van der Waals clusters between Fc&#x3b3;RI and Fc but only two between Fc&#x3b3;RIII and Fc (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Tables S2, S3</bold>
</xref>). The additional cluster was unique to Fc&#x3b3;RI and was proposed by Kiyoshi et&#xa0;al. as the primary source for Fc&#x3b3;RI&#x2019;s high affinity IgG binding. Mutation of the cluster resulted in ~2-fold reduction in IgG binding affinity (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;5C</bold>
</xref>). Even among the common interfaces van der Waals clusters, Fc&#x3b3;RI forms better hydrophobic packings than Fc&#x3b3;RIII (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Table S2</bold>
</xref>), suggesting they contribute to a more favorable IgG binding in Fc&#x3b3;RI than Fc&#x3b3;RII and Fc&#x3b3;RIII. Third, Fc&#x3b3;RI forms more hydrogen-bonds with Fc at their lower hinge contact area than the low affinity Fc&#x3b3;RIII. There are 3-6 hydrogen-bonds at the lower hinge contacts between Fc&#x3b3;RI and Fc, but only one observed between Fc&#x3b3;RIII and Fc (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Tables S2, S3</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<p>The relevance of Fc&#x3b3;RI in cellular function and immune response has been long debated. The fact that circulating IgG concentrations are three orders of magnitude higher than the receptor-IgG dissociation constant suggests most cell surface expressed Fc&#x3b3;RI would be occupied by monomeric IgG, making them unavailable for pathogenic immune complexes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">3</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">5</xref>). Nevertheless, the Fc&#x3b3;RI-deficient animals exhibited defects in phagocytosis of immune complexes, antigen presentations and antibody-mediated therapies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">9</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">29</xref>). We provided structural and biochemical evidence to show that the high affinity IgG binding of Fc&#x3b3;RI is pH sensitive, likely suggesting a functional role of Fc&#x3b3;RI is to internalize small monomeric antibody-antigen complexes for antigen presentation. Consistent with this view, we suggest that the distinct FG-loop contacts observed in different pH environment represent two distinct states of the receptor: the high affinity immune complex binding state of the receptor on cell surface and its low affinity antigen release state (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">30</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">31</xref>).</p>
<p>Current work demonstrates an important role of IgG-Fc associated glycans in Fc&#x3b3;RI function. Earlier work supports the function of Fc-glycans in maintaining the lower hinge conformation of Fc to be compatible for low affinity Fc receptor binding (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">32</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">33</xref>). Other than the role in conformational stability, Fc glycans were not observed to contact receptors directly in low affinity Fc-receptors (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">18</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">19</xref>). It&#x2019;s worth noting that the Fc&#x3b3;RI FG-loop-mediated high affinity IgG binding mechanism is distinct from that of Fc&#x3f5;RI binding to IgE, which does not involve the corresponding receptor FG-loop but contains more extensive interface contacts that are stabilized by IgE-C&#x3f5;2 domain (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">34</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">35</xref>). The involvement of Fc-glycan in the high affinity Fc&#x3b3;RI binding to IgG suggests potential use of antibody glycan engineering to modulate its binding to Fc&#x3b3;RI, and thereby achieve desired receptor binding affinity for optimum therapeutic applications.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4">
<title>Methods</title>
<sec id="s4_1">
<title>Expression and purification of recombinant proteins</title>
<p>IgG1 heavy and light chain expression plasmids of anti-HIV gp120 antibody VRC01 were kindly provided by Dr. Peter Kwong(VRC/NIAID). VRC01 heavy chain D265R, Fc&#x3b3;RI and Fc&#x3b3;RIIIA mutations were generated by site-directed mutagenesis using a QuikChange II Site-Directed Mutagenesis Kit (Agilent) according to the manufacture&#x2019;s instruction. All mutations were confirmed by DNA sequencing (ACGT Inc.). The mutated Fc&#x3b3;RI proteins, H174R variant, KHR/EEE triple mutant, and V132L/Y176V double mutant were expressed as the wild type and purified by IgG-sepharose affinity or Ni-NTA chromatography as described previously (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">12</xref>). Fc&#x3b3;RIIIA wild type protein, and L118V, V164Y, or L118V/V163Y mutants were expressed as inclusion bodies in bacteria and refolded as described previously (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">36</xref>). CHO DXB-11 cell-expressed Human IgG<sub>1</sub>-Fc protein (216&#x2013;444) was provided by Zymogenetics (Bristol-Myers Squibb Inc). Human plasma IgG<sub>1</sub>, IgG<sub>3</sub>, and IgG<sub>4</sub> antibodies are purchased from Athens Research &amp; Technology. Wildtype and D265R mutant VRC01 were expressed in 293freestyle cells (Thermo Scientific) by transient transfection with polyethylenimine (Polysciences). The transfected cells were cultured in a shaker incubator at 120rpm, 37&#xb0;C, 8% CO2 for 3-4 days. Culture supernatants were harvested and secreted antibodies were purified through a protein A column. All proteins were further purified by a Hiload 16/600 Superdex 200 column (GE healthcare).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4_2">
<title>Crystallization and structure determination</title>
<p>Before crystallization, Fc&#x3b3;RI H174R variant was mixed with Fc dimer at 1.2:1 molar ratio and the Fc&#x3b3;RI &#x2013;Fc complex was further purified by gel-filtration chromatography in 10mM Hepes (pH7.4) and 0.15M NaCl and concentrated to OD<sub>280nm</sub> of 18. Crystals were grown directly using commercially available screens from Hampton research and Qiagen in sitting-drop crystallization experiments that were set up in 96-well InterlliPlates by a Phoenix crystallization robot (Art Robbins Instruments). Fc&#x3b3;RI H174R variant-Fc complex crystals grew in conditions containing 20% PEG3350 with either 0.2M of sodium formate (pH6.7), magnesium formate (pH7.0), ammonium formate (pH6.6), sodium sulfate (pH6.7), potassium thiocyanate(pH7.0), sodium thiocyanate (pH6.9) or magnesium sulfate (pH6.0). The crystals were immersed in the above mother liquors plus 15% glycerol as the cryoprotectants prior to flash-cooling in liquid nitrogen. X-ray data sets for crystals grown in 20%PEG3350 and 0.2M sodium formate, or 0.2M magnesium formate, or 0.2M magnesium sulfate, were collected to 2.3 &#xc5; and 2.5 &#xc5; resolution respectively at SER-CAT beamlines, processed and merged with HKL2000 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">37</xref>) (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Table S1</bold>
</xref>). The structure of the Fc&#x3b3;RI H174R-Fc complex was solved by a molecular replacement method with the program Phaser (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">38</xref>) in CCP4 packages (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">39</xref>) using Fc&#x3b3;RI (PDB ID: 3RJD) and Fc (PDB ID: 3AY4) as the search model, respectively. Model building and refinement were carried out using Coot (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">40</xref>) and Phenix (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">41</xref>). The overall electron density of the complex is of excellent quality and carbohydrate molecules were added manually using (2Fo-Fc) electron density maps contoured at 1.0&#x3c3; (standard deviation of the map) and refined. The residues are numbered consistent with FCGR1_HUMAN in the Swiss-Prot entry. The Ramachandran statistics were generated and verified by Procheck of CCP4. The buried surface area was calculated and all structure figures were generated using Pymol (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">42</xref>). The final models of refined structures and X-ray diffraction data were deposited into Protein Data Bank with codes of 8DIR, 8DIN and 8DJ7, respectively</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4_3">
<title>Surface plasmon resonance and biolayer interferometry binding</title>
<p>Surface plasmon resonance measurements were performed using a BIAcore 3000 instrument and analyzed with BIAevaluation 4.1 software (Biacore AB). Different human IgG subclasses were obtained from Athens Research and Technology (Athens, GA). To measure the affinity to wild type or mutant Fc&#x3b3;RI and Fc&#x3b3;RIII proteins, human IgG<sub>1</sub>, IgG3 or IgG<sub>4</sub> were immobilized on carboxylated dextran CM5 chips (Biacore AB) to 200-1000 response units (RU) using a primary amine-coupling in 10mM sodium acetate (pH 5.0). To measure the pH-sensitive binding between Fc&#x3b3;RI and IgG1, Fc&#x3b3;RI, H174R and H174E variants were immobilized on CM5 chips. The analytes consisted of serial dilutions of IgG1 between 2&#xb5;M and 63 nM in a buffer containing 0.15M NaCl plus 10mM Hepes (pH7.4), or 10mM MES (pH6.5-5.8), or 10mM sodium acetate(pH5.6-4.0). The dissociation constants were obtained by kinetic curve fitting for the binding of Fc&#x3b3;RI to IgGs, and steady-state fitting for the binding of Fc&#x3b3;RI mutants to IgGs, respectively, using BIAevaluation 4.1 (BIAcore Inc.). For BLI binding experiments, VRC01 and D265 mutant antibodies were captured to Octet Protein A(ProA) biosensors using an Octet R8(Sartorius) to a response level of ~5nm. The sensortips were then dipped into running buffer of 10mM Hepes(pH7.5), 0.15M NaCl to remove unbound IgG. To measure association, the sensortips were dipped into wells containing serial dilutions of Fc&#x3b3;RI (Zymogenetics) before being dipped into wells only containing running buffer to measure dissociation. Data were reference subtracted and fit into a 1:1 binding model using Octet data analysis software v12.2.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4_4">
<title>Live cell imaging of Fc&#x3b3;RI-mediated immune complex uptake and release</title>
<p>Monocytes from healthy volunteers were obtained from individuals who consented to and enrolled in the NIH clinical center blood bank protocol (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00001846). Human monocyte-derived macrophages were generated by culturing monocytes in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% FBS, 10ng/ml M-CSF, 10ng/ml GM-CSF, 20mM L-glutamine and 50U/ml penicillin-Streptomycin for 7 days. After that, ~50,000 macrophages were plated in 8-well confocal cover slides for 1 h at 37&#xb0;C before imaging. Polyclonal rabbit anti-BSA IgG and BSA were labeled with Alexa633 and pHrodo (Thermo Scientific) according to manufacturers&#x2019; instruction, respectively. To test the binding of anti-BSA IgG to human Fc&#x3b3;RI, elutriated monocytes were stained with monomeric polyclonal rabbit IgG (Alexa633) at different concentrations ranging from 6-200ug/ml in the absence or presence of 5&#x3bc;g/ml either anti- Fc&#x3b3;RI antibody (Biolegend) or its isotype control (Alex488). Flow cytometry was performed on Fortessa X-20 (BD Biosciences) and data were analyzed using FlowJo software (<uri xlink:href="http://www.flowjo.com">www.flowjo.com</uri>). The presence of anti<bold>-</bold> Fc&#x3b3;RI antibody does not interfere the binding of anti-BSA IgG to human Fc&#x3b3;RI (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Figure S2</bold>
</xref>). To form immune complex, 10ul labelled BSA(4mg/ml) was added dropwise to 50ul anti-BSA IgG(2mg/ml) in 1x PBS and incubated for 10min on ice. Right before imaging, 20ul immune complex and 2ul Alexa488 labelled CD64 antibody (Biolegend) (0.5mg/ml) were added to macrophages with 180ul imaging solution of 1xPBS plus 5% FBS. Imaging was performed with a Zeiss LSM 880 confocal microscope while maintaining incubation conditions at 37&#xb0;C, 5% CO<sub>2</sub>, in a humidified chamber. Images were acquired at 20 s interval for 1 hr. Images were denoised and background subtracted (10 px radius) using ImageJ 1.53s. Extraneous signal outside the bounds of the differential interference contrast (DIC) cell outlines were removed. Manders Colocalization Coefficients (MCCs) were calculated using a custom macro and Chosen thresholds were guided by Costes regression analysis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">43</xref>).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s5" sec-type="data-availability">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found below: <uri xlink:href="http://www.wwpdb.org/">http://www.wwpdb.org/</uri>, 8DIR, 8DIN, 8DJ7.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s6" sec-type="author-contributions">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>JL and PS contributed to conception and design of the study. JL, MS, JB, MT, ZZ performed the experiments, JL and PS wrote the first draft of the manuscript. MS wrote sections of the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec id="s7" sec-type="funding-information">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>This work is supported by the Intramural Research funding of National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s8" sec-type="COI-statement">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s9" sec-type="disclaimer">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s10" sec-type="supplementary-material">
<title>Supplementary material</title>
<p>The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2023.1100499/full#supplementary-material">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2023.1100499/full#supplementary-material</ext-link>
</p>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="DataSheet_1.docx" id="SM1" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document"/>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Video_1.mp4" id="SV1" mimetype="video/mp4"/>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Video_2.mp4" id="SV2" mimetype="video/mp4"/>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1">
<label>1</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chenoweth</surname> <given-names>AM</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Trist</surname> <given-names>HM</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tan</surname> <given-names>PS</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wines</surname> <given-names>BD</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hogarth</surname> <given-names>PM</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>The high-affinity receptor for IgG, FcgammaRI, of humans and non-human primates</article-title>. <source>Immunol Rev</source> (<year>2015</year>) <volume>268</volume>:<page-range>175&#x2013;91</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/imr.12366</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<label>2</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bruhns</surname> <given-names>P</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Iannascoli</surname> <given-names>B</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>England</surname> <given-names>P</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mancardi</surname> <given-names>DA</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fernandez</surname> <given-names>N</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jorieux</surname> <given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Specificity and affinity of human fcgamma receptors and their polymorphic variants for human IgG subclasses</article-title>. <source>Blood</source> (<year>2009</year>) <volume>113</volume>:<page-range>3716&#x2013;25</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1182/blood-2008-09-179754</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<label>3</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Nimmerjahn</surname> <given-names>F</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ravetch</surname> <given-names>JV</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Fcgamma receptors as regulators of immune responses</article-title>. <source>Nat Rev Immunol</source> (<year>2008</year>) <volume>8</volume>:<fpage>34</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>47</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nri2206</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<label>4</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lux</surname> <given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>X</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Scanlan</surname> <given-names>CN</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nimmerjahn</surname> <given-names>F</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Impact of immune complex size and glycosylation on IgG binding to human FcgammaRs</article-title>. <source>J Immunol</source> (<year>2013</year>) <volume>190</volume>:<page-range>4315&#x2013;23</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4049/jimmunol.1200501</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<label>5</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hogarth</surname> <given-names>PM</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Fc receptors: Introduction</article-title>. <source>Immunol Rev</source> (<year>2015</year>) <volume>268</volume>:<fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>5</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/imr.12372</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<label>6</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Schiff</surname> <given-names>DE</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rae</surname> <given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Martin</surname> <given-names>TR</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Davis</surname> <given-names>BH</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Curnutte</surname> <given-names>JT</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Increased phagocyte fc gammaRI expression and improved fc gamma-receptor-mediated phagocytosis after <italic>in vivo</italic> recombinant human interferon-gamma treatment of normal human subjects</article-title>. <source>Blood</source> (<year>1997</year>) <volume>90</volume>:<page-range>3187&#x2013;94</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1182/blood.V90.8.3187</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<label>7</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Gericke</surname> <given-names>GH</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ericson</surname> <given-names>SG</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pan</surname> <given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mills</surname> <given-names>LE</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Guyre</surname> <given-names>PM</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ely</surname> <given-names>P</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Mature polymorphonuclear leukocytes express high-affinity receptors for IgG (Fc gamma RI) after stimulation with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF)</article-title>. <source>J Leukoc Biol</source> (<year>1995</year>) <volume>57</volume>:<page-range>455&#x2013;61</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/jlb.57.3.455</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<label>8</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Erbe</surname> <given-names>DV</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Collins</surname> <given-names>JE</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shen</surname> <given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Graziano</surname> <given-names>RF</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fanger</surname> <given-names>MW</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>The effect of cytokines on the expression and function of fc receptors for IgG on human myeloid cells</article-title>. <source>Mol Immunol</source> (<year>1990</year>) <volume>27</volume>:<fpage>57</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>67</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0161-5890(90)90060-D</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<label>9</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Barnes</surname> <given-names>N</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gavin</surname> <given-names>AL</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tan</surname> <given-names>PS</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mottram</surname> <given-names>P</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Koentgen</surname> <given-names>F</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hogarth</surname> <given-names>PM</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>FcgammaRI-deficient mice show multiple alterations to inflammatory and immune responses</article-title>. <source>Immunity</source> (<year>2002</year>) <volume>16</volume>:<page-range>379&#x2013;89</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S1074-7613(02)00287-X</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<label>10</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Akinrinmade</surname> <given-names>OA</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chetty</surname> <given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Daramola</surname> <given-names>AK</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Islam</surname> <given-names>MU</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Thepen</surname> <given-names>T</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Barth</surname> <given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>CD64: An attractive immunotherapeutic target for M1-type macrophage mediated chronic inflammatory diseases</article-title>. <source>Biomedicines</source> (<year>2017</year>) <volume>5</volume>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/biomedicines5030056</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<label>11</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Swisher</surname> <given-names>JF</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Feldman</surname> <given-names>GM</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>The many faces of FcgammaRI: Implications for therapeutic antibody function</article-title>. <source>Immunol Rev</source> (<year>2015</year>) <volume>268</volume>:<page-range>160&#x2013;74</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/imr.12334</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<label>12</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lu</surname> <given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chu</surname> <given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zou</surname> <given-names>Z</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hamacher</surname> <given-names>NB</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rixon</surname> <given-names>MW</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>PD</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Structure of FcgammaRI in complex with fc reveals the importance of glycan recognition for high-affinity IgG binding</article-title>. <source>Proc Natl Acad Sci United States America</source> (<year>2015</year>) <volume>112</volume>:<page-range>833&#x2013;8</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.1418812112</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<label>13</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kiyoshi</surname> <given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Caaveiro</surname> <given-names>JM</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kawai</surname> <given-names>T</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tashiro</surname> <given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ide</surname> <given-names>T</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Asaoka</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Structural basis for binding of human IgG1 to its high-affinity human receptor FcgammaRI</article-title>. <source>Nat Commun</source> (<year>2015</year>) <volume>6</volume>:<fpage>6866</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/ncomms7866</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<label>14</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Oganesyan</surname> <given-names>V</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mazor</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cook</surname> <given-names>KE</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Woods</surname> <given-names>RM</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ferguson</surname> <given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Structural insights into the interaction of human IgG1 with FcgRI: no direct role of glycan in binding</article-title>. <source>Acta Cryst D Biol Crystallogr</source> (<year>2015</year>) <volume>71</volume>:<page-range>2354&#x2013;61</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1107/S1399004715018015</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<label>15</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Caaveiro</surname> <given-names>JM</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kiyoshi</surname> <given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tsumoto</surname> <given-names>K</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Structural analysis of Fc/FcgammaR complexes: a blueprint for antibody design</article-title>. <source>Immunol Rev</source> (<year>2015</year>) <volume>268</volume>:<page-range>201&#x2013;21</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/imr.12365</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<label>16</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lu</surname> <given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>PD</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Structural mechanism of high affinity FcgammaRI recognition of immunoglobulin G</article-title>. <source>Immunol Rev</source> (<year>2015</year>) <volume>268</volume>:<fpage>192</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>200</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/imr.12346</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<label>17</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lu</surname> <given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ellsworth</surname> <given-names>JL</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hamacher</surname> <given-names>N</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Oak</surname> <given-names>SW</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>PD</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Crystal structure of fcgamma receptor I and its implication in high affinity gamma-immunoglobulin binding</article-title>. <source>J Biol Chem</source> (<year>2011</year>) <volume>286</volume>:<page-range>40608&#x2013;13</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1074/jbc.M111.257550</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<label>18</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sondermann</surname> <given-names>P</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Huber</surname> <given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Oosthuizen</surname> <given-names>V</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jacob</surname> <given-names>U</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>The 3.2-a crystal structure of the human IgG1 fc fragment-fc gammaRIII complex</article-title>. <source>Nature</source> (<year>2000</year>) <volume>406</volume>:<page-range>267&#x2013;73</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/35018508</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<label>19</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Radaev</surname> <given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Motyka</surname> <given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fridman</surname> <given-names>WH</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sautes-Fridman</surname> <given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>PD</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>The structure of a human type III fcgamma receptor in complex with fc</article-title>. <source>J Biol  Chem</source> (<year>2001</year>) <volume>276</volume>:<page-range>16469&#x2013;77</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1074/jbc.M100350200</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<label>20</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ramsland</surname> <given-names>PA</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Farrugia</surname> <given-names>W</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bradford</surname> <given-names>TM</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sardjono</surname> <given-names>CT</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Esparon</surname> <given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Trist</surname> <given-names>HM</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Structural basis for fc gammaRIIa recognition of human IgG and formation of inflammatory signaling complexes</article-title>. <source>J Immunol</source> (<year>2011</year>) <volume>187</volume>:<page-range>3208&#x2013;17</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4049/jimmunol.1101467</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<label>21</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mimoto</surname> <given-names>F</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Katada</surname> <given-names>H</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kadono</surname> <given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Igawa</surname> <given-names>T</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kuramochi</surname> <given-names>T</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Muraoka</surname> <given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Engineered antibody fc variant with selectively enhanced FcgammaRIIb binding over both FcgammaRIIa(R131) and FcgammaRIIa(H131)</article-title>. <source>Protein Engineering Design Selection PEDS</source> (<year>2013</year>) <volume>26</volume>:<page-range>589&#x2013;98</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/protein/gzt022</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<label>22</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Anderson</surname> <given-names>KW</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bergonzo</surname> <given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Scott</surname> <given-names>K</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Karageorgos</surname> <given-names>IL</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gallagher</surname> <given-names>ES</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tayi</surname> <given-names>VS</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>HDX-MS and MD simulations provide evidence for stabilization of the IgG1-FcgammaRIa (CD64a) immune complex through intermolecular glycoprotein bonds</article-title>. <source>J Mol Biol</source> (<year>2022</year>) <volume>434</volume>:<fpage>167391</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jmb.2021.167391</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<label>23</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wilkinson</surname> <given-names>I</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Anderson</surname> <given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fry</surname> <given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Julien</surname> <given-names>LA</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Neville</surname> <given-names>D</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Qureshi</surname> <given-names>O</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Fc-engineered antibodies with immune effector functions completely abolished</article-title>. <source>PloS One</source> (<year>2021</year>) <volume>16</volume>:<elocation-id>e0260954</elocation-id>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0260954</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<label>24</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Dai</surname> <given-names>X</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jayapal</surname> <given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tay</surname> <given-names>HK</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Reghunathan</surname> <given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lin</surname> <given-names>G</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Too</surname> <given-names>CT</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Differential signal transduction, membrane trafficking, and immune effector functions mediated by FcgammaRI versus FcgammaRIIa</article-title>. <source>Blood</source> (<year>2009</year>) <volume>114</volume>:<page-range>318&#x2013;27</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1182/blood-2008-10-184457</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<label>25</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Guyre</surname> <given-names>CA</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Barreda</surname> <given-names>ME</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Swink</surname> <given-names>SL</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fanger</surname> <given-names>MW</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Colocalization of fc gamma RI-targeted antigen with class I MHC: implications for antigen processing</article-title>. <source>J Immunol</source> (<year>2001</year>) <volume>166</volume>:<page-range>2469&#x2013;78</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4049/jimmunol.166.4.2469</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<label>26</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ohkuma</surname> <given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Poole</surname> <given-names>B</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Fluorescence probe measurement of the intralysosomal pH in living cells and the perturbation of pH by various agents</article-title>. <source>Proc Natl Acad Sci United States America</source> (<year>1978</year>) <volume>75</volume>:<page-range>3327&#x2013;31</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.75.7.3327</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<label>27</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Manders</surname> <given-names>EMM</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Verbeek</surname> <given-names>FJ</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Aten</surname> <given-names>JA</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Measurement of co-localization of objects in dual-colour confocal images</article-title>. <source>J Microsc</source> (<year>1993</year>) <volume>169</volume>:<page-range>375&#x2013;82</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2818.1993.tb03313.x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<label>28</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ioan-Facsinay</surname> <given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kimpe</surname> <given-names>SJ</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hellwig</surname> <given-names>SM</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lent van</surname> <given-names>PL</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hofhuis</surname> <given-names>FM</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ojik van</surname> <given-names>HH</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>FcgammaRI (CD64) contributes substantially to severity of arthritis, hypersensitivity responses, and protection from bacterial infection</article-title>. <source>Immunity</source> (<year>2002</year>) <volume>16</volume>:<fpage>391</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>402</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S1074-7613(02)00294-7</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<label>29</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Gillis</surname> <given-names>CM</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zenatti</surname> <given-names>PP</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mancardi</surname> <given-names>DA</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Beutier</surname> <given-names>H</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fiette</surname> <given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Macdonald</surname> <given-names>LE</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>
<italic>In vivo</italic> effector functions of high-affinity mouse IgG receptor FcgammaRI in disease and therapy models</article-title>. <source>J Autoimmun</source> (<year>2017</year>) <volume>80</volume>:<fpage>95</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>102</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jaut.2016.09.009</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<label>30</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Harrison</surname> <given-names>PT</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Davis</surname> <given-names>W</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Norman</surname> <given-names>JC</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hockaday</surname> <given-names>AR</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Allen</surname> <given-names>JM</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Binding of monomeric immunoglobulin G triggers fc gamma RI-mediated endocytosis</article-title>. <source>J Biol Chem</source> (<year>1994</year>) <volume>269</volume>:<page-range>24396&#x2013;402</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0021-9258(19)51097-3</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<label>31</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>van Vugt</surname> <given-names>MJ</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kleijmeer</surname> <given-names>MJ</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Keler</surname> <given-names>T</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zeelenberg</surname> <given-names>I</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dijk van</surname> <given-names>MA</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Leusen</surname> <given-names>JH</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>The FcgammaRIa (CD64) ligand binding chain triggers major histocompatibility complex class II antigen presentation independently of its associated FcR gamma-chain</article-title>. <source>Blood</source> (<year>1999</year>) <volume>94</volume>:<page-range>808&#x2013;17</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1182/blood.V94.2.808</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<label>32</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Radaev</surname> <given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>PD</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Recognition of IgG by fcgamma receptor. the role of fc glycosylation and the binding of peptide inhibitors</article-title>. <source>J Biol Chem</source> (<year>2001</year>) <volume>276</volume>:<page-range>16478&#x2013;83</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1074/jbc.M100351200</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<label>33</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Feige</surname> <given-names>MJ</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nath</surname> <given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Catharino</surname> <given-names>SR</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Weinfurtner</surname> <given-names>D</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Steinbacher</surname> <given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Buchner</surname> <given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Structure of the murine unglycosylated IgG1 fc fragment</article-title>. <source>J. Mol. Biol.</source> (<year>2009</year>) <volume>391</volume>:<fpage>599</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>608</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jmb.2009.06.048</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<label>34</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Garman</surname> <given-names>SC</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wurzburg</surname> <given-names>BA</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tarchevskaya</surname> <given-names>SS</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kinet</surname> <given-names>JP</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jardetzky</surname> <given-names>TS</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Structure of the fc fragment of human IgE bound to its high-affinity receptor fc epsilonRI alpha</article-title>. <source>Nature</source> (<year>2000</year>) <volume>406</volume>:<page-range>259&#x2013;66</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/35018500</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<label>35</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Holdom</surname> <given-names>MD</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Davies</surname> <given-names>AM</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nettleship</surname> <given-names>JE</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bagby</surname> <given-names>SC</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dhaliwal</surname> <given-names>B</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Girardi</surname> <given-names>E</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Conformational changes in IgE contribute to its uniquely slow dissociation rate from receptor FcvarepsilonRI</article-title>. <source>Nat Struct Mol Biol</source> (<year>2011</year>) <volume>18</volume>:<page-range>571&#x2013;6</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nsmb.2044</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B36">
<label>36</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lu</surname> <given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Marnell</surname> <given-names>LL</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Marjon</surname> <given-names>KD</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mold</surname> <given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Clos Du</surname> <given-names>TW</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>PD</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Structural recognition and functional activation of FcgammaR by innate pentraxins</article-title>. <source>Nature</source> (<year>2008</year>) <volume>456</volume>:<page-range>989&#x2013;92</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nature07468</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B37">
<label>37</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Otwinowski</surname> <given-names>Z</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Minor</surname> <given-names>W</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Processing x-ray diffraction data collected in oscillation mode</article-title>. <source>Methods Enzymol</source> (<year>1997</year>) <volume>276</volume>:<page-range>307&#x2013;26</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0076-6879(97)76066-X</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B38">
<label>38</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>McCoy</surname> <given-names>AJ</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Grosse-Kunstleve</surname> <given-names>RW</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Adams</surname> <given-names>PD</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Winn</surname> <given-names>MD</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Storoni</surname> <given-names>LC</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Read</surname> <given-names>RJ</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Phaser crystallographic software</article-title>. <source>J Appl Crystallogr</source> (<year>2007</year>) <volume>40</volume>:<page-range>658&#x2013;74</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1107/S0021889807021206</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B39">
<label>39</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<collab>Collaborative Computational Project</collab>
</person-group>. <article-title>The CCP4 suite: programs for protein crystallography</article-title>. <source>Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr</source> (<year>1994</year>) <volume>50</volume>:<page-range>760&#x2013;3</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1107/S0907444994003112</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B40">
<label>40</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Emsley</surname> <given-names>P</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cowtan</surname> <given-names>K</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Coot: model-building tools for molecular graphics</article-title>. <source>Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr</source> (<year>2004</year>) <volume>60</volume>:<page-range>2126&#x2013;32</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1107/S0907444904019158</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B41">
<label>41</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Afonine</surname> <given-names>PV</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Grosse-Kunstleve</surname> <given-names>RW</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Adams</surname> <given-names>PD</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>The phenix refinement framework</article-title>. <source>CCP4 Newslett</source> (<year>2005</year>) <volume>42</volume>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B42">
<label>42</label>
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>DeLano</surname> <given-names>W</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <source>The PyMOL molecular graphics system, version 1.3</source>. <publisher-name>Schr&#xf6;dinger, LLC</publisher-name> (<year>2008</year>). Available at: <uri xlink:href="https://www.pymol.org">https://www.pymol.org</uri>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B43">
<label>43</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Dunn</surname> <given-names>KW</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kamocka</surname> <given-names>MM</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>McDonald</surname> <given-names>JH</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>A practical guide to evaluating colocalization in biological microscopy</article-title>. <source>Am J Physiol Cell Physiol</source> (<year>2011</year>) <volume>300</volume>:<page-range>C723&#x2013;742</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1152/ajpcell.00462.2010</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>