Using the Beijing protocol at Peking University (1–7), there was a high incidence of CMV reactivation early after haploSCT (59.5-66%), whereas the rate of CMV disease was actually low (2.92-17%). CMV DNAemia was initially detected after a median of 35 days with a mean duration of positivity of 15 days (5, 6). Most (91.2%) cases of CMV gastroenteritis developed within 100 days, whereas most (90.3%) cases of CMV retinitis were late onset with the cumulative incidence of CMV retinitis at 2.3% one year (a median onset of 167 days) after haploSCT (6, 7). Einat Shmueli et al. from Israel designed a conditioning protocol for haploSCT including fludarabine, thiotepa, anti-thymocytic globulin, and total body irradiation (8). After receiving preemptive therapy, the incidence of CMV infection was 66.7% in haploSCT, and 11.6% of haploSCT transplant recipients with CMV reactivation developed CMV disease. Importantly, drug-resistance mutations and clinically suspected resistance were discovered only in haploSCT recipients (8), favoring prophylactic over preemptive treatment in high-risk patients and highlighting the need for better anti-CMV drugs.

It remains unclear whether primary disease affects CMV infection after haploSCT. Lan‐Ping Xu et al. from Peking University conducted studies to confirm the feasibility of haploidentical transplantation in patients with severe aplastic anemia (SAA) as salvage therapy (9–12). CMV viremia occurred in 51.7~84.00% of SAA patients. However, no difference in the rates of early CMV disease between haploidentical patients and matched related patients was found (9, 10). Consistently, several centers in China obtained similar results for SAA patients (13–15). The haploSCT cohorts with AML, MDS, or Ph+ ALL, including haplo-cord-HSCT, had higher CMV viremia than the HLA-matched HSCT cohorts (16–19), but the incidence of CMV disease was not significantly different between the two groups. Even in pediatric patients with MDS or patients with relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia after CAR-T therapy who underwent haploSCT, the incidence of CMV reactivation/infection was less than 60%, and very few patients developed CMV disease (20, 21).

Using a similar protocol, several transplant centers have reported promising results for unmanipulated haploidentical peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT) (22, 23) or cotransplantation of unrelated cord blood (UCB) (24–26) or mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) (27, 28). The 1-year cumulative incidence of CMV DNAemia in patients with hematologic malignancies was 23.5-41.7% in the matched sibling donor (MSD)-SCT group versus 62.1-81.0% in the haploSCT group with peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) (29, 30). The median time to the onset of CMV DNAemia in the haploSCT group was 33 days (range, 10–159 days) with the 1-year cumulative incidence of CMV disease at 7.9% (95% CI, 3.6–14.3%) (29). In addition, a total of 19.4%-92% of these patients experienced CMV reactivation after combination of haploSCT with UCB or MSCs (24–28). There was no statistical significance in the incidence of CMV viremia in terms of haplo-cord SCT vs HLA-matched donor SCT (MD-SCT) or haplo-cord SCT vs haploSCT (24–26).

As the use of ATG as a regimen for in vivo TCD and immunosuppressants is limited by impaired immune restoration and a high risk of severe infections, researchers are working on their impact after haploSCT. Peking University performed a study comparing 6 mg/kg ATG versus 10 mg/kg ATG in patients who underwent haploSCT (31). The 1-year cumulative incidence of CMV reactivation was similar between the ATG-6 and ATG-10 groups[(75.0% (66.8–83.2%) vs 78.6% (75.2–82.0%)]. Another multicenter study investigated the impact of 7.5 mg/kg and 10.0 mg/kg rabbit ATG on GVHD and virus reactivation after haploSCT (32). The 1-year incidence of CMV DNAemia was higher in the 10.0 mg/kg group [83.4% (77.5-87.9)] than in the 7.5 mg/kg group [73.4% (67.2-79.4)], whereas the 2-year incidence of CMV-associated diseases was also higher in the 10.0 mg/kg group [5.9% (3.2–9.7%)] than in the 7.5 mg/kg group [1.5% (0.4–4.0%)]. Yu Wang et al. recently extended follow-up from this original trial (33). They found that patients undergoing haploSCT benefit from 7.5 mg/kg ATG compared to 10.0 mg/kg ATG based on a balance between GVHD and infection control. The data supports ATG (7.5 mg/kg) is potentially the standard regimen in this platform. Researchers from Japan and the Republic of Korea later performed haploSCT using low-dose thymoglobulin at 5 mg/kg (34, 35). CMV reactivated in 41.67% and 72.7% of patients, but CMV disease developed in 0 and 19.4% of patients, respectively. A recent report from the Republic of Korea indicated that the cumulative incidence of CMV DNAemia at 3 years was 45.7% (30.7-59.4) for ATG (5-10 mg/kg)-based haploSCT (36). Moreover, a short-term tacrolimus regimen for the prophylaxis of GVHD in haploSCT did not increase the incidence of CMV infection compared with the Cyclosporine A regimen (39.5% vs. 37.5%, p = 0.783) (37).

CD34+ selection was initially used as a method for TCD, but it resulted in delayed immune reconstitution and a high incidence of opportunistic infections and nonrelapse mortality. The ex vivo TCD techniques have developed from CD34+ selection, CD3+ cell depletion, and αβ+/CD19+ cell depletion to recent CD45RA+ depletion. Compared with CD34+ cell selection, after CD3+ cell depletion, the graft has more natural killer (NK) cells, monocytes, and other immunomodulating cells with better outcomes. Sameh Gaballa et al. retrospectively compared data on patients undergoing a two-step (a fixed T cell infusion followed 2 days later by cyclophosphamide, and then a CD34-selected stem cell product infused) haploidentical or matched related PBSCT for high-risk hematological malignancies and aplastic anemia (38). Compared with the matched related PBSCT group (matched related, 19%), the 100-day cumulative incidence of CMV viremia was higher in the haploidentical group (haploidentical, 67%). The median time to develop CMV reactivation was 26 days in the haploSCT group and 36 days in the matched related PBSCT group.

The cumulative incidence of CMV DNAemia in patients with acute leukemia was 73.5-81% after ex vivo αβ T cell-depleted haploSCT (39, 40). No patient developed CMV disease or died (39). A more recent study explored the role of interim-foscarnet prophylaxis in preventing CMV infection after ex vivo αβ T cell-depleted haploSCT in children between May 2012 and May 2018 (41). Forty (50.8%) of 81 patients developed CMV reactivation at a median of 41.3 days (range, 13–132) after haploSCT. The median duration of CMV reactivation was 28.5 days (range, 1–179), and the peak PCR level was 3.82 log copies/mL (range, 2.85–6.03) (41). In nonmalignant disease, ganciclovir/foscarnet significantly decreased CMV reactivation incidence (43.7% vs. 78.3%), whereas the prophylaxis strategy had no significant impact in patients with hematological malignancies. No significant difference was found in the rate of CMV disease according to prophylaxis method. It suggests that this intensified antiviral strategy may be necessary for αβ T cell-depleted haploSCT patients with nonmalignant disease who require higher doses of ATG.

Through TCR α+β+/CD19+ cell-depleted haploSCT, it is feasible to transfer to the transplant recipient both donor hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) and hematopoietic progenitors as well as NK and γδ T cells, which could protect against leukemia and life-threatening infections, including posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD). A total of 7.27-75% of patients undergoing TCR α+β+/CD19+ cell depleted HSCT experienced CMV reactivation (42–46). Most patients experienced CMV viremia during the first month after haploSCT (days +1 to +24) (45). In a report including three sickle cell disease and 11 thalassemia patients, Gaziev J et al. stated that viral reactivation occurred in the vast majority of patients after TCR α+β+/CD19+ cell–depleted haploSCT, with CMV reactivation in 64%, although no cases of CMV were noted (47).

After removal of potentially alloreactive CD45RA+ cell depletion, memory T cells, including virus-specific T cells left in grafts, could shorten viremia and reduce GVHD (48). B M Triplett et al. reported data from 17 patients with poor-prognosis hematologic malignancy who underwent haploSCT with CD45RA-depleted grafts after a reduced intensity conditioning regimen without TBI or serotherapy (49). Three patients of 17 received anti-CMV treatment after CMV reactivation. None of the patients experienced CMV disease, and all of them cleared CMV viremia without donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI). Early T-cell reconstitution was directly linked to the CD45RA-depleted graft content. This group then compared 41 patients receiving CD3‐depleted (CD3dep recipients) grafts with 26 receiving CD45RA‐depleted grafts (CD45dep recipients) after haploSCT (50). CD3dep recipients were more likely to develop CMV reactivation—23 (56%) vs 5 (19%). All CD3dep recipients with CMV received treatment, and eight (36%) were also infused with donor lymphocytes for CMV, whereas CMV treatment was needed for only three of the five CD45RAdep recipients. Although three CD3dep recipients died with active CMV viremia, CMV was not detected in CD45RAdep recipients at the time of death. It seems that CD45RA-depleted haploSCT confers enhanced T-cell recovery and reduced infection without increase in severe GVHD among these ex vivo TCD methods.

PTCy is a method of in vivo T cell depletion that mainly acts on alloreactive T cells after haploSCT. CMV reactivation was noticed in 42%-69.2% of patients who underwent PTCy-haploSCT (51–58). A total of 2.8%-4.5% of patients experienced CMV-associated disease (51, 52). CMV reactivation occurred at a median time of 35-39 days (51, 52, 57). The median time to first episode of CMV DNAemia was 33 days (range, −7 to 123 days) after haploSCT (58). Moreover, the CMV DNA peak load was remarkably higher in haploSCT recipients, but the mortality by days 180 and 365 did not differ among comparison groups (55). García-Cadenas Irene et al. studied the impact of HLA donor matching on infection in patients receiving PTCy-based alloSCT (59). They found that haploSCT recipients had a higher incidence of CMV infection/reactivation at 18 months than other transplant modalities [(61% (95% CI: 41–74%) vs. 44% (95% CI: 31–54%)], whereas lethal infections were uncommon across all these groups. In their study, severe infections were common in transplant patients using PTCy. A more recent CIBMTR analysis reported (51) that PTCy increased the risk of CMV infection among CMV-seropositive recipients in both haploSCT and matched sibling donor HSCT compared with calcineurin inhibitor–based sibling donor transplantation, suggesting intensive CMV prevention strategies in all receiving PTCy. This is supported by the fact that an intensified method to prevent CMV reactivation correlated with a lower incidence of CMV reactivation (67% intensified group versus 81% traditional group) and less CMV disease (0% hybrid/intermediate dose versus 8% traditional dose) without increased toxicity after PTCy-haploSCT compared with a traditional antiviral prophylaxis regimen (60).

Primary disease and conditioning regimen could also impact CMV infection after PTCy-haploSCT. CMV reactivation post engraftment was noted in 43.7% and 62% of transplant recipients with primary immune deficiency disorders (PIDs) (61) and relapsed/refractory SAA (62) undergoing PTCy-haploSCT, respectively. R V Raj et al. then investigated the effect of conditioning intensity on the incidence of viral infection after PTCy-haploSCT (63). Their study found that challenging viral infections after haploSCT cause significant morbidity in this patient population. It appears that the incidence of viral complications is higher following myeloablative doses of busulfan-containing conditioning regimens (63). Emmanuel Katsanis et al. recently performed a single center phase I study substituting day +4 PTCy with bendamustine (PT‐BEN) following myeloablative conditioning and T‐cell replete haploidentical bone marrow transplantation (64). CMV reactivation was notably less common in trial patients receiving PTCy/BEN, with one out of eight at-risk (seropositive recipient and/or seropositive donor) of experiencing CMV reactivation, whereas 71.4% of the at‐risk PTCy patients reactivated CMV.

Compared with bone marrow (BM) as a graft source, PBSCs could yield higher CD34+ cell counts but were possibly accompanied by increased GVHD; however, no difference in GVHD was observed in haploSCT (65). A total of 46-68% of patients with PTCy-haploSCT and PBSC grafts had posttransplant CMV viremia (65–69). The median time to viremia was 24 days (range: 3–68). CMV disease occurred in 17-28.8% of patients with CMV viremia (65, 68). Sirolimus with micophenolate mofetil (MMF) has recently been regarded as an alternative to calcineurin inhibitor-containing approaches, as this combination has a decreased risk of acute renal failure, decreased incidence of CMV reactivation, and better regulatory T cell reconstitution. Some groups have introduced PTCy plus sirolimus and MMF (PT-CY-Sir-MMF) as GVHD prophylaxis in allo-HSCT, regardless of donor type (70, 71). CMV DNAemia occurred in 52-63% of patients after haploSCT. The cumulative incidence of CMV DNAemia in patients who received pre-emptive antiviral therapy at one year was 39% (95% CI, 31–47%), and the 1-year cumulative incidence of CMV disease was 2.6% (95% CI, 0.09–5%) (70).

As ATG is usually used to reduce the risk of graft rejection and GVHD, it is assumed that ATG combined with PTCy in T-cell replete-haploSCT would minimize GVHD risk but not impact engraftment and risk of relapse. Princes Margaret Cancer Centre from Canada established unmanipulated haploidentical PBSC transplantation following RIC with ATG (total 4.5 mg/kg), PTCy (cyclophosphamide 50 mg/kg/day i.v. on days +3 and +4), and cyclosporine as a GVHD prevention strategy (72–74). CMV reactivation occurred in 74% of cases with CMV disease in 11.5% of cases (72). Cheng‐Hsien Lin et al. retrospectively compared the cumulative incidence of CMV DNAemia, two‐year OS, and leukemia‐free survival rates in acute leukemia patients with MSD, matched unrelated donor (MUD), and haploidentical donor allografts (ATG: 2 mg·kg-1 day-1, from day -3 to day -2; PTCy) (75). The cumulative incidences of CMV DNAemia at day 180 in the haploidentical groups were 85.7%, which were higher than those in the MSD and MUD allo‐HSCT groups. For the haploidentical groups, CMV DNAemia was detected at a median time of 29 days.

Yu Wang et al. from Peking University initiated a prospective study in patients with a standard-dose ATG/granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF)-based regimen (ATG-PTCy) followed by low-dose PTCy (14.5 mg/kg on days 3 and 4) for haploSCT (76, 77). The 100-day cumulative incidence of CMV reactivation in the ATG-PTCy cohort was markedly higher than that in the ATG cohort (74% vs 30%), with a comparable incidence of CMV disease between the two cohorts (8% vs 8%) (77), indicating that dual T cell depletion with PTCy and ATG may bring about a higher incidence of CMV reactivation.

Published data have been inconsistent on the incidence of CMV reactivation and CMV disease after haploSCT ( Table 1 ). It indicates that haploSCT carries a substantially higher risk for CMV infection compared with HLA‐matched related or unrelated allo‐HSCTs, but this seemed not to impact overall and non‐relapse mortality. Hence, some data suggest the use of prophylactic anti-CMV antivirals when PTCy is used because a higher incidence of CMV reactivation was associated with the use of PTCy (51, 60). Surprisingly, a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies on haploSCT in idiopathic AA suggested that the addition of PTCy correlated with a lower risk of CMV viremia (10.4%) to a larger extent than MTX-containing (55.7%) and other (38.6%) regimens (79). The opposite results can be partly explained by the absence of an approved threshold of viral load to initiate anti-CMV treatment, considering the different transplant centers. The heterogeneous CMV serological status in the donor/recipient on account of geographical and ethnological characteristics is another possible explanation because the CMV seroprevalence is usually much higher (>=90%) in adult populations of China than in Europe and the USA (80–84). This issue could be better investigated in a future clinical trial.

Johanna Tischer et al. retrospectively compared the incidence of virus infections and outcome in two different haploSCT settings (78). The first approach was the combination of T cell repletion and T cell depletion (CD6 deletion) using ATG prior to haploSCT (cTCR/TCD group). The second was T cell repletion (TCR) using high-dose posttransplantation cyclophosphamide (TCR/PTCy group). CMV reactivation occurred more frequently in the cTCR/TCD group (57%) than in the TCR/PTCy group (31%). Furthermore, pre-emptive treatment of CMV reactivation was successful in the TCR/PTCy group, whereas CMV DNA became undetectable in only 50% of the cTCR/TCD group.

We previously investigated CMV-specific T cell (CMV-CTL) reconstitution post in vivo TCD-haploSCT (85–87). The CD8+ T cell number in transplant recipients was comparable to that of controls at day 60 after transplantation. The median number of CMV-CTLs and their subsets was equal to those of the controls from day 30 to day 360. In addition, haploSCT recipients had a high frequency of CMV-CTLs with strong proliferation capacities and interferon-γ production at one year after transplantation (86). CMV-specific T cells with the central memory CD45RO+CD62L+ cell phenotype were significantly expanded when CMV was reactivated early after transplantation (87). Ruri Kato et al. demonstrated that there were considerably lower maximum numbers of CMV-CTLs in the CMV antigenemia resolved group than in the persistent group (median, 22.15 vs. 50 cells/μl) (88). Nevertheless, CMV-CTLs reached a peak more quickly in the resolved group than in the persistent group (median, 21 vs. 78 days) (88).

M Noviello et al. retrospectively explored either CD34 selection or posttransplant sirolimus as GVHD prophylaxis for haploSCT recipients (89). At 30 days, 21.7% of patients had CMV-specific T cells higher than 1 sfc/μL measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot (ELISPOT), whereas CMV viremia occurred in only one patient who received anti-CMV treatment. At 90 days, 29.0% of patients reached this threshold, and no patients experienced clinically relevant viremia. At 180 days, 52.9% of patients finally reached the threshold, and none of them experienced CMV viremia. They found the protective value of 1 CMV sfc/μL against CMV reactivation posttransplant (89).

Dixie Huntley et al. performed a multicenter observational study to monitor CMV-specific T cell kinetics in PTCy-haploSCT patients and compared it with HLA-matched transplantation (58). In their analysis, CMV DNAemia developed at a similar frequency with equal numbers of CMV-specific T-cell at most time points examined between PTCy-haploSCT and MRD/MUD recipients. CMV DNAemia did not affect CMV-specific CD8+ and CD4+ T-cell reconstitution by the end of the follow-up period (day +180) in either allo-HSCT modality. They claimed that PTCy-haploSCT recipients may restore CMV-specific T-cell immunity to the same extent as HLA-matched allo-HSCT patients (58). The same group also reported that CMV infection was related to high levels of CD27−CD28− T cells, which behave like Tregs (90). They found a suboptimal correlation between CMV-specific CD4+ or CD8+ T cells and Tregs in peripheral blood (PB), which was weaker in patients with CMV reactivation prior to immunological monitoring. This suggests that recovery of PB Tregs and that of CMV-specific T-cell subsets show distinct kinetics, particularly after CMV reactivation.

More recently, Jasper J. P. van Beek et al. conducted longitudinal analysis of high-dimensional T-cell immunophenotypes in 21 recipients of PTCy-haploSCT (91). CMV-specific T-cells were primed early after PTCy-haploSCT and initially showed a proliferating/activated phenotype, that was quickly replaced by a terminal effector phenotype, while uncontrolled viral replication associated with lower abundance of distinct CMV-specific CD4+ T-cell immunophenotypes, hinting at a possible role of these cells in CMV control. CMV-specific T-cell features were similar to those of the CMV-seropositive donor one year posttransplantation, implying reestablishment of physiological homeostasis.

NK cells similarly play an essential role in defense against infections and leukemia relapse after hapoSCT. Fengyan Jin et al. explored NK cell dynamics in 29 patients after haploSCT between August 2011 and November 2014 (92). IFNγ-producing NK cells expanded in 19 patients after CMV reactivation, and the percentages of IFNγ-producing NK cells in these patients greatly increased from day 60 to 180 after transplantation compared to those of their donors. The percentage of KIR-expressing NK cells and IFNγ-producing NKG2C+ NK cells was significantly higher in haploSCT recipients with CMV reactivation than in those without CMV reactivation. Moreover, CMV reactivation was associated with expansion of the CD56^brightCD16^dim/−DNAM1⁺ NK cell subset between days 30 and 90 after haploSCT (93). Patients with increased CD56^brightCD16^dim/−DNAM1⁺ NK cells also had a remarkably higher CMV viral load (93).

Letizia Muccio et al. reported that CMV reactivation boosted the arrival of mature NK cells in pediatric patients with hematological malignancies receiving HLA-haploSCT after removal of both αβT cells and CD19 B cells (94). A memory-like NK cell subset expressing NKG2C and CD57 progressively expanded in most children. NKG2C+CD57+ NK cells were detected by month 3 after allo-SCT and expanded until at least month 12. These cells characteristically expressed high levels of killer Ig-like receptors (KIRs) and leukocyte inhibitory receptor 1 (LIR-1) and low levels of Siglec-7, NKG2A and interleukin-18Rα. Additionally, they poorly secreted interferon-γ in response to interleukin-12 and interleukin-18. The compromised response to these cytokines as well as their highly differentiated profile may reflect their skewing toward immune control of human cytomegalovirus.

Xiang‐Yu Zhao et al. from Peking University previously found that donor-recipient KIR ligand matching decreased CMV reactivation and refractory CMV infection by day 100 post-transplantation (95). This indicates that donor-recipient KIR ligand matching might improve the NK cell licensing process and promote NK cell-mediated control of CMV reactivation. The same group then prospectively assessed NK cell reconstitution in patients undergoing matched sibling transplantation and haploSCT (96). CD107a was increasingly expressed in NK cells after versus before CMV reactivation at days 60, 100, and 180 after transplantation, but CMV reactivation did not impact the maturation process of NK cells after transplantation. In addition, KIR expression and NKp30 expression were lower on NK cells in patients with CMV reactivation than in those without CMV reactivation at day 30. The NK-to-T-cell (NK/T) ratio was persistently higher in patients with CMV reactivation than in those without CMV reactivation from 30 days to one year after haploSCT.

An emerging report from Elisa Zaghi et al. demonstrated impaired adaptive NK cells expanded after CMV reactivation in PTCy-haploSCT (97). By a longitudinal single-cell computational profiling of multiparametric flow cytometry, they found that CMV accelerates NK cell immune recovery with the expansion of CD158b1b2j^pos/NKG2A^neg/NKG2C^pos/NKp30^lo NK cells. The number of this subset is associated with CMV reactivation, further increases in recipients with multiple viral reactivations and persists for months after the infection. The transcriptional characteristics of FACS-sorted CD158b1b2j^pos NK cells confirmed the capacity of CMV to deregulate NKG2C, NKG2A, and NKp30 gene expression, thus mediating the expansion of NK cells with adaptive traits. These results imply that the dysfunction/exhaustion of “adaptive” KIR^pos NK cells in patients with CMV reactivated is induced, at least partially, by the CMV-induced expression of checkpoint inhibitors.

Fifty pediatric patients undergoing αβ T cell-depleted haploSCT between August 2012 and December 2015 were analyzed (98). CMV reactivation developed in 19 transplantations at a median of 30 days (range, 13-318 days) after haploSCT. Higher γδ T cells were observed in patients without CMV reactivation than in patients with CMV reactivation at day 30 (197.8 ± 153.9 vs 53.9 ± 58.7). There was a significantly higher incidence of CMV reactivation in patients with a low percentage of γδ T cells at day 30 than in patients with a high percentage of γδ T cells (78.0 ± 15.3% vs 22.2 ± 13.9%). No difference in day 30 γδ T cells was found between patients with and without CMV disease.

Irma Airoldi et al. prospectively monitored the functional and phenotypic characteristics of γδ T cells up to 7 months after αβ+ T cells and CD19+ B cells depleted haploSCT in 27 children (44). They reported that γδ T cells are the foremost T-cell population in patients during the first weeks and are mainly derived from the graft content and expanded in vivo after transplantation. Central memory cells predominated very early after haploSCT for both the Vδ1 and the Vδ2 subsets. Vδ1 cells are specifically expanded in patients with CMV reactivation and are more cytotoxic than those of children without reactivation.

CMV-specific T-cell, NK cell, and γδ T-cell are vital to immune control of CMV infection post haploSCT, but it seems that γδ T-cell is more likely responsible for viral reactivation in the context of ex vivo TCD-haploSCT. Although NK cells and γδ T cells are the first lymphocytes that recover after transplantation, CMV-specific T cells are dominant in number in case of viral infection. The majority of studies state that impaired T-cell and NK-cell reconstitution and increased risk of CMV infection after haploSCT, so seeking factors influencing CMV-specific immune reconstitution and interventions to improve immune reconstitution is urgent at the moment. Although data from Dixie Huntley et al. supported similar incidence of CMV infection and restored CMV-specific T cells after PTCy-haploSCT compared to MRD/MUD transplantation (58), the scarce number of MUD and MRD recipients and more sirolimus used in PTCy-haploSCT group preclude any definitive conclusion and further studies are warranted to validate their findings.

Feuchtinger T et al. treated 18 patients after allo-SCT from HLA–mismatched/haploidentical or HLA–matched unrelated donors with polyclonal CMV-specific T cells (99). These T cells were generated by isolation of interferon-γ–producing cells after stimulation with pp65 antigen. Patients with refractory CMV disease or viremia received a mean of 21 × 10³/kg pp65-specific T cells. CMV infection was cleared, or viral burden was significantly decreased in 83% of these patients, even in patients with CMV encephalitis. Viral control was related to improved antiviral T-cell reconstitution and in vivo expansion of CMV-specific T cells in 12 of 16 evaluable cases without inducing GVHD or acute side effects.

In another CMV infection refractory cohort (100), 27 of 32 treated patients after haploSCT cleared CMV within four weeks after adoptive T-cell therapy without recurrence. After cellular transfer, CMV-specific T cells expanded in vivo with improved cytokine production and proliferation ability. In addition, the expression of programmed death-1 (PD-1) on CMV-specific T cells was reduced. In the early effective group, patients who cleared viremia within four weeks after T-cell infusion, CMV-specific CD8+ IFN-γ+ and CD4+ IFN-γ+ T cells were rapidly and massively expanded in vivo, whereas in the late effective group, there was no significant expansion of CMV-specific T cells. Xiang-Yu Zhao et al. further evaluated the safety and efficacy of donor-derived CMV-specific cytotoxic T cells (CTLs) as a first-line therapy for CMV infection after haploSCT (101). They observed that first-line therapy with CTLs significantly reduced the incidence of CMV infection with lower 1-year treatment-related mortality and better 1-year overall survival. Moreover, first-line therapy with CTLs promoted the recovery of CTLs in patients, which correlated with CMV clearance.

A case report described two patients with drug-resistant CMV encephalitis after haploSCT successfully received donor CMV-specific CTLs (102). In the first case, a 27-year-old male developed CMV encephalitis during ganciclovir maintenance treatment after haploSCT. After administering foscarnet and donor CMV-specific CTLs, CMV-DNA of his cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) was negative by RT-PCR, and the lesions on brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were reduced. Another case, a 57-year-old female, also experienced CMV encephalitis during maintenance treatment with ganciclovir after haploSCT. After intrathecal treatment with donor CMV-specific CTLs, the CMV load of the CSF was reduced.

Prophylactic and therapeutic DLI are administered to improve posttransplant immune restoration to reduce both infectious complications and disease relapse. Michael Maschan et al. investigated low-dose memory (CD45RA-depleted) donor lymphocyte infusion (mDLI) after αβ T-cell depleted HSCT (103–105). The incidence of CMV reactivation was 45-50% in the experimental mDLI arm and 54-55% in the control arm. The median duration of CMV viremia was 3 weeks (range, 1-9) in the prospective cohort and 4 weeks (range, 1-26) in the historical cohort (105). Memory DLI was associated with improved CMV-specific T-cell reconstitution in a subcohort of CMV IgG seropositive recipients. Analysis of a subcohort of CMV seropositive recipients indicated remarkably better CMV-specific T-cell reconstitution on day 30 in the experimental arm (104). Compared to that of the historical cohort, restoration of CMV-specific immunity at day 30 was significantly enhanced in the prospective cohort (40% versus 25%) (105). Luca Castagna et al. prospectively evaluated a CD45RA+ depleted DLI in terms of reducing viral infection early after PTCy-haploSCT (106). CMV reactivation occurred in 28% of patients. Although the majority of the patients received the planned three infusions, only one patient developed grade 2 acute GVHD, and two patients had moderate chronic GVHD.

Park HJ et al. reported the successful treatment of refractory CMV colitis after PTCy-haploSCT using CD45RA+ depleted DLI (107). After failure of ganciclovir and foscarnet, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor-primed, CD45RA+ depleted DLI was administered to treat refractory CMV colitis. CMV pp65-specific CTLs were found in recipients four weeks after DLI. Meanwhile, diffuse wall thickening involving the entire colon was also normalized in the abdominal CT scan.

As manipulated DLI approaches are still not widely used due to high cost and intensive labor, unmanipulated donor lymphocytes (U-DLIs), if feasible by harvesting CTLs directly from the peripheral blood of seropositive donors, are used for refractory or relapsed patients with CMV infection. Researchers from Turkey enrolled five pediatric patients receiving U-DLI for CMV infection after transplantation (108). Among them, three patients underwent haploSCT. One patient who was transplanted from an unrelated donor received U-DLI from his haploidentical mother. CMV titers were dramatically reduced after U-DLI in these patients.