Front. Immunol.
Frontiers in Immunology
Front. Immunol.
1664-3224
Frontiers Media S.A.
10.3389/fimmu.2020.625796
Immunology
Correction
Corrigendum: Analysis of a Large Standardized Food Challenge Data Set to Determine Predictors of Positive Outcome Across Multiple Allergens
Sindher
Sayantani
1
Long
Andrew J.
1
2
Purington
Natasha
1
Chollet
Madeleine
3
Slatkin
Sara
3
Andorf
Sandra
1
Tupa
Dana
1
Kumar
Divya
1
Woch
Margaret A.
1
O’Laughlin
Katherine L.
1
Assaad
Amal
4
Pongracic
Jacqueline
5
Spergel
Jonathan M.
6
Tam
Jonathan
7
Tilles
Stephen
8
Wang
Julie
9
Galli
Stephen J.
1
10
11
Nadeau
Kari C.
1
Chinthrajah
R. Sharon
1
*
1
Sean N. Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States
2
Department of Pharmacy, Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital Stanford, Stanford, CA, United States
3
Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States
4
Division of Allergy and Immunology, Cincinnati Children’s Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, United States
5
Division of Allergy and Immunology, The Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States
6
Division of Allergy and Immunology, The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia Department of Pediatrics, Perelman School of Medicine at University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
7
Division of Clinical Immunology and Allergy, Children’s Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
8
ASTHMA Inc. Clinical Research Center, Northwest Asthma and Allergy Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
9
Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States
10
Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States
11
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States
Approved by: Frontiers Editorial Office, Frontiers Media SA, Switzerland
*Correspondence: R. Sharon Chinthrajah, schinths@stanford.edu
This article was submitted to Nutritional Immunology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Immunology
30
11
2020
2020
11
625796
04
11
2020
05
11
2020
Copyright © 2020 Sindher, Long, Purington, Chollet, Slatkin, Andorf, Tupa, Kumar, Woch, O’Laughlin, Assaad, Pongracic, Spergel, Tam, Tilles, Wang, Galli, Nadeau and Chinthrajah
2020
Sindher, Long, Purington, Chollet, Slatkin, Andorf, Tupa, Kumar, Woch, O’Laughlin, Assaad, Pongracic, Spergel, Tam, Tilles, Wang, Galli, Nadeau and Chinthrajah
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
A Corrigendum on Analysis of a Large Standardized Food Challenge Data Set to Determine Predictors of Positive Outcome Across Multiple Allergens by Sindher S, Long AJ, Purington N, Chollet M, Slatkin S, Andorf S, Tupa D, Kumar D, Woch MA, O’Laughlin KL, Assaad A, Pongracic J, Spergel JM, Tam J, Tilles S, Wang J, Galli SJ, Nadeau KC, Chinthrajah RS (2018). Front Immunol. 9:2689. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.02689
food challenge
cumulative tolerated dose
AUC
biomarker evaluation
time-dependent ROC
In the original article, there was an error in the section “CTD-Dependent ROC for Clinical Thresholds,” Paragraph 3. The word “sesame” in this sentence is incorrect: “At defined values SPT had the best predictive value compared to sIgE and sIgEr. The PPV for all tested foods was 1 except for sesame, which was 0.95. Within sIgE values, sesame was the lowest at 0.64.”
A correction has been made to the above sentence, as follows: “At defined values SPT had the best predictive value compared to sIgE and sIgEr. The PPV for all tested foods was 1 except for pecan, which was 0.95. Within sIgE values, sesame was the lowest at 0.64.”
The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way.