<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="brief-report" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="EN">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Hum. Neurosci.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Human Neuroscience</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Hum. Neurosci.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">1662-5161</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fnhum.2024.1369862</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Human Neuroscience</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Brief Research Report</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Gabor filter-based statistical features for ADHD detection</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Sathiya</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2707531/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/visualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/validation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/software/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/funding-acquisition/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name><surname>Rao</surname> <given-names>T. D.</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001"><sup>&#x002A;</sup></xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/funding-acquisition/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Kumar</surname> <given-names>T. Sunil</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1965385/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1"><sup>1</sup><institution>Division of Mathematics, Vellore Institute of Technology</institution>, <addr-line>Chennai</addr-line>, <country>India</country></aff>
<aff id="aff2"><sup>2</sup><institution>Department of Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Science, University of G&#x00E4;vle</institution>, <addr-line>Gavle</addr-line>, <country>Sweden</country></aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by" id="fn0001">
<p>Edited by: Jiahui Pan, South China Normal University, China</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by" id="fn0002">
<p>Reviewed by: Durga Prasad Bavirisetti, NTNU, Norway</p>
<p>Md. Kafiul Islam, Independent University, Bangladesh, Bangladesh</p>
</fn>
<corresp id="c001">&#x002A;Correspondence: T. D. Rao, <email>tharasidilleswar.rao@vit.ac.in</email></corresp>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>10</day>
<month>04</month>
<year>2024</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2024</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>18</volume>
<elocation-id>1369862</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>13</day>
<month>01</month>
<year>2024</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>25</day>
<month>03</month>
<year>2024</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x00A9; 2024 Sathiya, Rao and Kumar.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2024</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Sathiya, Rao and Kumar</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>Attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a neuropsychological disorder that occurs in children and is characterized by inattention, impulsivity, and hyperactivity. Early and accurate diagnosis of ADHD is very important for effective intervention. The aim of this study is to develop a computer-aided approach to detecting ADHD using electroencephalogram (EEG) signals. Specifically, we explore a Gabor filter-based statistical features approach for the classification of EEG signals into ADHD and healthy control (HC). The EEG signal is processed by a bank of Gabor filters to obtain narrow-band signals. Subsequently, a set of statistical features is extracted. The computed features are then subjected to feature selection. Finally, the obtained feature vector is given to a classifier to detect ADHD and HC. Our approach achieves the highest classification accuracy of 96.4% on a publicly available dataset. Furthermore, our approach demonstrates better classification accuracy than the existing methods.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder</kwd>
<kwd>Gabor filter</kwd>
<kwd>EEG classification</kwd>
<kwd>ADHD</kwd>
<kwd>morphological</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<counts>
<fig-count count="2"/>
<table-count count="8"/>
<equation-count count="1"/>
<ref-count count="39"/>
<page-count count="9"/>
<word-count count="5209"/>
</counts>
<custom-meta-wrap>
<custom-meta>
<meta-name>section-at-acceptance</meta-name>
<meta-value>Brain-Computer Interfaces</meta-value>
</custom-meta>
</custom-meta-wrap>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec sec-type="intro" id="sec1">
<label>1</label>
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>On a global scale, it is estimated that approximately 5% of children are affected by attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref33">Song et al., 2021</xref>), one of the most common heterogenous disorders affecting children, characterized by inattention, impulsiveness, and hyperactivity. Children with ADHD have an adverse impact behavioral patterns, particularly in education and interpersonal growth, it may even extend into adulthood (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">Alt&#x0131;nkaynak et al., 2020</xref>). According to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref37">Xu et al. (2018)</xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref35">TaghiBeyglou et al. (2022)</xref>, individuals with ADHD spanning from childhood to adulthood often experience challenges in psychosocial and neuropsychological functioning. Untreated ADHD leads to worse social and professional functioning, a larger chance of comorbid, and a higher risk of serious depressive and anxiety disorders (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">American Psychiatric Association, 2013</xref>). Therefore, early detection and timely therapeutic intervention are of essential importance in preventing the severity of ADHD in children.</p>
<p>Traditionally, the diagnostic assessment of ADHD in children is conducted by psychiatrists through interviews with parents and/or the child. Manual diagnosis can be subjective, and this evaluation process is often time-consuming, demands a high level of medical expertise, and can be prone to error in certain cases (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref19">Khare and Acharya, 2023</xref>). In recent years, quantitative techniques such as brain signaling examinations have been conducted to establish a diagnosis.</p>
<p>Researchers have been utilizing many neuroimaging techniques to diagnose ADHD, some of them are magnetoencephalography (MEG) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">Hamedi et al., 2022</xref>), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref39">Zhou et al., 2021</xref>), and electroencephalogram (EEG) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">Allahverdy et al., 2016</xref>). However, some of these approaches, such as MEG, are radioactive, bulky, and costly (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref19">Khare and Acharya, 2023</xref>). On the other hand, EEG signals are portable and cost-effective solutions for ADHD detection (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref24">Maniruzzaman et al., 2023</xref>), and they have also been used in various applications (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref23">Kumar et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref20">Khare and Bajaj, 2020</xref>).</p>
<p>Over the last decade, researchers have extracted various linear, non-linear, and morphological features from time (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref38">Yang et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref17">Khaleghi et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref24">Maniruzzaman et al., 2023</xref>), frequency (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref26">Mueller et al., 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16">Kaur et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref17">Khaleghi et al., 2020</xref>), and time-frequency (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref29">&#x00D6;ztoprak et al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">Alt&#x0131;nkaynak et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">Joy et al., 2022</xref>) domain-based methodologies. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">Alt&#x0131;nkaynak et al. (2020)</xref> utilized event-related potentials (ERPs), while participants engaged in an auditory oddball task, which resulted in longer P300 latency for ADHD patients and smaller P300 amplitude for healthy control (HC). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref24">Maniruzzaman et al. (2023)</xref> performed a channel selection method and extracted various times, morphological, and non-linear features for the classification of ADHD and HC. The approach in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref17">Khaleghi et al. (2020)</xref> extracted various morphological, non-linear, time, frequency, and time&#x2013;frequency-based features; among these non-linear features (Petrosian and Katz fractal dimensions, Lyapunov exponent, approximate entropy, and Lempel-Ziv complexity) extracted from EEG, provides a good quantitative tool in the detection of ADHD. Similarly, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16">Kaur et al. (2019)</xref> extracted time-domain features, namely morphological, complexity features (power of scale-freeness and graph index complexity), and frequency-domain features such as Katz and Higuchi algorithm for diagnosis. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">Chow et al. (2019)</xref> developed an approach based on Hjorth mobility (M), and the results indicated that M values in the control group were significantly higher than the ADHD individuals. In the frequency domain, the power of different EEG frequency bands was used to diagnose ADHD (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">Alt&#x0131;nkaynak et al., 2020</xref>). It indicates increased theta power and a higher theta/beta ratio in ADHD patients compared to HC, but the use of non-linear features outperformed frequency band features (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">Gonz&#x00E1;lez, 2022</xref>). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">Alt&#x0131;nkaynak et al. (2020)</xref> investigated the entropy of the discrete wavelet transform (DWT) of auditory evoked potentials for the classification between ADHD and HC, and it exhibited significantly different values in both groups. Similarly, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">Castro-Ospina et al. (2012)</xref> investigated the occurrence of low-frequency bands computed through wavelets and empirical mode decomposition (EMD) to find the differences in the patterns of ERP waves between ADHD patients and control subjects. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref36">Tor et al. (2021)</xref> computed autoregressive modeling coefficients and relative wavelet energy from EMD and DWT for the detection of ADHD.</p>
<p>Since the EEG signal is characterized by non-stationary behavior and a diverse range of time-frequency components, using Gabor filters can be an advantage for discovering the signal's descriptive features. In recent years, researchers have prominently used Gabor filters in image processing (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14">Hu et al., 2020</xref>), and computer vision-based applications (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref28">Oppong et al., 2022</xref>). In addition, Gabor filter-based features have been found to be effective in signal classification tasks (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref23">Kumar et al., 2015</xref>) and even integrated into deep learning models (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">Barshooi and Amirkhani, 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">Hammouche et al., 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref18">Khalifa et al., 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref28">Oppong et al., 2022</xref>). Despite these advantages, the potential of the Gabor filter has not been explored for ADHD detection. Therefore, in this paper, we explore the bank of Gabor filters for ADHD detection.</p>
<p>To the best of our knowledge, there has been no prior investigation that evaluated Gabor filter-based features for the classification of EEG signals into ADHD and HC.</p>
<p>The following contributions made by our study are:</p>
<list list-type="order">
<list-item>
<p>Explored Gabor-based statistical features for the classification of EEG signals into ADHD and HC.</p>
</list-item>
<list-item>
<p>Our approach has been validated using 10-fold cross-validation and an 80:20 train-test split.</p>
</list-item>
<list-item>
<p>Our approach has outperformed the existing approaches in the detection of ADHD.</p>
</list-item>
</list>
<p>This paper is organized as follows: Section II explains the experimental procedure for ADHD detection. In Section III, Results and Discussion is presented, and finally, the conclusions are provided in Section IV.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="methods" id="sec2">
<label>2</label>
<title>Methodology</title>
<p>In this section, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref> represents the flowchart of the proposed approach. First, the EEG signals are processed using the bank of Gabor filters. This process converts a non-stationary EEG signal to a narrow-band signal. From each of those narrow-band signals, we extract a set of statistical features. Finally, the features extracted are concatenated and fed to classifiers to classify EEG signals into ADHD or HC. The description of each step is given below.</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig1">
<label>Figure 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Block diagram of proposed Gabor filter-based ADHD detection approach.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fnhum-18-1369862-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
<sec id="sec3">
<label>2.1</label>
<title>Gabor filters</title>
<p>The Gabor filter acts as a bandpass filter and provides good time-frequency localization (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">Gabor, 1946</xref>). Furthermore, using a bank of Gabor filters for the decomposition of signal makes it easier to extract discriminating information from a particular frequency range. The mathematical representation of the Gabor filter is as follows:</p>
<disp-formula id="E1">
<label>(1)</label>
<mml:math id="M1">
<mml:mi>g</mml:mi>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")">
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
</mml:mfenced>
<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
<mml:msqrt>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
<mml:mi>&#x03C0;</mml:mi>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mi>&#x03C3;</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msqrt>
</mml:mfrac>
<mml:mo>exp</mml:mo>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mi>&#x03C3;</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>j</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
<mml:mi>&#x03C0;</mml:mi>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>f</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>c</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:math>
</disp-formula>
<p>where <inline-formula>
<mml:math id="M2">
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>f</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>c</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>- central frequency,</p>
<p><italic>&#x03C3;</italic> &#x2013; Standard deviation of the Gaussian function.</p>
<p>The response <inline-formula>
<mml:math id="M3">
<mml:mi>z</mml:mi>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")">
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> is computed through the convolution of the input signal <inline-formula>
<mml:math id="M4">
<mml:mi>y</mml:mi>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")">
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> with the Gabor function <inline-formula>
<mml:math id="M5">
<mml:mi>g</mml:mi>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")">
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> as described by <xref rid="E1" ref-type="disp-formula">Equation (1)</xref>. Finally, the magnitude of the Gabor response will be determined for feature extraction.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec4">
<label>2.2</label>
<title>Statistical features</title>
<p>The feature extraction process is crucial in the classification process, as the choice of features significantly impacts the performance of the classification. Local binary pattern (LBP)-based histogram features are commonly used to extract features from the responses of Gabor filters (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref23">Kumar et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref32">Samiee et al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref34">Sunil Kumar and Kanhangad, 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref22">Kumar and Kanhangad, 2018</xref>). The length of the histogram (feature length) is 256. As we are conducting multichannel EEG signals (19 channels), extracting the traditional features will lead to a high-dimensional feature vector. Therefore, we have extracted four statistical features from each of the Gabor filter responses. In our study, statistical features such as entropy, standard deviation, skewness, and kurtosis were extracted from the magnitude of the response <inline-formula>
<mml:math id="M6">
<mml:mi>z</mml:mi>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")">
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>. Mathematical equations for the aforementioned features can be found in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref34">Sunil Kumar and Kanhangad (2017)</xref>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec5">
<label>2.3</label>
<title>Feature concatenation and classification</title>
<p>In this process, the feature vector is constructed through the concatenation of statistical features extracted from <inline-formula>
<mml:math id="M7">
<mml:mi>z</mml:mi>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")">
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> across all the channels. To classify the EEG segment into ADHD and HC, the feature vector is fed into classifiers. In our approach, we have used two classifiers; namely support vector machine (SVM) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref24">Maniruzzaman et al., 2023</xref>) and k-nearest neighbors (k-NN) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">Alt&#x0131;nkaynak et al., 2020</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec6">
<label>2.4</label>
<title>Feature selection</title>
<p>Feature selection (FS) is important for improving the performance of predictive models by eliminating redundant elements in a dataset, thereby maintaining only the most important features. In our study, we explored the <italic>t</italic>-test (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref24">Maniruzzaman et al., 2023</xref>) and the chi-square test (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref31">Rangarajan and Mahanand, 2014</xref>) to decrease the length of the feature vector and improve the accuracy (Acc) of classification.</p>
<p>The algorithm of our proposed approach is given below.</p>
<sec id="sec7">
<label>2.4.1</label>
<title>Algorithm of our proposed approach</title>
<p><bold>Step 1:</bold> process the multichannel EEG segment with a bank of Gabor filters.</p>
<p><bold>Step 2:</bold> compute statistical features from each of the Gabor responses.</p>
<p><bold>Step 3:</bold> concatenate the features corresponding to each individual channel to get the final feature vector. Apply the FS technique to reduce the length of the feature vector.</p>
<p><bold>Step 4:</bold> train the classification models, such as k-NN and SVM, and evaluate their performance.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="sec8">
<label>3</label>
<title>Experimental results</title>
<p>This section presents a comprehensive description of the dataset, followed by Results and Discussion.</p>
<sec id="sec9">
<label>3.1</label>
<title>Dataset</title>
<p>In our study, a publicly available dataset (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref27">Nasrabadi et al., 2020</xref>) has been utilized for detecting ADHD from EEG signals. The EEG signals acquired in this dataset include 61 children diagnosed with ADHD and 60 HC, and all the participants were within the age range of 7 to 12 years. The diagnostic criteria for the ADHD group with confirmation, are based on psychiatric evaluation in accordance with DSM-IV guidelines (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">American Psychiatric Association, 2013</xref>). Notably, the ADHD children had received Ritalin treatment for up to 6 months. The control group was free of psychiatric disorders, epilepsy, and high-risk behaviors. EEG recordings were acquired according to the 10-20 standard, utilizing 19 channels, and a sampling frequency of 128 Hz. In our study, the EEG signal is divided into segments with a duration of 30 and 60 s. For further information about the dataset, refer <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref27">Nasrabadi et al. (2020)</xref>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec10">
<label>3.2</label>
<title>Results</title>
<p>To validate the performance of our approach, the following metrics are used namely, Acc, specificity (Sp), and sensitivity (Sn) in which Sp denotes the capacity to correctly categorize normal data, while Sn signifies the ability to identify ADHD-related events, whereas Acc is defined as the ratio of correctly classified segments to the total number of segments in the test set.</p>
<p>In order to study the influence of the number of Gabor filters, we have performed our experiments by selecting the number of Gabor filters as 3, 4, and 5. The central frequency (<inline-formula>
<mml:math id="M8">
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>f</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>c</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>) and standard deviation (<inline-formula>
<mml:math id="M9">
<mml:mi>&#x03C3;</mml:mi>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>) of the individual filters are selected to cover the range of frequencies extending from 1 to 64 Hz (half of the sampling frequency). These parameters are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab1">Table 1</xref>. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref> shows an exemplary plot of the raw EEG signals and magnitude response of the Bank of Gabor filters with five filters (the parameters involved in each of these Gabor filters is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab1">
<label>Table 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Gabor filter parameters used in our approach.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top">No. of Gabor filters</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Central frequency</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Standard deviation</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">3</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">12.8, 25.6, 38.4</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">10, 10, 5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">4</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">12.8, 25.6, 38.4, 51.2</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">10, 10, 10, 10</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">5</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">10.24, 20.48, 30.72, 40.96, 51.2</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">12, 12, 12, 12, 10</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<fig position="float" id="fig2">
<label>Figure 2</label>
<caption>
<p>Plot of <bold>(A)</bold> Raw EEG signal. <bold>(B&#x2013;F)</bold> Magnitude response of each of the Gabor filters in the filter bank.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fnhum-18-1369862-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>To show the effectiveness of our approach, we have performed two sets of experiments: in the first set, we conducted 10-fold cross-validation, and in the second set, we divided the entire dataset into 80:20 train-test data.</p>
<p>The performance metrics obtained are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab2">Tables 2</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="table" rid="tab7">7</xref>. More specifically, <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab2">Tables 2</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="table" rid="tab4">4</xref> show the results obtained when an EEG segment of 30 s is used, while <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab5">Tables 5</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="table" rid="tab7">7</xref> show when an EEG segment of 60 s is used for classification purposes.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab2">
<label>Table 2</label>
<caption>
<p>Performance metrics obtained with an EEG segment of 30 s and three Gabor filters.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="middle">Validation</th>
<th align="left" valign="middle">Classifier</th>
<th align="left" valign="middle">FS</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">Acc (%)</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">Sn (%)</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">Sp (%)</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">No. of features</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="6">10-fold</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="3">SVM</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Without FS</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">86.1</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">83.26</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">88.25</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">228</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Chi-square</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">85.9</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">72.12</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">89.52</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">120</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>t</italic>-test</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">84.1</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">79.18</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">87.93</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">80</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="3">k-NN</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Without FS</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">89.5</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">84.89</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">92.69</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">228</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Chi-square</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">91.6</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">88.57</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">93.96</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">120</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>t</italic>-test</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">88</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">83.67</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">91.42</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">80</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="6">80:20</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="3">SVM</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Without FS</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">77.7</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">80.61</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">90.47</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">228</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Chi-square</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">89.3</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">79.59</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">89.68</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">140</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>t</italic>-test</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">81.2</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">73.46</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">86.50</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">83</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="3">k-NN</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Without FS</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">88.4</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">82.65</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">92.06</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">228</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Chi-square</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">92.9</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">86.73</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">93.25</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">140</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">t-test</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">90.2</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">70.08</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">91.26</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">83</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab3">
<label>Table 3</label>
<caption>
<p>Performance metrics obtained with an EEG segment of 30 s and four Gabor filters.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="middle">Validation</th>
<th align="left" valign="middle">Classifier</th>
<th align="left" valign="middle">FS</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">Acc (%)</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">Sn (%)</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">Sp (%)</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">No. of features</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="6">10-fold</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="3">SVM</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Without FS</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">95.3</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">94.69</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">95.85</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">304</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Chi-square</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">93.7</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">92.24</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">94.90</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">85</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>t</italic>-test</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">96.1</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">95.10</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">96.81</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">144</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="3">k-NN</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Without FS</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">93.4</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">91.02</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">95.22</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">304</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Chi-square</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">93.9</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">81.22</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">86.62</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">85</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>t</italic>-test</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">95.5</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">94.28</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">96.49</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">144</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="6">80:20</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="3">SVM</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Without FS</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">93.7</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">90.30</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">96.03</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">304</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Chi-square</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">95.5</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">91.83</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">94.44</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">85</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>t</italic>-test</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">94.6</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">93.87</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">95.63</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">159</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="3">k-NN</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Without FS</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">93.7</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">89.29</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">94.04</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">304</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Chi-square</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">92.8</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">87.75</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">95.23</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">85</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">t-test</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">
<bold>96.4</bold>
</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">
<bold>91.83</bold>
</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">
<bold>96.42</bold>
</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">
<bold>159</bold>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p>The bolded values indicate the classifier models with the highest accuracy scores among the ones presented in each table.</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab4">
<label>Table 4</label>
<caption>
<p>Performance metrics obtained with an EEG segment of 30 s and five Gabor filters.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="middle">Validation</th>
<th align="left" valign="middle">Classifier</th>
<th align="left" valign="middle">FS</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">Acc (%)</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">Sn (%)</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">Sp (%)</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">No. of features</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="6">10-fold</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="3">SVM</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Without FS</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">95.2</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">93.46</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">96.49</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">380</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Chi-square</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">94.5</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">93.87</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">94.90</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">85</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>t</italic>-test</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">95.5</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">93.46</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">97.13</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">148</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="3">k-NN</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Without FS</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">92.7</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">91.83</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">93.31</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">380</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Chi-square</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">93.4</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">89.79</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">96.17</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">85</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>t</italic>-test</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">93.4</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">89.79</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">96.17</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">148</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="6">80:20</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="3">SVM</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Without FS</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">94.6</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">88.77</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">95.23</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">380</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Chi-square</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">
<bold>96.4</bold>
</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">
<bold>89.79</bold>
</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">
<bold>92.85</bold>
</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">
<bold>85</bold>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>t</italic>-test</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">88.4</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">75</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">73.71</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">79</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="3">k-NN</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Without FS</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">93.7</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">86.22</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">92.85</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">380</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Chi-square</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">91.9</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">89.79</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">94.44</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">85</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>t</italic>-test</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">88.6</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">77.04</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">91.26</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">79</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p>The bolded values indicate the classifier models with the highest accuracy scores among the ones presented in each table.</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab5">
<label>Table 5</label>
<caption>
<p>Performance metrics obtained with an EEG segment of 60 s and three Gabor filters.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="middle">Validation</th>
<th align="left" valign="middle">Classifier</th>
<th align="left" valign="middle">FS</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">Acc (%)</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">Sn (%)</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">Sp (%)</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">No. of features</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="6">10-fold</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="3">SVM</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Without FS</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">82.1</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">75</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">87.5</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">228</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Chi-square</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">81.7</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">76.04</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">85.95</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">45</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>t</italic>-test</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">77.7</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">69.79</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">83.59</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">35</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="3">k-NN</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Without FS</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">76.8</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">68.75</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">82.81</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">228</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Chi-square</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">77.7</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">67.70</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">85.15</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">45</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>t</italic>-test</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">86.2</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">79.16</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">91.04</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">35</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="6">80:20</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="3">SVM</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Without FS</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">75</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">70.12</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">87.37</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">228</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Chi-square</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">75</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">67.53</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">87.37</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">45</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>t</italic>-test</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">79.5</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">68.83</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">84.46</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">35</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="3">k-NN</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Without FS</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">86.4</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">59.74</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">81.55</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">228</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Chi-square</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">
<bold>90.9</bold>
</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">
<bold>67.53</bold>
</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">
<bold>86.04</bold>
</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">
<bold>45</bold>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>t</italic>-test</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">88.6</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">67.53</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">91.26</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">35</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p>The bolded values indicate the classifier models with the highest accuracy scores among the ones presented in each table.</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab6">
<label>Table 6</label>
<caption>
<p>Performance metrics obtained with an EEG segment of 60 s and four Gabor filters.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="middle">Validation</th>
<th align="left" valign="middle">Classifier</th>
<th align="left" valign="middle">FS</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">Acc (%)</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">Sn (%)</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">Sp (%)</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">No. of features</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="6">10-fold</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="3">SVM</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Without FS</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">85.3</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">80</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">89.23</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">304</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Chi-square</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">79.6</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">71.57</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">85.38</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">74</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>t</italic>-test</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">86.2</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">81.05</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">90</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">100</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="3">k-NN</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Without FS</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">77.8</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">63.31</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">86.15</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">304</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Chi-square</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">80</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">71.57</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">86.15</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">74</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>t</italic>-test</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">82.2</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">72.63</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">89.23</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">100</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="6">80:20</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="3">SVM</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Without FS</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">84.4</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">76.31</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">84.61</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">304</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Chi-square</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">86.7</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">78.94</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">87.5</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">100</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>t</italic>-test</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">88.9</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">80.26</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">87.5</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">76</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="3">k-NN</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Without FS</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">86.7</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">65.78</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">85.57</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">304</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Chi-square</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">75.6</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">77.63</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">87.5</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">100</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>t</italic>-test</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">80</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">71.05</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">90.38</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">76</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab7">
<label>Table 7</label>
<caption>
<p>Performance metrics obtained with an EEG segment of 60 s and five Gabor filters.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="middle">Validation</th>
<th align="left" valign="middle">Classifier</th>
<th align="left" valign="middle">FS</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">Acc (%)</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">Sn (%)</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">Sp (%)</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">No. of features</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="6">10-fold</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="3">SVM</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Without FS</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">84.4</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">80</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">87.69</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">380</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Chi-square</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">80.4</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">73.73</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">84.61</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">60</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>t</italic>-test</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">84</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">75.78</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">90</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">79</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="3">k-NN</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Without FS</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">78.7</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">67.36</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">86.92</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">380</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Chi-square</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">84</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">77.89</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">88.46</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">60</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>t</italic>-test</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">85.8</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">76.84</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">92.30</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">79</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="6">80:20</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="3">SVM</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Without FS</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">82.2</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">72.36</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">89.42</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">380</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Chi-square</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">86.7</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">67.73</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">85.57</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">50</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>t</italic>-test</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">86.7</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">80.26</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">85.57</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">79</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="3">k-NN</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Without FS</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">77.8</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">59.21</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">86.53</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">380</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Chi-square</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">75.6</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">64.47</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">87.5</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">50</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>t</italic>-test</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">86.7</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">67.10</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">82.69</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">79</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<p><xref ref-type="table" rid="tab2">Tables 2</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="table" rid="tab4">4</xref>, it is evident that our approach performs better when the number of Gabor filters is set to 3 or 5, while the performance of the approach was comparatively inferior when the number of Gabor filters is set to 4 for 30-s duration. It can also be observed from our results that the classification improved when FS was included at the same time, and the number of features performed was reduced.</p>
<p>To understand the impact of segment length on the performance of the proposed approach, we performed the experiments by segmenting the EEG signals for 60 s. These results are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab5">Tables 5</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="table" rid="tab7">7</xref>. It can be observed from <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab5">Tables 5</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="table" rid="tab7">7</xref> that the proposed approach achieved a maximum Acc of 90.9% when a 60-s segment is used. The performance is inferior when compared to the performance achieved with 30 s of EEG data.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec11">
<label>3.3</label>
<title>Performance comparison</title>
<p>The performance comparison of our approach with existing approaches is shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab8">Table 8</xref>. Our approach has achieved better performance than the existing approaches in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">Chen et al. (2019)</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">Alt&#x0131;nkaynak et al. (2020)</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">Ekhlasi et al. (2021)</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref21">Kim et al. (2021)</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref30">Parashar et al. (2021)</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref25">Maniruzzaman et al. (2022)</xref>, and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">Alim and Imtiaz (2023)</xref>. The approaches in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">Chen et al. (2019)</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">Alt&#x0131;nkaynak et al. (2020)</xref>, and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref21">Kim et al. (2021)</xref> have performed experiments on different datasets, while the approaches in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">Ekhlasi et al. (2021)</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref30">Parashar et al. (2021)</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref25">Maniruzzaman et al. (2022)</xref>, and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">Alim and Imtiaz (2023)</xref> have performed experiments on the same dataset as ours. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">Chen et al. (2019)</xref> performed four distinct methods: relative spectral power, spectral power ratio, complexity analyses, and bicoherence for resting-state EEG feature extraction. The classifier constructed by selecting features from all four methods obtained an Acc of 85% on data acquired from 108 subjects. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref21">Kim et al. (2021)</xref> investigated the mismatch negativity (MMN) features, exploring both sensor-level attributes such as amplitude, latency, and source-level characteristics across various brain regions and achieved an Acc of 81%. It should be noted that authors have collected data from only 79 subjects. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">Alt&#x0131;nkaynak et al. (2020)</xref> analyzed wavelet, non-linear (Higuchi algorithm), and morphological features (P300 latency and amplitude parameters) by using different classifiers and obtained the highest Acc of 91.3%. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref30">Parashar et al. (2021)</xref> used various combinations of channels from different brain regions (frontal, central, occipital, and parietal) that are directly fed to classifiers for classification purposes. When considering all channels of the right hemisphere, the authors reported an Acc of 84%. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">Alim and Imtiaz (2023)</xref> used EEG linear features from the four sub-bands and achieved an Acc of 94.2%. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">Ekhlasi et al. (2021)</xref> obtained the effective connectivity matrices (ECMs) of each individual by directed phase transfer entropy (dPTE) between each pair of electrodes, achieving an Acc of 89.7% with the selected features of the effective connectivity vector (ECV). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref25">Maniruzzaman et al. (2022)</xref> extracted morphological and time-domain features such as absolute amplitude, positive area, negative area, total area, peak-to-peak, mean, median, energy, power, standard deviation, skewness, kurtosis, coefficient of variation, H parameter activity, mobility, and complexity of EEG signals and obtained an Acc of 94.2%. However, our Gabor filter-based approach achieved the highest classification Acc of 96.4 %, outperforming the existing approaches. The superior performance of our approach is due to the efficacy of the Gabor filter in time-frequency domain localization (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">Gabor, 1946</xref>). Extracting features from the narrow-band signals (obtained after processing through the bank of Gabor filters) may lead to an effective time-frequency representation of EEG signals, which could be the possible reason for its superior performance. The key advantage of our approach is that it is simple yet effective for detecting ADHD. Whereas, the limitation of our approach is that the number of features increases as the number of Gabor filters increases.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab8">
<label>Table 8</label>
<caption>
<p>Performance comparison with existing approaches.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="middle">Author</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">Dataset</th>
<th align="left" valign="middle">Feature extraction</th>
<th align="left" valign="middle">Classifier</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">Acc</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">Chen et al. (2019)</xref>
</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">108</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Power spectral features are used with SVM for classification.</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">SVM</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">84.59%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref21">Kim et al. (2021)</xref>
</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">79</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Mismatch negativity (MMN) features as biomarkers for classification.</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x2013;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">81.0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">Alt&#x0131;nkaynak et al. (2020)</xref>
</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">46</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Wavelet-based features</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">SVM, k-NN RF, AB, MLP, NB, LR</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">91.3%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref30">Parashar et al. (2021)</xref>
</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">120</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Different combinations of the feature channels</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">AB, RF, SVM</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">84%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">Alim and Imtiaz (2023)</xref>
</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">120</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">PCA-based features to train a Gaussian SVM model.</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">SVM</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">94.2% (80:20)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">Ekhlasi et al. (2021)</xref>
</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">121</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Directed Phase Transfer Entropy</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">ANN</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">89.7%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref25">Maniruzzaman et al. (2022)</xref>
</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">121</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Morphological<break/>Time-domain</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">SVM, k-NN, MLP, LR</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">94.2%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">
<bold>Present study</bold>
</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">121</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Gabor filter-based features were employed as features with SVM and k-NN.</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">SVM, k-NN</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">
<bold>96.1% (80:20), 95.5% (10-fold).</bold>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p>SVM: support vector machine; AB: Ada boost; RF: random forest; ANN: artificial neural network; k-NN: k-nearest neighbor; MLP: multilayer perceptron; LR: logistic regression; NB: na&#x00EF;ve Bayes.The bolded values indicate the classifier models with the highest accuracy scores among the ones presented in each table.</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="conclusions" id="sec12">
<label>4</label>
<title>Conclusion</title>
<p>In this paper, we have proposed an automated approach for the detection of ADHD using Gabor filter-based statistical features. Our methodology showed superior performance compared to the existing approaches to ADHD detection, signifying its potential as an efficient screening tool. However, this approach needs to be validated on a larger dataset before being used for any clinical purposes. As a part of our future study, we plan to explore deep-learning approaches for ADHD detection. Furthermore, we would like to explore Gabor filters for applications such as the classification of sleep stages and schizophrenia detection, which involves the classification of EEG signals.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="data-availability" id="sec13">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="author-contributions" id="sec14">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>ES: Writing &#x2013; original draft, Visualization, Validation, Software, Methodology, Investigation, Data curation, Conceptualization, Funding acquisition. TR: Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Formal analysis. TK: Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing, Supervision, Investigation, Formal analysis.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec sec-type="funding-information" id="sec15">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. The work presented in this article is funded by Vellore Institute of Technology, Chennai, India.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="COI-statement" id="sec16">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec100" sec-type="disclaimer">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="ref1">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Alim</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Imtiaz</surname> <given-names>M. H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Automatic identification of children with ADHD from EEG brain waves</article-title>. <source>Signals</source> <volume>4</volume>, <fpage>193</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>205</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/signals4010010</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref2">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Allahverdy</surname> <given-names>A. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Moghadam</surname> <given-names>M. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mohammadi</surname>
</name> <name><surname>Nasrabadi</surname> <given-names>A. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Detecting ADHD children using the attention continuity as nonlinear feature of EEG</article-title>. <source>Front. Biomed. Technol.</source> <volume>3</volume>, <fpage>28</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>33</lpage>. Accessed: Dec. 13, 2023. [Online]. Available at: <ext-link xlink:href="https://fbt.tums.ac.ir/index.php/fbt/article/view/135" ext-link-type="uri">https://fbt.tums.ac.ir/index.php/fbt/article/view/135</ext-link></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref3">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Alt&#x0131;nkaynak</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dolu</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>G&#x00FC;ven</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pekta&#x015F;</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>&#x00D6;zmen</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Demirci</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Diagnosis of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder with combined time and frequency features</article-title>. <source>Biocybernet. Biomed. Eng.</source> <volume>40</volume>, <fpage>927</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>937</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.bbe.2020.04.006</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref4">
<citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><collab id="coll1">American Psychiatric Association</collab></person-group>, <source>DSM-5 TM guidebook the essential companion to the diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, fifth edition</source>, <edition>5th ed.</edition> <publisher-loc>Washington</publisher-loc>, <publisher-name>DC American Psychiatric Publishing</publisher-name> (<year>2013</year>).</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref5">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Barshooi</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Amirkhani</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>A novel data augmentation based on Gabor filter and convolutional deep learning for improving the classification of COVID-19 chest X-ray images</article-title>. <source>Biomed. Signal Proc. Control</source> <volume>72</volume>:<fpage>103326</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.bspc.2021.103326</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34777557</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref6">
<citation citation-type="other"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Castro-Ospina</surname> <given-names>Andr&#x00E9;s Eduardo</given-names></name> <name><surname>Duque-Mu&#x00F1;oz</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Castellanos-Dom&#x00ED;nguez</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). &#x201C;<source>P300 analysis based on time frequency decomposition methods for adhd discrimination in child population</source>&#x201D;. <publisher-name>IEEE</publisher-name>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref7">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Song</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>EEG characteristics of children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder</article-title>. <source>Neuroscience</source> <volume>406</volume>, <fpage>444</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>456</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.neuroscience.2019.03.048</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref8">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chow</surname> <given-names>J. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ouyang</surname> <given-names>C.-S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chiang</surname> <given-names>C.-T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>R.-C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>R.-C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>H.-C.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Novel method using Hjorth mobility analysis for diagnosing attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder in girls</article-title>. <source>Brain Dev.</source> <volume>41</volume>, <fpage>334</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>340</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.braindev.2018.11.006</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30473392</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref9">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ekhlasi</surname> <given-names>A. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Motie Nasrabadi</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mohammadi</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Classification of the children with ADHD and healthy children based on the directed phase transfer entropy of EEG signals</article-title>. <source>Front. Biomed. Technol.</source> <volume>8</volume>, <fpage>115</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>122</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18502/fbt.v8i2.6515</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref10">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gabor</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>1946</year>). <article-title>Theory of communication. Part 3: frequency compression and expansion</article-title>. <source>J. Inst. Electr. Eng.</source> <volume>93</volume>, <fpage>445</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>457</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1049/ji-3-2.1946.0076</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref11">
<citation citation-type="other"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gonz&#x00E1;lez</surname> <given-names>L. M.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). &#x201C;<article-title>Attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder classification with EEG and machine learning</article-title>&#x201D; in <source>Biosignal processing and classification using computational learning and intelligence</source>. <publisher-name>Elsevier</publisher-name>, <fpage>447</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>469</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref12">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hamedi</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Khadem</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Delrobaei</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Babajani-Feremi</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Detecting ADHD based on brain functional connectivity using resting-state MEG signals</article-title>. <source>Front. Biomed. Technol.</source> <volume>9</volume>, <fpage>110</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>118</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18502/fbt.v9i2.8850</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref13">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hammouche</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Attia</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Akhrouf</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Akhtar</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Gabor filter bank with deep autoencoder based face recognition system</article-title>. <source>Expert Syst. Appl.</source> <volume>197</volume>:<fpage>116743</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.eswa.2022.116743</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref14">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hu</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hu</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Multi-modality medical image fusion based on separable dictionary learning and Gabor filtering</article-title>. <source>Signal Process. Image Commun.</source> <volume>83</volume>:<fpage>115758</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.image.2019.115758</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref15">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Joy</surname> <given-names>R. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>George</surname> <given-names>S. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rajan</surname> <given-names>A. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Subathra</surname> <given-names>M. S. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sairamya</surname> <given-names>N. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Prasanna</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Detection and classification of ADHD from EEG signals using Tunable Q-factor wavelet transform</article-title>. <source>Nonlin. Biomed. Phys.</source> <volume>2022</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>17</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1155/2022/3590973</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref16">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kaur</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Arun</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kaur</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bajaj</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Phase space reconstruction of EEG signals for classification of ADHD and control adults</article-title>. <source>Clin. EEG Neurosci.</source> <volume>51</volume>, <fpage>102</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>113</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1177/1550059419876525</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31533446</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref17">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Khaleghi</surname> <given-names>P. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Birgani</surname> <given-names>M. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fooladi</surname> <given-names>M. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mohammadi</surname> <given-names>M. R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Applicable features of electroencephalogram for ADHD diagnosis</article-title>. <source>Res. Biomed. Eng.</source> <volume>36</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>11</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s42600-019-00036-9</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref18">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Khalifa</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zaher</surname> <given-names>N. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Abdallah</surname> <given-names>A. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fakhr</surname> <given-names>M. W.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Convolutional neural network based on diverse Gabor filters for deepfake recognition</article-title>. <source>IEEE Access</source> <volume>10</volume>, <fpage>22678</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>22686</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1109/access.2022.3152029</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref19">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Khare</surname> <given-names>S. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Acharya</surname> <given-names>U. R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>An explainable and interpretable model for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children using EEG signals</article-title>. <source>Comput. Biol. Med.</source> <volume>155</volume>:<fpage>106676</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.106676</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">36827785</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref20">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Khare</surname> <given-names>S. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bajaj</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>A facile and flexible motor imagery classification using electroencephalogram signals</article-title>. <source>Comput. Methods Prog. Biomed.</source> <volume>197</volume>:<fpage>105722</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105722</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32862028</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref21">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Baek</surname> <given-names>J. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kwon</surname> <given-names>Y. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>H. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yoo</surname> <given-names>J. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shim</surname> <given-names>S. H.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Machine-learning-based diagnosis of drug-naive adult patients with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder using mismatch negativity</article-title>. <source>Transl. Psychiatry</source> <volume>11</volume>:<fpage>484</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41398-021-01604-3</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34537812</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref22">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kumar</surname> <given-names>T. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kanhangad</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Gabor filter-based one-dimensional local phase descriptors for obstructive sleep Apnea detection using single-Lead ECG</article-title>. <source>IEEE Sensors Letters</source> <volume>2</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>4</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1109/lsens.2018.2807584</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref23">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kumar</surname> <given-names>T. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kanhangad</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pachori</surname> <given-names>R. B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Classification of seizure and seizure-free EEG signals using local binary patterns</article-title>. <source>Biomed. Signal Proc. Control</source> <volume>15</volume>, <fpage>33</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>40</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.bspc.2014.08.014</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref24">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Maniruzzaman</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mehedi</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Asai</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shin</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Optimal channels and features selection based ADHD detection from EEG signal using statistical and machine learning techniques</article-title>. <source>IEEE Access</source> <volume>11</volume>, <fpage>33570</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>33583</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1109/access.2023.3264266</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref25">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Maniruzzaman</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shin</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>al Mehedi Hasan</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yasumura</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Efficient feature selection and machine learning based ADHD detection using EEG signal</article-title>. <source>Comput. Mat. Continua</source> <volume>72</volume>, <fpage>5179</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>5195</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.32604/cmc.2022.028339</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref26">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mueller</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Candrian</surname> <given-names>J. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kropotov</surname> <given-names>V. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ponomarev</surname> <given-names>V. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Baschera</surname> <given-names>G. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Classification of ADHD patients on the basis of independent ERP components using a machine learning system</article-title>. <source>Nonlin. Biomed. Phys.</source> <volume>4</volume>:<fpage>S1</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/1753-4631-4-s1-s1</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20522259</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref27">
<citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Nasrabadi</surname> <given-names>A. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Allahverdy</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Samavati</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mohammadi</surname> <given-names>M. R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <source>EEG data for ADHD/control children</source> <publisher-name>IEEE Dataport</publisher-name>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref28">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Oppong</surname> <given-names>S. O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Twum</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hayfron-Acquah</surname> <given-names>J. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Missah</surname> <given-names>Y. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>A novel computer vision model for medicinal plant identification using log-Gabor filters and deep learning algorithms</article-title>. <source>Comput. Intell. Neurosci.</source> <volume>2022</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>21</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1155/2022/1189509</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">36203732</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref29">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>&#x00D6;ztoprak</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Toycan</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Alp</surname> <given-names>Y. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ar&#x0131;kan</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Do&#x011F;utepe</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Karaka&#x015F;</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Machine-based classification of ADHD and nonADHD participants using time/frequency features of event-related neuroelectric activity</article-title>. <source>Clin. Neurophysiol.</source> <volume>128</volume>, <fpage>2400</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2410</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.clinph.2017.09.105</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29096213</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref30">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Parashar</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kalra</surname> <given-names>J. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kumar Goyal</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Machine learning based framework for classification of children with ADHD and healthy controls</article-title>. <source>Intel. Autom. Soft Comput.</source> <volume>28</volume>, <fpage>669</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>682</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.32604/iasc.2021.017478</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref31">
<citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rangarajan</surname> <given-names>S. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mahanand</surname> <given-names>B. S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <source>Identification of potential biomarkers in the hippocampus region for the diagnosis of ADHD using PBL-McRBFN approach</source>. <publisher-loc>Singapore</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>DR-NTU (Nanyang Technological University)</publisher-name>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref32">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Samiee</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kov&#x00E1;cs</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gabbouj</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Epileptic seizure detection in long-term EEG records using sparse rational decomposition and local Gabor binary patterns feature extraction</article-title>. <source>Knowl.-Based Syst.</source> <volume>118</volume>, <fpage>228</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>240</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.knosys.2016.11.023</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref33">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Song</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zha</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rudan</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>The prevalence of adult attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: a global systematic review and meta-analysis</article-title>. <source>J. Glob. Health</source> <volume>11</volume>:<fpage>4009</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7189/jogh.11.04009</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref34">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sunil Kumar</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kanhangad</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Detection of electrocardiographic changes in partial epileptic patients using local binary pattern based composite feature</article-title>. <source>Australas. Phys. Eng. Sci. Med.</source> <volume>41</volume>, <fpage>209</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>216</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s13246-017-0605-8</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29189968</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref35">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>TaghiBeyglou</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shahbazi</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bagheri</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Akbarian</surname>
</name> <name><surname>Jahed</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Detection of ADHD cases using CNN and classical classifiers of raw EEG</article-title>. <source>Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. Update</source> <volume>2</volume>:<fpage>100080</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cmpbup.2022.100080</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref36">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tor</surname> <given-names>H. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ooi</surname> <given-names>C. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lim-Ashworth</surname> <given-names>N. S. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wei</surname> <given-names>J. K. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jahmunah</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Oh</surname> <given-names>S. L.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Automated detection of conduct disorder and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder using decomposition and nonlinear techniques with EEG signals</article-title>. <source>Comput. Methods Prog. Biomed.</source> <volume>200</volume>:<fpage>105941</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cmpb.2021.105941</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33486340</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref37">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Strathearn</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bao</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Twenty-year trends in diagnosed attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder among US children and adolescents, 1997-2016</article-title>. <source>JAMA Netw. Open</source> <volume>1</volume>:<fpage>e181471</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.1471</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30646132</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref38">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zou</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Classification of children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and typically developing children based on electroencephalogram principal component analysis and k-nearest neighbor</article-title>. <source>Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi</source> <volume>33</volume>, <fpage>232</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>238</lpage>. Accessed: Jan. 12, 2024. [Online]. Available at: <ext-link xlink:href="https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29708321/" ext-link-type="uri">https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29708321/</ext-link></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="ref39">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lin</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gui</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lu</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Multimodal MR images-based diagnosis of early adolescent attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder using multiple kernel learning</article-title>. <source>Front. Neurosci.</source> <volume>15</volume>:<fpage>133</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fnins.2021.710133</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34594183</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>