In the last few decades, motor behavior and sport psychology literature have extensively examined sport expertise’s definition and identification. This concept has been defined in multiple ways, primarily focusing on either a naturalistic approach aimed on talent identification or an environmental approach, looking at practice as the primary vehicle to reach higher levels of expertise (Janelle and Hillman, 2003). Recently, a more “interactionist” approach to look at expertise has been advanced. Although recognizing the relevance of practice, this approach considers hereditary factors, individual differences, genetic characteristics, and especially motor and sensory function that potentially limit the level of acquirable expertise (Janelle and Hillman, 2003).

Researchers have investigated optimal visuomotor strategies utilized by experts in self-paced (Janelle and Hillman, 2003), and externally paced tasks (Murray and Hunfalvay, 2017; Hunfalvay and Murray, 2018) consistently concluding how specific visuomotor strategies mark skilled behaviors; however, few studies have described the relationship between player performance and visual motor control. Previous research that relates baseball performance with eye-tracking has found that professionals with better eye tracking are less likely to swing at pitches inside and outside the strike zone (Laby et al., 2019; Liu et al., 2020a). The fewer swings at pitches inside the strike zone imply that individuals with better visual abilities are more discerning in their swings (Liu et al., 2020a). Eye-tracking skills are noticeably better in the Major League Baseball players, demonstrated by general oculomotor speed being a significant predictor of league level in baseball (Liu et al., 2020a). Research has also shown significant differences in other eye-tracking abilities, including cardinal gaze between professional baseball players versus amateurs and non-athletes (Kubitz et al., 2020). Furthermore, there are several recent reviews of visual-motor control in baseball. For example, Toole and Fogt (2021) described the relatively consistent pattern of horizontal head and eye tracking movements in baseball batting until an anticipatory saccade occurs. As such visual-motor control is a significant factor in batting performance. Although batting performance is due to factors within perception-action coupling such as perceptual knowledge, attentional mechanisms, cognitive control, and motor function, and while under some debate, recent work has also demonstrated the importance of visual-motor assessment and training in high-level sport. Likewise, superior visual abilities are found among many high-level athletes. Laby and Appelbaum (2021) provide an extensive review on the association of visual-motor control and athletic performance and describe the potential value of sports vision training.

Although there is a growing effort in baseball to understand visual-motor control; few studies have examined these variables in cricket. Early work by Land and McLeod (2000) related cricket players’ performance and visual-motor control by tracking the eyes of batsmen as a bowler pitches them a ball. The better the individual was at the sport, the quicker the athlete used anticipatory saccades to shift their eyes to where the ball would bounce (Land and McLeod, 2000). The low-level club cricket player tested was either slower to initiate a saccade or did not use a saccade at all when tracking the ball. It was determined that the speed and variability in the timing of the initial saccade are related to batting performance.

Few definitions have been presented in previous literature to define expertise in the sport of cricket. Recently, several researchers have advanced methods to improve the evaluation of cricket skills. Studies have analyzed past performances to predict future outcomes, including a model that correctly predicts 71% of test cricket outcomes. Brooks et al. (2002) used data from 1994 to 1999 to create an ordered response model that can predict a match loss correctly 81% of the time, compared to predicting a match draw 57% of the time. The data used includes performance and strike rate for both batting and bowling coefficients. These investigators then ran through which predictions the model failed and found that different locations were more predictable than others, as Sri Lanka has a higher tendency to be involved in predictable matches. In contrast, Pakistan was less likely to be predicted correctly. The study found that there are five different styles of predicting outcomes. Each style describes one country, and some represent a second country to a lesser extent. The authors specified the predictability for each country studied and identified poor predictors of which the three most common are unsuccessful last innings runs chase; successful last innings runs chase, and weather-affected matches.

In 2003, a new, shorter version of cricket was introduced, labeled Twenty20 (T20). Since its inception, T20 cricket has rapidly become the most lucrative and desirable format of the game (Irvine and Kennedy, 2017). Due to the increasing popularity of the sport, there has been a wave of new research investigating successful tactics and strategies to facilitate perform better. The total number of dot balls bowled, the total number of wickets taken, and the innings run rate were the most significant indicators of success (Irvine and Kennedy, 2017). The findings show that batting sides should look to maximize their run rate per over throughout the entire inning, emphasizing selecting a batsman with high strike rates and supporting the notion of batting index (average + strike rate). These indicators of success remain consistent across different cricketing environments, with scoring and batting generally higher in sub-continent conditions.

Sharma (2012) also examined performance in T20 by conducting a factor analysis to determine if batting capability is superior to bowling capability. Sharma examined 85 batters and 85 bowlers from the Indian Premier League (IPL) with the following statistics for the batters: individual score, average batting performance, strike rate, numbers of fours and sixes, and for bowlers: economy rate (ECON), bowling average, and bowling strike rate. The study found that the variance explained by batting was 48.51%, and the variance explained by bowling was 20.23%. The variance of batting being much higher than the variance of bowling proves the higher importance of batting to bowling in T20 cricket (Sharma, 2012). While these statistics demonstrated differences between expertise, it can be challenging to differentiate the individual and team success. Manage, Scariano, and Hallum (Manage et al., 2013) analyzed the T20-World Cup Cricket 2012 data with a multivariate statistical analysis to rank the batsmen. The investigators used innings, runs, average, and strike rate to determine a point system, called MR points, to quantify contributions of cricket batters. The investigators compared matches, wickets, average, and ECON for bowlers to determine their MR points. Also, the authors calculated the players’ FPC rank, consisting of overs, wickets, average, ECON, and strike rate. The findings found that the MR method and FPC method had 8 of the top 10 batters and 8 out of the top 10 bowlers the same, showing that the FPC method is a transparent and straightforward way to evaluate cricket players with results comparable to previous methods.

Although several studies have examined visual behavior and baseball performance, few have examined Cricket performance, especially considering the recent advances in performance metrics. In addition, there is little research conducted specifically on the oculomotor control of professional athletes. Further investigation is also necessary to challenge the long-standing hypothesis that professional athletes lack superior visual behavior and that performance is solely related to relevant skill acquisition. Therefore, the primary purpose of this study was to determine if a series of oculomotor measures can predict batting and bowling performance in professional cricket players.

The interceptive task of hitting in cricket is a strikingly challenging task. This alone presents a level of difficulty that would surpass the coordination skills of many individuals. Vision training in other sports such as baseball has decreased the required reaction time for success and correlates to increased hitting performance (Kohmura and Yoshigi, 2004; Maman et al., 2011; Clark et al., 2012). However, as vision training is contemporary, its relationship to sports performance is still controversial (Knudson and Kluka, 1997; Wood and Abernethy, 1997; Khanal, 2015). The primary purpose of this study was to determine if a series of oculomotor performance can predict batting and bowling performance in professional cricket players. Results demonstrate that several oculomotor eye-tracking measures were good predictors of run performance and strike rate. In particular, batsman with better oculomotor function and oculomotor mechanics tended to have higher run scores and higher strike rate. These results support the hypothesis that better oculomotor skills predict better batsman performance. Likewise, several of the same metrics predicted Runs and Wicket performance for bowlers. Specifically, we found that brain overall score, brain pursuits percentile, and brain saccades percentile were predictors of Runs performance, and similarly, these measures were predictors of Wicket. Successful bowlers integrate sensory and motor functions, including proper mechanics and visual control to a target location. Combined, this represents a critical link between oculomotor behavior and motor performance.

Similar to Liu et al. (2020a), the present study demonstrates that oculomotor function is related to cricket performance. Most interestingly, eye tracking measures that indicate fundamental health (functional) and motor and nerve coordination (mechanics) have predictive potential to strike rate and runs (R² = 0.85). On-Field score, which includes reactivity, impulsivity and distractibility, and saccadic behavior, also demonstrated high predictive value for batting performance. These findings align well with multiple studies that have correlated better batting performance with earlier longer and more anticipatory saccade movements (Land and McLeod, 2000; Mann et al., 2013). For example, Kruger et al. (2010) found that training higher-level cricket players’ eyes lead to significant improvement in advanced ball skills, pursuit eye movements, eye tracking, visual anticipation, accuracy, and more. Finding the eye movement characteristics that help improve hitting success in players can lead to development/training programs that will enhance gaze pattern abilities in cricket players. Breaking down the many components of gaze patterns and finding the ones that influence hitting success is vital in creating a gaze pattern development or training program focused on improving hitting. In baseball, recent research has found visual acuity differences between baseball players and non-baseball players at the youth level (Boden et al., 2009). Also, studies have shown that functional factors, such as dynamic visual acuity (DVA), develop with age in both males and females (Kohmura et al., 2008). While there are already physical training programs aimed toward youth athletes (Szymanski, 2013), functional vision training programs could be implemented at the youth level to create future success. Boden et al. (2009) found that youth baseball and softball players had better static stereo acuity than non-ball players. Their finding suggests that visual differences can be seen at an early playing age, and it may be due to the visual requirements needed to be successful in hitting a moving ball. Vision training programs have been utilized to enhance stereopsis and sensorimotor abilities in baseball/softball settings (Clark et al., 2015; Appelbaum et al., 2016). DVA training programs have been used at the college level with some success (Kohmura and Yoshigi, 2004; Clark et al., 2012; Deveau et al., 2014). For example, Clark et al. (2015) implemented standard vision training exercises with a university baseball team for 2 years and found that the team improved their hitting statistics overall year over year. In addition, more recent studies using pre-post treatment-control designs have demonstrated increased performance following perceptual–cognitive skills training. Gray (2017) demonstrated positive transfer of training in pitch recognition within a virtual environment (VE). Specifically, Gray examined 4 different training protocols, including a control group, and found that the adaptive VE training group (increased challenged with correct responses) had significantly better batting performance than other conditions. Similarly, Liu et al. (2020b), in a placebo-controlled trial with a modified perceptual training framework, demonstrated that dynamic vision training had positive transfer to sport-specific batting practice performance, however, noted that there was not yet transfer to game performance. Along with Lui et al’s work, Gray, and this current study lead to the potential of perceptual–cognitive skills training and transfer to game performance.

The aims of this study were to examine the relationship between eye movement patterns and batting and bowling performance in cricket. The results demonstrated that several oculomotor eye-tracking measures were good predictors of batting and bowling performance in cricket. Additional research is needed to provide a more thorough understanding of the relationship between oculomotor function and performance and develop effective training methods that improve these swing qualities, which are indicative of skill level and success rates.

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by the East Carolina University IRB. The patients/participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.

All authors contributed to report writing, data analysis, and data collection.

MH is the Chief Science Officer & Co-Founder of RightEye, LLC. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.