AUTHOR=Bazan Ariane , Kushwaha Ramesh , Winer E. Samuel , Snodgrass J. Michael , Brakel Linda A. W. , Shevrin Howard 

TITLE=Phonological Ambiguity Detection Outside of Consciousness and Its Defensive Avoidance

JOURNAL=Frontiers in Human Neuroscience

VOLUME=Volume 13 - 2019

YEAR=2019

URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/human-neuroscience/articles/10.3389/fnhum.2019.00077

DOI=10.3389/fnhum.2019.00077

ISSN=1662-5161

ABSTRACT=Freud proposes that in unconscious processing, logical connections are also (heavily) based upon phonological similarities. Repressed concerns, for example, would express themselves by way of phonologic ambiguity. In order to investigate a possible unconscious influence of phonological similarity, 31 participants were submitted to a tachistoscopic subliminal priming experiment, with prime and target presented at 1 msec. In the experimental condition, the prime and one of the targets were phonological reverses though graphemically dissimilar (e.g. “nice” and “sign”); in the control condition the targets were pseudo-randomly attributed to primes to which they don’t belong. The experimental task was to “blindly” pick the choice most similar to the prime. ERPs were measured with a focus on the N320, which is known to react selectively to phonological mismatch in supraliminal visual word presentations. The N320 amplitude-effects at the electrodes on the midline and at the left of the brain significantly predicted the participants’ net behavioural choices more than half a second later, while their subjective experience is one of complete arbitrariness. Moreover, the social desirability score (SDS) significantly correlates with both the behavioural and the N320 brain responses of the participants. It is proposed that in participants with low SDS the phonological target induces a normal reduction of N320 as compared to control that increases their probability to pick this target, while high defensive participants have a perplexed brain reaction upon the phonological target with a negatively peaking N320 as compared to control that more often leads them to avoid this target. Social desirability, which is understood as reflecting defensiveness, might also manifest itself as a defence against the (energy-consuming) ambiguity of language. The specificity of this study is that all of this is happening totally out of awareness and at the level of very elementary linguistic distinctions.