Although the Constitution grants citizens the right to free and equitable health care, there are gaps of coverage (21, 24). Historically, health coverage in Greece has been linked to employment status through mandatory social insurance (guaranteeing access to all services provided within the public system) and to Greek/European Union citizenship (permitting access to some public services including primary and outpatient care) (10, 25, 26). This way, a disparity of coverage existed for vulnerable groups, such as uninsured citizens and refugees (27). In 2016, this was partially addressed by Law 4368, which extended access to ESY-operated services to those groups through an unemployment reserve, even though public services contracted from private entities remained excluded from this provision (28). On the practical level, there remain obstacles hindering access to health services for subgroups of the population (22, 26). Primarily stemming from inadequate funding for the ESY, they include insufficient availability of public services, a significant load of out-of-pocket payments for services contracted from the private sector, and suboptimal reimbursement arrangements (29–31). According to an European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies (OECD) (32) report, 56% of people in Greece were unsatisfied with coverage of health care services and 57,3% reported unmet long-term care needs.

The National Health System (ESY) is financed with a mix of public and private resources, and a considerable parcel is sourced from user fees (22, 33). Public financing originates from contributions to the Social Health Insurance (SHI) and taxation revenues (10, 34). The EFKA (Ενιαίος Φορέας Κοινωνικής Ασφάλισης, meaning Single Social Security Fund) collects insurance contributions from employees and employers (including the state), allocating 7.1% of its income to EOPYY (the National Organization for the Provision of Health Services). The EOPYY acts as the exclusive purchaser of services in ESY and was established to unify previous healthcare insurance funds (35). The Ministry of Finance manages the funds, covering EOPYY deficits with the state budget. Over the years, Greece has consistently allocated a lower proportion of public funding to healthcare compared to the EU average, particularly in the aftermath of the financial crisis. In 2021, Greece's per capita healthcare expenditure was less than half of the EU average for that year (36).

Private expenditure is a major financing source, corresponding to up to 41% of investments in health (10, 29, 30, 32). It encompasses user fees for public services provided by private operators, cost-sharing arrangements for services and medications, out-of-pocket payments (OOP) for services outside the public system, and private insurance. There are reimbursable schemes for private services contracted by EOPYY, meaning users pay upfront and are eligible for a partial or total refund. There are some reports of hidden payments for privileged access to public services, which may amount to a considerable quarter of all private expenditure (30, 37).

Health services covered by the EOPYY are defined by The Integrated Health Care Regulation (EKPY), which specifies coverage, duration, and user charges for public-run and private-contracted services (10). It includes inpatient care, outpatient care, diagnostic procedures, therapeutic procedures (physical therapy, psychotherapy, speech therapy, occupational therapy, special education therapy), pharmaceutical care, dental care, obstetric care, and childbirth allowance. Table 1 summarizes user costs for services provided within ESY.

The Hellenic Republic is a unitary state divided in thirteen regions and seven decentralized administrations. Although not exactly matching the administrative division in terms of geographical area, there are also seven regional health authorities (YPEs) for governing health care (see Figure 2) (39). Governance operates at three levels with shared responsibilities: the central government (Ministry of Health), the regional health authorities (YPEs), and municipal authorities (10). In practice, central governance concentrates the majority of attributions (40). While recent legislation transferred the organization of the primary care networks to regional and municipal authorities, their role remained limited, with most facilities still run by the Ministry of Health (41).

The ESY is defined as a primary care-oriented system. Nevertheless, to date, it does not operate in a community-oriented network of services, missing key elements such a dimensional, stepped-care approach, coordination of services, and focus on primary care and promotion (22, 41). Irrespective of location, patients can directly access health units aimed at primary and specialized care (10). Assistance is centered around specialists and hospitals, and there is no coordination across services or an unified register system (41, 42). There are only 1,200 general practitioners in the country, while a workforce of 5,000 professionals would be necessary to meet populational demands (41). Consequent to a lack of articulation and underfunding of public services, there are lengthy waiting lists for specialist consultations, resulting in an increased burden of out-of-pocket expenses for private alternative services. This process has been described as a passive privatization of the health sector (10, 43).

Over the past decade, legislation established a framework for primary care, yet there were barriers to its implementation (26, 44). The 2014 Law 4238 created the National Primary Healthcare Network (PEDY), a sectorized system that integrated clinics from Social Health Insurance, health centers, and contracted physicians (45). Following European Union recommendations, the 2017 Law 4486 further established two primary care structures: as a first tier, the Local Health Units (Topikes Monades Ygeias, TOMYs) would be located in neighborhoods to be the initial point of contact with the system, acting as gatekeeper and coordinator of care (41, 46). The next tier would be composed of Health Centers and PEDY units, managing conditions of increased complexity and also referring cases to specialized or tertiary services. However, there was an insufficient number of facilities and staff to widespread coverage, with reports of waiting times of up to three months before a primary care appointment (3).

In 2024, the Ministry of Health introduced a new plan to strengthen primary health care (47). It involves hiring 1375 primary care professionals and realigning the role of general practitioners to focus on promotion and prevention, management of chronic diseases, and improving health literacy. Additionally, the plan includes establishing seven to eight University Health Centers attached to Medical Faculties. These centers will be staffed by multiple primary care specialists, including two internal medicine/general medicine physicians (one specializing in emergency and the other in preventing cardiovascular diseases), one pediatrician (specializing in diabetes mellitus and obesity), and one psychologist with emphasis in Health Psychology. The centers will also offer telemedicine to outreach distant regions.

In line with the global context, Greece has undertaken reforms aimed at replacing asylum institutions with a community-oriented mental health system (see Table 2 for legislative milestones) (48, 49). Changes can be traced back to the early 1980s, when the provision relied on secluded psychiatric hospitals. This was also the period of democratization in the country, with reflections on healthcare paradigms towards inclusive access and biopsychosocial approaches. In 1983, the National Health System Law 1397 set the stage for universal coverage and public provision of health services, also establishing the first Mental Health Centers (50). A starting point for the reform came about due to concerns at the Leros Mental Hospital, an overcrowded asylum-hospital in the island of Leros (51). The appalling conditions and severe violations prompted action from healthcare professionals and public authorities, leading to the 1984 European Community Regulation 815, which provided financial and technical support for the transition from asylum-hospitals to community-oriented services in Greece (52). Later on, the 1992 Law 2071 on the “Modernization and Organization of the Health System” further protected humaning rights with provisions for voluntary and involuntary hospitalization (53).

In 1997, Greece unveiled Psychargos, the National Mental Health Plan aimed at deinstitutionalizing mental health services and transitioning towards community-based care (54). Focusing on human rights, mental health promotion, prevention, and rehabilitation, the 10-year plan was divided in phase I and II, each covering half a decade and achieving significant transformation. In 1999, the Law 2716 enacted the legal framework for the reform, legislating a community-based organization for services, the strengthening of primary and ambulatory care, and the closure of psychiatric hospitals (55). Importantly, it also introduced specialized mental health services to the elderly and to children/adolescents. Following this resolution, many asylums were substituted by an emerging infrastructure of mental health centers, day care units, child guidance services, psychiatric beds in general hospitals, open sheltered apartments, and rehabilitation units (48); a remarkable achievement was the closure of the asylum-like institution “Children”s Psychiatric Hospital of Attica”, which was in operation since 1960, transferring its departments to four general and pediatric hospitals (56). By 2002, sectorization had been successfully implemented, encompassing seven health regions and 37 mental health sectors (54).

In spite of achievements, barriers persist for fully accomplishing the objectives of the reform, including a lack of coordination across levels of care and a shortage of services and professionals, particularly in remote areas (see Figure 2, Table 3 and Table 4) (3, 62, 63). Over the last decades, successive initiatives have been established for solidifying the mental health care system and provision. In 2011, the Psychargos III was launched as a ten-year plan to strengthen the structure of community-based services, especially in undersupplied areas, organizing and monitoring the provision of services, supervising professional training and activities, and establishing promotion and prevention programs (64). In 2017, Law 4461 established scientific and administrative committees, councils, and coordination bodies at regional and sectoral levels, also enacting resolutions for enhancing community participation in mental health policies (65). In 2019, Law 2289 defined the organization of Community Child and Adolescent Mental Health Centers, providing universal access to comprehensive psychosocial care at public structures, also referring to the importance of coordination and continuity in care (66).

In 2020, the Ministry of Health appointed a deputy minister with exclusive responsibility for mental health, defining a comprehensive agenda for advancement (3). In February 2023, a new National Action Plan for Mental Health was released (67). Priorities include closing remaining long-term facilities and reforming forensic services and further expanding the community-based network, especially in regards to sectorization and integration with primary care; a goal was also set for reducing involuntary admissions to European Union standards. For promotion/prevention, it includes programs for workers’ mental health, anti-stigma campaigns, and integration of people with mental health disorders into the labor market. For special populations, the agenda involves a network of mental health services for children and adolescents, particularly the ones facing developmental conditions. A new legislation is also planned to reform the administration of mental health services, but it has not yet been finalized to be voted on in the Greek Parliament (68, 69). As revealed, a National Network of the Mental Health Services (Ε.Δ.Υ.Ψ.Υ.) will include all public and private mental health services, being divided into Regional Networks under the administration of the Deputy Manager of each YPE. The plan will establish a new National Organization for the Prevention and Management of Addictions including all related services operating across the country.

An overview of the current state of the mental healthcare system is provided by a 2021 joint assessment by the Deputy Ministry and the World Health Organization (WHO) (3). The report examined governance, organizational structure, service delivery, financial resources, and the workforce. Long-known issues were underscored, particularly the low availability and inequitable distribution of services and human resources, insufficient funding, and lack of coordination across different points of the system. Additionally, the report highlighted the absence of effective methods for monitoring performance, which were suggested as pivotal to establish funding mechanisms and directing payments. Tackling the need for distributing services according to community needs, the report recommended an assertive position from the Ministry of Health, as the primary funder of both public and private services, on determining where services should operate. It also highlighted the need for developing clinical protocols and care pathways tailored to individuals with mild, moderate, and severe mental health conditions, as well as prevention and promotion programs.

The Greek mental health system is integrated into the broader healthcare system, with public health facilities managed by ESY, university hospitals hosted in ESY (except two in Athens under the jurisdiction of the Ministry of Education), private providers contracted by ESY, and private services directly contracted by users; all such facilities are subject to regulation by the Ministry of Health (3, 10). Additionally, the school system provides psychoeducational services focused on learning disorders (see next section). There are also mental health facilities administered by the Ministry of Defence, and forensic services operated by the Ministry of Justice, although they are not dedicated to children/adolescents. Philanthropic and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and also participate in the mental health system, primarily operating residential-type facilities. For regionalization, a specific framework was created for mental health, with municipalities covered by Mental Health Sectors for adults (Τ.Ο.Ψ.Υ.) and for children/adolescents (Τ.Ο.Ψ.Υ.Π.Ε.) which operate under the seven YPEs through the Regional Administration of Mental Health Sectors (Πε.Δι.Τ.Ο.Ψ.Υ.) (39). In 2019, a ministerial decision established the current division of 17 child and adolescent mental health sectors (56, 65, 70).

Within this system, there are services spanning different levels of care, including special units of community services and residential assistance (see Figure 1) (3). Child and adolescent mental health services are integrated into this structure and can be found in inpatient and outpatient departments within the ESY and universities, community services, and also provided by NGOs and private mental health professionals. There are specialized units for children and adolescents or for autism/learning disorders, as well as general facilities that cater to children and adolescents (for instance, a few Mental Health Centers for Adults may include a child psychiatrist) (see Figure 1 and Table 3). Within primary care, pediatricians should be the main provider for this population, yet pediatric assistance is frequently sought in the private system and usually does not involve mental health assistance (41).

Some particular components of community mental health services are the Community Centers for Mental Health of Children and Adolescents (KOKEPSYPEs), the Hellenic Centers for Mental Health and Research (EKEPSYE), and the Mobile Mental Health Units (MMHU). The KOKEPSYPEs, formerly known as IPDs or Medical-Pedagogical Centers, are vinculated to existing mental health facilities in the ESY and address mental health and neurodevelopmental disorders (66). These units offer comprehensive psychiatric and psychological assessment, medication treatment, psychotherapy, psychosocial support, speech and occupational therapies, and special education services, being also responsible for community outreach as delivering psychoeducation/awareness programs in coordination with school institutions. For a catchment area of 250.000 population, a KOKEPSYPE should be minimally formed by four child/adolescent psychiatrists, three psychologists, three social workers, two occupation therapists, two health visitors (or community health agents), two speech therapists, one special educators, and administrative and general duties staff. For its turn, the EKEPSYEs are private organizations with several outpatient and rehabilitation units across the country, providing community services for small fees (approximately 2.50 euros for an appointment, and free-of-charge in cases of severe financial vulnerability) (71, 72). EKEPSYE units are supervised and funded by the Ministry of Health, and a plan was released in 2019 for increasing EKEPSYEs provision of child and adolescent mental health in rural areas of Greece, yet to date this was not implemented.

The MMHUs are designed to offer community-oriented care in rural/underserved areas, including early diagnosis and intervention, home care and crisis management, rehabilitation, family support, and anti-stigma programs (73, 74). They can be operated by public and university hospitals and non-profit NGOs, being composed of multidisciplinary teams with at least a psychiatrist, a psychologist, three nurses and/or health visitors, and administrative staff. In case of providing care to under 18 years-old, the team should include a child and adolescent psychiatrist. Services may be delivered either at patients' homes (with a MMHU car without logos of the organization) or at facilities provided by local authorities (such as health centers, rural clinics, schools, and other public buildings). For using existing infrastructure, MMHUs are considered low-cost services, and assessments indicate their effectiveness on reducing acute admissions (75). However, they face challenges related to understaffing and low-retention of personnel, particularly for MMHUs operated by public hospitals.

Existing upon the ESY framework, the mental health structure is under similar constraints in availability, regionalization, and coordination, with system inefficiencies resulting in prolonged wait times and pushing individuals towards out-of-pocket care (3, 10, 76). Mental health services were instituted based on the availability of private providers rather than community needs, then clustering in some specific urban areas and leaving peripheral areas unassisted; many YPEs do not count on inpatient units, so children need to be hospitalized in facilities far away from their homes (56, 63). While primary care should address mild to moderate mental health problems, in practice primary care providers are not involved in mental health care, lacking incentives and training for addressing this need (3). There is no gatekeeping mechanism and users tend to directly seek specialized providers. Services usually operate in isolation, as coordination mechanisms and patient pathways are lacking and an integrated electronic system is not available, meaning professionals cannot access registers from other facilities. On promotion and prevention, there is no cohesive mental health strategy, though some organizations and universities tap into ESY funding for anti-stigma/psychoeducation campaigns and the Ministry of Education promotes school-based campaigns addressing bullying and inclusivity (3, 63).

Services are provided in the public sector and at large at private providers with EOPYY reimbursement, including specialist consultation, medication, psychotherapy (individual, group, family), special educators, and speech, occupational, and physical therapy (3). Although public services are generally cost-free, low availability makes patients seek private providers, making reimbursement schemes the most frequent arrangement for care (see Table 5 for an overview of user costs). A standard fixed reimbursement amount applies to each service, which is not adjusted according to regional cost differences and is significantly below market prices (currently, there is no child and adolescent psychiatrist with an active contract with EOPYY for consultation, so reimbursement does not apply to this service). During times, repayment experience delays, as occurred during the Covid-19 pandemic.

Service reimbursement caps are set based on diagnosis, yet not all relevant ICD-10 diagnoses are included. For instance, there is a maximum monthly value of approximately €510 for Autism Spectrum Disorder, €310 for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder, €120 for Emotional Disorders, €60 for Speech Sound Disorder, €210 for Childhood-Onset Fluency Disorder/Stuttering (being €90 euros for psychotherapy and €120 for speech therapy). Only two diagnoses are allowed, yet not summing reimbursement rates for overlapping therapeutics. Currently, the reimbursement limit is finally decided by EOPYY auditors on a case-by-case basis upon evaluation of the clinical presentation noted by the prescribing physician (e.g.,: auditors may reduce the number of reimbursed therapy below the maximum number set for the diagnosis). There are prerequisites for reimbursement, as a diagnosis/prescription by medical specialists providing child and adolescent treatments, such as child and adolescent psychiatrists, adult psychiatrists, neurologists (specialized in children), pediatricians (specialized in developmental and behavioral pediatrics), and, for some therapeutics, ophthalmologists and orthopedists. There is an appendix in the legislation specifying which specialty can prescribe for each diagnosis and the amount of each session.

There are several professionals involved in child and adolescent mental health in Greece, including physicians, nurses, psychologists, social workers, speech therapists, occupational therapists, and health visitors. Table 3 provides an overview of the physician workforce as per the latest official survey (57). There are 406 registered child and adolescent psychiatrists in the country, corresponding to 20,86 specialists per 100,000 individuals below 19 (58). While the number stands above European Union averages, the actual ratio is shorter for significant parcels of the population, as the majority of professionals only work in the private system (3, 77). Furthermore, about 75% of all child and adolescent psychiatrists are concentrated in Attica (242) and Central Macedonia (74), with very few professionals in many regions (for instance, there is one specialist in North Aegean and two in Western Macedonia, amounting to a respective rate of 2,72 and 4,44 per 100,000 people under 19) (57). Other professional categories are not registered under a single association, and official data does not account for the total number of psychologists, nurses, social workers, occupation/speech therapists, and health visitors. Nevertheless, it has been reported that imbalances in distribution and understaffing extend to nursery personnel (78). While general hospitals tend to count on better staffing levels, mental health inpatient facilities face challenges in covering afternoon and night shifts, and community centers are compelled to prioritize essential tasks due to shortage of professionals (3).

In the realm of professional training and certification, child and adolescent psychiatry emerged as a separate medical specialty in 1981 and was previously categorized as a subspecialty of psychiatry (79). To align with the European Union of Medical Specialists, the residency program underwent changes in 2018 (80, 81). The present curriculum spans five years, with 3.5 years focused on field practice of child/adolescent mental health, including psychotherapy skills. However, the availability of training centers and positions for residents is limited, resulting in a five-year graduation rate of approximately 40 child/adolescent psychiatrists (3). General adult psychiatry training also extends for five years, including an optional placement of three months in child and adolescent services (79, 82). In the absence of child and adolescent psychiatrists, general adult psychiatrists should provide services to this population regardless of limited training. In practice, this is infrequent except for older adolescents and mainly in the private sector. However, due to the very limited number of inpatient beds especially for adolescents aged 14–17 years, a considerable number of older adolescents are hospitalized in adult psychiatric departments.

In academia, the field of child and adolescent psychiatry is still under consolidation (56). Out of seven medical schools in Greece, only four have faculty members specializing in this area. Of those, only one integrates a child psychiatry discipline in the core curriculum, whilst the other three offer an optional course. As a result, a significant number of graduate physicians lack fundamental knowledge to address children's mental health issues. Moreover, pediatricians' residency curriculum should include mental health theoretical courses, yet placements in clinical settings are scarce (56, 83).

As for psychologists, a university degree is required to obtain a practice permit after a four year undergraduate training (84). There are options for post-graduate specializations, such as clinical psychology, school psychology, or applied cognitive and developmental psychology. However, there is no formal requirement for specialist practice with children and adolescents. Vacancies in child/adolescent services refer to psychologists in general, therefore any psychologist can apply regardless of specialization or experience with minors. As for nursing, a previous legislation established the specialization of mental health nurses, which has been recently expanded and covers theoretical and practical training in ESY services (3, 85, 86). Nurses in Greece undergo four years of university education, with another two years dedicated to their chosen specialty. With the new program in place, nurses are now able to directly pursue mental health nursing as their specialization. Notably, in inpatient facilities, about 90% of nurses are specialized in mental health. Furthermore, there are ongoing programs for continued education, with approximately 500 nurses having received training in community care. Other training programs encompass areas like forensic care, drug addiction, and internet addiction.

The standards of care differ considerably across both public and private facilities in the country, and provision is not regularly monitored using indicators of quality (48). There is a gap in standardized clinical protocols defining practices for mental health conditions according to severity, as existing guidelines are often narrowed in scope and not widely disseminated (3). Professional practices are inconsistent, as treatment approaches are typically determined by individual professionals and usually influenced by tradition or personal preference rather than evidence-based protocols. Additionally, interviews with professionals from diverse backgrounds exposed gaps in skills such as psychotherapeutic techniques, case management, aggression management and violence de-escalation, and human rights safeguarding (3). While gaps were identified, the absence of a systematic monitoring of services means that the actual standards of care remain largely unknown (56). The funding model compounds this issue: resources are distributed according to the reported provision of services or block grants, without allocation mechanisms based on quality indicators (10).

Field assessments have suggested substantial deficiencies on interdisciplinary teamwork and community-based approaches, with many professionals adhering to a medical-dominated model in the central figure of a psychiatrist (3, 63, 87). There are fragilities in the community-based services, where timely interventions are hindered by long waiting lists, unavailability of care in certain areas, and inadequate coverage (3). In certain less-populated regions, such as Thrace and Ioannina, reports suggest that services are more effectively coordinated within a sectorized and community-oriented framework, which is evidenced by decreased rates of involuntary admission among the adult population (contrasting to alarmingly high rates across the country) (3, 88, 89). Moreover, even in regions with limited mental health units, there is a lack of formal connection between child/adolescent services and adult mental health services. Therefore, transition of adolescents to adult care usually is self or family driven, or by personal communication between mental health professionals rather than protocols and guidelines. This further leads to fragmentation in care, particularly for young adults suffering from Autism Spectrum Disorders.

Some mental health services are provided at the educational system, primarily focusing on learning disorders and offered through the Centers for Interdisciplinary Assessment, Counseling, and Support (KEDASY) (90, 91). In Greece, education across all levels is tuition-free, financed by the Ministry of Education, Religious Affairs and Sport (92). The system operates in a regionalized, decentralized structure with three levels of administration: local municipalities, thirteen regional directorates, and central government (Ministry of Education) (93). Every Regional Directorate of Education is staffed with an Advisor of Education, who is responsible for providing pedagogical and scientific guidance for educators, special educators, psychologists, social workers, and other specialties working in schools and KEDASYs (91). KEDASY centers are responsible for promoting awareness of psychosocial issues, assisting the implementation of mental health promotion and prevention, and offering psychoeducational support for children and adolescents with special educational needs and/or disabilities (91, 92). At a minimum, each center comprises a special education teacher, a psychologist, a social worker, and occasionally, a speech, occupational, or physical therapists.

The School Networks of Educational Support (SDEYs) is the network of schools built to promote access to education, cooperation across services, and protection and promotion of psychosocial health of students (94). Each SDEY is built at a local level and serves up to five general/special schools, being connected to one regional KEDASY as the next-tier supporting service. At each school unit, a School Life Advisor collaborates with the Advisor of Education and KEDASYs to provide guidance to students and caregivers on psycho-pedagogical issues, such as prevention and management of extreme behaviors, learning difficulties, and inclusion and integration (95). Additionally, a Committee of Interdisciplinary Support (EDY) is instituted for looking after the psychosocial wellbeing of students, composed of members of the school (directors and special support teachers) and from the affiliated SDEY (psychologists or social workers) (94, 96). The EDY is in systematic articulation with KEDASY in regular and extraordinary meetings, also collaborating with other health, educational, and legal-judicial services, the latter especially in instances of child maltreatment and neglect. Within this structure, the psychologist evaluates needs, offers counseling to students and families, and implements individual or group interventions targeting inclusion, awareness, and stress mitigation (94). For its turn, the social worker addresses socio-contextual challenges that may influence students and their families.

There are delineate pathways for students with special needs and psychosocial challenges (96). Initially, the EDY is responsible for identifying such students, addressing concerns within the school resources. If issues persist, the student is referred (either by the EDY, by schools without EDY, and by caregivers) to a KEDASY center for a comprehensive psychoeducational evaluation (alternatively, the student may be referred to a public mental health service for establishing a medical diagnosis) (91, 97). Based on those, students may be directed to special education services or supportive guidelines may be provided for care at school (91). Special services are categorized by group involvement and severity: Integration Class (TE) offers small-group interventions within general schools, catering to students with preserved functionality who face learning or intellectual difficulties. Parallel Support (PS) refers to co-teacher intensive one-to-one assistance within the general school, which is designed for children that are able to follow the regular class program with adequate support, when special education schools are unavailable, or to attend KEDASY recommendations. Lastly, Special Education Schools (SMEAE) are reserved for children with disabilities that impair their capacity to attend regular schools. Typically, these institutions provide specialized services for children diagnosed with Intellectual Developmental Disorder, Autism Spectrum Disorder, cerebral palsy, hearing impairments, and mobility disabilities.

This structure also faces operational challenges, including a pressing shortage of psychologists across schools, special schools, and KEDASYs (98). As a result, EDY committees often cannot serve all schools, leading to a prioritization of special education services. At regular schools, the scarcity of specialists leads to irregular visits, compromising psychosocial diagnostics and interventions (99). KEDASY evaluations are characterized by prolonged waiting times, often surpassing a school year. Due to the lack of physicians, it is common that KEDASYs refer children to ESY services for a diagnosis before their final report, enhancing delays as mental health facilities face prolonged waiting lists. Similarly, the demand for SMEAEs far exceeds the capacity of provision, and such units often lack technical capacity for delivering adequate specialized services.

Worthy noting, lesser-known structures related to wellbeing and mental health are the Centers for Creative Work for Children (KDAP) which operate under the new Ministry of Social Cohesion and Family (100). These facilities roll out programs aimed at fostering socialization, education, communication, and sensorimotor training, typically through recreational and cultural activities. KDAPs are staffed by educators, artists, physical therapists, and social workers, catering to both Greek and migrant children with typical development or with disabilities. For the latter, there are also specialized Centers for Creative Work for Children for Children with Disabilities (KDAPmeA).