Front. Genet.Frontiers in GeneticsFront. Genet.1664-8021Frontiers Media S.A.149788210.3389/fgene.2024.1497882GeneticsCorrectionCorrigendum: Serum exosomal circular RNA expression profile and regulative role in proliferative diabetic retinopathyLi et al.10.3389/fgene.2024.1497882LiXinshengWangJingfanQianHuimingWuYanZhangZhengyuHuZizhong*XiePing*Department of Ophthalmology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
Edited by:Yedi Zhou, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, China
Reviewed by:Stephen J. Bush, Xi’an Jiaotong University, China
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
A Corrigendum on Serum exosomal circular RNA Expression profile and regulative role in proliferative diabetic retinopathy by Li X, Wang J, Qian H, Wu Y, Zhang Z, Hu Z and Xie P (2021). Front. Genet. 12:719312. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2021.719312proliferative diabetic retinopathyexosomecircular RNAangiogenesisbioinformatics analysissection-at-acceptanceRNA
In the published article, there was an error in “Figure 7 Function of circFndc3b in angiogenesis in vitro” as published. This occurred during article production, when the two panels on the top left were mistakenly duplicated those from the equivalent positions in Figure 6B.
Function of circFndc3b in angiogenesis in vitro: (A) Small interfering RNA 2 had the greatest interference efficiency. (B, C) CircFndc3b knockdown can reduce the migration (B) and tube formation ability (C) of endothelial cells (ECs) in comparison to the negative control. Representative images of wound healing and tube formation are shown along with quantitative data (n = 3). Scale bar, 100 µm. *P < 0.0332, **P < 0.0021, ***P < 0.0002, ****P < 0.0001.
The revised Figure 7 is presented below.
The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.