<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="EN" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Genet.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Genetics</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Genet.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">1664-8021</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">1124632</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fgene.2023.1124632</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Genetics</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Gamma irradiation-induced genetic variability and its effects on the phenotypic and agronomic traits of groundnut (<italic>Arachis hypogaea</italic>L<italic>.</italic>)</article-title>
<alt-title alt-title-type="left-running-head">Saibari et al.</alt-title>
<alt-title alt-title-type="right-running-head">
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2023.1124632">10.3389/fgene.2023.1124632</ext-link>
</alt-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Saibari</surname>
<given-names>Imane</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Barrijal</surname>
<given-names>Sa&#xef;d</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2163360/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mouhib</surname>
<given-names>Mohammed</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2141045/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Belkadi</surname>
<given-names>Najlae</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Hamim</surname>
<given-names>Ahlam</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001">&#x2a;</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1911522/overview"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
<institution>Biotechnological Valorization of MicroorganismsLaboratory</institution>, <institution>Department of Life Sciences</institution>, <institution>Faculty of Sciences and Techniques</institution>, <institution>AbdelmalekEssaadi University</institution>, <addr-line>Tangier</addr-line>, <country>Morocco</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
<institution>Unity of Research On NuclearTechniques</institution>, <institution>National Institute For Agricultural Research</institution>, <addr-line>Tangier</addr-line>, <country>Morocco</country>
</aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>
<bold>Edited by:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/527961/overview">Maryke T. Labuschagne</ext-link>, University of the Free State, South Africa</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>
<bold>Reviewed by:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1862936/overview">Astha Gupta</ext-link>, Sharda University, India</p>
<p>
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/400717/overview">Abe Shegro Gerrano</ext-link>, Agricultural Research Council of South Africa (ARC-SA), South Africa</p>
</fn>
<corresp id="c001">&#x2a;Correspondence: Ahlam Hamim, <email>ahlam.hamim@gmail.com</email>, <email>ahlam.hamim@inra.ma</email>
</corresp>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>26</day>
<month>04</month>
<year>2023</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2023</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>14</volume>
<elocation-id>1124632</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>15</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2022</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>06</day>
<month>04</month>
<year>2023</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#xa9; 2023 Saibari, Barrijal, Mouhib, Belkadi and Hamim.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2023</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Saibari, Barrijal, Mouhib, Belkadi and Hamim</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>In order to increase genetic variability for the improvement of groundnut, two varieties, namely Kp29 and Fleur11, were treated with six different gamma irradiation doses. A significant effect of mutagenesis was distinctly observed in the stem lengths, roots, and survival percentage in both varieties. The radio-sensitivity test showed a mean lethal dose of 436.51Gy for Kp29 and 501.18&#xa0;Gy for Fleur11. Furthermore, this study revealed putative mutants with variable agro-morphological traits. Seven chlorophyll mutants and various seed shape and color mutants were obtained. This study demonstrates the potency of gamma irradiation to induce high genetic variability that led to the emergence of certain mutations of economic importance.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>
<italic>Arachis hypogaea</italic> L.</kwd>
<kwd>gamma irradiation</kwd>
<kwd>LD<sub>50</sub>
</kwd>
<kwd>radio-sensitivity</kwd>
<kwd>genetic variability</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<custom-meta-wrap>
<custom-meta>
<meta-name>section-at-acceptance</meta-name>
<meta-value>Plant Genomics</meta-value>
</custom-meta>
</custom-meta-wrap>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="s1">
<title>1 Introduction</title>
<p>Groundnut (<italic>Arachis hypogaea</italic> L.) is a multipurpose legume crop used in both human and animal nutrition due to its high protein (25%&#x2013;30%) and oil (42%&#x2013;52%) contents. It is considered one of the major oilseed crops; its worldwide production is 50.35 million metric tons (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B59">USDA-FAS, 2022</xref>). Groundnut is cultivated in tropical, subtropical, and temperate zones. The use of legumes as groundnut grown in rotations or intercropping is now considered as an alternative and sustainable way of introducing nitrogen into lower input agrosystems (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B53">Singh et al., 2021</xref>), in which has a high nitrogen fixing ability estimated to be 100&#x2013;190&#xa0;kg&#xa0;N.ha<sup>-1</sup>.</p>
<p>In Africa, smallholders consume it in the form of a vegetable, sauce, or artisanal oil. Groundnut oil is also industrially extracted for local consumption or export. It is valuable due to its nutritional qualities, stability, and good behavior in heat. In Morocco, the main groundnut production basin, particularly in irrigated cultivation, is located in the south-east of the Tangier region, particularly in the sandy coastal zone bordering the Atlantic extending between Larache and Kenitra, on approximately 25,000&#xa0;hectares (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Abbou et al., 2022</xref>) and its production is 38,000 tons according to statistics from the International Production Assessment Division of USDA&#x2019;S (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B60">USDA-IPAD, 2022</xref>). However, this production is subjected to various types of constraints: biotic stresses, such as abundance and diversity of weeds and fungal and microbial infection, and abiotic stresses, such as drought, salinity, and low soil fertility, which affect negatively seedling, vegetative and reproductive growth, seed quality, and yield (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">Nithila et al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B63">Verma et al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B61">Valenzuela-Ruiz et al., 2018</xref>).</p>
<p>Groundnut is an allotetraploid species that has very low genetic variability. Therefore, enrichment of genetic diversity through breeding programs is required to increase groundnut yield. Many useful genetic modifications that use different physical and chemical mutagen treatments have been successfully reported for many crops including groundnut (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B58">Tshilenge-Lukanda et al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Hanafy and Akladious, 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">Nurmansyah et al., 2020</xref>). The induced mutation has resulted in the official release of over 3,402 improved mutant varieties in more than 240 species from different crops (Mutant Variety Database (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">MVD, 2022</xref>), of which approximately 70% of these mutants were developed using physical techniques. While these techniques are considered safe and effective, they usually cause large mutations or large-scale deletions of DNA, especially the most widely used gamma ray irradiation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Bado et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">Oladosu et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">Spencer-Lopes et al., 2018</xref>). Thus, optimization of the radiation dose is the first step in mutation induction, besides the ideal dose depending on the plant materials and desired outcome (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">Oladosu et al., 2016</xref>). The present study aimed to determine the mean lethal dose (LD<sub>50</sub>) of gamma irradiation on groundnut cultivated in Morocco (<italic>Arachis hypogaea</italic> L. var. Kp29 and var. Fleur11) to obtain the genetic diversity of the M2 generation and screen and select mutant plants based on phenotypic and agronomic traits.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="materials|methods" id="s2">
<title>2 Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="s2-1">
<title>2.1 Plant materials</title>
<p>Two groundnut seed subspecies with erect habit and short cycle of 90&#x2013;110&#xa0;days that are widely grown in Northwest Morocco were used: <italic>fastigiata,</italic> variety Kp29 (Valencia type, having three to four seeds per pod); and subspecies <italic>hypogaea</italic>, variety Fleur11(Spanish type, having 2 seeds per pod). Healthy dry seeds of the same size were used. The moisture content of the seeds was kept at 10%&#x2013;12% until mutagen treatment according to the method described by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">Spencer-Lopes et al. (2018)</xref>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-2">
<title>2.2 Gamma irradiation treatment</title>
<p>Various doses ofcobalt-60(<sup>60</sup>Co) gamma ray were used to induce mutagenesis in groundnut seeds. Irradiation was performed with a dry storage source of <sup>60</sup>Cin the Boukhalef Ionisation Station (SIBO) at the Regional Center of Agronomic Research of Tangier. The dose rate was approximately 1.44&#xa0;Gy/min. Three replicates of 70gofseeds per genotype were placed in 15 &#xd7; 22&#xa0;cm zip-lock plastic bags, each containing approximately 80 groundnut seeds. The bags were irradiated with gammarayat0, 100, 150, 200, 350, 600, and 1,200&#xa0;Gy, with 0 (non-irradiated bag) as the control.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-3">
<title>2.3 Radio-sensitivity test</title>
<p>Uniform seeds of each variety were surface sterilized with 0.1% HgCl<sub>2</sub> for 3&#xa0;min, followed by thorough washing with distilled water. Three replicates of 20 seeds were placed on the sterile Joseph paper in the Petri dish, moistened with distilled water, and kept in the incubator at 28&#xb0;C for 15&#xa0;d. Germination was achieved when the radical length of the seeds reached 5&#xa0;mm and the germination percentage was estimated by counting the number of seedlings at 15&#xa0;d. After germination, we sowed the seeds in sandy soil and placed them in a greenhouse at 25&#xb0;C for 30&#xa0;d. The survival percentage was estimated by counting the viable seedlings 30&#xa0;d after germination. The lengths of the plant shoot and root were measured using a ruler. These variables are regarded as suitable indicators for estimating the damage caused by mutagenic treatments.</p>
<p>To determine the optimal dose, the LD<sub>50</sub> value of gamma irradiation on M1 seeds was determined using Probit analysis based on the survival percentage (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">Postelnicu, 2011</xref>). The percentage of germination and survival were calculated using the following formula:<disp-formula id="equ1">
<mml:math id="m1">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">G</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">n</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">n</mml:mi>
<mml:mtext>&#x2009;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="|">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>%</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>N</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>o</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>.</mml:mo>
<mml:mtext>&#x2009;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mi>o</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>f</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>g</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>r</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>d</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>s</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>d</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>s</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>T</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>o</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>l</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>N</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>o</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>.</mml:mo>
<mml:mtext>&#x2009;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mi>o</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>f</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>s</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>d</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>s</mml:mi>
<mml:mtext>&#x2009;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mi>p</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>l</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>d</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
<mml:mo>&#xd7;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>100</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</disp-formula>(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Olasupo et al., 2016</xref>).<disp-formula id="equ2">
<mml:math id="m2">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">u</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">l</mml:mi>
<mml:mtext>&#x2009;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="|">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>%</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>N</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>o</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>.</mml:mo>
<mml:mtext>&#x2009;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mi>o</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>f</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>s</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>u</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>r</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>v</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>v</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>d</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>s</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>d</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>l</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>g</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>s</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>N</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>o</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>.</mml:mo>
<mml:mtext>&#x2009;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mi>o</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>f</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>g</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>r</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>d</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>s</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>d</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>s</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
<mml:mo>&#xd7;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>100</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</disp-formula>(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Olasupo et al., 2016</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-4">
<title>2.4 Field experiments</title>
<p>The experiments were carried out at the experimental station of the National Institute for Agronomic Research in Larache, during the growing season of 2018&#x2013;2019. The soil of the station consisted of 80.5% sand, 11% silt, and 8.5% clay, with a pH of 5.5-6 and electrical conductivity of 40&#xa0;mS/m (&#xb1;25%). Conventional agricultural practices were employed in these experiments. Irrigation was carried out thrice per week by the drip system. M0 and M1 seeds (n &#x3d; 210) of each dose (0.100, 150, 200, 350, 600, and 1200Gy) of the two varieties (Fleur11 and Kp29) were sown in May 2018. Plots with dimensions of 2.5 &#xd7; 4.0&#xa0;m in a randomized complete block design were used. Then, the M1 plants from each irradiation dose were individually harvested and sown as M2 population plots in the next season (May 2019). Groundnut M2 seeds from the two varieties were grown in the field according to the pedigree method, which consists in sowing all seeds from a single plant in a raw (plant to row) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Breseghello and Coelho, 2013</xref>). The plots were 10 &#xd7; 15&#xa0;m in size, with 11 rows with 50&#xa0;cm in between rows and 25&#xa0;cm in between plants. The M0 plants were planted in the first row of each plot under the same culture conditions mentioned above. After sowing, M2 seedlings (600, 400, and 400 seedlings for 100, 200, and 350&#xa0;Gy, respectively) were screened every week from weeks 4&#x2013;8 to record the presence of chlorophyll mutants based on the nomenclature reported by (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Gustafsson, 1940</xref>). The frequency of chlorophyll mutants was calculated using the following formula:<disp-formula id="equ3">
<mml:math id="m3">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">u</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">n</mml:mi>
<mml:mtext>&#x2009;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">q</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">u</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">n</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">y</mml:mi>
<mml:mtext>&#x2009;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="|">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>%</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>N</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>O</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>.</mml:mo>
<mml:mtext>&#x2009;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mi>o</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>f</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>u</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>s</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>T</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>o</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>l</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>N</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>O</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>.</mml:mo>
<mml:mtext>&#x2009;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mi>o</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>f</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>M</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
<mml:mtext>&#x2009;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mi>s</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>d</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>l</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>g</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>s</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
<mml:mo>&#xd7;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>100</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</disp-formula>(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Konzak et al., 1965</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">FAO/IAEA, 2018</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-5">
<title>2.5 Statistical analysis</title>
<p>Experimental data were statistically analyzed for the analysis of variance (ANOVA), and the means were compared using Tukey&#x2019;s HSD (Honestly Significant Difference) test. Statistical analyses were performed on IBM SPSS Statistics version 26.0 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">IBM Corp, 2019</xref>), with statistical significance set at <italic>p</italic> &#x2264; 0.05.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="results" id="s3">
<title>3 Results</title>
<sec id="s3-1">
<title>3.1 Radio-sensitivity test</title>
<sec id="s3-1-1">
<title>3.1.1 Germination percentage</title>
<p>The data presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref> shows that the increasing the dose of gamma rays had no significant effect on seed germination in both varieties. Irradiated groundnut seeds maintained their germination capacity compared with the control. The germination percentage of M1 seeds decreased at 350 and 600&#xa0;Gy for the Kp29 variety and at 600&#xa0;Gy for the Fleur11 variety. No significant differences were observed in the survival percentage of M1 and M0 seeds (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap id="T1" position="float">
<label>TABLE 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Germination percentage in groundnut varieties on response to gamma irradiation.</p>
</caption>
<table>
<thead valign="top">
<tr>
<th rowspan="2" align="center">Dose (Gy)</th>
<th colspan="2" align="center">Varieties (%)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th align="center">Kp29</th>
<th align="center">Fleur11</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td align="left">Control</td>
<td align="center">100</td>
<td align="center">100</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">100</td>
<td align="center">97</td>
<td align="center">98</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">150</td>
<td align="center">98</td>
<td align="center">97</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">200</td>
<td align="center">93</td>
<td align="center">97</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">350</td>
<td align="center">92</td>
<td align="center">95</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">600</td>
<td align="center">92</td>
<td align="center">90</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">1,200</td>
<td align="center">95</td>
<td align="center">95</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Significance</td>
<td align="center">-</td>
<td align="center">-</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">(Tukey HSD <italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0,05)</td>
<td align="center">Ns</td>
<td align="center">Ns</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-2">
<title>3.2 Survival percentage</title>
<p>Significant differences were observed in the effect of gamma irradiation on the survival percentage of M1 seeds (350, 600, and 1,200&#xa0;Gy) in the two varieties compared with M0 seeds, reducing their survival percentage from 81.6% and 86.1%&#x2013;&#xa0;27.8% and 33.3% (Kp29 and Fleur11, respectively; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figures 1</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">2</xref>). However, no significant differences were observed in the survival percentage between M1 seeds var. Fleur11 (100, 150, and 200Gy) and M0 seeds (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2</xref>). The Probit analysis showed that the LD<sub>50</sub> was 436.51&#xa0;Gy for Kp29 and 501.18&#xa0;Gy for Fleur11 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figures 1</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">2</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F1" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Survival percentage of groundnut var. Kp29 seedlings in response to gamma irradiation. Means with different letters <bold>,</bold>(a,b,c,d) are significantly different (Tukey&#x2019;s HSD <italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.05).</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fgene-14-1124632-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig id="F2" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 2</label>
<caption>
<p>Survival percentage of groundnut var. Fleur11 seedlings in response to gamma irradiation. Means with different letters (a,b,c,d) are significantly different (Tukey&#x2019;s HSD <italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.05).</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fgene-14-1124632-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-3">
<title>3.3 Root and shoot length</title>
<p>A significant effect was observed for shoot and root length besides both varieties. The gamma rays significantly decreased the shoot length. For Kp29, three groups have been established: the first group contains 3 doses 150, 200, 600Gy, the second group with 1,200&#xa0;Gy with a value of 0.06cm, and the third group including the control, 100Gy and 350&#xa0;Gy, with values from 6.7 to 4.16&#xa0;cm, respectively (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3</xref>). In the Fleur11 variety, only two groups have been established: the first group of the control with a maximum value of 5.5&#xa0;cm, and the second group containing the seeds irradiated with doses from100Gy to 1200Gy with values ranging from 2.7 to 0.93&#xa0;cm (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F3" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 3</label>
<caption>
<p>Shoot length of groundnut seedling var. Fleur11 (indicated in uppercase letters) and Kp29 (indicated in lowercase letters). Different letters indicate a significant difference (Tukey&#x2019;s HSD <italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.05).</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fgene-14-1124632-g003.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Significant results were observed for the root length of Kp29, wherein seeds irradiated at 100&#xa0;Gy (16&#xa0;cm), 150&#xa0;Gy (9.16&#xa0;cm), 200&#xa0;Gy (9.16&#xa0;cm), 350&#xa0;Gy (6.8&#xa0;cm), 600&#xa0;Gy (2.4&#xa0;cm), and 1,200&#xa0;Gy (0.7&#xa0;cm) showed reduced values when compared to M0 (9.6 cm; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figures 4</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">5</xref>). Similar results were observed for root length in the Fleur11 variety, with the control having the highest value (16&#xa0;cm), followed by seeds irradiated at doses of 100&#xa0;Gy (9.16&#xa0;cm), 150&#xa0;Gy (9.16&#xa0;cm), 200&#xa0;Gy (10.5&#xa0;cm), 350&#xa0;Gy (6.8&#xa0;cm), 600&#xa0;Gy (2.4&#xa0;cm), and 1,200&#xa0;Gy (0.7&#xa0;cm). Thus, the greatest negative effect on the root and shoot of groundnut seedlings was observed in seeds irradiated at 1,200&#xa0;Gy (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figures 4</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">5</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F4" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 4</label>
<caption>
<p>Root length of groundnut seedling var. Fleur11 (indicated in uppercase letters) and Kp29 (indicated in lowercase letters). Different letters indicate a significant difference (Tukey&#x2019;s HSD <italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.05).</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fgene-14-1124632-g004.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig id="F5" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 5</label>
<caption>
<p>Dose effect of gamma irradiation on shoot and root lengths of two varieties 30 days after germination.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fgene-14-1124632-g005.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-4">
<title>3.4 M1 generation field experiment</title>
<sec id="s3-4-1">
<title>3.4.1 Germination percentage</title>
<p>In the field, the lowest germination percentage of M1 seeds for Kp29 was observed in those irradiated at 350&#xa0;Gy (43.3%), which was significantly different compared with the other doses. Compared with M0, seed germination was not significantly affected at 100&#xa0;Gy (84.3%), 150&#xa0;Gy (85.2%), and 200Gy (63.8%); however, a decreasing trend was observed (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure 6</xref>; <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F6" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 6</label>
<caption>
<p>Germination percentage of M1 of groundnut var. Under field conditions, 15&#xa0;days after sowing. <bold>(A)</bold> Control seeds, <bold>(B)</bold> seeds irradiated at 100&#xa0;Gy, <bold>(C)</bold> seeds irradiated at 150&#xa0;Gy, and <bold>(D)</bold> seeds irradiated at 200&#xa0;Gy, <bold>(E)</bold> seeds irradiated at 350&#xa0;Gy (left var. Kp29, right var. Fleur11).</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fgene-14-1124632-g006.tif"/>
</fig>
<table-wrap id="T2" position="float">
<label>TABLE 2</label>
<caption>
<p>Effect of gamma irradiation on different M2 generation groundnut varieties Kp29 and Fleur11 traits.</p>
</caption>
<table>
<thead valign="top">
<tr>
<th align="left">Variety</th>
<th align="center">Dose (Gy)</th>
<th align="center">Germination (%)</th>
<th align="center">Survival (%)</th>
<th align="center">Days to flower initiation</th>
<th align="center">Plant height (cm)</th>
<th align="center">Number of pods</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td rowspan="5" align="left">Kp29</td>
<td align="left">Control</td>
<td align="left">89.6<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td align="left">89.5<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td align="left">33<sup>b</sup>
</td>
<td align="left">51.56<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td align="left">46.3<sup>a</sup>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">100</td>
<td align="left">84.3<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td align="left">74.73<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td align="left">34<sup>b</sup>
</td>
<td align="left">47.56<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td align="left">38<sup>ab</sup>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">150</td>
<td align="left">85.2<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td align="left">63.3<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td align="left">43<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td align="left">45.78<sup>b</sup>
</td>
<td align="left">34.1<sup>b</sup>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">200</td>
<td align="left">63.8<sup>ab</sup>
</td>
<td align="left">62.8<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td align="left">45<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td align="left">40.44<sup>b</sup>
</td>
<td align="left">28.8<sup>b</sup>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">350</td>
<td align="left">43.3<sup>b</sup>
</td>
<td align="left">5.2<sup>b</sup>
</td>
<td align="left">-</td>
<td align="left">-</td>
<td align="left">-</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="5" align="left">Fleur11</td>
<td align="left">Control</td>
<td align="left">83.3<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td align="left">83.3<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td align="left">34<sup>b</sup>
</td>
<td align="left">49.8<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td align="left">42.3<sup>a</sup>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">100</td>
<td align="left">80<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td align="left">80<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td align="left">37<sup>b</sup>
</td>
<td align="left">42.1<sup>b</sup>
</td>
<td align="left">35.5<sup>b</sup>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">150</td>
<td align="left">64.3<sup>ab</sup>
</td>
<td align="left">60.9<sup>ab</sup>
</td>
<td align="left">44<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td align="left">39.1<sup>b</sup>
</td>
<td align="left">32.6<sup>bc</sup>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">200</td>
<td align="left">55.7<sup>b</sup>
</td>
<td align="left">52.8<sup>b</sup>
</td>
<td align="left">46<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td align="left">35.3<sup>c</sup>
</td>
<td align="left">27<sup>c</sup>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">350</td>
<td align="left">26.2<sup>c</sup>
</td>
<td align="left">1.4<sup>c</sup>
</td>
<td align="left">-</td>
<td align="left">-</td>
<td align="left">-</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>Means with a different letters (a,b,c,d) are significantly different (Tukey&#x2019;s HSD <italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.05).</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>Similarly, for the Fleur11 variety, the lowest germination percentage was observed at 350&#xa0;Gy (26.2%), which was also significantly different compared with the other doses. Compared with M0, seed germination was not significantly affected at 100&#xa0;Gy (80%) and 150&#xa0;Gy (64.3%; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure 6</xref>; <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table2</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-4-2">
<title>3.4.2 Survival percentage</title>
<p>For Kp29, the survival percentage of M1 seeds irradiated at 350&#xa0;Gy (5.2%) was significantly different compared with the other treatments. Similar to the seed germination percentage, the survival percentage of seedlings was not significantly affected at 100, 150, and 200&#xa0;Gy compared with M0; however, a decreasing trend was observed for this parameter.</p>
<p>For Fleur11, significant differences in the survival percentage of M1 seeds were observed between 200&#xa0;Gy (52.8%) and 350&#xa0;Gy (1.4%), as shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-4-3">
<title>3.4.3 Days to flower initiation</title>
<p>Flower initiation was significantly delayed in plants of both varieties for all irradiation doses compared with M0 plants. Compared with M0 plants (33&#xa0;d), the longest delay was observed for Kp29 plants irradiated at 200Gy (45&#xa0;d), followed by 150&#xa0;Gy (43&#xa0;d), and 100&#xa0;Gy (34&#xa0;d). For Fleur11, the longer delay was observed at 200&#xa0;Gy (46&#xa0;d), followed by 150&#xa0;Gy (44&#xa0;d) and 100&#xa0;Gy (37&#xa0;d) when compared with M0 plants (34 d; <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table2</xref>). Meanwhile, all seeds irradiated at 350Gy died a few days after germination, and no results were reported before the flowering stage.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-4-4">
<title>3.4.4 Plant height</title>
<p>Significant differences in plant height were observed among different irradiation doses. For the Kp29 cultivar, the lowest heights were observed at 200&#xa0;Gy (40.44&#xa0;cm), 150&#xa0;Gy (45.78&#xa0;cm), and 100&#xa0;Gy (47.56&#xa0;cm) compared with M0 (51.56&#xa0;cm; <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref>). For the Fleur11 cultivar, the lowest heights were observed at 200&#xa0;Gy (35.3&#xa0;cm), 150&#xa0;Gy (39.1&#xa0;cm), and 100&#xa0;Gy (42.1&#xa0;cm) compared with M0 (49.8 cm; <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-4-5">
<title>3.4.5 Number of pods</title>
<p>Similar results as the indicators mentioned above were observed for the number of pods. The number of pods in the two varieties was significantly reduced, with the highest number being observed for non-irradiated plants (46.3 in var. Kp29 and 42.3 in var. Fleur11) and the lowest being at dose 200Gy (28.8 in Kp29 and 27 in Fleur11; <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref>).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-5">
<title>3.5 M2 generation field experiment</title>
<sec id="s3-5-1">
<title>3.5.1 Chlorophyll mutants</title>
<p>Seven different types of chlorophyll appeared in the segregating generation: variegated mutants (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">Figure 7B</xref>) typically had green- and yellow-sectored leaves; yellow-viridis mutants (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">Figure 7C</xref>) had yellow green leaves; striata mutants (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8">Figure 8D</xref>) showed longitudinal yellow stripes; viridis mutants (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8">Figure 8E</xref>) had viridine green-colored leaves; maculata mutants (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8">Figure 8F</xref>) exhibited chlorophyll and carotin destruction in the form of dots over the leaves; chlorina mutants (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8">Figure 8G</xref>) had leaves that were yellowish to light green in color and survived within 20&#xa0;days and xhanta mutants (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8">Figure 8H</xref>) were completely yellow and could survive a few days after germination. All of the chlorophyll mutants types except striata, variagated, and viridis mutants were lethal and only survived to seedling stage.</p>
<fig id="F7" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 7</label>
<caption>
<p>Total numbers of mutants selected from different doses of gamma irradiation in M2 generation.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fgene-14-1124632-g007.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig id="F8" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 8</label>
<caption>
<p>Spectrum of chlorophyll mutants in the M2 generation of groundnut irradiated. <bold>(A)</bold> Control, <bold>(B)</bold> variagated, <bold>(C)</bold> Yellow-viridis, <bold>(D)</bold> Striata, <bold>(E)</bold> Viridis, <bold>(F)</bold> Maculata, <bold>(G)</bold> Chlorina, <bold>(H)</bold> Xhanta.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fgene-14-1124632-g008.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Different types of chlorophyll mutants were observed in the M2 generation of both varieties at different doses. The highest frequencies of chlorophyll mutants (6.15% var. Kp29% and 4.10% for var. Fleur11) were observed at 200&#xa0;Gy, and the lowest frequency was recorded at 100&#xa0;Gy (0.22% in both varieties; <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">Table 3</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap id="T3" position="float">
<label>TABLE 3</label>
<caption>
<p>Frequency and number of chlorophyll mutants types in M2 generation of groundnut in two varieties studied.</p>
</caption>
<table>
<thead valign="top">
<tr>
<th align="left"/>
<th align="left">Kp29</th>
<th align="left"/>
<th align="left"/>
<th rowspan="3" align="left">Total of chlorophyll types</th>
<th align="left">Fleur11</th>
<th align="left"/>
<th align="left"/>
<th rowspan="3" align="left">Total of chlorophyll types</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th rowspan="2" align="left">Number of M2 seedling</th>
<th align="left">100Gy</th>
<th align="left">150Gy</th>
<th align="left">200Gy</th>
<th align="left">100Gy</th>
<th align="left">150Gy</th>
<th align="left">200Gy</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th align="left">452</th>
<th align="left">289</th>
<th align="left">195</th>
<th align="left">446</th>
<th align="left">335</th>
<th align="left">268</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td align="left">Variagated (B)</td>
<td align="left">0</td>
<td align="left">0</td>
<td align="left">2</td>
<td align="left">2</td>
<td align="left">0</td>
<td align="left">1</td>
<td align="left">2</td>
<td align="center">3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Yellow viridis (C)</td>
<td align="left">0</td>
<td align="left">1</td>
<td align="left">2</td>
<td align="left">3</td>
<td align="left">0</td>
<td align="left">2</td>
<td align="left">3</td>
<td align="center">5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Striata (D)</td>
<td align="left">1</td>
<td align="left">1</td>
<td align="left">2</td>
<td align="left">4</td>
<td align="left">1</td>
<td align="left">1</td>
<td align="left">2</td>
<td align="center">4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Viridis (E)</td>
<td align="left">0</td>
<td align="left">1</td>
<td align="left">2</td>
<td align="left">3</td>
<td align="left">0</td>
<td align="left">1</td>
<td align="left">1</td>
<td align="center">2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Maculata (F)</td>
<td align="left">0</td>
<td align="left">0</td>
<td align="left">1</td>
<td align="left">1</td>
<td align="left">0</td>
<td align="left">1</td>
<td align="left">1</td>
<td align="center">2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Chlorina (G)</td>
<td align="left">0</td>
<td align="left">1</td>
<td align="left">2</td>
<td align="left">3</td>
<td align="left">0</td>
<td align="left">1</td>
<td align="left">1</td>
<td align="center">2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Xhanta (H)</td>
<td align="left">0</td>
<td align="left">0</td>
<td align="left">1</td>
<td align="left">1</td>
<td align="left">0</td>
<td align="left">1</td>
<td align="left">1</td>
<td align="center">2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Total</td>
<td align="left">1</td>
<td align="left">4</td>
<td align="left">12</td>
<td align="left">17</td>
<td align="left">1</td>
<td align="left">8</td>
<td align="left">11</td>
<td align="center">20</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Frequency (%)</td>
<td align="left">0.22</td>
<td align="left">1.38</td>
<td align="left">6.15</td>
<td align="left">7.25</td>
<td align="left">0,22</td>
<td align="left">2.38</td>
<td align="left">4.10</td>
<td align="center">6.70</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-5-2">
<title>3.5.2. Phenotypic and agronomic characteristics of mutants</title>
<p>The mutant number varied according to the irradiation dose and variety. The highest number of mutants was observed at 100&#xa0;Gy (191 for Fleur11 and 145 mutants for Kp29; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9">Figure 9</xref>). The frequencies of selected mutants were clustered into different groups to measure the extent of variability achieved through irradiation as shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T4">Table 4</xref>.</p>
<fig id="F9" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 9</label>
<caption>
<p>Pods shape variation of groundnut mutants in both varieties, <bold>(A)</bold> Kp 29, <bold>(B)</bold> Fleur 11. <bold>(1)</bold>: slight, <bold>(2)</bold>: very deep, <bold>(3)</bold>: deep, <bold>(4)</bold>: number of seeds per pod.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fgene-14-1124632-g009.tif"/>
</fig>
<table-wrap id="T4" position="float">
<label>TABLE 4</label>
<caption>
<p>Frequency of phenotypic characters of the selected mutants in M2 generation of groundnut var. Fleur11 and var. Kp29.</p>
</caption>
<table>
<thead valign="top">
<tr>
<th rowspan="2" align="left">Relative frequency of agronomic mutants (%)</th>
<th colspan="4" align="center">Kp29</th>
<th colspan="4" align="center">Fleu11</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th align="center">100Gy</th>
<th align="center">150Gy</th>
<th align="left">200Gy</th>
<th colspan="2" align="center">100Gy</th>
<th align="center">150Gy</th>
<th align="center">200Gy</th>
<th align="left"/>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td align="left">Early flowering</td>
<td align="left">19.02</td>
<td align="left">18.68</td>
<td align="left">15.38</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">8.29</td>
<td align="left">6.56</td>
<td align="left">6.71</td>
<td align="left"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Shape mutant seeds</td>
<td align="left">25.2</td>
<td align="left">33.6</td>
<td align="left">40.1</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">4.9</td>
<td align="left">13.8</td>
<td align="left">17.8</td>
<td align="left"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Color mutant coat seeds</td>
<td align="left">8.7</td>
<td align="left">9.7</td>
<td align="left">6.4</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">24.7</td>
<td align="left">13.1</td>
<td align="left">9.5</td>
<td align="left"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Color coat/shape mutants seeds</td>
<td align="left">2.8</td>
<td align="left">8.4</td>
<td align="left">6.4</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">1.7</td>
<td align="left">8.3</td>
<td align="left">2.9</td>
<td align="left"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Number of seed</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
<td colspan="2" align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;per pods</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
<td colspan="2" align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#xa0;&#xa0;1&#x2013;2</td>
<td align="left">16.50</td>
<td align="left">10.61</td>
<td align="left">7.44</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">100</td>
<td align="left">98.96</td>
<td align="left">99.40</td>
<td align="left"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#xa0;&#xa0;3&#x2013;4</td>
<td align="left">83.50</td>
<td align="left">88.93</td>
<td align="left">92.02</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">0</td>
<td align="left">1.04</td>
<td align="left">0.60</td>
<td align="left"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#xa0;&#xa0;&#x2265;5</td>
<td align="left">0</td>
<td align="left">0.45</td>
<td align="left">0.53</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">0</td>
<td align="left">0</td>
<td align="left">0</td>
<td align="left"/>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<p>The yield of the M2 generation was screened, and differences were observed. Plants carrying a putative mutation for early flowering were found: 84 (100&#xa0;Gy), 54 (150&#xa0;Gy) and 30 (200&#xa0;Gy) plants for Kp29; and 37 (100&#xa0;Gy), 22 (150&#xa0;Gy), 19 (200&#xa0;Gy) plants for Fleur 11. Mutations for the shape of pods and seeds were observed: 71 (100&#xa0;Gy), 75 (150Gy), and 75 (200&#xa0;Gy) plants for Kp29; and 17 (100Gy), 20 (150Gy), and 30 (200&#xa0;Gy) plants for Fleur11. Meanwhile, 25 (100&#xa0;Gy), 25 (150&#xa0;Gy), and 12 (200&#xa0;Gy) plants for Kp29, and 85 (100Gy), 11 (150&#xa0;Gy), and 18 (200Gy) plants for Fleur11 had mutations for seed color.</p>
<p>Mutations for color and shape were observed in 12 (100&#xa0;Gy), 19 (150&#xa0;Gy), and 8 plants (200&#xa0;Gy) for Kp29 and in 5 (100&#xa0;Gy), 22 (150&#xa0;Gy), and 7 (200&#xa0;Gy) plants for Fleur11.</p>
<p>In terms of the number of seeds per pods, 1 (100&#xa0;Gy) and 1 (200&#xa0;Gy) plant for Kp29, and 3 (100&#xa0;Gy) and 1 (200&#xa0;Gy) plant for Fleur11 showed mutations.</p>
<p>The different seed characteristics of mutant plants, including seed coat color, seed shape, and pod shape, are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9">Figures 9</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F10">10</xref>. Three different pod shapes were observed: slight (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9">Figure9A1</xref>), deep (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9">Figure 9A-B3</xref>), and very deep (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9">Figure 9A-B2</xref>). Meanwhile, two seed shapes were observed: seeds with different concavity forms and positions and large seed mutants (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F10">Figure 10A-B2, 3</xref>). A high number of seeds per pod (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F10">Figure 10A-B4</xref>) was also noted. Furthermore, different seed coat colors were observed: red spotted color (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F10">Figure 10A1</xref>); white strips (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F10">Figure 10A-B4</xref>); light-red coat color (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F10">Figure 10B5</xref>); black spotted coat color (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F10">Figure 10B6</xref>); and beige spotted coat color (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F10">Figure 10B7</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F10" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 10</label>
<caption>
<p>Seed coat color and shape variations of groundnut mutants. 1: red spotted color, 2: seeds with different concavity forms, 3: large mutant, 4: white strips mutant, 5: light red color coat, 6: black spotted color coat, 7: beige spotted color coat. <bold>(A)</bold>: Kp 29, <bold>(B)</bold>: Fleur 11.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fgene-14-1124632-g010.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="discussion" id="s4">
<title>4 Discussion</title>
<sec id="s4-1">
<title>4.1 Radiosensibility test</title>
<p>In this study, the radiosensitivity test of two groundnut varieties showed that the germination percentage was not affected by different irradiation doses (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table1</xref>). This result is consistent with that of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Essel et al. (2016)</xref>, which showed no significant effect on cowpea seeds in all treatments, suggesting that physical treatment does not have any effect on seed germination. Similarly, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Hameed et al. (2008)</xref> noted that the germination percentage of chickpea seeds was not significantly affected by gamma irradiation at all of the irradiation doses used. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Ahumada-Flores et al. (2021)</xref> also reported a delay in germination time of wheat seeds, but no effects were observed on the final germination percentage after irradiation at varying doses. The relatively high germination percentage recorded in this study could be explained by the stimulating effect of irradiation on RNA or protein synthesis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Kuzin et al., 1973</xref>).</p>
<p>Meanwhile, based on the survival percentage of seedlings of irradiated seeds, the obtained LD<sub>50</sub> was 436.51&#xa0;Gy for var. Kp29 and 501.18&#xa0;Gy for var. Fleur11. The difference in genotype sensitivity can be explained by the difference in the genotype between genetic patterns as clarified by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Khursheed et al. (2015)</xref> or in the nature of their seed coat and size (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">Olasupo et al., 2018</xref>). The large orange-beige seeds of Fleur11 had a lower dose compared with Kp29, which was noted for the small red grains. Similar findings have been previously reported in the LD<sub>50</sub> of groundnut, which was found to be between 400 and 600&#xa0;Gy (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B58">Tshilenge-Lukanda et al., 2013</xref>). Meanwhile, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Aparna et al. (2013)</xref> observed a 50% reduction in all germination parameters of Narayani groundnut species at a radiation dose of 1,500&#xa0;Gy. Furthermore, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Majeed et al. (2018)</xref> highlighted that the reduction in the survival of plants is an index of post-germination mortality resulting from cytological and physiological disturbances caused by irradiation.</p>
<p>In addition, the present findings showed a reduction in the mean height of shoot and root in both varieties as the radiation dose increased. A similar study by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Gunasekaran and Pavadai (2015)</xref> on groundnut showed that the effect of gammaray treatment on growth parameters of M1 generation decreased with increasing doses. In addition, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Aparna et al. (2013)</xref>reported that gamma radiation resulted in lower values of groundnut. This reduction was also observed in several other species: cowpea (<italic>Vigna unguiculata</italic> [L.] Walp) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Gnankambary et al., 2019</xref>), okra (<italic>Abelmoschusesculentus</italic> L. Moench.) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Asare et al., 2017</xref>), pea (<italic>Pisumsativum</italic> L.) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Majeed et al., 2016</xref>), rice (<italic>Oryza sativa</italic> L.) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Gowthami et al., 2017</xref>), and maize (<italic>Zea mays</italic> L.) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Matova et al., 2021</xref>). This reduction could be attributed to the inefficiency of plant growth hormone and auxin or to the influence of the ionizing radiation, which causes chromosomal aberration in both mitotic and meiotic cells (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Mondal et al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">Nurmansyah et al., 2020</xref>). Otherwise, indirect damage of the entire genome may partly be responsible for the dose-dependent induction of oxidative stress and reactive oxygen species (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Ford et al., 2018</xref>), which react rapidly with other cellular molecules, exerting negative structural effects and inactivating them. These changes can trigger growth abnormalities (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Majeed et al., 2018</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4-2">
<title>4.2 M1 generation field experiment</title>
<p>Similar to the laboratory assay, the lowest seedling survival percentage of irradiated groundnut seeds was observed in the field at a higher irradiation dose, 350&#xa0;Gy, which was significantly different compared with other irradiation doses. Gamma irradiation has been reported to have negative consequences on seedling development due to various damages in the whole genome, such as deletions of DNA nucleotide sequences that may lead to reading-frame shifts, inactive protein products, or faulty transcripts (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Manova and Gruszka, 2015</xref>).</p>
<p>In addition, the M1 plants from irradiated seeds had a longer period before flowering, whereas those from the control had a shorter period (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref>). Similar results were observed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Essel et al. (2016)</xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B62">Verma et al. (2018)</xref>, reporting that increasing irradiation doses delayed flowering initiation.</p>
<p>Regarding the number of pods, higher irradiation doses resulted in decreased numbers. For the KP29 variety, 46.3 pods were observed for plants from M0 seeds, while 28.8 pods were observed for plants from seeds irradiated at 350&#xa0;Gy (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref>). However, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Majeed et al. (2016)</xref> observed that increasing gamma irradiation doses did not alter the number of pods in pea plants, which contradicts the current findings. Moreover, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B55">Sm&#xfd;kal et al. (2012)</xref> confirmed that the number of pods depend on several factors, both endogenic and exogenic.</p>
<p>Plant height is generally used as an index to confirm the biological effects of mutagenesis. Groundnut varieties showed a reduction in plant height with increasing doses of gamma radiation. Similar findings have been reported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Ahumada-Flores et al. (2021)</xref>, increase in the dose reduced plant height in wheat. This reduction could be due to the effects of gamma ray that may have altered the expression of the gibberellic acid 2-oxidase gene that controls the plant height affecting the vegetative growth of plants (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Ford et al., 2018</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4-3">
<title>4.3 M2 generation field experiment</title>
<p>Chlorophyll mutation frequency is one of the most reliable phonological markers for evaluating mutagen-induced genetic alterations. Identification of chlorophyll mutants in the M2 generation was based on the intensity of pigmentation at the seedling stage (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">Swaminathan et al., 1962</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Harten, 1998</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B67">Wani et al., 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B66">Wani et al., 2017</xref>). A large number of chlorophyll mutants has been reported in many crops, and this can be attributed to various causes, such as impaired chlorophyll biosynthesis, further degradation of chlorophyll, and bleaching due to carotenoid deficiency (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Bevins et al., 1992</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">Shah et al., 2006</xref>). In addition, mutation of this trait is more likely to be heritable in the segregating generations due to their genes being located on several chromosomes; these genes could be adjacent to the centromere and proximal segment of the chromosome (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Gustafsson, 1940</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">Swaminathan et al., 1962</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Gaul, 1964</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Goud, 1967</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Chopra, 2005</xref>).</p>
<p>In this study, seven different types of mutants were observed in the M2 generation under different doses of gamma irradiation. Among these doses, the highest number of chlorophyll mutants was recorded at 200&#xa0;Gy. Consistent with our results, previous studies by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B64">Wang et al. (2013)</xref> found that significant changes in chlorophyll development always resulted in the variation of leaf color. Additionally, various chlorotic mutants defective in ChlH, ChlD, or ChlI, which encode the Mg-chelatase subunits, have been identified in <italic>Arabidopsis</italic>, rice, barley, and tea (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Mochizuki et al., 2001</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Jung et al., 2003</xref>). Meanwhile, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">Papenbrock et al. (2000)</xref> reported that the loss of chlorophyll is caused by either a reduction or an excess accumulation of ChlI.</p>
<p>Among the types of chlorophyll mutants recorded in the two varieties, yellow-viridis and striata were the most dominant, followed by viridis, variegated, and chlorina. The reason for the appearance of yellow-viridis may be attributed to the involvement of polygenes in chlorophyll formation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Gaul, 1964</xref>). A study by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Ambarkar et al. (2005)</xref> reported the predominance of viridis among chlorophyll mutant types in chickpea. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">Sj&#xf6;din, (1962)</xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Kumari et al. (2019)</xref> reported that viridis was the most common type in <italic>Vicia faba</italic> and rice bean, followed by xantha, while albino was a rare mutant as in most Leguminosae. This is inconsistent with the results of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Khan et al. (2005)</xref>, where in the highest number was observed for xhanta mutants in chickpea and Black Gram (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Lal et al., 2009</xref>).</p>
<p>In addition, we observed that increasing the frequency of chlorophyll mutation depends on increasing irradiation doses. Similar findings that higher doses of mutagens induce a higher frequency of chlorophyll mutations have been previously reported (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B67">Wani et al., 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Mishra et al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">Patil and Rane, 2015</xref>). In contrast, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Nadarajan et al. (1982)</xref>and<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B67">Wani et al. (2011)</xref> reported that chlorophyll mutations are dose independent. A higher frequency of chlorophyll mutants was observed at lower or medium doses of the mutagen in various crops. These behaviors in chlorophyll mutants can be associated with the saturation of mutational events, which may result in the elimination of mutant cells during plant growth as reported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Kozgar (2014)</xref>, and with the nature and genes involved in each specific chlorophyll mutation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">FAO/IAEA, 2018</xref>), which remains relatively unclear (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Kolar et al., 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Li et al., 2013</xref>).</p>
<p>Early flowering mutant plants were mostly recorded at 100Gy, followed by 150Gy and 200Gy in both varieties. Similar results were reported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B62">Verma et al. (2018)</xref>, who observed significant variation in the number of days before flowering in coriander and fennel through induced mutation. This can be attributed to various hormones such as florigen that may have also been induced or inhibited to initiate or impede flowering.</p>
<p>Other types of morphological mutants, including color, shape, and seed number mutants, were observed at all irradiation doses, and the mutation frequency for these traits increased with increasing doses. At irradiation doses of 100 and 150Gy, the highest frequency of morphological mutants, including seed coat color mutants, seed shape mutants, pod mutants, and plants that had either shape/color mutations, was recorded. Similarly, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Chen et al. (2020)</xref> observed different mutants in various phenotypic traits, including leaf color and seed size and color, induced by ethyl methane sulphonate in groundnut. Seed mutants were also found in different legume crops induced by physical and chemical mutagens. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B65">Wani and Anis, (2008)</xref> found three mutants in chickpea following gamma radiation exposure and EMS induction, which gave different seed shapes and showed higher production compared to the control seeds. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B66">Wani et al. (2017)</xref> also reported bold seed and long pod mutants in mungbean, as well as <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">Nurmansyah et al. (2020)</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Mondal et al. (2017)</xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Barshile, (2018)</xref>, evaluated different seed shapes and coat colors in faba bean, groundnut and chickpea.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="conclusion" id="s5">
<title>5 Conclusion</title>
<p>This study allowed us to reveal that gamma irradiation can be used to generate novel agronomic and phenotypic variants of groundnut crops in Morocco. The highest number of mutants was identified at 100 and 150&#xa0;Gy. The variations appear as different morphological characteristics depending on the variety. Furthermore, we determined LD<sub>50</sub> from the radiosensitivity test, which will benefit future mutagenic research. This genetic gain can be stabilized in segregating generations, and the genome of desirable mutants can be used to develop and increase variability of groundnut.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec sec-type="data-availability" id="s6">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s7">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>SB and AH conceived and designed the experiments. IS conducted the experiments, analyzed the data, and drafted the manuscript. NB and MM participated in the experiments and data analysis, SB and AH participated in the writing and revised the manuscript. The final version was approved by all authors.</p>
</sec>
<ack>
<p>The authors would like to thank the support of AIEA for the African Regional Cooperative Agreement (AFRA); Enhancing Crop Productivity through Climate Smart Crop Varieties with Improved Resource Use Efficiency (RAF/5/083) in collaboration with the National Institute of Agricultural Research of Morocco (INRA).</p>
</ack>
<sec sec-type="COI-statement" id="s8">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="disclaimer" id="s9">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Abbou</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chabbi</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ayadi</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zantar</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Benicha</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Assessing environmental impacts of pesticide usage in oiled seed ecosystems using environmental pesticide pressure indicators: A case study of groundnut in loukkos plain, north-west Morocco</article-title>. <source>Env. Dev. Sustain.</source> <volume>24</volume> (<issue>12</issue>), <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>19</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10668-022-02828-z</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ahumada-Flores</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gomez-Pando</surname>
<given-names>L. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Parra-Cota</surname>
<given-names>F. I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>de la Cruz-Torres</surname>
<given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sarsu</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>de los Santos-Villalobos</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Technical note: Gamma irradiation induces changes of phenotypic and agronomic traits in wheat (Triticum turgidum ssp. durum)</article-title>. <source>Appl. Radiat. Isot.</source> <volume>167</volume>, <fpage>109490</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.apradiso.2020.109490</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ambarkar</surname>
<given-names>A. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Harer</surname>
<given-names>P. N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kulkarni</surname>
<given-names>R. V.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Radiosensitivity and visible mutations in chickpea [Cicer arietinum (L.)]</article-title>. <source>Adv. Plant Sci</source> <volume>18</volume> (<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>559</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>563</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Aparna</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chaturvedi</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sreedhar</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pavan-Kumar</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Venu-Babu</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Singhal</surname>
<given-names>R. K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Impact of gamma rays on the seed germination and seedling parameters of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.)</article-title>. <source>Asian J. Exp. Biol. Sci.</source> <volume>4</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>61</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>68</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Asare</surname>
<given-names>A. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mensah</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Acheampong</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Asare-Bediako</surname>
<given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Armah</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Effects of gamma irradiation on agromorphological characteristics of okra (abelmoschus esculentus L. Moench.)</article-title>. <source>Adv. Agric</source> <volume>2017</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>7</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1155/2017/2385106</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bado</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Forster</surname>
<given-names>B. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nielen</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ali</surname>
<given-names>A. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lagoda</surname>
<given-names>P. J. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bradley</surname>
<given-names>J. Till.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Plant mutation breeding: Current progress and future assessment</article-title>. <source>Plant Breed. Rev.</source> <volume>39</volume>, <fpage>23</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>88</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/9781119107743.ch02</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Barshile</surname>
<given-names>J. D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Characterization of bold seed mutant in chickpea cultivar Vijay</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Res. Biosci. Agric.Technol.</source> <volume>6</volume> (<issue>2</issue>).</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bevins</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Markwell</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1992</year>). <article-title>Characterization of chlorophyll deficient mutant of sweet clover (Melilotus alba)</article-title>. <source>Plant Physiol. biochem.</source> <volume>30</volume>, <fpage>327</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>331</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Breseghello</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Coelho</surname>
<given-names>A. S. G.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Traditional and modern plant breeding methods with examples in rice (oryza sativa L.)</article-title>. <source>J. Agric. Food Chem.</source> <volume>61</volume>, <fpage>8277</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>8286</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/jf305531j</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Huang</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Huang</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zeng</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Ethyl methyl sulfonate-induced mutagenesis and its effects on peanut agronomic, yield and quality traits</article-title>. <source>Agronomy</source> <volume>10</volume> (<issue>5</issue>), <fpage>655</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/agronomy10050655</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chopra</surname>
<given-names>V. L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Mutagenesis: Investigating the process and processing the outcome for crop improvement</article-title>. <source>Curr. Sci.</source> <volume>89</volume> (<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>353</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>359</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Essel</surname>
<given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Asante</surname>
<given-names>I. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Odamtten</surname>
<given-names>G. T.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Mutagenic effect of gamma irradiation on seed germination and yield components of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp)</article-title>. <source>J. Ghana Sci. Assoc.</source> <volume>17</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>53</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>59</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<citation citation-type="book">
<collab>FAO/IAEA</collab> (<year>2018</year>). <source>Manual on mutation breeding</source>. <edition>Third ed</edition>. <publisher-loc>Rome, Italy</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Food and Agriculture Organization on the Unated Nations</publisher-name>, <fpage>301</fpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ford</surname>
<given-names>B. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Foo</surname>
<given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sharwood</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Karafiatova</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vr&#xe1;na</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>MacMillan</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Rht18 Semidwarfism in wheat is due to increased GA 2-oxidaseA9 expression and reduced GA content</article-title>. <source>Plant Physiol.</source> <volume>177</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>168</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>180</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1104/pp.18.00023</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Gaul</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1964</year>). <article-title>Mutations in plant breeding</article-title>. <source>Radiat. Bot.</source> <volume>4</volume> (<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>155</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>232</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0033-7560(64)80069-7</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Gnankambary</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Batieno</surname>
<given-names>T. B. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sawadogo</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sawadogo</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yonli</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ou&#xe9;draogo</surname>
<given-names>J. T.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Assessment of radio-sensitivity for three cowpea genotypes to gamma irradiation</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Genet. Mol. Biol.</source> <volume>11</volume> (<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>29</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>33</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5897/ijgmb2019.0174</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Goud</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1967</year>). <article-title>Induced mutations in bread wheat</article-title>. <source>Indian Soc. Genet. Plant Breed.</source> <volume>27</volume>, <fpage>40</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>45</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Gowthami</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vanniarajan</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Souframanien</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pillai</surname>
<given-names>M. A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Comparison of radiosensitivity of two rice (Oryza sativa L.) varieties to gamma rays and electron beam in M1 generation</article-title>. <source>Electro. J. Plant Breed.</source> <volume>8</volume> (<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>732</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>741</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5958/0975-928x.2017.00111.9</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Gunasekaran</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pavadai</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Effect of gamma rays on germination, morphology, yield and biochemical studies in groundnut (<italic>Arachis hypogaea</italic> L.)</article-title>. <source>World Sci. News</source> <volume>23</volume>, <fpage>13</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>23</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Gustafsson</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1940</year>). <article-title>A mutation system of the chlorophyll apparatus</article-title>. <source>Lunds Univ. &#xc5;rsskrift</source> <volume>2</volume> (<issue>36</issue>), <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>40</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hameed</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mahmud-Shah</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Manzoor-Atta</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Haq</surname>
<given-names>M. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sayed</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Gamma irradiation effects on seed germination and growth, protein content, peroxidase and protease activity, lipid peroxidation in desi and kabuli chickpea</article-title>. <source>Pak. J. Bot.</source> <volume>40</volume> (<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>1033</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1041</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hanafy</surname>
<given-names>R. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Akladious</surname>
<given-names>S. A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Physiological and molecular studies on the effect of gamma radiation in fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.) plants</article-title>. <source>J. Genet. Eng. Biotechnol.</source> <volume>16</volume> (<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>683</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>692</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jgeb.2018.02.012</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Harten</surname>
<given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1998</year>). <source>Mutation breeding: Theory and practical applications</source>. <publisher-loc>Cambridge, United Kingdom</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Cambridge University Press</publisher-name>, <fpage>137</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>158</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<citation citation-type="book">
<collab>IBM Corp</collab> (<year>2019</year>). <source>IBM SPSS statistics for windows (version 26.0)</source>. <publisher-name>IBM Corp</publisher-name>. <comment>[Computer software]</comment>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Jung</surname>
<given-names>K. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hur</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ryu</surname>
<given-names>C. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Choi</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chung</surname>
<given-names>Y. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Miyao</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Characterization of a rice chlorophyll-deficient mutant using the T-DNA gene-trap system</article-title>. <source>Plant Cell. Physiol.</source> <volume>5</volume>, <fpage>463</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>472</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/pcp/pcg064</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Khan</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>WaniBhat</surname>
<given-names>M. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Parveen</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Induced chlorophyll mutations in chickpea (cicer arietinum L.)</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Agri. Biol.</source> <volume>7</volume>, <fpage>5</fpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Khursheed</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Laskar</surname>
<given-names>R. u. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Raina</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Amin</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Khan</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Comparative analysis of cytological abnormalities induced in Vicia faba L. genotypes using physical and chemical mutagenesis</article-title>. <source>Chromosome Sci.</source> <volume>18</volume>, <fpage>47</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>51</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.11352/scr.18.47</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kolar</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pawar</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dixit</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Induced chlorophyll mutations in delphinium malabaricum (huth) munz</article-title>. <source>J. Appl. Hortic.</source> <volume>13</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>18</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>24</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.37855/jah.2011.v13i01.04</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Konzak</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nilan</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wagner</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Foster</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1965</year>). <article-title>Efficient chemical mutagenesis</article-title>. <source>Radiat. Bot.</source> <volume>5</volume>, <fpage>49</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>70</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kozgar</surname>
<given-names>M. I.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). &#x201c;<article-title>Chlorophyll mutations</article-title>,&#x201d; in <source>Mutation breeding in chickpea: Perspectives and prospects for food security</source>. Editors <person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname>Michalczyk</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Suliman</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<publisher-loc>Warsaw, Poland</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>De Gruyter Open Poland</publisher-name>), <fpage>31</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>36</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kumari</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pal</surname>
<given-names>D. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Singh</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Induced chlorophyll mutation in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp.)</article-title>. <source>J. Pharm. Phytoch.</source> <volume>8</volume> (<issue>6</issue>), <fpage>1246</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1249</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kuzin</surname>
<given-names>A. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vogabova</surname>
<given-names>M. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Revin</surname>
<given-names>A. F.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1973</year>). <article-title>Molecular mechanism of the stimulating action of ionizing radiation on seeds.2. Activation of protein and high-molecular RNA synthesis</article-title>. <source>Radiobiologiia</source> <volume>16</volume>, <fpage>259</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>261</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lal</surname>
<given-names>G. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bini</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sapna</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Induced chlorophyll mutations in black gram</article-title>. <source>A. J. Agri. Sci.</source> <volume>1</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jia</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xia</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kong</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Characterization and mapping of novel chlorophyll deficient mutant genes in durum wheat</article-title>. <source>Breed. Sci.</source> <volume>63</volume> (<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>169</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>175</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1270/jsbbs.63.169</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Majeed</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Muhammad</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ullah</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Growth and yield response of field pea (pisum sativum L.) to gamma irradiation stress</article-title>. <source>Plant Breed. Seed Sci.</source> <volume>74</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>27</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>35</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1515/plass-2016-0012</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B36">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Majeed</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zahir</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rehman</surname>
<given-names>U.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hazrat</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Gamma irradiation I: Effect on germination and general growth characteristics of plants&#x2013;a review</article-title>. <source>Pak. J. Bot.</source> <volume>50</volume> (<issue>6</issue>).</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B37">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Manova</surname>
<given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gruszka</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>DNA damage and repair in plants &#x2013; from models to crops</article-title>. <source>Front. Plant Sci.</source> <volume>6</volume> (<issue>10</issue>), <fpage>885</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>926</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2015.00885</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B38">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Matova</surname>
<given-names>P. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kamutando</surname>
<given-names>C. N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sarsu</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Magorokosho</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Labuschagne</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Determining the optimum gamma irradiation dose for developing novel maize genotypes</article-title>. <source>J. Crop Improv.</source> <volume>35</volume> (<issue>4</issue>), <fpage>568</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>581</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/15427528.2020.1850591</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B39">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mishra</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Singh</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sahu</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Gamma ray induced macro-mutations in greengram [vigna radiata(L.) wilczek]</article-title>. <source>Intl. J. Agric. For.</source> <volume>3</volume> (<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>105</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>109</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5923/j.ijaf.20130303.06</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B40">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mochizuki</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Brusslan</surname>
<given-names>J. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Larkin</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nagatani</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chory</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2001</year>). <article-title>Arabidopsis genomes uncoupled 5 (GUN5) mutant reveals the involvement of Mg-chelatase H subunit in plastid-to-nucleus signal transduction</article-title>. <source>Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.</source> <volume>98</volume> (<issue>4</issue>), <fpage>2053</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2058</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.98.4.2053</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B41">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mondal</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Petwal</surname>
<given-names>V. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Badigannavar</surname>
<given-names>A. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bhad</surname>
<given-names>P. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Verma</surname>
<given-names>V. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Goswami</surname>
<given-names>S. G.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Electron beam irradiation revealed genetic differences in radio-sensitivity and generated mutants in groundnut (<italic>Arachis hypogaea</italic> L.)</article-title>. <source>Appl. Radiat. Isot.</source> <volume>122</volume>, <fpage>78</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>83</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.apradiso.2017.01.016</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B42">
<citation citation-type="web">
<collab>MVD</collab> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Mutant variety Database</article-title>. <comment>Available at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://mvd.iaea.org/">https://mvd.iaea.org/</ext-link>
</comment>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B43">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Nadarajan</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sathupati</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shivaswamy</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1982</year>). <article-title>Investigation of induced macromutations in Cajanus cajan</article-title>. <source>Madras Agric. J.</source> <volume>69</volume>, <fpage>713</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>717</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B44">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Nithila</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Durga</surname>
<given-names>D. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Velu</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Amutha</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rangaraju</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Physiological evaluation of groundnut (<italic>Arachis hypogaea</italic> L.)varieties for salt tolerance and amelioration for Salt Stress</article-title>. <source>Res. J. Agric. For. Sci.</source> <volume>1</volume> (<issue>11</issue>), <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>8</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B45">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Nurmansyah</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Alghamdi</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Migdadi</surname>
<given-names>H. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Morphological diversity of faba bean (Vicia faba L.) M2 mutant populations induced by gamma radiation and diethyl sulfate</article-title>. <source>J. King Saud. Univ. Sci.</source> <volume>32</volume> (<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>1647</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1658</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jksus.2019.12.024</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B46">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Oladosu</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rafii</surname>
<given-names>M. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Abdullah</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hussin</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ramli</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rahim</surname>
<given-names>H. A.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Principle and application of plant mutagenesis in crop improvement: A review</article-title>. <source>Biotechnol. Biotechnolo. Equip.</source> <volume>30</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>16</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/13102818.2015.1087333</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B47">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Olasupo</surname>
<given-names>F. O.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ilori</surname>
<given-names>C. O.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Forster</surname>
<given-names>B. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bado</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Selection for novel mutations induced by gamma irradiation in cowpea [vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.]</article-title>. <source>Intl. J. Plant Breed. Genet.</source> <volume>12</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>12</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3923/ijpbg.2018.1.12</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B48">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Olasupo</surname>
<given-names>F. O.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Olumuyiwa Ilori</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Forster</surname>
<given-names>B. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bado</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Mutagenic Effects of Gamma Radiation on Eight Accessions of Cowpea (&#x26;lt;i&#x26;amp;gt;Vigna unguiculata&#x26;amp;lt;/i&#x26;amp;gt; [L.] Walp.)</article-title>. <source>Am. J. Plant Sci.</source> <volume>07</volume> (<issue>02</issue>), <fpage>339</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>351</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ajps.2016.72034</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B49">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Papenbrock</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pf&#xfc;ndelMock</surname>
<given-names>E. H.-P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Grimm</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2000</year>). <article-title>Decreased and increased expression of the subunit CHL I diminishes Mg chelatase activity and reduces chlorophyll synthesis in transgenic tobacco plants</article-title>. <source>Plant J</source> <volume>22</volume> (<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>155</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>164</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1046/j.1365-313x.2000.00724.x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B50">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Patil</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rane</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Gamma radiation induced chlorophyll mutations in cluster bean (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (L.) Taub) var-12. I</article-title>. <source>J. A. P. R. R.</source> <volume>2</volume> (<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>75</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>85</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B51">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Postelnicu</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <source>Probit analysis</source>. <publisher-loc>Berlin Heidelberg</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science Springer</publisher-name>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/978-3-642-04898-2461</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B52">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Shah</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mirza</surname>
<given-names>J. I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Atta</surname>
<given-names>B. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Induced genetic variability in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) I. Frequency and spectrum of chlorophyll mutations</article-title>. <source>Pak. J. Bot.</source> <volume>38</volume> (<issue>4</issue>), <fpage>1217</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1226</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B53">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Singh</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Raina</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sharma</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chaudhary</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sharma</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rajpal</surname>
<given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). &#x201c;<article-title>Functional uses of peanut (<italic>Arachis hypogaea</italic> L.) seed storage proteins</article-title>,&#x201d; in <source>Grain and Seed Proteins Functionality</source>. Editor <person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname>Jimenez-Lopez</surname>
<given-names>J. C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> <publisher-loc>London, United Kingdom</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>IntechOpen</publisher-name>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5772/intechopen.96871</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B54">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sj&#xf6;din</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1962</year>). <article-title>Some observations in X1 and X2 of Vicia faba L., after treatment with different mutagens</article-title>. <source>Hereditas</source> <volume>48</volume>, <fpage>565</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>586</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B55">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sm&#xfd;kal</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Aubert</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Burstin</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Coyne</surname>
<given-names>C. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ellis</surname>
<given-names>N. T. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Flavell</surname>
<given-names>A. J. R.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Pea (pisum sativum L.) in the genomic era</article-title>. <source>Agronomy</source> <volume>2</volume> (<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>74</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>115</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/agronomy2020074</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B56">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Spencer-Lopes</surname>
<given-names>M. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jankuloski</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mukhtar Ali Ghanim</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Matijevic</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kodym</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). &#x201c;<article-title>Physical mutagenesis</article-title>,&#x201d; in <source>Manual on mutation breeding</source>. Editors <person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname>Spencer-Lopes</surname>
<given-names>M. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Forster</surname>
<given-names>B. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jankuloski</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<publisher-loc>Rome, Italy</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations</publisher-name>), <fpage>5</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>49</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B57">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Swaminathan</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chopra</surname>
<given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bhaskaran</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1962</year>). <article-title>Chromosome aberrations and the frequency and spectrum of mutations induced by ethylmethane sulphonate in barley and wheat</article-title>. <source>Ind. J. Genet. Plant Breed.</source> <volume>22</volume>, <fpage>192</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>207</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B58">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Tshilenge-Lukanda</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kalonji-Mbuyi</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nkongolo</surname>
<given-names>K. K. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kizungu</surname>
<given-names>R. V.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Effect of Gamma Irradiation on Morpho-Agronomic Characteristics of Groundnut (&#x26;lt;i&#x26;amp;gt;<italic>Arachis hypogaea</italic>&#x26;amp;lt;/i&#x26;amp;gt; L.)</article-title>. <source>A. J. Plant Sci.</source> <volume>04</volume> (<issue>11</issue>), <fpage>2186</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2192</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ajps.2013.411271</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B59">
<citation citation-type="web">
<collab>USDA-FAS</collab> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>United States department of agriculture, foreign agricultural service (USDA-FAS)</article-title>. <comment>Available at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.fas.usda.gov/data">https://www.fas.usda.gov/data</ext-link>
</comment>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B60">
<citation citation-type="web">
<collab>USDA-IPAD</collab> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>The international production assessment division (IPAD) of the USDA&#x2019;s foreign agricultural service (FAS)</article-title>. <comment>Available at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://ipad.fas.usda.gov/">https://ipad.fas.usda.gov/</ext-link>
</comment>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B61">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Valenzuela-Ruiz</surname>
<given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ayala-Zepeda</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Arellano-Wattenbarger</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Parra-Cota</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Garc&#xed;a-Pereyra</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Avi&#xf1;a-Mart&#xed;nez</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Las colecciones microbianas y su potencial contribuci&#xf3;n a la seguridad alimentaria actual y futura</article-title>. <source>Rev. Latinoam. Recur. Nat.</source> <volume>14</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>18</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>25</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B62">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Verma</surname>
<given-names>A. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dhanasekar</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Choudhary</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Meena</surname>
<given-names>R. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lal</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Estimation of induced variability in M2 generation of fennel (Foeniculum vulgareMill.)</article-title>. <source>J. Pharm. Phytochem.</source> <volume>7</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>430</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>436</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B63">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Verma</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nizam</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Verma</surname>
<given-names>P. K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). &#x201c;<article-title>Biotic and abiotic stress signaling in plants</article-title>,&#x201d; in <source>Stress signaling in plants: Genomics and proteomics perspective</source>. Editors <person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname>Sarwat</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Altaf</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Abdin</surname>
<given-names>M. Z.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<publisher-name>Springer Science</publisher-name>), <fpage>25</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>49</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B64">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>Z.-k.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Huang</surname>
<given-names>Y.-x.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Miao</surname>
<given-names>Z.-d.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hu</surname>
<given-names>Z.-y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Song</surname>
<given-names>X.-z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Identification and characterization of BGL11(t), a novel gene regulating leaf-color mutation in rice (Oryza sativa L.)</article-title>. <source>Genes Genom</source> <volume>35</volume>, <fpage>491</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>499</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s13258-013-0094-4</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B65">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wani</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Anis</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Gamma ray- and EMS-induced bold-seeded high-yielding mutants in chickpea (cicer arietinum L.).T</article-title>. <source>J. Biol.</source> <volume>32</volume>, <fpage>161</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>166</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B66">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wani</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dar</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tak</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Amin</surname>
<given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shah</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rehman</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Chemo-induced pod and seed mutants in mungbean (Vigna Radiata L. Wilczek)</article-title>. <source>SAARC J. Agric.</source> <volume>15</volume>, <fpage>57</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>67</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3329/sja.v15i2.35161</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B67">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wani</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Khan</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kozgar</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Induced chlorophyll mutations. I. Mutagenic effectiveness and efficiency of EMS, HZ and SA in mungbean</article-title>. <source>Front. Agri. China</source> <volume>5</volume>, <fpage>514</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>518</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11703-011-1126-y</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>