<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="EN" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Genet.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Genetics</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Genet.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">1664-8021</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">895146</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fgene.2022.895146</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Genetics</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Comparative chloroplast genome analyses of 23 species in <italic>Swertia</italic> L. (Gentianaceae) with implications for its phylogeny</article-title>
<alt-title alt-title-type="left-running-head">Yang et al.</alt-title>
<alt-title alt-title-type="right-running-head">
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2022.895146">10.3389/fgene.2022.895146</ext-link>
</alt-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname>
<given-names>Lucun</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1139575/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>Jingjing</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">
<sup>3</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Zhou</surname>
<given-names>Guoying</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001">&#x2a;</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1004526/overview"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1">
<label>
<sup>1</sup>
</label>
<institution>Northwest Institute of Plateau Biology</institution>, <institution>Chinese Academy of Sciences</institution>, <addr-line>Xining</addr-line>, <country>China</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff2">
<label>
<sup>2</sup>
</label>
<institution>Key Laboratory of Tibetan Medicine Research</institution>, <institution>Chinese Academy of Sciences</institution>, <addr-line>Xining</addr-line>, <country>China</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff3">
<label>
<sup>3</sup>
</label>
<institution>College of Life Science, Qinghai Normal University</institution>, <addr-line>Xining</addr-line>, <country>China</country>
</aff>
<author-notes>
<corresp id="c001">&#x2a;Correspondence: Guoying Zhou, <email>zhougy@nwipb.cas.cn</email>
</corresp>
<fn fn-type="other">
<p>This article was submitted to Plant Genomics, a section of the journal Frontiers in Genetics</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>
<bold>Edited by:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/513975/overview">Madhav P. Nepal</ext-link>, South Dakota State University, United States</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>
<bold>Reviewed by:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/646414/overview">Abdullah</ext-link>, Quaid-i-Azam University, Pakistan</p>
<p>
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/913620/overview">Surendra Neupane</ext-link>, University of Florida, United States</p>
<p>
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1494299/overview">Jia-Yu Xue</ext-link>, Nanjing Agricultural University, China</p>
</fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>31</day>
<month>08</month>
<year>2022</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2022</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>13</volume>
<elocation-id>895146</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>13</day>
<month>03</month>
<year>2022</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>06</day>
<month>07</month>
<year>2022</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#xa9; 2022 Yang, Li and Zhou.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2022</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Yang, Li and Zhou</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>
<italic>Swertia</italic> L. is a large genus in the family Gentianaceae. Different chloroplast gene segments have been used to study systematic evolutionary relationships between species of <italic>Swertia</italic> L. However, as gene fragment&#x2013;based phylogenies lack sufficient resolution, the systematic evolutionary relationships between <italic>Swertia</italic> L. species have remained unclear. We sequenced and annotated the complete chloroplast genomes of four <italic>Swertia</italic> species, namely, <italic>S. bifolia</italic>, <italic>S. tetraptera</italic>, <italic>S. franchetian</italic>, and <italic>S. przewalskii</italic>, using next generation sequencing and the plastid genome annotator tool. The chloroplast genome sequences of 19 additional species of <italic>Swertia</italic> L. were downloaded from the NCBI database and also assessed. We found that all 23 <italic>Swertia</italic> L. species had a similar genetic structure, that is, a ring tetrad structure, but with some clear differences. The chloroplast genomes of the 23 <italic>Swertia</italic> L. species were 149036&#x2013;153691 bp long, averaging 152385&#xa0;bp; the genomes contained 134 functional genes: 38 tRNA, eight rRNA, and 88 protein-encoding genes. A comparative analysis showed that chloroplasts genome of <italic>Swertia</italic> was conserved in terms of genome structure, codon preference, and repeat sequences, but it differed in terms of genome sizes, gene contents, and SC/IR boundary. Using <italic>Swertia wolfangiana</italic> as a reference, we found clear divergences in most of the non-coding and intergenic regions of the complete chloroplast genomes of these species; we also found that <italic>rpoC1</italic>, <italic>ccsA</italic>, <italic>ndhI</italic>, <italic>ndhA</italic>, and <italic>rps15</italic> protein-coding genes had large variations. These highly variable hotspots will be useful for future phylogenetic and population genetic studies. Phylogenetic analysis with high bootstrap support showed that <italic>Swertia</italic> L. was not monophyletic. The classification of subgen. <italic>Swertia</italic> and subgen. <italic>Ophelia</italic> was supported by molecular data, which also partly supported the division of sect. <italic>Ophelia</italic>, sect. <italic>Platynema</italic>, sect. <italic>Poephila,</italic> sect<italic>. Swertia</italic>, and sect. <italic>Macranthos</italic>. However, the systematic positions of other groups and species require further exploration. The <italic>Swertia</italic> L formed at 29.60&#xa0;Ma. Speciation of 10 species occurred in succession after 12&#xa0;Ma and 13 species occurred in succession after 2.5&#xa0;Ma. Our analysis provides insight into the unresolved evolutionary relationships of <italic>Swertia</italic> L. species.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>
<italic>Swertia</italic>
</kwd>
<kwd>chloroplast genome</kwd>
<kwd>comparative analysis</kwd>
<kwd>phylogenetic analysis</kwd>
<kwd>repeat sequences</kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="s1">
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>
<italic>Swertia</italic> L. is a large genus in the family Gentianaceae and is widely distributed in Asia, Africa, and North America, with only a few species found in Europe. There are 170 species of <italic>Swertia</italic> L. plants, divided into 3 subgenera and 11 groups, which include 79 species found in China. These 79 species are most abundant in the Qinghai&#x2013;Tibetan Plateau (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B70">Struwe and Albert, 2002</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B73">Von Hagen and Kadereit, 2002</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Ho and Liu, 2015</xref>). A variety of plants in the <italic>Swertia</italic> L. genus have a long history of medicinal use in China. These plants and their components (such as oleanolic acid) have liver protective, enzyme lowering, anti-inflammatory, cardiotonic, diuretic, and anticancer effects and currently comprise part of an effective drug strategy for the treatment of hepatitis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">Liang and Gao, 1979</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Chen et al., 1999</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">Ma et al., 2008</xref>). Recent pharmacological studies have shown that plants from this genus can strengthen the heart, lower blood glucose concentration, promote blood circulation, and inhibit testosterone reductase (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Li et al., 2007</xref>). Thus, a significant amount of attention has been paid to <italic>Swertia</italic> L. because of its extensive pharmacological effects. However, the origins of this genus have been disputed, even at the subgenus and species levels (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Chassot et al., 2001</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B70">Struwe and Albert, 2002</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B73">Von Hagen and Kadereit, 2002</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B69">Shi, 2004</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Favre et al., 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B76">Xi et al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Cao et al., 2021</xref>). Different types of molecular data have been used to study the systematic evolutionary relationships between the species of <italic>Swertia</italic> L. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Chassot et al., 2001</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B73">Von Hagen and Kadereit, 2002</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Favre et al., 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B76">Xi et al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Cao et al., 2021</xref>), all of which have shown that the genus is not monophyletic (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Chassot et al., 2001</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B73">Von Hagen and Kadereit, 2002</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Favre et al., 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B76">Xi et al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Cao et al., 2021</xref>). Nevertheless, the systematic relationships within the <italic>Swertia</italic> L. genus have not been well resolved, and there remains great conflict between many molecular systematics studies and the traditional classification system based on morphological traits (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Chassot et al., 2001</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B73">Von Hagen and Kadereit, 2002</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Favre et al., 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B76">Xi et al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Cao et al., 2021</xref>). This conflict has mainly been caused by the low resolution of the chloroplast and its gene fragments. Although there are stark differences in sequence variation between genes, the phylogenetic information provided by one or a few gene segments is limited and phylogenetic trees may reflect only the gene trees of the few segments analyzed. Because gene trees are not always equivalent to species trees, they may not represent the true phylogenetic relationships between species. Molecular fragments are an important source of the traits displayed by specific taxa. Although they can provide significant information for the systematic reconstruction of taxa, they cannot truly reflect the real historical evolution of the taxa. Therefore, new techniques have been needed to evaluate the genetic relationships between <italic>Swertia</italic> L. species. At present, molecular markers such as nrDNA, chloroplast DNA, mitochondrial DNA, ISSR, and RAPD were widely used in phylogenetic studies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Hakki et al., 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B60">Pikunova et al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Adams and Schwarzbach, 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">Liu et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Kousteni et al., 2021</xref>). Also, RAPD and ISSR were used to access the genetic diversity in <italic>Swertia</italic> L. (Neupane et al., 2017; Chhipi Shrestha et al., 2013). However, as a dominant marker, RAPD and ISSR cannot effectively distinguish heterozygous and homozygous genotypes, so the results are not very reliable when used to study the relationship between species or related genera. In recent years, a comparative analysis of the complete chloroplast genomes of different related species has become a promising method for the study of phylogeny, population dynamics, and species evolution.</p>
<p>Chloroplasts are the descendants of ancient bacteria (early plants and cyanobacteria) and are important organelles for photosynthesis in plants. Thus, they confer on plants the role of producers in the ecological environments of the Earth. Chloroplasts, which are responsible for many metabolic tasks in addition to photosynthesis, are therefore extremely important and energetic organelles in plant cells (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Brunkard et al., 2015</xref>). Compared with nuclear genomes, chloroplast genomes have the following advantages for a phylogenetic analysis. First, chloroplast genomes have high copy numbers and relatively small complete sequencing sizes, making them suitable for analyzing the evolutionary relationships of plants (McNeal et al., 2006). Second, chloroplasts have a quadripartite structure with 100&#x2013;130 genes, all of which have highly conserved sequences and competition, making these genomes more conducive to comparison and analysis of evolution and kinship between species (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B74">Wicke et al., 2011</xref>). Due to its low replacement rate, lack of nucleotide recombination, and uniparental DNA sequence, the chloroplast genome is a key data source for inferring plant phylogeny (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B67">Shaw et al., 2005</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Chen and Liu, 2008</xref>). In recent years, complete chloroplast genomes have been widely used in phylogenetic and genetic relationship analyses of plants, allowing researchers to directly assess the evolutionary relationships between plants (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B78">Yang et al., 2016</xref>). For example, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B77">Yang et al. (2019)</xref> reconstructed phylogenetic trees based on whole-genome chloroplast data from 34 <italic>Vitis</italic> genera and found results consistent with the traditional classification.</p>
<p>In this study, an Illumina HiSeq sequencing platform was used to obtain the whole chloroplast genome sequences of four species in the genus <italic>Swertia</italic> L: <italic>S</italic>. <italic>tetraptera</italic>, <italic>S</italic>. <italic>franchetian</italic>, <italic>S</italic>. <italic>przewalskii</italic>, and <italic>S</italic>. <italic>bifolia.</italic> Based on the statistics listed in the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) database, we found that the chloroplast genomes of 23 species in <italic>Swertia</italic> L., including the four used in this study, have been published. However, most studies on <italic>Swertia</italic> L. have been limited to the publication of single chloroplast genomes, and there have been no systematic analyses of gene structure variations and phylogenetic relationships. Therefore, to obtain a comprehensive and deep understanding of the evolutionary relationships of <italic>Swertia</italic> L. species, all 23 chloroplast genomes were used in this study. The main scientific questions addressed in this study are as follows: 1) How are chloroplast genomes structured and how do they vary across species of <italic>Swertia</italic> L.? 2) What is the phylogenetic relationship between species of <italic>Swertia</italic> L.?</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="materials|methods" id="s2">
<title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="s2-1">
<title>Plant materials</title>
<p>In total, 23 species of <italic>Swertia</italic> L. were selected, four of which were sequenced using Illumina sequencing; the remaining 19 sequences were obtained from GenBank. Fresh young leaves of <italic>S. tetraptera</italic>, <italic>S. franchetian</italic>, <italic>S. przewalskii</italic>, and <italic>S. bifolia</italic> were sampled from Mengyuan county (101.32&#x2032; E, 37.62&#x2032;N, 3,208&#xa0;m), Huangzhong county (101.63&#x2032; E, 36.57&#x2032;N, 2,510&#xa0;m), Qilian county (99.61&#x2032;E, 38.83&#x2032;N, 3,234&#xa0;m), and Qilian county (102.22&#x2032;E, 37.45&#x2032;N, 3,135&#xa0;m), respectively, all in the Qinghai province of China. Voucher specimens were deposited in the QTPMB (Qinghai&#x2013;Tibetan Plateau Museum of Biology) with the voucher numbers QHGC-2011, QHGC20190821, QHGC-2013, and QHGC-2014, respectively. The leaves were dried and preserved in a silica gel.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-2">
<title>Genomic DNA extraction and sequencing</title>
<p>The improved cetyltrimethylammonium bromide method was used to extract the total DNA of <italic>Swertia</italic> L. plants (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Doyle, 1991</xref>). Agarose gel electrophoresis and a NanoDrop 2000 microspectrophotometer were used to measure the purity and concentration of the DNA. After Illumina PE library was constructed, high-throughput sequencing was completed by Beijing Biomarker Technologies Co., Ltd. Moreover, 150bp paired-end sequencing was performed using Illumina HiSeq (TM) 2000. Raw sequencing data were transformed into sequenced reads (raw data) by performing a base calling analysis of the raw image files. Raw reads data obtained by sequencing were filtered using ngSQCToolkit_v2.3.3 software (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B59">Patel and Jain, 2012</xref>) to remove low-quality regions and obtain clean reads. The results were then stored in the FASTQ format.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-3">
<title>Assembly, annotation, and sequence analyses</title>
<p>Chloroplast genome assembly was performed using the iterative organelle genome assembly pipeline (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Bakker et al., 2016</xref>). The chloroplast genome of <italic>S. mussotii</italic> (NC_031155) was used as the reference sequence. SPAdes v3.6.1 software was used for <italic>ab novo</italic> splicing under default parameters and to generate a series of contigs (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B62">Prjibelski et al., 2020</xref>). Contigs larger than 1,000&#xa0;bp were used for chloroplast genome assembly. Complete chloroplast genome sequences were constructed by matching and linking contigs (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Kearse et al., 2012</xref>) and filling the gaps after assembly using second-generation sequencing technology.</p>
<p>The plastid genome annotator tool was used for the functional annotation of <italic>Swertia</italic> L. chloroplast genomes; the start codon, stop codon, and other problematic sites in the annotation result were adjusted manually (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B63">Qu et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B72">Tian et al., 2021</xref>). The annotated chloroplast genome data were exported in Gb format, and the chloroplast genome maps of the four <italic>Swertia</italic> L. species were drawn using OGDRAW (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">Marc et al., 2013</xref>) software. The sequence data and gene annotation information were then uploaded to the NCBI database. The GenBank accession numbers were NC_056357 (<italic>S.franchetiana</italic>), ON164641 (<italic>S.tetraptera</italic>), ON017794 (<italic>S.przewalskii</italic>), and ON018645 (<italic>S.bifolia</italic>).</p>
<p>We used CodonW1.4.2 software to confirm the relative synonymous codon usage (RSCU) and amino acid usage frequency.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-4">
<title>Genome comparison analysis</title>
<p>The chloroplast DNA rearrangement analyses of the 23 <italic>Swertia</italic> L. species were carried out using Mauve alignment (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Darling et al., 2004</xref>). To show interspecific variation, after annotating the files using Python 3.10.1, the chloroplast genomes of another 22 species of <italic>Swertia</italic> L. were compared using the online software mVISTA (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Frazer et al., 2004</xref>) and <italic>S. wolfgangiana</italic> as a reference genome. Variations were detected using the Shuffle-LAGAN model. The percentages of variable characters in the coding and non-coding regions were calculated using the method developed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B79">Zhang et al. (2011)</xref>. IRscope software (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Amiryousefi et al., 2018</xref>) was used to visually analyze the contraction and expansion of the four boundaries of the 23 species of <italic>Swertia</italic> L.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-5">
<title>Identification of repeat sequences and simple sequence repeats</title>
<p>The online software REPuter (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Kurtz et al., 2001</xref>) was used to detect repeats in the chloroplast genome, such as forward (F), reverse (R), complementary (C), and palindromic (P). The minimum repetition was set to 30&#xa0;bp and minimum repetition sequence length distance to 3. In addition, the online program Tandem Repeats Finder was used to detect tandem repeats (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Benson, 1999</xref>). MISA software (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://pgrc.ipk-gatersleben.de/misa/">https://pgrc.ipk-gatersleben.de/misa/</ext-link>) was used to predict simple sequence repeat (SSR) in chloroplast genome, and the parameters were set as follows: mononucleotide unit repetition number &#x2265;10; dinucleotide unit repetition number &#x2265;5; trinucleotide unit repetition number &#x2265;4; and tetraconucleotide, pentanucleotide, and hexanucleotide unit repetition number &#x2265;3 (Beier et al., 2017).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-6">
<title>Phylogenetic analysis</title>
<p>In this study, 23 species were used to construct a phylogenetic tree based on Bayesian inference (BI) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B65">Ronquist and Huelsenbeck, 2003</xref>), using <italic>Gentianopsis paludosa</italic> (NC_050656) as the outgroup. Mafft v7.205 software was used to compare the sequences and remove irregular sequences at both ends (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Kazutaka and Standley, 2013</xref>). Before building the BI tree, PAUP and MrModeltest were jointly run through MrMTgui. The Akaike information criterion results showed that the best model for BI analysis was GTR &#x2b; I &#x2b; G, with a random tree as the starting tree. Starting with four Markov chains, that is, three hot chains and one cold chain, we saved one tree every 100 generations, calculated 9,000,000 generations, discarded the first 25% preheated (Burn-in) trees, and used the remaining trees to calculate the Bayesian posterior probability (PP) of the consistent tree and each branch.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-7">
<title>Estimation of the divergence times of <italic>Swertia</italic> L. Species</title>
<p>Based on the obtained chloroplast genome sequences, the divergence times of <italic>Swertia</italic> L. species was estimated using the Markov Monte Carlo algorithm (MCMC) molecular sequence Bayesian analysis in BEAST V1.7 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Drummond et al., 2012</xref>). First, BEAUti in the software package of BEAST was used to set the parameters of the sequence file in the Nexus format, and the optimal nucleotide substitution model was GTR &#x2b; I &#x2b; G, which was selected by MrModeltest. The uncorrelated relaxed clock method was used for the branch lengths with a Gama distribution. Due to the lack of fossil evidence for <italic>Swertia</italic> L. plants, the time was set at 15&#xa0;Ma (million years), which was from the published literature (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Chassot et al., 2001</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B73">Von Hagen and Kadereit, 2002</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Cao et al., 2021</xref>), and the standard variance was 1.0. After a burn-in of 10,000,000 steps, all of the parameters were collected once every 1,000 steps up to 1,00,000,000 Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithm steps. Then an XML format file was generated. The XML format file was imported to BEAST software. The convergence of the MCMC results was detected by using the Tracer v 1.5 program to check that the chain was balanced; we then used the Tree Annotator v 1.7.5 program to obtain the best tree merging and Figtree v 1.4.4 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B64">Rambaut, 2018</xref>) was used to view the resulting tree.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="results|discussion" id="s3">
<title>Results and discussion</title>
<sec id="s3-1">
<title>Comparison of the chloroplast genomes of 23 <italic>Swertia</italic> L. Species</title>
<p>The chloroplast genome lengths of the <italic>Swertia</italic> L. species ranged from 149,036&#xa0;bp to 153,691&#xa0;bp, with an average length of 152,385&#xa0;bp (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>). <italic>S. bimaculata</italic> had the longest chloroplast genome, differing from other species in <italic>Swertia</italic> L by 0.06&#x2013;4.715&#xa0;kb. As can be seen from the comparison of chloroplast sections, such differences mainly occurred in the large single-copy (LSC) and IR regions. The chloroplast genome length of angiosperms is generally 115&#x2013;165&#xa0;kb and that of Gentianaceae is 137&#x2013;154&#xa0;kb, which is consistent with the length characteristics of angiosperms and Gentianaceae (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">Li et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Dong et al., 2020</xref>). Compared with other genera of Gentianaceae, the average chloroplast genome length of <italic>Swertia</italic> L. was similar to that of <italic>Halenia</italic> (153&#xa0;kb), but shorter than that of <italic>Paedera</italic> (154&#xa0;kb) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Dong et al., 2020</xref>). The chloroplast genomes of the <italic>Swertia</italic> L. species contained two reverse repeats, IRa and IRb, which divided the whole genome into four parts; the remainder comprised LSC and small single-copy (SSC) regions (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1</xref>). The chloroplast genomes of the <italic>Swertia</italic> L. species had the ring tetrad structure typical of angiosperm chloroplast genomes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B58">Palmer, 1985</xref>), which made the chloroplast genome highly conserved. The lengths of the LSC regions varied from 80,432&#xa0;bp to 84,156&#xa0;bp, with a total GC content of 32.18%&#x2013;36.35%. The GC content of the SSC region was 31.25%&#x2013;33.66%, and the total length ranged from 17,887&#xa0;bp to 18,395&#xa0;bp. The pair of IRs had a length range of 25,069&#x2013;25,890&#xa0;bp and GC content of 42.16%&#x2013;44.38% (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap id="T1" position="float">
<label>TABLE 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Complete genome features of <italic>Swertia</italic> L. species.</p>
</caption>
<table>
<thead valign="top">
<tr>
<th align="left">Species</th>
<th align="left">All length (bp)</th>
<th align="left">GC (%)</th>
<th align="left">LSC length (bp)</th>
<th align="left">GC (%)</th>
<th align="left">SSC length (bp)</th>
<th align="left">GC (%)</th>
<th align="left">IR length (bp)</th>
<th align="left">GC (%)</th>
<th align="left">GenBank accession numbers</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td align="left">
<italic>Swertia bifolia</italic>
</td>
<td align="left">153,242</td>
<td align="left">38.06</td>
<td align="left">83,496</td>
<td align="left">36.16</td>
<td align="left">18,200</td>
<td align="left">31.89</td>
<td align="left">25,773</td>
<td align="left">43.33</td>
<td align="left">ON018645</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<italic>Swertia bimaculata</italic>
</td>
<td align="left">153,751</td>
<td align="left">38.03</td>
<td align="left">84,156</td>
<td align="left">36.02</td>
<td align="left">18,089</td>
<td align="left">32.07</td>
<td align="left">25,753</td>
<td align="left">43.39</td>
<td align="left">MW344296</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<italic>Swertia cincta</italic>
</td>
<td align="left">149,089</td>
<td align="left">38.20</td>
<td align="left">80,481</td>
<td align="left">36.34</td>
<td align="left">17,946</td>
<td align="left">31.79</td>
<td align="left">25,331</td>
<td align="left">43.42</td>
<td align="left">MZ261898</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<italic>Swertia cordata</italic>
</td>
<td align="left">153,429</td>
<td align="left">38.05</td>
<td align="left">83,612</td>
<td align="left">36.16</td>
<td align="left">18,037</td>
<td align="left">31.75</td>
<td align="left">25,890</td>
<td align="left">43.3</td>
<td align="left">NC_054359</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<italic>Swertia dichotoma</italic>
</td>
<td align="left">152,977</td>
<td align="left">37.5</td>
<td align="left">83,622</td>
<td align="left">35.55</td>
<td align="left">18,092</td>
<td align="left">31.25</td>
<td align="left">25,069</td>
<td align="left">43.02</td>
<td align="left">MZ261899.1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<italic>Swertia dilatata</italic>
</td>
<td align="left">150,057</td>
<td align="left">38.17</td>
<td align="left">81,310</td>
<td align="left">36.28</td>
<td align="left">17,887</td>
<td align="left">31.79</td>
<td align="left">25,430</td>
<td align="left">43.42</td>
<td align="left">MW344298</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<italic>Swertia diluta</italic>
</td>
<td align="left">153,691</td>
<td align="left">38.10</td>
<td align="left">83,859</td>
<td align="left">36.20</td>
<td align="left">18,300</td>
<td align="left">31.9</td>
<td align="left">25,766</td>
<td align="left">43.5</td>
<td align="left">NC057681.1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<italic>Swertia erythrosticta</italic>
</td>
<td align="left">153,039</td>
<td align="left">38.10</td>
<td align="left">83,372</td>
<td align="left">36.18</td>
<td align="left">18,249</td>
<td align="left">31.89</td>
<td align="left">25,709</td>
<td align="left">43.33</td>
<td align="left">MW344299</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<italic>Swertia franchetiana</italic>
</td>
<td align="left">153,428</td>
<td align="left">38.2</td>
<td align="left">83,564</td>
<td align="left">34.66</td>
<td align="left">18,342</td>
<td align="left">33.22</td>
<td align="left">25, 749</td>
<td align="left">43.28</td>
<td align="left">NC_056357</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<italic>Swertia hispidicalyx</italic>
</td>
<td align="left">149,488</td>
<td align="left">38.19</td>
<td align="left">80,727</td>
<td align="left">36.30</td>
<td align="left">17,903</td>
<td align="left">31.81</td>
<td align="left">25,429</td>
<td align="left">43.42</td>
<td align="left">NC_044474</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<italic>Swertia kouitchensis</italic>
</td>
<td align="left">153,475</td>
<td align="left">38.15</td>
<td align="left">83,595</td>
<td align="left">36.23</td>
<td align="left">18,348</td>
<td align="left">31.93</td>
<td align="left">25,766</td>
<td align="left">43.47</td>
<td align="left">MZ261902</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<italic>Swertia leducii</italic>
</td>
<td align="left">153,015</td>
<td align="left">38.17</td>
<td align="left">83,048</td>
<td align="left">36.35</td>
<td align="left">18,395</td>
<td align="left">31.90</td>
<td align="left">25,785</td>
<td align="left">43.44</td>
<td align="left">NC_045301</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<italic>Swertia macrosperma</italic>
</td>
<td align="left">152,737</td>
<td align="left">38.22</td>
<td align="left">83,046</td>
<td align="left">36.31</td>
<td align="left">18,231</td>
<td align="left">31.99</td>
<td align="left">25,730</td>
<td align="left">43.50</td>
<td align="left">MZ261903</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<italic>Swertia multicaulis</italic>
</td>
<td align="left">152,190</td>
<td align="left">38.10</td>
<td align="left">82,893</td>
<td align="left">36.25</td>
<td align="left">18,343</td>
<td align="left">31.82</td>
<td align="left">25,477</td>
<td align="left">43.35</td>
<td align="left">NC_050660</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<italic>Swertia mussotii</italic>
</td>
<td align="left">153,499</td>
<td align="left">38.16</td>
<td align="left">83,591</td>
<td align="left">36.23</td>
<td align="left">18,336</td>
<td align="left">31.95</td>
<td align="left">25,761</td>
<td align="left">43.50</td>
<td align="left">KU641021</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<italic>Swertia nervosa</italic>
</td>
<td align="left">153,690</td>
<td align="left">38.12</td>
<td align="left">83,864</td>
<td align="left">36.25</td>
<td align="left">18,254</td>
<td align="left">31.82</td>
<td align="left">25,786</td>
<td align="left">43.37</td>
<td align="left">NC_057596</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<italic>Swertia przewalskii</italic>
</td>
<td align="left">151,079</td>
<td align="left">38.1</td>
<td align="left">81,780</td>
<td align="left">33.22</td>
<td align="left">18,193</td>
<td align="left">33.66</td>
<td align="left">25,553</td>
<td align="left">42.16</td>
<td align="left">ON017794</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<italic>Swertia pubescens</italic>
</td>
<td align="left">149,036</td>
<td align="left">38.19</td>
<td align="left">80,432</td>
<td align="left">36.33</td>
<td align="left">17,936</td>
<td align="left">31.81</td>
<td align="left">25,334</td>
<td align="left">43.42</td>
<td align="left">MZ261905</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<italic>Swertia punicea</italic>
</td>
<td align="left">153,448</td>
<td align="left">38.15</td>
<td align="left">83,535</td>
<td align="left">36.25</td>
<td align="left">18,345</td>
<td align="left">31.88</td>
<td align="left">25,784</td>
<td align="left">43.47</td>
<td align="left">MZ261896</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<italic>Swertia souliei</italic>
</td>
<td align="left">152,804</td>
<td align="left">38.08</td>
<td align="left">83,195</td>
<td align="left">36.17</td>
<td align="left">18,105</td>
<td align="left">31.89</td>
<td align="left">25,752</td>
<td align="left">43.33</td>
<td align="left">NC_052874</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<italic>Swertia tetraptera</italic>
</td>
<td align="left">152,787</td>
<td align="left">38.1</td>
<td align="left">83,177</td>
<td align="left">32.18</td>
<td align="left">18,305</td>
<td align="left">32.18</td>
<td align="left">25,679</td>
<td align="left">44.38</td>
<td align="left">ON164641</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<italic>Swertia verticillifolia</italic>
</td>
<td align="left">151,682</td>
<td align="left">38.14</td>
<td align="left">82,623</td>
<td align="left">36.26</td>
<td align="left">18,335</td>
<td align="left">31.83</td>
<td align="left">25,362</td>
<td align="left">43.48</td>
<td align="left">MF795137</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<italic>Swertia wolfgangiana</italic>
</td>
<td align="left">153,225</td>
<td align="left">38.06</td>
<td align="left">83,528</td>
<td align="left">36.17</td>
<td align="left">18,219</td>
<td align="left">31.88</td>
<td align="left">25,739</td>
<td align="left">43.34</td>
<td align="left">MW344307</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<fig id="F1" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Structure and characteristics of the complete chloroplast genomes of 23 <italic>Swertia</italic> L. species. Genes inside and outside the circle are transcribed clockwise and counterclockwise separately. Darker and lighter grey in the inner circle each represent GC and AT content.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fgene-13-895146-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Similar chloroplast DNA GC compositions were found in all of the <italic>Swertia</italic> L. species (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>), demonstrating high species similarity. The IR regions had a higher GC content than the LSC and SSC regions; this has also been reported in other plants (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Choi and Park, 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Guo et al., 2020</xref>). The IR region contained rRNA and tRNA genes, which accounted for the high DNA GC content of this region (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Doorduin et al., 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Asaf et al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B68">Shen et al., 2017</xref>).</p>
<p>Most of the chloroplast genomes of angiosperms encode 74 proteins, but some genes have been captured, rearranged, and lost across different families, genera, and species (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B55">Millen et al., 2001</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Kim et al., 2009</xref>). The results of our study showed that <italic>S. bimaculata</italic>, <italic>S. cordata</italic>, <italic>S. diluta</italic>, <italic>S. erythrosticta</italic>, <italic>S. franchetian</italic>, <italic>S. kouitchensis</italic>, <italic>S. leducii</italic>, <italic>S. macrosperma</italic>, <italic>S. mussotii</italic>, <italic>S. punicea</italic>, <italic>S. souliei</italic>, <italic>S. vertickllifolia</italic>, and <italic>S. wolfgangiana</italic> had 133 genes comprising 87 protein-coding genes, 38 tRNA genes, and eight rRNA genes. <italic>S. cincta</italic>, <italic>S. dichotoma</italic>, <italic>S. nervosa</italic>, and <italic>S. pubescens</italic> lacked the <italic>rps16</italic> gene found in the chloroplast genomes of other species of <italic>Swertia</italic> L. Thus, these four chloroplast genomes consisted of 132 genes. The <italic>ycf15</italic> gene in the two reverse repeats was lost in <italic>S. przewalskii</italic> and <italic>S. bifolia</italic>, implying that their chloroplast genomes contained 131 genes. Our result was different from the previous result obtained for Gentianaceae (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Dong et al., 2020</xref>), which showed that the chloroplast genome of Gentianaceae had 67&#x2013;80 protein-coding genes, 30 tRNA genes, and four rRNA genes. This difference mainly arose due to gene deletion between genera. For example, the loss of <italic>ndh</italic> genes, including <italic>ndhA</italic>, <italic>ndhC</italic>, <italic>ndhG</italic>, <italic>ndhH</italic>, <italic>ndhI</italic>, <italic>ndhJ</italic>, and <italic>ndhK</italic>, was common to all Gentianaceae species. In addition, four pseudogenes (<italic>&#x3c8;rps16</italic>, <italic>&#x3c8;rps19</italic>, <italic>&#x3c8;infA</italic>, and <italic>&#x3c8;ycf1</italic>) were present in the chloroplast genomes of the <italic>Swertia</italic> L. species. Previous studies have shown that Gentianaceae plants generally have the same four pseudogenes; our results confirm these previous observations. The <italic>&#x3c8;infA</italic> pseudogene likely appeared due to transfer or loss during species evolution (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B55">Millen et al., 2001</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B81">Zhou et al., 2016</xref>). The appearance of the <italic>&#x3c8;rps19</italic> and <italic>&#x3c8;ycf1</italic> pseudogenes is likely due to their location at the boundary of the chloroplast gene region, which experiences a boundary effect (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">Li et al., 2018</xref>). The second missing exon in the <italic>&#x3c8;rps16</italic> pseudogene was first detected in <italic>Gentiana macrophyllum</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">Ni et al., 2016</xref>) and in non-parasitic species of the <italic>Chrysanthemum</italic> branch (APG IV). Since then, the <italic>&#x3c8;rps16</italic> pseudogene has been detected in the chloroplast genomes of several Gentianaceae members, the structures of which are similar across all species.</p>
<p>The functions of the major genes in the chloroplast genomes of <italic>Swertia</italic> L. were roughly classified into three categories (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref>): chloroplast self-replication&#x2013;related genes, photosynthesis-related genes, and other genes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B66">Saski et al., 2005</xref>). Genes related to photosynthesis and self-replication accounted for the majority of the chloroplast genome.</p>
<table-wrap id="T2" position="float">
<label>TABLE 2</label>
<caption>
<p>Gene composition of chloroplast genome of all <italic>Swertia</italic> L. species.</p>
</caption>
<table>
<thead valign="top">
<tr>
<th align="left">Category</th>
<th align="left">Group of genes</th>
<th align="left">Name of genes</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td rowspan="5" align="left">Photosynthesis</td>
<td align="left">Photosystem I</td>
<td align="left">
<italic>psa</italic>A, <italic>psa</italic>B, <italic>psa</italic>C, <italic>psa</italic>I, and <italic>psa</italic>J</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Photosystem II</td>
<td align="left">
<italic>psb</italic>A, <italic>psb</italic>B, <italic>psb</italic>C, <italic>psb</italic>D, <italic>psb</italic>E, <italic>psb</italic>F, <italic>psb</italic>H, <italic>psb</italic>I, <italic>psb</italic>J, <italic>psb</italic>K, <italic>psb</italic>L, <italic>psb</italic>M,<italic>psb</italic>N, <italic>psb</italic>T, and <italic>psb</italic>Z</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NADH dehydrogenase</td>
<td align="left">
<italic>ndh</italic>A<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn1">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>, <italic>ndh</italic>B<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn1">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>, <italic>ndh</italic>C, <italic>ndh</italic>D, <italic>ndh</italic>E, <italic>ndh</italic>F, <italic>ndh</italic>G, <italic>ndh</italic>H, <italic>ndh</italic>I, <italic>ndh</italic>J, and <italic>ndh</italic>K</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Cytochrome b/f complex</td>
<td align="left">
<italic>pet</italic>A, <italic>pe</italic>tB, <italic>pet</italic>D, <italic>pet</italic>G, <italic>pet</italic>L, and <italic>pet</italic>N</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">ATP synthase</td>
<td align="left">
<italic>atp</italic>A, <italic>atp</italic>B, <italic>atp</italic>E, <italic>atp</italic>F<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn1">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>, <italic>atp</italic>H, and <italic>atp</italic>I</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="5" align="left">Self-replication</td>
<td align="left">Ribosomal proteins (SSU)</td>
<td align="left">
<italic>rps</italic>2, <italic>rps</italic>3, <italic>rps</italic>4, <italic>rps</italic>7, <italic>rps</italic>8, <italic>rps</italic>11,<italic>rps</italic>12<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn3">
<sup>c</sup>
</xref>, <italic>rps</italic>14, <italic>rps</italic>15,<italic>rps</italic>16, <italic>rps</italic>18, and <italic>rps</italic>19</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Ribosomal proteins (LSU)</td>
<td align="left">
<italic>rpl</italic>2<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn1">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>, <italic>rpl</italic>14, <italic>rpl</italic>16, <italic>rpl</italic>20, <italic>rpl</italic>22, <italic>rpl</italic>23, <italic>rpl</italic>32, <italic>rpl</italic>33, and <italic>rpl</italic>36</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Ribosomal RNAs</td>
<td align="left">
<italic>rrn</italic>4.5<sup>1</sup>, <italic>rrn</italic>5<sup>1</sup>, <italic>rrn</italic>16<sup>1</sup>, and <italic>rrn</italic>23<sup>1</sup>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Transfer RNAs</td>
<td align="left">tRNA-Lys<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn1">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>, tRNA-Gln, tRNA-Ser, tRNA-Gly<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn1">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>, tRNA-Arg, tRNA-Cys, tRNA-Asp, tRNA-Tyr, tRNA-Glu, tRNA-Thr, tRNA-Ser, tRNA-Gly, tRNA-Met, tRNA-Ser, tRNA-Thr, tRNA-Leu, tRNA-Phe, tRNA-Val, tRNA-Gly, tRNA-Met, tRNA-Trp, tRNA-Pro, tRNA-Ile, tRNA-Leu<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn1">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>, tRNA-Val<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn1">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>, tRNA-His, tRNA-Ile<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn1">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>
<sup>1</sup>, tRNA-Ala<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn1">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>1, tRNA-Arg1, tRNA-Asn1, tRNA-Leu, tRNA-Asn, tRNA-Arg, tRNA-Ala, tRNA-Ile, and tRNA-His</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">DNA-dependent RNA polymerase</td>
<td align="left">
<italic>rpo</italic>A, <italic>rpo</italic>B, <italic>rpo</italic>C1<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn1">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>, and <italic>rpo</italic>C2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="5" align="left">Other genes</td>
<td align="left">Maturase</td>
<td align="left">matK</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Protease</td>
<td align="left">clpP<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn1">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Envelope membrane protein</td>
<td align="left">cemA</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Subunit acetyl-CoA carboxylase</td>
<td align="left">Accd</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">c-Type cytochrome synthesis gene</td>
<td align="left">ccsA</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Genes of unkown function</td>
<td align="left">Conserved open reading frames</td>
<td align="left">ycf1, 2a, 3<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn1">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>, 4, and 15</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn id="Tfn1">
<label>a</label>
<p>represents a gene with one intron.</p>
</fn>
<fn id="Tfn2">
<label>b</label>
<p>represents a gene with two introns.</p>
</fn>
<fn id="Tfn3">
<label>c</label>
<p>represents trans-splice gene.</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>Further analysis of the chloroplast genes of <italic>Swertia</italic> L. showed that they were similar to those of other plants and that most did not contain introns (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Du et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Guo et al., 2020</xref>). In this study, only 16 genes (<italic>rps12</italic>, <italic>trnK-UUU</italic>, <italic>atpF</italic>, <italic>rpoC1</italic>, <italic>ycf3</italic>, <italic>trnL-UAA</italic>, <italic>trnV-UAC</italic>, <italic>clpP</italic>, <italic>petB</italic>, <italic>petD</italic>, <italic>rpl16</italic>, <italic>rpl2</italic>, <italic>ndhB</italic>, <italic>trnI-GAU</italic>, <italic>trnA-UGC</italic>, and <italic>ndhA</italic>) in the chloroplast genomes of <italic>Swertia</italic> L. contained introns, and all of them contained one intron except for the <italic>clpP</italic> and <italic>ycf3</italic> genes, which had two introns (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref>). The <italic>rps12</italic> gene in the chloroplast genomes of <italic>Swertia</italic> L. experienced trans-splicing, in which the 3&#x2032; end was in the IR region and 5&#x2032; end was in the LSC region. This phenomenon has been observed in the majority of other land plants (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Du et al., 2018</xref>).</p>
<p>The preference of 59 synonymous codons was evaluated using RSCU (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B75">Wu et al., 2007</xref>). Based on the statistical analysis, the number of codons in the <italic>Swertia</italic> L. species varied from 49,696 to 512,30. Leucine (Leu; 4,988&#x2013;5,394 codons), isoleucine (Ile; 3,730&#x2013;4,277 codons), and phenylalanine (Phe; 3,498&#x2013;3,641 codons) were the three amino acids with the highest coding rates in the <italic>Swertia</italic> L. species chloroplast genomes. Only 663&#x2013;719 codons encoded tryptophan (Trp), which had the lowest coding rate among all of the amino acids (<xref ref-type="sec" rid="s10">Supplementary Table S1</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-2">
<title>Repeat sequences and simple sequence repeats</title>
<p>Repetitive sequences are the main sources of duplication, deletion, and rearrangement in the chloroplast genome (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">Li and Zheng, 2018</xref>). In this study, four kinds of repetitions were counted: forward, palindromic, tandem, and reverse. The results showed that the distributions and numbers of repeats in the 23 chloroplast genomes were similar and conserved (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2</xref>; <xref ref-type="sec" rid="s10">Supplementary Table S2</xref>). Tandem units were the most repeated type (605), followed by forward (260), palindromic (209), and reverse repeats (4) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2C</xref>). There were interspecific differences in the tandem repeats, but the ratio of forward to palindromic repeats was about 1:1. Reverse repeats only existed in <italic>S. cincta</italic>, <italic>S. leducii</italic>, and <italic>S. macrosperma</italic>. The lengths of the repeat units were mainly 8&#x2013;39&#xa0;bp (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2A</xref>). The majority of repetitive sequences were scattered across intergenic or intronic regions, with only a few distributed across gene regions such as <italic>ycf3</italic>, <italic>ycf2</italic>, <italic>ndhE</italic>, <italic>psaB</italic>, <italic>accD</italic>, <italic>petB</italic>, <italic>ndhA</italic>, <italic>psbA</italic>, <italic>accD</italic>, <italic>rps18</italic>, <italic>rps16</italic>, <italic>psbK</italic>, <italic>clpP</italic>, <italic>ycf1</italic>, <italic>atpH</italic>, and <italic>rps2</italic> (<xref ref-type="sec" rid="s10">Supplementary Table S2</xref>). <italic>S. bimaculata</italic> had the most repeat sequences (76) of all the analyzed <italic>Swertia</italic> L. species, followed by <italic>S. leducii</italic> (67); <italic>S. bifolia</italic> had the fewest repeat sequences (34) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2B</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F2" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 2</label>
<caption>
<p>Type of repeated sequences in the 23 <italic>Swertia</italic> L. plastid genomes. <bold>(A)</bold> Number of repeat sequences by length; <bold>(B)</bold> number of four repeat types (Note: BIF represents <italic>S. bifolia</italic>; BIM represents <italic>S. bimaculata</italic>; CIN represents <italic>S. cincta</italic>; COR represents <italic>S. cordata</italic>; DIC represents <italic>S. dichotoma</italic>; DILA represents <italic>S. dilatata</italic>; DIL represents <italic>S. diluta</italic>; ERY represents <italic>S. erythrosticta</italic>; FRA represents <italic>S. franchetiana</italic>; HIS represents <italic>S. hispidicalyx</italic>; KOU represents <italic>S. kouitchensis</italic>; LED represents <italic>S. leducii</italic>; MAC represents <italic>S. macrosperma</italic>; MUL represents <italic>S. multicaulis</italic>; MUS represents <italic>S. mussotii</italic>; NER represents <italic>S. nervosa</italic>; PRZ represents <italic>S. przewalskii</italic>; PUB represents <italic>S. pubescens</italic>; PUN represents <italic>S. punicea</italic>; SOU represents <italic>S. souliei</italic>; TET represents <italic>S. tetraptera</italic>; VET represents <italic>S. verticillifolia</italic>; and WOL represent <italic>S. wolfgangiana</italic>); <bold>(C)</bold> pie chart showing the numbers of four repeat types.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fgene-13-895146-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>As a classical molecular marker, simple repeat sequence (SSR) has been widely used in the analysis of population genetic evolution. We analyzed the simple repeat sequence (SSR) in the chloroplast genomes of 23 species of <italic>Swertia</italic> L. and the result showed that the numbers of SSR ranged from 35 to 61. <italic>S. tetraptera</italic> had the most SSRs (61) and <italic>S macrosperma</italic> had the fewest SSRs (38). Moreover, the numbers and types of mononucleotide, dinucleotide, trinucleotide, tetranucleotide, pentanucleotide, and hexanucleotide repeats were also different in the 23 species of <italic>Swertia</italic> L. (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3</xref>; <xref ref-type="sec" rid="s10">Supplementary Table S3</xref>). Mononucleotides were the most common repeat type. The proportion of mononucleotides in all SSRs ranged from 50.00% to 82.22% in 23 species of <italic>Swertia</italic> L. This finding is in accordance with the previous observation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Kuang et al., 2011</xref>). In total, 70 dinucleotides were detected in 23 species, which were AT/TA, accounting for 3.23%&#x2013;10.53% of the SSRs. In total, 76 trinucleotides and 133 tetranucleotides were found in the 23 complete cp genomes. A total of 15 pentanucleotides were discovered in chloroplast genes of 23 species in <italic>Swertia</italic> L. Only S. cordata (2), <italic>S. dichotoma</italic> (1), <italic>S. franchetiana</italic> (1), <italic>S. mussotii</italic> (1)<italic>, S. nervosa</italic> (3), and <italic>S. tetraptera</italic> (3) had hexanucleotides. In addition, compound SSRs accounted for 2.17%&#x2013;10.87% of the 23 genomes. The richness of SSRs and the count of SSRs were different within <italic>Swertia</italic> L. thus these may be helpful molecular marker for species identification. However, adopting SSRs to clarify ecological and evolutionary processes has yet to be fully implemented (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Ebert and Peakal, 2009</xref>). The results of this study will provide a basis for the study of chloroplast SSR markers in the future and lay a foundation for the study of the genetic relationship and diversity of this genus.</p>
<fig id="F3" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 3</label>
<caption>
<p>Simple sequence repeats (SSRs) in the 23 <italic>Swertia</italic> L. plastid genomes.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fgene-13-895146-g003.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Oligonucleotide repeats are widely found in the plastome (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Ahmed et al., 2012</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Abdullah et al., 2021</xref>). These repeats have an effect on generating mutations and have been suggested as a proxy for mutational hotspots (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Ahmed et al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Ahmed et al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Abdullah et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Abdullah et al., 2021</xref>). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Abdullah et al. (2020)</xref> proposed that the co-occurrence of repeats with substitutions was up to 90%, whereas 36%&#x2013;91% co-occurrence was found at the genus level. In the present study, 10 highly polymorphic loci were found. Among these, five loci belong to the regions where repeats are present, including <italic>psaA</italic>-<italic>ycf3</italic> and <italic>rps15</italic>, which showed the highest incidence of polymorphisms. Here, our findings support the use of repeats as a proxy, and this approach may also be helpful for the identification of suitable polymorphic loci for phylogenetic inference of other taxonomically complex genera. This approach is promising since the plastome of a single species can be used to identify polymorphic regions. Repeated coding regions and IR regions need to be avoided, however, due to the purifying selection pressure of protein-coding genes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Henriquez et al., 2020</xref>) and the fact that copy-dependent repair mechanisms (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B82">Zhu et al., 2016</xref>) lead to low rates of mutation.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-3">
<title>Sequence divergence across <italic>Swertia</italic> L. species</title>
<p>The chloroplast genomes of the 23 <italic>Swertia</italic> L. species were relatively conserved, with four parts of the genomes being arranged in consistent sequences (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4</xref>) and no rearrangement found in gene organization after verification (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5</xref>). Moreover, there was a higher degree of variation in non-coding regions than in the coding regions of the chloroplast genome of <italic>Swertia</italic> L. In the non-coding regions, the percentage of variations ranged from 13.14% to 81.84% (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure 6B</xref>), averaging 49.02%, whereas in coding regions, the percentage of variations ranged from 0.35% to 31.27%, averaging 9.10% (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure 6A</xref>). The SSC region variability of the 23 species in <italic>Swertia</italic> L. was higher than that of the LSC and IR regions in both coding (7.96%, 2.19%, and 17.16% for LSC, IR, and SSC regions, respectively) and non-coding regions (49.00%, 42.44%, and 54.23% for LSC, IR, and SSC regions, respectively). The degree of variation was lowest in the IR region, indicating a high degree of conservatism. These results were consistent with those obtained for other angiosperms (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Dong et al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Guo et al., 2020</xref>). In addition, some genes (<italic>rpoC1</italic>, <italic>ccsA</italic>, <italic>ndhI</italic>, <italic>ndhA</italic>, and <italic>rps15</italic>) exhibited higher variability than other genes in the 23 species of <italic>Swertia</italic> L. Some of the non-coding regions with high sequence divergence were <italic>trnH-GUG</italic>-<italic>psbA</italic>, <italic>psaA</italic>-<italic>ycf3</italic>, <italic>cemA</italic>-<italic>petA</italic>, <italic>ycf15</italic>-<italic>trnL-CAA</italic>, and <italic>ccsA</italic>-<italic>ndhD</italic>. These genes and hotspot regions can either be used in phylogenetic analyses or serve as potential DNA molecular barcodes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B79">Zhang et al., 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">Maier et al., 1995</xref>; Diekmann et al., 2009).</p>
<fig id="F4" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 4</label>
<caption>
<p>Comparison and analysis based on chloroplast genome of 23 <italic>Swertia</italic> L. species. Orientation of genes was pointed out by arrows up the alignments. Purple, blue, pink, and grey bars correspond to exons, untranslated regions, non-coding sequences, and mRNA, respectively. The <italic>Y</italic>-axis indicates the genetic similarity percentage. Genetic similarity among 50%&#x2013;100% were showed in the figure (for interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article).</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fgene-13-895146-g004.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig id="F5" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 5</label>
<caption>
<p>MAUVE alignment of 23 <italic>Swertia</italic> L. species chloroplast genomes. The <italic>S</italic>
<bold>
<italic>.</italic>
</bold> <italic>wolfgangiana</italic> genome is shown at the top as the reference genome.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fgene-13-895146-g005.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig id="F6" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 6</label>
<caption>
<p>Percentages of variable characters in homologous regions among chloroplast genomes of 23 <italic>Swertia</italic> L. species. <bold>(A)</bold> Coding region. <bold>(B)</bold> Non-coding region. The homologous regions are oriented according to their locations in the chloroplast genome.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fgene-13-895146-g006.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-4">
<title>IR contraction and expansion of the chloroplast genome</title>
<p>The chloroplast genome has two IR regions, which form four boundaries with LSC and SSC regions: IRb-LSC, IRb-SSC, IRa-LSC, and IRa-SSC. When the ancient genome evolved, the IR boundary expanded and contracted, causing some genes to enter IR regions and some to enter the single-copy regions, with different levels of sequence replication at each species boundary. As can be seen from <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">Figure 7</xref>, the four boundaries of the chloroplast genomes of the <italic>Swertia</italic> L. species were relatively well-conserved. The <italic>rps19</italic> gene spanning the LSC and IRb regions was present at the IRb-LSC boundary in all 23 <italic>Swertia</italic> L. chloroplast genomes. This gene was mainly located in the LSC region at the same bases, except in <italic>S. cordata</italic> (85), <italic>S. cinata</italic> (118), and <italic>S. pubescens</italic> (118). The IRa-LSC boundaries in most of the <italic>Swertia</italic> L. chloroplast genomes occurred between the <italic>rps19</italic> pseudogene in the IRa region and the <italic>trnH</italic> gene in the LSC region; however, the <italic>rps19</italic> pseudogene was absent in <italic>S. bifolia</italic>, <italic>S. przewalskii</italic>, <italic>S. nervosa</italic>, and <italic>S. multicaulis</italic>. The IRb-SSC boundaries in the <italic>Swertia</italic> L. chloroplast genomes varied greatly. This boundary was located in the overlapping region of the <italic>ycf1</italic> pseudogene and <italic>ndhF</italic> gene in 11 <italic>Swertia</italic> L. chloroplast genomes, with the IRb-SSC boundary in six <italic>Swertia L.</italic> chloroplast genomes crossing the overlap region and extending 5&#x2013;100&#xa0;bp to the <italic>ndhF</italic> gene. The <italic>ycf1</italic> pseudogene in eight <italic>Swertia</italic> L. chloroplast genomes was present in the IRb region, along with a terminal from the IRa-SSC border. In addition, the <italic>ycf1</italic> pseudogene was lost in the IRb-SSC boundaries of the chloroplast genomes in <italic>S. tetraptera</italic>, <italic>S. nervosa</italic>, and <italic>S. multicaulis</italic> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure 6</xref>). The IRa-SSC boundary was located in the <italic>ycf1</italic> gene in all of the species, but the length of the <italic>ycf1</italic> gene fragment in the IRa region differed to some extent and ranged from 988&#xa0;bp to 1,004&#xa0;bp. The length of this fragment was about 5,400&#xa0;bp in most <italic>Swertia</italic> L. species, except for <italic>S. nervosa</italic> and <italic>S. souliei</italic>. The <italic>ycf1</italic> gene in the <italic>S. nervosa</italic> chloroplast genome was present in the SSC region, with a terminal 126&#xa0;bp from the IRa-SSC border. The total length of the <italic>ycf1</italic> gene in the <italic>S. souliei</italic> chloroplast genome was 1,013&#xa0;bp, with only 10&#xa0;bp located in the SSC region. The sliding of the IRa-SSC and IRb-LSC boundaries in the chloroplast genomes of vascular plants generally occurs in different genera or even within the same genus, resulting in large variations in chloroplast genome length across different plants. The IRb-LSC boundaries of the <italic>Swertia</italic> L. species were largely located within the <italic>rps19</italic> gene and, as mentioned earlier, the IRa-LSC boundary was located between the <italic>rps19</italic> gene of the IRa region and the <italic>trnH</italic> gene of the LSC region. However, in monocotyledon plants such as those in the Orchidaceae and Poaceae families, the boundaries are extended and the <italic>rps19</italic> and <italic>trnH</italic> genes are located in the IR regions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B71">Tang et al., 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Hu, 2020</xref>). Both genes changed from one to two copies, whereas in barley and sorghum, boundary shrinkage occurred, resulting in two copies of the <italic>rps19</italic> and <italic>trnH</italic> gene in the LSC region (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B71">Tang et al., 2011</xref>). The IRb-SSC boundary was located in the <italic>ycf1-ndhF</italic> overlap region in 11 <italic>Swertia</italic> L. species, which is consistent with the observations from many species of cruciferous plants (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">Li et al., 2017</xref>), for example, <italic>Aethionema grandiflorum</italic>, <italic>Arabidopsis thaliana</italic>, <italic>Barbarea verna</italic>, <italic>Brassica napus</italic>, <italic>Cakile arabica</italic> and so on. The extension of the IRb-SSC boundary to the <italic>ndhF</italic> gene due to boundary expansion has also been detected in <italic>Arabidopsis thaliana</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B71">Tang et al., 2011</xref>), in which the IRa-SSC boundary is located in the <italic>ycf1</italic> gene. In <italic>A. thaliana</italic>, the fragment lengths of the <italic>ycf1</italic> gene in the SSC and IRa regions are different due to either contraction or expansion of the boundary. In rice, wheat, maize, and other plants, this boundary is located on the <italic>ndhH</italic> gene, further indicating that the boundary between dicotyledons and monocotyledons is quite different (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B53">Melodelima et al., 2013</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F7" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 7</label>
<caption>
<p>Comparative analysis of chloroplast genomic boundaries of the 23 <italic>Swertia</italic> L. plastid genomes.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fgene-13-895146-g007.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>People have different views on the mechanism of contraction and expansion of the IR region (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Guo et al., 2020</xref>). DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are currently considered the main molecular mechanism underlying IR expansion. As large contractions in the IR region are rare, the DSB theory may also underlie IR region contraction.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-5">
<title>Phylogenetic analysis</title>
<p>The maximum likelihood and Bayesian methods were used to construct phylogenetic trees for the chloroplast genomes of the 23 <italic>Swertia</italic> L. species. The topological structures of the phylogenetic trees obtained using the two methods were similar (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8">Figure 8</xref>). Phylogenetic analysis showed that all 23 species of <italic>Swertia</italic> L. in conjunction with those of <italic>G. paludosa,</italic> formed a well-supported clade, indicating that the genus <italic>Swertia</italic> L. was not monophyletic. This result is supported by previous studies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Chassot et al., 2001</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B70">Struwe and Albert, 2002</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B73">Von Hagen and Kadereit, 2002</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Favre et al., 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B76">Xi et al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Cao et al., 2021</xref>). In addition, the well-supported clade was divided into two major clades (A and B), corresponding to the subgen. <italic>Swertia</italic> (A) and subgen. <italic>Ophelia</italic> (B).</p>
<fig id="F8" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 8</label>
<caption>
<p>Phylogenetic tree of 23 <italic>Swertia L.</italic> species using Bayesian inference (BI) analyses based on whole chloroplast genomes.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fgene-13-895146-g008.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Seven species in <italic>Swertia</italic> L. were clustered into a subgen. <italic>Swertia</italic> phylogenetic tree at the base, which showed a close genetic relationship. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Ho et al. (1994)</xref> believed that this subgenus was a relatively primitive group of <italic>Swertia</italic> L. consisting of a perennial herb with ancestral traits such as a single stem and unbranched large flowers. Within the same clade, the four species of sect. <italic>Swertia</italic> (<italic>S. souliei</italic>, <italic>S. bifolia</italic>, <italic>S. wolfgangiana</italic>, and <italic>S. erythrosticta</italic>) formed a single clade (A1) and two species (<italic>S. cordata</italic> and <italic>S. nervosa</italic>) of sect. <italic>Ophelia</italic> formed another clade (A2). These two were sister branches, further supporting the division of these groups by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Ho et al. (1994)</xref>. Clade B had two branches: B1 and B2 subclades. The B1 subclade contained <italic>S. bimaculata</italic>, which belonged to sect. <italic>Ophelia</italic>. This clade also included an <italic>S. dichotomy</italic>&#x2013;<italic>S. tetraptera</italic> branch. <italic>S. bimaculata</italic> and <italic>S. dichotomy</italic>&#x2013;<italic>S. tetraptera</italic> were sisters. The plants in these two branches were closely related (100 bootstrap), indicating a common ancestor. The B2 subclade contained sect. <italic>Ophelia</italic>, sect. <italic>Platynema</italic>, sect. <italic>Poephila</italic>, and sect. <italic>Macranthos</italic>. In this subclade, <italic>S. leducii</italic> was differentiated first and located at the base. Furthermore, two parallel branches were then isolated: sect. <italic>Ophelia</italic> and sect. <italic>Platynema</italic>; sect. <italic>Poephila</italic> and sect. <italic>Macranthos</italic>. <italic>S. multicaulis</italic>, from subgen. <italic>Poephila</italic>, and <italic>S. verticillifolia</italic>, from sect. <italic>Macranthos</italic>, were first clustered into a small clade and then into a large clade with the three species of sect. <italic>Platynema</italic> and one species of sect. <italic>Ophelia</italic>. This differed from the morphological classification. Sect. <italic>Platynema</italic> was at the top of the B2 subclade, indicating that it was located in a comparable evolutionary position of the phylogenetic tree of <italic>Swertia</italic> L. The clustering results partially validated the results obtained by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Ho et al. (1994)</xref>, who showed that sect. <italic>Platynema</italic> and sect. <italic>Kingdon-Wardia</italic> (Marq.) were the most evolved groups of the genus and characterized by extremely enlarged filaments at the base, a single glandula in each corolla lobe, and diminished tassels. In the present study, sect. <italic>Kingdon-Wardia</italic> (Marq.) was not included in the phylogenetic tree, making it impossible to show its systematic position. However, sect. <italic>Platynema</italic> and sect. <italic>Kingdon-Wardia</italic> (Marq.) were clustered together and located in the same relative evolutionary branch of <italic>Swertia</italic> L. in a study by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B76">Xi et al. (2014)</xref>. From what has been discussed before, the division of the two subgenera (subgen. <italic>Swertia</italic> and subgen. <italic>Ophelia</italic>) and five sections (sect. <italic>Ophelia</italic>, sect. <italic>Platynema</italic>, sect. <italic>Poephila,</italic> sect<italic>. Swertia</italic>, and sect. <italic>Macranthos</italic>) is partially supported by molecular data. However, the systematic positions of other sections and species in <italic>Swertia</italic> L. derived from molecular data differed from the morphological classification. Inconsistencies between different data types, specifically between morphological and molecular data, remain a major problem of systematics (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">Lee, 2001</xref>). Such inconsistencies have been reported and discussed for many plant and animal groups, such as Rubiaceae, Loganiaceae, <italic>Isothecium</italic>, and Dendrocolaptinae (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Bremer and Struwe, 1992</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Irestedt et al., 2004</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Draper et al., 2007</xref>). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B61">Pisani et al. (2007)</xref> argued that despite the widespread inconsistencies between morphological and molecular data, both data types were equally important in estimating phylogenetic relationships and that molecular data could not be considered more reliable. The results of this study were roughly equivalent to those of previous studies that used different gene fragments and species to examine the phylogeny of <italic>Swertia</italic> L. indicating a conflict between the morphological classification system and molecular data, which can be explained from the perspective of evolution. The formation of new species is a slow process, usually occurring over thousands of years. Variations due to natural selection and genetic drift become fixed in a group, driving the formation of new species that eventually differ from two recent common ancestors, that is, species derived from two recent common ancestors, both morphologically discontinuous and reproductively isolated, are monophyletic (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Liu, 2016</xref>). Driven by the drastic changes in the geology and climate of the Qinghai&#x2013;Tibetan Plateau, the ancestors of <italic>Swertia</italic> L. evolved rapidly and showed abundant morphological diversity, such as in the shape and length of the corolla and number and location of nectaries, nectary appendages, and corolla throat appendages. However, this taxon has not accumulated enough sequence variation for a molecular phylogenetic analysis over a relatively short period of time. Moreover, mutations in gene sequences have not been fixed in the population by genetic drift. In addition, the uniparental inheritance of the plastome may also confound phylogenetic inference. Previous studies have shown that the phylogeny based on plastome and mitochondria sequences contradicted with nuclear due to uniparental inheritance of these genomes (Vargas et al., 2017; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Abdullah et al., 2021</xref>). Therefore, more genetic markers (nuclear) and more taxa of <italic>Swertia</italic> L will be needed to further explore the phylogenetic relationships in this genus.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-6">
<title>Divergence time of <italic>Swertia</italic> L. Species</title>
<p>Tracer v 1.5 was used to check the analysis values of each parameter, and it was shown that the number of MCMC iterations calculated by BEAST had met the effective sample size (ESS), which was greater than 200. The BEAST analysis was based on the phylogenetic trees of chloroplast genomes of 23 species of <italic>Swertia</italic> L.(<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9">Figure 9</xref>), and the numbers at each branch node of the phylogenetic tree were the divergence times (Ma) of the corresponding groups. The result showed that the estimated divergence between <italic>Swertia</italic> L. and <italic>Gentianopsis</italic> occurred at 29.60&#xa0;Ma. We therefore inferred that <italic>Swertia</italic> L formed at 29.60&#xa0;Ma, corresponding to the early Miocene of the Tertiary. Meanwhile, the divergence between subgen. <italic>Swertia</italic> and subgen. <italic>Ophelia</italic> appeared at 14.69&#xa0;Ma. In addition, the estimated divergence time in 23 species of <italic>Swertia</italic> L. was between 12.40 and &#x2212;0.05&#xa0;Ma. The formation of <italic>S. franchetiana</italic>, <italic>S. mussotii</italic>, <italic>S. punicea</italic>, <italic>S. kouitchensis</italic>, <italic>S. diluta</italic>, <italic>S. pubescens</italic>, <italic>S. cincta</italic>, <italic>S. dilatata</italic>, <italic>S. hispidicalyx</italic>, <italic>S. souliei</italic>, <italic>S. bifolia</italic>, <italic>S. wolfgangiana</italic>, and <italic>S. przewalskii</italic> were at 0.05&#x2013;1.33&#xa0;Ma (the Quaternary), and <italic>S. macrosperma</italic>, <italic>S. erythrosticta</italic>, <italic>S. nervosa</italic>, <italic>S. cordata</italic>, <italic>S. tetraptera</italic>, <italic>S. dichotoma</italic>, <italic>S. bimaculata</italic>, <italic>S. verticillifolia</italic>, <italic>S. multicaulis</italic>, and <italic>S. leducii</italic> were formed at 2.72&#x2013;12.40&#xa0;Ma (end of Tertiary).</p>
<fig id="F9" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 9</label>
<caption>
<p>Divergence time estimated using BEAST.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fgene-13-895146-g009.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>In the present study, the formation of <italic>Swertia</italic> L. was dated back to 29.60&#xa0;Ma, which was slightly earlier than other studies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Chassot et al., 2001</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B73">Von Hagen and Kadereit, 2002</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Cao et al., 2021</xref>). Geologic evidence demonstrated that the turn of the Oligocene and Miocene was a crucial period of the tectonic evolution of the Qinghai&#x2013;Tibetan Plateau(QTP), the central part of the QTP rose to a height of nearly 3,000&#xa0;m in the Early Miocene, the cooling effect made by QTP uplift resulted in the transition of QTP from tropical and subtropical environment to a warm and cool environment consistent with the temperate climate, and the further development of herbaceous plants began in the Early Miocene (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Deng et al., 2019</xref>). During this period, a primitive group of <italic>Swertia</italic> L. plants appeared, represented by subgen. <italic>Swertia</italic> L., which was characterized by perennial herbs, single stems, unbranched, and large but few flowers (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Cao et al., 2021</xref>).</p>
<p>During the following 20&#xa0;Ma to 10&#xa0;Ma period, the QTP was further uplifted, and the Himalayan mountains and Tianshan Mountains were significantly elevated, which strongly changed the atmospheric circulation. Meanwhile, the global temperature decreased from the optimum temperature in the middle Miocene of the third century, resulting in a cool and dry climate (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">Miao et al., 2012</xref>). During this period, <italic>Swertia</italic> L. plants appeared as annual herbs with strongly branched stems and many small flowers, represented by subgen. <italic>Ophelia</italic>. The new taxa produced a large number of seeds during their life cycle and thus were better adapted to changing environments (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Cao et al., 2021</xref>). When the climate was suitable, the new species gave rise to a large number of offspring, which has the potential for a great deal of variation.</p>
<p>Since 10&#xa0;Ma, the QTP has been further uplifted in the late Miocene and Pliocene periods, and the Himalayas have blocked almost all the warm and wet air masses from the Indian Ocean, and the QTP has become cold and arid. Since 4&#xa0;Ma, the QTP has been affected by Quaternary glaciation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">Li et al., 1999</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">Mulch et al., 2006</xref>). The complex landform and rapidly changing climate resulted in many isolated small populations of <italic>Swertia</italic> L. which underwent radiation differentiation due to differentiated selection and random factors, forming new species adapted to local environment in a relatively short period of time. This process of radiation differentiation eventually led to the diversity of <italic>Swertia</italic> L. plants today. In this study, 13 species of the 23 <italic>Swertia</italic> L. species were formed at Quaternary. This group is the most richly differentiated and most widely adapted in <italic>Swertia</italic> L. with distribution in both plateau and plain.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="conclusion" id="s4">
<title>Conclusion</title>
<p>The chloroplast genome lengths of 23 species of <italic>Swertia</italic> L. were between 149,036&#xa0;bp and 153,691&#xa0;bp. The chloroplast genomes of <italic>Swertia</italic> L. contained 134 genes: eight rRNA, 38 tRNA, and 88 protein-coding genes. Introns were found in five tRNA and 11 protein-encoding genes. The chloroplast genomes of the 23 species of <italic>Swertia</italic> L. contained interspersed repeat sequences and tandem repeat sequences. The IR region variability was significantly inferior to that of the LSC and SSC regions. The majority of the protein-coding genes were comparatively well-conserved, expect for <italic>rpoC1</italic>, <italic>ccsA</italic>, <italic>ndhI</italic>, <italic>ndhA</italic>, and <italic>rps15</italic>, which had high variation and could potentially serve as DNA molecular barcodes. The highly differentiated regions were generally located in intergenic regions. <italic>Swertia</italic> L. was found to not be monophyletic, and the division of subgen. <italic>Swertia</italic> and subgen. <italic>Ophelia</italic> was supported by molecular data. However, the molecular data only partly supported the division of sect. <italic>Ophelia</italic>, sect. <italic>Platynema</italic>, sect. <italic>Poephila,</italic> sect<italic>. Swertia</italic>, and sect. <italic>Macranthos.</italic> The systematic positions of other groups and species require further investigation. The <italic>Swertia</italic> L. formed at 29.60&#xa0;Ma. Speciation of 10 species occurred in succession after 12&#xa0;Ma and 13 species occurred in succession after 2.5&#xa0;Ma.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec sec-type="data-availability" id="s5">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found in the article/<xref ref-type="sec" rid="s10">Supplementary Material</xref>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s6">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>LY collected the plant materials, did the analysis, and wrote the first manuscript. JL designed the experiment and performed data analysis. GZ contributed to the manuscript revision. All authors read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s7">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>This research was funded by the Second Tibetan Plateau Scientific Expedition and Research Program (No. 2019QZKK1003) and Key deployment project of Chinese Academy of Sciences (No. ZDRW-ZS-2020).</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="COI-statement" id="s8">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="disclaimer" id="s9">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors, and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s10">
<title>Supplementary material</title>
<p>The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fgene.2022.895146/full#supplementary-material">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fgene.2022.895146/full&#x23;supplementary-material</ext-link>
</p>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Table2.XLSX" id="SM1" mimetype="application/XLSX" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Table3.XLSX" id="SM2" mimetype="application/XLSX" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Table1.XLSX" id="SM3" mimetype="application/XLSX" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="DataSheet1.docx" id="SM4" mimetype="application/docx" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Abdullah, </surname>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Henriquez</surname>
<given-names>C. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mehmood</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shahzadi</surname>
<given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ali</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Waheed</surname>
<given-names>M. T.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Comparison of chloroplast genomes among Species of Unisexual and Bisexual clades of the monocot family Araceae</article-title>. <source>Plants</source> <volume>9</volume>, <fpage>737</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/plants9060737</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Abdullah, </surname>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mehmood</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shahzadi</surname>
<given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ali</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Islam</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Naeem</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Correlations among oligonucleotide repeats, nucleotide substitutions and insertion-deletion mutations in chloroplast genomes of plant family Malvaceae</article-title>. <source>J. Syst. Evol.</source> <volume>59</volume>, <fpage>388</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>402</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/jse.12585</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Adams</surname>
<given-names>R. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schwarzbach</surname>
<given-names>A. E.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Phylogeny of <italic>Juniperus</italic> using nrDNA and four cpDNA regions</article-title>. <source>Phytologia</source> <volume>95</volume> (<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>179</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>187</lpage>. </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ahmed</surname>
<given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Biggs</surname>
<given-names>P. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Matthews</surname>
<given-names>P. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Collins</surname>
<given-names>L. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hendy</surname>
<given-names>M. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lockhart</surname>
<given-names>P. J.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Mutational dynamics of aroid chloroplast genomes</article-title>. <source>Genome Biol. Evol.</source> <volume>4</volume>, <fpage>1316</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1323</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/gbe/evs110</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ahmed</surname>
<given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Matthews</surname>
<given-names>P. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Biggs</surname>
<given-names>P. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Naeem</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mclenachan</surname>
<given-names>P. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lockhart</surname>
<given-names>P. J.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Identification of chloroplast genome loci suitable for high-resolution phylogeographic studies of <italic>Colocasia esculenta</italic> (L.) Schott (Araceae) and closely related taxa</article-title>. <source>Mol. Ecol. Resour.</source> <volume>13</volume>, <fpage>929</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>937</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/1755-0998.12128</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Amiryousefi</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hyv&#xf6;nen</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Poczai</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>IRscope: An online program to visualize the junction sites of chloroplast genomes</article-title>. <source>Bioinformatics</source> <volume>34</volume> (<issue>17</issue>), <fpage>3030</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3031</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/bioinformatics/bty220</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Asaf</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Khan</surname>
<given-names>A. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Khan</surname>
<given-names>M. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Waqas</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kang</surname>
<given-names>S. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yun</surname>
<given-names>B.-W.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Chloroplast genomes of <italic>Arabidopsis halleri</italic> ssp. <italic>gemmifera</italic> and <italic>Arabidopsis lyrata</italic> ssp. <italic>petraea</italic>: Structures and comparative analysis</article-title>. <source>Sci. Rep.</source> <volume>7</volume>, <fpage>7556</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41598-017-07891-5</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bakker</surname>
<given-names>F. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lei</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yu</surname>
<given-names>J. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mohammadin</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wei</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>van de Kerke</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Herbarium genomics: Plastome sequence assembly from a range of herbarium specimens using an iterative organelle genome assembly pipeline</article-title>. <source>Biol. J. Linn. Soc.</source> <volume>117</volume>, <fpage>33</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>43</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/bij.12642</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Benson</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1999</year>). <article-title>Tandem repeats finder: A program to analyze DNA sequences</article-title>. <source>Nucleic Acids Res.</source> <volume>27</volume>, <fpage>573</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>580</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/nar/27.2.573</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bremer</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Struwe</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1992</year>). <article-title>Phylogeny of the Rubiaceae and the Loganiaceae: Congruence of conflict between morphological and molecular data?</article-title> <source>Am. J. Bot.</source> <volume>79</volume> (<issue>10</issue>), <fpage>1171</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1184</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/j.1537-2197.1992.tb13714.x</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Brunkard</surname>
<given-names>J. O.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Runkel</surname>
<given-names>A. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zambryski</surname>
<given-names>P. C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Chloroplasts extend stromules independently and in response to internal redox signals</article-title>. <source>Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.</source> <volume>112</volume>, <fpage>10044</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>10049</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.1511570112</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Cao</surname>
<given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xu</surname>
<given-names>L. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>J. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>F. Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname>
<given-names>S. L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Molecular phylogeny of subtribe swertiinae</article-title>. <source>Bull. Bot. Res.</source> <volume>41</volume> (<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>408</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>418</lpage>. </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chassot</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nemomissa</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yuan</surname>
<given-names>Y. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kupfer</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2001</year>). <article-title>High paraphyly of <italic>Swertia</italic> L. (Gentianaceae) in the <italic>Gentianella</italic>-lineage as revealed by nuclear and chloroplast DNA sequence variation</article-title>. <source>Plant Syst. Evol.</source> <volume>229</volume> (<issue>1-2</issue>), <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>21</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s006060170015</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname>
<given-names>J. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wan</surname>
<given-names>D. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nanbo</surname>
<given-names>H. X.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1999</year>). <article-title>Ethnic and folk medicine arrangement of Swertia</article-title>. <source>Chin. J. Ethnomed. Ethnopharm.</source> <volume>2</volume>, <fpage>98</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>101</lpage>. </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Progress in chloroplast genome analysis</article-title>. <source>Adv. Biochem. Biophysics</source> <volume>35</volume>, <fpage>21</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>28</lpage>. </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Choi</surname>
<given-names>K. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Park</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>The complete chloroplast genome sequence of <italic>Aster spathulifolius</italic> (Asteraceae) genomic features and relationship with Asteraceae</article-title>. <source>Gene</source> <volume>572</volume> (<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>214</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>221</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.gene.2015.07.020</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Darling</surname>
<given-names>A. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mau</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Blattner</surname>
<given-names>F. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Perna</surname>
<given-names>N. T.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>Mauve: Multiple alignment of conserved genomic sequence with rearrangements</article-title>. <source>Genome Res.</source> <volume>14</volume>, <fpage>1394</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1403</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1101/gr.2289704</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Deng</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname>
<given-names>F. X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>S. Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Su</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhou</surname>
<given-names>Z. K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Significant shift in the terrestrial ecosystem at the Paleogene/Neogene boundary in the Tibetan Plateau</article-title>. <source>Chin. Sci. Bull.</source> <volume>64</volume> (<issue>27</issue>), <fpage>2894</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2906</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1360/tb-2019-0053</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Dong</surname>
<given-names>B. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname>
<given-names>Z. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ni</surname>
<given-names>L. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname>
<given-names>J. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Danzhen</surname>
<given-names>Z. G.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Comparative analysis of complete chloroplast genome sequences within Gentianaceae and significance of identifying species</article-title>. <source>Chin. Tradit. Herb. Drugs.</source> <volume>51</volume> (<issue>6</issue>), <fpage>1641</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1649</lpage>. </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Dong</surname>
<given-names>W. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xu</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cheng</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lin</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhou</surname>
<given-names>S. L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Sequencing angiosperm plastid genomes made easy: A complete set of universal primers and a case study on the phylogeny of saxifragales</article-title>. <source>Genome Biol. Evol.</source> <volume>5</volume>, <fpage>989</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>997</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/gbe/evt063</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Doorduin</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gravendeel</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lammers</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ariyurek</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chinawoeng</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vrieling</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>The complete chloroplast genome of 17 individuals of pest species jacobaea vulgaris: SNPs, microsatellites and barcoding markers for population and phylogenetic studies</article-title>. <source>DNA Res.</source> <volume>18</volume> (<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>93</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>105</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/dnares/dsr002</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Doyle</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1991</year>). &#x201c;<article-title>DNA protocols for plants-CTAB total DNA isolation</article-title>,&#x201d; in <source>Molecular techniques in taxonomy</source>. Editors <person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname>Hewitt</surname>
<given-names>G. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Johnston</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<publisher-loc>Berlin</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Springer</publisher-name>). </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Draper</surname>
<given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Heden&#xe4;s</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Grimm</surname>
<given-names>G. W.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Molecular and morphological incongruence in European species of Isothecium (Bryophyta)</article-title>. <source>Mol. Phylogenet. Evol.</source> <volume>42</volume> (<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>700</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>716</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ympev.2006.09.021</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Drummond</surname>
<given-names>A. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Suchard</surname>
<given-names>M. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xie</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rambaut</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Bayesian phylogenetics with BEAUti and the BEAST 1.7.</article-title> <source>Mol. Biol. Evol.</source> <volume>29</volume> (<issue>8</issue>), <fpage>1969</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1973</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/molbev/mss075</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Du</surname>
<given-names>J. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zuo</surname>
<given-names>L. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>Y. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yu</surname>
<given-names>X. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dong</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>J. M.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Chloroplast genome and CP-SSR site analyses of <italic>Ulmus laciniata</italic>
</article-title>. <source>J. Plant Genet. Res.</source> <volume>19</volume> (<issue>6</issue>), <fpage>1187</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1196</lpage>. </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ebert</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Peakal</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Chloroplast simple sequence repeats (cpSSRs): Technical resources and recommendations for expanding cpSSR discovery and applications to a wide array of plant species</article-title>. <source>Mol. Ecol. Resour.</source> <volume>9</volume>, <fpage>673</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>690</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1755-0998.2008.02319.x</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Favre</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yuan</surname>
<given-names>Y. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>K&#xfc;pfer</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Alvarez</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Phylogeny of subtribe Gentianinae (Gentianaceae): Biogeographic inferences despite limitations in temporal calibration points</article-title>. <source>Taxon</source> <volume>59</volume> (<issue>6</issue>), <fpage>1701</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1711</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/tax.596005</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Frazer</surname>
<given-names>K. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pachter</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Poliakov</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rubin</surname>
<given-names>E. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dubchak</surname>
<given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>Vista: Computational tools for comparative genomics</article-title>. <source>Nucleic Acids Res.</source> <volume>32</volume> (<issue>Suppl. 2</issue>), <fpage>W273</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>W279</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/nar/gkh458</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Guo</surname>
<given-names>L. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Guo</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xu</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>He</surname>
<given-names>L. X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Carlsond</surname>
<given-names>J. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hou</surname>
<given-names>X. G.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Phylogenetic analysis based on chloroplast genome uncover evolutionary relationship of all the nine species and six cultivars of tree peony</article-title>. <source>Ind. Crops Prod.</source> <volume>153</volume>, <fpage>112567</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.indcrop.2020.112567</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hakki</surname>
<given-names>E. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dogan</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Duran</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Martin</surname>
<given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dinc</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Phylogenetic relationship analysis of Genista L. (Fabaceae) species from Turkey as revealed by inter-simple sequence repeat amplification</article-title>. <source>Afr. J. Biotechnol.</source> <volume>9</volume> (<issue>18</issue>), <fpage>2627</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2632</lpage>. </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Henriquez</surname>
<given-names>C. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Abdullah, </surname>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ahmed</surname>
<given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Carlsen</surname>
<given-names>M. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zuluaga</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Croat</surname>
<given-names>T. B.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Molecular evolution of chloroplast genomes in Monsteroideae (Araceae)</article-title>. <source>Planta</source> <volume>251</volume>, <fpage>72</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00425-020-03365-7</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ho</surname>
<given-names>T. N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>S. W.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <source>A worldwide monograph of <italic>Swertia</italic> and its allies</source>. <publisher-loc>Beijing</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Science Press</publisher-name>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>4</lpage>. </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ho</surname>
<given-names>T. N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xue</surname>
<given-names>C. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1994</year>). <article-title>The origin, dispersal and formation of the distribution pattern of <italic>Swertia</italic> L. (Gentianaceae)</article-title>. <source>Acta Phytotaxon. Sin.</source> <volume>32</volume> (<issue>6</issue>), <fpage>525</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>537</lpage>. </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<citation citation-type="thesis">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hu</surname>
<given-names>G. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <source>The complete chloroplast genomes of paphiopedilum and cymbidium (Orchidaceae) species: Comparative genomic and phylogenetic analyses</source>. <comment>Master&#xb4;s Dissertation</comment> (<publisher-loc>Xian, Shanxi, China</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Northwest university</publisher-name>).</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Irestedt</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fjeldsa</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ericson</surname>
<given-names>P. G. P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>Phylogenetic relationships of woodcreepers (Aves: Dendrocolaptinae)-/incongruence between molecular and morphological data</article-title>. <source>J. Avian Biol.</source> <volume>35</volume> (<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>280</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>288</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.0908-8857.2004.03234.x</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B36">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kazutaka</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Standley</surname>
<given-names>D. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: Improvements in performance and usability</article-title>. <source>Mol. Biol. Evol.</source> <volume>30</volume> (<issue>4</issue>), <fpage>772</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>780</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/molbev/mst010</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B37">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kearse</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Moir</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wilson</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Stones-Havas</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cheung</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sturrock</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Geneious Basic: An integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data</article-title>. <source>Bioinformatics</source> <volume>28</volume> (<issue>12</issue>), <fpage>1647</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1649</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/bioinformatics/bts199</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B38">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kim</surname>
<given-names>Y. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Park</surname>
<given-names>C. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kim</surname>
<given-names>K. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Complete chloroplast DNA sequence from a Korean endemic genus, <italic>Megaleranthis saniculifolia</italic>, and its evolutionary implications</article-title>. <source>Mol. Cells</source> <volume>27</volume>, <fpage>365</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>381</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10059-009-0047-6</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B39">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kousteni</surname>
<given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mazzoleni</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vasileiadou</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rovatsos</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Complete mitochondrial DNA genome of nine species of sharks and rays and their phylogenetic placement among modern elasmobranchs</article-title>. <source>Genes.</source> <volume>12</volume> (<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>324</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/genes12030324</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B40">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kuang</surname>
<given-names>D. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>Y. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gao</surname>
<given-names>L. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>S. Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lu</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Complete chloroplast genome sequence of <italic>Magnolia kwangsiensis</italic> (magnoliaceae): Implication for DNA barcoding and population genetics</article-title>. <source>Genome</source> <volume>54</volume> (<issue>8</issue>), <fpage>663</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>673</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1139/g11-026</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B41">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kurtz</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Choudhuri</surname>
<given-names>J. V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ohlebusch</surname>
<given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schleiermacher</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Stoye</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Giegerich</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2001</year>). <article-title>REPuter: The manifold applications of repeat analysis on a genomic scale</article-title>. <source>Nucleic Acids Res.</source> <volume>29</volume>, <fpage>4633</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>4642</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/nar/29.22.4633</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B42">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lee</surname>
<given-names>M. S. Y.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2001</year>). <article-title>Uninformative characters and apparent conflict between molecules and morphology</article-title>. <source>Mol. Biol. Evol.</source> <volume>18</volume> (<issue>4</issue>), <fpage>676</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>680</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a003848</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B43">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>D. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xiao</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>G. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Advances in studies on chemical compositions and their pharmacological effect in the plants of Swertia</article-title>. <source>J. Dali Univ.</source> <volume>6</volume> (<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>77</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>80</lpage>. </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B44">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>J. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fang</surname>
<given-names>X. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1999</year>). <article-title>Uplift of the Tibetan Plateau and environmental changes</article-title>. <source>Chin. Sci. Bull.</source> <volume>44</volume> (<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>2117</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2124</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/bf03182692</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B45">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zang</surname>
<given-names>M. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>M. Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fang</surname>
<given-names>Y. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Complete chloroplast genome sequence and phylogenetic analysis of <italic>Quercus acutissia</italic>
</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Mol. Sci.</source> <volume>19</volume> (<issue>8</issue>), <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>17</lpage>. </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B46">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>L&#xfc;</surname>
<given-names>G. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>X. N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>He</surname>
<given-names>X. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Chloroplast genome structure and variation analysis of Brassicaceae species</article-title>. <source>Acta Bot. boreal.-occident. Sin.</source> <volume>37</volume> (<issue>6</issue>), <fpage>1090</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1101</lpage>. </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B47">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Liang</surname>
<given-names>Q. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gao</surname>
<given-names>X. Y.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1979</year>). <article-title>Study on anti-hepatitis flavone constituents of <italic>Swertia mileensis</italic>
</article-title>. <source>Chin. Herb. Med.</source> <volume>9</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>4</lpage>. </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B48">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>J. Q.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>The integrative species concept&#x201d; and &#x201c;specieson the speciation way&#x201d;</article-title>. <source>Biodivers. Sci.</source> <volume>24</volume> (<issue>9</issue>), <fpage>1004</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1008</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.17520/biods.2016222</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B49">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>X. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>M. Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xu</surname>
<given-names>W. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schwarzacher</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Heslop-Harrison</surname>
<given-names>J. S.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Comparative chloroplast genome analyses of avena: Insights into evolutionary dynamics and phylogeny</article-title>. <source>BMC Plant Biol.</source> <volume>20</volume>, <fpage>406</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12870-020-02621-y</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B50">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ma</surname>
<given-names>L. N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tian</surname>
<given-names>C. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>T. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Advances in study on iridoids in plant of Swertia L. and their pharmacological activity</article-title>. <source>Chin. Tradit. Herb. Drugs.</source> <volume>39</volume>, <fpage>790</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>795</lpage>. </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B51">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Maier</surname>
<given-names>R. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Neckermann</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Igloi</surname>
<given-names>G. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>K&#xf6;ssel</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1995</year>). <article-title>Complete sequence of the maize chloroplast genome: Gene content, hotspots of divergence and fine tuning of genetic information by transcript editing</article-title>. <source>J. Mol. Biol.</source> <volume>251</volume>, <fpage>614</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>628</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1006/jmbi.1995.0460</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B52">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Marc</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Oliver</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sabine</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ralph</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>OrganellarGenomeDRAW-a suite of tools for generating physical maps of plastid and mitochondrial genomes and visualizing expression data sets</article-title>. <source>Nucleic Acids Res.</source> <volume>41</volume>, <fpage>575</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>581</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/nar/gkt289</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B53">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Melodelima</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lobreaux</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Complete <italic>Arabis alpina</italic> chloroplast genome sequence and insight into its polymorphism</article-title>. <source>Meta Gene</source> <volume>1</volume>, <fpage>65</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>75</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.mgene.2013.10.004</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B54">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Miao</surname>
<given-names>Y. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Herrmann</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname>
<given-names>F. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xian</surname>
<given-names>X. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname>
<given-names>S. L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>What controlled mid-late Miocene long-term aridification in central Asia? Global cooling or Tibetan plateau uplift: A review</article-title>. <source>Earth. Sci. Rev.</source> <volume>112</volume> (<issue>3-4</issue>), <fpage>155</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>172</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.earscirev.2012.02.003</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B55">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Millen</surname>
<given-names>R. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Olmstead</surname>
<given-names>R. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Adams</surname>
<given-names>K. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Palmer</surname>
<given-names>J. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lao</surname>
<given-names>N. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Heggie</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2001</year>). <article-title>Many parallel losses of infA from chloroplast DNA during angiosperm evolution with multiple independent transfers to the nucleus</article-title>. <source>Plant Cell.</source> <volume>13</volume>, <fpage>645</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>658</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1105/tpc.13.3.645</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B56">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mulch</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chamberlain</surname>
<given-names>C. P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Earth science: The rise and growth of tibet</article-title>. <source>Nature</source> <volume>439</volume> (<issue>7077</issue>), <fpage>670</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>671</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/439670a</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B57">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ni</surname>
<given-names>L. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname>
<given-names>Z. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xu</surname>
<given-names>H. X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname>
<given-names>S. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dorje</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Chloroplast genome structures in <italic>Gentiana</italic> (Gentianaceae), based on three medicinal alpine plants used in Tibetan herbal medicine</article-title>. <source>Curr. Genet.</source> <volume>63</volume> (<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>241</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>252</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00294-016-0631-1</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B58">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Palmer</surname>
<given-names>J. D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1985</year>). <article-title>Comparative organization of chloroplast genomes</article-title>. <source>Annu. Rev. Genet.</source> <volume>19</volume>, <fpage>325</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>354</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1146/annurev.ge.19.120185.001545</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B59">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Patel</surname>
<given-names>R. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jain</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>NGS qc toolkit: A toolkit for quality control of next generation sequencing data</article-title>. <source>PLoS One</source> <volume>7</volume>, <fpage>e30619</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0030619</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B60">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Pikunova</surname>
<given-names>A. V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Martirosian</surname>
<given-names>E. V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kniazev</surname>
<given-names>S. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ryzhova</surname>
<given-names>N. N.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Application of the RAPD-analysis for the study of genetic polymorphism and phylogenetic relationships in the Ribes L. genus</article-title>. <source>Russ. J. Genet. Appl. Res.</source> <volume>2</volume>, <fpage>141</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>151</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1134/s2079059712020098</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B61">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Pisani</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Benton</surname>
<given-names>M. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wilkinson</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Congruence of morphological and molecular phylogenies</article-title>. <source>Acta Biotheor.</source> <volume>55</volume> (<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>269</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>281</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10441-007-9015-8</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B62">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Prjibelski</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Antipov</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Meleshko</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lapidus</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Korobeynikov</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Using SPAdes de novo assembler</article-title>. <source>Curr. Protoc. Bioinforma.</source> <volume>70</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>e102</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/cpbi.102</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B63">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Qu</surname>
<given-names>X. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Moore</surname>
<given-names>M. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>D. Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yi</surname>
<given-names>T. S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>PGA: A software package for rapid, accurate, and flexible batch annotation of plastomes</article-title>. <source>Plant Methods</source> <volume>15</volume>, <fpage>50</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s13007-019-0435-7</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B64">
<citation citation-type="web">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Rambaut</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>FigTree v.1.4.4</article-title>. <comment>Available at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/ftree/">http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/</ext-link>
</comment>(<comment>Accessed October 25, 2020)</comment>. </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B65">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ronquist</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Huelsenbeck</surname>
<given-names>J. P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>MRBAYES 3: Bayesian phylogeneticinference under mixed models</article-title>. <source>Bioinformatics</source> <volume>19</volume>, <fpage>1572</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1574</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/bioinformatics/btg180</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B66">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Saski</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lee</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Daniell</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wood</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tomkins</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kim</surname>
<given-names>H. G.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Complete chloroplast genome sequence of Gycine max and comparative analyses with other legume genomes.</article-title> <source>Plant Mol. Biol.</source> <volume>59</volume> (<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>309</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>322</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11103-005-8882-0</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B67">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Shaw</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lickey</surname>
<given-names>E. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Beck</surname>
<given-names>J. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Farmer</surname>
<given-names>S. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>W. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Miller</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>The tortoise and the hare II: Relative utility of 21 noncoding chloroplast DNA sequences for phylogenetic analysis</article-title>. <source>Am. J. Bot.</source> <volume>92</volume>, <fpage>142</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>166</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3732/ajb.92.1.142</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B68">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Shen</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liao</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bai</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xiao</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Complete chloroplast genome sequence and phylogenetic analysis of the medicinal plant artemisia annua.</article-title> <source>Molecules</source> <volume>22</volume>, <fpage>1330</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/molecules22081330</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B69">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Shi</surname>
<given-names>G. R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>Cluster analysis for embryological characters of 12 species in Gentianaceae</article-title>. <source>J. Huaibei Coal Indus. Teach. Colle.</source> <volume>25</volume> (<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>51</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>55</lpage>. </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B70">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Struwe</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Albert</surname>
<given-names>V. A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <source>Gentianaceae: Systematics and natural history</source>. <publisher-loc>New York</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Cambridge University Press</publisher-name>, <fpage>242</fpage>. </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B71">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Tang</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ruan</surname>
<given-names>Q. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Peng</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Phylogeny in structure alterations of Poaceae cpDNA</article-title>. <source>Chin. Agric. Sci. Bull.</source> <volume>27</volume> (<issue>30</issue>), <fpage>171</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>176</lpage>. </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B72">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Tian</surname>
<given-names>C. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>X. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname>
<given-names>Z. N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>Z. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hou</surname>
<given-names>X. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>R. Y. H.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Characterization and comparative analysis of complete chloroplast genomes of three species from the genus Astragalus (Leguminosae)</article-title>. <source>Front. Genet.</source> <volume>12</volume>, <fpage>705482</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fgene.2021.705482</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B73">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Von Hagen</surname>
<given-names>K. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kadereit</surname>
<given-names>J. W.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>Phylogeny and flower evolution of the Swertiinae (Gentianaceae-Gentianeae): Homoplasy and the principle of variable proportions</article-title>. <source>Syst. Bot.</source> <volume>27</volume>, <fpage>548</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>572</lpage>. </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B74">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wicke</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schneeweiss</surname>
<given-names>G. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pamphilis</surname>
<given-names>C. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kai</surname>
<given-names>F. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Quandt</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>The evolution of the plastid chromosome in land plants: Gene content, gene order, gene function</article-title>. <source>Plant Mol. Biol.</source> <volume>51</volume>, <fpage>273</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>297</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11103-011-9762-4</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B75">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname>
<given-names>X. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname>
<given-names>S. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ren</surname>
<given-names>D. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhu</surname>
<given-names>Y. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>He</surname>
<given-names>F. C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>The analysis method and progress in the study of codon bias</article-title>. <source>Yi Chuan Hered.</source> <volume>29</volume> (<issue>4</issue>), <fpage>420</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>426</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1360/yc-007-0420</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B76">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Xi</surname>
<given-names>H. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sun</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xue</surname>
<given-names>C. Y.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Molecular phylogeny of Swertiinae (Gentianaceae-Gentianeae) based on sequence data of ITS and matK</article-title>. <source>Plant Divers Res.</source> <volume>36</volume> (<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>145</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>156</lpage>. </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B77">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname>
<given-names>Y. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jiao</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fan</surname>
<given-names>X. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jiang</surname>
<given-names>J. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Complete chloroplast genome sequence and characteristics analysis of Vitis ficifolia</article-title>. <source>Acta. Hort. .Sin.</source> <volume>46</volume> (<issue>4</issue>), <fpage>635</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>648</lpage>. </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B78">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tao</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dong</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Feng</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname>
<given-names>G. F.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Comparative analysis of the complete chloroplast genomes of five quercus species</article-title>. <source>Front. Plant Sci.</source> <volume>7</volume>, <fpage>959</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2016.00959</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B79">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>Y. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ma</surname>
<given-names>P. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>D. Z.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>High-throughput sequencing of six bamboo chloroplast genomes: Phylogenetic implications for temperate woody bamboos (Poaceae: Bambusoideae)</article-title>. <source>PLoS One</source> <volume>6</volume>, <fpage>e20596</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0020596</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B80">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhou</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jin</surname>
<given-names>S. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Qin</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>The applications of chloroplast genome analysis in plant system development</article-title>. <source>Botanical Res.</source> <volume>3</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>9</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.12677/br.2014.31001</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B81">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhou</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wei</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chang</surname>
<given-names>Y. X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bai</surname>
<given-names>G. Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>Z, H.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Comparative transcriptome and chloroplast genome analyses of two related <italic>Dipteronia</italic> species</article-title>. <source>Front. Plant Sci.</source> <volume>7</volume>, <fpage>1512</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2016.01512</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B82">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhu</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Guo</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gupta</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fan</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mower</surname>
<given-names>J. P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Evolutionary dynamics of the plastid inverted repeat: The effects of expansion, contraction, and loss on substitution rates</article-title>. <source>New Phytol.</source> <volume>209</volume>, <fpage>1747</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1756</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/nph.13743</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>