<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="EN" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Genet.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Genetics</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Genet.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">1664-8021</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">635904</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fgene.2021.635904</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Genetics</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Hypoxia Induced Sex-Difference in Zebrafish Brain Proteome Profile Reveals the Crucial Role of H3K9me3 in Recovery From Acute Hypoxia</article-title>
<alt-title alt-title-type="left-running-head">Das et&#x20;al.</alt-title>
<alt-title alt-title-type="right-running-head">Sex-Difference in Zebrafish-Brain on Hypoxia</alt-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Das</surname>
<given-names>Tapatee</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/675386/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kamle</surname>
<given-names>Avijeet</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">
<sup>3</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kumar</surname>
<given-names>Arvind</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">
<sup>3</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/705390/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Chakravarty</surname>
<given-names>Sumana</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001">&#x2a;</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/229586/overview"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
<institution>Applied Biology, CSIR-Indian Institute of Chemical Technology (IICT)</institution>, <addr-line>Hyderabad</addr-line>, <country>India</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
<institution>Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research (AcSIR)</institution>, <addr-line>Ghaziabad</addr-line>, <country>India</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff3">
<sup>3</sup>
<institution>CSIR-Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology (CCMB)</institution>, <addr-line>Hyderabad</addr-line>, <country>India</country>
</aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>
<bold>Edited by:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/39565/overview">Sanjay Kumar Banerjee</ext-link>, National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research (Guwahati), India</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>
<bold>Reviewed by:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/814502/overview">Renu Goel</ext-link>, Translational Health Science and Technology Institute (THSTI), India</p>
<p>
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1485676/overview">Parmeshwar Katare</ext-link>, University of Oslo, Norway</p>
</fn>
<corresp id="c001">&#x2a;Correspondence: Sumana Chakravarty, <email>sumanachak@iict.res.in</email>
</corresp>
<fn fn-type="other">
<p>This article was submitted to Systems Biology Archive, a section of the journal Frontiers in Genetics</p>
</fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>31</day>
<month>01</month>
<year>2022</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2021</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>12</volume>
<elocation-id>635904</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>30</day>
<month>11</month>
<year>2020</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>29</day>
<month>09</month>
<year>2021</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#xa9; 2022 Das, Kamle, Kumar and Chakravarty.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2022</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Das, Kamle, Kumar and Chakravarty</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these&#x20;terms.</p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>Understanding the molecular basis of sex differences in neural response to acute hypoxic insult has profound implications for the effective prevention and treatment of ischemic stroke. Global hypoxic-ischemic induced neural damage has been studied recently under well-controlled, non-invasive, reproducible conditions using a zebrafish model. Our earlier report on sex difference in global acute hypoxia-induced neural damage and recovery in zebrafish prompted us to conduct a comprehensive study on the mechanisms underlying the recovery. An omics approach for studying quantitative changes in brain proteome upon hypoxia insult following recovery was undertaken using iTRAQ-based LC-MS/MS approach. The results shed light on the altered expression of many regulatory proteins in the zebrafish brain upon acute hypoxia following recovery. The sex difference in differentially expressed proteins along with the proteins expressed in a uniform direction in both the sexes was studied. Core expression analysis by Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) showed a distinct sex difference in the disease function heatmap. Most of the upstream regulators obtained through IPA were validated at the transcriptional level. Translational upregulation of H3K9me3 in males led us to elucidate the mechanism of recovery by confirming transcriptional targets through ChIP-qPCR. The upregulation of H3K9me3 level in males at 4&#xa0;h post-hypoxia appears to affect the early neurogenic markers nestin, klf4, and sox2, which might explain the late recovery in males, compared to females. Acute hypoxia-induced sex-specific comparison of brain proteome led us to reveal many differentially expressed proteins, which can be further studied for the development of novel targets for better therapeutic strategy.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>sex difference</kwd>
<kwd>IPA</kwd>
<kwd>pathway analysis</kwd>
<kwd>iTRAQ</kwd>
<kwd>hypoxia-ischemia recovery</kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="s1">
<title>Highlights</title>
<p>
<list list-type="simple">
<list-item>
<p>&#x2043; Sex disparity was observed in differentially regulated proteins; mostly downregulated in&#x20;males.</p>
</list-item>
<list-item>
<p>&#x2043; Five common transcription regulators [Myc, Mknk1, Nfe2l2 (Nrf2), Thrb, and Otx 2] have differential activation states.</p>
</list-item>
<list-item>
<p>&#x2043; Upon CoIP, H3K9me3 targets of hypoxia were found to be totally different from normoxia.</p>
</list-item>
<list-item>
<p>&#x2043; H3K9me3 seems to be a key player in early neurogenesis.</p>
</list-item>
<list-item>
<p>&#x2043; Novel finding: H3K9me3 appeals to play an important role in the delayed recovery of males from acute hypoxia.</p>
</list-item>
</list>
</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2">
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Oxygenation in vertebrates is always a life-or-death necessity for any of the metabolic needs of cells and tissues (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Sun, 1999</xref>). Over the last decade, we have acquired adequate information on cellular and molecular mechanisms in hypoxic-ischemic injury, survival, and death (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Muller and Marks, 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Sekhon et&#x20;al., 2017</xref>). Hypoxic-ischemic neural injury continues to be the leading cause of death and disability worldwide (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Catherine and Collaborators, 2019</xref>). The degree of disability does not simply reflect the severity or distribution of the impaired blood supply (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Dugan et&#x20;al., 1999</xref>). The most common condition of hypoxia-ischemia leads to cerebral stroke due to the focal disruption of blood supply to a part of the brain. Other conditions include transient impairment of blood flow to the entire brain, termed global ischemia, which occurs following cardiac arrest.</p>
<p>A low level of oxygen and the brain&#x2019;s susceptibility to acute hypoxia characterizes the key factor determining critical dependency. Cerebral oxygenation is reduced in hypoxia and neuronal damage can occur during a prolonged mismatch between oxygen supply and demand (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Goodall et&#x20;al., 2014</xref>). All the neurons in the brain can sense and, crucially, modify, their activity in response to hypoxia. Most neurons respond to hypoxia by decreasing metabolic demand and thus the need for aerobic energy (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Michiels, 2004</xref>). Deciphering cellular response to energetic challenges that occur on the onset of acute hypoxia may give insight into the ischemic condition in various diseases (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Bickler and Buck, 2007</xref>). Broad high throughput approaches in global changes in protein expression allow uncovering the critical signals underlying mechanisms in the disease condition. Acute Hypoxia causes a significant perturbation in cellular energy homeostasis before a hypoxia sensing and signal transduction cascade needing energy demand initiates (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Hochachka et&#x20;al., 1996</xref>). An early component of the responses to acute hypoxia i.e.,&#x20;neural damage and recovery may have both post-transcriptional and translational mechanisms. The rapid response to acute hypoxia may preclude many pathways that require many new gene expressions suggesting the mechanism underlying recovery from acute hypoxia is mediated at least in part by the activities of the existing pool of mRNA and protein. An approach such as high throughput proteomic analysis is one of the ideally suited approaches to understand the neural changes induced by acute hypoxia with recovery (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Li et&#x20;al., 2019</xref>).</p>
<p>Previous proteomic studies have shown hypoxia-induced changes in the zebrafish (<italic>Danio rerio</italic>) skeletal muscle proteome (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Chen et&#x20;al., 2013</xref>) and have implicated a broad range of cellular functions in response to hypoxia. Another proteomics study on zebrafish brain upon chronic unpredictable stress (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Chakravarty et&#x20;al., 2013</xref>) has recently laid the groundwork for the analysis of neural proteome response to stressors.</p>
<p>A recent review article on Proteomics-Based Approaches for the Study of Ischemic Stroke (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Li et&#x20;al., 2019</xref>) discussed the proteomics study of ischemic stroke using <italic>in vivo</italic> and <italic>in&#x20;vitro</italic> models, with and without interventions and taking tissue, cerebrospinal fluid, or plasma. Although proteomic studies have contributed with a long list of potential biomarkers for diagnosis, prognosis, and monitoring of ischemic stroke, most of these have not been implemented in clinical application successfully. The shortcomings from the existing proteomics data are small sample size, cell types, te age of experimental animals, and using single-sex experimental animals all seem to be responsible for blocking these results from achieving clinical implementation.</p>
<p>Like many neurological disorders, cerebral stroke is reported to have sex-specific differences in occurrence and mechanisms. However, the molecular details underlying these sex-specific differences have not yet been explored using a relevant animal model. In fact, many factors including genetics, hormones (estrogen and androgen), epigenetic regulation, and environment contribute to sex-specific differences. Since ischemic sensitivity varies over the lifespan, and the &#x201c;ischemia resistant&#x201d; female phenotype diminishes after menopause, hence the role of sex hormones cannot be ruled out. To understand the role of hormonal status on the cerebral vasculature in pinpointing sex-specific differences in stroke pathophysiology, a suitable, simple animal model that can help to address these complicated sex-specific differences is warranted.</p>
<p>Sex-specific differences in the hypoxic-ischemic brain have profound implications for effective prevention and treatment. Global hypoxic-ischemic damages and recovery are well studied under the well-controlled, non-invasive, reproducible conditions in zebrafish (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">Yu and Li, 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Braga et&#x20;al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Silva et&#x20;al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Das et&#x20;al., 2019</xref>). In our previous study, we have reported the sex-specific difference in hypoxia-induced neural damage and recovery, where we have concluded that as compared to males, females showed a higher level of neural damage and an ability to recover faster. This interesting finding led us to explore the global proteome changes induced in recovery after the hypoxic stress, so in the present study, we performed a high throughput proteomic analysis on zebrafish brain by iTRAQ method. The iTRAQ labeling method also allows the identification of different post-translational modifications which are key to understand the aetiology and develop better treatment.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3">
<title>Experimental Procedure</title>
<sec id="s3-1">
<title>Animal Procurement and Acute-Hypoxia Treatment</title>
<p>Wild type strain of zebrafish was bred and raised at CSIR-IICT zebrafish facility in accordance with protocol no IICT/CB/SC/281114/30 under registration no&#x23; 97/1999/CPCSEA. All the experimental animals were maintained in a controlled environment with a 14&#xa0;h light/10&#xa0;h dark cycle at 28&#xb0;C with three feedings and constant aeration. Zebrafish aged 5&#x2013;6&#xa0;month were segregated on the basis of sex and used for all the experiments. For an acute hypoxia treatment animals were placed in an air-tight glass hypoxia chamber for a period of 5&#xa0;min with 0.6&#xa0;mg/ltr dissolved oxygen following reoxygenation at 7&#xa0;mg/ltr dissolved oxygen in a recovery tank, which is exactly described in (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Das et&#x20;al., 2019</xref>). After 4&#xa0;h post-hypoxia, all the animals were sacrificed for brain tissue collection.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-2">
<title>Protein Extraction for iTRAQ</title>
<p>The animals were euthanatized and decapitated to remove the brain. The whole brain from each animal was homogenized in a lysis buffer [50&#xa0;mM ammonium bicarbonate pH 8.0, 0.1% SDS with protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma)] and for further efficient disruption and homogenization of tissue, a mild sonication was done using Bioruptor<sup>&#xae;</sup>. The obtained lysates were cold-centrifuged at 14,000&#xa0;rpm for 15&#xa0;min and the supernatant was quantified using Bradford assay with BSA as standard. Further protein samples were cleaned up by acetone precipitation. For each group, 80&#xa0;&#xb5;g of protein was taken and six volumes of chilled acetone were added for precipitation. After decantation of acetone the samples were resuspended in dissolution buffer (Buffer pH is 8.5. Contains 0.5&#xa0;M triethyammonium bicarbonate) provided with the iTRAQ<sup>&#xae;</sup> Reagents-4plex Applications kit-Protein (AB Sciex). Before trypsin digestion, all the protein samples were reduced and cysteine blocked using the reagents provided in the iTRAQ<sup>&#xae;</sup> Reagents-4plex Applications kit-Protein (AB Sciex). Digestion and labeling of proteins were done according to the manufacturer&#x2019;s protocol. The samples from normoxia male and female were labeled with reagents 114 and 116 and the samples from hypoxia male and female were labeled with reagents 115 and 117, respectively. Subsequently, all the labeled samples were pooled and vacuum dried, and further cleaned up using the C18 desalting column (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The final fraction was concentrated using a vacuum concentrator and reconstituted in 10&#xa0;&#xb5;l of 0.1% formic acid for LC-MS/MS analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-3">
<title>LC-MS/MS Analysis</title>
<p>LC-MS/MS analysis of the trypsin digested iTRAQ labeled and purified fractions were performed in LTQ - Orbitrap Velos (Thermo Scientific, Germany). The fragmentation was carried out using higher-energy collision dissociation (HCD) with 50% normalized collision energy. The MS data were analyzed using Proteome Discoverer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Version 1.4). MS/MS search was carried out using the SEQUEST search engine against the NCBI zebrafish protein database. Search parameters included trypsin as an enzyme with a maximum of two missed cleavage allowed; precursor and fragment mass tolerance were set to 10&#xa0;ppm and 0.2&#xa0;Da respectively; Methionine oxidation was set as a dynamic modification while methylthio modification at cysteine and iTRAQ modification at N-terminus of the peptide were set as static modifications. The FDR was calculated by enabling the peptide sequence analysis using a decoy database. High confidence peptide identifications were obtained by setting a target FDR threshold of 1% at the peptide level. Relative quantitation of proteins was determined based on the ratios of relative intensities of the reporter ions from hypoxia treated and untreated samples released during MS/MS fragmentation of each peptide. Appropriate quality control filters at the level of peptides/peptide spectral matches (PSMs) and then at the protein level were applied to the iTRAQ data. Proteins identified from the triplicate runs as having more than 1.5-log-fold changes in the hypoxia samples against the normoxia samples were selected for upregulation and having less than 0.5-log fold change considered to be downregulated for its differential expression. Proteins based on their regulation were analyzed for putative associations in different network pathways.</p>
<p>The mass spectrometry proteomics data have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE partner repository with the dataset identifier PXD027528".</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-4">
<title>Protein Enrichment Analysis</title>
<p>To perform the functional enrichment tests of the candidate proteins, we used Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) software for both canonical pathways and molecular networks altered. The IPA system provides a more comprehensive pathway resource based on manual collection and curation. The rich information returned by IPA is also suitable for pathway crosstalk analysis as it has more molecules and their connections included. For analysis, we have provided the identified peptides with relative and absolute expression fold change values and performed core IPA analysis, biomarkers, and molecular and functional comparison analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-5">
<title>Co-Immunoprecipitation</title>
<p>Zebrafish brain tissue was homogenized in nuclear extraction buffer [50&#xa0;mM HEPES (pH&#x202f;7.8), 50&#xa0;mM KCl, 300&#xa0;mM NaCl, 0.1&#xa0;M EDTA, 1&#xa0;mM DTT, 10% (v/v) Glycerol and 1X protease inhibitor] and further washed with PBS and incubated in RIPA buffer [20&#xa0;mM Tris (pH&#x202f;7.5), 150&#xa0;mM NaCl, 1% NP-40, 5&#xa0;mM EDTA, protease and phosphatase inhibitors] for 15&#xa0;min on ice. After centrifugation, the supernatant was collected and pre-cleared with protein A agarose beads (Santa Cruz) at 4&#xb0;C for 30&#xa0;min. The pre-cleared lysate was then incubated with Anti-Histone H3 (tri methyl K9) antibody (H3K9me3) (AB8898 1:250) complexed to protein A beads at 4&#xb0;C for 5&#x2013;6&#xa0;h, followed by washes with a buffer containing 10&#xa0;mM Tris (pH&#x202f;7.5), 150&#xa0;mM NaCl, and 1&#xa0;mM EDTA. The beads complexed with the immunoprecipitated proteins were then boiled at 100&#xb0;C in 3X Laemmli buffer for 5&#xa0;min. 2.5% of whole tissue lysate was taken as input for each immunoprecipitation. Western blotting was carried out by loading equal amounts of the immunoprecipitated proteins.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-6">
<title>Immunoblotting Analysis</title>
<p>For immunoblotting experiments, cells were lysed in 3X Laemmli buffer [180&#xa0;mM Tris (pH&#x202f;6.8), 6% SDS, 15% glycerol, 7.5% &#x3b2;-mercaptoethanol, and 0.01% bromophenol blue]. Images were captured using Chemicapt (Vilber-Lourmat, Germany). Densitometry analysis for blots was performed using ImageJ software (NIH) and images were processed in Adobe Photoshop CS3. The intensity values plotted or mentioned are average values from the number of biological replicates indicated in the legend.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-7">
<title>Chromatin Immunoprecipitation Assay</title>
<p>ChIP was performed as described in (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Weidemann et&#x20;al., 2013</xref>) with required minor modifications. Briefly, for each ChIP, cross-linked samples from three animals were pooled together both in the normoxia and hypoxia groups. The 30&#xa0;&#x3bc;g of chromatin from each sample was pre-cleared with Dynabeads (Invitrogen) before incubation with an anti-rabbit H3K9me3 antibody (EPR16601) keeping non-immune rabbit IgG antibody as a negative control. After reverse cross-linking and sequential washes with different concentration salt buffers, DNA was purified using phenol-chloroform-isoamyl alcohol (25:24:1 ratio, SIGMA). Specific primers for the gene-specific 5&#x2032; upstream region of the transcription start site were used for quantifying the enrichment of the histone mark H3K9me3, for 10% input, in SYBR Green-based qPCR assays.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-8">
<title>qPCR</title>
<p>The total RNA was isolated using TRIzol Reagent as per the manufacturer&#x2019;s instruction. The cDNA was synthesized employing RevertAid H Minus First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit according to the manufacturer&#x2019;s protocol. The primer sequences are available on a request basis. Real-time PCR was performed in triplicate using SYBR Green PCR Master Mix Detection System (Applied Biosystems). Normalization of mRNA expression levels was carried out using &#x3b2;-actin as the housekeeping gene. Gene expression was normalized against the ubiquitously expressed beta actin gene. Data were analyzed using the &#x394;(&#x394;CT) method.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-9">
<title>Statistical Analysis</title>
<p>Statistical analysis was performed using Microsoft Excel. Mean differences between the normoxia and hypoxia groups were determined using a two-tailed unpaired Student&#x2019;s <italic>t</italic>-test with confidence intervals of 95% since only two groups were used to compare a single variable i.e.,&#x20;normoxia/hypoxia. A <italic>p</italic>-value of &#x2264;0.05 was considered significant.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="results|discussion" id="s4">
<title>Results and Discussion</title>
<sec id="s4-1">
<title>Analysis of Zebrafish Brain Proteome Induced by Acute Hypoxia and During Recovery Using iTRAQ Based LC-MS/MS</title>
<p>As described previously by us (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Das et&#x20;al., 2019</xref>), 4&#xa0;h post-acute hypoxia treatment (for 5&#xa0;min at DO &#x3d; &#xb1;0.6&#xa0;mg/litre) the brain tissues from both hypoxia-treated and untreated male and female zebrafish were isolated (<italic>n</italic>&#x20;&#x3d; 6 per group) and subjected to comprehensive proteomic profiling. For this, male and female zebrafish brains of nine individuals from each sex were pooled together for iTRAQ based LC-MS/MS method and three technical replicates were run in LC-MS/MS, as depicted in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure&#x20;1A</xref>. Differentially expressed proteins were identified using iTRAQ and LC-MS/MS analysis on an LTQ Orbitrap Velos mass spectrometer, by comparing hypoxia male (HM) vs. normoxia male (NM) and hypoxia female (HF) vs. normoxia female (NF) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure&#x20;1A</xref>). A total of 2,323 proteins were identified to be regulated differentially after the data analysis from experimental runs in triplicate. The resuling proteins (2,323) were used to generate a clustered heatmap for showing the sex difference in expression patterns (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure&#x20;1B</xref>). A majority (i.e.,&#x20;84%) of differentially regulated proteins, 1,968 in total, were found downregulated in HM versus NM. In contrast, more than half (51%) of differentially regulated proteins, 1,188 in total, were found upregulated in HF versus NF (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure&#x20;1C</xref>). 1,535 proteins were differentially regulated, among those 1,518 (98%) proteins were upregulated in females and downregulated in males whereas only 17 (2%) proteins were upregulated in males and downregulated in females, showing a clear differential regulation in a sex-specific manner. Another 554 proteins showed a similar expression pattern in both sexes, where 478 proteins were upregulated and 76 proteins downregulated. A list of differentially regulated proteins is provided in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table&#x20;1</xref>.</p>
<fig id="F1" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Analysis of zebrafish brain proteome by iTRAQ. Schematic representation of brain proteome analysis by iTRAQ labeling <bold>(A)</bold>, Cluster heatmap of proteins obtained from iTRAQ analysis for hypoxia male [HM] vs. normoxia male [NM] and hypoxia female [HF] vs. normoxia female [NF] <bold>(B)</bold>, Pie chart showing the analysis of expression of proteins resulted from iTRAQ in hypoxia male and female brain compared with normoxia male and female brain <bold>(C)</bold>.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fgene-12-635904-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
<table-wrap id="T1" position="float">
<label>TABLE 1</label>
<caption>
<p>IPA generated disease function analysis for zebrafish male and female brain proteome induced by hypoxia following recovery.</p>
</caption>
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<td colspan="6" align="left">
<bold>Male ZF brain proteome analysis (HM/NM)</bold>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Categories</td>
<td align="center">Diseases or functions annotation</td>
<td align="center">
<italic>p</italic>-value</td>
<td align="center">Predicted activation state</td>
<td align="center">Activation z-score</td>
<td align="center">&#x23; Molecules</td>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td align="left">Organismal survival</td>
<td align="left">Organismal death</td>
<td align="center">2.31E-11</td>
<td align="center">Increased</td>
<td align="center">12.434</td>
<td align="center">251</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Cell death and survival</td>
<td align="left">Cell death</td>
<td align="center">2.51E-11</td>
<td align="center">Increased</td>
<td align="center">4.843</td>
<td align="center">218</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Cell death and survival</td>
<td align="left">Necrosis</td>
<td align="center">3.27E-09</td>
<td align="center">Increased</td>
<td align="center">4.131</td>
<td align="center">154</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Cancer, organismal injury and abnormalities, respiratory disease</td>
<td align="left">Development of lung tumor</td>
<td align="center">9.13E-08</td>
<td align="center">Increased</td>
<td align="center">3.302</td>
<td align="center">27</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Cancer, organismal injury and abnormalities</td>
<td align="left">Incidence of tumor</td>
<td align="center">0.000000893</td>
<td align="center">Increased</td>
<td align="center">2.199</td>
<td align="center">87</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Cell death and survival</td>
<td align="left">Apoptosis</td>
<td align="center">0.000000991</td>
<td align="center">Increased</td>
<td align="center">4.38</td>
<td align="center">153</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Cancer, organismal injury and abnormalities</td>
<td align="left">Malignant genitourinary solid tumor</td>
<td align="center">0.00000154</td>
<td align="center">Increased</td>
<td align="center">2.272</td>
<td align="center">33</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Cancer, organismal injury and abnormalities</td>
<td align="left">Frequency of tumor</td>
<td align="center">0.00000449</td>
<td align="center">Increased</td>
<td align="center">2.133</td>
<td align="center">77</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Cancer, organismal injury and abnormalities, respiratory disease</td>
<td align="left">Lung carcinoma</td>
<td align="center">0.0000213</td>
<td align="center">Increased</td>
<td align="center">2.584</td>
<td align="center">23</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Cancer, organismal injury and abnormalities</td>
<td align="left">Tumorigenesis of epithelial neoplasm</td>
<td align="center">0.0000284</td>
<td align="center">Increased</td>
<td align="center">2.18</td>
<td align="center">52</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Cancer, organismal injury and abnormalities</td>
<td align="left">Development of adenocarcinoma</td>
<td align="center">0.0000307</td>
<td align="center">Increased</td>
<td align="center">2.525</td>
<td align="center">28</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Cell death and survival</td>
<td align="left">Apoptosis of neurons</td>
<td align="center">0.0000414</td>
<td align="center">Increased</td>
<td align="center">3.077</td>
<td align="center">39</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Gastrointestinal disease, hepatic system disease, organismal injury and abnormalities</td>
<td align="left">Liver lesion</td>
<td align="center">0.000048</td>
<td align="center">Increased</td>
<td align="center">2.594</td>
<td align="center">53</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Developmental disorder, embryonic development, organismal survival</td>
<td align="left">Death of embryo</td>
<td align="center">0.0000693</td>
<td align="center">Increased</td>
<td align="center">4.258</td>
<td align="center">22</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Cancer, organismal injury and abnormalities</td>
<td align="left">Epithelial neoplasm</td>
<td align="center">0.0000849</td>
<td align="center">Increased</td>
<td align="center">2.115</td>
<td align="center">65</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Cancer, organismal injury and abnormalities</td>
<td align="left">Development of carcinoma</td>
<td align="center">0.0000998</td>
<td align="center">Increased</td>
<td align="center">2.229</td>
<td align="center">39</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Cancer, organismal injury and abnormalities, respiratory disease</td>
<td align="left">Development of lung carcinoma</td>
<td align="center">0.000105</td>
<td align="center">Increased</td>
<td align="center">2.559</td>
<td align="center">17</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Cancer, organismal injury and abnormalities</td>
<td align="left">Adenocarcinoma</td>
<td align="center">0.000142</td>
<td align="center">Increased</td>
<td align="center">2.587</td>
<td align="center">30</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Cancer, cell death and survival, organismal injury and abnormalities</td>
<td align="left">Cell death of tumor</td>
<td align="center">0.000151</td>
<td align="center">Increased</td>
<td align="center">3.66</td>
<td align="center">30</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Cancer, cell death and survival, organismal injury and abnormalities, tumor morphology</td>
<td align="left">Necrosis of tumor</td>
<td align="center">0.000254</td>
<td align="center">Increased</td>
<td align="center">3.66</td>
<td align="center">29</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Cancer, organismal injury and abnormalities, respiratory disease</td>
<td align="left">Lung adenocarcinoma</td>
<td align="center">0.000393</td>
<td align="center">Increased</td>
<td align="center">2.375</td>
<td align="center">15</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Cancer, organismal injury and abnormalities, respiratory disease</td>
<td align="left">Non-small cell lung carcinoma</td>
<td align="center">0.000584</td>
<td align="center">Increased</td>
<td align="center">2.559</td>
<td align="center">17</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Cancer, organismal injury and abnormalities</td>
<td align="left">Adenoma</td>
<td align="center">0.00077</td>
<td align="center">Increased</td>
<td align="center">2.042</td>
<td align="center">25</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Developmental disorder, embryonic development</td>
<td align="left">Degeneration of embryo</td>
<td align="center">0.000814</td>
<td align="center">Increased</td>
<td align="center">2.804</td>
<td align="center">8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Cancer, organismal injury and abnormalities</td>
<td align="left">Carcinoma</td>
<td align="center">0.00101</td>
<td align="center">Increased</td>
<td align="center">2.006</td>
<td align="center">48</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Developmental disorder, embryonic development, tissue morphology</td>
<td align="left">Degeneration of embryoblast</td>
<td align="center">0.00135</td>
<td align="center">Increased</td>
<td align="center">2.433</td>
<td align="center">6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Cancer, cell death and survival, organismal injury and abnormalities, tumor morphology</td>
<td align="left">Cell death of tumor cells</td>
<td align="center">0.00151</td>
<td align="center">Increased</td>
<td align="center">3.536</td>
<td align="center">26</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Connective tissue disorders, developmental disorder, organismal injury and abnormalities, skeletal and muscular disorders</td>
<td align="left">Dysplasia of skeleton</td>
<td align="center">0.00204</td>
<td align="center">Increased</td>
<td align="center">2.2</td>
<td align="center">7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Organismal survival</td>
<td align="left">Perinatal death</td>
<td align="center">0.00223</td>
<td align="center">Increased</td>
<td align="center">6.322</td>
<td align="center">60</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Developmental disorder, embryonic development, tissue morphology</td>
<td align="left">Degeneration of embryonic tissue</td>
<td align="center">0.00329</td>
<td align="center">Increased</td>
<td align="center">2.63</td>
<td align="center">7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Neurological disease, organismal injury and abnormalities</td>
<td align="left">Hydrocephalus</td>
<td align="center">0.00329</td>
<td align="center">Increased</td>
<td align="center">3.138</td>
<td align="center">11</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Carbohydrate metabolism</td>
<td align="left">Glycolysis of cells</td>
<td align="center">0.00522</td>
<td align="center">Increased</td>
<td align="center">2</td>
<td align="center">8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Lipid metabolism, molecular transport, small molecule biochemistry</td>
<td align="left">Concentration of acylglycerol</td>
<td align="left">0.00562</td>
<td align="center">Increased</td>
<td align="center">2.147</td>
<td align="center">33</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Cellular compromise</td>
<td align="left">Dysfunction of mitochondria</td>
<td align="center">0.00654</td>
<td align="center">Increased</td>
<td align="center">2.213</td>
<td align="center">5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Cancer, cell death and survival, organismal injury and abnormalities, tumor morphology</td>
<td align="left">Cell death of cancer cells</td>
<td align="center">0.00661</td>
<td align="center">Increased</td>
<td align="center">3.252</td>
<td align="center">20</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Cancer, cell death and survival, organismal injury and abnormalities, tumor morphology</td>
<td align="left">Cell death of osteosarcoma cells</td>
<td align="center">0.00721</td>
<td align="center">Increased</td>
<td align="center">3.742</td>
<td align="center">14</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Cancer, organismal injury and abnormalities</td>
<td align="left">Development of head and neck tumor</td>
<td align="center">0.00724</td>
<td align="center">Increased</td>
<td align="center">2.189</td>
<td align="center">11</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Cellular assembly and organization, cellular function and maintenance</td>
<td align="left">Organization of cytoskeleton</td>
<td align="center">6.48E-08</td>
<td align="center">Decreased</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;3.001</td>
<td align="center">101</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Nervous system development and function, tissue morphology</td>
<td align="left">Quantity of neurons</td>
<td align="center">0.000000822</td>
<td align="center">Decreased</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;2.239</td>
<td align="center">53</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Cellular assembly and organization, cellular function and maintenance</td>
<td align="left">Organization of cytoplasm</td>
<td align="center">0.000000842</td>
<td align="center">Decreased</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;3.001</td>
<td align="center">103</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Cellular assembly and organization, cellular function and maintenance</td>
<td align="left">Microtubule dynamics</td>
<td align="center">0.00000115</td>
<td align="center">Decreased</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;3.268</td>
<td align="center">86</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Cell morphology, cellular assembly and organization, cellular function and maintenance</td>
<td align="left">Formation of cellular protrusions</td>
<td align="center">0.00000314</td>
<td align="center">Decreased</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;2.624</td>
<td align="center">70</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Cancer, organismal injury and abnormalities</td>
<td align="left">Growth of tumor</td>
<td align="center">0.00000351</td>
<td align="center">Decreased</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;3.22</td>
<td align="center">75</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Cellular movement</td>
<td align="left">Cell movement</td>
<td align="center">0.00000707</td>
<td align="center">Decreased</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;4.559</td>
<td align="center">132</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Tissue morphology</td>
<td align="left">Quantity of cells</td>
<td align="center">0.00001</td>
<td align="center">Decreased</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;3.306</td>
<td align="center">171</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Cellular growth and proliferation, connective tissue development and function, tissue development</td>
<td align="left">Proliferation of connective tissue cells</td>
<td align="center">0.0000108</td>
<td align="center">Decreased</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;2.856</td>
<td align="center">49</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Cellular movement</td>
<td align="left">Migration of cells</td>
<td align="center">0.0000139</td>
<td align="center">Decreased</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;4.26</td>
<td align="center">117</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Cellular movement, nervous system development and function</td>
<td align="left">Migration of neurons</td>
<td align="center">0.0000177</td>
<td align="center">Decreased</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;2.055</td>
<td align="center">30</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Connective tissue development and function, tissue development</td>
<td align="left">Growth of connective tissue</td>
<td align="center">0.0000256</td>
<td align="center">Decreased</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;2.686</td>
<td align="center">50</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Cellular assembly and organization</td>
<td align="left">Quantity of intermediate filaments</td>
<td align="center">0.000211</td>
<td align="center">Decreased</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;2</td>
<td align="center">4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Nervous system development and function</td>
<td align="left">Sensation</td>
<td align="center">0.00041</td>
<td align="center">Decreased</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;2.482</td>
<td align="center">30</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Cancer, organismal injury and abnormalities</td>
<td align="left">Neoplasia of tumor cell lines</td>
<td align="center">0.000582</td>
<td align="center">Decreased</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;2.44</td>
<td align="center">15</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Cellular development, cellular growth and proliferation, nervous system development and function, tissue development</td>
<td align="left">Development of neurons</td>
<td align="center">0.000782</td>
<td align="center">Decreased</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;2.282</td>
<td align="center">63</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Cellular function and maintenance</td>
<td align="left">Cellular homeostasis</td>
<td align="center">0.000792</td>
<td align="center">Decreased</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;2.034</td>
<td align="center">103</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Organismal development</td>
<td align="left">Size of animal</td>
<td align="center">0.00102</td>
<td align="center">Decreased</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;2.322</td>
<td align="center">22</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Cell-to-cell signaling and interaction, nervous system development and function</td>
<td align="left">Auditory evoked potential</td>
<td align="center">0.00126</td>
<td align="center">Decreased</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;2.725</td>
<td align="center">12</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Behavior</td>
<td align="left">Learning</td>
<td align="center">0.00151</td>
<td align="center">Decreased</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;2.11</td>
<td align="center">41</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Lipid metabolism, small molecule biochemistry, vitamin and mineral metabolism</td>
<td align="left">Synthesis of steroid hormone</td>
<td align="center">0.00168</td>
<td align="center">Decreased</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;2.219</td>
<td align="center">6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Tissue development</td>
<td align="left">Formation of gland</td>
<td align="center">0.00313</td>
<td align="center">Decreased</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;2.088</td>
<td align="center">25</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Embryonic development, organismal development</td>
<td align="left">Development of body trunk</td>
<td align="center">0.00377</td>
<td align="center">Decreased</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;3.116</td>
<td align="center">95</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Embryonic development, organ development, organismal development, skeletal and muscular system development and function, tissue development</td>
<td align="left">Formation of muscle</td>
<td align="center">0.00389</td>
<td align="center">Decreased</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;2.398</td>
<td align="center">32</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Cancer, organismal injury and abnormalities</td>
<td align="left">Metastasis of tumor cell lines</td>
<td align="center">0.00431</td>
<td align="center">Decreased</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;2.556</td>
<td align="center">10</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Organismal development</td>
<td align="left">Development of genitourinary system</td>
<td align="center">0.0049</td>
<td align="center">Decreased</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;3.43</td>
<td align="center">86</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Auditory and vestibular system development and function, nervous system development and function</td>
<td align="left">Hearing</td>
<td align="center">0.00506</td>
<td align="center">Decreased</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;2.157</td>
<td align="center">15</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Amino acid metabolism,post-translational modification, small molecule biochemistry</td>
<td align="left">Phosphorylation of L-amino acid</td>
<td align="center">0.00686</td>
<td align="center">Decreased</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;2</td>
<td align="center">13</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<bold>Female ZF brain proteome analysis (HF/NF)</bold>
</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
<td/>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<bold>Categories</bold>
</td>
<td align="center">
<bold>Diseases or functions annotation</bold>
</td>
<td align="center">
<bold>
<italic>p</italic>-value</bold>
</td>
<td align="center">
<bold>Predicted activation state</bold>
</td>
<td align="center">
<bold>Activation z-score</bold>
</td>
<td align="center">
<bold>&#x23; Molecules</bold>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Cellular assembly and organization, cellular function and maintenance</td>
<td align="left">Organization of cytoskeleton</td>
<td align="center">6.83E-08</td>
<td align="center">Increased</td>
<td align="center">2.675</td>
<td align="center">101</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Cellular assembly and organization, cellular function and maintenance</td>
<td align="left">Organization of cytoplasm</td>
<td align="center">0.000000884</td>
<td align="center">Increased</td>
<td align="center">2.675</td>
<td align="center">103</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Cellular assembly and organization, cellular function and maintenance</td>
<td align="left">Microtubule dynamics</td>
<td align="center">0.0000012</td>
<td align="center">Increased</td>
<td align="center">2.941</td>
<td align="center">86</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Cell morphology, cellular assembly and organization, cellular function and maintenance</td>
<td align="left">Formation of cellular protrusions</td>
<td align="center">0.00000326</td>
<td align="center">Increased</td>
<td align="center">2.483</td>
<td align="center">70</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Cancer, organismal injury and abnormalities</td>
<td align="left">Growth of tumor</td>
<td align="center">0.00000365</td>
<td align="center">Increased</td>
<td align="center">2.325</td>
<td align="center">75</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Cellular movement</td>
<td align="left">Cell movement</td>
<td align="center">0.00000746</td>
<td align="center">Increased</td>
<td align="center">2.14</td>
<td align="center">132</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Nucleic acid metabolism</td>
<td align="left">Metabolism of nucleic acid component or derivative</td>
<td align="center">0.000087</td>
<td align="center">Increased</td>
<td align="center">2.209</td>
<td align="center">27</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Cell morphology, cellular function and maintenance</td>
<td align="left">Autophagy</td>
<td align="center">0.000186</td>
<td align="center">Increased</td>
<td align="center">2.393</td>
<td align="center">24</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Nucleic acid metabolism, small molecule biochemistry</td>
<td align="left">Metabolism of nucleotide</td>
<td align="center">0.000212</td>
<td align="center">Increased</td>
<td align="center">2.209</td>
<td align="center">23</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Organismal survival</td>
<td align="left">Viability</td>
<td align="center">0.000296</td>
<td align="center">Increased</td>
<td align="center">3.302</td>
<td align="center">14</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Nervous system development and function</td>
<td align="left">Sensation</td>
<td align="center">0.000417</td>
<td align="center">Increased</td>
<td align="center">2.058</td>
<td align="center">30</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Cellular function and maintenance</td>
<td align="left">Cellular homeostasis</td>
<td align="center">0.000821</td>
<td align="center">Increased</td>
<td align="center">2.663</td>
<td align="center">103</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Organismal development</td>
<td align="left">Size of animal</td>
<td align="center">0.00104</td>
<td align="center">Increased</td>
<td align="center">2.322</td>
<td align="center">22</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Embryonic development, organismal development</td>
<td align="left">Growth of embryo</td>
<td align="center">0.00133</td>
<td align="center">Increased</td>
<td align="center">2.454</td>
<td align="center">46</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Cellular movement, embryonic development</td>
<td align="left">Cell movement of embryonic cells</td>
<td align="center">0.00172</td>
<td align="center">Increased</td>
<td align="center">2.2</td>
<td align="center">12</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Embryonic development, organismal development</td>
<td align="left">Development of body trunk</td>
<td align="center">0.00389</td>
<td align="center">Increased</td>
<td align="center">2.736</td>
<td align="center">95</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Cancer, organismal injury and abnormalities</td>
<td align="left">Metastasis of tumor cell lines</td>
<td align="center">0.00434</td>
<td align="center">Increased</td>
<td align="center">2.008</td>
<td align="center">10</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Nervous system development and function, tissue morphology</td>
<td align="left">Quantity of neuroglia</td>
<td align="center">0.00449</td>
<td align="center">Increased</td>
<td align="center">2.402</td>
<td align="center">14</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Nucleic acid metabolism, small molecule biochemistry</td>
<td align="left">Synthesis of nucleotide</td>
<td align="center">0.00583</td>
<td align="center">Increased</td>
<td align="center">2.019</td>
<td align="center">15</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Respiratory system development and function</td>
<td align="left">Respiration of mice</td>
<td align="center">0.00693</td>
<td align="center">Increased</td>
<td align="center">2</td>
<td align="center">9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Embryonic development, organ development, organismal development, skeletal and muscular system development and function, tissue development</td>
<td align="left">Development of striated muscle</td>
<td align="center">0.00767</td>
<td align="center">Increased</td>
<td align="center">2.236</td>
<td align="center">17</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Organismal survival</td>
<td align="left">Organismal death</td>
<td align="center">2.59E-11</td>
<td align="center">Decreased</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;7.796</td>
<td align="center">251</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Developmental disorder, embryonic development, organismal survival</td>
<td align="left">Death of embryo</td>
<td align="center">0.0000704</td>
<td align="center">Decreased</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;2.198</td>
<td align="center">22</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Cancer, cell death and survival, organismal injury and abnormalities</td>
<td align="left">Cell death of tumor</td>
<td align="center">0.000153</td>
<td align="center">Decreased</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;2.141</td>
<td align="center">30</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Cancer, cell death and survival, organismal injury and abnormalities, tumor morphology</td>
<td align="left">Necrosis of tumor</td>
<td align="center">0.000258</td>
<td align="center">Decreased</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;2.141</td>
<td align="center">29</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Cancer, cell death and survival, organismal injury and abnormalities, tumor morphology</td>
<td align="left">Cell death of tumor cells</td>
<td align="center">0.00154</td>
<td align="center">Decreased</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;2.363</td>
<td align="center">26</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Connective tissue disorders, developmental disorder, organismal injury and abnormalities, skeletal and muscular disorders</td>
<td align="left">Dysplasia of skeleton</td>
<td align="center">0.00205</td>
<td align="center">Decreased</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;2.2</td>
<td align="center">7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Organismal survival</td>
<td align="left">Perinatal death</td>
<td align="center">0.00228</td>
<td align="center">Decreased</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;3.588</td>
<td align="center">60</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Organismal survival</td>
<td align="left">Death of perinatal stage organism</td>
<td align="center">0.00619</td>
<td align="center">Decreased</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;2.137</td>
<td align="center">11</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Cellular compromise</td>
<td align="left">Dysfunction of mitochondria</td>
<td align="center">0.00657</td>
<td align="center">Decreased</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;2.213</td>
<td align="center">5</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="s4-2">
<title>Protein Enrichment Analysis for Zebrafish Brain Proteome Induced by Acute Hypoxia and During Recovery</title>
<p>Based on the zebrafish annotated database, IPA mapped 994 proteins out of 2,323 proteins identified in the iTRAQ analysis. These 994 proteins included different types of proteins i.e.,&#x20;transporters, transmembrane receptors, translation and transcription regulators, phosphatases, peptidase, kinases, enzymes, G-protein coupled receptors, ligand-binding receptors, and cytokines (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure&#x20;2A</xref>). Out of all the groups, the majority of proteins belonged to the group &#x201c;transcription regulators.&#x201d;</p>
<fig id="F2" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 2</label>
<caption>
<p>Protein enrichment analysis by IPA showing types of protein and Comparative heat map. Pie chart showing types of protein mapped by IPA <bold>(A)</bold>, Disease function Heat map of male <bold>(B)</bold> and female <bold>(C)</bold> zebrafish brain proteome upon hypoxia treatment.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fgene-12-635904-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>The protein enrichment analysis on the altered proteome was performed using the Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) software. The disease function pathway-based heat map generated by the IPA (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figures 2B,C</xref>) clearly showed a sex-specific difference in the altered expression of proteins in different disease pathway conditions.</p>
<p>The IPA analysis for disease function annotation showed a predicted activation state with activation z-score and <italic>p</italic>-values and molecules involved in each category of disease function. Among all the 502 proteins mapped in IPA for the disease and function analysis, in males 65 categories of disease function showed the predicted activation state: 37 categories showed increased activation states while 28 categories exhibited decreased activation states. In females only 30 categories of disease function showed the predicted activation state and among those, 21 categories of disease function showed increased activation states and only 9 categories showed decreased activation states.</p>
<p>The most striking feature was the contrasting regulation between male and female in one of the disease and function categories named &#x201c;organismal survival&#x201d; and &#x201c;leads to organismal death&#x201d; with a very significant (<italic>p</italic>&#x20;&#x3d; 2.31E-11) activation z-score (12.434) identifying 251 molecules with an increased activation state, but the same 251 molecules showed a significantly (2.59E-11) decreased activation state with a z-score (&#x2212;7.796) in females (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table&#x20;1</xref>). In males most of the increased activation state was observed in organismal injury, abnormalities, cell death, connective tissue disorders, developmental disorder, skeletal and muscular disorders, neurological, respiratory diseases, and cancer; whereas in females cellular assembly and organization, cellular function and maintenance, cell morphology, nucleic acid metabolism, and cellular movement showed an increased activation state. The disease function analysis clearly showed a sex-specific difference in hypoxia-induced neural damage and recovery as seen in our earlier studies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Das et&#x20;al., 2019</xref>).</p>
<p>The IPA generated core expression analysis shed light on sex differences in canonical pathways with their predictive upregulation and downregulation in expression (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3A</xref>). Among all, the top five canonical pathways were Actin Cytoskeleton Signaling, TCA Cycle II (Eukaryotic) 14-3-3-mediated Signaling, Remodeling of Epithelial Adherens Junctions, and Huntington&#x2019;s Disease Signaling showed negative score in males while in females, a positive score was observed.</p>
<fig id="F3" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 3</label>
<caption>
<p>Pathway based on the top networks. Comparative heatmap for canonical pathways of male and female brain proteome induced by hypoxia <bold>(A)</bold>, Predictive pathway for zebrafish male <bold>(B)</bold> and female <bold>(C)</bold> brain proteome induced by hypoxia, comparative heatmap for upstream regulators <bold>(D)</bold>.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fgene-12-635904-g003.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Hypoxia can induce cytoskeletal injury and remodeling through the activation of hypoxia-inducible factor-1&#x3b1; (HIF-1&#x3b1;) and HIF-1&#x3b1; activation results in actin cytoskeleton signaling (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Weidemann et&#x20;al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Huang et&#x20;al., 2019</xref>). F-actin in non-muscle cells is to organize the actin cytoskeleton, which is utilized for cell locomotion, adhesion, and cell proliferation and we have observed activation of Factin in females (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figures 3B,C</xref>) indicating early proliferation in response to neural damage induced by hypoxia.</p>
<p>The core expression analysis of IPA led us to decipher many regulatory networks, disease function pathways, top upstream regulators and their predicted activation state, and also some biomarkers. Upon reviewing all the pathways involved, two individual pathways were found very interesting in males and females (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figures 3A,B</xref>), which clearly showed a gender-specific difference in the expression of a number of proteins in the pathway such as Rock1, Inppl1, Factin, Stat5ab, Ncor2, SRC-family, Got, Ints7 and Pdgfr, which were downregulated in the male brain but upregulated in the female brain. Though the pathways involved many molecules and networks, they were still centered around the AKT signaling pathway, which regulates a wide range of cellular functions and is involved in the resistance response to hypoxia-ischemia through the activation of proteins associated with cell survival, proliferation, and regulation of HIF-1&#x3b1; (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Zhang et&#x20;al., 2018</xref>). The growth factors and inflammation markers noticed in the pathway were studied in our previous study reported in (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Das et&#x20;al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Das et&#x20;al., 2020</xref>).</p>
<p>The upstream regulators analyzed in IPA were 155 in male and 165 in female; among these 18 upstream regulators in male and 24 in female showed the predicted activation state (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table&#x20;2</xref>). Among the 18 upstream regulators in males, 14 were inhibited and only 4 were activated, and most of these were transcription regulators. Among the 24 upstream regulators in females, 16 were activated, with a majority of transcription regulators, and only with 8 were inhibited, which were not found in the males. Five upstream regulators [Myc, Mknk1, Nfe2l2 (Nrf2), Thrb, and otx2] were found to be common in both males and females with differential activation states, and interestingly these were in opposite directions, i.e.,&#x20;inhibited in males while activated in females.</p>
<table-wrap id="T2" position="float">
<label>TABLE 2</label>
<caption>
<p>IPA generated upstream regulators analysis for male and female zebrafish brain proteome induced by hypoxia following recovery.</p>
</caption>
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<td colspan="12" align="left">
<bold>Upstream regulators in male zebrafish brain with predicted activation state</bold>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<bold>S. No.</bold>
</td>
<td align="center">
<bold>Upstream regulator</bold>
</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">
<bold>Molecule type</bold>
</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">
<bold>Predicted activation state</bold>
</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">
<bold>Activation z-score</bold>
</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">
<italic>
<bold>p</bold>
</italic>
<bold>-value of overlap</bold>
</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">
<bold>Target molecules in dataset</bold>
</td>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td align="left">1</td>
<td align="left">MYC</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">Transcription regulator</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">Inhibited</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">&#x2212;2.24</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">4.52E-05</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">BUB1, CCNA2, ENO1, EZH1, GLS, GOT1, GOT2, GPI, HIF1A, LDHB, MCM6, MCM7, PA2G4, PDHA1, PDK1, PGAM1, PGK1, PKM, TCF3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">2</td>
<td align="left">RB1</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">Transcription regulator</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">Inhibited</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">&#x2212;3.183</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">0.000472</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">ACO2, Actn3, APAF1, ATP1A1, ATP5F1A, BCKDHA, CASP9, CCNA2, CKM, DLST, FABP2, HSBP1, KRT18, MCM7, MFN2, MLYCD, MYH4, MYH6, MYH7, NDUFB10, RBL1, TIMM22</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">3</td>
<td align="left">TSC2</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">Other</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">Inhibited</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">&#x2212;2.433</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">0.000695</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">IRS1, IRS2, MCL1, PDGFRB, PRKCA, PSMC3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">4</td>
<td align="left">CSF2</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">Cytokine</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">Inhibited</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">&#x2212;3.141</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">0.00347</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">BUB1, C3, CCNA2, CHTF18, E2F8, EXO1, FBXO5, FIGNL1, IL12B, KNTC1, MCM6, MNS1, NOS2, POLD1, POLE, SMC2, TLR4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">5</td>
<td align="left">MKNK1</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">Kinase</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">Inhibited</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">&#x2212;3.317</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">0.00792</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">APC, ATP1A3, CRMP1, DPYSL3, HADHA, KIF5A, MYO6, PRKAR1B, SNAP25, STXBP1, THRA</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">6</td>
<td align="left">Gsk3</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">Group</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">Inhibited</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">&#x2212;2.219</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">0.00826</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">COL2A1, KDR, MYH6, NOS2, STAT1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">7</td>
<td align="left">NFE2L2</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">Transcription regulator</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">Inhibited</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">&#x2212;2.066</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">0.00931</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">ACTG1, ALAS2, APOA4, ATP1A1, CDKN2C, ESD, FKBP5, G6PD, GFAP, GSTP1, HMOX1, L1CAM, MCFD2, NCKAP1, NOS2, NQO1, PDIA3, PFN2, PSMC1, PSMC3, PSMD11, RAN, SCG2, SREBF1, SYP, TTR, VCP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">8</td>
<td align="left">THRB</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">Ligand-dependent nuclear receptor</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">Inhibited</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">&#x2212;3.054</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">0.0121</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">ABCD3, CSHL1, DDC, DIO1, FGFR3, IGFBP2, MAPK8, MYH6, MYH7, NCOR2, STAT5B, WNT4, YWHAE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">9</td>
<td align="left">LEPR</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">Transmembrane receptor</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">Inhibited</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">&#x2212;2.791</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">0.0139</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">APOA1, APOA4, CREB3L2, CSHL1, EXOC4, GFAP, HIF1A, INPPL1, IRS2, MMP14, NBN, PLCB3, SNAP25, SREBF1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">10</td>
<td align="left">IL1B</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">Cytokine</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">Inhibited</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">&#x2212;2.59</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">0.0182</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">A2M, ATP1A1, C3, COL2A1, FKBP5, FOXO1, HAS2, HIF1A, KIF15, MMP9, NOS2, STAT1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">11</td>
<td align="left">EGFR</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">Kinase</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">Inhibited</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">&#x2212;2.314</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">0.0258</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">ACY1, ATAD3A, CCNA2, CCT5, GFAP, HAS2, MMP14, MMP9, PA2G4, TUBA4A, UBA1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">12</td>
<td align="left">OTX2</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">Transcription regulator</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">Inhibited</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">&#x2212;2.219</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">0.0435</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">A2M, EN1, PRDM1, SIX3, TF, TTR</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">13</td>
<td align="left">UCHL1</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">Peptidase</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">Inhibited</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">&#x2212;2</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">0.366</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">ANXA6, LDHB, MAPK6, SCP2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">14</td>
<td align="left">STAT6</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">Transcription regulator</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">Inhibited</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">&#x2212;2.433</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">1</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">BCL6, Cmah, IL12B, IRS2, MMP14, MMP9, MYO6, NCOA3, SERPINA1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">15</td>
<td align="left">KDM5A</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">Transcription regulator</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">Activated</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">2.688</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">0.00249</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">ACO2, Actn3, ATP1A1, ATP5F1A, BCKDHA, DLST, HSBP1, MFN2, MLYCD, MYH4, MYH6, MYH7, NDUFB10, TIMM22</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">16</td>
<td align="left">26s Proteasome</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">Complex</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">Activated</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">2.236</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">0.00826</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">APAF1, BHLHE22, FOXO1, NOTCH1, PRKCA</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">17</td>
<td align="left">HAND1</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">Transcription regulator</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">Activated</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">2</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">0.0179</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">KDR, MLYCD, NOTCH1, NRP1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">18</td>
<td align="left">SATB1</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">Transcription regulator</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">Activated</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">2</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">0.472</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">APC, ETS1, NCOR1, NR2C2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="12" align="left">
<bold>Upstream regulators in female zebrafish brain with predicted activation state</bold>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<bold>S. No.</bold>
</td>
<td align="center">
<bold>Upstream regulator</bold>
</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">
<bold>Molecule type</bold>
</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">
<bold>Predicted activation state</bold>
</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">
<bold>Activation z-score</bold>
</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">
<italic>
<bold>p</bold>
</italic>
<bold>-value of overlap</bold>
</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">
<bold>Target molecules in dataset</bold>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">1</td>
<td align="left">MYC</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">Transcription regulator</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">Activated</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">2.801</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">4.58E-05</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">BUB1, CCNA2, ENO1, EZH1, GLS, GOT1, GOT2, GPI, HIF1A, LDHB, MCM6, MCM7, PA2G4, PDHA1, PDK1, PGAM1, PGK1, PKM, TCF3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">2</td>
<td align="left">INSR</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">Kinase</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">Activated</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">2.124</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">0.000466</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">ACO2, ACTA1, ACTN4, ALDH6A1, ATP5F1A, ATP5F1B, CS, DCTN4, FLNC, GOT2, HADHA, HSPD1, IDH3A, IGF2R, INSR, MDH2, MMP9, MPEG1, MYH7, NAMPT, OGDH, PDHA1, PDHB, PKLR, SCP2, SREBF1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">3</td>
<td align="left">Gm21596/Hmgb1</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">Transcription regulator</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">Activated</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">2.219</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">0.00101</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">HIF1A, NOS2, PKM, SIGIRR, TLR4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">4</td>
<td align="left">PIK3R1</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">Kinase</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">Activated</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">2.621</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">0.00711</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">FOXO1, HIF1A, HMOX1, IL12B, NOS2, PDHA1, PDK1, PKM</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">5</td>
<td align="left">MKNK1</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">Kinase</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">Activated</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">2.111</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">0.00798</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">APC, ATP1A3, CRMP1, DPYSL3, HADHA, KIF5A, MYO6, PRKAR1B, SNAP25, STXBP1, THRA</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">6</td>
<td align="left">NFE2L2</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">Transcription regulator</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">Activated</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">2.705</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">0.00943</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">ACTG1, ALAS2, APOA4, ATP1A1, CDKN2C, ESD, FKBP5, G6PD, GFAP, GSTP1, HMOX1, L1CAM, MCFD2, NCKAP1, NOS2, NQO1, PDIA3, PFN2, PSMC1, PSMC3, PSMD11, RAN, SCG2, SREBF1, SYP, TTR, VCP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">7</td>
<td align="left">EGR3</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">Transcription regulator</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">Activated</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">2.219</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">0.0116</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">BCL6, ESD, LMO7, NOTCH1, PABPC1L</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">8</td>
<td align="left">THRB</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">Ligand-dependent nuclear receptor</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">Activated</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">3.054</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">0.0122</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">ABCD3, CSHL1, DDC, DIO1, FGFR3, IGFBP2, MAPK8, MYH6, MYH7, NCOR2, STAT5B, WNT4, YWHAE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">9</td>
<td align="left">MYB</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">Transcription regulator</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">Activated</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">2</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">0.019</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">CLTA, HSPA8, MAD1L1, NOTCH1, RGS8, SLC27A2, TULP4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">10</td>
<td align="left">OTX2</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">Transcription regulator</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">Activated</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">2.219</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">0.0437</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">A2M, EN1, PRDM1, SIX3, TF, TTR</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">11</td>
<td align="left">SRF</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">Transcription regulator</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">Activated</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">2.957</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">0.0551</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">ACTA1, ACTG1, CKM, ETS1, ITGA2B, ITGB1, KDR, MYH4, MYH6, MYH7, PRSS57, TTN, VCL</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">12</td>
<td align="left">HIF1A</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">Transcription regulator</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">Activated</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">2.008</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">0.165</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">ENO1, IL12B, MIF, NOS2, NOTCH1, PDHA1, PDK1, PKM, TTN</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">13</td>
<td align="left">HOXD10</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">Transcription regulator</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">Activated</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">2</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">0.193</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">DAPP1, RSAD2, TFR2, WDR5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">14</td>
<td align="left">Creb</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">Group</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">Activated</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">2</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">0.296</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">ARHGEF9, CBWD1, GABBR1, GRK3, INTS7, MCL1, PGK1, POLE, PRKCA</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">15</td>
<td align="left">HNF4A</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">Transcription regulator</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">Activated</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">2.382</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">0.329</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">CCNA2, ELMO1, FABP2, HIF1A, HSPA8, KRT8, NBEA, PFN2, PKM, RSPH4A, SCP2, SERPINA1, TF, TFR2, WNT4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">16</td>
<td align="left">mir-223</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">MicroRNA</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">Activated</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">2</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">1</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">ALCAM, CRHBP, NQO1, TLR4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">17</td>
<td align="left">DNMT3B</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">Enzyme</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">Inhibited</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">&#x2212;2.53</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">0.00754</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">ACTA1, CKM, GRK3, KDR, MYH6, MYH7, PIK3C2B, PRKAR1B, SLC8A2, STAT1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">18</td>
<td align="left">MAT1A</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">Enzyme</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">Inhibited</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">&#x2212;2</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">0.0149</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">APOA1, KRT18, MAT1A, PRDX6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">19</td>
<td align="left">CHADL</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">Other</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">Inhibited</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">&#x2212;2</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">0.061</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">COL2A1, CSPG4, MN1, NTRK3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">20</td>
<td align="left">PTPN1</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">Phosphatase</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">Inhibited</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">&#x2212;2.219</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">0.0762</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">HHEX, IRS1, IRS2, NOS2, TMEM26</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">21</td>
<td align="left">DNMT3A</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">Enzyme</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">Inhibited</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">&#x2212;2.121</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">0.142</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">ACTA1, CKM, GRK3, IRS1, MYH6, MYH7, PIK3C2B, SLC8A2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">22</td>
<td align="left">ZNF106</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">Other</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">Inhibited</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">&#x2212;2</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">0.204</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">ALAS2, C3, NDUFB10, PRDX2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">23</td>
<td align="left">BTNL2</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">Transmembrane receptor</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">Inhibited</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">&#x2212;2</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">0.55</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">CDKN2C, DAPP1, NTRK3, S100A4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">24</td>
<td align="left">DICER1</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">Enzyme</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">Inhibited</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">&#x2212;2.138</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">1</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">CCNG1, CRH, ERBB2, HNRNPH1, IGF2R, ITGB1, MMP9, NOTCH1, PRKCA</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<p>In <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">Table&#x20;3</xref> the regulator effects of males and females are shown, where only one of the regulators, Nfe2l2, is common in both, but with only one common target molecule VCP (valosin containing protein), and all different target molecules in both the dataset VCP was earlier reported to be an AKT binding protein, and its expression was found enhanced in hypoxia (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Klein et&#x20;al., 2005</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap id="T3" position="float">
<label>TABLE 3</label>
<caption>
<p>IPA generated regulatory effect analysis for male and female zebrafish brain proteome induced by hypoxia following recovery.</p>
</caption>
<table>
<thead valign="top">
<tr>
<th colspan="9" align="left">Male hypoxia regulator effects</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">ID</td>
<td align="center">Consistency score</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">Regulators</td>
<td align="center">Target total</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">Target molecules in dataset</td>
<td align="center">Diseases &#x26; functions</td>
<td align="center">Known regulator-disease/function relationship</td>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td align="left">1</td>
<td align="center">2.309</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">HAND1,THRB</td>
<td align="center">12</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">CSHL1,FGFR3,IGFBP2,KDR,MAPK8,MLYCD,MYH6,NCOR2,NOTCH1,NRP1,STAT5B,WNT4</td>
<td align="left">Cellular homeostasis, development of body trunk, development of genitourinary system</td>
<td align="center">67% (4/6)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">2</td>
<td align="center">2.111</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">MYC</td>
<td align="center">11</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">BUB1,CCNA2,ENO1,GLS,GPI,HIF1A,PA2G4,PDHA1,PDK1,PKM,TCF3</td>
<td align="left">Carcinoma, frequency of tumor, growth of tumor, incidence of tumor</td>
<td align="center">100% (4/4)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">3</td>
<td align="center">2</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">NFE2L2</td>
<td align="center">4</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">PSMC1,PSMD11,RAN,VCP</td>
<td align="left">Cell death of tumor cells</td>
<td align="center">0% (0/1)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">4</td>
<td align="center">1.789</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">OTX2</td>
<td align="center">5</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">A2M,EN1,PRDM1,SIX3,TF</td>
<td align="left">Quantity of cells</td>
<td align="center">100% (1/1)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">5</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;5.715</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">MYC</td>
<td align="center">6</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">ENO1,GPI,HIF1A,PDK1,PGK1,PKM</td>
<td align="left">Glycolysis of cells</td>
<td align="center">100% (1/1)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">6</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;7.506</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">HAND1</td>
<td align="center">3</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">KDR,NOTCH1,NRP1</td>
<td align="left">Migration of cells</td>
<td align="center">0% (0/1)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">7</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;16.743</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">HAND1</td>
<td align="center">3</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">KDR,NOTCH1,NRP1</td>
<td align="left">Organization of cytoplasm</td>
<td align="center">0% (0/1)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">8</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;19.23</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">MYC</td>
<td align="center">5</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">BUB1,CCNA2,GPI,HIF1A,PDK1</td>
<td align="left">Growth of connective tissue</td>
<td align="center">100% (1/1)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="9" align="left">
<bold>Female hypoxia regulator effects</bold>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<bold>ID</bold>
</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">
<bold>Consistency score</bold>
</td>
<td align="center">
<bold>Regulators</bold>
</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">
<bold>Target total</bold>
</td>
<td align="center">
<bold>Target molecules in dataset</bold>
</td>
<td align="left">
<bold>Diseases &#x26; functions</bold>
</td>
<td align="center">
<bold>Known regulator-disease/function relationship</bold>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#xa0;&#xa0;1</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">3.051</td>
<td align="left">Gm21596/Hmgb1,PIK3R1,THRB</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">13</td>
<td align="left">CSHL1,FGFR3,FOXO1,HIF1A,HMOX1,IL12B,MAPK8,MYH6,NCOR2,NOS2,STAT5B,TLR4,WNT4</td>
<td align="left">Autophagy, development of body trunk</td>
<td align="center">50% (3/6)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#xa0;&#xa0;2</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">&#x2212;4.082</td>
<td align="left">MKNK1</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">6</td>
<td align="left">ATP1A3,HADHA,KIF5A,SNAP25,STXBP1,THRA</td>
<td align="left">Perinatal death</td>
<td align="center">0% (0/1)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#xa0;&#xa0;3</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">&#x2212;4.491</td>
<td align="left">PIK3R1</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">6</td>
<td align="left">FOXO1,HIF1A,HMOX1,IL12B,NOS2,PDK1</td>
<td align="left">Cell movement</td>
<td align="center">100% (1/1)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#xa0;&#xa0;4</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">&#x2212;5.367</td>
<td align="left">MKNK1</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">5</td>
<td align="left">APC,CRMP1,DPYSL3,KIF5A,MYO6</td>
<td align="left">Microtubule dynamics</td>
<td align="center">0% (0/1)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#xa0;&#xa0;5</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">&#x2212;6.5</td>
<td align="left">Gm21596/Hmgb1</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">4</td>
<td align="left">HIF1A,NOS2,PKM,TLR4</td>
<td align="left">Growth of tumor</td>
<td align="center">100% (1/1)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#xa0;&#xa0;6</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">&#x2212;7.5</td>
<td align="left">NFE2L2</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">4</td>
<td align="left">G6PD,NOS2,NQO1,VCP</td>
<td align="left">Metabolism of nucleotide</td>
<td align="center">0% (0/1)</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="s4-3">
<title>Validation of Few Selected Regulator Effects Molecules From IPA Analysis</title>
<p>A few of the target molecules (Eno1, Foxo1, Gp1, Hmox1, Nos2, Pkm, Ran, and Vcp) from both the data sets were considered for validation by quantitative Realtime PCR (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure&#x20;4</xref>). eno1 (enolase 1) is one of the HIF target genes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Benita et&#x20;al., 2009</xref>). The qPCR analysis revealed more than &#x223c;2-fold increase in eno1 and ran (ras-related nuclear protein) in females but it remained unchanged in males. The foxo transcriptional factors are important regulators of cell survival in response to various stresses including oxidative stress (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Bakker et&#x20;al., 2007</xref>). foxo1 was upregulated &#x223c;4-fold in females but unaffected in males thus indicating better survival response after hypoxia in females. The expression of gp1 (Glycoprotein 1) and hmox1 (Heme Oxygenase 1) showed a similar kind of expression pattern in both sexes, a mild upregulation in males, and &#x223c;3-fold upregulation in females. (gp1) acts as a glycolytic enzyme, as well as functioning as a tumor-secreted cytokine and an angiogenic factor (AMF) that stimulates endothelial cell motility, GPI is also a neurotrophic factor (Neuroleukin) for spinal and sensory neurons. The role of neurotrophic factors in repair mechanisms are well evident, therefore in our study 4&#xa0;h post-hypoxia females are better in recovery speed as compared to males. Hmox1 has been shown to be induced by various stresses including hypoxia (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Panchenko et&#x20;al., 2000</xref>); our study also revealed an increase in its expression. The expression of nos2 (nitric oxide synthase) and pkm (pyruvate kinase M) is inducible with hypoxia and hif1 targets showed a higher fold upregulation in females as compared to&#x20;males.</p>
<fig id="F4" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 4</label>
<caption>
<p>Validation of few regulatory target molecules. Graph showing mRNA expression of eno1, foxo1, gp1, hmox1, nos2, pkm, ran, and vcp <bold>(A)</bold> The data are expressed as the mean&#x20;&#xb1; SEM, (<italic>n</italic>&#x20;&#x3d; 6 pooled brains). Immunoblot showing expression of pCREB and pAKT in male and female brain <bold>(B)</bold>, Densitometry for comparison of protein expression in HM vs. NM and HF vs. NF <bold>(C)</bold>.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fgene-12-635904-g004.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Various mediators like growth factors, glucose transporters, solute carriers, neurotransmitters, inflammatory molecules, and stress signals as well as factors known to modulate the intracellular cAMP or Ca<sup>2&#x2b;</sup> levels can activate cAMP-responsive element-binding protein (CREB) through phosphorylation of serine 133 (Ser<sup>133</sup>) by protein kinase A (PKA) and protein kinase B (PKB/AKT) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Steven et&#x20;al., 2016</xref>). The pathway generated by IPA in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figures 3A,B</xref> was also centered on the AKT pathway with many downstream interacting molecules involved in cell death and repair mechanisms. Among all the molecules, we evaluated the expression of two of the major molecules in acute hypoxia recovery with respect to sex difference and found a sex difference in the expression of PCREB and PAKT (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figures 4B,C</xref>) where in females activation of CREB and AKT leads to early cell death survival and repair.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4-4">
<title>Analysis of Proteins Showing Uniform (Either Upregulated or Downregulated) Expression in Both the Sexes</title>
<p>Throughout the protein enrichment analysis by IPA sex-specific, global proteome changes in the acute hypoxia zebrafish model were observed, which is in concurrence with our previous study (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Das et&#x20;al., 2019</xref>). But the question which remains unsolved is why the recovery in females is quicker than in males. At 4&#xa0;h post-hypoxia when both the sexes survived coping up with the neural damage then there must be some common mechanism involved for recovery. So rather than looking further into the differentially expressed markers, we looked into the shared regulation of proteins. In <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure&#x20;1B</xref> we have shown the analysis of proteins resulted from iTRAQ where 554 proteins have a common expression pattern in both the sexes and among them 478 proteins were found regulated in one direction i.e.,&#x20;upregulated in both male and female brain in response to acute hypoxia. We hypothesized that as animals from both sexes are in the recovery process, therefore, a common mechanism of regulation may help to elucidate the mechanism behind the later recovery of the males from neural damage induced by hypoxia-ischemia. While looking into the 478 upregulated proteins, among the top five upregulated proteins in males, we identified histone-lysine N-methyltransferase H3&#x20;lysine-9 specific 5 protein, an epigenetic regulator displaying &#x223c;3-fold upregulation in the male brains and &#x223c;1.6-fold upregulation in the female brains (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T4">Table&#x20;4</xref>). Post-translational modifications of histones are widely recognized as an important epigenetic mechanism in the organization of chromosomal domains and gene regulation. Methylation of lysine 4 and acetylation of lysine 9 of histone H3 has been associated with regions of active transcription, whereas methylation of H3K9 and H3K27 are generally associated with gene repression (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Litt et&#x20;al., 2001</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Nakayama et&#x20;al., 2001</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Maison et&#x20;al., 2002</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Peters et&#x20;al., 2002</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Vakoc et&#x20;al., 2006</xref>). Recently, hypoxia-induced histone modifications in neural gene regulation have been reported, and these were found on both hypoxia-activated and hypoxia-repressed genes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Johnson et&#x20;al., 2008</xref>). H3K9 methylation is a critical epigenetic mark for gene repression and silencing. Hypoxia induces H3K9 methylation at different gene promoters, which is correlated with the repression and silencing of those genes following hypoxia (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Lu et&#x20;al., 2011</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap id="T4" position="float">
<label>TABLE 4</label>
<caption>
<p>Top 5 upregulated proteins retrieved from uniformly regulated (upregulated) in both male and female zebrafish brain induced by acute hypoxia.</p>
</caption>
<table>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td align="left">
<bold>S. No.</bold>
</td>
<td align="center">
<bold>Accession No.</bold>
</td>
<td align="center">
<bold>Description</bold>
</td>
<td align="center">
<bold>HM/NM</bold>
</td>
<td align="center">
<bold>HF/NF</bold>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">1</td>
<td align="center">56693350</td>
<td align="left">Very long-chain acyl-CoA synthetase</td>
<td align="char" char=".">3.234</td>
<td align="char" char=".">1.690</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<bold>2</bold>
</td>
<td align="center">
<bold>71834420</bold>
</td>
<td align="left">
<bold>Histone-lysine N-methyltransferase, H3&#x20;lysine-9 specific 5</bold>
</td>
<td align="char" char=".">
<bold>3.188</bold>
</td>
<td align="char" char=".">
<bold>1.603</bold>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">3</td>
<td align="center">189531944</td>
<td align="left">Predicted: hypothetical protein LOC100148665</td>
<td align="char" char=".">3.057</td>
<td align="char" char=".">1.966</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">4</td>
<td align="center">326666355</td>
<td align="left">Predicted: zinc finger protein 208-like</td>
<td align="char" char=".">2.984</td>
<td align="char" char=".">2.606</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">5</td>
<td align="center">326664965</td>
<td align="left">Predicted: protein FAM5C</td>
<td align="char" char=".">2.742</td>
<td align="char" char=".">3.703</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>H3K9 which was the focus of manuscript and taken for further mechanistic analysis so made it bold.</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="s4-5">
<title>Deciphering the Role of H3K9me3 by Co-Immunoprecipitation and ChIP qPCR</title>
<p>Based on the previous literature (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Lindeman et&#x20;al., 2010</xref>), we hypothesized that H3K9 can be our prime target for deciphering late recovery in males as it was significantly upregulated in the male brain following hypoxia and being a repressive epigenetic mark in nature its high level can repress and/or silence a number of critical neural genes. Considering the role of H3K9me3 in hypoxia (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Chakravarty et&#x20;al., 2016</xref>) we immunoblotted for H3K9me3 using a specific antibody and performed a co-immunoprecipitation (CoIP) to identify the interacting proteins of H3K9me3 in hypoxic condition (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figures 5A&#x2013;C</xref>). We could validate the expression of H3K9me3 through immunoblotting with an upregulation of H3K9me3 in hypoxia males when compared to normoxia males (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure&#x20;5A</xref>). For CoIP experiment, nuclear extract was isolated from male zebrafish brains. The eluted proteins were then detected for immunoprecipitated and co-immunoprecipitated proteins by SDS-PAGE followed by western blotting. Then, 5% of the initial lysates were used as the input (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure&#x20;5B</xref>). A mass spectrometric approach was used to identify the co-immunoprecipitated proteins obtained by the pull-down of the target antibody. The resultant peptides from MS/MS for four groups (normoxia IgG, normoxia and hypoxia H3k9me3 pull-down) were analyzed and after removing the background of IgG pooled proteins we could obtain 153 proteins identified in male normoxia H3K9me3&#x20;pull-down and 72 proteins identified in male hypoxia H3K9me3 pull down. Surprisingly, there were no common proteins in the normoxia and hypoxia H3K9me3&#x20;pull-downs, showing hypoxia stress may lead to alteration in interacting proteins. Further, we went through our iTRAQ data and tried to see whether these co-immunoprecipitated proteins were also found altered post-hypoxia in our high throughput proteomics data where almost all the proteins were found to overlap (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure&#x20;5C</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F5" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 5</label>
<caption>
<p>Deciphering the role of H3K9me3 by co-immunoprecipitation. Immunoblot of H3K9me3 showing upregulation in hypoxia <bold>(A)</bold>, CoIP of H3K9me3 in zebrafish male brain nuclear protein <bold>(B)</bold>, Schematic representation of CoIP analysis <bold>(C)</bold>. ChIP qPCR showing H3K9 occupancy on target gene promoter. ChIP qPCR showing the increase in H3K9me3 enrichment on the promoter region of klf4, sox2, and nestin in hypoxic male brain <bold>(D)</bold>.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fgene-12-635904-g005.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>The co-interacted proteins of H3K9me3 could not answer the unresolved question of why the males are recovering later. Therefore, we thought of evaluating the transcriptional targets of H3K9me3 to get an answer to our question, as H3K9me3 is a repressive marker so its upregulation in males may repress any neurogenic marker needed for recovery from hypoxia-induced neural damage. An earlier report on chromatin state of the developmentally regulated genes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Lindeman et&#x20;al., 2010</xref>) led us to explore the striking upregulation of transcriptionally repressive epigenetic marker H3K9me3 at 4&#xa0;h post hypoxia in zebrafish male&#x20;brain.</p>
<p>The ChIP-qPCR data showed the repression of early neurogenesis markers nestin, klf4, and sox2 in the zebrafish male brain 4&#xa0;h post-hypoxia (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure&#x20;5D</xref>). It is pertinent to mention here that the ChIP assay was not performed on female zebrafish brains as the male brain proteome showed a higher fold upregulation in H3K9me3. For further validating the data the mRNA expression levels for nestin, klf4, and sox2 at two-time points of recovery i.e.,&#x20;at 4&#xa0;h (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure&#x20;6A</xref>) and 12&#xa0;h (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure&#x20;6B</xref>) post hypoxia, was assessed. The qPCR analysis showed at 4&#xa0;h post-hypoxia the expression of early neurogenic markers showed mild activation in males and later at 12&#xa0;h post-hypoxia the expression was much higher. The protein level expression of Sox2 was evaluated at low concentration (25&#xa0;&#x3bc;g) of protein which showed in both males and females at 4&#xa0;h post-hypoxia but the expression was quite low in both the sexes; in the male it was almost negligible, however in female a mild expression was observed, which at the later time point i.e.,&#x20;12&#xa0;h post-hypoxia showed noticeable upregulation in both male and female brain (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure&#x20;6C</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F6" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 6</label>
<caption>
<p>Validation ChIP analysis. mRNA expression at 4&#xa0;h <bold>(A)</bold> and 10&#xa0;h <bold>(B)</bold> post hypoxia in both male and female (<italic>n</italic>&#x20;&#x3d; pooled 6 brain). Expression of sox2 protein at different times of recovery from hypoxia <bold>(C)</bold>. Expression of H3K9me3 at different times of recovery from hypoxia <bold>(D)</bold>.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fgene-12-635904-g006.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>To further validate if the sox2 expression is dependent on H3K9me3 level, the expression level of H3K9me3 was assessed and predictably it was found upregulated in the male brain as shown in the previous experiment, compared to the female brain at 4&#xa0;h post-hypoxia. Later at 12&#xa0;h post-hypoxia, the level of H3K9me3 was much less in males than what it was at 4&#xa0;h post-hypoxia (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure&#x20;6D</xref>). This result suggested that with the activation of H3K9me3 the expression levels of early neurogenic markers are getting repressed. This could be the possible reason for late recovery in males as early neurogenic markers are not fully activated in response to hypoxia insult, in contrast to the female&#x20;brain.</p>
<p>Among Cerebral strokes, ischemic stroke is the most common type of stroke and a major cause of death and/or disability worldwide, though there are continuous efforts to establish a proper diagnosis and efficient therapy. The proteomics study complements both genomics and transcriptomics and simultaneously provides information about the proteins that can be implemented for main functional mediators of cells such as their post-translational modification and their interactions with biological molecules. However, post-stroke is mostly related to protein function which can be a direct target for therapeutic intervention. Therefore in the present study, we performed a quantitative proteomics approach for hypoxia-induced brain to identify favorable biomarkers involved in neuronal injury and recovery (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Li et&#x20;al., 2019</xref>). In our previous study, clear sex-specific differences were observed in acute hypoxia-induced neural damage and recovery but to explore more about the mechanism of recovery in the present study we have focused on a 4&#xa0;h post hypoxia timepoint, predicting this could possibly be a viable therapeutic window. To date, many high throughput studies on hypoxia (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Durukan and Tatlisumak, 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Cuadrado et&#x20;al., 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Goldenberg et&#x20;al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Chen et&#x20;al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Durukan and Tatlisumak, 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Cuadrado et&#x20;al., 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Goldenberg et&#x20;al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Chen et&#x20;al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Ton et&#x20;al., 2003</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">van der Meer et&#x20;al., 20052005</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Shah et&#x20;al., 2019</xref>) gave sufficient information about the genes and proteins involved in hypoxia and related diseases but the roles of these hallmarked hypoxia markers are not well studied in a sex-specific context. Therefore, we have attempted to emphasize more on the sex-specific neural regulation post-hypoxia, which will provide a better insight into designing efficient therapeutics for patients who suffered acute hypoxic insults. The prevalence of hypoxic brain damage is increasing and prognostic factors for either poor or good outcome are lacking (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Heinz and Rollnik, 2015</xref>).</p>
<p>The advantage over traditional proteomics and iTRAQ based proteomics is that in iTRAQ all four groups can be simultaneously processed to reduce the error rate and post-translational modifications can also be quantified. The present study on whole zebrafish brain proteome upon global acute hypoxia sheds light on many differential roles of protein markers which can be further validated. Solute carrier (SLC) transporters are well-known therapeutic targets (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Lin et&#x20;al., 2015</xref>) and in our study too we have observed a very high activation in recovery. We tried to elucidate the role of one of the histone-based epigenetic regulatory mechanism (H3K9me3) that controls adult neurogenesis during the recovery phase post-hypoxia-ischemia. There is hardly any study on the epigenetic mechanisms in the zebrafish brain to date. Here, we identified hundreds of transcription factors involved in post-hypoxia recovery in a gender-specific manner, which can add to the development of a better therapeutic strategy.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="conclusion" id="s5">
<title>Conclusion</title>
<p>To conclude we have studied the sex-specific difference in global proteome changes in zebrafish brain induced by acute hypoxia and during the recovery. We elucidated the unresolved question from our previous study (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Das et&#x20;al., 2019</xref>) regarding the delayed recovery in males following hypoxic insult. With the striking upregulation of H3K9me3 in males at 4&#xa0;h post-hypoxia, the early neurogenic markers like nestin, klf4, and sox2 expression level got affected, which might be the reason for late recovery in males, compared to females. Acute hypoxia-induced sex-specific comparison of brain proteome led us to reveal many differentially expressed proteins including the novel ones, which can be further studied for the development of novel targets and a better therapeutic strategy.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec id="s6">
<title>Data Availability Statement</title>
<p>The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found below: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://proteomecentral.proteomexchange.org/">http://proteomecentral.proteomexchange.org/</ext-link>, PXD027528.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s7">
<title>Ethics Statement</title>
<p>The animal study was reviewed and approved by: All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed. The approved institutional protocol number was IICT/CB/SC/281114/30 under registration no&#x23;97/1999/CPCSEA. Further, this article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s8">
<title>Author Contributions</title>
<p>TD: Conceptualization, Methodology, Validation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing&#x2014;Original Draft. AvK: Methodology, Validation, Formal analysis. ArK: Conceptualization, Resources, Supervision, Project administration, Funding acquisition, Writing&#x2014;Review &#x26; Editing. SC: Conceptualization, Resources, Supervision, Project administration, Funding acquisition, Writing&#x2014;Review &#x26; Editing.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s9">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>This study was funded jointly by the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), India network project (BSC0103-UNDO to SC and AK), and Department of Biotechnology, Government of India project (BT/PR14338/MED/30/495/2010 to&#x20;SC).</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="COI-statement" id="s10">
<title>Conflict of Interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="disclaimer" id="s11">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s Note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
<ack>
<p>The authors thank the Director, CSIR-IICT for the necessary support and the Knowledge and Information Management (KIM) Department for generating the official communication number (IICT/Pubs/2019/436).</p>
</ack>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bakker</surname>
<given-names>W. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Harris</surname>
<given-names>I. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mak</surname>
<given-names>T. W.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>FOXO3a Is Activated in Response to Hypoxic Stress and Inhibits HIF1-Induced Apoptosis via Regulation of CITED2</article-title>. <source>Mol. Cel.</source> <volume>28</volume> (<issue>6</issue>), <fpage>941</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>953</lpage>. <comment>S1097-2765(07)00826-X [pii]</comment>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.molcel.2007.10.035</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Benita</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kikuchi</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Smith</surname>
<given-names>A. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>M. Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chung</surname>
<given-names>D. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xavier</surname>
<given-names>R. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>An Integrative Genomics Approach Identifies Hypoxia Inducible Factor-1 (HIF-1)-Target Genes that Form the Core Response to Hypoxia</article-title>. <source>Nucleic Acids Res.</source> <volume>37</volume> (<issue>14</issue>), <fpage>4587</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>4602</lpage>. <comment>gkp425 [pii].</comment> <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/nar/gkp425</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bickler</surname>
<given-names>P. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Buck</surname>
<given-names>L. T.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Hypoxia Tolerance in Reptiles, Amphibians, and Fishes: Life with Variable Oxygen Availability</article-title>. <source>Annu. Rev. Physiol.</source> <volume>69</volume>, <fpage>145</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>170</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1146/annurev.physiol.69.031905.162529</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Braga</surname>
<given-names>M. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Silva</surname>
<given-names>E. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Moraes</surname>
<given-names>T. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schirmbeck</surname>
<given-names>G. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rico</surname>
<given-names>E. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pinto</surname>
<given-names>C. B.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Brain Zinc Chelation by Diethyldithiocarbamate Increased the Behavioral and Mitochondrial Damages in Zebrafish Subjected to Hypoxia</article-title>. <source>Sci. Rep.</source> <volume>6</volume>, <fpage>20279</fpage>. <comment>srep20279 [pii]</comment>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/srep20279</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Catherine</surname>
<given-names>O. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Collaborators</surname>
<given-names>G. S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Global, Regional, and National burden of Stroke, 1990-2016: a Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016</article-title>. <source>Lancet Neurol.</source> <volume>18</volume> (<issue>5</issue>), <fpage>439</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>458</lpage>. <comment>S1474-4422(19)30034-1 [pii]</comment>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30034-1</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chakravarty</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jhelum</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bhat</surname>
<given-names>U. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rajan</surname>
<given-names>W. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Maitra</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pathak</surname>
<given-names>S. S.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Insights into the Epigenetic Mechanisms Involving Histone Lysine Methylation and Demethylation in Ischemia Induced Damage and Repair Has Therapeutic Implication</article-title>. <source>Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Basis Dis.</source> <volume>1863</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>152</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>164</lpage>. <comment>S0925-4439(16)30238-1 [pii]</comment>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.bbadis.2016.09.014</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chakravarty</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Reddy</surname>
<given-names>B. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sudhakar</surname>
<given-names>S. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Saxena</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Das</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Meghah</surname>
<given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Chronic Unpredictable Stress (CUS)-induced Anxiety and Related Mood Disorders in a Zebrafish Model: Altered Brain Proteome Profile Implicates Mitochondrial Dysfunction</article-title>. <source>PLoS One</source> <volume>8</volume> (<issue>5</issue>), <fpage>e63302</fpage>. <comment>[pii]</comment>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0063302.PONE-D-12-39866</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname>
<given-names>J.&#x20;H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kuo</surname>
<given-names>H. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lee</surname>
<given-names>K. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tsai</surname>
<given-names>T. H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Global Proteomic Analysis of Brain Tissues in Transient Ischemia Brain Damage in Rats</article-title>. <source>Int. J.&#x20;Mol. Sci.</source> <volume>16</volume> (<issue>6</issue>), <fpage>11873</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>11891</lpage>. <comment>ijms160611873 [pii]</comment>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/ijms160611873</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cole</surname>
<given-names>R. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rees</surname>
<given-names>B. B.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Hypoxia-induced Changes in the Zebrafish (<italic>Danio rerio</italic>) Skeletal Muscle Proteome</article-title>. <source>J.&#x20;Proteomics</source> <volume>78</volume>, <fpage>477</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>485</lpage>. <comment>S1874-3919(12)00712-9 [pii]</comment>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jprot.2012.10.017</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Cuadrado</surname>
<given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rosell</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Colome</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hernandez-Guillamon</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Garcia-Berrocoso</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ribo</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>The Proteome of Human Brain after Ischemic Stroke</article-title>. <source>J.&#x20;Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol.</source> <volume>69</volume> (<issue>11</issue>), <fpage>1105</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1115</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1097/NEN.0b013e3181f8c539</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Das</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Soren</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yerasi</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kamle</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kumar</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chakravarty</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Molecular Basis of Sex Difference in Neuroprotection Induced by Hypoxia Preconditioning in Zebrafish</article-title>. <source>Mol. Neurobiol.</source> <volume>57</volume> (<issue>12</issue>), <fpage>5177</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>5192</lpage>. <comment>[pii]</comment>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s12035-020-02091-1</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Das</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Soren</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yerasi</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kumar</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chakravarty</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Revealing Sex-specific Molecular Changes in Hypoxia-Ischemia Induced Neural Damage and Subsequent Recovery Using Zebrafish Model</article-title>. <source>Neurosci. Lett.</source> <volume>712</volume>, <fpage>134492</fpage>. <comment>S0304-3940(19)30595-6 [pii]</comment>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.neulet.2019.134492</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Dugan</surname>
<given-names>L. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Choi</surname>
<given-names>D. W.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1999</year>). &#x201c;<article-title>Hypoxia-Ischemia and Brain Infarction</article-title>,&#x201d; in <source>Basic Neurochemistry: Molecular, Cellular and Medical Aspects</source>. <person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname>Siegel</surname>
<given-names>GJ AB</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Albers</surname>
<given-names>RW</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<publisher-loc>Philadelphia</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Lippincott-Raven</publisher-name>). </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Durukan</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tatlisumak</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Acute Ischemic Stroke: Overview of Major Experimental Rodent Models, Pathophysiology, and Therapy of Focal Cerebral Ischemia</article-title>. <source>Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav.</source> <volume>87</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>179</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>197</lpage>. <comment>S0091-3057(07)00137-2 [pii]</comment>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.pbb.2007.04.015</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Goldenberg</surname>
<given-names>N. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Everett</surname>
<given-names>A. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Graham</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bernard</surname>
<given-names>T. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nowak-Gottl</surname>
<given-names>U.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Proteomic and Other Mass Spectrometry Based &#x201c;omics&#x201d; Biomarker Discovery and Validation in Pediatric Venous Thromboembolism and Arterial Ischemic Stroke: Current State, Unmet Needs, and Future Directions</article-title>. <source>Proteomics Clin. Appl.</source> <volume>8</volume> (<issue>11-12</issue>), <fpage>828</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>836</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/prca.201400062</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Goodall</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Twomey</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Amann</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Acute and Chronic Hypoxia: Implications for Cerebral Function and Exercise Tolerance</article-title>. <source>Fatigue: Biomed. Health Behav.</source> <volume>2</volume> (<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>73</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>92</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/21641846.2014.909963</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Heinz</surname>
<given-names>U. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rollnik</surname>
<given-names>J.&#x20;D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Outcome and Prognosis of Hypoxic Brain Damage Patients Undergoing Neurological Early Rehabilitation</article-title>. <source>BMC Res. Notes</source> <volume>8</volume>, <fpage>243</fpage>. <comment>[pii]</comment>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s13104-015-1175-z</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hochachka</surname>
<given-names>P. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Buck</surname>
<given-names>L. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Doll</surname>
<given-names>C. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Land</surname>
<given-names>S. C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1996</year>). <article-title>Unifying Theory of Hypoxia Tolerance: Molecular/metabolic Defense and rescue Mechanisms for Surviving Oxygen Lack</article-title>. <source>Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.</source> <volume>93</volume> (<issue>18</issue>), <fpage>9493</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>9498</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.93.18.9493</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Huang</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cao</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xiao</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Song</surname>
<given-names>J.-x.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>Y.-j.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zheng</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Hypoxia Induces Actin Cytoskeleton Remodeling by Regulating the Binding of CAPZA1 to F-Actin via PIP2 to Drive EMT in Hepatocellular Carcinoma</article-title>. <source>Cancer Lett.</source> <volume>448</volume>, <fpage>117</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>127</lpage>. <comment>S0304-3835(19)30072-2 [pii]</comment>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.canlet.2019.01.042</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Johnson</surname>
<given-names>A. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Denko</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Barton</surname>
<given-names>M. C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Hypoxia Induces a Novel Signature of Chromatin Modifications and Global Repression of Transcription</article-title>. <source>Mutat. Res.</source> <volume>640</volume> (<issue>1-2</issue>), <fpage>174</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>179</lpage>. <comment>S0027-5107(08)00017-1 [pii]</comment>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2008.01.001</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Klein</surname>
<given-names>J.&#x20;B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Barati</surname>
<given-names>M. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gozal</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sachleben</surname>
<given-names>L. R.</given-names>
<suffix>Jr.</suffix>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kausar</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Akt-mediated Valosin-Containing Protein 97 Phosphorylation Regulates its Association with Ubiquitinated Proteins</article-title>. <source>J.&#x20;Biol. Chem.</source> <volume>280</volume> (<issue>36</issue>), <fpage>31870</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>31881</lpage>. <comment>M501802200 [pii]</comment>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1074/jbc.m501802200</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>You</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shen</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Proteomic-Based Approaches for the Study of Ischemic Stroke</article-title>. <source>Transl. Stroke Res.</source> <volume>10</volume> (<issue>6</issue>), <fpage>601</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>606</lpage>. <comment>[pii]</comment>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s12975-019-00716-9</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lin</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yee</surname>
<given-names>S. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kim</surname>
<given-names>R. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Giacomini</surname>
<given-names>K. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>SLC Transporters as Therapeutic Targets: Emerging Opportunities</article-title>. <source>Nat. Rev. Drug Discov.</source> <volume>14</volume> (<issue>8</issue>), <fpage>543</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>560</lpage>. <comment>nrd4626 [pii]</comment>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nrd4626</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lindeman</surname>
<given-names>L. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Winata</surname>
<given-names>C. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Aanes</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mathavan</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Alestrom</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Collas</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Chromatin States of Developmentally-Regulated Genes Revealed by DNA and Histone Methylation Patterns in Zebrafish Embryos</article-title>. <source>Int. J.&#x20;Dev. Biol.</source> <volume>54</volume> (<issue>5</issue>), <fpage>803</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>813</lpage>. <comment>103081ll [pii]</comment>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1387/ijdb.103081ll</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Litt</surname>
<given-names>M. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Simpson</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gaszner</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Allis</surname>
<given-names>C. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Felsenfeld</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2001</year>). <article-title>Correlation between Histone Lysine Methylation and Developmental Changes at the Chicken Beta Globin Locus</article-title>. <source>Science</source> <volume>293</volume> (<issue>5539</issue>), <fpage>2453</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2455</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/science.1064413</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lu</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chu</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Turker</surname>
<given-names>M. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Glazer</surname>
<given-names>P. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Hypoxia-induced Epigenetic Regulation and Silencing of the BRCA1 Promoter</article-title>. <source>Mol. Cel. Biol</source>. <volume>31</volume> (<issue>16</issue>), <fpage>3339</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3350</lpage>. <comment>MCB.01121-10 [pii</comment>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/MCB.01121-10</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Maison</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bailly</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Peters</surname>
<given-names>A. H. F. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Quivy</surname>
<given-names>J.-P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Roche</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Taddei</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>Higher-order Structure in Pericentric Heterochromatin Involves a Distinct Pattern of Histone Modification and an RNA Component</article-title>. <source>Nat. Genet.</source> <volume>30</volume> (<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>329</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>334</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/ng843</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Michiels</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>Physiological and Pathological Responses to Hypoxia</article-title>. <source>Am. J.&#x20;Pathol.</source> <volume>164</volume> (<issue>6</issue>), <fpage>1875</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1882</lpage>. <comment>S0002-9440(10)63747-9 [pii]</comment>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0002-9440(10)63747-9</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Muller</surname>
<given-names>A. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Marks</surname>
<given-names>J.&#x20;D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Hypoxic-Ischemic Brain Injury: Potential Therapeutic Interventions for the Future</article-title>. <source>Neoreviews</source> <volume>15</volume> (<issue>5</issue>), <fpage>e177</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>e186</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1542/neo.15-5-e177</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Nakayama</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rice</surname>
<given-names>J.&#x20;C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Strahl</surname>
<given-names>B. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Allis</surname>
<given-names>C. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Grewal</surname>
<given-names>S. I.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2001</year>). <article-title>Role of Histone H3 Lysine 9 Methylation in Epigenetic Control of Heterochromatin Assembly</article-title>. <source>Science</source> <volume>292</volume> (<issue>5514</issue>), <fpage>110</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>113</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/science.1060118</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Panchenko</surname>
<given-names>M. V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Farber</surname>
<given-names>H. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Korn</surname>
<given-names>J.&#x20;H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2000</year>). <article-title>Induction of Heme Oxygenase-1 by Hypoxia and Free Radicals in Human Dermal Fibroblasts</article-title>. <source>Am.&#x20;J.&#x20;Physiology-Cell Physiol.</source> <volume>278</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>C92</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>C101</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1152/ajpcell.2000.278.1.C92</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Peters</surname>
<given-names>A. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mermoud</surname>
<given-names>J.&#x20;E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>O&#x27;Carroll</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pagani</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schweizer</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Brockdorff</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>Histone H3 Lysine 9 Methylation Is an Epigenetic Imprint of Facultative Heterochromatin</article-title>. <source>Nat. Genet.</source> <volume>30</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>77</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>80</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/ng789</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sekhon</surname>
<given-names>M. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ainslie</surname>
<given-names>P. N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Griesdale</surname>
<given-names>D. E.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Clinical Pathophysiology of Hypoxic Ischemic Brain Injury after Cardiac Arrest: a &#x201C;Two-Hit&#x201d; Model</article-title>. <source>Crit. Care</source> <volume>21</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>90</fpage>. <comment>[pii]</comment>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s13054-017-1670-9</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Shah</surname>
<given-names>F. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zeb</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ali</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Muhammad</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Faheem</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Alam</surname>
<given-names>S. I.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Identification of Proteins Differentially Expressed in the Striatum by Melatonin in a Middle Cerebral Artery Occlusion Rat Model-A Proteomic and In Silico Approach</article-title>. <source>Front. Neurosci.</source> <volume>12</volume>, <fpage>888</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fnins.2018.00888</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Silva</surname>
<given-names>E. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rocha</surname>
<given-names>J.&#x20;B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Souza</surname>
<given-names>D. O.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Braga</surname>
<given-names>M. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>How Does Zebrafish Support New Strategies for Neuroprotection and Neuroregeneration in Hypoxia-Related Diseases?</article-title> <source>Neural Regen. Res.</source> <volume>11</volume> (<issue>7</issue>), <fpage>1069</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1070</lpage>. <comment>[pii]</comment>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4103/1673-5374.187030.NRR-11-1069</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B36">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Steven</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Leisz</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sychra</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hiebl</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wickenhauser</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mougiakakos</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Hypoxia-mediated Alterations and Their Role in the HER-2/neuregulated CREB Status and Localization</article-title>. <source>Oncotarget</source> <volume>7</volume> (<issue>32</issue>), <fpage>52061</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>52084</lpage>. <comment>10474 [pii]</comment>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18632/oncotarget.10474</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B37">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sun</surname>
<given-names>M.-K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1999</year>). <article-title>Hypoxia, Ischemic Stroke, and Memory Deficits: Prospects for Therapy</article-title>. <source>Tbmb</source> <volume>48</volume> (<issue>4</issue>), <fpage>373</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>378</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/713803535</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B38">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ton</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Stamatiou</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liew</surname>
<given-names>C. C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Gene Expression Profile of Zebrafish Exposed to Hypoxia during Development</article-title>. <source>Physiol. Genomics</source> <volume>13</volume> (<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>97</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>106</lpage>. <comment>00128.2002 [pii]</comment>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1152/physiolgenomics.00128.2002</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B39">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Vakoc</surname>
<given-names>C. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sachdeva</surname>
<given-names>M. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Blobel</surname>
<given-names>G. A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Profile of Histone Lysine Methylation across Transcribed Mammalian Chromatin</article-title>. <source>Mol. Cel. Biol</source>. <volume>26</volume> (<issue>24</issue>), <fpage>9185</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>9195</lpage>. <comment>MCB.01529-06 [pii]</comment>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/MCB.01529-06</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B40">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>van der Meer</surname>
<given-names>D. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>van den Thillart</surname>
<given-names>G. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Witte</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>de Bakker</surname>
<given-names>M. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Besser</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Richardson</surname>
<given-names>M. K.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>20052005</year>). <article-title>Gene Expression Profiling of the Long-Term Adaptive Response to Hypoxia in the Gills of Adult Zebrafish</article-title>. <source>Am. J.&#x20;Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.</source> <volume>289</volume> (<issue>5</issue>), <fpage>R1512</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>R1519</lpage>. <comment>[pii]</comment>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1152/ajpregu.0008910.1152/ajpregu.00089.2005</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B41">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Weidemann</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Breyer</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rehm</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Eckardt</surname>
<given-names>K.-U.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Daniel</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cicha</surname>
<given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>HIF-1&#x3b1; Activation Results in Actin Cytoskeleton Reorganization and Modulation of Rac-1 Signaling in Endothelial Cells</article-title>. <source>Cell Commun. Signal</source> <volume>11</volume>, <fpage>80</fpage>. <comment>1478-811X-11-80 [pii]</comment>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/1478-811X-11-80</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B42">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Yu</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>Y. V.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Neuroprotective Effect of Zinc Chelator DEDTC in a Zebrafish (<italic>Danio rerio</italic>) Model of Hypoxic Brain Injury</article-title>. <source>Zebrafish</source> <volume>10</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>30</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>35</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1089/zeb.2012.0777</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B43">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yao</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Du</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>PI3K/Akt and HIF-1 S-ignaling P-athway in H-ypoxia-ischemia (Review)</article-title>. <source>Mol. Med. Rep.</source> <volume>18</volume> (<issue>4</issue>), <fpage>3547</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3554</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3892/mmr.2018.9375</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>