<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="EN">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. For. Glob. Change</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Forests and Global Change</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. For. Glob. Change</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">2624-893X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/ffgc.2024.1467381</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Forests and Global Change</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Leaf-level physiological strategies related to productivity and plasticity of <italic>Populus</italic> in the Southeastern United States</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name><surname>Renninger</surname> <given-names>Heidi J.</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001"><sup>&#x002A;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/27115/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/funding-acquisition/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Pitts</surname> <given-names>Justin J.</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn0001"><sup>&#x2020;</sup></xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Jiaxin</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn0001"><sup>&#x2020;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2315264/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff><institution>Department of Forestry, Mississippi State University</institution>, <addr-line>Starkville, MS</addr-line>, <country>United States</country></aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by" id="fn0002">
<p>Edited by: Ned Fetcher, Wilkes University, United States</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by" id="fn0003">
<p>Reviewed by: Alexander Wait, Missouri State University, United States</p>
<p>Michael Tyree, Indiana University of Pennsylvania, United States</p>
</fn>
<corresp id="c001">&#x002A;Correspondence: Heidi J. Renninger, <email>hr427@msstate.edu</email></corresp>
<fn fn-type="present-address" id="fn0001"><p><sup>&#x2020;</sup>Present addresses: Justin J. Pitts, Department of Agronomy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States</p>
<p>Jiaxin Wang, Department of Forest Resources and Environmental Conservation, Virginia Polytechnic and State University, Blacksburg, VA, United States</p></fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>18</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2024</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2024</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>7</volume>
<elocation-id>1467381</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>19</day>
<month>07</month>
<year>2024</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>02</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2024</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x00A9; 2024 Renninger, Pitts and Wang.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2024</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Renninger, Pitts and Wang</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<sec id="sec80">
<title>Introduction</title>
<p><italic>Populus</italic> and its hybrids are attractive bioenergy crops and the southeastern United States has broad ability to supply bioenergy markets with woody biomass. Breeding and hybridization have led to superior eastern cottonwood (<italic>Populus deltoides</italic> W. Bartram ex Marshall) and hybrid poplars adapted to a wide variety of site types not suited for agricultural production. In order to maximize productivity and minimize inputs, genotypes need to efficiently use available site resources and tolerate environmental stresses. In addition, we need to determine plasticity of traits and their coordination across sites to select traits that will broadly characterize genotypes. Therefore, our study objectives were to determine (1) which leaf traits were correlated with growth, (2) if traits and genotypes exhibited significant plasticity across sites, and (3) how traits were coordinated within and across sites and <italic>Populus</italic> taxa.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec81">
<title>Methods</title>
<p>We measured trees at two sites in northeastern Mississippi, United States: one upland and one alluvial terrace site. Genotypes included eastern cottonwoods as well as F<sub>1</sub> crosses of eastern cottonwood and <italic>P. maximowiczii</italic> (Henry), <italic>P. nigra</italic> (L.) and <italic>P. trichocarpa</italic> (Torr. &#x0026; Gray).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec82">
<title>Results</title>
<p>We found that sites differed in which leaf traits were correlated with productivity; with water use efficiency specifically being positively correlated with growth at an alluvial terrace site, but negatively correlated with growth at an upland site. Tree height growth, leaf isotope composition (&#x03B4;<sup>13</sup>C and &#x03B4;<sup>15</sup>N), as well as leaf mass per area (LMA) exhibited the least plasticity across sites, while physiological gas exchange parameters and leaf nitrogen concentration exhibited the highest plasticity. Broadly across taxa, leaf carbon isotope ratios were correlated with intrinsic water use efficiency, and stomatal conductance was positively correlated with photosynthetic nitrogen use efficiency across sites, while leaf nitrogen isotope ratios exhibited contrasting relationships with leaf nitrogen concentration.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec83">
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>Overall, these results allow us to refine selections of productive genotypes based on site conditions and site-specific relationships with physiological parameters to better match <italic>Populus</italic> taxa with sites and landowner objectives.</p>
</sec>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>short rotation woody crops</kwd>
<kwd>cottonwood</kwd>
<kwd>bioenergy feedstocks</kwd>
<kwd>genotype&#x00D7;environment interactions</kwd>
<kwd>leaf mass per area</kwd>
<kwd>leaf gas exchange</kwd>
<kwd>stable isotopes</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<counts>
<fig-count count="8"/>
<table-count count="4"/>
<equation-count count="0"/>
<ref-count count="62"/>
<page-count count="14"/>
<word-count count="8777"/>
</counts>
<custom-meta-wrap>
<custom-meta>
<meta-name>section-at-acceptance</meta-name>
<meta-value>Forest Ecophysiology</meta-value>
</custom-meta>
</custom-meta-wrap>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec sec-type="intro" id="sec1">
<label>1</label>
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Sustainable biomass production for bioenergy relies on low resource input crop production, and short-rotation poplar (<italic>Populus</italic> spp.) are a promising crop for bioenergy systems due to their fast growth, wide adaptability, short rotation lengths, and limited management requirements (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">Azar et al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">An et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref62">Xu et al., 2021</xref>). According to the Department of Energy&#x2019;s Billion Ton Update (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref54">U.S. Department of Energy, 2016</xref>), the southeastern United States (US) is forecasted to provide 68% of woody biomass for energy usage in the US by 2040 and <italic>Populus</italic> is a prime candidate to supply this feedstock because it has historically been grown for pulpwood production or low-cost timber (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref45">Ridge et al., 1986</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref52">Stanton et al., 2002</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref51">Spinelli and Hartsough, 2006</xref>). Therefore, much of the knowledge base and genetic improvement needed for fast growth, and harvesting technology is already available. Moreover, genetic breeding has enabled poplar to be more adaptive and resistant to biotic and abiotic factors (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref19">Han et al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref39">Polle et al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref53">Thakur et al., 2021</xref>) and grow on land not considered suitable for food crops (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref46">Robinson et al., 2000</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref58">Vose et al., 2000</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref17">Guerra et al., 2011</xref>). Nevertheless, poplar for traditional timber products have been grown on fertile, alluvial sites, therefore commercial breeding efforts seldomly focused on selecting for conservative water use strategies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref30">Monclus et al., 2006</xref>). The next generation of poplar genotypes for bioenergy production will need to display fast growth in addition to efficient use of resources (water and nutrients) and the ability to tolerate marginal sites in order to provide bioenergy feedstocks with minimal ecosystem impacts.</p>
<p>Tree breeding and improvement in <italic>Populus</italic> have led to clonal material that exhibit no genetic variability within individuals of the same genotype, but potentially substantial genetic variability across genotypes. Physiologically, this can aid in the identification of suites of traits that vary together or broadscale tradeoffs among traits. Likewise, leaf traits can be categorized as &#x201C;functional&#x201D; if they predict plant performance metrics like growth and productivity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref56">Violle et al., 2007</xref>). In the fast-slow plant economics spectrum, suites of traits are coordinated such that high rates of resource acquisition and processing are associated with high growth rates in resource-rich environments and traits need to be coordinated throughout the organism so that there are no bottlenecks or wasteful allocation of carbon and resources (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref41">Reich, 2014</xref>). Broadly, studies have found that total leaf area and water use were positively correlated with growth in <italic>Populus</italic> spp. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref36">Pellis et al., 2004</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref27">Marron et al., 2005</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref29">Monclus et al., 2005</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref31">Monclus et al., 2009</xref>).</p>
<p>Additionally, planting of specific genotypes at differing sites allows for the identification of genotype by environment (G&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;E) interactions to determine which physiological characteristics and suites of traits are site dependent and which exhibit consistent patterns across sites. The presence of G&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;E interactions, particularly in productivity or resource-use parameters, can limit the selection of superior genotypes to site-specific locations (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref26">Marron et al., 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref28">Miller, 2018</xref>). Alternatively, suites of plant traits can differ across sites, but potentially yield similar growth rankings among genotypes depending on the trait plasticity within individual genotypes. In total, plant functional traits can be used to select genotypes with high performance and resource use efficiency and identify trait plasticity across sites to identify the most robust plant traits to use for broadscale genotype selection.</p>
<p>In this study, we compared leaf physiological, anatomical, and biochemical traits as well as productivity from 168 genotypes of eastern cottonwood (<italic>Populus deltoides</italic> W. Bartram ex Marshall) and hybrid poplars planted at two sites (40 genotypes were planted at both sites and 128 were unique to only one site) differing in belowground water availability and located in the southeastern US. Genotypes included selected and improved eastern cottonwoods as well as hybrid poplars resulting from F<sub>1</sub> crosses of <italic>Populus deltoides</italic>, <italic>Populus maximowiczii</italic> (Henry), <italic>Populus nigra</italic> (L.) and <italic>Populus trichocarpa</italic> (Torr. &#x0026; Gray). <italic>Populus</italic> species crosses generally exhibit hybrid vigor particularly in first generation (F<sub>1</sub>) hybrids (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">Cronk, 2005</xref>). The objectives of the study were (1) to compare leaf traits and determine which traits were significantly correlated with growth at each site and potentially across sites, (2) identify suites of traits that were coordinated or exhibited tradeoffs and determine if these relationships were site and/or taxon specific and (3) determine which traits and genotypes had significant G&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;E interactions and exhibited the greatest plasticity. Overall, these data will increase understanding of leaf physiological traits and the tradeoffs among them in <italic>Populus</italic> genotypes that differ greatly in growth rate and site conditions. Assessing physiological performance and leaf traits in relation to productivity of numerous unique eastern cottonwood and hybrid poplars, many of which have not been studied before, will also improve our collective knowledge on the functioning and culture of these potential bioenergy feedstocks to aid in future breeding and selection of optimal genotypes for the southeastern US.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="materials|methods" id="sec2">
<label>2</label>
<title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="sec3">
<label>2.1</label>
<title>Site descriptions and planting</title>
<p>The study was conducted at two field trials in Monroe (33&#x00B0;51&#x2019; N, 88&#x00B0;17&#x2019; W) and Pontotoc (34&#x00B0;08&#x2019; N, 88&#x00B0;59&#x2019; W) counties, in northeastern Mississippi, US. These sites are located about 70&#x202F;km apart and are located on the Gulf Coastal Plain of the US. The climate of the region is humid subtropical characterized by mild winters and long, hot summers. These sites have a 30&#x202F;year (1991&#x2013;2020) mean annual rainfall of about 1,490&#x202F;mm, mean maximum and minimum temperatures of 22.5&#x00B0;C and 10.3&#x00B0;C, respectively and a mean annual temperature of 16.4&#x00B0;C (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref34">NOAA, 2023</xref>). <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab1">Table 1</xref> contains specifics on site elevation, depth to the water table and soil composition. Specifically, the Monroe site is categorized as an &#x201C;alluvial terrace&#x201D; located approximately 500&#x202F;m from the Buttahatchee River with fine sandy loam soils and a water table within 2&#x202F;m of the surface (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref32">Natural Resources Conservation Service, 2023</xref>). The Pontotoc site is characterized as an &#x201C;upland&#x201D; site with an elevation about 65&#x202F;m higher than the Monroe site and a water table over 2&#x202F;m below the surface. Soils are categorized as silt loams (<xref ref-type="table" rid="tab1">Table 1</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref32">Natural Resources Conservation Service, 2023</xref>). Volumetric soil moisture contents were measured at each field site with 30&#x202F;cm long time domain reflectometry probes (Campbell Scientific Inc. Logan UT, USA) attached to a CR1000 datalogger (Campbell Scientific Inc.) that recorded data half-hourly. Relative soil moisture content in the top 30&#x202F;cm was calculated as soil moisture divided by the highest soil moisture in the sample period (representing field capacity) and converted to a percentage. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref> presents relative soil moisture contents for both the Monroe (alluvial terrace) and Pontotoc (upland) sites and shows that they did not differ significantly from one another during the growing season with the alluvial terrace site being near field capacity during the dormant season (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab1">
<label>Table 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Location, elevation and soil data for the study sites (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref32">Natural Resources Conservation Service, 2023</xref>).</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th/>
<th align="center" valign="top">Alluvial terrace site</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Upland site</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="bottom">Location</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">Monroe Co. MS, USA</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">Pontotoc Co. MS, USA</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="bottom">Water table</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">as shallow as 170&#x202F;cm</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">below 2&#x202F;m depth</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="bottom">Soil type</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">Prentiss fine sandy loam</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">Atwood Silt Loam</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="bottom">Elevation (m)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">85</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">149.5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="bottom" colspan="3">Soil properties (0&#x2013;20&#x202F;cm)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="bottom">Sand (%)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">55</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">11</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="bottom">Silt (%)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">36</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">74</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="bottom">Clay (%)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">9</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">15</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="bottom">CEC (cmol (+) kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">7</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">6.5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="bottom">OM (%)</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.6</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.1</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p>CEC, cation exchange capacity and OM, organic matter.</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<fig position="float" id="fig1">
<label>Figure 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Relative soil moisture content for sensors located in the top 30&#x202F;cm of soil for the alluvial terrace (blue) and upland (pink) field sites.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="ffgc-07-1467381-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>The alluvial terrace was established and planted in April 2018, and the previous use of this site was peanut production. The upland site was established and planted in April 2019 and was previously used for annual row crop production. Both sites were tilled and subsoiled along planting rows that were 2.7&#x202F;m apart to a depth of 45.7&#x202F;cm and treated with pre-emergent herbicide before planting. One hundred and 108 unique genotypes were planted at the alluvial terrace and upland sites, respectively, (<xref ref-type="table" rid="tab2">Table 2</xref>). Six taxa including improved eastern cottonwoods (D&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;D) as well as hybrid poplars were used including <italic>P. deltoides</italic> &#x00D7; <italic>P. maximowiczii</italic> (D&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;M), <italic>P. deltoides</italic> &#x00D7; <italic>P. nigra</italic> (D&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;N), <italic>P. deltoides</italic> &#x00D7; <italic>P. trichocarpa</italic> (D&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;T), <italic>P. trichocarpa</italic> &#x00D7; <italic>P. deltoides</italic> (T&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;D), <italic>P. trichocarpa</italic> &#x00D7; <italic>P. maximowiczii</italic> (T&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;M) and <italic>P. deltoides</italic> &#x00D7; <italic>P. nigra</italic> &#x00D7; <italic>P. maximowiczii</italic>, (D&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;N&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;M) which was grouped with D&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;N genotypes since only one genotype was represented (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Table S1</xref>). Dormant and unrooted hybrid poplar cuttings (22.9&#x202F;cm long) were obtained from GreenWood Resources (Portland, OR, USA) and kept in a walk-in freezer until planting. Dormant, unrooted, eastern cottonwood cuttings (40.6&#x202F;cm long) were obtained from the Department of Forestry Cottonwood Cutting Orchard at Mississippi State University. Before planting, hybrid poplar cuttings were soaked in insecticide (Admire&#x00AE; Pro, Bayer Corp., Whippany, NJ, USA) for 3&#x2013;4&#x202F;days, and eastern cottonwood cuttings were also soaked in water and insecticide for 18&#x202F;h, wrapped in plastic film, and placed in the freezer prior to planting. Cuttings were planted in subsoiled rows at a 1.8&#x202F;m spacing and two ramets of the same genotype were planted adjacent to one another in each block. Taxa were contained together in subplots within blocks, when possible, given the number of genotypes per taxa at each site, to provide consistent competition around trees.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab2">
<label>Table 2</label>
<caption>
<p>Selected <italic>Populus</italic> taxa and number of genotypes planted at the Alluvial terrace (Monroe) and Upland (Pontotoc) field sites located in northeastern Mississippi, US.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top">Site</th>
<th align="left" valign="top">Taxa</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Genotypes</th>
<th align="left" valign="top">Cross</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="6">Alluvial terrace</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">D&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;D</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">25</td>
<td align="left" valign="top"><italic>Populus deltoides</italic> &#x00D7; <italic>P. deltoides</italic></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">D&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;M</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">46</td>
<td align="left" valign="top"><italic>Populus deltoides</italic> &#x00D7; <italic>P. maximowiczii</italic></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">D&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;N</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">11</td>
<td align="left" valign="top"><italic>Populus deltoides</italic> &#x00D7; <italic>P. nigra</italic></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">D&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;T</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">13</td>
<td align="left" valign="top"><italic>Populus deltoides</italic> &#x00D7; <italic>P. trichocarpa</italic></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">T&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;D</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">4</td>
<td align="left" valign="top"><italic>Populus trichocarpa</italic> &#x00D7; <italic>P. deltoides</italic></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">T&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;M</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1</td>
<td align="left" valign="top"><italic>Populus trichocarpa</italic> &#x00D7; <italic>P. maximowiczii</italic></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="7">Upland</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">D&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;D</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">24</td>
<td align="left" valign="top"><italic>Populus deltoides</italic> &#x00D7; <italic>P. deltoides</italic></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">D&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;M</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">39</td>
<td align="left" valign="top"><italic>Populus deltoides</italic> &#x00D7; <italic>P. maximowiczii</italic></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">D&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;N</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">22</td>
<td align="left" valign="top"><italic>Populus deltoides</italic> &#x00D7; <italic>P. nigra</italic></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">D&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;T</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">4</td>
<td align="left" valign="top"><italic>Populus deltoides</italic> &#x00D7; <italic>P. trichocarpa</italic></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">T&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;D</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2</td>
<td align="left" valign="top"><italic>Populus trichocarpa</italic> &#x00D7; <italic>P. deltoides</italic></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">T&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;M</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">16</td>
<td align="left" valign="top"><italic>Populus trichocarpa</italic> &#x00D7; <italic>P. maximowiczii</italic></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">(D&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;N)&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;M</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">(<italic>Populus deltoides</italic> &#x00D7;<italic>P. nigra</italic>)&#x202F;&#x00D7; <italic>P. maximowiczii</italic></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<p>For the first growing season, sites were maintained with minimal competition from herbaceous vegetation through hand weeding combined with tilling and chemical herbicide (Select, Valent USA LLC., Walnut Creek CA, USA) application. Additional fertilization and irrigation were not added to the site. If trees were being impacted by cottonwood leaf beetle (<italic>Chrysomela scripta</italic> Fabricius) larval feeding, sites were aerially sprayed with insecticide (Admire&#x00AE; Pro, Bayer Corp., Whippany, NJ, USA). Tree heights were measured at the end of the first growing season using a height pole.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec4">
<label>2.2</label>
<title>Leaf physiology, morphology, and chemical composition</title>
<p>During approximately July and early August of the first growing season at each site, leaf gas exchange measurements were made on an attached, fully expanded and developed leaf near the top of the tree using a LiCOR 6400 portable photosynthesis system (calibrated in 2015; LI-COR Biosciences Inc., Lincoln, NE, USA). One individual per genotype (generally the larger of the two) in three blocks at each site was measured for leaf gas exchange during midmorning on sunny days after dew had evaporated, but before significant midday leaf stress. Generally, one replicate block was measured per day and blocks were chosen that represented a range of study site conditions within the larger study sites. Light levels in the leaf chamber were 1,500&#x202F;&#x03BC;mol&#x202F;m<sup>&#x2212;2</sup> s<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>, CO<sub>2</sub> concentrations were 400&#x202F;ppm and relative humidity was controlled to be between 40 and 60%. Measurements were made between about 8:30 and 12:30 local time, leaf temperatures ranged from about 27 to 37&#x00B0;C and leaf VPD ranged from about 0.8 to 3.8&#x202F;kPa. Net assimilation rates (A<sub>net</sub>; &#x03BC;mol m<sup>&#x2212;2</sup> s<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>) and stomatal conductance (g<sub>s</sub>; mol m<sup>&#x2212;2</sup> s<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>) were monitored and allowed to equilibrate for approximately 2&#x202F;minutes before measurements were taken with the ratio of the two representing intrinsic water use efficiency (iWUE).</p>
<p>After gas exchange measurements, leaves were placed in labeled, zip top bags and into a cooler to be transported back to the laboratory. Leaves were kept in a refrigerator until their fresh areas could be measured using a LI-COR 3100 leaf area scanner. Leaves were then placed in envelopes and oven dried for approximately 1&#x202F;week at 65&#x00B0;C, then their dry weights were obtained. The ratio of leaf fresh area and dry mass was used to calculate leaf dry mass per unit area (LMA; g m<sup>&#x2212;2</sup>) which was used to calculate net assimilation on a per unit leaf mass basis (A<sub>mass</sub>). Dry leaves were then separated from the petiole and midrib and ground to pass through a 2&#x202F;mm sieve. Ground leaf material was encapsulated in tin capsules, and sent to the University of California, Davis Stable Isotope Facility (Davis, CA, USA) for total sample carbon (C), and total sample nitrogen (N), and stable isotopes of carbon and nitrogen (&#x03B4;<sup>13</sup>C, &#x03B4;<sup>15</sup>N) using elemental combustion analysis (PDZ Europa ANCA-GSL elemental analyzer; Sercon Ltd., Cheshire, UK) and inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (PDZ Europa 20&#x2013;20 isotope mass spectrometer; Sercon Ltd., Cheshire, UK) respectively. Leaf nitrogen content was calculated on a per unit area basis (N<sub>area</sub>; g N m<sup>&#x2212;2</sup>) by multiplying leaf N concentration by LMA. Photosynthetic nitrogen use efficiency (PNUE; &#x03BC;mol g<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> N s<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>) was calculated by dividing leaf photosynthetic rates by nitrogen content on a per unit area basis.</p>
<p>Carbon isotope analysis provides an indirect measure of stomatal diffusion, but more importantly, of water use efficiency due to the inherent discrimination of the RuBisCO enzyme against <sup>13</sup>C (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14">Farquhar et al., 1989</xref>) and potentially provides a temporally and spatially integrated measure of intrinsic water use efficiency. Nitrogen isotope analysis can be more difficult to interpret compared with &#x03B4;<sup>13</sup>C due to the multitude of soil nitrogen transformations and soil microbial species performing these chemical reactions and each exhibiting differing discrimination against <sup>15</sup>N (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">Craine et al., 2015</xref>). However, in general, &#x03B4;<sup>15</sup>N can distinguish between sources of N (soil or atmospheric; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">Craine et al. (2015)</xref>) as well as potentially indicating N availability and if a site is nearing N saturation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">Craine et al., 2009</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec5">
<label>2.3</label>
<title>Data and statistical analysis</title>
<p>Because gas exchange data were measured throughout the day and on multiple days, net assimilation and stomatal conductance data were scaled to a common temperature before further analysis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref59">Willis et al., 2023</xref>). Using these corrected data, intrinsic water use efficiency was calculated as the ratio of net assimilation and stomatal conductance. Significant differences in physiological parameters across sites were accessed using ANOVA (aov) in R version 4.2.2 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref40">R Core Team, 2022</xref>). Graphs were produced and <italic>p</italic>-values, correlation coefficients, and data quartiles were calculated using Sigmaplot version 13 (Systat Software Inc. San Jose, California, USA). Spearman rank correlations (<italic>&#x03C1;</italic>) and <italic>p</italic>-values were calculated in R using the &#x201C;corr.test&#x201D; function on genotypes that were present at both sites to evaluate ranking stability between sites (40 genotypes; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Supplementary Table S1</xref>). Weak correlation between parameters (high <italic>p</italic>-value, low <italic>&#x03C1;</italic>) indicate a large difference in genotype ranks between sites and suggests the presence of a G&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;E interaction and traits with high plasticity. To determine total rank differences, genotypes were ranked from high to low values for each physiological parameter and absolute differences between sites for each genotype were calculated. These absolute differences were summed for each genotype to determine their total rank difference. Principal component analysis was performed for each site in R using the &#x201C;prcomp&#x201D; function with the datasets scaled and zero centered.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="results" id="sec6">
<label>3</label>
<title>Results</title>
<sec id="sec7">
<label>3.1</label>
<title>Site differences</title>
<p>Although growth was higher across taxa at the alluvial terrace site, many leaf physiological and biochemical metrics were higher at the upland site including A<sub>net</sub>, g<sub>s</sub>, LMA, leaf N concentrations and &#x03B4;<sup>13</sup>C (signifying more moisture stress and/or more water use efficiency; <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab3">Table 3</xref>). The alluvial terrace site also had higher &#x03B4;<sup>15</sup>N across taxa and higher leaf-level iWUE in D&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;D and D&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;M individuals (<xref ref-type="table" rid="tab3">Table 3</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab3">
<label>Table 3</label>
<caption>
<p>Mean (standard error in parentheses) for leaf physiological, biochemical and anatomical parameters and tree height growth for <italic>Populus</italic> taxa planted at the Monroe (alluvial terrace) and Pontotoc (upland) sites.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th/>
<th align="center" valign="top" colspan="2">D&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;D</th>
<th/>
<th align="center" valign="top" colspan="2">D&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;M</th>
<th/>
<th align="center" valign="top" colspan="2">D&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;N</th>
<th/>
<th align="center" valign="top" colspan="2">D&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;T/D&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;T</th>
<th/>
</tr>
<tr>
<th/>
<th align="center" valign="top">Monroe</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Pontotoc</th>
<th/>
<th align="center" valign="top">Monroe</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Pontotoc</th>
<th/>
<th align="center" valign="top">Monroe</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Pontotoc</th>
<th/>
<th align="center" valign="top">Monroe</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Pontotoc</th>
<th/>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">A<sub>net</sub> (&#x03BC;mol&#x202F;m<sup>&#x2212;2</sup> s<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">16.9 (0.4)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle"><bold>18.8 (0.3)</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">15.2 (0.3)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle"><bold>21.3 (0.4)</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">17.2 (0.4)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle"><bold>20.8 (0.5)</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">17.2 (0.5)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle"><bold>22.0 (0.6)</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">g<sub>s</sub> (mol&#x202F;m<sup>&#x2212;2</sup> s<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.58 (0.02)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle"><bold>0.70 (0.02)</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x002A;&#x002A;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.48 (0.01)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle"><bold>0.78 (0.02)</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.60 (0.05)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.70 (0.03)</td>
<td/>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.64 (0.03)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.70 (0.05)</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">iWUE (&#x03BC;mol&#x202F;mol<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle"><bold>33.7 (1.4)</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">28.3 (0.8)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x002A;&#x002A;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle"><bold>35.1 (1.0)</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">28.9 (0.8)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">33.5 (2.6)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">32.2 (1.6)</td>
<td/>
<td align="center" valign="middle">28.5 (1.3)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">32.4 (1.5)</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">LMA (g&#x202F;m<sup>&#x2212;2</sup>)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">63.9 (0.9)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle"><bold>69.1 (1.4)</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x002A;&#x002A;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">66.6 (0.8)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle"><bold>74.9 (1.1)</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">60.5 (1.7)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle"><bold>66.7 (1.2)</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x002A;&#x002A;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">65.8 (1.0)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle"><bold>70.6 (1.2)</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x002A;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x03B4;<sup>13</sup>C (&#x2030;)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x2212;29.7 (0.1)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle"><bold>&#x2212;29.1 (0.1)</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x002A;&#x002A;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x2212;30.3 (0.1)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle"><bold>&#x2212;29.8 (0.1)</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x2212;30.4 (0.2)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle"><bold>&#x2212;29.5 (0.1)</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x2212;30.2 (0.2)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle"><bold>&#x2212;28.5 (0.3)</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">&#x03B4;<sup>15</sup>N (&#x2030;)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle"><bold>6.3 (0.1)</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.3 (0.1)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle"><bold>6.7 (0.1)</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.0 (0.1)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle"><bold>7.7 (0.2)</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.3 (0.1)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle"><bold>7.4 (0.2)</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.0 (0.1)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">N conc. (%)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.1 (0.1)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.0 (0.1)</td>
<td/>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.5 (0.05)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle"><bold>2.9 (0.04)</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.1 (0.1)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle"><bold>3.4 (0.1)</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x002A;&#x002A;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.5 (0.1)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle"><bold>3.2 (0.1)</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">PNUE (&#x03BC;mol&#x202F;g<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> s<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">8.8 (0.3)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle"><bold>9.5 (0.2)</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x002A;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">9.4 (0.3)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">10.1 (0.3)</td>
<td/>
<td align="center" valign="middle">9.4 (0.4)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">9.4 (0.3)</td>
<td/>
<td align="center" valign="middle">10.4 (0.2)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">9.8 (0.3)</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Ht. growth (m)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle"><bold>3.9 (0.1)</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.7 (0.1)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle"><bold>4.2 (0.1)</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.4 (0.1)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle"><bold>3.7 (0.1)</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.9 (0.1)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle"><bold>3.3 (0.1)</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.4 (0.1)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p>D, <italic>Populus deltoides</italic>; M, <italic>P. maximowiczii</italic>; N, <italic>P. nigra</italic>; T, <italic>P. trichocarpa</italic>. &#x002A;&#x002A;&#x002A;&#x202F;=&#x202F;<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.0001 in site comparison, &#x002A;&#x002A;&#x202F;=&#x202F;<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.01, &#x002A;&#x202F;=&#x202F;<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.05. Sample size is the number of genotypes in each taxa at each site (<xref ref-type="table" rid="tab2">Table 2</xref>) with replicates averaged within each genotype. The site that was significantly greater for each variable is shown in bold.</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="sec8">
<label>3.2</label>
<title>Productivity predictors</title>
<p>Physiological and biochemical parameters to predict productivity in terms of yearly height growth were site specific with no common parameters across sites (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>). At the alluvial terrace site, height growth was positively correlated with leaf-level iWUE, and negatively correlated with A<sub>net</sub>, g<sub>s</sub> and PNUE (less so for D&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;M than other taxa; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>). At the upland site, height growth was negatively correlated with leaf level iWUE and &#x03B4;<sup>13</sup>C and positively correlated with g<sub>s</sub> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figures 2</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">3</xref>). When separating out D&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;D and hybrid taxa that were planted at both field sites, no parameters were significantly correlated with height growth for D&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;D genotypes at the upland site while height growth was negatively correlated with A<sub>net</sub> and positively correlated with &#x03B4;<sup>15</sup>N at the alluvial terrace site (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>). For hybrid poplar taxa, height growth at the alluvial terrace site was negatively correlated with water use efficiency in terms of &#x03B4;<sup>13</sup>C and negatively correlated with N concentrations, while being positively correlated with &#x03B4;<sup>15</sup>N and negatively correlated with A<sub>net</sub> at the upland site (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>).</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig2">
<label>Figure 2</label>
<caption>
<p>Correlations among leaf parameters and height growth for the alluvial terrace (top diagonal) and upland (bottom diagonal) field sites. Empty squares exhibited a non-significant correlation (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003E;&#x202F;0.05). Gray squares represent statistically significant (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.05) correlations that were similar in direction between sites, yellow squares represent correlations that were only significant at one site and orange squares represent statistically significant but opposing correlations between sites.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="ffgc-07-1467381-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig position="float" id="fig3">
<label>Figure 3</label>
<caption>
<p>Physiological parameters correlated tree height growth (m) at the alluvial terrace (left) and upland (right) sites for <italic>P. deltoides</italic> &#x00D7; <italic>P. deltoides</italic> (D&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;D; green), <italic>P. deltoides</italic> &#x00D7; <italic>P. maximowiczii</italic> (D&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;M; red), <italic>P. deltoides</italic> &#x00D7; <italic>P. nigra</italic> (D&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;N; black), <italic>P. deltoides</italic> &#x00D7; <italic>P. trichocarpa</italic> (D&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;T) and <italic>P. trichocarpa</italic> &#x00D7; <italic>P. deltoides</italic> (T&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;D; light blue), and <italic>P. trichocarpa</italic> &#x00D7; <italic>P. maximowiczii</italic> (T&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;M; purple).</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="ffgc-07-1467381-g003.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig position="float" id="fig4">
<label>Figure 4</label>
<caption>
<p>Correlations among leaf parameters and height growth for <italic>Populus deltoides</italic> &#x00D7; <italic>P. deltoides</italic> (D&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;D; left) and hybrid poplars (D&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;M, D&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;N, D&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;T, T&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;D) at the alluvial terrace (top diagonals) and upland (bottom diagonals) field sites. Empty squares exhibited a non-significant correlation (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003E;&#x202F;0.05). Dark gray squares represent statistically significant correlations (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;&#x003C;&#x202F;0.05) that were similar in direction across taxa groupings and sites. Light gray squares represent statistically significant correlations that were similar within taxa grouping between sites, yellow squares represent correlations that were only significant at one site within taxa groupings.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="ffgc-07-1467381-g004.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="sec9">
<label>3.3</label>
<title>Coordination and tradeoffs among physiological parameters</title>
<p>Several physiological parameters exhibited consistent relationships across all planted <italic>Populus</italic> taxa at both the alluvial terrace and upland sites including positive relationships between A<sub>net</sub> and g<sub>s</sub> as well as PNUE, negative relationships between g<sub>s</sub> and iWUE and &#x03B4;<sup>13</sup>C (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>), and negative correlations between leaf N concentration and LMA (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>) and well as PNUE (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>). Particularly, &#x03B4;<sup>13</sup>C and iWUE were positively correlated at both sites (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>). Stomatal conductance was also positively correlated with PNUE across taxa and sites suggesting a consistent relationship between water use and nitrogen use efficiency (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>). LMA was negatively correlated with &#x03B4;<sup>15</sup>N at both sites across all taxa (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>) and &#x03B4;<sup>15</sup>N and &#x03B4;<sup>13</sup>C were also negatively correlated with one another (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>). However, &#x03B4;<sup>15</sup>N exhibited opposing relationships with leaf N concentration being positively correlated at the upland site, but negatively correlated at the alluvial site (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>). For the 40 common genotypes (D&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;D and hybrids) planted at both sites, physiological relationships including positive correlations between A<sub>net</sub> and g<sub>s</sub> as well as PNUE and negative relationships between g<sub>s</sub> and iWUE were evident (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>). PNUE and g<sub>s</sub> were also positively correlated across sites and <italic>Populus</italic> types suggesting a broad relationship between water use and PNUE. For D&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;D genotypes, leaf nitrogen parameters exhibited more similar relationships across sites with leaf N concentration being positively correlated with A<sub>net</sub>, and &#x03B4;<sup>13</sup>C and negatively correlated with LMA and PNUE (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>). For <italic>Populus</italic> hybrids, fewer consistent relationships were evident across sites except for iWUE which was positively correlated with &#x03B4;<sup>13</sup>C and negatively correlated with &#x03B4;<sup>15</sup>N at both sites (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>). Nevertheless, <italic>P. deltoides</italic> tended to have more significant correlations among leaf traits particularly with regard to iWUE at the alluvial terrace site, while hybrid poplars exhibited more trait correlation particularly for leaf nitrogen traits at the upland site (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>).</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig5">
<label>Figure 5</label>
<caption>
<p>Relationships among leaf physiological parameters at the alluvial terrace (left) and upland (right) sites for genotypes in the <italic>P. deltoides</italic> &#x00D7; <italic>P. deltoides</italic> (D&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;D; green), <italic>P. deltoides</italic> &#x00D7; <italic>P. maximowiczii</italic> (D&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;M; red), <italic>P. deltoides</italic> &#x00D7; <italic>P. nigra</italic> (D&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;N; black), <italic>P. deltoides</italic> &#x00D7; <italic>P. trichocarpa</italic> (D&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;T) and <italic>P. trichocarpa</italic> &#x00D7; <italic>P. deltoides</italic> (T&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;D; light blue), and <italic>P. trichocarpa</italic> &#x00D7; <italic>P. maximowiczii</italic> (T&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;M; purple) taxa.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="ffgc-07-1467381-g005.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>For principal component analysis, the first two PCs explained about 59 and 53% of the variation in data for the alluvial terrace and upland field sites, respectively, (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>). At both sites, iWUE and &#x03B4;<sup>13</sup>C were positively correlated and &#x03B4;<sup>15</sup>N and PNUE were positively correlated with one another. At the alluvial terrace site, assimilation rates were positively correlated with g<sub>s</sub> and negatively correlated with LMA, while at the upland site, assimilation rates were positively correlated with leaf N<sub>conc</sub> and PNUE and negatively correlated with LMA and leaf CN ratios (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>). At the alluvial terrace site, yearly height growth was positively correlated with iWUE and negatively correlated with PNUE and &#x03B4;<sup>15</sup>N. At the upland site, height growth was positively correlated with g<sub>s</sub> and negatively correlated with &#x03B4;<sup>13</sup>C and iWUE (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>).</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig6">
<label>Figure 6</label>
<caption>
<p>Principal component analysis (PCA) for the alluvial terrace (top) and upland (bottom) sites showing the loading of physiological parameters (arrows) in relation to the PC scores for all genotypes in the <italic>P. deltoides</italic> &#x00D7; <italic>P. deltoides</italic> (D&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;D; green), <italic>P. deltoides</italic> &#x00D7; <italic>P. maximowiczii</italic> (D&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;M; red), <italic>P. deltoides</italic> &#x00D7; <italic>P. nigra</italic> (D&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;N; black), <italic>P. deltoides</italic> &#x00D7; <italic>P. trichocarpa</italic> and <italic>P. trichocarpa</italic> &#x00D7; <italic>P. deltoides</italic> (D&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;T and T&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;D; blue), and <italic>P. trichocarpa</italic> &#x00D7; <italic>P. maximowiczii</italic> (T&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;M; purple) taxa.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="ffgc-07-1467381-g006.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="sec10">
<label>3.4</label>
<title>G&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;E interactions and trait plasticity</title>
<p>For the 40 genotypes planted at both field sites, rankings among genotypes changed the most, and G&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;E interactions were the most evident, in terms of physiological parameters, in particular A<sub>net</sub>, nitrogen parameters, and to a lesser extent, water use parameters (<xref ref-type="table" rid="tab4">Table 4</xref>). For A<sub>net</sub>, D&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;M genotypes were the most likely to have high rates at the upland site but low rates at the alluvial terrace site, while the opposite was true for D&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;D which tended to have high rates at the alluvial terrace site as opposed to the upland site (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>). For leaf N concentrations, D&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;D genotypes were more likely to be in the extremes with high leaf N concentration at one site and low leaf N for the same genotype at the other field site (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>). Most other physiological traits exhibited a mix of taxa with opposing ranking at one site vs. another (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>). Leaf isotope ratios (&#x03B4;<sup>13</sup>C and &#x03B4;<sup>15</sup>N) and leaf anatomical parameters (LMA) tended to have the lowest plasticity and low G&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;E interaction as they were correlated across sites (<xref ref-type="table" rid="tab4">Table 4</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>). Finally, height growth was consistent across sites suggesting minimal site effects on height rankings among genotypes (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab4">
<label>Table 4</label>
<caption>
<p>Spearman rank correlation coefficient (<italic>&#x03C1;</italic>) and <italic>p</italic>-values comparing correlations among 40 genotypes planted at the Monroe (alluvial terrace) and Pontotoc (upland) sites for leaf physiological, biochemical, and anatomical parameters and well as tree height growth.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top">Parameter</th>
<th align="center" valign="top"><italic>p</italic>-value</th>
<th align="center" valign="top"><italic>&#x03C1;</italic></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="bottom">A<sub>net</sub> (&#x03BC;mol&#x202F;m<sup>&#x2212;2</sup> s<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>)</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">0.83</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">&#x2212;0.036</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="bottom">PNUE (&#x03BC;mol&#x202F;g<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> s<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>)</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">0.6</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">0.084</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="bottom">N<sub>conc</sub> (%)</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">0.58</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">0.089</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="bottom">iWUE (&#x03BC;mol&#x202F;mol<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>)</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">0.36</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">&#x2212;0.15</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="bottom">g<sub>s</sub> (mol&#x202F;m<sup>&#x2212;2</sup> s<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>)</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">0.35</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">&#x2212;0.15</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="bottom">&#x03B4;<sup>15</sup>N (&#x2030;)</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">0.04</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">0.32</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="bottom">&#x03B4;<sup>13</sup>C (&#x2030;)</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">0.02</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">0.36</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="bottom">Height growth (m)</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">&#x003C;0.001</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">0.56</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="bottom">LMA (g&#x202F;m<sup>&#x2212;2</sup>)</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">&#x003C;0.001</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">0.62</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p>Low and non-significant correlations indicate higher genotype &#x00D7; environment (G&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;E) interactions.</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<fig position="float" id="fig7">
<label>Figure 7</label>
<caption>
<p>Physiological parameters measured in the same genotypes from <italic>P. deltoides</italic> &#x00D7; <italic>P. deltoides</italic> (D&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;D; green), <italic>P. deltoides</italic> &#x00D7; <italic>P. maximowiczii</italic> (D&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;M; red), <italic>P. deltoides</italic> &#x00D7; <italic>P. nigra</italic> (D&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;N; black), <italic>P. deltoides</italic> &#x00D7; <italic>P. trichocarpa</italic> (D&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;T) and <italic>P. trichocarpa</italic> &#x00D7; <italic>P. deltoides</italic> (T&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;D; light blue) planted at both the alluvial terrace (x axes) and upland (y axes) field sites (<xref ref-type="table" rid="tab4">Table 4</xref>). Solid lines represent the median and dashed lines represent the upper and lower quartiles for each parameter.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="ffgc-07-1467381-g007.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Among the genotypes that were common at both field sites, certain genotypes were more likely to exhibit trait plasticity across sites when all measured parameters were taken into account while others exhibited fairly low plasticity (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref>). Taxa did not factor into trait plasticity with each taxa containing genotypes that exhibited high and low plasticity across sites. For D&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;D genotypes, &#x2018;83&#x2013;2&#x2019;, &#x2018;S7C2&#x2019;, &#x2018;S7C4&#x2019; and &#x2018;27&#x2013;5&#x2019; exhibited high trait plasticity while genotypes &#x2018;122&#x2019;, &#x2018;95A-6&#x2019;, &#x2018;6&#x2013;1&#x2019; and &#x2018;6&#x2013;5&#x2019; exhibited relatively low plasticity (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref>). For D&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;T and T&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;D genotypes &#x2018;5077&#x2019; and &#x2018;9552&#x2019; (both T&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;D) exhibited high plasticity while &#x2018;10029&#x2019; and &#x2018;7903&#x2019; (both D&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;T) exhibited relatively low plasticity (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref>). Finally, for D&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;M genotypes &#x2018;9252&#x2019;, &#x2018;13724&#x2019;, &#x2018;8019&#x2019; and &#x2018;13738&#x2019; exhibited relatively high plasticity while &#x2018;9225&#x2019; exhibited low plasticity between sites (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref>). Overall, trait plasticity was not correlated with height growth (<italic>p</italic>&#x202F;=&#x202F;0.52; data not shown) with both low and high plasticity genotypes of each taxa capable of high growth.</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig8">
<label>Figure 8</label>
<caption>
<p>Total of rank differences between the alluvial terrace and upland field sites summed across each measured physiological parameter for genotypes from taxa including <italic>P. deltoides</italic> &#x00D7; <italic>P. deltoides</italic> (D&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;D; green), <italic>P. deltoides</italic> &#x00D7; <italic>P. maximowiczii</italic> (D&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;M; red), <italic>P. deltoides</italic> &#x00D7; <italic>P. nigra</italic> (D&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;N; black), <italic>P. deltoides</italic> &#x00D7; <italic>P. trichocarpa</italic> (D&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;T) and <italic>P. trichocarpa</italic> &#x00D7; <italic>P. deltoides</italic> (T&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;D; light blue) planted at both sites. The horizontal line represents the average rank difference summed across all parameters.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="ffgc-07-1467381-g008.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="discussion" id="sec11">
<label>4</label>
<title>Discussion</title>
<sec id="sec12">
<label>4.1</label>
<title>Productivity predictors</title>
<p>Year one height growth was significantly greater at the alluvial terrace site for all taxa groups compared with the upland site and site and taxonomic differences meant that no single measured physiological parameter predicted growth across sites and taxa. Across all taxa at the alluvial terrace site, a tradeoff was evident in terms of either using water or nitrogen efficiently with a positive correlation between height growth and iWUE but a negative correlation between height growth and stomatal conductance as well as PNUE. Several other studies found a tradeoff between water and nitrogen use efficiency (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref48">Sage and Pearcy, 1987</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">DeLucia and Schlesinger, 1991</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref20">Hikosaka et al., 1998</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">Chen et al., 2005</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">Broeckx et al., 2014</xref>), since restricting CO<sub>2</sub> intake and exhibiting a high water use efficiency should make photosynthetic enzymes, and the nitrogen used to make them, less efficiently utilized. Other studies have also reported a positive relationship between growth and water use efficiency in <italic>Populus</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref63">Zhang et al., 2004</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref31">Monclus et al., 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref22">King et al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref44">Renninger et al., 2021b</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref42">Renninger et al., 2023</xref>). At the upland site, the opposite was true with height growth being negatively correlated with both iWUE and &#x03B4;<sup>13</sup>C and positively correlated with stomatal conductance which was seen in other studies as well (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref31">Monclus et al., 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref43">Renninger et al., 2021a</xref>) and fits with the fast/slow hypothesis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref41">Reich, 2014</xref>) of high resource acquisition leading to higher growth rates. These data as well as the results from other research suggest that whether growth is positively or negatively related with water use efficiency is related to site characteristics and potentially water availability. However, it is surprising that at the alluvial terrace site with a seemingly more abundant water supply, height growth would be positively associated with water use efficiency, while height growth was negatively correlated with water use efficiency parameters at the drier upland site. This could suggest that access and acquisition to water leads to greater height growth at the upland site, while at the alluvial terrace site, efficient use of water at the leaf level may allow for more overall leaf area and therefore greater growth. This is corroborated by the results of the PCA analysis wherein height growth was positively correlated with iWUE at the alluvial terrace site but was inversely correlated with iWUE at the upland site. Other studies found that leaf area was correlated with productivity in <italic>Populus</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref36">Pellis et al., 2004</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref27">Marron et al., 2005</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref29">Monclus et al., 2005</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref44">Renninger et al., 2021b</xref>). Likewise, the large growth rates seen at the alluvial terrace site may have led to water resource limitations, or at least limitations in resource acquisition compared with the rate of growth occurring.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec13">
<label>4.2</label>
<title>Coordination and tradeoffs among physiological parameters</title>
<p>Across sites and taxa, broadscale relationships and coordination among physiological parameters were evident including well established relationships between A<sub>net</sub> and g<sub>s</sub> as well as PNUE, negative relationships between g<sub>s</sub> and iWUE and &#x03B4;<sup>13</sup>C and negative correlations between leaf N concentration and LMA and well as PNUE. The negative correlation between LMA and leaf N concentration is in line with the worldwide leaf economic spectrum in which &#x201C;quick-return&#x201D; leaves exhibit high leaf N and low LMA with the opposite being true of &#x201C;slow-return&#x201D; leaves (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref60">Wright et al., 2004</xref>). Other broadly significant relationships were the positive correlation between leaf gas exchange-estimated iWUE and &#x03B4;<sup>13</sup>C, an estimate of water use efficiency based on carbon isotope ratios which has been seen in other studies as well (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref50">Soolanayakanahally et al., 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">Bogeat-Triboulot et al., 2019</xref>). This suggests that the instantaneous measures from single leaves on the canopy provided a broad representation of the water use efficiency of the individual as is captured by leaf isotope data.</p>
<p>Another broad-scale relationship is the positive correlation between stomatal conductance and PNUE likely explained by the aforementioned mechanism in which higher stomatal conductance allows leaf nitrogen in photosynthetic enzymes to be used more efficiently (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">Field et al., 1983</xref>). Additionally, a positive correlation between leaf N concentration and &#x03B4;<sup>13</sup>C seen across taxa at the alluvial terrace site, in D&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;D at both sites and in hybrids at the upland site suggests the same scenario in which greater leaf nitrogen and photosynthetic enzymes allow water to be used more efficiently (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">Brueck, 2008</xref>). Finally, a negative correlation between LMA and &#x03B4;<sup>15</sup>N was observed at both sites. This relationship is more difficult to interpret as a wide variety of soil characteristics and processes affect &#x03B4;<sup>15</sup>N of nutrients taken up by plants (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">Craine et al., 2015</xref>). However, N saturated sites have been shown to have higher &#x03B4;<sup>15</sup>N values (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">Craine et al., 2009</xref>) and more microsite N availability within sites may lead to &#x201C;quick return&#x201D; leaves with lower LMA, particularly given the negative relationship between leaf N and LMA. This explanation is corroborated by the positive relationship between leaf N concentration and &#x03B4;<sup>15</sup>N at the upland site, however the opposite relationship is seen at the alluvial terrace site. Nitrogen isotope ratios at the alluvial terrace site may be further complicated by the loss of the lighter isotopes of N due to denitrification (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">Blackmer and Bremner, 1977</xref>) which potentially explains why that site has more positive &#x03B4;<sup>15</sup>N values than the upland site. Therefore, issues of greater denitrification and potential nitrate leaching (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref35">Ostrom et al., 1998</xref>) due to the greater soil saturation at the alluvial terrace site may be affecting the isotopic ratio of nitrate and ammonium and affecting its relationship with leaf N concentration. Overall, these differing relationships help determine what may be site-specific trait interactions and which are more broadly held across environmental conditions.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec14">
<label>4.3</label>
<title>G&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;E interactions and trait plasticity</title>
<p>For genotype &#x00D7; environment interactions, leaf gas exchange, particularly A<sub>net</sub> and PNUE, as well as leaf N parameters exhibited the most plasticity between sites, while tree height growth and leaf anatomical and isotopic parameters were most similar in terms of displaying similar rankings among genotypes between sites. This means that site effects should not impact studies that aim to identify the most productive genotypes in field trials at least for similar geographic conditions. Similar findings were reported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref25">Marron and Ceulemans (2006)</xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref33">Nelson et al. (2018)</xref>, but differ from findings from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref43">Renninger et al. (2021a)</xref> who found significant G&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;E interactions in productivity parameters across study sites, although sites were in different physiographic regions and exhibited different disease pressures from Septoria stem canker (<italic>Sphaerulina musiva</italic>). Other studies also report G&#x202F;&#x00D7;&#x202F;E interactions in terms of productivity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref24">Marron et al., 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref26">Marron et al., 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref38">Pliura et al., 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref47">R&#x00F6;nnberg-W&#x00E4;stljung et al., 2022</xref>) with some genotypes exhibiting more stability in productivity across sites than others (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">Alvarez et al., 2020</xref>). Plasticity in physiological functioning has been reported by other researchers who found changes in gene expression as a result of water stress conditions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref55">Vigar et al., 2016</xref>) and plasticity in sylleptic branching (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref61">Wu and Stettler, 1998</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">Cooke et al., 2005</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref24">Marron et al., 2006</xref>), as well as in xylem hydraulic traits (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref37">Plavcov&#x00E1; and Hacke, 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16">Garavillon-Tournayre et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref23">Lemaire et al., 2021</xref>) and leaf physiological traits (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16">Garavillon-Tournayre et al., 2018</xref>). For leaf metrics, isotope (&#x03B4;<sup>13</sup>C and &#x03B4;<sup>15</sup>N) and anatomical (LMA) parameters had the lowest plasticity with genotype rankings remaining similar across sites. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref43">Renninger et al. (2021a)</xref> also found that LMA, &#x03B4;<sup>13</sup>C and &#x03B4;<sup>15</sup>N exhibited similar rankings among genotypes across different field sites and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref21">Himes et al. (2021)</xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref57">Voltas et al. (2006)</xref> found that &#x03B4;<sup>13</sup>C exhibited low plasticity across irrigation treatments. However, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref18">Guet et al. (2015)</xref> found that LMA and &#x03B4;<sup>13</sup>C exhibited significant phenotypic plasticity across sites in <italic>P. nigra</italic> genotypes. Nevertheless, these leaf traits may represent robust parameters for broad phenotypic comparison since genotypes maintained their ranking for these parameters regardless of site.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="conclusions" id="sec15">
<label>5</label>
<title>Conclusion</title>
<p>In total, these data can aid in future breeding of superior <italic>Populus</italic> genotypes for growth in the southeastern US as well as selection of optimal genotypes based on site conditions. In terms of physiological parameters that predict growth, parameters were site specific due to the significant impacts of resource availability and the need for physiological adjustments to perform optimally at each site. Likewise, physiological and leaf N parameters exhibited the highest trait plasticity with genotypes changing rank in these traits while height growth remained consistent in genotype rankings. Therefore, the best <italic>Populus</italic> genotypes in terms of growth were able to adjust their physiology and N uptake to match site conditions and optimally grow under divergent site conditions. LMA and isotope ratios (&#x03B4;<sup>13</sup>C and &#x03B4;<sup>15</sup>N) exhibited the least plasticity across sites suggesting that, like overall height growth, they represent cumulative functioning with genotype rankings remaining consistent even as small-scale alterations in leaf functioning are made. Due to their low site plasticity, LMA and leaf isotopes may be broadly useful in categorizing genotypes in terms of their intrinsic physiology in terms of water use efficiency and nutrient uptake in comparison with one another. We also found that coordination of some leaf traits was maintained across sites and taxa, specifically relationships between leaf N (and &#x03B4;<sup>15</sup>N) and LMA, gas exchange and carbon isotope metrics for water use efficiency, stomatal conductance and PNUE. Other relationships among leaf traits differed by site suggesting environmental controls on these relationships. Overall, these data can broaden our understanding of coordination among leaf traits and their relationship with tree growth as well as select optimal genotypes of <italic>Populus</italic> for bioenergy feedstock production across environmental site conditions.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec sec-type="data-availability" id="sec16">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found at: <ext-link xlink:href="https://scholarsjunction.msstate.edu/fwrc-publications/13/" ext-link-type="uri">https://scholarsjunction.msstate.edu/fwrc-publications/13/</ext-link>.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="author-contributions" id="sec17">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>HR: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Supervision, Writing &#x2013; original draft. JP: Investigation, Methodology, Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing. JW: Investigation, Methodology, Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="funding-information" id="sec18">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This research was supported by grants from the National Institute of Food and Agriculture, U.S. Department of Agriculture (2018&#x2013;68005-27636 and McIntire-Stennis project MISZ-067050), and the United States Department of Energy (DE-EE0009280).</p>
</sec>
<ack>
<p>The authors thank R. Rousseau, C. James, M. Murphy, T. Bowling, W. Booth, and T. Y. Kyaw for site logistics and fieldwork assistance. This publication is a contribution of the Forest and Wildlife Research Center, Mississippi State University.</p>
</ack>
<sec sec-type="COI-statement" id="sec19">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
<p>The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="disclaimer" id="sec20">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="supplementary-material" id="sec21">
<title>Supplementary material</title>
<p>The Supplementary material for this article can be found online at: <ext-link xlink:href="https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/ffgc.2024.1467381/full#supplementary-material" ext-link-type="uri">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/ffgc.2024.1467381/full#supplementary-material</ext-link></p>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Table_1.docx" id="SM1" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="ref1"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Alvarez</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cortizo</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gyenge</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Yield stability and phenotypic plasticity of <italic>Populus</italic> spp. clones growing in environmental gradients: I-yield stability under field conditions</article-title>. <source>For. Ecol. Manag.</source> <volume>463</volume>:<fpage>117995</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foreco.2020.117995</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref2"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>An</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lu</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mansfield</surname> <given-names>S. D.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Opportunities and barriers for biofuel and bioenergy production from poplar</article-title>. <source>GCB Bioenergy</source> <volume>13</volume>, <fpage>905</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>913</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/gcbb.12829</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref3"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Azar</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Johansson</surname> <given-names>D. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mattsson</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Meeting global temperature targets&#x2014;the role of bioenergy with carbon capture and storage</article-title>. <source>Environ. Res. Lett.</source> <volume>8</volume>:<fpage>034004</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1088/1748-9326/8/3/034004</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref4"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Blackmer</surname> <given-names>A. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bremner</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1977</year>). <article-title>Nitrogen isotope discrimination in denitrification of nitrate in soils</article-title>. <source>Soil Biol. Biochem.</source> <volume>9</volume>, <fpage>73</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>77</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0038-0717(77)90040-2</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref5"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bogeat-Triboulot</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bur&#x00E9;</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gerardin</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chuste</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Le Thiec</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hummel</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Additive effects of high growth rate and low transpiration rate drive differences in whole plant transpiration efficiency among black poplar genotypes</article-title>. <source>Environ. Exp. Bot.</source> <volume>166</volume>:<fpage>21</fpage>:<fpage>103784</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.envexpbot.2019.05.021</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref6"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Broeckx</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fichot</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Verlinden</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ceulemans</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Seasonal variations in photosynthesis, intrinsic water-use efficiency and stable isotope composition of poplar leaves in a short-rotation plantation</article-title>. <source>Tree Physiol.</source> <volume>34</volume>, <fpage>701</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>715</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/treephys/tpu057</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25074859</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref7"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Brueck</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Effects of nitrogen supply on water-use efficiency of higher plants</article-title>. <source>J. Plant Nutr.</source> <volume>171</volume>, <fpage>210</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>219</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/jpln.200700080</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref8"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bai</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Han</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Comparing physiological responses of two dominant grass species to nitrogen addition in Xilin River basin of China</article-title>. <source>Environ. Exp. Bot.</source> <volume>53</volume>, <fpage>65</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>75</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.envexpbot.2004.03.002</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref9"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cooke</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Martin</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Davis</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Short-term physiological and developmental responses to nitrogen availability in hybrid poplar</article-title>. <source>New Phytol.</source> <volume>167</volume>, <fpage>41</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>52</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01435.x</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15948828</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref10"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Craine</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Brookshire</surname> <given-names>E. N. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cramer</surname> <given-names>M. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hasselquist</surname> <given-names>N. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Koba</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Marin-Spiotta</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Ecological interpretations of nitrogen isotope ratios of terrestrial plants and soils</article-title>. <source>Plant Soil</source> <volume>396</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>26</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11104-015-2542-1</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref11"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Craine</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Elmore</surname> <given-names>A. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Aidar</surname> <given-names>M. P. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bustamante</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dawson</surname> <given-names>T. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hobbie</surname> <given-names>E. A.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Global patterns of foliar nitrogen isotopes and their relationships with climate, mycorrhizal fungi, foliar nutrient concentrations, and nitrogen availability</article-title>. <source>New Phytol.</source> <volume>183</volume>, <fpage>980</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>992</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.02917.x</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19563444</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref12"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cronk</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Plant eco-devo: the potential of poplar as a model organism</article-title>. <source>New Phytol.</source> <volume>166</volume>, <fpage>39</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>48</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01369.x</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref13"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Delucia</surname> <given-names>E. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schlesinger</surname> <given-names>W. H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1991</year>). <article-title>Resource-use efficiency and drought tolerance in adjacent Great Basin and Sierran plants</article-title>. <source>Ecology</source> <volume>72</volume>, <fpage>51</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>58</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2307/1938901</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref14"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Farquhar</surname> <given-names>G. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ehleringer</surname> <given-names>J. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hubick</surname> <given-names>K. T.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1989</year>). <article-title>Carbon isotope discrimination and photosynthesis</article-title>. <source>Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol.</source> <volume>40</volume>, <fpage>503</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>537</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1146/annurev.pp.40.060189.002443</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref15"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Field</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Merino</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mooney</surname> <given-names>H. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1983</year>). <article-title>Compromises between water-use efficiency and nitrogen-use efficiency in five species of California evergreens</article-title>. <source>Oecologia</source> <volume>60</volume>, <fpage>384</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>389</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/BF00376856</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28310700</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref16"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Garavillon-Tournayre</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gousset-Dupont</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gautier</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Benoit</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Conchon</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Souchal</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Integrated drought responses of black poplar: how important is phenotypic plasticity?</article-title> <source>Physiol. Plant</source> <volume>163</volume>, <fpage>30</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>44</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/ppl.12646</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28940533</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref17"><citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Guerra</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gainza-Cort&#x00E9;s</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>P&#x00E9;rez-Castro</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zamudio</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). &#x201C;<article-title>Phytoremediation of heavy metals using poplars (<italic>Populus</italic> spp.): a glimpse of the plant responses to copper, cadmium and zinc stress</article-title>&#x201D; in <source>Handbook of Phytoremediation</source>. ed. <person-group person-group-type="editor"><name><surname>Golubev</surname> <given-names>I. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<publisher-loc>New York, NY</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Nova Science</publisher-name>), <fpage>387</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>413</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref18"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Guet</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fabbrini</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fichot</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sabatti</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bastien</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Brignolas</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Genetic variation for leaf morphology, leaf structure and leaf carbon isotope discrimination in European populations of black poplar (<italic>Populus nigra</italic> L.)</article-title>. <source>Tree Physiol.</source> <volume>35</volume>, <fpage>850</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>863</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/treephys/tpv056</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26224105</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref19"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Han</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Noh</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Han</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Enhanced drought and salt tolerance by expression of AtGSK1 gene in poplar</article-title>. <source>Plant Biotechnol. Rep.</source> <volume>7</volume>, <fpage>39</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>47</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11816-012-0258-8</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref20"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hikosaka</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hanba</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hirose</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Terashima</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1998</year>). <article-title>Photosynthetic nitrogen-use efficiency in leaves of woody and herbaceous species</article-title>. <source>Funct. Ecol.</source> <volume>12</volume>, <fpage>896</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>905</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1046/j.1365-2435.1998.00272.x</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref21"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Himes</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Emerson</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>McClung</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Renninger</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rosenstiel</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Stanton</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Leaf traits indicative of drought resistance in hybrid poplar</article-title>. <source>Agric. Water Manag.</source> <volume>246</volume>:<fpage>106676</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106676</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref22"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>King</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ceulemans</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Albaugh</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dillen</surname> <given-names>S. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Domec</surname> <given-names>J. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fichot</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>The challenge of lignocellulosic bioenergy in a water-limited world</article-title>. <source>Bioscience</source> <volume>63</volume>, <fpage>102</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>117</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1525/bio.2013.63.2.6</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref23"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lemaire</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Blackman</surname> <given-names>C. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cochard</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Menezes-Silva</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Torres-Ruiz</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Herbette</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Acclimation of hydraulic and morphological traits to water deficit delays hydraulic failure during simulated drought in poplar</article-title>. <source>Tree Physiol.</source> <volume>41</volume>, <fpage>2008</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2021</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/treephys/tpab086</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34259313</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref24"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Marron</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bastien</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sabatti</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Taylor</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ceulemans</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Plasticity of growth and sylleptic branchiness in two poplar families grown at three sites across Europe</article-title>. <source>Tree Physiol.</source> <volume>26</volume>, <fpage>935</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>946</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/treephys/26.7.935</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16585039</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref25"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Marron</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ceulemans</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Genetic variation of leaf traits related to productivity in a <italic>Populus deltoides</italic> &#x00D7; <italic>Populus nigra</italic> family can</article-title>. <source>J. For. Res.</source> <volume>36</volume>, <fpage>390</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>400</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1139/x05-245</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref26"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Marron</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dillen</surname> <given-names>S. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ceulemans</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Evaluation of leaf traits for indirect selection of high yielding poplar hybrids</article-title>. <source>Environ. Exp. Bot.</source> <volume>61</volume>, <fpage>103</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>116</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.envexpbot.2007.04.002</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref27"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Marron</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Villar</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dreyer</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Delay</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Boudouresque</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Petit</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Diversity of leaf traits related to productivity in 31 <italic>Populus deltoides</italic> &#x00D7; <italic>Populus nigra</italic> clones</article-title>. <source>Tree Physiol.</source> <volume>25</volume>, <fpage>425</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>435</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/treephys/25.4.425</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15687091</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref28"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Miller</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Growth variation among hybrid poplar varieties in Michigan, USA and the implications for commercial biomass production</article-title>. <source>Bioenergy Res.</source> <volume>11</volume>, <fpage>816</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>825</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s12155-018-9937-9</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref29"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Monclus</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dreyer</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Delmotte</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Villar</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Delay</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Boudouresque</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Productivity, leaf traits and carbon isotope discrimination in 29 <italic>Populus deltoides</italic> &#x00D7; <italic>P. nigra</italic> clones</article-title>. <source>New Phytol.</source> <volume>167</volume>, <fpage>53</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>62</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01407.x</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref30"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Monclus</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dreyer</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Villar</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Delmotte</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Delay</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Petit</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Impact of drought on productivity and water use efficiency in 29 genotypes of <italic>Populus deltoides</italic> x <italic>Populus nigra</italic></article-title>. <source>New Phytol.</source> <volume>169</volume>, <fpage>765</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>777</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01630.x</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref31"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Monclus</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Villar</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Barbaroux</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bastien</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fichot</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Delmotte</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Productivity, water-use efficiency and tolerance to moderate water deficit correlate in 33 poplar genotypes from a <italic>Populus deltoides</italic> x <italic>Populus trichocarpa</italic> F1 progeny</article-title>. <source>Tree Physiol.</source> <volume>29</volume>, <fpage>1329</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1339</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/treephys/tpp075</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19773340</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref32"><citation citation-type="other"><person-group person-group-type="author"><collab id="coll1">Natural Resources Conservation Service</collab></person-group> (<year>2023</year>). United states department of agriculture. Web Soil Survey. Available at: (<ext-link xlink:href="https://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/" ext-link-type="uri">https://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/</ext-link>).</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref33"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Nelson</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Berguson</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mcmahon</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cai</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Buchman</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Growth performance and stability of hybrid poplar clones in simultaneous tests on six sites</article-title>. <source>Biomass Bioenergy</source> <volume>118</volume>, <fpage>115</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>125</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.biombioe.2018.08.007</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref34"><citation citation-type="other"><person-group person-group-type="author"><collab id="coll2">NOAA</collab></person-group> (<year>2023</year>). U.S. climate normals: national centers for environmental information. Available: (<ext-link xlink:href="https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/products/land-based-station/us-climate-normals" ext-link-type="uri">https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/products/land-based-station/us-climate-normals</ext-link>).</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref35"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ostrom</surname> <given-names>N. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Knoke</surname> <given-names>K. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hedin</surname> <given-names>L. O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Robertson</surname> <given-names>G. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Smucker</surname> <given-names>A. J. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1998</year>). <article-title>Temporal trends in nitrogen isotope values of nitrate leaching from an agricultural soil</article-title>. <source>Chem. Geol.</source> <volume>146</volume>, <fpage>219</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>227</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0009-2541(98)00012-6</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref36"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Pellis</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Laureysens</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ceulemans</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>Growth and production of a short rotation coppice culture of poplar I. Clonal differences in leaf characteristics in relation to biomass production</article-title>. <source>Biomass Bioenergy</source> <volume>27</volume>, <fpage>9</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>19</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.biombioe.2003.11.001</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref37"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Plavcov&#x00E1;</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hacke</surname> <given-names>U.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Phenotypic and developmental plasticity of xylem in hybrid poplar saplings subjected to experimental drought, nitrogen fertilization, and shading</article-title>. <source>J. Exp. Bot.</source> <volume>63</volume>, <fpage>6481</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>6491</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jxb/ers303</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23095999</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref38"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Pliura</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mackay</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bousquet</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Genotypic variation in wood density and growth traits of poplar hybrids at four clonal trials</article-title>. <source>For. Ecol. Manag.</source> <volume>238</volume>, <fpage>92</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>106</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foreco.2006.09.082</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref39"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Polle</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Janz</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Teichmann</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lipka</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Poplar genetic engineering: promoting desirable wood characteristics and pest resistance</article-title>. <source>Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.</source> <volume>97</volume>, <fpage>5669</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>5679</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00253-013-4940-8</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23681587</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref40"><citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><collab id="coll3">R Core Team</collab></person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <source>R: a language and environment for statistical computing</source>. <publisher-loc>Vienna, Austria</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>R Foundation for Statistical Computing</publisher-name>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref41"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Reich</surname> <given-names>P. B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>The world-wide &#x2018;fast&#x2013;slow&#x2019; plant economics spectrum: a traits manifesto</article-title>. <source>J. Ecol.</source> <volume>102</volume>, <fpage>275</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>301</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/1365-2745.12211</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref42"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Renninger</surname> <given-names>H. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pitts</surname> <given-names>J. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rousseau</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Comparisons of biomass, water use efficiency and water use strategies across five genomic groups of <italic>Populus</italic> and its hybrids</article-title>. <source>Glob. Change Biol. Bioenergy.</source> <volume>15</volume>, <fpage>99</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>112</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/gcbb.13014</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref43"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Renninger</surname> <given-names>H. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Stewart</surname> <given-names>L. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Freeman</surname> <given-names>J. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rousseau</surname> <given-names>R. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021a</year>). <article-title>Physiological functioning and productivity in eastern cottonwood and hybrid poplars on contrasting sites in the southeastern US</article-title>. <source>Bioenergy Res.</source> <volume>15</volume>, <fpage>1057</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1070</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s12155-021-10377-y</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref44"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Renninger</surname> <given-names>H. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Stewart</surname> <given-names>L. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rousseau</surname> <given-names>R. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021b</year>). <article-title>Water use, efficiency, and stomatal sensitivity in eastern cottonwood and hybrid poplar varietals on contrasting sites in the southeastern U.S. Frontiers in forests and global</article-title>. <source>Change</source> <volume>4</volume>:<fpage>704799</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/ffgc.2021.704799</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref45"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ridge</surname> <given-names>C. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hinckley</surname> <given-names>T. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Stettler</surname> <given-names>R. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Van Volkenburgh</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1986</year>). <article-title>Leaf growth characteristics of fast-growing poplar hybrids <italic>Populus trichocarpa</italic> &#x00D7; <italic>P. deltoides</italic></article-title>. <source>Tree Physiol.</source> <volume>1</volume>, <fpage>209</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>216</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/treephys/1.2.209</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">14975897</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref46"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Robinson</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mills</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Petit</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fung</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Green</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Clothier</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2000</year>). <article-title>Natural and induced cadmium-accumulation in poplar and willow: implications for phytoremediation</article-title>. <source>Plant Soil</source> <volume>227</volume>, <fpage>301</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>306</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1023/A:1026515007319</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref47"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>R&#x00F6;nnberg-W&#x00E4;stljung</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Adler</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Karacic</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liepins</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Richards</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ingvarsson</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Phenotypic plasticity in <italic>Populus trichocarpa</italic> clones across environments in the Nordic&#x2013;Baltic region</article-title>. <source>Scand. J. For. Res.</source> <volume>37</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>5</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/02827581.2022.2039279</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref48"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sage</surname> <given-names>R. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pearcy</surname> <given-names>R. W.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1987</year>). <article-title>The nitrogen use efficiency of C<sub>3</sub> and C<sub>4</sub> plants: II. Leaf nitrogen effects on the gas exchange characteristics of <italic>Chenopodium album</italic> (L.) and <italic>Amaranthus retroflexus</italic> (L.)</article-title>. <source>Plant Physiol.</source> <volume>84</volume>, <fpage>959</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>963</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1104/pp.84.3.959</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16665551</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref50"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Soolanayakanahally</surname> <given-names>R. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Guy</surname> <given-names>R. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Silim</surname> <given-names>S. N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Drewes</surname> <given-names>E. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schroeder</surname> <given-names>W. R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Enhanced assimilation rate and water use efficiency with latitude through increased photosynthetic capacity and internal conductance in balsam poplar (<italic>Populus balsamifera</italic> L.)</article-title>. <source>Plant Cell Environ.</source> <volume>32</volume>, <fpage>1821</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1832</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.02042.x</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19712064</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref51"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Spinelli</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hartsough</surname> <given-names>B. R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Harvesting SRF poplar for pulpwood: experience in the Pacific northwest</article-title>. <source>Biomass Bioenergy</source> <volume>30</volume>, <fpage>439</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>445</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.biombioe.2005.11.021</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref52"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Stanton</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Eaton</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Johnson</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rice</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schuette</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Moser</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>Hybrid poplar in the Pacific northwest: the effects of market-driven management</article-title>. <source>J. For.</source> <volume>100</volume>, <fpage>28</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>33</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jof/100.4.28</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref53"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Thakur</surname> <given-names>A. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kumar</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Parmar</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shandil</surname> <given-names>R. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Aggarwal</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gaur</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Achievements and prospects of genetic engineering in poplar: a review</article-title>. <source>New For.</source> <volume>52</volume>, <fpage>889</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>920</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11056-021-09836-3</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref54"><citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><collab id="coll4">U.S. Department of Energy</collab></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <source>2016 billion-ton report: Advancing domestic resources for a thriving bioeconomy. Volume 1: Economic availability of feedstocks</source>. <publisher-loc>Oak Ridge, TN, USA</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Oak Ridge National Laboratory</publisher-name>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref55"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Vigar</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Smith</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cohen</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dewoody</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Trewin</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Steenackers</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Adaptive mechanisms and genomic plasticity for drought tolerance identified in European black poplar (<italic>Populus nigra</italic> L.)</article-title>. <source>Tree Physiol.</source> <volume>36</volume>, <fpage>909</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>928</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/treephys/tpw017</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27174702</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref56"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Violle</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Navas</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vile</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kazakou</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fortunel</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hummel</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Let the concept of trait be functional!</article-title> <source>Oikos</source> <volume>116</volume>, <fpage>882</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>892</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.0030-1299.2007.15559.x</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref57"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Voltas</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Serrano</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hern&#x00E1;ndez</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pem&#x00E1;n</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Carbon isotope discrimination, gas exchange and stem growth of four Euramerican hybrid poplars under different watering regimes</article-title>. <source>New For.</source> <volume>31</volume>, <fpage>435</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>451</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11056-005-0879-7</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref58"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Vose</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Swank</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Harvey</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Clinton</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sobek</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2000</year>). <article-title>Leaf water relations and sapflow in eastern cottonwood (<italic>Populus deltoides</italic> Bartr.) trees planted for phytoremediation of a groundwater pollutant</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Phytoremediation</source> <volume>2</volume>, <fpage>53</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>73</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/15226510008500030</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref59"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Willis</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Renninger</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schnake</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Alexander</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Xerophytic hardwood retention promotes competition over facilitation in longleaf pine woodlands in the absence of fire</article-title>. <source>For. Ecol. Manag.</source> <volume>531</volume>:<fpage>120792</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foreco.2023.120792</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref60"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wright</surname> <given-names>I. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Reich</surname> <given-names>P. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Westoby</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ackerly</surname> <given-names>D. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Baruch</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bongers</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>The worldwide leaf economics spectrum</article-title>. <source>Nature</source> <volume>428</volume>, <fpage>821</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>827</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nature02403</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref61"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Stettler</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1998</year>). <article-title>Quantitative genetics of growth and development in <italic>Populus</italic>. III. Phenotypic plasticity of crown structure and function</article-title>. <source>Heredity</source> <volume>81</volume>, <fpage>299</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>310</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1046/j.1365-2540.1998.00397.x</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref62"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Long</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Feng</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sai</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chirkova</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>GABA signalling modulates stomatal opening to enhance plant water use efficiency and drought resilience</article-title>. <source>Nat. Commun.</source> <volume>12</volume>:<fpage>1952</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41467-021-21694-3</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref63"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zang</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>Population differences in physiological and morphological adaptations of <italic>Populus davidiana</italic> seedlings in response to progressive drought stress</article-title>. <source>Plant Sci.</source> <volume>166</volume>, <fpage>791</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>797</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.plantsci.2003.11.016</pub-id></citation></ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>