<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xml:lang="EN" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. For. Glob. Change</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Forests and Global Change</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. For. Glob. Change</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">2624-893X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/ffgc.2024.1393772</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Forests and Global Change</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Short-term effects of understory removal on understory diversity and biomass of temperate forests in northeast China</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Yanyan</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2632632/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/software/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/visualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Yuan</surname> <given-names>Quan</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2712385/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Deng</surname> <given-names>Jiaojiao</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2728586/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>Li</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/project-administration/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>Dapao</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1663132/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/project-administration/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>Wangming</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001"><sup>&#x0002A;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/451866/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Qing-Wei</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c002"><sup>&#x0002A;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1428754/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/funding-acquisition/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1"><sup>1</sup><institution>CAS Key Laboratory of Forest Ecology and Silviculture, Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences</institution>, <addr-line>Shenyang</addr-line>, <country>China</country></aff>
<aff id="aff2"><sup>2</sup><institution>Jilin Changbai Mountain West Slope National Research Station of Forest Ecosystem</institution>, <addr-line>Shenyang</addr-line>, <country>China</country></aff>
<aff id="aff3"><sup>3</sup><institution>Yancheng Wetland and Natural World Heritage Conservation and Management Center</institution>, <addr-line>Yancheng</addr-line>, <country>China</country></aff>
<aff id="aff4"><sup>4</sup><institution>School of Life Sciences, Anqing Normal University</institution>, <addr-line>Anqing</addr-line>, <country>China</country></aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by"><p>Edited by: Ana Cristina Gon&#x000E7;alves, University of Evora, Portugal</p></fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by"><p>Reviewed by: Xueyong Pang, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), China</p>
<p>Sumit Chakravarty, Uttar Banga Krishi Viswavidyalaya, India</p>
<p>Zuoqiang Yuan, Northwestern Polytechnical University, China</p></fn>
<corresp id="c001">&#x0002A;Correspondence: Wangming Zhou <email>zhouwangming&#x00040;126.com</email></corresp>
<corresp id="c002">Qing-Wei Wang <email>wangqingwei&#x00040;iae.ac.cn</email></corresp>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>17</day>
<month>05</month>
<year>2024</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2024</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>7</volume>
<elocation-id>1393772</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>29</day>
<month>02</month>
<year>2024</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>19</day>
<month>04</month>
<year>2024</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x000A9; 2024 Zhang, Yuan, Deng, Zhou, Yu, Zhou and Wang.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2024</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Zhang, Yuan, Deng, Zhou, Yu, Zhou and Wang</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p></license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<sec>
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Understory removal is a traditional practice in forest management to reduce fire risk and promote seedling regeneration. However, its effect on understory diversity, biomass and soil nutrients in temperate forest ecosystems is less known, which limits our assessment of the effectiveness of understory vegetation management.</p></sec>
<sec>
<title>Methods</title>
<p>We quantified the composition of the understory species, their diversity, and the biomass of the understory and factors driving changes in these parameters in primary mixed broad-leaved <italic>Pinus koraiensis</italic> forest (BKF), secondary <italic>Betula platyphylla</italic> forest (BF), and <italic>Larix gmelinii</italic> plantation (LF) in northeast China after a 5-year understory removal.</p></sec>
<sec>
<title>Results</title>
<p>After understory removal, the number of shrub and herb species in BKF and LF decreased, while the number of shrub species in BF increased significantly and that of herb species decreased; the species with strong light preference, <italic>Equisetum hyemale, Impatiens noli-tangere</italic>, and <italic>Filipendula Palmata</italic>, were dominant in the herb layer of the three forest types; Shannon&#x02013;Wiener diversity, Pielou evenness, and Simpson diversity of the herb layer in LF increased significantly (<italic>P</italic> &#x0003C; 0.05), while those of the shrub and herb layers in BF and LF showed no significant changes (<italic>P</italic> &#x0003E; 0.05). The total understory biomass of understory of BKF and LF decreased by 0.94 t&#x000B7;hm<sup>&#x02212;2</sup> and 1.32 t&#x000B7;hm<sup>&#x02212;2</sup>, respectively, while that of BF increased by 1.31 t&#x000B7;hm<sup>&#x02212;2</sup>; soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1"><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>NH</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>4</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x0002B;</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:math></inline-formula>-N and total phosphorus (TP) were the key factors regulating understory vegetation diversity and biomass, respectively.</p></sec>
<sec>
<title>Conclusion</title>
<p>These results suggest that understory removal is a beneficial management strategy for increasing shrub biomass and diversity in secondary forests, while it should be avoided in primary forests and plantations to prevent the reduction of understory plant diversity and soil nutrient loss.</p></sec></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>understory removal</kwd>
<kwd>understory vegetation restoration</kwd>
<kwd>biomass</kwd>
<kwd>diversity</kwd>
<kwd>soil properties</kwd>
<kwd>typical temperate forests</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<contract-num rid="cn001">NSFC (Grant No. 41877549)</contract-num>
<contract-num rid="cn001">NEYSF (Grant No. 32122059)</contract-num>
<contract-sponsor id="cn001">Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences<named-content content-type="fundref-id">10.13039/501100015922</named-content></contract-sponsor>
<counts>
<fig-count count="5"/>
<table-count count="2"/>
<equation-count count="10"/>
<ref-count count="60"/>
<page-count count="11"/>
<word-count count="7960"/>
</counts>
<custom-meta-wrap>
<custom-meta>
<meta-name>section-at-acceptance</meta-name>
<meta-value>Forest Management</meta-value>
</custom-meta>
</custom-meta-wrap>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec sec-type="intro" id="s1">
<title>1 Introduction</title>
<p>Understory vegetation accounts for a large proportion of the species diversity of forest ecosystems (Deng et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">2023a</xref>) and is very crucial to maintaining community stability and regulating the structure and function of the forest ecosystem (Nilsson and Wardle, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">2005</xref>; Bartels and Chen, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">2013</xref>; Rodriguez-Rodriguez et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">2023</xref>). The tree layer dominates the consumption of space, light (Bartels and Chen, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">2010</xref>), water, and soil nutrients (Rybar et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">2023</xref>) and has strong space heterogeneity (Yu et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">2022</xref>), which strongly influences the composition and distribution of understory vegetation (Kumar et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">2018</xref>). Nevertheless, understory vegetation has a detrimental impact on sharing environmental resources (De Lombaerde et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">2020</xref>) or poses an interference competition against target overstory trees (Balandier et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">2022</xref>) when it covers more forest land area. Moreover, overstory management, mainly thinning and pruning practices, can directly and indirectly affect the formation of understory vegetation (Wang et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">2021</xref>). However, the process of forest management, such as understory removal, seldom attracts people&#x00027;s attention. Therefore, it is necessary to explore the ecological effects of understory removal, so as to implement high-quality forest ecosystem management based on improving forest complexity and versatility (Wang and Yu, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">2023</xref>).</p>
<p>Understory removal is a sustainable forest management practice followed worldwide for plantations and natural forests (Povak et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">2008</xref>) to decrease fire hazards (Jimenez et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">2015</xref>) and promote the growth of target trees (Yildiz et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">2011</xref>). Therefore, understory removal has stimulated much exploration about its effectiveness, producing some controversial results (Deng et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">2023a</xref>). Understory removal can alter the characteristics of the understory environment, for example, soil water and nutrient availability (Zhao et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B55">2011</xref>; Deng et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">2023b</xref>), microbial community (Deng et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">2023b</xref>) and light conditions (Kume et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">2003</xref>), as well as limiting the build-up of litter (Navarro et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">2010</xref>). Although previous studies have confirmed that, on the one hand, understory removal increases the understory diversity (Premer et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">2016</xref>) and biomass by decreasing belowground competition and enhancing soil nutrients (Canteiro et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">2011</xref>; Giuggiola et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">2018</xref>), on the other hand, understory removal predominantly results in an increased seedling performance (De Lombaerde et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">2021</xref>) and biomass. This contrasting finding is because it not only elicits significant increases in photosynthetic characteristics (Kume et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">2003</xref>) but also reduces drought stress, resulting in an increased allocation of carbon into below-ground organs (Vandenberghe et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">2006</xref>). Moreover, other researchers have argued that understory removal can prevent nutrient output and limit the build-up of litter and light distribution (Motsinger et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">2010</xref>), thereby limiting plant recruitment (Premer et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">2016</xref>) and ultimately leading to a decrease in understory biomass (Pires and Xavier, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">2010</xref>). These contradictory reports on the effects of understory management on the understory characteristic may be attributed to differences in forest stand and types (Premer et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">2016</xref>) and ages (Yildiz et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">2011</xref>; Zhou et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B60">2018b</xref>), the number (Dupuy and Chazdon, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">2008</xref>) and times (De Lombaerde et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">2021</xref>) of understory management, and vegetation types (Copeland et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">2019</xref>). Therefore, it is imperative to understand how the understory community changes following understory removal, paying particular attention to the dynamic relationship between its characteristics (e.g., diversity and biomass) and soil properties (Ares et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">2010</xref>; MacDonald et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">2015</xref>), which will aid in a comprehensive assessment of the effectiveness of understory removal management.</p>
<p>The Changbai Mountains forest area is a typical temperate forest ecosystem and also is the largest forest area in Northeast China (Dai et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">2011</xref>). Before the 1980s, the forest area was mainly used for timber production and therefore had a large area of logging. Following the complete implementation of the natural forest protection project in 2015, all commercial logging of natural forests in the forest area has ceased entirely (Qi et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">2018</xref>). At present, the forest area is characterized by a small amount of undisturbed original broad-leaved Korean pine forest, a large number of <italic>Betula platyphylla</italic> secondary forests disturbed by logging, and some <italic>Larix gmelinii</italic> artificial forests replanted on clear-cutting land. Currently, the main forest management strategy is understory removal (Qi et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">2018</xref>). Previous studies mainly focused on the effects of understory management on soil microorganisms (Deng et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">2023b</xref>) and the effects of thinning on the characteristics of understory vegetation (Wang et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">2021</xref>) in Changbai Mountains, which revealed the mechanism of the influence of vegetation on forest soil ecological process to a certain extent. However, it is unclear about the restoration characteristics of understory vegetation and their influencing factors in typical forests in Northeast China after understory removal.</p>
<p>In this study, our goal was to assess the effectiveness of understory removal management by determining how it affected understory plant community composition, diversity and biomass in a short-term (5 years) understory manipulation experiment in temperate forests (original broad-leaved Korean pine forest, <italic>B. platyphylla</italic> secondary forest, and <italic>L. gmelinii</italic> artificial forest). We examined the change in plant community and how it correlates with its driving soil contents and looked for indexes in plant community measures associated with management goals, such as understory plant abundance, height, and coverage. We particularly addressed the following questions: (1) What are the changes in understory vegetation composition in three typical stands before and after understory management? Considering that understory species have different demands for light and soil contents, we hypothesized that heliophile plants in understory removal treatments dominated the understory layer of the three stands; (2) After the short-term management, what are the characteristics of understory vegetation community in different stands and its driving factors? The removal of denser understory vegetation and under open understory conditions is expected to increase the biomass and diversity in the shrub layer faster than in the herb layer. Our findings will not only support forest managers&#x00027; decision-making but also help to assess understory removal under which stand is the most justified and most conducive to understory regeneration.</p></sec>
<sec sec-type="materials and methods" id="s2">
<title>2 Materials and methods</title>
<sec>
<title>2.1 Study area</title>
<p>This study was conducted in Fusong County, Jilin Province in the northwest of Changbai Mountains (127&#x000B0;29&#x02032; to 128&#x000B0;02&#x02032;E; 42&#x000B0;20&#x02032;to 42&#x000B0;40&#x02032;N; 600 to 800 m A. S. L., <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1</xref>). It is characterized by north temperate continental climate with prolonged and severe winters and hot and humid summer: long-term average annual precipitation recorded at the Baihe weather station ranged from 800 to 1,040 mm and the average annual temperature is 4.5&#x02013;7.8&#x000B0;C. The forests are characterized by the original broad-leaved Korean pine forest and natural secondary forests regenerated after devastation with complex canopy, which is dominated by <italic>Pinus koraiensis, B. platyphylla, L. gmelinii</italic>, and <italic>Acer pictum</italic>. The soil is characterized as a mountain dark brown forest soil, and its average depth is about 50 cm (Deng et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">2023b</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F1" position="float">
<label>Figure 1</label>
<caption><p>The location of the study area.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="ffgc-07-1393772-g0001.tif"/>
</fig></sec>
<sec>
<title>2.2 Experimental design</title>
<p>In the summer of 2015, two types, namely, understory removal plot (UR) and understory left intact plot (CK), of monitoring large plots with three repetitions (50 m &#x000D7; 50 m) were set up in the mixed broad-leaved <italic>P. koraiensis</italic> (BKF), <italic>B. platyphylla</italic> (BF), and <italic>L. gmelinii</italic> (LF) forests, respectively, and according to the forest inventory data from the local forestry bureau, the ages of the three stands were 195, 42, and 22 years, respectively. To minimize the edge effects, the large plots of each plot were replicated at least 20 m away from each other. The understory removal experiment in each stand was performed by a kind of machine that was used to cut the above-ground part of the understory shrubs, vines, and tall herbs that hinder the growth of seedlings, saplings, and trees. As a result, the plant residues were evenly stacked in the forests with some spacing. In July 2020, we randomly set up three subplots and their control plots with an area of 20 m &#x000D7; 20 m with similar abiotic conditions of topography, geology, soil, and climate in each large plot. The characteristics of each stand with two kinds of understory treatments are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T1">
<label>Table 1</label>
<caption><p>Characteristics of the three stands with understory left intact (CK) and removal (UR).</p></caption>
<table frame="box" rules="all">
<thead>
<tr style="background-color:#919498;color:#ffffff">
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Stand type</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Forest management</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Number of trees</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Mean tree DBH/cm</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Tree density/(tree&#x000B7;hm<sup>&#x02212;2</sup>)</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Dominant trees</bold></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">BKF</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">CK</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">8.00 &#x000B1; 0.58</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">18.88 &#x000B1; 4.34</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">850.00 &#x000B1; 170.17</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Pinus koraiensis, Acer pictum, Acer mandshuricum</italic></td>
</tr>
 <tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left">UR</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">8.33 &#x000B1; 1.20</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">19.90 &#x000B1; 3.72</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">808.33 &#x000B1; 164.15</td>
<td/>
</tr> <tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">BF</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">CK</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">8.00 &#x000B1; 1.53</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">18.11 &#x000B1; 1.23</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1,083.33 &#x000B1; 124.44</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Betula platyphylla, Larix gmelinii</italic></td>
</tr>
 <tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left">UR</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">8.00 &#x000B1; 1.00</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">17.78 &#x000B1; 0.90</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">983.33 &#x000B1; 65.09</td>
<td/>
</tr> <tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">LF</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">CK</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">8.67 &#x000B1; 1.45</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">22.89 &#x000B1; 0.77a</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">741.67 &#x000B1; 50.69</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Larix gmelinii, Pinus koraiensis</italic></td>
</tr>
 <tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left">UR</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">7.67 &#x000B1; 0.33</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">19.65 &#x000B1; 0.86b</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">841.67 &#x000B1; 58.33</td>
<td/>
</tr></tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p>BKF, mixed broad-leaved Pinus koraiensis forest; BF, Betula platyphylla forest; LF, Larix gmelinii forest. Mean &#x000B1; SD; n = 3. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between different understory managements in the same stands (P &#x0003C;0.05).</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap></sec>
<sec>
<title>2.3 Understory vegetation survey and measurement</title>
<sec>
<title>2.3.1 Diversity survey</title>
<p>In July 2020, we set up four 1 m &#x000D7; 1 m subplots for herbaceous species at the four corners of each management plot. We collected basic information on all herbaceous species including their names, abundance, height, coverage, and total coverage, and then harvested the whole plant for all the herbs in a 50 cm &#x000D7; 50 cm random sample square in a 1 m &#x000D7; 1 m subplots. Meanwhile, four 5 m &#x000D7; 5 m subplots were set up for recording species names, abundance, height, canopy width and basal diameter of all shrub plants.</p></sec>
<sec>
<title>2.3.2 Obtaining biomass</title>
<p>We took the herbaceous samples back to the laboratory and dried them in an oven at 85&#x000B0;C for 48 h to constant weight and weighed their dry weight. The indicators (height, ground diameter, east-west and north-south, and crown width) of each shrub were placed into the corresponding allometric growth equations for obtaining biomass (Fan et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">2011</xref>; He et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">2011</xref>; Wang et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">2016</xref>). The herb and shrub biomass per unit area were calculated based on coverage, the dry weight of the herbaceous plants, shrub biomass in each subplot, and the area of the entire subplot. The coverage of the plant refers to the ratio of the vertical projection area of above the ground part of the plant to the ground, and it was estimated in the field research by a visual method.</p></sec></sec>
<sec>
<title>2.4 Soil sampling and analysis</title>
<p>Five soil cores (0&#x02013;20 cm depth) of each subplot were collected randomly with an auger after removing the litter layer in July 2020 and were mixed with one composite sample. Soil samples of four plots from each treatment in each forest of each site were divided into two parts. One fresh part was dried and weighed to test its water content (SWC). The other part was air-dried for the determination of soil total carbon (TC), total nitrogen (TN), total phosphorus (TP), available phosphorus (AP), ammonium nitrogen (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2"><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>NH</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>4</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x0002B;</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:math></inline-formula>-N), and nitrate nitrogen (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3"><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:math></inline-formula>-N) content, as well as pH, resulting in a total of 24 soil samples.</p>
<p>Soil pH was determined using a pH meter (PHS-3C) in a 1:2.5 soil:water solution (weight/volume). Soil TC and TN contents were measured using a C/N analyzer (Elementar vario MACRO cube, German). Soil TP and AP contents were obtained by using a spectrophotometer (UV-9000S, China) with H<sub>2</sub><inline-formula><mml:math id="M4"><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>SO</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>4</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:math></inline-formula>HClO<sub>4</sub> digestion and 0.5 mol/L NaHCO<sub>3</sub> extraction, respectively. Soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5"><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>NH</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>4</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x0002B;</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:math></inline-formula>-N and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6"><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:math></inline-formula>-N contents were extracted by 1 mol/L potassium chloride solution and analyzed using dual-wavelength ultraviolet spectrophotometry.</p></sec>
<sec>
<title>2.5 Data analysis</title>
<sec>
<title>2.5.1 Importance value of understory vegetation</title>
<p>To quantify the status and dominance of understory plants in the community, we calculated their importance value (IV, <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="E1">Equation 1</xref>), which was defined as the average of its relative abundance (Ar, <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="E2">Equation 2</xref>), relative coverage (Cr, <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="E3">Equation 3</xref>), and relative frequency (Fr, <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="E4">Equation 4</xref>) based on the obtained data. These parameters were calculated as follows (Arbainsyah et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">2014</xref>):</p>
<disp-formula id="E1"><label>(1)</label><mml:math id="M7"><mml:mtable class="eqnarray" columnalign="left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>IV</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Ar</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&#x0002B;</mml:mo><mml:mtext>Cr</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&#x0002B;</mml:mo><mml:mtext>Fr</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>
<disp-formula id="E2"><label>(2)</label><mml:math id="M8"><mml:mtable columnalign='left'><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>Ar&#x02009;=&#x02009;number&#x02009;of&#x02009;individuals&#x02009;of&#x02009;a&#x02009;species/</mml:mtext></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>&#x02009;&#x02009;&#x02009;&#x02009;&#x02009;&#x02009;total&#x02009;number&#x02009;of&#x02009;individuals&#x02009;</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&#x000D7;</mml:mo><mml:mtext>100</mml:mtext></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>
<disp-formula id="E3"><label>(3)</label><mml:math id="M10"><mml:mtable class="eqnarray" columnalign="left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>Cr</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mtext>coverage&#x000A0;of&#x000A0;a&#x000A0;species</mml:mtext><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mtext>sum&#x000A0;coverage&#x000A0;of&#x000A0;all&#x000A0;species&#x000A0;</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&#x000D7;</mml:mo><mml:mn>100</mml:mn></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>
<disp-formula id="E4"><label>(4)</label><mml:math id="M11"><mml:mtable columnalign='left'><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>&#x02009;&#x02009;&#x02009;&#x02009;&#x02009;&#x02009;&#x02009;&#x02009;&#x02009;&#x02009;&#x02009;&#x02009;&#x02009;Fr&#x02009;=&#x02009;frequency&#x02009;of&#x02009;a&#x02009;species/</mml:mtext></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>sum&#x02009;of&#x02009;frequencies&#x02009;for&#x02009;all&#x02009;species&#x02009;</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&#x000D7;</mml:mo><mml:mtext>100</mml:mtext></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>
<p>where Ar is the relative abundance, Cr is the relative canopy, and Fr is the relative frequency.</p></sec>
<sec>
<title>2.5.2 Understory vegetation diversity</title>
<p>Margalef richness index (<italic>R</italic>, <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="E4">Equation 5</xref>), Shannon&#x02013;Wiener diversity index (<italic>H</italic>, <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="E6">Equation 6</xref>), Simpson dominance index (<italic>D</italic>, <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="E7">Equation 7</xref>), and Pielou evenness index (<italic>J</italic>, <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="E8">Equation 8</xref>) were selected for calculating understory vegetation diversity (Hill and Pielou, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">1970</xref>):</p>
<disp-formula id="E5"><label>(5)</label><mml:math id="M13"><mml:mtable class="eqnarray" columnalign="left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>
<disp-formula id="E6"><label>(6)</label><mml:math id="M14"><mml:mtable class="eqnarray" columnalign="left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:munderover accentunder="false" accent="false"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x02211;</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:munderover></mml:mstyle><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo class="qopname">ln</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>
<disp-formula id="E7"><label>(7)</label><mml:math id="M15"><mml:mtable class="eqnarray" columnalign="left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:munderover accentunder="false" accent="false"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x02211;</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:munderover></mml:mstyle><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>
<disp-formula id="E8"><label>(8)</label><mml:math id="M16"><mml:mtable class="eqnarray" columnalign="left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>
<p>where <italic>S</italic> is the number of species in the sample plot, <italic>N</italic> is the total number of individuals of all species in the sample plot, and <italic>P</italic><sub><italic>i</italic></sub> is the ratio of the number of individuals of a species to the number of individuals of all species in the sample plot.</p>
<p>Importance values of understory species were calculated using Excel 2016. The vegetation diversity indices were calculated using the &#x02018;vegan&#x00027; package of RStudio software. Based on SPSS18.0 software, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed to test understory removal effects on herbaceous diversity and biomass and test the difference between different forests (LSD, <italic>P</italic> = 0.05). Independent-sample <italic>t</italic>-test was performed to compare the difference between using different management strategies in the same forest. Redundancy analysis (RDA) was performed in Canoco 5.0 software to determine the extent to which the soil&#x00027;s physical and chemical properties can explain the quantitative characteristics of plant communities.</p></sec></sec></sec>
<sec sec-type="results" id="s3">
<title>3 Results</title>
<sec>
<title>3.1 Understory vegetation diversity</title>
<sec>
<title>3.1.1 Species composition and importance values</title>
<p>Five years after understory removal, the number of herbaceous plants of all three stands decreased; the number of species, genera, and families of shrub plants of LF decreased significantly, BKF decreased little, whereas BF increased largely (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2</xref>). In particular, there were no significant differences of the number of understory plants between different understory management in the same stand, the number of species, genera, and families of shrub plants of BKF was significantly higher than that of LF (<italic>P</italic> &#x0003C; 0.05).</p>
<fig id="F2" position="float">
<label>Figure 2</label>
<caption><p>Changes in the number of families, genera, and species in understory left intact (CK) and removal (UR) stands. BKF, mixed broad-leaved <italic>Pinus koraiensis</italic> forest; BF, <italic>Betula platyphylla</italic> forest; LF, <italic>Larix gmelinii</italic> forest. Mean &#x000B1; SD, <italic>n</italic> = 4. Different uppercase letters indicate significant differences between different understory managements in the same stands (<italic>P</italic> &#x0003C; 0.05), and different lowercase letters indicate significant differences among different forest types within a given understory management (<italic>P</italic> &#x0003C; 0.05).</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="ffgc-07-1393772-g0002.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>The importance values of the main species in the three stands are shown in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Table S1</xref>. Five years after understory removal, the light-demanding herbaceous plants, such as <italic>Filipendula palmata, Urtica angustifolia</italic> and <italic>Equisetum hyemale</italic>, which displayed a strong reproduction capacity and adaptability in the three stands, quickly occupied forest lands and their dominant position was enhanced, while the dominance of sciophiles, such as <italic>Ostericum grosseserratum, Meehania urticifolia</italic>, and <italic>Carex pilosa</italic>, decreased. The dominance of the shrub plants in the three stands did not vary congruously to understory removal, and the dominance of some heliophile shrubs, such as <italic>Acer ukurunduense</italic> (8.51 increased to 42.04) in BKF, <italic>Acer tegmentosum</italic> (1.81 increased to 10.13) in BF, and <italic>Ribes mandshuricum</italic> (3.57 increased to 13.55) in LF, increased. Whereas the dominance of some heliophile shrubs, such as <italic>Eleutherococcus senticosus</italic> and <italic>A. tegmentosum</italic> (importance value reduced to 0) in BKF, <italic>Acer pictum subsp. mono</italic> (importance value reduced to 0) in LF decreased after understory removal.</p></sec>
<sec>
<title>3.1.2 Plant diversity</title>
<p>Five years after understory removal, Shannon&#x02013;Wiener diversity (<italic>H</italic>), Pielou evenness (<italic>J</italic>), Simpson diversity (<italic>D</italic>), and Margalef richness (<italic>R</italic>) indices showed no significant changes in the shrub layer of the three stands (<italic>P</italic> &#x0003E; 0.05), while Shannon&#x02013;Wiener diversity (<italic>H</italic>), Pielou evenness (<italic>J</italic>), and Simpson diversity (<italic>D</italic>) indices of the herb layer of LF increased significantly (<italic>P</italic> &#x0003C; 0.05). However, there were no significant differences between the four diversity indices of the herb layer of BF and BKF (<italic>P</italic> &#x0003E; 0.05) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F3" position="float">
<label>Figure 3</label>
<caption><p>Changes in understory vegetation community diversity in understory left intact (CK) and removal (UR) stands. <bold>(A&#x02013;D)</bold> represent Shannon-Wiener diversity index, Pielou evenness index, Simpson dominance index, and Margalef richness index of the understory, respectively.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="ffgc-07-1393772-g0003.tif"/>
</fig></sec></sec>
<sec>
<title>3.2 Understory vegetation biomass</title>
<p>Understory removal significantly decreased the understory biomass of BKF and LF (<italic>P</italic> &#x0003E; 0.05) but can promote the increase of BF, and there were no significant differences among the three stands (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4</xref>). Five years after understory removal, the total understory biomass of BKF and LF had decreased by 0.94 t&#x000B7;hm<sup>&#x02212;2</sup> and 1.32 t&#x000B7;hm<sup>&#x02212;2</sup>, respectively, where there was a more than 25% decrease both in the biomass of the shrub and herb layers. In contrast, the total understory biomass of BF increased by 1.31 t&#x000B7;hm<sup>&#x02212;2</sup>, and understory biomass increased by 82.63% and 21.77% in the shrub and herb layers, respectively, in understory removal stands as compared to that in the understory left stands.</p>
<fig id="F4" position="float">
<label>Figure 4</label>
<caption><p>Changes in understory vegetation biomass in understory left intact (CK) and removal (UR) stands.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="ffgc-07-1393772-g0004.tif"/>
</fig></sec>
<sec>
<title>3.3 Soil properties</title>
<p>Understory removal had a greater impact on the soil&#x00027;s physical and chemical properties of BF and LF (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref>). Five years after understory removal, there were no significant variations in soil properties in BKF (<italic>P</italic> &#x0003E; 0.05); the content of soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17"><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:math></inline-formula>-N and available phosphorus (AP) of BF; while the water content (SWC), total nitrogen (TN), and total phosphorus (TP) content of LF increased significantly (<italic>P</italic> &#x0003C; 0.05). For the three stands, the total nutrient content (TN, TP, and total soil carbon (TC)) of BF in soil was the highest and significantly higher than BKF, followed by LF after understory removal; there were no significant differences in soil pH, SWC, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18"><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>NH</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>4</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x0002B;</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:math></inline-formula>-N among the three stands.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T2">
<label>Table 2</label>
<caption><p>Soil characteristics of the three stands with understory left intact (CK) and removal (UR).</p></caption>
<table frame="box" rules="all">
<thead>
<tr style="background-color:#919498;color:#ffffff">
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Index</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="left" colspan="2"><bold>BKF</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="left" colspan="2"><bold>BF</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="left" colspan="2"><bold>LF</bold></th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th/>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left"><bold>CK</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><bold>UR</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><bold>CK</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><bold>UR</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><bold>CK</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><bold>UR</bold></td>
</tr> <tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">pH</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">5.08 &#x000B1; 0.16Ab</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">5.05 &#x000B1; 0.19Aa</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">5.06 &#x000B1; 0.10Ab</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">5.07 &#x000B1; 0.09Aa</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">5.30 &#x000B1; 0.13Aa</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">5.25 &#x000B1; 0.22Aa</td>
</tr> <tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">SWC</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.59 &#x000B1; 0.08Aa</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.56 &#x000B1; 0.17Aa</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.42 &#x000B1; 0.07Ab</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.50 &#x000B1; 0.09Aa</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.31 &#x000B1; 0.02Bc</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.41 &#x000B1; 0.05Aa</td>
</tr> <tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">TC (%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">5.53 &#x000B1; 0.67Ab</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">5.39 &#x000B1; 1.35Ab</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">8.32 &#x000B1; 2.02Aa</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">8.27 &#x000B1; 0.64Aa</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">5.28 &#x000B1; 0.86Ab</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">6.78 &#x000B1; 1.03Aab</td>
</tr> <tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">TN (%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.49 &#x000B1; 0.08Ab</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.48 &#x000B1; 0.14Ab</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.64 &#x000B1; 0.08Aa</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.64 &#x000B1; 0.05Aa</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.45 &#x000B1; 0.10Bb</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.61 &#x000B1; 0.07Aab</td>
</tr> <tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">TP (%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.09 &#x000B1; 0.02Aa</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.08 &#x000B1; 0.03Ab</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.11 &#x000B1; 0.02Aa</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.13 &#x000B1; 0.02Aa</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.05 &#x000B1; 0.005Bb</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.09 &#x000B1; 0.02Ab</td>
</tr> <tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M19"><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>NH</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>4</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x0002B;</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:math></inline-formula>-N (mg&#x000B7;kg-1)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">3.58 &#x000B1; 2.68Aa</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">5.10 &#x000B1; 4.57Aa</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">3.89 &#x000B1; 1.20Aa</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">6.29 &#x000B1; 3.48Aa</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">4.12 &#x000B1; 1.21Aa</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">4.19 &#x000B1; 1.43Aa</td>
</tr> <tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M20"><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:math></inline-formula>-N (mg&#x000B7;kg-1)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">17.41 &#x000B1; 1.24Aa</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">14.86 &#x000B1; 3.10Aab</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">15.32 &#x000B1; 1.12Bab</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">18.13 &#x000B1; 2.00Aa</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">12.57 &#x000B1; 2.66Ab</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">14.20 &#x000B1; 1.13Ab</td>
</tr> <tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">AP (mg&#x000B7;kg<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">14.16 &#x000B1; 6.29Aa</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">15.22 &#x000B1; 5.04Aa</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">11.07 &#x000B1; 1.34Bab</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">18.09 &#x000B1; 3.44Aa</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">6.66 &#x000B1; 3.21Ab</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">12.63 &#x000B1; 5.15Aa</td>
</tr> <tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">C/N</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">11.44 &#x000B1; 0.39Aa</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">11.42 &#x000B1; 1.13Aab</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">12.80 &#x000B1; 1.47Aa</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">12.88 &#x000B1; 0.86Aa</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">11.78 &#x000B1; 0.96Aa</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">11.02 &#x000B1; 0.86Ab</td>
</tr> <tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">N/P</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">5.91 &#x000B1; 1.55Ab</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">5.83 &#x000B1; 1.13Aa</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">5.92 &#x000B1; 1.38Ab</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">5.09 &#x000B1; 0.33Aa</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">10.12 &#x000B1; 2.37Aa</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">6.78 &#x000B1; 1.47Aa</td>
</tr></tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p>Mean &#x000B1; SD, n = 4. Different capital letters represent significant differences between different treatments under the same forest type (P &#x0003C;0.05), and different lowercase letters represent significant differences between different forest types under the same treatment (P &#x0003C;0.05). SWC, water content; TC, soil total carbon; TN, total nitrogen; TP, total phosphorus; AP, available phosphorus; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21"><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>NH</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>4</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x0002B;</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:math></inline-formula>-N, ammonium nitrogen; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22"><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:math></inline-formula>-N, nitrate nitrogen.</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap></sec>
<sec>
<title>3.4 Correlations of understory vegetation characteristics with soil properties</title>
<p>The biomass and diversity of understory vegetation were different due to different soil properties (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5</xref>, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Tables S2</xref>, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">S3</xref>). Redundancy analysis (RDA) was used to explore correlations of understory vegetation characteristics with soil properties (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Table S2</xref>). Soil N/P was the primary factor impacting understory vegetation diversity and biomass prior to understory removal (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Table S3</xref>), and as its value increased, shrub diversity and understory biomass increased, whereas herb diversity decreased (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figures 5A</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">C</xref>). Five years after understory removal, soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23"><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>NH</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>4</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x0002B;</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:math></inline-formula>-N and TP were the key factors regulating understory vegetation diversity and biomass, respectively (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Table S3</xref>), and as these values increased, shrub and herb diversity reduced while understory biomass increased (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figures 5B</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">D</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F5" position="float">
<label>Figure 5</label>
<caption><p>Redundancy analysis (RDA) for correlation between characteristics of understory vegetation and soil properties. <bold>(A, B)</bold> are redundant analyses of understory vegetation diversity and soil properties in understory left intact (CK) and removal (UR) stands, respectively; the first two axes explained 87.52% and 81% of understory plant diversity. <bold>(C, D)</bold> are the redundancy analysis of understory vegetation biomass and soil properties in understory removal and retaining stands, respectively, and the first two axes explained 98.96% and 95.3% of the understory biomass. <italic>S-R, S-H, S-D</italic>, and <italic>S-J</italic> and <italic>H-R, H-H, H-D</italic>, and <italic>H-J</italic> represent the Margalef richness index, the Shannon&#x02013;Wiener diversity index, the Simpson dominance index and the Pielou evenness index of the shrub and herb layers, respectively. <italic>S-T, H-T</italic>, and <italic>A-T</italic> represent the shrub layer biomass, the herb layer biomass, and the total biomass of understory vegetation, respectively.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="ffgc-07-1393772-g0005.tif"/>
</fig></sec></sec>
<sec sec-type="discussion" id="s4">
<title>4 Discussion</title>
<sec>
<title>4.1 Changes in understory diversity and biomass</title>
<p>Disturbance and the availability of resources, particularly light and soil conditions have been recognized as key factors influencing plant diversity in the understory of temperate forests (Hofmeister et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">2009</xref>; Forster et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">2017</xref>). After understory removal, the vertical light distribution changed dramatically, and 50% of the light absorbed by the higher canopy was released (Matsuo et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">2021</xref>), resulting in an increase in photosynthetically active radiation reaching the forest land, as well as an increase in the availability of temperature, humidity, and nutrients in the forest (De Lombaerde et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">2021</xref>). Furthermore, understory species or species groups that demand different environmental resources may respond in various ways to the canopy opening (Forster et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">2017</xref>; Deng et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">2023b</xref>). Although previous studies have confirmed that understory management decreased species richness in the semi-arid ecosystem (Jimenez et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">2015</xref>), our study in temperate forests demonstrated that its impact varies by forest type and understory vegetation layers (Hart and Chen, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">2008</xref>). In this study, the species diversity of understory increased rapidly in the three stands, especially for <italic>B. platyphylla</italic> forest (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2</xref>). The response of herbaceous plants to interference is more sensitive than shrub plants (Wang et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">2021</xref>), the dominance of strong adaptability and reproductive ability and heliophiles herbaceous species increased significantly after understory removal, such as <italic>Impatiens noli-tangere, F. palmata</italic>, and <italic>E. hyemale</italic>, which caused significant differences in three forest types. Because the standground was not fully expanded by the shrub plants, it directly reduced the dominance of sciophiles herbaceous species (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Table S1</xref>). The growth cycle of shrubs is usually longer than that of herbaceous species, therefore shrub diversity was not affected by understory removal, and their recovery process still needs to be studied on a longer time scale (Copeland et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">2019</xref>). Because broad-leaved forests (BF) have higher canopy light transmission (Messier et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">1998</xref>), their soil water and light conditions are superior to coniferous forests (LF) (Hart and Chen, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">2008</xref>), resulting in increasing vegetation diversity and resource availability, which was in line with other research studies, that is, increase of broad-leaved trees benefitted the understory plant richness via improved nutrient availability in the soil (Salemaa et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">2023</xref>). Shrub plants of broad-leaved forests grow faster and have more plant species than coniferous forests. The increase in dominance of the shrub layer would lead to the loss of species diversity under shrubs (Pajunen et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">2011</xref>). Therefore, after understory removal, BF has the highest shrub diversity and the lowest herb diversity, which is in contrast to LF (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figures 2</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">3</xref>).</p>
<p>Biomass compensation for understory removals occurs significantly in BF, but not in BKF and LF after treatment. In an arid region forest, the researchers found the degree of biomass compensation was dependent on restoration term (Canteiro et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">2011</xref>) and a fertilized environment (Pires and Xavier, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">2010</xref>) after the removal, and they observed that there was a compensation for removals under high fertilization during the first 3 years but was reduced compensation after 9 years. Moreover, biomass compensation for plant removals can occur relatively rapidly in temperate ecosystems (Gonzalez et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">2019</xref>). However, in contrast with our findings, biomass compensation after removals in the short term only appeared rapidly in the broad-leaved pure forest (that is BF) with a fast litter turnover and decomposition rate (Zhao et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">2022b</xref>). After a 5-year removal, the litter&#x00027;s turnover mechanism (Qiao et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">2014</xref>) and nutrient content (Peng et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">2020</xref>) changed, the litter in broad-leaved forests increased and accumulated faster than in coniferous forests, and its biological return was greater (Zhou et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B58">2018a</xref>), which promoted the rapid accumulation of soil nutrient content such as organic matter in soil in BF (Zhang et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">2022</xref>). In addition, the canopy density of BF is higher than that of coniferous forests and coniferous and broad-leaved mixed forests, and the light environment of the lower layer of the forest has improved after understory removal (Wang et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">2021</xref>), thus the species with light-demanding and strong reproductive ability (such as <italic>F. Palmata and A. ukurunduense</italic>) enter the forest first and occupy a large area under the forest. Finally, light-demanding and shade-tolerant shrubs exist at the same time, resulting in the recovery of the species in the short term (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">Table S1</xref>). However, soil nutrient contents in BKF and LF were lower than in BF (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref>), and some shade-tolerant and hygrophilous plants grew slowly, which limited understory vegetation restoration in a short time. Overall, understory removal appeared to promote shrub diversity and biomass of broad-leaved forests more than that of conifer forests (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4</xref>).</p></sec>
<sec>
<title>4.2 The relationship between understory and soil properties</title>
<p>In this study, we found that before the understory removal, soil N/P promoted the increase of understory vegetation biomass and shrub plant diversity (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5</xref>). The effect of soil N/P on the diversity of the shrub layer and the herb layer was opposite, indicating that the shrub layer was more stable in response to changes in the soil&#x00027;s physical and chemical properties, which may be due to the understory canopy limiting the distribution of herbaceous plants. The shrub layer and the herb layer have a competitive relationship with environmental conditions such as light, water, and nutrients. Therefore, with the change in the soil&#x00027;s physical and chemical properties, the diversity of the shrub layer and the herb layer showed an opposite trend of change (Zhou et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B59">2021</xref>).</p>
<p>After understory removal, the understory canopy closure decreased (Gurlevik et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">2004</xref>; Matsushima and Chang, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">2007</xref>), which increased light transmittance and, combined with the plant residues, increased the amount of rainwater in the coniferous forest (LF). This increase facilitated the availability of more nutrients to the soil with rainwater and significantly increased the soil water content of the forest land, which improved the utilization efficiency of nutrients in the ecosystem (Wang et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">2023</xref>). Soil moisture in broad-leaved forests was comparable to those in coniferous and broad-leaved mixed forests, indicating that soil water content had little effect on the biomass and composition of the forest (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref>). In addition, the plant residues from understory management could be used as biomass energy, which is conducive to the realization of carbon neutralization (Wang et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">2023</xref>). The management process generates a significant number of branches, plant residues and other residues, which causes a rapid increase in organic matter on forest land, stimulates litter decomposition, and enhances soil nutrient input. Because of the strong demand for plant growth and its limited nutrients, increasing soil TP concentration promotes the development of plant roots, which is the primary determinant for the expansion of early biomass of understory plants (Zhao et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">2022a</xref>). It promotes the growth of understory biomass in BF in particular, which shows the quickest microbial activity, decomposition rate, nutrient accumulation rate, and energy cycle (Li et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">2016</xref>; Zhao et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">2022b</xref>). Furthermore, some studies suggested that plant diversity decreased with the decrease in soil pH, that is, the increase of soil acidity (Zarfos et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B53">2019</xref>), which is consistent with our findings on the shrub layer (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4</xref>). The species richness and diversity of the herb layer increased, because the tolerance of the shrub layer to soil pH was higher than that of the herb layer, and the herbaceous plants were mostly shallow roots, and the competitiveness of soil nutrients was poor (Zhao et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">2022a</xref>). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24"><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>NH</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>4</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x0002B;</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:math></inline-formula>-N is the basis of plant growth and development. This study found that with the increase of soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25"><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>NH</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>4</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x0002B;</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:math></inline-formula>-N, the diversity of shrubs and herbs decreased and the biomass increased. It may be because the increase in plant biomass will increase the competition between species, thus reducing species diversity. In general, the coupling relationship between the diversity of the shrub layer and the herb layer and the physical and chemical properties of soil is complex and quite different. This may be because the structure and the growth pattern of shrubs and herbaceous plants are different (Keeley and Johnson, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">1977</xref>), and the absorption of different elements in the soil is different (Salas-Lu&#x000E9;vano et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">2017</xref>).</p>
<p>The diversity and biomass of understory vegetation is an important indicator to measure the effectiveness of forest management measures. Our study only analyzed the impact of soil properties on understory plant characteristics; however, for a full appreciation of the impact of understory removal on understory diversity and biomass, environmental parameters, such as light environment, should be taken into account to guide forest management and promote the restoration of understory vegetation in the future.</p></sec></sec>
<sec sec-type="conclusions" id="s5">
<title>5 Conclusion</title>
<p>Understory management, which aims to reduce the competition between seedling and understory vegetation, affected the composition of understory species, their diversity, and biomass, and the primary soil properties driving these changes were different in three temperate typical stands. Five years after understory removal, the light conditions and soil temperature in the forest changed and the composition and diversity of herbaceous plants of BF decreased significantly, while its shrubs became established and grew faster than in BKF and LF. Thus, understory removal should be applied in the growth stage of birch seedlings to improve understory productivity and plant diversity, while understory removal should be avoided in BKF and LF to reduce understory plant diversity and soil nutrient loss. Considering the multiple effects of understory removal, forest managers should implement the current understory removal policy based on different forest types for better cultivating the forests. Further research should emphasize the effect of understory removal on the relationship between overstory and understory development in a long-term operation experiment.</p></sec>
<sec sec-type="data-availability" id="s6">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.</p></sec>
<sec sec-type="author-contributions" id="s7">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>YZ: Methodology, Software, Visualization, Writing &#x02013; original draft, Writing &#x02013; review &#x00026; editing. QY: Investigation, Methodology, Writing &#x02013; original draft. JD: Writing &#x02013; review &#x00026; editing. LZ: Data curation, Project administration, Writing &#x02013; review &#x00026; editing. DY: Project administration, Writing &#x02013; review &#x00026; editing. WZ: Writing &#x02013; review &#x00026; editing. Q-WW: Funding acquisition, Writing &#x02013; review &#x00026; editing.</p></sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec sec-type="funding-information" id="s8">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This study was supported by NEYSF (Grant No. 32122059) and NSFC (Grant No. 41977423).</p>
</sec>
<ack><p>We thank Professor Jinshi Xu of Ludong University for his help in the revision of the article and the staff from Jilin Changbai Mountain West Slope National Research Station of Forest Ecosystem for their support with the fieldwork.</p>
</ack>
<sec sec-type="COI-statement" id="conf1">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="disclaimer" id="s9">
<title>Publisher&#x00027;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="supplementary-material" id="s10">
<title>Supplementary material</title>
<p>The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/ffgc.2024.1393772/full#supplementary-material">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/ffgc.2024.1393772/full#supplementary-material</ext-link></p>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Table_1.DOCX" id="SM1" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/></sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Arbainsyah de Iongh</surname> <given-names>H. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kustiawan</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>de Snoo</surname> <given-names>G. R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Structure, composition and diversity of plant communities in FSC-certified, selectively logged forests of different ages compared to primary rain forest</article-title>. <source>Biodivers. Conserv.</source> <volume>23</volume>, <fpage>2445</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>2472</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10531-014-0732-4</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ares</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Neill</surname> <given-names>A. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Puettmann</surname> <given-names>K. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Understory abundance, species diversity and functional attribute response to thinning in coniferous stands</article-title>. <source>For. Ecol. Manage.</source> <volume>260</volume>, <fpage>1104</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1113</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foreco.2010.06.023</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Balandier</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>M&#x000E5;rell</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pr&#x000E9;vosto</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vincenot</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Tamm review: forest understorey and overstorey interactions: so much more than just light interception by trees</article-title>. <source>For. Ecol. Manage.</source> <volume>526</volume>:<fpage>120584</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foreco.2022.120584</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bartels</surname> <given-names>S. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>H. Y. H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Is understory plant species diversity driven by resource quantity or resource heterogeneity?</article-title> <source>Ecology</source> <volume>91</volume>, <fpage>1931</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1938</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1890/09-1376.1</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20715612</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B5">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bartels</surname> <given-names>S. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>H. Y. H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Interactions between overstorey and understorey vegetation along an overstorey compositional gradient</article-title>. <source>J. Vegetat. Sci.</source> <volume>24</volume>, <fpage>543</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>552</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1654-1103.2012.01479.x</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Canteiro</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pinto-Cruz</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Simoes</surname> <given-names>M. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gazarini</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Conservation of Mediterranean oak woodlands: understorey dynamics under different shrub management</article-title>. <source>Agroforest. Syst.</source> <volume>82</volume>, <fpage>161</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>171</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10457-011-9375-6</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Copeland</surname> <given-names>S. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Munson</surname> <given-names>S. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bradford</surname> <given-names>J. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Butterfield</surname> <given-names>B. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gunnell</surname> <given-names>K. L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Long-term plant community trajectories suggest divergent responses of native and non-native perennials and annuals to vegetation removal and seeding treatments</article-title>. <source>Restorat. Ecol.</source> <volume>27</volume>, <fpage>821</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>831</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/rec.12928</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dai</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Qi</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Su</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Changes in forest structure and composition on Changbai Mountain in Northeast China</article-title>. <source>Ann. For. Sci.</source> <volume>68</volume>, <fpage>889</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>897</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s13595-011-0095-x</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>De Lombaerde</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Baeten</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Verheyen</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Perring</surname> <given-names>M. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ma</surname> <given-names>S. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Landuyt</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Understorey removal effects on tree regeneration in temperate forests: a meta-analysis</article-title>. <source>J. Appl. Ecol.</source> <volume>58</volume>, <fpage>9</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>20</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/1365-2664.13792</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>De Lombaerde</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Blondeel</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Baeten</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Landuyt</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Perring</surname> <given-names>M. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Depauw</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Light, temperature and understorey cover predominantly affect early life stages of tree seedlings in a multifactorial mesocosm experiment</article-title>. <source>For. Ecol. Manage.</source> <volume>461</volume>:<fpage>117907</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foreco.2020.117907</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Deng</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fang</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jin</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kuang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lin</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2023a</year>). <article-title>Forest understory vegetation study: current status and future trends</article-title>. <source>Forest. Res.</source> <volume>3</volume>:<fpage>6</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.48130/FR-2023-0006</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Deng</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dai</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yuan</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Qi</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2023b</year>). <article-title>The effects of shrub removal on soil microbial communities in primary forest, secondary forest and plantation forest on Changbai Mountain</article-title>. <source>Microb. Ecol.</source> <volume>85</volume>, <fpage>642</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>658</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00248-021-01943-0</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">35089393</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B13">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dupuy</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chazdon</surname> <given-names>R. L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Interacting effects of canopy gap, understory vegetation and leaf litter on tree seedling recruitment and composition in tropical secondary forests</article-title>. <source>For. Ecol. Manage.</source> <volume>255</volume>, <fpage>3716</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>3725</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foreco.2008.03.021</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Fan</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Forest biomass estimation models of remote sensing in Changbai Mountain forests</article-title>. <source>Scientia Silvae Sinicae</source> <volume>47</volume>, <fpage>16</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>20</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.11707/j.1001-7488.20111003</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Forster</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Becker</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gerlach</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Meesenburg</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Leuschner</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Long-term change in understorey plant communities of conventionally managed temperate deciduous forests: effects of nitrogen deposition and forest management</article-title>. <source>J. Vegetat. Sci.</source> <volume>28</volume>, <fpage>747</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>761</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/jvs.12537</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Giuggiola</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zweifel</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Feichtinger</surname> <given-names>L. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vollenweider</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bugmann</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Haeni</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Competition for water in a xeric forest ecosystem &#x02013; Effects of understory removal on soil micro-climate, growth and physiology of dominant Scots pine trees</article-title>. <source>For. Ecol. Manage.</source> <volume>409</volume>, <fpage>241</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>249</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foreco.2017.11.002</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gonzalez</surname> <given-names>M. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Crofts</surname> <given-names>A. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>McLaren</surname> <given-names>J. R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Plant biomass, rather than species composition, determines ecosystem properties: results from a long-term graminoid removal experiment in a northern Canadian grassland</article-title>. <source>J.Ecol.</source> <volume>107</volume>, <fpage>2211</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>2225</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/1365-2745.13169</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gurlevik</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kelting</surname> <given-names>D. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Allen</surname> <given-names>H. L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2004</year>). Nitrogen mineralization following vegetation control and fertilization in a 14-year-old loblolly pine plantation. S<source>oil Sci. Soc. Am. J.</source> <volume>68</volume>, <fpage>272</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>281</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2136/sssaj2004.2720</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hart</surname> <given-names>S. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>H. Y. H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Fire, logging, and overstory affect understory abundance, diversity, and composition in boreal forest</article-title>. <source>Ecol. Monogr.</source> <volume>78</volume>, <fpage>123</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>140</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1890/06-2140.1</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>He</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fan</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gao</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Feng</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Estimation and analysis of understory shrub biomass in Changbai Mountains</article-title>. <source>J. Nanjing Forestry Univer.</source> <volume>35</volume>, <fpage>45</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>50</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3969/j.jssn.1000-2006.2011.05.010</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hill</surname> <given-names>M. O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pielou</surname> <given-names>E. G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1970</year>). <article-title>An introduction to mathematical ecology</article-title>. <source>J. Ecol</source>. 58, 896. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2307/2258549</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hofmeister</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hosek</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Modry</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rolecek</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>The influence of light and nutrient availability on herb layer species richness in oak-dominated forests in central Bohemia</article-title>. <source>Plant Ecology</source> <volume>205</volume>, <fpage>57</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>75</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11258-009-9598-z</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jimenez</surname> <given-names>M. N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Spotswood</surname> <given-names>E. N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Canadas</surname> <given-names>E. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Navarro</surname> <given-names>F. B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Stand management to reduce fire risk promotes understorey plant diversity and biomass in a semi-arid Pinus halepensis plantation</article-title>. <source>Appl. Vegetat. Sci.</source> <volume>18</volume>, <fpage>467</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>480</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/avsc.12151</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Keeley</surname> <given-names>S. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Johnson</surname> <given-names>A. W.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1977</year>). <article-title>Comparison of pattern of herb and shrub growth in comparable sites in Chile and California</article-title>. <source>Am. Midland Natural.</source> <volume>97</volume>, <fpage>120</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>132</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2307/2424690</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kumar</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>H. Y. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Thomas</surname> <given-names>S. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shahi</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Linking resource availability and heterogeneity to understorey species diversity through succession in boreal forest of Canada</article-title>. <source>J.Ecol.</source> <volume>106</volume>, <fpage>1266</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1276</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/1365-2745.12861</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kume</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Satomura</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tsuboi</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chiwa</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hanba</surname> <given-names>Y. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nakane</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Effects of understory vegetation on the ecophysiological characteristics of an overstory pine, Pinus densiflora</article-title>. <source>For. Ecol. Manage.</source> <volume>176</volume>, <fpage>195</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>203</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0378-1127(02)00282-7</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cao</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Difference feature of planted vegetation biomass and litter biomass for three plantations and their relationship with soil nutrients in Lvliang Mountainous Region</article-title>. <source>Bullet. Botan. Res</source>. <volume>36</volume>, <fpage>573</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>580</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7525/j.issn.1673-5102.2016.04.013</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>MacDonald</surname> <given-names>R. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>H. Y. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bartels</surname> <given-names>S. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Palik</surname> <given-names>B. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Prepas</surname> <given-names>E. E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Compositional stability of boreal understorey vegetation after overstorey harvesting across a riparian ecotone</article-title>. <source>J. Vegetat. Sci.</source> <volume>26</volume>, <fpage>733</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>741</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/jvs.12272</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Matsuo</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Martinez-Ramos</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bongers</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>van der Sande</surname> <given-names>M. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Poorter</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Forest structure drives changes in light heterogeneity during tropical secondary forest succession</article-title>. <source>J.Ecol.</source> <volume>109</volume>, <fpage>2871</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>2884</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/1365-2745.13680</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34588706</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B30">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Matsushima</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chang</surname> <given-names>S. X.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Effects of understory removal, N fertilization, and litter layer removal on soil N cycling in a 13-year-old white spruce plantation infested with Canada bluejoint grass</article-title>. <source>Plant Soil</source> <volume>292</volume>, <fpage>243</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>258</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11104-007-9220-x</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Messier</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Parent</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bergeron</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1998</year>). <article-title>Effects of overstory and understory vegetation on the understory light environment in mixed boreal forests</article-title>. <source>J. Vegetat. Sci.</source> <volume>9</volume>, <fpage>511</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>520</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2307/3237266</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Motsinger</surname> <given-names>J. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kabrick</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dey</surname> <given-names>D. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Henderson</surname> <given-names>D. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zenner</surname> <given-names>E. K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Effect of midstory and understory removal on the establishment and development of natural and artificial pin oak advance reproduction in bottomland forests</article-title>. <source>New Forests</source> <volume>39</volume>, <fpage>195</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>213</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11056-009-9164-5</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Navarro</surname> <given-names>F. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jim&#x000E9;nez</surname> <given-names>M. N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gallego</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ripoll</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Short-term effects of overstory reduction and slash mulching on ground vegetation in a Mediterranean Aleppo pine woodland</article-title>. <source>Eur. J. For. Res.</source> <volume>129</volume>, <fpage>689</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>696</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10342-010-0374-3</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Nilsson</surname> <given-names>M.-C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wardle</surname> <given-names>D. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Understory vegetation as a forest ecosystem driver: evidence from the northern Swedish boreal forest</article-title>. <source>Front. Ecol. Environ.</source> <volume>3</volume>, <fpage>421</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>428</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1890/1540-9295(2005)003(0421:UVAAFE)2.0.CO;2</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Pajunen</surname> <given-names>A. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Oksanen</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Virtanen</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Impact of shrub canopies on understorey vegetation in western Eurasian tundra</article-title>. <source>J. Vegetat. Sci.</source> <volume>22</volume>, <fpage>837</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>846</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1654-1103.2011.01285.x</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B36">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Peng</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schmidt</surname> <given-names>I. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zheng</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hed&#x0011B;nec</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bachega</surname> <given-names>L. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yue</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Tree species effects on topsoil carbon stock and concentration are mediated by tree species type, mycorrhizal association, and N-fixing ability at the global scale</article-title>. <source>For. Ecol. Manage.</source> <volume>478</volume>:<fpage>118510</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118510</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B37">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Pires</surname> <given-names>A. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xavier</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Influence of vegetation management and fertilization on &#x0003C;i&#x0003E;Pinus pinaster &#x0003C;/i&#x0003E; growth and on understory biomass and composition</article-title>. <source>Forest Syst</source>. <volume>19</volume>, <fpage>404</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>409</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5424/fs/2010193-8927</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B38">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Povak</surname> <given-names>N. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lorimer</surname> <given-names>C. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Guries</surname> <given-names>R. P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Altering successional trends in oak forests: 19 year experimental results of low- and moderate-intensity silvicultural treatments</article-title>. <source>Canad. J. Forest Res.</source> <volume>38</volume>, <fpage>2880</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>2895</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1139/X08-118</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B39">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Premer</surname> <given-names>M. I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Froese</surname> <given-names>R. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Webster</surname> <given-names>C. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nagel</surname> <given-names>L. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Vegetation response to logging residue removals in Great Lakes aspen forests: Long-term trends under operational management</article-title>. <source>For. Ecol. Manage.</source> <volume>382</volume>, <fpage>257</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>268</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foreco.2016.09.048</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B40">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Qi</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>An integrated multi-scale approach to restoring a degraded secondary forest ecosystem: a case study in the Changbai Mountains, northeastern China</article-title>. <source>Ecol. Eng.</source> <volume>125</volume>, <fpage>98</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>105</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ecoleng.2018.09.028</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B41">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Qiao</surname> <given-names>Y. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Miao</surname> <given-names>S. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Silva</surname> <given-names>L. C. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Horwath</surname> <given-names>W. R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Understory species regulate litter decomposition and accumulation of C and N in forest soils: a long-term dual-isotope experiment</article-title>. <source>For. Ecol. Manage.</source> <volume>329</volume>, <fpage>318</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>327</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foreco.2014.04.025</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B42">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rodriguez-Rodriguez</surname> <given-names>J. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fenton</surname> <given-names>N. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kembel</surname> <given-names>S. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mestre</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jean</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bergeron</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Drivers of contrasting boreal understory vegetation in coniferous and broadleaf deciduous alternative states</article-title>. <source>Ecol. Monogr.</source> <volume>93</volume>:<fpage>1587</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/ecm.1587</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B43">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rybar</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bosela</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Marcis</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ujh&#x000E1;zyov,&#x000E1;</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Polt&#x000E1;k</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hederov,&#x000E1;</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Effects of tree canopy on herbaceous understorey throughout the developmental cycle of a temperate mountain primary forest</article-title>. <source>For. Ecol. Manage.</source> <volume>546</volume>:<fpage>121353</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foreco.2023.121353</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B44">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Salas-Lu&#x000E9;vano</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mauricio-Castillo</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gonz&#x000E1;lez-Rivera</surname> <given-names>M. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vega-Carrillo</surname> <given-names>H. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Salas-Mu&#x000F1;oz</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Accumulation and phytostabilization of As, Pb and Cd in plants growing inside mine tailings reforested in Zacatecas, Mexico</article-title>. <source>Environm. Earth Sci.</source> <volume>76</volume>:<fpage>7139</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s12665-017-7139-y</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B45">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Salemaa</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hotanen</surname> <given-names>J.-P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Oksanen</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tonteri</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Meril,&#x000E4;</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Broadleaved trees enhance biodiversity of the understorey vegetation in boreal forests</article-title>. <source>For. Ecol. Manage.</source> <volume>546</volume>:<fpage>121357</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foreco.2023.121357</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B46">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Vandenberghe</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Frel&#x000E9;choux</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gadallah</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Buttler</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Competitive effects of herbaceous vegetation on tree seedling emergence, growth and survival: does gap size matter?</article-title> <source>J. Vegetat. Sci.</source> <volume>7</volume>, <fpage>481</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>488</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1654-1103.2006.tb02469.x</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B47">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>G. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Guan</surname> <given-names>N. Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Y. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jiang</surname> <given-names>R. H.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Effect of thinning intensity on understory herbaceous diversity and biomass in mixed coniferous and broad-leaved forests of Changbai Mountain</article-title>. <source>Forest Ecosyst</source>. <volume>8</volume>:<fpage>331</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s40663-021-00331-x</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B48">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fu</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bing</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xi</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Benefit analysis of multi-approach biomass energy utilization toward carbon neutrality</article-title>. <source>The Innovation</source> <volume>4</volume>:<fpage>100423</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.xinn.2023.100423</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">37181230</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B49">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Peng</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gen</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Study on tree layer biomass and productivity in forest in Lushihe Forest Bureau of Changbai Mountains</article-title>. <source>Res. Soil Water Conservat.</source> <volume>23</volume>, <fpage>277</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>281</lpage>&#x0002B;287.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B50">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Ecosystem quality-based management and the development of a new eco-friendly economy</article-title>. <source>The Innovation</source> <volume>4</volume>, <fpage>100491</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.xinn.2023.100491</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">37663932</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B51">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yildiz</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cromack</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Radosevich</surname> <given-names>S. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Martinez-Ghersa</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Baham</surname> <given-names>J. E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Comparison of 5th- and 14th-year Douglas-fir and understory vegetation responses to selective vegetation removal</article-title>. <source>For. Ecol. Manage.</source> <volume>262</volume>, <fpage>586</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>597</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foreco.2011.04.015</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B52">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>J. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>X. N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>C. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hao</surname> <given-names>M. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Choe</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>He</surname> <given-names>H. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Thinning can increase shrub diversity and decrease herb diversity by regulating light and soil environments</article-title>. <source>Front. Plant Sci.</source> 13. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2022.948648</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">35991461</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B53">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zarfos</surname> <given-names>M. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dovciak</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lawrence</surname> <given-names>G. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>McDonnell</surname> <given-names>T. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sullivan</surname> <given-names>T. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Plant richness and composition in hardwood forest understories vary along an acidic deposition and soil-chemical gradient in the northeastern United States</article-title>. <source>Plant Soil</source> <volume>438</volume>, <fpage>461</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>477</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11104-019-04031-y</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B54">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Man</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Litter decomposition and nutrient release of typical forest communities in non-growing season in cold temperate zone. <italic>J. Beijing Forest</italic></article-title>. <source>Univer.</source> <volume>44</volume>, <fpage>65</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>74</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B55">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shao</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fu</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Effects of vegetation removal on soil properties and decomposer organisms</article-title>. <source>Soil Biol. Biochem.</source> <volume>43</volume>, <fpage>954</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>960</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.01.010</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B56">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>M. X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Qi</surname> <given-names>L. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>C. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>W. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Y. J.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2022a</year>). <article-title>Coupled relationship between soil physicochemical properties and plant diversity in the process of vegetation restoration</article-title>. <source>Forests</source> <volume>13</volume>:<fpage>648</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/f13050648</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B57">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>Y. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Z. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lou</surname> <given-names>A. R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2022b</year>). <article-title>Leaf litter decomposition characteristics and controlling factors across two contrasting forest types</article-title>. <source>J. Plant Ecol.</source> <volume>15</volume>, <fpage>1285</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1301</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jpe/rtac073</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B58">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Z. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>X. S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018a</year>). <article-title>Deposition and fate of mercury in litterfall, litter, and soil in coniferous and broad-leaved forests</article-title>. <source>J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeosci.</source> <volume>123</volume>, <fpage>2590</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>2603</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1029/2018JG004415</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B59">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dong</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Species diversity and soil physicochemical properties at Eucalyptus robustaolantations of different ages in Weiyuan</article-title>. <source>Chinese J. Appl. Environm. Biol.</source> <volume>27</volume>, <fpage>742</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>748</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B60">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>X. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>H. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wen</surname> <given-names>Y. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Goodale</surname> <given-names>U. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>X. Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>You</surname> <given-names>Y. M.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2018b</year>). <article-title>Effects of understory management on trade-offs and synergies between biomass carbon stock, plant diversity and timber production in eucalyptus plantations</article-title>. <source>For. Ecol. Manage.</source> <volume>410</volume>, <fpage>164</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>173</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foreco.2017.11.015</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>