<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="EN" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Food. Sci. Technol.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Food Science and Technology</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Food. Sci. Technol.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">2674-1121</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">1075789</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/frfst.2023.1075789</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Food Science and Technology</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Corn distiller&#x2019;s dried grains with solubles as a target for fermentation to improve bioactive functionality for animal feed and as a source for a novel microorganism with antibacterial activity</article-title>
<alt-title alt-title-type="left-running-head">Christopher et al.</alt-title>
<alt-title alt-title-type="right-running-head">
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/frfst.2023.1075789">10.3389/frfst.2023.1075789</ext-link>
</alt-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Christopher</surname>
<given-names>Ashish</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1545298/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ostrander</surname>
<given-names>Jesse</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mathew</surname>
<given-names>Jithin</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">
<sup>3</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sarkar</surname>
<given-names>Dipayan</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1362218/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Shetty</surname>
<given-names>Kalidas</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001">&#x2a;</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/469234/overview"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
<institution>Department of Plant Sciences</institution>, <institution>North Dakota State University</institution>, <addr-line>Fargo</addr-line>, <addr-line>ND</addr-line>, <country>United States</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
<institution>Department of Plant Pathology</institution>, <institution>North Dakota State University</institution>, <addr-line>Fargo</addr-line>, <addr-line>ND</addr-line>, <country>United States</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff3">
<sup>3</sup>
<institution>Department of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering</institution>, <institution>North Dakota State University</institution>, <addr-line>Fargo</addr-line>, <addr-line>ND</addr-line>, <country>United States</country>
</aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>
<bold>Edited by:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/735631/overview">Jailane de Souza Aquino</ext-link>, Federal University of Para&#xed;ba, Brazil</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>
<bold>Reviewed by:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1489165/overview">Jonas Vi&#x161;kelis</ext-link>, Lithuanian Research Centre for Agriculture and Forestry, Lithuania</p>
<p>
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/455267/overview">Sohail</ext-link>, Humboldt University of Berlin, Germany</p>
<p>
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/103666/overview">Abdeslam Asehraou</ext-link>, Mohamed Premier University, Morocco</p>
</fn>
<corresp id="c001">&#x2a;Correspondence: Kalidas Shetty, <email>kalidas.shetty@ndsu.edu</email>
</corresp>
<fn fn-type="other">
<p>This article was submitted to Food Biotechnology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Food Science and Technology</p>
</fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>17</day>
<month>01</month>
<year>2023</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2023</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>3</volume>
<elocation-id>1075789</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>20</day>
<month>10</month>
<year>2022</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>02</day>
<month>01</month>
<year>2023</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#xa9; 2023 Christopher, Ostrander, Mathew, Sarkar and Shetty.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2023</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Christopher, Ostrander, Mathew, Sarkar and Shetty</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>Plant-based bioenergy by-products such as corn distillers&#x2019; dried grains with solubles (DDGS) are widely utilized as animal feed sources and feed ingredients due to their balanced nutritional profile and animal health protective functional qualities. Bioprocessing of this bioenergy by-product using beneficial lactic acid bacteria (LAB)-based fermentation strategy to improve animal-health targeted functional qualities has wider relevance for animal feed applications. In this study, liquid extracts of corn DDGS were fermented with <italic>Lactiplantibacillus plantarum</italic> and <italic>Lactobacillus helveticus.</italic> The unfermented and fermented extracts were then analyzed (at 0, 24, 48 and 72-h) for their total soluble phenolic content (TSP), phenolic profile, antioxidant activity <italic>via</italic> ABTS and DPPH radical scavenging activity, and antimicrobial activity against the gut pathogen <italic>Helicobacter pylori</italic> using <italic>in vitro</italic> assay models. Statistical differences in antioxidant activity and phenolic content were observed among the unfermented and fermented extracts. The major phenolic compounds detected in corn DDGS were gallic, dihydroxybenzoic, <italic>p</italic>-coumaric, caffeic and ferulic acid, and catechin. Antimicrobial activity against <italic>H. pylori</italic> was observed for the unfermented extracts and the antimicrobial activity was attributed to the growth of a corn DDGS-endemic culture. The culture was isolated, sequenced, and identified as <italic>Bacillus amyloliquefaciens</italic>. Results of this study indicated that processing strategies of by-products such as LAB- based fermentation of corn DDGS could affect its bioactive-linked functional qualities due to microbial interaction with the phytochemicals. Furthermore, plant by-products can serve as novel sources of beneficial microflora that have relevance in wider agriculture, food safety, and therapeutic applications.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>antioxidant</kwd>
<kwd>antimicrobial</kwd>
<kwd>corn DDGS</kwd>
<kwd>fermentation</kwd>
<kwd>lactic acid bacteria</kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="s1">
<title>1 Introduction</title>
<p>Distillers dried grains with solubles (DDGS) is a corn bioenergy by-product from the dry grinding process during ethanol production. In 2021, over 15 billion gallons of ethanol were produced from corn in the United States with 44 million metric tons of DDGS being generated in the process (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">U.S. Grains Council, 2022</xref>). Corn DDGS is commonly used as a livestock feed in the dairy and beef cattle industry and used as an animal feed and ingredient source for poultry, swine, sheep, goat, and horses, as well as in aquaculture diets for fish and shrimp (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">U.S. Grains Council, 2018</xref>). The nutrient composition and digestibility of DDGS can vary among corn sources with ash, fiber, fat, lysine, tryptophan, and phosphorus content having high variation among the different DDGS sources (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">U.S. Grains Council, 2018</xref>). Feed rations supplemented with corn DDGS were found to alter the intestinal microbiota of the broiler chickens, and DDGS was negatively correlated with the genera <italic>Faecalibacterium</italic> and <italic>Streptococcus</italic> while <italic>Turicibacter</italic> was positively associated with corn DDGS supplemented broiler feed (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Abudabos et al., 2017</xref>). Egg-laying hens fed on a diet supplemented with corn DDGS resulted in the egg yolk having a lower proportion of saturated fatty acids and a higher proportion of unsaturated fatty acids, while DDGS supplemented up to 10% in the diet had no adverse effect on egg-laying performance (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Jiang et al., 2013</xref>). Recent studies have looked at replacing or supplementing soybean meal with corn DDGS as animal feed for poultry, swine, and cattle, with the goal of improving the nutritional qualities of the feed (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Paine et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Rho et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Ajao et al., 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Chesini et al., 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Ding et al., 2022</xref>). Apart being used as animal feed sources, corn DDGS can potentially be utilized as a value-added functional material for wood composites due to their physical and chemical attributes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Liaw et al., 2019</xref>).</p>
<p>There is an increasing interest in microbial fermentation of corn DDGS as a value-added strategy to improve its role as an animal feed. The carbohydrate component of corn DDGS can be converted to other compounds including succinic acid, acetone, butanol, ethanol, and lactic acid (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Iram et al., 2020</xref>). In addition to improving the nutritional value through microbial fermentation, corn DDGS is a rich source of phytochemical compounds that may provide antioxidant and wider animal health benefits in addition to the macronutrient and micronutrient composition (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Shin et al., 2018</xref>). Protein hydrolysates of corn DDGS were found to have potential use as naturally derived antioxidants in food, pet food, and feed systems with good protection against lipid oxidation, which is relevant for the improvement of stability of the product during storage (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Hu et al., 2020</xref>). In our previous studies, we have utilized LAB based fermentation of food substrates, like hulled emmer and pear juice to improve the health-protective health benefits in terms of its <italic>in vitro</italic> antioxidant and antihyperglycemic activity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Ankolekar et al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Christopher et al., 2021</xref>). However, LAB fermentation of corn-DDGS as substrate source targeting improvement of animal feed quality and antimicrobial property has not been explored previously. The scope and utilization of LAB-based fermentation of corn-DDGS to improve animal feed qualities targeting wider animal health and antimicrobial benefits is novel and investigated for the first time.</p>
<p>Apart from the nutritional and health benefits of corn DDGS which can be utilized in animal feed source to improve animal health, the native microflora associated with such by-products often have diverse biotechnological applications due to the production of useful enzymes or proteins. Therefore, it is important to screen and bioprocess bioactive enriched corn DDGS to improve their antioxidant and animal health-relevant properties. Additionally, isolating and characterizing the associated microflora of corn DDGS for potential biotechnological applications in agricultural, industrial, or pharmaceutical industries has wider relevance. Isolation and identification of novel microflora from corn-DDGS and its subsequent utilization in antimicrobial feed and agricultural applications has diverse value-added benefits. Therefore, the aim of this study was to advance the biotransformation of corn DDGS using LAB-based fermentation strategy to improve the phenolic phytochemical-linked functional qualities such as antioxidant activity and antimicrobial property against the gut pathogen <italic>Helicobacter pylori</italic>. Targeting <italic>H. pylori</italic> as a model antibacterial screening is based on the rationale that it shares similar environmental or growth conditions with bacterial pathogens such as <italic>Campylobacter jejuni</italic>, which is a major poultry-related food-borne pathogen, and hence can be subsequently targeted in poultry food safety applications. Furthermore, an unknown microbial culture isolated from unfermented corn DDGS was identified and the antimicrobial activity against <italic>H. pylori</italic> was characterized.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="materials|methods" id="s2">
<title>2 Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="s2-1">
<title>2.1 Preparation of the corn DDGS extracts</title>
<p>The corn DDGS sample was obtained from the Tharaldson ethanol plant (Casselton, North Dakota, USA) and was extracted in duplicate based on the cold-water extraction protocol as described in a previous study (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Christopher et al., 2018</xref>). For this study, the corn DDGS sample was blended with cold distilled water in a 1:4 ratio using a waring blender set at medium speed for 5&#xa0;min. The extracts were then centrifuged at 8,500&#xa0;rpm for 20&#xa0;min and the supernatant was collected and re-centrifuged at 8,500&#xa0;rpm for 15&#xa0;min. The extracts were then pasteurized in a water bath set at 70&#xb0;C for 15 min, after which the extracts were immediately cooled down using an ice bath, followed by storage at 4&#xb0;C prior to advancing LAB fermentation.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-2">
<title>2.2 Bacterial strains used</title>
<p>
<italic>Lactiplantibacillus plantarum</italic> (ATCC 8014), <italic>Lactobacillus helveticus</italic> (ATCC 15009), and <italic>Helicobacter pylori</italic> (ATCC 43579) strains were used in this study. The <italic>L. plantarum</italic> and <italic>L. helveticus</italic> cultures were stored as frozen stocks in MRS broth (Difco) containing 20% glycerol as the cryoprotectant. The <italic>H. pylori</italic> culture was stored as frozen stocks in <italic>H. pylori</italic> special peptone broth (HPSP) containing 10&#xa0;g&#xa0;L<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> special peptone (Oxoid, Basingstoke, UK), 5&#xa0;g&#xa0;L<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> sodium chloride (Fisher Scientific, MA, USA), 5&#xa0;g&#xa0;L<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> yeast extract (Difco), and 5&#xa0;g&#xa0;L<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> beef extract (Difco), with 20% glycerol as the cryoprotectant. The MRS and HPSP agar plates were prepared by the addition of 15&#xa0;g&#xa0;L<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> of granulated agar (Difco) to the respective broths. All media were autoclaved prior to use. For the revival of frozen bacterial stocks, 100&#xa0;&#x3bc;L of thawed <italic>L. plantarum</italic>, <italic>L. helveticus</italic>, and <italic>H. pylori</italic> stocks were inoculated in 10&#xa0;mL of the respective MRS or HPSP broth and incubated at 37&#xb0;C for 24&#xa0;h. Then 100&#xa0;&#x3bc;L of the 24- h culture was re-inoculated into 10&#xa0;mL sterile MRS or HPSP broth and incubated at 37&#xb0;C for another 24&#xa0;h. The revived cultures were used in the respective fermentation and <italic>in-vitro</italic> antimicrobial analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-3">
<title>2.3 Fermentation of the corn DDGS extracts</title>
<p>Fermentation of the corn DDGS extracts was done based on the protocol as described earlier (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Ankolekar et al., 2012</xref>). The frozen stocks of <italic>L. plantarum</italic> and <italic>L. helveticus</italic> were revived in MRS broth and 10&#xa0;mL of the revived cultures were added to the respective sterile flasks, each containing 90&#xa0;mL of the pasteurized corn DDGS extracts. For the unfermented extract or control, 10&#xa0;mL of sterile MRS broth was added to the extract instead of the cultures. The extracts were then incubated in duplicate at 37&#xb0;C for 72&#xa0;h and samples were collected at the 0, 24, 48, and 72-h fermentation timepoints for <italic>in vitro</italic> analysis. The growth of <italic>L. plantarum</italic> and <italic>L. helveticus</italic> was measured at each time point by serially diluting the fermented extracts followed by plating onto MRS agar plates. The plates were then incubated anaerobically at 37&#xb0;C for 48&#xa0;h in BBL GasPak jars (Becton, Dickinson &#x26; Co.) containing the BD GasPak EZ anaerobe container system sachets (Becton, Dickinson &#x26; Co.), after which the number of colonies were counted and expressed in log CFU&#xa0;mL<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>. The samples collected from the unfermented and fermented extracts at the 0, 24, 48 and 72-h timepoints were centrifuged at 8,500 rm for 15 min, after which the supernatant was collected and the pH of one of the duplicates was adjusted close to neutral using 1&#xa0;M NaOH, while a corresponding amount of water was added to the other duplicate (without pH adjustment) in order maintain equal volume. The unfermented and fermented extracts (with and without pH adjustment) were analyzed for their TSP content and antioxidant activity at the 0, 24, 48, and 72-h time points of fermentation. The samples of the unfermented and fermented extracts (with and without pH adjustment) at each time point were also filter-sterilized using sterile .22&#xa0;&#xb5;m syringe filters (Millipore Corp, MA, USA) and then stored at &#x2212;20&#xb0;C for later analysis of the phenolic profile and antimicrobial activity.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-4">
<title>2.4 Total soluble phenolic (TSP) content</title>
<p>The TSP content of the unfermented and fermented corn DDGS extracts were determined using the Folin-Ciocalteu method based on the protocol as described previously (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Shetty et al., 1995</xref>). To determine TSP content, .5&#xa0;mL aliquots of the unfermented and fermented extracts were taken into the respective glass tubes, after which 1&#xa0;mL of 95% ethanol, .5&#xa0;mL of 50% (v/v) Folin-Ciocalteu reagent, and 1&#xa0;mL of 5% sodium carbonate were added sequentially to the extracts. The tubes were then mixed using a vortex machine and incubated for 1&#xa0;h under dark condition. The absorbance values of corn-DDGS fermented and unfermented extracts were then measured at 725&#xa0;nm with a UV-visible spectrophotometer (Genesys 10S UV-VIS spectrophotometer, Thermo Scientific, NY, USA). Using a standard curve of different concentrations of gallic acid in 95% ethanol, the absorbance values of the extracts were converted into the TSP content, which was expressed in milligram gallic acid equivalents per Gram dry weight (mg GAE g<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> DW).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-5">
<title>2.5 Phenolic profile characterization using high-performance liquid chromatography</title>
<p>Phenolic profile of the corn DDGS samples was characterized using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method, in which 5&#xa0;&#x3bc;L of the unfermented and fermented corn DDGS extracts were injected using an Agilent ALS 1200 auto-extractor into an Agilent 1,260 series (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA) HPLC equipped with a D1100 CE diode array detector. A gradient elution with two solvents, 10&#xa0;mM phosphoric acid (pH 2.5) and 100% methanol, were used. The methanol concentration was increased to 60% for the first 8 min, then to 100% over the next 7 min, then decreased to 0% for the next 3&#xa0;min and was maintained for 7&#xa0;min with a total run time of 25&#xa0;min per injected sample run. The analytical column used was Agilent Zorbax SB-C18, 250&#x2013;4.6&#xa0;mm i.d., with packing material of 5&#xa0;&#x3bc;m particle size at a flow rate of .7&#xa0;mL&#xa0;min<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> at room temperature. The absorbance values were recorded at 214&#xa0;nm, 230&#xa0;nm, 260&#xa0;nm, and 306&#xa0;nm and the chromatogram was integrated using Agilent Chem station enhanced integrator. Pure standards of <italic>p</italic>-coumaric acid, gallic acid, dihydroxybenzoic acid, caffeic acid, ferulic acid and catechin in 100% methanol were used to calibrate the respective standard curves and retention times. The phenolic compounds detected in the extracts were expressed in micro Gram per Gram dry weight (&#xb5;g g<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-6">
<title>2.6 Antioxidant activity</title>
<p>The antioxidant activity of the unfermented and fermented corn DDGS extracts was measured by their scavenging activity against the free radicals 2, 2-Dipheny-1-Picryl hydrazyl (DPPH) (D9132-5G, Sigma-Aldrich), and 2, 2-Azino-bis-(3-ethylbenzthiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) (ABTS) (A1888-5G, Sigma-Aldrich) respectively. The DPPH scavenging assay was based on the protocol as described previously (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Kwon et al., 2006</xref>) in which .25&#xa0;mL of the extract was added to 1.25&#xa0;mL of 60&#xa0;mM DPPH (prepared in 95% ethanol) while the control had .25&#xa0;mL of 95% ethanol instead of the extract. After 5&#xa0;min of incubation, the extracts and their corresponding controls were centrifuged at 13,000&#xa0;rpm for 1&#xa0;min and the absorbance values of the supernatant was measured at 517&#xa0;nm using a UV-visible spectrophotometer (Genesys 10S UV-VIS spectrophotometer, Thermo Scientific, NY). The ABTS scavenging assay was based on the protocol as described previously (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Re et al., 1999</xref>) in which .05&#xa0;mL of the extract was added to 1&#xa0;mL of ABTS (prepared in 95% ethanol) while the control had .05&#xa0;mL of 95% ethanol instead of the extract. After 2&#xa0;min of incubation, the extracts and their corresponding controls were centrifuged at 13,000&#xa0;rpm for 1&#xa0;min and the absorbance values of the supernatant was measured at 734&#xa0;nm using a UV-visible spectrophotometer (Genesys 10S UV-VIS spectrophotometer, Thermo Scientific, NY). The absorbance values from the DPPH and ABTS radical scavenging assays were used to calculate the percentage of antioxidant activity of the extracts using the following formula:<disp-formula id="equ1">
<mml:math id="m1">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>%</mml:mo>
<mml:mtext>&#xa0;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">n</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">x</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">n</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi>
<mml:mtext>&#xa0;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">y</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">n</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">l</mml:mi>
<mml:mtext>&#xa0;</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">n</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">x</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi>
<mml:mtext>&#xa0;</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">n</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
<mml:mtext>&#xa0;</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">n</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">l</mml:mi>
<mml:mtext>&#xa0;</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">o</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">n</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mfrac>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">x</mml:mi>
<mml:mtext>&#xa0;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mn>100</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</disp-formula>
</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-7">
<title>2.7 Antimicrobial activity</title>
<p>The <italic>in vitro</italic> antimicrobial activity of the unfermented and fermented corn DDGS extracts against <italic>H. pylori</italic> was measured using the agar diffusion method based on the protocol described previously (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Ranilla et al., 2017</xref>). The frozen <italic>H. pylori</italic> culture was revived and streaked onto HPSP agar plates with the help of sterile cotton swabs. Then sterile 12.7&#xa0;mm paper discs (BBL Taxo, Becton, Dickinson &#x26; Co.) were placed on the HPSP agar plates and 100&#xa0;&#xb5;L of the filter sterilized extracts from the 0, 24, 48, and 72-h fermentation time points were added to their respective paper discs with each plate having a control disc of sterile water. The plates were incubated at 37&#xb0;C for 48&#xa0;h in BBL GasPak jars (Becton, Dickinson &#x26; Co.) containing BD GasPak Campy container system sachets (Becton, Dickinson &#x26; Co.) to help maintain a microaerophilic environment. After incubation, the plates were examined for any zones of inhibition (no growth) around the discs, and the diameter of the zones of inhibition was expressed in millimeters. To determine if the antimicrobial activity was due to the bacterial or fungal growth present on the surface of the pasteurized corn DDGS extracts, the corn DDGS extracts were untreated, pasteurized (70&#xb0;C for 15&#xa0;min), or autoclaved (121&#xb0;C for 20&#xa0;min) respectively, followed by incubation at 37&#xb0;C for 72&#xa0;h. At the 0, 24, 48, and 72-h time points of incubation, samples were collected and centrifuged at 8,500&#xa0;rpm for 15 min, after which the supernatant was collected and filter-sterilized for analysis of <italic>in vitro</italic> antimicrobial activity against <italic>H. pylori</italic>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-8">
<title>2.8 Isolation of a microorganism from pasteurized corn DDGS extract</title>
<p>The pasteurized corn DDGS extracts were incubated at 37&#xb0;C for up to 72&#xa0;h under aerobic conditions. After 24&#xa0;h of incubation, the microorganism growth present on the surface of the extracts was streaked onto nutrient agar plates (Difco, Becton Dickinson &#x26; Co.) using an inoculation loop, and the plates were incubated at 37&#xb0;C for 24&#xa0;h. The isolated colonies were then sub-cultured in 10&#xa0;mL nutrient broth (Difco, Becton Dickinson &#x26; Co.) for another 24&#xa0;h at 37&#xb0;C after which the culture broth was serially diluted, and the higher dilutions were streaked onto nutrient agar plates and incubated for another 24&#xa0;h at 37&#xb0;C. The plates containing the isolated colonies were used as the stock plates. The isolated colonies from the stock plates were inoculated in nutrient broth and incubated at 37&#xb0;C for a period of 72&#xa0;h. At the 0, 24, 48, and 72-h incubation time points, samples of the culture broth were collected aseptically and centrifuged at 8,500&#xa0;rpm for 15&#xa0;min. The cell free supernatant (CFS) containing the nutrient broth without the culture was collected and filter-sterilized using .20&#xa0;&#xb5;m syringe filters (Millipore Corp, MA, USA), followed by storage at &#x2212;20&#xb0;C for later analysis of <italic>in vitro</italic> antimicrobial activity against <italic>H. pylori.</italic>
</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-9">
<title>2.9 Characterization of antimicrobial activity</title>
<p>The effect of pH and temperature on the antimicrobial activity of the CFS collected at 0, 24, 48, and 72-h time points of incubation were analyzed. To determine the effect of pH on antimicrobial activity, the CFS was adjusted to acidic (pH 3.0), neutral (pH7.0), or alkaline (pH 9.0) pH respectively using 1N HCl or 1N NaOH, while CFS without pH adjustment (native pH) was used as control treatment. To determine the effect of temperature, the CFS was autoclaved at 121&#xb0;C for 20, 30, and 45&#xa0;min respectively, while the CFS without heat treatment was used as control. The pH-adjusted and heat-treated CFS along with their corresponding controls were filter-sterilized and stored at &#x2212;20&#xb0;C for later analysis of <italic>in vitro</italic> antimicrobial activity against <italic>H. pylori</italic>. The antimicrobial activity of CFS collected at 0, 24, 48, and 72-h time points of incubation was also compared to Nisin, which is an antibacterial peptide. Nisin was prepared to a working concentration of 1000 IU mL<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> in .02&#xa0;N HCl and was filter sterilized and stored at &#x2212;20&#xb0;C prior to analysis in the <italic>in vitro</italic> antimicrobial assay.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-10">
<title>2.10 PCR with bacterial and fungal-specific primers</title>
<p>Under aseptic conditions, a loopful of the culture isolated from pasteurized corn DDGS extracts was used in DNA extraction with the Qiagen DNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen, Cat. &#x23; 69106), and the quality of extracted DNA was determined with a UV-Vis spectrophotometer (NanoDrop&#x2122; 2000; ThermoFisher). To determine if the growth isolated from pasteurized corn-DDGS extract (unfermented) was prokaryotic or eukaryotic, conventional PCR (C1000 Touch thermal cycler, BioRad) was performed using bacterial-specific 16s rRNA universal primers and fungal-specific ITS4/5 primers. The PCR was performed in 50&#xa0;&#xb5;L reaction volumes containing 1X Green GoTaq reaction buffer with 1.5&#xa0;mM MgCl<sub>2</sub> (Promega, Madison, WI), .2&#xa0;mM of each dNTP, .4&#xa0;&#xb5;M of each primer, 1.25u of GoTaq DNA polymerase (Promega, Madison, WI), .5&#xa0;&#xb5;g of template DNA, and nuclease-free water. For the ITS4/5 primers, the following thermocycler parameters were used: initial denaturation at 95&#xb0;C for 3 min; 31 cycles of 94&#xb0;C for 90 s, 60&#xb0;C for 90 s, and 72&#xb0;C for 2 min, followed by a final extension at 72&#xb0;C for 10&#xa0;min. For the 16s rRNA primers, the following thermocycler parameters were used: initial denaturation at 95&#xb0;C for 10 min; 36 cycles of 95&#xb0;C for 30 s, 55&#xb0;C for 1 min, and 72&#xb0;C for 2 min, followed by a final extension at 72&#xb0;C for 5&#xa0;min. For both PCR runs, DNA isolated from <italic>Colletotrichum coccodes</italic> and <italic>Streptomyces scabies</italic>, both laboratory isolates, were used as the respective fungal and bacterial positive controls while sterile water was used as the negative control. The PCR product was purified using a PCR clean up kit (MidSci IBI Gel Extraction Kit, item &#x23;ASDNARNAKIT6) and was sent to MCLAB (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.mclab.com/DNA-Sequencing-Services.html">www.mclab.com/DNA-Sequencing-Services.html</ext-link>) for sequencing. The sequence data was analyzed using a consensus tool (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.geneious.com/">https://www.geneious.com/</ext-link>) and the resulting consensus sequence was compared to the nucleotide database using the Nucleotide BLAST tool at NCBI (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi">https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi</ext-link>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-11">
<title>2.11 PCR with <italic>Bacillus</italic> specific primer and construction of the phylogenetic tree</title>
<p>The DNA extracted from the bacterial isolate was subjected to conventional PCR using the <italic>Bacillus</italic> specific forward primer BacF (5&#x2032;- GGG&#x200b;AAA&#x200b;CCG&#x200b;GGG&#x200b;CTA&#x200b;ATA&#x200b;CCG&#x200b;GAT- 3&#x2032;) and the universal bacterial 16S rDNA reverse primer R1378 (5&#x2032;-CGG&#x200b;TGT&#x200b;GTA&#x200b;CAA&#x200b;GGC&#x200b;CCG&#x200b;GGA&#x200b;ACG-3&#x2032;) as described earlier (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Garbeva et al., 2003</xref>). The PCR was performed in 50&#xa0;&#xb5;L reaction volumes containing 1X Green GoTaq reaction buffer with 1.5&#xa0;mM MgCl<sub>2</sub> (Promega, Madison, WI), .2&#xa0;mM of each dNTP, .4&#xa0;&#xb5;M of each primer, 1.25u of GoTaq DNA polymerase (Promega, Madison, WI), .5&#xa0;&#xb5;g of template DNA, and nuclease-free water. The thermocycler parameters used were as follows: initial denaturation at 95&#xb0;C for 15 min; forty cycles of 95&#xb0;C for 60 s, 63&#xb0;C for 30 s, and 72&#xb0;C for 60 s, followed by a final extension at 72&#xb0;C for 8&#xa0;min. DNA isolated from <italic>Bacillus subtilis</italic> (ATCC 6051) and <italic>Helicobacter pylori</italic> (ATCC 43579) were used as the respective positive and negative controls. The PCR product was purified and sent to Eurofins (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.eurofins.com/genomic-services/our-services/custom-dna-sequencing/">https://www.eurofins.com/genomic-services/our-services/custom-dna-sequencing/</ext-link>) for sequencing. From the resulting sequence data, a consensus sequence was generated using MultAlign (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://multalin.toulouse.inra.fr/multalin/">http://multalin.toulouse.inra.fr/multalin/</ext-link>). A pairwise sequence alignment of the forward sequence with a reverse complement of the reverse sequence was done using the Smith-Waterman algorithm, and the missing base pairs were filled with the help of complementary base-pairing from the aligned sequences. This step was done to ensure that the final 16s rRNA sequence had the best base coverage. The final consensus sequence was submitted to the GenBank (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://submit.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/">https://submit.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/</ext-link>) and the accession number ON553411 was assigned to the 16S rRNA sequence (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://submit.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/subs/?search=SUB11502195">https://submit.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/subs/?search&#x3d;SUB11502195</ext-link>). Nucleotide BLAST tool at NCBI was used to compare ON553411 against the database with the taxonomy ID - 1,386 (<italic>Bacillus</italic> species) in the organism category. A phylogenetic analysis of ON553411 was done with MEGA X software (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Kumar et al., 2018</xref>) in which the sequence was first aligned using MUSCLE algorithm followed by phylogenetic analysis <italic>via</italic> the neighbor-joining, maximum-parsimony, and maximum-likelihood method, each performed with 100 bootstrap replications.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-12">
<title>2.12 Statistical analysis</title>
<p>Fermentation, phenolic profile characterization, and antioxidant and antimicrobial assays were repeated two times with repeat extractions and duplicate samples. The means and standard error were calculated from 12 n) data points using Microsoft Excel XP software. The analysis of covariance was determined using Statistical Analysis Software (SAS version 9.4, SAS Institute, Cary, NC). Statistical mean separation among extracts, fermentation time points, and extract &#xd7; fermentation time point interactions were determined using Tukey&#x2019;s test at .05 probability level.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="results|discussion" id="s3">
<title>3 Results and discussion</title>
<sec id="s3-1">
<title>3.1 Total soluble phenolic content (TSP) and phenolic profile</title>
<p>The TSP content of the corn DDGS extracts (unfermented and fermented) ranged from 2.49 to 2.85&#xa0;mg GAE g<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> DW (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1</xref>). Statistical differences in TSP content were observed among main effects of extracts and fermentation time points individually (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; .05), but not among extract &#xd7; fermentation time point interactions. Overall, unfermented extracts had higher TSP content and mean TSP content increased after 24&#xa0;h of fermentation. The stability of TSP in unfermented and fermented corn DDGS after 24&#xa0;h has relevance in utilizing them in value-added feed applications targeting phytochemical-linked functional benefits. In our previous studies, we have targeted improvement of phenolic stability in food substrates like wheat and pear juice using LAB based fermentation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Ankolekar et al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Christopher et al., 2021</xref>). In the current study, similar fermentation strategy was used to enhance stability and bioavailability of phenolic bioactive in animal feed substrate, such as corn-DDGS.</p>
<fig id="F1" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Total soluble phenolic content (mg GAE g<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>) of the unfermented and fermented corn DDGS extracts. Different lowercase letters represent statistical differences in TSP content among the extracts (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; .05). Different uppercase letters represent statistical differences in TSP content among the fermentation time points (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; .05).</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="frfst-03-1075789-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Individual phenolic compounds detected through HPLC analysis of the unfermented and fermented corn DDGS were gallic acid, dihydroxybenzoic acid, <italic>p</italic>-coumaric acid, ferulic acid, caffeic acid, and catechin, with their respective concentrations ranging from 1.51 to 6.97, 1.48 to 9.53, 10.18 to 16.70, .27 to 1.65, .51 to 1.63, and 2.35&#x2013;4.44&#xa0;&#x3bc;g&#xa0;g<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>). In a previous study, corn-DDGS samples collected from different ethanol production plants in the US were analyzed for their phytochemical content and the study found that corn DDGS had a higher content of tocopherols, tocotrienols, lutein and ferulic acid (free and bound) when compared to yellow corn (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Shin et al., 2018</xref>). The same study found the free ferulic acid content to be 3 times higher in the corn DDGS samples when compared to yellow corn (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Shin et al., 2018</xref>). In another study, corn DDGS samples from three different ethanol production plants were found to have the phenolic compounds-vanillic, caffeic, <italic>p</italic>-coumaric, ferulic, and sinapic acids, with ferulic and <italic>p</italic>-coumaric acid accounting for 80% of the total phenolic acid content (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Luthria et al., 2012</xref>). Also, the same study found the total phenolic acid content to be 3 times higher in the corn DDGS samples when compared to the yellow corn samples (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Luthria et al., 2012</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap id="T1" position="float">
<label>TABLE 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Phenolic profile of the unfermented and fermented corn DDGS extracts (&#xb5;g g<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>).</p>
</caption>
<table>
<thead valign="top">
<tr>
<th align="left">Fermentation time point (h)</th>
<th align="left">Extracts</th>
<th align="left"/>
<th align="left"/>
<th colspan="2" align="left">Phenolic profile<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn1">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>
<sup>,</sup>
<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn2">
<sup>b</sup>
</xref>
<sup>,</sup>
<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn3">
<sup>c</sup>
</xref>
</th>
<th align="left"/>
<th align="left"/>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left">Gallic acid<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn3">
<sup>c</sup>
</xref>
</td>
<td align="left">Dihydroxybenzoic acid<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn3">
<sup>c</sup>
</xref>
</td>
<td align="left">
<italic>p</italic>-coumaric acid<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn3">
<sup>c</sup>
</xref>
</td>
<td align="left">Ferulic acid<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn3">
<sup>c</sup>
</xref>
</td>
<td align="left">Caffeic acid<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn3">
<sup>c</sup>
</xref>
</td>
<td align="left">Catechin<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn4">
<sup>d</sup>
</xref>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">0</td>
<td align="left">Unfermented</td>
<td align="left">5.49 &#xb1; 0.8b</td>
<td align="left">3.72 &#xb1; 0.1</td>
<td align="left">13.76 &#xb1; 0.0def</td>
<td align="left">ND</td>
<td align="left">1.27 &#xb1; 0.0g</td>
<td align="left">2.37 &#xb1; 0.0B</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left">
<italic>L. plantarum</italic> fermented/adjusted pH</td>
<td align="left">5.14 &#xb1; 0.1bc</td>
<td align="left">1.48 &#xb1; 0.3</td>
<td align="left">14.26 &#xb1; 0.0def</td>
<td align="left">.27 &#xb1; 0.0</td>
<td align="left">1.29 &#xb1; 0.0&#xa0;fg</td>
<td align="left">2.35 &#xb1; 0.1B</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left">
<italic>L. plantarum</italic> fermented/unadjusted pH</td>
<td align="left">5.03 &#xb1; 0.1bcd</td>
<td align="left">1.88 &#xb1; 0.0</td>
<td align="left">16.35 &#xb1; 0.2a</td>
<td align="left">.68 &#xb1; 0.0</td>
<td align="left">1.42 &#xb1; 0.0cd</td>
<td align="left">2.69 &#xb1; 0.0B</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left">
<italic>L. helveticus</italic> fermented/adjusted pH</td>
<td align="left">5.32 &#xb1; 0.0bc</td>
<td align="left">4.04 &#xb1; 0.0</td>
<td align="left">14.25 &#xb1; 0.1def</td>
<td align="left">.33 &#xb1; 0.0</td>
<td align="left">1.32 &#xb1; 0.0ef</td>
<td align="left">2.48 &#xb1; 0.4B</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left">
<italic>L. helveticus</italic> fermented/unadjusted pH</td>
<td align="left">5.05 &#xb1; 0.1bcd</td>
<td align="left">2.05 &#xb1; 0.0</td>
<td align="left">16.16 &#xb1; 0.1abc</td>
<td align="left">.72 &#xb1; 0.0</td>
<td align="left">1.39 &#xb1; 0.0d</td>
<td align="left">2.47 &#xb1; 0.0B</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">24</td>
<td align="left">Unfermented</td>
<td align="left">5.56 &#xb1; 0.1b</td>
<td align="left">2.00 &#xb1; 0.0</td>
<td align="left">16.27 &#xb1; 0.0&#xa0;ab</td>
<td align="left">.79 &#xb1; 0.0</td>
<td align="left">1.43 &#xb1; 0.0c</td>
<td align="left">3.11 &#xb1; 0.0A</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left">
<italic>L. plantarum</italic> fermented/adjusted pH</td>
<td align="left">1.78 &#xb1; 0.0ij</td>
<td align="left">ND</td>
<td align="left">14.39 &#xb1; 0.0def</td>
<td align="left">.39 &#xb1; .01</td>
<td align="left">1.49 &#xb1; 0.0b</td>
<td align="left">3.55 &#xb1; 0.1A</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left">
<italic>L. plantarum</italic> fermented/unadjusted pH</td>
<td align="left">1.51 &#xb1; 0.0j</td>
<td align="left">ND</td>
<td align="left">13.44 &#xb1; 0.0efgh</td>
<td align="left">.80 &#xb1; 0.0</td>
<td align="left">1.33 &#xb1; 0.0e</td>
<td align="left">3.77 &#xb1; 0.0A</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left">
<italic>L. helveticus</italic> fermented/adjusted pH</td>
<td align="left">2.90 &#xb1; 0.0ghi</td>
<td align="left">4.11 &#xb1; 0.0</td>
<td align="left">14.55 &#xb1; 0.0cdef</td>
<td align="left">.45 &#xb1; 0.0</td>
<td align="left">1.30 &#xb1; 0.0&#xa0;fg</td>
<td align="left">3.00 &#xb1; 0.1A</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left">
<italic>L. helveticus</italic> fermented/unadjusted pH</td>
<td align="left">1.96 &#xb1; 0.0ij</td>
<td align="left">4.21 &#xb1; 0.0</td>
<td align="left">14.70 &#xb1; 0.0bcde</td>
<td align="left">.72 &#xb1; 0.0</td>
<td align="left">1.27 &#xb1; 0.0g</td>
<td align="left">4.38 &#xb1; 0.9A</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">48</td>
<td align="left">Unfermented</td>
<td align="left">6.97 &#xb1; 0.1a</td>
<td align="left">9.53 &#xb1; 0.1</td>
<td align="left">12.20 &#xb1; 1.2gh</td>
<td align="left">.59 &#xb1; 0.0</td>
<td align="left">.92 &#xb1; 0.0i</td>
<td align="left">3.72 &#xb1; 0.8A</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left">
<italic>L. plantarum</italic> fermented/adjusted pH</td>
<td align="left">4.45 &#xb1; 0.3bcdef</td>
<td align="left">ND</td>
<td align="left">11.92 &#xb1; 0.0hi</td>
<td align="left">1.65 &#xb1; 0.0</td>
<td align="left">1.19 &#xb1; 0.0h</td>
<td align="left">3.79 &#xb1; 0.1A</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left">
<italic>L. plantarum</italic> fermented/unadjusted pH</td>
<td align="left">3.86 &#xb1; 0.0efg</td>
<td align="left">ND</td>
<td align="left">13.32 &#xb1; 0.0efgh</td>
<td align="left">.72 &#xb1; 0.1</td>
<td align="left">1.28 &#xb1; 0.0g</td>
<td align="left">4.21 &#xb1; 0.2A</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left">
<italic>L. helveticus</italic> fermented/adjusted pH</td>
<td align="left">4.99 &#xb1; 0.1bcde</td>
<td align="left">3.47 &#xb1; 0.0</td>
<td align="left">13.02 &#xb1; 0.0fgh</td>
<td align="left">.66 &#xb1; 0.0</td>
<td align="left">1.20 &#xb1; 0.0h</td>
<td align="left">3.09 &#xb1; 0.0A</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left">
<italic>L. helveticus</italic> fermented/unadjusted pH</td>
<td align="left">4.71 &#xb1; 0.0bcde</td>
<td align="left">4.47 &#xb1; 0.0</td>
<td align="left">16.70 &#xb1; 0.0a</td>
<td align="left">.79 &#xb1; 0.0</td>
<td align="left">1.49 &#xb1; 0.0b</td>
<td align="left">3.67 &#xb1; 0.0A</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">72</td>
<td align="left">Unfermented</td>
<td align="left">4.48 &#xb1; 0.1bcdef</td>
<td align="left">2.68 &#xb1; 0.9</td>
<td align="left">10.18 &#xb1; 0.0j</td>
<td align="left">ND</td>
<td align="left">.70 &#xb1; 0.0j</td>
<td align="left">3.92 &#xb1; 0.0A</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left">
<italic>L. plantarum</italic> fermented/adjusted pH</td>
<td align="left">3.92 &#xb1; 0.1defg</td>
<td align="left">ND</td>
<td align="left">12.95 &#xb1; 0.1fgh</td>
<td align="left">.96 &#xb1; 0.1</td>
<td align="left">1.19 &#xb1; 0.0h</td>
<td align="left">4.44 &#xb1; 0.0A</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left">
<italic>L. plantarum</italic> fermented/unadjusted pH</td>
<td align="left">3.34 &#xb1; 0.1fgh</td>
<td align="left">ND</td>
<td align="left">10.40 &#xb1; 0.0ij</td>
<td align="left">.51 &#xb1; 0.0</td>
<td align="left">.51 &#xb1; 0.0k</td>
<td align="left">3.78 &#xb1; 0.0A</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left">
<italic>L. helveticus</italic> fermented/adjusted pH</td>
<td align="left">4.27 &#xb1; 0.2cdef</td>
<td align="left">3.40 &#xb1; 0.0</td>
<td align="left">13.37 &#xb1; 0.0efgh</td>
<td align="left">ND</td>
<td align="left">1.51 &#xb1; 0.0b</td>
<td align="left">3.33 &#xb1; 0.0A</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left">
<italic>L. helveticus</italic> fermented/unadjusted pH</td>
<td align="left">2.68 &#xb1; .01hi</td>
<td align="left">4.02 &#xb1; 0.0</td>
<td align="left">15.47 &#xb1; 0.1abcd</td>
<td align="left">.86 &#xb1; 0.0</td>
<td align="left">1.63 &#xb1; 0.0a</td>
<td align="left">3.65 &#xb1; 0.0A</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn id="Tfn1">
<label>
<sup>a</sup>
</label>
<p>Mean value &#xb1;standard error.</p>
</fn>
<fn id="Tfn2">
<label>
<sup>b</sup>
</label>
<p>Concentration expressed in microgram per Gram dry weight (&#xb5;g g<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> D.W).</p>
</fn>
<fn id="Tfn3">
<label>
<sup>c</sup>
</label>
<p>Different lowercase letters in each column represent statistically significant differences between extract &#xd7; fermentation time point interactions (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; .05).</p>
</fn>
<fn id="Tfn4">
<label>
<sup>d</sup>
</label>
<p>Different uppercase letters in this column represent statistically significant differences in catechin content between fermentation time points (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; .05).</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>In the current study, <italic>p</italic>-coumaric acid was the dominant phenolic acid while ferulic acid was present in smaller quantities (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>). Dihydroxybenzoic acid was detected in the unfermented and <italic>L. helveticus</italic> fermented extracts and not in the <italic>L. plantarum</italic> fermented extracts, thereby indicating possible microbial metabolism of dihydroxybenzoic acid by <italic>L. plantarum</italic>. Also, gallic acid was higher in the unfermented extracts when compared to the fermented extracts at the 24 and 48-h time points, thereby indicating possible microbial metabolism of gallic acid by <italic>L. helveticus</italic> and <italic>L. plantarum</italic>. Furthermore, the low pH generated during fermentation due to growth of LAB can also affect the stability of phenolic compounds, as a pH close to neutral favors a better stability of these water-soluble phenolics (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Friedman and J&#xfc;rgens, 2000</xref>). These results indicate that fermentation of corn DDGS with LAB did not drastically alter the TSP content, however the profile and concentration of individual phenolic compounds can be altered depending upon the type of LAB used for fermentation and total duration of fermentation. The result of this study has wider relevance to utilize LAB based fermentation for improving animal feed quality and subsequently enhancing animal health benefits of corn-DDGS, and can also be explored for other animal feed applications.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-2">
<title>3.2 Antioxidant activity</title>
<p>The ABTS and DPPH radical scavenging activity of corn DDGS extracts (unfermented and fermented) ranged from 74% to 83.9% and 57.3%&#x2013;81.8% respectively (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figures 2</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">3</xref>). Statistical differences in ABTS and DPPH radical scavenging activity were observed among extracts, fermentation time points, and extract &#xd7; fermentation time point interactions (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; .05). Overall, the unfermented and fermented corn DDGS extracts had higher ABTS scavenging activity when compared to DPPH scavenging activity. This difference in activity between two free radical scavenging assays is due to the chemical nature of the radicals in which DPPH being a more stable radical, requires stronger antioxidant activity when compared to ABTS. In a previous study, corn DDGS samples collected from different ethanol production plants in the US were analyzed for their antioxidant activity <italic>via</italic> DPPH radical scavenging activity, and the activity was found to vary greatly among the corn DDGS samples, with activity being 3 times higher in the corn DDGS samples when compared to yellow corn (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Shin et al., 2018</xref>). Similarly in another study, the antioxidant activity of corn DDGS samples from three different ethanol production plants was found to be 2.5 times higher when compared to yellow corn (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Luthria et al., 2012</xref>). Protein hydrolysates and peptides from corn by-products display antioxidant activity which can be used to improve the shelf-life of animal feed (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Hu et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Sharma et al., 2022</xref>). In the current study, LAB fermentation resulted in an improvement in antioxidant activity (based on DPPH results) after 24&#xa0;h fermentation. The results of the current study indicated that fermentation of corn DDGS, specifically for 24&#xa0;h can be a potential strategy to improve the stability of phenolic phytochemicals and associated antioxidant activity targeting wider animal feed and animal health benefits. In future, other animal feed sources like soybean or canola meal can be targeted for LAB based fermentation to potentially improve animal health relevant functional qualities of feed or feed ingredients.</p>
<fig id="F2" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 2</label>
<caption>
<p>2, 2-Azino-bis-(3-ethylbenzthiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) (ABTS) scavenging activity (% inhibition). Different letter represents statistical differences in ABTS scavenging activity among the extract &#xd7; fermentation time point interactions (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; .05).</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="frfst-03-1075789-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig id="F3" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 3</label>
<caption>
<p>2, 2-Dipheny-1-Picryl hydrazyl (DPPH) scavenging activity (% inhibition). Different letter represents statistical differences in DPPH scavenging activity among the extract &#xd7; fermentation time point interactions (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; .05).</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="frfst-03-1075789-g003.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-3">
<title>3.3 Antimicrobial activity</title>
<p>Antimicrobial activity against <italic>H. pylori</italic> was observed only among the unfermented extracts at the 48 and 72&#xa0;h fermentation time points, while no antimicrobial activity was observed for the extracts fermented with <italic>L. plantarum</italic> and <italic>L. helveticus</italic> (with and without pH adjustment) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figures 4</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">5</xref>). The zones of inhibition for the unfermented extracts ranged from 2 to 4&#xa0;mm and 11&#x2013;12&#xa0;mm at the 48 and 72&#xa0;h fermentation time points respectively.</p>
<fig id="F4" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 4</label>
<caption>
<p>Antimicrobial activity of unfermented and <italic>L. plantarum</italic> fermented (with and without pH adjustment) corn-DDGS extracts against <italic>H. pylori</italic> at <bold>(A)</bold> 48-and <bold>(B)</bold> 72-h fermentation time points. C- control (sterile water), one- unfermented extract, 2-fermented extract (adjusted pH), and three- fermented extract (unadjusted pH). Zone of inhibition measured in millimeters (mm).</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="frfst-03-1075789-g004.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig id="F5" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 5</label>
<caption>
<p>Antimicrobial activity of unfermented and <italic>L. heveticus</italic> fermented (with and without pH adjustment) corn DDGS extracts against <italic>H. pylori</italic> at <bold>(A)</bold> 48-and <bold>(B)</bold> 72-h fermentation time points. C- control (sterile water), one- unfermented extract, two- fermented extract (adjusted pH), and three- fermented extract (unadjusted pH). Zone of inhibition measured in millimeters (mm).</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="frfst-03-1075789-g005.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Growth of an unknown microorganism was observed at the surface of the unfermented pasteurized corn DDGS extracts after 24&#xa0;h of incubation at 37&#xb0;C. To confirm if the antimicrobial activity was due to the microorganism growth, the corn DDGS extracts were untreated, pasteurized, or autoclaved, followed by incubation at 37&#xb0;C for 72&#xa0;h. A microbial lawn appeared at the surface of the pasteurized corn DDGS extracts after 24&#xa0;h of incubation, while some turbidity was observed for the untreated extracts which could be due to microbial growth, and no turbidity or growth was observed in the autoclaved extracts (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure 6</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F6" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 6</label>
<caption>
<p>Presence of microorganism growth at the surface of pasteurized corn-DDGS extracts. I- untreated extract, II- pasteurized extract (70&#xb0;C for 15&#xa0;min), and III- autoclaved extract (121&#xb0;C for 20&#xa0;min).</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="frfst-03-1075789-g006.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Antimicrobial activity was observed only for the pasteurized extract at the 48 and 72&#xa0;h incubation time points, with zones of inhibition ranging from 6 to 10&#xa0;mm and 7&#x2013;14&#xa0;mm, respectively (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">Figure 7</xref>). These results indicated that the pasteurization of the corn DDGS extract was responsible for the growth of the microorganism endemic to the corn DDGS sample, and pasteurization led to the potential activation of bacterial spores, which later was confirmed belonging to spore producing genus of <italic>Bacillus.</italic> Furthermore, the microorganism growth which was present only in the pasteurized corn DDGS extracts was responsible for exhibiting antimicrobial activity against <italic>H. pylori</italic>.</p>
<fig id="F7" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 7</label>
<caption>
<p>Antimicrobial activity of untreated, pasteurized, and autoclaved corn DDGS extracts against <italic>H. pylori</italic> at the <bold>(A)</bold> 48-h and <bold>(B)</bold> 72-h incubation time points. C- control (sterile water), one- untreated extract, two- pasteurized extract, and three- autoclaved extract. Zone of inhibition measured in millimeters (mm).</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="frfst-03-1075789-g007.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-4">
<title>3.4 Characterization of antimicrobial activity</title>
<p>The antimicrobial activity was affected by pH and high temperature. With regard to the effect of pH, at the 48-h incubation time point, no antimicrobial activity was observed for CFS adjusted to acidic pH (pH 3.0) while the activity was unaffected at neutral (pH 7.0) and alkaline (pH 9.0) when compared to the control (native pH 5.0) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8">Figure 8</xref>). At the 72-h incubation time point, mild antimicrobial activity was observed at acidic pH (pH 3.0) while the activity was unaffected at neutral and alkaline pH (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F8" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 8</label>
<caption>
<p>Antimicrobial activity of pH-adjusted cell free supernatant (CFS) against <italic>H. pylori</italic> at <bold>(A)</bold> 48- h and <bold>(B)</bold> 72-h incubation time points. C- control (native pH 5.0), one- acidic (pH 3.0), two- neutral (pH 7.0), and three- alkaline (pH 9.0). Zone of inhibition measured in millimeters (mm).</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="frfst-03-1075789-g008.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>In terms of the effect of temperature, at the 48-h incubation time point, no antimicrobial activity was observed for CFS treated at 121&#xb0;C for 20, 30, and 45&#xa0;min respectively when compared to the control (unadjusted pH) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9">Figure 9</xref>). However, at the 72-h incubation time point, mild antimicrobial activity was observed for CFS treated at 121&#xb0;C for 20, 30, and 45&#xa0;min respectively when compared to the control (untreated) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9">Figure 9</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F9" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 9</label>
<caption>
<p>Antimicrobial activity of heat-treated (121&#xb0;C) cell free supernatant (CFS) against <italic>H. pylori</italic> at <bold>(A)</bold> 48-h and <bold>(B)</bold> 72-h incubation time points. C- control (untreated), 1&#x2013;20 min, 2&#x2013;30 min, and 3&#x2013;45&#xa0;min. Zone of inhibition measured in millimeters (mm).</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="frfst-03-1075789-g009.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>The sensitivity of antimicrobial activity to pH and high temperature indicated the possibility of extracellular antimicrobial peptides produced by unknown bacterial/fungal growth are potentially responsible for antimicrobial activity against <italic>H. pylori</italic>. Furthermore, the mild antimicrobial activity observed for heat-treated CFS at the 72-h incubation time point indicated that sufficient concentration of these antimicrobials was produced to show antimicrobial activity even at a high temperature, thereby indicating that these antimicrobials are generally heat stable. Finally, the CFS at the 48 and 72-h incubation time points had similar antimicrobial activity when compared to Nisin (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F10">Figure 10</xref>), thereby indicating that these potential peptides would have relevant applications for developing natural antibiotics with potential antimicrobial activity against other bacterial pathogens. Further in future studies more detailed functional characterization to confirm the peptide nature of antimicrobial is essential.</p>
<fig id="F10" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 10</label>
<caption>
<p>Antimicrobial activity of cell free supernatant (CFS) and Nisin against <italic>H. pylori</italic> at 48-h and 72-h incubation time points. C- control (sterile water), N- Nisin (1000 IU/mL), 48 h- and 72 h-incubation time point.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="frfst-03-1075789-g010.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-5">
<title>3.5 Isolation and identification of microorganism growth</title>
<p>The isolated microbial growth on the stock plates appeared as dry wrinkled colonies on the nutrient agar plate which is the colony morphology often associated with certain <italic>Bacillus</italic> spp., (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F11">Figure 11</xref>) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Koneman et al., 1997</xref>). The ability of <italic>Bacillus</italic> spp., to form a biofilm or lawn at the surface of the liquid medium (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure 6</xref>) has also been reported in a previous study (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Lu et al., 2018</xref>). Species belonging to <italic>Bacillus</italic> are rod-shaped, endospore-forming, Gram-positive bacteria that are abundant in the soil and can produce structurally diverse antimicrobial peptides that exhibit a wide spectrum of antibiotic activity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Sumi et al., 2015</xref>). The formation of endospores enables <italic>Bacillus</italic> spp., to survive long periods of adverse environmental conditions and the germination of endospores can occur due to pressure, chemical treatment, or sublethal heat treatment (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Cronin and Wilkinson, 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Luu et al., 2015</xref>). In the current study, the pasteurization of the corn DDGS extracts at 70&#xb0;C allowed endospores to survive which then germinated under normal cellular growth conditions resulting in the growth of the <italic>Bacillus</italic> isolate, while the untreated and autoclaved (121&#xb0;C) extracts did not show any growth of the isolate (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure 6</xref>). The absence of the microbial lawn in the untreated extract can be attributed to the non-germination of endospores due to no sublethal heat treatment, while autoclaving the extracts at 121&#xb0;C could have potentially denatured the endospores. Furthermore, during the fermentation experiment, the absence of the microbial lawn in the fermented extracts can be attributed to the low pH generated by growth of LAB which can potentially inhibit the growth of the <italic>Bacillus</italic> isolate.</p>
<fig id="F11" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 11</label>
<caption>
<p>Colony morphology of unknown microbial growth isolated from pasteurized corn-DDGS extracts.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="frfst-03-1075789-g011.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-6">
<title>3.6 PCR identification of microorganism growth and phylogenetic analysis</title>
<p>To identify whether the growth was bacterial or fungal, the isolated culture was subjected to PCR using bacterial-specific 16s rRNA primers and fungal-specific ITS4/5 primers. PCR with 16s rRNA primers gave an amplified product while no product was observed with the fungal-specific primers, therefore indicating that the isolated growth was bacterial (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F12">Figure 12</xref>). Sequence analysis showed a close match with <italic>Bacillus</italic> spp (99.51%&#x2013;99.75%). However, a higher degree of specificity could not be determined with the universal 16s rRNA primers. To improve the accuracy of the bacterial identification, PCR with <italic>Bacillus</italic>-specific 16S rRNA primers was performed (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F13">Figure 13</xref>), and sequence analysis of the PCR product (956 bp) (consensus sequence assigned as ON553411) showed a close match (99.9%) with <italic>Bacillus amyloliquefaciens</italic>, <italic>B. velezensis</italic>, <italic>B. subtilis</italic>, and <italic>B. siamensis</italic>. To determine the closest match among these candidates, a phylogenetic tree was constructed using the neighbor joining method with 100 bootstrap replications and ON553411 was found to share a cluster with <italic>B. amyloliquefaciens</italic> strain B6 16S rRNA gene partial sequence (MN908674.1) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F14">Figure 14</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F12" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 12</label>
<caption>
<p>PCR with fungal-specific ITS 1/4 primers: <bold>(A)</bold>- 100 bp ladder, <bold>(B)</bold>- DNA isolate (first replicate), <bold>(C)</bold>- DNA isolate (second replicate), <bold>(D)</bold>- DNA isolate (third replicate), <bold>(E)</bold>-fungal control (<italic>Colletotrichum coccodes</italic>), <bold>(F)</bold>- bacterial control (<italic>Streptomyces scabies</italic>), <bold>(G)</bold>-negative control (water), and <bold>(H)</bold>- 100 bp ladder. PCR with bacterial-specific 16s rRNA primers: <bold>(I)</bold>- 100 bp ladder, <bold>(J)</bold>- DNA isolate (first replicate), <bold>(K)</bold>- DNA isolate (second replicate), <bold>(L)</bold>- DNA isolate (third replicate), <bold>(M)</bold>-fungal control (<italic>C. coccodes</italic>), <bold>(N)</bold>- bacterial control (<italic>S. scabies</italic>), <bold>(O)</bold>- negative control (water), <bold>(P)</bold>- 100 bp ladder.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="frfst-03-1075789-g012.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig id="F13" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 13</label>
<caption>
<p>PCR with <italic>Bacillus</italic>-specific primers: <bold>(A)</bold>- 100 bp ladder, <bold>(B)</bold>- 16s rRNA PCR product, <bold>(C)</bold>- positive control (<italic>B. subtilis</italic>), <bold>(D)</bold>-negative control (<italic>H. pylori</italic>), <bold>(E)</bold>-negative control (water), <bold>(F)</bold>- DNA isolate (single replicate), <bold>(G)</bold>- 100 bp ladder.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="frfst-03-1075789-g013.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig id="F14" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 14</label>
<caption>
<p>Phylogenetic analysis of ON553411 sequence based on 16SrRNA gene sequences of <italic>Bacillus</italic> strains. Neighbor joining method was used with 100 bootstrap replications and genetic distances were computed by Kimura&#x2019;s two-parameter model. Only bootstrap percentages above 50% are shown. Bars, .005 substitutions per nucleotide position.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="frfst-03-1075789-g014.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Although PCR based methods using 16S rRNA sequencing are used to discriminate between <italic>Bacillus</italic> spp., a high degree of sequence similarity can make it difficult to accurately discriminate between the species. In a previous study, a <italic>Bacillus</italic> strain isolated from soil shared a high sequence similarity (95%&#x2013;99%) with 16S rRNA and <italic>gyr</italic>B sequences of <italic>B. amyloliquefaciens</italic> and <italic>B. velezensis</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Wang, Lee, Tai &#x26; Kuo, 2008</xref>). In the same study, a phylogenetic analysis of the 16S rRNA sequences showed that the <italic>Bacillus</italic> strain isolated from the soil was in the same cluster as other <italic>Bacillus</italic> species including <italic>B. velezensis</italic>, <italic>B. amyloliquefaciens</italic>, and <italic>B. vallismortis</italic>, thereby making it difficult to accurately identify the isolated strain (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Wang et al., 2008</xref>). Similarly in another study, sequence analysis of the primer annealing sites revealed no clear-cut differences in the variable region (V 1) of the 16S rRNA and <italic>gyr</italic>B gene among the <italic>B. cereus</italic> and <italic>B. thuringiensis</italic> strains that were tested (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Chen &#x26; Tsen, 2002</xref>). These studies indicated that identification of <italic>Bacillus</italic> spp., can be challenging due to high sequence similarity, especially among strains of <italic>B. amyloliquefaciens</italic> and <italic>B. velezensis</italic>. Apart from the production of antimicrobial peptides against <italic>H. pylori</italic>, the corn DDGS isolate which was identified as a <italic>B.amyloliquefaciens</italic> strain could also have potential antimicrobial activity against other human bacterial pathogens, in addition to other relevant biotechnological applications. Indeed, <italic>B. amyloliquefaciens</italic> and other <italic>Bacillus</italic> species can act as plant growth promoters, biocontrol agents, probiotics, bioremediation agents, as well as producers of commercial enzymes and antibiotics (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Raddadi et al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Zhang et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Ngalimat et al., 2021</xref>).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="conclusion" id="s4">
<title>4 Conclusion</title>
<p>Plant-based by-products such as corn DDGS from biotechnological or industrial processing often have further applications as animal feed due to their suitable calorific content and potential phytochemical-linked health-protective benefits. Furthermore, bio-transformative strategies such as fermentation with LAB can promote value-added functional qualities to the animal feed in terms of altering or improving these associated health protective benefits such as antioxidant properties of the feed. Lactic acid bacteria based fermentation strategy is widely used in food substrates to improve shelf-life and human health targeted qualities food and beverages. However, in this study, LAB-based fermentation strategy was explored for the first time to improve phenolic bioactive-linked animal health benefits of animal feed substrate like corn-DDGS. The results of this study demonstrated that LAB-based fermentation altered the phytochemical content and composition, as well as the antioxidant-associated health protective benefits of corn DDGS. In addition to plant-based by-products being utilized as animal feed, these by-products can also serve as a source for novel native microflora that have suitable biotechnological, industrial, or pharmaceutical applications. In this study, a microbe with antimicrobial activity against <italic>H. pylori</italic> was isolated from corn DDGS and identified as <italic>B. amyloliquefaciens</italic>. Further studies are essential for in depth analysis of antimicrobial activity of this corn DDGS isolate against other gut and foodborne related pathogens such as <italic>Salmonella</italic>, <italic>Listeria</italic> or <italic>E. coli</italic>. In addition, the production of other useful peptides or enzymes from the corn DDGS isolate with relevant biotechnological applications should also be analyzed. Hence corn DDGS is a suitable substrate for fermentation strategies aimed at improving the phenolic-linked health-protective benefits in animal feed, as well as a potential source for novel microorganisms that have biotechnological, industrial, or pharmaceutical applications. Isolation and identification of such beneficial microorganism (<italic>B. amyloliquefaciens</italic>) from corn DDGS also has major contribution in the field of agriculture, animal feed and health, and potential application in synthetic antibiotic replacement strategies.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec sec-type="data-availability" id="s5">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found below: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/">https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/</ext-link>- ON553411.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s6">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>AC, DS, and KS contributed to the conceptualization and design of the study. AC, JO, and JM performed the experimentation and data analysis. AC, DS, and KS edited and reviewed the final draft of the manuscript.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="COI-statement" id="s7">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="disclaimer" id="s8">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s9">
<title>Supplementary Material</title>
<p>The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frfst.2023.1075789/full#supplementary-material">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frfst.2023.1075789/full#supplementary-material</ext-link>
</p>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Table1.DOCX" id="SM1" mimetype="application/DOCX" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Abudabos</surname>
<given-names>A. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Al-Atiyat</surname>
<given-names>R. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Albatshan</surname>
<given-names>H. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Aljassim</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Aljumaah</surname>
<given-names>M. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Alkhulaifi</surname>
<given-names>M. M.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Effects of concentration of corn distillers dried grains with solubles and enzyme supplementation on cecal microbiota and performance in broiler chickens</article-title>. <source>Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.</source> <volume>101</volume> (<issue>18</issue>), <fpage>7017</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>7026</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00253-017-8448-5</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ajao</surname>
<given-names>A. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>White</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kim</surname>
<given-names>W. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Olukosi</surname>
<given-names>O. A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Partial replacement of soybean meal with canola meal or corn DDGS in low-protein diets supplemented with crystalline amino acids&#x2014;effect on growth performance, whole-body composition, and litter characteristics</article-title>. <source>Animals</source> <volume>12</volume> (<issue>19</issue>), <fpage>2662</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/ani12192662</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ankolekar</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pinto</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Greene</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shetty</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>
<italic>In vitro</italic> bioassay based screening of antihyperglycemia and antihypertensive activities of <italic>Lactobacillus acidophilus</italic> fermented pear juice</article-title>. <source>Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol.</source> <volume>13</volume>, <fpage>221</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>230</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ifset.2011.10.008</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname>
<given-names>M. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tsen</surname>
<given-names>H. Y.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>Discrimination of <italic>Bacillus cereus</italic> and <italic>Bacillus thuringiensis</italic> with 16S rRNA and gyrB gene based PCR primers and sequencing of their annealing sites</article-title>. <source>J. Appl. Microbiol.</source> <volume>92</volume> (<issue>5</issue>), <fpage>912</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>919</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1046/j.1365-2672.2002.01606.x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chesini</surname>
<given-names>R. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Takiya</surname>
<given-names>C. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dias</surname>
<given-names>M. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Silva</surname>
<given-names>T. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nunes</surname>
<given-names>A. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Grigoletto</surname>
<given-names>N. T.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Dietary replacement of soybean meal with heat-treated soybean meal or high-protein corn distillers grains on nutrient digestibility and milk composition in mid-lactation cows</article-title>. <source>J. Dairy Sci.</source> <volume>106</volume>, <fpage>233</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>244</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3168/jds.2022-21904</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Christopher</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sarkar</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shetty</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Improving phenolic-linked antioxidant, antihyperglycemic and antibacterial properties of emmer and conventional wheat using beneficial lactic acid bacteria</article-title>. <source>Appl. Microbiol.</source> <volume>1</volume> (<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>270</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>288</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/applmicrobiol1020020</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Christopher</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sarkar</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zwinger</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shetty</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Ethnic food perspective of North Dakota common emmer wheat and relevance for health benefits targeting type 2 diabetes</article-title>. <source>J. Ethn. Foods</source> <volume>5</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>66</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>74</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jef.2018.01.002</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Cronin</surname>
<given-names>U. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wilkinson</surname>
<given-names>M. G.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>
<italic>Bacillus cereus</italic> endospores exhibit a heterogeneous response to heat treatment and low-temperature storage</article-title>. <source>Food Microbiol.</source> <volume>25</volume> (<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>235</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>243</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fm.2007.11.004</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ding</surname>
<given-names>X. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Qi</surname>
<given-names>Y. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>K. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tian</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bai</surname>
<given-names>S. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>J. P.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Corn distiller&#x27;s dried grains with solubles as an alternative ingredient to corn and soybean meal in Pekin duck diets based on its predicted AME and the evaluated standardized ileal digestibility of amino acids</article-title>. <source>Poult. Sci.</source> <volume>101</volume>, <fpage>101974</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.psj.2022.101974</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Friedman</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>J&#xfc;rgens</surname>
<given-names>H. S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2000</year>). <article-title>Effect of pH on the stability of plant phenolic compounds</article-title>. <source>J. Agric. Food Chem.</source> <volume>48</volume> (<issue>6</issue>), <fpage>2101</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2110</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/jf990489j</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Garbeva</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Van Veen</surname>
<given-names>J. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Van Elsas</surname>
<given-names>J. D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Predominant <italic>Bacillus</italic> spp. in agricultural soil under different management regimes detected via PCR-DGGE</article-title>. <source>Microb. Ecol.</source> <volume>45</volume> (<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>302</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>316</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00248-002-2034-8</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hu</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dunmire</surname>
<given-names>K. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Truelock</surname>
<given-names>C. N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Paulk</surname>
<given-names>C. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Aldrich</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Antioxidant performances of corn gluten meal and DDGS protein hydrolysates in food, pet food, and feed systems</article-title>. <source>J. Agric. Food Res.</source> <volume>2</volume>, <fpage>100030</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jafr.2020.100030</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Iram</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cekmecelioglu</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Demirci</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Distillers&#x2019; dried grains with solubles (DDGS) and its potential as fermentation feedstock</article-title>. <source>Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.</source> <volume>104</volume> (<issue>14</issue>), <fpage>6115</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>6128</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00253-020-10682-0</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Jiang</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shan</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>The effect of vitamin E on laying performance and egg quality in laying hens fed corn dried distillers grains with solubles</article-title>. <source>Poult. Sci.</source> <volume>92</volume> (<issue>11</issue>), <fpage>2956</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2964</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3382/ps.2013-03228</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname>Koneman</surname>
<given-names>E. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Allen</surname>
<given-names>S. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Janda</surname>
<given-names>W. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schreckenberger</surname>
<given-names>P. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>WinnJr</surname>
<given-names>W. C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (Editors) (<year>1997</year>). <source>Color atlas and textbook of diagnostic microbiology</source> <edition>5th ed.</edition> (<publisher-loc>New York, NY</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Lippincott-Raven Publishers</publisher-name>).</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kwon</surname>
<given-names>Y. I. I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vattem</surname>
<given-names>D. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shetty</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Evaluation of clonal herbs of <italic>Lamiaceae</italic> species for management of diabetes and hypertension</article-title>. <source>Asia Pac. J. Clin. Nutr.</source> <volume>15</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>107</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>118</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kumar</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Stecher</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Knyaz</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tamura</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>MEGA X: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms</article-title>. <source>Mol. Biol. Evol.</source> <volume>35</volume> (<issue>6</issue>), <fpage>1547</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/molbev/msy096</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Liaw</surname>
<given-names>J. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bajwa</surname>
<given-names>D. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shojaeiarani</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bajwa</surname>
<given-names>S. G.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Corn distiller&#x2019;s dried grains with solubles (DDGS)-A value added functional material for wood composites</article-title>. <source>Ind. Crops Prod.</source> <volume>139</volume>, <fpage>111525</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.indcrop.2019.111525</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lu</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Guo</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Isolation, identification, and characterization of novel <italic>Bacillus subtilis</italic>
</article-title>. <source>J. Vet. Med. Sci.</source> <volume>80</volume> (<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>427</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>433</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1292/jvms.16-0572</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Luthria</surname>
<given-names>D. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Memon</surname>
<given-names>A. A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Phenolic acids and antioxidant capacity of distillers dried grains with solubles (DDGS) as compared with corn</article-title>. <source>J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc.</source> <volume>89</volume> (<issue>7</issue>), <fpage>1297</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1304</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11746-012-2025-y</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Luu</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cruz-Mora</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Setlow</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Feeherry</surname>
<given-names>F. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Doona</surname>
<given-names>C. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Setlow</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>The effects of heat activation on <italic>Bacillus</italic> spore germination, with nutrients or under high pressure, with or without various germination proteins</article-title>. <source>Appl. Environ. Microbiol.</source> <volume>81</volume> (<issue>8</issue>), <fpage>2927</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2938</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/AEM.00193-15</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ngalimat</surname>
<given-names>M. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yahaya</surname>
<given-names>R. S. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Baharudin</surname>
<given-names>M. M. A. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yaminudin</surname>
<given-names>S. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Karim</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ahmad</surname>
<given-names>S. A.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>A review on the biotechnological applications of the operational group <italic>Bacillus amyloliquefaciens</italic>
</article-title>. <source>Microorganisms</source> <volume>9</volume> (<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>614</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/microorganisms9030614</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Paine</surname>
<given-names>J. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jones</surname>
<given-names>C. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lattimer</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Crane</surname>
<given-names>A. R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Impact of including distillers&#x2019; dried grains with solubles at expense of soybean meal on Boer-influenced goat growth performance</article-title>. <source>Transl. Anim. Sci.</source> <volume>2</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>S93</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/tas/txy074</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Raddadi</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Crotti</surname>
<given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rolli</surname>
<given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Marasco</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fava</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Daffonchio</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2012</year>). in <source>The most important <italic>Bacillus</italic> species in Biotechnology&#x201d; in <italic>Bacillus thuringiensis</italic> Biotechnology</source>. Editor <person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname>Sansinenea</surname>
<given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<publisher-loc>Dordrecht</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Springer</publisher-name>), <fpage>329</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>345</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ranilla</surname>
<given-names>L, G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Christopher</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sarkar</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shetty</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chirinos</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Campos</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Phenolic composition and evaluation of the antimicrobial activity of free and bound phenolic fractions from a Peruvian purple corn (<italic>Zea mays</italic> L.) accession</article-title>. <source>J. Food Sci.</source> <volume>82</volume> (<issue>12</issue>), <fpage>2968</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2976</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/1750-3841.13973</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Re</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pellegrini</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Proteggente</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pannala</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rice-Evans</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1999</year>). <article-title>Antioxidant activity applying an improved ABTS radical cation decolorization assay</article-title>. <source>Free Radic. Biol. Med.</source> <volume>26</volume> (<issue>9-10</issue>), <fpage>1231</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1237</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0891-5849(98)00315-3</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Rho</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wey</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhu</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kiarie</surname>
<given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Moran</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>van Heugten</surname>
<given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Growth performance, gastrointestinal and digestibility responses in growing pigs when fed corn&#x2013;soybean meal-based diets with corn DDGS treated with fiber degrading enzymes with or without liquid fermentation</article-title>. <source>J. Anim. Sci.</source> <volume>96</volume> (<issue>12</issue>), <fpage>5188</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>5197</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jas/sky369</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sharma</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pradhan</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Manickavasagan</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Thimmanagari</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Saha</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Singh</surname>
<given-names>S. S.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Production of antioxidative protein hydrolysates from corn distillers solubles: Process optimization, antioxidant activity evaluation, and peptide analysis</article-title>. <source>Ind. Crops Prod.</source> <volume>184</volume>, <fpage>115107</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.indcrop.2022.115107</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Shetty</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Curtis</surname>
<given-names>O. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Levin</surname>
<given-names>R. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Witkowsky</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ang</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1995</year>). <article-title>Prevention of vitrification a&#xdf;ociated with <italic>in vitro</italic> shoot culture of oregano. (<italic>Origanum vulgare</italic>) by <italic>Pseudomonas</italic> spp</article-title>. <source>J. Plant Physiol.</source> <volume>147</volume> (<issue>3-4</issue>), <fpage>447</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>451</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0176-1617(11)82181-4</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Shin</surname>
<given-names>E. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shurson</surname>
<given-names>G. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gallaher</surname>
<given-names>D. D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Antioxidant capacity and phytochemical content of 16 sources of corn distillers dried grains with solubles (DDGS)</article-title>. <source>Anim. Nutr.</source> <volume>4</volume> (<issue>4</issue>), <fpage>435</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>441</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.aninu.2018.07.003</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sumi</surname>
<given-names>C. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname>
<given-names>B. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yeo</surname>
<given-names>I. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hahm</surname>
<given-names>Y. T.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Antimicrobial peptides of the genus <italic>Bacillus</italic>: A new era for antibiotics</article-title>. <source>Can. J. Microbiol.</source> <volume>61</volume> (<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>93</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>103</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1139/cjm-2014-0613</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<citation citation-type="web">
<collab>U.S. Grains Council</collab> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Production and exports</article-title>. <comment>Available at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://grains.org/buying-selling/ddgs/">https://grains.org/buying-selling/ddgs/</ext-link>
</comment>(<comment>Accessed October 15, 2022)</comment>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<citation citation-type="web">
<collab>U.S. Grains Council</collab> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>User handbook</article-title>. <comment>Available at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://grains.org/buying-selling/ddgs/user-handbook/">https://grains.org/buying-selling/ddgs/user-handbook/</ext-link>
</comment>(<comment>Accessed October 15, 2022)</comment>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>L. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lee</surname>
<given-names>F. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tai</surname>
<given-names>C. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kuo</surname>
<given-names>H. P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>
<italic>Bacillus velezensis</italic> is a later heterotypic synonym of <italic>Bacillus amyloliquefaciens</italic>
</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol.</source> <volume>58</volume> (<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>671</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>675</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1099/ijs.0.65191-0</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Al-Dossary</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hussain</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Setlow</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>an Li</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Applications of <italic>Bacillus subtilis</italic> spores in biotechnology and advanced materials</article-title>. <source>Appl. Environ. Microbiol.</source> <volume>86</volume> (<issue>17</issue>), <fpage>010966</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>e1120</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/AEM.01096-20</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>