<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3-mathml3.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xml:lang="EN">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Environ. Sci.</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Environmental Science</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Environ. Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">2296-665X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">1745501</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fenvs.2026.1745501</article-id>
<article-version article-version-type="Version of Record" vocab="NISO-RP-8-2008"/>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Ten-year changes in China&#x2019;s ecological environment: governance effectiveness, problem analysis, and implications for global sustainable development</article-title>
<alt-title alt-title-type="left-running-head">Wang et al.</alt-title>
<alt-title alt-title-type="right-running-head">
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2026.1745501">10.3389/fenvs.2026.1745501</ext-link>
</alt-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author" equal-contrib="yes">
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>Qiong</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn001">
<sup>&#x2020;</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/3358227"/>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Conceptualization" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/">Conceptualization</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Data curation" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/">Data curation</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Funding acquisition" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/funding-acquisition/">Funding acquisition</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; original draft" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/">Writing - original draft</role>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" equal-contrib="yes">
<name>
<surname>Shao</surname>
<given-names>Honghao</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001">&#x2a;</xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn001">
<sup>&#x2020;</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/3278080"/>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Visualization" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/visualization/">Visualization</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; review &#x26; editing" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/Writing - review &#x26; editing/">Writing - review and editing</role>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" equal-contrib="yes">
<name>
<surname>Qian</surname>
<given-names>Bin</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">
<sup>3</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn001">
<sup>&#x2020;</sup>
</xref>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Funding acquisition" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/funding-acquisition/">Funding acquisition</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Supervision" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/">Supervision</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Validation" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/validation/">Validation</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; review &#x26; editing" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/Writing - review &#x26; editing/">Writing - review and editing</role>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1">
<label>1</label>
<institution>School of Marxism, City University of Hefei</institution>, <city>Hefei</city>, <country country="CN">China</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff2">
<label>2</label>
<institution>School of Business, Anhui Wenda University of Information Engineering</institution>, <city>Hefei</city>, <country country="CN">China</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff3">
<label>3</label>
<institution>School of Marxism, University of Science and Technology of China</institution>, <city>Hefei</city>, <country country="CN">China</country>
</aff>
<author-notes>
<corresp id="c001">
<label>&#x2a;</label>Correspondence: Honghao Shao, <email xlink:href="mailto:shh12345@mail.ustc.edu.cn">shh12345@mail.ustc.edu.cn</email>
</corresp>
<fn fn-type="equal" id="fn001">
<label>&#x2020;</label>
<p>These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship</p>
</fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date publication-format="electronic" date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2026-02-11">
<day>11</day>
<month>02</month>
<year>2026</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date publication-format="electronic" date-type="collection">
<year>2026</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>14</volume>
<elocation-id>1745501</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>13</day>
<month>11</month>
<year>2025</year>
</date>
<date date-type="rev-recd">
<day>17</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2025</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>13</day>
<month>01</month>
<year>2026</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#xa9; 2026 Wang, Shao and Qian.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2026</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Wang, Shao and Qian</copyright-holder>
<license>
<ali:license_ref start_date="2026-02-11">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ali:license_ref>
<license-p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY)</ext-link>. The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</license-p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<sec>
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>This research comprehensively examines changes in China&#x2019;s ecological environment from 2015 to 2024, alongside relevant policy and governance measures, to draw lessons for the global sustainable development.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Methods</title>
<p>Based on data from the China Ecological and Environmental Status Bulletin, this study employs statistical and case analysis methods to evaluate governance effectiveness and ongoing challenges across nine key areas, including the atmosphere, water, soil, and biodiversity.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Results</title>
<p>Significant progress is evident in air quality, surface water management, ecological restoration, and the transition to green energy. However, persistent challenges remain, including groundwater pollution, threats to biodiversity, and climate warming.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>The analysis, structured around conceptual transformation, legal-institutional safeguards, technological empowerment, low-carbon transition, and pathway improvements, enriches theoretical and practical scholarship while offering relevant insights for other developing countries addressing ecological challenges.</p>
</sec>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>ecological environment</kwd>
<kwd>ecological restoration</kwd>
<kwd>environmental governance</kwd>
<kwd>green low-carbon transition</kwd>
<kwd>sustainable development</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<funding-group>
<award-group id="gs1">
<funding-source id="sp1">
<institution-wrap>
<institution>Anhui Provincial Department of Education</institution>
<institution-id institution-id-type="doi" vocab="open-funder-registry" vocab-identifier="10.13039/open_funder_registry">10.13039/501100010814</institution-id>
</institution-wrap>
</funding-source>
<award-id rid="sp1">2023cxtd001</award-id>
<award-id rid="sp1">2023sxzz099</award-id>
<award-id rid="sp1">2024sxzz001</award-id>
</award-group>
<funding-statement>The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. This work was supported by the Anhui Provincial Quality Engineering Project (Grant Nos. 2023cxtd001, 2023sxzz099, and 2024sxzz001).</funding-statement>
</funding-group>
<counts>
<fig-count count="5"/>
<table-count count="0"/>
<equation-count count="0"/>
<ref-count count="16"/>
<page-count count="13"/>
</counts>
<custom-meta-group>
<custom-meta>
<meta-name>section-at-acceptance</meta-name>
<meta-value>Environmental Policy and Governance</meta-value>
</custom-meta>
</custom-meta-group>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec sec-type="intro" id="s1">
<label>1</label>
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Climate change, biodiversity loss, and environmental pollution are critical global challenges. In response, the United Nations adopted the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development in 2015, comprising 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) that include food security, clean water, sanitation, and clean energy (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">United Nations, 2015</xref>). However, progress on the agenda has been slow. By the end of 2024, only 17% of the targets had been on track (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, 2025</xref>). Clearly, coordinating economic development with environmental protection to achieve these SDGs remains a formidable worldwide challenge. In this context, China has advanced the concept that &#x201c;Man and nature form a community of life,&#x201d; and has implemented measures such as shifting its economic development model, establishing environmental regulatory frameworks, and carrying out ecological protection and restoration projects. Over the past decade, China has achieved significant improvements in air, water, and soil quality alongside rapid biodiversity growth. Concurrently, it continues to encounter severe issues, including deterioration of groundwater quality, increased threats to species, and a rising national average temperature. Consequently, an examination of China&#x2019;s environmental measures and their outcomes during this period may offer valuable insights for global ecological conservation.</p>
<p>Existing research often focuses on specific geographical areas or singular ecological components (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Zhang et al., 2025</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Xiao et al., 2025</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Wang et al., 2025</xref>). There is a lack of macro-level, nationwide analysis of overall outcomes and persistent challenges, and even less scholarship on China&#x2019;s sustainable development philosophy and governance models. This paper aims to address the following core research questions: (1) What transformations have occurred in China&#x2019;s ecological environment? (2) What are the primary drivers behind these ecological changes? (3) Can China&#x2019;s ecological governance pathway yield new theoretical perspectives and practical implications for global ecological governance and sustainable development?</p>
<p>Through conducting a comparative and correlational analysis of data covering a decade of changes in China&#x2019;s ecological environment, this study aims to: (1) provide a comprehensive overview of the achievements and shortcomings in China&#x2019;s ecological development; (2) analyze the causes of these changes and discuss the potential experiences and lessons they may offer for global ecological governance and protection; and (3) enrich both theoretical and practical research in this field. The paper is structured into five sections. This introduction outlines the background, research questions, and objectives. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="s2">Section 2</xref> reviews the existing literature and theoretical foundations, providing context for the study. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="s3">Section 3</xref> details the methodology, primarily employing data analysis and case study methods to analyze statistics from China&#x2019;s Ministry of Ecology and Environment and to interpret relevant cases. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="s4">Section 4</xref> presents the results derived from the data analysis. Finally, <xref ref-type="sec" rid="s5">Section 5</xref> discusses these findings, distilling the experiences and implications arising from China&#x2019;s governance models and practical approaches. The research framework is presented in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1</xref>.</p>
<fig id="F1" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Conceptual research framework.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fenvs-14-1745501-g001.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Flowchart depicting a research framework. &#x22;Research Foundation&#x22; leads to &#x22;Literature &#x26; Theory Gap&#x22; and &#x22;Core Research Questions.&#x22; Next, &#x22;Methodological Approach&#x22; branches into &#x22;Macro-Level Data Analysis&#x22; and &#x22;In-Depth Case Studies.&#x22; Then, &#x22;Integrated Analysis &#x26; Synthesis&#x22; splits to &#x22;Key Findings&#x22; and &#x22;Synthesis,&#x22; concluding with &#x22;Conclusion &#x26; Implications.&#x22;</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s2">
<label>2</label>
<title>Literature review: research status and theoretical framework</title>
<sec id="s2-1">
<label>2.1</label>
<title>Research status</title>
<p>International research in ecological and environmental studies is well established and covers diverse areas. Major trends include: (1) A focus on deploying technology for environmental governance, advocating for the integration of 5G, AI, and blockchain into ecological monitoring, simulation, and decision-making to facilitate green transformation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">CloudFerro, 2024</xref>). (2) An emphasis on interdisciplinary and cross-regional collaboration, promoting the integration of natural and social sciences and calling for global cooperative governance (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Marciniak et al., 2024</xref>). (3) Significant attention to top-level design and institution-building (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2011</xref>). For example, differentiated institutional arrangements in the United States concerning quality standards, watershed management, regional cooperation, and urban planning offer potential insights for comparative institutional analysis. (4) Studies focus on the impact of human activities on the environment, including climate change, biodiversity loss, and compound pollution within the context of the Anthropocene (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Harris et al., 2024</xref>). Methodologically, international research frequently employs empirical approaches such as Earth observation and artificial intelligence, aiming to establish a quantifiable, actionable scientific foundation for global sustainable development.</p>
<p>In contrast, research on ecological and environmental issues in China has followed its own trajectory. Research on ecological and environmental issues in China has evolved through three primary phases. The initial phase (pre-2000) was characterized by a focus on pollution control, with research primarily technical and oriented toward end-of-pipe treatment (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Xuan, 1998</xref>). The transitional phase (2000&#x2013;2012) saw a shift toward the concept of Ecological Civilization, with research expanding into sustainable development and the green economy (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Xu, 2010</xref>). The current deepening phase (2012&#x2013;present), guided by the Ecological Civilization framework, integrates ecological and environmental considerations into the overarching national strategic layout. Research during this phase exhibits trends toward systematization, institutionalization, and internationalization (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Zheng and Zheng, 2025</xref>). Theoretically, this period has yielded core concepts such as &#x201c;Lucid waters and lush mountains are invaluable assets&#x201d; and &#x201c;harmonious coexistence between humankind and nature.&#x201d; Institutionally, research focuses on regional governance mechanisms, property rights systems for natural resources, ecological compensation, and market-based reforms such as carbon trading. At the practical level, studies examine initiatives like collaborative zoning governance in the Yellow River Basin, Zhejiang&#x2019;s &#x201c;Ten-Thousand-Village Project (a rural revitalization initiative)&#x201d; for rural revitalization and urban-rural integration, and the green development dimension of the Belt and Road Initiative. Regarding governance instruments, research emphasizes developing the legal system and empowering digital technologies to accelerate the realization of the &#x201c;Beautiful China&#x201d; vision.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-2">
<label>2.2</label>
<title>Theoretical framework</title>
<p>Two prominent and relatively mature theories in international ecological and environmental research are Ecological Modernization Theory (EMT) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Mol and Spaargaren, 2000</xref>) and Environmental State Theory (EST) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Kirsop-Taylor et al., 2020</xref>). EMT argues that environmental protection and economic growth are not a zero-sum game and can be harmonized through technological innovation, market mechanisms, and policy integration. The theory emphasizes market forces, casting the government in a collaborative or facilitating role. This perspective aligns with elements of China&#x2019;s governance approach, particularly its emphasis on technological upgrading, market-based instruments, and policy coordination. However, as a Western-centric framework, EMT proves inadequate for fully addressing the specific complexities of China&#x2019;s economic structure, consumption patterns, and environmental governance challenges. EST, which focuses on state capacity&#x2014;including regulatory, monitoring, and enforcement capabilities&#x2014;correlates more closely with the realities of state-led governance in the Chinese context. A key limitation, however, is that this theory primarily conceptualizes the modern &#x201c;environmental state&#x201d; through a developed-world lens, often overlooking the distinct economic and social development priorities of countries like China. Furthermore, China&#x2019;s model of state-society relations, characterized by intertwined rather than separate spheres, deviates from the theory&#x2019;s underlying assumptions about societal participation. Consequently, these existing theoretical frameworks are insufficient for understanding the practical demands of ecological governance in China, underscoring the need for analyses that are grounded in and responsive to the Chinese context.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-3">
<label>2.3</label>
<title>Research assessment and contributions</title>
<p>Although existing scholarship has generated a substantial body of work, it is marked by several significant limitations. First, established theoretical frameworks, such as EMT and EST, struggle to fully account for the distinctive patterns of state participation that characterize China&#x2019;s ecological governance. Second, methodologically, there is a prevalent over-reliance on technical modeling and microdata, which facilitates a precise description of environmental issues but often comes at the expense of critically examining underlying development paradigms, consumption cultures, and transnational linkages. Research conducted in China often aligns closely with prevailing policy agendas, leading to proposals that favor end-of-pipe solutions and lack longitudinal analysis or critical reflection. Conversely, international scholarship can become mired in theoretical debates, yielding solutions with limited practical applicability and often disconnected from the developmental realities and priorities of the Global South. Consequently, neither research tradition has successfully established a coherent, integrative paradigm for ecological governance. To address these gaps, this study makes three primary contributions. (1) By analyzing a decade of macro-level data on China&#x2019;s ecological and environmental development, it provides an empirical foundation for context-specific research in this field. (2) Through this analysis, it synthesizes key approaches and strategies emerging from the Chinese context, thereby supplementing the global literature with a distinct perspective grounded in local practice. (3) By identifying persistent shortcomings revealed by the data, it proposes targeted improvements. Collectively, these insights offer a valuable reference point for ecological governance and protection efforts in other national contexts.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s3">
<label>3</label>
<title>Research methods</title>
<p>The primary data for this study are sourced from the China Ecological and Environmental Status Bulletin, published by the Ministry of Ecology and Environment of the People&#x2019;s Republic of China. To mitigate potential limitations associated with official data&#x2014;such as variations in monitoring-network deployment and adjustments to statistical reporting standards&#x2014;key indicators were cross-validated against open datasets from the World Bank and the International Energy Agency (IEA). The consistent major trends identified across these sources provide external corroboration for the macro-level conclusions derived from the MEE bulletin. Furthermore, these national-level data constitute an authoritative, publicly accessible, and continuous time series, offering a robust empirical basis for assessing long-term macro-level trends. All data employed in this analysis were systematically extracted, standardized, and are directly verifiable in the respective annual public bulletins.</p>
<sec id="s3-1">
<label>3.1</label>
<title>Data analysis method</title>
<p>Given the macro-scale of the research and the complex interplay of environmental philosophies, policies, legal frameworks, and technologies, constructing definitive causal inference models is not feasible. This study, therefore, employs a correlation analysis, examining long-term data trends in conjunction with the temporal continuity of policy. It systematically compiles time-series data for core indicators across nine key sectors relevant to China&#x2019;s commitments under international environmental conventions: atmospheric, water, soil, biodiversity, and climate change. Specific indicators include the air quality compliance rate (percentage of days meeting standards), the proportion of surface water bodies with good quality, the extent of soil erosion, the Ecological Quality Index (EQI, calculated according to the Chinese standard HJ 192&#x2013;2015), and the share of clean energy consumption, among others. The data trends are then interpreted in relation to the major policies and actions undertaken over the past decade, thereby identifying factors associated with ecological improvement. Through objective and systematic data analysis, this approach provides an empirical basis for assessing the effectiveness and governance models of China&#x2019;s ecological governance, while also offering quantifiable benchmarks for global environmental governance.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-2">
<label>3.2</label>
<title>Case study method</title>
<p>This study employs the case study method to investigate the specific pathways and outcomes of China&#x2019;s ecological governance and protection. Cases were selected based on their typicality, representativeness, and data availability.</p>
<p>
<statement content-type="case" id="Case_1">
<label>Case 1</label>
<p>The &#x201c;Ten-Thousand-Village Project&#x201d; in Zhejiang Province &#x2013; An Ecological Governance Model. Through sustained efforts over more than a decade, this project has reached most administrative villages in Zhejiang, achieving synergistic improvements in rural habitat, local economies, and ecological value. It stands as a concrete example of sustainable development concepts in practice.</p>
</statement>
</p>
<p>
<statement content-type="case" id="Case_2">
<label>Case 2</label>
<p>Establishing Ecological Protection Demonstration Zones in the Yangtze and Yellow River Basins. These two major river basins span 19 provincial-level regions in China, supporting approximately 71% of the national population. Characterized by complex ecological challenges and substantial governance difficulties, they have been the focus of numerous legal and institutional initiatives over the past decade, providing a representative context for examining the role of regulatory measures.</p>
</statement>
</p>
<p>
<statement content-type="case" id="Case_3">
<label>Case 3</label>
<p>The &#x201c;Ecological Eye&#x201d; Platform in the Yangtze River Basin &#x2013; A Technology-Driven Governance Tool. This intelligent management platform covers 11 provinces and municipalities along the Yangtze River, exemplifying the application of technology to empower environmental governance.</p>
</statement>
</p>
<p>
<statement content-type="case" id="Case_4">
<label>Case 4</label>
<p>New Energy Vehicles &#x2013; A Driver of Green and Low-Carbon Transition. The rapid development and adoption of new energy vehicles in China represents a pivotal shift towards greener transportation.</p>
<p>Data for all cases are publicly accessible through official Chinese government portals, ensuring availability. The case study approach not only strengthens the empirical foundation and persuasiveness of this research but also provides a solid basis for understanding China&#x2019;s governance measures. Furthermore, it helps elucidate, from a micro-level perspective, the on-the-ground effectiveness and scalability potential of macro-level strategies.</p>
</statement>
</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-3">
<label>3.3</label>
<title>Research limitations and boundaries of causal inference</title>
<p>This study employs statistical analysis to depict macro trends and employs typical cases for illustration. This correlational analysis shows that changes in indicators are synchronized with policy measures. However, because no causal model was constructed, the study lacks direct causal identification. Consequently, it cannot rule out the influence of factors such as business-cycle fluctuations and concurrent policy interventions. Future research could combine panel data from specific ecological regions and adopt the Difference-in-Differences method to assess the net effect of legal and policy instruments. Regression Discontinuity Design could also be employed to analyze the boundary effects of mandatory policies, such as the delineation of ecological conservation redlines or environmental inspection campaigns.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="results" id="s4">
<label>4</label>
<title>Results</title>
<sec id="s4-1">
<label>4.1</label>
<title>Significant achievements in China&#x2019;s ecological and environmental governance and protection</title>
<sec id="s4-1-1">
<label>4.1.1</label>
<title>Notable progress in air pollution control</title>
<p>Over the past decade, China has made significant progress in air pollution control, as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2A</xref>. Air quality has shown marked improvement, with a clear upward trend in the proportion of days meeting national air quality standards (AQI)<xref ref-type="fn" rid="fn1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>. This figure rose steadily from 24.9% in 2016 to 65.5% in 2024, representing an increase of 40.6 percentage points, or more than a 2.6-fold growth. Concurrently, the area affected by acid rain decreased from 690,000&#xa0;km<sup>2</sup> to 442,000&#xa0;km<sup>2</sup>, a 35.9% reduction. While this long-term trend is acknowledged, it is important to note that reduced economic activity during the 2020&#x2013;2022 pandemic contributed to lower emissions. Nevertheless, the sustained growth in air quality compliance after 2023 suggests that the improvements are not merely the result of external, transient factors. This resilience is likely underpinned by a pollution control system integrating rule of law with precision-based measures.</p>
<fig id="F2" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 2</label>
<caption>
<p>Progress in atmospheric and water environmental quality in China (2015&#x2013;2024). <bold>(A)</bold> Atmospheric environment: air quality vs acid rain area, 2015&#x2013;2024. <bold>(B)</bold> Water quality rates (%), 2015&#x2013;2024. <bold>(C)</bold> Water quality improvement: 2015 vs 2024. <bold>(D)</bold> Water quality annual improvement and policy implementation, 2016-2024.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fenvs-14-1745501-g002.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">A series of four charts titled &#x22;Atmospheric and Water Quality Improvements.&#x22;A. Line chart showing air quality improvement from 2015 to 2024, depicting a decline in acid rain area. Key points include the 2015 baseline, 2018 action plan, and 2021 adjustment.B. Heatmap displaying water quality rates from 2015 to 2024. Categories include surface water, drinking water, and coastal areas, with varying improvements over time.C. Bar chart comparing water quality in 2015 and 2024, highlighting significant improvement in surface water and coastal areas.D. Bar chart showing annual water quality improvement policies from 2015 to 2024, with specific initiatives noted throughout.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<p>Institutionally, the policy framework anchored by the Air Pollution Prevention and Control Action Plan has set clear targets and responsibilities, with its enforcement rigor enhanced through central environmental inspection campaigns. Structurally, source-level reductions in aggregate emissions have been achieved through transforming the energy mix, implementing ultra-low-emission retrofits in key industries, and promoting cleaner transportation. In terms of governance modality, the national monitoring network enables precise pollution source tracing, while coordinated regional prevention and control mechanisms&#x2014;especially in key areas such as the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region and the Yangtze River Delta&#x2014;effectively address complex, compound air pollution.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4-1-2">
<label>4.1.2</label>
<title>Marked progress in water pollution control</title>
<p>Following a decade of sustained governance, China&#x2019;s water quality has shown significant improvement (see <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figures 2B&#x2013;D</xref>). For surface water, the share of monitoring sections rated as having &#x201c;Excellent&#x201d; (Grade I&#x2013;III) quality rose from 67.8% to 90.4%, an increase of 22.6 percentage points, while the share of &#x201c;Below Grade V&#x2033; sections fell from 8.6% to 0.6%. In drinking water safety, the compliance rate of centralized urban drinking water sources nationwide climbed from 90.4% to 98.3%. Regarding marine ecology, the area of jurisdictional waters with Grade I quality expanded from 95.0% to 97.7%; the proportion of coastal waters meeting Grade I&#x2013;II standards improved from 73.4% to 83.7%, and the share with quality worse than Grade IV dropped from 13.2% to 8.6%. In terms of aquatic ecosystem health, monitoring data from 2020 to 2024 indicate a stable proportion of systems classified as &#x201c;Healthy,&#x201d; with the &#x201c;Unhealthy&#x201d; category having been virtually eliminated.</p>
<p>These water quality gains are likely linked to innovations in governance systems and approaches. Institutionally, the River Chief and Lake Chief Systems have created a responsibility framework anchored in executive accountability, enabling precise management from the basin scale down to individual monitoring sections. Operationally, initiatives under the Water Pollution Prevention and Control Action Plan&#x2014;focusing on industrial and municipal wastewater treatment and agricultural non-point source pollution control&#x2014;have effectively reduced the discharge of key pollutants such as Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) and ammonia nitrogen. For marine protection, the Bay Chief System<xref ref-type="fn" rid="fn2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref> and integrated land-sea coordination have curbed the influx of land-based pollutants, such as nitrogen and phosphorus. Furthermore, securing ecological base flows and restoring wetlands have bolstered the self-purification capacity and ecological resilience of water bodies.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4-1-3">
<label>4.1.3</label>
<title>Positive outcomes in land protection and restoration</title>
<p>
<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figures 3A,B</xref> illustrate China&#x2019;s significant progress in soil and water conservation, desertification control, and farmland security. Over the past decade, the safe utilization rate of contaminated farmland has achieved 92%. The total area affected by soil and water erosion declined from 2.949 million km<sup>2</sup> to 2.602 million km<sup>2</sup>, a net reduction of 347,000&#xa0;km<sup>2</sup> or 11.8%. Between 2015 and 2020, the extent of desertified land and sandy land remained stable at approximately 2.612 million km<sup>2</sup> and 1.721 million km<sup>2</sup>, respectively, indicating initial success in halting their expansion. A pivotal shift occurred after 2021, with both areas registering notable concurrent declines: desertified land decreased to 2.574 million km<sup>2</sup> (a reduction of 37,900&#xa0;km<sup>2</sup>), and sandy land diminished to 1.688 million km<sup>2</sup> (a reduction of 33,400&#xa0;km<sup>2</sup>).</p>
<fig id="F3" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 3</label>
<caption>
<p>Land protection, ecological restoration, and biodiversity conservation in China (2015&#x2013;2024). <bold>(A)</bold> Land area changes, 2015&#x2013;2024. <bold>(B)</bold> Safe utilization rate of contaminated cultivated Land, 2019&#x2013;2024. <bold>(C)</bold> Ecological quality and biodiversity by category, 2015&#x2013;2024.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fenvs-14-1745501-g003.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Three graphs illustrate environmental trends from 2015 to 2024. Graph A shows declines in soil erosion, desertified, and sandy land areas, with key laws enacted and a turning point in 2021. Graph B depicts a rise in the safe utilization rate of contaminated cultivated land from 90% to 92%, aiming for a 95% target by 2035. Graph C shows an improvement in Eco-quality Index and biodiversity with key policy breakthroughs, highlighting increases in Animalia, Plantae, Fungi, and Others categories.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<p>These outcomes stem from a governance framework designed to deliver both ecological and economic benefits. Legally anchored by the Soil and Water Conservation Law and the Law on Prevention and Control of Desertification, this system has advanced major ecological projects while tightening oversight and guiding industrial practices. Technologically, it employs an integrated mix of engineering and biological solutions. Examples include constructing terraces, silt-retaining dams, and restoring vegetation on the Loess Plateau; applying the water-adaptive greening principle (&#x2018;greening according to water availability&#x2019;) in arid zones through techniques such as straw checkerboard sand stabilization and drought-resilient plant cultivation; and rehabilitating moderately and lightly contaminated farmland through techniques like low-accumulation crop substitution, immobilization amendments, and microbial remediation. Dedicated demonstration zones for concentrated remediation, such as those in the Yangtze River Delta and Pearl River Delta, have further helped reduce soil heavy metal content. This comprehensive approach establishes a solid foundation for achieving twin objectives: curbing soil erosion and desertification while reaching the 2035 target of maintaining a safe utilization rate above 95% for contaminated farmland.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4-1-4">
<label>4.1.4</label>
<title>Marked progress in ecological conservation</title>
<p>Data presented in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3C</xref> on China&#x2019;s national EQI and biodiversity reveal substantial ecosystem improvement over the past decade. The EQI rose from 44.9 to 59.95, marking a 33.5% increase. This trend is strongly corroborated by biodiversity gains: documented species and infraspecific taxonomic units (such as subspecies and varieties) surged from 86,575 to 155,364&#x2014;a rise of 79.5%. While animal and plant species counts showed steady growth, fungal species registered a dramatic increase from 3,488 to 27,807, representing an approximately eight-fold expansion.</p>
<p>These positive trends are linked to China&#x2019;s comprehensive ecological conservation strategy. Institutionally, frameworks like the ecological conservation redline system and the national park&#x2013;centered protected area network have strengthened habitat protection. Technically, an integrated approach has been advanced for conserving and restoring interconnected landscapes encompassing mountains, rivers, forests, farmlands, lakes, grasslands, and deserts. Focused projects on forest quality enhancement, wetland restoration, and habitat rehabilitation for endangered species have further enhanced overall ecosystem integrity and connectivity.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s4-2">
<label>4.2</label>
<title>Persistent challenges in China&#x2019;s ecological and environmental governance</title>
<sec id="s4-2-1">
<label>4.2.1</label>
<title>Concerning trends in groundwater quality</title>
<p>Between 2015 and 2024, national groundwater quality followed an inverted-V trajectory, characterized by initial improvement, subsequent decline, and eventual stagnation (see <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4A</xref>). The share of water meeting Grades I&#x2013;IV standards rose from 81.2% in 2015 to a peak of 85.3% in 2016 before entering a sustained decline, reaching a 10-year low of 77.6% in 2022. A marginal recovery to 77.8%&#x2013;77.9% in 2023&#x2013;2024 kept the figure below the 80% warning threshold. Conversely, the proportion of heavily polluted Grade V water increased from a low of 14.7% in 2016 to a high of 22.4% in 2022 and has persisted at approximately 22% in recent years, underscoring the persistent severity of groundwater contamination.</p>
<fig id="F4" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 4</label>
<caption>
<p>Persistent challenges in China&#x2019;s ecological and environmental governance (2015&#x2013;2024). <bold>(A)</bold> groundwater quality evolution, 2015&#x2013;2024. <bold>(B)</bold> Ecological conservation protected area expansion vs species threat paradox, 2016&#x2013;2024. <bold>(C)</bold> Temperature anomaly and greenhouse gas trends, 2015&#x2013;2024.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fenvs-14-1745501-g004.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Panel A shows groundwater quality evolution from 2015 to 2024, highlighting a peak at 85.3% and a low at 77.6%. Panel B illustrates the ecological conservation paradox with protected area expansion and a rise in threatened species from 2016 to 2024. Panel C depicts temperature anomalies and greenhouse gas trends, indicating a maximum temperature of 10.9 degrees Celsius in 2024. Annotated policies and targets provide additional context for each panel.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<p>These patterns reveal systemic gaps in current water environmental governance. Firstly, inadequate coverage of the groundwater monitoring network hampers precise source identification and traceability. Secondly, weak inter-agency coordination&#x2014;given that groundwater management spans authorities responsible for natural resources, water affairs, ecology and environment, and agriculture&#x2014;results in fragmented oversight and diluted enforcement efficacy. Moreover, groundwater pollution presents unique challenges due to its concealed, lagged, and cumulative effects. Remediation often necessitates a geological timescale, vastly longer than for surface water. Unlike surface waters, where pollutants can be intercepted or diluted, the slow flow, high adsorption capacity, and dispersion within aquifers result in a prolonged release of contaminants, extending treatment timelines. Underlying drivers requiring attention include the potential rebound of agricultural nonpoint-source and industrial pollution, as well as insufficient impetus for concerted regional action.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4-2-2">
<label>4.2.2</label>
<title>The imperative for diversified ecological conservation measures</title>
<p>
<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4B</xref> illustrates the complex dynamics in China&#x2019;s ecological conservation, where intensified efforts coexist with ongoing species threats. The proportion of the national terrestrial area under various forms of protection has risen steadily from about 14.87% prior to 2018 to approximately 18%, thereby reaching the ecological conservation redline target and signaling a significant expansion of habitat safeguards. However, the number of threatened species has not decreased correspondingly. On the contrary, it surged from a historically stable level of 3,767 to 4,088 in 2022 and has plateaued since. This paradox points to shortcomings in the quality and management efficacy of conservation initiatives.</p>
<p>Contributing factors are multifaceted. Management effectiveness within protected areas is often suboptimal, hampered by insufficient technical capacity, inadequate equipment, and a shortage of specialized personnel. Concurrently, progress in establishing ecological corridors has been slow, leaving habitats fragmented and inadequately connected. Additionally, conservation interventions often fail to adequately adapt to local contexts. Moving forward, a strategic pivot from pursuing &#x201c;scale expansion&#x201d; to achieving &#x201c;quality enhancement&#x201d; is essential. Priorities must include bolstering protected area management, accelerating ecological corridor development, and implementing targeted threat mitigation&#x2014;measures aimed at translating conservation inputs into tangible population recovery for key species.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4-2-3">
<label>4.2.3</label>
<title>Persistent increase in the national average temperature</title>
<p>As indicated in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4C</xref>, the national average temperature rose from 10.5&#xa0;&#xb0;C in 2015 to 10.9&#xa0;&#xb0;C in 2024, following a fluctuating upward trajectory, signaling a clear overall warming. Simultaneously, atmospheric concentrations of primary greenhouse gases increased consistently. The carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) level rose from 404.4&#xa0;ppm in 2017 to 421.4&#xa0;ppm in 2023, while methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) and nitrous oxide (N<sub>2</sub>O) followed similar growth paths, increasing from 1907&#xa0;ppb to 329.7 ppb&#x2013;1986&#xa0;ppb and 337.3 ppb, respectively. These data collectively underscore the influence of anthropogenic emissions on the climate system and reveal a strong correlation between rising temperatures and greenhouse gas concentrations, corroborating the dominant role of the greenhouse effect in regional warming. Notably, even during the transient economic slowdown associated with the COVID-19 pandemic, greenhouse gas concentrations continued to rise, highlighting the inherent inertia of the climate system and the protracted, formidable challenge of emissions reduction. This ongoing trend suggests that China may confront more frequent extreme climate events and heightened ecosystem stress in the future&#x2014;a projection consistent with natural disaster statistics in the China Ecological and Environmental Status Bulletin. Consequently, it underscores the pressing need for more robust policies focused on climate change adaptation and mitigation.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s4-3">
<label>4.3</label>
<title>Notable progress in China&#x2019;s green and low-carbon transition</title>
<sec id="s4-3-1">
<label>4.3.1</label>
<title>Enhanced solid waste management</title>
<p>Data trends in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5A</xref> indicate a rise in general industrial solid waste generation from 3.68 billion tons in 2021 to 4.47 billion tons in 2024, corresponding to an average annual compound growth rate of 6.7% and reflecting increased resource consumption alongside economic expansion. During the same period, the comprehensive utilization rate for such waste increased from 55.4% to 59.3%, whereas the direct disposal rate dropped from 25.0% to 17.5%. Meanwhile, the harmless treatment rate for municipal solid waste climbed from 97.14% to 99.90%. These metrics collectively indicate improved solid waste management performance in China.</p>
<fig id="F5" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 5</label>
<caption>
<p>China&#x2019;s achievements in green low-carbon transition (2015&#x2013;2024). <bold>(A)</bold> Solid waste management: Treatment rates and volumes, 2021&#x2013;2024. <bold>(B)</bold> New energy vehicles: Stock and market penetration, 2015&#x2013;2024. <bold>(C)</bold> Energy production structure: clean energy transition, 2015&#x2013;2024. <bold>(D)</bold> Energy consumption: decarbonization progress, 2015&#x2013;2024.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fenvs-14-1745501-g005.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Four-panel infographic showing trends in China&#x27;s waste management, energy production, and vehicle market (2015-2024). Panel A: Industrial waste treatment rates show an increase in disposal and utilization. Panel B: New energy vehicle stock and market penetration grow, influenced by policies. Panel C: Shift from thermal to renewable energy sources with a marked increase in solar and wind power. Panel D: Decarbonization progress shows a reduction in coal share and carbon intensity while total energy consumption rises. Key policies are highlighted in each panel.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<p>This progress stems primarily from a maturing governance framework combining regulations and technological innovation. Legally, the 2020 revision of the Law on the Prevention and Control of Environmental Pollution Caused by Solid Wastes codified the core principles of reduction, recycling, and harmless treatment while reinforcing the extended producer responsibility system. Institutionally, the national &#x201c;Zero-Waste City&#x201d; initiative has facilitated precise oversight through mandatory waste declaration, registration, and discharge permit systems. From a policy perspective, tax incentives and the promotion of green manufacturing systems have effectively encouraged enterprises to improve solid waste recycling. Technologically, wider adoption of industrial waste utilization techniques and intelligent sorting equipment has boosted resource recovery rates. Furthermore, advances in waste-to-energy incineration and source-separated disposal of municipal solid waste have been instrumental in achieving near-complete harmless treatment.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4-3-2">
<label>4.3.2</label>
<title>Substantial growth in the new energy vehicle sector</title>
<p>The continual expansion of China&#x2019;s motor vehicle fleet historically posed a significant challenge to decarbonizing the transportation sector (see <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5B</xref>). In recent years, however, the development of the New Energy Vehicle (NEV) industry has been fundamentally reshaping this landscape. The market share of NEVs surged from a minimal baseline in 2015 to 8.9% in 2024, establishing China as a frontrunner in the global automotive industry&#x2019;s transition. This structural change has been facilitated by an integrated framework that effectively couples policy guidance with market forces.</p>
<p>Policy instruments, including purchase subsidies and tax exemptions for NEVs, have successfully stimulated both supply and demand. Parallel efforts to rapidly deploy charging infrastructure and integrate smart grid planning have addressed critical constraints related to vehicle range and energy replenishment. Technologically, sustained national R&#x26;D programs have driven advancements in core areas such as battery energy density and electric motor efficiency, leading to significant cost reductions and performance gains. This multi-pronged approach&#x2014;combining policy incentives, infrastructure investment, and technological innovation&#x2014;has not only catalyzed the rapid scaling of the NEV industry but has also demonstrated a viable model for achieving a low-carbon transition in transportation.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4-3-3">
<label>4.3.3</label>
<title>Marked rise in the share of clean energy</title>
<p>China&#x2019;s energy system demonstrates a dual trend of expanding total supply and accelerating decarbonization (see <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figures 5C,D</xref>). Total energy production and power generation grew at average annual rates of 3.3% and 7.8% respectively, underscoring robust energy security. Structurally, thermal power&#x2019;s share declined from 73.0% to 63.2%, whereas the combined share of wind and solar power surged from 3.5% to 18.2%, establishing clean energy as the dominant source of new capacity. On the demand side, coal&#x2019;s share of primary energy consumption fell by 10.8 percentage points, driving an 18.4% cumulative drop in carbon intensity&#x2014;a clear sign that low-carbon policies are effectively replacing fossil fuels. Nuclear power expanded at an average annual rate of 9.1%, and hydropower output in 2024 reached its second-highest level on record. Collectively, these trends outline a distinct low-carbon transition pathway defined by the rapid substitution of clean energy for conventional sources.</p>
<p>This transition has been enabled by a coherent, multi-dimensional system. Policy-wise, the regulatory emphasis has shifted from capping total energy use to controlling carbon emissions, supported by a renewable energy consumption guarantee mechanism that creates an incentive-aligned framework. Technologically, successive advancements in photovoltaic and wind power have drastically reduced costs, enabling commercial scale-up. The coordinated build-out of ultra-high-voltage transmission corridors and energy storage systems has been key to addressing grid integration and stability challenges associated with variable renewables. Market-based instruments, including the national carbon emissions trading scheme and pilot green power trading platforms, are increasingly reflecting the economic and environmental value of clean energy. This integrated model, combining policy direction, technological innovation, and market signals, has not only accelerated the restructuring of the energy mix but is also fostering core competencies in green, low-carbon industries.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="discussion" id="s5">
<label>5</label>
<title>Discussion</title>
<sec id="s5-1">
<label>5.1</label>
<title>Lessons and insights from China&#x2019;s ecological governance</title>
<sec id="s5-1-1">
<label>5.1.1</label>
<title>Cultivating a development philosophy aligning economic growth with ecological protection</title>
<p>China&#x2019;s approach to ecological governance has moved beyond the conventional &#x201c;pollute first, remedy later&#x201d; trajectory and the narrow, technology-focused ecological modernization paradigm. Its fundamental shift lies in reorienting the very philosophy of development. The concept that &#x201c;Lucid waters and lush mountains are invaluable assets&#x201d; reconceptualizes natural capital and embeds its value within socio-economic calculus. Leveraging the combined force of the rule of law and market mechanisms, this idea has catalyzed a tangible chain of conversion&#x2014;from a guiding principle into institutional frameworks and, further, into economic incentives. This offers a novel perspective on tackling the classic &#x201c;tragedy of the commons&#x201d; (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Hardin, 1968</xref>) and &#x201c;collective action dilemmas&#x201d; (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Olson, 1965</xref>) by using valuation methods and institutional design to make stewardship of shared resources economically rewarding, thereby activating inherent motives for cooperative action.</p>
<p>The success of Zhejiang&#x2019;s &#x201c;Ten-Thousand-Village Project&#x201d; exemplifies how ecological assets can be translated into economic competitiveness, demonstrating a synergistic model where Gross Domestic Product (GDP) and Gross Ecosystem Product (GEP) advance together. This logic is further extended to the international arena through the core ethos of &#x201c;harmonious coexistence between humanity and nature&#x201d; and the global vision of &#x201c;a community with a shared future for mankind.&#x201d; Initiatives such as the Green Silk Road and South-South cooperation facilitate the global diffusion of low-carbon technologies and environmental standards. By actively implementing the principle of &#x201c;common but differentiated responsibilities,&#x201d; China contributes its approach toward fostering a more equitable architecture for global environmental governance.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s5-1-2">
<label>5.1.2</label>
<title>A rigorous rule of law as the institutional safeguard for ecological development</title>
<p>China&#x2019;s ecological and environmental legal framework provides a solid institutional constraint for translating ecological principles into practice. At the legislative level, centered on the Environmental Protection Law, the introduction of coercive measures such as &#x201c;daily fines&#x201d; and &#x201c;seizure and impoundment&#x201d; has significantly raised the cost of non-compliance. This reflects the state&#x2019;s coercive enforcement capacity as an environmental regulator. Legislation such as the Yangtze River Protection Law and the Yellow River Protection Law, combined with action plans for the prevention and control of air, water, and soil pollution, signifies a legal paradigm shift from managing individual environmental elements toward a &#x201c;community of life&#x201d; approach that governs ecosystems holistically.</p>
<p>At the enforcement level, the central environmental inspection system utilizes top-down political pressure and the &#x201c;dual responsibility&#x201d; mechanism (holding officials accountable for both their specific posts and environmental protection) to anchor responsibilities at the local government level, thereby alleviating the dilemma of &#x201c;laws existing but not being followed&#x201d;.</p>
<p>In the judicial sphere, the refinement of the environmental public interest litigation system and the establishment of specialized courts have embedded the &#x2018;protection-first&#x2019; judicial principle, as evidenced by landmark cases such as the &#x201c;Green Peafowl Case&#x201d;<xref ref-type="fn" rid="fn3">
<sup>3</sup>
</xref> in Yunnan and the &#x201c;Contaminated Land Case&#x201d;<xref ref-type="fn" rid="fn4">
<sup>4</sup>
</xref> in Jiangsu.</p>
<p>This comprehensive legalization process, spanning legislation, enforcement, and adjudication, has not only constructed a multi-tiered, all-encompassing institutional network for environmental governance but has also achieved an institutional leap&#x2014;from advocating principles to constraining behavior, and from localized remediation to systemic oversight. This may constitute the core institutional mechanism underpinning the observed improvements in China&#x2019;s ecological and environmental quality.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s5-1-3">
<label>5.1.3</label>
<title>Advanced technology as a critical enabler of ecological development</title>
<p>Technological empowerment offers a viable pathway for global ecological governance and protection. China has deployed an integrated, real-time monitoring network encompassing space, air, land, and sea, which utilizes a suite of technologies including high-resolution satellites, Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR), Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), Unmanned Surface Vessels (USVs), and Internet of Things (IoT) sensors. This system facilitates minute-by-minute updates for more than 200 indicators spanning atmospheric and aquatic parameters, enabling both macro-scale dynamic tracking and micro-scale precise source identification of pollutants and ecosystem changes. A representative application is the Yangtze River &#x201c;Ecological Eye&#x201d; platform, which leverages satellite remote sensing, big data, IoT, and Artificial Intelligence (AI) for around-the-clock monitoring and intelligent analysis of the river basin&#x2019;s ecological status.</p>
<p>In data utilization, big data and AI act as a &#x201c;smart brain,&#x201d; assimilating and modeling vast environmental datasets to refine forecasting, early warning systems, and remediation strategies, thereby increasing the precision and proactivity of environmental management. Beyond monitoring, technological applications directly enhance restoration outcomes, as seen in projects such as the Kubuqi Desert rehabilitation in Inner Mongolia, where techniques such as UAV-assisted seeding and water-efficient irrigation have significantly improved restoration efficiency. This systematic framework, which deeply integrates sensing, information, and engineering technologies, has successfully transformed technological tools from a supporting role into a central driver of innovation in environmental governance.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s5-1-4">
<label>5.1.4</label>
<title>The green and low-carbon transition as the pathway to sustainable ecological development</title>
<p>Green and low-carbon strategies characterized by low energy consumption and low emissions represent a critical pathway towards achieving sustainable ecological development. China is advancing this transition through optimizing its energy mix, restructuring industrial systems, and transforming public lifestyles. For instance, Shenzhen has reduced carbon emissions and improved urban air quality by electrifying its public bus and taxi fleets and constructing a smart grid. Beijing has employed digital platforms such as the &#x201c;MaaS (Mobility as a Service)&#x201d; travel platform alongside a digital-technology-enabled carbon inclusion mechanism to incentivize residents to choose low-carbon transportation options, thereby fostering public participation and cultivating low-carbon lifestyles. In rural areas, the &#x201c;photovoltaic &#x2b; Agriculture&#x201d; model facilitates the development of clean energy alongside agricultural production, achieving integrated land use and increasing farmers&#x2019; income. In urban mobility, the widespread adoption and comprehensive coverage of bike-sharing systems have reduced reliance on private fuel-powered vehicles, curbing greenhouse gas emissions. Furthermore, converting individual low-carbon actions&#x2014;such as green commuting and waste sorting&#x2014;into tradable carbon assets has stimulated endogenous public motivation for emission reduction.</p>
<p>These real-world applications collectively demonstrate that the green and low-carbon transition is not merely a singular technological upgrade but a comprehensive societal transformation. By embedding low-carbon principles into urban planning, industrial structuring, and daily public behavior, it catalyzes a paradigm shift from resource-intensive growth to a model that prioritizes ecological benefits.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s5-2">
<label>5.2</label>
<title>Optimization pathways for China&#x2019;s ecological and environmental governance</title>
<p>Building on the identified shortcomings in China&#x2019;s ecological governance process, future optimization efforts are required. Firstly, it is essential to improve inter-departmental coordination and watershed management mechanisms. To address the persistent deterioration of groundwater quality, cross-regional management bodies should be established. These bodies must go beyond the existing &#x201c;River Chief&#x201d; and &#x201c;Lake Chief&#x201d; systems to implement cross-jurisdictional ecological compensation mechanisms grounded in actual water-quality improvement outcomes.</p>
<p>Secondly, the focus of natural protected areas must shift from &#x201c;scale expansion&#x201d; to &#x201c;quality enhancement.&#x201d; The evaluation criteria for these areas should transition from assessing sheer protected area coverage to evaluating management effectiveness. Priority should be given to assessing management efficacy, technological investment, and the development of ecological corridors to improve habitat construction.</p>
<p>Thirdly, it is essential to develop a smarter ecological and environmental monitoring network. Key efforts should address the current gaps in monitoring groundwater and subsurface soil. The application of big data and AI in pollution source tracing, trend forecasting, and risk assessment should be deepened to enhance the predictive capacity and precision of environmental management.</p>
<p>Finally, market mechanisms and public participation should be strengthened. GEP accounting should be integrated into local government performance evaluations. The carbon market and carbon inclusion mechanisms should be refined to foster a collaborative governance framework involving the government, the market, and civil society.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s5-3">
<label>5.3</label>
<title>Engaging with theory</title>
<p>Comparing China&#x2019;s governance pathway with the &#x201c;technology-market-state&#x201d; tripartite synergy mechanism emphasized by Ecological Modernization Theory reveals significant differences in institutional embeddedness, state leadership, and the pace of green transformation. First, unlike the theory&#x2019;s presumption of reliance on spontaneous market regulation, China&#x2019;s approach features robust state intervention (e.g., national environmental supervision agencies and basin-specific legislation), demonstrating the distinct &#x201c;state capacity&#x201d; characteristic of Environmental State Theory.</p>
<p>Second, China has not followed the conventional &#x201c;pollute first, remedy later&#x201d; trajectory. Instead, it initiated its green transition during its middle-income stage by adopting the principle that &#x201c;lucid waters and lush mountains are invaluable assets,&#x201d; thereby integrating ecological value as a foundational element in economic accounting. This has crystallized a distinctive &#x201c;philosophy-rule of law-technology-market&#x201d; governance model.</p>
<p>This pathway not only resonates with the emphasis on &#x201c;state capacity&#x201d; in Environmental State Theory but also offers countries in the Global South a new possibility that transcends the established Ecological Modernization template.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="conclusion" id="s6">
<label>6</label>
<title>Conclusion</title>
<sec id="s6-1">
<label>6.1</label>
<title>Research findings</title>
<p>This study is based on an analysis of China&#x2019;s ecological and environmental monitoring data from 2015 to 2024. The results show a 40.6 percentage-point increase in the proportion of days meeting air quality standards, a 22.6 percentage-point rise in the share of surface water sections with good quality, a concurrent decline in areas affected by both soil erosion and desertification, a 33.5% growth in the EQI, a 79.5% surge in the number of catalogued species, alongside a rapid expansion in the share of clean energy and continuous growth in new energy vehicle penetration. Concurrently, persistent challenges include lagging improvement in groundwater quality, an increase in the number of threatened species, and an unabated warming trend. This pattern indicates that China&#x2019;s ecological and environmental quality has achieved systematic and multi-dimensional improvement, while also revealing that deep-seated environmental issues remain.</p>
<p>In summary, addressing these entrenched ecological and environmental problems requires multi-dimensional coordination. It necessitates guidance from the philosophy of sustainable development, safeguards from a robust legal system, leverage from technological empowerment, and direction from a green, low-carbon transition. This &#x201c;China Pathway&#x201d; provides a hybrid governance model integrating state capacity with market dynamism, offering a potential solution to the &#x201c;collective action dilemma&#x201d; in global sustainable development. Its significant academic value lies in pointing to the viability of a development path that achieves both economic and ecological benefits. This offers practical insights for other countries globally, particularly developing nations. Consequently, it contributes a Chinese approach with both theoretical and practical relevance for realizing the United Nations&#x2019; 2030 SDGs.</p>
<p>The China Pathway does not seek to replace existing theories but offers a contextualized supplement to Ecological Modernization Theory. It also yields the following policy insights for an international audience:<list list-type="order">
<list-item>
<p>Governance through Rule of Law Policies (applicable to middle-income countries). For example, drawing on China&#x2019;s River Chief and Lake Chief Systems, it is advisable for developing countries to introduce executive accountability mechanisms in watershed management, linking water quality compliance to official performance evaluations. This can elevate the priority given to ecological governance and protection.</p>
</list-item>
<list-item>
<p>Green Industrial Policies (applicable to emerging economies). For instance, referencing China&#x2019;s Zero-Waste City pilot initiatives, promoting the recycling and reuse of industrial solid waste through market-based instruments can reduce resource consumption. Policies such as tax incentives and extended producer responsibility can further mitigate pollutant emissions.</p>
</list-item>
<list-item>
<p>Eco-Agricultural Policies (applicable to agrarian economies). Building on China&#x2019;s experience with photovoltaics for emission reduction and income generation, scaling up the installation of photovoltaic systems, wind turbines, and other renewable energy facilities in rural areas can reduce reliance on petroleum resources, curb pollution at the source, and increase farmers&#x2019; incomes.</p>
</list-item>
</list>
</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s6-2">
<label>6.2</label>
<title>Research limitations and future prospects</title>
<p>This study has considered the alignment in timing between the implementation of policies and relevant ecological and environmental indicators. However, it must be acknowledged that a causal relationship has not been rigorously established. Therefore, future research should empirically validate the governance framework proposed here and develop formal causal models. Key priorities will include distinguishing the relative contributions of policy interventions from other influencing factors, differentiating between the effects of short-term and long-term policies, and controlling for fluctuations in the broader industrial environment to avoid confounding cyclical improvements with sustained institutional effectiveness. Furthermore, employing control groups will be essential to ensure that &#x201c;policy effectiveness&#x201d; is not treated as an untested prior assumption.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec sec-type="data-availability" id="s7">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>Publicly available datasets were analyzed in this study. This data can be found here: The primary datasets analyzed for this study are hosted in the following public repositories: Repository Name: Ministry of Ecology and Environment of the People&#x2019;s Republic of China Data: China Ecological and Environmental Status Bulletin (Annual Series, 2015&#x2013;2024) Direct Link: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.mee.gov.cn/hjzl/sthjzk/zghjzkgb/">http://www.mee.gov.cn/hjzl/sthjzk/zghjzkgb/</ext-link> Note: This is the portal page for the annual bulletins. Each year&#x2019;s report (e.g., the &#x201c;2024 Bulletin&#x201d;) is available as a separate PDF document for download from this page. There are no specific &#x201c;accession numbers&#x201d;; the reports themselves are the citable public assets. Repository Name: The World Bank Data: World Bank Open Data (e.g., indicators for CO2 emissions, energy use) Direct Link: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://data.worldbank.org/">https://data.worldbank.org/</ext-link> Note: Specific indicators can be searched and accessed via this platform. Repository Name: International Energy Agency (IEA) Data: IEA Data and Statistics Direct Link: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics">https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics</ext-link> Note: The specific datasets for China&#x2019;s energy production and consumption can be accessed and filtered through this portal.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="author-contributions" id="s8">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>QW: Conceptualization, Data curation, Funding acquisition, Writing &#x2013; original draft. HS: Visualization, Writing &#x2013; review and editing. BQ: Funding acquisition, Supervision, Validation, Writing &#x2013; review and editing.</p>
</sec>
<ack>
<title>Acknowledgements</title>
<p>During the preparation of this manuscript, the authors used Grammarly (version 1.2.210.1786) for grammar checking and language polishing. The authors have reviewed and edited the output and take full responsibility for the content of this publication.</p>
</ack>
<sec sec-type="COI-statement" id="s10">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="ai-statement" id="s11">
<title>Generative AI statement</title>
<p>The author(s) declared that generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript. During the preparation of this manuscript, the authors used Grammarly (version 1.2.210.1786) for grammar checking and language polishing. The authors have reviewed and edited the output and take full responsibility for the content of this publication.</p>
<p>Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="disclaimer" id="s12">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
<fn-group>
<fn fn-type="custom" custom-type="edited-by">
<p>
<bold>Edited by:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/3185066/overview">Wei Jiang</ext-link>, Shandong University, China</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="custom" custom-type="reviewed-by">
<p>
<bold>Reviewed by:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/3290649/overview">shaohuai Feng</ext-link>, University of Science Malaysia, Malaysia</p>
<p>
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/3336829/overview">Xiaoru Zhang</ext-link>, Wuhan University, China</p>
</fn>
</fn-group>
<fn-group>
<fn id="fn1">
<label>1</label>
<p>The proportion of days when the AQI meets national standards, primarily monitoring PM<sub>2</sub>.<sub>5</sub>, PM<sub>10</sub>, SO<sub>2</sub>, NO<sub>2</sub>, O<sub>3</sub>, and CO concentrations.</p>
</fn>
<fn id="fn2">
<label>2</label>
<p>The &#x201c;Bay Chief System,&#x201d; an institutional innovation in marine ecological conservation where designated officials are held accountable for the environmental management of specific coastal bays, modeled after the River Chief System.</p>
</fn>
<fn id="fn3">
<label>3</label>
<p>China&#x2019;s first preventive public-interest litigation concerning endangered wildlife. The case was initiated by an environmental organization against a hydropower station project that threatened the habitat of the green peafowl (<italic>Pavo muticus</italic>). The court ultimately ruled in favor of halting the construction.</p>
</fn>
<fn id="fn4">
<label>4</label>
<p>A landmark environmental public-interest litigation case. It involved soil contamination that caused health issues among students. Three liable chemical companies were sued and were jointly ordered by the court to pay substantial costs for environmental remediation.</p>
</fn>
</fn-group>
<fn-group>
<fn fn-type="abbr" id="abbrev1">
<label>Abbreviations:</label>
<p>SDGs, Sustainable Development Goals; EMT, Ecological Modernization Theory; EST, Environmental State Theory; IEA, International Energy Agency; EQI, Ecological Quality Index; AQI, Air Quality Index; COD, Chemical Oxygen Demand; NEV, New Energy Vehicle; GDP, Gross Domestic Product; GEP, Gross Ecosystem Product; InSAR, Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar; UAV, Unmanned Aerial Vehicle; USV, Unmanned Surface Vessel; IoT, Internet of Things; AI, Artificial Intelligence; MaaS, Mobility as a Service.</p>
</fn>
</fn-group>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<collab>CloudFerro</collab> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Horizon Europe supports innovative EO projects: how does horizon Europe support innovative EO projects?</article-title> <source>CloudFerro Blog</source>. <comment>Available online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://cloudferro.com/blog/how-does-horizon-europe-support-innovative-eo-projects/">https://cloudferro.com/blog/how-does-horizon-europe-support-innovative-eo-projects/</ext-link>(Accessed October 1, 2025)</comment>.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hardin</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1968</year>). <article-title>The tragedy of the commons</article-title>. <source>Science</source> <volume>162</volume> (<issue>3859</issue>), <fpage>1243</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1248</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/science.162.3859.1243</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">5699198</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Harris</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lyon</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sioen</surname>
<given-names>G. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ebi</surname>
<given-names>K. L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Working with the tensions of transdisciplinary research: a review and agenda for the future of knowledge co-production in the anthropocene</article-title>. <source>Glob. Sustain.</source> <volume>7</volume>, <fpage>e13</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1017/sus.2024.11</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kirsop-Taylor</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Russel</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Winter</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>The contours of state retreat from collaborative environmental governance under austerity</article-title>. <source>Sustainability</source> <volume>12</volume> (<issue>7</issue>), <fpage>2761</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/su12072761</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Marciniak</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Urbach</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schneider</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Krug</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>De Bremond</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Stafford-Smith</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Leveraging capacity for transformative sustainability science: a theory of change from the future Earth pathways initiative</article-title>. <source>Glob. Sustain.</source> <volume>7</volume>, <fpage>e21</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1017/sus.2024.19</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mol</surname>
<given-names>A. P. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Spaargaren</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2000</year>). <article-title>Ecological modernisation theory in debate: a review</article-title>. <source>Environ. Polit.</source> <volume>9</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>17</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>49</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/09644010008414511</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<mixed-citation publication-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Olson</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1965</year>). <source>The logic of collective action: public goods and the theory of groups</source>. <publisher-loc>Cambridge, MA</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Harvard University Press</publisher-name>.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<mixed-citation publication-type="web">
<collab>United Nations</collab>. (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>
<italic>Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development</italic> (Resolution A/RES/70/1)</article-title>. <comment>Available online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.refworld.org/legal/resolution/unga/2015/en/111816">https://www.refworld.org/legal/resolution/unga/2015/en/111816</ext-link> (Accessed October 21, 2015)</comment>.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<mixed-citation publication-type="book">
<collab>United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs</collab> (<year>2025</year>). <source>The sustainable development goals report 2025</source>. <publisher-loc>New York</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>UN DESA</publisher-name>. <comment>Available online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2025/">https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2025/</ext-link>.</comment>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<mixed-citation publication-type="web">
<collab>U.S. Environmental Protection Agency</collab> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>
<italic>The benefits and costs of the Clean Air Act from 1990 to 2020</italic> (Report No. EPA-410-R-11-001)</article-title>. <comment>Available online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2015-07/documents/fullreport_rev_a.pdf">https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2015-07/documents/fullreport_rev_a.pdf</ext-link>.</comment>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>Y.-C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>Y.-Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fan</surname>
<given-names>Y.-P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2025</year>). <article-title>Spatiotemporal dynamics of the eco-innovation level of China&#x27;s marine economy</article-title>. <source>Sustainability</source> <volume>17</volume> (<issue>12</issue>), <fpage>5660</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/su17125660</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Xiao</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wei</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2025</year>). <article-title>Failure mechanism and movement process inversion of rainfall-induced landslide in Yuexi County</article-title>. <source>Sustainability</source> <volume>17</volume> (<issue>12</issue>), <fpage>5639</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/su17125639</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Xu</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Theoretical interpretation of the concept of ecological civilization</article-title>. <source>J. Peking Univ. Philosophy Soc. Sci.</source> <volume>47</volume> (<issue>01</issue>), <fpage>61</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>63</lpage>.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Xuan</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1998</year>). <article-title>Study on the visualization of control analysis for water pollution</article-title>. <source>China Environ. Sci.</source> (<issue>03</issue>), <fpage>40</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>44</lpage>.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ma</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hua</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hu</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yao</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2025</year>). <article-title>Spatiotemporal dynamics of the grassland cover in Xinjiang, China, from 2000 to 2023</article-title>. <source>Sustainability</source> <volume>17</volume> (<issue>12</issue>), <fpage>5654</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/su17125654</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zheng</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zheng</surname>
<given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2025</year>). <article-title>On the formative background, theoretical connotation, and practical significance of Xi thought on ecological civilization</article-title>. <source>J. Guangxi Univ. Philosophy Soc. Sci.</source> <volume>47</volume> (<issue>04</issue>), <fpage>9</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>17</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.13624/j.cnki.jgupss.20250806.012</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>