<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="EN" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Environ. Sci.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Environmental Science</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Environ. Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">2296-665X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">1533441</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fenvs.2025.1533441</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Environmental Science</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Soil fungi respond more violently to both polyethylene and PBAT biodegradable mulch film residues than bacteria do</article-title>
<alt-title alt-title-type="left-running-head">Liu et al.</alt-title>
<alt-title alt-title-type="right-running-head">
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2025.1533441">10.3389/fenvs.2025.1533441</ext-link>
</alt-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author" equal-contrib="yes">
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>Liyuan</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn001">
<sup>&#x2020;</sup>
</xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" equal-contrib="yes">
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>Liuliu</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn001">
<sup>&#x2020;</sup>
</xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zou</surname>
<given-names>Guoyuan</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/software/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/Writing - review &#x26; editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Gu</surname>
<given-names>Jialin</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/Writing - review &#x26; editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zuo</surname>
<given-names>Qiang</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/validation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Zheng</surname>
<given-names>Xiangqun</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001">&#x2a;</xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/Writing - review &#x26; editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Du</surname>
<given-names>Lianfeng</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001">&#x2a;</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2904132/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>Dongsheng</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001">&#x2a;</xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/funding-acquisition/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
<institution>Institute of Plant Nutrition, Resources and Environment</institution>, <institution>Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences</institution>, <addr-line>Beijing</addr-line>, <country>China</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
<institution>Institute of Environment and Sustainable Development in Agriculture</institution>, <institution>Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences</institution>, <addr-line>Beijing</addr-line>, <country>China</country>
</aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>
<bold>Edited by:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2531310/overview">Lyudmyla Symochko</ext-link>, University of Coimbra, Portugal</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>
<bold>Reviewed by:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1311092/overview">Yuan Li</ext-link>, Lanzhou University, China</p>
<p>
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2124105/overview">Ruimin Qi</ext-link>, Southern University of Science and Technology, China</p>
</fn>
<corresp id="c001">&#x2a;Correspondence: Xiangqun Zheng, <email>zhengxiangqun@caas.cn</email>; Lianfeng Du, <email>dulianfengyzs@163.com</email>; Dongsheng Liu, <email>2243019559@qq.com</email>
</corresp>
<fn fn-type="equal" id="fn001">
<label>
<sup>&#x2020;</sup>
</label>
<p>These authors have contributed equally to this work</p>
</fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>20</day>
<month>05</month>
<year>2025</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2025</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>13</volume>
<elocation-id>1533441</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>24</day>
<month>11</month>
<year>2024</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>13</day>
<month>03</month>
<year>2025</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#xa9; 2025 Liu, Li, Zou, Gu, Zuo, Zheng, Du and Liu.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2025</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Liu, Li, Zou, Gu, Zuo, Zheng, Du and Liu</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>Biodegradable mulch film (BDM) residues in farmland have attracted extensive concern due to their low degradation rate in soil after the service period. However, different reactions of the bacterial and fungal communities to LDPEM and BDM residues have been confusing. A pot experiment was implemented to explore the influences of 0.5% and 2.0% (w/w) LDPEM and BDM residues on soil physicochemical properties and bacterial and fungal communities in the present study. The results indicated that BDM residues significantly increased soil pH and SOC to an increasing degree under the treatment with a higher mulch film residue amount, while LDPEM residues did not. The dissimilarities of the bacterial community between the treatment groups and the control ranged from 0.24 to 0.27, while the dissimilarities of the fungal community were higher, with the variation ranging from 0.43 to 0.46. Higher variations in the internal correlation coefficient were observed in the fungal community than in the bacterial community under the treatment groups. In addition, the modules of the bacterial community network increased from 2 to 3 under the BDM 0.5% and BDM 2.0%. Comparatively, the treatments with BDM residues doubled the modules of the fungal community network from 2 to 4. Structural equation modelling indicated that mulch film residues had a higher negative direct effect on fungal community structure (&#x2212;0.752) than on bacterial community structure (&#x2212;0.600). However, soil physicochemical properties had no significant influences on either bacterial or fungal communities. Overall, soil fungi respond more violently to mulch film residues than bacteria do.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>mulch film residues</kwd>
<kwd>soil fungi</kwd>
<kwd>soil bacteria</kwd>
<kwd>low-density polyethylene mulch film</kwd>
<kwd>biodegradable mulch film</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<contract-sponsor id="cn001">Beijing Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences<named-content content-type="fundref-id">10.13039/501100007934</named-content>
</contract-sponsor>
<custom-meta-wrap>
<custom-meta>
<meta-name>section-at-acceptance</meta-name>
<meta-value>Soil Processes</meta-value>
</custom-meta>
</custom-meta-wrap>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="s1">
<title>1 Introduction</title>
<p>Plastic film mulching technology is widely promoted worldwide due to its superiority in maintaining soil temperature and moisture (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B88">Zhang et al., 2016</xref>). Plastic mulch film usage was approximately 0.3 million tons in 1991 in China, and the number rapidly increased to 1.30 million by 2021 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B63">Ren et al., 2023</xref>), and it will continue to grow in the future (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B82">Yang et al., 2021</xref>). However, plastic mulch film residues in farmland have been a global concern due to their long application history and low degradation rate (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">Mak-Mensah et al., 2021</xref>). Numerous studies have demonstrated the significant harm of plastic film residues to soil environment and crops (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Hua et al., 2024</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Li et al., 2023a</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Li et al., 2023b</xref>). To alleviate residual pollution from plastic mulch, researchers have developed biodegradable mulch film (BDM), which can be degraded easily by microorganisms under composting conditions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B66">Song et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Giordano et al., 2020</xref>). Currently, the main component of BDM with the largest promotion area currently is poly (butylene adipate-co-butylene terephthalate) (PBAT). Although the degradation rate of commercially available BDM derived from PBAT at present is faster than that of polyethylene mulch films (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Anunciado et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B71">Wang et al., 2022</xref>). The soil-biodegradable plastic films do not decompose in a lake sediment over 9&#xa0;months of incubation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B70">Van and Carsten, 2023</xref>). The investigation of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Deirdre et al. (2022)</xref> found that up to 58&#xa0;months were required to realize a degradation rate of approximately 90% in soil according to modelling data forecasting. Therefore, BDM can also cause residues in farmland before being degraded completely.</p>
<p>Soil harbours highly diverse microorganisms including bacteria, fungi, archaea, viruses, protozoa, and microalgae, which are involved in processes such as nitrogen fixation, decomposition of organic matter, and the breakdown of toxic substances, helping to maintain ecosystem functions and plant productivity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Bardgett and Van, 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">De Vries et al., 2018</xref>). Plastic mulch residues can negatively impact soil bacterial communities by several ways. Firstly, they physically block soil pores, reducing aeration and water infiltration, which favors anaerobic bacteria and inhibits aerobic bacteria (Cao et al., 2022). The slow breakdown of plastics also releases harmful chemicals, such as plasticizers and stabilizers, which can leach into the soil and disrupt bacterial growth, potentially harming microbial diversity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Cheng et al., 2024</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B67">Souza et al., 2019</xref>). In addition, bacteria have been proven to actively participate in the geochemical processes of low-density polyethylene mulch film (LDPEM) residues, including migration, fragmentation and degradation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B85">Yuan et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Dong et al., 2024</xref>). Soil bacteria and their relationships with environmental factors in different soil types contaminated with LDPEM residues have also been studied (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Hu et al., 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Fan et al., 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Dong et al., 2024</xref>). In addition to various concentrations and sizes of LDPEM residues, pH and soil organic carbon have been demonstrated to be the main environmental factors influencing the structure of the bacterial community (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B65">Song et al., 2023</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B76">Wilhelm et al., 2023</xref>). Besides some bacterial groups that are sensitive to LDPEM residues, potential LDPEM microplastic-degrading bacteria were also identified in the study of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B77">Wu et al. (2022)</xref>. Despite great achievements brought about during the years of efforts regarding the bacterial community in LDPEM residue-contaminated soil, the responses of the bacterial community to BDM residues remain unclear.</p>
<p>Fungi are indispensable soil microbes and perform crucial functions in the transformation of soil nutrients (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Khan et al., 2024</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Li et al., 2023</xref>). However, our knowledge about how soil fungi respond to mulch film residues is extremely limited compared with that of bacteria (Romano et al., 2024; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Jiao et al., 2024</xref>). Some toxic substances present in plastic materials may inhibit fungal metabolic processes, thereby reducing fungal activity and altering community composition (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Francioni et al., 2024</xref>). Additionally, the presence of plastic residues may affect the decomposition rates of organic matter, as fungi play a crucial role in this process (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B60">Qi et al., 2022</xref>). It has been demonstrated that 14% polyethylene and polyvinyl chloride mulch film residues addition in aquic soil can significantly decrease the diversity of the soil fungal community (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Fan et al., 2022</xref>). The relative abundance of <italic>Ascomycota</italic>, which is a crucial decomposition agent in farmland, significantly increased by 20.1% with 14% LDPEM residues addition compared with control (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Fan et al., 2022</xref>). Mulch film residues could alter the abundance of <italic>arbuscular mycorrhizal</italic>, which is highly dependent on the mulch film material types, dose, and cultivation environment (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">De Souza et al., 2019</xref>). Moreover, endophytic fungi could provide protection for host plants in mulch film residue-contaminated soil (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Fan et al., 2022</xref>). Despite the studies mentioned above, fungal communities in soil with LDPEM and BDM residues are far less studied.</p>
<p>Despite the involvement of both bacteria and fungi in the degradation of organic matter, bacteria are generally regarded as significant regulators of the rapid carbon metabolism pathways of soils, whereas fungi are well known for their performance in the decomposition of refractory and highly polymeric organic matter (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B75">Wengel et al., 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">Perkins et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Fierer et al., 2007</xref>). Despite the distinct roles of bacteria and fungi in soil functions, they regulate soil biogeochemical processes jointly and cooperate closely (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B92">Zhang et al., 2021a</xref>). This is because the different contributions and close cooperation of bacteria and fungi on nutrient cycling and energy flow of the soil food web guarantee the stability of the soil nutrient supply (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B61">Rashid, et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Li et al., 2016</xref>). Multiple studies have demonstrated that the optimum environmental conditions for the reproduction of fungi and bacteria are different (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B80">Xu et al., 2023</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Fan et al., 2022</xref>), and their sensitivities to environmental disturbances are also different. For example, soil bacteria are more susceptible to long-term throughfall reduction than fungal communities in warm-temperate forests (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B90">Zhang et al., 2021b</xref>). While, the study of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Chen et al. (2020)</xref> revealed that soil fungal networks are more sensitive to grazing exclusion than bacterial networks. Variations in the soil micro-environment induced by LDPEM and BDM residues (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Gao et al., 2021</xref>) could stimulate differential responses of bacteria and fungi, which have not been studied to our knowledge.</p>
<p>To this end, a well-controlled pot experiment planting Chinese cabbage with different levels of LDPEM and BDM residues was conducted to examine the influences of mulch film residues on soil bacterial and fungal communities.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="materials|methods" id="s2">
<title>2 Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="s2-1">
<title>2.1 Experimental design and sampling</title>
<p>The soil applied in the present study was collected in farmland in the plough layer (0&#x2013;20&#xa0;cm) with a alluvial soil texture in Beijing, China, which had never been mulched by LDPEM or BDM. The collected soil was air-dried and passed through a 2-mm sieve for experiment. The main component of the LDPEM low density polyethylene. The color of the LDPEM is white with the thickness of 0.014&#xa0;mm. The applied BDM was the most widely promoted mulch film in China, with the main component being poly (butylene adipate-<italic>co</italic>-butylene terephthalate) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B68">Su et al., 2020</xref>). There are also Poly lactic acid (PLA) and inorganic materials such as calcium carbonate. The color of the mulch is black with the thickness of 0.01&#xa0;mm. Both the LDPEM and BDM were cut into three sizes by scissors, namely, 10&#xa0;mm &#xd7; 10&#xa0;mm, 5&#xa0;mm &#xd7; 5&#xa0;mm and 1&#xa0;mm &#xd7; 1&#xa0;mm, to imitate residues in farmland according to the literature (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Huang et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Liu et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B95">Zhou et al., 2020</xref>). The three particle sizes were mixed in equal proportions. Five treatments with three replicates planting Chinese cabbage were conducted with ceramic planting containers (L: 45&#xa0;cm &#xd7; W: 23&#xa0;cm &#xd7; H: 17&#xa0;cm), namely: 1) CK, no mulch film fragment addition; 2) LDPEM 0.5%, 0.5% (w/w) of LDPEM fragments added to soil; 3) LDPEM 2.0%, 2.0% (w/w) of LDPEM fragments added to soil; 4) BDM 0.5%, 0.5% (w/w) of BDM fragments added to soil; and 5) BDM 2.0%, 2.0% (w/w) of BDM fragments added to the soil. The pots were installed the smart greenhouse at Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry. The temperature and humidity during the experiment were recorded every 10&#xa0;min, as shown in the <xref ref-type="sec" rid="s11">Supplementary Figure S1</xref>. It lasted for 54&#xa0;days from sowing to harvesting. The irrigation amount was 500&#xa0;mL for each time with a frequency of twice a week. No fertilizers were applied in the present study to avoid the interference of fertilization on soil microbial community. Other management measures for all treatments were consistent. Soil samples were collected and divided into two parts in parallel after crop harvesting. One part was applied to determine the soil&#x2019;s physicochemical properties with air drying. The other part was stored at &#x2212;80&#xb0;C before the measurements of soil microbes.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-2">
<title>2.2 Analysis of soil physicochemical properties and enzymes activities</title>
<p>The soil property indices determined in this study included pH, soil electrical conductivity (EC), soil organic carbon (SOC), available nitrogen (AN), available phosphorus (AP), and available potassium (AK) following the description of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Bao, (1999)</xref>. In briefly, pH and EC were determined by electrode method with the soil to water ratio of 1:2.5 and 1:5 respectively. SOC was determined by oxidizing organic C with potassium dichromate. AN, AP and AK were determined by Kjeldahl digestion, Olsen method and flame photometry respectively.</p>
<p>Benzene disodium phosphate colorimetric method was applied to determined the activity of phosphatase (AKP). The AKP activity is expressed in micromolar (&#x3bc;mol) of phenols in 1.0&#xa0;g of soil after 24&#xa0;h (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B53">Peng et al., 2022</xref>). Urease (UE) activity was determined using the sodium phenate-sodium hypochlorite colorimetric method. The UE activity is expressed in microgram (&#x3bc;g) of NH<sub>4</sub> <sup>&#x2b;</sup>-N in 1.0&#xa0;g of soil after 24&#xa0;h (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Lu and Chen, 2022</xref>). The method of pyrogallol oxidation was used to determine the activity of peroxidase (POD). The POD activity is expressed in milligram (mg) of quinone in 1.0&#xa0;g of soil after 24&#xa0;h (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Li et al., 2022</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-3">
<title>2.3 Analysis of soil bacterial and fungal communities</title>
<p>According the instructions of the soil DNA kit (Omega Bio tek, Norcross, GA, U.S.) to extract the total genomic DNA, whose quality was detected by 1% agarose gel electrophoresis and spectrophotometry (optical density at 260 nm/280&#xa0;nm ratio). Bacterial 16S rRNA and fungal ITS1 gene were sequenced for bacterial and fungal communities with the bacterial primer set 338F (5&#x2032;-ACT&#x200b;CCT&#x200b;ACG&#x200b;GGA&#x200b;GGC&#x200b;AGC&#x200b;A-3&#x2032;) and 806R (5&#x2032;-GGACTACHVGGGTWTCTAAT-3&#x2032;) and fungal primer set ITS1F (5&#x2032;-CTT&#x200b;GGT&#x200b;CAT&#x200b;TTA&#x200b;GAG&#x200b;GAA&#x200b;GTA&#x200b;A-3&#x2032;) and ITS2 (5&#x2032;- GCT&#x200b;GCG&#x200b;TTC&#x200b;TTC&#x200b;ATC&#x200b;GAT&#x200b;GC-3&#x2032;) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B71">Wang et al. (2022)</xref>. The PCR reaction system were performed in triplicate 25 mixtures including 4&#xa0;&#x3bc;L of 5 &#xd7; TransStart FastPfu buffer, 2&#xa0;&#x3bc;L 2.5&#xa0;mM dNTPs, 0.8&#xa0;&#x3bc;L upstream primer (5uM), 0.8&#xa0;&#x3bc;L downstream primer (5uM), 0.4&#xa0;&#x3bc;L TransStart FastPfu DNA polymerase. The amplification procedure is as follows: pre denaturation at 95&#xb0;C for 3&#xa0;min, 27 cycles (denaturation at 95&#xb0;C for 30&#xa0;s, annealing at 55&#xb0;C for 30&#xa0;s, and extension at 72&#xb0;C for 30&#xa0;s), followed by stable extension at 72&#xb0;C for 10&#xa0;min, and finally stored at 4&#xb0;C. The 2% agarose gel and DNA gel recovery and purification kit (PCR Clean Up Kit, China Yuhua) was applied to recover PCR products and purify the recovered products. The detection and quantify of the recovered products was by Qubit 4.0 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). The library of purified PCR products was build by NEXTFLEX Rapid DNA Seq Kit. Illumina PE300 platform was applied for sequencing (Majorbio Bio-pharm Technology Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-4">
<title>2.4 Data analysis</title>
<p>To obtain the species classification for each operational taxonomic unit (OTU), the Bayesian RDP classifier was used for taxonomic analyses at a 97% similarity level. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was applied to analyse soil physicochemical properties, composition of bacterial and fungal communities on phyla level. The structure of bacterial and fungal communities at the OTU level was calculated by principal component analysis (PCA) by the software of R. The correlations of bacterial and fungal communities at OTU level was calculated by by &#x201c;hmisc&#x201d; in R. The distribution of correlation coefficients was analyzed to clarity the distribution patterns of bacterial community and fungal community respectively. Absolute value of all correlation coefficients was calculated to clarity the absolute distribution patterns of bacterial community and fungal community respectively. The networks of bacterial and fungal communities were performed by &#x201c;igraph&#x201d; in R (R &#x3e; 0.80, P &#x3c; 0.01). The significant differences between groups were determined based on network topological indices were determined by Kolmogorov-Smirnov test (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Banerjee et al., 2019</xref>). The Z score analysis among mulch film residues, physicochemical properties and microbial community structure was carried out by Origin 2021. Furthermore, the relationships among mulch film residues, physicochemical properties and microbial community structure were calculated by a structural equation model (SEM) by the software of R (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B93">Zhang et al., 2022</xref>). The Jaccard dissimilarity index is calculated using the following formula, where a is the number of species shared between the two samples, and b and c are the numbers of species that appear only in the first and second samples, respectively.<disp-formula id="equ1">
<mml:math id="m1">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">J</mml:mi>
<mml:mtext>dis</mml:mtext>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</disp-formula>
</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="results|discussion" id="s3">
<title>3 Results and discussion</title>
<sec id="s3-1">
<title>3.1 Soil physicochemical properties and enzymes activities</title>
<p>Variations in pH, EC, SOC and available nutrients under the stress of different concentrations and types of mulch film residues are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1</xref>. Soil pH showed no significant responses to LDPEM residues, which was in accordance with the result of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B77">Wu et al. (2022)</xref>. Comparatively, the BDM residues increased the soil pH significantly, and the enhancement degree increased with the increasing residual amount (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1a</xref>). The degradation of biodegradable polymers in solution could generate acidic monomers and oligomers, which accounted for the decrease in solution pH (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B74">Wei et al., 2022</xref>). It would be taken for granted that the soil pH would decrease due to the release of organic acids similar to the solution. Unexpectedly, no decrease but a substantial increase in soil pH was determined under 0.5% BDM and 2.0% BDM. The discrepant responses of pH in soil and solution might be induced by differences in degradation progress and mechanisms (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B74">Wei et al., 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Deirdre et al., 2022</xref>). Compared with CK, there was no significant difference in EC in the treatment groups (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1b</xref>). Studies have demonstrated that soil EC is mainly affected by ion concentration and charge, including Cl<sup>&#x2212;</sup>, Na<sup>&#x2b;</sup>, and K<sup>&#x2b;</sup> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B81">Yan and Petra, 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B83">Yasenjiang et al., 2019</xref>). The main elements contained in LDPEM and BDM were carbon, hydrogen and carbon, and hydrogen and oxygen (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">Pei et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B87">Zhang et al., 2021</xref>), and these elements made little contribution to soil EC. The two treatments with BDM residues significantly increased SOC by 7.66% and 12.45%, while LDPEM residues did not (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1c</xref>). No significant influence of LDPEM residues on SOC was also proven in a previous study (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B77">Wu et al., 2022</xref>); rather, the influence was induced mainly by the inertness of LDPE hindering the release of carbon (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B64">Restrepo-Fl&#xf3;rez et al., 2014</xref>). There have also been studies indicating that LDPEM residues decrease SOC (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Dong et al., 2015</xref>). Different influences of LDPEM residues on SOC might be induced by the various soil types and culturing durations. Different from LDPEM, the carbon in BDM could be easily metabolized by microorganisms, which could replenish the soil carbon pool.</p>
<fig id="F1" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Soil physicochemical properties under different treatments. Note: EC, soil electrical conductivity; SOC, soil organic carbon; AN, available nitrogen; AP, available phosphorus; AK, available potassium; CK, no mulch film fragment addition; LDPEM 0.5%, 0.5% (w/w) of LDPEM fragments added to soil; LDPEM 2.0%, 2.0% (w/w) of LDPEM fragments added to soil; BDM 0.5%, 0.5% (w/w) of BDM fragments added to soil; BDM 2.0%, 2.0% (w/w) of BDM fragments added to the soil. Different letters <bold>(a-f)</bold> denote significant differences.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fenvs-13-1533441-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Overall, all three types of available nutrients showed a downtrend in the four treatment groups (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figures 1d&#x2013;f</xref>). In detail, LDPEM 2.0%, BDM 0.5% and BDM 2.0% decreased soil AN by 4.50%, 7.42%, and 8.14%, respectively, compared with CK (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1d</xref>). The four treatment groups significantly decreased the soil AP content by 6.29%, 7.17%, 8.14% and 7.99% compared with the control, as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1e</xref>. In terms of AK, a significant difference was found between the control and BDM 2.0% treatments, with an 11.49% reduction in the BDM 2.0% treatment (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1f</xref>). The downtrend of available nutrients, especially for AN and AP, under the treatments with mulch film residues was in line with the findings of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Dong et al. (2015)</xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Koskei et al. (2021)</xref>. There could be several reasons accounting for these results. First, there was almost no nitrogen, phosphorus or potassium in either LDPEM or BDM (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B87">Zhang et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">Pei et al., 2020</xref>). Moreover, film residues had adverse effects on soil physical properties, including bulk density and water holding capacity, which are closely related to soil available nutrients (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">De Souza et al., 2018</xref>). On the other hand, studies have indicated that soil enzyme activities, which act as mediators and catalysts to realize the biochemical processes of soil ecosystems, would be inhibited by mulch film residues, resulting in a decrease in nutrient conversion efficiency (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B84">Yu et al., 2020</xref>).</p>
<p>The variations of alkaline phosphatase (AKP), urease (UE), and peroxidase (POD) was determined as shown in the <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2</xref>. The addition of BDM residues significantly decreased soil AKP activities by 11.96% and 15.99% under the treatments of BDM 0.5% and BDM 2.0% respectively, which was in accordance with the study of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Awet et al. (2018)</xref>. On the contrary, the addition of mulch film residues for both LDPEM and BDM significantly increased the activities of UE and POD. Compared with CK, the activities of UE significant increased by 4.43%&#x2013;6.37% under the four treatments with mulch film residues as shown in the <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2b</xref>. Studies have demonstrated the mulch film residues can stimulate soil UE activity and affect soil carbon and nitrogen content (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Huang et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Judy et al., 2019</xref>). While, the activities of POD increased by 9.37%&#x2013;12.5% under the four treatments with mulch films residues. Researches have confirmed that soil POD is significantly positively correlated with soil aerobic microorganisms (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Huang et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Liu et al., 2017a</xref>). Mulch film residues could increase the abundance of soil aerobic microorganisms by increasing soil porosity, further enhancing POD activity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B59">Qi et al., 2020b</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Gao et al., 2021</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F2" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 2</label>
<caption>
<p>Soil enzymes activities under different treatments. Note: AKP, alkaline phosphatase; UE, urease; POD, peroxidase; CK, no mulch film fragment addition; LDPEM 0.5%, 0.5% (w/w) of LDPEM fragments added to soil; LDPEM 2.0%, 2.0% (w/w) of LDPEM fragments added to soil; BDM 0.5%, 0.5% (w/w) of BDM fragments added to soil; BDM 2.0%, 2.0% (w/w) of BDM fragments added to the soil. Different letters <bold>(a-c)</bold> denote significant differences.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fenvs-13-1533441-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-2">
<title>3.2 Structure and composition of bacterial and fungal communities</title>
<p>The structures of both bacterial and fungal communities were strongly, but differently, affected by mulch film residues (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3</xref>). The PCA at the OTU level of the bacterial and fungal communities indicated significant differences among the different treatments (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figures 3a, e</xref>). For bacteria and fungi, the five treatments were distributed in the whole quadrants, with the sum explanation proportions of 67.62% and 86.61% for the first two principal components, respectively. The results of LDPEM 2.0% and BDM 2.0% were farther from CK compared with those of LDPEM 0.5% and BDM 0.5% for bacteria and fungi, in line with previous studies that indicated greater influences in the groups with higher concentrations of residues on the microbial community (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Fan et al., 2022</xref>), which highlights the dose-dependent nature of mulch film residue impacts on soil microbial ecosystems.</p>
<fig id="F3" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 3</label>
<caption>
<p>The response of the bacterial and fungal communities to mulch film residues. PCA of bacterial <bold>(a)</bold> and fungal <bold>(e)</bold> communities. Richness of bacterial <bold>(b)</bold> and fungal <bold>(f)</bold> communities. Evenness of bacterial <bold>(c)</bold> and fungal <bold>(g)</bold> communities. Jaccard dissimilarity of bacterial <bold>(d)</bold> and fungal <bold>(h)</bold> communities between the control and treatments. Note: LDPEM 0.5%, 0.5% (w/w) of LDPEM fragments added to soil; LDPEM 2.0%, 2.0% (w/w) of LDPEM fragments added to soil; BDM 0.5%, 0.5% (w/w) of BDM fragments added to soil; BDM 2.0%, 2.0% (w/w) of BDM fragments added to the soil.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fenvs-13-1533441-g003.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>LDPEM 0.5%, BDM 0.5% and BDM 2.0% significantly decreased microbial community richness and evenness compared with the control, as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figures 2f</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">3b</xref>. The richness in BDM 2.0% was the lowest, with reductions of 6.25% and 4.75% for the bacterial community and fungal community, respectively. Compared with the control, BDM 2.0% decreased the evenness of the bacterial and fungal communities by 1.15% and 7.34%, respectively, as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figures 3c, g</xref>, indicating that a high concentration of BDM residues significantly influenced the structure of the microbial community, which has also been demonstrated by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Hu et al. (2022)</xref>. However, no significant difference was observed in the richness and evenness between the control and 0.5% LDPEM for both bacteria and fungi, which was attributed to the certain buffer capacity of the soil (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">Malczyk et al., 2008</xref>). In addition, the same concentration of BDM residues had a stronger effect on soil microorganisms than that of LDPEM residues, which was mainly induced by the different compositions of the two types of mulch film (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Liu et al., 2022</xref>). BDM can be degraded by microorganisms, while LDPEM is rarely utilized by microbes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B69">Tribedi and Samrat, 2017</xref>).</p>
<p>To further clarify the influences of mulch film residues on soil bacteria and fungi, Jaccard dissimilarities between the control and each treatment for the bacterial and fungal communities were calculated, as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figures 3d, h</xref>. The dissimilarities of the bacterial community between the treatment groups and the control ranged from 0.24 to 0.27. The dissimilarities of the fungal community varied from 0.43 to 0.46 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3h</xref>), and the dissimilarities under the 0.5% LDPE treatment were significantly lower than those under the other three treatments. The dissimilarities of the fungal community were higher under the same treatment than the bacterial community, as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figures 3d, h</xref>, which indicated that fungi were more sensitive to mulch film residues. Previous studies have demonstrated that the influences of long-term application of nitrogen fertilizer on the UniFrac distance of the fungal community were greater than those of the bacterial community (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B72">Wang et al., 2019</xref>), which was attributed to the higher resistance to interference of bacteria from its higher growth rate and unicellular properties (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">Powell et al., 2015</xref>). Moreover, the lower habitat niche breadths of fungi than bacteria resulted in a lower tolerance of fungi to environmental variation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B94">Zhao et al., 2019</xref>). At lower concentrations (0.5%), LDPEM is more stable and resistant to microbial degradation, so its impact on soil microorganisms is relatively small. Bacterial communities are generally better able to adapt to this stable environment, with their metabolic activity being less affected by the mulch film residues. While fungal communities also show some adaptability, they are more sensitive to environmental changes compared to bacteria. Therefore, under the 0.5% LDPEM treatment, the response of the fungal community is more subtle compared to that of the bacterial community. However, at the higher concentration of BDM 2.0%, the differences in the responses of bacteria and fungi become more pronounced. This is primarily due to the biodegradability of BDM. The degradation of BDM residues in the soil releases more organic matter, providing rich carbon sources for microorganisms. However, the degradation process of BDM may also promote the rapid growth of specific microbial groups. For fungal communities, although the degradation products of BDM provide additional nutrients, the excessive stimulation may disrupt the balance of the fungal community. As a result, the impact of BDM 2.0% on bacteria is milder compared to fungi, with a significant decrease in the evenness of the fungal community, demonstrating stronger niche competition and changes in community structure.</p>
<p>As the dominant strains of soil bacteria (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Delgado-Baquerizo et al., 2018</xref>), the bacterial phyla <italic>Actinobacteriota</italic>, <italic>Proteobacteria</italic>, <italic>Acidobacteriota</italic>, <italic>Chloroflexi</italic>, and <italic>Firmicutes</italic> were the top five bacterial phyla, accounting for 81.75%&#x2013;86.12% of the total soil bacterial community (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4a</xref>; <xref ref-type="sec" rid="s11">Supplementary Table S1</xref>). <italic>Actinobacteriota</italic> and <italic>Proteobacteria</italic>, which are capable of decomposing microplastics (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B77">Wu et al., 2022</xref>), increased by 24.38% and 24.32% in BDM 2.0% compared with the control, accelerating the degradation of BDM suggesting that BDM may stimulate the growth of specific microbial communities that facilitate its degradation. The increased abundance of <italic>Actinobacteria</italic> and <italic>Proteobacteria</italic> could be associated with their enhanced metabolic activity, particularly in degrading complex organic compounds such as plastic polymers (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Liu et al., 2022</xref>). However, the relative abundance of <italic>Acidobacteriota</italic> decreased significantly by 40.88% in BDM 2.0%. The increased soil pH under the 2.0% BDM treatment could explain the decrease in the relative abundance of <italic>Acidobacteria</italic>. <italic>Acidobacteria</italic> are generally more competitive in low pH environments (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Liu et al., 2020</xref>), and their reduced abundance suggests that soil pH changes have a profound effect on microbial community structure. Moreover, LDPE 2.0%, BDM 0.5%, and BDM 2.0% significantly decreased the relative abundance of <italic>Gemmatimonadota</italic> and <italic>Myxococcota</italic>, which is in line with the previous work of Liu et al. (2021). <italic>Gemmatimonadota</italic> and <italic>Myxococcota</italic> are typically involved in organic matter decomposition and carbon and nitrogen cycling in the soil ecosystem (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">Ning et al., 2024</xref>). The changes in the relative abundance of <italic>Gemmatimonadota</italic> and <italic>Myxococcota</italic> may be due to changes in soil organic matter content or microbial interaction patterns induced by the presence of these plastic materials, which in turn affect the growth and metabolic activity of these bacterial groups.</p>
<fig id="F4" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 4</label>
<caption>
<p>The community composition for bacteria <bold>(a)</bold> and fungi <bold>(b)</bold> at the phylum level. Note: LDPEM 0.5%, 0.5% (w/w) of LDPEM fragments added to soil; LDPEM 2.0%, 2.0% (w/w) of LDPEM fragments added to soil; BDM 0.5%, 0.5% (w/w) of BDM fragments added to soil; BDM 2.0%, 2.0% (w/w) of BDM fragments added to the soil.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fenvs-13-1533441-g004.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Regarding the fungal community, the top five determined phyla were <italic>Basidiomycota</italic>, <italic>Ascomycota</italic>, <italic>Mortierellomycota</italic>, <italic>Olpidiomycota</italic>, and <italic>Chytridiomycota</italic>, making up 87.98%&#x2013;99.35% of the fungal sequences (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4b</xref>; <xref ref-type="sec" rid="s11">Supplementary Table S2</xref>), which was consistent with the findings of the majority of studies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">Paungfoo-Lonhienne et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Feng et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">Pan et al., 2020</xref>), indicating the governing position of these phyla in soil fungal communities. The relative abundances of <italic>Basidiomycota</italic> were 18.33%, 24.99% and 24.21% lower in the LDPEM 0.5%, LDPEM 2.0% and BDM 2.0% treatments than in the control, but no significant difference was observed in the relative abundance of <italic>Basidiomycota</italic> between the BDM 0.5% and CK treatments (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4b</xref>). The reduction in <italic>Basidiomycota</italic> in the treatments with plastic residues might be due to the inability of these fungi to degrade the plastic film residues, which highlights the potential inhibitory effects of plastic materials on key decomposition agents in agricultural soils, affecting microbial diversity and functioning. Studies have indicated that <italic>Basidiomycota</italic> are key decomposition agents in agricultural soil for phenolic compounds (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">Mart&#xed;nkov&#xe1; et al., 2016</xref>). The combination of its inability to degrade mulch film residues and the enhancement of the relative abundance of fungal phyla enabling the degradation of mulch film residues resulted in a decrease in <italic>Basidiomycota</italic>.</p>
<p>The relative abundances of <italic>Ascomycota</italic> in LDPEM 2.0% and BDM 2.0% were 34.25% and 32.86%, respectively. However, the LDPEM 0.5% and BDM 0.5% treatments had no significant effect on the relative abundance of <italic>Ascomycota</italic>. The significant increase in <italic>Ascomycota</italic> in the higher concentration treatments may reflect the role of this microbe in breaking down plastic film residues. A similar finding was recorded by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Fan et al. (2022)</xref>, whose study indicated that high concentrations of mulch residues could stimulate the abundance of <italic>Ascomycota</italic> because <italic>Ascom</italic>ycota can produce hydrolase and promote mulch film degradation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B55">Phosri et al., 2012</xref>). This supports the idea that the presence of higher concentrations of mulch residues encourages the growth of specific fungal groups, which are involved in the degradation process, providing further insight into the microbial adaptation to plastic pollution. Apart from BDM 2.0%, which increased <italic>Mortierellomycota</italic> significantly by 86.08%, the other three treatments with residues showed no significant influence on <italic>Mortierellomycota</italic> compared with the control. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B85">Yuan et al. (2020)</xref> indicated that diseased soils harboured a higher relative abundance of <italic>Mortierellomycota</italic>, which has a strong decomposition ability (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B78">Wu et al., 2021</xref>). The significant increase in <italic>Mortierellomycota</italic> in the BDM 2.0% treatment may be linked to its specific metabolic pathways or the ability to adapt to the presence of BDM, enhancing its growth and activity in degrading organic matter. The four treatment groups had no significant influence on the abundance of <italic>Olpidiomycota</italic>, in agreement with the works of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B91">Zhang et al. (2020)</xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Liu et al. (2020)</xref>, which revealed that <italic>Olpidiomycota</italic> was not sensitive to external disturbances. LDPEM 2.0% and BDM 2.0% significantly increased the relative abundance of <italic>Chytridiomycot</italic>a, which was approximately five and four times that of the control, respectively (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4b</xref>; <xref ref-type="sec" rid="s11">Supplementary Table S2</xref>). Studies have demonstrated that most <italic>Chytridiomycota</italic> are complex compounds-degrading including cellulose- and chitin (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Letcher et al., 2008</xref>). Therefor, <italic>Chytridiomycota</italic> might be responsible for mulch film residue degradation.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-3">
<title>3.3 Networks of bacterial and fungal communities</title>
<p>To clarify the internal relationships of the bacterial and fungal communities under different treatments, the correlations of the bacterial community and fungal community at the genus level were calculated. Similar to the study of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">De Vries et al. (2018)</xref>, the distribution of the correlation coefficients for both bacteria and fungi presented a trend similar to the normal distribution for all correlations, as shown in <xref ref-type="sec" rid="s11">Supplementary Figure S1A</xref>. When considering correlation coefficients greater than 0.6, which was regarded as the cut-off of significant correlation, the negative correlation coefficients of the bacterial community showed an increasing trend in the treatments with mulch film residues, especially for the treatment of BDM 2.0%, which significantly increased the negative correlation by 45.68% (two side <italic>x</italic>
<sup>2</sup> - test of proportion; P &#x3c; 0.05). The competitive and antagonistic interactions among bacterial communities may be enhanced with the increase of mulch film residues due to the increase of the negative correlation. In particular, the treatment of BDM 2.0% significantly intensified this antagonism, likely due to the chemical composition of BDM, which bacteria might find less adaptable. This phenomenon suggested that ecological niche overlap between bacteria may decrease, resulting in stronger resource competition within the bacterial community. In contrast, the treatments of LDPEM 0.5%, LDPEM 2.0%, BDM 0.5% and BDM 2.0% significantly (two-sided <italic>x</italic>
<sup>2</sup> - test of proportion; P &#x3c; 0.05) decreased the positive correlation more than 0.6 for the bacterial community by 13.92%, 19.46%, 22.52% and 38.49%, respectively, compared with the control, which indicated that BDM residues had a greater impact on bacterial internal relationships than LDPEM residues (<xref ref-type="sec" rid="s11">Supplementary Figure S1A</xref>). This finding was supported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Liu et al. (2022)</xref>, revealing that microorganisms were more perceptive of the chemical compositions of BDM than of LDPEM. On the other hand, the decrease in the positive correlation and increase in the negative correlation indicated that mulch film residues enhanced the antagonism among bacteria. The presence of mulch film residues likely altered the soil microenvironment, intensifying competition among bacteria. Particularly in the BDM treatment, this competitive relationship became more pronounced. Due to the environmental stress posed by the mulch film residues, bacteria may have been forced to increase negative interactions as a strategy to outcompete one another. Compared with the control, the negative correlation coefficients for the fungal community were significantly increased by 40.71% under BDM 2.0% (two-sided <italic>x</italic>
<sup>2</sup> - test of proportion; P &#x3c; 0.05). However, no significant difference was observed among LDPEM 0.5%, LDPE 2.0%, BDM 0.5% and the control (two-sided <italic>x</italic>
<sup>2</sup> - test of proportion; P &#x3e; 0.05) suggesting that BDM residues have a more significant effect on the fungal community. The BDM likely exerted a strong influence on fungal communities, promoting increased antagonism between fungal species.</p>
<p>For the positive correlation coefficients, the LDPEM 0.5%, LDPEM 2.0%, BDM 0.5% and BDM 2.0% treatments significantly increased the positive correlation coefficients by 43.06%, 47.59%, 47.91% and 49.15%, respectively, compared with the control (two-sided <italic>x</italic>
<sup>2</sup> - test of proportion; P &#x3c; 0.05), which suggesting that mulch film residues enhanced cooperative relationships within the fungal community. Notably, higher variations in the correlation coefficients of fungi under the treatments with mulch film residues were observed compared with bacteria, indicating greater changes in internal relations in the fungal community than in the bacterial community. This could be explained by the lower habitat niche breadths of fungi than bacteria, which resulted in a lower tolerance of fungi to environmental variation induced by interference than bacteria (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B94">Zhao et al., 2019</xref>).</p>
<p>Networks at the genus level for different treatments of the bacterial community and fungal community are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5</xref>. Overall, the network density of bacterial networks was significantly higher than that of fungal networks under the same treatment, indicating stronger interactions in the bacterial community, which was supported by the study by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">De Vries et al. (2018)</xref>. To deeply determine network structure variations, the distribution patterns of the bacterial community and fungal community under different treatments were analysed. As shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5</xref>, the module numbers of the bacterial community and fungal community also responded to mulch film residues. In detail, there were 2 modules in the networks of the bacterial community for the CK, LDPEM 0.5% and LDPEM 2.0% treatments. However, there were 3 modules of the bacterial community in BDM 0.5% and BDM 2.0%, and they increased by a ratio of 50.0% compared with the control, indicating that BDM residues could disturb the soil bacterial community further (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Liu et al., 2022</xref>). Modules of the fungal community doubled from 2 to 4 in BDM 0.5% and BDM 2.0% compared with the control. Stronger module variation for the fungal community network probably resulted from the stronger structural variation of the fungal community than that of the bacterial community, as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figures 3</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">4</xref>.</p>
<fig id="F5" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 5</label>
<caption>
<p>Networks of the bacterial community and fungal community at the genus level. The significant difference between groups based on network topological indices (&#x2a;: p &#x3c; 0.05). Note: LDPEM 0.5%, 0.5% (w/w) of LDPEM fragments added to soil; LDPEM 2.0%, 2.0% (w/w) of LDPEM fragments added to soil; BDM 0.5%, 0.5% (w/w) of BDM fragments added to soil; BDM 2.0%, 2.0% (w/w) of BDM fragments added to the soil.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fenvs-13-1533441-g005.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-4">
<title>3.4 The relationship among mulch film residues, physicochemical properties, enzyme activities, and microbial community structure</title>
<p>To synthetically evaluate how mulch film residues influenced physicochemical properties, enzyme activities, and microbial community structure, Z score analysis was carried out. The Z scores of richness, evenness, AK, AP, AN, and AKP decreased for bacterial communities in the treatment groups compared with CK. However, pH, EC, SOC, UE and POD showed adverse trends, as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure 6a</xref>. The Z-score of soil physicochemical properties in fungal community structure is different from bacterial communities. Specifically, the Z scores of evenness, AK, AP, AN and AKP decreased in the treatments with mulch films compared with CK, especially for BDM 2.0% (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure 6b</xref>). However, the richness, pH, EC, SOC UE and POD scores increased in the treatment groups. Differences in the results of the Z scores for the bacterial and fungal communities also indicated the various reactions of the bacterial and fungal communities to mulch film residues. To further determine the complex interrelationships of mulch film residues on soil bacterial and fungal community structures, SEMs were established, as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figures 6c, d</xref>, respectively. The results indicated that mulch film residues significantly influenced soil physicochemical properties and enzymes activities (P &#x3c; 0.05), which are closely related to the growth and development process of crops (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">Mandal et al., 2003</xref>), in line with the study of Wang et al. (2020). This suggests that the degradation and accumulation of mulch residues can alter the basic soil environment, potentially hindering plant growth by affecting nutrient availability and soil structure, similar to how previous studies have pointed out the role of soil properties in crop performance. Consequently, urgent actions are needed to tackle film mulch pollution to ensure global food security, whether for LDPEM residues or BDM residues. Mulch film residues had a significantly negative direct influence on the structure of the bacterial community (&#x2212;0.600) and fungal community structure (&#x2212;0.752), which indicated that mulch film residues had a greater impact on soil fungal communities. Fungi often play more specialized roles in decomposition and nutrient cycling, may be more sensitive to the presence of mulch film residues, leading to a more pronounced alteration in their community composition compared to bacteria. The influences of soil enzymes activities on bacterial community and fungal community structure were significant with path coefficient of &#x2212;0.724 and &#x2212;0.765 respectively. The close relationship between enzyme activities and microbial structure suggests that enzymatic processes are key drivers of microbial community composition. However, the soil physicochemical properties had no significant influences on the bacterial and fungal communities (P &#x3e; 0.05), which indicates that while physical and chemical soil properties are important, mulch film residues appear to exert a more direct and pronounced effect on microbial community structures, overshadowing the influence of other soil characteristics. This finding was supported by the study of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B78">Wu et al. (2021)</xref>, who also revealed that residues of mulch film significantly influenced soil microbial communities but did not alter soil physicochemical properties. Therefore, mulch film residues directly affected soil microbial communities, though not by influencing soil physicochemical properties.</p>
<fig id="F6" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 6</label>
<caption>
<p>Z scores of the pH, EC, SOM, AN, AP, AK, richness and evenness for the bacterial community <bold>(a)</bold> and fungal community <bold>(b)</bold> Partial least squares path model for the bacterial community <bold>(c)</bold> and fungal community <bold>(d)</bold> Path coefficients were calculated after 1000 bootstrap replicates and are reflected by the width of the arrow, with blue and red indicating positive and negative effects, respectively. Dashed arrows show that the coefficients did not significantly differ from 0 (P &#x3e; 0.05).</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fenvs-13-1533441-g006.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-5">
<title>3.5 The significance of soil bacterial ad fungal community for agricultural environmental protection and sustainable development</title>
<p>Promote the circulation of soil organic matter: Soil bacteria and fungi decompose organic matter, converting it into nutrients that can be absorbed and utilized by plants, which could improve soil fertility and provides a continuous supply of nutrients for agricultural production (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">Pu&#x161;kari&#x107; et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Chen et al., 2023</xref>). Improve soil structure: Bacteria and fungi promote aggregation of soil particles, and form a good soil structure, which improves soil aeration and water retention and provides a good soil environment for plant growth (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Navas et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B61">Rashid et al., 2016</xref>). Promote plant growth: Some soil bacteria and fungi can form symbiotic relationships with plants, helping them absorb nutrients, resist diseases and pests, and promote plant growth, which improve plant stress resistance and allow plants to grow normally under adverse conditions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Feng et al., 2023</xref>). Decompose residual plastic film: Soil bacteria and fungi can decompose residual plastic film, converting it into small molecular substances, thereby reducing its negative impact on the soil. The microplastics produced by the residual film after degradation will increase the soil microbial biomass carbon (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Liu et al., 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B79">Xiang et al., 2024</xref>).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="conclusion" id="s4">
<title>4 Conclusion</title>
<p>The present study investigated the different reactions of bacterial and fungal communities as well as soil physicochemical properties to LDPEM and BDM residues. The results indicated that BDM residues significantly increased soil pH and SOC, with greater enhancement observed in higher residue treatments, while LDPEM residues did not. Both film types residues reduced AN, AP, and AK levels. The dissimilarities of the fungal community between the treatment groups and the control were greater than those of the bacterial community. Higher variations in the internal correlation coefficient were observed in the fungal community than in the bacterial community under the treatments with mulch film residues compared with CK. Modules of the bacterial community network increased from 2 to 3 under the BDM 0.5% and BDM 2.0%. Comparatively, BDM 0.5% and BDM 2.0% doubled the modules of the fungal community network from 2 to 4. Notably, SEM indicated that residues of mulch film and soil enzymes had a higher negative direct effect on fungal community structure than on bacterial community structure. The soil physicochemical properties had no significant influences on the bacterial and fungal communities (<italic>P</italic> &#x3e; 0.05), suggesting that the effects of mulch residues on soil bacterial and fungal communities were not produced through the changes of soil physicochemical properties. In summary, our findings underscore the differential microbial responses to mulch residues, particularly emphasizing the heightened respond of soil fungi to mulch film residues compared to bacteria, thus enhancing our understanding of the broader environmental impacts of mulch residues on soil ecosystems. Future research could focus on elucidating the long-term effects of mulch residues on soil microbial communities across different agricultural systems.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec sec-type="data-availability" id="s5">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found in the article/<xref ref-type="sec" rid="s11">Supplementary Material</xref>.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="author-contributions" id="s6">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>LyL: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing &#x2013; original draft. LuL: Formal Analysis, Writing &#x2013; original draft. GZ: Conceptualization, Software, Writing &#x2013; review and editing. JG: Methodology, Supervision, Writing &#x2013; review and editing. QZ: Formal Analysis, Validation, Writing &#x2013; original draft. XZ: Writing-review and editing. LD: Methodology, Validation, Writing &#x2013; original draft, Writing &#x2013; review and editing. DL: Funding acquisition, Writing&#x2013;original draft.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="funding-information" id="s7">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This work was supported by Special Project for Innovation Capacity Building of Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences (KJCX20230421). Independent Project Proposal of Institute of Plant Nutrition, Resources and Environment, Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences (YZS202206). China Agriculture Research System of MOF and MARA.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="COI-statement" id="s8">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="ai-statement" id="s9">
<title>Generative AI statement</title>
<p>The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="disclaimer" id="s10">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s11">
<title>Supplementary material</title>
<p>The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2025.1533441/full#supplementary-material">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2025.1533441/full&#x23;supplementary-material</ext-link>
</p>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Supplementaryfile1.docx" id="SM1" mimetype="application/docx" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Anunciado</surname>
<given-names>M. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hayes</surname>
<given-names>D. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Astner</surname>
<given-names>A. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wadsworth</surname>
<given-names>L. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cowan-Banker</surname>
<given-names>C. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gonzalez</surname>
<given-names>J. E. L.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Effect of environmental weathering on biodegradation of biodegradable plastic mulch films under ambient soil and composting conditions</article-title>. <source>J. Polym. Environ.</source> <volume>29</volume> (<issue>9</issue>), <fpage>2916</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2931</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10924-021-02088-4</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Awet</surname>
<given-names>T. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kohl</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Meier</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Straskraba</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gr&#xfc;n</surname>
<given-names>A. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ruf</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Effects of polystyrene nanoparticles on the microbiota and functional diversity of enzymes in soil</article-title>. <source>Environ. Sci. Eur.</source> <volume>30</volume>, <fpage>11</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12302-018-0140-6</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Banerjee</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Walder</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Buchi</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Meyer</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Held</surname>
<given-names>A. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gattinger</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Agricultural intensification reduces microbial network complexity and the abundance of keystone taxa in roots</article-title>. <source>ISME J.</source> <volume>13</volume> (<issue>7</issue>), <fpage>1722</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1736</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41396-019-0383-2</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bao</surname>
<given-names>S. D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1999</year>). <source>Analytical methods of soil agrochemistry</source>. <edition>3rd ed</edition>. <publisher-loc>Beijing, China</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>China Agricultural Press</publisher-name>. <comment>(In Chinese)</comment>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bardgett</surname>
<given-names>R. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Van</surname>
<given-names>D. P. W. H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Belowground biodiversity and ecosystem functioning</article-title>. <source>Nature</source> <volume>515</volume> (<issue>7528</issue>), <fpage>505</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>511</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nature13855</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>J. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>He</surname>
<given-names>L. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xu</surname>
<given-names>X. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ren</surname>
<given-names>C. J.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Metagenomic highlight contrasting elevational pattern of bacteria- and Fungi-derived compound decompositions in forest soils</article-title>. <source>Plant Soil</source> <volume>490</volume> (<issue>1-2</issue>), <fpage>617</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>629</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11104-023-06104-5</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname>
<given-names>L. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bao</surname>
<given-names>Z. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Taogetao</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shi</surname>
<given-names>J. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Soil fungal networks are more sensitive to grazing exclusion than bacterial networks</article-title>. <source>PeerJ</source> <volume>8</volume>, <fpage>E9986</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7717/peerj.9986</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Cheng</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhou</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Beiyuan</surname>
<given-names>J. Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>X. N. M. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Su</surname>
<given-names>L. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>L. J.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Insights into the effect of hydrochar-derived dissolved organic matter on the sorption of diethyl phthalate onto soil: a pilot mechanism study</article-title>. <source>Sci. Total Environ.</source> <volume>912</volume>, <fpage>169101</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.169101</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Deirdre</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ghimire</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yu</surname>
<given-names>Y. X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Scheenstra</surname>
<given-names>E. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Miles</surname>
<given-names>C. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Flury</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>In-field degradation of soil-biodegradable plastic mulch films in a mediterranean climate</article-title>. <source>Sci. Total Environ.</source> <volume>806</volume>, <fpage>150238</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150238</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Delgado-Baquerizo</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Oliverio</surname>
<given-names>A. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Brewer</surname>
<given-names>T. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Benavent-Gonzalez</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Eldridge</surname>
<given-names>D. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bardgett</surname>
<given-names>R. D.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>A global atlas of the dominant bacteria found in soil</article-title>. <source>Science</source> <volume>359</volume>, <fpage>320</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>325</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/science.aap9516</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>De Souza</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Anderson</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chung</surname>
<given-names>W. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Werner</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Joana</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Julie</surname>
<given-names>B. B.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Microplastics can change soil properties and affect plant performance</article-title>. <source>Environ. Sci. Technol.</source> <volume>53</volume> (<issue>10</issue>), <fpage>6044</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>6052</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/acs.est.9b01339</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>De Souza</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lau</surname>
<given-names>C. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Till</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kloas</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lehmann</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Becker</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Impacts of microplastics on the soil biophysical environment</article-title>. <source>Environ. Sci. Technol.</source> <volume>52</volume>, <fpage>9656</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>9665</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/acs.est.8b02212</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>De Vries</surname>
<given-names>F. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rob</surname>
<given-names>I. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mark</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hayley</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mariangela</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hyun</surname>
<given-names>S. G.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Soil bacterial networks are less stable under drought than fungal networks</article-title>. <source>Nat. Commun.</source> <volume>9</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>3033</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3112</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41467-018-05516-7</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Dong</surname>
<given-names>D. Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Guo</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname>
<given-names>F. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Plastic residues alter soil microbial community compositions and metabolite profiles under realistic conditions</article-title>. <source>Sci. Total Environ.</source> <volume>906</volume>, <fpage>167352</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.167352</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Dong</surname>
<given-names>H. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Han</surname>
<given-names>Z. Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sun</surname>
<given-names>Q. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Determining time limits of continuous film mulching and examining residual effects on cotton yield and soil properties</article-title>. <source>J. Environ. Biol.</source> <volume>36</volume>, <fpage>677</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>684</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Fan</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tan</surname>
<given-names>W. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yu</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Effects of different concentrations and types of microplastics on bacteria and fungi in alkaline soil</article-title>. <source>Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf.</source> <volume>229</volume>, <fpage>113045</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.113045</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Feng</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gao</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ren</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hu</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Effect of land use on the composition of bacterial and fungal communities in saline&#x2010;sodic soils</article-title>. <source>Land Degrad. Dev.</source> <volume>30</volume> (<issue>15</issue>), <fpage>1851</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1860</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/ldr.3386</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Feng</surname>
<given-names>Z. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>X. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Qin</surname>
<given-names>Y. Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Feng</surname>
<given-names>G. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhou</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhu</surname>
<given-names>H. H.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Cooperation of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and bacteria to facilitate the host plant growth dependent on soil pH</article-title>. <source>Front. Microbiol.</source> <volume>14</volume>, <fpage>1116943</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2023.1116943</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Fierer</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bradford</surname>
<given-names>M. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jackson</surname>
<given-names>R. B.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Toward an ecological classification of soil bacteria</article-title>. <source>Ecol</source> <volume>88</volume>, <fpage>1354</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1364</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1890/05-1839</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Francioni</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yuko</surname>
<given-names>T. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ayaka</surname>
<given-names>W. K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Effects of crop residue incorporation on soil&#x2010;biodegradable mulch film degradation in a Broccoli&#x2010;Sorghum rotation system</article-title>. <source>Agron. J.</source> <volume>116</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>94</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>108</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/agj2.21497</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Gao</surname>
<given-names>X. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dong</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Effects of a PLA/PBAT biodegradable film mulch as a replacement of polyethylene film and their residues on crop and soil environment</article-title>. <source>Agric.Water Manag.</source> <volume>255</volume>, <fpage>107053</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.agwat.2021.107053</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Giordano</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ciro</surname>
<given-names>G. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Christophe</surname>
<given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Youssef</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Stefania</surname>
<given-names>D. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chiara</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>An appraisal of biodegradable mulch films with respect to strawberry crop performance and fruit quality</article-title>. <source>Horticulturae</source> <volume>6</volume> (<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>48</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/horticulturae6030048</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hu</surname>
<given-names>X. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gu</surname>
<given-names>H. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>Y. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>J. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yu</surname>
<given-names>Z. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>Y. S.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Succession of soil bacterial communities and network patterns in response to conventional and biodegradable microplastics: a microcosmic study in mollisol</article-title>. <source>J. Hazard. Mater.</source> <volume>436</volume>, <fpage>129218</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.129218</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hua</surname>
<given-names>Z. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>T. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Luo</surname>
<given-names>J. Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bai</surname>
<given-names>H. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ma</surname>
<given-names>S. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Qiang</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Internalization, physiological responses and molecular mechanisms of lettuce to polystyrene microplastics of different Sizes: Validation of simulated soilless culture</article-title>. <source>J. Hazard. Mater.</source> <volume>462</volume>, <fpage>132710</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jhazmat.2023.132710</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Huang</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jia</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yan</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Agricultural plastic mulching as a source of microplastics in the terrestrial environment</article-title>. <source>Environ. Pollut.</source> <volume>260</volume>, <fpage>114096</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114096</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Huang</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jia</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Qin</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>LDPE microplastic films alter microbial community composition and enzymatic activities in soil</article-title>. <source>Environ. Pollut.</source> <volume>254</volume>, <fpage>112983</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.envpol.2019.112983</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Jiao</surname>
<given-names>Y. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>G. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ai</surname>
<given-names>X. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>X. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Comparison of the effects of LDPE and PBAT film residues on soil microbial ecology</article-title>. <source>Curr. Microbiol.</source> <volume>81</volume> (<issue>7</issue>), <fpage>185</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00284-024-03722-9</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Judy</surname>
<given-names>J. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Williams</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gregg</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Oliver</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kumar</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kookana</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Microplastics in municipal mixed-waste organic outputs induce minimal short to long-term toxicity in key terrestrial biota</article-title>. <source>Environ. Pollut.</source> <volume>252</volume>, <fpage>522</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>531</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.envpol.2019.05.027</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Khan</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tariq</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Muhammad</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Khadija</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Abdulaziz</surname>
<given-names>A. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Parvaiz</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Alleviation of microplastic toxicity in soybean by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi: regulating glyoxalase system and root nodule organic acid</article-title>. <source>J. Environ. Manage.</source> <volume>349</volume>, <fpage>119377</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119377</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Koskei</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Alex</surname>
<given-names>N. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>Y. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname>
<given-names>Z. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhou</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sylvia</surname>
<given-names>N. I.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Effects of increased plastic film residues on soil properties and crop productivity in agro-ecosystem</article-title>. <source>J. Hazard. Mater.</source> <volume>414</volume>, <fpage>125521</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.125521</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Letcher</surname>
<given-names>P. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Martha</surname>
<given-names>J. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Donald</surname>
<given-names>J. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Perry</surname>
<given-names>F. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>William</surname>
<given-names>S. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kathryn</surname>
<given-names>T. P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Rhizophlyctidales--a new order in chytridiomycota</article-title>. <source>Mycol. Res.</source> <volume>112</volume> (<issue>9</issue>), <fpage>1031</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1048</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.mycres.2008.03.007</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>H. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>X. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tan</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>C. X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wei</surname>
<given-names>X. C.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Coconut shell and its biochar as fertilizer amendment applied with organic fertilizer: efficacy and course of actions on eliminating antibiotic resistance genes in agricultural soil</article-title>. <source>J. Hazard. Mater.</source> <volume>437</volume>, <fpage>129322</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.129322</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>J. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>Q. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pan</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Guan</surname>
<given-names>X. M.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Impact of mowing management on nitrogen mineralization rate and fungal and bacterial communities in a semiarid grassland ecosystem</article-title>. <source>J. Soils Sediments</source> <volume>17</volume> (<issue>6</issue>), <fpage>1715</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1726</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11368-016-1620-1</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>M. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jia</surname>
<given-names>W. Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xu</surname>
<given-names>L. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Huang</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Deciphering the effects of LDPE microplastic films on diversity, composition and co-occurrence network of soil fungal community</article-title>. <source>Appl. Soil Ecol.</source> <volume>182</volume>, <fpage>104716</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.apsoil.2022.104716</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>N. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Qu</surname>
<given-names>J. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname>
<given-names>J. Y.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2023b</year>). <article-title>Microplastics distribution and microbial community characteristics of farmland soil under different mulch methods</article-title>. <source>J. Hazard. Mater.</source> <volume>445</volume>, <fpage>130408</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.130408</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B36">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>R. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tu</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>L. Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>X. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Feng</surname>
<given-names>Y. D.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2023a</year>). <article-title>Visual tracking of label-free microplastics in wheat seedlings and their effects on crop growth and physiology</article-title>. <source>J. Hazard. Mater.</source> <volume>456</volume>, <fpage>131675</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jhazmat.2023.131675</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B37">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>H. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname>
<given-names>X. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>G. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liang</surname>
<given-names>C. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xue</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2017a</year>). <article-title>Response of soil dissolved organic matter to microplastic addition in Chinese loess soil</article-title>. <source>Chemosphere</source> <volume>185</volume>, <fpage>907</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>917</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.07.064</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B38">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>L. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>C. Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhu</surname>
<given-names>S. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xu</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>H. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zheng</surname>
<given-names>X. Q.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Combined application of organic and inorganic nitrogen fertilizers affects soil prokaryotic communities compositions</article-title>. <source>Agronomy</source> <volume>10</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>132</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/agronomy10010132</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B39">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>L. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zou</surname>
<given-names>G. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zuo</surname>
<given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>C. Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gu</surname>
<given-names>J. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kang</surname>
<given-names>L. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Soil bacterial community and metabolism showed a more sensitive response to PBAT biodegradable mulch residues than that of LDPE mulch residues</article-title>. <source>J. Hazard. Mater.</source> <volume>438</volume>, <fpage>129507</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.129507</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B40">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>L. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zou</surname>
<given-names>G. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zuo</surname>
<given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>S. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bao</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jin</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>It is still too early to promote biodegradable mulch film on a large scale: a bibliometric analysis</article-title>. <source>Environ. Technol. Innov.</source> <volume>27</volume>, <fpage>102487</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.eti.2022.102487</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B41">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lu</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Song</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lei</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hu</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lv</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Microplastic and mesoplastic pollution in farmland soils in suburbs of Shanghai, China</article-title>. <source>Environ. Pollut.</source> <volume>242</volume> (<issue>Pt A</issue>), <fpage>855</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>862</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.envpol.2018.07.051</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B42">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>Y. Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>Y. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hu</surname>
<given-names>Y. L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Response of bacterial and fungal soil communities to Chinese fir (Cunninghamia Lanceolate) long-term monoculture plantations</article-title>. <source>Front. Microbiol.</source> <volume>11</volume>, <fpage>181</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2020.00181</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B58">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Huang</surname>
<given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hu</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Qin</surname>
<given-names>J. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zheng</surname>
<given-names>Y. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>J. F.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Effects of plastic mulch film residues on soil-microbe-plant systems under different soil pH conditions</article-title>. <source>Chemosphere</source>, <volume>267</volume>, <fpage>128901</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.128901</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B43">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lu</surname>
<given-names>X. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname>
<given-names>Y. l.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Varying characteristics and driving mechanisms of antibiotic resistance genes in farmland soil amended with high-density polyethylene microplastics</article-title>. <source>J. Hazard. Mater.</source> <volume>428</volume>, <fpage>128196</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.128196</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B44">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mak-Mensah</surname>
<given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Peter Bilson</surname>
<given-names>O.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Eunice</surname>
<given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>John</surname>
<given-names>K. A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Influence of plastic film mulch with biochar application on crop yield, evapotranspiration, and water use efficiency in northern China: a meta-analysis</article-title>. <source>PeerJ</source> <volume>9</volume>, <fpage>E10967</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7717/peerj.10967</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B45">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Malczyk</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kobierski</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jaworska</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dabkowska-Naskret</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Uniwersytet</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bydgoszcz</surname>
<given-names>K. G.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Relationships between selected soil Properties and buffer capacity in arable soils from Kujawy-Pomorze region, Poland</article-title>. <source>Rocz. Glebozn.</source> <volume>59</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>149</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>154</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B46">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mandal</surname>
<given-names>U. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Singh</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Victor</surname>
<given-names>U. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sharma</surname>
<given-names>K. L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Green manuring: its effect on soil properties and crop growth under rice&#x2013;wheat cropping system</article-title>. <source>Eur. J. Agron.</source> <volume>19</volume> (<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>225</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>237</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/s1161-0301(02)00037-0</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B47">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mart&#xed;nkov&#xe1;</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kotik</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Markov&#xe1;</surname>
<given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Homolka</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Biodegradation of phenolic compounds by Basidiomycota and its phenol oxidases: a review</article-title>. <source>Chemosphere</source> <volume>149</volume>, <fpage>373</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>382</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.01.022</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B48">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Navas</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Diana</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chiquinquir&#xe1;</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kelly</surname>
<given-names>U.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ignacio</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>The distinct responses of bacteria and fungi in different&#x2010;sized soil aggregates under different management practices</article-title>. <source>Eur. J. Soil Sci.</source> <volume>72</volume> (<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>1177</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1189</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B49">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ning</surname>
<given-names>D. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Han</surname>
<given-names>Q. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>Y. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Qin</surname>
<given-names>A. Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>Z. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>J. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Responses of soil microbial community characteristics and enzyme activities to different irrigation modes over four wheat-maize rotation seasons</article-title>. <source>Agr. Water Manag.</source> <volume>306</volume> (<issue>2024</issue>), <fpage>109166</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.agwat.2024.109166</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B50">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Pan</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname>
<given-names>M. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Feng</surname>
<given-names>H. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wei</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Song</surname>
<given-names>F. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lou</surname>
<given-names>Y. H.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Organic and inorganic fertilizers respectively drive bacterial and fungal community compositions in a Fluvo-aquic soil in northern China</article-title>. <source>Soil Tillage Res.</source> <volume>198</volume>, <fpage>104540</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.still.2019.104540</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B51">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Paungfoo-Lonhienne</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yeoh</surname>
<given-names>Y. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kasinadhuni</surname>
<given-names>N. R. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lonhienne</surname>
<given-names>T. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Robinson</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hugenholtz</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Nitrogen fertilizer dose alters fungal communities in sugarcane soil and rhizosphere</article-title>. <source>Sci. Rep.</source> <volume>5</volume>, <fpage>8678</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/srep08678</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B52">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Pei</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhu</surname>
<given-names>J. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pan</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Sorption kinetics of parent and substituted PAHs for low-density polyethylene (LDPE): determining their partition coefficients between LDPE and water (KLDPE) for passive sampling</article-title>. <source>J. Environ. Sci.</source> <volume>87</volume>, <fpage>349</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>360</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jes.2019.07.021</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B53">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Peng</surname>
<given-names>Y. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>B. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Guan</surname>
<given-names>C. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jiang</surname>
<given-names>X. Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tan</surname>
<given-names>J. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>X. Y.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Identifying biotic and abiotic processes of reversing biochar-induced soil Phosphorus leaching through biochar modification with MgAl Layered (hydr)oxides</article-title>. <source>Sci. Total Environ.</source> <volume>843</volume>, <fpage>157037</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.157037</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B54">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Perkins</surname>
<given-names>A. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lars</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Keilor</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jeremy</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Grant</surname>
<given-names>C. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hans-Peter</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Highly diverse fungal communities in carbon-rich aquifers of two contrasting lakes in northeast Germany</article-title>. <source>Fungal Ecol.</source> <volume>41</volume>, <fpage>116</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>125</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.funeco.2019.04.004</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B55">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Phosri</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Polme</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Taylor</surname>
<given-names>A. F. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Koljalg</surname>
<given-names>U.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Suwannasai</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tedersoo</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Diversity and community composition of ectomycorrhizal fungi in a dry deciduous dipterocarp forest in Thailand</article-title>. <source>Biodivers. Conserv.</source> <volume>21</volume>, <fpage>2287</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2298</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10531-012-0250-1</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B56">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Powell</surname>
<given-names>J. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Karunaratne</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Campbell</surname>
<given-names>C. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yao</surname>
<given-names>H. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Robinson</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Singh</surname>
<given-names>B. K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Deterministic processes vary during community assembly for ecologically dissimilar taxa</article-title>. <source>Nat. Commun.</source> <volume>6</volume>, <fpage>8444</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/ncomms9444</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B57">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Pu&#x161;kari&#x107;</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jurica</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vladimir</surname>
<given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Brigita</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ivan</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mirjana</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>The communities of the nematodes, bacteria, and fungi and the soil&#x2019;s organic matter in an agroforestry ecosystem in Croatia</article-title>. <source>Poljoprivreda</source> <volume>27</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>66</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>74</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18047/poljo.27.1.9</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B59">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Qi</surname>
<given-names>Y. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nicolas</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gerrit</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Esperanza</surname>
<given-names>H. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Harm</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname>
<given-names>X. M.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2020b</year>). <article-title>Impact of plastic mulch film debris on soil physicochemical and hydrological properties</article-title>. <source>Environ. Pollut.</source> <volume>266</volume> (<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>115097</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115097</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B60">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Qi</surname>
<given-names>Y. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ossowicki</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yergeau</surname>
<given-names>&#xc9;.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vigani</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Geissen</surname>
<given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Garbeva</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Plastic mulch film residues in agriculture: impact on soil suppressiveness, plant growth, and microbial communities</article-title>. <source>FEMS Microbiol. Ecol.</source> <volume>98</volume>, <fpage>fiac017</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/femsec/fiac017</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B61">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Rashid</surname>
<given-names>M. I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liyakat</surname>
<given-names>H. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tanvir</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Talal</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Iqbal</surname>
<given-names>M. I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mohammad</surname>
<given-names>O.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Bacteria and fungi can contribute to nutrients bioavailability and aggregate formation in degraded soils</article-title>. <source>Microbiol. Res.</source> <volume>183</volume>, <fpage>26</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>41</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.micres.2015.11.007</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B63">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ren</surname>
<given-names>S. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>J. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>J. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>H. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Qi</surname>
<given-names>R. M.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Potential sources and occurrence of macro-plastics and microplastics pollution in farmland soils: a typical case of China</article-title>. <source>Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol.</source> <volume>54</volume> (<issue>7</issue>), <fpage>533</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>556</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/10643389.2023.2259275</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B64">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Restrepo-Fl&#xf3;rez</surname>
<given-names>J. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bassi</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Thompson</surname>
<given-names>M. R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Microbial degradation and deterioration of polyethylene&#x2013;A review</article-title>. <source>Int. Biodeter. Biodegr.</source> <volume>88</volume>, <fpage>83</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>90</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ibiod.2013.12.014</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B62">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Romano</surname>
<given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ventorino</surname>
<given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schettino</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Magaraci</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pepe</surname>
<given-names>O.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>, (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Changes in soil microbial communities induced by biodegradable and polyethylene mulch residues under three different temperatures</article-title>. <source>Microb. Ecol.</source> <volume>87</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>101</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00248-024-02420-0</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B65">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Song</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname>
<given-names>L. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shi</surname>
<given-names>H. Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>L. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bai</surname>
<given-names>W. M.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Soil acidification under long-term N addition decreases the diversity of soil bacteria and fungi and changes their community composition in a semiarid grassland</article-title>. <source>Microb. Ecol.</source> <volume>85</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>221</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>231</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00248-021-01954-x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B66">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Song</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dou</surname>
<given-names>Y. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Niu</surname>
<given-names>Y. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>He</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Properties of HA/PBS biodegradable film and evaluation of its influence on the growth of vegetables</article-title>. <source>Polym. Test.</source> <volume>95</volume>, <fpage>107137</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.polymertesting.2021.107137</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B67">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Souza</surname>
<given-names>P. M. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Coelho</surname>
<given-names>F. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sommaggio</surname>
<given-names>L. R. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Marin-Morales</surname>
<given-names>M. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Morales</surname>
<given-names>A. R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Disintegration and biodegradation in soil of PBAT mulch films: influence of the stabilization systems based on carbon black/hindered amine light stabilizer and carbon black/Vitamin E</article-title>. <source>J. Polym. Environ.</source> <volume>27</volume> (<issue>7</issue>), <fpage>1584</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1594</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10924-019-01455-6</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B68">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Su</surname>
<given-names>H. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bao</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dong</surname>
<given-names>D. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yan</surname>
<given-names>C. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lei</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Degradation of biodegradable mulch film and its effect on the yield of processing tomatoes in the Xinjiang region</article-title>. <source>J. Agric. Res. Environ.</source> <volume>37</volume> (<issue>4</issue>), <fpage>615</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>622</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B69">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Tribedi</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Samrat</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Pre-oxidation of low-density polyethylene (LDPE) by ultraviolet light (UV) promotes enhanced degradation of LDPE in soil</article-title>. <source>Environ.Monit. Assess.</source> <volume>189</volume> (<issue>12</issue>), <fpage>624</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>628</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10661-017-6351-2</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B70">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Van</surname>
<given-names>G. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Carsten</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Soil-biodegradable plastic films do not decompose in a lake sediment over 9 months of incubation</article-title>. <source>Biogeosciences</source> <volume>20</volume> (<issue>19</issue>), <fpage>4213</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>4220</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/bg-20-4213-2023</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B71">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chang</surname>
<given-names>Q. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname>
<given-names>C. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhong</surname>
<given-names>X. Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yuan</surname>
<given-names>K. X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname>
<given-names>M. H.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Degradation characteristics of biodegradable film and its effects on soil nutrients in tillage layer, growth and development of taro and yield formation</article-title>. <source>AMB Exp.</source> <volume>12</volume>, <fpage>81</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s13568-022-01420-y</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B72">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>Q. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ma</surname>
<given-names>M. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jiang</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Guan</surname>
<given-names>D. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wei</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname>
<given-names>B. S.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Impact of 36 years of nitrogen fertilization on microbial community composition and soil carbon cycling-related enzyme activities in rhizospheres and bulk soils in northeast China</article-title>. <source>Appl. Soil Ecol.</source> <volume>136</volume>, <fpage>148</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>157</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.apsoil.2018.12.019</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B85">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>Z. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>X. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shi</surname>
<given-names>H. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>W. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname>
<given-names>W. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Qin</surname>
<given-names>Y. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>, (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Estimating the water characteristic curve for soil containing residual plastic film based on an improved pore-size distribution</article-title>. <source>Geoderma</source>, <fpage>370</fpage>, <fpage>114341</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.geoderma.2020.114341</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B74">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wei</surname>
<given-names>X. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Antonio</surname>
<given-names>J. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cui</surname>
<given-names>Y. X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>L. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Aron</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lu</surname>
<given-names>B. C.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Millions of microplastics released from a biodegradable polymer during biodegradation/enzymatic hydrolysis</article-title>. <source>Water Res.</source> <volume>211</volume>, <fpage>118068</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.watres.2022.118068</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B75">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wengel</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Erika</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Christian</surname>
<given-names>M. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Klaus</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gerd</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Degradation of organic matter from black shales and charcoal by the wood-rotting fungus schizophyllum commune and release of DOC and heavy metals in the Aqueous phase</article-title>. <source>Sci. Total Environ.</source> <volume>367</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>383</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>393</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2005.12.012</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B76">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wilhelm</surname>
<given-names>R. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Juana</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fabian</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Karin</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Marc</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Daniel</surname>
<given-names>H. B.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>The effects of mixed-species root zones on the resistance of soil bacteria and fungi to long-term experimental and natural reductions in soil moisture</article-title>. <source>Sci. Total Environ.</source> <volume>873</volume>, <fpage>162266</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.162266</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B77">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname>
<given-names>C. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ma</surname>
<given-names>Y. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shan</surname>
<given-names>Y. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Song</surname>
<given-names>X. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hu</surname>
<given-names>H. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Integrated microbiology and metabolomics analysis reveal plastic mulch film residue affects soil microorganisms and their metabolic functions</article-title>. <source>J. Hazard. Mater.</source> <volume>423</volume>, <fpage>127258</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.127258</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B78">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname>
<given-names>X. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>P. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Carl-Eric</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Luo</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xiao</surname>
<given-names>K. Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cui</surname>
<given-names>Z. L.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Deciphering microbial mechanisms underlying soil organic carbon storage in a wheat-maize rotation system</article-title>. <source>Sci. Total Environ.</source> <volume>788</volume>, <fpage>147798</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147798</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B79">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Xiang</surname>
<given-names>Y. Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rillig</surname>
<given-names>M. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pen&#x303;uelas</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sardans</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yao</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Global responses of soil carbon dynamics to microplastic exposure: a data synthesis of laboratory studies</article-title>. <source>Environ. Sci. Technol.</source> <volume>58</volume> (<issue>13</issue>), <fpage>5821</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>5831</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/acs.est.3c06177</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B80">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Xu</surname>
<given-names>S. Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Luo</surname>
<given-names>S. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ma</surname>
<given-names>L. N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhou</surname>
<given-names>J. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Huang</surname>
<given-names>Y. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Community assembly processes of soil bacteria and fungi along a chronosequence of rice paddies cultivated on saline&#x2010;sodic land</article-title>. <source>Land Degrad. Dev.</source> <volume>34</volume> (<issue>12</issue>), <fpage>3648</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3662</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/ldr.4710</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B81">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Yan</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Petra</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Response of soil respiration and microbial biomass to changing EC in saline soils</article-title>. <source>Soil Biol. Biochem.</source> <volume>65</volume>, <fpage>322</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>328</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B82">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Qi</surname>
<given-names>J. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Muhammad</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>M. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lu</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Impact of information acquisition on farmers&#x2019; willingness to recycle plastic mulch film residues in China</article-title>. <source>J. Clean. Prod.</source> <volume>297</volume>, <fpage>126656</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126656</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B83">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Yasenjiang</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname>
<given-names>S. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nigara</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Hyperspectral estimation of soil electrical conductivity based on fractional order differentially optimised spectral indices</article-title>. <source>Acta Ecol. Sin.</source> <volume>19</volume>, <fpage>7237</fpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B84">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Yu</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fan</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hou</surname>
<given-names>J. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dang</surname>
<given-names>Q. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cui</surname>
<given-names>D. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xi</surname>
<given-names>B. D.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Inhibitory effect of microplastics on soil extracellular enzymatic activities by changing soil properties and direct adsorption: an investigation at the aggregate-fraction level</article-title>. <source>Environ. Pollut.</source> <volume>267</volume>, <fpage>115544</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115544</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B86">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Yuan</surname>
<given-names>J. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ma</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sun</surname>
<given-names>Y. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhou</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname>
<given-names>Y. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yu</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Microbial degradation and other environmental aspects of microplastics/plastics</article-title>. <source>Sci. Total Environ.</source> <volume>715</volume>, <fpage>136968</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136968</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B87">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>C. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname>
<given-names>F. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Meng</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>C. Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cui</surname>
<given-names>R. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xia</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Polyurethane prepolymer-modified high-content starch-PBAT films</article-title>. <source>Carbohydr. Polym.</source> <volume>253</volume>, <fpage>117168</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.117168</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B88">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>H. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hu</surname>
<given-names>W. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Qin</surname>
<given-names>X. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ma</surname>
<given-names>X. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yan</surname>
<given-names>C. R.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>The status and distribution characteristics of residual mulching film in Xinjiang</article-title>. <source>China. J. interg. Agr.</source> <volume>11</volume>, <fpage>2639</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2646</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B90">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>J. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>S. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>C. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Luan</surname>
<given-names>J. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>X. J.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2021b</year>). <article-title>Soil bacterial and fungal richness and network exhibit different responses to long-term throughfall reduction in a warm-temperate oak forest</article-title>. <source>Forests</source> <volume>12</volume> (<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>165</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/f12020165</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B91">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>S. N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sun</surname>
<given-names>L. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Qiu</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ding</surname>
<given-names>Y. Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gu</surname>
<given-names>H. L.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Organic mulching positively regulates the soil microbial communities and ecosystem functions in tea plantation</article-title>. <source>BMC Microbiol.</source> <volume>20</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>103</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12866-020-01794-8</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B92">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>X. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ouyang</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lei</surname>
<given-names>J. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tan</surname>
<given-names>Q. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xie</surname>
<given-names>L. L.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2021a</year>). <article-title>Systematical review of interactions between microplastics and microorganisms in the soil environment</article-title>. <source>J. Hazard. Mater.</source> <volume>418</volume>, <fpage>126288</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.126288</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B93">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>Z. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>An</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xiong</surname>
<given-names>S. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>X. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xin</surname>
<given-names>M. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Orychophragmus violaceus-maize rotation increases maize productivity by improving soil chemical properties and plant nutrient uptake</article-title>. <source>Field Crops Res.</source> <volume>279</volume>, <fpage>108470</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fcr.2022.108470</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B94">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname>
<given-names>Z. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>He</surname>
<given-names>J. Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Stefan</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Han</surname>
<given-names>L. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>J. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shen</surname>
<given-names>J. P.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Protist communities are more sensitive to nitrogen fertilization than other microorganisms in diverse agricultural soils</article-title>. <source>Microbiome</source> <volume>7</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>33</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s40168-019-0647-0</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B95">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhou</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shi</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fei</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Huang</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Microplastics in agricultural soils on the coastal plain of Hangzhou Bay, east China: multiple sources other than plastic mulching film</article-title>. <source>J. Hazard. Mater.</source> <volume>388</volume>, <fpage>121814</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.121814</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>