<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="EN" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Environ. Sci.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Environmental Science</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Environ. Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">2296-665X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">1488638</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fenvs.2024.1488638</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Environmental Science</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Risk for nitrogen leaching after application of solid manure in autumn differs between manure types</article-title>
<alt-title alt-title-type="left-running-head">Delin et al.</alt-title>
<alt-title alt-title-type="right-running-head">
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2024.1488638">10.3389/fenvs.2024.1488638</ext-link>
</alt-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Delin</surname>
<given-names>Sofia</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001">&#x2a;</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/478011/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/funding-acquisition/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/project-administration/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/visualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/Writing - review &#x26; editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>M&#xe5;rtensson</surname>
<given-names>Kristina</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2858380/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/Writing - review &#x26; editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Johnsson</surname>
<given-names>Holger</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/Writing - review &#x26; editing/"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
<institution>Department of Soil and Environment</institution>, <institution>Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences</institution>, <addr-line>Skara</addr-line>, <country>Sweden</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
<institution>Department of Soil and Environment</institution>, <institution>Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences</institution>, <addr-line>Uppsala</addr-line>, <country>Sweden</country>
</aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>
<bold>Edited by:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1552344/overview">Yefang Jiang</ext-link>, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (AAFC), Canada</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>
<bold>Reviewed by:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1756296/overview">Holger Rupp</ext-link>, Helmholtz Association of German Research Centres (HZ), Germany</p>
<p>
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2834928/overview">Yvonne Uwituze</ext-link>, Government of Prince Edward Island, Canada</p>
</fn>
<corresp id="c001">&#x2a;Correspondence: Sofia Delin, <email>sofia.delin@slu.se</email>
</corresp>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>13</day>
<month>11</month>
<year>2024</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2024</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>12</volume>
<elocation-id>1488638</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>02</day>
<month>09</month>
<year>2024</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>31</day>
<month>10</month>
<year>2024</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#xa9; 2024 Delin, M&#xe5;rtensson and Johnsson.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2024</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Delin, M&#xe5;rtensson and Johnsson</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>Manure application performed in autumn requires regulation due to the risk of nitrogen (N) leaching during winter. On the other hand, application of manure in spring can pose some practical problems depending on the risk for N immobilization and the difficulty in ploughing heavy clay soils during this time of year. The risk for leaching is likely to differ between different soil texture and manure characteristics. In this study, we sought to estimate the risk for nitrogen leaching depending on the carbon/nitrogen ratio (C/N) of the manure, time for manure application, and soil type. We combined 3-year lysimeter experiments with 2-year field plot experiments and laboratory soil incubations and compared results with those from an empirical model. We compared effects of manure application on two soils (silty clay and loamy sand) and solid manures with different representing C/N ratios. In incubations, only manure with a C/N-ratio below 14 contributed with significant amounts of leachable N during the first months after application. In the lysimeter study, N leaching was unaffected by the timing of the application of the manure with C/N-ratio 18. However, regarding manure with C/N-ratio 10, N leaching was elevated with 10&#x2013;15&#xa0;kg&#xa0;N per ha after manure application in October compared to November and March on both soil types. The mineral N analyses from soil profiles in the field experiments showed a similar pattern, however, the increase was higher on the loamy sand compared to the silty clay. The ammonia emissions did not differ between manure types, but were on average 24% of applied NH<sub>4</sub>-N after application in October when air temperature was on average 12&#xb0;C compared to only 3% of applied NH<sub>4</sub>-N in November and March when air temperature was on average 5&#xb0;C. Similar to lysimeter results, the modelled N leaching was higher the earlier the manure application occurred in autumn. However, the model also predicted increased leaching for the manure with a high C/N-ratio, and a smaller effect on leaching on clay soil. Considering this, the model calculations overestimated the leaching effects from manure with a high C/N-ratio and underestimated the leaching effects on clay soil.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>nitrogen leaching</kwd>
<kwd>soil type</kwd>
<kwd>lysimeter</kwd>
<kwd>solid manure</kwd>
<kwd>C/N ratio</kwd>
<kwd>spring sowing</kwd>
<kwd>manure application</kwd>
<kwd>NLeCCS system</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<contract-num rid="cn001">2012-00676</contract-num>
<contract-sponsor id="cn001">Svenska Forskningsr&#xe5;det Formas<named-content content-type="fundref-id">10.13039/501100001862</named-content>
</contract-sponsor>
<custom-meta-wrap>
<custom-meta>
<meta-name>section-at-acceptance</meta-name>
<meta-value>Soil Processes</meta-value>
</custom-meta>
</custom-meta-wrap>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="s1">
<title>1 Introduction</title>
<p>Manure application that is carried out in autumn poses a risk for nitrogen leaching during the following winter period, which has a low crop uptake and large drainage runoff (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Aronsson et al., 2014</xref>), particularly before spring sowing when there is no crop. This risk is therefore dependent on when the manure is applied during the year (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Thomsen, 2005</xref>). Different manure application times may also mean different time for soil incorporation by ploughing, which can also affect nitrogen leaching (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Stenberg et al., 1999</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Norberg and Aronsson, 2024</xref>). The composition of nitrogen compounds in the manure can also influence whether or not leaching is affected, in which solid manure with less mineral nitrogen can be expected to have an insignificant effect on leaching (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Shepherd and Newell-Price, 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Pedersen B. N. et al., 2021</xref>).</p>
<p>There are currently no reported Swedish leaching experiments regarding solid manure in autumn before a spring crop, but there are results available from Denmark (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Hansen et al., 2004</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Thomsen, 2005</xref>) and the United Kingdom (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Smith et al., 2002</xref>). Indeed, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Thomsen (2005)</xref> showed in a lysimeter experiment on loamy sand that nitrate leaching, after application of manure in December and in March, was the same size for unmanured lysimeters, whereas leaching was higher after manure application in September. Moreover, in two parallel plot experiments on a sandy loam with nearly twice as much precipitation as in the lysimeter experiments, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Hansen et al. (2004)</xref> reported that N utilization was lower after application in both September and December compared to application in spring. This suggests both autumn applications suffered from increased leaching losses. In four experiments on sandy soils in the United Kingdom, application of 200&#xa0;kg total N with solid farmyard manure in October resulted in an average 4&#xa0;kg&#xa0;N&#xa0;ha<sup>&#x2013;1</sup> increase in nitrate leaching compared to the unmanured control (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Smith et al., 2002</xref>). Solid fractions with a C/N-ratio ranging from 7 to 10 from separated slurry also caused a significant increase in N leaching after autumn application to winter wheat in Danish experiments (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">S&#xf8;rensen and Rub&#xe6;k, 2012</xref>). Solid manures (&#x3e;20% DM) may, however, have a larger C/N-ratio and a smaller fraction of mineral nitrogen.</p>
<p>Approximately 40% of the animal farms with cattle and pigs in Sweden have management systems with solid manure and deep litter (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">SCB, 2020</xref>). In 2018/19, 1,800,000 tons of solid manure from cattle, 800,000 tons of deep litter from cattle, and 60,000 tons of solid manure from pigs were distributed on Swedish agricultural land (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">SCB, 2020</xref>). Depending on, for instance, both the type and amount of bedding material as well as the storage time, these types of manure may vary considerably in their chemical composition (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Ayadi et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Keskinen et al., 2017</xref>). A manure from a housing with generous amounts of bedding material, that has also not yet been decomposed during storage, will have a much higher proportion of carbon compared to a manure with less bedding material or a manure that already been degraded during storage. The C/N-ratio for solid beef manure normally varies between 11 and 16 but can also be above 20 from systems with a large amount of straw bedding (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Qian and Schoenau, 2002</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Loro, 2005</xref>). With a higher ratio of carbon compared to nitrogen in the manure, more nitrogen will be immobilized by soil biota and there is consequently less in mineral form (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Delin et al., 2012</xref>) that is available for crop uptake and leaching. This type of manure can be both more practical and beneficial for crop production to apply and incorporate in autumn, particularly on clay soils whose soil structure benefit from ploughing in autumn compared to spring (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Nj&#xf8;s and B&#xf8;rresen, 1991</xref>). However, manure application with a lower C/N- ratio in autumn may lead to nutrient leaching during winter (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Aronsson et al., 2014</xref>) and on lighter soils, where spring ploughing is suitable, manure application in spring has resulted in greater yields of spring-sown cereals compared to application in autumn (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Hansen et al., 2004</xref>).</p>
<p>In Sweden, the main part of the agricultural land is designated as nitrate vulnerable zones that are regulated by the European Union Nitrates Directive. According to current regulations for manure application within these zones, solid manures may be applied in October but not in November-February prior to spring sowing. The intention of this regulation is to limit nitrogen leaching. However, results from Denmark (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Thomsen, 2005</xref>) and modelling calculations from Sweden (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Johnsson and Hoffman, 1995</xref>) both suggest that early autumn application enhances leaching more so than if manure is applied in late autumn. In addition, solid manures may vastly differ in chemical composition and if they pose a risk for leaching or not. The risk may also differ between soils with different texture (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Hina, 2024</xref>).</p>
<p>Swedish data on how nitrogen leaching is affected by time for application of solid manure depending on manure and soil characteristics would enable a better basis for both regulations and recommendations for farmers that would lead to limited nitrogen leaching. This is important to assure safe water quality and to limit environmental impacts such as eutrophication of our waters. The objective of this study was to describe the nitrogen (N) dynamics following the application of different kinds of solid manures to bare soil in Sweden to estimate the risk for nitrogen leaching during the first year after application depending on the carbon/nitrogen ratio (C/N) of the manure, the time for manure application, and the soil type.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="materials|methods" id="s2">
<title>2 Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="s2-1">
<title>2.1 Combination of experiments in the field, lab and in outdoor lysimeters</title>
<p>In order to study the effects of solid manure application on several variables, we combined lysimeter experiments with field plot experiments and laboratory soil incubations. The lysimeter experiments were included to study nutrient leaching and the field experiments to study ammonia emissions, grain yield, and soil mineral nitrogen profiles. In the soil incubations we studied the course of net N mineralisation for a greater number of manures. In all experiments, the same two soils representing clay soil and sandy soil (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>) and the two manure types representing a high and low C/N-ratio (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref>) were included. Manure A, which represented a solid farmyard manure with a relatively low C/N-ratio of 10, originated from a sow stable with moderate amounts of straw bedding compared to a deep litter. Manure B represented a solid manure with a relatively high C/N-ratio of 18 and was acquired from a deep litter for dairy heifers. The lysimeter facility and one of the field experiments were located at Lanna Research Station (58&#xb0;20&#xa0;N, 13&#xb0;7&#xa0;E) and another field experiment was located at Foteg&#xe5;rden (58&#xb0;28&#xa0;N, 13&#xb0;14&#xa0;E), 17&#xa0;km north from Lanna (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1</xref>). Weather data was only recorded at Lanna (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2</xref>), but data from a weather station in close to Foteg&#xe5;rden confirms that temperatures are very similar and that precipitation may be a bit higher at Foteg&#xe5;rden. The hydrological year (July-June) 2014/2015 had unusually high precipitation in August and a milder winter than usual (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap id="T1" position="float">
<label>TABLE 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Soil characteristics for the two soils used in lysimeters, field experiments, and incubations (where only the 0&#x2013;30&#xa0;cm is relevant for the incubations).</p>
</caption>
<table>
<thead valign="top">
<tr>
<th rowspan="2" align="left">Depth (cm)</th>
<th colspan="3" align="center">Lanna</th>
<th colspan="3" align="center">Foteg&#xe5;rden</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th align="right">0&#x2013;30</th>
<th align="right">30&#x2013;60</th>
<th align="right">60&#x2013;90</th>
<th align="right">0&#x2013;30</th>
<th align="right">30&#x2013;60</th>
<th align="right">60&#x2013;90</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td align="left">Ca-AL (mg 100g<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>)</td>
<td align="right">93</td>
<td align="right">16.4</td>
<td align="right">41.1</td>
<td align="right">257</td>
<td align="right">266</td>
<td align="right">230</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">P-AL (mg 100g<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>)</td>
<td align="right">14.8</td>
<td align="right">2.2</td>
<td align="right">4.3</td>
<td align="right">3</td>
<td align="right">11.8</td>
<td align="right">19.1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Al-AL</td>
<td align="right">88.4</td>
<td align="right">22.1</td>
<td align="right">4.1</td>
<td align="right">22.5</td>
<td align="right">33.8</td>
<td align="right">33.3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Fe-AL</td>
<td align="right">19.8</td>
<td align="right">11.6</td>
<td align="right">9.5</td>
<td align="right">41.4</td>
<td align="right">12.3</td>
<td align="right">17.2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">K-AL</td>
<td align="right">4</td>
<td align="right">1.3</td>
<td align="right">2.9</td>
<td align="right">10.7</td>
<td align="right">13.9</td>
<td align="right">18.7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">pH</td>
<td align="right">6.7</td>
<td align="right">7.3</td>
<td align="right">7.5</td>
<td align="right">6.3</td>
<td align="right">6.4</td>
<td align="right">6.7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">CEC (cmol kg<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>)</td>
<td align="right">19</td>
<td align="right">21</td>
<td align="right">19</td>
<td align="right">7.3</td>
<td align="right">1.4</td>
<td align="right">2.3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Base saturation (%)</td>
<td align="right">88</td>
<td align="right">93</td>
<td align="right">94</td>
<td align="right">61</td>
<td align="right">48</td>
<td align="right">80</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Clay (%)</td>
<td align="right">45</td>
<td align="right">55</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="right">5.6</td>
<td align="right">4.5</td>
<td align="right">2.7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Silt (%)</td>
<td align="right">42</td>
<td align="right">51</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="right">7.3</td>
<td align="right">3.4</td>
<td align="right">4.8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Sand (%)</td>
<td align="right">10</td>
<td align="right">4</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="right">81</td>
<td align="right">89</td>
<td align="right">91</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">SOM (%)</td>
<td align="right">2.9</td>
<td align="right">0.4</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="right">5.4</td>
<td align="right">2.6</td>
<td align="right">0.9</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<table-wrap id="T2" position="float">
<label>TABLE 2</label>
<caption>
<p>Characteristics of the two types of manure used in lysimeters, field experiments, and incubations.</p>
</caption>
<table>
<thead valign="top">
<tr>
<th align="left">Manure</th>
<th align="right">A</th>
<th align="right">B</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td align="left">From animal</td>
<td align="right">Sow</td>
<td align="right">Heifer</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Dry matter, %</td>
<td align="right">20</td>
<td align="right">22</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Total N, kg ton<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>
</td>
<td align="right">8.0</td>
<td align="right">4.8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NH<sub>4</sub>-N, kg ton<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>
</td>
<td align="right">1.9</td>
<td align="right">0.7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">C/N-ratio</td>
<td align="right">10</td>
<td align="right">18</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Total <italic>p</italic>, kg ton<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>
</td>
<td align="right">2.4</td>
<td align="right">1.2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Total K, kg ton<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>
</td>
<td align="right">7.0</td>
<td align="right">9.4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Total Mg, kg ton<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>
</td>
<td align="right">1.5</td>
<td align="right">1.3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Total Ca, kg ton<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>
</td>
<td align="right">5.0</td>
<td align="right">4.2</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<fig id="F1" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Location of field experiments, lysimeter facility and weather station.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fenvs-12-1488638-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig id="F2" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 2</label>
<caption>
<p>Monthly averages of air temperature and monthly accumulated precipitation at Lanna research station during the experimental period.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fenvs-12-1488638-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-2">
<title>2.2 Field experiments</title>
<sec id="s2-2-1">
<title>2.2.1 Experimental design</title>
<p>Two 2-year field experiments were conducted on fields with different soil conditions (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>). One field had loamy sand at the farm Foteg&#xe5;rden. For that experiment, three different times of application of two different solid manures (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref>) were compared with two unmanured controls with different levels of mineral nitrogen fertilizer (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">Table 3</xref>). The lower level of mineral fertilizer was the same as in manured treatments and the higher similar as the expected N fertilization effect of manure N. These treatments were included for comparison, to evaluate the effects of manure N. The other experiment was located at Lanna Research Station in a field with silty clay soil (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>). For this experiment, the times for manure application were limited to the two times in autumn and with only one of the manures (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">Table 3</xref>). The reason for the limitation of application times at this site was that this type of soil would not be feasible to plough in spring. To limit costs, only the manure type that was expected to have larger impact on yield and soil mineral N levels was included. The experiments had a randomized block design with three replicates at Foteg&#xe5;rden and four replicates at Lanna. Each individual plot was 4&#xa0;m wide and 15&#xa0;m long. The experiments were established in autumn 2013 starting with manure application according to plan (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">Table 3</xref>) and was finished after harvest in 2015.</p>
<table-wrap id="T3" position="float">
<label>TABLE 3</label>
<caption>
<p>Treatments in the field experiments where &#xd7; indicates which treatments are included at the sites Lanna (L) and Foteg&#xe5;rden (F).</p>
</caption>
<table>
<thead valign="top">
<tr>
<th align="left"/>
<th align="left">L</th>
<th align="left">F</th>
<th align="left">Manure type</th>
<th align="left">Time for application</th>
<th align="left">Mineral fertilizer</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td align="left">1</td>
<td align="left">&#xd7;</td>
<td align="left">&#xd7;</td>
<td align="left">No manure</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left">40&#xa0;kg&#xa0;N ha<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">2</td>
<td align="left">&#xd7;</td>
<td align="left">&#xd7;</td>
<td align="left">No manure</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left">80&#xa0;kg&#xa0;N ha<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">3</td>
<td align="left">&#xd7;</td>
<td align="left">&#xd7;</td>
<td align="left">Low C/N-ratio</td>
<td align="left">Early autumn (1 October<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn1">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>)</td>
<td align="left">40&#xa0;kg&#xa0;N ha<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">4</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left">&#xd7;</td>
<td align="left">Deep litter</td>
<td align="left">Early autumn (1 October<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn1">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>)</td>
<td align="left">40&#xa0;kg&#xa0;N&#xa0;ha<sup>-1</sup>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">5</td>
<td align="left">&#xd7;</td>
<td align="left">&#xd7;</td>
<td align="left">Low C/N-ratio</td>
<td align="left">Late autumn (25 November<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn1">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>)</td>
<td align="left">40&#xa0;kg&#xa0;N&#xa0;ha<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">6</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left">&#xd7;</td>
<td align="left">Deep litter</td>
<td align="left">Late autumn (25 November<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn1">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>)</td>
<td align="left">40&#xa0;kg&#xa0;N&#xa0;ha<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">7</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left">&#xd7;</td>
<td align="left">Low C/N-ratio</td>
<td align="left">spring (25 March<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn1">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>)</td>
<td align="left">40&#xa0;kg&#xa0;N&#xa0;ha<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">8</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left">&#xd7;</td>
<td align="left">Deep litter</td>
<td align="left">spring (25 March<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn1">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>)</td>
<td align="left">40&#xa0;kg&#xa0;N&#xa0;ha<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn id="Tfn1">
<label>
<sup>a</sup>
</label>
<p>Exact dates for manure application is presented in supplementary material (<xref ref-type="sec" rid="s11">Supplementary Table S1</xref>).</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-2-2">
<title>2.2.2 Manure application and ammonia emission</title>
<p>Manure amounts corresponding to approximately 150&#xa0;kg total N&#xa0;ha<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>, i.e. 20 tons ha<sup>&#x2013;1</sup> of manure A and 30 tons ha<sup>&#x2013;1</sup> of manure B were distributed within the plots using pitchforks. Ammonia emissions were measured from the time of application until ploughing, which was approximately 24&#xa0;h. For this, an equilibrium concentration method dynamic technique, with chambers and passive diffusion samplers, was used (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Svensson, 1994</xref>). In each plot with manure application, one or two 0.3&#xa0;m &#xd7; 0.4&#xa0;m large metal frames were inserted into the soil on which ventilated chambers were then placed. We put one diffusive sampler both inside and outside each chamber to estimate the equilibrium concentration using <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="e1">Equation 1</xref>. To determine suitable exposure periods, the NH<sub>3</sub> concentration in the ventilated chambers was measured with detection tubes. This usually resulted in one sampler during the first 3&#x2013;5&#xa0;h and a new one for the remaining 19&#x2013;21&#xa0;h. To ensure the correct manure amount where ammonia emissions were carried out, the amount of manure applied within the frames was weighed separately on a finer scale.<disp-formula id="e1">
<mml:math id="m1">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">E</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="|">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">C</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">e</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">q</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">C</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">a</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">K</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">Z</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
<label>(1)</label>
</disp-formula>Where E is the ammonia emission, C<sub>eq</sub> denotes the equilibrium concentration of NH<sub>3</sub> measured inside the chambers, C<sub>a</sub> the ambient NH<sub>3</sub> concentration measured outside the chambers and K<sub>Z</sub> the mass transfer coefficient which was set to 10&#xa0;mm&#xa0;s<sup>&#x2013;1</sup> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Svensson and Ferm, 1993</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-2-3">
<title>2.2.3 Crop management and yield measurements</title>
<p>The ploughing, harrowing, and sowing was all performed with conventional equipment. Mineral fertilizer corresponding to 40&#xa0;kg&#xa0;N&#xa0;ha<sup>&#x2013;1</sup> was applied in all plots with a boom fertilizer spreader in connection to sowing. Another 40&#xa0;kg&#xa0;N&#xa0;ha<sup>&#x2013;1</sup> was applied in the 80&#xa0;kg&#xa0;N&#xa0;ha<sup>&#x2013;1</sup> treatment with a plot spreader. The grain yield was measured with a plot combine in 20&#xa0;m<sup>2</sup> large areas within each plot and grain samples were taken plot-wise for an analysis of nitrogen content using near infrared transmission (NIT) spectroscopy.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-2-4">
<title>2.2.4 Soil mineral nitrogen</title>
<p>Soil samples were taken in March 2014, February/March 2015, and September 2015 for determination of mineral nitrogen (NH<sub>4</sub>-N and NO<sub>3</sub>-N) in the soil profile. For this, 18 cores from the 0&#x2013;30&#xa0;cm soil layer, 9 cores from the 30&#x2013;60&#xa0;cm, and 60&#x2013;90&#xa0;cm depths were mixed to composite samples for each plot and depth. The samples were stored at a frozen temperature until analysis. The samples were milled and homogenized in a frozen state. Subsamples of 40&#xa0;g were extracted with 100&#xa0;mL 2 M KCl (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Mulvaney, 1996</xref>). The ammonium (NH4&#x2b;) and nitrate (NO3-) analyses were then carried out using colorimetric methods on a Seal AA3 auto-analyzer (SEAL Analytical Inc., Mequon, Wisconsin, United States).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-2-5">
<title>2.2.5 Statistics</title>
<p>Differences in yield and mineral N in subsoil was analyzed statistically with one-way ANOVA for each location and occasion separately. Tukey&#x2019;s test (confidence interval of 95%) was used to investigate differences between the treatments. To verify assumptions for ANOVA, normal probability tests were performed in Mintab.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-3">
<title>2.3 Lysimeter experiments</title>
<sec id="s2-3-1">
<title>2.3.1 Lysimeters</title>
<p>Differences in N leaching between treatments with three different times of application of the two different solid manures (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref>) was compared with an unmanured control in a lysimeter experiment (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T4">Table 4</xref>) involving the two soil types (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>). The treatments were the same as in the field experiments, except there was only one unmanured control. For the collection of undisturbed soil monoliths for the experiment, we used a drilling technique described by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Persson and Bergstr&#xf6;m (1991)</xref>. To carry out this method, we used a corer consisting of a steel cylinder with cutting teeth at the bottom, into which plastic pipes were inserted to encase the soil columns. The steel cylinder rotates and carves out soil cores that were gently pushed into the pipes. The lysimeter containers had an inner diameter of 0.295&#xa0;m, a length of 1.18&#xa0;m, and were made of polyvinyl chloride (PVC). This depth correspond to the standard drainage depth of around 1&#xa0;m on Swedish agricultural soils, which means that water collected at this depth represents drainage water. Twenty-one soil columns with loamy sand, that were 0.8&#xa0;m in length, were collected from the same field that was used in the field experiment at Foteg&#xe5;rden. This slightly more shallow depth was chosen for practical reasons, as deeper soil cores required much more force from the drill leading to compacted and unrepresentative soil columns. A further nine soil columns with silty clay soil were used from a field nearby the field experiment at Lanna. The monoliths were collected in June 2013 and then stored in a cool barn for 6&#xa0;weeks before they were entered into the ground in the lysimeter facility, which was placed at Lanna, around 500&#xa0;m from the field experiment on clay soil. Grass was sown between the lysimeters, in order to reduce the weather exposure of the crop. The construction was very similar to the one decribed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Bergstr&#xf6;m and Johansson, (1991)</xref> with water sampled underground individually for each lysimeter.</p>
<table-wrap id="T4" position="float">
<label>TABLE 4</label>
<caption>
<p>Treatments in the lysimeter experiment and corresponding treatment 1-8 in field experiments (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">Table 3</xref>) at Lanna (L) and Foteg&#xe5;rden (F).</p>
</caption>
<table>
<thead valign="top">
<tr>
<th align="left"/>
<th align="left">Manure type</th>
<th align="left">Time for application</th>
<th align="left">Soil type</th>
<th align="left">Corresponding field treatment</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td align="left">A</td>
<td align="left">No manure</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left">Loamy sand</td>
<td align="left">F1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">B</td>
<td align="left">Low C/N-ratio</td>
<td align="left">Early autumn (1 October)</td>
<td align="left">Loamy sand</td>
<td align="left">F3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">C</td>
<td align="left">Deep litter</td>
<td align="left">Early autumn (1 October)</td>
<td align="left">Loamy sand</td>
<td align="left">F4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">D</td>
<td align="left">Low C/N-ratio</td>
<td align="left">Late autumn (25 November)</td>
<td align="left">Loamy sand</td>
<td align="left">F5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">E</td>
<td align="left">Deep litter</td>
<td align="left">Late autumn (25 November)</td>
<td align="left">Loamy sand</td>
<td align="left">F6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">F</td>
<td align="left">Low C/N-ratio</td>
<td align="left">spring (25 March)</td>
<td align="left">Loamy sand</td>
<td align="left">F7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">G</td>
<td align="left">Deep litter</td>
<td align="left">spring (25 March)</td>
<td align="left">Loamy sand</td>
<td align="left">F8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">H</td>
<td align="left">No manure</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left">Silty clay</td>
<td align="left">L1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">I</td>
<td align="left">Low C/N-ratio</td>
<td align="left">Early autumn (1 October)</td>
<td align="left">Silty clay</td>
<td align="left">L3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">J</td>
<td align="left">Low C/N-ratio</td>
<td align="left">Late autumn (25 November)</td>
<td align="left">Silty clay</td>
<td align="left">L5</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-3-2">
<title>2.3.2 Manure</title>
<p>The manure was homogenized and divided into 205&#xa0;g and 137&#xa0;g large portions of heifer and sow manure respectively, to correspond to 20- and 30- tons ha<sup>&#x2013;1</sup> or roughly 150&#xa0;kg&#xa0;ha<sup>&#x2013;1</sup> total N when applied to the lysimeters. For the homogenization we first used scissors to cut the straw in the manure into 2&#x2013;3&#xa0;cm long pieces, before mixing it all with a spoon. The portions were stored in the freezer until manure application during the following 3-year period. Manure was applied in either October, November or March depending on treatment (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">Table 3</xref>) during three consecutive years starting in autumn 2013. Prior to manure application, the upper 15&#xa0;cm of soil was removed and placed in a bucket. The manure was then applied, and the removed soil was returned on top. This procedure simulated manure application with immediate incorporation by ploughing. We only carried out this procedure once per year in each lysimeter, meaning that they had different ploughing times depending on time for manure application. For the unmanured treatment, ploughing was simulated in this way in October in 2013 and 2015 and in November in 2014. To avoid any difference in plant cover for different treatments (which could affect leaching) weeds were removed in all lysimeters at all times of manure application.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-3-3">
<title>2.3.3 Crop management</title>
<p>In the years following manure application (2014&#x2013;2016) and the next year with continued leaching measurements (2017), spring cereals were grown with spring oats in 2014 and 2016, spring barley in 2015, and spring wheat in 2017. The sowing was done by hand in three rows with a 10&#xa0;cm distance. In addition to the applied manure, all lysimeters received mineral N fertilizer as 50&#xa0;kg&#xa0;N&#xa0;ha<sup>&#x2013;1</sup> broadcasted ammonium nitrate (YaraBela AXAN) immediately after sowing. Weeds were removed by hand shortly after emergence. The crop was harvested at ripening by cutting the straw 10&#x2013;15&#xa0;cm above ground. Due to birds and moles eating parts of the harvest in 2014 and 2015, the yield measurements from the lysimeters are unreliable and thus not presented.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-3-4">
<title>2.3.4 Water sampling</title>
<p>The drainage water from each lysimeter was assembled in containers placed underground in basement and transported in connecting pipes through free drainage. This water was sampled every second week during periods with enough drainage water (&#x3e;40&#xa0;mL per lysimeter) after which the containers were emptied. Throughout the periods with very large amounts of drainage water, sampling was done with only a 1-week interval, to avoid overflow in the water collection containers. During the first few months (until March 2014), the accumulated drainage runoff for the sampling period was measured in connection with sampling. After this, scales with continuous logging were installed and values for drainage runoff were logged for each 15&#xa0;min period.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-3-5">
<title>2.3.5 Water analysis</title>
<p>The total N concentrations in drainage water were determined by using the combustion method, according to the European standard (SS-EN 12260:2004). The instrument used was TOC-VCPH, including TNM-1 and ASI-V (Shimadzu). The sum of N in NO3- and NO2- was determined by the photometric method according to the standard SS-EN ISO 15293&#x2013;1:2013, and the instrument used was a Gallery Discrete Analyzer (Thermo Fisher Scientific).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-3-6">
<title>2.3.6 Leaching calculations and statistical analysis</title>
<p>Nitrogen leaching was calculated for each lysimeter by multiplying the measured drainage volumes by its nitrogen concentration for each sampling period. The calculated leaching was then summarized for each year ranging from 1st October until 30th September. Differences in yearly leakage between treatments on the sandy soil were analyzed using a three-way factorial ANOVA with manure type, soil type, and application time as the independent variables. Tukey&#x2019;s test (confidence interval of 95%) was used to investigate differences among treatments. To verify assumptions for ANOVA, normal probability tests were performed on the residuals. Only for the very last dates of nitogen concenteration, assumptions were not met. For this data, the Box-cox transformation options &#x201c;No transformation&#x201d; and &#x201c;Optimal &#x3bb;&#x201d; were tested to see if transformation was required. Since data transformation did not have any significant effects on the results, the results of comparing non-transformed data are presented.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-4">
<title>2.4 Soil incubations</title>
<p>Two incubation experiments were performed for this study. In the first, the relations between mineral N content in soil after manure addition and the C/N-ratio of the manure was studied using thirteen different manures from various animals (cattle, pigs, sheep, horses and minks) and the loamy sand soil from Foteg&#xe5;rden (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>). In the second incubation, the effects of soil type on mineral N content in soil was studied by repeating the incubation with two manures (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref>) on the silty clay soil from Lanna (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>). The incubations were performed in metal cylinders that were 5&#xa0;cm high and 7&#xa0;cm wide. Manure corresponding to 6-ton dry matter ha<sup>&#x2013;1</sup> was sandwiched between two layers of soil that was watered to 50 or 60% of water holding capacity on the silty clay and loamy sand, respectively. The cylinders with loamy sand were prepared by adding 125&#xa0;g soil, then the manure and finally another 125&#xa0;g of soil. Due to the soil structure of the silty clay, it could not be prepared in the same way. Instead, those cylinders were taken out from the field. When arriving in the lab the soil was gently pushed so that half the column entered a second cylinder, and it was then divided into two parts with a knife. After adding the manure to one of the half-filled cylinders, the other half could be returned. To obtain equal amounts of soil in all the cylinders, some soil was removed from each one until the soil weight reached 300&#xa0;g. The reason for adding the manure as a layer in the middle, rather than mixing it with the soil, was to imitate when manure is incorporated by ploughing and to retain a field like structure of the silty clay.</p>
<p>The cylinders were placed in 10&#xb0;C and sampled after 0, 7, 28 and 56&#xa0;days. To prevent the soil from drying out and to also maintain an aerobic environment, the cylinders were placed on grids in closed boxes that were aerated at least twice a week. A sufficient amount of cylinders were prepared to sample three replicates at each sampling date. At sampling, the whole cylinders were poured into plastic bags and put in the freezer. The samples were milled in a frozen state and subsamples of 40&#xa0;g were extracted with 100&#xa0;mL 2&#xa0;M KCl (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Mulvaney, 1996</xref>). The ammonium (NH<sub>4&#x2b;</sub>) and nitrate (NO<sub>3&#x2212;</sub>) analyses were then carried out using colorimetric methods on a Seal AA3 auto-analyzer (SEAL Analytical Inc., Mequon, Wisconsin, United States).</p>
<p>From the results the amount of mineral N supplied from manure addition to soil was calculated by subtracting the min N content from the unmanured control. This is hereafter referred to as <italic>Net mineral N release</italic>, expressed as % of added total N. It provides a measure of potentially plant-available N from manure, and was calculated according to <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="e2">Equation 2</xref>:<disp-formula id="e2">
<mml:math id="m2">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext mathvariant="bold">Net&#x2009;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mtext mathvariant="bold">mineral&#x2009;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold">N</mml:mi>
<mml:mtext mathvariant="bold">&#x2009;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mtext mathvariant="bold">release</mml:mtext>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext mathvariant="bold">Mineral</mml:mtext>
<mml:mtext>&#x2009;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold">N</mml:mi>
<mml:mtext>&#x2009;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mtext mathvariant="bold">in</mml:mtext>
<mml:mtext mathvariant="bold">&#x2009;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mtext mathvariant="bold">soil</mml:mtext>
<mml:mtext mathvariant="bold">&#x2009;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mtext mathvariant="bold">with</mml:mtext>
<mml:mtext mathvariant="bold">&#x2009;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mtext mathvariant="bold">slurry</mml:mtext>
<mml:mtext mathvariant="bold">&#x2009;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mo>&#x2013;</mml:mo>
<mml:mtext mathvariant="bold">&#x2009;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mtext mathvariant="bold">Mineral</mml:mtext>
<mml:mtext mathvariant="bold">&#x2009;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold">N</mml:mi>
<mml:mtext mathvariant="bold">&#x2009;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mtext mathvariant="bold">in</mml:mtext>
<mml:mtext mathvariant="bold">&#x2009;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mtext mathvariant="bold">control</mml:mtext>
<mml:mtext mathvariant="bold">&#x2009;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mtext mathvariant="bold">soil</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext mathvariant="bold">Total</mml:mtext>
<mml:mtext mathvariant="bold">&#x2009;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold">N</mml:mi>
<mml:mtext mathvariant="bold">&#x2009;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mtext mathvariant="bold">added</mml:mtext>
<mml:mtext mathvariant="bold">&#x2009;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mtext mathvariant="bold">with</mml:mtext>
<mml:mtext mathvariant="bold">&#x2009;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mtext mathvariant="bold">slurry</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
<label>(2)</label>
</disp-formula>
</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-5">
<title>2.5 Modelling</title>
<p>To ensure the results from these experiments were in line with models that describe nitrogen leaching after manure application, nitrogen leakage was calculated using the NLeCCS system (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Johnsson et al., 2022</xref>), which includes the SOILNDB simulation tools (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Johnsson et al., 2002</xref>). This system is used for calculations of leakage to report to different commissions for water protection (HELCOM, OSPAR and EEA). The model setup from the PLC6-calculations was used (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Johnsson et al., 2016</xref>). The NLeCCS method calculates nitrogen leaching from arable land, using a 30-year climate data series assumed to represent normal climate. Climate conditions and agricultural management represent leaching regions. The climate series was run a total of 500 times with a crop sequence that included the crops grown in the leaching region in the proportion reported by Statistics Sweden (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">SCB, 2014</xref>). Also, the fertilizer regimes (<italic>Only mineral fertilization</italic> and <italic>Manure fertilization with supplementary mineral fertilization</italic>) were distributed in the crop sequence according to Statistics Sweden (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">SCB, 2014</xref>). The calculated leaching region was lr 5a (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Johnsson et al., 2016</xref>).</p>
<p>Calculations of nitrogen leaching after application of manure at five different points between 30 September and 14 March, before sowing of spring barley, was made for a crop sequence where manure application occurred a sufficient number of times. Ploughing was carried out the day after manure application. Calculations were made for similar soil types (clay and sandy loam) and for manure types with similar C/N-ratios and ammonium contents as in our experiments, as well as the leaching region where the experiments were performed.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="results" id="s3">
<title>3 Results</title>
<sec id="s3-1">
<title>3.1 Soil incubations</title>
<p>The measured increase in mineral N content in soil directly after manure addition correlated well (r<sup>2</sup>
<sub>adj</sub> &#x3d; 0.92&#x2a;&#x2a;&#x2a;) but was only about 80% of what was added with manure (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3A</xref>). Also, after 7, 28, and 56 days there was a strong correlation (r<sup>2</sup>
<sub>adj</sub> &#x3d; 0.84&#x2013;0.89&#x2a;&#x2a;&#x2a;), but with somewhat flatter regression lines (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3A</xref>). The later measurements indicated a net immobilisation of around 25% of the added ammonium N until day 56 in the treatments with the highest amounts of ammonium added, while for the manures with initial low contents of ammonium N added there was a slight net mineralisation of up to 4% of total N added. There was not any significant correlation (r<sup>2</sup>
<sub>adj</sub> &#x3d; 0.18&#x2013;0.30) between the C/N-ratio of the manure and net mineral N release to soil from manure addition, although there was a tendency (<italic>p</italic> &#x3d; 0.06) for exponential decay (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3B</xref>). However, none of the manures with C/N-ratios above 11 resulted in mineral N contents above 15% mineral N of added total N at any time throughout the measuring period.</p>
<fig id="F3" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 3</label>
<caption>
<p>Results of incubations showing net mineral N release from manure addition expressed as percentage of total N added with manure and plotted against <bold>(A)</bold> manure content of NH<sub>4</sub>-N and <bold>(B)</bold> manure C/N-ratio.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fenvs-12-1488638-g003.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-2">
<title>3.2 Nitrogen leaching in lysimeters</title>
<p>The nitrogen concentration in drainage water was higher during certain periods in treatments B and I, which are the treatments where manure A (with a low C/N-ratio) is applied in early autumn on loamy sand and silty clay respectively (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4</xref>). In treatment B (on sandy soil), the nitrogen concentration was significantly higher compared to other treatments on that soil in sampling dates from 19 January 2015 until 31 March 2015. This means a time lag of 3.5&#xa0;months between surface application in beginning of October until significant effect appeared in leachate. In treatment I (on silty clay) the nitrogen concentration was significantly higher than in the treatment without manure on that soil, and occasionally also higher than in the treatment with later manure application, during the period 13 November 2014 until 7 January 2017, which is a time lag of only 1.5&#xa0;months between surface application and effect on leachate. </p>
<fig id="F4" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 4</label>
<caption>
<p>Nitrogen concentration at different sampling dates for the different treatments.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fenvs-12-1488638-g004.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>During the first year of measurement (1 October 2013&#x2013;30 September 2014), the nitrogen concentration was unusually high in all treatments, likely due to mineralisation of dead plant material during the period after drilling up the soil monoliths. Therefore, the focus is hereafter mainly given to the two following years (1 October 2014&#x2013;30 September 2016), as they could be considered to better mirror a field situation. Due to the high nitrogen concentrations in drainage water during the first year of measurements, leaching during this year was also high and ranged from 58 to 119&#xa0;kg&#xa0;N&#xa0;ha<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>. The highest leaching that was measured within each soil type was in the treatments with early autumn application of manure A, but there were no significant differences within the soil types. For the two following years (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5</xref>), early autumn application of manure A was significantly higher in both years on the silty clay and in the year 2014/2015 on the loamy sand. The evaluation was on average for both years 10&#xa0;kg&#xa0;N per ha on loamy sand (<italic>p</italic> &#x3d; 0.07) and 15&#xa0;kg&#xa0;ha<sup>&#x2013;1</sup> on silty clay (<italic>p</italic> &#x3d; 0.02) compared to application in November (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F5" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 5</label>
<caption>
<p>Yearly nitrogen leaching throughout the years (October-September) following the manure applications 2014/2015 and 2015/2016 which compare treatments with manure application applied at different times of the year for each manure type and soil type separately. Error bars show standard error, and the same letter indicates that the treatments are not significantly different from other treatments with the same soil and manure type within the same year.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fenvs-12-1488638-g005.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-3">
<title>3.3 Results from field experiments</title>
<sec id="s3-3-1">
<title>3.3.1 Grain yield</title>
<p>The grain yield was similar between application times of manure, with no significant yield differences on the loamy sand (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T5">Table 5</xref>). However, on the clay soil the yield was significantly lower after application in November compared to October (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T5">Table 5</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap id="T5" position="float">
<label>TABLE 5</label>
<caption>
<p>Grain yield in the field experiments at the two sites during the two different years. The same letter indicates treatments do not differ significantly (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.05) within that experiment.</p>
</caption>
<table>
<thead valign="top">
<tr>
<th rowspan="2" align="left">Manure</th>
<th rowspan="2" align="left">Application time</th>
<th rowspan="2" align="left">Mineral fertilizer kg&#xa0;N&#xa0;ha<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>
</th>
<th colspan="7" align="left">Silty clay</th>
<th colspan="4" align="left">Loamy sand</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th colspan="3" align="left">2014</th>
<th colspan="4" align="left">2015</th>
<th colspan="2" align="left">2014</th>
<th colspan="2" align="left">2015</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td align="left">No</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left">40</td>
<td align="left">3,282</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left">B</td>
<td align="left">3,098</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left">C</td>
<td align="left">4,034</td>
<td align="left">A</td>
<td align="left">6,290</td>
<td align="left">A</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">No</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left">80</td>
<td align="left">4,384</td>
<td align="left">A</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left">4,624</td>
<td align="left">A</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left">5,206</td>
<td align="left">A</td>
<td align="left">6,458</td>
<td align="left">A</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">C/N 10</td>
<td align="left">October</td>
<td align="left">40</td>
<td align="left">4,441</td>
<td align="left">A</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left">3,951</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left">B</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left">4,669</td>
<td align="left">A</td>
<td align="left">7,156</td>
<td align="left">A</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">C/N 18</td>
<td align="left">October</td>
<td align="left">40</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left">5,290</td>
<td align="left">A</td>
<td align="left">7,703</td>
<td align="left">A</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">C/N 10</td>
<td align="left">November</td>
<td align="left">40</td>
<td align="left">3,619</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left">B</td>
<td align="left">3,360</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left">C</td>
<td align="left">4,948</td>
<td align="left">A</td>
<td align="left">7,561</td>
<td align="left">A</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">C/N 18</td>
<td align="left">November</td>
<td align="left">40</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left">4,734</td>
<td align="left">A</td>
<td align="left">6,934</td>
<td align="left">A</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">C/N 10</td>
<td align="left">spring</td>
<td align="left">40</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left">4,644</td>
<td align="left">A</td>
<td align="left">7,068</td>
<td align="left">A</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">C/N 18</td>
<td align="left">spring</td>
<td align="left">40</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left">4,717</td>
<td align="left">A</td>
<td align="left">6,326</td>
<td align="left">A</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-3-2">
<title>3.3.2 Ammonia emissions</title>
<p>The measured ammonia emissions varied between 0% and 40% of applied NH<sub>4</sub>-N (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T6">Table 6</xref>). The emission was positively correlated with temperature (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure 6</xref>). The average temperature after manure application in October was 10&#xb0;C, which resulted in an average ammonia emission of 24% of NH<sub>4</sub>-N. In November and March, the temperatures were on average only 3&#xb0;C and 5&#xb0;C and the average ammonia emissions were limited to 4% and 2% of NH<sub>4</sub>-N respectively. The differences in ammonia emissions between occasions with high temperatures could not be explained by differences in wind speed. There were no significant differences in emissions depending on manure or soil type, although the emissions on clay soil appeared as though they were larger (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure 6</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap id="T6" position="float">
<label>TABLE 6</label>
<caption>
<p>Nitrogen leaching, including 95% confidence interval (95%conf), according to calculations made with the NLeCCs system (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Johnsson et al., 2016</xref>) with different manure application times, soils, and C/N ratio.</p>
</caption>
<table>
<thead valign="top">
<tr>
<th rowspan="3" align="left">Soil</th>
<th colspan="2" align="left">Manure</th>
<th colspan="2" align="left">N Leaching</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th align="left">Time</th>
<th align="left">C/N</th>
<th align="left">year 1</th>
<th align="left">95% conf</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th colspan="2" align="left"/>
<th align="left">kg Nha<sup>&#x2013;</sup>
</th>
<th align="left">kg Nha<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td align="left">sandy loam</td>
<td align="left">30-sep</td>
<td align="left">20</td>
<td align="left">50.0</td>
<td align="left">4.5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">sandy loam</td>
<td align="left">14-okt</td>
<td align="left">20</td>
<td align="left">45.6</td>
<td align="left">4.5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">sandy loam</td>
<td align="left">15-nov</td>
<td align="left">20</td>
<td align="left">39.6</td>
<td align="left">4.4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">sandy loam</td>
<td align="left">30-dec</td>
<td align="left">20</td>
<td align="left">37.9</td>
<td align="left">4.3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">sandy loam</td>
<td align="left">14-mar</td>
<td align="left">20</td>
<td align="left">36.6</td>
<td align="left">4.3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">sandy loam</td>
<td align="left">30-sep</td>
<td align="left">13</td>
<td align="left">56.7</td>
<td align="left">5.0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">sandy loam</td>
<td align="left">14-okt</td>
<td align="left">13</td>
<td align="left">50.6</td>
<td align="left">4.8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">sandy loam</td>
<td align="left">15-nov</td>
<td align="left">13</td>
<td align="left">41.6</td>
<td align="left">4.5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">sandy loam</td>
<td align="left">30-dec</td>
<td align="left">13</td>
<td align="left">38.5</td>
<td align="left">4.4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">sandy loam</td>
<td align="left">14-mar</td>
<td align="left">13</td>
<td align="left">36.8</td>
<td align="left">4.3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">clay</td>
<td align="left">30-sep</td>
<td align="left">13</td>
<td align="left">14.6</td>
<td align="left">1.8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">clay</td>
<td align="left">14-okt</td>
<td align="left">13</td>
<td align="left">12.7</td>
<td align="left">1.6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">clay</td>
<td align="left">15-nov</td>
<td align="left">13</td>
<td align="left">10.2</td>
<td align="left">1.5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">clay</td>
<td align="left">30-dec</td>
<td align="left">13</td>
<td align="left">9.5</td>
<td align="left">1.4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">clay</td>
<td align="left">14-mar</td>
<td align="left">13</td>
<td align="left">9.1</td>
<td align="left">1.4</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<fig id="F6" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 6</label>
<caption>
<p>ammonia emission from manure application until ploughing (20&#xa0;h) depending on temperature after application with the two manure types on the two soil types.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fenvs-12-1488638-g006.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-3-3">
<title>3.3.3 Soil mineral N profiles</title>
<p>On clay soil, soil mineral nitrogen in the subsoil (30&#x2013;90&#xa0;cm) was elevated with 8&#xa0;kg&#xa0;N&#xa0;ha<sup>&#x2013;1</sup> in March 2014 after application of manure A in October compared to application in November or no manure application (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">Figure 7A</xref>). In the following year, there was no significant differences found in soil mineral nitrogen in the subsoil (30&#x2013;90&#xa0;cm) between any of the manured treatments and the unmanured control (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">Figure 7B</xref>). On the sandy soil, application of manure A at both times in autumn and in both years elevated the soil mineral N content in subsoil in February-March with 10&#x2013;18&#xa0;kg&#xa0;N&#xa0;ha<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>, although in the second year this was not statistically significant (<italic>p</italic> &#x3d; 0.09) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">Figures 7C, D</xref>). Application of manure B did not lead to any significant elevation of soil mineral nitrogen in subsoil (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">Figures 7C, D</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F7" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 7</label>
<caption>
<p>Soil Mineral N in soil profiles in the experiment at Lanna in <bold>(A)</bold> March 2014 and <bold>(B)</bold> March 2015 and in the experiment at Foteg&#xE5;rden in <bold>(C)</bold> March 2014 and <bold>(D)</bold> February 2015. Bars that don&#x2019;t share the same letter differ significantly (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.05) in soil mineral N content in the subsoil (30&#x2013;90&#xa0;cm depth).</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fenvs-12-1488638-g007.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-4">
<title>3.4 Nitrogen leaching according to model</title>
<p>The nitrogen leaching during the first year after manure application, as calculated according to the NLeCCS system (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T6">Table 6</xref>), was higher the earlier the manure application was carried out before sowing. Leaching was higher after manure application in the autumn and when the ammonium content of the manure was higher and the C/N-ratio lower, but any differences depending on these manure characteristics were rather small (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T6">Table 6</xref>). Differences in leaching between soil types were high with small differences concerning the effect on leaching between earliest and latest application date on the clay soil compared to on the sandy loam (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T6">Table 6</xref>).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="discussion" id="s4">
<title>4 Discussion</title>
<sec id="s4-1">
<title>4.1 Conformity between lysimeter and field experiments</title>
<p>The lysimeter study showed a similar trend of leaching from the silty clay as from the loamy sand (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5</xref>). Likewise, the mineral N content in the soil profiles that were taken in late winter or early spring in the field experiments (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">Figure 7</xref>) reveal that nitrogen from manure applied in early autumn has moved down to the subsoil on both soil types in 2014. However, in the lysimeters, the leaching effects tended to be higher on the silty clay, whereas in the field experiments the increased mineral N content in subsoil was half as much on the silty clay as on the loamy sand. The higher transport of mineral N in the lysimeter could be due to edge effects in the lysimeter. As the soil dries, large cracks are formed in this type of soil, both in the field and in the lysimeters. However, cracking along the edges in the lysimeter may have increased this effect, which is also indicated by the quite short time lag of only 1.5&#xa0;months between manure application and effect on leachate on this soil compared to 3.5&#xa0;months on the lighter soil. The lighter soil was lacking macropores, and therefor had a slower response on drainage from heavy rainfall than the structured silty clay soil. Another observed difference is that on the loamy sand, there was no difference in subsoil mineral N between the two different application times in autumn, whereas on the silty clay subsoil it was only elevated after late autumn application, similar to the lysimeter experiments. The somewhat lower effect on the clay soil shown in the field experiments exhibits a closer similarity with previous observations at Lanna (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Aronsson and Stenberg, 2010</xref>) and from fine textured soils in general (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Hina, 2024</xref>). Since low leaching from clay soils are, at times, explained by assumed higher denitrification losses (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Aronsson and Stenberg, 2010</xref>) which occur on water saturated soil (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Bouwman, 1996</xref>), one could speculate that the denitrification losses may have been smaller in the lysimeters. Indeed, because they often appeared to be dry, they may never have become as saturated with water, which can be the case under field conditions when ground water level occasionally rises above the drainage depth, since that should not be possible in the freely drained lysimeters. However, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Wallman and Delin (2022)</xref> found from measurements of drainage water from lysimeters in the same facility and within the same soil from the same field, that leaching levels were similar to those measured from a tile drained field facility in that very same field where the lysimeters were collected. Hence, the large effects on leaching that also occurred on the silty clay cannot be ignored.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4-2">
<title>4.2 Measured and modelled leaching</title>
<p>The modelled higher leaching with earlier manure application (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T6">Table 6</xref>) was in accordance with the results with Manure A in the lysimeter study. However, as opposed to the lysimeter study where the effects of Manure B on leaching were insignificant, the effect of manure application according to the model was very similar regardless of the ammonium content or the C/N-ratio. Negligible leaching after application of manure with a high C/N-ratio, as found in the lysimeter study, is supported by previous literature (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Shepherd and Newell-Price, 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Pedersen B. N. et al., 2021</xref>). This implies that the effect of the C/N-ratio is underestimated by the model. Another disparity between the modelled and experimental results were the differences between the soil types. According to the model, leaching effects on the clay soil were rather small compared to lighter soil which is in line with other publications (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Hina, 2024</xref>), as discussed above. Considering both the literature (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Hina, 2024</xref>) and the results from the field experiments (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">Figure 7</xref>) the modelled effects of soil type may be more representative than what was observed in the lysimeter study.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4-3">
<title>4.3 Conformity with other studies</title>
<p>The leaching results after application of the low C/N-ratio manure were in line with those found by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Thomsen (2005)</xref>, who also concluded that manure applied in early autumn increased leaching losses compared to later applications that were carried out in winter or spring. However, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Thomsen (2005)</xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Hansen et al (2004)</xref> also found that early application improved crop N utilization, which was not applicable to the results in our field experiments, in which the yield was unaffected on the loamy sand and affected in the opposite direction on the clay soil. Reduced crop yield after late compared to early autumn ploughing was, on the other hand, in accordance with results from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Stenberg et al. (1999)</xref>, who suggested this to be an effect of increased growth of weeds in the late ploughed treatment. That there is a temperature dependence of ammonia emissions from manure is known from previous research and the increase from less than 5% to 20%&#x2013;40% with higher emissions at fine textured soils is in line with what <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Pedersen J. et al. (2021)</xref> presented for animal slurries with high DM content.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4-4">
<title>4.4 Implementation</title>
<p>The results indicate that the risk for leaching after autumn application differ depending on the composition of the manure. Therefore, restrictions may only be relevant for manure with C/N-ratios below 14 or based on the amount of ammonium nitrogen content. Applying the manure late rather than early was unbeneficial for yield as opposed for leaching and current restrictions that only allow application before a certain date does not serve any purpose when it comes to the limitation of leaching. If farmers find it better to apply the manure later, it could also benefit from lower leaching.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="conclusion" id="s5">
<title>5 Conclusion</title>
<p>The results confirm that the risk for leaching is dependent on the nitrogen and carbon composition of the manure. According to the results in this study, the risk for leaching is predominantly for manure with a C/N-ratio below 14 and the amount of leachable nitrogen is very similar to the amount of mineral nitrogen that was applied from the start. Nitrogen leaching was higher after application of manure with a low C/N-ratio in October compared to both November and April. It was affected similarly on clay soil as on sandy soil, however, indications from soil profiles suggest that leaching from clay soil may be smaller under field condition, as indicated by model calculations. The lower ammonia emissions at cooler temperatures later in the autumn also support that manure application would cause lower nitrogen losses in total after application late rather than early in the autumn. Only on clay soils, when soil conditions in late autumn may be too wet to succeed with ploughing without soil structural damage and therefore lower crop yield, earlier application can be motivated.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec sec-type="data-availability" id="s6">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="author-contributions" id="s7">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>SD: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Project administration, Visualization, Writing&#x2013;original draft, Writing&#x2013;review and editing. KM: Formal Analysis, Writing&#x2013;review and editing. HJ: Formal Analysis, Writing&#x2013;review and editing.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="funding-information" id="s8">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>The authors declare that financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This study was funded by the Swedish Research Council FORMAS (grant number 2012-00676).</p>
</sec>
<ack>
<p>Thanks to Ingrid Thomsen at Aarhus University for valuable guidance during the planning of this project, especially concerning the incubation experiments. Thanks to Lars Bergstr&#xf6;m for advice, Rolf Tunared for construction and G&#xf6;ran Johansson, Maria Stenberg and Tobias Carlsson for practical assistance with the lysimeter facility. Thanks to the staff at Lanna Research station for assistance with experiments in the field and in lysimeters. Thanks to all the farmers that contributed with manure and to the farmers at Foteg&#xe5;rden that gave access to their land and their soil. Thanks also to Martin Ferm for supervision regarding ammonia emission measurements.</p>
</ack>
<sec sec-type="COI-statement" id="s9">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="disclaimer" id="s10">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s11">
<title>Supplementary material</title>
<p>The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2024.1488638/full#supplementary-material">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2024.1488638/full&#x23;supplementary-material</ext-link>
</p>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Table1.docx" id="SM1" mimetype="application/docx" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Aronsson</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ekre</surname>
<given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Torstensson</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Salomon</surname>
<given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Effects of pig and dairy slurry application on N and P leaching from crop rotations with spring cereals and forage leys</article-title>. <source>Nutrient Cycl. Agroecosyst.</source> <volume>98</volume>, <fpage>281</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>293</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10705-014-9611-3</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Aronsson</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Stenberg</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Leaching of nitrogen from a 3-yr grain crop rotation on a clay soil</article-title>. <source>Soil Use Manag.</source> <volume>26</volume>, <fpage>274</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>285</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1475-2743.2010.00277.x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ayadi</surname>
<given-names>F. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Spiehs</surname>
<given-names>M. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cortus</surname>
<given-names>E. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Miller</surname>
<given-names>D. N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Djira</surname>
<given-names>G. D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Physical, chemical, and biological properties of simulated beef cattle bedded manure packs</article-title>. <source>Trans. ASABE</source> <volume>58</volume>, <fpage>797</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>811</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.13031/trans.58.10962</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bergstr&#xf6;m</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Johansson</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1991</year>). <article-title>Leaching of nitrate from monolith lysimeters of different types of agricultural soils</article-title>. <source>J. Environ. Qual.</source> <volume>20</volume>, <fpage>801</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>807</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2134/jeq1991.00472425002000040015x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bouwman</surname>
<given-names>A. F.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1996</year>). <article-title>Direct emission of nitrous oxide from agricultural soils</article-title>. <source>Nutrient Cycl. Agroecosyst.</source> <volume>46</volume>, <fpage>53</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>70</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/bf00210224</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Delin</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Stenberg</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nyberg</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>och Brohede</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Potential methods for estimating nitrogen fertilizer value of organic residues</article-title>. <source>Soil Use Manage.</source> <volume>28</volume>, <fpage>283</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>291</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1475-2743.2012.00417.x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hansen</surname>
<given-names>E. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Thomsen</surname>
<given-names>I. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hansen</surname>
<given-names>M. N.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>Optimizing farmyard manure utilization by varying the application time and tillage strategy</article-title>. <source>Soil Use</source> <volume>20</volume>, <fpage>173</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>177</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1475-2743.2004.tb00353.x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hina</surname>
<given-names>N. S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Global meta-analysis of nitrate leaching vulnerability in synthetic and organic fertilizers over the past four decades</article-title>. <source>Water</source> <volume>16</volume>, <fpage>457</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/w16030457</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Johnsson</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hoffmann</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1995</year>). <article-title>Ber&#xe4;kning av kv&#xe4;veutlakning vid olika spridningstidpunkter f&#xf6;r stallg&#xf6;dsel. Avdelningen f&#xf6;r vattenv&#xe5;rdsl&#xe4;ra, Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet</article-title>. <comment>Teknisk rapport 11.(In Swedish)</comment>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Johnsson</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Larsson</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>M&#xe5;rtensson</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hoffmann</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>SOILNDB: a decision support tool for assessing nitrogen leaching losses from arable land</article-title>. <source>Environ. Model. and Softw.</source> <volume>17</volume>, <fpage>505</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>517</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S1364-8152(02)00013-0</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Johnsson</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>M&#xe5;rtensson</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lindsj&#xf6;</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Persson</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Andrist Rangel</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Blomb&#xe4;ck</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). &#x201c;<article-title>L&#xe4;ckage av n&#xe4;rings&#xe4;mnen fr&#xe5;n svensk &#xe5;kermark</article-title>,&#x201d; in <source>Ber&#xe4;kningar av normall&#xe4;ckage av kv&#xe4;ve och fosfor f&#xf6;r 2013. SMED Rapport Nr 189 2016</source>. <comment>(In Swedish)</comment>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Johnsson</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>M&#xe5;rtensson</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lindsj&#xf6;</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Persson</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>och Blomb&#xe4;ck</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>NLeCCS &#x2013; a system for calculating nutrient leakage from arable land</article-title>. <source>Ekohydrologi</source> <volume>177</volume>. <comment>Uppsala: Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet</comment>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Keskinen</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Saastamoinen</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nikama</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>S&#xe4;rkij&#xe4;rvi</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Myllym&#xe4;ki</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Salo</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Recycling nutrients from horse manure: effects of bedding type and its compostability</article-title>. <source>Agric. Food Sci.</source> <volume>26</volume>, <fpage>68</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>79</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.23986/afsci.60443</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mulvaney</surname>
<given-names>R. L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1996</year>). &#x201c;<article-title>Nitrogen&#x2014;inorganic forms</article-title>,&#x201d; in <source>Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 3-Chemical Methods</source>. Editor <person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname>Sparks</surname>
<given-names>D. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Page</surname>
<given-names>A. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Helmke</surname>
<given-names>R. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Leoppert</surname>
<given-names>P. N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Soltanpour</surname>
<given-names>M. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tabatabai</surname>
<given-names>C. T.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <comment>Soil Science Society of America Book Series</comment>. (<publisher-loc>Madison, Wisconsin, United States</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>American Society of Agronomy and Soil Science Society of America</publisher-name>), <fpage>1123</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1184</lpage>. <comment>Available at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2136/sssabookser5.3.c38">https://doi.org/10.2136/sssabookser5.3.c38</ext-link>
</comment>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Loro</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2005</year>). &#x201c;<article-title>Characterization of solid beef manure</article-title>,&#x201d; in <source>A study funded by the manitoba cattle producers association</source> (<publisher-name>Final Report</publisher-name>).</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Nj&#xf8;s</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>B&#xf8;rresen</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1991</year>). <article-title>Long-term experiment with straw management, stubble cultivation, autumn and spring ploughing on a clay soil in S.E. Norway</article-title>. <source>Soil Tillage Res.</source> <volume>21</volume>, <fpage>53</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>66</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0167-1987(91)90005-i</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Norberg</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Aronsson</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Effects of spring and autumn tillage, catch crops, and pig manure application on long-term nutrient leaching from a loamy sand</article-title>. <source>Eur. J. Agron.</source> <volume>156</volume>, <fpage>127156</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.eja.2024.127156</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Pedersen B. N.</surname>
<given-names>B. N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Eriksen</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Christensen</surname>
<given-names>B. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>S&#xf8;rensen</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Fertilizer replacement value and leaching of nitrogen applied to spring barley in cattle deep litter: a 3-year lysimeter study</article-title>. <source>Soil Tillage Res.</source> <volume>209</volume>, <fpage>104954</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.still.2021.104954</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Pedersen</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nyord</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Feilberg</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Labouriau</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Analysis of the effect of air temperature on ammonia emission from band application of slurry</article-title>. <source>Environ. Pollut.</source> <volume>282</volume>, <fpage>117055</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.envpol.2021.117055</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Persson</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bergstr&#xf6;m</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1991</year>). <article-title>Drilling method for collection of undisturbed soil monoliths</article-title>. <source>Soil. Sci. Soc. Am. J.</source> <volume>55</volume>, <fpage>285</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>287</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Qian</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schoenau</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>Availability of nitrogen in solid manure amendments with different C:N ratios</article-title>. <source>Can. J. Soil Sci.</source> <volume>82</volume>, <fpage>219</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>225</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4141/S01-018</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<collab>SCB</collab> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>G&#xf6;dselmedel i jordbruket 2012/2013. Mineral-och stallg&#xf6;dseltill olika gr&#xf6;dor samt hantering och lagring av stallg&#xf6;dsel. (Use of fertilisers and animal manure in agriculture in 2012/13)</article-title>. <source>Stat. Meddel. MI 30 SM</source>, <fpage>1403</fpage>. <comment>Available at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.scb.se/contentassets/211cde08daf74ac9acf844721b15ab46/mi1001_2012b13_sm_mi30sm1402.pdf">https://www.scb.se/contentassets/211cde08daf74ac9acf844721b15ab46/mi1001_2012b13_sm_mi30sm1402.pdf</ext-link>
</comment>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<collab>SCB</collab> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>G&#xf6;dselmedel i jordbruket 2018/19 Mineral-och stallg&#xf6;dsel till olika gr&#xf6;dor samt hantering och lagring av stallg&#xf6;dsel. (Use of fertilisers and animal manure in agriculture in 2018/19)</article-title>. <source>Statiska Meddel. MI 30 SM</source> <volume>1402</volume>, <fpage>156</fpage>. <comment>ISSN 1403-8978</comment>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Shepherd</surname>
<given-names>M. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Newell-Price</surname>
<given-names>J. P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>The effects of pig manure type and application timing and frequency on nitrate leaching from a seven-course arable rotation on a retentive alluvial soil</article-title>. <source>Soil Use Manag.</source> <volume>32</volume>, <fpage>117</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>126</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/sum.12223</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Smith</surname>
<given-names>K. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Beckwith</surname>
<given-names>C. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chalmers</surname>
<given-names>A. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jackson</surname>
<given-names>D. R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>Nitrate leaching following autumn and winter application of animal manures to grassland</article-title>. <source>Soil Use Manag.</source> <volume>18</volume>, <fpage>428</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>434</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1475-2743.2002.tb00262.x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>S&#xf8;rensen</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rub&#xe6;k</surname>
<given-names>G. H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Leaching of nitrate and phosphorus after autumn and spring application of separated solid animal manures to winter wheat</article-title>. <source>Soil Use Manag.</source> <volume>28</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>11</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1475-2743.2011.00382.x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Stenberg</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Aronsson</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Linden</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rydberg</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gustafson</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1999</year>). <article-title>Soil mineral nitrogen and nitrate leaching losses in soil tillage systems combined with a catch crop</article-title>. <source>Soil Tillage Res.</source> <volume>50</volume>, <fpage>115</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>125</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/s0167-1987(98)00197-4</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Svensson</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1994</year>). <article-title>A new dynamic chamber technique for measuring ammonia emissions from land-spread manure and fertilizers</article-title>. <source>Acta Agric. Scand. Sect. B&#x2013;Soil and Plant Sci.</source> <volume>44</volume>, <fpage>35</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>46</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/09064719409411255</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Svensson</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ferm</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1993</year>). <article-title>Mass transfer coefficient and equilibrium concentration as key factors in a new approach to estimate ammonia emission from livestock manure</article-title>. <source>J. Agric. Eng. Res.</source> <volume>56</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>11</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1006/jaer.1993.1056</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Thomsen</surname>
<given-names>I. K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Crop N utilization and leaching losses as affected by time and method of application of farmyard manure</article-title>. <source>Eur. J. Agron.</source> <volume>22</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>9</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.eja.2003.10.008</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wallman</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Delin</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Nitrogen leaching from tile&#x2010;drained fields and lysimeters receiving contrasting rates and sources of nitrogen</article-title>. <source>Soil Use Manage.</source> <volume>38</volume>, <fpage>596</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>610</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/sum.12724</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>