Pastoral and agro-pastoral production systems are a cornerstone of life for a substantial portion of Ethiopia’s Oromia Regional State. These pastoral and agro-pastoral (PAP) systems are practiced across eight zones: Borana, Guji, West Guji, East Bale, Bale, East Showa, West Hararghe, and East Hararghe. Encompassing 43 districts, this vast area covers 152,070 square kilometers, which translates to 43% of the Oromia region’s landmass (OPADCC, 2019 unpublished). This territory stretches from Moyale in the Borana zone to Chinaksan in the East Hararghe zone. The predominant vegetation in Oromia’s pastoral areas is savanna-type grassland and bushland. This ecosystem provides sustenance for a variety of livestock, including cattle, camels, and small ruminants like goats and sheep. These pastoral lands are scattered across the southern, southeastern, and eastern parts of the Oromia region. Compared to other regions, Oromia’s pastoral communities tend to have a lower degree of livelihood diversification, meaning their income relies heavily on pastoral activities. These communities also have a lower level of market integration, suggesting they may sell or purchase fewer goods and services compared to other areas. The spread of invasive plants like Acacia drepanolobium presents a growing threat to herders’ livelihoods (Gebremeskel et al., 2019). It outcompetes native plants, reducing grazing land and forcing herders further for forage. This weakens the ecosystem and potentially reduces crop yields, creating a cycle of declining productivity and resource limitations. The pastoral areas within both Bale zones share these characteristics with other pastoral regions in Oromia and across Ethiopia (Figure 1). The chosen districts, Rayitu, Sawena, Gura Dhamole (pastoralist) and Lagahidah, Dalo mena, and Harena Buluk (agro-pastoralist), represent a variety of ecological zones, livelihood types, and factors that might arise during a drought or border conflict. By including these diverse locations, the investigation aims to gather well-rounded information applicable to a wider range of scenarios.

This research employs a multistage purposive sampling approach to ensure the collected data accurately reflects the realities faced by pastoralists in the Bale zones, particularly regarding the impact of recurring droughts on their livelihoods (Bernard, 2017). This approach prioritizes capturing in-depth data from the most relevant populations, even though it may not be statistically generalizable to the entire Bale zone population. In the first stage, six districts were chosen purposefully, considering two key factors such as livelihood type and drought severity considerations (Scoones, 2004). Accordingly, three agro-pastoralist districts (Lagahida, Dalo mena, and Harena Buluk) and three pastoralist districts (Rayitu, Sawena, and Gura Dhamole) were selected to ensure the survey captures the experiences of both groups who may have distinct vulnerabilities and adaptation strategies during droughts. In addition, Geographic representation, and the severity of recent drought conditions within the Bale zones influenced the selection of specific districts (Mutimba and Mortimore, 2005). Therefore, districts’ experiencing more frequent or intense droughts in recent years were prioritized to ensure the sample reflects a range of drought experiences and allows for exploration of potential variations in coping mechanisms across these diverse drought conditions.

In the second stage, two villages were purposefully chosen from each of the six selected districts. Like district selection based on drought prevalence, location, and accessibility villages with a documented history of frequent or severe droughts were prioritized consulting local reports on drought occurrences from Bale zone (Gebrehiwot et al., 2011). In addition, villages were chosen from geographically diverse locations within each district to ensure the research captures potential variations in drought impacts due to factors like microclimates or proximity to water sources (Desta and Hailemariam, 2010). Moreover, ease of access for conducting the household survey was also considered to ensure logistical feasibility (Bernard, 2017). A specific Yamane’s single population proportion formula was used to determine the final sample size of households for the survey (Yemane, 1967).

n = N 1 + N ( e ) 2, where n is the sample size, N is the population size and e is the precision level at 95%CI (confidence interval) with 0.5 degrees of variability and at 7% precision level (Yemane, 1967) Population size N = 4897(No of HH of the selected Villages and accordingly 288 respondents were selected for the questionnaires.

This research employed a mixed-methods approach to comprehensively assess community-driven drought risk management strategies in Bale zones’ pastoral and agro-pastoral districts. This approach combines quantitative and qualitative data collection methods to achieve a well-rounded understanding of the topic (Creswell and Plano Clark, 2018).

The household survey, focus group discussion and key informant interview result suggests that pastoral and agro-pastoral activities remain the dominant economic drivers in the region while other livelihood strategies are on their early stage and introduced by developmental agents or organizations. In addition, the FGD and KII show that crop productions and all other income sources except livestock rearing is dominated by Youngers aged up to 35 years; while older are sticks to livestock only. The household surveys (n = 288) revealed gender imbalance, with a higher representation of male participants (80.5%) compared to females (19.9%). This imbalance is due to cultural and religious norms. In addition, at the time of data collection most of females migrated to other nearby areas and relatives taking their children while men remained at home to treat their livestock. Future research should employ strategies to ensure more balanced participation, such as conducting interviews at convenient times for women and offering childcare options.

Livelihood strategies varied, with pure pastoralists (41.8%), agro-pastoralists (40.5%), other livelihoods (11.7%), farm owners (7%), small businesses (6%) and other income sources (4.7%). Pure pastoralists group relies primarily on livestock, including cattle, goats, sheep, camels, and equines. The specific composition of herds might vary depending on cultural preferences, ecology, and market demands. Agro-pastoralists households combine livestock rearing with crop cultivation (maize, sorghum, teff, mung beans, and sesame). A small percentage reported income sources beyond pastoral and agro-pastoral activities and limited land ownership for large-scale farming. Small Businesses’ (6%) presence indicates some economic diversification.

The following Graph sheds light on the age, gender, and education levels of survey respondents in pastoral and agro-pastoral communities (Figure 2). A sizable portion of the surveyed population falls within the 18–35-year-old age range (16.1%). The younger population shows less experience coping with droughts compared to older generations. Regarding gender women make up 19.5% of the surveyed population and often play a critical role in managing household water and food security in these communities. In terms of education a substantial portion of the population (65.8%) has no formal education. This can significantly influence access to information and resources for coping with drought. Individuals with higher education (6.3%) reported better equipped to understand drought forecasts and implement mitigation strategies.

The research reveals a unanimous understanding across all communities (through surveys, FGDs, and key informant interviews) that rainfall patterns are negatively impacting livelihoods. Participants reported a decrease in rainfall, harming crop production and livestock rearing, the region’s main economic activities. Additionally, according to all FGD participants and key informants, a concerning trend of shorter rainy seasons alongside rising temperatures was observed. These findings align with existing research by Yimam and Mohammed (2016) who documented similar trends in southern Ethiopia. Furthermore, studies by Deressa et al. (2008), Bewket (2012), and Viste et al. (2012) support these observations, highlighting a broader national trend of decreasing rainfall and rising temperatures. This convergence of evidence underscores the significant challenge posed by changing climatic conditions.

The household surveys and qualitative data from key informant interviews and focus group discussions (FGDs) paint a concerning picture of increasing drought challenges in the study area. Both the frequency and spread of droughts throughout the primary and secondary rainy seasons (Genna and Hagaya) were reported as high. The years 2021 and 2022 saw extreme drought pressure across the region, with varying intensities impacting separate locations and survey results also supported these observations. A staggering 96.9% of participants reported an increase in drought frequency over the past 35 years, with over half (58.02%) experiencing annual droughts and another third (33%) feeling the impact every year. Community members, particularly elders participating in key informant interviews and FGDs, attributed this rise in drought frequency and intensity to several factors: deforestation, population growth, and overgrazing. They reminisce about a time when the area was covered by forests, and the two rainy seasons were sufficient to sustain both livestock and crops. This historical perspective sheds light on the potential causes of the current situation. Previously, communities could manage with some assistance if the expected heavy rains failed during one or both rainy seasons. However, recent droughts have become more severe and prolonged, making adaptation significantly harder. This increased variability in rainfall patterns disrupts traditional planning for the rainy season, hindering preparedness efforts. These observations align with existing research (Huho and Mugalavai, 2010; Kogan et al., 2016) highlighting the global rise in droughts. Additionally, studies by Deressa et al. (2010) and Bayissa et al. (2015) demonstrate a concerning trend of more frequent and intense droughts in Ethiopia over the past 3 decades.

Pastoralists in the study area painted a grim picture of the drought’s consequences. Key concerns included drying water sources, widespread crop failure, and livestock deaths due to lack of water and forage, and pasture degradation (Table 2). The economic impacts were equally severe, with rising food prices and plummeting livestock prices squeezing household budgets. Social issues arose as well, with children forced to drop out of school due to hardship. The rising temperatures further exacerbated the situation, contributing to poor human health and livestock infections. These impacts intensified during the recent drought period (2019–2022) and similar years preceding it. The burden of supporting the affected communities stretched beyond pastoral and agro-pastoral households. The government, NGOs, individuals, private sectors, and even the Ethiopian diaspora all felt the strain of helping in these drought-stricken areas. The study shows a grim scenario where drought has decimated livestock herds, a crucial source of income contributing to the country’s GDP. Crop failures further compound the issue, jeopardizing food security.

Focus group discussions with community leaders and elders confirmed the widespread prevalence of the previously mentioned impacts. For instance, due to children dropping out of school and water scarcity, satellite schools were forced to close during the drought years of 2019–2022. This highlights the disruption to education caused by drought. Furthermore, the lack of water during prolonged dry seasons leads to frequent outbreaks of waterborne illnesses like diarrhea. Survey data provided a quantitative perspective on the severity of these impacts. All respondents (99.7% and 99.2% respectively) rated pasture deterioration and water scarcity as having a remarkably high impact during drought years. These factors significantly affect livestock health and survival, with 98.2% of respondents reporting extremely high livestock death rates due to drought. The economic consequences are equally concerning for 94.6% and 90.5% of respondents experiencing severe food scarcity and a decrease in household income.

The long dry season and drought years exacerbate these issues. According to key informant interview a huge portion of respondents (73.7%, 86.5%, and 97.5%) reported a high impact on health, household income, and food insecurity respectively during these extended dry periods. While less prevalent, other drought-related issues such as population migration (56.5%), unemployment (63.85%), conflict over resources (40.7%), and child school dropout (82.3%) were still considered to have a high impact by a substantial portion of the population. This data paints a clear picture of the devastating impact of drought on pastoral communities in the study area. It affects not only their livelihoods and wellbeing but also disrupts social structures and educational opportunities.

This situation aligns with a study by Bekele and Amsalu, 2012 exploring the impact of drought on Karrayyu pastoralists in the Fantale woredas. The study underscores the critical importance of understanding drought’s effects for all stakeholders involved in developing and implementing measures to mitigate its consequences (Pandey and Bhandari, 2009; Catley et al., 2021). By acknowledging the severity of the problem, relevant parties can work together to create effective solutions that protect these communities and their way of life. In addition, this finding aligns with existing research on the social and economic impacts of drought in various regions (Bekele, 2012; Lekapana, 2013; Kogan and Guo, 2016; Udmale et al., 2014; Menghistu et al., 2018), highlighting the widespread challenges faced by communities across the globe.

The below Table 3 shows the potential impact of drought on various aspects of women’s lives in Bale’s pastoral and agro pastoral communities. Drought significantly increases the workload for women, particularly in water collection (70%) and food management (60%). With more time spent fetching water (40%), other aspects of their lives can be strained. This strain is further compounded by reduced food availability (60%), potentially leading to higher malnutrition rates (40%) for both women and children. Utilizing drought-resistant crops (25%) and food preservation techniques (40%) were crucial coping mechanisms in these situations. Disruptions to traditional livelihoods (50%) force women to seek alternative income sources. Developing small businesses (30%) and joining income-generating groups (25%) are potential strategies. However, access to microloans or grants (20%) was limited, hindering their ability to establish these income sources. Limited water access (60%) increases the risk of waterborne illnesses (60%). Water treatment (50%) and prioritizing hygiene (70%) are essential coping mechanisms. However, only 40% have access to healthcare services, highlighting a potential gap in support systems. The increased workload limited women’s participation in household decision-making (20%), potentially reducing their influence on resource allocation during drought. Reduced access to nutritious food (40%) was leading to nutritional deficiencies and dietary diversification (35%) and rationing (60%) were potential coping mechanisms.

The increased pressure on women (20%) due to these various burdens can indirectly impact girls’ education. Advocating for girls’ education (30%) and seeking support for childcare (20%) could help mitigate this impact. Encouraging girls’ participation in household tasks that are compatible with education (15%) might also be beneficial. Finally, the increased stress and anxiety (30%) due to various burdens highlight the need for social support from other women or family members.

The findings in this table align with existing research on the gendered impacts of drought in pastoral communities. For instance, studies by Scheelbeek et al., 2021; Awiti, 2022 highlight how drought disproportionately increases women’s workload, particularly in water collection and food management. This is further supported by Akpalu, D.A., 2005; Anbacha,and Kjosavik, 2019 who emphasizes the pressure on women to ensure household food security during times of drought. In addition, this aligns with Pukunyiem, 2020 who argues that women often play a crucial role in income generation during droughts, particularly through small-scale businesses and income-generating groups. Moreover, aligns with Moser (1998) who emphasizes how crises can exacerbate existing gender inequalities. Furthermore, this is supported by Moser and Felton (2010) who discuss how girls are often pulled out of school to help with household chores during crises.

Pastoral communities represented respondents (100%) perceive reduced grazing land and water resources, leading to a high prevalence of livestock mortality (60%) and potential decreases in milk production (50%) and breeding cycles (50%). Most (80%) experience increased pressure on resources and overgrazing, with 40% facing social conflicts due to competition (Table 4). Significant income loss from livestock sales (70%) is another challenge. The coping mechanisms employed by pastoral communities focus on mobility (herding animals to distant pastures) for 50% of respondents, and collaborative grazing management for 30%. To manage livestock health, destocking weak animals (40%) and using drought-resistant fodder (25%) are utilized. Sharing resources and cooperation within communities are also important (20%). Like pastoral communities, most agro-pastoral communities (80%) perceive reduced grazing land and water resources. High percentages experience crop failure and reduced yields (90%), leading to increased reliance on livestock (reflected in the 60% who perceive difficult choices regarding selling livestock for food). Livestock mortality (50%) and decreased milk production (40%) are also concerns, though social conflicts are a potential concern for a smaller portion (20%) compared to pastoral communities. The majority (70%) report increased pressure on resources and overgrazing, with half (50%) perceiving increased vulnerability. Agro-pastoral communities utilize mobility for livestock less frequently (30%) due to potential limitations on suitable grazing areas. Collaborative grazing management (20%) and destocking (30%) are still practiced. Utilizing drought-resistant crops is a potential strategy (20%) under practice with a lower percentage of community members (model farmers). Diversifying income sources (40%) and seeking external support (food aid) (30%) are part of crucial strategies for these communities.

The general output demonstrates strong parallels with existing research on how droughts differentially impact pastoral and agro-pastoral communities. For pastoral communities, the perceived near-universal reduction in grazing land and water resources (100%) aligns with studies by Tolera, and Senbeta, (2020) highlighting how droughts force pastoralists to travel further for sustenance. Similarly, the high prevalence of perceived livestock mortality (60%) echoes is in line with Anbacha, and Kjosavik, 2019 work on the devastating impact of drought on livestock wealth and food security. The potential for social conflicts due to competition (40%) resonates with Jury, and Vaux, (2007) emphasis on how crises can exacerbate existing tensions over scarce resources.

The consolidated findings from surveys, focus group discussions (FGDs), and key informant interviews (KIIs) offer valuable insights into the community’s current comprehension of anticipatory action, their perception of existing risks, preparedness capacity, and willingness to collaborate on enhancing a proactive approach towards drought mitigation. Respondents observed that anticipatory action involves utilizing early warning systems to prompt pre-planned interventions aimed at protecting families and their assets prior to a disaster. Participants indicated a readiness to proactively respond to drought warnings by implementing pre-established measures such as distributing drought-resistant seeds, selling livestock before market prices drop, or securing access to alternative water sources.

This proactive strategy enhances community resilience by emphasizing two critical capabilities. Firstly, it involves the ability to anticipate risks through pre-emptive assessment of potential drought threats, enabling the development of appropriate mitigation strategies. Secondly, communities are encouraged to prepare and adjust by providing them with tools and resources to make informed decisions amidst uncertain future risks. Adopting anticipatory action enables communities to shift from a reactive to a proactive stance, facilitating the preservation of lives, protection of assets, and minimization of overall disaster impact, thereby fostering a more secure and resilient future.

Resource management emerges as a vital component of community survival, with most participants (90%) engaging in early livestock grazing practices to optimize resource use and animal wellbeing (Table 5). Similarly, adjusting planting schedules based on rainfall patterns is universal (92%). These practices highlight the community’s pragmatic and adaptable approach towards resource utilization. Furthermore, a substantial percentage (60%) rely on traditional methods such as constructing open ponds (62.8%) and strategic migration for water and forage (81.9%). The widespread adoption of communal enclosures (96.5%) reflects the community’s adaptability to evolving environmental and social challenges. Additionally, a sizable portion (over 60%) utilize livestock distribution across zones (61.7%) and alternative feed sources like evergreen tree leaves (75%) to supplement grazing resources. This find is inconsistent with research report of Duguma and Janssens, 2021 on assessment of livestock feed resources and coping strategies with dry season feed scarcity in mixed crop–livestock farming systems Agriculture is essential for ensuring food security, with over 80% of individuals cultivating drought-resistant crops such as sorghum and millet (Table 6). The majority also prioritize short-season, high-yielding varieties of these crops, with over 90% adjusting sowing times to optimize planting based on weather patterns. Additionally, 60% of communities adopt improved crop varieties and practice intercropping to further enhance yield and soil health.

In addition to recovery programs, livelihood diversification plays a crucial role in providing a safety net during droughts (Table 7). A significant majority (over 60%) of community members engage in alternative income sources such as petty trade or transportation services (63.1%), displaying their entrepreneurial mindset. This is further supported by robust social safety nets within the communities, with many individuals adapting their livelihoods (83%) and seeking refuge with relatives in less affected areas (48.2%) during times of crisis. Another prevalent strategy is the distribution of family labor across various activities (54.6%), further reinforcing the community’s resilience is moderately prevalent (40%–60%).

The household surveys, key informant interviews, and focus group discussions conducted in the study area have revealed a worsening drought situation, with high frequency and spread reported during both the primary and secondary rainy seasons in 2021 and 2022. The survey results indicate a significant 96.9% increase in drought frequency over the past 35 years, with more than half of the participants experiencing annual droughts. These findings are consistent with previous research by Huho and Mugalavai (2010) and Kogan et al. (2016) that highlight a global rise in droughts, as well as studies by Deressa et al. (2008) and Bayissa et al. (2017) showing more frequent and intense droughts in Ethiopia. The changing rainfall patterns have had a negative impact on livelihoods, with decreased overall rainfall harming crop production and livestock rearing (Bekele, 2015). Additionally, participants have noted shorter rainy seasons and rising temperatures, which align with research by Yimam and Mohammed (2016), Deressa et al. (2008), Bewket (2012), and Viste et al. (2013) indicating a national trend of decreasing rainfall and increasing temperatures.

Droughts in Bale zones of Ethiopia disproportionately burden women in pastoral and agro-pastoral communities. In support of this finding, the studies by Cruikshank, 2010, and Quandt (2019) show a significant increase in their workload, particularly for water collection and food management, straining their time and resources. Ngoc et al. (2023) further highlight that droughts heighten the risk of malnutrition and waterborne diseases for women and children due to biological vulnerabilities and caregiving roles. The study has also revealed a diversity of perspectives among pastoral communities regarding drought causation, with approximately 60% of participants viewing drought solely as a natural phenomenon, 31% attributing drought entirely to human activities, and the remaining 9% acknowledging the interplay of both natural and human-induced factors. Pastoral households in the Bale zone heavily rely on traditional methods for weather forecasting and drought prediction, with a reported reliance of 90.5% on traditional knowledge systems, Abate, 2016; McOmber, 2020 reported inconsistent concept in southern ethiopia and africa. The study also suggests an 85% accuracy rate in weather forecasting using traditional methods, although implementation by communities is around 58.8%. These findings underscore the importance of how pastoral communities interpret the natural world around them and align with research by Abarufa (2011), Svoboda et al., 2011 and Khetran et al. (2012) suggesting animals can detect storms and exhibit specific pre-emptive behaviors.

The study delves into the potential for a change in thinking in how Bale communities approach drought mitigation with the concept of anticipatory action, which leverages early warning systems to trigger pre-planned interventions before a disaster unfolds that in line with Anita et al., 2010; Abdela 2022 finding. The study suggests that communities are open to moving beyond a reactive stance of simply waiting for droughts to arrive, instead utilizing early warnings to activate pre-established actions like the concept reported by Desta, 2013. The finding that over 62.8% of respondents participate in preparing ponds in the study area aligns with Agrawal, and Saberwal, 2004 research on communal resource management in pastoral societies, showcasing the communal effort and cultural tradition of Bale communities. Additionally, the high prevalence of migration (81.9%) as the primary coping mechanism during hardships underscores the crucial role seasonal migration plays in ensuring the survival of pastoral communities during harsh climatic conditions, aligning with existing research by Hasan (2008), Bekele and Amsalu, 2012, Abdulatife and Ebro (2015), and Teshome (2016), as well as research by Ellis and Freeman (2004) and Leweri (2022). Moreover, the study highlights a shift away from traditional communal migration practices towards individual approaches like enclosure due to the decreasing availability of grazing land in the Bale lowlands, with 96.5% of respondents ranking individual migration as the most common strategy. This reflects the challenges faced by pastoral communities, with government directives potentially contributing to the shift. Additionally, splitting livestock into different areas and employing a zonal livestock distribution strategy can minimize overall herd losses during droughts, aligning with research by Kurukulasuriya and Rosenthal (2013), Hassan (2008), Abate, et al., 2009 and Huho et al. (2011) on the benefits of diversification in promoting the long-term sustainability of the rangeland ecosystem.

The research highlights the crucial role of herd diversification among pastoral communities in the Bale lowlands, enabling them to cope with harsh environmental conditions and adapt to a changing climate, as emphasized by researchers Ifejika (2010), Teshome (2016), and Rojas et al. (2017). To combat drought, Bale pastoral communities demonstrate remarkable innovation by cultivating drought-resistant crops, adopting intercropping techniques, and prioritizing female-dominated herds for long-term herd recovery. These strategies showcase their commitment to food security. This strategy, supported by research from Vandermeer (1992), Degefa, 2008 and Ayanlade et al. (2018), serves as a form of crop insurance and enhances productivity while mitigating risks associated with monoculture cropping systems. The study also reveals a shift towards agro-pastoralism among Bale pastoral communities, integrating crop cultivation into their practices to diversify livelihoods and address challenges such as population growth and environmental change, in line with research by Degefa, 2008,Lenaiyasa et al. (2020) and Alary et al. (2022).

The research in Bale zone southeast Ethiopia, reveals a unanimous understanding across communities: declining rainfall patterns are negatively impacting livelihoods. This decreases, alongside rising temperatures, aligns with existing national and global trends. Both surveys and qualitative data paint a concerning picture of intensifying droughts. Droughts are increasing in frequency and intensity, disrupting traditional agricultural practices. Community elders attribute this shift to deforestation and overgrazing, highlighting potential causes demanding further investigation.

Water source depletion, widespread crop failures, and livestock deaths due to lack of water and forage have crippled livelihoods. Social issues like school dropouts and health problems exacerbate the situation. Drought decimates livestock herds, a crucial economic pillar, and jeopardizes food security through crop failures. Survey data quantifies the severity, with near-unanimous reports of extremely high impacts on pasture, water scarcity, and livestock death rates. The economic consequences concern a vast majority experiencing severe food scarcity and income decline. While less prevalent, issues like population migration, unemployment, conflict, and school dropout still hold a high impact for a substantial portion of the population. Focus groups with leaders reveal animal mortality, food scarcity, and water scarcity as top concerns, highlighting the profound impact on the foundation of pastoral life. The situation worsens during prolonged dry seasons, with some resorting to migration that can lead to conflict.

Drought disproportionately burdens Bale’s pastoral women. Workloads surge in water collection and food management. Malnutrition risk rises for women and children due to reduced food availability. Women seek alternative income, but limited access to microloans hinders efforts. Water scarcity increases waterborne illness risk, highlighting the need for improved water treatment and sanitation. Increased workload also reduces women’s decision-making power and access to nutritious food.

The study reveals significant impacts of drought on both pastoral and agro-pastoral communities in Bale. Reduced grazing land and water scarcity cripple livelihoods, leading to high livestock mortality and declining milk production. Pastoral communities face intense pressure and potential conflict due to overgrazing. Both groups experience income loss, but agro-pastoralists are additionally burdened by crop failure, forcing difficult choices. Mobility, destocking, collaborative grazing, and resource sharing are crucial coping mechanisms, with agro-pastoralists also utilizing drought-resistant crops and income diversification.

Human contributions like population growth and deforestation contribute to droughts in Bale. However, community perceptions vary, with some attributing drought solely to natural factors while others acknowledge human influence. Bale’s pastoralists rely heavily (90.5%) on traditional methods for weather forecasting (animal behavior, plants, stars,etc.) passed down through generations. Modern methods play a minor role. This study highlights the value of combining traditional knowledge with science for better drought preparedness.

The study highlights a shift towards proactive drought mitigation in Bale communities. They value early warnings and envision using them to take pre-emptive actions like distributing drought-resistant seeds or securing water sources. This proactive approach focuses on understanding potential threats and being prepared to adapt. Bale’s pastoralists display remarkable resilience against droughts through a multifaceted approach. They leverage seasonal migration and strategic herd management to secure water, pasture, and animal health. This includes diversifying herds with drought-resistant species and strategically selling livestock before droughts. Furthermore, over 97% cultivate drought-resistant crops, employing intercropping techniques to maximize resources. These findings highlight the pastoral communities’ deep understanding of their environment, resourcefulness, and long-term planning for the wellbeing of their herds and communities.

The study’s findings paint a clear picture of the challenges faced by Bale’s pastoral communities–a relentless cycle of drought exacerbated by water scarcity. Based on these insights, the following recommendations are proposed to enhance community resilience and promote long-term sustainability.