<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="EN" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Environ. Sci.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Environmental Science</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Environ. Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">2296-665X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">1123510</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fenvs.2023.1123510</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Environmental Science</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Short-term effects of increasing compost application rates on soil C and greenhouse gas (N<sub>2</sub>O and CO<sub>2</sub>) emissions in a California central coast vineyard</article-title>
<alt-title alt-title-type="left-running-head">Wong et al.</alt-title>
<alt-title alt-title-type="right-running-head">
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2023.1123510">10.3389/fenvs.2023.1123510</ext-link>
</alt-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Wong</surname>
<given-names>Connie T. F.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001">&#x2a;</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2134215/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Falcone</surname>
<given-names>Mia</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2189206/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Rich</surname>
<given-names>Geovan</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Stubler</surname>
<given-names>Craig</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Malama</surname>
<given-names>Bwalya</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lazcano</surname>
<given-names>Cristina</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/254034/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Decock</surname>
<given-names>Charlotte</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/955265/overview"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
<institution>Department of Land, Air and Water Resources</institution>, <institution>University of California, Davis</institution>, <addr-line>Davis, CA</addr-line>, <country>United States</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
<institution>Natural Resources Management and Environmental Sciences Department</institution>, <institution>California Polytechnic State University</institution>, <addr-line>San LuisObispo</addr-line>, <addr-line>CA</addr-line>, <country>United States</country>
</aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>
<bold>Edited by:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1533313/overview">Xiaobo Qin</ext-link>, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS), China</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>
<bold>Reviewed by:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1272427/overview">Jiaogen Zhou</ext-link>, Huaiyin Normal University, China</p>
<p>
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/188605/overview">Jinyang Wang</ext-link>, Nanjing Agricultural University, China</p>
</fn>
<corresp id="c001">&#x2a;Correspondence: Connie T. F. Wong, <email>ctfwong@ucdavis.edu</email>
</corresp>
<fn fn-type="other">
<p>This article was submitted to Soil Processes, a section of the journal Frontiers in Environmental Science</p>
</fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>11</day>
<month>04</month>
<year>2023</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2023</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>11</volume>
<elocation-id>1123510</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>14</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2022</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>28</day>
<month>02</month>
<year>2023</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#xa9; 2023 Wong, Falcone, Rich, Stubler, Malama, Lazcano and Decock.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2023</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Wong, Falcone, Rich, Stubler, Malama, Lazcano and Decock</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>Compost application is commonly considered by winegrape producers to improve soil health while sequestering carbon (C) and mitigating climate change. However, inputs of available C and nitrogen (N) as nutrients can induce emissions of greenhouse gases (GHG) such as carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) and nitrous oxide (N<sub>2</sub>O). A 2-year field experiment in a Mediterranean vineyard on the California Central Coast was conducted to investigate the short-term effects of compost application at four different rates on soil C dynamics and greenhouse gas emissions. Two years of greenhouse gas sampling were performed using static chambers at vineyard management events in two functional locations (tractor row and under the vines). Soil samples were collected annually in spring at the same locations at 0&#x2013;15, 15&#x2013;30 and 30&#x2013;60&#xa0;cm depth, and during greenhouse gas sampling at 0&#x2013;15&#xa0;cm. The increasing compost application rate did not increase soil C stock, cumulative greenhouse gas emissions and global warming potential. The increase in active soil C observed to the depth of 60&#xa0;cm suggests that increasing the compost application rate up to the rate of 13.5&#xa0;Mg&#xa0;ha<sup>-1</sup> year<sup>-1</sup> can facilitate the early stages of C stabilization and sequestration. Compost application did not have a significant effect on grape yield or cover crop growth during the study. Our results provided important information on the potential environmental tradeoffs as greenhouse gas emissions from compost applications, which should be taken into account when considering the vineyard C budget.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>GHG</kwd>
<kwd>greenhouse gas</kwd>
<kwd>GWP</kwd>
<kwd>global warming potential</kwd>
<kwd>carbon sequestration</kwd>
<kwd>compost application</kwd>
<kwd>soil health</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<contract-num rid="cn001">17&#x2013;0624-000-HS</contract-num>
<contract-num rid="cn002">19&#x2013;03-104</contract-num>
<contract-sponsor id="cn001">California Department of Food and Agriculture<named-content content-type="fundref-id">10.13039/100006759</named-content>
</contract-sponsor>
<contract-sponsor id="cn002">Agricultural Research Institute, California State University<named-content content-type="fundref-id">10.13039/100011956</named-content>
</contract-sponsor>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="s1">
<title>1 Introduction</title>
<p>Over the past decades, soils have been increasingly suffering from erosion loss, or threatened by problems related to human activities and agricultural production (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Marras et al., 2015</xref>). Many regional, national and international incentives aimed at promoting conservation of soil health and mitigating climate change have been introduced to the industry in recent years, including the international &#x201c;4 per 1000&#x201d; initiative announced at the Climate Summit in France in 2015 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Minasny et al., 2017</xref>), and the Healthy Soils Program launched by the California Department of Food and Agriculture (CDFA) in 2017 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">Ross, 2016</xref>). Under these initiatives, many conventional cropping systems across the globe began to adopt management practices that promote soil organic matter (SOM), soil carbon (C) sequestration and potentially mitigate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">Paustian et al., 2019</xref>).</p>
<p>Grapevine cultivation for winemaking has long been rooted in European culture and has vastly expanded worldwide (International Organization of Vine and Wine, 2017); as of 2021, there are more than 300,000&#xa0;ha of harvested grapevines in California according to the CDFA. Traditional vineyard operations require intensive agricultural practices, most notably the use of mechanical tillage and the application of synthetic fertilizers, herbicides, or pesticides. The deterioration of vineyard soil is evident in literature, with observed trends of soil erosion, organic matter depletion, and loss of biodiversity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Le Bissonnais et al., 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Mart&#xed;nez-Casasnovas et al., 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Kom&#xe1;rek et al., 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">Polge de Combret - Champart et al., 2013</xref>), and is particularly threatening vineyard soil health and functions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B60">Salom&#xe9; et al., 2016</xref>). Efforts to restore and improve health and productivity of vineyard soils are therefore of utmost importance to maintain sustainability of this cropping system.</p>
<p>Compared to annual crops, perennial grapevines have a larger potential for C sequestration (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B73">Carlisle et al., 2010</xref>). The woody biomass and extensive deep root systems in grapevines provide a great soil C storage potential (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Kroodsma and Field, 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Agnelli et al., 2014</xref>), which can be further enhanced with appropriate soil management practices (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Lal, 2011</xref>). In vineyards, compost application is a common soil and nutrient management practice that is often used to provide a direct input of C and other nutrients to the soil (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Lal, 2004</xref>). The addition of C triggers an increase in microbial activity which promotes aggregate formation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B62">Six et al., 2004</xref>), thereby facilitating stabilization and sequestration of C. A large amount of scientific literature has shown the positive effects of compost application on not only SOM and C sequestration (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">Pinamonti, 1998</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Korboulewsky et al., 2002</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Morlat and Chaussod, 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Brown and Cotton, 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">Mugnai et al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">Peregrina et al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">Rubio et al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Calleja-Cervantes et al., 2015a</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Calleja-Cervantes et al., 2015b</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Gaiotti et al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">Mondini et al., 2018</xref>), but also other chemical and physical properties such as nutrient availability, moisture retention, and aggregate stability (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Morlat and Chaussod, 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Calleja-Cervantes et al., 2015a</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Calleja-Cervantes et al., 2015b</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B53">Ramos, 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">Mondini et al., 2018</xref>). Increases in soil stabilized C can have a lasting effect after one single compost application (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B59">Ryals et al., 2014</xref>) or repetitive annual additions of compost over two decades (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Morlat and Chaussod, 2008</xref>). Moreover, positive effects on other soil C sequestration indicators that are sensitive to management-induced changes, such as permanganate oxidizable carbon (POXC) and mineralizable C (Min C), can be observed in short term (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Culman et al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Hannam et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Hurisso et al., 2016</xref>). Long-term compost application can result in an increase in the large macroaggregate (LM) fraction, reflecting the tendency of C sequestration (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Liu et al., 2021</xref>). It can be assumed that increasing compost application rate increases SOM, and hence provides more soil health benefits and leads to an increase in C sequestration, until the soil reaches an equilibrium where C inputs are roughly equal to losses through mineralization processes after long-term practice (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Morlat and Chaussod, 2008</xref>).</p>
<p>However, the labile organic C addition from compost application can potentially result in the subsequent increase of microbial activity and release of carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Calleja-Cervantes et al., 2015a</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Calleja-Cervantes et al., 2015b</xref>) and nitrous oxide (N<sub>2</sub>O) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Bustamante et al., 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Lazcano et al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B67">Verhoeven et al., 2017</xref>). Aerobic nitrification of ammonium (NH<sub>4</sub>
<sup>&#x2b;</sup>) to nitrate (NO<sub>3</sub>
<sup>&#x2212;</sup>) and anaerobic denitrification are the two main processes that produce nitrous oxide (N<sub>2</sub>O) as a by-product, and are greatly dependent on oxygen, moisture contents and water filled pore space (WFPS; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B67">Verhoeven et al., 2017</xref>). These drivers of soil N<sub>2</sub>O emissions are often affected by agricultural management practices, such as fertilization and irrigation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">Oertel et al., 2016</xref>). N<sub>2</sub>O emissions have been found to increase with increasing soil mineral nitrogen (N) concentration following fertilizer application (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Dobbie et al., 1999</xref>). While perennial crops such as grapevines can act as C storage facilities and climate change mitigating systems, the results from these studies suggest that the use of compost in vineyards may have short-term environmental tradeoffs between soil health benefits and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Lazcano et al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Cheng et al., 2015</xref>). These environmental tradeoffs may be influenced by compost application rate (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Fabrizio et al., 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Mart&#xed;nez-Blanco et al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Chenu et al., 2019</xref>).</p>
<p>Here we evaluated whether the soil health benefits from compost application increase with increasing application rates, and whether these benefits observed in a vineyard soil outweigh the potential environmental impacts in the form of GHG emissions, by investigating 1) soil C dynamics, 2) N<sub>2</sub>O and CO<sub>2</sub> emissions and global warming potential (GWP), and 3) cover crop C and N contents, and grape yield after two annual compost applications. We hypothesized that total soil C stocks would not change after two years of compost application, due to the short-term treatments and the low input of C compared to the initial soil C content. However, POXC, Min C and aggregate stability were expected to increase with increasing compost application rate, indicating a trend toward C stabilization, and an increase in microbial activity. We expected no significant differences in GHG emissions between treatments. We further hypothesized that the increase in compost application rate would increase cover crop growth after two compost applications, while grape yield would remain unaffected.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="materials|methods" id="s2">
<title>2 Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="s2-1">
<title>2.1 Field site description</title>
<p>This study was conducted in a commercial vineyard (<italic>Vitis vinifera</italic>, var. Cabernet Sauvignon) located in the Paso Robles American Viticultural Area (AVA), California between October 2018&#x2014;November 2020 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1</xref>). This region has a warm Mediterranean climate with hot, dry summers; the average temperature and annual precipitation of the region are 18&#xb0;C and 385&#xa0;mm, respectively. During the experimental period, the recorded average temperature at the site was 15.1&#xb0;C with an average annual precipitation of 318&#xa0;mm (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2</xref>). The experimental site location has both the San Ysidro series (Fine, smectitic, thermic Typic Palexerolls) and the Arbuckle-San Ysidro complex, which consists of 40% of Arbuckle series (Fine-loamy, mixed, superactive, thermic Typic Haploxeralfs) and 20% of San Ysidro series (Soil Survey Staff, 2021). The soil texture is sandy loam, with 20% clay and 40% sand. The average bulk densities are 1.24 and 1.45&#xa0;g&#xa0;cm<sup>-3</sup> at 0&#x2013;15 and 15&#x2013;30&#xa0;cm depth respectively, based on our pre-treatment baseline measurements.</p>
<fig id="F1" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 1</label>
<caption>
<p>A geographical map of the field site located in Paso Robles, CA, and a schematic of the experimental design of the study illustrating the sampling area and the functional locations.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fenvs-11-1123510-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig id="F2" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 2</label>
<caption>
<p>Precipitation and temperature recorded at the experimental site over the course of the study.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fenvs-11-1123510-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>The grafted vines at this site are clone eight Cabernet Sauvignon on 5C rootstock planted in 1989. Vines are arranged in rows with a spacing of 1.8&#xa0;m between vines and 3&#xa0;m between rows. Cover crop consisted of 15% foxtail (<italic>Bromus hordeaceus</italic>) and 85% Zorro Fescue (<italic>Vulpia myuros</italic>) and was allowed to reseed naturally every year. The vineyard was under no-till management and drip irrigation. No fertilizers were added to the experimental site during the project timeline, while herbicides were sprayed under the vines as needed.</p>
<p>The experimental setup was a randomized complete block design with four blocks and four treatments randomly distributed within each block: 0 (control), 4.5, 9.0, and 13.5&#xa0;Mg&#xa0;ha<sup>-1</sup> year<sup>-1</sup> (fresh weight) compost application rates, resulting in a total of 16 plots. The selection of treatments was based on the CDFA Healthy Soils Incentives Program recommendation for compost application on tree crops with compost C:N ratios of &#x2264;11, the practical range of compost application rate commonly found in the area, and the local growers&#x2019; concern of excessive soil N level caused by high compost application rates based on personal communication with growers and vineyard advisors in the region. The plots were 55&#xa0;m long and 9&#xa0;m wide, including four rows of 30 vines and three interrow areas (tractor rows) each, with a total plot area of 485&#xa0;m<sup>2</sup>. Soil, GHG, cover crop and grape sampling were only done in the two middle vine rows and the middle tractor row, with two sampling (functional) locations designated as under the vines, and the tractor row.</p>
<p>Organic compost (certified through CDFA&#x2019;s Organic Input Materials Program) used in this study was made of processed livestock manure and green waste, with a C:N ratio of about 9&#x2013;10. (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>). In year 1, the compost was applied between harvest and the first occurrence of fall precipitation, on November 9th and 10th, 2018. In year 2, compost was applied on 10 January 2020. Compost was broadcasted over the entire vineyard floor.</p>
<table-wrap id="T1" position="float">
<label>TABLE 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Properties of the certified organic compost applied in November 2018 (Year 1) and January 2020 (Year 2). Values represent the dry weight of each nutrient contained in the compost.</p>
</caption>
<table>
<thead valign="top">
<tr>
<th align="left"/>
<th align="right">Year 1</th>
<th align="right">Year 2</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td align="left">C:N ratio</td>
<td align="right">10</td>
<td align="right">9.1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Organic matter</td>
<td align="right">32.6%</td>
<td align="right">34.9%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Organic C</td>
<td align="right">15.0%</td>
<td align="right">14.0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Total Nitrogen (N)</td>
<td align="right">1.5%</td>
<td align="right">1.6%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Phosphorus (P as P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub>)</td>
<td align="right">1.2%</td>
<td align="right">1.4%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Potassium (K as K<sub>2</sub>O)</td>
<td align="right">1.8%</td>
<td align="right">1.8%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Calcium (Ca)</td>
<td align="right">2.6%</td>
<td align="right">3.0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Magnesium (Mg)</td>
<td align="right">1.6%</td>
<td align="right">1.6%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Sodium (Na)</td>
<td align="right">0.38%</td>
<td align="right">0.31%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Chloride (Cl)</td>
<td align="right">0.42%</td>
<td align="right">0.41%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Sulfur (SO<sub>4</sub>
<sup>2-</sup>-S)</td>
<td align="right">550&#xa0;mg/kg</td>
<td align="right">420&#xa0;mg/kg</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Total Boron (B)</td>
<td align="right">30&#xa0;mg/kg</td>
<td align="right">30&#xa0;mg/kg</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Copper (Cu)</td>
<td align="right">52&#xa0;mg/kg</td>
<td align="right">62&#xa0;mg/kg</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Iron (Fe)</td>
<td align="right">16,000&#xa0;mg/kg</td>
<td align="right">19,000&#xa0;mg/kg</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Lead (Pb)</td>
<td align="right">5.0&#xa0;mg/kg</td>
<td align="right">4.4&#xa0;mg/kg</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Manganese (Mn)</td>
<td align="right">390&#xa0;mg/kg</td>
<td align="right">430/kg</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-2">
<title>2.2 Soil and plant sampling</title>
<p>Soil samples were collected from the two functional locations of each plot on April 23&#x2013;24th, 2018 to establish baseline soil data prior to compost application, and subsequently on April 10th, 2019 and April 24th, 2020, for analysis of treatment effects. Soil samples were collected at depths of 0&#x2013;15&#xa0;cm, 15&#x2013;30&#xa0;cm and 30&#x2013;60&#xa0;cm. Additionally, topsoil samples were collected at the 0&#x2013;15&#xa0;cm depth during GHG sampling for determination of WFPS (the volumetric ratio of soil water content to porosity) and plant-available N (ammonium, NH<sub>4</sub>
<sup>&#x2b;</sup>-N, and nitrate, NO<sub>3</sub>
<sup>&#x2212;</sup>-N) concentrations. All soil samples were transferred to the soil laboratory and stored at 4&#xb0;C for analysis.</p>
<p>A sampling of cover crop aboveground biomass occurred immediately before the mowing event in spring 2019 using a 1&#xa0;m<sup>2</sup> quadrant, and the samples were transported to the lab for biomass (2019 only) and total C and N content measurements. Grapes were harvested on October 19th, 2019, and October 17th, 2020, at approximately 23 &#xb0;Brix. All clusters from ten randomly selected vines were hand-picked. The average number of clusters per vine and the average fresh weight of cluster per vine were determined to calculate grape yield in ton&#xa0;ha<sup>-1</sup>. Around 250 individual berries were randomly collected from vines within the sampling areas to determine average fresh berry weight.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-3">
<title>2.3 GHG flux measurements and global warming potential (GWP) calculations</title>
<p>Gas samples were collected on the day before and 4&#xa0;days after main management events (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B66">Verhoeven and Six, 2014</xref>). Fluxes were assessed through the static chamber technique (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Hutchinson and Mosier, 1981</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Parkin and Venterea, 2010</xref>), where 20&#xa0;mL of gas samples were taken at 15-min intervals (0, 15, 30, and 45&#xa0;min after closure of chamber) using an air-tight polypropylene syringe. Temperatures within the closed chambers were measured by a Fisherbrand&#x2122; Traceable&#x2122; total-range thermocouple thermometer (Pittsburgh, PA, United States). Gas samples were stored in pre-evacuated 12-mL glass Exetainers<sup>&#xae;</sup> vials (Labco, Buckinghamshire, England), and analyzed using Shimadzu GC-2014&#xa0;Ga Chromatograph (GC; Columbia, MD, United States). Fluxes of CO<sub>2</sub> (kg CO<sub>2</sub>-C ha<sup>-1</sup>&#xa0;day<sup>-1</sup>) and N<sub>2</sub>O (g N<sub>2</sub>O-N ha<sup>-1</sup>&#xa0;day<sup>-1</sup>) were calculated using the ideal gas law based on the chamber temperature, volume, and surface area. The fluxes of both gases were set to zero if the difference between maximum and minimum concentrations measured during chamber closure was smaller than the detection limit.</p>
<p>Linear and non-linear regressions were computed to determine the flux value, and the latter used the quadratic output of the LINEST function in Excel (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B66">Verhoeven and Six, 2014</xref>). Daily CO<sub>2</sub> and N<sub>2</sub>O fluxes were used to calculate cumulative area-scaled CO<sub>2</sub> and N<sub>2</sub>O emissions using trapezoidal integration of fluxes <italic>versus</italic> time, assuming that the changes of fluxes were linear between measurement dates. The reported cumulative emissions of CO<sub>2</sub> and N<sub>2</sub>O were determined by season. We defined that the dry season started on the first day of cover crop mowing (early to mid-April) and overlapped with the vine growing season (April&#x2013;October), while the wet season started after the harvest event (November&#x2013;March) when the associated N<sub>2</sub>O fluxes had subsided to background level, overlapping with vine dormancy.</p>
<p>Net global warming potential (GWP) was calculated using the changes in soil C stock (&#x394;SOC) over the 2-year experimental period and cumulative annual N<sub>2</sub>O emissions transformed, both converted to CO<sub>2</sub> equivalents (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B62">Six et al., 2004</xref>). The &#x394;SOC and N<sub>2</sub>O emissions were adjusted based on the area occupied by tractor row (approximately 52.6%) and vine row (approximately 47.4%). The global warming potential for N<sub>2</sub>O emissions was adopted from IPCC AR6 (IPCC, 2021), where 1&#xa0;kg N<sub>2</sub>O &#x3d; 273&#xa0;kg CO<sub>2</sub> for a given 100-year time horizon.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-4">
<title>2.4 Analyses of soil and plant samples</title>
<p>Prior to analysis, soil samples were sieved to 8&#xa0;mm. Gravimetric soil moisture content was determined by drying at 105&#xb0;C for 24&#xa0;h, and was then used to calculate oven-dried mass of the undisturbed soil core for bulk density (g cm<sup>-3</sup>) determination. Remaining soil subsamples were air-dried for subsequent soil analyses. Total soil C (%) and N (%) were determined by combustion in a Vario Max CNS elemental analyzer (Elementar, Langenselbold, Hesse, Germany) at 900&#xb0;C. POXC was determined colorimetrically using the revised protocol described in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B68">Weil et al. (2003)</xref>, where 2.5&#xa0;g air-dried soil samples reacted with 0.2&#xa0;<italic>M</italic> potassium permanganate solution, and the resulted solution absorbance was measured by a Spectronic 20 spectrophotometer (Milton Roy, Houston, Texas, United States) at 550&#xa0;nm. Min C was determined by rewetting air-dried soil samples to 50% water-holding capacity and measuring CO<sub>2</sub> concentration (mg CO<sub>2</sub>-C kg<sup>-1</sup> soil hr<sup>-1</sup>) with a Li-COR Li-850 CO<sub>2</sub>/H<sub>2</sub>O gas analyzer (Lincoln, NE, United States) after a 48-h incubation. Aggregate fractionation was measured only after the second compost application because the effects of compost on aggregation may not be detected immediately. Approximately 80&#xa0;g of air-dried soil were wet-sieved based on the methodology described in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B72">Six et al. (2000)</xref> to separate into four aggregate-size fractions: silt and clay (S &#x2b; C; &#x3c;53&#xa0;&#x3bc;m), microaggregate (m; 53&#x2013;250&#xa0;&#x3bc;m), small macroaggregate (SM; 250&#x2013;2000&#xa0;&#x3bc;m), and large macroaggregate (LM; 2000&#x2013;8000&#xa0;&#x3bc;m). Aggregate stability was determined by mean weight diameter (MWD) and geometric mean diameter (GMD) calculated from the equations:<disp-formula id="equ1">
<mml:math id="m1">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>M</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>W</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>D</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:munderover>
<mml:mstyle displaystyle="true">
<mml:mo>&#x2211;</mml:mo>
</mml:mstyle>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
</mml:munderover>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mover accent="true">
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>x</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#xaf;</mml:mo>
</mml:mover>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>w</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</disp-formula>
<disp-formula id="equ2">
<mml:math id="m2">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>G</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>M</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>D</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>exp</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x2061;</mml:mo>
<mml:mo>&#x2061;</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="[" close="]" separators="|">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:munderover>
<mml:mstyle displaystyle="true">
<mml:mo>&#x2211;</mml:mo>
</mml:mstyle>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
</mml:munderover>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>w</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mi mathvariant="italic">log</mml:mi>
<mml:mover accent="true">
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>x</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#xaf;</mml:mo>
</mml:mover>
<mml:mo>/</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:munderover>
<mml:mstyle displaystyle="true">
<mml:mo>&#x2211;</mml:mo>
</mml:mstyle>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
</mml:munderover>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>w</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</disp-formula>where n is the number of size fractions, <inline-formula id="inf1">
<mml:math id="m3">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mover accent="true">
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>x</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#xaf;</mml:mo>
</mml:mover>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> is the mean diameter of each size fraction (mm), and <inline-formula id="inf2">
<mml:math id="m4">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>w</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> is the proportion of the total sample weight in the corresponding size fraction (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Kemper and Rosenau, 1986</xref>).</p>
<p>Soil samples collected at the time of GHG sampling were analyzed for WFPS and plant-available N concentrations. To determine plant-available N concentrations, samples were extracted with 2&#xa0;<italic>M</italic> potassium chloride solution and analyzed using a colorimetric method with a Thermo Scientific Evolution 201 UV-visible spectrophotometer (Madison, WI, United States) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Doane and Horw&#xe1;th, 2003</xref>).</p>
<p>All cover crop samples were oven-dried at 60&#xb0;C for 24&#xa0;h for determination of dry biomass. The dry plant tissue was analyzed for C (%) and N (%) using a Vario Max CNS elemental analyzer at 900&#xb0;C. Average fresh grape berry weight (g) was measured from the berry samples collected during harvest.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-5">
<title>2.5 Statistical analysis</title>
<p>Linear mixed effects analysis was performed using the package lme4 (Bates et al., 2014) in R version 4.1.3 to assess the effects of various factors for each response variable. Three-way split-plot-factorial ANOVA was used with compost application rate as main factor, and location and depth as subplot factors on the following variables: total C and N content, POXC and Min C concentrations, bulk density, MWD, GMD, and aggregate fractionation. Two-way split-plot-factorial ANOVA was used with rate as main factor and location as subplot factor on seasonal cumulative CO<sub>2</sub> and N<sub>2</sub>O emissions. One-way repeated measures ANOVA was used with rate as the only factor on GWP, cover crop and grape yield measurements. Normal distribution of residuals and homogeneity of variance were tested using the Shapiro-Wilk and Levene&#x2019;s test. We used the non-parametric Spearman&#x2019;s rank correlation test to assess the relationship between daily N<sub>2</sub>O fluxes and variables driving N<sub>2</sub>O emissions, including daily CO<sub>2</sub> fluxes, NO<sub>3</sub>
<sup>&#x2212;</sup>-N and NH<sub>4</sub>
<sup>&#x2b;</sup>-N concentrations, WFPS, as residuals of Pearson correlations were not normally distributed, and there was no suitable data transformation to meet the assumptions.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="results" id="s3">
<title>3 Results</title>
<sec id="s3-1">
<title>3.1 Soil C dynamics</title>
<p>Total C stocks to 60&#xa0;cm depth were higher in the tractor row (33.3&#xa0;Mg&#xa0;C&#xa0;ha<sup>-1</sup>) than that in the vine row (24.9&#xa0;Mg&#xa0;C&#xa0;ha<sup>-1</sup>; Depth: <italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.001), however, no statistical differences were found among compost application rates. Soil C stocks in 2020 after two compost applications were also the highest in the tractor row topsoil across all treatments when compared to the vine row and subsoil depths (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2A</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap id="T2" position="float">
<label>TABLE 2</label>
<caption>
<p>A) Total soil C, POXC and Min C &#xb1; standard errors of the means (n &#x3d; 4) as affected by compost application rate, functional location and depth in April 2020. Lowercase letters within the same column indicate significant interactive effects of location and depth at <italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.05. B) Averages of POXC &#xb1; standard errors of the means (n &#x3d; 4) by compost application rate in April 2020. Uppercase letters indicate significant main effect of the treatments at <italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.05.</p>
</caption>
<table>
<thead valign="top">
<tr>
<th colspan="10" align="left">A)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th align="left">Location</th>
<th colspan="2" align="left">Depth</th>
<th colspan="2" align="left">Application<break/>rate (Mg ha<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>)</th>
<th colspan="2" align="left">Total C<break/>(Mg C ha<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>)</th>
<th colspan="2" align="left">POXC<break/>(mg kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> soil)</th>
<th align="left">Min C<break/>(mg kg<sup>-1</sup> soil hr<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td rowspan="12" align="left">Tractor row</td>
<td rowspan="4" colspan="2" align="left">0&#x2013;15 cm</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">0 (control)</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">15.3 &#xb1; 0.5 a</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">313 &#xb1; 33 a</td>
<td align="left">0.64 &#xb1; 0.08 a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2" align="left">4.5</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">16.9 &#xb1; 1.5 a</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">390 &#xb1; 27 a</td>
<td align="left">0.52 &#xb1; 0.14 a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2" align="left">9.0</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">17.5 &#xb1; 1.1 a</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">402 &#xb1; 13 a</td>
<td align="left">0.50 &#xb1; 0.08 a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2" align="left">13.5</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">18.9 &#xb1; 1.6 a</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">464 &#xb1; 31 a</td>
<td align="left">0.59 &#xb1; 0.09 a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="4" colspan="2" align="left">15&#x2013;30 cm</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">0</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">6.3 &#xb1; 0.2 d</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">31 &#xb1; 6 c</td>
<td align="left">0.18 &#xb1; 0.02 bc</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2" align="left">4.5</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">6.9 &#xb1; 0.5 d</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">59 &#xb1; 6 c</td>
<td align="left">0.18 &#xb1; 0.04 bc</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2" align="left">9.0</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">6.7 &#xb1; 0.6 d</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">59 &#xb1; 10 c</td>
<td align="left">0.19 &#xb1; 0.03 bc</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2" align="left">13.5</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">6.2 &#xb1; 0.1 d</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">88 &#xb1; 12 c</td>
<td align="left">0.21 &#xb1; 0.03 bc</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="4" colspan="2" align="left">30&#x2013;60 cm</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">0</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">10.5 &#xb1; 0.5 c</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">29 &#xb1; 6 cd</td>
<td align="left">0.21 &#xb1; 0.02 bc</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2" align="left">4.5</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">9.7 &#xb1; 1.1 c</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">37 &#xb1; 2 cd</td>
<td align="left">0.19 &#xb1; 0.01 bc</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2" align="left">9.0</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">9.4 &#xb1; 0.7 c</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">52 &#xb1; 3 cd</td>
<td align="left">0.12 &#xb1; 0.03 bc</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2" align="left">13.5</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">9.2 &#xb1; 0.5 c</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">71 &#xb1; 6 cd</td>
<td align="left">0.14 &#xb1; 0.04 bc</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="12" align="left">Vine row</td>
<td rowspan="4" colspan="2" align="left">0&#x2013;15 cm</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">0</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">10.1 &#xb1; 0.6 b</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">113 &#xb1; 14 b</td>
<td align="left">0.18 &#xb1; 0.03 b</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2" align="left">4.5</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">7.2 &#xb1; 0.4 b</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">179 &#xb1; 9 b</td>
<td align="left">0.25 &#xb1; 0.02 b</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2" align="left">9.0</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">8.4 &#xb1; 0.3 b</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">169 &#xb1; 19 b</td>
<td align="left">0.24 &#xb1; 0.04 b</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2" align="left">13.5</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">9.4 &#xb1; 1.3 b</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">213 &#xb1; 16 b</td>
<td align="left">0.23 &#xb1; 0.02 b</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="4" colspan="2" align="left">15&#x2013;30 cm</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">0</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">6.0 &#xb1; 0.2 d</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">39 &#xb1; 6 c</td>
<td align="left">0.17 &#xb1; 0.01 bc</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2" align="left">4.5</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">6.0 &#xb1; 0.2 d</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">56 &#xb1; 9 c</td>
<td align="left">0.15 &#xb1; 0.00 bc</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2" align="left">9.0</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">6.4 &#xb1; 0.5 d</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">70 &#xb1; 15 c</td>
<td align="left">0.15 &#xb1; 0.05 bc</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2" align="left">13.5</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">6.7 &#xb1; 0.2 d</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">58 &#xb1; 12 c</td>
<td align="left">0.19 &#xb1; 0.01 bc</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="4" colspan="2" align="left">30&#x2013;60 cm</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">0</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">10.3 &#xb1; 0.4 cd</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">34 &#xb1; 7 d</td>
<td align="left">0.16 &#xb1; 0.03 c</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2" align="left">4.5</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">8.3 &#xb1; 1.0 cd</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">32 &#xb1; 5 d</td>
<td align="left">0.12 &#xb1; 0.03 c</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2" align="left">9.0</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">9.2 &#xb1; 0.4 cd</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">49 &#xb1; 7 d</td>
<td align="left">0.16 &#xb1; 0.02 c</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2" align="left">13.5</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">9.8 &#xb1; 0.6 cd</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">44 &#xb1; 2 d</td>
<td align="left">0.13 &#xb1; 0.03 c</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="10" align="left">B)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2" align="left">Application rate (Mg ha<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>)</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">0</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">4.5</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">9.0</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">13.5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2" align="left">POXC (mg kg<sup>-1</sup> soil)</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">93.0 &#xb1; 54.2 C</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">125.6 &#xb1; 66.5 B</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">133.6 &#xb1; 65.7 AB</td>
<td colspan="2" align="center">156.3 &#xb1; 77.1 A</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<p>Compost application rate had a significant effect on POXC concentrations after two consecutive annual applications (Rate: <italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.001; <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2B</xref>). The average POXC concentration in 2020 was 156.3&#xa0;mg&#xa0;C&#xa0;kg<sup>-1</sup> soil at the rate of 13.5&#xa0;Mg&#xa0;ha<sup>-1</sup>, which was significantly higher than that at the rates of 4.5 and 0 (control) Mg&#xa0;ha<sup>-1</sup> (125.6 and 93.0&#xa0;mg&#xa0;C&#xa0;kg<sup>-1</sup> soil, respectively). In addition, both POXC and Min C concentrations were higher in the tractor row topsoil than the subsoil, and higher than all depths in the vine row (Location &#xd7; Depth: <italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.001, <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2A</xref>). Min C, unlike POXC, did not significantly increase with the increasing compost application rate (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2A</xref>). After two years of compost application, Min C concentration was higher in the topsoil than the 15&#x2013;30&#xa0;cm and 30&#x2013;60&#xa0;cm depths (Location &#xd7; Depth interaction: <italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.001).</p>
<p>The distribution of the large macroaggregates (LM) fraction was subjected to a significant interactive effect of location and depth (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3</xref>). There were significantly more LM in the tractor row topsoil than the subsoil (Location &#xd7; Depth: <italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.001) as well as both depths in the vine row (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.001). Note that there were more LM in the tractor row topsoil with 9.0 and 13.5&#xa0;Mg&#xa0;ha<sup>-1</sup> compost application rates than the control (Rate &#xd7; Location &#xd7; Depth: <italic>p</italic> &#x3d; 0.0755), which indicates a marginal positive effect of compost application on LM formation in the topsoil. Significant differences were found between the two depth increments in small macroaggregates (SM) (Depth: <italic>p</italic> &#x3d; 0.048; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3</xref>), microaggregates (m) (Depth: <italic>p</italic> &#x3d; 0.013; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3</xref>), and silt and clay (S &#x2b; C) fractions (Depth: <italic>p</italic> &#x3d; 0.019; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3</xref>). More SM were found in the topsoil than in the subsoil at both locations, but the opposite trend was observed in the m and S &#x2b; C fractions at both locations.</p>
<fig id="F3" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 3</label>
<caption>
<p>Fractions (%) of soil aggregates by size and functional location at the depths of 0&#x2013;15 and 15&#x2013;30&#xa0;cm after two&#xa0;years of compost application. LM, SM, m, and S &#x2b; C represent: large macroaggregate, small macroaggregate, microaggregate, and silt and clay, respectively. Error bars are standard errors of the means (n &#x3d; 4). Lowercase letters indicate significant differences between locations and depths, while asterisks (&#x2a;) indicate significant differences between depths at <italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.05 within each aggregate size category.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fenvs-11-1123510-g003.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Aggregate stability parameters (MWD and GMD) were higher in the tractor row topsoil than the subsoil or the vine row (Location &#xd7; Depth: <italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.001 (MWD); <italic>p</italic> &#x3d; 0.002 (GMD); <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">Table 3</xref>). When compost was applied at 9.0&#xa0;Mg&#xa0;ha<sup>-1</sup>, MWD was significantly higher in the topsoil than that with no compost applied (Rate &#xd7; Depth: <italic>p</italic> &#x3d; 0.020).</p>
<table-wrap id="T3" position="float">
<label>TABLE 3</label>
<caption>
<p>Mean weight diameter (MWD) and geometric mean diameter (GMD) of soil aggregates, and the respective standard errors of means (n &#x3d; 4) by functional location and depth (left), and by compost application rate and depth (right, shaded) in April 2020. Lowercase letters indicate significant differences between depths and locations, uppercase letters indicate significant differences between depth and rates.</p>
</caption>
<table>
<thead valign="top">
<tr>
<th align="left">Depth</th>
<th align="left">Location</th>
<th align="left">MWD</th>
<th align="left">GMD</th>
<th align="left">Depth</th>
<th align="left">Application rate (Mg ha<sup>-1</sup>)</th>
<th align="left">MWD</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td rowspan="4" align="left">0&#x2013;15&#xa0;cm</td>
<td rowspan="2" align="left">Tractor row</td>
<td rowspan="2" align="left">0.49 &#xb1; 0.04 a</td>
<td rowspan="2" align="left">0.50 &#xb1; 0.01 a</td>
<td rowspan="4" align="left">0&#x2013;15&#xa0;cm</td>
<td align="left">0 (control)</td>
<td align="left">0.40 &#xb1; 0.03 BC</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">4.5</td>
<td align="left">0.47 &#xb1; 0.05 AB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="2" align="left">Vine row</td>
<td rowspan="2" align="left">0.41 &#xb1; 0.03&#xa0;b</td>
<td rowspan="2" align="left">0.48 &#xb1; 0.02&#xa0;b</td>
<td align="left">9.0</td>
<td align="left">0.48 &#xb1; 0.04 A</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">13.5</td>
<td align="left">0.45 &#xb1; 0.04 AB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="4" align="left">15&#x2013;30&#xa0;cm</td>
<td rowspan="2" align="left">Tractor row</td>
<td rowspan="2" align="left">0.34 &#xb1; 0.01 c</td>
<td rowspan="2" align="left">0.44 &#xb1; 0.01 c</td>
<td rowspan="4" align="left">15&#x2013;30&#xa0;cm</td>
<td align="left">0</td>
<td align="left">0.34 &#xb1; 0.01 C</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">4.5</td>
<td align="left">0.34 &#xb1; 0.00 C</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="2" align="left">Vine row</td>
<td rowspan="2" align="left">0.34 &#xb1; 0.01 c</td>
<td rowspan="2" align="left">0.45 &#xb1; 0.00 c</td>
<td align="left">9.0</td>
<td align="left">0.34 &#xb1; 0.01 C</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">13.5</td>
<td align="left">0.35 &#xb1; 0.02 C</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-2">
<title>3.2 N<sub>2</sub>O and CO<sub>2</sub> emissions and GWP</title>
<p>Daily N<sub>2</sub>O fluxes ranged from &#x2212;3.9&#x2013;55.9&#xa0;g N<sub>2</sub>O-N ha<sup>-1</sup>&#xa0;day<sup>-1</sup>, and no significant differences were observed between treatments (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4</xref>). The average annual cumulative N<sub>2</sub>O emissions were 0.47 &#xb1; 0.11&#xa0;kg N<sub>2</sub>O-N ha<sup>-1</sup>&#xa0;year<sup>-1</sup> for the first post-compost application year, and 0.81 &#xb1; 0.15&#xa0;kg N<sub>2</sub>O-N ha<sup>-1</sup>&#xa0;year<sup>-1</sup> for the second year. The seasonal cumulative emissions across all treatments and locations ranged from 0.10 &#xb1; 0.05 to 0.24 &#xb1; 0.07&#xa0;kg N<sub>2</sub>O-N ha<sup>-1</sup> season<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> throughout the entire experimental period and were significantly higher in the vine row than the tractor row during the first dry season (Location: <italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.001; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5</xref>). Average daily N<sub>2</sub>O fluxes in the tractor row were positively and significantly correlated with the average daily CO<sub>2</sub> flux, soil NO<sub>3</sub>
<sup>&#x2212;</sup>-N and WFPS and were negatively and significantly correlated with the daily fluxes of NH<sub>4</sub>
<sup>&#x2b;</sup>-N (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T4">Table 4</xref>). In the vine row, average daily N<sub>2</sub>O fluxes were positively and significantly correlated with the daily nitrate-N fluxes only.</p>
<fig id="F4" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 4</label>
<caption>
<p>Average N<sub>2</sub>O daily fluxes &#xb1; standard errors (n &#x3d; 4) in the tractor row and under the vines at the four compost application rates studied during November 2018&#x2014;November 2020.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fenvs-11-1123510-g004.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig id="F5" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 5</label>
<caption>
<p>Cumulative N<sub>2</sub>O emissions by functional location under compost application treatments (0, 4.5, 9.0 and 13.5&#xa0;Mg&#xa0;ha<sup>-1</sup>) during two wet and two dry seasons from 2018 to 2020. Error bars represent standard errors of the mean (n &#x3d; 4). Asterisk (&#x2a;) indicate significant differences between locations at <italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.05 within the dry season.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fenvs-11-1123510-g005.tif"/>
</fig>
<table-wrap id="T4" position="float">
<label>TABLE 4</label>
<caption>
<p>Non-parametric Spearman correlation test on N<sub>2</sub>O daily flux vs. water-filled pore space (WFPS), soil mineral nitrogen concentrations (NH<sub>4</sub>
<sup>&#x2b;</sup>-N and NO<sub>3</sub>
<sup>&#x2212;</sup>-N), and CO<sub>2</sub> daily flux by functional locations in October 2018&#x2014;March 2020. Asterisks (&#x2a;) indicate the significant correlations at <italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.05.</p>
</caption>
<table>
<thead valign="top">
<tr>
<th colspan="6" align="center">Tractor row</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th align="left"/>
<th align="left">N<sub>2</sub>O-N (g ha<sup>-1</sup> day<sup>-1</sup>)</th>
<th align="left">CO<sub>2</sub>-C (kg ha<sup>-1</sup> day<sup>-1</sup>)</th>
<th align="left">NO<sub>3</sub>
<sup>&#x2212;</sup>-N (&#xb5;g g<sup>-1</sup> soil)</th>
<th align="left">NH<sub>4</sub>
<sup>&#x2b;</sup>-N (&#xb5;g g<sup>-1</sup> soil)</th>
<th align="left">WFPS (%)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td align="left">N<sub>2</sub>O-N (g ha<sup>-1</sup> day<sup>-1</sup>)</td>
<td align="left">N/A</td>
<td align="left">0.182&#x2a;</td>
<td align="left">0.314&#x2a;</td>
<td align="left">&#x2212;0.095&#x2a;</td>
<td align="left">0.200&#x2a;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">CO<sub>2</sub>-C (kg ha<sup>-1</sup> day<sup>-1</sup>)</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left">N/A</td>
<td align="left">0.287&#x2a;</td>
<td align="left">&#x2212;0.321&#x2a;</td>
<td align="left">0.369&#x2a;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NO<sub>3</sub>
<sup>&#x2212;</sup>-N (&#xb5;g g<sup>-1</sup> soil)</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left">N/A</td>
<td align="left">&#x2212;0.164&#x2a;</td>
<td align="left">0.672&#x2a;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NH<sub>4</sub>
<sup>&#x2b;</sup>-N (&#xb5;g g<sup>-1</sup> soil)</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left">N/A</td>
<td align="left">&#x2212;0.385&#x2a;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="6" align="center">Vine row</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">N<sub>2</sub>O-N (g ha<sup>-1</sup> day<sup>-1</sup>)</td>
<td align="left">N/A</td>
<td align="left">0.169</td>
<td align="left">0.355&#x2a;</td>
<td align="left">0.048</td>
<td align="left">0.022</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">CO<sub>2</sub>-C (kg ha<sup>-1</sup> day<sup>-1</sup>)</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left">N/A</td>
<td align="left">0.006</td>
<td align="left">&#x2212;0.005</td>
<td align="left">0.038</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NO<sub>3</sub>
<sup>&#x2212;</sup>-N (&#xb5;g g<sup>-1</sup> soil)</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left">N/A</td>
<td align="left">0.208&#x2a;</td>
<td align="left">0.047</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NH<sub>4</sub>
<sup>&#x2b;</sup>-N (&#xb5;g g<sup>-1</sup> soil)</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left">N/A</td>
<td align="left">&#x2212;0.086&#x2a;</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<p>Daily CO<sub>2</sub> fluxes ranged from &#x2212;2.9&#x2013;123.5&#xa0;kg CO<sub>2</sub>-C ha<sup>-1</sup>&#xa0;day<sup>-1</sup> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure 6</xref>) and were positively and significantly correlated with soil NO<sub>3</sub>
<sup>&#x2212;</sup>-N and WFPS, but negatively and significantly correlated with soil NH<sub>4</sub>
<sup>&#x2b;</sup>-N (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T4">Table 4</xref>). The annual cumulative CO<sub>2</sub> emissions were 4980 &#xb1; 367&#xa0;kg CO<sub>2</sub>-C ha<sup>-1</sup>&#xa0;year<sup>-1</sup> and 6510 &#xb1; 463&#xa0;kg CO<sub>2</sub>-C ha<sup>-1</sup>&#xa0;year<sup>-1</sup> in the first and second year of the study, respectively. Seasonal cumulative CO<sub>2</sub> emissions across all treatments and locations ranged from 900 &#xb1; 162 to 2500 &#xb1; 292&#xa0;kg CO<sub>2</sub>-C ha<sup>-1</sup> season<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">Figure 7</xref>). During both wet seasons of the study, there were significantly higher CO<sub>2</sub> emissions in the tractor row than in the vine row (Location: <italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.001 for both wet seasons; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure 6</xref>), while the trend was the opposite during the first dry season (Location: <italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.001; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure 6</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F6" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 6</label>
<caption>
<p>Average CO<sub>2</sub> daily fluxes &#xb1; standard errors (n &#x3d; 4) in the tractor row and under the vines at the four compost application rates during November 2018&#x2014;November 2020.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fenvs-11-1123510-g006.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig id="F7" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 7</label>
<caption>
<p>Cumulative CO<sub>2</sub> emissions by functional location under compost application treatments (0, 4.5, 9.0 and 13.5&#xa0;Mg&#xa0;ha<sup>-1</sup>) during two wet and two dry seasons from 2018 to 2020. Error bars represent standard errors of the mean (n &#x3d; 4). Asterisks (&#x2a;) indicate significant differences between locations within the same season and application rate at <italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.05.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fenvs-11-1123510-g007.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Based on the soil C and GHG emissions, soil C sequestration outpaced the N<sub>2</sub>O emissions, making this vineyard a net C sink. Yet, changes in total soil C stock, cumulative N<sub>2</sub>O emissions and global warming potential (GWP) were not significantly different between the four compost application treatments (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T5">Table 5</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap id="T5" position="float">
<label>TABLE 5</label>
<caption>
<p>Changes in SOC stocks, cumulative N<sub>2</sub>O emissions and global warming potential (GWP) evaluated in the study by compost application rate over the 2-year experimental period (2018&#x2013;2020). Values are means (n &#x3d; 4) &#xb1; standard errors.</p>
</caption>
<table>
<thead valign="top">
<tr>
<th align="left">Application rate (Mg ha<sup>-1</sup>)</th>
<th align="left">&#x394; SOC (Mg CO<sub>2</sub>-eq ha<sup>-1</sup>)</th>
<th align="left">N<sub>2</sub>O (Mg CO<sub>2</sub>-eq ha<sup>-1</sup>)</th>
<th align="left">GWP (Mg CO<sub>2</sub>-eq ha<sup>-1</sup> year<sup>-1</sup>)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td align="left">0 (control)</td>
<td align="left">&#x2212;2.4 &#xb1; 4.4</td>
<td align="left">0.37 &#xb1; 0.07</td>
<td align="left">&#x2212;0.99 &#xb1; 2.20</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">4.5</td>
<td align="left">&#x2212;5.2 &#xb1; 4.7</td>
<td align="left">0.24 &#xb1; 0.06</td>
<td align="left">&#x2212;2.47 &#xb1; 2.34</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">9.0</td>
<td align="left">&#x2212;3.3 &#xb1; 3.7</td>
<td align="left">0.25 &#xb1; 0.04</td>
<td align="left">&#x2212;1.55 &#xb1; 1.88</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">13.5</td>
<td align="left">&#x2212;6.2 &#xb1; 3.6</td>
<td align="left">0.34 &#xb1; 0.07</td>
<td align="left">&#x2212;2.93 &#xb1; 1.83</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-3">
<title>3.3 Cover crop C and N contents, and grape yield</title>
<p>No significant differences were found in cover crop biomass, C and N content, and C:N between the compost application rates (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T6">Table 6</xref>). The average cover crop biomass ranged between 227 and 316&#xa0;g/m<sup>2</sup> among the four treatments in 2019. Cover crop C was around 42% in 2019 and between 40% and 41% in 2020, while N content ranged between 1.27% and 1.82% in 2019, and between 1.30% and 1.67% in 2020. The resulting C:N ratios were between 24.2 and 33.4, and between 25.1 and 32.4 for 2019 and 2020, respectively. Similarly, there were no significant differences between treatments within each year of 2019 and 2020 (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T6">Table 6</xref>). Grape yield ranged between 10.6 and 11.5 tons ha<sup>-1</sup> in 2019, and between 6.6 and 8.0 tons ha<sup>-1</sup> in 2020.</p>
<table-wrap id="T6" position="float">
<label>TABLE 6</label>
<caption>
<p>Dry biomass and C content of cover crop, grape yield components, and the respective standard errors of the means (n &#x3d; 4) by compost application rate in 2019 and 2020. Note that cover crop biomass was only measured in April 2019 after the first compost application.</p>
</caption>
<table>
<thead valign="top">
<tr>
<th align="left"/>
<th align="left"/>
<th colspan="4" align="left">Cover crop</th>
<th colspan="4" align="left">Grape yield</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th align="left">Year</th>
<th align="left">Application rate (Mg ha<sup>-1</sup>)</th>
<th align="left">Biomass (g m<sup>-2</sup>)</th>
<th align="left">C content (%)</th>
<th align="left">N content (%)</th>
<th align="left">C:N ratio</th>
<th align="left">Clusters per vine</th>
<th align="left">Cluster weight (g/cluster)</th>
<th align="left">Berry mass (g/berry)</th>
<th align="left">Yield (ton ha<sup>-1</sup>)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td rowspan="4" align="left">2019</td>
<td align="left">0</td>
<td align="left">303 &#xb1; 73</td>
<td align="left">41.7 &#xb1; 0.2</td>
<td align="left">1.27 &#xb1; 0.09</td>
<td align="left">33.4 &#xb1; 2.4</td>
<td align="left">63 &#xb1; 3</td>
<td align="left">91.8 &#xb1; 4.4</td>
<td align="left">0.71 &#xb1; 0.02</td>
<td align="left">11.5 &#xb1; 2.0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">4.5</td>
<td align="left">288 &#xb1; 26</td>
<td align="left">41.7 &#xb1; 0.3</td>
<td align="left">1.39 &#xb1; 0.13</td>
<td align="left">30.6 &#xb1; 2.4</td>
<td align="left">62 &#xb1; 2</td>
<td align="left">88.3 &#xb1; 2.9</td>
<td align="left">0.62 &#xb1; 0.05</td>
<td align="left">10.9 &#xb1; 2.4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">9.0</td>
<td align="left">227 &#xb1; 32</td>
<td align="left">41.5 &#xb1; 0.3</td>
<td align="left">1.82 &#xb1; 0.25</td>
<td align="left">24.2 &#xb1; 3.5</td>
<td align="left">62 &#xb1; 2</td>
<td align="left">86.9 &#xb1; 3.5</td>
<td align="left">0.66 &#xb1; 0.02</td>
<td align="left">10.6 &#xb1; 1.9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">13.5</td>
<td align="left">316 &#xb1; 44</td>
<td align="left">41.5 &#xb1; 0.4</td>
<td align="left">1.29 &#xb1; 0.07</td>
<td align="left">32.4 &#xb1; 1.9</td>
<td align="left">61 &#xb1; 2</td>
<td align="left">90.0 &#xb1; 1.8</td>
<td align="left">0.66 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
<td align="left">10.8 &#xb1; 2.0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="4" align="left">2020</td>
<td align="left">0</td>
<td align="left">N/A</td>
<td align="left">41.0 &#xb1; 0.2</td>
<td align="left">1.37 &#xb1; 0.25</td>
<td align="left">32.4 &#xb1; 4.6</td>
<td align="left">52 &#xb1; 2</td>
<td align="left">69.8 &#xb1; 2.6</td>
<td align="left">0.69 &#xb1; 0.03</td>
<td align="left">7.3 &#xb1; 1.6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">4.5</td>
<td align="left">N/A</td>
<td align="left">40.3 &#xb1; 0.1</td>
<td align="left">1.33 &#xb1; 0.09</td>
<td align="left">30.7 &#xb1; 1.9</td>
<td align="left">50 &#xb1; 4</td>
<td align="left">64.2 &#xb1; 1.4</td>
<td align="left">0.75 &#xb1; 0.02</td>
<td align="left">6.6 &#xb1; 1.9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">9.0</td>
<td align="left">N/A</td>
<td align="left">40.0 &#xb1; 0.4</td>
<td align="left">1.30 &#xb1; 0.07</td>
<td align="left">31.0 &#xb1; 1.9</td>
<td align="left">58 &#xb1; 6</td>
<td align="left">68.7 &#xb1; 2.3</td>
<td align="left">0.70 &#xb1; 0.03</td>
<td align="left">8.0 &#xb1; 1.6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">13.5</td>
<td align="left">N/A</td>
<td align="left">40.0 &#xb1; 0.4</td>
<td align="left">1.67 &#xb1; 0.25</td>
<td align="left">25.1 &#xb1; 2.9</td>
<td align="left">54 &#xb1; 4</td>
<td align="left">67.3 &#xb1; 3.3</td>
<td align="left">0.68 &#xb1; 0.02</td>
<td align="left">7.2 &#xb1; 2.0</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="discussion" id="s4">
<title>4 Discussions</title>
<sec id="s4-1">
<title>4.1 Effects of increasing compost application rate on soil C dynamics</title>
<p>Although increases in SOM and SOC from compost application have been widely reported (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">Pinamonti, 1998</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Korboulewsky et al., 2002</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Morlat and Chaussod, 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Brown and Cotton, 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">Peregrina et al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">Rubio et al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Calleja-Cervantes et al., 2015a</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Calleja-Cervantes et al., 2015b</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Hannam et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Gaiotti et al., 2017</xref>), our results did not show a significant effect of compost addition on total soil C stock, confirming our initial hypothesis. This is likely due to the changes in C content from compost input being too small compared to the inherent C stock, and the slow C turnover rates in soil might cause any management-related fluctuations to take years or even decades to be detected.</p>
<p>The significant effect of compost application rate observed in POXC up to the 60&#xa0;cm, depth, but not in Min C, suggests that applying compost up to the rate of 13.5&#xa0;Mg&#xa0;ha<sup>-1</sup> in a vineyard for two&#xa0;years can lead to stabilizing and potentially sequestering new C in soil without increasing C mineralization (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Hurisso et al., 2016</xref>). Other studies such as <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Hannam et al. (2016)</xref> studied the interactive effects of three annual compost applications at rates equivalent to 15&#xa0;g of available N per vine (C content unknown) on soil nutrient dynamics in a young Merlot vineyard, and found similar increase in total C and POXC in the compost-treated plots. Applying compost bi-yearly in an uncultivated grassland at a rate of 108.7&#xa0;Mg&#xa0;ha<sup>-1</sup> for eight&#xa0;years was also found to significantly increase POXC up to the depth of 30&#xa0;cm, which agreed with our results (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Liu et al., 2021</xref>). The significant increase in POXC with increasing compost input observed up to 60&#xa0;cm depth in this study was an indication of C sequestration not only in topsoil, but also in the upper subsoil layer (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B65">Tautges et al., 2019</xref>). As Min C measures the flush of CO<sub>2</sub> from rewetting soils through a short-term aerobic incubation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Haynes, 2005</xref>), the differences of Min C between top- and subsoil depths were likely attributed to the decrease in microbiological activity as soil depth increases (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B65">Tautges et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B70">Yost and Hartemink, 2020</xref>).</p>
<p>The greater macroaggregate fractions (LM &#x2b; SM) but smaller m and S &#x2b; C fractions in the topsoil than the subsoil could be explained by the natural distribution of soil organic matter and fauna populations, which promote soil aggregate formation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B62">Six et al., 2004</xref>). The positive trend observed in the LM fraction from the two highest application rates matches with the marginally significant increase in the LM fraction after long-term (8 years) compost application found in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Liu et al. (2021)</xref>. Moreover, the presence of cover crop and roots in the tractor row could potentially be an extra C input through root exudation, which might further enhance microbial growth and LM formation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B75">Tisdall and Oades, 1982</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B62">Six et al., 2004</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B74">Sokol et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B61">Schaefer et al., 2020</xref>).</p>
<p>Furthermore, soil structure stability generally increases with increasing average particle size of aggregation, which is indicated by increased value of MWD and GMD (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">Nimmo and Perkins, 2002</xref>). A 5-year study of compost application at 22&#xa0;Mg&#xa0;ha<sup>-1</sup> on semi-arid Mediterranean soil observed increased soil aggregate stability in response to compost application (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Celik et al., 2004</xref>); however, another 4-year study investigating the effects of annual compost application at 8 and 25&#xa0;Mg&#xa0;ha<sup>-1</sup> in a semi-arid vineyard did not find any significant changes on soil stability (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">Peregrina et al., 2012</xref>). Our results suggest that the extra C input from compost could promote aggregate stability by influencing the drivers of aggregate formation such as biological activities of soil microorganisms and plant roots. Based on our findings, C inputs from compost application could increase the active C pool which was involved in the early stages of C stabilization in vineyard soil, while further confirmation is required to investigate the influence of the fibrous fine root system of cover crop coupling with the effects of compost application on indicators of soil C sequestration, such as soil respiration, aggregation and stability.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4-2">
<title>4.2 Effects of increasing compost application rate on N<sub>2</sub>O and CO<sub>2</sub> emissions and GWP</title>
<p>The lack of treatment effect on N<sub>2</sub>O fluxes and annual emissions could be due to the application rates with low N inputs, and the potential interference of any background N<sub>2</sub>O emissions from the soil ecosystem (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B71">Zhu-Barker et al., 2019</xref>). The average annual cumulative N<sub>2</sub>O emissions were also found to be comparatively lower than previously reported for California vineyards (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B71">Zhu-Barker et al., 2019</xref>). In agreement with our initial hypothesis, insignificant differences among the four compost treatments suggest that the environmental tradeoff in the form of N<sub>2</sub>O emissions may be minimal in vineyards. This finding partially resembled the study by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Calleja-Cervantes et al. (2015a)</xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Calleja-Cervantes et al. (2015b)</xref>, which reported insignificant changes in N<sub>2</sub>O emissions following the long-term application of sheep manure compost at the rate of 4.63&#xa0;Mg&#xa0;ha<sup>-1</sup>, while N<sub>2</sub>O emissions increased significantly with the pelletized organic compost treatment. Our annual cumulative N<sub>2</sub>O emissions were also near the low limit of the annual N<sub>2</sub>O emissions of 0.56 &#xb1; 0.11 to 3.92 &#xb1; 0.65&#xa0;kg N<sub>2</sub>O-N ha<sup>-1</sup>&#xa0;year<sup>-1</sup> documented in studies that have investigated GHG emissions in California vineyards (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Garland et al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B66">Verhoeven and Six, 2014</xref>). Studies on N<sub>2</sub>O emissions following organic fertilization in other California cropping systems such as walnut orchards also found relatively low ranges of annual N<sub>2</sub>O emissions from 1.09 &#xb1; 0.24 to 1.61 &#xb1; 0.15&#xa0;kg N<sub>2</sub>O-N ha<sup>-1</sup>&#xa0;year<sup>-1</sup>, with the exceptions of a rain-fed annual ryegrass system and dairy forage production fields, which showed annual N<sub>2</sub>O emissions of 19.00 &#xb1; 3.00&#xa0;kg N<sub>2</sub>O-N ha<sup>-1</sup>&#xa0;year<sup>-1</sup> and 6.12&#x2013;13.93 &#xb1; 0.64&#x2013;3.81&#xa0;kg N<sub>2</sub>O-N ha<sup>-1</sup>&#xa0;year<sup>-1</sup>, respectively (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B67">Verhoeven et al., 2017</xref>). A study in a California almond orchard using synthetic N fertilizer at 258&#x2013;280&#xa0;kg&#xa0;N&#xa0;ha<sup>-1</sup> year<sup>-1</sup> also found similar annual N<sub>2</sub>O emissions value (0.73 &#xb1; 0.13&#xa0;kg N<sub>2</sub>O-N ha<sup>-1</sup>) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Decock et al., 2017</xref>). Soil properties such as coarse texture and low organic C content have been found to play a significant role in low N<sub>2</sub>O emissions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B64">Stehfest and Bouwman, 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Decock, 2014</xref>), and may explain the relatively low emissions in this study.</p>
<p>The significantly higher N<sub>2</sub>O emissions in the vine row during the first dry season were likely due to the irrigation events through the drip irrigation system under the vines, as changes in soil moisture and dry-wet cycles play a key role in the production of N<sub>2</sub>O (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Hutchinson and Mosier, 1981</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Dobbie and Smith, 2003</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Congreves et al., 2018</xref>). During the wet seasons, soil moisture fluctuations during rainfall events caused temporary spikes in N<sub>2</sub>O emissions in both tractor row and vine row; however, because the rainwater was received by the entire vineyard, the differences in N<sub>2</sub>O emissions between the functional locations were minimized. Previous research suggests that the episodic changes in soil oxygen and moisture content influence the relative contribution to N<sub>2</sub>O production by nitrification and denitrification (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Granli and B&#xf8;ckman, 1995</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Dobbie et al., 1999</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Dalal et al., 2003</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Congreves et al., 2018</xref>). As N<sub>2</sub>O emissions mainly originate from nitrification when WFPS is below 40%, and from denitrification when WFPS is above 60%&#x2013;70% (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Dalal et al., 2003</xref>), our results may imply that nitrification is likely the major pathway of N<sub>2</sub>O production in this vineyard during the dry (growing) seasons, while denitrification is the main source of N<sub>2</sub>O emissions in wet (dormant) seasons, as suggested by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Garland et al. (2011)</xref>.</p>
<p>Seasonal patterns of CO<sub>2</sub> emissions vary largely depending on vineyard management practices, such as the use of cover crop and irrigation system (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Longbottom and Petrie, 2015</xref>) as well as precipitation events (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B63">Steenwerth et al., 2010</xref>). In this vineyard, the cover crop was active in the wet season while the vines went into dormancy. Root and microbial respiration along with decomposition of organic matter induced by compost application in the beginning of the wet season would likely boost CO<sub>2</sub> emissions from the tractor row (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Marras et al., 2015</xref>). On the contrary, during the dry season, the cover crop had been terminated and was inactive, while the vines entered the productive stages of their life cycle and received irrigation, thereby increasing CO<sub>2</sub> emissions at the vine row.</p>
<p>Comparing the three compost treatments with the control, the more net negative GWP suggested that compost application promoted C sequestration in soil. While there is a lack of data on the GWP budget of winegrape vineyards, our results aligned with other studies on sustainable practices in vineyards (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B69">Wolff et al., 2018</xref>) or other perennial system such as poplar (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">Robertson et al., 2000</xref>). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B69">Wolff et al. (2018)</xref> investigated the effects of minimum tillage on soil C, N<sub>2</sub>O emissions and crop production, and found a negative net GWP only from the alternative tillage practice with the presence of cover crop, which was known to promote soil C storage. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">Robertson et al. (2000)</xref> also reported a negative or neutral net GWP from poplar cropping systems. However, we acknowledged that another common GHG, methane (CH<sub>4</sub>), is often included in net GWP calculations. In our study, CH<sub>4</sub> was not included because the emissions were consistently lower than the detection limit. Our estimate on GWP of a vineyard should also be revised with consideration of fuel consumption, which may vary depending on vineyard compost application practices, to obtain a comprehensive GWP analysis for this cropping system.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4-3">
<title>4.3 Effects of increasing compost application rate on cover crop C and N contents, and grape yield</title>
<p>The lack of effect of compost application on cover crop biomass in the first year of our study contradicted the results of previous studies. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B55">Rose et al. (2014)</xref> reported increases on plant growth with applications of humic substances that were originated from organic amendments including green waste-based composts. Compost and phosphate-enriched compost treatments were found to increase ryegrass shoots and roots biomass in two arable soils when compared to the control and mineral fertilizer treatments (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Khan and Joergensen, 2012</xref>). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">Morlat (2008)</xref> found significantly higher yield of ryegrass in composted treatments (18&#x2013;45&#xa0;Mg&#xa0;ha<sup>-1</sup>) compared to a control with no compost applied after long-term compost application, which also contradicted our results. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B58">Ryals and Silver (2013)</xref> also suggested the indirect positive effects of a single application of compost at the rate equivalent to 14.2&#xa0;Mg&#xa0;C&#xa0;ha<sup>-1</sup> on C sequestration through increased aboveground net primary productivity. The compost application rates used in our study (4.5&#x2013;13.5&#xa0;Mg&#xa0;ha<sup>-1</sup>, equivalent to 0.45&#x2013;1.36&#xa0;Mg&#xa0;C&#xa0;ha<sup>-1</sup>), however, were much lower than the rates applied in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">Morlat (2008)</xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B58">Ryals and Silver (2013)</xref>, thus, the plant growth promoting effect of SOM input on aboveground biomass and subsequent C sequestration from compost might become insignificant at low rates.</p>
<p>Grape yield across all treatments was significantly lower in 2020 than that in 2019 possibly due to the variability in vineyard productivity across vintages, the old age of the vines (30&#x2b; years), and the existence of Eutypa Dieback. The lack of significant difference in yield between treatment was in accordance with previous studies by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">Morlat, (2008)</xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">Mugnai et al. (2012)</xref>. However, other studies such as <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">Rubio et al. (2013)</xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Gaiotti et al. (2017)</xref> showed a positive effect on grape yield one and five&#xa0;years after compost application, respectively. Long-term vineyard trials by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Conradie and Saayman (1989)</xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">Morlat (2008)</xref> both suggested that the low grapevine demand on mineral N at 30&#x2013;40&#xa0;kg&#xa0;N&#xa0;ha<sup>-1</sup> can be the reason for the minimal yield response to compost application. The N supply from all compost treatments in our study ranged between 67.5 and 216&#xa0;kg&#xa0;N&#xa0;ha<sup>-1</sup> in the two applications. While only about 10% of this N is expected to be mineralized and become plant available in the first year after compost application, the inherent soil N mineralization alone could be a sufficient supply to the vines in the growing season (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Conradie and Saayman, 1989</xref>). It was possible that in both years the vines had met their production capacity with the N supply by the soil and through fertigation, and other external factors such as vine health, age, and climate might play a significant role in the year-to-year variability in yield during the whole experiment.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="conclusion" id="s5">
<title>5 Conclusion</title>
<p>Our study provided evidence on the lack of environmental tradeoff in the form of GHG emissions by increasing the annual application rate of a livestock manure and green waste-based compost up to 13.5&#xa0;Mg&#xa0;ha<sup>-1</sup>, which is useful information when considering balancing C budget in a California perennial vineyard system under Mediterranean climate conditions. Compost application at various rates in a California vineyard over two&#xa0;years did not increase total soil C stock, N<sub>2</sub>O and CO<sub>2</sub> emissions and GWP significantly, but had a positive effect on POXC to the depth of 60&#xa0;cm, suggesting an early trend of C stabilization in both top- and subsoil across functional locations in the vineyard. Despite seasonal fluctuations of N<sub>2</sub>O and CO<sub>2</sub> emissions, cumulative emissions were not significantly different between treatments, implying that the GHG fluxes induced by compost application were minimal when compared to the background soil emissions. Compost application also did not increase crop yield, which agrees with our initial hypothesis. The observed changes in soil C and GHG indicators in the tractor row topsoil may suggest that the cover crop also play a major role in the C dynamics and GHG emissions. It is recommended that, instead of focusing on the effects of one particular soil management practice at a time, researchers may further investigate any synergistic effects from combination of practices on C sequestration and GHG mitigation.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec sec-type="data-availability" id="s6">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the corresponding author, without undue reservation.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s7">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>All authors listed have made a substantial, direct, and intellectual contribution to the work and approved it for publication.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s8">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>This work was supported by the California Department of Food and Agriculture (CDFA) Healthy Soils Initiative (Grant number 17-0624-000-HS); the Agricultural Research Institute (ARI) of the California State University (Grant number 19-03-104), and the Research, Scholarly and Creative Activities Program awarded by the Cal Poly division of Research, Economic Development and Graduate Education.</p>
</sec>
<ack>
<p>The authors would like to express gratitude to the funding agencies, Anji Perry and the staff at J. Lohr Vineyard and Wines for their support and collaboration in the project.</p>
</ack>
<sec sec-type="COI-statement" id="s9">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="disclaimer" id="s10">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s11">
<title>Abbreviations</title>
<p>GHG, greenhouse gas; GMD, geometric mean weight; GWP, global warming potential; LM, large macroaggregate fraction; m, microaggregate fraction; Min C, mineralizable carbon; MWD, mean weight diameter; POXC, permanganate oxidizable carbon; S &#x2b; C, fraction of silt and clay; SM, small macroaggregate fraction; &#x394;SOC, changes in soil C stock; SOM, soil organic matter; WFPS, water-filled pore space.</p>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Agnelli</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bol</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Trumbore</surname>
<given-names>S. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dixon</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cocco</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Corti</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Carbon and nitrogen in soil and vine roots in harrowed and grass-covered vineyards</article-title>. <source>Agric. Ecosyst. Environ.</source> <volume>193</volume>, <fpage>70</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>82</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.agee.2014.04.023</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Brown</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cotton</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Changes in soil properties and carbon content following compost application: Results of on-farm sampling</article-title>. <source>Compost Sci. Util.</source> <volume>19</volume> (<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>87</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>96</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/1065657X.2011.10736983</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bustamante</surname>
<given-names>M. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Said-Pullicino</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Agull&#xf3;</surname>
<given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Andreu</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Paredes</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Moral</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Application of winery and distillery waste composts to a Jumilla (SE Spain) vineyard: Effects on the characteristics of a calcareous sandy-loam soil</article-title>. <source>Agric. Ecosyst. Environ.</source> <volume>140</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>80</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>87</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.agee.2010.11.014</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Calleja-Cervantes</surname>
<given-names>M. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fern&#xe1;ndez-Gonz&#xe1;lez</surname>
<given-names>A. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Irigoyen</surname>
<given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fern&#xe1;ndez-L&#xf3;pez</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Aparicio-Tejo</surname>
<given-names>P. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Men&#xe9;ndez</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015a</year>). <article-title>Thirteen years of continued application of composted organic wastes in a vineyard modify soil quality characteristics</article-title>. <source>Soil Biol. Biochem.</source> <volume>90</volume>, <fpage>241</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>254</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.07.002</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Calleja-Cervantes</surname>
<given-names>M. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Men&#xe9;ndez</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fern&#xe1;ndez-Gonz&#xe1;lez</surname>
<given-names>A. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Irigoyen</surname>
<given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cibri&#xe1;in-Sabalza</surname>
<given-names>J. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Toro</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2015b</year>). <article-title>Changes in soil nutrient content and bacterial community after 12 years of organic amendment application to a vineyard</article-title>. <source>Eur. J. Soil Sci.</source> <volume>66</volume> (<issue>4</issue>), <fpage>802</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>812</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/ejss.12261</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B73">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Carlisle</surname>
<given-names>E. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Smart</surname>
<given-names>D. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Williams</surname>
<given-names>L. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Summers</surname>
<given-names>M. </given-names>
</name>
</person-group>(<year>2010</year>). <article-title>California vineyard greenhouse gas emissions: Assessment of the available literature and determination of research needs</article-title>. <source>California Sustainable Winegrowing Alliance</source>. <comment>Available at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.sustainablewinegrowing.org/docs/CSWA%20GHG%20Report_Final.pdf">https://www.sustainablewinegrowing.org/docs/CSWA%20GHG%20Report_Final.pdf</ext-link>
</comment> (<comment>Accessed April 03, 2023</comment>)</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Celik</surname>
<given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ortas</surname>
<given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kilic</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>Effects of compost, mycorrhiza, manure and fertilizer on some physical properties of a Chromoxerert soil</article-title>. <source>Soil Tillage Res.</source> <volume>78</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>59</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>67</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.still.2004.02.012</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Cheng</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>J.-B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>M&#xfc;ller</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>S.-Q.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>15N tracing study to understand the N supply associated with organic amendments in a vineyard soil</article-title>. <source>Biol. Fertil. Soils</source> <volume>51</volume> (<issue>8</issue>), <fpage>983</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>993</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00374-015-1044-x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chenu</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Angers</surname>
<given-names>D. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Barr&#xe9;</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Derrien</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Arrouays</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Balesdent</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Increasing organic stocks in agricultural soils: Knowledge gaps and potential innovations</article-title>. <source>Soil Tillage Res.</source> <volume>188</volume>, <fpage>41</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>52</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.still.2018.04.011</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Congreves</surname>
<given-names>K. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wagner-Riddle</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Si</surname>
<given-names>B. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Clough</surname>
<given-names>T. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Nitrous oxide emissions and biogeochemical responses to soil freezing-thawing and drying-wetting</article-title>. <source>Soil Biol. Biochem.</source> <volume>117</volume>, <fpage>5</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>15</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.soilbio.2017.10.040</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Conradie</surname>
<given-names>W. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Saayman</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1989</year>). <article-title>Effects of long-term nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium fertilization on chenin blanc vines. II. Leaf analyses and grape composition</article-title>. <source>Am. J. Enology Vitic.</source> <volume>40</volume> (<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>91</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>98</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5344/ajev.1989.40.2.91</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Culman</surname>
<given-names>S. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Snapp</surname>
<given-names>S. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Green</surname>
<given-names>J. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gentry</surname>
<given-names>L. E.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Short- and long-term labile soil carbon and nitrogen dynamics reflect management and predict corn agronomic performance</article-title>. <source>Agron. J.</source> <volume>105</volume> (<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>493</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>502</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2134/agronj2012.0382</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Dalal</surname>
<given-names>R. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Robertson</surname>
<given-names>G. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Parton</surname>
<given-names>W. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Nitrous oxide emission from Australian agricultural lands and mitigation options: A review</article-title>. <source>Soil Res.</source> <volume>41</volume> (<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>165</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>195</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1071/sr02064</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Decock</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Garland</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Suddick</surname>
<given-names>E. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Johan</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). &#x201c;<article-title>Season and location-specific nitrous oxide emissions in an almond orchard in California</article-title>,&#x201d; in <source>Nutrient cycling in agroecosystems</source>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>17</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Decock</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Mitigating nitrous oxide emissions from corn cropping systems in the midwestern U.S.: Potential and data gaps</article-title>. <source>Environ. Sci. Technol.</source> <volume>48</volume> (<issue>8</issue>), <fpage>4247</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>4256</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/es4055324</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Doane</surname>
<given-names>T. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Horw&#xe1;th</surname>
<given-names>W. R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Spectrophotometric determination of nitrate with a single reagent</article-title>. <source>Anal. Lett.</source> <volume>36</volume> (<issue>12</issue>), <fpage>2713</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2722</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1081/AL-120024647</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Dobbie</surname>
<given-names>K. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Smith</surname>
<given-names>K. A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Nitrous oxide emission factors for agricultural soils in Great Britain: The impact of soil water-filled pore space and other controlling variables</article-title>. <source>Glob. Change Biol.</source> <volume>9</volume> (<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>204</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>218</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1046/j.1365-2486.2003.00563.x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Dobbie</surname>
<given-names>K. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>McTaggart</surname>
<given-names>I. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Smith</surname>
<given-names>K. A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1999</year>). <article-title>Nitrous oxide emissions from intensive agricultural systems: Variations between crops and seasons, key driving variables, and mean emission factors</article-title>. <source>J. Geophys. Res. Atmos.</source> <volume>104</volume> (<issue>D21</issue>), <fpage>26891</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>26899</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1029/1999JD900378</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Fabrizio</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tambone</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Genevini</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Effect of compost application rate on carbon degradation and retention in soils</article-title>. <source>Waste Manag.</source> <volume>29</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>174</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>179</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.wasman.2008.02.010</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Gaiotti</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Marcuzzo</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Belfiore</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lovat</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fornasier</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tomasi</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Influence of compost addition on soil properties, root growth and vine performances of Vitis vinifera cv Cabernet sauvignon</article-title>. <source>Sci. Hortic.</source> <volume>225</volume>, <fpage>88</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>95</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scienta.2017.06.052</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Garland</surname>
<given-names>G. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Suddick</surname>
<given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Burger</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Horwath</surname>
<given-names>W. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Six</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Direct N2O emissions following transition from conventional till to no-till in a cover cropped Mediterranean vineyard (Vitis vinifera)</article-title>. <source>Agric. Ecosyst. Environ.</source> <volume>144</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>423</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>428</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.agee.2011.11.001</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Garland</surname>
<given-names>G. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Suddick</surname>
<given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Burger</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Horwath</surname>
<given-names>W. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Six</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Direct N2O emissions from a Mediterranean vineyard: Event-related baseline measurements</article-title>. <source>Agric. Ecosyst. Environ.</source> <volume>195</volume>, <fpage>44</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>52</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.agee.2014.05.018</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Granli</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>B&#xf8;ckman</surname>
<given-names>O. C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1995</year>). <article-title>Nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions from soils in warm climates</article-title>. <source>Fertilizer Res.</source> <volume>42</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>159</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>163</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/BF00750510</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hannam</surname>
<given-names>K. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Neilsen</surname>
<given-names>G. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Forge</surname>
<given-names>T. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Neilsen</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Losso</surname>
<given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jones</surname>
<given-names>M. D.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Irrigation practices, nutrient applications, and mulches affect soil nutrient dynamics in a young Merlot (Vitis vinifera L.) vineyard</article-title>. <source>Can. J. Soil Sci.</source> <volume>96</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>23</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>36</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1139/cjss-2014-0118</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Haynes</surname>
<given-names>R. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2005</year>). &#x201c;<article-title>Labile organic matter fractions as central components of the quality of agricultural soils: An overview</article-title>,&#x201d; in <source>Advances in agronomy</source> (<publisher-name>Academic Press</publisher-name>), <volume>85</volume>, <fpage>221</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>268</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0065-2113(04)85005-3</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hurisso</surname>
<given-names>T. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Culman</surname>
<given-names>S. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Horwath</surname>
<given-names>W. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wade</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cass</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Beniston</surname>
<given-names>J. W.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Comparison of permanganate-oxidizable carbon and mineralizable carbon for assessment of organic matter stabilization and mineralization</article-title>. <source>Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J.</source> <volume>80</volume> (<issue>5</issue>), <fpage>1352</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1364</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2136/sssaj2016.04.0106</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hutchinson</surname>
<given-names>G. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mosier</surname>
<given-names>A. R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1981</year>). <article-title>Improved soil cover method for field measurement of nitrous oxide fluxes</article-title>. <source>Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J.</source> <volume>45</volume> (<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>311</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>316</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2136/sssaj1981.03615995004500020017x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kemper</surname>
<given-names>W. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rosenau</surname>
<given-names>R. C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1986</year>). &#x201c;<article-title>Aggregate stability and size distribution</article-title>,&#x201d; in <source>Methods of soil analysis</source> (<publisher-name>John Wiley and Sons</publisher-name>), <fpage>425</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>442</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2136/sssabookser5.1.2ed.c17</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Khan</surname>
<given-names>K. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Joergensen</surname>
<given-names>R. G.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Compost and phosphorus amendments for stimulating microorganisms and growth of ryegrass in a Ferralsol and a Luvisol</article-title>. <source>J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci.</source> <volume>175</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>108</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>114</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/jpln.201100127</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kom&#xe1;rek</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>&#x10c;adkov&#xe1;</surname>
<given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chrastn&#xfd;</surname>
<given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bordas</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bollinger</surname>
<given-names>J.-C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Contamination of vineyard soils with fungicides: A review of environmental and toxicological aspects</article-title>. <source>Environ. Int.</source> <volume>36</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>138</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>151</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.envint.2009.10.005</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Korboulewsky</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dupouyet</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bonin</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>Environmental risks of applying sewage sludge compost to vineyards</article-title>. <source>J. Environ. Qual.</source> <volume>31</volume> (<issue>5</issue>), <fpage>1522</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1527</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2134/jeq2002.1522</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kroodsma</surname>
<given-names>D. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Field</surname>
<given-names>C. B.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Carbon sequestration in California agriculture, 1980&#x2013;2000</article-title>. <source>Ecol. Appl.</source> <volume>16</volume> (<issue>5</issue>), <fpage>1975</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1985</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1890/1051-0761(2006)016[1975:csica]2.0.co;2</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lal</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>Soil carbon sequestration impacts on global climate change and food security</article-title>. <source>Science</source> <volume>304</volume> (<issue>5677</issue>), <fpage>1623</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1627</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/science.1097396</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lal</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Sequestering carbon in soils of agro-ecosystems</article-title>. <source>Food Policy</source> <volume>36</volume>, <fpage>S33</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>S39</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foodpol.2010.12.001</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lazcano</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>G&#xf3;mez-Brand&#xf3;n</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Revilla</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dom&#xed;nguez</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Short-term effects of organic and inorganic fertilizers on soil microbial community structure and function</article-title>. <source>Biol. Fertil. Soils</source> <volume>49</volume> (<issue>6</issue>), <fpage>723</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>733</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00374-012-0761-7</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Le Bissonnais</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Blavet</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>De Noni</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Laurent</surname>
<given-names>J.-Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Asseline</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chenu</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Erodibility of Mediterranean vineyard soils: Relevant aggregate stability methods and significant soil variables</article-title>. <source>Eur. J. Soil Sci.</source> <volume>58</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>188</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>195</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2389.2006.00823.x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B36">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Calder&#xf3;n</surname>
<given-names>F. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fonte</surname>
<given-names>S. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Compost inputs, cropping system, and rotation phase drive aggregate-associated carbon</article-title>. <source>Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J.</source> <volume>85</volume> (<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>829</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>846</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/saj2.20252</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B37">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Longbottom</surname>
<given-names>M. l.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Petrie</surname>
<given-names>P. r.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Role of vineyard practices in generating and mitigating greenhouse gas emissions</article-title>. <source>Aust. J. Grape Wine Res.</source> <volume>21</volume> (<issue>S1</issue>), <fpage>522</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>536</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/ajgw.12197</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B38">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Marras</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Masia</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Duce</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Spano</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sirca</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Carbon footprint assessment on a mature vineyard</article-title>. <source>Agric. For. Meteorol.</source> <volume>214&#x2013;215</volume>, <fpage>350</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>356</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.agrformet.2015.08.270</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B39">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mart&#xed;nez-Blanco</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lazcano</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Christensen</surname>
<given-names>T. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mu&#xf1;oz</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rieradevall</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>M&#xf8;ller</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Compost benefits for agriculture evaluated by life cycle assessment. A review</article-title>. <source>Agron. Sustain. Dev.</source> <volume>33</volume> (<issue>4</issue>), <fpage>721</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>732</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s13593-013-0148-7</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B40">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mart&#xed;nez-Casasnovas</surname>
<given-names>J. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ramos</surname>
<given-names>M. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Garc&#xed;a-Hern&#xe1;ndez</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Effects of land-use changes in vegetation cover and sidewall erosion in a gully head of the Pened&#xe8;s region (northeast Spain)</article-title>. <source>Earth Surf. Process. Landforms</source> <volume>34</volume> (<issue>14</issue>), <fpage>1927</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1937</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/esp.1870</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B41">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Minasny</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Malone</surname>
<given-names>B. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>McBratney</surname>
<given-names>A. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Angers</surname>
<given-names>D. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Arrouays</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chambers</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Soil carbon 4 per mille</article-title>. <source>Geoderma</source> <volume>292</volume>, <fpage>59</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>86</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.01.002</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B42">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mondini</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fornasier</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sinicco</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sivilotti</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gaiotti</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mosetti</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Organic amendment effectively recovers soil functionality in degraded vineyards</article-title>. <source>Eur. J. Agron.</source> <volume>101</volume>, <fpage>210</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>221</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.eja.2018.10.002</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B43">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Morlat</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chaussod</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Long-term additions of organic amendments in a loire valley vineyard. I. Effects on properties of a calcareous sandy soil</article-title>. <source>Am. J. Enol. Vitic.</source> <volume>59</volume> (<issue>4</issue>), <fpage>353</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>363</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5344/ajev.2008.59.4.353</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B44">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Morlat</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Long-term additions of organic amendments in a loire valley vineyard on a calcareous sandy soil. II. Effects on root system, growth, grape yield, and foliar nutrient status of a Cabernet franc vine</article-title>. <source>Am. J. Enol. Vitic.</source> <volume>59</volume> (<issue>4</issue>), <fpage>364</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>374</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5344/ajev.2008.59.4.364</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B45">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mugnai</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Masi</surname>
<given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Azzarello</surname>
<given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mancuso</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Influence of long-term application of green waste compost on soil characteristics and growth, yield and quality of grape (Vitis vinifera L.)</article-title>. <source>Compost Sci. Util.</source> <volume>20</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>29</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>33</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/1065657x.2012.10737019</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B46">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Nimmo</surname>
<given-names>J. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Perkins</surname>
<given-names>K. S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2002</year>). &#x201c;<article-title>Aggregate stability and size distribution</article-title>,&#x201d; in <source>Methods of soil analysis</source> (<publisher-name>John Wiley and Sons</publisher-name>), <fpage>317</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>328</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2136/sssabookser5.4.c14</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B47">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Oertel</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Matschullat</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zurba</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zimmermann</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Erasmi</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Greenhouse gas emissions from soils&#x2014;a review</article-title>. <source>Geochemistry</source> <volume>76</volume> (<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>327</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>352</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.chemer.2016.04.002</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B48">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Parkin</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Venterea</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2010</year>). &#x201c;<article-title>USDA-ARS GRACEnet Project Protocols, Chapter 3. Chamber-based trace gas flux measurements</article-title>,&#x201d; in <source>Sampling protocols</source>. Editor <person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname>Follett</surname>
<given-names>R. F.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> <comment>Available at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.ars.usda.gov/ARSUserFiles/31831/2011%20Parkin%20and%20Venterea%20Trace%20Gas%20Protocol%20Revision%20Final.pdf">https://www.ars.usda.gov/ARSUserFiles/31831/2011%20Parkin%20and%20Venterea%20Trace%20Gas%20Protocol%20Revision%20Final.pdf</ext-link>
</comment>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B49">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Paustian</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Collier</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Baldock</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Burgess</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Creque</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>DeLonge</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Quantifying carbon for agricultural soil management: From the current status toward a global soil information system</article-title>. <source>Carbon Manag.</source> <volume>10</volume> (<issue>6</issue>), <fpage>567</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>587</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/17583004.2019.1633231</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B50">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Peregrina</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Larrieta</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Colina</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mariscal-Sancho</surname>
<given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mart&#xed;n</surname>
<given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mart&#xed;nez-Vidaurre</surname>
<given-names>J. M.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Spent mushroom substrates influence soil quality and nitrogen availability in a semiarid vineyard soil</article-title>. <source>Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J.</source> <volume>76</volume> (<issue>5</issue>), <fpage>1655</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1666</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2136/sssaj2012.0018</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B51">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Pinamonti</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1998</year>). <article-title>Compost mulch effects on soil fertility, nutritional status and performance of grapevine</article-title>. <source>Nutrient Cycl. Agroecosyst.</source> <volume>51</volume> (<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>239</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>248</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1023/A:1009701323580</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B52">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Polge de Combret - Champart</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Guilpart</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>M&#xe9;rot</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Capillon</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gary</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Determinants of the degradation of soil structure in vineyards with a view to conversion to organic farming</article-title>. <source>Soil Use Manag.</source> <volume>29</volume> (<issue>4</issue>), <fpage>557</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>566</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/sum.12071</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B53">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ramos</surname>
<given-names>M. C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Effects of compost amendment on the available soil water and grape yield in vineyards planted after land levelling</article-title>. <source>Agric. Water Manag.</source> <volume>191</volume>, <fpage>67</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>76</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.agwat.2017.05.013</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B54">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Robertson</surname>
<given-names>G. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Paul</surname>
<given-names>E. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Harwood</surname>
<given-names>R. R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2000</year>). <article-title>Greenhouse gases in intensive agriculture: Contributions of individual gases to the radiative forcing of the atmosphere</article-title>. <source>Science</source> <volume>289</volume> (<issue>5486</issue>), <fpage>1922</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1925</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/science.289.5486.1922</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B55">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Rose</surname>
<given-names>M. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Patti</surname>
<given-names>A. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Little</surname>
<given-names>K. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Brown</surname>
<given-names>A. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jackson</surname>
<given-names>W. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cavagnaro</surname>
<given-names>T. R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). &#x201c;<article-title>Chapter two - a meta-analysis and review of plant-growth response to humic substances: Practical implications for agriculture</article-title>,&#x201d; in <source>Advances in agronomy</source>. Editor <person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname>Sparks</surname>
<given-names>D. L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<publisher-name>Academic Press</publisher-name>), <volume>124</volume>, <fpage>37</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>89</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/B978-0-12-800138-7.00002-4</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B56">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ross</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Preparing for an uncertain future with climate smart agriculture</article-title>. <source>Calif. Agric.</source> <volume>70</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>4</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>5</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3733/ca.v070n01p4</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B57">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Rubio</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>P&#xe9;rez-Murcia</surname>
<given-names>M. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Agull&#xf3;</surname>
<given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bustamante</surname>
<given-names>M. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>S&#xe1;nchez</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Paredes</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Recycling of agro-food wastes into vineyards by composting: Agronomic validation in field conditions</article-title>. <source>Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal.</source> <volume>44</volume> (<issue>1&#x2013;4</issue>), <fpage>502</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>516</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/00103624.2013.744152</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B58">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ryals</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Silver</surname>
<given-names>W. L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Effects of organic matter amendments on net primary productivity and greenhouse gas emissions in annual grasslands</article-title>. <source>Ecol. Appl.</source> <volume>23</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>46</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>59</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1890/12-0620.1</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B59">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ryals</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kaiser</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Torn</surname>
<given-names>M. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Berhe</surname>
<given-names>A. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Silver</surname>
<given-names>W. L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Impacts of organic matter amendments on carbon and nitrogen dynamics in grassland soils</article-title>. <source>Soil Biol. Biochem.</source> <volume>68</volume>, <fpage>52</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>61</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.soilbio.2013.09.011</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B60">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Salom&#xe9;</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Coll</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lardo</surname>
<given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Metay</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Villenave</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Marsden</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>The soil quality concept as a framework to assess management practices in vulnerable agroecosystems: A case study in mediterranean vineyards</article-title>. <source>Ecol. Indic.</source> <volume>61</volume>, <fpage>456</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>465</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.09.047</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B61">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Schaefer</surname>
<given-names>M. V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bogie</surname>
<given-names>N. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rath</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Marklein</surname>
<given-names>A. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Garniwan</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Haensel</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Effect of cover crop on carbon distribution in size and density separated soil aggregates</article-title>. <source>Soil Syst.</source> <volume>4</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>6</fpage>. <comment>Article 1</comment>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/soilsystems4010006</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B62">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Six</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bossuyt</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Degryze</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Denef</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>A history of research on the link between (micro)aggregates, soil biota, and soil organic matter dynamics</article-title>. <source>Soil Tillage Res.</source> <volume>79</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>7</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>31</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.still.2004.03.008</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B72">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Six</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Paustian</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Elliott</surname>
<given-names>E. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Combrink</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2000</year>). <article-title>Soil structure and soil organic matter: I. Distribution of aggregate size classes and aggregate associated carbon</article-title>. <source>Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J.</source> <volume>64</volume>, <fpage>681</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>689</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2136/sssaj2000.642681x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B74">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sokol</surname>
<given-names>N. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kuebbing</surname>
<given-names>S. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Karlsen-Ayala</surname>
<given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bradford</surname>
<given-names>M. A. </given-names>
</name>
</person-group>(<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Evidence for the primacy of living root inputs, not root or shoot litter, in forming soil organic carbon</article-title>. <source>New Phytologist </source>
<volume>221</volume>, <fpage>233</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>246</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/nph.15361</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B63">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Steenwerth</surname>
<given-names>K. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pierce</surname>
<given-names>D. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Carlisle</surname>
<given-names>E. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Spencer</surname>
<given-names>R. G. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Smart</surname>
<given-names>D. R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>A vineyard agroecosystem: Disturbance and precipitation affect soil respiration under mediterranean conditions</article-title>. <source>Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J.</source> <volume>74</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>231</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>239</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2136/sssaj2008.0346</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B64">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Stehfest</surname>
<given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bouwman</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>N2O and NO emission from agricultural fields and soils under natural vegetation: Summarizing available measurement data and modeling of global annual emissions</article-title>. <source>Nutrient Cycl. Agroecosyst.</source> <volume>74</volume> (<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>207</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>228</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10705-006-9000-7</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B65">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Tautges</surname>
<given-names>N. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chiartas</surname>
<given-names>J. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gaudin</surname>
<given-names>A. C. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>O&#x2019;Geen</surname>
<given-names>A. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Herrera</surname>
<given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Scow</surname>
<given-names>K. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Deep soil inventories reveal that impacts of cover crops and compost on soil carbon sequestration differ in surface and subsurface soils</article-title>. <source>Glob. Change Biol.</source> <volume>25</volume> (<issue>11</issue>), <fpage>3753</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3766</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/gcb.14762</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B75">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Tisdall</surname>
<given-names>J. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Oades</surname>
<given-names>J. M. </given-names>
</name>
</person-group>(<year>1982</year>). <article-title>Organic matter and water stable aggregates in soils</article-title>. <source>Journal of Soil Science </source>
<volume>33</volume>, <fpage>141</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>163</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B66">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Verhoeven</surname>
<given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Six</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Biochar does not mitigate field-scale N2O emissions in a Northern California vineyard: An assessment across two years</article-title>. <source>Agric. Ecosyst. Environ.</source> <volume>191</volume>, <fpage>27</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>38</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.agee.2014.03.008</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B67">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Verhoeven</surname>
<given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pereira</surname>
<given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Decock</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Garland</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kennedy</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Suddick</surname>
<given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>N2O emissions from California farmlands: A review</article-title>. <source>Calif. Agric.</source> <volume>71</volume> (<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>148</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>159</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3733/ca.2017a0026</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B68">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Weil</surname>
<given-names>R. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Islam</surname>
<given-names>K. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Stine</surname>
<given-names>M. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gruver</surname>
<given-names>J. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Samson-Liebig</surname>
<given-names>S. E.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Estimating active carbon for soil quality assessment: A simplified method for laboratory and field use</article-title>. <source>Am. J. Altern. Agric.</source> <volume>18</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>3</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>17</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1079/ajaa2003003</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B69">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wolff</surname>
<given-names>M. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Alsina</surname>
<given-names>M. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Stockert</surname>
<given-names>C. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Khalsa</surname>
<given-names>S. D. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Smart</surname>
<given-names>D. R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Minimum tillage of a cover crop lowers net GWP and sequesters soil carbon in a California vineyard</article-title>. <source>Soil Tillage Res.</source> <volume>175</volume>, <fpage>244</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>254</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.still.2017.06.003</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B70">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Yost</surname>
<given-names>J. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hartemink</surname>
<given-names>A. E.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>How deep is the soil studied &#x2013; An analysis of four soil science journals</article-title>. <source>Plant Soil</source> <volume>452</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>5</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>18</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11104-020-04550-z</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B71">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhu-Barker</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Easter</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Swan</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Carlson</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Thompson</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Horwath</surname>
<given-names>W. R.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Soil management practices to mitigate nitrous oxide emissions and inform emission factors in arid irrigated specialty crop systems</article-title>. <source>Soil Syst.</source> <volume>3</volume> (<issue>4</issue>), <fpage>76</fpage>. <comment>Article 4</comment>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/soilsystems3040076</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>