<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="EN" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Environ. Sci.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Environmental Science</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Environ. Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">2296-665X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">889119</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fenvs.2022.889119</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Environmental Science</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Thermodynamics and Kinetics of pH-dependent Dissolution of Sparingly Soluble Alkaline Earth Hydroxides in Source-Separated Human Urine Collected in Decentralised Sanitation Systems</article-title>
<alt-title alt-title-type="left-running-head">Simha et al.</alt-title>
<alt-title alt-title-type="right-running-head">Dissolution of Mg(OH)<sub>2</sub> in Human Urine</alt-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Simha</surname>
<given-names>Prithvi</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001">&#x2a;</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/606801/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Deb</surname>
<given-names>Chinmoy Kanti</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Randall</surname>
<given-names>Dyllon G.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1161680/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Vinner&#xe5;s</surname>
<given-names>Bj&#xf6;rn</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/574661/overview"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
<institution>Department of Energy and Technology</institution>, <institution>Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences</institution>, <addr-line>Uppsala</addr-line>, <country>Sweden</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
<institution>Civil Engineering Department and the Future Water Institute</institution>, <institution>University of Cape Town</institution>, <addr-line>Cape Town</addr-line>, <country>South Africa</country>
</aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>
<bold>Edited by:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/997282/overview">Amin Mojiri</ext-link>, Hiroshima University, Japan</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>
<bold>Reviewed by:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1681559/overview">Salem S. Abu Amr</ext-link>, Karab&#xfc;k University, Turkey</p>
<p>
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1681478/overview">Mohammed Bashir</ext-link>, Tunku Abdul Rahman University, Malaysia</p>
</fn>
<corresp id="c001">&#x2a;Correspondence: Prithvi Simha, <email>Prithvi.Simha@slu.se</email>, <email>prithvi.simha@mespom.eu</email>
</corresp>
<fn fn-type="other">
<p>This article was submitted to Water and Wastewater Management, a section of the journal Frontiers in Environmental Science</p>
</fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>12</day>
<month>04</month>
<year>2022</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2022</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>10</volume>
<elocation-id>889119</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>03</day>
<month>03</month>
<year>2022</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>17</day>
<month>03</month>
<year>2022</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#xa9; 2022 Simha, Deb, Randall and Vinner&#xe5;s.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2022</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Simha, Deb, Randall and Vinner&#xe5;s</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>Alkaline earth hydroxides are widely used in water and wastewater treatment. Within the emerging niche of source-separating sanitation, these chemicals have found a new application&#x2014;to prevent urease-catalysed degradation of urea present in freshly excreted human urine. However, little is known about the dissolution behaviour of these hydroxides in biological fluids like human urine. Herein, we investigate the solubility of Mg(OH)<sub>2</sub> and examine factors that govern its dissolution in different types of urine (real fresh urine, synthetic fresh urine, synthetic dephosphatised fresh urine and real fresh urine concentrated by CO<sub>2</sub>-free drying). We report experimentally determined as well as thermodynamically simulated data on Mg(OH)<sub>2</sub> solubility, dissolution kinetics, and chemical speciation in urine. We find that it takes between 6 and 16&#xa0;min for Mg(OH)<sub>2</sub> to dissolve and the average solubility in real fresh urine at 25&#xb0;C to be 650&#xa0;mg&#xa0;L<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>. We show that solubility is influenced mainly by concentration of organic compounds, soluble phosphate, and magnesium excreted in fresh urine. When fresh urine is supersaturated with Mg(OH)<sub>2</sub>, the pH increases to &#x3e;10.5 and urease-catalysed degradation of urea is inhibited for &#x3e;14&#xa0;days. Removing 95% water present in urine increases the solubility of Mg(OH)<sub>2</sub> to 16,240&#xa0;mg&#xa0;L<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> but reduces pH to &#x3c; 10. Because relative increase in Mg(OH)<sub>2</sub> solubility decreases as more water is removed and the solubility is retrograde with respect to temperature, to increase the urine pH to &#x3e;10 and prevent enzymatic ureolysis, the temperature must be kept &#x3c; 29&#xb0;C at 75% water removal and &#x3c; 22&#xb0;C at 95% water removal. We find this dissolution behaviour of Mg(OH)<sub>2</sub> in concentrated urine solutions to be unlike other alkaline earth hydroxides. These findings have significant implications for the design of new sanitation systems that separately collect and recycle plant-essential nutrients present in human urine.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>free ammonia</kwd>
<kwd>nutrient recycling</kwd>
<kwd>solubility</kwd>
<kwd>source separating sanitation</kwd>
<kwd>urease</kwd>
<kwd>wastewater</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<contract-sponsor id="cn001">Svenska Forskningsr&#xe5;det Formas<named-content content-type="fundref-id">10.13039/501100001862</named-content>
</contract-sponsor>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="s1">
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Compounds containing the alkaline Earth metals magnesium and calcium are abundant in nature (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Bray and Ghalayin, 2020</xref>) and used widely in the wastewater treatment sector for a variety of applications, including the removal of eutrophying nutrients (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Ahmad et al., 2020</xref>), odours (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Jefferson et al., 2002</xref>), organic pollutants (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Nie et al., 2019</xref>), heavy metals (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Dhakal et al., 2005</xref>), reactive dyes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Li et al., 2016</xref>) and microplastics (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Zhang et al., 2021</xref>). Within the niche of source separation, where technologies are being developed to separately collect, treat, and recycle different fractions of domestic wastewater (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Larsen et al., 2013</xref>), a new use for these chemicals has recently emerged. It involves using alkaline Earth monoxides and hydroxides to increase the pH of fresh source-separated human urine, which is usually &#x3c; 7&#xa0;at excretion (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Rose et al., 2015</xref>), to &#x3e;10 in order to prevent the natural degradation of urea that occurs in all sanitation systems (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Chin and Kroontje, 1963</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">H&#xf6;glund et al., 2000</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Udert et al., 2003</xref>). Urea accounts for 75&#x2013;90% of the urinary nitrogen excretion (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Rose et al., 2015</xref>). In the presence of the enzyme urease (urea amidohydrolase, EC 3.5.1.5), urea is catalytically decomposed (<italic>K</italic>
<sub>M</sub> &#x3d; 0.2&#x2013;32&#xa0;mM and <italic>t</italic>
<sub>1/2</sub> &#x3d; 20&#xa0;&#xb5;S) to ammonia and carbon dioxide (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Dixon et al., 1980</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Qin and Cabral, 2009</xref>). If the degradation of urea is prevented, then the majority of the urinary nitrogen is non-volatile and can be recovered as solids; <italic>e.g.</italic>, by evaporating urine by alkaline dehydration (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Simha et al., 2020b</xref>). A simple approach to inhibit urease is to increase the pH of urine, since alkaline conditions (pH &#x3e; 9.1) affect the functioning of the mobile &#x201c;flap&#x201d; that caps the bi-nickel active site of the enzyme (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Benini et al., 1999</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Krajewska and Ciurli, 2005</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Roberts et al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Mazzei et al., 2020</xref>).</p>
<p>In previous studies, both Mg(OH)<sub>2</sub> and Ca(OH)<sub>2</sub> have been used to alkalise fresh human urine and have been shown to increase the pH to &#x3e;10 and &#x3e;12.5, respectively (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Randall et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Vasiljev et al., 2022</xref>). Their use has even been piloted in field-scale implementation of new urine recycling technologies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Flanagan and Randall, 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Simha et al., 2020a</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Riechmann et al., 2021</xref>). However, apart from a simulation of Ca(OH)<sub>2</sub> solubility in fresh human urine by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Randall et al. (2016)</xref>, we know quite little about the dissolution behaviour of alkaline Earth hydroxides in biological fluids such as human urine.</p>
<p>In this study, we were interested in bridging this research gap. We performed experiments in parallel with thermodynamic simulations of the chemical speciation to systematically study the dissolution and quantify the solubility of Mg(OH)<sub>2</sub> in different types of urine&#x2013;real fresh urine, synthetic fresh urine, synthetic dephosphatised fresh urine and real fresh urine concentrated by evaporation in a CO<sub>2</sub>-free drying chamber. We identified factors that affect solubility, determined dissolution kinetics, quantified the concentration of major solids that form in alkalised urine, as well as assessed the accuracy of computer-simulated thermodynamic model. Our results have implications for the design of new source-separating sanitation systems that aim for recycling resources like plant-essential nutrients contained in wastewater, which is key to achieving multiple global Sustainable Development Goals.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="methods" id="s2">
<title>Methodology</title>
<sec id="s2-1">
<title>Materials</title>
<p>Light burned MgO of technical grade (&#x2265;97%, VWR Chemicals BDH<sup>&#xae;</sup>, United Kingdom) and high reactivity (citric acid neutralisation time of 45 &#xb1; 6&#xa0;s) was used. Fresh human urine (20 persons, age 25&#x2013;65) was collected using 500&#xa0;ml sterile high-density polyethylene bottles, pooled, and used within 7&#xa0;hours of donation. The samples represented urine collected over a working day (FU<sub>1</sub> and FU<sub>3</sub>), first-morning urine (FU<sub>2</sub>), and a mixture of first-morning urine and day urine (FU<sub>4</sub>). Synthetic fresh urine (SU<sub>1</sub>-SU<sub>4</sub>) that mimicked the composition of real fresh urine was prepared by dissolving urea and inorganic compounds (NaCl, Na<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub>, KCl, MgCl<sub>2</sub>.6H<sub>2</sub>O, NaH<sub>2</sub>PO<sub>4</sub>, CaCl<sub>2</sub>, and NH<sub>4</sub>Cl) in Milli-Q water and adjusting the pH of the solution with NaOH (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>). When preparing synthetic dephosphatised fresh urine (SDU<sub>1</sub>-SDU<sub>4</sub>), NaH<sub>2</sub>PO<sub>4</sub> was substituted with NaCl, to have the same sodium concentration as that measured for fresh human urine. To make concentrated fresh human urine, a sample of fresh human urine was dried in a CO<sub>2</sub>-free drying chamber till the urine weighed 1/8th of its original weight. The concentrated urine (CFU<sub>&#xd7;8</sub>) was diluted with Milli-Q water to prepare CFU<sub>&#xd7;2</sub> and CFU<sub>&#xd7;4</sub>. To make concentrated synthetic urine (CSU<sub>&#xd7;2</sub>, CSU<sub>&#xd7;4</sub> and CSU<sub>&#xd7;8</sub>), the same procedure as that for making fresh synthetic urine was followed but the concentration of urea and inorganic compounds in Milli-Q water was increased by two, four or eight times, respectively.</p>
<table-wrap id="T1" position="float">
<label>TABLE 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Composition of fresh urine samples. The compositions FU<sub>1</sub>, FU<sub>2</sub>, FU<sub>3</sub> and FU<sub>4</sub> were measured in this study, while FU<sub>5</sub>, FU<sub>6</sub>, FU<sub>7</sub> and FU<sub>8</sub> were taken from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Randall et al. (2016)</xref>, FU<sub>9</sub> from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Udert et al. (2006)</xref>, FU<sub>10</sub> from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Udert et al. (2003)</xref> and FU<sub>11</sub> from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Vasiljev et al. (2022)</xref>.</p>
</caption>
<table>
<thead valign="top">
<tr>
<th align="left">Measurement</th>
<th align="center">Unit</th>
<th align="center">FU<sub>1</sub>
</th>
<th align="center">FU<sub>2</sub>
</th>
<th align="center">FU<sub>3</sub>
</th>
<th align="center">FU<sub>4</sub>
</th>
<th align="center">FU<sub>5</sub>
</th>
<th align="center">FU<sub>6</sub>
</th>
<th align="center">FU<sub>7</sub>
</th>
<th align="center">FU<sub>8</sub>
</th>
<th align="center">FU<sub>9</sub>
</th>
<th align="center">FU<sub>10</sub>
</th>
<th align="center">FU<sub>11</sub>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td align="left">Total inorganic carbon</td>
<td align="center">mg L<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>
</td>
<td align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td align="char" char=".">28</td>
<td align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td align="center">&#x2013;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Urea-N</td>
<td align="center">mg L<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>
</td>
<td align="center">3,570</td>
<td align="center">6,260</td>
<td align="center">4,500</td>
<td align="center">3,740</td>
<td align="char" char=".">5,420</td>
<td align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td align="center">4,985</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NO<sub>2</sub>-N</td>
<td align="center">mg L<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>
</td>
<td align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x3c; 10</td>
<td align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td align="center">&#x2013;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NO<sub>3</sub>-N</td>
<td align="center">mg L<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>
</td>
<td align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td align="char" char=".">11</td>
<td align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td align="center">&#x2013;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">PO<sub>4</sub>-P</td>
<td align="center">mg L<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>
</td>
<td align="center">156</td>
<td align="center">476</td>
<td align="center">257</td>
<td align="center">265</td>
<td align="char" char=".">260</td>
<td align="center">300</td>
<td align="center">394</td>
<td align="center">329</td>
<td align="center">740</td>
<td align="center">559</td>
<td align="center">316</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Total ammonia nitrogen</td>
<td align="center">mg L<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>
</td>
<td align="center">137</td>
<td align="center">283</td>
<td align="center">177</td>
<td align="center">120</td>
<td align="char" char=".">436</td>
<td align="center">346</td>
<td align="center">418</td>
<td align="center">170</td>
<td align="center">480</td>
<td align="center">386</td>
<td align="center">115</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">dissolved COD</td>
<td align="center">mg L<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>
</td>
<td align="center">3,767</td>
<td align="center">9,933</td>
<td align="center">5,767</td>
<td align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td align="char" char=".">6,400</td>
<td align="center">5,900</td>
<td align="center">6,910</td>
<td align="center">5,500</td>
<td align="center">10,000</td>
<td align="center">9,700</td>
<td align="center">&#x2013;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Cl<sup>&#x2212;</sup>
</td>
<td align="center">mg L<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>
</td>
<td align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td align="char" char=".">4,430</td>
<td align="center">4,780</td>
<td align="center">4,790</td>
<td align="center">3,380</td>
<td align="center">3,800</td>
<td align="center">5,230</td>
<td align="center">&#x2013;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">SO<sub>4</sub>
<sup>2-</sup>
</td>
<td align="center">mg L<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>
</td>
<td align="center">1,551</td>
<td align="center">2,143</td>
<td align="center">1709</td>
<td align="center">1847</td>
<td align="char" char=".">825</td>
<td align="center">825</td>
<td align="center">817</td>
<td align="center">673</td>
<td align="center">1,050</td>
<td align="center">1,500</td>
<td align="center">977</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Na<sup>&#x2b;</sup>
</td>
<td align="center">mg L<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>
</td>
<td align="center">875</td>
<td align="center">1856</td>
<td align="center">1,135</td>
<td align="center">2,404</td>
<td align="char" char=".">2,510</td>
<td align="center">2,600</td>
<td align="center">2,580</td>
<td align="center">2,340</td>
<td align="center">2,600</td>
<td align="center">3,730</td>
<td align="center">1,406</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">K<sup>&#x2b;</sup>
</td>
<td align="center">mg L<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>
</td>
<td align="center">1,016</td>
<td align="center">1,204</td>
<td align="center">798</td>
<td align="center">822</td>
<td align="char" char=".">469</td>
<td align="center">2,130</td>
<td align="center">2,810</td>
<td align="center">2,730</td>
<td align="center">2,200</td>
<td align="center">2,250</td>
<td align="center">1,547</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Ca<sup>2&#x2b;</sup>
</td>
<td align="center">mg L<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>
</td>
<td align="center">53</td>
<td align="center">136</td>
<td align="center">69</td>
<td align="center">82</td>
<td align="char" char=".">132</td>
<td align="center">100</td>
<td align="center">326</td>
<td align="center">77</td>
<td align="center">190</td>
<td align="center">168</td>
<td align="center">94</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Mg<sup>2&#x2b;</sup>
</td>
<td align="center">mg L<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>
</td>
<td align="center">30</td>
<td align="center">89</td>
<td align="center">48</td>
<td align="center">44</td>
<td align="char" char=".">57</td>
<td align="center">158</td>
<td align="center">148</td>
<td align="center">44</td>
<td align="center">100</td>
<td align="center">121</td>
<td align="center">53</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">pH</td>
<td align="center">-</td>
<td align="center">6.3</td>
<td align="center">6.0</td>
<td align="center">6.1</td>
<td align="center">6.5</td>
<td align="char" char=".">6.3</td>
<td align="center">6.6</td>
<td align="center">6.9</td>
<td align="center">6.7</td>
<td align="center">6.2</td>
<td align="center">6.0</td>
<td align="center">6.3</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-2">
<title>Solubility of Mg(OH)<sub>2</sub> in Human Urine</title>
<p>To study the dissolution of Mg(OH)<sub>2</sub> in urine, flasks containing 250&#xa0;ml fresh urine were dosed with 2&#xa0;g MgO L<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>, covered with parafilm, and placed at room temperature (23 &#xb1; 2&#xb0;C) over a magnetic stirrer set to 700&#xa0;rpm for 60&#xa0;min. Pre-trials indicated that at these experimental conditions (MgO dosage, mixing speed and duration), less than 15&#xa0;min was required for electrical conductivity (EC) of urine to increase and equilibrate. The pH, electrical conductivity, and temperature of urine were monitored at 60&#xa0;s intervals for the first 15&#xa0;min, and thereafter at every 15&#xa0;min interval. The pH was measured using a single junction gel electrode (13-620-AE6, Fisher Scientific United States) connected to a benchtop pH meter (AE150 accumet, Fisher Scientific, United States), while the EC and temperature were monitored with a probe (TetraCon 325, WTW, Germany) connected to a handheld meter (Cond 340i, WTW, Germany). After 60&#xa0;min, the urine was filtered using a 0.45&#xa0;&#x3bc;m pore size filter paper (Merck KGaA, Germany) placed in a vacuum filtration system (Uni-Crown, Taiwan) that was set to a pressure of 1.5&#xa0;atm. A representative sample of the filtered urine was acidified to a pH of &#x3c; 2 by adding 1&#xa0;M H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> and stored at 4&#xb0;C for further analysis.</p>
<p>To determine the effect of organic substances and soluble phosphate present in urine on the solubility of Mg(OH)<sub>2</sub>, the dissolution experiments were repeated using synthetic fresh human urine and synthetic dephosphatised fresh human urine, respectively.</p>
<p>To determine the effect of water removal (<italic>i.e.</italic>, concentrating urine) on the solubility of Mg(OH)<sub>2</sub>, the dissolution experiments were repeated with concentrated real fresh urine and concentrated synthetic fresh urine. All the experiments were performed in triplicate and average values along with their standard deviation are reported.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-3">
<title>Inhibition of Urease</title>
<p>Flasks containing 250&#xa0;ml fresh human urine or fresh human urine dosed with 2&#xa0;g MgO L<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> were contaminated with 7.3&#xa0;mg urease L<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> (lyophilised urease from <italic>Canavalia ensiformis</italic> with activity of &#x2265;5 U mg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>; 108,489 urease, Merck, Germany), covered with parafilm, and placed over a magnetic stirrer set to 700&#xa0;rpm at room temperature (23 &#xb1; 2&#xb0;C). The flasks were monitored for 14&#xa0;days, and daily measurements were made for pH and total ammonia concentration in urine. As control, flasks containing fresh urine and fresh urine saturated with Mg(OH)<sub>2</sub>, both without any urease contamination were also monitored. The concentration of urease was fixed based on the enzymatic activity reported by the manufacturer (5&#xa0;&#xb5;mol ammonia mg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>&#xa0;min<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>), a total hydrolysis time of 14&#xa0;days, and assuming that fresh urine contained 10&#xa0;g urea L<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-4">
<title>Analytical Methods</title>
<p>The concentration of total ammonia nitrogen, total nitrogen, and chemical oxygen demand was determined colorimetrically using Spectroquant<sup>&#xae;</sup> test kits according to the instructions of the manufacturer (Merck KGaA, Germany) and a Spectroquant<sup>&#xae;</sup> photometer (NOVA 60 A, Merck KGaA, Germany). The concentration of phosphorus, potassium, calcium, magnesium, sodium, and sulphur was determined by inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectrometry (Optima Avio 200, PerkinElmer, United States), prior to which urine samples were digested with 65% HNO<sub>3</sub> and diluted with Milli-Q water.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-5">
<title>Calculations</title>
<p>The solubility of Mg(OH)<sub>2</sub> in urine was calculated using <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="e1">Eq. 1</xref>, whereas the MgO dosage required to saturate fresh human urine with Mg(OH)<sub>2</sub> was calculated using <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="e2">Eq. 2</xref>.<disp-formula id="e1">
<mml:math id="m1">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="italic">Solubilit</mml:mi>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>y</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="italic">Mg</mml:mi>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="italic">OH</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>2</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mi>&#x3d;</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>[</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>M</mml:mi>
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mi>g</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>aq</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>2&#x2b;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msubsup>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>]</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#xd7;</mml:mi>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>M</mml:mi>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>M</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mg</mml:mi>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>OH</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>2</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>M</mml:mi>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>M</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">2&#x2b;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
<label>(1)</label>
</disp-formula>
<disp-formula id="e2">
<mml:math id="m2">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="italic">Saturation</mml:mi>
<mml:mtext>&#x2009;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mi mathvariant="italic">dos</mml:mi>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="italic">MgO</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mi>&#x3d;</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>{</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>[</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>M</mml:mi>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mi>g</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>2&#x2b;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>]</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>aq</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mi>&#x2b;</mml:mi>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>[</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>M</mml:mi>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mi>g</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>2&#x2b;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>]</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="italic">s</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mi>-</mml:mi>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>[</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>M</mml:mi>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mi>g</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>2&#x2b;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>]</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>}</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#xd7;</mml:mi>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>M</mml:mi>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>M</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>MgO</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>M</mml:mi>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>M</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">2&#x2b;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
<label>(2)</label>
</disp-formula>where <inline-formula id="inf1">
<mml:math id="m3">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>[</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>2&#x2b;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>]</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>aq</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> and <inline-formula id="inf2">
<mml:math id="m4">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>[</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">2&#x2b;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>]</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">&#xa0;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> are the concentration of Mg<sup>2&#x2b;</sup> in the filtered urine and in the precipitated solids, <inline-formula id="inf3">
<mml:math id="m5">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>[</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">2&#x2b;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>]</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> is the concentration of Mg<sup>2&#x2b;</sup> initially present in the fresh urine, and <inline-formula id="inf4">
<mml:math id="m6">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mg</mml:mi>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>, <inline-formula id="inf5">
<mml:math id="m7">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MgO</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> and <inline-formula id="inf6">
<mml:math id="m8">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">2&#x2b;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> are the molar mass of Mg(OH)<sub>2</sub>, MgO and magnesium, respectively.</p>
<p>The concentration factor, which can be defined either as the ratio of volume of water present in urine initially to the volume of water left after evaporation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Randall and Nathoo, 2015</xref>), or the proportion of ion concentration in urine after evaporation versus the ion concentration in fresh urine (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Pronk et al., 2006</xref>), was calculated using <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="e3">Eq. 3</xref>.<disp-formula id="e3">
<mml:math id="m9">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CF&#x3d;</mml:mi>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="italic">wate</mml:mi>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>r</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mi>&#xa0;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="italic">wate</mml:mi>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>r</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>f</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
<mml:mi>&#xa0;or&#xa0;</mml:mi>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mstyle displaystyle="true">
<mml:mo>&#x2211;</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>C</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="italic">C,f</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mi>&#x2b;</mml:mi>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>C</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="italic">A,f</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mstyle>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mstyle displaystyle="true">
<mml:mo>&#x2211;</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>C</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="italic">C,i</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mi>&#x2b;</mml:mi>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>C</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="italic">A,i</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mstyle>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
<label>(3)</label>
</disp-formula>
</p>
<p>The subscripts <italic>i</italic> and <italic>f</italic> refer to fresh urine and concentrated urine, respectively, whereas <italic>C</italic> and <italic>A</italic> refer to cations and anions.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-6">
<title>Modelling of Dissolution Kinetics and Chemical Speciation</title>
<p>To determine the pH of human urine as function of time, the experimental data was fitted to the pseudo second order kinetic model (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="e4">Eq. 4</xref>).<disp-formula id="e4">
<mml:math id="m10">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>p</mml:mi>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>H</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>k</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mi>p</mml:mi>
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mi>H</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>q</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:msubsup>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>k</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mi>p</mml:mi>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>H</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>q</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
<label>(4)</label>
</disp-formula>where k<sub>2</sub> (min<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>) is the rate constant, and <italic>pH</italic>
<sub>
<italic>t</italic>
</sub> and <italic>pH</italic>
<sub>
<italic>eq</italic>
</sub> are the pH of urine at time <italic>t</italic> and at equilibrium, respectively. To evaluate goodness of fit of the model, the correlation coefficient (<italic>R</italic>
<sup>2</sup>; <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="e5">Eq. 5</xref>) and normalised standard deviation &#x394;<italic>pH</italic> (%; <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="e6">Eq. 6</xref>) were calculated.<disp-formula id="e5">
<mml:math id="m11">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mi>R</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:msup>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mstyle displaystyle="true">
<mml:mo>&#x2211;</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>p</mml:mi>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>H</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>c</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>l</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mover accent="true">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>p</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>H</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="true">&#xaf;</mml:mo>
</mml:mover>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>c</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>l</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>p</mml:mi>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>H</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>x</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>p</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mover accent="true">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>p</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>H</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="true">&#xaf;</mml:mo>
</mml:mover>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>x</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>p</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mstyle>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mstyle displaystyle="true">
<mml:mo>&#x2211;</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>p</mml:mi>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>H</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>c</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>l</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mover accent="true">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>p</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>H</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="true">&#xaf;</mml:mo>
</mml:mover>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>c</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>l</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:msup>
<mml:mstyle displaystyle="true">
<mml:mo>&#x2211;</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>p</mml:mi>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>H</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>x</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>p</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mover accent="true">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>p</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>H</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="true">&#xaf;</mml:mo>
</mml:mover>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>x</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>p</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mstyle>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mstyle>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
<label>(5)</label>
</disp-formula>
<disp-formula id="e6">
<mml:math id="m12">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x394;pH&#x3d;100&#xd7;</mml:mi>
<mml:msqrt>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mstyle displaystyle="true">
<mml:mo>&#x2211;</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>[</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>p</mml:mi>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>H</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="italic">t,exp</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>-</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>p</mml:mi>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>H</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>t,cal</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>/</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>p</mml:mi>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>H</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="italic">t,exp</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>]</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mstyle>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>2</mml:mi>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>-</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msqrt>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
<label>(6)</label>
</disp-formula>where <italic>pH</italic>
<sub>
<italic>t,cal</italic>
</sub> and <italic>pH</italic>
<sub>
<italic>t,exp</italic>
</sub> are the calculated and experimental pH of urine at time <italic>t</italic>, <inline-formula id="inf7">
<mml:math id="m13">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mover accent="true">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>p</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>H</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="true">&#xaf;</mml:mo>
</mml:mover>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>
<sub>
<italic>t,exp</italic>
</sub> is the average of <italic>pH</italic>
<sub>
<italic>t,exp</italic>
</sub> and <italic>n</italic> is the number of data points (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Lin and Wang, 2009</xref>).</p>
<p>The software OLI Stream Analyzer (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">OLI Systems Inc., 2020</xref>) was used (using the Mixed Solvent Electrolyte model option) to simulate the pH, chemical speciation, and major solids formed in urine at thermodynamic equilibrium. The pH predicted by the software was matched with the experimentally determined pH using <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="e4">Eq. 4</xref>, and used to estimate the kinetics of chemical speciation, <italic>i.e.</italic>, time required for Mg(OH)<sub>2</sub> to dissolve and for major solids to form in urine. The simulations were made for different compositions of real and synthetic urine used in this study (FU<sub>1</sub>-FU<sub>4</sub>), as well as for urine compositions taken from literature (FU<sub>5</sub>-FU<sub>11</sub>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-7">
<title>Statistical Analyses</title>
<p>The experiment data was tested for normality and homogeneity of variance, after which one way analysis of variance at 95% confidence interval was performed to assess whether the initial composition of fresh urine and the type of urine (fresh, synthetic or concentrated) had a significant influence on the pH, EC and elemental composition of the saturated urine as well as the solubility of Mg(OH)<sub>2</sub>. When significant differences were found, a post-hoc test (Tukey&#x2019;s honest significant difference) was performed at 95% confidence interval. In addition, exploratory principal component analysis was conducted to identify variables that explained the variance in the solubility data, following which linear regression analysis was performed on the variables of interest. All the statistical analyses were carried out in RStudio version 1.2.5042 and R version 4.0.0 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">RStudio Team, 2016</xref>).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="results" id="s3">
<title>Results</title>
<sec id="s3-1">
<title>Inhibition of Enzymatic Urea Hydrolysis</title>
<p>The effect of introducing urease to fresh urine, with and without alkalisation by Mg(OH)<sub>2</sub> are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1</xref>. Without any Mg(OH)<sub>2</sub>, urea is quickly hydrolysed to ammonia (1860&#xa0;mg&#xa0;L<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> after 14&#xa0;days), which increases the pH of urine to 8.6. In fresh urine treated with Mg(OH)<sub>2</sub>, the concentration of total ammonia nitrogen increased from 100&#xa0;mg&#xa0;L<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> to 128&#xa0;mg&#xa0;L<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> after 14&#xa0;days. This corresponds to a urea hydrolysis rate of just 0.5%. As fresh urine was dosed with excess MgO (2&#xa0;g&#xa0;L<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>), it was saturated with Mg(OH)<sub>2</sub> and maintained a pH of &#x3e;10.5 for 14&#xa0;days.</p>
<fig id="F1" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 1</label>
<caption>
<p>The <bold>(A)</bold> concentration of total ammonia nitrogen (TAN) and the <bold>(B)</bold> pH is shown over time (days) for fresh human urine, with (red) and without (orange) contamination by jack bean urease and for fresh human urine alkalised using Mg(OH)<sub>2</sub>, with (green) and without (blue) contamination by jack bean urease. Data points are average values of three replicates and error bars show the standard deviation.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fenvs-10-889119-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-2">
<title>Simulation of Mg(OH)<sub>2</sub> Dissolution</title>
<p>When MgO is added to fresh urine, it hydrates to Mg(OH)<sub>2</sub>. As Mg(OH)<sub>2</sub> dissolves in urine, the concentration of Mg<sup>2&#x2b;</sup>(aq) and OH<sup>&#x2212;</sup>(aq) increases (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="e7">Eq. 7</xref>), resulting in a corresponding increase in the urine pH (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2</xref>). Depending on the composition of urine, when the pH is between 6.8 and 7.4, the concentration of Mg<sup>2&#x2b;</sup>(aq) and <inline-formula id="inf8">
<mml:math id="m14">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi>
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">3-</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msubsup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> (aq) starts decreasing, whereas the concentration of Mg<sup>2&#x2b;</sup>(s) starts increasing, suggesting that the precipitation of struvite is triggered. This trend continues until pH 8.6, when the majority of the soluble phosphate is precipitated.<disp-formula id="e7">
<mml:math id="m15">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MgO</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">&#x2b;</mml:mi>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O&#x2194;Mg</mml:mi>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">&#x2194;M</mml:mi>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">2&#x2b;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aq</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">&#x2b;2O</mml:mi>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">-</mml:mi>
</mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aq</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
<label>(7)</label>
</disp-formula>
</p>
<fig id="F2" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 2</label>
<caption>
<p>The concentration of Mg<sup>2&#x2b;</sup>(aq) (blue), Mg<sup>2&#x2b;</sup>(s) (yellow) and <inline-formula id="inf9">
<mml:math id="m16">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi>
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">3-</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msubsup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> (aq) (<sup>&#x2026;</sup>), in fresh human urine treated with MgO at 25&#xb0;C. The simulated pH (<bold>&#x2015;</bold>) is shown on the secondary <italic>y</italic>-axis. For the simulations, four different urine compositions measured in this study were used: FU<sub>1</sub> <bold>(A)</bold>, FU<sub>2</sub> <bold>(B)</bold>, FU<sub>3</sub> <bold>(C)</bold> and FU<sub>4</sub> <bold>(D)</bold>. See <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref> for the urine compositions.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fenvs-10-889119-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>At 25&#xb0;C, between 80 and 700&#xa0;mg&#xa0;Mg(OH)<sub>2</sub>&#xa0;L<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> dissolves, depending on the composition of urine (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3A</xref>). The average simulated Mg(OH)<sub>2</sub> solubility is 365&#xa0;mg&#xa0;L<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>, making it sparingly soluble in fresh human urine. The dissolution of Mg(OH)<sub>2</sub> increases the pH of urine to 10 &#xb1; 0.15&#xa0;at 25&#xb0;C (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3B</xref>). The overall dosage of MgO needed to saturate fresh urine with Mg(OH)<sub>2</sub> at 25&#xb0;C varies between 250 and 970&#xa0;mg&#xa0;L<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3C</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F3" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 3</label>
<caption>
<p>The simulated <bold>(A)</bold> solubility of Mg(OH)<sub>2</sub>, <bold>(B)</bold> pH and <bold>(C)</bold> MgO dosage needed to saturate fresh human urine at different temperatures and for different urine compositions. The compositions are described in detail in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fenvs-10-889119-g003.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>The dissolution of Mg(OH)<sub>2</sub> is exothermic, so it has retrograde solubility in fresh urine. Increasing the temperature decreases Mg(OH)<sub>2</sub> solubility (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3A</xref>) as well as the pH of urine (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3B</xref>). The solubility of Mg(OH)<sub>2</sub> in concentrated fresh urine is higher than its solubility in fresh urine (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4A</xref>) and there is a linear relationship between solubility and urine concentration factor (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5</xref>). At 25&#xb0;C and CF &#x3d; 32, the solubility of Mg(OH)<sub>2</sub> in concentrated fresh urine is 16,240&#xa0;mg&#xa0;L<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>, which is 27 times higher than the solubility in fresh urine (<xref ref-type="sec" rid="s11">Supplementary Figure S1</xref>). As a result, at a given temperature, the higher the concentration factor, the lower is the pH of fresh urine when it is saturated with Mg(OH)<sub>2</sub> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4B</xref>). Only when &#x3e;98% of the water is removed from urine, <italic>i.e.</italic>, concentration factors above 60, the minerals arcanite and halite are predicted to precipitate (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F4" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 4</label>
<caption>
<p>The simulated <bold>(A)</bold> solubility of Mg(OH)<sub>2</sub> and <bold>(B)</bold> pH of fresh human urine at different concentration factors and temperatures.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fenvs-10-889119-g004.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig id="F5" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 5</label>
<caption>
<p>The concentration factor (&#x002D;) obtained as function of water removed (%) from urine. Shown on the secondary y-axis are simulated (green squares) and experimentally determined (red squares) solubility of Mg(OH)<sub>2</sub>, as well as the simulated amount of struvite (&#x25CB;), hydroxyapatite (&#x2219;), halite (&#x002B;) and arcanite (&#x2715;) that form in urine.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fenvs-10-889119-g005.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-3">
<title>Experimentally Determined Mg(OH)<sub>2</sub> Solubility</title>
<p>The solubility of Mg(OH)<sub>2</sub> in real fresh urine at 23 &#xb1; 2&#xb0;C was measured to be between 495&#xa0;mg&#xa0;L<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> (FU<sub>1</sub>) and 940&#xa0;mg&#xa0;L<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> (FU<sub>2</sub>), varying with urine composition (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure 6</xref>). According to the mass balance (<xref ref-type="sec" rid="s11">Supplementary Figure S2</xref>), 60% (&#xb1;2) of the total ammonia initially present in fresh urine, which accounted for 10% (&#xb1;5%) of the total nitrogen, precipitated when the urine was saturated with Mg(OH)<sub>2</sub>. In addition, 94% (&#xb1;3) of the total phosphorus, 69% (&#xb1;23) of the calcium, and 55% (&#xb1;9) of the sulphur also precipitated. The solubility of Mg(OH)<sub>2</sub> in real fresh urine increased when the urine was concentrated by evaporation (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5</xref>). At CF &#x3d; 8, the solubility was 3,980&#xa0;mg&#xa0;L<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> or about seven times higher than the solubility in unconcentrated fresh urine, whereas the pH of urine decreased from 10.6 to 9.8. The relative increase in Mg(OH)<sub>2</sub> solubility for concentrated fresh synthetic urine was lower than the relative increase in solubility for real urine. The pH of synthetic fresh urine saturated with Mg(OH)<sub>2</sub> was &#x3e;11, but the pH dropped to 10.3 (&#xb1;0.1) at CF&#x3d;16 (<xref ref-type="sec" rid="s11">Supplementary Figure S3</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F6" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 6</label>
<caption>
<p>The experimentally determined solubility and the simulated solubility of Mg(OH)<sub>2</sub> in real fresh urine (blue), synthetic fresh urine (orange) and dephosphatised synthetic fresh urine (green). Data points for experimental solubility are average values of three replicates, with error bars showing the standard deviation. Dashed lines represent linear fit to the experimental data.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fenvs-10-889119-g006.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>The deviation between the Mg(OH)<sub>2</sub> solubility determined in experiments and the thermodynamic simulations were less than 5% (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure 6</xref>), suggesting that the thermodynamic model accurately predicted the chemical speciation in urine. In fact, the experimentally measured EC in urine and the simulated Mg(OH)<sub>2</sub> solubility curve had the same trend&#x2013;increasing at first, then decreasing, and finally equilibrating. In comparison to real fresh urine, the solubility of Mg(OH)<sub>2</sub>&#xa0;at 23 &#xb1; 2 &#xb0;C was less in synthetic (393 &#xb1; 180&#xa0;mg&#xa0;L<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>) and dephosphatised synthetic urine (452 &#xb1; 126&#xa0;mg&#xa0;L<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>), and the deviation between the simulated and experimental values was much larger (&#x3e;28%).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-4">
<title>Simulation of Mg(OH)<sub>2</sub> Dissolution Kinetics</title>
<p>By matching the experimentally determined pH with the thermodynamically simulated pH of urine, we could also simulate the kinetics of Mg(OH)<sub>2</sub> dissolution. We found that it took between 6 and 16&#xa0;min for brucite (Mg(OH)<sub>2</sub>) to dissolve (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">Figure 7</xref>), which compares well with the time required for the pH to increase to &#x3e;10 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8">Figure 8</xref>) and EC to equilibrate (<xref ref-type="sec" rid="s11">Supplementary Figure S4</xref>). In addition to brucite, struvite and hydroxyapatite were the only two minerals predicted to form. All the urine solutions were supersaturated with respect to struvite in 10&#xa0;min, while hydroxyapatite supersaturation required less than 2&#xa0;min. It is likely that both the minerals precipitated in 15&#xa0;min as the change in EC of urine is less than 5% after this (<xref ref-type="sec" rid="s11">Supplementary Figure S4</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F7" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 7</label>
<caption>
<p>Kinetics of dissolution of Mg(OH)<sub>2</sub> (black line) and formation of hydroxyapatite (red line) and struvite (green line) in fresh urine dosed with 2&#xa0;g MgO L<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> at 25&#x00B0;C. Four different urine compositions were used: FU<sub>1</sub> <bold>(A)</bold>, FU<sub>2</sub> <bold>(B)</bold>, FU<sub>3</sub> <bold>(C)</bold> and FU<sub>4</sub> <bold>(D)</bold>.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fenvs-10-889119-g007.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig id="F8" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 8</label>
<caption>
<p>Mg(OH)<sub>2</sub> dissolution kinetics in <bold>(A)</bold> fresh urine and <bold>(B)</bold> concentrated fresh urine. Data points show experimentally determined average pH values and dashed lines represent first order kinetic fit by linear regression and plotted using rate constants shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref>. For fresh urine, four urine compositions were used: FU<sub>1</sub> (blue), FU<sub>2</sub> (red), FU<sub>3</sub> (yellow) and FU<sub>4</sub> (green). For concentrated fresh urine, FU<sub>1</sub> was dehydrated to make CFU<sub>&#xd7;2</sub> (&#x25AA;), CFU<sub>&#xd7;4</sub> (&#x25c6;) and CFU<sub>&#xd7;8</sub> (&#x25b2;).</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fenvs-10-889119-g008.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-5">
<title>Experimentally Determined Mg(OH)<sub>2</sub> Dissolution Kinetics</title>
<p>In experiments, after 60&#xa0;min of mixing at 700&#xa0;rpm, the pH of real fresh urine treated with Mg(OHJ<sub>2</sub> reached &#x3e;10.5 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8">Figure 8A</xref>) and remained stable during 14 days of storage in a closed flask (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1</xref>). To reach pH 10, the average time required was 8.9 &#xb1; 5.7&#xa0;min. Increasing the urine concentration factor reduced the pH but increased the time required to achieve saturation (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref>). The Mg(OH)<sub>2</sub> dissolution kinetics in both fresh urine and concentrated fresh urine was well described (<italic>R</italic>
<sup>2</sup> &#x3d; &#x3e;0.99 and &#x394;<italic>pH</italic> &#x3d; &#x3c;5%) by the pseudo-second order rate equation (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8">Figures 8A,B</xref>) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref>). Similar trends were seen when the experiments were repeated with synthetic fresh urine and synthetic concentrated urine, although the pH of urine was higher, and the time required to reach equilibrium was less in comparison to real fresh urine.</p>
<table-wrap id="T2" position="float">
<label>TABLE 2</label>
<caption>
<p>Dissolution kinetics of Mg(OH)<sub>2</sub> in real fresh urine (FU), synthetic fresh urine (SU), concentrated fresh urine (CFU) and concentrated fresh synthetic urine (CSU).</p>
</caption>
<table>
<thead valign="top">
<tr>
<th rowspan="2" align="left">Urine</th>
<th align="center">
<italic>pH</italic>
<sub>
<italic>eq,exp</italic>
</sub>
<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn1">
<italic>
<sup>a</sup>
</italic>
</xref>
</th>
<th align="center">
<italic>pH</italic>
<sub>
<italic>eq, calc</italic>
</sub>
<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn2">
<italic>
<sup>b</sup>
</italic>
</xref>
</th>
<th align="center">
<italic>K</italic>
<sub>
<italic>2</italic>
</sub>
</th>
<th align="center">
<italic>t</italic>
<sub>
<italic>eq</italic>
</sub>
</th>
<th align="center">
<italic>R</italic>
<sup>2</sup>
</th>
<th align="center">&#x394;<italic>pH</italic>
</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th align="center">[&#x2212;]</th>
<th align="center">[&#x2212;]</th>
<th align="center">[min<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>]</th>
<th align="center">[min]</th>
<th align="center">[&#x2212;]</th>
<th align="center">[%]</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td align="left">FU<sub>1</sub>
</td>
<td align="char" char=".">10.6</td>
<td align="char" char=".">10.7</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.21</td>
<td align="char" char=".">51.8</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.99</td>
<td align="char" char=".">3.3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">FU<sub>2</sub>
</td>
<td align="char" char=".">10.4</td>
<td align="char" char=".">10.6</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.09</td>
<td align="char" char=".">120</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.99</td>
<td align="char" char=".">1.6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">FU<sub>3</sub>
</td>
<td align="char" char=".">10.6</td>
<td align="char" char=".">10.7</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.25</td>
<td align="char" char=".">42.9</td>
<td align="char" char=".">1</td>
<td align="char" char=".">1.2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">FU<sub>4</sub>
</td>
<td align="char" char=".">10.6</td>
<td align="char" char=".">10.7</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.21</td>
<td align="char" char=".">51.3</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.99</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">SU<sub>1</sub>
</td>
<td align="char" char=".">11.1</td>
<td align="char" char=".">11.2</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.24</td>
<td align="char" char=".">47.2</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.99</td>
<td align="char" char=".">4.3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">SU<sub>2</sub>
</td>
<td align="char" char=".">10.8</td>
<td align="char" char=".">11.2</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.24</td>
<td align="char" char=".">47.2</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.99</td>
<td align="char" char=".">11.1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">SU<sub>3</sub>
</td>
<td align="char" char=".">10.8</td>
<td align="char" char=".">10.9</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.24</td>
<td align="char" char=".">46.3</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.99</td>
<td align="char" char=".">3.5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">SU<sub>4</sub>
</td>
<td align="char" char=".">11</td>
<td align="char" char=".">11.1</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.24</td>
<td align="char" char=".">45.4</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.99</td>
<td align="char" char=".">3.1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">CFU<sub>&#xd7;2</sub>
</td>
<td align="char" char=".">10.1</td>
<td align="char" char=".">10.1</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.88</td>
<td align="char" char=".">11.4</td>
<td align="char" char=".">1</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">CFU<sub>&#xd7;4</sub>
</td>
<td align="char" char=".">9.9</td>
<td align="char" char=".">9.9</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.45</td>
<td align="char" char=".">22.3</td>
<td align="char" char=".">1</td>
<td align="char" char=".">2.5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">CFU<sub>&#xd7;8</sub>
</td>
<td align="char" char=".">9.8</td>
<td align="char" char=".">9.8</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.43</td>
<td align="char" char=".">22.8</td>
<td align="char" char=".">1</td>
<td align="char" char=".">3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">CSU<sub>&#xd7;2</sub>
</td>
<td align="char" char=".">10.9</td>
<td align="char" char=".">10.9</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.88</td>
<td align="char" char=".">11.4</td>
<td align="char" char=".">1</td>
<td align="char" char=".">5.4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">CSU<sub>&#xd7;4</sub>
</td>
<td align="char" char=".">10.8</td>
<td align="char" char=".">10.8</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.79</td>
<td align="char" char=".">13.6</td>
<td align="char" char=".">1</td>
<td align="char" char=".">7.1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">CSU<sub>&#xd7;8</sub>
</td>
<td align="char" char=".">10.5</td>
<td align="char" char=".">10.6</td>
<td align="char" char=".">1.03</td>
<td align="char" char=".">10.3</td>
<td align="char" char=".">1</td>
<td align="char" char=".">4.8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">CSU<sub>&#xd7;16</sub>
</td>
<td align="char" char=".">10.3</td>
<td align="char" char=".">10.3</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.39</td>
<td align="char" char=".">10.3</td>
<td align="char" char=".">1</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.7</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn id="Tfn1">
<label>a</label>
<p>pH measured after 60&#xa0;min of continuous mixing at 700&#xa0;rpm and 23 &#xb1; 2&#xb0;C.</p>
</fn>
<fn id="Tfn2">
<label>b</label>
<p>Calculated from rate equation.</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="discussion" id="s4">
<title>Discussion</title>
<sec id="s4-1">
<title>Factors Affecting the Solubility of Mg(OH)<sub>2</sub> in Urine</title>
<p>The results of our study demonstrated that Mg(OH)<sub>2</sub>, an alkaline Earth metal compound, is sparingly soluble in freshly excreted human urine. Despite a low solubility of &#x3c; 1&#xa0;g&#xa0;Mg(OH)<sub>2</sub>&#xa0;L<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>&#xa0;at 25&#xb0;C, fresh urine saturated with Mg(OH)<sub>2</sub> has pH &#x3e; 10.5, which we also demonstrated as being sufficient alkalinity to inhibit the enzymatic degradation of urea (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1</xref>). Yet, many factors determine the solubility of this compound in human urine. First, fresh urine with different compositions had different solubilities. According to descriptive principal component analysis, it is the concentration of magnesium (<italic>R</italic>
<sup>2</sup>&#x3d;0.95; <italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.0001) and phosphate (<italic>R</italic>
<sup>2</sup>&#x3d;0.93; <italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.0001) and to a lesser extent calcium (<italic>R</italic>
<sup>2</sup>&#x3d;0.89; <italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.001) and total ammonia (<italic>R</italic>
<sup>2</sup>&#x3d;0.88; <italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.001) that is initially present in urine that explain this variability (&#x3e;94% of total variance) and has the largest influence on Mg(OH)<sub>2</sub> solubility (<xref ref-type="sec" rid="s11">Supplementary Figure S5</xref>). This is apparent because Mg(OH)<sub>2</sub> solubility is a direct reflection of the concentration of Mg<sup>2&#x2b;</sup>(aq) (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="e1">Eq. 1</xref>), which is influenced by the concentration of Mg<sup>2&#x2b;</sup> removed from urine as a precipitate (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2</xref>).</p>
<p>Secondly, the solubility is retrograde with respect to the temperature of urine, increasing significantly at lower temperatures (<italic>R</italic>
<sup>2</sup>&#x3d;0.97; <italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.001). The hydration of MgO(s) is exothermic, with reaction enthalpy of &#x2212;81&#xa0;kJ&#xa0;mol<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Kato et al., 1996</xref>). The dissolution of Mg(OH)<sub>2</sub> is also exothermic, with solution enthalpy of &#x2212;152&#xa0;kJ&#xa0;mol<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Tahiri et al., 2003</xref>). The overall enthalpy change is about eight times more if urine is dosed with CaO (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Long et al., 2017</xref>) as the solubility of Ca(OH)<sub>2</sub> in fresh urine is 5&#xa0;g&#xa0;L<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> at 25&#xb0;C (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Randall et al., 2016</xref>). Due to the low solubility of Mg(OH)<sub>2</sub>, the temperature of urine dosed with 2&#xa0;g MgO L<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> and kept in an uninsulated flask increases by just 2&#xb0;C over 60&#xa0;min (<xref ref-type="sec" rid="s11">Supplementary Figure S6</xref>). The rate of increase in the urine temperature depends on the hydration kinetics of MgO and the dissolution kinetics of Mg(OH)<sub>2</sub>. According to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Kato et al. (1996)</xref>, the hydration of MgO involves rapid physical adsorption of water to produce an intermediate (MgOH<sub>2</sub>O), followed by chemical hydration which is the rate-controlling process. A fraction of MgO remains inert to hydration because of sintering during calcination (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Strydom et al., 2005</xref>).</p>
<p>Thirdly, we found a large effect on solubility from organic substances present in urine. On average, the solubility of Mg(OH)<sub>2</sub> was 40% lower in synthetic fresh urine than in real fresh urine. The synthetic urine that we prepared contained only urea, which has no COD (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Li et al., 2012</xref>), whereas in real human urine, the concentration of organic substances is about 10&#xa0;g COD L<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Udert et al., 2006</xref>) and there can be hundreds of metabolic breakdown products (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Bouatra et al., 2013</xref>). Organic compounds in urine also have pH-dependent solubility. Increasing the pH of urine from &#x3c; 7 to &#x3e;10 increases the solubility of creatinine but decreases the solubility of uric acid. We also know that some organic substances in urine co-precipitate by adhesion to mineral colloids and that the sediment at the bottom of tanks storing hydrolysed urine contain 0.39&#x2013;0.65&#xa0;g VS. g TS<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">H&#xf6;glund et al., 2000</xref>). On the other hand, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Curtin et al. (2016)</xref> showed that solubility and degradation of organic matter increases when soil is treated with Ca(OH)<sub>2</sub>. It seems that the presence and/or degradation of organic substances and the change in their solubility also affects the solubility of Mg(OH)<sub>2</sub> in urine.</p>
<p>Lastly, we found that the more concentrated the urine, the higher is the solubility of Mg(OH)<sub>2</sub>. However, the relative increase in the Mg(OH)<sub>2</sub> solubility is lower at a higher concentration factor, as is the pH of the urine saturated with Mg(OH)<sub>2</sub>. Increasing the temperature reduces the pH of urine further. For instance, at 50&#xb0;C and concentration factor of 16, the pH of urine saturated with Mg(OH)<sub>2</sub> drops to &#x3c; 9. To increase the urine pH to &#x2265;10 and prevent ureolysis, the temperature must be &#x3c; 30&#xb0;C at CF&#x3d;1 and &#x3c; 22&#xb0;C at CF&#x3d;16, respectively (<xref ref-type="sec" rid="s11">Supplementary Figure S7</xref>). In contrast, the solubility of Ca(OH)<sub>2</sub> and the pH of urine increase with concentration factor since soluble sulphate in urine precipitates as gypsum at CF &#x3c; 60 and anhydrite at CF &#x3e; 60. In contrast, no ammonia nitrogen can be recovered when fresh urine is alkalised using Ca(OH)<sub>2</sub> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Riechmann et al., 2021</xref>), since all of the phosphate in urine precipitates as hydroxyapatite (Ca<sub>10</sub>(PO<sub>4</sub>)<sub>6</sub>(OH)<sub>2</sub>) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Randall et al., 2016</xref>). At CF &#x3e; 100 or when 99% water is removed from urine dosed with Mg(OH)<sub>2</sub>, the fraction of soluble phosphate in urine that is precipitated as struvite increases and hydroxyapatite decreases (<xref ref-type="sec" rid="s11">Supplementary Figure S8</xref>). This suggests that there is higher potential to recover ammonia nitrogen excreted in fresh urine as struvite at high concentration factors. Depending on the composition of urine, between 22 and 100% of the ammonia nitrogen can be recovered as struvite when fresh urine is alkalised using Mg(OH)<sub>2</sub> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9">Figure 9</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F9" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 9</label>
<caption>
<p>Concentration of total ammonia and soluble phosphate in freshly excreted urine and concentration of total magnesium in fresh urine saturated with Mg(OH)<sub>2</sub> at 25&#xb0;C is shown for different urine compositions. The fraction of ammonia nitrogen that can be recovered from saturated urine as struvite is shown on the secondary <italic>y</italic>-axis. See <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref> for the urine compositions.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fenvs-10-889119-g009.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="conclusion" id="s5">
<title>Conclusion</title>
<p>In this study, we developed experimental and simulated data on the dissolution of Mg(OH)<sub>2</sub> in human urine. Our results showed that Mg(OH)<sub>2</sub> is particularly well suited to prevent the urease-catalysed degradation of urea and inhibit ureolysis in the long-term (&#x3e;14&#xa0;days). A dosage of &#x3c; 1&#xa0;g MgO L<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> is needed to increase the pH of fresh urine to &#x3e;10 and saturate it with Mg(OH)<sub>2</sub>. We identified and quantified the influence of a range of factors on the solubility of Mg(OH)<sub>2</sub> in urine. We found that the composition (e.g., initial total ammonia and phosphate concentration) and type of urine (fresh or concentrated), and the choice of the dissolution conditions (temperature, pH, time) have significant effect on solubility, dissolution kinetics, and MgO dosage required to saturate urine with Mg(OH)<sub>2</sub>. These results have implications for the use of alkaline Earth monoxides and hydroxides in sanitation systems based on source-separation that aim to recycle plant-essential nutrients present in wastewater.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec id="s6">
<title>Data Availability Statement</title>
<p>The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/<xref ref-type="sec" rid="s11">Supplementary Material</xref>, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s7">
<title>Author Contributions</title>
<p>All authors contributed to the study conceptualization and design, manuscript revision, read and approved the submitted version. PS and CD performed the experiments, physicochemical analyses, and formal data analysis. DR modeled the chemical speciation of urine using OLI. BV supervised the study, provided resources and acquired funding. PS wrote the first draft of the manuscript. All authors contributed to manuscript revision, read and approved the submitted version.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s8">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>The study was funded by a grant from the Swedish Research Council for the project &#x201c;Urintorkning processoptimering och underliggande processer&#x201d; (Grant number 2019&#x2013;00986). DR was supported through the FLAIR Fellowship by the Royal Society and the African Academy of Sciences.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="COI-statement" id="s9">
<title>Conflict of Interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="disclaimer" id="s10">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s Note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors, and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s11">
<title>Supplementary Material</title>
<p>The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2022.889119/full#supplementary-material">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2022.889119/full&#x23;supplementary-material</ext-link>
</p>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="DataSheet1.docx" id="SM1" mimetype="application/docx" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ahmad</surname>
<given-names>S. Z. N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hamdan</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Al&#x2010;Gheethi</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Alkhadher</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Othman</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Removal of Phosphate from Wastewater by Steel Slag with High Calcium Oxide Column Filter System; Efficiencies and Mechanisms Study</article-title>. <source>J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol.</source> <volume>95</volume> (<issue>12</issue>), <fpage>3232</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3240</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/jctb.6501</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Benini</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rypniewski</surname>
<given-names>W. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wilson</surname>
<given-names>K. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Miletti</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ciurli</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mangani</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1999</year>). <article-title>A New Proposal for Urease Mechanism Based on the crystal Structures of the Native and Inhibited Enzyme from Bacillus Pasteurii: Why Urea Hydrolysis Costs Two Nickels</article-title>. <source>Structure</source> <volume>7</volume> (<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>205</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>216</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/s0969-2126(99)80026-4</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B37">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bouatra</surname>
<given-names>S. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Aziat</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mandal</surname>
<given-names>A. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Guo</surname>
<given-names>M. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wilson</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Knox</surname>
<given-names>T. C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>The Human Urine Metabolome</article-title>. <source>PLoS One</source> <volume>8(9), e73076</volume>. </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bray</surname>
<given-names>E. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ghalayin</surname>
<given-names>Z. T.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). &#x201c;<article-title>Magnesium Compounds</article-title>,&#x201d; in <source>2017 Minerals Yearbook</source> (<publisher-name>Reston, Virginia: U.S. Department of the Interior &#x26; U.S. Geological Survey</publisher-name>). </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chin</surname>
<given-names>W.-t.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kroontje</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1963</year>). <article-title>Urea Hydrolysis and Subsequent Loss of Ammonia1</article-title>. <source>Soil Sci. Soc. America J.</source> <volume>27</volume> (<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>316</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>318</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2136/sssaj1963.03615995002700030030x</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Curtin</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Peterson</surname>
<given-names>M. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Anderson</surname>
<given-names>C. R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>pH-Dependence of Organic Matter Solubility: Base Type Effects on Dissolved Organic C, N, P, and S in Soils with Contrasting Mineralogy</article-title>. <source>Geoderma</source> <volume>271</volume>, <fpage>161</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>172</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.geoderma.2016.02.009</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Dhakal</surname>
<given-names>R. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ghimire</surname>
<given-names>K. N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Inoue</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Adsorptive Separation of Heavy Metals from an Aquatic Environment Using orange Waste</article-title>. <source>Hydrometallurgy</source> <volume>79</volume> (<issue>3-4</issue>), <fpage>182</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>190</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.hydromet.2005.06.007</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Dixon</surname>
<given-names>N. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Riddles</surname>
<given-names>P. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gazzola</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Blakeley</surname>
<given-names>R. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zerner</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1980</year>). <article-title>Jack Bean Urease (EC 3.5.1.5). V. On the Mechanism of Action of Urease on Urea, Formamide, Acetamide, N-Methylurea, and Related Compounds</article-title>. <source>Can. J. Biochem.</source> <volume>58</volume> (<issue>12</issue>), <fpage>1335</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1344</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1139/o80-181</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Flanagan</surname>
<given-names>C. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Randall</surname>
<given-names>D. G.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Development of a Novel Nutrient Recovery Urinal for On-Site Fertilizer Production</article-title>. <source>J. Environ. Chem. Eng.</source> <volume>6</volume> (<issue>5</issue>), <fpage>6344</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>6350</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jece.2018.09.060</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>H&#xf6;glund</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vinner&#xe5;s</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Stenstr&#xf6;m</surname>
<given-names>T. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>J&#xf6;nsson</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2000</year>). <article-title>Variation of Chemical and Microbial Parameters in Collection and Storage Tanks for Source Separated Human Urine</article-title>. <source>J. Environ. Sci. Health A</source> <volume>35</volume> (<issue>8</issue>), <fpage>1463</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1475</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/10934520009377047</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Jefferson</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hurst</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Stuetz</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Parsons</surname>
<given-names>S. A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>A Comparison of Chemical Methods for the Control of Odours in Wastewater</article-title>. <source>Process Saf. Environ. Prot.</source> <volume>80</volume> (<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>93</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>99</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1205/095758202753553211</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kato</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yamashita</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kobayashi</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yoshizawa</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1996</year>). <article-title>Kinetic Study of the Hydration of Magnesium Oxide for a Chemical Heat Pump</article-title>. <source>Appl. Therm. Eng.</source> <volume>16</volume> (<issue>11</issue>), <fpage>853</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>862</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/1359-4311(96)00009-9</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Krajewska</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ciurli</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Jack Bean (Canavalia Ensiformis) Urease. Probing Acid-Base Groups of the Active Site by pH Variation</article-title>. <source>Plant Physiol. Biochem.</source> <volume>43</volume> (<issue>7</issue>), <fpage>651</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>658</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.plaphy.2005.05.009</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Larsen</surname>
<given-names>T. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Udert</surname>
<given-names>K. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lienert</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <source>Source Separation and Decentralization for Wastewater Management</source>. <publisher-loc>London, U.K.</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>IWA Publishing</publisher-name>. </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Feng</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Removal of Reactive Dyes from Wastewater Assisted with Kaolin clay by Magnesium Hydroxide Coagulation Process</article-title>. <source>Colloids Surf. A: Physicochemical Eng. Aspects</source> <volume>494</volume>, <fpage>222</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>227</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.colsurfa.2016.01.048</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Determination of Chemical Oxygen Demand of Nitrogenous Organic Compounds in Wastewater Using Synergetic Photoelectrocatalytic Oxidation Effect at TiO2 Nanostructured Electrode</article-title>. <source>Analytica Chim. Acta</source> <volume>754</volume>, <fpage>47</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>53</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.aca.2012.10.008</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lin</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Comparison between Linear and Non-linear Forms of Pseudo-first-order and Pseudo-second-order Adsorption Kinetic Models for the Removal of Methylene Blue by Activated Carbon</article-title>. <source>Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. China</source> <volume>3</volume> (<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>320</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>324</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11783-009-0030-7</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Long</surname>
<given-names>X. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dai</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lou</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>The Kinetics Research of Thermochemical Energy Storage System Ca(OH)2/CaO</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Energ. Res.</source> <volume>41</volume> (<issue>7</issue>), <fpage>1004</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1013</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/er.3688</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mazzei</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Musiani</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ciurli</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>The Structure-Based Reaction Mechanism of Urease, a Nickel Dependent Enzyme: Tale of a Long Debate</article-title>. <source>J. Biol. Inorg. Chem.</source> <volume>25</volume> (<issue>6</issue>), <fpage>829</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>845</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00775-020-01808-w</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Nie</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Deng</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nie</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yan</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ding</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dong</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Simultaneous Removal of Bisphenol A and Phosphate from Water by Peroxymonosulfate Combined with Calcium Hydroxide</article-title>. <source>Chem. Eng. J.</source> <volume>369</volume>, <fpage>35</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>45</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cej.2019.03.046</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<citation citation-type="book">
<collab>OLI Systems Inc</collab> (<year>2020</year>). <source>OLI Stream Analyser, 10.0</source>. <publisher-loc>New Jersey, United States: OLI Systems Inc</publisher-loc>. </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Pronk</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Biebow</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Boller</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Electrodialysis for Recovering Salts from a Urine Solution Containing Micropollutants</article-title>. <source>Environ. Sci. Technol.</source> <volume>40</volume> (<issue>7</issue>), <fpage>2414</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2420</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/es051921i</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Qin</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cabral</surname>
<given-names>J. M. S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Review Properties and Applications of Urease</article-title>. <source>Biocatal. Biotransformation</source> <volume>20</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>14</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/10242420210154</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Randall</surname>
<given-names>D. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Krahenbuhl</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kopping</surname>
<given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Larsen</surname>
<given-names>T. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Udert</surname>
<given-names>K. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>A Novel Approach for Stabilizing Fresh Urine by Calcium Hydroxide Addition</article-title>. <source>Water Res.</source> <volume>95</volume>, <fpage>361</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>369</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.watres.2016.03.007</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Randall</surname>
<given-names>D. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nathoo</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>A Succinct Review of the Treatment of Reverse Osmosis Brines Using Freeze Crystallization</article-title>. <source>J. Water Process Eng.</source> <volume>8</volume>, <fpage>186</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>194</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jwpe.2015.10.005</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Riechmann</surname>
<given-names>M. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ndwandwe</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Greenwood</surname>
<given-names>E. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Reynaert</surname>
<given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Morgenroth</surname>
<given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Udert</surname>
<given-names>K. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>On-site Urine Treatment Combining Ca(OH)2 Dissolution and Dehydration with Ambient Air</article-title>. <source>Water Res. X</source> <volume>13</volume>, <fpage>100124</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.wroa.2021.100124</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Roberts</surname>
<given-names>B. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Miller</surname>
<given-names>B. R.</given-names>
<suffix>3rd</suffix>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Roitberg</surname>
<given-names>A. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Merz</surname>
<given-names>K. M.</given-names>
<suffix>Jr.</suffix>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Wide-open Flaps Are Key to Urease Activity</article-title>. <source>J. Am. Chem. Soc.</source> <volume>134</volume> (<issue>24</issue>), <fpage>9934</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>9937</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/ja3043239</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Rose</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Parker</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jefferson</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cartmell</surname>
<given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>The Characterization of Feces and Urine: A Review of the Literature to Inform Advanced Treatment Technology</article-title>. <source>Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol.</source> <volume>45</volume> (<issue>17</issue>), <fpage>1827</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1879</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/10643389.2014.1000761</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<citation citation-type="book">
<collab>RStudio Team</collab> (<year>2016</year>). in <source>RStudio: Integrated Development for R.</source> (<publisher-loc>Boston, MA</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>I. RStudio.</publisher-name>). </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Simha</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Karlsson</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Viskari</surname>
<given-names>E.-L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Malila</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vinner&#xe5;s</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020a</year>). <article-title>Field Testing a Pilot-Scale System for Alkaline Dehydration of Source-Separated Human Urine: A Case Study in Finland</article-title>. <source>Front. Environ. Sci.</source> <volume>8</volume>, <fpage>570637</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fenvs.2020.570637</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Simha</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lalander</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nordin</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vinner&#xe5;s</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020b</year>). <article-title>Alkaline Dehydration of Source-Separated Fresh Human Urine: Preliminary Insights into Using Different Dehydration Temperature and media</article-title>. <source>Sci. Total Environ.</source> <volume>733</volume>, <fpage>139313</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139313</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Strydom</surname>
<given-names>C. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Van der Merwe</surname>
<given-names>E. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Aphane</surname>
<given-names>M. E.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>The Effect of Calcining Conditions on the Rehydration of Dead Burnt Magnesium Oxide Using Magnesium Acetate as a Hydrating Agent</article-title>. <source>J. Therm. Anal. Calorim.</source> <volume>80</volume> (<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>659</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>662</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10973-005-0710-x</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Tahiri</surname>
<given-names>I. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Matiullah</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Subhani</surname>
<given-names>M. S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Molten Ba(OH)2&#xb7;8H2O as an Etchant for CR-39 Detector</article-title>. <source>Radiat. Measurements</source> <volume>37</volume> (<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>205</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>210</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/s1350-4487(03)00030-1</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Udert</surname>
<given-names>K. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Larsen</surname>
<given-names>T. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Biebow</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gujer</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Urea Hydrolysis and Precipitation Dynamics in a Urine-Collecting System</article-title>. <source>Water Res.</source> <volume>37</volume> (<issue>11</issue>), <fpage>2571</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2582</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/s0043-1354(03)00065-4</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Udert</surname>
<given-names>K. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Larsen</surname>
<given-names>T. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gujer</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Fate of Major Compounds in Source-Separated Urine</article-title>. <source>Water Sci. Technol.</source> <volume>54</volume> (<issue>11-12</issue>), <fpage>413</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>420</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2166/wst.2006.921</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Vasiljev</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Simha</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Demisse</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Karlsson</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Randall</surname>
<given-names>D. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vinner&#xe5;s</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Drying Fresh Human Urine in Magnesium-Doped Alkaline Substrates: Capture of Free Ammonia, Inhibition of Enzymatic Urea Hydrolysis &#x26; Minimisation of Chemical Urea Hydrolysis</article-title>. <source>Chem. Eng. J.</source> <volume>428</volume>, <fpage>131026</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cej.2021.131026</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B36">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tian</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lu</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mu</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Coagulation Removal of Microplastics from Wastewater by Magnetic Magnesium Hydroxide and PAM</article-title>. <source>J. Water Process Eng.</source> <volume>43</volume>, <fpage>102250</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jwpe.2021.102250</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>