<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="EN" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Environ. Sci.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Environmental Science</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Environ. Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">2296-665X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">1084902</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fenvs.2022.1084902</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Environmental Science</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>The ability of three climbing plant species to capture particulate matter and their physiological responses at different environmental sampling sites</article-title>
<alt-title alt-title-type="left-running-head">Lyu et al.</alt-title>
<alt-title alt-title-type="right-running-head">
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.1084902">10.3389/fenvs.2022.1084902</ext-link>
</alt-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lyu</surname>
<given-names>Xiaoqian</given-names>
</name>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2076428/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chang</surname>
<given-names>Lu</given-names>
</name>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lu</surname>
<given-names>Zhengyan</given-names>
</name>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>Junfeng</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001">&#x2a;</xref>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff>
<institution>College of Architecture and Art</institution>, <institution>Hefei University of Technology</institution>, <addr-line>Hefei</addr-line>, <country>China</country>
</aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>
<bold>Edited by:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/528153/overview">Tiana Carla Lopes Moreira</ext-link>, University of S&#xe3;o Paulo, Brazil</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>
<bold>Reviewed by:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1679666/overview">Worradorn Phairuang</ext-link>, Kanazawa University, Japan</p>
<p>
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/941742/overview">Sanja Potgieter</ext-link>, Manchester Metropolitan University, United Kingdom</p>
</fn>
<corresp id="c001">&#x2a;Correspondence: Junfeng Li, <email>june4ni@126.com</email>
</corresp>
<fn fn-type="other">
<p>This article was submitted to Toxicology, Pollution and the Environment, a section of the journal Frontiers in Environmental Science</p>
</fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>06</day>
<month>01</month>
<year>2023</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2022</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>10</volume>
<elocation-id>1084902</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>31</day>
<month>10</month>
<year>2022</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>09</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2022</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#xa9; 2023 Lyu, Chang, Lu and Li.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2023</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Lyu, Chang, Lu and Li</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>The adsorption of particulate matter (PM) by the leaves of urban plants can effectively reduce the particulate matter concentration in the atmosphere. The use of climbing plants to abate particulate matter is an important means of urban greening in China, which is rich in climbing plant species. In this study, three evergreen climbing plants were selected to assess their ability to adsorb particulate matter and determine their physiological responses to particulate pollution. PM deposition was determined gravimetrically. There were four key results. 1) The adsorption capacity of the three evergreen climbers followed the order of <italic>Hedera nepalensis var</italic> &#x3e; <italic>Ficus pumila Linn</italic> &#x3e; <italic>Euonymus fortunei</italic>, and was significantly higher in an overpass environment than in a campus environment for all three species. 2) The seasonal characteristics of particulate adsorption by the three types of climbers in both the overpass and campus environments followed the order of winter &#x3e; autumn &#x3e; spring &#x3e; summer. 3) The net photosynthetic rate of the three climbing plants was significantly affected by particulate matter in a size dependent manner, with fine particulate matter on the plant leaf surface and coarse particulate matter in the leaf waxy layer being important factors affecting plant photosynthesis. 4) Particulate pollution led to changes in the activities of plant protective enzymes in plants, with increases in the superoxide dismutase (SOD) and peroxidase (POD) activity, and the malondialdehyde (MDA) and soluble protein contents. There were different trends in the soluble sugar content among the different plant species. In conclusion, <italic>F. pumila</italic> had a strong resistance to particulate pollutants, while <italic>H. nepalensis</italic> was considered suitable for planting in polluted areas where it could improve ambient air quality by adsorbing large amounts of particulate matter.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>climbing plant</kwd>
<kwd>particulate matter</kwd>
<kwd>physiological</kwd>
<kwd>leaf waxy</kwd>
<kwd>biochemistry</kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="s1">
<title>1 Introduction</title>
<p>With the ongoing urbanization and industrial development in China, particulate matter (PM) has become the main atmospheric pollutant in most cities and is used as an important indicator in the evaluation of urban air quality (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">Zou et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Segalin et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Li et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Nisha et al., 2021</xref>). The sources of PM are complex and difficult to manage, with motor vehicle emissions, fossil fuel combustion, and industrial dust being the main sources. Particulate matter is a mixture of harmful substances and other suspended matter in the atmosphere, and is of particular concern due to its extreme toxicity to humans, resulting in more serious health effects than any other air pollutant (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">WHO, 2019</xref>). Various epidemiological studies have shown an association between PM and adverse health effects, including exacerbation of chronic respiratory and cardiovascular disease, impaired lung function, and premature death (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Shaughnessy et al., 2015</xref>). The severity of the human health effects due to PM exposure varies according to the particle size, with PM2.5 being the most toxic size fraction (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Gu et al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Du et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">Xiong et al., 2021</xref>).</p>
<p>In addition to reducing pollutant emissions, planting vegetation is an effective means of mitigating PM pollution and improving the atmospheric environment of urban areas. Green plants have the potential to clean polluted air by capturing PM on the leaf surface (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">Chen et al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Panda et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Choi et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">Zhang et al., 2021</xref>), and if PM contains lipophilic organic pollutants, additional sequestration can occur when the particles penetrate the leaf wax (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Dzierzanowski et al., 2011</xref>). The ability of plants to retain PM is not only related to the planted area, but also has a strong correlation with the plant leaf surface morphology. It has been reported that plant leaves with fuzzy, furrowed surfaces have a stronger dust retention capacity than leaves with smooth, thin, waxy layers (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">De Nicola et al., 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">S&#xe6;b&#xf8; et al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Jaconis et al., 2017</xref>). The overall plant retention of PM is a combination of retention on the leaf surface and in the waxy layer, and it has also been shown that the thickness of the waxy layer is a key factor affecting the plant retention of PM (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">Sun et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Choi et al., 2021</xref>). Atmospheric pollutants, including PM, can cause changes in plant physiological parameters such as pigment deterioration, changes in antioxidant enzyme activity, production of antioxidant metabolites, and membrane damage (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Chaudhary and Rathore., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B60">Singh et al., 2018</xref>). It has been reported that PM may block plant stomata leading to a decrease in the net photosynthetic rate and may also cause additional radiation absorption by leaves leading to an increase in leaf surface temperature (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Popek et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Li M et al., 2021</xref>), which can alter the enzyme activity in plants. In addition, PM may also lead to an imbalance in osmotic pressure and an increase in free radicals in plants (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">Singh et al., 2020</xref>). It has been found that the soluble protein content decreases when French sycamore and oleander are exposed to industrial and urban pollution, while peroxidase activity increases (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Do&#x11f;anlar and Atmaca, 2011</xref>). Singh observed a significant increase in oxidative stress in mustard under exposure to ozone (O<sub>3</sub>), leading to a significant decrease in the photosynthetic pigment and soluble protein content in leaves, while strengthening antioxidant defense systems to resist its effects (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Singh et al., 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">Singh et al., 2020</xref>). In summary, PM can enter plants through stomata and affect them by inducing the formation of reactive oxygen species and redox-sensitive signaling pathways that exert toxicity through the synergistic effects of oxidative stress and inflammation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Michael et al., 2013</xref>). Therefore, plant response to PM pollution is also one of the most important indicators considered in the selection of tree species used for urban greening.</p>
<p>China has a rich variety of climbing plants, most of which have high ornamental value. Climbing plants do not occupy space at the street level, but use existing building walls, or vertical greening methods on highways and slopes. Vertical greening using climbing plants in urban areas not only expands urban garden space and increases the artistic beauty of urban architecture, but also increases urban green coverage. Climbing plants can also serve as an ideal natural filter to mitigate air pollution (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Naomi et al., 2020</xref>). However, there have been few studies of the adsorption effects of climbing plants on atmospheric PM. This study analyzed and compared the adsorption of PM by three evergreen climbing plants at different levels of PM pollution and assessed their physiological responses to PM pollution. The results can be used in the selection of climbing species with high PM adsorption and resistance, and will provide a reference for the construction of urban forests.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="materials|methods" id="s2">
<title>2 Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="s2-1">
<title>2.1 Study area and sampling collection</title>
<p>To ensure that the test results were representative of the greening characteristics of the main climbing plants in Nanjing, we selected Himalayan ivy [<italic>Hedera nepalensis</italic> var. sinensis (Tobl.) Rehd], climbing fig (<italic>Ficus pumila</italic> Linn), and Fu Fang vine [<italic>Euonymus fortunei</italic> (Turcz) Hand Mazz] as the test subjects for preliminary research. The climbing plants were growing on bridge pillars in an overpass and on a wall in a university campus. Sampling sites were located at Nanjing Forestry University campus and Yingtian overpass in Nanjing, China. Yingtian overpass is an important section of the Nanjing Inner Ring Expressway. Traffic is heavy, and air pollution caused by vehicle exhaust is a serious problem around the sampling site. Samples were collected in May, August, and November 2021 and January 2022. To evaluate the dust retention ability of different species of climbing plants for different sizes of particulate matter, we selected 28 consecutive days without rainfall for sampling. This ensured that the dust retention of each type of climbing plant reached a saturation value for particulate matter (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Liu et al., 2012</xref>).</p>
<p>In this study, mature individuals of three common climbing tree species were studied. To ensure that a representative sample was investigated, a range of tree forms, landscape applications, growth conditions, and leaf characteristics were included. Plants that were in good condition with luxuriant foliage, no pests, and aged between 25 and 30&#xa0;years were selected. For each species of tree, three climbing trees were selected, and leaves collected randomly in four directions (east, south, west, and north) of column, and in four directions (up, down, left, and right) at 1.0&#x2013;2.5&#xa0;m above ground, depending on the plant structure with a pruner. Five sample trees were collected for each climbing tree species, as well as 10 pieces in each direction per plant (200 pieces in total for five plants) for <italic>H. nepalensis</italic>. <italic>E. fortune and F. pumila,</italic> from which 15 leaf samples in each direction were collected, for a total of 60 pieces (300 pieces in total for five plants) as their leaves were small. Samples for the determination of particulate retention were placed in self-sealing bags and brought back to the laboratory. The surface of each leaf was wiped clean and immediately soaked with liquid nitrogen. All samples were placed back into the self-sealing bags and stored in an ultra-low-temperature refrigerator prior to the enzyme assay.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-2">
<title>2.2 Extraction and determination of PM on the leaf surface and from the waxy layer</title>
<p>Dust retention was determined using Przbysz&#x2019;s method (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Przbysz et al., 2014</xref>). Filter papers with pore sizes of 10, 2.5, and 0.2&#xa0;&#x3bc;m were placed inside half-open weighing bottles in an oven at 60&#xb0;C for 60&#xa0;min (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Dzier&#x17c;anowski et al., 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Chiam et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Ko&#x144;czak et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Li X. L et al., 2021</xref>). The bottles were then covered for 60 min, removed, and placed in a drying dish until a constant weight was obtained. The dried filters were placed on an analytical balance (readability &#x3d; 0.0001&#xa0;g) (ME204E, Mettler Toledo, Columbus, OH, United States) and weighed to obtain both the initial weight of each filter paper (g) and the total initial weight of the weighing bottle and filter paper (g).</p>
<p>Particulate matter on the surface of the leaves that could be washed off by water was referred to as &#x201c;particulate matter on the surface (sPM).&#x201d; Leaves were placed into beakers with deionized water and stirred for 1&#xa0;min with a glass rod. The beakers were placed in an ultrasonic cleaner (JP-020, Skymen, Guangdong, China) and shaken for 1&#xa0;min to remove the PM adsorbed on the leaf surface. The resulting solution was passed through a standard splitting sieve (160 mesh, pore size of about 100&#xa0;&#x3bc;m), followed by filtering in turn through filter papers with pore sizes of 10 and 2.5&#xa0;&#x3bc;m to obtain three particle size ranges: large particles of 10&#x2013;100&#xa0;&#x3bc;m, coarse particles of 2.5&#x2013;10&#xa0;&#x3bc;m, and fine particles of 0.2&#x2013;2.5&#xa0;&#x3bc;m. The filter paper was placed into an oven to dry, removed, and left to stand in a drying dish. After reaching a constant weight, the weight of each filter paper after filtration (g) and the total weight of the weighing bottle and filter paper after filtration (g) were determined using an analytical balance. The amount of &#x201c;surface PM&#x201d; attached to each sample at each particle size was calculated using the weight difference method.</p>
<p>The mass of PM contained in wax layer (wPM) was detected the rinse and weight method (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Dzier&#x17c;anowski et al., 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Chiam et al., 2019</xref>). Clean leaf samples were rinsed with deionized water and then rinsed again for 40&#xa0;s in 150&#xa0;cm<sup>3</sup> of chloroform to dissolve the epicuticular waxes and wash the micro-particles fixed in the wax to obtain the wPM fraction. The liquid obtained from the rinsing was filtered continuously through a filter according to the procedure used to filter aqueous fractions containing surface PM, with the difference that the chloroform remaining after filtration was poured into an empty pre-weighted clean flask. After the chloroform evaporation (more than 10 or even 48&#xa0;h), the flasks were weighed on a laboratory microbalance. Then, the difference between the masses of the empty flask and flask containing wax was determined. Filtration was performed following the same procedure used for sPM washing. After drying, the filters were also weighed and the PM was determined based on the difference in weight.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-3">
<title>2.3 Leaf area determination</title>
<p>After drying, the leaves were scanned using an electronic scanner (V370, Epson, Nagaon, Japan) and then imported into ImageJ 1.48 software to determine the leaf area, with the leaf area of each sample obtained as S (cm<sup>2</sup>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-4">
<title>2.4 Measurement of the photosynthetic parameters of plant leaves</title>
<p>Four leaves from each climbing plant were selected from the upper, middle, and lower well-developed mature parts of the climbing plant. The analytical instrument used for the measurements was a Li-6400 portable photosynthesis meter (Li-COR, Lincoln, NE, United States). Gas exchange parameters, including the maximum net photosynthetic rate (<italic>P</italic>n), stomatal conductance (<italic>G</italic>s), intercellular carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) concentration (<italic>C</italic>i), and transpiration rate (<italic>T</italic>r), were measured in May, August, and November 2021 and January 2022 for the tagged leaves. Mature leaves with healthy growth and a similar growth status were selected for measurements from 09:00 to 11:00 after eight consecutive days without precipitation.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-5">
<title>2.5 Determination of the biochemical indexes of plant leaves</title>
<p>About 0.5&#xa0;g of intact and similarly colored leaf samples were randomly selected from each package of leaves, cut into small pieces, and placed in 5&#xa0;ml centrifuge tubes with 2&#xa0;ml of phosphate buffer. The samples were ground with an automatic sample rapid grinder (JXFSTPRP-24, Jingxin Technology, Shandong, China) and then the centrifuge tube was rinsed with extraction medium. The final volume was fixed to 5&#xa0;ml with the extraction medium, and then the supernatant was extracted with a ST8R centrifuge (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, United States) at 4,500&#xa0;rpm for 15&#xa0;min. The supernatant was then extracted with a 10&#xa0;ml pipette for the determination of superoxide dismutase (SOD) and peroxidase (POD) activity. Enzyme extract (2.5&#xa0;ml) was added to 2.5&#xa0;ml of distilled water for the determination of malondialdehyde (MDA) and soluble protein content.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-6">
<title>2.6 Measurement of the photosynthetic parameters of plant leaves</title>
<p>About 0.5&#xa0;g of intact and similarly colored leaf samples were randomly selected from each package of leaves, cut into small pieces, and placed in 5&#xa0;ml centrifuge tubes with 2&#xa0;ml of phosphate buffer. The samples were ground with an automatic sample rapid grinder (JXFSTPRP-24, Jingxin Technology, Shandong, China) and then the centrifuge tube was rinsed with extraction medium. The final volume was fixed to 5&#xa0;ml with the extraction medium, and then the supernatant was extracted with a ST8R centrifuge (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, United States) at 4,500&#xa0;rpm for 15&#xa0;min. The supernatant was then extracted with a 10&#xa0;ml pipette for the determination of superoxide dismutase (SOD) and peroxidase (POD) activity. Enzyme extract (2.5&#xa0;ml) was added to 2.5&#xa0;ml of distilled water for the determination of malondialdehyde (MDA) and soluble protein content.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-7">
<title>2.7 Data processing</title>
<p>The experimental data were subjected to both a one-way and two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) using SPSS22.0 software, with multiple testing applied to detect whether statistical differences existed between the treatments. Independent sample t-tests were used to rapidly analyze the differences between the physiological and biochemical indices of plants located at the campus and the overpass. Pearson&#x2019;s correlation coefficient was used to analyze the relationship between plant dust retention capacity and photosynthetic gas parameters. Plots were constructed using Origin 2016 software.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="results" id="s3">
<title>3 Results</title>
<sec id="s3-1">
<title>3.1 The mass of PM retained on leaf surface in different seasons</title>
<p>There were significant differences in the mass of the different sizes of PM among the different species in spring (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1</xref>). Both campus and overpass <italic>H. nepalensis</italic> had a significantly higher adsorption capacity for total suspended particulate (TSP) and the different particle size classes of PM than the other two climbers, with overpass <italic>H. nepalensis</italic> adsorbing sPM (18.97 &#xb1; 2.03&#xa0;&#x3bc;g&#xa0;cm<sup>&#x2212;2</sup>) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1A</xref>), sPM10&#x2013;100 (12.51 &#xb1; 1.56&#xa0;&#x3bc;g&#xa0;cm<sup>&#x2212;2</sup>) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1B</xref>), sPM2.5&#x2013;10 (5.13 &#xb1; 0.38&#xa0;&#x3bc;g&#xa0;cm<sup>&#x2212;2</sup>) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1C</xref>), and sPM0.2&#x2013;2.5 (1.33 &#xb1; 0.15&#xa0;&#x3bc;g&#xa0;cm<sup>&#x2212;2</sup>) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1D</xref>). In addition, the adsorption of PM2.5&#x2013;10 was significantly higher (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.05) in <italic>F. pumila</italic> at the overpass than in <italic>E. fortunei</italic>, and the adsorption of PM0.2&#x2013;2.5 was significantly higher (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.05) in <italic>E. fortunei</italic> than in <italic>F. pumila</italic>.</p>
<fig id="F1" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 1</label>
<caption>
<p>The mass of retained particulate matter on the leaf surface in spring (mean &#xb1; SE). <bold>(A)</bold> The total mass of particulate matter. <bold>(B)</bold> The mass of PM10&#x2013;100. <bold>(C)</bold> The mass of PM2.5&#x2013;10. <bold>(D)</bold> The mass of PM0.2&#x2013;2.5.&#x2a;Bars with different letters indicate signigicant differenc (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.05) between the sites at a specific season. The same below.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fenvs-10-1084902-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>The maximum retention of the different particle sizes by <italic>H. nepalensis</italic> in summer at the overpass was sPM (15.94 &#xb1; 1.67&#xa0;&#x3bc;g&#xa0;cm<sup>&#x2212;2</sup>) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2A</xref>), sPM10&#x2013;100 (11.99 &#xb1; 0.75&#xa0;&#x3bc;g&#xa0;cm<sup>&#x2212;2</sup>) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2B</xref>), sPM2.5&#x2013;10 (2.60 &#xb1; 0.13&#xa0;&#x3bc;g&#xa0;cm<sup>&#x2212;2</sup>) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2C</xref>), and sPM0.2&#x2013;2.5 (1.35 &#xb1; 0.11&#xa0;&#x3bc;g&#xa0;cm<sup>&#x2212;2</sup>) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2D</xref>). Campus <italic>H. nepalensis</italic> adsorbed significantly more sPM and sPM10&#x2013;100 than the other two climbers, and campus <italic>H. nepalensis</italic> and <italic>E. fortunei</italic> adsorbed significantly more sPM0.2&#x2013;2.5 than <italic>F. pumila</italic> (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.05) There was no significant difference in the adsorption of sPM2.5&#x2013;10 among the three plants. The adsorption of sPM and the different particle size classes by <italic>H. nepalensis</italic> at the overpass was significantly higher than that by <italic>E. fortunei</italic> (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.05). There was no significant difference between the adsorption of sPM, sPM10&#x2013;100 and sPM2.5&#x2013;10 by <italic>H. nepalensis</italic> and <italic>F. pumila</italic>, but the adsorption of sPM0.2&#x2013;2.5 by the three climbing plants was significantly different (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.05).</p>
<fig id="F2" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 2</label>
<caption>
<p>The mass of retained particulate matter on the leaf surface in summer (mean &#xb1; SE). <bold>(A)</bold> The total mass of particulate matter. <bold>(B)</bold> The mass of PM10&#x2013;100. <bold>(C)</bold> The mass of PM2.5&#x2013;10. <bold>(D)</bold> The mass of PM0.2&#x2013;2.5.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fenvs-10-1084902-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>In autumn, <italic>H. nepalensis</italic> at the overpass had the highest adsorption among the particles of different particle sizes, sPM (14.41 &#xb1; 2.14&#xa0;&#x3bc;g&#xa0;cm<sup>&#x2212;2</sup>) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3A</xref>), s PM10&#x2013;100 (9.29 &#xb1; 1.97&#xa0;&#x3bc;g&#xa0;cm<sup>&#x2212;2</sup>) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3B</xref>), sPM2.5&#x2013;10 (3.50 &#xb1; 0.45&#xa0;&#x3bc;g&#xa0;cm<sup>&#x2212;2</sup>) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3C</xref>), and sPM0.2&#x2013;2.5 (1.61 &#xb1; 0.13&#xa0;&#x3bc;g&#xa0;cm<sup>&#x2212;2</sup>) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3D</xref>). A one-way ANOVA showed that there was no significant difference in sPM adsorption by the three climbers at the campus. The adsorption of sPM10&#x2013;100 and sPM2.5&#x2013;10 by <italic>H. nepalensis</italic> was significantly higher than that of <italic>F. pumila</italic> and <italic>E. fortunei</italic> (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.05), and the adsorption of sPM0.2&#x2013;2.5 by <italic>H. nepalensis</italic> and <italic>F. pumila</italic> was significantly higher than that of <italic>E. fortunei</italic> (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.05). The adsorption of sPM and sPM2.5&#x2013;10 by <italic>H. nepalensis</italic> and <italic>F. pumila</italic> at the overpass was significantly higher than that of <italic>E. fortunei</italic> (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.05). The adsorption of sPM10&#x2013;100 by all three plants at the overpass was significantly different (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.05), and the adsorption of sPM0.2&#x2013;2.5 by <italic>F. pumila</italic> was significantly higher than that of <italic>E. fortunei</italic> (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.05).</p>
<fig id="F3" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 3</label>
<caption>
<p>The mass of retained particulate matter on the leaf surface in autumn (mean &#xb1; SE). <bold>(A)</bold> The total mass of particulate matter. <bold>(B)</bold> The mass of PM10&#x2013;100. <bold>(C)</bold> The mass of PM2.5&#x2013;10. <bold>(D)</bold> The mass of PM0.2&#x2013;2.5.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fenvs-10-1084902-g003.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>The maximum adsorption of the different particle sizes in winter at the overpass for <italic>H. nepalensis</italic> was: sPM (21.35 &#xb1; 2.01&#xa0;&#x3bc;g&#xa0;cm<sup>&#x2212;2</sup>) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4A</xref>), sPM10&#x2013;100 (14.99 &#xb1; 1.36&#xa0;&#x3bc;g&#xa0;cm<sup>&#x2212;2</sup>) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4B</xref>), sPM2.5&#x2013;10 (3.49 &#xb1; 0.31&#xa0;&#x3bc;g&#xa0;cm<sup>&#x2212;2</sup>) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4C</xref>), and sPM0.2&#x2013;2.5 (2.87 &#xb1; 0.15&#xa0;&#x3bc;g&#xa0;cm<sup>&#x2212;2</sup>) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4D</xref>). The adsorption patterns of the three climbers for sPM and sPM10&#x2013;100 were consistent across sampling sites, with all having a significantly higher adsorption of sPM and sPM10&#x2013;100 by <italic>H. nepalensis</italic> than by <italic>F. pumila</italic> and <italic>E. fortunei</italic> (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.05). The adsorption of sPM2.5&#x2013;10 and sPM0.2&#x2013;2.5&#xa0;at the campus by <italic>H. nepalensis</italic> and <italic>F. pumila</italic> was significantly higher than that of <italic>E. fortunei</italic> (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.05). The adsorption of sPM2.5&#x2013;10 by the three climbers at the overpass was not significantly different, and the adsorption of sPM0.2&#x2013;2.5 by <italic>H. nepalensis</italic> was significantly higher than that of the other two climbers (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.05).</p>
<fig id="F4" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 4</label>
<caption>
<p>The mass of retained particulate matter on the leaf surface in winter (mean &#xb1; SE). <bold>(A)</bold> The total mass of particulate matter. <bold>(B)</bold> The mass of PM10&#x2013;100. <bold>(C)</bold> The mass of PM2.5&#x2013;10. <bold>(D)</bold> The mass of PM0.2&#x2013;2.5.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fenvs-10-1084902-g004.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-2">
<title>3.2 The mass of PM retained on the leaf wax layer in different seasons</title>
<p>The adsorption of PM, PM10&#x2013;100, and PM2.5&#x2013;10 was highest in the leaf wax layer of <italic>H. nepalensis</italic> in the spring at the overpass, with values of 13.04 &#xb1; 2.28&#xa0;&#x3bc;g&#xa0;cm<sup>&#x2212;2</sup> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5A</xref>), 7.05 &#xb1; 0.69&#xa0;&#x3bc;g&#xa0;cm<sup>&#x2212;2</sup> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5B</xref>), and 5.37 &#xb1; 0.35&#xa0;&#x3bc;g&#xa0;cm<sup>&#x2212;2</sup> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5C</xref>), respectively, and the adsorption of PM0.2&#x2013;2.5 was highest in the leaf wax layer of <italic>E. fortunei</italic> (1.68 &#xb1; 0.3&#xa0;&#x3bc;g&#xa0;cm<sup>&#x2212;2</sup>) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5D</xref>). The adsorption of PM and PM2.5&#x2013;10 by the waxy layer of <italic>H. nepalensis</italic> leaves in both the campus and overpass was significantly higher than that of the other two climbers (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.05), and the adsorption of PM10&#x2013;100 by the waxy layer of <italic>H. nepalensis</italic> and <italic>E. fortunei</italic> leaves was significantly higher than that of <italic>F. pumila</italic> (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.05). The adsorption of PM0.2&#x2013;2.5 by the waxy layer of <italic>H. nepalensis</italic> leaves at the campus was significantly higher than that of the other two climbers (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.05). The adsorption of PM0.2&#x2013;2.5 by the waxy layer of the leaves of <italic>E. fortunei</italic> at the overpass was significantly higher than that of the other two climbers (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.05).</p>
<fig id="F5" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 5</label>
<caption>
<p>The mass of retained particulate matter on the leaf wax layer in spring (mean &#xb1; SE). <bold>(A)</bold> The total mass of particulate matter. <bold>(B)</bold> The mass of PM10&#x2013;100. <bold>(C)</bold> The mass of PM2.5&#x2013;10. <bold>(D)</bold> The mass of PM0.2&#x2013;2.5.&#x2a;Bars with different letters indicate signigicant differenc (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.05) between the sites at a specific season. The same below.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fenvs-10-1084902-g005.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>The adsorption of PM by the waxy layer of H. <italic>nepalensis</italic> leaves at both the campus and the overpass reached a maximum in summer. The adsorption of PM of different particle sizes by the <italic>H. nepalensis</italic> leaves at the overpass was: wPM (10.83 &#xb1; 0.52&#xa0;&#x3bc;g&#xa0;cm<sup>&#x2212;2</sup>) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure 6A</xref>), wPM10-100 (7.93 &#xb1; 0.36&#xa0;&#x3bc;g&#xa0;cm<sup>&#x2212;2</sup>) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure 6B</xref>), and wPM0.2&#x2013;2.5 (1.03 &#xb1; 0.15&#xa0;&#x3bc;g&#xa0;cm<sup>&#x2212;2</sup>) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure 6D</xref>). Overall, the adsorption of PM, PM10&#x2013;100 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5C</xref>), and PM0.2&#x2013;2.5 by the waxy layer of campus <italic>H. nepalensis</italic> leaves was significantly higher than that of the other two climbers (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.05), and the adsorption of PM, PM2.5&#x2013;10, and PM0.2&#x2013;2.5 by the waxy layer of <italic>H. nepalensis</italic> leaves at the overpass was significantly higher than that of the other two climbers (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.05).</p>
<fig id="F6" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 6</label>
<caption>
<p>The mass of retained particulate matter on the leaf wax layer in summer (mean &#xb1; SE). <bold>(A)</bold> The total mass of particulate matter. <bold>(B)</bold> The mass of PM10&#x2013;100. <bold>(C)</bold> The mass of PM2.5&#x2013;10. <bold>(D)</bold> The mass of PM0.2&#x2013;2.5.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fenvs-10-1084902-g006.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>The adsorption of PM by the waxy layer of <italic>H. nepalensis</italic> leaves at the overpass reached a maximum in autumn for PM (10.83 &#xb1; 0.52&#xa0;&#x3bc;g&#xa0;cm<sup>&#x2212;2</sup>) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">Figure 7A</xref>), PM10&#x2013;100 (7.93 &#xb1; 0.36&#xa0;&#x3bc;g&#xa0;cm<sup>&#x2212;2</sup>) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">Figure 7B</xref>), PM2.5&#x2013;10 (1.87 &#xb1; 0.21&#xa0;&#x3bc;g&#xa0;cm<sup>&#x2212;2</sup>) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">Figure 7C</xref>), and PM0.2&#x2013;2.5 (1.03 &#xb1; 0.15&#xa0;&#x3bc;g&#xa0;cm<sup>&#x2212;2</sup>) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">Figure 7D</xref>). The adsorption pattern of the leaf wax layer of the three climbing plants at the campus was consistent for PM, PM10&#x2013;100, and PM0.2&#x2013;2.5, all of which were significantly higher for <italic>H. nepalensis</italic> than for the other two plants (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.05). The adsorption pattern of the three plants at the overpass was consistent for PM and PM10&#x2013;100, i.e., <italic>H. nepalensis</italic> was significantly higher than the other two plants (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.05). The adsorption pattern of the three climbing plants was also consistent for PM2.5&#x2013;10, while there was no significant difference in the adsorption of PM0.2&#x2013;2.5 among the three climbers (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.05).</p>
<fig id="F7" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 7</label>
<caption>
<p>The mass of retained particulate matter on the leaf wax layer in autumn (mean &#xb1; SE). <bold>(A)</bold> The total mass of particulate matter. <bold>(B)</bold> The mass of PM10&#x2013;100. <bold>(C)</bold> The mass of PM2.5&#x2013;10. <bold>(D)</bold> The mass of PM0.2&#x2013;2.5.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fenvs-10-1084902-g007.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>The adsorption of different particle sizes of PM by the leaf wax layer of all three plants in the winter at the campus was significantly higher for <italic>H. nepalensis</italic> than for the other two plants (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.05). The adsorption of different particle sizes of PM by the leaf wax layer of <italic>H. nepalensis</italic> in the overpass was: wPM (10.83 &#xb1; 0.52&#xa0;&#x3bc;g&#xa0;cm<sup>&#x2212;2</sup>) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8">Figure 8A</xref>), wPM10&#x2013;100 (7.93 &#xb1; 0.36&#xa0;&#x3bc;g&#xa0;cm<sup>&#x2212;2</sup>) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8">Figure 8B</xref>), and wPM2.5&#x2013;10 (7.93 &#xb1; 0.36&#xa0;&#x3bc;g&#xa0;cm<sup>&#x2212;2</sup>) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8">Figure 8C</xref>). The adsorption patterns of PM, PM10&#x2013;100, and PM2.5&#x2013;10 were consistent among the three plants at the overpass, i.e., <italic>H. nepalensis</italic> was significantly higher than the other two plants (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.05), and there were significant differences (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.05) in the adsorption of PM0.2&#x2013;2.5 for all three climbers at the overpass (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8">Figure 8D</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F8" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 8</label>
<caption>
<p>The mass of retained particulate matter on the leaf wax layer in winter (mean &#xb1; SE). <bold>(A)</bold> The total mass of particulate matter. <bold>(B)</bold> The mass of PM10&#x2013;100. <bold>(C)</bold> The mass of PM2.5&#x2013;10. <bold>(D)</bold> The mass of PM0.2&#x2013;2.5.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fenvs-10-1084902-g008.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-3">
<title>3.3 The photosynthetic gas exchange paremeters response of climbing plants to different levels of PM pollution</title>
<p>The P<sub>n</sub>, C<sub>i</sub>, and T<sub>r</sub> of <italic>F. pumila</italic> leaves on campus were significantly higher than those of the other two climbers in spring. The G<sub>s</sub> of <italic>H. nepalensis</italic> leaves reached a maximum on campus, which was significantly higher than that of <italic>E. fortunei</italic>. On the overpass, the P<sub>n</sub> of <italic>F. pumila</italic> leaves was significantly higher than that of <italic>E. fortune</italic>. The Gs and Tr of <italic>F. pumila</italic> and <italic>H. nepalensis</italic> leaves were significantly higher than those of <italic>E. fortunei</italic>. The C<sub>i</sub> of <italic>H. nepalensis</italic> leaves was significantly higher than that of <italic>E. fortune</italic> (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table.1</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap id="T1" position="float">
<label>TABLE 1</label>
<caption>
<p>The photosynthetic gas exchange parameters response of climbing plants to different levels of PM pollution.</p>
</caption>
<table>
<thead valign="top">
<tr>
<th rowspan="2" align="center">Seasons</th>
<th align="left"/>
<th colspan="2" align="center">P<sub>n</sub> (&#x3bc;mol&#xb7;m<sup>&#x2212;2</sup>&#xb7;s<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>)</th>
<th colspan="2" align="center">G<sub>s</sub> (mol&#xb7;m<sup>&#x2212;2</sup>&#xb7;s<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>)</th>
<th colspan="2" align="center">C<sub>i</sub> (&#x3bc;mol&#xb7;mol<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>)</th>
<th colspan="2" align="center">Tr (mmol&#xb7;H<sub>2</sub>O&#xb7;m<sup>&#x2212;2</sup>&#xb7;s<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th align="left"/>
<th align="center">campus</th>
<th align="center">overpass</th>
<th align="center">campus</th>
<th align="center">overpass</th>
<th align="center">campus</th>
<th align="center">overpass</th>
<th align="center">campus</th>
<th align="center">overpass</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td rowspan="3" align="center">spring</td>
<td align="center">
<italic>E. fortunei</italic>
</td>
<td align="center">3.61 &#xb1; 0.34b</td>
<td align="center">1.89 &#xb1; 0.19B</td>
<td align="center">0.08 &#xb1; 0.02b</td>
<td align="center">0.04 &#xb1; 0.01B</td>
<td align="center">187.31 &#xb1; 22.71b</td>
<td align="center">160.21 &#xb1; 27.53B</td>
<td align="center">0.22 &#xb1; 0.08c</td>
<td align="center">0.11 &#xb1; 0.06B</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">
<italic>F. pumila</italic>
</td>
<td align="center">5.41 &#xb1; 0.48a</td>
<td align="center">3.29 &#xb1; 0.58A</td>
<td align="center">0.15 &#xb1; 0.03a</td>
<td align="center">0.06 &#xb1; 0.01A</td>
<td align="center">284.98 &#xb1; 28.54a</td>
<td align="center">190.16 &#xb1; 26.18AB</td>
<td align="center">1.75 &#xb1; 0.24a</td>
<td align="center">0.58 &#xb1; 0.06A</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">
<italic>H. nepaensis</italic>
</td>
<td align="center">4.01 &#xb1; 0.52a</td>
<td align="center">2.65 &#xb1; 0.45AB</td>
<td align="center">0.17 &#xb1; 0.04a</td>
<td align="center">0.07 &#xb1; 0.001A</td>
<td align="center">201.18 &#xb1; 23.17b</td>
<td align="center">229.33 &#xb1; 22.37A</td>
<td align="center">1.02 &#xb1; 0.31b</td>
<td align="center">0.54 &#xb1; 0.07A</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="3" align="center">summer</td>
<td align="center">
<italic>E. fortunei</italic>
</td>
<td align="center">6.32 &#xb1; 0.59b</td>
<td align="center">2.09 &#xb1; 0.22B</td>
<td align="center">0.04 &#xb1; 0.01b</td>
<td align="center">0.02 &#xb1; 0.01A</td>
<td align="center">143.54 &#xb1; 20.77b</td>
<td align="center">152.19 &#xb1; 17.27A</td>
<td align="center">1.05 &#xb1; 0.23b</td>
<td align="center">0.99 &#xb1; 0.12A</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">
<italic>F. pumila</italic>
</td>
<td align="center">7.4 &#xb1; 0.43a</td>
<td align="center">2.28 &#xb1; 0.08B</td>
<td align="center">0.06 &#xb1; 0.01ab</td>
<td align="center">0.02 &#xb1; 0.01A</td>
<td align="center">179.06 &#xb1; 25.78ab</td>
<td align="center">96.05 &#xb1; 15.27B</td>
<td align="center">1.92 &#xb1; 0.46a</td>
<td align="center">0.54 &#xb1; 0.07B</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">
<italic>H. nepaensis</italic>
</td>
<td align="center">8.93 &#xb1; 0.26a</td>
<td align="center">3.74 &#xb1; 0.03A</td>
<td align="center">0.10 &#xb1; 0.002a</td>
<td align="center">0.04 &#xb1; 0.01A</td>
<td align="center">213.17 &#xb1; 29.64a</td>
<td align="center">135.35 &#xb1; 14.7A</td>
<td align="center">2.43 &#xb1; 0.37a</td>
<td align="center">0.93 &#xb1; 0.16A</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="3" align="center">autumn</td>
<td align="center">
<italic>E. fortunei</italic>
</td>
<td align="center">4.9 &#xb1; 0.25c</td>
<td align="center">2.55 &#xb1; 0.21C</td>
<td align="center">0.05 &#xb1; 0.01b</td>
<td align="center">0.05 &#xb1; 0.01B</td>
<td align="center">211.68 &#xb1; 26.73a</td>
<td align="center">219.81 &#xb1; 25.29A</td>
<td align="center">0.33 &#xb1; 0.02b</td>
<td align="center">0.59 &#xb1; 0.12B</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">
<italic>F. pumila</italic>
</td>
<td align="center">6.51 &#xb1; 0.21a</td>
<td align="center">3.58 &#xb1; 0.36A</td>
<td align="center">0.07 &#xb1; 0.01ab</td>
<td align="center">0.05 &#xb1; 0.02A</td>
<td align="center">182.23 &#xb1; 26.73a</td>
<td align="center">206.87 &#xb1; 16.82A</td>
<td align="center">0.35 &#xb1; 0.08ab</td>
<td align="center">0.44 &#xb1; 0.12A</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">
<italic>H. nepaensis</italic>
</td>
<td align="center">4.74 &#xb1; 0.49b</td>
<td align="center">3.05 &#xb1; 0.27B</td>
<td align="center">0.08 &#xb1; 0.03a</td>
<td align="center">0.04 &#xb1; 0.01AB</td>
<td align="center">261.2 &#xb1; 27.92a</td>
<td align="center">180.22 &#xb1; 33.48A</td>
<td align="center">0.69 &#xb1; 0.14a</td>
<td align="center">0.34 &#xb1; 0.11B</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="3" align="center">winter</td>
<td align="center">
<italic>E. fortunei</italic>
</td>
<td align="center">2.61 &#xb1; 0.36b</td>
<td align="center">2.38 &#xb1; 0.38B</td>
<td align="center">0.04 &#xb1; 0.01b</td>
<td align="center">0.03 &#xb1; 0.01A</td>
<td align="center">193.81 &#xb1; 36.23a</td>
<td align="center">180.85 &#xb1; 26.99A</td>
<td align="center">1.06 &#xb1; 0.12b</td>
<td align="center">0.32 &#xb1; 0.08A</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">
<italic>F. pumila</italic>
</td>
<td align="center">7.81 &#xb1; 0.66a</td>
<td align="center">5.62 &#xb1; 0.55A</td>
<td align="center">0.07 &#xb1; 0.02ab</td>
<td align="center">0.06 &#xb1; 0.02A</td>
<td align="center">193.44 &#xb1; 19.01b</td>
<td align="center">180.71 &#xb1; 19.85A</td>
<td align="center">1.78 &#xb1; 0.42b</td>
<td align="center">1.62 &#xb1; 0.24A</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">
<italic>H. nepaensis</italic>
</td>
<td align="center">4.39 &#xb1; 0.47b</td>
<td align="center">4.03 &#xb1; 0.39AB</td>
<td align="center">0.12 &#xb1; 0.04a</td>
<td align="center">0.04 &#xb1; 0.01A</td>
<td align="center">248.43 &#xb1; 23.67a</td>
<td align="center">147.72 &#xb1; 10.91A</td>
<td align="center">2.39 &#xb1; 0.42a</td>
<td align="center">0.61 &#xb1; 0.15A</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>Note: &#x2a;Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences in data within the campus, different capital letters indicate significant differences in data within the overpass.</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>As can be seen from <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>, the <italic>P</italic>
<sub>
<italic>n</italic>
</sub>, <italic>C</italic>
<sub>
<italic>i</italic>
</sub>, and <italic>T</italic>
<sub>
<italic>R</italic>
</sub> of <italic>E. fortunei</italic> leaves at the campus were significantly higher than for the other two climbers in summer. Additionally, the <italic>P</italic>
<sub>
<italic>n</italic>
</sub>, <italic>T</italic>
<sub>
<italic>R</italic>
</sub>, <italic>G</italic>, and <italic>C</italic>
<sub>
<italic>i</italic>
</sub> of <italic>E. fortunei</italic> leaves all reached a maximum in the summer. The <italic>P</italic>
<sub>
<italic>n</italic>
</sub>, <italic>G</italic>
<sub>
<italic>s</italic>
</sub>, and <italic>T</italic>
<sub>
<italic>R</italic>
</sub> of the <italic>H. nepalensis</italic> and <italic>F. pumila</italic> leaves at the interchange were significantly higher than those of <italic>E. fortunei</italic>.</p>
<p>The <italic>P</italic>
<sub>
<italic>n</italic>
</sub>, <italic>G</italic>
<sub>
<italic>s</italic>
</sub>, <italic>C</italic>
<sub>
<italic>i</italic>
</sub>, and <italic>T</italic>
<sub>
<italic>R</italic>
</sub> of <italic>H. nepalensis</italic> and <italic>F. pumila</italic> leaves were significantly higher than those of <italic>E. fortunei</italic> in autumn. The <italic>P</italic>
<sub>
<italic>n</italic>
</sub>, and <italic>G</italic>
<sub>
<italic>s</italic>
</sub> of <italic>H. nepalensis</italic> leaves reached a maximum at the overpass, where the <italic>P</italic>
<sub>
<italic>n</italic>
</sub>, of <italic>H. nepalensis</italic> leaves was significantly higher than those of the other two plants. The <italic>C</italic>
<sub>
<italic>i</italic>
</sub> and <italic>T</italic>
<sub>
<italic>R</italic>
</sub> of <italic>H. nepalensis</italic> and <italic>E. fortunei</italic> leaves were significantly higher than those of <italic>F. pumila</italic> at the overpass, and the <italic>G</italic>
<sub>
<italic>s</italic>
</sub> of the three plants was not significantly different.</p>
<p>The <italic>P</italic>
<sub>
<italic>n</italic>
</sub> of <italic>F. pumila</italic> leaves was significantly higher than that of <italic>E. fortunei</italic> and <italic>H. nepalensis</italic> leaves in winter at the campus. The <italic>C</italic>
<sub>
<italic>i</italic>
</sub> of both <italic>E. fortunei</italic> and <italic>H. nepalensis</italic> leaves was significantly higher than that of <italic>F. pumila</italic>. The <italic>G</italic>
<sub>
<italic>s</italic>
</sub> and transpiration rate of <italic>H. nepalensis</italic> leaves reached a maximum in winter, while the <italic>G</italic>
<sub>
<italic>s</italic>
</sub> of <italic>H. nepalensis</italic> and <italic>F. pumila</italic> leaves was significantly higher than that of <italic>E. fortunei</italic>, and the <italic>T</italic>
<sub>
<italic>R</italic>
</sub> of <italic>H. nepalensis</italic> leaves was significantly different. The <italic>T</italic>
<sub>
<italic>R</italic>
</sub> of <italic>H. nepalensis</italic> leaves was significantly higher than that of the other two plants.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-4">
<title>3.4 The physiological and biochemical responses of climbing plants to different levels of PM pollution</title>
<sec id="s3-4-1">
<title>3.4.1 Seasonal changes of total SOD activity of plants under different levels of PM pollution</title>
<p>As can be seen from <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9">Figure 9</xref>, the SOD activity of <italic>H. nepalensis</italic> leaves was significantly higher than that of the other two plants in summer (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9">Figure 9B</xref>) and autumn (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9">Figure 9C</xref>). The SOD activity of <italic>F</italic>. <italic>pumila</italic> leaves was significantly higher than that of the other two plants in winter at the campus (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9">Figure 9D</xref>). At the overpass, the SOD activity of <italic>H. nepalensis</italic> leaves in spring (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9">Figure 9A</xref>)and autumn was significantly higher than that of the other two plants, and the SOD activity of <italic>H. nepalensis</italic> and <italic>F. pumila</italic> leaves in summer was significantly higher than that of <italic>E. fortunei</italic> leaves (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.05) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9">Figure 9B</xref>). The SOD activity of <italic>F. pumila</italic> leaves in winter at the overpass reached a maximum and was significantly higher than that of the other two plants.</p>
<fig id="F9" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 9</label>
<caption>
<p>Effects of different levels of particulate pollution on SOD activities in plant leaves (mean &#xb1; SE). <bold>(A)</bold> spring, <bold>(B)</bold> summer, <bold>(C)</bold> autumn, <bold>(D)</bold> winter.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fenvs-10-1084902-g009.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-4-2">
<title>3.4.2 Seasonal changes of plant POD activity under different levels of PM pollution</title>
<p>As can be seen from <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F10">Figure 10</xref>, the POD activity of E. fortunei leaves at the campus reached a maximum in spring (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F10">Figure 10A</xref>), summer (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F10">Figure 10B</xref>), and winter (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F10">Figure 10D</xref>). The POD activity of <italic>E. fortunei</italic> leaves at the campus was significantly higher than that of the other two plants in spring and winter. The POD activity of <italic>E</italic>. <italic>fortune</italic> and <italic>F</italic>. <italic>pumila</italic> leaves was significantly higher than that of H. nepalensis leaves in summer, and there was no significant difference in the POD activity of the leaves of the three plants in autumn (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F10">Figure 10C</xref>). The leaf POD activity of <italic>E</italic>. <italic>fortunei</italic> was significantly higher than that of the other two plants, and the leaf POD activity of all three plants at the overpass was higher than that at the campus in all four seasons.</p>
<fig id="F10" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 10</label>
<caption>
<p>Effects of different levels of particulate pollution on POD activities in plant leaves (mean &#xb1; SE). <bold>(A)</bold> spring, <bold>(B)</bold> summer, <bold>(C)</bold> autumn, <bold>(D)</bold> winter.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fenvs-10-1084902-g010.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-4-3">
<title>3.4.3 Seasonal changes of the MDA content of plants under different levels of PM pollution</title>
<p>As can be seen from the <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F11">Figure 11</xref>, the MDA content of F. pumila leaves reached a maximum at the campus, where the MDA content of <italic>F</italic>. <italic>pumila</italic> and <italic>H</italic>. <italic>nepalensis</italic> leaves was significantly higher than that of <italic>E. fortune</italic> leaves in spring (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F11">Figure 11A</xref>) and summer (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F11">Figure 11B</xref>). The MDA content of F. pumila leaves was significantly higher than that of <italic>E. fortunei</italic> and <italic>H</italic>. <italic>nepalensis</italic> leaves in autumn (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F11">Figure 11C</xref>) and winter (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F11">Figure 11D</xref>). At the overpass, the leaf MDA content of <italic>H</italic>. <italic>nepalensis</italic> and <italic>F</italic>. <italic>pumila</italic> was significantly higher than that of <italic>E. fortunei</italic> in spring; the leaf MDA content of <italic>E. fortunei</italic> and <italic>F. pumila</italic> was significantly higher than that of <italic>H</italic>. <italic>nepalensis</italic> in summer; the leaf MDA content of <italic>E. fortunei</italic> was significantly higher than that of the other two plants in autumn; and the leaf MDA content of <italic>F</italic>. <italic>pumila</italic> was significantly higher than that of <italic>E</italic>. <italic>fortunei</italic> and <italic>H</italic>. <italic>nepalensis</italic> in winter.</p>
<fig id="F11" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 11</label>
<caption>
<p>Effects of different levels of particulate pollution on MDA content in plant leaves (mean &#xb1; SE). <bold>(A)</bold> spring, <bold>(B)</bold> summer, <bold>(C)</bold> autumn, <bold>(D)</bold> winter.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fenvs-10-1084902-g011.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-4-4">
<title>3.4.4 Seasonal changes of the soluble protein content under different levels of PM pollution</title>
<p>As can be seen from the <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref>, the soluble protein content of <italic>H. nepalensis</italic> and <italic>F</italic>. <italic>pumila</italic> leaves was significantly higher than that of <italic>E</italic>. <italic>fortunei</italic> leaves in spring and summer at the campus, and there was no significant difference in the soluble protein content of the leaves of all three plants in autumn. The soluble protein content of <italic>F</italic>. <italic>pumila</italic> leaves was significantly higher than that of <italic>H</italic>. <italic>nepalensis</italic> and E. fortunei leaves in winter. At the overpass, the soluble protein content of <italic>H</italic>. <italic>nepalensis</italic> leaves was largest in spring and autumn, with the soluble protein content of <italic>H</italic>. <italic>nepalensis</italic> leaves in spring being significantly higher than that of the other two plants. In summer, the plant soluble protein of <italic>F</italic>. <italic>pumila</italic> leaves was significantly higher than that of <italic>E</italic>. <italic>fortune</italic> leaves. In autumn, the soluble protein of <italic>H</italic>. <italic>nepalensis</italic> leaves was significantly higher than that of <italic>E</italic>. <italic>fortune</italic> leaves. In winter, the plant soluble protein of <italic>F</italic>. <italic>pumila</italic> leaves was significantly higher than that of the other climbers.</p>
<table-wrap id="T2" position="float">
<label>TABLE 2</label>
<caption>
<p>Effects of different levels of particulate pollution on soluble protein content in plant leaves (g&#xb7;100&#xa0;g<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> FW).</p>
</caption>
<table>
<thead valign="top">
<tr>
<th rowspan="2" align="center">Plant species</th>
<th colspan="2" align="center">Spring</th>
<th colspan="2" align="center">Summer</th>
<th colspan="2" align="center">Autumn</th>
<th colspan="2" align="center">Winter</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th align="center">Campus</th>
<th align="center">Overpass</th>
<th align="center">Campus</th>
<th align="center">Overpass</th>
<th align="center">Campus</th>
<th align="center">Overpass</th>
<th align="center">Campus</th>
<th align="center">Overpass</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td align="center">
<italic>E. fortunei</italic>
</td>
<td align="center">0.22 &#xb1; 0.07b</td>
<td align="center">0.04 &#xb1; 0.0063C</td>
<td align="center">0.13 &#xb1; 0.074a</td>
<td align="center">0.13 &#xb1; 0.074B</td>
<td align="center">0.89 &#xb1; 0.067a</td>
<td align="center">0.53 &#xb1; 0.085B</td>
<td align="center">0.09 &#xb1; 0.0036b</td>
<td align="center">0.39 &#xb1; 0.042B</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">
<italic>F. pumila</italic>
</td>
<td align="center">0.59 &#xb1; 0.09a</td>
<td align="center">0.34 &#xb1; 0.08B</td>
<td align="center">0.27 &#xb1; 0.04a</td>
<td align="center">0.27 &#xb1; 0.04A</td>
<td align="center">1.19 &#xb1; 0.085a</td>
<td align="center">0.91 &#xb1; 0.066AB</td>
<td align="center">0.34 &#xb1; 0.015a</td>
<td align="center">0.74 &#xb1; 0.027A</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">
<italic>H. nepaensis</italic>
</td>
<td align="center">0.78 &#xb1; 0.11a</td>
<td align="center">0.51 &#xb1; 0.06A</td>
<td align="center">0.32 &#xb1; 0.036a</td>
<td align="center">0.32 &#xb1; 0.036AB</td>
<td align="center">0.82 &#xb1; 0.076a</td>
<td align="center">1.31 &#xb1; 0.084A</td>
<td align="center">0.18 &#xb1; 0.007b</td>
<td align="center">0.52 &#xb1; 0.018B</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-4-5">
<title>3.4.5 Seasonal changes of plant soluble sugar content under different levels of PM pollution</title>
<p>As can be seen from the <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">Table 3</xref>, the soluble sugar content of <italic>E. fortunei</italic> leaves at the campus reached a maximum in spring, summer, and autumn, and the soluble sugar content of <italic>E</italic>. <italic>fortunei</italic> leaves and <italic>H</italic>. <italic>nepalensis</italic> leaves was significantly higher than that of <italic>F</italic>. <italic>pumila</italic> leaves in spring. The soluble sugar content of <italic>E. fortunei</italic> leaves was significantly higher than that of the other two plants in summer and autumn. The soluble sugar content of <italic>H</italic>. <italic>nepalensis</italic> and <italic>E</italic>. <italic>fortunei</italic> leaves at the campus was significantly higher than that of <italic>F</italic>. <italic>pumila</italic> leaves in winter. At the overpass, the soluble sugar content of <italic>E</italic>. <italic>fortunei</italic> leaves was significantly higher than that of <italic>F</italic>. <italic>pumila</italic> leaves in spring. At the overpass, the soluble content of <italic>H. nepalensis</italic> leaves was significantly higher than the other two plants in spring, the soluble sugar content of <italic>E. fortunei</italic> and <italic>F</italic>. <italic>pumila</italic> leaves was significantly higher than that of <italic>H</italic>. <italic>nepalensis</italic> leaves in summer, the soluble sugar content of <italic>E</italic>. <italic>fortunei</italic> leaves was significantly higher than that of the other two plants in autumn (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.05), and the soluble sugar content of <italic>H</italic>. <italic>nepalensis</italic> leaves was significantly higher than that of the other two plants in winter.</p>
<table-wrap id="T3" position="float">
<label>TABLE 3</label>
<caption>
<p>Effects of different levels of particulate pollution on total soluble sugar content in plant leaves (g&#xb7;100&#xa0;g<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>FW).</p>
</caption>
<table>
<thead valign="top">
<tr>
<th rowspan="2" align="center">Plant species</th>
<th colspan="2" align="center">Spring</th>
<th colspan="2" align="center">Summer</th>
<th colspan="2" align="center">Autumn</th>
<th colspan="2" align="center">Winter</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th align="center">Campus</th>
<th align="center">Overpass</th>
<th align="center">Campus</th>
<th align="center">Overpass</th>
<th align="center">Campus</th>
<th align="center">Overpass</th>
<th align="center">Campus</th>
<th align="center">Overpass</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td align="center">
<italic>E. fortunei</italic>
</td>
<td align="center">5.66 &#xb1; 0.73a</td>
<td align="center">0.55 &#xb1; 0.07C</td>
<td align="center">6.19 &#xb1; 0.21a</td>
<td align="center">4.35 &#xb1; 0.15A</td>
<td align="center">6.56 &#xb1; 0.17a</td>
<td align="center">6.54 &#xb1; 0.19A</td>
<td align="center">4.27 &#xb1; 0.21a</td>
<td align="center">3.11 &#xb1; 0.18B</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">
<italic>F. pumila</italic>
</td>
<td align="center">1.42 &#xb1; 0.89b</td>
<td align="center">2.63 &#xb1; 0.12B</td>
<td align="center">2.48 &#xb1; 0.14c</td>
<td align="center">3.48 &#xb1; 0.16A</td>
<td align="center">3.58 &#xb1; 0.11c</td>
<td align="center">3.77 &#xb1; 0.16B</td>
<td align="center">2.09 &#xb1; 0.13b</td>
<td align="center">3.28 &#xb1; 0.25B</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">
<italic>H. nepaensis</italic>
</td>
<td align="center">5.01 &#xb1; 0.63a</td>
<td align="center">4.79 &#xb1; 0.17A</td>
<td align="center">3.49 &#xb1; 0.11b</td>
<td align="center">0.35 &#xb1; 0.15B</td>
<td align="center">5.09 &#xb1; 0.19b</td>
<td align="center">3.73 &#xb1; 0.15B</td>
<td align="center">5.01 &#xb1; 0.32a</td>
<td align="center">4.76 &#xb1; 0.28A</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-5">
<title>3.5 Two-factor ANOVA</title>
<p>As shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T4">Table 4</xref>, the interaction of tree species and sampling site had highly significant effects (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.001) on the sPM, sPM10&#x2013;100, sPM2.5&#x2013;10, wPM, wPM10&#x2013;100, POD activity, MDA content, P<sub>n</sub>, and G<sub>s</sub> of climbing plants. The effect of tree species on the wPM2.5&#x2013;10 and wPM0.2&#x2013;2.5 of all climbing plants was highly significant (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.01). Sampling site had a highly significant effect on the sPM0.2&#x2013;2.5 and T<sub>r</sub> of climbing plants (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.01). Tree species had a highly significant effect on the soluble protein content, C<sub>i</sub>, and T<sub>r</sub> of climbing plants (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.001). The interaction of tree species and sampling site had highly significant effects on the POD activity (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.001), soluble sugar content (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.01), and sPM10&#x2013;100, wPM2.5&#x2013;10, wPM0.2&#x2013;2.5, MDA, G<sub>s</sub>, and T<sub>r</sub> (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.05).</p>
<table-wrap id="T4" position="float">
<label>TABLE 4</label>
<caption>
<p>Effect of tree species and sampling sites on the adsorption particulate matter, photosynthesis and biochemistry by leaves of climbing plants.</p>
</caption>
<table>
<thead valign="top">
<tr>
<th align="left">Index</th>
<th align="left">sPM</th>
<th align="left">sPM10&#x223c;100</th>
<th align="left">sPM2.5&#x223c;10</th>
<th align="left">sPM0.2&#x223c;2.5</th>
<th align="left">wPM</th>
<th align="left">wPM10&#x223c;100</th>
<th align="left">wPM2.5&#x223c;10</th>
<th align="left">wPM0.2&#x223c;2.5</th>
<th align="left">SOD</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td align="left">Areas (A)</td>
<td align="left">0.000&#x2a;&#x2a;&#x2a;</td>
<td align="left">0.000&#x2a;&#x2a;&#x2a;</td>
<td align="left">0.000&#x2a;&#x2a;&#x2a;</td>
<td align="left">0.003&#x2a;&#x2a;</td>
<td align="left">0.000&#x2a;&#x2a;&#x2a;</td>
<td align="left">0.000&#x2a;&#x2a;&#x2a;</td>
<td align="left">0.000&#x2a;&#x2a;&#x2a;</td>
<td align="left">0.000&#x2a;&#x2a;&#x2a;</td>
<td align="left">0.000&#x2a;&#x2a;&#x2a;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Tree species (T)</td>
<td align="left">0.000&#x2a;&#x2a;&#x2a;</td>
<td align="left">0.000&#x2a;&#x2a;&#x2a;</td>
<td align="left">0000&#x2a;&#x2a;&#x2a;</td>
<td align="left">0.000&#x2a;&#x2a;&#x2a;</td>
<td align="left">0.000&#x2a;&#x2a;&#x2a;</td>
<td align="left">0.000&#x2a;&#x2a;&#x2a;</td>
<td align="left">0.002&#x2a;&#x2a;</td>
<td align="left">0.001&#x2a;&#x2a;</td>
<td align="left">0.658</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">A&#xd7;T</td>
<td align="left">0.114 ns</td>
<td align="left">0.033&#x2a;</td>
<td align="left">0.352 ns</td>
<td align="left">0.045</td>
<td align="left">0.111 ns</td>
<td align="left">0.209</td>
<td align="left">0.029 &#x2a;</td>
<td align="left">0.002&#x2a;</td>
<td align="left">0.947</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Index</td>
<td align="left">POD</td>
<td align="left">MDA</td>
<td align="left">Soluble protein</td>
<td align="left">Total soluble sugar</td>
<td align="left">P<sub>n</sub>
</td>
<td align="left">G<sub>s</sub>
</td>
<td align="left">C<sub>i</sub>
</td>
<td align="left">T<sub>r</sub>
</td>
<td align="left"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Areas (A)</td>
<td align="left">0.000&#x2a;&#x2a;&#x2a;</td>
<td align="left">0.000&#x2a;&#x2a;&#x2a;</td>
<td align="left">0.004&#x2a;</td>
<td align="left">0.000&#x2a;&#x2a;&#x2a;</td>
<td align="left">0.000&#x2a;&#x2a;&#x2a;</td>
<td align="left">0.000&#x2a;&#x2a;&#x2a;</td>
<td align="left">0.544 ns</td>
<td align="left">0.002&#x2a;&#x2a;</td>
<td align="left"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Tree species (T)</td>
<td align="left">0.000&#x2a;&#x2a;&#x2a;</td>
<td align="left">0.000&#x2a;&#x2a;&#x2a;</td>
<td align="left">0.000&#x2a;&#x2a;&#x2a;</td>
<td align="left">0.597</td>
<td align="left">0.000&#x2a;&#x2a;&#x2a;</td>
<td align="left">0.000&#x2a;&#x2a;&#x2a;</td>
<td align="left">0.000&#x2a;&#x2a;&#x2a;</td>
<td align="left">0.000&#x2a;&#x2a;&#x2a;</td>
<td align="left"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">A &#xd7; T</td>
<td align="left">0.000&#x2a;&#x2a;&#x2a;</td>
<td align="left">0.020&#x2a;</td>
<td align="left">0.171</td>
<td align="left">0.001&#x2a;&#x2a;</td>
<td align="left">0.171 ns</td>
<td align="left">0.020&#x2a;</td>
<td align="left">0.422&#xa0;ns</td>
<td align="left">0.041&#x2a;</td>
<td align="left"/>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>&#x2a;&#x2a;&#x2a;indicated significant correlation at <italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.001, &#x2a;&#x2a; indicated significant correlation at <italic>p &#x3c;</italic> 0.01, &#x2a; indicated significant correlation at <italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.05.</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-6">
<title>3.6 Relationship between particulate matter, photosynthesis and biochemistry by leaves of climbing plants</title>
<p>AS shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F12">Figure 12</xref>, the SOD activity was positively correlated with MDA content, cell concentration (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.01), G<sub>s</sub>, sPM, sPM10&#x2013;100, wPM, wPM10&#x2013;100 (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.05), and negatively correlated with the POD activity and soluble sugar content (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.05). The POD activity was positively correlated with the MDA content (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.05), and negatively correlated with the soluble protein content, P<sub>n</sub>, G<sub>s</sub> (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.01), and <italic>T</italic>
<sub>
<italic>R</italic>
</sub> and wPM2.5&#x2013;10 (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.05). The MDA content was positively correlated with the soluble protein content, sPM, and sPM0.2&#x2013;2.5 (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.01), and sPM10&#x2013;100 and sPM2.5&#x2013;10 (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.05), and negatively correlated with the total soluble sugar content (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.01), and G<sub>s</sub> and C<sub>i</sub> (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.05). The soluble protein content was positively correlated with the T<sub>R</sub> (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.01) and P<sub>n</sub> (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.05), and negatively correlated with the C<sub>i</sub> (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.01). The soluble sugar content was negatively correlated with the P<sub>n</sub> (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.01). The P<sub>n</sub> was positively correlated with G<sub>s</sub> and the T<sub>r</sub> (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.01), and negatively correlated with sPM, sPM10&#x2013;100, sPM2.5&#x2013;10, wPM, and wPM10&#x2013;100 (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.01), and sPM0.2&#x2013;2.5 (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.05). G<sub>s</sub> was positively correlated with C<sub>i</sub> and the T<sub>r</sub> (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.01), and negatively correlated with sPM, sPM10&#x2013;100, and wPM10&#x2013;100 (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.05). The sPM was positively correlated with sPM10&#x2013;100, sPM2.5&#x2013;10, sPM0.2&#x2013;2.5, wPM, wPM10&#x2013;100, wPM2.5&#x2013;10, and wPM0.2&#x2013;2.5 (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.01). The sPM10&#x2013;100 was positively correlated with sPM2.5&#x2013;10, 1 sPM0.2&#x2013;2.5, wPM, wPM10&#x2013;100, wPM2.5&#x2013;10, and wPM0.2&#x2013;2.5 (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.01). The sPM2.5&#x2013;10 was positively correlated with sPM0.2&#x2013;2.5, wPM, wPM10&#x2013;100, wPM2.5&#x2013;10, and wPM0.2&#x2013;2.5 (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.01). The sPM0.2&#x2013;2.5 was positively correlated with wPM, wPM10&#x2013;100, wPM2.5&#x2013;10, and wPM0.2&#x2013;2.5 (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.01). The wPM was positively correlated with wPM10&#x2013;100, wPM2.5&#x2013;10, and wPM0.2&#x2013;2.5 (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.01). The wPM10&#x2013;100 was positively correlated with wPM2.5&#x2013;10 and wPM0.2&#x2013;2.5 (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.01). The wPM2.5&#x2013;10 value was positively correlated with wPM0.2&#x2013;2.5 (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.01).</p>
<fig id="F12" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 12</label>
<caption>
<p>Correlations between accumulated particulate matter, photosynthesis and antioxidant enzyme activities by leaves of climbing plants.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fenvs-10-1084902-g012.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="discussion" id="s4">
<title>4 Discussion</title>
<sec id="s4-1">
<title>4.1 Particle adsorption by the leaves of different climbing plants</title>
<p>The adsorption of PM by the three evergreen climbers followed the order of <italic>H. nepalensis</italic> &#x3e; <italic>F. pumila</italic> &#x3e; <italic>E. fortunei</italic>, indicating that <italic>H. nepalensis</italic> has a strong adsorption capacity for PM, which is related to its larger individual leaf area, sparsity of scales on the lower surface, and obvious lateral and reticulate veins on the leaf surface. <italic>E. fortunei</italic> has thin leathery leaves with fine lateral veins and inconspicuous veinlets, and displayed the fewest seasonal differences among the three climbers, indicating a consistent ability to adsorb PM. <italic>F. pumila</italic> leaves have a glabrous surface with dorsal short hairs and reticulate veins that protrude in the form of a honeycomb, which is conducive to the adsorption of PM. The roughness of the leaf surfaces of the different plants varied, and these differences had a great influence on the adsorption of PM (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Wang et al., 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Li M et al., 2021</xref>). The ability of plants to adsorb PM is closely related to the micromorphology of the leaf surface, and dense, narrow, and deep grooves on the leaf surface could favor the adsorption of PM by plants (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Li et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B53">Zha et al., 2019</xref>). In this study, the adsorption of PM by all three climbing plants was higher at the overpass than at the campus, which was because the overpass was located in the middle of a road segregation zone that was affected by vehicle exhaust. Atmospheric PM pollution was more serious than in other areas, which was consistent with the findings of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Beckett et al., 2000</xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Freer-Smith et al., 2005</xref>. The amount of PM adsorbed by leaf surfaces and wax for all three climbing plants followed the order of winter &#x3e; spring &#x3e; summer &#x3e; autumn, which may be due to the higher level of atmospheric PM pollution in winter than in other seasons, resulting in plants adsorbing more PM. The occurrence of the maximum dust retention in winter was also reported by other researchers (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Prajapati and Tripathi, 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B53">Zha et al., 2019</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4-2">
<title>4.2 The effects of PM pollution on the photosynthetic gas exchange parameters of plants</title>
<p>It was found that PM deposited on the leaf surface increased the leaf temperature and interfered with photosynthetic CO<sub>2</sub> exchange and transpiration rates by shading and impeding diffusion (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Gimeno and Deltoro, 2000</xref>). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B55">Zia-Khan et al. (2015)</xref> found that there may be stomatal occlusion on the leaves of plants growing near coal fields, which may result in a decrease in <italic>G</italic>
<sub>
<italic>s</italic>
</sub>. In this study, it was found that the <italic>P</italic>
<sub>
<italic>n</italic>
</sub> of the three climbing plants was more strongly affected under the high PM pollution conditions at the overpass (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>). Compared to the overpass, at the campus, the P<sub>n</sub> and G<sub>s</sub> of the three climbing plants decreased and the C<sub>i</sub> concentration increased, indicating that high levels of PM pollution inhibited photosynthesis through its effect on <italic>G</italic>
<sub>
<italic>s</italic>
</sub> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Guidi et al., 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Gaji&#x107; et al., 2013</xref>). The toxic elements from particulate matter can inhibit potosynthetic gas exchange parameters of climbing plants, which consistent with <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Guidi et al. (2011)</xref>. The Pearson correlation coefficients between the plant adsorption of different particle sizes and photosynthetic parameters showed that different particle sizes were highly significantly negatively correlated with the net <italic>P</italic>
<sub>
<italic>n</italic>
</sub> and G<sub>s</sub> of plant leaves, i.e., (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>). A similar finding was also reported that photosynthesis nad stomatal conductance declined over time at elevated PM2.5, with large variations with PM2.5 concentrations (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">Yu et al., 2018</xref>). The transpiration of stomata was found to make the leaf surface wetter and enhance the deposition of PM. Among the plants investigated in this study <italic>H. nepalensis</italic> was found to have the highest transpiration rate, which is one of the reasons why it had the greatest ability to adsorb PM (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Hinds, 1999</xref>). Tree species that display resistance to air pollution are reported to have the highest respiration rates (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Lorencplucinska, 1980</xref>), and an analysis of the three plants in this study showed that <italic>F. pumila</italic> had the highest P<sub>n</sub>., indicating a strong resistance to particulate pollution.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4-3">
<title>4.3 The effects of PM pollution on plant biochemical indicators</title>
<p>The degree of oxidative stress in plants depends on the ability of the plant antioxidant capacity system to inhibit superoxide, hydroxyl, and peroxyl radicals at the cellular level (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Mroczek-Zdyrska and Wojcik, 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">Bisoi et al., 2017</xref>). Antioxidant enzymes, such as SOD and POD, are physiological and biochemical indicators that are critical for plant stress resistance and the mitigation of oxidative stress (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Radwan and Eldeen, 2012</xref>).</p>
<p>The three plant species in this study showed a general trend of higher SOD (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F10">Figure 10</xref>) and POD levels (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F11">Figure 11</xref>) in all seasons at the overpass than at the campus, indicating an increase in oxidative stress generated by PM pollution on plants. The increase in SOD and POD enzyme activity indicated an increase in free radicals in plant cells caused by PM pollution, with both SOD and POD scavenging these free radicals to reduce the pollution damage to plants (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">Verma and Dubey 2003</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">Xu et al., 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B59">Sharma et al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Panda et al., 2018</xref>). In addition, in all three plants there was a general trend for a higher MDA content in all seasons at the overpass than at the campus (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F12">Figure 12</xref>), which was due to the higher level of cell membrane damage in the overpass plants following their exposure to higher pollution levels than the plants at the campus. The higher leaf SOD activity of the three plant species in the winter at both the overpass and campus in this study may be related to high dust levels, high reactive oxygen species production rates, high atmospheric particulate matter pollutant concentrations, and low available light levels during the winter (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">Singh et al., 2020</xref>).</p>
<p>The soluble protein content of the three climbing plants displayed different trends in each season (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table. 2</xref>), and the soluble protein content of <italic>F. pumila</italic> leaves in the summer and winter overpass environments was higher than that of the campus, which may be due to the more extreme weather conditions in summer and winter, when plants actively accumulate soluble proteins to maintain their osmoregulation and sustain higher levels of growth. Kumar and Dubey et al. found that pollutants from automobile exhaust emissions may have an inhibitory effect on protein synthesis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Kumar and Dubey, 1998</xref>). The decrease in the foliar protein content in this study may have been due to the breakdown of existing proteins or a decrease in protein synthesis from scratch (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Iqba et al., 2000</xref>; Singh et al., 1998).</p>
<p>In the three climbing plants investigated in this study there was a general trend for lower soluble sugars in all seasons in the overpass than in the campus, indicating that the three climbing plants were more affected by stress at the overpass (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">Table. 3</xref>). The decrease in the soluble sugar content of damaged leaves may correspond to the photosynthetic inhibition or stimulation of respiration rate (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">Tzvetkova and Kolarov, 1996</xref>). Similarly, Bucker and Ballach et al. found that the level of soluble carbohydrates decreased due to the fumigation of a mixture of O<sub>3</sub>, SO<sub>2</sub>, and nitrogen dioxide (NO<sub>2</sub>) in the leaves, and that the decrease in the soluble sugar content may be the result of increased metabolic depletion under stress (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">B&#xfc;cke and Ballach, 2010</xref>). Thus, we believe that more particulate matter accumulated in the leaves leads to shade-induced decrease in photosynthetic efficiency, could be responsible for decline in sugar content in the leaves. A similar finding was also reported that heavy metals containing particulate matter can decrease the sugar levels in <italic>pistia stratiotes</italic>, <italic>spirodela polyrrhiza</italic>, <italic>Eichhornia crassipes</italic>, <italic>Lagerstomia speciose</italic> and <italic>Acacia moniliformis</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Mishra and Tripathi, 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Gupta et al., 2011</xref>).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="conclusion" id="s5">
<title>5 Conclusion</title>
<p>In summary, the ability of the three climbing plants to adsorb PM followed the order of <italic>H. nepalensis</italic> &#x3e; <italic>F. pumila</italic> &#x3e; <italic>E. fortunei</italic> and the differences in the adsorption characteristics of the different plant species were mainly caused by the different morphological and structural characteristics of the leaf surface. The greater the roughness of the leaf surface and the higher the density of pileus on the leaf, the greater the ability of plant leaves to adsorb PM. There were seasonal differences in PM adsorption by climbing plants, with a trend of winter &#x3e; autumn &#x3e; spring &#x3e; summer. Particulate pollution is an important factor affecting plant photosynthesis, and the effect of PM on the net <italic>P</italic>
<sub>
<italic>n</italic>
</sub> varies according to particle size. A comprehensive comparative analysis of the three plants showed that <italic>F. pumila</italic> was the most resistant to PM pollution under the different levels of PM pollution. The three climbing plants actively accumulated biochemical substances in their bodies to regulate osmotic pressure and maintain normal growth when they were exposed to high levels of PM, among which the POD activity and MDA content were the most sensitive indicators of PM stress. Therefore, the identification and assess of the photosynthetic efficacy of these plant species, and their physiological and biochemical responses, may be significant for the selection of climbing tree species for pollution control.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec sec-type="data-availability" id="s6">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/<xref ref-type="sec" rid="s11">Supplymentary Meterial</xref>, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s7">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>XL: Conceptualization, writing, and methodology. LC: Data curation. ZL: visualization. JL: writing and investigation.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s8">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>This work is supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities&#x201d; (Grant No. JS2021ZSPY0023) and the Teaching Research Project for Young Teachers of Hefei University of Technology (JYQN2107).</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="COI-statement" id="s9">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="disclaimer" id="s10">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s11">
<title>Supplementary material</title>
<p>The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2022.1084902/full#supplementary-material">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2022.1084902/full&#x23;supplementary-material</ext-link>
</p>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Table1.XLSX" id="SM1" mimetype="application/XLSX" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B2">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Beckett</surname>
<given-names>K. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Freer-Smith</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Taylor</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2000</year>). <article-title>Effective tree species for local air-quality management</article-title>. <source>J. Arboric.</source> <volume>26</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>12</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>19</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.48044/jauf.2000.002</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B58">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bisoi</surname>
<given-names>S. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mishra</surname>
<given-names>S. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Barik</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Panda</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Effects of different treatmentsof fly ash and mining soil on growth and antioxidant protection of Indian wild rice</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Phytorem.</source> <volume>19</volume> (<issue>5</issue>), <fpage>446</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>452</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/15226514.2016.1244164</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>B&#xfc;cke</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ballach</surname>
<given-names>H, J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Alterations in carbohydrate levels in leaves of populus du-e to ambient air pollution</article-title>. <source>Physiol. Plant</source> <volume>86</volume> (<issue>4</issue>), <fpage>512</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>517</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1399-3054.1992.tb02163.x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chaudhary</surname>
<given-names>I. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rathore</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Suspended particulate matter deposition and its impact on urban trees</article-title>. <source>Atmos. Pollut. Res.</source> <volume>9</volume> (<issue>6</issue>), <fpage>1072</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1082</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.apr.2018.04.006</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B57">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zou</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Variation in tree species ability to capture and retain airborne fine particulate matter (PM2.5)</article-title>. <source>Sci. Rep.</source> <volume>7</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>11</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41598-017-03360-1</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chiam</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Song</surname>
<given-names>X. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lai</surname>
<given-names>H. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tan</surname>
<given-names>H. T. W.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Particulate matter mitigation via plants: understanding complex relationships with leaf traits</article-title>. <source>Sci. Total Environ.</source> <volume>688</volume>, <fpage>398</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>408</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.06.263</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Choi</surname>
<given-names>Y. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Song</surname>
<given-names>H. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jo</surname>
<given-names>J. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bang</surname>
<given-names>S. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Park</surname>
<given-names>B. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kim</surname>
<given-names>H. H.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Morphological and chemical evaluations of leaf surface on particulate matter 2.5 (PM2.5) removal in a botanical plant-based biofilter system</article-title>. <source>Plants (Basel)</source> <volume>10</volume> (<issue>12</issue>), <fpage>2761</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/plants10122761</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>De Nicola</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Maisto</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Prati</surname>
<given-names>M. V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Alfani</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Leaf accumulation of trace elements and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in Quercus ilex L</article-title>. <source>Environ. Poll.</source> <volume>153</volume>, <fpage>376</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>383</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.envpol.2007.08.008</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Do&#x11f;anlar</surname>
<given-names>Z. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Atmaca</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Influence of airborne pollution on Cd, Zn, Pb, Cu, and Alaccumulation and physiological parameters of plant leaves in Antakya (Turkey)</article-title>. <source>Water Air Soil Pollut.</source> <volume>214</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>509</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>523</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11270-010-0442-9</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Du</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xu</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chu</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Guo</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Air particulate matter and cardiovascular disease: the epidemiological, biomedical and clinical evidence</article-title>. <source>J. Thorac. Dis.</source> <volume>8</volume>, <fpage>E8</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>E19</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2015.11.37</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Dzier&#x17c;anowski</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Popek</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gawronska</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Saeb&#xf8;</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gawronska</surname>
<given-names>S. W.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Deposition of particulate matter of different size fractions on leaf surfaces and in waxes of urban forest species</article-title>. <source>Int J Phytoremediat</source> <volume>13</volume>, <fpage>1037</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1046</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/15226514.2011.552929</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Freer-Smith</surname>
<given-names>P. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Beckrtt</surname>
<given-names>K. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Taylor</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Deposition velocities to Sorbus aria, Acer campestre, Populus deltoides X trichocarpa &#x2018;Beaupr&#xe9;&#x2019;, Pinus nigra and X Cupressocyparis leylandii for coarse, fine and ultra-fine particles in the urban environment</article-title>. <source>Environ. Pollut.</source> <volume>133</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>157</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>167</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.envpol.2004.03.031</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Gajic</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pavlovic</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kostic</surname>
<given-names>O.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jaric</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>&#x110;ur&#x110;evic</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pavlovic</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Ecophysiological and biochemical traits of three herbaceous plants growing on the disposed coal combustion fly ash of different weathering stage</article-title>. <source>Arch. Biol. Sci.</source> <volume>65</volume> (<issue>4</issue>), <fpage>1651</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1667</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2298/abs1304651g</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Gimeno</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Deltoro</surname>
<given-names>V. I.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2000</year>). <article-title>Sulphur dioxide effects on cell structure and photosynthetic performance in the liverwort &#x3c;i&#x26;gt;Frullania dilatata&#x26;lt;/i&#x26;gt;</article-title>. <source>Can. J. Bot.</source> <volume>78</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>98</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>104</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1139/cjb-78-1-98</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Gu</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pitz</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Breitner</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Birmili</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Klot</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schneider</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Selection of key ambient particulate variables for epidemiological studies-applying cluster and heatmap analyses as tools for data reduction</article-title>. <source>Sci. Total Environ.</source> <volume>435</volume>, <fpage>541</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>550</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.07.040</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Guidi</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Degl&#x2019;Innocenti</surname>
<given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Carmassi</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Massa</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pardossi</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Effects of boron on leaf chlorophyll fluorescence of greenhouse tomato grown with saline water</article-title>. <source>Environ. Exp. Bot.</source> <volume>73</volume>, <fpage>57</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>63</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.envexpbot.2010.09.017</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Gupta</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nayek</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bhattacharya</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Effect of air-borne heavy metals on the biochemical signature of tree species in an industrial region, with an emphasis on anticipated performance index</article-title>. <source>Chem. Ecol.</source> <volume>27</volume>, <fpage>381</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>392</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/02757540.2011.561791</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hinds</surname>
<given-names>W, C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1999</year>). <article-title>Aerosol Technology:Properties, behavior, and measurement of airborne -particles</article-title>. <source>J. Aerosol Sci.</source> <volume>31</volume> (<issue>9</issue>), <fpage>1121</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1122</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0021-8502(99)00571-6</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Iqba</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Srivastava</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Siddiqi</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2000</year>). <article-title>Anthropogenic stresses in the environment and their consequences</article-title>. <source>Environ. Hazards</source>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>40</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Jaconis</surname>
<given-names>S. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Culley</surname>
<given-names>T. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Meier</surname>
<given-names>A. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Does particulate matter along roadsides interfere with plant reproduction? A comparison of effects of different road types on cichorium intybus pollen deposition and germination</article-title>. <source>Environ. Pollut.</source> <volume>222</volume>, <fpage>261</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>266</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.envpol.2016.12.047</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ko&#x144;czak</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cempa</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pierzchala</surname>
<given-names>&#x141;.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Deska</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Assessment of the ability of roadside vegetation to remove particulate matter from the urban air</article-title>. <source>Environ. Pollut.</source> <volume>268</volume>, <fpage>115465</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115465</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kumar</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dubey</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1998</year>). <article-title>Differential response and detoxifying mechanisms of Cassia si-amea Lam and Dalbergia sissoo Roxb of different ages to SO<sub>2</sub> treatment</article-title>. <source>J. Environ. Biol.</source> <volume>19</volume> (<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>243</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>249</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>Y. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>S. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname>
<given-names>Q. B.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Potential of thirteen urban greening plants to capture particulate matter on leaf surfaces across three levels of ambient atmospheric pollution</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health.</source> <volume>16</volume>, <fpage>402</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/ijerph16030402</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Huang</surname>
<given-names>D. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhou</surname>
<given-names>Y. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lin</surname>
<given-names>X. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>The legacy effects of PM2.5 depositon on Nerium Oleander L</article-title>. <source>Chemosphere</source> <volume>281</volume>, <fpage>130682</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.130682</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>X. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>T. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sun</surname>
<given-names>F. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Song</surname>
<given-names>X. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>Y. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Huang</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>The relation-ship between particulate matter retention capacity and leaf surface micromorphology of ten tree species in Hangzhou, China</article-title>. <source>Sci. Total Environ.</source> <volume>771</volume>, <fpage>144</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>812</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2020.144812</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Guan</surname>
<given-names>D. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Peart</surname>
<given-names>M. R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>The morphological structure of leaves and the dust retaining capability of afforested plants in urban Guangzhou, South China</article-title>. <source>Environ. Sci. Pollut. R.</source> <volume>19</volume> (<issue>8</issue>), <fpage>3440</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3449</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11356-012-0876-2</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lorencplucinska</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1980</year>). <source>Influence of hydrogen fluoride on the rate of CO<sub>2</sub> exchange in Scots pines of different susceptibility to this gas</source>. <publisher-loc>Arbor</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>K&#xf3;rnickie</publisher-name>, <fpage>269</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>276</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Michael</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Montag</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dott</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Pro-inflammatory effects and oxidative stress in lung macrophages and epithelial cells induced by ambient particulate matter</article-title>. <source>Environ. Poll.</source> <volume>183</volume>, <fpage>19</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>29</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.envpol.2013.01.026</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mishra</surname>
<given-names>V. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tripathi</surname>
<given-names>B. D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Concurrent removal and accumulation of heavy metals by the three aquatic macrophytes</article-title>. <source>Bioresour. Technol.</source> <volume>99</volume>, <fpage>7091</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>7097</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.biortech.2008.01.002</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mroczek-Zdyrska</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>W&#xf3;jcik</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>The influence of selenium on root growth and oxida-tive stress induced by lead in vicia faba l.minor plants</article-title>. <source>Biol. Trace Elem. Res.</source> <volume>147</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>320</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>328</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s12011-011-9292-6</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Naomi</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Krix</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Peter</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Torpy</surname>
<given-names>F. R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Airborne particulate matter accumulation on common green wall plants</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Phytoremediation</source> <volume>22</volume> (<issue>6</issue>), <fpage>594</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>606</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/15226514.2019.1696744</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Nisha</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Joosung</surname>
<given-names>O.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sangwon</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hyunook</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Impact of particulate matter on primary leaves of Vigna radiata (L.) R. Wilczek</article-title>. <source>Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf.</source> <volume>212</volume>, <fpage>111965</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.111965</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Panda</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Panda</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Padhan</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Biswas</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Growth and physiological response of lemongrass (Cymbopogon citratus (D.C.) Stapf.) under different levels of fly ash-amended soil</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Phytoremediat</source> <volume>20</volume> (<issue>6</issue>), <fpage>538</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>544</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/15226514.2017.1393394</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Popek</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Przybysz</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gawro&#x144;ska</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Klamkowski</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gawro&#x144;ski</surname>
<given-names>S. W.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Impact of particulate matter accumulation on the photosynthetic apparatus of roadside woody plants growing in the urban conditions</article-title>. <source>Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf.</source> <volume>163</volume>, <fpage>56</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>62</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.07.051</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Prajapati</surname>
<given-names>S, K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tripathi</surname>
<given-names>B, D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Seasonal variation of leaf dust accumulation and pigment content in plant species exposed to urban particulates pollution</article-title>. <source>J. Environ. Qual.</source> <volume>37</volume> (<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>865</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>870</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2134/jeq2006.0511</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Przybysz</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>S&#xe6;b&#xf8;</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hanslin</surname>
<given-names>H. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gawro&#x144;ski</surname>
<given-names>S. W.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Accumulation of particulate matter and trace elements on vegetation as affected by pollution level, rainfall and the passage of time</article-title>. <source>Sci. Total Environ.</source> <volume>481</volume> (<issue>481</issue>), <fpage>360</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>369</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.02.072</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B36">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Radwan</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Eldeen</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Salicylic acid induced alleviation of oxidative stress caused by clethodim in maize (Zea mays L.) leaves</article-title>. <source>Pestic. Biochem. Phys.</source> <volume>102</volume> (<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>182</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>188</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.pestbp.2012.01.002</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B37">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>S&#xe6;b&#xf8;</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Popek</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nawrot</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hanslin</surname>
<given-names>H. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gawronska</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gawronski</surname>
<given-names>S. W.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Plant species differences in particulate matter accumulation on leaf surfaces</article-title>. <source>Sci. Total Environ.</source> <volume>427</volume>, <fpage>347</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>354</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.03.084</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B38">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Segalin</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kumar</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Micadei</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fornaro</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gon&#xe7;alves</surname>
<given-names>F. L. T.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Size-segregated particulate matter inside residences of elderly in the metropolitan area of s&#xe3;o paulo, brazil</article-title>. <source>Atmos. Environ.</source> <volume>148</volume>, <fpage>139</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>151</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.10.004</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B59">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sharma</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jha</surname>
<given-names>A. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dubey</surname>
<given-names>R. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pessarakli</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Reactive oxygenspecies, oxidative damage, and antioxidative defense mechanismin plants under stressful conditions</article-title>. <source>Plant Biotechnol.</source> <volume>32</volume>, <fpage>243</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>247</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1155/2012/217037</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B39">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Shaughnessy</surname>
<given-names>W. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Venigalla</surname>
<given-names>M. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Trump</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Health effects of ambient levels of respirable particulate matter (PM) on healthy, young-adult population</article-title>. <source>Atmos. Environ.</source> <volume>123</volume>, <fpage>102</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>111</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.10.039</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B41">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Singh</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Agrawal</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Agrawal</surname>
<given-names>S. B.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Differences in ozone sensitivity at differ-ent NPK levels of three tropical varieties of mustard (Brassica campestris L.): phot-osynthetic pigments, metabolites, and antioxidants</article-title>. <source>Water Air Soil Pollut.</source> <volume>214</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>435</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>450</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11270-010-0434-9</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B60">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Singh</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tiwari</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hopke</surname>
<given-names>P. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhou</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Turner</surname>
<given-names>J. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Panicker</surname>
<given-names>A. S.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Ambient black carbon particulate matter in the coal region of Dhanbad, India</article-title>. <source>Sci. Total Environ.</source> <volume>615</volume>, <fpage>955</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>963</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.09.307</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B42">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Singh</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pandey</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Roy</surname>
<given-names>L. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shekhar</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Singh</surname>
<given-names>R. K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Tree responses to foliar dust deposition and gradient of air pollution around op-encast coal mines of jharia coalfield, India: gas exchange, antioxidative potential an-d tolerance level</article-title>. <source>Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res.</source> <volume>28</volume> (<issue>7</issue>), <fpage>8637</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>8651</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/S11356-020-11088-1</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B44">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sun</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Guo</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sun</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Capacity of six shrub species to retain atmospheric particulates with different diameters</article-title>. <source>Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int.</source> <volume>25</volume> (<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>2643</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2650</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11356-017-0549-2</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B45">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Tzvetkova</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kolarov</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1996</year>). <article-title>Effect of air pollution on carbohydrate and nutrients co-ncentrations in some deciduous tree species</article-title>. <source>J. Plant Physiol.</source> <volume>22</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>53</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>63</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B46">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Verma</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dubey</surname>
<given-names>R. S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Lead toxicity induces lipid peroxidation and alters the activities of antioxidant enzymes in growing rice plants</article-title>. <source>Plant Sci.</source> <volume>164</volume>, <fpage>645</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>655</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/s0168-9452(03)00022-0</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B48">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>L. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gao</surname>
<given-names>S. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hasi</surname>
<given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Physicochemical characteristics of ambient particles settling upon leaf surfaces of urban plants in Beijing</article-title>. <source>J. Environ. Sci. (China)</source> <volume>18</volume> (<issue>5</issue>), <fpage>921</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>926</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/s1001-0742(06)60015-6</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B49">
<citation citation-type="book">
<collab>WHO World Health Organization</collab> (<year>2019</year>). <source>Ambient (outdoor) air pollution</source>. <publisher-loc>Geneva</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>World Health Organization</publisher-name>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B50">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Xiong</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jiang</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>He</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>PM2.5-induced lung injury is attenuated in macrophage-specific NLRP3 deficient mice</article-title>. <source>Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf.</source> <volume>221</volume>, <fpage>112433</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.112433</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B51">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Xu</surname>
<given-names>Q. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hu</surname>
<given-names>J. Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xie</surname>
<given-names>K. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname>
<given-names>H. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Du</surname>
<given-names>K. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shi</surname>
<given-names>G. X.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Accumulation and acute toxicity of silver in Potamogeton crispus (L.)</article-title>. <source>J. Hazard Mater</source> <volume>173</volume>, <fpage>186</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>193</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.08.067</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B52">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Yu</surname>
<given-names>W. Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>Y. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>Y. Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>Y. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Application of a coupled model of photosynthesis and stomatal conductance for estimating plant physiological response to pollution by fine particulate matter (PM2.5)</article-title>. <source>Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res.</source> <volume>25</volume>, <fpage>19826</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>19835</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11356-018-2128-6</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B53">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zha</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shi</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tang</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Feng</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Spatial-temporal variability and dust-capture capability of 8 plants in urban China</article-title>. <source>Pol. J. Environ. Stud.</source> <volume>28</volume>, <fpage>453</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>462</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.15244/pjoes/81679</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B54">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lyu</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zeng</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sun</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yin</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Individual effects of trichomes and leaf morphology on PM2.5 dry deposition velocity: a variable-control approach using species from the same family or genus</article-title>. <source>Environ. Pollut.</source> <volume>272</volume>, <fpage>116385</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.envpol.2020.116385</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B55">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zia-Khan</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Spreer</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pengnian</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname>
<given-names>X, N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Othmanli</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>He</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Effect of dust deposition on stomatal conductance and leaf temperature of cotton in Northwest China</article-title>. <source>Water-Sui</source> <volume>7</volume>, <fpage>116</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>131</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/w7010116</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B56">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zou</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zheng</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wan</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Qiu</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wilson</surname>
<given-names>J. G.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>An optimized spatial proximity model for fine particulate matter air pollution exposure assessment in areas of sparse monitoring</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci.</source> <volume>30</volume>, <fpage>727</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>747</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/13658816.2015.1095921</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>