<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="EN" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Environ. Sci.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Environmental Science</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Environ. Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">2296-665X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">766413</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fenvs.2021.766413</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Environmental Science</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Growth and Anchorage of <italic>Myriophyllum spicatum</italic> L. in Relation to Water Depth and the Content of Organic Matter in Sediment</article-title>
<alt-title alt-title-type="left-running-head">He et&#x20;al.</alt-title>
<alt-title alt-title-type="right-running-head">Effects of Sediment on Submersed Macrophyte</alt-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>He</surname>
<given-names>Liang</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/519962/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>Rui</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>Huan</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">
<sup>3</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>Meng</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4">
<sup>4</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1314631/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>Ying</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhu</surname>
<given-names>Guorong</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5">
<sup>5</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/301056/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Cao</surname>
<given-names>Te</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">
<sup>3</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/506159/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ni</surname>
<given-names>Leyi</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">
<sup>3</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/576374/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Ge</surname>
<given-names>Gang</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001">&#x2a;</xref>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1">
<label>
<sup>1</sup>
</label>School of Resources, Environmental and Chemical Engineering and Key Laboratory of Poyang Lake Environment and Resource Utilization of Ministry of Education, Nanchang University, <addr-line>Nanchang</addr-line>, <country>China</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff2">
<label>
<sup>2</sup>
</label>School of Life Science, Nanchang University, <addr-line>Nanchang</addr-line>, <country>China</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff3">
<label>
<sup>3</sup>
</label>Institute of Hydrobiology, Chinese Academy of Science, <addr-line>Wuhan</addr-line>, <country>China</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff4">
<label>
<sup>4</sup>
</label>Jiangxi Academy of Eco-Environmental Sciences and Planning, <addr-line>Nanchang</addr-line>, <country>China</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff5">
<label>
<sup>5</sup>
</label>College of Fisheries, Henan Normal University, <addr-line>Xinxiang</addr-line>, <country>China</country>
</aff>
<author-notes>
<corresp id="c001">&#x2a;Correspondence: Gang Ge, <email>gge@ncu.edu.cn</email>
</corresp>
<fn fn-type="other">
<p>This article was submitted to Freshwater Science, a section of the journal Frontiers in Environmental Science</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>
<bold>Edited by:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/992585/overview">Xiufeng Zhang</ext-link>, Jinan University, China</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>
<bold>Reviewed by:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1027791/overview">Jinlei Yu</ext-link>, Nanjing Institute of Geography and Limnology (CAS), China</p>
<p>
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1088400/overview">Isabelle Combroux</ext-link>, Universit&#xe9; de Strasbourg, France</p>
</fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>14</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2021</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2021</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>9</volume>
<elocation-id>766413</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>29</day>
<month>08</month>
<year>2021</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>18</day>
<month>11</month>
<year>2021</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#xa9; 2021 He, Wang, Zhang, Zhang, Liu, Zhu, Cao, Ni and Ge.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2021</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>He, Wang, Zhang, Zhang, Liu, Zhu, Cao, Ni and Ge</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these&#x20;terms.</p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>A large body of evidence suggests that the physical and chemical characteristics of the sediment in lakes that have undergone eutrophication have been significantly altered. However, the effects of alterations in sediments on submersed macrophytes remain unknown. In this study, we present the results of an outdoor experiment that examined how the growth and anchorage of the widespread submersed macrophyte <italic>Myriophyllum spicatum</italic> L. responded to the enrichment of organic matter in the sediments and whether water depth affects these responses. We found that low levels of enrichment with organic matter (&#x2264;7%) enhanced the growth of <italic>M. spicatum</italic>. In contrast, high levels of enrichment with organic matter (from 12 to 18%) slightly inhibited its growth. Although the anchorage force of <italic>M. spicatum</italic> slightly decreased with an increase in the content of organic matter in the sediment, it was much higher than the hydraulic drag force on plants at a relatively high current velocity, indicating that the plants were unlikely to be uprooted in these sediments. The water depth did not alter the responses of growth and anchorage of <italic>M. spicatum</italic> to enrichment with organic matter. Our results suggest that <italic>M. spicatum</italic> could be a potential species to restore eutrophic lakes, since it can grow well and anchor stably in sediments with relatively high organic matter and manage low light stress.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>eutrophicaion</kwd>
<kwd>submersed macrophyte</kwd>
<kwd>organic matter enrichment</kwd>
<kwd>sediment phosphorous</kwd>
<kwd>lake restoration</kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="s1">
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Submersed macrophytes are highly important for stabilizing the function and structure of freshwater ecosystems, particularly in shallow lakes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Hilt et&#x20;al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Lurig et&#x20;al., 2021</xref>). A high coverage and diversity of submersed macrophytes can provide positive feedback for the provision of clear water and enhance the biodiversity of shallow lakes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Scheffer et&#x20;al., 1993</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Law et&#x20;al., 2019</xref>). Recent evidence points toward a progressive loss of submersed macrophytes during the process of lake eutrophication (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Sand-Jensen et&#x20;al., 2000</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Zhang et&#x20;al., 2017</xref>). This deterioration has primarily been attributed to an increase in the attenuation of light by phytoplankton and epiphytes following nutrient enrichment in the water column (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Phillips et&#x20;al., 2016</xref>). A large body of evidence suggests that the physical and chemical characteristics of the sediment had also been substantially altered as the lakes eutrophied (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Van Der Molen et&#x20;al., 1998</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Sand-Jensen et&#x20;al., 2005</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Hobaek et&#x20;al., 2012</xref>), which may have a strong influence on the growth and community structure of submersed macrophytes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Barko et&#x20;al., 1991</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Raun et&#x20;al., 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Bornette and Puijalon, 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Xie et&#x20;al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Li et&#x20;al., 2015</xref>). However, the effects of alteration of sediments on submersed macrophytes are still largely unknown.</p>
<p>One significant change in sediment with eutrophication is that the content of organic matter increased as a result of the turnover of the thriving macrophytes and sedimentation of organic particles from the production of phytoplankton (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Sand-Jensen and M&#xf8;ller, 2014</xref>). Previous studies found that submersed macrophytes benefit from the enrichment of organic matter at low levels in the sediment, since the decomposition of organic matter can increase the concentration of nutrients in pore water (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Silveira and Thomaz, 2015</xref>). However, at high levels, submersed macrophytes may suffer anaerobic and phytotoxic effects induced by organic matter (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Wu et&#x20;al., 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Pulido et&#x20;al., 2011</xref>). In addition, an increase in the organic matter in sediment can reduce the strength of submersed macrophytes to anchor, and thus enhance their risk of uprooting (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Sand-Jensen and M&#xf8;ller, 2014</xref>).</p>
<p>The depth of water has a profound impact on the growth of submersed macrophytes and their allocation and morphology (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Fu et&#x20;al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">He et&#x20;al., 2019</xref>). Previous studies found that water depth can alter the responses of submersed macrophytes to other stressors (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Xiao et&#x20;al., 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Xu et&#x20;al., 2016</xref>). For example, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Xu et&#x20;al. (2016)</xref> reported that the water depth, substrate type, and wave exposure had extremely significant joint influences on the growth and morphology of <italic>Vallisneria natans</italic>. The negative influence of high water levels on submersed macrophytes may be aggravated by decreased belowground growth under high water levels, exposure to high waves, and high nutrient conditions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Xu et&#x20;al., 2016</xref>). However, whether the water depth affects the responses of the growth and anchorage of submersed macrophytes to sediment enriched in organic matter remains unclear.</p>
<p>In this study, we aimed to investigate how the submersed macrophyte growth and anchorage responded to the enrichment of organic matter in the sediment and whether water depth affects these responses. To answer these questions, we conducted an outdoor experiment in which we evaluated the response of the widespread submerged macrophyte <italic>Myriophyllum spicatum</italic> L. to the individual and combined effects of water depth and enrichment of organic matter in the sediment. We hypothesized the following: 1) Low levels of enrichment in organic matter in the sediment would enhance the growth of the plant, while high levels of organic matter would inhibit the plant growth. 2) The anchorage force would decrease with an increase in the content of organic matter in the sediment. 3) The negative effects of high content of organic matter on the plant would be stronger in deep water than shallow ones, since the plant may allocate more resources to the elongation of shoots at deeper&#x20;sites.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="materials|methods" id="s2">
<title>Materials and Methods</title>
<sec id="s2-1">
<title>Plant Species</title>
<p>
<italic>M. spicatum</italic> is a rooted submersed aquatic plant that forms canopies. It has spread from its native Eurasia to become an invasive plant worldwide (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Aiken et&#x20;al., 1979</xref>). This species occurs at a wide range of water and sediment conditions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Sondergaard et&#x20;al., 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Su et&#x20;al., 2019</xref>), and the plant strongly morphologically and physiologically responds to changing environmental conditions, such as variations in temperature, light, nutrients, and dissolved inorganic carbon availability (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Strand and Weisner, 2001</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Wang et&#x20;al., 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Hussner and Jahns, 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Hussner and Heidbuchel, 2021</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-2">
<title>Experiment Establishment</title>
<p>A two-by-five factorial design experiment was conducted with two levels of water depth and five levels of the addition of organic matter to the sediment. Each treatment included seven replicates. The experiment was performed using a concrete pond (length 6&#xa0;m &#xd7; width 4&#xa0;m &#xd7; depth 1.6&#xa0;m) located outdoors at the Biological Gardens of Nanchang University (Nanchang, China) (28&#xb0;39&#x2032; N, 115&#xb0;48&#x2032; E) and filled with tap water. No further water was added after the beginning of the experiment (except for precipitation). Sediment was collected from Poyang Lake, air-dried, and mixed. The contents of total nitrogen (TN), total phosphorus (TP), and organic matter in the sediment were 0.54&#x20;&#xb1; 0.02&#xa0;g&#xa0;kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>g, 0.25&#x20;&#xb1; 0.01&#xa0;g&#xa0;kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>, and 0.81&#x20;&#xb1; 0.01% dry weight (dw), respectively. A gradient of 4, 8, 12, and 16% dry weight treatments of organic matter were produced by adding commercial peat soil (Compo, Germany) to the lake sediment. Lake sediment without the addition of organic matter was used as control. Three sediment samples were taken randomly from each gradient to analyze the actual initial organic matter and contents of TN and TP. Three healthy and clean apices of <italic>M. spicatum</italic> (15&#xa0;cm in length) were planted in each pot (diameter &#x3d; 15&#xa0;cm, height &#x3d; 10&#xa0;cm) filled with 8&#xa0;cm of sediment. Ten plant apices of similar sizes were randomly selected to determine their initial dry weight. Half of the pots were placed at 0.8&#xa0;m water depth on a steel frame submersed in the pond water. The other pots were placed on the bottom of the pond (without sediment). The pots just covered 5% area of the pond, and the volume of the sediment was only 0.25% of the water; thus, the dissolved organic matter release from the sediment would not strongly influence the plant performance.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-3">
<title>Monitoring</title>
<p>Three sites were established to monitor the water parameters in the pond. Two of the sites were next to the middle of the long sides, while one was beside the middle of the short side. The concentration of phytoplankton chlorophyll <italic>a</italic> (chl-<italic>a</italic>) and water temperature in the pond were measured weekly using a BBE algae analyzer (AlgeaTorch, Moldaenke, Germany). Dissolved oxygen, pH, and conductivity were measured weekly at 10&#xa0;cm below the water surface using a multiparameter water quality instrument (HI9829, Hanna, Italy). Photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) was measured weekly at intervals of 0.5&#xa0;m water depth from the subsurface to 1&#xa0;m of the water column using a Li-COR UWQ-9525 sensor coupled with a Li-1500 data logger (LI-COR, Lincoln, NE, United&#x20;States). The attenuation coefficient of light (K) in the water column was calculated based on the PAR at different depths as described by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Duarte et&#x20;al. (1986)</xref>. Water samples were collected from the pond biweekly to analyze the levels of TN, TP, ammonium nitrogen (NH<sub>4</sub>
<sup>&#x2b;</sup>-N), and nitrate nitrogen (NO<sub>3</sub>
<sup>&#x2212;</sup>-N). Samples filtered through Whatman GF/C glass fiber filters were used to determine the amount of NH<sub>4</sub>
<sup>&#x2b;</sup>-N using Nessler&#x2019;s reagent colorimetric method and NO<sub>3</sub>
<sup>&#x2212;</sup>-N using ultraviolet spectrophotometric methods (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">State Environmental Protection Administration of China, 2002</xref>). TP and TN were analyzed from unfiltered water using the ammonium molybdate spectrophotometric method after digestion with K<sub>2</sub>S<sub>2</sub>O<sub>8</sub> solution and the ultraviolet spectrophotometric method after digestion with K<sub>2</sub>S<sub>2</sub>O<sub>8</sub> and the addition of HCl (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">State Environmental Protection Administration of China, 2002</xref>), respectively.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-4">
<title>Plant Harvest and Anchorage Force Measurement</title>
<p>The experiment ended when some of the plants at 0.8&#xa0;m deep reached the water surface. The duration of the experiment was from August 25, 2019, to October 9, 2019, a period of 45&#xa0;days. The plant height and anchorage force were measured immediately when the pots were removed from the pond. The anchorage force was measured by wrapping a cotton rope around the stem just above the sediment, connecting it via a metal string to a digital force gauge and gradually increasing the pull until the plant was dislodged (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Sand-Jensen and M&#xf8;ller, 2014</xref>). The maximum pull registered by digital force gauge was registered as the anchorage strength. A few measurements were discarded where the plant broke. The plant shoots and roots of each pot were collected and then dried at 60&#xb0;C for 48&#xa0;h for dry weight measurements. The plant relative growth rate (RGR) was calculated as follows:</p>
<p>RGR &#x3d; ln(W<sub>t</sub>/W<sub>0</sub>)/t,</p>
<p>where W<sub>0</sub> is the initial dry weight of <italic>M. spicatum</italic> (g), W<sub>t</sub> is the dry weight (including shoots and roots) of <italic>M. spicatum</italic> at the end of the experiment (g), and t is the duration of experiment (days).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-5">
<title>Calculation of Hydraulic Forces</title>
<p>To evaluate whether the plant will be uprooted in lakes, we calculated the hydraulic force (F) on <italic>M. spicatum</italic> as described by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">Schutten and Davy (2000)</xref>:</p>
<p>F &#x3d; A&#xd7;biomass&#xd7;velocity<sup>1.5</sup>, where A is a species-specific factor that incorporates the roughness that arises from shoot geometry and surface characteristic. In this study, we used the species-specific factor A &#x3d; 2564 for <italic>M. spicatum</italic> delineated by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">Schutten and Davy (2000)</xref> and the velocity &#x3d; 0.6&#xa0;m&#xa0;s<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> as described by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Schutten et&#x20;al. (2005)</xref>. This value of velocity was relatively high compared with that in lakes under normal conditions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Schutten et&#x20;al., 2005</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Qin et&#x20;al., 2007</xref>), but it may occur in extreme conditions, such as during a storm (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Schutten et&#x20;al., 2005</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-6">
<title>Sediment and Plant Sample Analyses</title>
<p>The contents of TN, TP, and organic carbon (OC) of the sediment taken at the beginning of the experiment were analyzed using standard methods (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Shi, 1994</xref>), i.e.,&#x20;the K<sub>2</sub>Cr<sub>2</sub>O<sub>7</sub>&#x2013;H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> oxidation method for OC, the Kjeldahl acid-digestion method for TN, and the molybdenum blue colorimetric method for TP. The total organic matter of the sediment was determined by multiplying OC with Van Bemmelen&#x2019;s factor of 1.724. At the end of the experiment, sediment samples were taken from each pot to analyze the water content and dry density analysis as described by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">Barko and Smart (1986)</xref>. The contents of C, N, and P of <italic>M. spicatum</italic> shoots were analyzed after being ground into powder as described&#x20;above.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-7">
<title>Data Analyses</title>
<p>The relationship between TN, TP, water content along with the density, and the content of organic matter in the sediment was examined using linear regression analyses to assess the effects of addition of organic matter on the characteristics of the sediment. The effects of water depth, enrichment in organic matter, and their interaction on the sediment and plant parameters were tested using two-way analyses of variance (ANOVAs). GAMs (generalized additive models) were used to fit the relationship between the content of organic matter and plant parameters at 0.8 and 1.6&#xa0;m, respectively. GAMs were also used to fit the relationship between shoot N, shoot P, and the plant RGR. The GAMs were constructed with the function &#x201c;gam&#x201d; in package &#x201c;mgcv&#x201d; using penalized regression splines as the smoothing function, Gaussian error distribution, and automatic calculation of smoothing parameters. All the analyses were performed in R (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">R Core Team, 2020</xref>). The results were considered to be significant at <italic>p</italic>&#x20;&#x3c;&#x20;0.05.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="results" id="s3">
<title>Results</title>
<sec id="s3-1">
<title>Water Characteristics in the Pond</title>
<p>The water conditions were suitable for the growth of submersed macrophytes. There were low concentrations of water nutrients, resulting in a low abundance of phytoplankton and high transparency in the pond (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table&#x20;1</xref>). The warm temperatures were beneficial to plant growth (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table&#x20;1</xref>). In addition, warm temperatures can maintain high levels of decomposition of the organic matter in the sediment, which is crucial to properly evaluate the addition of organic matter on the growth of submersed macrophytes.</p>
<table-wrap id="T1" position="float">
<label>TABLE 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Physical, chemical, and biological parameters of water in the pond during the experiment.</p>
</caption>
<table>
<thead valign="top">
<tr>
<th align="left">Parameter</th>
<th align="center">Mean&#x20;&#xb1; SD</th>
<th align="center">Parameter</th>
<th align="center">Mean&#x20;&#xb1; SD</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td align="left">TN (mg L<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>)</td>
<td align="center">0.387&#x20;&#xb1; 0.226</td>
<td align="left">Conductivity (&#x3bc;s cm<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>)</td>
<td align="center">167.97&#x20;&#xb1; 15.58</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">TP (mg L<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>)</td>
<td align="center">0.030&#x20;&#xb1; 0.012</td>
<td align="left">DO (mg L<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>)</td>
<td align="center">10.28&#x20;&#xb1; 1.86</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NH<sub>4</sub>
<sup>&#x2b;</sup>-N (mg L<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>)</td>
<td align="center">0.073&#x20;&#xb1; 0.028</td>
<td align="left">Temperature (&#xb0;C)</td>
<td align="center">29.21&#x20;&#xb1; 2.82</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NO<sub>3</sub>
<sup>&#x2212;</sup>-N (mg L<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>)</td>
<td align="center">0.281&#x20;&#xb1; 0.240</td>
<td align="left">Chlorophyll-<italic>a</italic> (&#x3bc;g L<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>)</td>
<td align="center">3.58&#x20;&#xb1; 1.83</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">pH</td>
<td align="center">9.48&#x20;&#xb1; 0.51</td>
<td align="left">K</td>
<td align="center">0.012&#x20;&#xb1; 0.002</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>TN, total nitrogen; TP, total phosphorous; DO, dissolved oxygen; K, light attenuation coefficient.</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-2">
<title>Effects of the Addition of Organic Matter on the Sediment Characteristics</title>
<p>Both the TN and TP of the sediment increased linearly as the content of organic matter increased (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figures 1A,B</xref>; <italic>R</italic>
<sup>
<italic>2</italic>
</sup> &#x3d; 0.992, <italic>p</italic>&#x20;&#x3c; 0.001 for N and <italic>R</italic>
<sup>
<italic>2</italic>
</sup> &#x3d; 0.973, <italic>p</italic>&#x20;&#x3d; 0.001 for P). The addition of organic matter had strong effects on the water content of the sediment (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table&#x20;2</xref>, <italic>p</italic>&#x20;&#x3c; 0.001) and sediment density (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table&#x20;2</xref>, <italic>p</italic>&#x20;&#x3c; 0.001). With the addition of organic matter, the mean water content of sediment increased from 36 to 71% (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">Table&#x20;3</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure&#x20;1C</xref>), whereas the mean sediment density decreased from 0.99&#xa0;g&#xa0;cm<sup>&#x2212;3</sup> to 0.30&#xa0;g&#xa0;cm<sup>&#x2212;3</sup> (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">Table&#x20;3</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure&#x20;1D</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F1" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Relationship between the sediment organic matter and <bold>(A)</bold> sediment total nitrogen (N), <bold>(B)</bold> sediment total phosphorous (P), <bold>(C)</bold> sediment water content, and <bold>(D)</bold> sediment density. The lines are predicted by linear models. The points of 1.6&#xa0;m water depth were moved 0.6% to the right to avoid overlapping.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fenvs-09-766413-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
<table-wrap id="T2" position="float">
<label>TABLE 2</label>
<caption>
<p>Results of two-way ANOVAs for water depth and the addition of organic matter on sediment and plant parameters.</p>
</caption>
<table>
<thead valign="top">
<tr>
<th rowspan="2" align="left"/>
<th colspan="3" align="center">Water depth (A)</th>
<th colspan="3" align="center">Organic matter (B)</th>
<th colspan="3" align="center">A&#xd7;B</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th align="center">df</th>
<th align="center">F</th>
<th align="center">
<italic>p</italic>
</th>
<th align="center">df</th>
<th align="center">F</th>
<th align="center">
<italic>p</italic>
</th>
<th align="center">df</th>
<th align="center">F</th>
<th align="center">
<italic>p</italic>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td align="left">Sediment water content</td>
<td align="center">1</td>
<td align="char" char=".">68.4</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x3c;0.001</td>
<td align="center">4</td>
<td align="center">837</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x3c;0.001</td>
<td align="center">4</td>
<td align="char" char=".">51.6</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x3c;0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Sediment density</td>
<td align="center">1</td>
<td align="char" char=".">3.74</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.058</td>
<td align="center">4</td>
<td align="center">222</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x3c;0.001</td>
<td align="center">4</td>
<td align="char" char=".">38.2</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x3c;0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Relative growth rate</td>
<td align="center">1</td>
<td align="char" char=".">1.98</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.165</td>
<td align="center">4</td>
<td align="center">9.92</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x3c;0.001</td>
<td align="center">4</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.18</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.947</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Shoot biomass</td>
<td align="center">1</td>
<td align="char" char=".">2.01</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.163</td>
<td align="center">4</td>
<td align="center">8.27</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x3c;0.001</td>
<td align="center">4</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.72</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.584</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Root biomass</td>
<td align="center">1</td>
<td align="char" char=".">3.04</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.087</td>
<td align="center">4</td>
<td align="center">8.02</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x3c;0.001</td>
<td align="center">4</td>
<td align="char" char=".">3.16</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.021</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Plant height</td>
<td align="center">1</td>
<td align="char" char=".">193</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x3c;0.001</td>
<td align="center">4</td>
<td align="center">9.99</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x3c;0.001</td>
<td align="center">4</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.97</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.430</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Shoot C</td>
<td align="center">1</td>
<td align="char" char=".">11.6</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.001</td>
<td align="center">4</td>
<td align="center">1.16</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.340</td>
<td align="center">4</td>
<td align="char" char=".">4.60</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.003</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Shoot N</td>
<td align="center">1</td>
<td align="char" char=".">26.2</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x3c;0.001</td>
<td align="center">4</td>
<td align="center">2.63</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.045</td>
<td align="center">4</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.58</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.675</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Shoot P</td>
<td align="center">1</td>
<td align="char" char=".">13.6</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.001</td>
<td align="center">4</td>
<td align="center">228</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x3c;0.001</td>
<td align="center">4</td>
<td align="char" char=".">1.73</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.157</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Shoot C:N</td>
<td align="center">1</td>
<td align="char" char=".">34.6</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x3c;0.001</td>
<td align="center">4</td>
<td align="center">3.38</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.016</td>
<td align="center">4</td>
<td align="char" char=".">1.73</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.158</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Shoot C:P</td>
<td align="center">1</td>
<td align="char" char=".">26.7</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x3c;0.001</td>
<td align="center">4</td>
<td align="center">217</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x3c;0.001</td>
<td align="center">4</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.31</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.871</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Shoot N:P</td>
<td align="center">1</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.00</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.985</td>
<td align="center">4</td>
<td align="center">260</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x3c;0.001</td>
<td align="center">4</td>
<td align="char" char=".">3.03</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.026</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Anchorage force</td>
<td align="center">1</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.05</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.828</td>
<td align="center">4</td>
<td align="center">1.37</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.256</td>
<td align="center">4</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.45</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.770</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>C, carbon; N, nitrogen; P, phosphorous.</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<table-wrap id="T3" position="float">
<label>TABLE 3</label>
<caption>
<p>Relationship between the organic matter in sediments and plant traits and sediment parameters based on linear or generalized additive models.</p>
</caption>
<table>
<thead valign="top">
<tr>
<th align="left"/>
<th align="center">Model</th>
<th align="center">Water depth</th>
<th align="center">N</th>
<th align="center">Df/edf</th>
<th align="center">F</th>
<th align="center">
<italic>R</italic>
<sup>
<italic>2</italic>
</sup>
</th>
<th align="center">
<italic>p</italic>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td align="left">Sediment N</td>
<td align="left">lm</td>
<td align="center">-</td>
<td align="center">5</td>
<td align="center">1</td>
<td align="center">497</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.99</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x3c;0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Sediment P</td>
<td align="left">lm</td>
<td align="center">-</td>
<td align="center">5</td>
<td align="center">1</td>
<td align="center">148</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.97</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="2" align="left">Sediment water content</td>
<td rowspan="2" align="left">lm</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.8</td>
<td align="center">32</td>
<td align="center">1</td>
<td align="center">156</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.83</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x3c;0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="char" char=".">1.6</td>
<td align="center">34</td>
<td align="center">1</td>
<td align="center">406</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.92</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x3c;0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="2" align="left">Sediment density</td>
<td rowspan="2" align="left">lm</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.8</td>
<td align="center">32</td>
<td align="center">1</td>
<td align="center">133</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.81</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x3c;0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="char" char=".">1.6</td>
<td align="center">34</td>
<td align="center">1</td>
<td align="center">173</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.84</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x3c;0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="2" align="left">Relative growth rate</td>
<td rowspan="2" align="left">gam</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.8</td>
<td align="center">31</td>
<td align="center">3.35</td>
<td align="center">6.93</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.44</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="char" char=".">1.6</td>
<td align="center">33</td>
<td align="center">2.30</td>
<td align="center">3.69</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.21</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.043</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="2" align="left">Shoot biomass</td>
<td rowspan="2" align="left">Gam</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.8</td>
<td align="center">31</td>
<td align="center">3.27</td>
<td align="center">4.44</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.31</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.013</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="char" char=".">1.6</td>
<td align="center">32</td>
<td align="center">2.43</td>
<td align="center">5.74</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.33</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.005</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="2" align="left">Root biomass</td>
<td rowspan="2" align="left">Gam</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.8</td>
<td align="center">29</td>
<td align="center">3.35</td>
<td align="center">7.18</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.47</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="char" char=".">1.6</td>
<td align="center">33</td>
<td align="center">1.48</td>
<td align="center">3.77</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.19</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.026</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="2" align="left">Plant height</td>
<td rowspan="2" align="left">Gam</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.8</td>
<td align="center">33</td>
<td align="center">2.56</td>
<td align="center">4.72</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.30</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.008</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="char" char=".">1.6</td>
<td align="center">33</td>
<td align="center">3.57</td>
<td align="center">5.93</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.38</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.002</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="2" align="left">Shoot C</td>
<td rowspan="2" align="left">Gam</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.8</td>
<td align="center">33</td>
<td align="center">1.69</td>
<td align="center">5.00</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.23</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.012</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="char" char=".">1.6</td>
<td align="center">33</td>
<td align="center">1</td>
<td align="center">4.16</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.39</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.050</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="2" align="left">Shoot N</td>
<td rowspan="2" align="left">Gam</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.8</td>
<td align="center">31</td>
<td align="center">1</td>
<td align="center">6.32</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.15</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.018</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="char" char=".">1.6</td>
<td align="center">29</td>
<td align="center">1.78</td>
<td align="center">1.92</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.11</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.161</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="2" align="left">Shoot P</td>
<td rowspan="2" align="left">Gam</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.8</td>
<td align="center">32</td>
<td align="center">3.83</td>
<td align="center">111</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.93</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x3c;0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="char" char=".">1.6</td>
<td align="center">32</td>
<td align="center">3.95</td>
<td align="center">132</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.94</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x3c;0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="2" align="left">Shoot C:N</td>
<td rowspan="2" align="left">Gam</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.8</td>
<td align="center">32</td>
<td align="center">1.27</td>
<td align="center">9.97</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.29</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.003</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="char" char=".">1.6</td>
<td align="center">28</td>
<td align="center">1.63</td>
<td align="center">0.83</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.03</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.46</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="2" align="left">Shoot C:P</td>
<td rowspan="2" align="left">gam</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.8</td>
<td align="center">32</td>
<td align="center">3.69</td>
<td align="center">87.4</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.92</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x3c;0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="char" char=".">1.6</td>
<td align="center">34</td>
<td align="center">3.53</td>
<td align="center">114</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.93</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x3c;0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="2" align="left">Shoot N:P</td>
<td rowspan="2" align="left">gam</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.8</td>
<td align="center">32</td>
<td align="center">3.78</td>
<td align="center">150</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.95</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x3c;0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="char" char=".">1.6</td>
<td align="center">29</td>
<td align="center">3.45</td>
<td align="center">141</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.95</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x3c;0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="2" align="left">Anchorage force</td>
<td rowspan="2" align="left">lm</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.8</td>
<td align="center">31</td>
<td align="center">1</td>
<td align="center">0.63</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.02</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.434</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="char" char=".">1.6</td>
<td align="center">32</td>
<td align="center">1</td>
<td align="center">4.31</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.13</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.047</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>lm, linear model; gam, generalized additive model; C, carbon; N, nitrogen; P, phosphorous.</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-3">
<title>Effects of Water Depth and the Addition of Organic Matter on Plant Growth</title>
<p>There was no interactive effect of water depth and organic matter addition on the plant growth parameters with the exception of the root biomass (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table&#x20;2</xref>; <italic>p</italic>&#x20;&#x3d; 0.947 for the relative growth rate, <italic>p</italic>&#x20;&#x3d; 0.584 for shoot biomass, <italic>p</italic>&#x20;&#x3d; 0.430 for plant height and <italic>p</italic>&#x20;&#x3d; 0.021 for root biomass). The water depth had no effect on the plant RGR (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table&#x20;2</xref>; <italic>p</italic>&#x20;&#x3d; 0.165) and shoot biomass (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table&#x20;2</xref>; <italic>p</italic>&#x20;&#x3d; 0.163), whereas the effect on plant height was significantly positive with much taller plants at a depth of 1.6&#xa0;m compared with those at a depth of 0.8&#xa0;m (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table&#x20;2</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure&#x20;2D</xref>; <italic>p</italic>&#x20;&#x3c; 0.001). The plant RGR increased in parallel with the content of organic matter of the sediment from 0.81 to 7.29% and tended to slightly decrease when the content of organic matter in the sediment was higher at both water depths (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">Table&#x20;3</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure&#x20;2A</xref>; <italic>p</italic>&#x20;&#x3d; 0.001 for 0.8&#xa0;m and <italic>p</italic>&#x20;&#x3d; 0.043 for 1.6&#xa0;m). The plant shoot biomass responded similarly to the content of organic matter in the sediment with that of plant RGR (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">Table&#x20;3</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure&#x20;2B</xref>; <italic>p</italic>&#x20;&#x3d; 0.013 for 0.8&#xa0;m and <italic>p</italic>&#x20;&#x3d; 0.015 for 1.6&#xa0;m). The plant height increased in parallel with that of organic matter in the sediment at the lower end of the gradient at both water depths (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure&#x20;2D</xref>, <italic>p</italic>&#x20;&#x3d; 0.008 for 0.8&#xa0;m and <italic>p</italic>&#x20;&#x3d; 0.002 for 1.6&#xa0;m). At higher levels of sediment organic matter, the plant height was constant at a water depth of 1.6&#xa0;m but tended to decrease at a water depth of 0.8&#xa0;m (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure&#x20;2D</xref>, <italic>p</italic>&#x20;&#x3d; 0.008 for 0.8&#xa0;m and <italic>p</italic>&#x20;&#x3d; 0.002 for 1.6&#xa0;m).</p>
<fig id="F2" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 2</label>
<caption>
<p>Relationship between sediment organic matter and <bold>(A)</bold> plant relative growth rate (RGR), <bold>(B)</bold> shoot biomass, <bold>(C)</bold> root biomass, and <bold>(D)</bold> plant height. The lines are predicted by generalized additive models. The points of 1.6&#xa0;m water depth were moved 0.6% to the right to avoid overlapping dw, dry weight.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fenvs-09-766413-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-4">
<title>Effects of Water Depth and the Addition of Organic Matter on the Elemental Content of Plant Shoots</title>
<p>There was no interactive effect between the water depth and the addition of organic matter on the elemental content of the plant shoots with the exception of the shoot C and shoot N:P ratio (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table&#x20;2</xref>; <italic>p</italic>&#x20;&#x3d; 0.675 for shoot N, <italic>p</italic>&#x20;&#x3d; 0.157 for shoot P, <italic>p</italic>&#x20;&#x3d; 0.158 for shoot C:N, <italic>p</italic>&#x20;&#x3d; 0.871 for shoot C:P, <italic>p</italic>&#x20;&#x3d; 0.003 for shoot C, and <italic>p</italic>&#x20;&#x3d; 0.026 for shoot N:P). The contents of shoot N and P of the plant shoots were slightly higher at a water depth of 1.6&#xa0;m than that at 0.8&#xa0;m (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table&#x20;2</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure&#x20;3 B, C</xref>; <italic>p</italic>&#x20;&#x3c; 0.001 for shoot N and <italic>p</italic>&#x20;&#x3d; 0.001 for shoot P). However, the shoot C, shoot C:N ratio, and shoot C:P ratio were lower at a water depth of 1.6&#xa0;m than that at 0.8&#xa0;m (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table&#x20;2</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figures 3A,D,E</xref>; <italic>p</italic>&#x20;&#x3d; 0.001 for shoot C, <italic>p</italic>&#x20;&#x3c; 0.001 for shoot C:N, and <italic>p</italic>&#x20;&#x3c; 0.001 for shoot C:P). There was no significant effect of water depth on the shoot N:P ratio (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table&#x20;2</xref>, <italic>p</italic>&#x20;&#x3d; 0.985). The content of shoot C increased in parallel with an increase in the content of organic matter at a water depth of 0.8&#xa0;m, whereas it showed an inverse trend at a water depth of 1.6&#xa0;m (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">Table&#x20;3</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure&#x20;3A</xref>; <italic>p</italic>&#x20;&#x3d; 0.012 for 0.8&#xa0;m and <italic>p</italic>&#x20;&#x3d; 0.050 for 1.6&#xa0;m). The shoot N content decreased with an increase in the sediment organic content at a water depth of 0.8&#xa0;m, while it remained unchanged at a water depth of 1.6&#xa0;m (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">Table&#x20;3</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure&#x20;3B</xref>; <italic>p</italic>&#x20;&#x3d; 0.018 for 0.8&#xa0;m and <italic>p</italic>&#x20;&#x3d; 0.161 for 1.6&#xa0;m). The content of shoot P rapidly increased in parallel with that in the organic matter in the sediment up to 7.29% but remained unchanged at greater values of organic matter at both water depths (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">Table&#x20;3</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure&#x20;3C</xref>; <italic>p</italic>&#x20;&#x3c; 0.001 for 0.8&#xa0;m and <italic>p</italic>&#x20;&#x3c; 0.001 for 1.6&#xa0;m). The shoot C:N ratio increased as the sediment organic content increased at a water depth of 0.8&#xa0;m, while it remained constant at a water depth of 1.6&#xa0;m (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">Table&#x20;3</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure&#x20;3D</xref>; <italic>p</italic>&#x20;&#x3d; 0.003 for 0.8&#xa0;m and <italic>p</italic>&#x20;&#x3d; 0.460 for 1.6&#xa0;m). The shoot C:P and N:P ratios decreased with an increase in the organic matter in the sediment from 0.81 to 7.29%, but they remained unchanged at greater values of organic content at both water depths (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">Table&#x20;3</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figures 3E,F</xref>, <italic>p</italic>&#x20;&#x3c; 0.001).</p>
<fig id="F3" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 3</label>
<caption>
<p>Relationship between sediment organic matter and <bold>(A)</bold> shoot carbon (C), <bold>(B)</bold> shoot nitrogen (N), <bold>(C)</bold> shoot phosphorous (P), <bold>(D)</bold> shoot C:N ratio, <bold>(E)</bold> shoot C:P ratio, and <bold>(F)</bold> shoot N:P ratio. The lines are predicted by generalized additive models. The points of 1.6&#xa0;m water depth were moved 0.6% to the right to avoid overlapping.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fenvs-09-766413-g003.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-5">
<title>Relationship between the Shoot N, Shoot P, and Plant Relative Growth Rate</title>
<p>The plant RGR decreased as the content of shoot N at a water depth of 0.8&#xa0;m, whereas there was no measurable significant relationship between the plant RGR and the content of shoot N at a water depth of 1.6&#xa0;m (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T4">Table&#x20;4</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure&#x20;4A</xref>; <italic>p</italic>&#x20;&#x3d; 0.027 for 0.8&#xa0;m and <italic>p</italic>&#x20;&#x3d; 0.237 for 1.6&#xa0;m). The plant RGR increased when the content of shoot P was as high as 4&#xa0;mg&#xa0;g<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>, while it remained unchanged with a further increase in the content of P (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T4">Table&#x20;4</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure&#x20;4B</xref>; <italic>p</italic>&#x20;&#x3d; 0.007 for 0.8&#xa0;m and <italic>p</italic>&#x20;&#x3d; 0.011 for 1.6&#xa0;m).</p>
<table-wrap id="T4" position="float">
<label>TABLE 4</label>
<caption>
<p>Relationship between shoot nitrogen (N), phosphorous (P), and plant relative growth rate based on generalized additive models.</p>
</caption>
<table>
<thead valign="top">
<tr>
<th align="left"/>
<th align="center">Predictor</th>
<th align="center">Water depth</th>
<th align="center">N</th>
<th align="center">Df/edf</th>
<th align="center">F</th>
<th align="center">
<italic>R</italic>
<sup>
<italic>2</italic>
</sup>
</th>
<th align="center">
<italic>p</italic>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td rowspan="4" align="left">Relative growth rate</td>
<td rowspan="2" align="center">N</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.8</td>
<td align="center">30</td>
<td align="char" char=".">1.18</td>
<td align="char" char=".">4.37</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.17</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.027</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="char" char=".">1.6</td>
<td align="center">28</td>
<td align="char" char=".">1</td>
<td align="char" char=".">1.46</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.02</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.237</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="2" align="center">P</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.8</td>
<td align="center">31</td>
<td align="char" char=".">2.04</td>
<td align="char" char=".">5.60</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.31</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.007</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="char" char=".">1.6</td>
<td align="center">31</td>
<td align="char" char=".">2.11</td>
<td align="char" char=".">4.58</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.29</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.011</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<fig id="F4" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 4</label>
<caption>
<p>Relationship between <bold>(A)</bold> shoot nitrogen (N), <bold>(B)</bold> shoot phosphorous (P), and the plant relative growth rate (RGR). The lines were predicted by generalized additive models.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fenvs-09-766413-g004.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-6">
<title>Effects of Water Depth and the Addition of Organic Matter on the Plant Anchorage Force</title>
<p>Neither the water depth nor the addition of organic matter had an effect on the plant anchorage force based on the two-way ANOVA test (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table&#x20;2</xref>, <italic>p</italic>&#x20;&#x3d; 0.828 for water depth and <italic>p</italic>&#x20;&#x3d; 0.256 for organic matter addition), while the results of GAMs suggested that the plant anchorage force decreased with the content of organic matter in the sediment at a water depth of 1.6&#xa0;m (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">Table&#x20;3</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure&#x20;5A</xref>; <italic>p</italic>&#x20;&#x3d; 0.047). The plant anchorage force was larger than the hydraulic forces in all the treatments. This indicated that there was no risk of <italic>M. spicatum</italic> becoming uprooted in these sediments when the current velocity was below 0.6&#xa0;m&#xa0;s<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure&#x20;5B</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F5" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 5</label>
<caption>
<p>Relationship between the sediment organic matter and plant anchorage force <bold>(A)</bold>. The lines are predicted by linear models. Anchorage force minus hydraulic force (AF-HF) for the sediment with different organic matter contents <bold>(B)</bold>. The points of 1.6&#xa0;m water depth were moved 0.6% to the right to avoid overlapping.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fenvs-09-766413-g005.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="discussion" id="s4">
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>Our findings revealed two important aspects with respect to how the enrichment of organic matter in sediment affects the submersed macrophytes. First, low levels of the enrichment of organic matter in the sediment (&#x2264;7%) enhanced the growth of <italic>M. spicatum</italic> by increasing the supply of phosphorus, whereas high levels of organic matter in the sediment inhibited its growth. Second, although the anchorage forces of <italic>M. spicatum</italic> decreased slightly as the amount of organic matter increased in the sediment, they were much higher than the hydraulic drag force on the plant at a relatively high current velocity. Therefore, our results suggest that the risk of uprooting <italic>M. spicatum</italic> is very low even in lakes that have high levels of organic matter in their sediment. In contrast to our hypothesis, the water depth did not alter the responses of plant growth and root anchorage of <italic>M. spicatum</italic> to the enrichment of organic matter.</p>
<sec id="s4-1">
<title>Effects of the Addition of Organic Matter on Plant Growth</title>
<p>The growth of <italic>M. spicatum</italic> benefited from the enrichment in low levels of organic matter in the sediment. After a threshold of organic matter was reached, the growth rate of <italic>M. spicatum</italic> decreased. The optimum level of organic matter (&#x2248;7%) for the growth of <italic>M. spicatum</italic> is consistent with that identified by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">Barko and Smart (1986)</xref> and similar to that of <italic>Hydrilla verticillata</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Silveira and Thomaz, 2015</xref>). The mechanism behind the enhancement of enrichment of organic matter on plant growth could be that the supply of phosphorus increased in parallel with that of the organic matter in sediment. This is confirmed by the results that the contents of shoot P in <italic>M. spicatum</italic> increased in parallel with that in the content of organic matter (&#x3c;7%), and the growth rate of <italic>M. spicatum</italic> increased with the content of shoot P (&#x3c;4%). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Richter and Gross (2013)</xref> also found that <italic>M. spicatum</italic> grows poorly when the supply of phosphorus is low. However, the positive effect of increased phosphorus supply was counteracted by other stressors when the organic matter reached a high level. The stressor was not likely to be the deficiency of nutrients in sediments with a high content of organic matter as described by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Barko et&#x20;al. (1991)</xref>, since the shoot N and P of <italic>M. spicatum</italic> growing in sediments with a high content of organic matter were comparable to those growing in moderate ones. Instead, toxicity or the anaerobic conditions induced by the high organic matter may be responsible for the decrease in growth of <italic>M. spicatum</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Barko et&#x20;al., 1991</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Wu et&#x20;al., 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Silveira and Thomaz, 2015</xref>). However, we found that the growth rate of <italic>M. spicatum</italic> was quite high in our experiment even in the treatment with the highest content of organic matter, indicating that <italic>M. spicatum</italic> has a high tolerance to the enrichment of organic matter in the sediment. This is consistent with the results of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Lemoine et&#x20;al. (2012)</xref>, who found that <italic>M. spicatum</italic> can survive in anaerobic sediments and maintain similar photosynthetic rates with those under aerobic conditions by increasing their root porosity and radial loss of oxygen.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4-2">
<title>Effects of the Addition of Organic Matter on Plant Anchorage</title>
<p>Anchorage in the sediment is crucial for the survival and growth of submersed macrophytes in lakes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Schutten et&#x20;al., 2005</xref>). The enrichment in organic matter reduced the anchorage of roots of submersed macrophytes by impairing root development and reducing the cohesive strength of the sediment (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Sand-Jensen and M&#xf8;ller, 2014</xref>). In our study, the force of root anchorage clearly showed a slight tendency to decrease with increasing organic matter in the sediment as predicted at a water depth of 1.6&#xa0;m. The root anchorage force was primarily determined by the size of plant root and the characteristics of the sediment (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Sand-Jensen and M&#xf8;ller, 2014</xref>). No significant reduction of the root system in the sediment that contained a high content of organic matter was observed in our experiment. Thus, the reduction of anchorage force in the sediment that had a high content of organic matter was primarily owing to falling mass density and the falling cohesive binding between root surfaces and the surrounding sediment (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Sand-Jensen and M&#xf8;ller 2014</xref>). Consistent with a previous study (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Schutten et&#x20;al., 2005</xref>), we demonstrated that <italic>M. spicatum</italic> had a very low risk of uprooting even in the sediment with the highest content of organic matter (18%) in our experiment because the anchorage force of the plants was much higher than the hydraulic force that the plant may be exposed in lakes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Schutten et&#x20;al., 2004</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4-3">
<title>Effects of Water Depth on the Response of Plant Growth and Root Anchorage to Enriched Organic Matter</title>
<p>Overall, the water depth did not alter the response of plant growth and root anchorage to the enrichment of organic matter in the sediment. <italic>M. spicatum</italic> elongated its shoots to avoid low light stress and increased the contents of shoot N and P to enhance the photosynthetic efficiency at high water depths, which resulted in a similar biomass at the end of the experiment. Similar responses to low light condition were also identified in <italic>M. spicatum</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Strand and Weisner, 2001</xref>) and other canopy-forming species (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">He et&#x20;al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">He et&#x20;al., 2019</xref>). The canopy-forming species elongate their stems as a major strategy to respond to low light conditions, which can help these species to concentrate their leaves closer to the water surface (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">He et&#x20;al., 2019</xref>). Increased leaf chlorophylls at low light conditions, which resulted in higher N and P contents in leaves (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">He et&#x20;al., 2018</xref>), could further enhance their ability to absorb light (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Strand and Weisner, 2001</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Hussner and Heidbuchel, 2021</xref>). Interestingly, the plastic responses of <italic>M. spicatum</italic> to low light stress did not weaken its ability to manage the stresses induced by high organic matter in the sediment. Therefore, we demonstrated that <italic>M. spicatum</italic> could maintain the ability to assimilate and allocate the resources to both support growth and resist the stress of enrichment of organic matter through morphological and physiological adjustments in deep water. The ability to tolerate high amounts of organic matter in the sediment and effectively manage low light stress could be the reason for the ability of this species to survive eutrophication in lakes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Qiu and Wu, 1996</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Cao et&#x20;al., 2011</xref>).</p>
<p>In conclusion, our data showed that <italic>M. spicatum</italic> had a high tolerance to the enrichment with organic matter and could anchor without the risk of uprooting in sediments with a wide range of organic matter content. In addition, <italic>M. spicatum</italic> can effectively manage low light stress through morphological and physiological adjustments. Thus, we suggest that <italic>M. spicatum</italic> could be a potential species for the restoration of eutrophic lakes since it can grow well and anchor stably in sediments with a relatively high amount of organic matter and effectively manage low light stress.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec id="s5">
<title>Data Availability Statement</title>
<p>The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s6">
<title>Author Contributions</title>
<p>LH and GG conceived the idea and proposed the method. LH and RW contributed to conduct the experiment. LH, HZ, YL, MZ, GZ, TC, and LN wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s7">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>This work was supported by the National Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 31700402, 31860125, and 32071568) and Science and Technology Project of Department of Water Resources of Jiangxi Province (Grant No. 201820YBKT22).</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="COI-statement" id="s8">
<title>Conflict of Interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="disclaimer" id="s9">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s Note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors, and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
<ack>
<p>We acknowledge technical assistance by Yueyao Chen, Tongde Yang, Kaipeng Shao, and Zongcheng&#x20;Yao.</p>
</ack>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Aiken</surname>
<given-names>S. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Newroth</surname>
<given-names>P. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wile</surname>
<given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1979</year>). <article-title>The Biology of Canadian Weeds. 34 <italic>Myriophyllum Spicatum</italic> L</article-title>. <source>Can. J.&#x20;Plant Sci.</source> <volume>59</volume>, <fpage>210</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>215</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4141/cjps79-028</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Barko</surname>
<given-names>J.&#x20;W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gunnison</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Carpenter</surname>
<given-names>S. R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1991</year>). <article-title>Sediment Interactions with Submersed Macrophyte Growth and Community Dynamics</article-title>. <source>Aquat. Bot.</source> <volume>41</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>41</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>65</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0304-3770(91)90038-7</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B44">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Barko</surname>
<given-names>J. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Smart</surname>
<given-names>R. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1986</year>). <article-title>Sediment-Related Mechanisms of Growth Limitation in Submersed Macrophytes</article-title>. <source>Ecology.</source> <volume>67</volume>, <fpage>1328</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1340</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2307/1938689</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bornette</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Puijalon</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Response of Aquatic Plants to Abiotic Factors: a Review</article-title>. <source>Aquat. Sci.</source> <volume>73</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>14</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00027-010-0162-7</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Cao</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ni</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xie</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xu</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Effects of Moderate Ammonium Enrichment on Three Submersed Macrophytes under Contrasting Light Availability</article-title>. <source>Freshwater Biol.</source> <volume>56</volume> (<issue>8</issue>), <fpage>1620</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1629</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2427.2011.02601.x</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B43">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Duarte</surname>
<given-names>C. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kalff</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1986</year>). <article-title>Littoral Slope as a Predictor of the Maximum Biomass of Submerged Macrophyte Communities</article-title>. <source>Limnol. Oceanogr.</source> <volume>31</volume>, <fpage>1072</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1080</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4319/lo.1986.31.5.1072</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Fu</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yuan</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cao</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ni</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>An Alternative Mechanism for Shade Adaptation: Implication of Allometric Responses of Three Submersed Macrophytes to Water Depth</article-title>. <source>Ecol. Res.</source> <volume>27</volume> (<issue>6</issue>), <fpage>1087</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1094</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11284-012-0991-z</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>He</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhu</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Littoral Slope, Water Depth and Alternative Response Strategies to Light Attenuation Shape the Distribution of Submerged Macrophytes in a Mesotrophic Lake</article-title>. <source>Front. Plant Sci.</source> <volume>10</volume>, <fpage>169</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2019.00169</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hilt</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Brothers</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jeppesen</surname>
<given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Veraart</surname>
<given-names>A. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kosten</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Translating Regime Shifts in Shallow Lakes into Changes in Ecosystem Functions and Services</article-title>. <source>Bioscience</source> <volume>67</volume> (<issue>10</issue>), <fpage>928</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>936</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/biosci/bix106</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hobaek</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>L&#xf8;vik</surname>
<given-names>J.&#x20;E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rohrlack</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Moe</surname>
<given-names>S. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Grung</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bennion</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Eutrophication, Recovery and Temperature in Lake Mj&#xf8;sa: Detecting Trends with Monitoring Data and Sediment Records</article-title>. <source>Freshw. Biol.</source> <volume>57</volume> (<issue>10</issue>), <fpage>1998</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2014</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2427.2012.02832.x</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hussner</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Heidb&#xfc;chel</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Sediment-rooting Affects Growth and Biomass Allocation in <italic>Myriophyllum Spicatum</italic> under Varying Growth Conditions</article-title>. <source>Aquat. Bot.</source> <volume>170</volume>, <fpage>103354</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.aquabot.2021.103354</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hussner</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jahns</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>European Native <italic>Myriophyllum Spicatum</italic> Showed a Higher Use Capacity Than Alien Invasive <italic>Myriophyllum Heterophyllum</italic>
</article-title>. <source>Hydrobiologia</source> <volume>746</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>171</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>182</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10750-014-1976-4</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Law</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Baker</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sayer</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Foster</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gunn</surname>
<given-names>I. D. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Taylor</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>The Effectiveness of Aquatic Plants as Surrogates for Wider Biodiversity in Standing Fresh Waters</article-title>. <source>Freshw. Biol.</source> <volume>64</volume> (<issue>9</issue>), <fpage>1664</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1675</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/fwb.13369</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lemoine</surname>
<given-names>D. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mermillod-Blondin</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Barrat-Segretain</surname>
<given-names>M.-H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mass&#xe9;</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Malet</surname>
<given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>The Ability of Aquatic Macrophytes to Increase Root Porosity and Radial Oxygen Loss Determines Their Resistance to Sediment Anoxia</article-title>. <source>Aquat. Ecol.</source> <volume>46</volume> (<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>191</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>200</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10452-012-9391-2</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhu</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xie</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jiang</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Deng</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Colonization by Fragments of the Submerged Macrophyte <italic>Myriophyllum Spicatum</italic> under Different Sediment Type and Density Conditions</article-title>. <source>Sci. Rep.</source> <volume>5</volume>, <fpage>11821</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/srep11821</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Liang</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xiaoxi</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wei</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tianshun</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yao</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Leaf Carbon, Nitrogen and Phosphorus Stoichiometric Characteristics and Photosynthetic Pigments Composition of Four Submerged Macrophytes in Response to Various Water Depth in Lake Erhai, China</article-title>. <source>J.&#x20;Lake Sci.</source> <volume>30</volume> (<issue>5</issue>), <fpage>1413</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1419</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18307/2018.0522</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>L&#xfc;rig</surname>
<given-names>M. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Narwani</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Penson</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wehrli</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Spaak</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Matthews</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Non&#x2010;additive Effects of Foundation Species Determine the Response of Aquatic Ecosystems to Nutrient Perturbation</article-title>. <source>Ecology</source> <volume>102</volume> (<issue>7</issue>), <fpage>e03371</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/ecy.3371</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Phillips</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Willby</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Moss</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Submerged Macrophyte Decline in Shallow Lakes: What Have We Learnt in the Last Forty Years?</article-title> <source>Aquat. Bot.</source> <volume>135</volume>, <fpage>37</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>45</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.aquabot.2016.04.004</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Pulido</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lucassen</surname>
<given-names>E. C. H. E. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pedersen</surname>
<given-names>O.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Roelofs</surname>
<given-names>J.&#x20;G. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Influence of Quantity and Lability of Sediment Organic Matter on the Biomass of Two Isoetids, <italic>Littorella Uniflora</italic> and <italic>Echinodorus Repens</italic>
</article-title>. <source>Freshw. Biol.</source> <volume>56</volume> (<issue>5</issue>), <fpage>939</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>951</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2427.2010.02539.x</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Qin</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xu</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname>
<given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Luo</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Environmental Issues of Lake Taihu, China</article-title>. <source>Hydrobiologia</source> <volume>581</volume>, <fpage>3</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>14</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10750-006-0521-5</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Qiu</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1996</year>). <article-title>On the Degradation and Restoration of Shallow Eutrophic Chinese Lakes</article-title>. <source>Resour. Environ. Yangtze Valley</source> <volume>5</volume>, <fpage>355</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>361</lpage>. </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<citation citation-type="book">
<collab>R Core Team</collab> (<year>2020</year>). <source>R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing</source>. <publisher-loc>Vienna, Austria</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>R Foundation for Statistical Computing</publisher-name>. </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Raun</surname>
<given-names>A. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Borum</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sand-Jensen</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Influence of Sediment Organic Enrichment and Water Alkalinity on Growth of Aquatic Isoetid and Elodeid Plants</article-title>. <source>Freshw. Biol.</source> <volume>55</volume> (<issue>9</issue>), <fpage>1891</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1904</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2427.2010.02423.x</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Richter</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gross</surname>
<given-names>E. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Chara Can Outcompete <italic>Myriophyllum</italic> under Low Phosphorus Supply</article-title>. <source>Aquat. Sci.</source> <volume>75</volume> (<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>457</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>467</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00027-013-0292-9</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sand-Jensen</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Borum</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Binzer</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Oxygen Stress and Reduced Growth of <italic>Lobelia Dortmanna</italic> in sandy lake Sediments Subject to Organic Enrichment</article-title>. <source>Freshw. Biol</source> <volume>50</volume> (<issue>6</issue>), <fpage>1034</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1048</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2427.2005.01382.x</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sand-Jensen</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>M&#xf8;ller</surname>
<given-names>C. L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Reduced Root anchorage of Freshwater Plants in Sandy Sediments Enriched with fine Organic Matter</article-title>. <source>Freshw. Biol.</source> <volume>59</volume> (<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>427</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>437</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/fwb.12275</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sand-Jensen</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Riis</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vestergaard</surname>
<given-names>O.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Larsen</surname>
<given-names>S. E.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2000</year>). <article-title>Macrophyte Decline in Danish Lakes and Streams over the Past 100&#x20;Years</article-title>. <source>J.&#x20;Ecol.</source> <volume>88</volume> (<issue>6</issue>), <fpage>1030</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1040</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1046/j.1365-2745.2000.00519.x</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Scheffer</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hosper</surname>
<given-names>S. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Meijer</surname>
<given-names>M. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Moss</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jeppesen</surname>
<given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1993</year>). <article-title>Alternative Equilibria in Shallow Lakes</article-title>. <source>Trends Ecol. Evol.</source> <volume>8</volume> (<issue>8</issue>), <fpage>275</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>279</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0169-5347(93)90254-m</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B45">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Schutten</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Davy</surname>
<given-names>A. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2000</year>). <article-title>Predicting the Hydraulic Forces on Submerged Macrophytes from Current Velocity, Biomass and Morphology</article-title>. <source>Oecologia</source> <volume>123</volume>, <fpage>445</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>452</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s004420000348</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Schutten</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dainty</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Davy</surname>
<given-names>A. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Root anchorage and its Significance for Submerged Plants in Shallow Lakes</article-title>. <source>J.&#x20;Ecol.</source> <volume>93</volume> (<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>556</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>571</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2745.2005.00980.x</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Schutten</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dainty</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Davy</surname>
<given-names>A. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>Wave-induced Hydraulic Forces on Submerged Aquatic Plants in Shallow Lakes</article-title>. <source>Ann. Bot.</source> <volume>93</volume> (<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>333</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>341</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/aob/mch043</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Shi</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1994</year>). <source>Agricultural and Chemical Analysis for Soil</source>. <publisher-loc>Beijing</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Chinese Agriculture Press</publisher-name>. </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Silveira</surname>
<given-names>M. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Thomaz</surname>
<given-names>S. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Growth of a Native versus an Invasive Submerged Aquatic Macrophyte Differs in Relation to Mud and Organic Matter Concentrations in Sediment</article-title>. <source>Aquat. Bot.</source> <volume>124</volume>, <fpage>85</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>91</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.aquabot.2015.03.004</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>S&#xf8;ndergaard</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Johansson</surname>
<given-names>L. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lauridsen</surname>
<given-names>T. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>J&#xf8;rgensen</surname>
<given-names>T. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liboriussen</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jeppesen</surname>
<given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Submerged Macrophytes as Indicators of the Ecological Quality of Lakes</article-title>. <source>Freshw. Biol.</source> <volume>55</volume> (<issue>4</issue>), <fpage>893</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>908</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02331.x</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<citation citation-type="book">
<collab>State Environmental Protection Administration of China</collab> (<year>2002</year>). <source>Monitoring and Analytical Methods of Water and Wastewater</source>. <publisher-loc>Beijing</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>China Environmental Science Press</publisher-name>. </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Strand</surname>
<given-names>J.&#x20;A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Weisner</surname>
<given-names>S. E. B.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2001</year>). <article-title>Morphological Plastic Responses to Water Depth and Wave Exposure in an Aquatic Plant (<italic>Myriophyllum Spicatum</italic>)</article-title>. <source>J.&#x20;Ecol.</source> <volume>89</volume> (<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>166</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>175</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1046/j.1365-2745.2001.00530.x</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Su</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xia</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Han</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Stoichiometric Mechanisms of Regime Shifts in Freshwater Ecosystem</article-title>. <source>Water Res.</source> <volume>149</volume>, <fpage>302</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>310</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.watres.2018.11.024</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Van Der Molen</surname>
<given-names>D. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Portielje</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Boers</surname>
<given-names>P. C. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lijklema</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1998</year>). <article-title>Changes in Sediment Phosphorus as a Result of Eutrophication and Oligotrophication in Lake Veluwe, The Netherlands</article-title>. <source>Water Res.</source> <volume>32</volume> (<issue>11</issue>), <fpage>3281</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3288</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/s0043-1354(98)00117-1</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B36">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yu</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Growth, Biomass Allocation, and Autofragmentation Responses to Root and Shoot Competition in <italic>Myriophyllum Spicatum</italic> as a Function of Sediment Nutrient Supply</article-title>. <source>Aquat. Bot.</source> <volume>89</volume> (<issue>4</issue>), <fpage>357</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>364</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.aquabot.2008.04.001</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B37">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cheng</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liang</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Effects of Organic-Rich Sediment and Below-Ground Sulfide Exposure on Submerged Macrophyte, <italic>Hydrilla Verticillata</italic>
</article-title>. <source>Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol.</source> <volume>83</volume> (<issue>4</issue>), <fpage>497</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>501</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00128-009-9800-y</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B38">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Xiao</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yu</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Differential Effects of Water Depth and Sediment Type on Clonal Growth of the Submersed Macrophyte <italic>Vallisneria Natans</italic>
</article-title>. <source>Hydrobiologia</source> <volume>589</volume>, <fpage>265</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>272</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10750-007-0740-4</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B39">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Xie</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yu</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>You</surname>
<given-names>W.-H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>L.-G.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Morphological and Physiological Responses to Sediment Nutrients in the Submerged Macrophyte <italic>Myriophyllum Spicatum</italic>
</article-title>. <source>Wetlands</source> <volume>33</volume> (<issue>6</issue>), <fpage>1095</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1102</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s13157-013-0465-2</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B40">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Xu</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hu</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Deng</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhu</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhou</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Impacts of Water Depth and Substrate Type on <italic>Vallisneria Natans</italic> at Wave-Exposed and Sheltered Sites in a Eutrophic Large Lake</article-title>. <source>Ecol. Eng.</source> <volume>97</volume>, <fpage>344</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>354</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ecoleng.2016.10.029</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B41">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jeppesen</surname>
<given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Qin</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shi</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhou</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Global Loss of Aquatic Vegetation in Lakes</article-title>. <source>Earth-Science Rev.</source> <volume>173</volume>, <fpage>259</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>265</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.earscirev.2017.08.013</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>