Plants cannot endure high concentration of salts in the cytoplasm both under the normal and stressful conditions. They get rid of these excessive salts either by their extrusion from the cell or their sequesterization into the vacuole or the older tissues (Gupta and Huang, 2014; Maathuis et al., 2014). Understanding of the mechanism behind ions transport and sequesterization has always remained a prime focus of plant science research. Potassium (K⁺) ions are the most predominant ions present in the plant cytosol which plays critical role in plant enzyme activation, photosynthesis, stomatal activity and sugar transport, etc. (Wang et al., 2013). Plants maintain high potassium (K⁺)/sodium (Na⁺) cytosolic ratio for maintaining their normal functioning.

Sodium chloride (NaCl) present in the soil during salt stress ionizes to form Na⁺ and Cl⁻ ions. These excessive Na⁺ ions inhibit K⁺ ion uptake by interfering in the plasma membrane K⁺ transporters of root cells. During salinity, high affinity K⁺ ion transporters behave as low affinity Na⁺ ion transporters and act as a potential pathway for influx of Na⁺ ions in the cells (Brini and Masmoudi, 2012; Bojórquez-Quintal et al., 2014). These Na⁺ ions compete with K⁺ ions for binding to the catalytic sites of essential enzymes being physiochemically similar to each other (Brini and Masmoudi, 2012). Therefore, reestablishment of high K⁺/Na⁺ ions ratio is one of the critical aspect of salinity tolerance in plants (Brini and Masmoudi, 2012). This is achieved with the help of Na⁺/H⁺ antiporters that either export the excessive ions out of the cell or transport them to the vacuole (Zhao et al., 2017). Na⁺/H⁺ antiporters are broadly categorized into three types viz salt overly sensitive (SOS), NHX and high-affinity potassium transporters (HKT). Among these, the SOS ion transporters are the most extensively studied and well-characterized in plants (Ma et al., 2014). There are three genes that encode for SOS proteins in rice: SOS1, SOS2 and SOS3. These three SOS proteins work in a co-ordinate manner to transport excess of Na⁺ ions from the cytoplasm (Brini and Masmoudi, 2012). With the help of modern research tools, biologists have deciphered the detailed cascade of signaling events involved in SOS pathway. This pathway is triggered by the high Na⁺ concentration that is perceived by the intracellular calcium (Ca²⁺) ion signals. High concentration of NaCl perturbes intracellular Ca²⁺ level via hypothetical plasma membrane sensors (Türkan and Demiral, 2009). This unique and specific Ca²⁺ signal is recognized and decoded by SOS3 protein that belongs to calcineurin B-like protein (CBLs) family. SOS 3 then interacts with SOS 2 to form a SOS3/SOS2 protein kinase complex and these together activate SOS1. SOS1 encodes for a plasma membrane Na⁺/H⁺ antiporter that maintains Na⁺ ion homeostasis by effluxing excess of Na⁺ ions during salinity. SOS2 also differentially regulates vacuolar Na⁺/H⁺ and H⁺/Ca²⁺ antiporters contributing to enhanced sequesterization of Na⁺ ions in vacuole and thereby confer salinity tolerance. Further, the SOS2/SOS3 kinase complex downregulates the activity of Na⁺ ion transporters that mediates entry of these ions into root cells during salinity (Türkan and Demiral, 2009). In a recent report, a OsSOS1 gene isolated from salt tolerant rice variety Pokkali has been shown to confer salinity tolerance when expressed constitutively using CaMV35S promoter in rice salt sensitive cultivar BRRI dhan 28 (Yasmin et al., 2016). Apart from well-established role in Na⁺ ion homeostasis, SOS proteins have also been reported to play novel roles during stress like regulating the dynamics of cytoskeleton (Yasmin et al., 2016).

Along with SOS pathway, Ca²⁺ signal initiated by salinity is also perceived and decoded by calmoudlin like proteins (CMLs) (Zeng et al., 2015). CMLs bind to the Ca²⁺ ions and regulate a plethora of target proteins including ion transporters, protein kinases, transcription factors (TFs) and various metabolic proteins (Zeng et al., 2015). Recently, the interaction of vacuolar Na⁺/H⁺ antiporters with CML18 protein has been found to regulate the process of ion sequestration in the vacuole. Under the control conditions, these two proteins are found to interact strongly that in turn modifies the Na⁺/K⁺ antiporters ion selectivity resulting in reduced Na⁺/H⁺ exchange process. Under the effect of salt stress, due to the change in vacuolar pH, repression of Na⁺/H⁺ activity by CML18 is inhibited resulting in the sequesterization of Na⁺ ions in the vacuole (Yamaguchi et al., 2005). Further, rice CML proteins are reported to confer salt stress tolerance in an ABA dependent manner and in association with MYB TFs (Zeng et al., 2015).

NHX antiporters are localized in the tonoplast and are involved in sequesterization of excessive Na⁺ ions in the vacuole. Along with this; they have been lately reported to be involved in cell growth, osmoregulation and plant development (Deinlein et al., 2014). Constitutive overexpression of rice OsNHX1 gene isolated from well-known salt tolerant cultivar Pokkali has been reported to enhance the salt tolerance of rice salt sensitive cultivar (Amin et al., 2016). NHX antiporters also substantially contribute in the regulation of cellular pH and stomatal functioning of plants by K⁺ ion sequesterization in the vacuole (Barragán et al., 2012).

HKT family of ion transporters specifically transports Na⁺ ions although they were initially described as high affinity K⁺ ion transporters (Brini and Masmoudi, 2012). They can either transport Na⁺ ions prefentially or symport Na⁺/K⁺ ions depending upon the presence of serine or glycine residues in the protein structure. HKT transporters are of particular importance in regulating the influx of Na⁺ ions into the roots (Brini and Masmoudi, 2012). They are considered as the most widely known genes that confer salt tolerance in plants. Seven functional OsHKT genes have been reported to exist in japonica rice cultivar and are considered as a potential marker for salinity tolerance (Hamamoto et al., 2015). However, serious efforts are further required to explore the role of these genes in conferring salt stress adaptation.

Classical studies mainly focused on the role of Na⁺ ion homeostasis in salt tolerance, however with the advent of modern research methodology, researchers have suggested that along with Na⁺ ion transporters, a thorough understanding of Cl⁻ ion transporters is also essential for improving the salt tolerance in plants. The accumulation of Cl⁻ ions is considered even more toxic for the plant vital processes like photosynthesis (Brini and Masmoudi, 2012; Li et al., 2017). However, the physiological and molecular mechanisms underlying chloride ion toxicity are not well-understood in plants (Khare et al., 2015). The fine tune balance of Cl⁻ ions in the cytosol is achieved through their sequesterization in the vacuole with the help of ion transporters and voltage gated ion channels (Brini and Masmoudi, 2012; Li et al., 2017). As the net charge in the vacuole is slightly positive with respect to the negatively charged cytoplasm, a voltage gradient is maintained between the vacuole and the cytoplasm. Majority of the Cl⁻ ions are sequestered in the vacuole through voltage–gated anion channels belonging to CLC family present on the tonoplast. In rice, the significant upregulation of a OsCLCa gene has been reported in response to salt stress. Further, in a comparative studies, the expression level of an OsCLCc gene was observed to be low in case of salt sensitive IR29 and high in the salt tolerant Pokkali cultivar of rice (Brini and Masmoudi, 2012). Cl⁻ ion signal in the salt effected soil has also been linked to stomata closure in an ABA dependent manner as an early salt stress response (Geilfus et al., 2015). These studies indicate the importance of Cl⁻ ion signaling and transporters in regulating the different pathways conferring salt tolerance.

Recently, researchers have identified that along with extrusion of excessive detrimental ions out of the cell cytosol, efficient uptake of K⁺ ions and their long distance distribution also plays critical role in deciding the salt tolerance level of a plant (Himabindu et al., 2016; Garriga et al., 2017). Three types of transporter families are involved in K⁺ ions transport namely HKT (High affinity K Transporter), HAK (High Affinity K)/KUP (K UP take)/KT (K Transporter) and Shaker K⁺ channel transporters (Shabala and Pottosin, 2014; Véry et al., 2014). But these transporters have not been well-studied in context to salt tolerance in rice. Hence, along with the conventional understanding of Na⁺ ion homeostasis exploring various mechanisms associated with Cl⁻ ion and K⁺ ion mediated salinity tolerance can give a new hope to the researchers for developing salt tolerant rice varieties.

Osmotic stress is another detrimental consequence of salinity on plant cells apart from ionic stress (Gupta and Huang, 2014). It occurs because of the intracellular water loss from the plant cells when the NaCl concentration increases above threshold level in the immediate environment of the cells (Türkan and Demiral, 2009). An instant response to this stress in plants is stomatal closure (Carillo et al., 2011). But this response is temporary and untenable for long duration because stomatal opening is required for carbon fixation (Carillo et al., 2011). So for long term strategy, plant cells tend to increase their osmotic potential by accumulating various metabolites better known as compatible (organic) solutes in the cytosol in order to reduce the water loss from the cells (Türkan and Demiral, 2009; Cardi et al., 2015). It is a key adaptation at the cellular level to combat the effect of osmotic stress (Hussain et al., 2016). Compatible solutes are water soluble, small polar, uncharged compounds and their high concenteration does not affect the plant's vital processes and enzymatic activities. They are mainly categorized into amino acid derivatives, sugars, sugar alcohols, complex sugars, sulfonium compounds, and tertiary amines (Flowers and Colmer, 2008). These solutes counterbalance the higher concenteration of salts outside the cells in one direction and accumulated Na⁺ and Cl⁻ ions in the vacuole on the another direction (Türkan and Demiral, 2009). Along with osmoregulation, they also play key role in ROS detoxification and stabilization of membranes and proteins (Hussain et al., 2016).

The amino acid proline is one of the osmotically most active compound that substantially contributes to the osmotic adjustment (Hussain et al., 2016). It is also reported to act as a signaling/ regulatory molecule that can activate various pathways involved in salt stress adaptation process (Hussain et al., 2016). Moreover, it serves as a nitrogen reservoir when the plant recovers from stress (Hadi et al., 2014). The level of proline increases to many folds in response to salt stress in rice (Sharma et al., 2015). Modern molecular biology tools have given insights into the identification of different genes responsible for metabolic level of proline in the cell. This increased level of proline is consequence of the tight regulation of its anabolism and catabolism processes which are controlled by the two key enzymes viz biosynthetic enzyme pyrroline-5-carboxylate synthetase1 (P5CS1) and catabolic enzyme proline dehydrogenase (PDH1) (Verbruggen and Hermans, 2008; Kaur et al., 2016b). The expression of OsP5CS1 gene along with other biosynthetic genes like Δ¹, -Pyrrolline-5-carboxylate reductase, and Ornithine-δ- aminotransferase increases whereas, the expression of catabolic gene OsPDH decreases in response to salt stress in rice (Bagdi et al., 2015). Its content has also been observed to be constitutively high in salt tolerant cultivars of rice (Kaur et al., 2016a). Further, the expression of biosynthetic gene OsP5CS was observed to be high in these tolerant cultivars (Kaur et al., 2016b). Therefore, OsP5CS and OsPDH can be considered as the potential candidates for developing transgenic rice cultivars with better salt tolerance ability in future.

Soluble, non-structural carbohydrates (sucrose, hexoses) are one of the key players in osmoregulation during salt stress. Their increase in the cell during stress provides optimism for enhancing the plant salt tolerance (Rosa et al., 2009). The level of these soluble sugars increases in plants when exposed to saline conditions. Trehalose is a disaccharide sugar synthesized from two glucose units linked by an α-α-1, 1 glycosidic bond that protects the plant cells from osmotic stress injuries (Redillas et al., 2012; Reina-Bueno et al., 2012). The level of trehalose increases significantly in response to salt stress in plants (Nounjan et al., 2012; Henry et al., 2015). Further the exogenous application of trehalose has been shown to be involved in better recovery of rice plants under salinity stress (Nounjan et al., 2012). Trehalose is synthesized in the plants via a conserved pathway that involves two steps catalyzed by trehalose-6-phosphate synthesis (TPS) and trehalose-6-phosphate phosphatases (TPP). The expression of these TPS and TPP genes increases in response to osmotic stress in plants (Henry et al., 2015). Furthermore, rice transgenic plants expressing TPSP gene that encodes for a bifunctional fusion enzyme TPSP were found to accumulate trehalose that resulted in enhanced salt stress tolerance. These plants were also observed to have more content of soluble sugars (sucrose, glucose, and fructose) (Redillas et al., 2012). Hence, trehalose can be considered as an absolute marker for salt stress tolerance in rice and genes involved in its biosynthesis are the vital candidates for crop improvement using genetic engineering. Along with this, trehalose-6- phosphate (T6P) that is an intermediate in biosynthesis of trehalose has been identified as an important signaling molecule that regulates plant growth and development (Gazzarrini and Tsai, 2014). It globally controls the process of plant metabolism and transcription by inhibiting the sucrose-non-fermenting-1 related kinase-1 (SnRk1) activity (Gazzarrini and Tsai, 2014; Figueroa and Lunn, 2016). T6P and SnRk1 also interact in an antagonistic manner under stressful conditions and thus maintains energy homeostasis required for the survival of plants (Gazzarrini and Tsai, 2014). However, the detailed pathway through which T6P regulates these vital processes is still required to be elucidated in detail.

Sugar alcohols also play diverse roles during salt stress. They are involved in osmoregulation, ROS scavenging and at the same time acts as molecular chaperons (Gupta and Huang, 2014). Mannitol is the chemically reduced form of mannose and is of utmost importance among sugar alcohols during osmoregulation (Trontin et al., 2014). It accumulates in plant cells in response to low water potential that occurs due to salt stress. Along with osmoregulation, it also acts as an alternative carbon and energy source during stress. In a comparative metabolic analysis in rice salt sensitive and tolerant cultivars, the level of mannitol was found to consistenly increase under the effect of salt stress hinting its role in providing salt stress adaptation in rice halophytes (Zhao et al., 2014). Mannitol level in the plant cell is tightly regulated at the level of its biosynthesis and degradation. Modern research resources have given deeper insights into the identification of critical genes involved in these processes. It is synthesized from fructose-6-phosphate by the activity of two enzymes mannitol-1-phosphate dehydrogenase (M1PDH) and a mannitol-1-phosphatase (M1Pase) (Groisillier et al., 2014). Higher level of mannitol is transported to the sink tissues of the plants where it is metabolized by the action of enzyme mannitol dehydrogenase (MTD). Overexpression of MTLD gene that encodes for M1PDH protein has been reported to accumulate mannitol in the transgenic rice plants thus improving their salt tolerance (Iwamoto and Shiraiwa, 2005). On the contarary, only meager information is available on exploitation of M1Pase and MTD genes in improving stress tolerance in plants. Hence, modulation of these key anabolic and catabolic genes regulating the level of mannitol in plants can be considered as an effective strategy for improving salt tolerance in rice.

Glycine betaine (GB) is a water soluble, non-toxic ammonium compound that plays critical role in salt stress adaptation by enhancing the content of cellular osmolytes (Gupta and Huang, 2014). Its implication in osmotic adjustment, lowering of ROS, stabilization of proteins and photosynthetic apparatus has been well-demonstrated by various workers (Cha-um and Kirdmanee, 2010; Gupta and Huang, 2014). Within a cell, it is synthesized either from glycine or choline that involves the participation of many enzymes including glycine sarcosine N-methyl transferase (GSMT), sarcosine dimethylglycine N-methyl transferase (SDMT), choline monooxygenase (CMO) and betaine aldehyde dehydrogenase (BADH). In rice, the biosynthesis of GB is not reported till date due to the formation of non-functional proteins involved in its biosynthetic pathway. However, transgenic rice plants raised with overexpression of choline oxidase (cod A) gene isolated from bacteria Arthrobacter glabiformis were found to highly tolerate the salinity (Mohanty et al., 2002; Giri, 2011). Therefore, raising the transgenic rice plants using the genes that encode for functional proteins involved in GB biosynthesis can act as an effective strategy for enhancing the salt stress adaptation in rice.

One of the pronounced effect of salinity stress on plants is the oxidative damage to the biomolecules like proteins, lipids triggered by reactive oxygen species (ROS) (AbdElgawad et al., 2016). ROS including superoxide radical (O²⁻), hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂) and hydroxyl radical (OH⁻) are generated in the plant organelle mitochondria, chloroplast and cytoplasm in minute concentration when the electrons escaped from the electron transport chains are accepted by oxygen leading to the formation of O²⁻ in the absence of other acceptors (Türkan and Demiral, 2009; Kaur et al., 2016a). At this low concenteration, ROS are involved in regulation of plant growth, development and stress adaptation (Kaur et al., 2016a). But under the effect of salt stress, the disruption of ROS homeostasis occurs which harms the plant (Baxter et al., 2014). Plants acclimatize under the salt stress conditions by restricting their ROS level to a threshold value with the help of ROS generating and scavenging machinery.

The utmost and extensively studied enzyme system involved in O²⁻ generation is NADPH oxidase that catalyzes the shifting of electrons from NADPH to molecular oxygen (O₂). In plants, NADPH oxidase genes are known as respiratory burst oxidase homologs (Rbohs) (Kaur et al., 2014). In rice, nine genes have been proposed to encode for Rbohs (Kaur et al., 2014). The expression of two rice genes OsRbohA and OsRbohI has been shown to be up-regulated at the transcript level under the effect of salt stress (Wang et al., 2013). Moreover, the enzymatic activity of NADPH oxidase has been reported to be more in salt tolerant cultivars of rice than the sensitive cultivars (Kaur et al., 2016a). These findings clearly hint toward the possible role of OsRboh genes in salt stress acclimization in rice.

Superoxide ions (O²⁻) generated by the action of NADPH oxidase is further converted into H₂O₂ by virtue of enzyme superoxide dismutase (SOD). H₂O₂ acts as an important signaling molecule and activates an array of stress responsive pathways in plants (Kaur et al., 2016a). Initially, H₂O₂ was considered as a harmful reactive molecule that damages the plants. But in the recent years, with the advancement of research tools, it has emerged as a vital molecule for plant growth and survival as it regulates a number of stress adaptive pathways (Elizabeth and Alison, 2011; Orabi et al., 2015). The level of H₂O₂ has been reported to increase in rice under the effect of NaCl. Its level is also observed to be constitutively high in salt tolerant cultivars of rice (Luna Sankhi and Luna Suvarna) (Kaur et al., 2016a). Although, H₂O₂ plays immensely important role in regulation of different plant processes, its level above threshold value can result in serious harm to the plant. So, its level in plants is tightly regulated with the help of SOD and H₂O₂ scavenging enzymes. The enzymatic activity of SOD increases in response to salt stress in rice plants (Sharma et al., 2015). Further, at the transcript level, higher gene expression level of two isoforms of SOD viz. Fe-SOD and Cu/Zn-SOD has been reported under the effect of salt stress (Sharma et al., 2013). Furthermore, overexpression studies conducted with cytosolic Cu/Zn-SOD and Fe-SOD have shown improved tolerance towards oxidative and salt stress in rice (Prashanth et al., 2008; Bose et al., 2013). A comparative study done on rice glycophytes and halophytes have also shown the higher expression level of Fe-SOD and Cu/Zn SOD genes in halophytic rice (Kaur et al., 2016a). Once the signaling cascade has been initiated, excessive H₂O₂ is scavenged by downstream antioxidant enzymes ascorbate oxidase (APX), catalase (CAT) and guaicol peroxidase (GR) (You and Chan, 2015). The expression level of H₂O₂ scavenging enzymes also shows interesting trend in response to salt stress in rice. The expression level of CAT, APX and GPX has been reported to increase under the effect of 100 mM of NaCl in rice cultivar Pusa basmati-1 (Sharma et al., 2015). The higher activity of these enzymes is even considered as a well-known marker for salinity tolerance in plants (Kaur et al., 2016a).

Till now; the majority of literature has linked the salt stress tolerance to the level of these antioxidant enzymes. But, in the past few years with the advancement of biochemical, microscopic and molecular tools, ROS generating NADPH oxidase enzyme system has also proved its candidature as a potential marker for salinity tolerance. It clearly indicates that along with our existing knowledge on the role of ROS scavenging system in rice salt stress acclimization, we should give equal emphasis to the ROS generating system for getting better insights into the mechanism of salt stress adaptation in rice as these two pathways may work in a coordinated manner for achieving salt stress tolerance (Figure 1).

Phytohormones are well-known as the key players regulating plant growth and development. With the advent of modern research tools, their critical role in modulation of different abiotic stress responses has attained huge attention (Kohli et al., 2013; Wani et al., 2016). They act as a mediator for controlling the interaction between the environmental stresses and plant responses (Tao et al., 2008).

The plant hormone abscisic acid (ABA) was originally discovered in early 1960s and was known as an inhibitory rather than stimulatory hormone. It is reported to be involved in the process of stomata closure, bud dormancy, seed dormancy and inhibition of shoot growth (Rodríguez-Gacio et al., 2009). The critical role of ABA in regulation of salt stress adaptation is also well-established. The level of ABA increases in response to salt stress in rice and lead to the activation of cascade of responses regulating salt stress tolerance (Kumar et al., 2013). The most predominant ABA mediated response that regulates salt stress tolerance is stomatal closure, thus preventing the loss of water as a stress adaptive feature (Sah et al., 2016). Recently, it is found that ABA also modulates root architecture in response to stress. The increased ABA level increases the root biomass leading to higher root to shoot ratio (Sah et al., 2016). Modern research tools and genetic resources have helped the researchers in deciphering the detailed pathway and identification of key genes involved in ABA biosynthesis and catabolism that could be targeted for achieving salt tolerance. NCED (9-cis-epoxycarotenoid dioxygenase) is the critical gene that encodes for the rate limiting enzyme involved in ABA biosynthesis in plants (Jisha et al., 2015). Recently, the overexpression of a rice transcription factor OsEREBP1 has been shown to increase the expression of NCED that in turn confers salt tolerance in rice (Jisha et al., 2015). These studies show that manipulating the expression levels of key genes involved in ABA biosynthesis and degradation can be considered as an effective approach for achieving salt tolerance in rice.

The phytohormone auxin is classically known as a master regulator of plant root development (Saini et al., 2013). But, in the past few years, the role of auxins in salt stress tolerance has also been well-realized (Du et al., 2013; Zörb et al., 2013). The level of different types of auxins like IAA and IBA increases significantly in response to salt stress. They are known to modulate the root architecture of the plant under stress conditions for achieving salt tolerance (Kazan, 2013). Auxins also increase the photosynthetic pigment concentration, alter the activities of key antioxidant enzymes and reduces the membrane permeability for conferring salt tolerance (Kaya et al., 2013). However, the specific role of auxin in providing salt stress tolerance in rice is still not well-understood. The advanced research tools have played a pivotal role in the identification of the key genes involved in auxin biosynthesis, transport and degradation that constitutes an essential component of the plant's abiotic stress tolerance mechanisms. Further, exploration of the role of these genes using the current research techniques can ultimately lead to the better understanding of role of auxins in development of crops which are better adapted to stressful environments.

Brassinosteroids are the steroidal plant hormones that are indispensible for plant growth and development as they regulate a plethora of vital plant processes including growth, flowering, seed germination, senescence, rhizogenesis, abscission and maturation (Gudesblat and Russinova, 2011; Fridman and Savaldi-Goldstein, 2013). In the past decade, the involvement of brassinosteroids has been well-established in the amelioration of different abiotic stresses in rice (Bajguz and Hayat, 2009). Exogenous treatment of brassinosteroids leads to salt stress adaptation in rice through the modulation of ROS machinery (Sharma et al., 2015). Brassinosteroids promote the transcript level expression and protein activity of different ROS detoxification enzymes such as superoxide dismutase, ascorbate peroxidase and catalase (Bajguz and Hayat, 2009; Choudhary et al., 2012; Sharma et al., 2015). Brassinosteroids also prevent the water loss during salt stress by inactivating the YDA-mediated signaling cascades of stomata development which is triggered by BIN2 (Kumar et al., 2013).

Gibberellic acid (GA) has been well-known as a growth stimulating hormones in plants (Gupta and Chakrabarty, 2013). It also mitigates the drastic effects of salt stress in different crops by enhancing the carbohydrates, proline, protein and amino acid content (Shaddad et al., 2013). The increased endogenous level of GA has been linked to salt stress tolerance in rice (Sahoo et al., 2014). However, the detailed mechanism how GA regulates salt tolerance is still not well-explored in rice. Modern research tools have enhanced our understanding of the detailed pathway involved in GA biosynthesis, signaling and degradation. Recently, the GA signaling genes (ga3ox1-3, rga28, gai-2, della) have been linked to endoreduplication during cell cycle in response to mild osmotic stress (Colebrook et al., 2014). Exploring the role of these genes using transgenics approach can help further in deduction of the probable mechanism of action of gibberellic acid in salt stress amelioration in rice.

Cytokinin is a well-known plant growth regulator that play a pivotal role in many of the plant processes including cell division, photomorphogenetic differentiation, photosynthesis promotion and inhibition of leaf senescence (Wang et al., 2015; Zwack and Rashotte, 2015). The level of cytokinins increases during salt stress thus improving the salt stress adaptation by reprogramming the transcript level expression of genes related to plant growth and development. It helps in retaining the expression of these genes which otherwise is masked under the effect of salt stress (Golan et al., 2016). The exogenous application of cytokinins increases the grain yield of rice under the salt stress conditions (Javid et al., 2011) However, a complete understanding of the events that regulate cytokinin mediated salt stress tolerance is still lacking. This could be due to the complex communication between stress signaling and cytokinins (Zwack and Rashotte, 2015). Further, overexpression of cytokinin biosynthetic gene AtlPT8 (Adenosine phosphate-isopentenyl transferase 8) decreases the salt stress tolerance in Arabidopsis by increasing the level of ROS, inhibition of primary root growth and decreasing the chlorophyll content (Wang et al., 2015). Therefore, the role of cytokinins in regulation of salt stress adaptation is contradictory as there are equal number of evidences supporting the positive as well as negative role of these in salt stress tolerance (Wang et al., 2015; Zwack and Rashotte, 2015). Hence, further comprehensive study is required to solve the mystery that how cytokinins regulate salt stress adaptation pathways.

Polyamines are a class of aliphatic nitrogen containing plant growth regulator that plays a significant role in cellular growth and development in plants (Gill and Tuteja, 2010). They are also well-known to regulate salt stress adaptation in plants. They confer salt stress tolerance mainly by modulation of ROS homeostasis (Liu et al., 2015; Saha et al., 2015). Recently, they have been hypothesized to regulate the process of ion transport during salt stress adaptation (Saha et al., 2015). However, the crosstalk that exists between polyamines, ROS and ion transporters is complex and more research is required to decipher this. Further, there is scarcity of information available on the signaling cascade of how polyamine genes are linked to salt stress responses (Liu et al., 2015).

Strigolactones are the plant signaling molecules which have been added in the growing list of plant growth regulators in the past decade (Smith and Li, 2014; Pandey et al., 2016). They are well-known for their role in plant-microbe symbiotic interactions, root growth, internode elongation and senescence (Van Ha et al., 2014; Pandey et al., 2016). The role of strogolactones has also been well-established in salt stress adaptation using loss-of-function mutation. The loss of function of strigolactone biosynthetic genes (MAX) increases the salt stress susceptivity establishing a direct positive link between strigolactone and salt stress adaptation (Van Ha et al., 2014). However, serious research efforts are still required to uncover the detailed signaling mechanism of strigolactone mediated salt stress tolerance particularly in rice.

All the mechanisms involved in salinity tolerance are tightly regulated by different transcription factors and genes that are either up-regulated or down-regulated in response to salt stress and thereby serve distinct functions in stress adaptation (Yoshida et al., 2014). The major transcription factors playing critical role in salt stress tolerance comprises WRKY, NAC, DREB, bZIP, AP2, C2H2 zinc finger families (Gupta and Huang, 2014). All these bind to the regulatory regions of the stress responsive genes and hence modulate their expression for conferring salt tolerance. WRKY belongs to one of the largest family of transcription factors involved in regulation of salt stress signaling pathways in rice (Banerjee and Roychoudhury, 2015). Overexpression of rice OsWRKY08 gene has been reported to enhance the salt tolerance in Arabidopsis through regulation of stress responsive COR and RD genes in an ABA independent manner (Chen et al., 2012). NAC family of transcription factors are also the key players in plant's fight against salt stress (Hong et al., 2016). But the detailed function of many of the members of this family in abiotic stress tolerance is not well-understood in rice. Recently, a rice OsNAC022 gene was overexpressed in rice that lead to salt and drought tolerance by increasing the gene expression of functional LEA and ERD genes (Hong et al., 2016). DREB is another one of the most critical transcription factors to synchronize the plants response toward salinity. They recognize and bind to the DRE motif in the promoter region of stress responsive genes. Among the major DRE binding proteins, the overexpression of rice DREB genes like OsDREBIF confers salt tolerance (Lata and Prasad, 2011). It confers salt tolerance in rice in a ABA dependent and ABA independent manner. They regulate the expression of an array of genes like ERD, KIN, and RD for conferring salt tolerance in rice. GRAS belongs to the plant specific class of transcription factors that play a significant role in achieving salt stress tolerance (Xu et al., 2015). Overexpression of GRAS transcription factors in plants like Arabidopsis thaliana has proved its role in salt tolerance but very less information is available in literature upon its role in regulation of salt stress in rice (Ma et al., 2010). MYB/MYC transcription factors are well-known for their role in abiotic stress tolerance (Dubos et al., 2010). They regulate the expression of salt stress signaling genes like those encoding ion transporters, proline synthase etc. in an ABA dependent manner for conferring salt tolerance (Yang et al., 2012). bZIP belongs to the largest family of transcription factors in plants. They play significant role in salt tolerance of rice in an ABA dependent manner (Liu et al., 2013). Overexpression of OsbZIP71gene increased the expression of stress regulated RD and NHX1 genes. RD genes encode for cell protective LEA/Dehydrin proteins and NHX1 plays significant role in ion compartmentalization. Moreover, it increased the transcript level of OsMYB4 which is involved in salt tolerance (Liu et al., 2014). Although, the role of NPR1 in biotic stress tolerance is well-established, its role in abiotic stress tolerance also cannot be ignored (Srinivasan et al., 2009). It interacts with bZIP transcription factor and leads to salt and drought tolerance in rice by regulating the expression of PR proteins (Alves et al., 2013).

Protein kinases and phosphates are the key enzymatic proteins that play a pivotal role in salt stress adaptation. They are involved in the regulation of the key components of stress signaling pathways by their phosphorylation and dephosphorylation, respectively. They act as on/off switch for controlling the salt stress adaptive pathways (País et al., 2009). The most widely studied protein kinases that play immensely important role in salt stress adaptation are mitogen activated protein kinases (MAPKs). Their involvement has been reported in response to salt stress in rice (De Zelicourt et al., 2016). They are considered as a central hub in different salt stress adaptation pathways like ROS signaling, ion homeostasis and hormonal regulated salt tolerance (Golldack et al., 2014). In the context of abiotic stress tolerance in plants, a MAP kinase core composed of 3 MAPK kinases viz.MEKK1→MKK2→MPK4/MPK6 has been identified. But still a complete cascade of MAPK involved in salt stress adaptation is missing. Researchers have established the role of different members of MAPKs in rice in response to salt stress by hunting a transgenic circuit approach (Moustafa, 2014). Overexpression of MKK1 that regulates the activity of MPK4 confers salt stress tolerance in rice through a cascade of signaling events (Wang F. et al., 2014). Further, the constitutive activation of OsMKK6 achieved through site directed mutagenesis of serine and threonine residues into glutamic acid improved salt tolerance in rice cultivar Pusa Basmati-1 suggesting the definite role of MKK6 in salt stress adaptation pathways in rice (Kumar and Sinha, 2013). Apart from MAPKs, calcium dependent protein kinases (CDPKs) are also critical for salt stress adaptation. They belong to the serine/threonine kinases family and translate the cytosolic Ca²⁺ stimuli generated by salinity into phosphorylation signals (Latz et al., 2013). The overexpression of rice OsCPK4 gene is reported to confer salt stress tolerance in plants by inhibiting the lipid peroxidation of plasma membrane (Campo et al., 2014). Although, CDPK genes are known to behave as an integral part of salt stress adaptive pathways, the function of only a few members has been deduced in rice. Hence, functional characterization of various salt stress responsive CDPKs is of vital importance for achieving salt stress tolerance in rice.

In contrast to the plenty of information available on the protein kinase enzymes, the knowledge on the role of protein phosphatases in salt stress adaptation is very limited. They are usually considered as unexciting enzymes as they are involved in the turning off of the signaling cascades triggered by protein kinases (País et al., 2009). But, recently it has been documented that it positively regulate the salt stress responsive pathways (Liao et al., 2016). In a latest research, overexpression of protein phosphatase 1a (OsPP1a) has been reported to enhance salinity tolerance in rice (Liao et al., 2016). In an another study, a rice phosphatase 2C has been found to confer salt tolerance in Arabidopsis (Singh et al., 2015). Thus, protein phosphatases can also be useful along with transcription factors and protein kinases in enhancing the salt tolerance in rice.

The identification and characterization of different proteins playing critical roles in salt stress signaling acts as a fascinating approach for understanding the complex process of salt tolerance (Himabindu et al., 2016). The major functional proteins involved in the process of salt tolerance are heat shock proteins (HSPs), late embryogenesis abundant (LEA) proteins, ion transporters, ROS detoxification enzymes, etc. (Kosová et al., 2013). LEA proteins are the low molecular weight hydrophilic proteins that belong to a huge and diverse gene family present in different plant species (Bhardwaj et al., 2013; Gao and Lan, 2016). They are rich in glycine, glutamic acid, lysine, and threoinine amino acids. The high content of glycine enables them to adopt random- coiled structures (Hu et al., 2016). The role of LEA proteins in conferring salt and drought tolerance in various plants is well-established. LEA proteins directly accumulate in plant cells in response to salt stress and thereof confers tolerance by mainly protecting the mitochondrial membranes. They also function as enzyme protectants, molecular chaperones, multi-functional water-binding molecules, membrane stabilizers and space fillers, thus inhibiting cellular collapse during salt stress (Liang et al., 2013; Hu et al., 2016). In a recent, study overexpression of a OsLEA4 gene that encodes for a LEA protein has been reported to confer salt tolerance in rice (Hu et al., 2016). These studies indicate that LEA family members are the absolutely potential candidates for genetic modifications in rice for achieving salt tolerance.

HS Ps are stress inducible proteins having chaperone activity and are synthesized in response to almost all kind of stresses in plants (Wang et al., 2004; Wang Y. et al., 2014; Hu et al., 2017). According to their molecular weight, major categories of HSPs are small heat shock proteins, Hsp60, Hsp70, Hsp90 and Hsp100 (Wang Y. et al., 2014). The expression of HSPs in response to different stresses is regulated by the transcription factors known as heat shock transcription factors (Hsfs; Liu et al., 2013). Overexpression rice OsHsfA7 gene encoding HSP transcription factor has been reported to confer salt stress tolerance in rice (Liu et al., 2013). Further, the overexpression of LimHSP16.45 which is a small heat shock protein has been shown to confer multiple abiotic stress tolerance including salinity in Arabidopsis (Mu et al., 2013). These reports emphasize on the prospective role of HSPs in achieving salt stress tolerance in rice.

Lectins are the carbohydrate binding proteins that possesses at least one non catalytic domain that binds reversibly and specifically to carbohydrates and their derivatives, without altering their structure (De Hoff et al., 2009). They are found to have a ubiquitous distribution in all kingdoms of life playing a diverse array of roles (De Hoff et al., 2009). The role of plant lectins have been well-explored in relation to regulation of innate immune responses against predators and pathogens (De Hoff et al., 2009). However, from the past few years, they are in limelight for their potential role in regulation of abiotic stress responses in plants. A plethora of uncharacterized abiotic stress responsive lectins have been identified at the genomic scale in plants suggesting their novel and unexplored roles (Komath et al., 2006; De Hoff et al., 2009). A study conducted on rice suggests that mannose binding lectins are involved in regulation of salt stress tolerance (Sharma et al., 2013). But the exact role of lectins in salt stress adaptation in rice is completely unrevealed till date. As these proteins accumulate in response to salt stress, their functional characterization can open a new chapter in the area of rice salt stress management in future.

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.