<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3-mathml3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xml:lang="EN" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Energy Res.</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Energy Research</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Energy Res.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">2296-598X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">1765488</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fenrg.2026.1765488</article-id>
<article-version article-version-type="Version of Record" vocab="NISO-RP-8-2008"/>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Evaluation of mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic co-digestion of agricultural residues for biogas production and antibiotic degradation</article-title>
<alt-title alt-title-type="left-running-head">Zhu et al.</alt-title>
<alt-title alt-title-type="right-running-head">
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2026.1765488">10.3389/fenrg.2026.1765488</ext-link>
</alt-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhu</surname>
<given-names>Xiaoli</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/3262739"/>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Methodology" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/">Methodology</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Conceptualization" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/">Conceptualization</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; original draft" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/">Writing - original draft</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Funding acquisition" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/funding-acquisition/">Funding acquisition</role>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname>
<given-names>Guowei</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; review &#x26; editing" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/Writing - review &#x26; editing/">Writing - review and editing</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Formal analysis" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/">Formal Analysis</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Methodology" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/">Methodology</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Investigation" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/">Investigation</role>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>Jia</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2047516"/>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; review &#x26; editing" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/Writing - review &#x26; editing/">Writing - review and editing</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Data curation" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/">Data curation</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Resources" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/resources/">Resources</role>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Gera</surname>
<given-names>Abdullah</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; review &#x26; editing" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/Writing - review &#x26; editing/">Writing - review and editing</role>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Xu</surname>
<given-names>Yanping</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">
<sup>3</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001">&#x2a;</xref>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; review &#x26; editing" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/Writing - review &#x26; editing/">Writing - review and editing</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Methodology" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/">Methodology</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Funding acquisition" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/funding-acquisition/">Funding acquisition</role>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1">
<label>1</label>
<institution>Weifang Institute of Technology</institution>, <city>Weifang</city>, <country country="CN">China</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff2">
<label>2</label>
<institution>Weifang Commercial College Shandong Province</institution>, <city>Weifang</city>, <country country="CN">China</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff3">
<label>3</label>
<institution>Dezhou Weili Engineering Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd</institution>, <city>Dezhou</city>, <country country="CN">China</country>
</aff>
<author-notes>
<corresp id="c001">
<label>&#x2a;</label>Correspondence: Yanping Xu, <email xlink:href="mailto:xuziping0635@163.com">xuziping0635@163.com</email>
</corresp>
</author-notes>
<pub-date publication-format="electronic" date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2026-02-10">
<day>10</day>
<month>02</month>
<year>2026</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date publication-format="electronic" date-type="collection">
<year>2026</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>14</volume>
<elocation-id>1765488</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>11</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2025</year>
</date>
<date date-type="rev-recd">
<day>23</day>
<month>01</month>
<year>2026</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>27</day>
<month>01</month>
<year>2026</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#xa9; 2026 Zhu, Chen, Liu, Gera and Xu.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2026</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Zhu, Chen, Liu, Gera and Xu</copyright-holder>
<license>
<ali:license_ref start_date="2026-02-10">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ali:license_ref>
<license-p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY)</ext-link>. The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</license-p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>Temperature plays a crucial role in determining the operational performance of the anaerobic digestion process. However, a systematic comparison between mesophilic and thermophilic regimes for the anaerobic co-digestion of diverse agricultural residues in terms of biogas production and antibiotic degradation is still lacking. Herein, anaerobic co-digestion of cow manure, chicken manure, corn stover, and wheat straw was investigated under mesophilic (37 &#xb0;C) and thermophilic (55 &#xb0;C) conditions using biochemical methane potential testing. The tests were conducted in 500 mL serum bottles with a 350 mL working volume, using acclimated biogas slurry as the inoculum at a substrate-to-inoculum ratio of 3:1 on a volatile solid basis. Methane production, physicochemical parameters, concentrations of three quinolone antibiotics and microbial community were analyzed. The results showed that during the initial 10-day period, daily methane production was consistently higher in the mesophilic digester than in the thermophilic digester. Total methane production over 45 days was approximately twice as high in the mesophilic system. Ammonia, chemical oxygen demand, and volatile fatty acid concentrations were significantly higher under thermophilic conditions, indicating that elevated temperature accelerated the hydrolysis and acidogenesis stages of the anaerobic digestion process. Hydrogenotrophic methanogens (Methanobrevibacter) dominated in both the thermophilic and mesophilic systems, but acetoclastic methanogenesis (Methanosarcina) was more active during the anaerobic digestion process under mesophilic conditions, which likely contributed to its higher overall methane yield. Furthermore, the removal rates of enrofloxacin and ofloxacin in the thermophilic group exceeded those in the mesophilic group by approximately 8%. Overall, anaerobic co-digestion of these four agricultural wastes at 37 &#xb0;C was more favorable to the methane production, whereas digestion at 55 &#xb0;C enhanced the degradation of organic substances, including the three quinolone antibiotics. This study highlights the critical role of temperature in shaping microbial communities and provides valuable guidance for temperature selection in the co-digestion of diverse agricultural residues.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>agricultural wastes</kwd>
<kwd>anaerobism</kwd>
<kwd>microbial community</kwd>
<kwd>semi-dry fermentation</kwd>
<kwd>temperature</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<funding-group>
<award-group id="gs1">
<funding-source id="sp1">
<institution-wrap>
<institution>Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province</institution>
<institution-id institution-id-type="doi" vocab="open-funder-registry" vocab-identifier="10.13039/open_funder_registry">10.13039/501100007129</institution-id>
</institution-wrap>
</funding-source>
</award-group>
<funding-statement>The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. This work was supported by Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation (grant number ZR2021QB183), Shandong Province Key Program Research and Development Project (grant number 2023TZXD028), and Weifang Science and Technology Development Project (grant number 2024GX060).</funding-statement>
</funding-group>
<counts>
<fig-count count="8"/>
<table-count count="1"/>
<equation-count count="0"/>
<ref-count count="37"/>
<page-count count="00"/>
</counts>
<custom-meta-group>
<custom-meta>
<meta-name>section-at-acceptance</meta-name>
<meta-value>Bioenergy and Biofuels</meta-value>
</custom-meta>
</custom-meta-group>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec sec-type="intro" id="s1">
<label>1</label>
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Anaerobic digestion (AD), which integrates environmental engineering and microbial technology, is a cost-efficient approach for treating agricultural organic waste, while simultaneously producing renewable energy (biogas) and generating high-value-added products such as organic fertilizer. This process plays a key role in achieving carbon-emission reduction goals (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">An et al., 2024</xref>). Consequently, it is a relatively mature technique that has garnered significant research and commercial interest. However, several key challenges hinder its broader application, including the complexity of feedstock materials, regional and seasonal temperature variations, and uncertainty regarding the composition of key microbial taxa.</p>
<p>The expansion of agricultural production, driven by the rising demand for food coupled with population growth, ultimately causes the massive generation of agricultural waste. Notably, fiber-based agricultural waste alone reaches 1.4 billion tons annually (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Xu et al., 2023</xref>). Improper management of recyclable agricultural by-products can result in significant resource waste and environmental damage, including water, soil, and air pollution, as well as potential risks to human health. Typical examples include uncontrolled discharge of livestock manure and the release of strong, unpleasant odors. AD facilitates the transformation of organic matter in agricultural waste. Through the processes of hydrolysis, acidification, acetogenesis, and methanogenesis, anaerobic fermentation converts agricultural waste into methane and digestate (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Wu et al., 2022</xref>). The methane produced has applications in space heating, electricity generation, and as bio-natural gas. Additionally, the solid and liquid digestate (biogas slurry and biogas residues) serve as valuable resources for use as fertilizer, soil conditioner, or animal bedding (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Akor et al., 2021</xref>). The co-digestion of multiple agricultural wastes, such as animal manure and crop residues, not only optimizes nutrient balance in AD digesters but also facilitates waste management in the same geographic region and regional development. Furthermore, it is more conducive to achieving stable year-round operation and steady biogas production, significantly reducing greenhouse gas emissions, thereby yielding substantial environmental benefits.</p>
<p>Among various physical and chemical indices, temperature is one of the most important parameters that exerts a critical influence on AD performance, such as modulating microbial community structure, interspecies interactions and metabolic activities. A robust and stable microbial community is essential for the sustained operation of AD plants. Throughout the AD process, diverse bacterial communities work together via the formation of an anaerobic food chain: the products generated by one group become the substrate for another. Close cooperation and a balanced state among these communities are prerequisites for effective system function (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Sudiartha et al., 2024</xref>). According to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Nie et al. (2021)</xref>, methanogens exhibit optimal activity within the mesophilic (30 &#xb0;C&#x2013;40 &#xb0;C) and thermophilic (50 &#xb0;C&#x2013;60 &#xb0;C) ranges, making these the dominant regimes for commercial AD systems (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Sudiartha et al., 2024</xref>). Mesophilic conditions are characterized by greater process stability and reduced energy consumption (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Singh et al., 2023</xref>). In contrast, the thermophilic processes offer significant advantages, including faster waste stabilization, enhanced biogas production with high methane content, accelerated fermentation processes, effective removal of pathogens in the feedstock and improved sludge dewaterability (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Xu et al., 2023</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Morais et al., 2025</xref>). However, maintaining thermophilic conditions, especially in cold climates like northern China in winter, requires substantial auxiliary heating. This high energy demand increases operational costs, compromises system sustainability, and ultimately undermines the economic viability of full-scale projects (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Morais et al., 2025</xref>). Temperature also regulates reaction kinetics and alters the thermodynamic equilibrium of key reactions, thereby modifying biochemical pathways and exerting a profound influence on the efficiency and stability of syntrophic interactions. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Nie et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Sudiartha et al., 2024</xref>). Therefore, the optimal fermentation temperatures depend strongly on characteristics of the feedstock and the specific operational conditions. Although extensive research has investigated the influence of temperature on AD, most studies have focused on wet digestion systems using one or two types of substrates (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Chen et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Liu et al., 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Li et al., 2024</xref>). Consequently, the precise effects of temperature on the semi-dry co-digestion of multiple agricultural residues remain inadequately understood. In particular, how temperature regulates microbial community succession as a central mechanism controlling biogas production requires further elucidation.</p>
<p>Antibiotics are increasingly recognized as one of the most frequently detected pollutants in wastewater (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Vistanty et al., 2025</xref>), particularly from livestock farms. Driven by accelerated intensive breeding practices, antibiotic usage in livestock and poultry production has surged, consequently elevating the levels of antibiotic residues in animal manure (Ali. et al., 2025). AD has proven effective in mitigating antibiotic contamination (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Vistanty et al., 2025</xref>). A critical yet often overlooked aspect of using biogas slurry as an organic amendment is its possible contamination with antibiotic residues. Repeated application also risks the accumulation of these compounds in agricultural soils, creating a potential pathway for their entry into food crops and posing a threat to food safety (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Wang et al., 2022</xref>). Therefore, the effectiveness of AD in removing antibiotics, a process highly dependent on operational parameters, has attracted growing attention (Ali. et al., 2025). Additionally, quinolones are generally categorized as recalcitrant antibiotics due to their persistence in anaerobic environments (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Sun et al., 2023</xref>). However, the removal efficiency of quinolone antibiotics during semi-dry co-digestion of multiple agricultural wastes under different temperature regimes remains unclear.</p>
<p>This study systematically compared the performance of semi-dry AD of a mixture of corn stalk, wheat straw, cow and chicken manure under mesophilic and thermophilic conditions. The aim was to assess the impact of temperature on the anaerobic co-digestion of diverse agricultural waste, evaluate system performance and stability by monitoring methane yield and key physicochemical Indicators, analyze the corresponding changes in the microbial community, identify the optimal temperature conditions for AD and disposal of agricultural by-products, and provide operational insights for minimizing the environmental risk of antibiotic residues in biogas slurry.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="materials|methods" id="s2">
<label>2</label>
<title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="s2-1">
<label>2.1</label>
<title>Materials</title>
<p>Chicken manure and cow manure were collected from local livestock farmers in Weifang, Shandong Province. The corn stover and wheat straw were also harvested from local cultivation areas and air-dried. The dried materials were ground using a grinder (FW135, Beijing Ever Bright Medical Treatment Instrument Co., Ltd., Beijing, China) and sifted using a 40-mesh sieve. The biogas slurry, used as inoculum, was obtained from an operational 6,000 m<sup>3</sup> anaerobic digester (Shandong Luxi Dasheng Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd., Weifang) that primarily treats cow, chicken, and duck manure. Before use, the biogas slurry was pre-incubated under anaerobic conditions for 2 weeks at 37 &#xb0;C &#xb1; 0.2 &#xb0;C for the mesophilic trial and 55 &#xb0;C &#xb1; 0.2 &#xb0;C for the thermophilic trial, respectively. The characteristics of all materials are presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>.</p>
<table-wrap id="T1" position="float">
<label>TABLE 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Fermentation substrates and inoculum characteristics.</p>
</caption>
<table>
<thead valign="top">
<tr>
<th align="left">Item</th>
<th align="left">Total solid/%</th>
<th align="left">Volatile solid (dry basis)/%</th>
<th align="left">Total organic carbon content/%</th>
<th align="left">Total nitrogen content/%</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td align="left">Wheat straw</td>
<td align="left">89.8</td>
<td align="left">92.0</td>
<td align="left">44.5</td>
<td align="left">0.446</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Corn stalk</td>
<td align="left">91.4</td>
<td align="left">89.9</td>
<td align="left">44.3</td>
<td align="left">0.601</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Cow manure</td>
<td align="left">15.7</td>
<td align="left">85.7</td>
<td align="left">40.5</td>
<td align="left">1.57</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Chicken manure</td>
<td align="left">39.1</td>
<td align="left">77.8</td>
<td align="left">38.1</td>
<td align="left">4.22</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Biogas digestate</td>
<td align="left">5.50</td>
<td align="left">64.9</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-2">
<label>2.2</label>
<title>Anaerobic fermentation equipment experiment design</title>
<p>The experiment was conducted using MultiTalent 203 (Nova Skantek Instruments Co., Ltd., Beijing, China) to automatically record the methane yield. The fully automatic methane potential tester consists of an AD unit, an acidic gas adsorption module, a gas flow rate and a data acquisition module (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1</xref>). The AD unit includes an electric-heated thermostatic water bath and 500 mL sealed glass bottles equipped with separate mechanical stirrers. The acidic gas adsorption module comprises 100 mL glass bottles, each containing 80 mL of 3 mol/L sodium hydroxide solution.</p>
<fig id="F1" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Schematic diagram of the anaerobic digestion equipment.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fenrg-14-1765488-g001.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Diagram showing an anaerobic digestion system where agricultural and animal wastes are fed into a digestion unit with water and a heater, producing biogas that passes through an acidic gas adsorption unit containing sodium hydroxide, followed by gas data acquisition and recording.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<p>The experiment comprised two treatments: a mesophilic group (MT, 37 &#xb0;C &#xb1; 0.2 &#xb0;C) and a thermophilic group (HT, 55 &#xb0;C &#xb1; 0.2 &#xb0;C) with three replicates per treatment. Each bottle was loaded with 350 g (wet weight) of the substrate-inoculum mixture, resulting in a working volume of approximately 350 mL. Based on experience in engineering practice, the substrate was formulated on a dry matter basis as a mixture of chicken manure, cow manure, wheat straw and corn stalks in a 1.6:1:1:1 ratio, with a total carbon-to-nitrogen ratio (C/N) of 20.2. The total solid (TS) content was adjusted to 12% (semi-dry) using biogas slurry. The feedstock contained naturally occurring quinolone antibiotics, with initial concentrations of ciprofloxacin (24.6 &#x3bc;g/kg), enrofloxacin (379 &#x3bc;g/kg) and ofloxacin (467 &#x3bc;g/kg). After sealing, the bottles were incubated in a thermostatic water bath for a 45-day AD period. The mixture was agitated intermittently at 80 rpm for 30 s, followed by a 3-min rest period.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-3">
<label>2.3</label>
<title>Sampling and measurements</title>
<p>Samples were collected on day 10 and day 45, with three replicates being tested. The pH value was measured using PHS-3E (INASE Scientific Instrument Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) instantly after halting the AD process by rapid cooling in an ice box. Aliquots of fermentation liquid from each bottle were collected and pooled with the samples from the same group, rapidly frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at &#x2212;80 &#xb0;C until microbial community analysis. The fermentation liquid supernatant was obtained by centrifugation (20,000 &#xd7; g, 15 min, 4 &#xb0;C) and subsequently analyzed for ammonia nitrogen, chemical oxygen demand (COD), and volatile fatty acid (VFA). TS were determined by drying 20 mL of fermentation liquid at 105 &#xb0;C for 48 h in a laboratory oven (WGL-45B, Tianjin Taisite Instrument Co., Ltd., China). Subsequently, volatile solids (VS) were determined by combusting the dried residues in a chamber furnace (SX-4-10, Tianjin Taisite Instrument Co., Ltd., China) at 550 &#xb0;C for 5 h. The residual fermentation liquid of each group was pooled by group and submitted to Anqiu Agricultural Product Quality and Safety Management Service Center (Weifang, China) for the analysis of three antibiotics (ciprofloxacin, enrofloxacin and ofloxacin). The analysis was performed using high-performance liquid chromatography-triple quadrupole mass spectrometry, following the standardized protocol outlined in the Chinese National Standard <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">HJ 1399-2024 (2024)</xref>. Elemental analysis was performed on a Vario MAX cube system (Elementar Analysensysteme GmbH, Germany) to quantify total carbon and nitrogen content. The VFA concentrations were analyzed following the method of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Sun et al. (2009)</xref>. Ammonia nitrogen concentrations were quantified via Nessler&#x2019;s reagent spectrophotometry (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">HJ 535-2009, 2009</xref>, China), and COD was assessed using the fast digestion-spectrophotometric method (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">HJ/T 399-2007, 2007</xref>, China).</p>
<p>Genomic DNA was extracted from the fermentation liquid samples using the E. Z.N.A.&#xae; Soil DNA Kit (Omega Bio-tek, Norcross, GA, United States). Following extraction, DNA quality was evaluated by measuring purity and concentration with a NanoDrop 2000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, United States), and assessing integrity through 1% agarose gel electrophoresis. Next-generation sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene was performed by Shanghai Biozeron Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). For microbial community analysis, the V3-V4 hypervariable regions of the bacterial 16S rRNA were amplified using primers 341F (5&#x2032;-CCTAYGGGRBGCASCAG-3&#x2032;) and 806R (5&#x2032;-GGACTACHVGGGTWTCTAAT-3&#x2032;), while archaeal communities were targeted using primers Arch519F (5&#x2032;-CAGCCGCCGCGGTAA-3&#x2032;) and Arch915R (5&#x2032;-GTGCTCCCCCGCCAATTCCT-3&#x2032;). Sequencing was carried out using NovaSeq PE250 (Illumina, Kapa Biosciences, Woburn, MA, United States) following library construction with the NEXTFlex Rapid DNA-Seq Kit (&#x200c;Bioo Scientific, Austin, TX, United States).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-4">
<label>2.4</label>
<title>Statistical analysis</title>
<p>Data was analyzed using SPSS Statistics 22 software (IBM, Armonk, NY, United States). Measurements of ammonia nitrogen content, pH value, COD, TS, VS, VFA and cumulative methane yield on day 45 (n &#x3d; 3) were subjected to an independent-samples T-test. Significant differences were considered at P &#x2264; 0.05. GraphPad Prism 6 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, United States) was used to create the graphs.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="results|discussion" id="s3">
<label>3</label>
<title>Results and discussion</title>
<sec id="s3-1">
<label>3.1</label>
<title>Methane production</title>
<p>The efficiency of methanogenesis in anaerobic digestion is governed by both the extent of substrate decomposition and the conversion of intermediate compounds into methane (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Ali et al., 2025</xref>). As shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2</xref>, the mesophilic (MT) digester&#x2019;s daily methane fluctuated from 1.05 to 3.09 mL/g&#xb7;VS during the first 17 days, after which it increased gradually to a first peak of 7.34 mL/g&#xb7;VS on day 26. Conversely, the thermophilic (HT) digester achieved its first peak on day 14, but at a lower yield of 3.43 mL/g&#xb7;VS. These trends suggest a rapid process initiation under mesophilic conditions, compared to a brief lag phase under thermophilic conditions. The second peak in the MT group occurred on day 36 (3.89 mL/g&#xb7;VS) and then declined. Although a similar pattern was observed in the HT group, its daily methane production remained consistently lower than that of the MT group. These results indicate that the mesophilic AD of the four agricultural residues was more favorable for methane production than the thermophilic condition, a finding further supported by the cumulative methane production data (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2</xref>). Ultimately, the cumulative gas production of the mesophilic group was significantly higher than that of the thermophilic group (<italic>p</italic> &#x3d; 0.010), reaching approximately twice the total volume over the 45-day operational period. This result aligns with the findings of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Yu et al. (2025)</xref>, who reported that the methanogenic potential of corn stover was lower under thermophilic conditions (52 &#xb0;C) than under mesophilic conditions (37 &#xb0;C). However, it contrasts with a study by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Hupfauf et al. (2018)</xref> on the anaerobic co-digestion of corn straw and cow manure, which observed a higher methane yield at 55 &#xb0;C than at 37 &#xb0;C. This discrepancy, in which the optimal temperature varies across studies, collectively underscores the importance of selecting an appropriate temperature regime for process optimization.</p>
<fig id="F2" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 2</label>
<caption>
<p>Daily methane production and cumulative methane production of semi-dry anaerobic digestion of a mixture of agricultural residues under mesophilic and thermophilic conditions.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fenrg-14-1765488-g002.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Two line graphs compare methane production for MT and HT over forty-five days. The top graph shows daily methane production, with MT peaking around day twenty-five. The lower graph presents cumulative methane production, with MT values consistently higher than HT throughout the period.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<p>To identify the key drivers of methane yield, correlations with key physicochemical parameters and microbial taxa were evaluated (<xref ref-type="sec" rid="s11">Supplementary Figure S1</xref>). Methanogens play a pivotal role in biogas production, and the diversity of their methanogenic pathways significantly influences yield variations (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Sudiartha et al., 2024</xref>). In line with this, our analysis revealed a positive correlation between cumulative methane yield and the relative abundance of Methanoculleus, a hydrogenotrophic archaeon. Its prevalence was higher under mesophilic conditions (2.76% of total archaea) than under thermophilic conditions (1.48%) on day 45, consistent with the higher methane yield observed at mesophilic temperatures. This suggests that Methanoculleus was an important contributor to methane production in the present system, where hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis dominated, which is consistent with the reported positive association between its abundance and enhanced methane production (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Sudiartha et al., 2024</xref>).</p>
<sec id="s3-1-1">
<label>3.1.1</label>
<title>Physicochemical indicators</title>
<p>In engineering practice, physicochemical parameters are widely employed as indicators to assess the operational status of AD systems. In this study, no significant differences in pH or TS were observed between the two groups (<italic>p</italic> &#x3e; 0.05, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3</xref>). The pH values remained within the optimal range of 6.5&#x2013;8.0 for microbial activities during AD (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Suanu et al., 2018</xref>), indicating that both AD systems operated stably. Ammonia nitrogen levels were significantly higher in the thermophilic (HT) group compared to the mesophilic (MT) group by day 10 of fermentation (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.001), and differences remained significant through day 45 (<italic>p</italic> &#x3d; 0.018), aligning with the results of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Li et al. (2024)</xref>. In locally operated biogas plants that primarily use livestock and poultry manure as feedstock and operate stably, an ammonia nitrogen concentration between 3,000 and 4,000 mg/L is considered normal. Therefore, the mesophilic group was more closely aligned with practical conditions and less likely to experience ammonia inhibition. In contrast, the thermophilic group exhibited ammonia nitrogen concentrations of over 6,000 mg/L. This may be due, on the one hand, to the accelerated degradation of protein-rich substrates at elevated temperatures and, on the other hand, to the potential onset of ammonia inhibition, which impairs substrate utilization efficiency (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Zhang et al., 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">He et al., 2025</xref>). Free ammonia nitrogen, which is a fraction of total ammonia nitrogen, is more toxic to methanogens as it can penetrate cell membranes and disrupt intracellular enzyme systems. Given that ammonia nitrogen concentration increases substantially with temperature (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Liu et al., 2022</xref>), the methanogenic activity in our HT group was likely subject to inhibition. Another explanation for the reduced methanogenesis under ammonia nitrogen stress is that ammonia-tolerant taxa, regardless of their functional roles in AD (e.g., hydrolytic bacteria, methanogens), must allocate additional carbon, nitrogen, and energy resources to counteract ammonia toxicity. This metabolic reallocation compromises central carbon metabolism, ultimately reducing metabolic methane yields (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Finn et al., 2023</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F3" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 3</label>
<caption>
<p>Effects of fermentation temperature on ammonia nitrogen content, pH value, chemical oxygen demand, TS and VS in anaerobic fermentation of agricultural residues.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fenrg-14-1765488-g003.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Five bar graphs present ammonia nitrogen, chemical oxygen demand, total solids, volatile solids, and pH value at ten and forty-five days for MT and HT groups. Significant differences are marked with asterisks.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<p>Moisture content (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3</xref>) is a key factor for microbial activity, as it supports the motility and growth of microorganisms, promotes the dissolution and transport of nutrients, and alleviates mass transfer limitations associated with heterogeneous or particulate substrates (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Suanu et al., 2018</xref>). In the present study, the higher VS content in the HT group on day 10 (<italic>p</italic> &#x3d; 0.011) indicates a lower initial organic matter degradation efficiency compared to the mesophilic group. However, this difference disappeared by day 45. These findings suggest that temperature exerts distinct regulatory effects on the anaerobic microbiota, and independently modulates the initial start-up rate and the long-term organic matter degradation potential of the system.</p>
<p>Overall, the HT group consistently exhibited elevated VFA levels at both time points (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4</xref>). Higher levels of acetic acid, butyric acid, isobutyric acid, isovaleric acid and total VFAs were observed in the HT treatment compared with the MT treatment (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.05). This pattern reflects a more intensive substrate decomposition in the thermophilic group during the early stage of AD, suggesting a higher potential for subsequent methane production&#x2014;this was further supported by the increased methane yield observed from day 10 to day 14. Moreover, the presence of unconsumed VFAs in the HT group on day 45 indicates the potential for continued fermentation and subsequent biogas generation. The present study observed that the propionate concentration in the MT group was significantly higher than in the HT group by day 45 (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.001). The syntrophic oxidation of propionate is crucial for methanogenesis, as approximately 30% of the electrons derived from complex substrate breakdown pass through propionate during AD. This process requires acetogenic bacteria to form syntrophic partnerships with hydrogenotrophic archaea, which consume H<sub>2</sub> to maintain a low partial pressure, thereby enabling thermodynamically favourable propionate degradation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Sudiartha et al., 2024</xref>). Therefore, the propionate accumulation observed in the MT group by day 45 likely served as a substrate reservoir for continued methanogenesis. The elevated abundances of Fermentimonas (a propionate-producing genus) and the hydrogenotrophic methanogen Methanobrevibacter during this period support the scenario that propionate was further converted to acetate and H<sub>2</sub>, with the latter being efficiently consumed for methane production. A positive correlation was observed between propionate content and the relative abundance of Bacteroidota (<xref ref-type="sec" rid="s11">Supplementary Figure S1</xref>). The relative abundance of Bacteroidota increased on day 45 in the mesophilic group, and the active metabolic activity of bacteria in this phylum might lead to the accumulation of propionate at this time point. Previous studies have reported that ammonia toxicity is primarily caused by the free ammonia fraction, which can promote VFA accumulation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Liu et al., 2022</xref>). The interaction between free ammonia and VFAs may establish a dynamic equilibrium, resulting in a stable yet suboptimal inhibited steady state characterized by lower methane yield. This mechanism may help explain the performance observed under thermophilic AD conditions.</p>
<fig id="F4" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 4</label>
<caption>
<p>Effects of fermentation temperature on volatile fatty acids production in anaerobic fermentation of agricultural residues.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fenrg-14-1765488-g004.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Seven grouped bar graphs compare concentrations of different acids (acetic, propanoic, butyric, isobutyric, valeric, isovaleric) and total volatile fatty acids between MT and HT at days 10 and 45. Asterisks denote significant differences.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<p>COD quantifies the dissolved, oxidizable organic matter in digestate and is a critical parameter for assessing its residual organic load (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Abid et al., 2021</xref>). Its levels in the HT group were significantly elevated, measuring 1.84 and 2.46 times higher than in the mesophilic (MT) group on day 10 and 45, respectively (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.05). This increase can be attributed not only to the generally accelerated degradation rate under thermophilic conditions but more specifically to the substantial accumulation of VFAs, key components of COD.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-2">
<label>3.2</label>
<title>Antibiotic degradation</title>
<p>The extensive use of antibiotics to enhance feed efficiency, prevent infections, and treat diseases is a ubiquitous feature of intensive animal production systems (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Chen et al., 2025</xref>). They are excreted in urine and feces, leading to high concentrations in manure, with a substantial fraction remaining in their original form or as transformed metabolites (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Zubair et al., 2023</xref>). <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5</xref> illustrates the degradation rates of three antibiotics during anaerobic fermentation under different temperature conditions. For enrofloxacin and ofloxacin, the degradation efficiency of AD under high-temperature treatment exceeded that of mesophilic treatment by 8.05% and 7.92%, respectively. After 45 days of anaerobic fermentation, ciprofloxacin was completely degraded in both the MT and HT groups, likely due to the relatively low initial concentration (&#x3c;25 &#x3bc;g/kg). These antibiotics belong to quinolones, a class of synthetic antimicrobial agents with strong bactericidal activity and broad-spectrum antibacterial properties (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Wu et al., 2024</xref>). Anaerobic fermentation markedly reduced their concentrations, supporting the standardized use of the resulting organic fertilizer and minimizing potential adverse impacts on soil and plants. Overall, thermophilic AD achieved greater removal of quinolone antibiotics, consistent with <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Zahedi et al. (2022)</xref>, who found thermophilic conditions superior for removing various veterinary pharmaceuticals. This alignment suggests a potentially common, thermally enhanced degradation mechanism (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Zubair et al., 2023</xref>). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Zhang et al. (2022)</xref> stated that key enzymes involved in quinolone biodegradation in AD systems, such as hydrolases (deaminases and peptidases), ligases, transferases, and lyases, are positively associated with the phylum Bacillota. Their activity is sensitive to the accumulation of propionic acid. Consistent with this finding, our results demonstrated that the mesophilic group exhibited both a lower relative abundance of Bacillota and a significantly higher concentration of propionic acid compared to the thermophilic reactor at day 45. This combination of an unfavourable microbial community structure and inhibitory metabolic conditions likely suppressed the relevant enzymatic activity, thereby explaining the lower enrofloxacin and ofloxacin degradation efficiency observed under mesophilic conditions.</p>
<fig id="F5" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 5</label>
<caption>
<p>Effects of fermentation temperature on antibiotic degradation rates in 45-day anaerobic fermentation of agricultural residues.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fenrg-14-1765488-g005.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Bar chart comparing antibiotic degradation rates for ciprofloxacin, enrofloxacin, and ofloxacin under two treatments labeled MT and HT. Rates are highest for ciprofloxacin, with both treatments near one hundred percent, while MT yields lower degradation than HT for enrofloxacin and ofloxacin.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-3">
<label>3.3</label>
<title>Microbial community</title>
<p>Studies have shown that anaerobic co-digestion systems of straw with livestock and poultry manure optimize the microbial community composition and structure (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Huang et al., 2024</xref>). This is critical because the acid-forming and methane-forming microorganisms in these systems have distinct physiologies and growth requirements. Since different bacterial species synergistically produce a diverse array of enzymes, the composition and diversity of the bacterial community in AD systems significantly influence the extent of substrate degradation. Furthermore, the composition of methanogenic archaea strongly affects methane production, as acidolysis produces a variety of substrates that necessitate different methanogenic pathways for efficient methanogenesis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Niya et al., 2024</xref>).</p>
<p>In the present study, pretreatment and sequencing generated 727 bacterial operational taxonomic units (OTUs) and 612 archaeal OTUs across all samples. Among the alpha diversity indexes, the bacterial Chao1 index of the MT group was 1.93 and 2.52 times higher than that of the HT group on days 10 and 45, respectively (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure 6</xref>). They exhibited a similar temporal pattern in bacterial richness, with higher species numbers in the early stage and lower richness in the late stage. It is widely recognized that greater microbial diversity in AD systems is associated with enhanced biogas production (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Kong et al., 2018</xref>). Although the archaeal Chao1 indices were higher in the HT group, the greater bacterial diversity under mesophilic conditions likely played a more pivotal role. Diverse bacterial communities supply a broader spectrum of metabolic intermediates (e.g., hydrogen, formate, acetate) that are essential substrates for various methanogenic archaea (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Finn et al., 2023</xref>). Therefore, the MT environment was more conducive to maintaining the complex syntrophic networks necessary for efficient methanogenesis, which may explain the higher methane production observed in the MT group.</p>
<fig id="F6" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 6</label>
<caption>
<p>Effects of fermentation temperature on microbial diversity of anaerobic fermentation of agricultural residues. <bold>(A)</bold> bacterial diversity. <bold>(B)</bold> archaeal diversity.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fenrg-14-1765488-g006.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Figure consists of two panels, A and B, each containing three bar charts for Chao1, Shannon, and Simpson diversity indices at days 10 and 45. In panel A, the black bars (MT) are higher than gray bars (HT) for Chao1, while Shannon and Simpson indices are similar between groups. In panel B, gray bars (HT) are higher than black bars (MT) for Chao1 and Shannon indices, while Simpson index remains similar between groups. MT and HT are indicated in the legend, with time points shown on the x-axes and diversity values on the y-axes.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<p>Based on the bacterial Shannon index, the species evenness in the thermophilic group was higher than in the mesophilic group on day 10. However, by day 45, evenness in the HT group had decreased to a level below that in the MT group, which exhibited an increase over time. This pattern suggests that high temperature imposed a strong environmental filter on the bacterial communities, selecting for a subset of thermotolerant species. On the 10th day of AD, the archaeal evenness of the HT group showed slightly higher evenness than the MT group, but by day 45, the two groups exhibited nearly identical evenness. On day 10, the HT group harboured a community with high evenness and transient diversity. This was consistent with the reported decoupling between methanogenesis and biodiversity in AD (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Finn et al., 2023</xref>). As fermentation progressed, however, sustained thermophilic conditions likely led to the gradual loss of less tolerant species, resulting in a community dominated by a few competitive, thermotolerant taxa. Additionally, the Simpson index values over 0.859 across all samples, confirming that several dominant species constituted a large proportion of the microbial community. Given that efficient methanogenesis relies on the participation of multiple microbial species, and higher microbial abundance and diversity can facilitate more robust methane conversion (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Huang et al., 2024</xref>).</p>
<p>The analysis of diversity indices revealed distinct thermal responses between bacterial and archaeal communities. High temperature acted as an environmental filter, reducing bacterial richness while promoting archaeal diversity. This selective pressure ultimately shaped a functionally streamlined yet less resilient thermophilic community, dominated by specialist taxa adapted to the dual stresses of heat and potential ammonia. In contrast, the mesophilic system fostered a functionally robust and diverse community, characterized by a higher proportion of generalist taxa and complex interaction networks (<xref ref-type="sec" rid="s11">Supplementary Figure S2</xref>), thereby explaining its superior and more stable methane production. To explore the specific differences in bacterial and archaeal communities at different taxonomic levels induced by temperature, the following sections provide a detailed analysis of community composition at both the phylum and genus levels for each domain.</p>
<sec id="s3-3-1">
<label>3.3.1</label>
<title>Bacterial community</title>
<p>The dominant bacterial communities, comprising the top 10 phyla and genera, are present in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">Figure 7</xref> (the remainder are classified as &#x201c;Others&#x201d;). At the phylum level, the mesophilic community was dominated by Bacillota, Bacteroidota, Pseudomonadota, and Actinomycetota. A distinct shift occurred under thermophilic conditions, where the top five phyla were Bacillota, Halanaerobiaeota, Actinomycetota, Bacteroidota and Pseudomonadota. In both cases, these dominant phyla collectively represented over 98% of the community, highlighting their strong adaptive capacity to the microenvironment and utilize organic substances and sustain rapid growth (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">An et al., 2024</xref>). Bacillota and Bacteroidota comprise most of the hydrolytic and acidogenic taxa, which efficiently degrade macromolecular organic matter, including protein, lipid and cellulose, and thereby establishing the foundation for the methanogenic stage (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Huang et al., 2024</xref>). Bacteroidota was more dominant in the mesophilic group, consistent with findings from anaerobic digestion of poultry and cattle manures (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Zahedi et al., 2022</xref>). By day 45, the relative abundance of Bacillota increased under elevated temperature, in agreement with <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Pap et al. (2015)</xref>. Interestingly, Halanaerobiaeota, a phylum of halophilic and halotolerant anaerobic bacterium, was detected exclusively in the HT group, where its relative abundance rose from 2.61% on day 10%&#x2013;11.5% on day 45. This pattern suggests that thermophilic fermentation may promote the formation of locally hypersaline microenvironments, likely due to water evaporation and consequent salt concentration, that favour its growth. In contrast, the salt concentration in the mesophilic system presumably remained below the threshold required to activate its salt-in mechanism, reducing its competitiveness relative to other microbial taxa.</p>
<fig id="F7" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 7</label>
<caption>
<p>Bacterial community structures at the phylum and genus levels. Bacterial community structures at day 10 and day 45 of the fermentation under mesophilic conditions at the phylum <bold>(a)</bold> and genus <bold>(c)</bold> levels. Bacterial community structures at day 10 and day 45 of the fermentation under thermophilic conditions at the phylum <bold>(b)</bold> and genus <bold>(d)</bold> levels.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fenrg-14-1765488-g007.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Four stacked bar charts compare the relative abundance percentages of dominant phyla and genera in two sample groups each. Charts (a) and (b) display phylum-level data, while charts (c) and (d) show genus-level data. Corresponding legends indicate color assignments for each bacterial group.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<p>Among the top 10 most abundant genera in the MT group, Alkaliphilus, Caldicoprobacter, Fastidiosipila, Tissierella and Anaerocolumna (Bacillota), as well as Fermentimonas and Proteiniphilum (Bacteroidota), were all capable of degrading organic substances such as cellulose, sugars and proteins, exhibiting functional redundancy (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Finn et al., 2023</xref>). Notably, the relative abundance of Fermentimonas in the MT group increased 9.50-fold from day 10 to day 45, suggesting potential syntrophic interactions with hydrogenotrophic methanogens (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Finn et al., 2023</xref>). The dominant genera in the HT group differed substantially from those in the MT group. Aside from Corynebacterium (Actinobacteriota) and Proteiniphilum under (Bacteroidota), the remaining seven dominant genera belonged to the phylum Bacillota. As fermentation progressed, the combined relative abundance of these 10 genera in the HT group decreased sharply (by 22.0%), mainly because the abundances of UCG-012, Keratinibaculum, Proteiniphilum, Jeotgalicoccus, and Lachnospiraceae NK3A20 each fell below 1% on day 45. Caldicoprobacter, Halocella and Tepidimicrobium are thermotolerant, moderately halophilic and strictly anaerobic bacteria capable of fermenting and utilizing cellulose, starch, and protein to produce VFAs and hydrogen. Among them, Halocella became increasingly important for substrate hydrolysis during the later stage of thermophilic fermentation, indicating that a considerable amount of recalcitrant substrate remained. In contrast, in the MT group, a large quantity of organic matter remained on day 10, with Caldicoprobacter showing relatively high degradation activity. By day 45, its abundance had declined by 24.7%; however, as system pH increased, the abundance of the mesophilic alkaliphilic bacterium Alkaliphilus rose by 28.2%, becoming the dominant taxon responsible for degrading complex organic matter.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-3-2">
<label>3.3.2</label>
<title>Archaea community</title>
<p>During the methanogenesis stage, multiple species of methanogenic archaea taxa are involved in reducing C1&#x2013;C2 intermediates to methane (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Finn et al., 2023</xref>). At the phylum level (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8">Figure 8</xref>), Methanobacteriota, Thermoplasmatota, Thermoproteota, and Halobacteriota were detected across all samples (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Huang et al., 2024</xref>), with Methanobacteriota being the most dominant phylum. Thermoplasmatota was abundantly present only in the mesophilic group at day 10, reaching a relative abundance of 31.7%, which likely reflects the activity of specific genera within this phylum, such as Candidatus Methanoplasma and its role as an early adaptive specialist. Members of this phylum are known for versatile metabolism (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Zhang et al., 2022</xref>), possibly thriving on initial fermentation intermediates. Its decline on day 45 coincides with the rise of Methanobacteriota, indicating a functional succession in the archaeal community. As the system stabilized, specialized hydrogenotrophic methanogens (Methanobacteriota) outcompeted other taxa, optimizing the community for efficient methanogenesis from H<sub>2</sub> or CO<sub>2</sub>. Notably, some Thermoplasmatota are methylotrophic methanogens (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Zheng et al., 2022</xref>), and their presence suggests a complementary methanogenic pathway under mesophilic conditions that may have contributed to methane production. Thermoproteota exceeded 9% in both the mesophilic and thermophilic groups on day 10, but declined to below 1% by day 45, indicating its role as an early colonizer rather than a keystone lineage for sustained methanogenesis. The elevated abundance of Halobacteriota in the mesophilic group by day 45 was notable. Since this phylum contains methanogens with diverse substrate preferences (hydrogenotrophic, acetoclastic, and methylotrophic) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Lyu et al., 2025</xref>), this observation directly supports the coexistence of multiple methanogenic pathways in the mesophilic system.</p>
<fig id="F8" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 8</label>
<caption>
<p>Archaeal community structures at day 10 and day 45 of the fermentation at the phylum and genus levels.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fenrg-14-1765488-g008.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Grouped bar charts comparing the relative abundance of dominant archaeal phyla and genera across four sample groups labeled MT10, MT45, HT10, and HT45. The left chart shows Methanobacteriota as the predominant phylum, while the right chart shows Methanobrevibacter as the predominant genus. Colorful legends identify each taxon.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<p>At the genus level, Methanobrevibacter was the predominant species across treatments. Under mesophilic conditions on day 10, Methanobrevibacter, Candidatus Methanoplasma and Methanobacterium collectively accounted for 85.4% of the methanogenic community. In contrast, Methanobrevibacter alone represented more than 85% of the relative abundance in each of the three remaining groups. Anaerobic methane production typically proceeds through three metabolic routes, whose energetic efficiency generally follows the order: hydrogenotrophic &#x3e; methylotrophic &#x3e; acetotrophic (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Niya et al., 2024</xref>). As hydrogenotrophic methanogens, Methanobrevibacter and Methanobacterium are characterized by reducing CO<sub>2</sub> to CH<sub>4</sub> using H<sub>2</sub> and/or formic acid serving as electron donors (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Ayob et al., 2023</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Huang et al., 2024</xref>). Members of Candidatus Methanoplasma form syntrophic associations with hydrogen-producing bacteria and are obligate methylotrophs that utilize methylated compounds for methane production; a related methylotrophic genus, Methanomassiliicoccus, was primarily observed in the MT group. On day 10, Candidatus Nitrosocosmicus reached a relative abundance of 7.32% in the mesophilic group, while Candidatus Nitrosopumilus accounted for 8.27% in the thermophilic group. As ammonia-oxidizing archaea within Methanobacteriota, both taxa can tolerate high ammonia concentrations and play crucial roles in nitrification and the nitrogen cycle, enabling them to colonize a wide spectrum of extreme environments (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Ayob et al., 2023</xref>). By day 45, however, their abundances had declined markedly to below 0.5%, which is ultimately beneficial for the stability of the AD system because the nitrite they produced can be toxic to methanogens and anaerobic bacteria. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Finn et al. (2023)</xref> reported that methanogenesis under ammonia stress is likely supported by interactions among ammonia-tolerant taxa, which are found across all functionally important prokaryotic phyla. Numerous studies have also shown evidence that microbial communities can adapt to total ammonia nitrogen concentrations from 2000 mg/L to 7,000 mg/L (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Finn et al., 2023</xref>). A consistent observation is that, under ammonia-inhibitory conditions, the dominant methanogenic pathway shifts from aceticlastic to hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Finn et al., 2023</xref>).</p>
<p>Methanosarcina which exhibits high metabolic flexibility by utilizing multiple methanogenic pathways, served as the primary acetotrophic methanogen in this study. They are capable of oxidizing the carboxyl group of acetate to CO<sub>2</sub> while reducing the methyl group to methane (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Huang et al., 2024</xref>). Their abundance increased over time in the mesophilic group but decreased in the thermophilic group, suggesting that acetoclastic methanogenesis was better sustained under mesophilic conditions. Based on the combined analysis of VFAs and ammonia nitrogen levels, it can be inferred that under mesophilic conditions, the methanogenic process was dominated by hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis, with methylotrophic methanogenesis and acetoclastic pathways acting as supplementary routes. In contrast, elevated temperature increased the relative abundance of Methanobacteriota at the phylum level and Methanobrevibacter at the genus level, particularly on day 10. Our findings are consistent with <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Pap et al. (2015)</xref>, who reported that increasing temperature from 37 &#xb0;C to 55 &#xb0;C enhances hydrogenotrophic rather than acetoclastic methanogenesis. In our HT system, this shift was marked by the reduced abundance of acetoclastic Methanosarcina and the concurrent proliferation of hydrogenotrophic genera like Methanobrevibacter.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="conclusion" id="s4">
<label>4</label>
<title>Conclusion</title>
<p>The results of this study demonstrate that stable biogas production is achievable from the anaerobic co-digestion of complex agricultural waste under both mesophilic and thermophilic conditions, but with different features. The thermophilic system exhibited faster organic matter degradation, including enhanced removal of quinolone antibiotics, whereas the mesophilic system achieved a higher overall methane yield, attributable to a more robust and functionally diverse microbial ecosystem. The mesophilic anaerobic digestion involved multiple methanogenic pathways (acetoclastic, hydrogenotrophic, methylotrophic), which granted greater resilience and metabolic flexibility. In contrast, the thermophilic system evolved toward a specialized but susceptible state, dominated by hydrogenotrophic methanogens. Ultimately, ammonia inhibition, high VFA accumulation, and a scarcity of acetoclastic methanogens (e.g., Methanosarcina) collectively resulted in its lower methane production. Therefore, this study confirms that temperature is a decisive engineering parameter that directly shapes microbial community structure and function, thereby determining process performance in the co-digestion of heterogeneous feedstocks. The choice between mesophilic and thermophilic operation is not absolute but should be strategically aligned with specific waste characteristics and operational priorities.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec sec-type="data-availability" id="s5">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="author-contributions" id="s6">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>XZ: Methodology, Conceptualization, Writing &#x2013; original draft, Funding acquisition. GC: Writing &#x2013; review and editing, Formal Analysis, Methodology, Investigation. JL: Writing &#x2013; review and editing, Data curation, Resources. AG: Writing &#x2013; review and editing. YX: Writing &#x2013; review and editing, Methodology, Funding acquisition.</p>
</sec>
<ack>
<title>Acknowledgements</title>
<p>We are extremely grateful to the staff of Shandong Luxi Dasheng Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd. for their assistance in this study.</p>
</ack>
<sec sec-type="COI-statement" id="s8">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>Author YX was employed by Dezhou Weili Engineering Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd.</p>
<p>The remaining author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="ai-statement" id="s9">
<title>Generative AI statement</title>
<p>The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.</p>
<p>Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="disclaimer" id="s10">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="supplementary-material" id="s11">
<title>Supplementary material</title>
<p>The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenrg.2026.1765488/full#supplementary-material">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenrg.2026.1765488/full&#x23;supplementary-material</ext-link>
</p>
<supplementary-material>
<label>SUPPLEMENTARY FIGURE 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Heatmap of Pearson correlations between physicochemical characteristics and cumulative methane production, as well as microbial communities based on treatment condition means. NH3-N: ammonia nitrogen; COD: chemical oxygen demand; TS: total solids; VS: volatile solids; VFA: total volatile fatty acids; CMP: cumulative methane production. &#x2a; Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level; &#x2a;&#x2a; Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level.</p>
</caption>
</supplementary-material>
<supplementary-material>
<label>SUPPLEMENTARY FIGURE 2</label>
<caption>
<p>Schematic diagram of anaerobic co-digestion of agricultural residues for biogas production under mesophilic and thermophilic conditions. Red arrow: inhibitory effects; green arrow: facilitative effects; black arrow: common pathway.</p>
</caption>
</supplementary-material>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Image2.tif" id="SM1" mimetype="application/tif" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Image1.tif" id="SM2" mimetype="application/tif" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/>
</sec>
<fn-group>
<fn fn-type="custom" custom-type="edited-by">
<p>
<bold>Edited by:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1511217/overview">Shiv Prasad</ext-link>, Indian Agricultural Research Institute (ICAR), India</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="custom" custom-type="reviewed-by">
<p>
<bold>Reviewed by:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/3308419/overview">Jingwei Wu</ext-link>, Taizhou University, China</p>
<p>
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/3329152/overview">Gede Adi Wiguna Sudiartha</ext-link>, Udayana University, Indonesia</p>
</fn>
</fn-group>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B38">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Abid</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Seyedsalehi</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hu</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tian</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Novel insights of impacts of solid content on high solid anaerobic digestion of cow manure: kinetics and microbial community dynamics</article-title>. <source>Bioresour. Technol.</source> <volume>333</volume>, <fpage>125205</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125205</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33932808</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B1">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Akor</surname>
<given-names>C. I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Osman</surname>
<given-names>A. I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Farrell</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>McCallum</surname>
<given-names>C. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Doran</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Morgan</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Thermokinetic study of residual solid digestate from anaerobic digestion</article-title>. <source>Chem. Eng. J.</source> <volume>406</volume>, <fpage>127039</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cej.2020.127039</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ali</surname>
<given-names>M. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xu</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gaballah</surname>
<given-names>M. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gaballah</surname>
<given-names>E. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Samer</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2025</year>). <article-title>Nexus between anaerobic digestion of animal waste and antibiotic-related pollutants: a critical review</article-title>. <source>Appl. Energy</source> <volume>382</volume>, <fpage>125284</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.125284</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>An</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shen</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liang</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Microbial diagnostics unveil key driver bacteria and methanogens associated with system stability and biogas production in food waste anaerobic digestion systems</article-title>. <source>J. Environ. Chem. Eng.</source> <volume>12</volume> (<issue>6</issue>), <fpage>114435</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jece.2024.114435</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ayob</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kusai</surname>
<given-names>N. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jantan</surname>
<given-names>N. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Murdi</surname>
<given-names>A. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Law</surname>
<given-names>M. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Khairuddin</surname>
<given-names>N. S. K.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Methanogenic archaea community in relation to methane production in oil palm planted on tropical peatland</article-title>. <source>IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci.</source> <volume>1167</volume>, <fpage>012013</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1088/1755-1315/1167/1/012013</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Huang</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Han</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xiao</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Biohythane production and microbial characteristics of two alternating mesophilic and thermophilic two-stage anaerobic co-digesters fed with rice straw and pig manure</article-title>. <source>Bioresour. Technol.</source> <volume>320</volume>, <fpage>124303</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.biortech.2020.124303</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33126132</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cai</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shen</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liao</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ren</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ding</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2025</year>). <article-title>Exploring the changes in chicken manure bacterial community structure and function after antibiotic and composting: implications for food safety</article-title>. <source>Food Humanity</source> <volume>4</volume>, <fpage>100571</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foohum.2025.100571</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Finn</surname>
<given-names>D. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rohe</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Krause</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Guliyev</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Loewen</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tebbe</surname>
<given-names>C. C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Methanogenesis in biogas reactors under inhibitory ammonia concentration requires community-wide tolerance</article-title>. <source>Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.</source> <volume>107</volume> (<issue>21</issue>), <fpage>6717</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>6730</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00253-023-12752-5</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">37672072</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>He</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ma</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Khan</surname>
<given-names>M. U.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Peng</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Geng</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2025</year>). <article-title>Mitigation of ammonia inhibition in dry anaerobic digestion of chicken manure and corn straw using a self-developed gradient anaerobic digestion reactor</article-title>. <source>Energy</source> <volume>332</volume>, <fpage>137256</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.energy.2025.137256</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<mixed-citation publication-type="book">
<collab>HJ 1399-2024</collab> (<year>2024</year>). <source>Water quality&#x2014;Determination of 17 fluoroquinolone antibiotics&#x2014; high performance liquid chromatography&#x2043;triple quadrupole mass spectrometry</source>. <publisher-loc>Beijing</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Ministry of Environmental Protection of the People&#x27;s Republic of China</publisher-name>.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<mixed-citation publication-type="book">
<collab>HJ 535-2009</collab> (<year>2009</year>). <source>Water quality - determination of ammonia nitrogen - nessler&#x27;s reagent spectrophotometry</source>. <publisher-loc>Beijing</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Ministry of Environmental Protection of the People&#x27;s Republic of China</publisher-name>.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<mixed-citation publication-type="book">
<collab>HJ/T 399-2007</collab> (<year>2007</year>). <source>Water quality - determination of the chemical oxygen demand - fast digestion -spectrophotometric method</source>. <publisher-loc>Beijing</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Ministry of Environmental Protection of the People&#x27;s Republic of China</publisher-name>.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Huang</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hua</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Effects of inocula on methane production and the microbial community in a rice straw anaerobic digestion system</article-title>. <source>Fuel</source> <volume>359</volume>, <fpage>130340</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fuel.2023.130340</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hupfauf</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Plattner</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wagner</surname>
<given-names>A. O.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kaufmann</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Insam</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Podmirseg</surname>
<given-names>S. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Temperature shapes the microbiota in anaerobic digestion and drives efficiency to a maximum at 45 &#xb0;C</article-title>. <source>Bioresour. Technol.</source> <volume>269</volume>, <fpage>309</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>318</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.biortech.2018.08.106</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30195223</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kong</surname>
<given-names>D. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>K. Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fang</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gao</surname>
<given-names>W. X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liang</surname>
<given-names>J. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liang</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Study of microbial community and biogas production in anaerobic digestion of pig manure with digested slurry recirculation</article-title>. <source>J. Agro-Environment Sci.</source> <volume>37</volume> (<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>559</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>566</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.11654/jaes.2017-1241</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vojislav</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhu</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Comparative experimental study of mesophilic and thermophilic batch fermentation process of vegetable waste</article-title>. <source>China Biogas.</source> <volume>42</volume> (<issue>5</issue>), <fpage>23</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>29</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.20022/j.cnki.1000-1166.2024050023</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xing</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ma</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nan</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pan</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Anaerobic co-digestion of Chinese cabbage waste and cow manure at mesophilic and thermophilic temperatures: digestion performance, microbial community, and biogas slurry fertility</article-title>. <source>Bioresour. Technol.</source> <volume>363</volume>, <fpage>127976</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.biortech.2022.127976</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">36122849</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lyu</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shao</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Akinyemi</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Whitman</surname>
<given-names>W. B.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Methanogenesis</article-title>. <source>Curr. Biol.</source> <volume>28</volume> (<issue>13</issue>), <fpage>R727</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>R732</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cub.2018.05.021</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29990451</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Morais</surname>
<given-names>N. W. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Silva</surname>
<given-names>M. V. D. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nascimento</surname>
<given-names>R. G. N. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Santos</surname>
<given-names>A. B.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2025</year>). <article-title>Effect of electron-conducting materials, substrate-inoculum ratio, and temperature on swine wastewater anaerobic digestion</article-title>. <source>J. Water Process Eng.</source> <volume>78</volume>, <fpage>108828</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jwpe.2025.108828</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Nie</surname>
<given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>He</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hao</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shao</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lu</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>How does temperature regulate anaerobic digestion?</article-title> <source>Renew. Sustain Energy Rev.</source> <volume>150</volume>, <fpage>111453</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.rser.2021.111453</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Niya</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yaakoubi</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Beraich</surname>
<given-names>F. Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Arouch</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kadmiri</surname>
<given-names>I. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Current status and future developments of assessing microbiome composition and dynamics in anaerobic digestion systems using metagenomic approaches</article-title>. <source>Heliyon</source> <volume>10</volume> (<issue>6</issue>), <fpage>e28221</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28221</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">38560681</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Pap</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gyoerkei</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Boboescu</surname>
<given-names>I. Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nagy</surname>
<given-names>I. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Biro</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kondorosi</surname>
<given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Temperature-dependent transformation of biogas-producing microbial communities points to the increased importance of hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis under thermophilic operation</article-title>. <source>Bioresour. Technol.</source> <volume>177</volume>, <fpage>375</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>380</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.biortech.2014.11.021</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25481804</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Singh</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hans</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kumar</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yadav</surname>
<given-names>Y. K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Thermophilic anaerobic digestion: an advancement towards enhanced biogas production from lignocellulosic biomass</article-title>. <source>Sustainability</source> <volume>15</volume>, <fpage>1859</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/su15031859</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Suanu</surname>
<given-names>L. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Abiodun</surname>
<given-names>A. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Josiah</surname>
<given-names>I. U.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Peter</surname>
<given-names>A. O.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Anaerobic digestion and agricultural application of organic wastes</article-title>. <source>Environ. Res.</source> <volume>7</volume> (<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>73</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>85</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.12989/AER.2018.7.2.073</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sudiartha</surname>
<given-names>G. A. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Imai</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Reungsang</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Syntrophic relationship among microbial communities enhance methane production during temperature transition from mesophilic to thermotolerant conditions</article-title>. <source>J. Environ. Chem. Eng.</source> <volume>12</volume> (<issue>6</issue>), <fpage>114903</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jece.2024.114903</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sun</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chu</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Determination of volatile fatty acids in anaerobic reaction by high performance liquid chromatography</article-title>. <source>Water Purif. Technol.</source> <volume>28</volume> (<issue>05</issue>), <fpage>64</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>66</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.15890/j.cnki.jsjs.2009.05.005</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sun</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Qian</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gu</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Residual enrofloxacin in cattle manure increased persistence and dissemination risk of antibiotic resistance genes during anaerobic digestion</article-title>. <source>J. Environ. Manag.</source> <volume>326</volume>, <fpage>116864</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116864</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">36436244</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Vistanty</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Budihardjo</surname>
<given-names>M. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Malik</surname>
<given-names>R. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mukimin</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Setianingsih</surname>
<given-names>N. I.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2025</year>). <article-title>Enhanced antibiotic removal by anaerobic co-digestion in an expanded granular sludge bed (egsb) reactor treating real pharmaceutical wastewater: from lab-scale to pilot-plant application</article-title>. <source>Bioresour. Technol. Rep.</source> <volume>31</volume>, <fpage>102286</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.biteb.2025.102286</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Huang</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>A review of the effects of antibiotics on the anaerobic digestion of swine waste</article-title>. <source>Curr. Opin. Environ. Sci. Health</source> <volume>25</volume>, <fpage>100312</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.coesh.2021.100312</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname>
<given-names>Z. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xia</surname>
<given-names>Z. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gou</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sun</surname>
<given-names>Z. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tang</surname>
<given-names>Y. Q.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>The responses of mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic digestion of municipal sludge to periodic fluctuation disturbance of organic loading rate</article-title>. <source>Environ. Res.</source> <volume>218</volume>, <fpage>114783</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.envres.2022.114783</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">36372150</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Deng</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>The resistance of hydrogenotrophic methanogenic microorganisms to ofloxacin in sludge anaerobic digestion process</article-title>. <source>J. Environ. Manage</source>, <volume>365</volume>:<fpage>121522</fpage>. doi.org:<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121522</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">38909576</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Xu</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shu</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhou</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Pretreatment and composting technology of agricultural organic waste for sustainable agricultural development</article-title>. <source>Heliyon</source> <volume>9</volume> (<issue>5</issue>), <fpage>e16311</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16311</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">37305492</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Yu</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Guo</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Huang</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2025</year>). <article-title>Influence of temperature on the potential and kinetics of methane production from anaerobic digestion of corn stover</article-title>. <source>J. Heilongjiang Bayi Agric. Univ.</source> <volume>37</volume> (<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>75&#x223c;81</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3969/j.issn.1002-2090.2025.02.011</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zahedi</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gros</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Casabella</surname>
<given-names>O.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Petrovic</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Balcazar</surname>
<given-names>J. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pijuan</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Occurrence of veterinary drugs and resistance genes during anaerobic digestion of poultry and cattle manures</article-title>. <source>Sci. Total Environ.</source> <volume>822</volume>, <fpage>153477</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153477</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">35093343</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zamudio</surname>
<given-names>C. E. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhu</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Linville</surname>
<given-names>J. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>He</surname>
<given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Robustness of archaeal populations in anaerobic co-digestion of dairy and poultry wastes</article-title>. <source>Bioresour. Technol.</source> <volume>102</volume> (<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>779</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>785</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.biortech.2010.08.10</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20863697</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yue</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhou</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ding</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kamran</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Key microbial clusters and environmental factors affecting the removal of antibiotics in an engineered anaerobic digestion system</article-title>. <source>Bioresour. Technol.</source> <volume>348</volume>, <fpage>126770</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.biortech.2022.126770.4</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">35091038</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B36">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zheng</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wei</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhou</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Qi</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Diao</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Genomic evidence for the recycling of complex organic carbon by novel thermoplasmatota clades in deep-sea sediments</article-title>. <source>mSystems</source> <volume>7</volume> (<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>16</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/msystems.00077-22</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">35430893</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B37">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zubair</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhu</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>The antibiotics degradation and itsmechanisms during the livestock manure anaerobic digestion</article-title>. <source>Molecules</source> <volume>28</volume>, <fpage>4090</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/molecules28104090</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">37241831</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>