<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="EN" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Energy Res.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Energy Research</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Energy Res.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">2296-598X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">1235277</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fenrg.2023.1235277</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Energy Research</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Numerical simulation of transient cavitation characteristics of valve-controlled liquid-filled hydrodynamic coupling</article-title>
<alt-title alt-title-type="left-running-head">Cui et al.</alt-title>
<alt-title alt-title-type="right-running-head">
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2023.1235277">10.3389/fenrg.2023.1235277</ext-link>
</alt-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Cui</surname>
<given-names>Hongwei</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001">&#x2a;</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1711491/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>Jiahua</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">
<sup>3</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>Li</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>Guoqiang</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
<institution>College of Mechanical and Vehicle Engineering</institution>, <institution>Taiyuan University of Technology</institution>, <addr-line>Taiyuan</addr-line>, <country>China</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
<institution>Shanxi Key Laboratory of Fully Mechanized Coal Mining Equipment</institution>, <institution>Taiyuan University of Technology</institution>, <addr-line>Taiyuan</addr-line>, <country>China</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff3">
<sup>3</sup>
<institution>School of Mechanical Engineering</institution>, <institution>Beijing Institute of Technology</institution>, <addr-line>Beijing</addr-line>, <country>China</country>
</aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>
<bold>Edited by:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1600274/overview">Kan Kan</ext-link>, College of Energy and Electrical Engineering, China</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>
<bold>Reviewed by:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2350550/overview">Boshen Liu</ext-link>, University of Science and Technology Beijing, China</p>
<p>
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2351734/overview">Gangfeng Tan</ext-link>, Wuhan University of Technology, China</p>
</fn>
<corresp id="c001">&#x2a;Correspondence: Hongwei Cui, <email>cuihongwei@tyut.edu.cn</email>
</corresp>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>29</day>
<month>08</month>
<year>2023</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="ecorrected">
<day>27</day>
<month>02</month>
<year>2026</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2023</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>11</volume>
<elocation-id>1235277</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>06</day>
<month>06</month>
<year>2023</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>31</day>
<month>07</month>
<year>2023</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#xa9; 2023 Cui, Zhang, Li and Wang.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2023</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Cui, Zhang, Li and Wang</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>In high-power impeller industries, valve-controlled liquid-filled hydrodynamic couplings are widely used in the soft startup of heavy-duty scraper conveyors for mining. However, the water circulation speed in internal flow fields is higher at lower speed ratios, making the hydrodynamic couplings prone to severe cavitation, which further results in severe performance degradation, noise, vibration, or even erosion failure. Meanwhile, because a hydrodynamic coupling is a piece of closed-loop multicomponent turbomachinery, internal transient cavitation flow behavior cannot be easily controlled. To reasonably predict the characteristics of cavitation and its influence on the working performance of the hydrodynamic coupling, a high-quality structured mesh model of the internal flow field for an impeller was established. Considering the periodic structural characteristics of the impeller, a scale-resolving simulation turbulence model was combined with a Rayleigh&#x2013;Plesset cavitation model to establish a single-cycle hydrodynamic coupling calculation model. The cavitation distribution characteristics and torque transmission of the flow field under different working conditions were obtained, and the effect of cavitation on the soft startup performance was analyzed. The results demonstrated that cavitation in the hydrodynamic coupling mainly occurred under low speed ratios. The degree of cavitation decreased as speed ratio increased. The worst-case scenario for cavitation occurred when the speed ratio was zero. Most of the cavitation bubbles were generated at the tip of the blades, resulting in unstable variation in torque characteristics and deterioration of the working performance of the hydrodynamic coupling. The analysis reveals that the cavitation process in the impeller is highly unstable and periodic, and the cavitation development near the tip of the blades occurs in four stages: birth, growth, separation, and disintegration. The generated steam accumulates in the inner ring of the impeller. Therefore, a method for accurately predicting the cavitation characteristics of hydrodynamic couplings based on high-precision technology is proposed, and a theoretical basis for coupling design and cavitation suppression technology is provided.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>valve-controlled liquid-filled hydrodynamic coupling</kwd>
<kwd>cavitation</kwd>
<kwd>scale-resolving simulation</kwd>
<kwd>CFX</kwd>
<kwd>torque characteristic</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<counts>
<page-count count="14"/>
</counts>
<custom-meta-wrap>
<custom-meta>
<meta-name>section-at-acceptance</meta-name>
<meta-value>Process and Energy Systems Engineering</meta-value>
</custom-meta>
</custom-meta-wrap>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="s1">
<title>1 Introduction</title>
<p>Efficient and safe mining equipment plays a vital role in coal mining and utilization. Scraper conveyors often encounter harsh working conditions, such as excessively hard coal walls, sudden changes in coal production, stagnation of scraper chains, and unbalanced loads. These conditions can cause unexpected shutdowns, affect production efficiency, and affect the reliability and service life of the motor and scraper conveyor. Commonly used transmission devices in mines include valve-controlled liquid-filled hydrodynamic couplings, controlled start transmission, and frequency conversion drive devices. Compared with other transmission methods, valve-controlled liquid-filled hydrodynamic couplings use water as the working medium. The amount of liquid in the hydrodynamic coupling is varied via a hydraulic valve; speed regulation and soft starting of the load are then realized. As a commonly used soft start device on conveyors, this hydrodynamic coupling exhibits the advantages of a large starting torque coefficient, flexible transmission, simple structure, reliable performance, low equipment investment, and low maintenance cost (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Zhang et al., 2020</xref>).</p>
<p>With the rapid development of computing power and various commercial finite-element software packages, the application of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) technology has become crucial to solve the problem of fluid calculation. To study hydraulic transmission, several researchers have conducted numerical computations for various hydraulic components based on CFD technology.</p>
<p>At present, most scholars focus on the cavitation characteristics of torque converter flow field in various operating conditions. Liu Cheng et al. revealed the fluid field mechanism of the influence of charging oil conditions on torque converter cavitation behavior, providing practical guidelines for suppressing cavitation in torque converter (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Liu et al., 2022</xref>). Ran Zilin et al. developed a cavitation suppression technique by slotting one side of the stator suction side, which was proven to be able to significantly shorten the cavitation duration (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Ran et al., 2022</xref>). Guo Meng et al. developed a full flow passage geometry and a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model with cavitation to analyze the flow behavior in the torque converter (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Guo et al., 2022a</xref>). Xiong Pan et al. optimized the Joukowsky airfoil used in the design of stator blades, which greatly reduced the probability of cavitation and improved the performance and service life of the torque converter (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Pan et al., 2021</xref>).</p>
<p>Cavitation is a transient phase change phenomenon. Vapor bubbles occur, grow, and collapse in liquids with variations in the local pressure. This is a common issue in fluid machinery. To face complex coal conditions underground, mining equipment with high power that can sustain high loads are being developed. This has increased the demand for the soft start and stable transmission capabilities of the hydrodynamic coupling. A higher power density results in a higher circulation velocity and lower local pressure in the internal flow field. Simultaneously, because the working medium of the high-power hydrodynamic coupling for mining is water, a large amount of dissolved gas and undissolved microbubbles are present in the medium. Therefore, cavitation can easily occur, particularly on the blade surface, leading to unstable transmission and reduced power, thus reducing the life of the impeller.</p>
<p>At present, research on the cavitation phenomenon of the hydraulic transmission device primarily entails the torque converter. Anderson et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Anderson et al., 2003</xref>) investigated cavitation signatures under the stall condition in an automotive torque converter using a microwave telemetry technique. Liu et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Liu et al., 2018a</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Liu et al., 2019</xref>) studied the influence of the stator blade shape on the cavitation process of a hydraulic torque converter and found that cavitation is directly related to the internal mass flow rate. Robinette et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Robinette, 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Robinette et al., 2008a</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Robinette et al., 2008b</xref>) investigated the effects of torque converter design and operating conditions on the onset of cavitation during vehicle launch using a nearfield acoustical technique. From their numerical results, Dong et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Yu et al., 2002</xref>) determined that the cavitation on the stator leading edge grew in size with increasing pump speed, resulting in severe performance degradation in the torque converter. Zhao (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Zhao et al., 2016</xref>) used the full channel transient CFD calculation model to simulate the mechanism of bubble breakup in a hydraulic torque converter by implanting bubbles in it, and they calculated the high incidence area of bubble breakdown. Watanabe et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Watanabe et al., 1996</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Watanabe et al., 1997</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Watanabe et al., 2007</xref>) established a cavitation observation model based on a transparent plastic torque converter. A high-speed camera was used to observe the cavitation in the torque converter, which was combined with dynamic torque testing to confirm that the cavitation process produced high-frequency torsional vibration. Kang (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Kang et al., 2017</xref>) and Dong (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Dong et al., 2017</xref>) studied the flow structure and cavitation phenomena in a hydraulic retarder. In addition, several important results have been obtained from research on hydrofoil cavitation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Sun et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Bai et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Cheng et al., 2020</xref>). Chai et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Chai et al., 2022</xref>) revealed the three-dimensional morphological characteristics of cavitation flow under extreme working conditions through high-precision numerical simulation and analysis of the cavitation flow field of a flat torque converter. Guo et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Guo et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Guo et al., 2022b</xref>) proposed full-flow CFD models with and without cavitation for torque converters, and studied the effects of different pump impeller speeds, pump turbine speed differences and cavitation parameters on the internal flow field of the torque converter. Xiong et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Xiong et al., 2021</xref>) modified the torque converter stator blades through Joukowsky airfoil transformation, which greatly reduced the probability of cavitation.</p>
<p>Because hydraulic transmission machinery is a closed multi-impeller rotating machine, the internal two-phase flow phenomenon cannot be easily observed (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Timoshevski et al., 2016</xref>). The current research results are mainly on the torque characteristics and two-phase flow field under part filling conditions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Da Silva et al., 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Hur et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Hur et al., 2017</xref>). However, there is still no reasonable explanation for the formation of two-phase flow in the coupling. Xuesong Li (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Li et al., 2020</xref>) studied the formation of two-phase flow state and flow mechanism of the flow field in the hydraulic retarder from the point of view of cavitation phenomenon, and the object of the study is highly similar to the structure of the hydrodynamic coupling, so similar theories can be used to analyze the two-phase flow. In addition, theoretical speculations suggest that, owing to the particularity of the working medium and working conditions of the mining high-power valve-controlled liquid-filled hydrodynamic coupling, the cavitation phenomenon has a greater impact on the working characteristics of the coupling under the condition of an impeller high-speed difference. Therefore, this study aims to analyze the occurrence and development of cavitation in the flow field of high-power hydrodynamic couplings as well as to examine their external characteristics. This is of great significance for improving the accuracy of the prediction of hydrodynamic coupling characteristics and for improving performance and durability.</p>
<p>The research object in this study was a high-power mine-adjustable double-chamber hydrodynamic coupling with a circulation circle outer diameter of 575&#xa0;mm. A single-channel calculation model of the impeller flow field on the output side was established. A SBES(Stress-Blended Eddy Simulation) calculation model was used to study the effect of cavitation on the performance of the fluid coupling. The development of the torque characteristics and cavitation distribution of the fluid coupling under closed working conditions was analyzed. The results provide a high-precision research method for the cavitation characteristics of fluid couplings; they also provide a reliable theoretical basis for the optimization of the structure of fluid couplings.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2">
<title>2 Numerical simulation</title>
<sec id="s2-1">
<title>2.1 Geometric and mesh model</title>
<p>The structure and working principle of the valve-controlled liquid-filled hydrodynamic coupling are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1</xref>.</p>
<fig id="F1" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Structure and working principle of hydrodynamic coupling.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fenrg-11-1235277-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>The speed-adjusting double-chamber hydrodynamic coupling with the outer diameter D &#x3d; 575&#xa0;mm was considered as the analysis model. The numbers of pump wheels and turbine blades were 46 and 45, respectively. Because the two pairs of impellers of this coupling had symmetrical structures, the flow field of the output impeller was used as the calculation model. The speed ratio of the hydrodynamic coupling was defined as <inline-formula id="inf1">
<mml:math id="m1">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>T</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>/</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>P</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>, <inline-formula id="inf2">
<mml:math id="m2">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>T</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> was the turbine rotation speed and <inline-formula id="inf3">
<mml:math id="m3">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>P</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> was the pump rotation speed. To describe the spatial position of the impeller blades accurately, the surfaces of the different side blades of the pump and turbine were defined according to the impeller rotation direction. The parameters of the coupling impeller are listed in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>, and the process of establishing the flow field model is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2A</xref>.</p>
<table-wrap id="T1" position="float">
<label>TABLE 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Structure parameters of the coupling impeller.</p>
</caption>
<table>
<thead valign="top">
<tr>
<th align="center">Parameters</th>
<th align="center">Value</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td align="center">Circular circle outer diameter, <italic>D</italic> (mm)</td>
<td align="center">575</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">Circular circle inner diameter, <italic>d</italic> (mm)</td>
<td align="center">276</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">Baffle diameter, <italic>d</italic>
<sub>B</sub> (mm)</td>
<td align="center">320</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">Baffle thickness, <italic>h</italic>
<sub>B</sub> (mm)</td>
<td align="center">5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">Impeller material</td>
<td align="center">ZL101&#xa0;A</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">Rotation speed of pump, <italic>n</italic>
<sub>P</sub> (r/min)</td>
<td align="center">1475</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">Number of pump blades, <italic>BN</italic>
<sub>P</sub>
</td>
<td align="center">46</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">Number of turbine blades, <italic>BN</italic>
<sub>T</sub>
</td>
<td align="center">45</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">Minimum blade thickness, <italic>h</italic> (mm)</td>
<td align="center">3</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<fig id="F2" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 2</label>
<caption>
<p>Geometric model and mesh model.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fenrg-11-1235277-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>To improve the computation efficiency and obtain a high flow field mesh density, a single flow channel calculation model of 1/x (where x is the number of impeller blades) was obtained by utilizing the cyclically symmetric structural characteristics of the inner flow field. The structured hexahedral grid in ICEM CFD was used to discretize the flow field model of a single channel of a fluid coupling. Moreover, o-division and mesh refinement were performed at the circle of curvature and the blade wall surface to improve the computational efficiency and mesh quality. This was because the three-dimensional circulation of the flow field in the coupling was complicated, and the cavitation was distributed under extremely unsteady conditions. Therefore, a high-quality mesh was required to calculate the actual flow state and capture the transient cavitation flow behavior. The process of establishing the single-channel mesh model is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2B</xref>.</p>
<p>Taking the internal flow field of the pump wheel as an example, the boundary condition setting method is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3</xref>, which mainly includes the no-slip wall at the wall surface of the pump wheel blades and the wall surface of the flow channel, the periodic surface of the pump wheel field according to its own geometric cycle symmetry structure, and the coupling surface of the flow solving area between the pump wheel internal flow field and the turbine internal flow field. Interface). Based on the viscous qualities of the fluid, the flow field near the wall of the existence of a thin layer of flow velocity and the wall of the same speed of the fluid, the thin layer of fluid and the wall of the wall of the relative slip does not exist, so the wall of the wall of the wall of the speed of the fluid unit of the velocity of the surface layer to take the value.</p>
<fig id="F3" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 3</label>
<caption>
<p>Fluid boundary.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fenrg-11-1235277-g003.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>The accuracy and efficiency of the solution are directly affected by the quality and quantity of the mesh. In theory, a higher number of grids produce better calculation accuracy, but more grids require greater computing resources. Therefore, an appropriate mesh density should be determined to achieve an appropriate balance between accuracy and computational cost. The calculated torque change rate <inline-formula id="inf4">
<mml:math id="m4">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>f</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="|">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">n</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> of the mesh with different grid densities is<disp-formula id="e1">
<mml:math id="m5">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>f</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="|">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">n</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>T</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="|">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">n</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>T</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="|">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">n</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>T</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="|">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">n</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
<label>(1)</label>
</disp-formula>where <inline-formula id="inf5">
<mml:math id="m6">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>T</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="|">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">n</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> is the computation result under the current density mesh, and <inline-formula id="inf6">
<mml:math id="m7">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>T</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="|">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">n</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> is the computation result under the previous mesh with lower density. When the change rate of the calculation result between the two meshes with different densities is less than 2%, the influence of the current mesh density on the calculation result is acceptable&#x2014;that is, the calculation result is independent of the grid. Mesh independence tests were performed on seven models with different grid resolutions. The results are listed in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref> and shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4</xref>.</p>
<table-wrap id="T2" position="float">
<label>TABLE 2</label>
<caption>
<p>Structural mesh independence analysis results.</p>
</caption>
<table>
<thead valign="top">
<tr>
<th align="center">Number of grids in pump flow field</th>
<th align="center">Global size setting (mm)</th>
<th align="center">Time consumption (min)</th>
<th align="center">Pump wheel torque (N&#xb7;m)</th>
<th align="center">
<italic>f</italic>(n) <sub>pump</sub> (%)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td align="center">83,036</td>
<td align="center">3.5</td>
<td align="center">6</td>
<td align="center">286.377</td>
<td align="left"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">121,512</td>
<td align="center">3</td>
<td align="center">10</td>
<td align="center">277.062</td>
<td align="center">3.24</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">163,254</td>
<td align="center">2.5</td>
<td align="center">16</td>
<td align="center">269.734</td>
<td align="center">2.96</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">248,045</td>
<td align="center">2</td>
<td align="center">30</td>
<td align="center">261.862</td>
<td align="center">2.66</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">364,704</td>
<td align="center">1.7</td>
<td align="center">50</td>
<td align="center">258.997</td>
<td align="center">1.59</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">679,386</td>
<td align="center">1.3</td>
<td align="center">89</td>
<td align="center">257.700</td>
<td align="center">0.89</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">1,406,380</td>
<td align="center">1</td>
<td align="center">140</td>
<td align="center">256.837</td>
<td align="center">0.34</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<fig id="F4" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 4</label>
<caption>
<p>Analysis results of grid independence test.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fenrg-11-1235277-g004.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>When the global size of the mesh is less than 1.7 mm, the torque change generated by further increasing the number of grids is less than 2% and the model is considered to be mesh-independent. Considering the calculation efficiency and precision comprehensively, the global grid size is selected to be 1.7&#xa0;mm. The grids number of the turbine flow field is 948,230, and the grids number of the turbine flow field is 1,157,138.</p>
<p>To ensure the accuracy of the boundary layer flow field computation, the minimum boundary layer size was set to 0.01 mm, which ensured that the minimum y &#x2b; value around the blade was less than 10. The grid thickness growth rate was set to 1.15.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-2">
<title>2.2 Multiphase model</title>
<p>In this study, the multiphase flow field caused by cavitation in the completely filled liquid flow field was obtained. In addition to the general set of mass conservation equations, the mass exchange between liquid and non-condensable vapor is governed by the following transport equation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Zhou et al., 2017</xref>):<disp-formula id="e2">
<mml:math id="m8">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mi>&#x3b4;</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b4;</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="|">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>f</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>l</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>&#x3c1;</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>l</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mi>&#x3b4;</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b4;</mml:mi>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>x</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>j</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="|">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>f</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>l</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>&#x3c1;</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>l</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>v</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>j</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mover accent="true">
<mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x2d9;</mml:mo>
</mml:mover>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
<label>(2)</label>
</disp-formula>
</p>
<p>The key to solving the cavitation problem is the determination of the interphase mass transfer rate, i.e., cavitation rate, which is driven by the difference between local pressure and vapor pressure (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Wang et al., 2013</xref>). Assuming that no interphase slip or heat transfer exists between the liquid and vapor, the radius of a spherical vapor bubble can be described by the Rayleigh&#x2013;Plesset equation in its first-order approximation form as follows:<disp-formula id="e3">
<mml:math id="m9">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>R</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>B</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:msqrt>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>p</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>v</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>p</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>&#x3c1;</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>l</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msqrt>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
<label>(3)</label>
</disp-formula>
</p>
<p>Then, the cavitation rate during vaporization can be given as<disp-formula id="e4">
<mml:math id="m10">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mover accent="true">
<mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x2d9;</mml:mo>
</mml:mover>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>f</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>v</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>&#x3c1;</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>v</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>R</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>B</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mfrac>
<mml:msqrt>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>p</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>v</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>p</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>&#x3c1;</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>l</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msqrt>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
<label>(4)</label>
</disp-formula>
</p>
<p>Because the nucleation site density decreases when the vapor volume fraction increases, the vapor volume fraction <inline-formula id="inf7">
<mml:math id="m11">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>f</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>v</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> is replaced by <inline-formula id="inf8">
<mml:math id="m12">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>f</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>u</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>c</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="|">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>f</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>v</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> to yield the following (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Jin et al., 2018</xref>):<disp-formula id="e5">
<mml:math id="m13">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mover accent="true">
<mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x2d9;</mml:mo>
</mml:mover>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
</mml:msup>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>F</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>v</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>p</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>f</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>u</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>c</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="|">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>f</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>v</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>&#x3c1;</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>v</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>R</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>B</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mfrac>
<mml:msqrt>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>p</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>v</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>p</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>&#x3c1;</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>l</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msqrt>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
<label>(5)</label>
</disp-formula>
</p>
<p>When the partial pressure exceeds the vapor condensation pressure, the mass transfer rate becomes<disp-formula id="e6">
<mml:math id="m14">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mover accent="true">
<mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x2d9;</mml:mo>
</mml:mover>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
</mml:msup>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>F</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>c</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>o</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>d</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>f</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>v</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>&#x3c1;</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>v</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>R</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>B</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mfrac>
<mml:msqrt>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>p</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>p</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>v</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>&#x3c1;</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>l</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msqrt>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
<label>(6)</label>
</disp-formula>
</p>
<p>Because the condensation process is generally much slower than vaporization, different empirical factors are assumed as follows: <inline-formula id="inf9">
<mml:math id="m15">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>F</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>v</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>p</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> &#x3d; 50, <inline-formula id="inf10">
<mml:math id="m16">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>F</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>c</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>o</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>d</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> &#x3d; 0.01, <inline-formula id="inf11">
<mml:math id="m17">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>f</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>u</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>c</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> &#x3d; 5e-4, and <inline-formula id="inf12">
<mml:math id="m18">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>R</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>B</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> &#x3d; 1e-6&#xa0;m.</p>
<p>A homogeneous multiphase condition is also assumed to simplify the model; thus, the liquid and vapor share the same velocity and turbulence profiles. The mixture of fluid and vapor is treated as a pseudofluid whose density <inline-formula id="inf13">
<mml:math id="m19">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>&#x3c1;</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> and dynamic viscosity <inline-formula id="inf14">
<mml:math id="m20">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>&#x3bc;</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> are defined as follows:<disp-formula id="e7">
<mml:math id="m21">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>&#x3c1;</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="|">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>f</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>v</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>&#x3c1;</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>l</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>f</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>v</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>&#x3c1;</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>v</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
<label>(7)</label>
</disp-formula>
<disp-formula id="e8">
<mml:math id="m22">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>&#x3bc;</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="|">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>f</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>v</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>&#x3bc;</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>l</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>f</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>v</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>&#x3bc;</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>v</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
<label>(8)</label>
</disp-formula>
</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-3">
<title>2.3 Simulation settings</title>
<p>First, the upwind steady-state model was used to determine the flow field characteristics of the fluid coupling without cavitation. The high-resolution convection scheme was then used to perform steady-state computations to provide accurate flow field conditions. Based on the results of the noncavitation model, a high-resolution scheme was used to simulate the steady-state cavitation behavior. Finally, with the steady-state cavitation output as the initial condition, a transient CFD cavitation model was established to simulate the dynamic cavitation process in the internal flow field.</p>
<p>For the interface between the flow field and impeller wall surface and blade wall surface, the nonslip wall surface treatment was adopted, while the wall surface roughness was neglected. In the steady-state computation stage, the stage interface model was used to exchange data between the pump&#x2013;turbine flow field interface. In the transient computation stage, the transient rotor&#x2013;stator interface model was used to capture more transient flow characteristics. The corresponding CFD multistep solution model settings are listed in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">Table 3</xref>.</p>
<table-wrap id="T3" position="float">
<label>TABLE 3</label>
<caption>
<p>CFD model settings.</p>
</caption>
<table>
<thead valign="top">
<tr>
<th align="center">Analysis step</th>
<th align="center">&#x2160;</th>
<th align="center">&#x2161;</th>
<th align="center">&#x2162;</th>
<th align="center">&#x2163;</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td align="center">Analysis type</td>
<td align="center">Steady state</td>
<td align="center">Steady state</td>
<td align="center">Steady state</td>
<td align="center">Transient</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">Interface model</td>
<td align="center">Stage</td>
<td align="center">Stage</td>
<td align="center">Stage</td>
<td align="center">Transient rotor&#x2013;stator</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">Cavitation model</td>
<td align="center">None</td>
<td align="center">None</td>
<td align="center">Rayleigh&#x2013;Plesset</td>
<td align="center">Rayleigh&#x2013;Plesset</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">Turbulence model</td>
<td align="center">SST</td>
<td align="center">SST</td>
<td align="center">SST</td>
<td align="center">SBES</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">Advection scheme</td>
<td align="center">Upwind</td>
<td align="center">High resolution</td>
<td align="center">High resolution</td>
<td align="center">High resolution</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">Time step</td>
<td align="center">1e-3s</td>
<td align="center">Auto timescale</td>
<td align="center">Auto timescale</td>
<td align="center">Auto timescale</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">Convergence target</td>
<td align="center">RMS 1e-4</td>
<td align="center">RMS 1e-5</td>
<td align="center">RMS 1e-5</td>
<td align="center">RMS 1e-5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">Fluid properties</td>
<td colspan="4" align="center">
<italic>&#x3c1;</italic>
<sub>water</sub> &#x3d; 970&#xa0;kgm<sup>&#x2212;3</sup>, <italic>&#x3bc;</italic>
<sub>water</sub> &#x3d; 8.9e-4&#xa0;Pas</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">Vapor properties</td>
<td colspan="4" align="center">
<italic>&#x3c1;</italic>
<sub>vapor</sub> &#x3d; 2.3e-2&#xa0;kgm<sup>&#x2212;3</sup>, <italic>&#x3bc;</italic>
<sub>vapor</sub> &#x3d; 9.8e-6&#xa0;Pas</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">Pump status</td>
<td colspan="4" align="center">Fixed at 1475&#xa0;rpm</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">Turbine status</td>
<td colspan="4" align="center">Varied from 0 to 1465.2&#xa0;rpm</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">Boundary details</td>
<td colspan="4" align="center">No slip and smooth wall</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">Heat transfer model</td>
<td colspan="4" align="center">50&#xa0;&#xb0;C isothermal</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">Saturation pressure</td>
<td colspan="4" align="center">12333.43&#xa0;Pa</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<p>To obtain accurate cavitation characteristics and corresponding flow field characteristics, the SST SBES DSL model in the scale-resolving simulation is used in transient computations. Compared with the DES, this model features a considerably improved shielding function to protect RANS boundary layers from the impact of the grid-dependent term; further, this model can automatically switch between existing RANS and LES models (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Liu et al., 2018b</xref>).</p>
<p>The shielding function developed can be used in the following manner for achieving a blending on the stress level between RANS and LES formulations (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Li, 2018</xref>):<disp-formula id="e9">
<mml:math id="m23">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mi>&#x3c4;</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>j</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>S</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>B</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>E</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>S</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msubsup>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>f</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>S</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>B</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>E</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>S</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mi>&#x3c4;</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>j</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>R</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>A</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>N</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>S</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msubsup>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="|">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>f</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>S</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>B</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>E</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>S</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mi>&#x3c4;</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>j</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>L</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>E</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>S</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msubsup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
<label>(9)</label>
</disp-formula>where <inline-formula id="inf15">
<mml:math id="m24">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mi>&#x3c4;</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>j</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>R</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>A</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>N</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>S</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msubsup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> is the RANS portion and <inline-formula id="inf16">
<mml:math id="m25">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mi>&#x3c4;</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>j</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>L</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>E</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>S</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msubsup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> is the LES portion of the modeled stress tensor. In cases where both models are based on eddy viscosity concepts, the formulation can be simplified as follows:<disp-formula id="e10">
<mml:math id="m26">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mi>v</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>S</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>B</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>E</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>S</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msubsup>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>f</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>S</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>B</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>E</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>S</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mi>v</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>R</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>A</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>N</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>S</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msubsup>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="|">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>f</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>S</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>B</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>E</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>S</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mi>v</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>L</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>E</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>S</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msubsup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
<label>(10)</label>
</disp-formula>
</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s3">
<title>3 Experimental research</title>
<p>A macro characteristic test was conducted, wherein a motor was used to provide power at the input end and load at the output end, to simulate the working conditions of the downhole fluid coupling. A pump station was used to control the inlet and outlet pressures of the valve control oil and working water, complete the startup of the coupling, and test the macroscopic characteristics of the hydrodynamic coupling at different speed ratios. The rotation speed and torque sensors were used to obtain the dynamic hydraulic performance of the coupling. According to the comprehensive analysis results of the torque transmission characteristic computation data and test data, the prediction accuracy of the torque characteristic was verified. The macro characteristic test plan and parameter settings of the hydrodynamic coupling are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5</xref>. Test device parameters mainly include that the power of power motor was set to 2500kW, rated input rotation speed of test bench and hydrodynamic coupling was set to 1475rpm, the water supply flow was greater than 240L/min, and rated power of hydrodynamic coupling was 1200&#xa0;kW.</p>
<fig id="F5" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 5</label>
<caption>
<p>Macro characteristics test plan.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fenrg-11-1235277-g005.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Data collection system: The test system data were collected by an efficiency meter industrial control computer. The main collection parameters were as follows: input torque, input speed, output torque, output speed, coupling liquid level pressure, coupling working chamber temperature, filling and discharging liquid valve action signal, and other data.</p>
<p>According to the test plan, a macro characteristic testbed was built. Carry out several repeated tests from starting and running to complete filling, draining, circulating and changing fluids. The working performance and reliability of the equipment were examined.</p>
<p>Test procedure: The drag motor was started at no load, drag motor was maintained at 1475&#xa0;rpm, and coupling was filled with liquid. The coupling was then loaded until it reached the rated power and remained at the rated working conditions. After 8&#xa0;h of operation, the coupling ran smoothly without abnormal noise. The input and output speed and torque data were collected and analyzed during the loading process.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="results|discussion" id="s4">
<title>4 Results and discussion</title>
<sec id="s4-1">
<title>4.1 Cavitation distribution characteristics of steady flow field</title>
<p>According to the numerical analysis results of steady-state cavitation two-phase flow under fully filled working conditions, following the multicycle cavitation and steam accumulation processes in the flow field of the hydrodynamic coupling, a stable inner ring steam accumulation area was formed. The field resulted in a more stable circulation characteristic. The distribution characteristics of cavitation were analyzed at different speed ratios, combined with the liquid velocity and blade pressure distribution trends obtained before and after the cavitation computation model was opened at different speed ratios, which was required to realize complete filling. This analysis was then used to analyze the influence of cavitation on the flow field distribution characteristics.</p>
<p>
<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure 6</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">Figure 7</xref> show the distribution characteristics of the flow field velocity streamlines when the cavitation computation model is turned off (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure 6A</xref>) and turned on (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure 6B</xref>), respectively. Comparative analysis shows that the water&#x2013;liquid circulationSR velocity gradually decreased as the speed ratio increased. Because the steam generated in the cavitation process accumulated in the inner ring of the impeller, the water&#x2013;liquid circulation state changed, and the circulation velocity was lower than that without the cavitation model. With an increase in the speed ratio, the volume of the vapor accumulation zone decreased because of the decrease in the degree of water cavitation, and its influence on the state of water circulation and flow velocity also decreased.</p>
<fig id="F6" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 6</label>
<caption>
<p>Velocity streamline distribution.A,B</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fenrg-11-1235277-g006.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig id="F7" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 7</label>
<caption>
<p>Change in mean flow velocity in the flow field.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fenrg-11-1235277-g007.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>A comparative analysis of the effects of steam accumulation on the blade pressure field distribution under different steady-state cavitation simulation conditions is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8">Figure 8</xref>. The overall pressure distribution trends at the blade wall before and after opening the cavitation computation model were the same. Owing to the change in the circulation characteristics, the overall pressure distribution of the blade after cavitation was reduced. Simultaneously, because of the existence of the vapor accumulation area, the corresponding area generates low-pressure areas A and B, and the pressure gradient of the blade was evident.</p>
<fig id="F8" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 8</label>
<caption>
<p>Comparison of blade pressure distribution.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fenrg-11-1235277-g008.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s4-2">
<title>4.2 Characteristics of transient cavitation</title>
<p>According to the distribution law of cavitation bubbles, the bubbles are mainly generated in the pump flow field. To analyze the distribution pattern and evolution law of the cavitation field in the pump flow field, a speed ratio of 0.6 was considered as an example to analyze the volume rate distribution of cavitation in different development stages.</p>
<p>Because the flow field in the fluid coupling is complex and three-dimensional, the cavitation bubble movement in the flow field is also complex and three-dimensional. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9">Figure 9</xref> shows the development of the cavitation bubble characterized by the 90% steam volume rate isosurface. The figure shows that the evolution of cavitation bubbles can be divided into four stages. In Stage 1, the banded bubble is born around the tip on the suction surface side of the pump blade; this bubble follows the steam in the cavitation bubble. Cloudy bubbles form in the accumulation of phases. In Stage 2, cavitation bubbles always adhere to the surface of the blades. As the bubbles leave the blades, some bubbles enter the flow channel and gradually form ellipsoidal bubbles. In Stage 4, when the volume of ellipsoidal bubbles increases and reaches a certain level, they break away from the surface of the blade. They then enter the flow channel and burst after covering a certain distance. Some steam condenses, and the remaining gas continues to move in the flow field, forming broken bubbles with irregular shapes and sizes and moving toward the inner ring of the pump wheel. Eventually, as cavitation continues to accumulate, a vapor concentration area is formed.</p>
<fig id="F9" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 9</label>
<caption>
<p>Evolution of cavitation bubbles.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fenrg-11-1235277-g009.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>To obtain the volume rate, pressure, and speed distribution data of the cavitation observed near the blade tip of the pump wheel, located near the inner ring, at a speed ratio of 0.6, a circular data analysis cross section with a diameter of da &#x3d; 180&#xa0;mm was established, as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F10">Figure 10</xref>.</p>
<fig id="F10" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 10</label>
<caption>
<p>Schematic of cross-sectional position.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fenrg-11-1235277-g010.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>
<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F11">Figure 11A</xref> shows the distribution of the steam volume fraction at the cross section. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F11">Figure 11B</xref> shows the distribution of water speed streamline. The evolution of cavitation from birth, growth, separation, and disintegration is evident. According to the transient changes in cross-sectional pressure and velocity, combined with the volume fraction distribution characteristics, part of the high-speed water from the turbine inner ring outlet enters the pump wheel and hits the blade tip; the flow rate then decreases rapidly and a local high pressure forms at the blade tip area. After passing through the tip area, the flow is affected by the local high pressure. Simultaneously, this flow is driven by other incoming flows to form a high-speed jet close to the blade surface as well as an angle with the surface. Therefore, on the pressure surface side of the impeller blades, a low-pressure region, wherein the pressure is below the vapor pressure, is formed near the tip of the blade; a severe cavitation phenomenon occurs in this region. As the cavitation bubble grows, the flow into the pump wheel is hindered by the bubble, and the jet angle increases. When the growth of cavitation is large, reverse flow can be found near the blade wall, and strong vortices are observed in the corresponding areas. This causes the internal pressure to decrease and promotes the formation of bubbles. As the cavitation bubble moves toward the inner circle of the circulation circle and breaks up, the jet angle decreases and promotes the birth of new cavitation bubbles.</p>
<fig id="F11" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 11</label>
<caption>
<p>Simulated cloud image.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fenrg-11-1235277-g011.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>The pressure distribution in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F11">Figure 11C</xref> shows that, owing to the increase in the jet angle and the appearance of strong vortices near the blade, the range of the low-pressure area near the tip area of the blade pressure surface becomes large, which promotes the growth of cavitation.</p>
<p>As the cavitation bubble grows further, under the influence of the bubble surface tension and the surrounding high-pressure water flow, the shape of the cavitation bubble gradually becomes irregular. As the bubble volume increases, the surface tension is insufficient to maintain the growth of the bubble, the bubble ruptures under the surrounding high pressure, and a small range of low-pressure fragmented bubble areas and new cavitation bubble birth areas form in the flow channel.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4-3">
<title>4.3 Torque characteristics</title>
<p>
<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F12">Figure 12</xref> shows a characteristic diagram of torque transmission in a fluid coupling considering cavitation and noncavitation. Without cavitation computation, the overall output torque tends to decrease. As the speed ratio increases, the rate of decline continues to increase. The overall trend remains unchanged when the cavitation model is considered. Further, the transmission torque under cavitation is lower than that under noncavitation.</p>
<fig id="F12" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 12</label>
<caption>
<p>Transmission torque of flow field in impeller.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fenrg-11-1235277-g012.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>At low speed ratios, owing to the large rotational speed difference between the pump and turbine, the water&#x2013;liquid circulation speed was rapid, and the cavitation phenomenon was severe. At this time, the torque transmission characteristic also severely deteriorated, and the output torque dropped significantly. As the speed ratio increased, the degree of cavitation in the flow field continued to decrease. At a speed ratio of approximately 0.9, cavitation had little effect on the flow state. Therefore, the occurrence of the cavitation phenomenon considerably affected the overload starting and working ability of the coupling. This phenomenon had relatively little influence on the torque transmission ability under rated working conditions.</p>
<p>To analyze the degree of influence of cavitation on the torque transmission characteristics accurately, <inline-formula id="inf17">
<mml:math id="m27">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>P</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>T</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> was defined as the torque forecast correction ratio, <inline-formula id="inf18">
<mml:math id="m28">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>T</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>N</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>C</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> as the torque computational result without considering the cavitation, <inline-formula id="inf19">
<mml:math id="m29">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>T</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>C</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> as the torque computational result considering the cavitation, and <inline-formula id="inf20">
<mml:math id="m30">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">&#x3a6;</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>T</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> as the characteristic difference.</p>
<p>The characteristic difference is<disp-formula id="e11">
<mml:math id="m31">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">&#x3a6;</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>T</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>T</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>N</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>C</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>T</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>C</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
<label>(11)</label>
</disp-formula>
</p>
<p>The torque characteristic prediction correction is<disp-formula id="e12">
<mml:math id="m32">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>P</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>T</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">&#x3a6;</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>T</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>/</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>T</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>C</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
<label>(12)</label>
</disp-formula>
</p>
<p>A comparative analysis of the correction of the torque transfer value of the flow field at different speed ratios is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F13">Figure 13</xref>. The <inline-formula id="inf21">
<mml:math id="m33">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>P</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>T</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> is affected by the amount of cavitation vapor accumulation and the degree of cavitation occurrence, and the overall trend is a downward trend as SR increases. At <inline-formula id="inf22">
<mml:math id="m34">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> &#x3d; 0, <inline-formula id="inf23">
<mml:math id="m35">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>P</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>T</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> and <inline-formula id="inf24">
<mml:math id="m36">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">&#x3a6;</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>T</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> reach the maximum. At this time, the characteristic difference is 1468.35&#xa0;N&#xb7;m, and the correction ratio is 12.85%. At a speed ratio of 0.99, because the degree of cavitation is the lowest at this time, the correction factor is 0.32%.</p>
<fig id="F13" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 13</label>
<caption>
<p>Torque correction distribution of cavitation model.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fenrg-11-1235277-g013.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="conclusion" id="s5">
<title>5 Conclusion</title>
<p>In this study, CFD technology and experiments were used to investigate the unsteady flow field affected by the cavitation characteristics of fluid coupling. Based on the numerical simulation data, the cavitation distribution, evolution characteristics, and their effects on the torque transmission characteristics were analyzed. The study clarified the following:<list list-type="simple">
<list-item>
<p>1) The flow field results demonstrate that the severity of cavitation in the internal flow field of the coupling decreases with increasing SR, and the generated steam mainly accumulates at the inner ring of the pump wheel. The formation of a stable steam accumulation area reduces the circulation velocity and flow state of the flow field. Compared with the pressure distribution gradient obtained in the region not affected by cavitation, that on the blade surface affected by cavitation is larger, forming a low-pressure region near the inner ring.</p>
</list-item>
<list-item>
<p>2) Transient cavitation simulation demonstrates that cavitation bubbles are generated near the tip of the blade pressure surface of the internal flow field. Affected by the flow characteristics of water, the evolution process has four stages: birth, growth, separation, and disintegration. This is a periodic cyclic process. The generated steam is finally concentrated inside the circulation circle of the pump wheel. The flow velocity and pressure at the blade surface are both reduced.</p>
</list-item>
<list-item>
<p>3) An analysis of the torque transmission characteristics revealed that the torque drop is considerably affected by severe cavitation at a low speed ratio. The computation results demonstrate that the introduction of the cavitation calculation model can improve the accuracy of torque prediction by approximately 13% under a low speed ratio. The effect of cavitation is smaller at high speeds.</p>
</list-item>
</list>
</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec sec-type="data-availability" id="s6">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The raw data supporting the conclusion of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s7">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>The author contributions are as follows: HC was in charge of the whole trial; JZ wrote the manuscript; LL and GW assisted with sampling and laboratory analyses. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s8">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>Supported by the Fund for Shanxi &#x201c;1331 Project&#x201d;. Supported by Key Project of Key Research Programs of Shanxi Province (Grant No. 03012015002).</p>
</sec>
<ack>
<p>The authors would like to acknowledge their appreciation for the continuous assistance with the experiment from Prof. Teng Wang at China Coal Science and Technology Group.</p>
</ack>
<sec sec-type="COI-statement" id="s9">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="correction-note" id="s34">
<title>Correction note</title>
<p>This article has been corrected with minor changes. These changes do not impact the scientific content of the article.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="disclaimer" id="s10">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Anderson</surname>
<given-names>C. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zeng</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sweger</surname>
<given-names>P. O.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Narain</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Blough</surname>
<given-names>J. R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Experimental investigation of cavitation signatures in an automotive torque converter using a microwave telemetry technique</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Rotating Mach.</source> <volume>9</volume>, <fpage>403</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>410</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1155/s1023621x03000381</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bai</surname>
<given-names>X. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cheng</surname>
<given-names>H. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ji</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Long</surname>
<given-names>X. p.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Large eddy simulation of tip leakage cavitating flow focusing on cavitation-vortex interaction with Cartesian cut-cell mesh method</article-title>. <source>J. Hydrodynamics</source> <volume>30</volume> (<issue>4</issue>), <fpage>750</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>753</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s42241-018-0068-8</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chai</surname>
<given-names>B. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>G. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yan</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>, (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Numerical simulation of cavitation in torque converter and analysis of its influence on performance</article-title>. <source>J. Jilin Univ. Eng. Technol. Ed.</source>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>9</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Cheng</surname>
<given-names>H. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bai</surname>
<given-names>X. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Long</surname>
<given-names>X. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ji</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Peng</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Farhat</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Large Eddy Simulation of the Tip-leakage Cavitating flow with an insight on how cavitation influences vorticity and turbulence</article-title>. <source>Appl. Math. Model.</source> <volume>77</volume>, <fpage>788</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>809</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.apm.2019.08.005</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Da Silva</surname>
<given-names>M. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lu</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>S&#xfc;hnel</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schleicher</surname>
<given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Thiele</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kernchen</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Autonomous planar conductivity array sensor for fast liquid distribution imaging in a fluid coupling</article-title>. <source>Sensors Actuators A Phys.</source> <volume>147</volume> (<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>508</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>515</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.sna.2008.06.019</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Dong</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xiao</surname>
<given-names>J. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ming</surname>
<given-names>J. Y.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>, (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Numerical simulation and experimental study on cavitation behavior of hydraulic retarder model</article-title>. <source>J. Drainage Irrigation Mach. Eng.</source> <volume>35</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>5</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3969/j.issn.1674-8530.15.0287</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Guo</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yan</surname>
<given-names>Q. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ke</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wei</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Evaluation and validation of viscous oil cavitation model used in torque converter</article-title>. <source>Appl. Sci.</source> <volume>11</volume> (<issue>8</issue>), <fpage>3643</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/app11083643</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Guo</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yan</surname>
<given-names>Q. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wei</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Khoo</surname>
<given-names>B. C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022b</year>). <article-title>The effect of rotating speeds on the cavitation characteristics in hydraulic torque converter</article-title>. <source>Machines</source> <volume>10</volume> (<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>80</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/machines10020080</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Guo</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yan</surname>
<given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wei</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Khoo</surname>
<given-names>B. C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022a</year>). <article-title>The effect of rotating speeds on the cavitation characteristics in hydraulic torque converter</article-title>. <source>Machines</source> <volume>10</volume> (<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>80</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/machines10020080</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hur</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kwak</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Moshfeghi</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chang</surname>
<given-names>C. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kang</surname>
<given-names>N. W.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Numerical flow analyses of a two-phase hydraulic coupling</article-title>. <source>J. Mech. Sci. Technol.</source> <volume>31</volume> (<issue>5</issue>), <fpage>2307</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2317</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s12206-017-0427-3</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hur</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Moshfeghi</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lee</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Flow and performance analyses of a partially-charged water retarder</article-title>. <source>Comput. Fluids</source> <volume>164</volume>, <fpage>18</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>26</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.compfluid.2016.10.033</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Jin</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xu</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tang</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhou</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhou</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ren</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Coefficient adaptation method for the Zwart model</article-title>. <source>J. Appl. Fluid Mech.(JAFM)</source> <volume>11</volume>, <fpage>1665</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1678</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.29252/jafm.11.06.28784</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kang</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mao</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>G. F.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Highly confined floes and cavitation phenomenon in a hydraulic retarder</article-title>. <source>J. Eng. Thermophys.</source> <volume>38</volume> (<issue>10</issue>), <fpage>2151</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2158</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname>
<given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Miao</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yak</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Scale-resolving simulations and investigations of the flow in a hydraulic retarder considering cavitation</article-title>. <source>J. Zhejiang University-Science A</source> <volume>21</volume> (<issue>10</issue>), <fpage>817</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>833</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1631/jzus.a1900466</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <source>Scale-resolving simulation and experimental verification of different working media flow based on stator/rotor</source>. <publisher-loc>Changchun, China</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Jilin University</publisher-name>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>C. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bu</surname>
<given-names>W. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xu</surname>
<given-names>Z. x.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xu</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ma</surname>
<given-names>W. x.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018b</year>). <article-title>Application of scale-resolving simulation to a hydraulic coupling, a hydraulic retarder, and a hydraulic torque converter</article-title>. <source>J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci.</source> <volume>19</volume> (<issue>12</issue>), <fpage>904</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>925</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1631/jzus.a1700508</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<citation citation-type="confproc">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Guo</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yan</surname>
<given-names>Q. D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>, &#x201c;<article-title>Numerical investigation on the transient cavitating flow inside a torque converter</article-title>,&#x201d; in <conf-name>Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE 8th International Conference on Fluid Power and Mechatronics (FPM)</conf-name>, <conf-loc>Wuhan, China</conf-loc>, <conf-date>April 2019</conf-date>, <fpage>208</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>216</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1109/FPM45753.2019.9035838</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Guo</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yan</surname>
<given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wei</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Influence of charging oil condition on torque converter cavitation characteristics</article-title>. <source>Chin. J. Mech. Eng.</source> <volume>35</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>49</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s10033-022-00727-y</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wei</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yan</surname>
<given-names>Q. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Weaver</surname>
<given-names>B. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wood</surname>
<given-names>H. G.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018a</year>). <article-title>Influence of stator blade geometry on torque converter cavitation</article-title>. <source>ASME J. Fluids Eng.</source> <volume>4</volume> (<issue>4</issue>), <fpage>0411021</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>04110210</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1115/1.4038115</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Pan</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xinyuan</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hongjun</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jiping</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lin</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Huichao</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Effect of the blade shaped by Joukowsky airfoil transformation on the characteristics of the torque converter</article-title>. <source>Proc. Institution Mech. Eng. Part D J. Automob. Eng.</source> <volume>235</volume> (<issue>14</issue>), <fpage>3314</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3321</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1177/09544070211014291</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ran</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ma</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Design approach and mechanism analysis for cavitation-tolerant torque converter blades</article-title>. <source>Appl. Sci.</source> <volume>12</volume> (<issue>7</issue>), <fpage>3405</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/app12073405</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Robinette</surname>
<given-names>D. L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <source>Detecting and predicting the onset of cavitation in automotive torque converters</source>. <publisher-loc>Michigan, United States</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Michigan Technological University</publisher-name>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Robinette</surname>
<given-names>D. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schweitzer</surname>
<given-names>J. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Maddock</surname>
<given-names>D. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Anderson</surname>
<given-names>C. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Blough</surname>
<given-names>J. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Johnson</surname>
<given-names>M. A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2008a</year>). <article-title>Predicting the onset of cavitation in automotive torque converters&#x2014;Part I: Designs with geometric similitude</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Rotating Mach.</source> <volume>2008</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>8</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1155/2008/803940</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Robinette</surname>
<given-names>D. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schweitzer</surname>
<given-names>J. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Maddock</surname>
<given-names>D. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Anderson</surname>
<given-names>C. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Blough</surname>
<given-names>J. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Johnson</surname>
<given-names>M. A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2008b</year>). <article-title>Predicting the onset of cavitation in automotive torque converters&#x2014;Part II: A generalized model</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Rotating Mach.</source> <volume>2008</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>8</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1155/2008/312753</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sun</surname>
<given-names>T. Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wei</surname>
<given-names>Y. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zou</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jiang</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xu</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zong</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Numerical investigation on the unsteady cavitation shedding dynamics over a hydrofoil in thermo-sensitive fluid</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Multiph. Flow</source> <volume>111</volume>, <fpage>82</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>100</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2018.11.014</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Timoshevski</surname>
<given-names>M. V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zapryagaev</surname>
<given-names>L. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Peryunin</surname>
<given-names>K. S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>, (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Cavitation control on a 2D hydrofoil through a continuous tangential injection of liquid: Experimental study</article-title>. <source>AIP Conf. Proc.</source> <volume>1770</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>030026</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1063/1.4963968</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Guo</surname>
<given-names>H. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>L. X.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>, (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Influence of leading-edge suction on hydrodynamic and cavitation performance of hydrofoil</article-title>. <source>J. Ship Mech.</source> <volume>17</volume> (<issue>12</issue>), <fpage>1361</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1370</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3969/j.issn.1007-7294.2013.12.001</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Watanabe</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yoshida</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yamada</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>, (<year>1996</year>). <article-title>Flow visualization and measurement in the stator of a torque converter</article-title>. <source>JSAE Rev.</source> <volume>17</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>25</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>30</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0389-4304(95)00058-5</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Watanabe</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yoshida</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yamada</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>, (<year>1997</year>).<source>Flow visualization and measurement of torque converter stator blades using a laser sheet lighting method and a laser Doppler velocimeter</source> <publisher-loc>Warrendale, Pennsylvania, United States</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>SAE Transaction</publisher-name>, <fpage>1196</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1206</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Watanabe</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sasaki</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Miyamoto</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>, (<year>2007</year>). <source>Toyota&#x27;s new six-speed automatic transmission AB60E for RWD vehicles</source>. <publisher-loc>Warrendale, Pennsylvania, United States</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>SAE Technical Paper</publisher-name>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Xiong</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname>
<given-names>X. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sun</surname>
<given-names>H. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jiping</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lin</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Huichao</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Effect of the blade shaped by Joukowsky airfoil transformation on the characteristics of the torque converter</article-title>. <source>Proc. Institution Mech. Eng. Part D J. Automob. Eng.</source> <volume>235</volume> (<issue>14</issue>), <fpage>3314</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3321</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1177/09544070211014291</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Yu</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vamshi</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pradeep</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>, (<year>2002</year>). <source>Torque converter CFD engineering part 2: Performance improvement through core leakage flow and cavitation control</source>. <publisher-loc>Warrendale, Pennsylvania, United States</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>SAE Transaction</publisher-name>, <fpage>1272</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1285</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>J. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cui</surname>
<given-names>H. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>,(<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Two-phase circulation characteristics prediction of variable speed hydrodynamic coupling</article-title>. <source>Chin. Hydraulics Pneumatics</source> (<issue>4</issue>), <fpage>73</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>81</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname>
<given-names>L. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dong</surname>
<given-names>Z. Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lian</surname>
<given-names>J. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname>
<given-names>F. Q.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Analysis of bubble breakup motion for hydrodynamic torque-converter</article-title>. <source>Hydraul. Pneum. Seals</source> <volume>36</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>4</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3969/j.issn.1008-0813.2016.09.001</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B36">
<citation citation-type="confproc">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhou</surname>
<given-names>H. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xiang</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname>
<given-names>Z. P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>, &#x201c;<article-title>Analysis and optimization of the effect of cavitation model parameters on calculation of cavitation flow field</article-title>,&#x201d; in <conf-name>Proceedings of the 14th National Congress on Hydrodynamics and the 28th National Hydrodynamics Symposium</conf-name>, <conf-loc>Pasadena, California, USA</conf-loc>, <conf-date>September, 2017</conf-date>, <fpage>335</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>337</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
<sec id="s12">
<title>Nomenclature</title>
<table-wrap id="udT1" position="float">
<table>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td align="left">
<inline-formula id="inf25">
<mml:math id="m37">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">B</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">N</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">P</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>
</td>
<td align="left">Number of pump blades</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<inline-formula id="inf26">
<mml:math id="m38">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">B</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">N</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">T</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>
</td>
<td align="left">Number of turbine blades</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<bold>D</bold>
</td>
<td align="left">Circular circle outer diameter [mm]</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<bold>d</bold>
</td>
<td align="left">Circular circle inner diameter [mm]</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<bold>da</bold>
</td>
<td align="left">A circular data analysis cross section diameter [mm]</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<inline-formula id="inf27">
<mml:math id="m39">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">d</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">B</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>
</td>
<td align="left">Baffle diameter [mm]</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<inline-formula id="inf28">
<mml:math id="m40">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">F</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">v</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">p</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>
</td>
<td align="left">Cavitation vaporization coefficient</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<inline-formula id="inf29">
<mml:math id="m41">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">F</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">c</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">o</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">n</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">d</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>
</td>
<td align="left">Cavitation condensation coefficient</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<bold>f(n)</bold>
</td>
<td align="left">Torque change rate</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<inline-formula id="inf30">
<mml:math id="m42">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">f</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">l</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>
</td>
<td align="left">Liquid volume fraction</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<inline-formula id="inf31">
<mml:math id="m43">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">f</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">v</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>
</td>
<td align="left">Vapor volume fraction</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<inline-formula id="inf32">
<mml:math id="m44">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">f</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">n</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">u</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">c</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>
</td>
<td align="left">The nucleation site volume fraction</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<inline-formula id="inf33">
<mml:math id="m45">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">f</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">S</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">B</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">E</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">S</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>
</td>
<td align="left">The fraction of RANS in the SBES model</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<bold>h</bold>
</td>
<td align="left">Minimum blade thickness</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<inline-formula id="inf34">
<mml:math id="m46">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">h</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">B</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>
</td>
<td align="left">Baffle thickness [mm]</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<bold>i</bold>
</td>
<td align="left">
<inline-formula id="inf35">
<mml:math id="m47">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>T</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>/</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>P</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>, The speed ratio</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<inline-formula id="inf36">
<mml:math id="m48">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mover accent="true">
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold">m</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x2d9;</mml:mo>
</mml:mover>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>
</td>
<td align="left">The interphase mass transfer rate</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<inline-formula id="inf37">
<mml:math id="m49">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mover accent="true">
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">m</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x2d9;</mml:mo>
</mml:mover>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>
</td>
<td align="left">Mass condensation rate</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<inline-formula id="inf38">
<mml:math id="m50">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mover accent="true">
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">m</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x2d9;</mml:mo>
</mml:mover>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>
</td>
<td align="left">Mass vaporization rate</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<inline-formula id="inf39">
<mml:math id="m51">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">n</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">T</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>
</td>
<td align="left">The turbine rotation speed [r/min]</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<inline-formula id="inf40">
<mml:math id="m52">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">n</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">P</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>
</td>
<td align="left">The pump rotation speed [r/min]</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<inline-formula id="inf41">
<mml:math id="m53">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">P</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">v</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>
</td>
<td align="left">Pressure in the bubble [Pa]</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<inline-formula id="inf42">
<mml:math id="m54">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">P</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">T</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>
</td>
<td align="left">The torque forecast correction ratio</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<bold>P</bold>
</td>
<td align="left">Liquid pressure [Pa]</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<inline-formula id="inf43">
<mml:math id="m55">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">R</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">B</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>
</td>
<td align="left">Mean radius the cavitation [m]</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<bold>T(n)</bold>
</td>
<td align="left">The computation result under the current density mesh [N&#xb7;m]</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<bold>T (n-1)</bold>
</td>
<td align="left">The computation result under the previous mesh with lower density [N&#xb7;m]</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<inline-formula id="inf44">
<mml:math id="m56">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">T</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">C</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>
</td>
<td align="left">The torque computational result considering the cavitation [N&#xb7;m]</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<inline-formula id="inf45">
<mml:math id="m57">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">T</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">N</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">C</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>
</td>
<td align="left">The torque computational result without considering the cavitation [N&#xb7;m]</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<inline-formula id="inf46">
<mml:math id="m58">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">v</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">j</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>
</td>
<td align="left">Liquid phase velocity [m/s]</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<inline-formula id="inf47">
<mml:math id="m59">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">v</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">t</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">S</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">B</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">E</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">S</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msubsup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>
</td>
<td align="left">Model viscosity [m2/s]</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<inline-formula id="inf48">
<mml:math id="m60">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">v</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">t</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">R</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">A</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">N</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">S</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msubsup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>
</td>
<td align="left">
<inline-formula id="inf49">
<mml:math id="m61">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mi>v</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>R</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>A</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>N</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>S</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msubsup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>:RANS portion of the mdeled viscosity [m2/s]</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<inline-formula id="inf50">
<mml:math id="m62">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">v</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">t</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">L</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">E</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">S</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msubsup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>
</td>
<td align="left">
<inline-formula id="inf51">
<mml:math id="m63">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mi>v</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>L</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>E</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>S</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msubsup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>:LES portion of the mdeled viscosity [m2/s]</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<inline-formula id="inf52">
<mml:math id="m64">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">&#x3c1;</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">l</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>
</td>
<td align="left">
<inline-formula id="inf53">
<mml:math id="m65">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>&#x3c1;</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>l</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>:Liquid density [kg/m3]</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<inline-formula id="inf54">
<mml:math id="m66">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">&#x3c1;</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">v</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>
</td>
<td align="left">
<inline-formula id="inf55">
<mml:math id="m67">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>&#x3c1;</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>v</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>:Vapor density [kg/m3]</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<inline-formula id="inf56">
<mml:math id="m68">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">&#x3c1;</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">m</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>
</td>
<td align="left">
<inline-formula id="inf57">
<mml:math id="m69">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>&#x3c1;</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>:Mixed fluid density [kg/m3]</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<inline-formula id="inf58">
<mml:math id="m70">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">&#x3bc;</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">m</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>
</td>
<td align="left">
<inline-formula id="inf59">
<mml:math id="m71">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>&#x3bc;</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>:Mixed fluid dynamic viscosity [Pa&#xb7;s]</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<inline-formula id="inf60">
<mml:math id="m72">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">&#x3bc;</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">l</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>
</td>
<td align="left">
<inline-formula id="inf61">
<mml:math id="m73">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>&#x3bc;</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>l</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>:Liquid dynamic viscosity [Pa&#xb7;s]</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<inline-formula id="inf62">
<mml:math id="m74">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">&#x3bc;</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">v</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>
</td>
<td align="left">
<inline-formula id="inf63">
<mml:math id="m75">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>&#x3bc;</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>v</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>:Vapor dynamic viscosity [Pa&#xb7;s]</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<inline-formula id="inf64">
<mml:math id="m76">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">&#x3c4;</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">i</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">j</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">S</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">B</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">E</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">S</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msubsup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>
</td>
<td align="left">
<inline-formula id="inf65">
<mml:math id="m77">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mi>&#x3c4;</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>j</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>S</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>B</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>E</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>S</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msubsup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>:Model stress [Pa]</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<inline-formula id="inf66">
<mml:math id="m78">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">&#x3c4;</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">i</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">j</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">R</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">A</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">N</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">S</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msubsup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>
</td>
<td align="left">
<inline-formula id="inf67">
<mml:math id="m79">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mi>&#x3c4;</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>j</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>R</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>A</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>N</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>S</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msubsup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>:RANS portion of the modeled stress tensor [Pa]</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<inline-formula id="inf68">
<mml:math id="m80">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">&#x3c4;</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">i</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">j</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">L</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">E</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">S</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msubsup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>
</td>
<td align="left">
<inline-formula id="inf69">
<mml:math id="m81">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mi>&#x3c4;</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>j</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>L</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>E</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>S</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msubsup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>:LES portion of the modeled stress tensor [Pa]</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<inline-formula id="inf70">
<mml:math id="m82">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold">&#x3a6;</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">T</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>
</td>
<td align="left">
<inline-formula id="inf71">
<mml:math id="m83">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">&#x3a6;</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>T</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>:The characteristic difference of the torque [N&#xb7;m]</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
</back>
</article>