According to Bradford’s Law, core scholarly contributions in a given discipline are typically concentrated in a limited number of high-impact journals, which collectively provide a comprehensive overview of the field (Bradford, 1934). The Web of Science (WOS), one of the most widely utilized citation index databases globally, offers access to a broad range of disciplines. Its core indices include the Science Citation Index (SCI), Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI), Arts and Humanities Citation Index (AHCI), and Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI), covering high-quality, peer-reviewed publications across the natural sciences, engineering, social sciences, arts, and humanities.

In this study, the core collection of the WOS was selected as the data source. Literature on the theme of teachers’ information literacy was retrieved for scientometric analysis. The subject search terms were carefully constructed to include relevant fields in the title, abstract, keywords, and Keywords Plus. The main search terms used were “digital literacy” and “teacher,” supplemented by extended keywords such as “information and communication technologies digital,” “information literacy digital,” “instructional technology strategies,” and “new literacies digital,” to broaden the scope. The search was limited to the document type “article,” with the publication date range set from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2024. The retrieval was conducted on March 12, 2025.

Inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) The research population consisted of teachers, including preschool, primary, secondary, university, vocational, medical, librarian, preservice, and future teachers. (2) The topic was focused on digital literacy and information literacy. (3) The literature was published in English. Exclusion criteria involved the following conditions: (1) Publications that had been withdrawn. (2) Studies that focused on students, citizens, youth, or other non-teacher populations. (3) Literature not directly related to digital literacy, such as those primarily focused on health literacy, civic literacy, assessment literacy, research literacy, scientific literacy, or feedback literacy. (4) Publications not written in English. Based on this search strategy, a total of 994 articles were retrieved. Initially, withdrawn publications were removed. The remaining records were then screened according to the predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Titles and abstracts were examined first, followed by full-text reviews where necessary to assess relevance to the research objectives. Ultimately, 169 articles met the criteria and were included in the study. The selection was performed by the first author and subsequently reviewed and validated by the second author.

The analysis was conducted using CiteSpace, a visualization software developed by Dr. Chaomei Chen at Drexel University in collaboration with the WISE Laboratory of Dalian University of Technology. Operated on a Java platform, CiteSpace is widely applied to identify developmental trends, collaboration networks, and research frontiers within a specific academic field. Through co-citation analysis, the software reveals the underlying knowledge base and thematic evolution of scholarly research (Chen, 2004; Chen, 2006). The 6.3.R3 Advanced version of CiteSpace was used in this study.

The selected literature was exported from WOS in plain text format, including full records and cited references. The analysis time span was set from 2015 to 2024. The g-index was used as the selection criterion during time slicing, with K = 25. Atlas clipping was not applied. Key parameters for analysis included authors, institutions, countries, keywords, and references, all of which were subjected to co-occurrence analysis. After configuring thresholds, fonts, and node parameters, a series of visual maps was generated to illustrate the development trends, core contributors, thematic shifts, knowledge structure, and intellectual landscape of research on teachers’ digital literacy over the past decade.

The annual distribution of publications serves as a key indicator for evaluating and forecasting research trends in a given field. After completing the retrieval and screening processes, a total of 169 research articles on teachers’ digital literacy published between 2015 and 2024 were identified in the WOS Core Collection.

As illustrated in Figure 1, the number of publications has shown an upward trend over the past decade. Notably, 2020 represents a significant turning point in the field’s development trajectory. The period from 2015 to 2019 reflects the early exploratory phase, characterized by a relatively limited number of publications. In contrast, the period from 2020 to 2024 witnessed a surge in publication output, indicating that the research has entered a phase of rapid development and intensified scholarly interest.

A dual-map overlay, generated using CiteSpace, visualizes the relationship between citing and cited journals by superimposing two maps. This technique enables researchers to explore the interdisciplinary knowledge flow and interaction patterns among different domains (Chen and Leydesdorff, 2013).

As shown in Figure 2, the map on the left represents the citing journals, while the map on the right depicts the cited journals. The arcs connecting the two sides illustrate citation paths. The overlay reveals that the primary knowledge sources in teachers’ digital literacy research are concentrated in the fields of computer science, educational technology, and psychology. These disciplinary intersections highlight the interdisciplinary nature of the research and suggest that educational technology is deeply informed by both computational and behavioral sciences.

Based on node analysis for “Country,” 13 countries each published more than five papers on the topic. The top contributors are: China (28), Spain (25), USA (18), Turkey (13), Germany (10), Australia (9), Norway (8), England (7), South Korea (7), Sweden (7), Israel (6), and Finland (5).

When using “Institution” as a node, Table 1 lists the top nine institutions with the highest number of publications. The institution co-occurrence network, depicted in Figure 3, visualizes the relationships between these entities. Node size represents the volume of publications, while link strength indicates institutional collaboration. The results reveal that institutional collaboration remains relatively weak, suggesting a need for stronger academic partnerships to enhance knowledge integration and methodological diversity in this field.

Taking “Author” as a node, a total of 484 unique authors contributed to the included publications. Among them, 460 authors (95%) published only one paper, reflecting a dispersed author network with limited core group formation. Only three authors—Martinez-Abad Fernando, Yang Jun-feng, and Lin Ru-yi—authored three papers each. The author co-occurrence map (Figure 4) illustrates the authorship network, with node size indicating publication count and links reflecting the degree of collaboration. The current structure suggests that a core author cluster has not yet emerged, pointing to a fragmented research landscape and opportunities for more sustained collaborative efforts.

The citation frequency of an article serves as a key indicator of its academic impact, as highly cited works often form the knowledge foundation of a specific research domain. Reviewing such literature provides valuable insights into the development trajectory and thematic focus of research on teachers’ digital literacy (Aksnes et al., 2019). Table 2 presents citation information for the 12 most frequently cited papers. Falloon (2020) constructed a framework for teachers’ digital competence, offering an extended interdisciplinary perspective and discussing its implications. Siddiq et al. (2016) validated the TEDDICS instrument to measure the emphasis teachers place on developing students’ digital information and communication skills, using data from Norwegian participants in the ICILS study. Hatlevik (2017) conducted an empirical study involving 332 teachers to examine the relationship between online collaboration self-efficacy, digital competence, information assessment strategies, and school-level ICT use, finding significant factor loadings and positive correlations. Sanchez-Cruzado et al. (2021) surveyed 4,883 individuals in Spain across educational levels to assess digital skill levels after the COVID-19 pandemic and proposed a digital skills training program for teachers. Claro et al. (2018) developed a test instrument to evaluate digital teaching capabilities and applied it to 828 in-service teachers in Chile, revealing generally poor performance and conducting an explanatory variable analysis. Instefjord and Munthe (2015) proposed the “Digital Competence for Teachers” framework, which includes technical proficiency, teaching relevance, and social awareness, and used it to evaluate Norwegian teacher education curriculum, offering suggestions for improvement. Reisoglu and Cebi (2020) designed and implemented a 70-h digital competence training program for 24 pre-service teachers to assess its effectiveness. Maderick et al. (2015) surveyed pre-service teachers at a public university in the United States to compare self-assessed versus objectively measured digital competence, revealing that subjective self-assessment lacked validity and did not independently predict actual skill levels. Engen (2020) explored the meaning of being a “professional, digitally competent teacher” within real school contexts. Ming and Zhonggen (2022), in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, addressed the importance of digital literacy in higher education and argued that sufficient digital competence is essential for fulfilling the evolving professional roles of teachers; their findings showed significant correlations between digital literacy, professional satisfaction, and role perception. List (2019) used qualitative methods to examine pre-service teachers’ views on digital literacy development, uncovering perspectives centered on self-development, technology orientation, and project-based learning. Rubach and Lazarides (2020) created and validated an assessment tool measuring basic ICT competency beliefs among 329 German teachers, identifying six core dimensions: information and data literacy, communication and collaboration, digital content creation, safety and security, problem solving, and analysis and reflection.

The publication and citation patterns of scientific and technological literature reflect the evolution of research and the formation of a field’s knowledge base. By analyzing co-citation relationships, it is possible to uncover the disciplinary structure and core intellectual foundations of a research area. In this study, CiteSpace software was used to generate a journal co-citation network that illustrates the key journals cited within the field of teachers’ digital literacy. In Figure 10, the size of each node represents the number of citations, while the thickness of the connecting lines indicates the strength of co-citation relationships. The cited literature spans 815 journals, indicating a high degree of disciplinary diversity. The most frequently cited journal is Computer Education, cited 133 times, followed by Educational Information Technology (83), British Journal of Educational Technology (72), Computers in Human Behavior (69), Teaching and Teacher Education (69), Educational Technology Research and Development (62), Journal of Computer-Assisted Learning (56), Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy (49), Teaching College Record (46), and European Journal of Teaching and Education (44). This distribution demonstrates that research on teachers’ digital literacy is inherently multidisciplinary, drawing theoretical foundations from computer science, educational technology, pedagogy, and psychology. These domains collectively shape the conceptual and methodological approaches in the field.

Table 3 presents the 10 most frequently cited individual works, encompassing various aspects of the field: the construction of conceptual frameworks for teachers’ digital literacy (Falloon, 2020; Carretero et al., 2017), the development of competency models (Starkey, 2020), strategies for teacher training and professional development (Instefjord and Munthe, 2017; Reisoglu and Cebi, 2020), empirical investigations into teacher behaviors and performance (Gudmundsdottir and Hatlevik, 2018; Sanchez-Cruzado et al., 2021; Pozo Sánchez et al., 2020), and research methodologies applied in digital literacy studies (Braun and Clarke, 2021; Ronny et al., 2019).

Using “Reference” as the node in CiteSpace, a co-citation network cluster was generated, resulting in 10 distinct thematic clusters. In Figure 11, the clustered layout visualizes the representative scholarly contributions associated with each theme.

An analysis of publication volume over time reveals that research on teachers’ digital literacy has grown rapidly in the past 10 years, with a particularly sharp increase in recent years. By 2024, the annual number of publications reached 53, accounting for nearly one-third of the total articles analyzed. The period from 2015 to 2019 represents an early exploratory stage characterized by limited output, while the period from 2020 to 2024 marks a phase of accelerated growth and intensified scholarly focus. The year 2020 emerges as a critical turning point due to the global outbreak of COVID-19, which catalyzed the widespread adoption of remote learning as a means to sustain educational continuity. Governments and institutions deployed online platforms, livestreaming, and digital tools to deliver instruction, accelerating the digitalization and networking of educational resources. These changes significantly heightened the demand for teachers’ digital competencies, drawing increased attention to the topic in academic and policy discussions. As artificial intelligence continues to advance and educational environments transition more deeply into digital ecosystems, the educational landscape is undergoing transformative shifts. Promoting the integration of digital technology into teaching and learning has become an inevitable trend. Consequently, teachers’ digital literacy has evolved from a basic operational skillset to a complex and multifaceted system encompassing technology integration, data-driven thinking, ethical awareness, and transformational leadership. This evolution necessitates a fundamental reevaluation of teachers’ professional identities and a continuous push for professional development that aligns with these emerging demands. Recent years have witnessed a surge in literature on this topic, suggesting that research interest will continue to expand rapidly. Scientometric analysis reveals a shift in the conceptual framework from fragmented, skill-based models to integrated systems that holistically address technological, cognitive, ethical, and leadership dimensions. This integrated perspective addresses the shortcomings in earlier research that treated these elements in isolation, demonstrating the evolution from technical skill – focused frameworks to competency-driven systems for educational reform and providing a theoretical foundation for understanding digital literacy as a dynamic, context-sensitive construct. However, current research continues to overlook critical contexts, particularly rural and under-resourced regions, where educators face unique challenges such as inadequate infrastructure, limited access to digital tools, and insufficient technical support. These environments remain underrepresented in the literature. Furthermore, there is a lack of longitudinal research investigating the sustained impact of digital literacy initiatives on both teaching practices and student learning outcomes. Addressing these gaps should be a priority for future studies, ensuring that digital literacy strategies are equitable, inclusive, and responsive to the diverse realities of educational practice across varying geographic and socioeconomic contexts.

Keywords are critical indicators that best reflect the research topic and information characteristics of academic papers. High-frequency keywords allow for the identification of research focuses and thematic patterns in a given field. Through the cluster analysis of high-frequency and co-occurring keywords, combined with targeted literature tracking, several key themes in teacher education research have emerged: (1) teacher education and professional development, such as enhancing teachers’ digital competence through pre-service education and in-service training; (2) digital divide and educational equity, which involves examining how unequal access to technological resources affects teachers’ information literacy; (3) technology integration and STEM education innovation, including the implementation of digital tools such as programming platforms and virtual experiments in STEM instruction; (4) self-efficacy and technology acceptance, focusing on the influence of teachers’ confidence in using digital technologies on instructional innovation; (5) innovative teaching methods and technological tools, such as the classroom application of virtual laboratories and interactive platforms; and (6) localization practice and policy response, analyzing challenges and strategies specific to national contexts, such as China’s education policy framework. According to the content of highly cited literature, current academic hot topics in teachers’ digital literacy research include: (1) conceptual development and multi-dimensional frameworks of digital literacy; (2) design and validation of assessment tools for digital literacy and competence; (3) the creation and implementation of digital literacy training programs; (4) empirical investigations into current literacy levels and their influencing factors; and (5) teachers’ perceptions and interpretations of digital literacy. The results have a multi-faceted impact: Academically, they map out the knowledge landscape of teacher digital literacy, clarifying research hotspots (e.g., digital divide, localized policy responses) and frontiers (e.g., ecological reconstruction of teaching), which in turn guides future inquiry. Practically, the findings inform teacher training design-for instance, the strong correlation between self-efficacy and technology acceptance underscores the need for incorporating psychological empowerment modules in programs. Administrators can leverage these insights to identify competency gaps and optimize technology integration strategies, especially for resource-constrained regions. Policymakers benefit from evidence supporting the prioritization of digital equity initiatives and context-adaptive policy frameworks. These themes indicate that, as the digital age advances toward increased intelligence, ubiquity, and data-driven approaches, the conceptual scope of teachers’ digital literacy is expanding, its definition is deepening, and related research is becoming increasingly multifaceted—Spanning theoretical inquiry, empirical analysis, and practical intervention. While most studies emphasize the critical role of digital literacy in educational practice, certain debates persist, particularly concerning the reliability of self-assessment as a measurement approach. Discrepancies between self-perceived and objectively assessed digital competence underscore the need for more rigorous validation of assessment tools and a clearer understanding of the cognitive biases influencing self-evaluation. Future studies should address these inconsistencies by developing more robust and valid evaluation frameworks.

Research frontiers refer to turning points or novel discoveries in a field that attract widespread attention over a relatively short period. CiteSpace software employs mutation detection algorithms to identify and track these frontiers, allowing for a more precise analysis of emerging trends. According to the visualization map, earlier prominent keywords such as “classroom,” “literacy,” “media,” and “computer” reflect a focus on technical capabilities, technology application, and classroom instructional reform. In more recent years, terms such as “efficacy,” “perceptions,” “digital competencies,” and “attitudes” have become increasingly prominent, indicating a broader analytical lens and underscoring the role of digital literacy in advancing systemic educational reform. This shift is also supported by citation bursts in recent influential studies. For instance, Starkey (2020) further developed the teacher digital competency model; Napal-Fraile et al. (2018) examined the progression of digital competence among secondary school teachers; Pettersson (2018) addressed digital competence in inquiry-based learning environments; and Tondeur et al. (2018) proposed a model to explain pre-service teachers’ perceptions of ICT competence. These works exemplify the growing depth and multidimensionality of research into the framework and connotation of teachers’ digital literacy. The current frontier reveals a transition from basic digital skills training to the deep integration of technology, from individual capacity building to structural educational reform, and from utilitarian tool use to literacy-driven transformation of the teaching ecosystem. This transition is analogous to modernizing a traditional library into a collaborative, digitally enriched learning environment. To meet the evolving demands of education, researchers must expand their conceptualization of digital literacy beyond the “technology application” layer to encompass critical digital ethics, cross-cultural collaboration, immersive instructional design, and deeper integration with professional teacher development. Despite these insights, several significant gaps persist. First, underrepresented low-income regions need localized studies on barriers such as infrastructure scarcity and low-cost tool adaptation, which requires integrating regional databases. Second, emerging technologies (e.g., generative AI, immersive learning) demand a reevaluation of competency frameworks to include new dimensions like algorithmic ethics and data privacy. Third, longitudinal research is needed to assess the long-term effects of digital literacy interventions on student outcomes across diverse socioeconomic contexts. Additionally, special education settings are understudied, calling for investigations into the tailored digital literacy needs of teachers in these fields. So, enhancing teachers’ digital literacy is crucial. To create a more effective and inclusive educational landscape, it is essential to adapt to evolving research frontiers. By integrating localized solutions, embracing technological advancements, and conducting comprehensive research, we can better prepare teachers for the digital age and drive educational transformation.