Executive functions refer to a family of interrelated cognitive and self-regulatory skills that are required when an individual is required to focus and persist to achieve a goal (Garon et al., 2008). Often referred to as the brain’s ‘air traffic control system’, these skills help adults and young children to manage a lot of information and avoid distractions (Center on the Developing Child, 2011, p. 1). Despite some variation in how executive functions are defined, most scholars acknowledge three interconnected but distinct features that form the core components of executive functions, these being: (a) working memory, which is the ability to hold and retrieve information in the mind long enough to allow mental manipulation; (b) inhibitory control, which is the ability to suppress instinctive thoughts or behaviours in favour of a predetermined response; and (c) cognitive flexibility, which is the ability to shift attention and adapt to new demands when performing a task (Best and Miller, 2010; Diamond, 2020; Miyake et al., 2000).

The development of executive functions in children does not emerge in isolation. In recent times, a growing body of literature has discussed the influence of contextual processes on the development of executive functions in children, such as parenting behaviours (Castelo et al., 2022; Zvara et al., 2019), family attributes (Blair et al., 2011; Conway et al., 2018), cultural contexts (Howard et al., 2020; Schirmbeck et al., 2020), social groups (Doebel and Munakata, 2018), teacher behaviours (Koşkulu-Sancar et al., 2023; Bardack and Obradović, 2019); and the classroom environment (Cumming et al., 2020). For example, executive functions in childhood are robustly associated with both the positive and negative dimensions of parental behaviours. A longitudinal study by Hughes and Devine (2019) reports that gains in executive functions during the period from 3 to 4 years of age show specific associations with parental scaffolding, parental language input, and negative parent–child interactions (e.g., criticism, negative affects, and control). Similarly, the evidence shows that parental behaviours that support autonomy, such as offering choices, positive verbalisation, scaffolding and supporting competence, are closely associated with the development of executive functions in early childhood (Carlson, 2003; Carlson, 2023; Castelo et al., 2022). In fact, so extensive is the evidence confirming that parent–child interactions have a noteworthy influence over how executive functions develop, it raises the question as to whether interactions with other role models, such as teachers, may also play a similarly important role.

Within the literature, there is observational evidence to support the idea that the development of executive functions in children is positively associated with good experiences in a rich learning environment. Most of these studies rely on the Classroom Assessment Scoring System (CLASS; Pianta et al., 2008), which assesses classroom quality and teacher-child interactions against three broad domains: emotional support, classroom organisation and instructional support (see Anderson et al., 2020; Early et al., 2018; Goble et al., 2019; Hatfield et al., 2016). For example, Choi et al. (2016) report that emotional support (e.g., teacher sensitivity) and classroom organisation (e.g., sharing behavioural expectations and routines) were, over a 6-month period, positively associated with improvements in preschoolers who initially showed low inhibitory control skills. Similarly, Hamre et al. (2014) also found that preschoolers displayed gains in working memory and inhibitory control skills when they had teachers who were able to: efficiently respond to the child’s perspectives, support their autonomy, and implement strong routines in the classroom (as demonstrated by higher emotional support and classroom organisation).

However, while these two studies demonstrated positive associations between the three CLASS domains and gains in executive functions, subsequent evaluations have not established a relationship between these two variables. For example, Guerrero-Rosada et al. (2021) report that none of the CLASS domains are linked to gains in children’s executive functions. They argue that, in high-quality contexts, general measures of process quality are not strong predictors of gains in executive functions.

Researchers have also highlighted that intentionally deploying strategies to support and extend children’s language and critical thinking are an important way to stimulate children’s executive functions within preschool classrooms. These strategies include, but are not limited to: the use of language to sustain and extend children’s thinking (Muir et al., 2024b); providing opportunities for adult-to-peer and peer-to-peer interactions that require negotiation, problem-solving and flexible thinking (Early et al., 2018; Goble and Pianta, 2017); promoting children’s reasoning and facilitating reflection (Distefano et al., 2020); encouraging higher order thinking skills through open-ended questions, problem solving and language modelling (Goble et al., 2019); expanding children’s responses and, providing activity narration and questioning (Moreno et al., 2017). In education, this type of teacher-child interaction is known as sustained shared thinking, “where two or more individuals work (often playfully) together in an intellectual way to solve a problem, clarify a concept, evaluate activities, or extend a narrative” (Siraj-Blatchford, 2008, p. 7).

Multiple theoretical perspectives highlight the positive association between the development of children’s executive functions and dimensions of autonomy-supportive behaviours by adults (Carlson, 2023; Distefano et al., 2022; Dias and Seabra, 2015). Autonomy support consists of a range of adult behaviours that are attentive to children’s psychological needs, interests and values (Reeve, 2006). These behaviours involve following the child’s pace and lead, scaffolding the child’s independent problem solving, providing choices to children that encourage them to reflect on options and make decisions, taking the child’s perspective and allowing the child to be an agent in their learning (Day et al., 2022). In a review of the literature, a few studies show positive associations between teacher behaviours that support autonomy and the development of executive functions in preschoolers. These include: providing open-ended activities where children have the freedom to select what and when they would like to learn through play (Goble and Pianta, 2017; Moreno et al., 2017); facilitating children’s self-directed activities and offering guidance according to the child’s competence level (Distefano et al., 2020); offering individualised attention and tailoring guidance (Choi et al., 2016); supporting children to make decisions and fostering independence by engaging in open-ended activities (Early et al., 2018). Notably, a study by Sosic-Vasic et al. (2015) also investigated how teachers who support autonomy impact executive functions in children, finding lower error rates in executive function tests for students with teachers that support autonomy. This finding accords with parental studies that consider supporting autonomy to be a strong predictor of executive function development in preschoolers (Bernier et al., 2010; Carlson, 2023; Castelo et al., 2022; Distefano et al., 2018).

In recent years, intervention studies have also explored the impact of purposefully designed professional learning programs for early childhood teachers that target the development of executive functions in preschool education contexts (see Dias and Seabra, 2015; Fleer et al., 2020; McClelland et al., 2019; Muir et al., 2024a; Williams et al., 2020). The purpose of these professional learning programs is to deliver in-service professional learning that familiarises teachers with the theoretical and developmental underpinnings of executive functions. These programs also provide support and a repertoire of activities to promote executive functions in preschool children. Additionally, curricula programs such as Tools of the Mind (Bodrova and Leong, 2007) have been designed to improve preschoolers’ executive functions with a focus on language and structured play (e.g., dramatic play, cooperative learning experiences). External mediators, such as visuals and engaging children in shared activities that encourage turn-taking, are among the approaches that have been used by teachers in the Tools of the Mind program (Bodrova and Leong, 2018). Taken together, these studies show promise for facilitating the development of executive functions in children (Muir et al., 2023). They demonstrate that a teacher’s understanding of executive functions as well as enacting explicit pedagogical practices can lead to positive growth in these abilities. Additionally, studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of certain learning experiences on the development of executive functions in preschoolers, including activities such as: block play (Schmitt et al., 2018); mindfulness (Bockmann and Yu, 2022; Zelazo et al., 2018); music (Shen et al., 2019); role play (Thibodeau-Nielsen et al., 2020); and, physical activities, such as dance, energetic games and yoga (Xiong et al., 2017). A guiding document from the Center on the Developing Child at Harvard University, (2014) also provides specific activities that support executive functions by allowing children to practice these skills.

In education, the term ‘pedagogy’ refers to the intentional actions that teachers use to put curriculum approaches into practice (Arthur et al., 2015). Examples of these pedagogical practices include purposeful interactions with learners, scaffolding, facilitating, implementing learning experiences and organising learning environments for play and exploration. According to Siraj-Blatchford et al. (2002), pedagogy is an interactive process between a teacher, a learner and the learning environment and defined as a “set of instructional techniques and strategies which enable learning to take place and provide opportunities for the acquisition of knowledge, skills, attitudes and dispositions within a particular social and material context” (p. 28). Hence, teachers apply pedagogical understanding and knowledge of explicit teaching practices to facilitate learning and development in children (Wilson and Bai, 2010). Further, a teacher’s choice of explicit teaching practices can be influenced by their beliefs and awareness of different educational and psychological concepts (Keenan et al., 2020; Maier et al., 2013; Wilson and Bai, 2010). For example, if teachers know that facilitating executive functions in children is important, it is likely to influence their intentionality, their choice of effective teaching practices and the range of learning opportunities they offer in the classroom. This is evident when receiving in-service professional learning. Indeed, early childhood teachers and educators have demonstrated a high capacity for supporting the development of executive functions in preschoolers (Fleer et al., 2020; Muir et al., 2024a).

Nevertheless, very little research has explored what teachers know about executive functions in general. The limited research that has been undertaken has been conducted at the primary school level in studies undertaken in Ireland (Keenan et al., 2020), Israel (Rapoport et al., 2016), Sweden (Nyroos et al., 2018), and the United Kingdom (Gilmore and Cragg, 2014). These studies report that primary school teachers recognise the significance of executive functions for academic success but show limited knowledge of executive functions and the importance of their role in promoting executive functions development in learners. Interestingly, teachers with years of extensive classroom experience seemed more able to recognise the importance of executive functions than those simply trained through a formal institution (Gilmore and Cragg, 2014; Keenan et al., 2020; Rapoport et al., 2016). According to the Center on the Developing Child (2011), initial teacher education courses dedicate little or no time to educating future teachers about the development of executive functions. As a result, the extent to which teachers know about executive functions and their pedagogical understanding of the practices needed to grow these skills in learners is unclear, particularly in early childhood education.

In this study, pedagogical understanding is defined as teachers’ knowledge about evidence-based practices that are employed to intentionally facilitate children’s learning to create an environment within which their executive functions can develop. Exploring the pedagogical understanding early childhood teachers have of executive functions in preschool children is essential for two reasons. First, there is a growing body of research to show that a teacher’s understanding of childhood development along with their knowledge of neuroscience affects the teaching practices they implement in the classroom (Daniels and Shumow, 2003; Dubinsky et al., 2013). Second, studies have not yet investigated early childhood teachers’ pedagogical understanding of evidence-based practices that are intended to facilitate children’s executive functions in day-to-day preschool classrooms. Thus, the aim of this study is to explore early childhood teachers’ understanding of pedagogical practices that positively impact executive functions in preschool children. The research is guided by the following two research questions: First, what do early childhood teachers know about executive functions in preschool children? Second, what do they know about evidence-based practices that support the development of executive functions in preschool children?

The inclusion criteria stipulated a full early childhood teacher qualification and current engagement with the profession in Victoria, Australia. Fifty-eight early childhood teachers from sessional kindergartens and long day care services participated in the study. They were recruited through social media platforms including Facebook and LinkedIn via the snowball sampling method (Baltar and Brunet, 2012). All questionnaires were completed anonymously. Demographic information about the participants is provided in the Results section.

This research explores early childhood teachers’ knowledge of executive functions and their pedagogical practices in support of these skills. The research project was approved by the Department of Education and Training Victoria (approval no. 2022_004605), and received university HREC approval (approval no. 20230327). The data for analysis were gathered through a modified qualitative questionnaire, originally developed by Keenan et al. (2020), and designed to explore Irish primary school teachers’ understanding of executive functions. As previous research in this area has mainly relied on quantitative data in primary school settings (e.g., Gilmore and Cragg, 2014; Rapoport et al., 2016), their questionnaire incorporated both closed and open-ended questions. The questionnaire addressed teachers’ experiences in teaching students with executive dysfunctions, their role in shaping the development of executive functions, and their encounters with neuropsychological reports and interventions targeting executive function skills. Based on this, we adjusted the questionnaire to investigate early childhood teachers’ pedagogical understanding and practices intended to facilitate children’s executive functions in preschool classrooms on a day-to-day basis. Since the original questionnaire did not thoroughly uncover these specific teaching practices, we revised it to focus primarily on open-ended questions related to teachers’ knowledge and practices. Hence, we modified closed questions (e.g., Have you ever taught a student who had difficulties remembering what he/she has been asked to do?) to open-ended questions (e.g., please describe specific teaching strategies that support a child to remember what s/he has been asked to do) to gain insight into early childhood teachers’ roles in facilitating preschoolers’ executive functions development. As a result, this study employed an approach that elicited a mixture of data types: fixed response items to identify the frequency of participants’ responses and demographic data, with quantitative data and open-ended response items generating qualitative data to identify and interpret the types of executive functions-supportive pedagogical practices.

The final questionnaire was designed and delivered online using the Qualtrics platform and consisted of 35 closed-and open-ended questions clustered into three categories: (a) demographic characteristics of participants, covered by 10 questions; (b) knowledge of executive functions, addressed by 8 questions; and (c) pedagogical practices to facilitate executive functions, explored with 17 questions (see Table 1). The third section of the questionnaire invited participants to respond to six scenarios as a way of exploring the pedagogical practices they employ to support children’s working memory, inhibitory control, and cognitive flexibility skills. These scenarios were adopted from Keenan et al.’ (2020) instrument. Thirty-nine respondents completed this section.

The questionnaire was first piloted with two early childhood teachers and peer-reviewed by four early childhood researchers. This led to minor revisions to the structure of the questionnaire, such as the inclusion of page breaks within the categories. The participants received an information sheet about the research project at the beginning of the questionnaire and were informed that they could exit the questionnaire at any point. All participants provided informed consent by checking the relevant box before proceeding. The questionnaire was available for completion for 1 month.

The Qualtrics statistical analysis tool was used to analyse demographic data, providing descriptive statistical information including age, qualifications, and participants’ years of experience. This contextual information was predominantly used to facilitate a deeper understanding of the demographic factors that might influence the identified pedagogical practices.

The data were primarily descriptive in nature and an abductive approach to thematic analysis was used to analyse the qualitative data and thereafter to identify the pedagogical practices that early childhood teachers intended to promote children’s executive functions within their day-to-day classroom. Using thematic analysis helped the authors to “identify patterns within and across data in relation to participants’ lived experience, views and perspectives, and behavior and practices; ‘experiential’ research which seeks to understand what participants think, feel, and do” (Clarke and Braun, 2017, p. 297).

The abductive approach was applied through two iterative cycles using NVivo software (Version 12). The first cycle involved deductive coding informed by existing literature, while the second cycle employed inductive coding derived directly from the data (Miles et al., 2020; Sætre and Van de Ven, 2021). Through this iterative process, the authors refined and aligned themes with both prior literature and the raw data, ensuring that the analysis reflected insights drawn from the participants’ lived experiences.

Within the two cycles, understanding patterned responses and meaning across the dataset involved following the six steps of thematic analysis outlined by Braun and Clarke (2006). The first cycle began with step one: the first author thoroughly reviewed participants’ responses to the open-ended questions and captured initial impressions. This process was complemented by recording memos to document preliminary thoughts on potential links to the literature. In steps two and three, the data were analysed deductively, with existing literature guiding the development of codes applied “in tandem with the raw data to explain the patterns and story behind the data” (Thompson, 2022, p. 1411). Two coding approaches—provisional coding and concept coding—were used during this cycle (Miles et al., 2020).

The second cycle repeated steps two and three, iteratively refining codes identified in cycle one and developing themes using inductive coding approaches such as pattern coding (Miles et al., 2020). This cycle then progressed to steps four and five, where themes were named and reviewed to ensure alignment with the data. Finally, in the sixth step, the report was developed by synthesising the themes into a coherent narrative that highlighted the main findings.

During both cycles, the coding of qualitative data was led by the first author, who regularly met with the second and third authors to review the data, generate codes, and discuss themes. Iterative discussions enabled the authors to reach a consensus in both cycles, refining their definitions, and ensuring alignment with the raw data and the existing literature. All four authors met to discuss the results and overarching findings.

The questionnaire was completed by 39 respondents. A further 19 participants responded to the first two categories only: (a) demographic characteristics of participants and (b) knowledge of executive functions and did not complete the third category: (c) pedagogical practices to facilitate executive functions. Ninety per cent of the participants were female; this reflects the current gender distribution of the early childhood workforce in Australia¹. Respondents held bachelor’s degrees (47%; N = 27), master’s degrees (29%; N = 17), graduate diplomas or certificates (21%; N = 12), and advanced diplomas or associate degrees (3%; N = 2). Participants had a range of work experience within the early childhood education and care sector, with 19% (N = 11) having taught for less than 5 years (‘beginning teachers’), 22% (N = 13) having taught for five to 10 years (‘mid-career teachers’) and 59% (N = 34) having taught for more than 10 years (‘experienced teachers’).

As a whole, 87.93% (N = 51) of the participants reported they had heard the term ‘executive functions’ and rated their knowledge about executive functions as Average (47%; N = 24) or Above Average (47%; N = 24). Only 12.07% (N = 7) of the respondents had not previously heard the term. The participants noted they had heard or learned about executive functions through their own teaching experience (33.77%; N = 26), initial teacher education (28.57%; N = 22), and in-service professional learning (25.97%; N = 20). Fifty-eight per cent of respondents (N = 25) stated that none of the teacher qualifications that provided them with early childhood teacher status included a specific focus on topics related to executive functions. Meanwhile, 27.91% (N = 12) indicated that their qualifications did include such a focus, and 13.95% (N = 6) were unsure. Notably, the participants were asked to define the term executive functions before being presented with a definition in the questionnaire. In analysing the written responses as to how the participants defined the term, 43 responses were provided. Of these responses, 39 participants provided their definitions in both short and long sentences and only 4 participants responded, “I do not know.” Most of the respondents who reported being aware of executive functions were able to deliver definitions that identified skills relating to executive functions. For example, one of the teachers defined the term:

Other participants provided more detailed definition from the lens of a child’s executive function skills, such as:

While participants emphasised executive functions as a “suite of skills and capacities that enable an individual to organise, attend to and complete cognitive tasks” (T49, experienced teacher), the importance of executive functions for young children were also emphasised as “necessary skills for children to develop in order to successfully cope with learning, socialising, and a healthy life” (T45, beginning teacher). This is in line with the nature of the responses from most of the participants who considered: (a) manipulating abstract information; (b) thinking flexibly; (c) focusing and avoiding distractions; and (d) sorting and mentally manipulating information to be extremely important executive function skills that equip children to succeed at school in future. As shown in Figure 1, a majority of the participants rated these skills as either ‘very important’ or ‘extremely important’.

The participants were asked to rate the importance of executive functions for social skills, academic achievement, and classroom behaviour (Figure 2). Of the responses, the following percentages of participants believed executive function skills to be important for: children’s classroom behaviour 63.41% (N = 26), academic achievement 58.54% (N = 24), and social skills 51.22% (N = 21). Only a few considered their importance within the mentioned areas moderately and slightly important. Respondents were also asked to indicate the extent to which they believe their behaviours and pedagogical practices influence children’s executive functions. The majority of respondents (78.79%; N = 26) believed their pedagogical practices impact children’s executive functions ‘to a great extent’.

Five themes were identified in the participants’ responses, reflecting pedagogical practices that both align with and extend the existing literature: (a) environment and activity structuring, where participants highlighted the intentional design of physical space and planned learning experiences to facilitate executive functions; (b) supporting autonomy, highlighting strategies to promote children’s competence and independence; (c) classroom organisation, referring to approaches aimed at building positive relationships, promoting desirable behaviour, and managing effective routines; (d) sustained shared thinking, a pedagogical interaction where teachers and children co-construct knowledge through extended interaction; and (e) activities that support executive functions; involving targeted tasks intended to enhance children’s executive function skills.

NVivo was used to explore the relationships found in the coded data. Insight was gained into how often particular codes or themes appeared together in the data by creating a matrix of the intersections between different coded sources. Table 2 presents the frequency of identified themes among the beginning, mid-career and experienced teachers. The frequency is portrayed by different shades, with darker shades representing higher frequency and lighter shades signifying lower frequency. In this regard, environment and activity structuring as well as supporting autonomy were reported as the most frequently mentioned practices among experienced teachers. To illustrate the associations between the reported pedagogical practices and the three core components of executive functions, the participants were provided with scenarios involving examples of skills in children that characterise executive functions and were asked to describe specific pedagogical practices that support those skills (e.g., “Please describe specific teaching strategies that support a child to control his/her impulses: for example, interrupting others or not waiting his/her turn”). Table 3 shows the correspondences found. Here, the teachers reported environment and activity structuring as being particularly effective for supporting a child’s inhibitory controls and supporting autonomous behaviours as beneficial for a child’s working memory.

The following section discusses each theme in more detail, complemented by illustrative excerpts from participants’ written responses.

The findings demonstrate that the early childhood teachers in this study rate their knowledge of executive functions as average and above average and regard executive functions to be extremely important for academic achievement, classroom behaviour and social skills. As with studies conducted in primary school settings (Gilmore and Cragg, 2014; Keenan et al., 2020; Rapoport et al., 2016), many of the participants in this study reported that they have heard or learnt about executive functions through their own teaching experience, rather than in their teacher education program of study. This aligns with reports by the Center on the Developing Child (2011) that teaching programs dedicate little or no time to educating future teachers about the development of executive functions. As a result, it may take many years of experience for teachers to gain a good understanding of executive functions through classroom experiences. Consistent with Gilmore and Cragg (2014), teachers in our study with more than 10 years of experience reported more pedagogical understanding of executive functions compared with those with fewer years of experience. Additionally, themes related to evidence-based practices appeared more frequently in their responses (see Table 2). Notably, the majority of the participating teachers had more than 10 years’ experience. Moreover, their responses included more explicit aspects of how they facilitate the development of executive functions in children. Unlike most of the beginning and mid-career teachers, these experienced teachers provided more specific examples of evidence-based executive functions-supportive pedagogical practices.

In this study, most participants reported that none of their early childhood teacher qualifications had included a specific focus on executive functions or any topics related to executive functions. This finding suggests that providing information to teachers about executive functions and evidence-based pedagogical practices that intended to facilitate them could yield significant benefits for both the teachers and the young learners. According to MacNaughton and Williams (2009), “access to information about a broad and diverse repertoire of teaching methods can increase the likelihood that staff will choose the best rather than the most familiar way to further children’s learning” (p. xiii). The recently-qualified early childhood teachers should not bear the sole responsibility for lacking evidence-based teaching repertoire; rather responsibility should be shared with early childhood education and care system stakeholders (researchers, regulators, policymakers, initial teacher education providers; Cohrssen et al., 2023). In the absence of elaboration of executive functions in the EYLF (AGDE, 2022), highlighting the need for stronger emphasis on executive functions in initial teacher education, the Australian Education Research Organisation (AERO) developed a suite of learning trajectories that draw on empirical research and elaborate on children’s emerging executive functions (Jackson et al., 2023). The learning trajectories and the supporting evidence paper are an attempt to equip early childhood teachers to understand the theory/research behind domains of learning and development including executive functions as well as equip them to recognise, consolidate and extend the domains in practice.

Another notable finding of this study is that the participating teachers perceive their role to be highly influential in supporting children’s executive functions in the day-to-day preschool classroom. They demonstrated this pedagogical understanding by sharing explicit practices that have been suggested in the research literature. These include environment and activity structuring (e.g., Moreno et al., 2017; Learning Difficulties Coalition, 2021), offering behaviours that support autonomy (e.g., Carlson, 2023; Dias and Seabra, 2015), enacting strong classroom organisation (e.g., Hamre et al., 2014), encouraging sustained shared thinking (e.g., Muir et al., 2024b), and conducting activities that support executive functions (Center on the Developing Child at Harvard University, 2014). These themes, while aligning with established pedagogical categories, were identified through iterative engagement with the data and theory, offering new insights into their practical application within preschool settings.

Most importantly, the explicit use of pedagogical practices by early childhood teachers shows that a rich preschool curriculum presents many opportunities for early childhood teachers to support and facilitate the development of executive functions whilst simultaneously following children’s interests. Within their responses, the participating teachers readily connected the pedagogical practices that support executive function to the components of their preschool curricula, such as play-based learning (e.g., mediated structured play, semi-structured creative play) and socio-emotional approaches (e.g., yoga, mindfulness), interventions that appear to enhance the development of executive functions in preschool settings (Muir et al., 2023).

In terms of supporting autonomy to promote executive functions, many of the teachers also reported cultivating these skills within a play-based learning approach. Their strategies were multifaceted, including maintaining awareness of each child’s needs, interests and preferences, allowing children to work at their own pace, delivering less structured activities where the children can make choices, providing interest-based learning activities, and offering progress-enabling hints when the children seem stuck. A key aspect of these autonomy-supporting practices, as articulated by the participants, is differentiated teaching and learning to meet the needs of every child. Participants explained that one must determine a child’s zone of proximal development and then offer just enough support for the child to feel they have successfully accomplished the task on their own (Vygotsky, 1978) and to enhance their learning disposition as a consequence of experiencing success. As children become more competent at these goal-directed tasks, the teachers suggested encouraging greater autonomy by reducing the level of support provided, thus creating opportunities for children to rehearse their executive functions. Through behaviours that support autonomy, children are more likely to internalise strategies related to executive functions, improving their own ability to solve problems independently (Koşkulu-Sancar et al., 2023).

Furthermore, the study revealed a link between classroom organisation and pedagogical practices intended to support children’s executive functions, indicating that more positive teacher-child relationships and sharing clear and consistent behavioural expectations and routines with the children was vital. The teachers described the strategies they intentionally and explicitly use to support executive functions, such as ensuring regular routines where each child knows what to do throughout the day. These teachers plan their activities to create opportunities for children to engage in goal-directed tasks. They also express approval over a child’s behaviour by communicating an appreciation for their efforts, showing warmth and encouragement. Additionally, the teachers intentionally involve themselves in children’s play to support and extend their thinking and language through sustained shared thinking with children (Muir et al., 2024b). Engaging in this type of thinking contributes to a child’s thinking by enabling reflection, encouraging analysis and reasoning, and using repetition and extension—approaches that are deemed to be crucial for developing executive functions in children (Distefano et al., 2020; Zelazo, 2015).

Another significant finding of this study is that the participating teachers reported their use of different pedagogical practices to tailor their support of children’s working memory, inhibitory control, and cognitive flexibility skills according to their needs (see Table 3). As described by the early childhood teachers, environment and activity structuring are key for supporting children’s inhibitory control skills. These practices highlight the significance of a well-organised and clearly structured learning environment that reduce distractions and facilitates learning progression. According to the participants, supporting autonomy also emerges as a crucial pedagogical practice for promoting children’s working memory and inhibitory control skills. This suggests that providing children with opportunities to make choices and have some control over their learning process can be advantageous (Carlson, 2023). Enacting strong classroom organisation also appears to facilitate inhibitory controls in children. More specifically, establishing predictable and consistent routines and communicating clear expectations for behaviour and participation contributes greatly to a child’s ability to control their impulses and keep attention (Hamre et al., 2014). Encouraging sustained shared thinking was also reported to facilitate children’s inhibitory controls and working memory by expanding their critical thinking and language (Goble et al., 2019). But this is not thought to be as strong an influence as environment and activity structuring, or approaches that promote autonomy.

This research has some limitations. First, 58 early childhood teachers elected to participate in the study. Their willingness to participate may be indicative of greater self-efficacy in supporting executive functions than the broader population of early childhood teachers and thus may bring into question the generalisability of the results. Most participants in this study were experienced teachers. Less experienced teachers may still be developing their teaching repertoire, which might impact their self-reported efficacy. Also, data were missing from 19 teachers who did not fully complete the questionnaire. Hence, expanding the sample to include a larger population of early childhood teachers would strengthen this line of research.

Second, knowledge of children’s executive functions does not necessarily lead to the use of executive functions-supportive pedagogical practices in classrooms. Consequently, future research could employ interviews and classroom observations. A third limitation is that we did not evaluate the extent of teachers’ actual knowledge about executive functions or the effectiveness of the self-reported executive functions-supportive pedagogical practices. It would be of value to examine the effectiveness of the identified pedagogical practices and their relationships with working memory, inhibitory control, and cognitive flexibility.

Despite these limitations, to the best of our knowledge, this may be the first study to explore early childhood teachers’ pedagogical understanding of executive functions in Australian preschool settings. As such, and in light of the inclusion of executive functions in the EYLF (AGDE, 2022), this work is timely and highlights important implications for early childhood initial teacher education in Australia.