Publisher's note

Front. Ecol. Evol.

Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution

Front. Ecol. Evol.

2296-701X

Frontiers Media S.A.

10.3389/fevo.2022.1093961

Ecology and Evolution

Correction

Corrigendum: Does climate change affect enterprises' ability to sell their products?

Siming

¹ Cai

Cheng

² ^* Zhang

Shuocheng

³ You

Peng

⁴

¹College of Economics and Management, China Three Gorges University, Yichang, China ²School of Accountancy, Hubei University of Economics, Wuhan, China ³School of Economics and Management, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China ⁴Department of Finance, Shenzhen Ji Yatou Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Shenzhen, China

Edited and reviewed by: Federica Cucchiella, University of L'Aquila, Italy

*Correspondence: Cheng Cai ✉ caicsmile@hbue.edu.cn

This article was submitted to Environmental Informatics and Remote Sensing, a section of the journal Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution

17 01 2023

2022

1093961

09 11 2022 20 12 2022

2023

Yu, Cai, Zhang and You

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

A corrigendum on Does climate change affect enterprises' ability to sell their products? by Yu, S., Cai, C., Zhang, S., and You, P. (2022). Front. Ecol. Evol. 10:944964. doi: 10.3389/fevo.2022.944964

climate change rising temperatures sales power company ability product selling

In the published article, there was an error in the legend for Table 3 as published. All the negative signs are not marked. The corrected legend appears below.

Table 3

Correlation coefficients.

	Lnincome	Detatem	AGDP	SA	ROA	Size	CHAIR_CEO	CH	FIC	LEV	Tobin_QA	BTMA
Lnincome	1
Detatem	−0.025^***	1
AGDP	0.058^***	−0.142^***	1
SA	−0.054^***	0.104^***	−0.075^***	1
ROA	0.086^***	−0.009	0.021^***	0.050^***	1
SIZE	0.868^***	−0.027^***	0.080^***	−0.046^***	0.009	1
CHAIR_CEO	0.171^***	0.039^***	−0.138^***	−0.065^***	−0.046^***	0.178^***	1
CH	−0.231^***	−0.057^***	0.171^***	0.160^***	0.139^***	−0.256^***	−0.318^***	1
FIC	0.093^***	−0.051^***	0.516^***	−0.0100	0.052^***	0.118^***	−0.054^***	0.092^***	1
LEV	0.418^***	0.042^***	−0.051^***	−0.066^***	−0.384^***	0.448^***	0.168^***	−0.313^***	−0.039^***	1
Tobin_QA	−0.412^***	0.014^**	0	0.046^***	0.029^***	−0.435^***	−0.060^***	−0.007	0.001	−0.170^***	1
BTMA	0.504^***	−0.016^**	−0.001	−0.021^***	−0.113^***	0.576^***	0.107^***	−0.086^***	0.008	0.311^***	−0.798^***	1

^*** and ^** denote significance at the 1, 5, and 10% levels, respectively.

In the published article, there was an error in the legend for Table 4 as published. All the negative signs are not marked. The corrected legend appears below.

Table 4

Impact of climate change on enterprises' sales revenue.

	(1)	(2)	(3)
	Lnincome	Lnincome	Lnincome
Detatem	−0.158^***	−0.040^**	−0.056^***
	(0.000)	(0.046)	(0.002)
AGDP		−0.001	0.001
		(0.122)	(0.108)
CHAIR_CEO		0.044^***	0.051^***
		(0.000)	(0.000)
SA		−0.061^***	−0.062^***
		(0.002)	(0.001)
SIZE		0.884^***	0.991^***
		(0.000)	(0.000)
CH		−0.001^***	−0.002^***
		(0.002)	(0.000)
ROA		2.984^***	2.813^***
		(0.000)	(0.000)
FIC		−0.002	0.016^***
		(0.605)	(0.000)
LEV		0.724^***	0.830^***
		(0.000)	(0.000)
Tobin_QA		−0.096^***	−0.062^***
		(0.000)	(0.000)
BTMA		−0.325^***	−0.250^***
		(0.000)	(0.000)
Year	No	No	Yes
Ind	No	No	Yes
_cons	21.390^***	1.553^***	−1.119^***
	(0.000)	(0.000)	(0.000)
N	26,786	22,691	22,691
Adj. R²	0.001	0.775	0.844

^*** and ^** denote significance at the 1, 5, and 10% levels, respectively.

In the published article, there was an error in the legend for Table 5 as published. All the negative signs are not marked. The corrected legend appears below.

Table 5

Regression results when using the extreme climate measure.

	(1)	(2)	(3)
	Lnincome	Lnincome	Lnincome
Frel	−0.001^***	−0.002^**	−0.002^***
	(0.002)	(0.000)	(0.000)
SA		−0.048^**	−0.048^**
		(0.031)	(0.020)
ROA		3.008^***	2.866^***
		(0.000)	(0.000)
SIZE		0.882^***	0.980^***
		(0.000)	(0.000)
Chair_CEO		0.047^***	0.055^***
		(0.000)	(0.000)
CH		−0.002^***	−0.002^***
		(0.000)	(0.000)
Tobin_Q		−0.093^***	−0.058^***
		(0.000)	(0.000)
BTMA		−0.313^***	−0.228^***
		(0.000)	(0.000)
Lev		0.757^***	0.886^***
		(0.000)	(0.000)
AGDP		0.001	0.001^**
		(0.869)	(0.013)
FIC		−0.011^**	0.007^**
		(0.010)	(0.035)
Year	No	No	Yes
Ind	No	No	Yes
_cons	21.434^***	1.760^***	−0.751^***
	(0.000)	(0.000)	(0.000)
N	26,812	26,812	26,812
Adj. R²	0	0.784	0.851

^*** and ^** denote significance at the 1, 5, and 10% levels, respectively.

In the published article, there was an error in the legend for Table 6 as published. All the negative signs are not marked. The corrected legend appears below.

Table 6

Impact of low-carbon city pilot policy on enterprises' sales revenue.

	Lnincome
Pilot–post	0.041^***	(0.004)
Pilot	−0.046^***	(0.000)
Post	−0.160^***	(0.000)
AGDP	0.001^***	(0.002)
SA	−0.066^***	(0.000)
CHAIR_CEO	0.050^***	(0.000)
SIZE	0.986^***	(0.000)
CH	−0.002^***	(0.000)
ROA	2.919^***	(0.000)
FIC	0.017^***	(0.000)
Lev	0.889^***	(0.000)
Tobin_Q	−0.047^***	(0.000)
BTMA	−0.181^***	(0.000)
Ind	Yes
Year	Yes
_cons	−1.074^***	(0.000)
N	28,236
Adj. R²	0.847

^*** and ^** denote significance at the 1, 5, and 10% levels, respectively.

In the published article, there was an error in the legend for Table 7 as published. All the negative signs are not marked. The corrected legend appears below.

Table 7

Impact of temperature variation difference on sales revenue.

	(1)	(2)	(3)
	Lnincome	Lnincome	Lnincome
Detatem4	−0.061^***
	(0.001)
Detatem5		−0.067^***
		(0.000)
Detatem6			−0.073^***
			(0.000)
AGDP	0.001	0.001	0.001
	(0.154)	(0.172)	(0.176)
SA	−0.062^***	−0.062^***	−0.062^***
	(0.001)	(0.001)	(0.001)
CHAIR_CEO	0.051^***	0.051^***	0.051^***
	(0.000)	(0.000)	(0.000)
SIZE	0.991^***	0.991^***	0.991^***
	(0.000)	(0.000)	(0.000)
CH	−0.002^***	−0.002^***	−0.002^***
	(0.000)	(0.000)	(0.000)
ROA	2.813^***	2.813^***	2.812^***
	(0.000)	(0.000)	(0.000)
FIC	0.017^***	0.017^***	0.017^***
	(0.000)	(0.000)	(0.000)
Lev	0.830^***	0.831^***	0.830^***
	(0.000)	(0.000)	(0.000)
Tobin_Q	−0.062^***	−0.062^***	−0.062^***
	(0.000)	(0.000)	(0.000)
BTMA	−0.250^***	−0.250^***	−0.250^***
	(0.000)	(0.000)	(0.000)
Ind	Yes	Yes	Yes
Year	Yes	Yes	Yes
_cons	−1.119^***	−1.116^***	−1.113^***
	(0.000)	(0.000)	(0.000)
N	22,691	22,691	22,691
Adj. R²	0.844	0.845	0.845

^*** and ^** denote significance at the 1, 5, and 10% levels, respectively.

In the published article, there was an error in the legend for Table 8 as published. All the negative signs are not marked. The corrected legend appears below.

Table 8

Regression results for the mechanism of action.

	Demand side		Supply side	Enterprise side
	(1)	(2)	(3)	(4)
	Large customers	Small customers	Commercial credit	Productivity	Cost of sales	Management fees
	lntop	lnuntop	detbc1	tfp_lp	sale	man
Detatem	−0.070^**	−0.027	−0.005^**	−0.054^***	−0.039	−0.027^*
	(0.016)	(0.435)	(0.050)	(0.002)	(0.202)	(0.064)
AGDP	0.002^***	−0.001	0.000^***	0.002^***	0.001^*	0.002^***
	(0.003)	(0.952)	(0.000)	(0.000)	(0.088)	(0.000)
SA	0.151^***	0.071^**	0.011^***	−0.055^***	−0.139^***	−0.054^***
	(0.000)	(0.049)	(0.000)	(0.003)	(0.000)	(0.000)
CHAIR_CEO	0.070^***	0.015	0.002	0.022^**	−0.039^**	0.035^***
	(0.000)	(0.427)	(0.220)	(0.018)	(0.016)	(0.000)
SIZE	0.799^***	0.980^***	−0.006^***	0.595^***	0.925^***	0.864^***
	(0.000)	(0.000)	(0.000)	(0.000)	(0.000)	(0.000)
CH	−0.003^***	0.001	−0.001^**	−0.001	0.003^***	0.002^***
	(0.000)	(0.643)	(0.011)	(0.265)	(0.000)	(0.000)
ROA	1.726^***	3.199^***	0.118^***	2.989^***	2.928^***	0.109^*
	(0.000)	(0.000)	(0.000)	(0.000)	(0.000)	(0.074)
FIC	0.027^***	−0.009^*	0.004^***	0.036^***	0.015^***	0.034^***
	(0.000)	(0.080)	(0.000)	(0.000)	(0.002)	(0.000)
LEV	0.641^***	0.803^***	0.213^***	0.799^***	0.290^***	0.087^***
	(0.000)	(0.000)	(0.000)	(0.000)	(0.000)	(0.000)
Tobin_Q	−0.036^***	−0.117^***	−0.007^***	−0.030^***	−0.085^***	−0.001
	(0.000)	(0.000)	(0.000)	(0.000)	(0.000)	(0.757)
BTMA	−0.069	−0.186^***	−0.006	−0.094^***	−0.908^***	−0.621^***
	(0.222)	(0.006)	(0.301)	(0.005)	(0.000)	(0.000)
Ind	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes
Year	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes
_cons	−1.863^***	−0.491^**	0.054^***	0.689^***	−2.622^***	−0.863^***
	(0.000)	(0.038)	(0.007)	(0.000)	(0.000)	(0.000)
N	27,901	27,548	19,273	22,281	27,541	28,222
Adj. R²	0.561	0.555	0.300	0.712	0.536	0.790

^***, ^**, and ^* denote significance at the 1, 5, and 10% levels, respectively.

In the published article, there was an error in the legend for Table 9 as published. All the negative signs are not marked. The corrected legend appears below.

Table 9

Climate change, ownership, and sales revenue.

	(1)	(2)
	State-owned enterprises	Private enterprises
Detatem	−0.020	−0.093^***
	(0.519)	(0.000)
AGDP	−0.004^***	0.002^***
	(0.000)	(0.000)
SA	0.203^***	0.083^***
	(0.000)	(0.002)
CHAIR_CEO	0.010	0.028^**
	(0.692)	(0.035)
SIZE	0.962^***	0.976^***
	(0.001)	(0.001)
CH	−0.009	0.001
	(0.200)	(0.540)
ROA	2.420^***	3.350^***
	(0.000)	(0.000)
FIC	0.009^*	−0.006
	(0.077)	(0.163)
Lev	0.665^***	0.683^***
	(0.000)	(0.000)
Tobin_Q	−0.122^***	−0.102^***
	(0.000)	(0.000)
BTMA	−0.654^***	−0.293^***
	(0.000)	(0.000)
Ind	Yes	Yes
Year	Yes	Yes
Coefficient difference test	3.18^*
_cons	1.164^***	0.101
	(0.000)	(0.534)
N	9,333	12,952
Adj. R²	0.779	0.744

^***, ^**, and ^* denote significance at the 1, 5, and 10% levels, respectively.

In the published article, there was an error in the legend for Table 10 as published. All the negative signs are not marked. The corrected legend appears below.

Table 10

Climate change, regional economy, and sales revenue.

	(1)	(2)
	Eastern China	Central and western China
Detatem	−0.006	−0.071^**
	(0.820)	(0.012)
AGDP	−0.001	−0.015^***
	(0.621)	(0.000)
SA	−0.062^***	−0.042
	(0.004)	(0.250)
CHAIR_CEO	0.063^***	0.026
	(0.000)	(0.169)
SIZE	0.966^***	1.030^***
	(0.000)	(0.000)
CH	−0.001^***	−0.005^***
	(0.002)	(0.000)
ROA	2.811^***	2.668^***
	(0.000)	(0.000)
FIC	−0.005	0.027^***
	(0.268)	(0.000)
Lev	1.065^***	0.508^***
	(0.000)	(0.000)
Tobin_Q	−0.045^***	−0.078^***
	(0.000)	(0.000)
BTMA	−0.122^***	−0.425^***
	(0.004)	(0.000)
Ind	Yes	Yes
Year	Yes	Yes
Coefficient difference test	2.87^*
_cons	−0.531^***	−1.649^***
	(0.001)	(0.000)
N	14,652	8,039
Adj. R²	0.857	0.830

^***, ^**, and ^* denote significance at the 1, 5, and 10% levels, respectively.

In the published article, there was an error in the legend for Table 11 as published. All the negative signs are not marked. The corrected legend appears below.

Table 11

Climate change, internal controls, and sales revenue.

	(1)	(2)
	Enterprises with weak internal controls	Enterprises with strong internal controls
Detatem	−0.070^**	−0.026
	(0.024)	(0.313)
AGDP	0.001^*	0.001
	(0.068)	(0.250)
SA	−0.059^*	0.060^**
	(0.087)	(0.024)
CHAIR_CEO	0.041^**	0.064^***
	(0.018)	(0.000)
SIZE	1.009^***	0.985^***
	(0.000)	(0.000)
CH	−0.001^**	−0.004^***
	(0.029)	(0.000)
ROA	1.950^***	3.957^***
	(0.000)	(0.000)
FIC	0.019^***	0.019^***
	(0.000)	(0.000)
Lev	0.545^***	1.051^***
	(0.000)	(0.000)
Tobin_Q	−0.105^***	−0.051^***
	(0.000)	(0.000)
BTMA	−0.385^***	−0.111^**
	(0.000)	(0.028)
Ind	Yes	Yes
Year	Yes	Yes
Coefficient difference test	1.05
_cons	−1.401^***	−0.771^***
	(0.000)	(0.000)
N	10,282	10,684
Adj. R²	0.783	0.866

^***, ^**, and ^* denote significance at the 1, 5, and 10% levels, respectively.

The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.