<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xml:lang="EN" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Ecol. Evol.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Ecol. Evol.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">2296-701X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fevo.2021.662092</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Ecology and Evolution</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Biogeography Meets Niche Modeling: Inferring the Role of Deep Time Climate Change When Data Is Limited</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name><surname>Culshaw</surname> <given-names>Victoria</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001"><sup>&#x002A;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/228970/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Mairal</surname> <given-names>Mario</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/853277/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name><surname>Sanmart&#x00ED;n</surname> <given-names>Isabel</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001"><sup>&#x002A;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/99736/overview"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1"><sup>1</sup><institution>Real Jard&#x00ED;n Bot&#x00E1;nico (RJB), CSIC</institution>, <addr-line>Madrid</addr-line>, <country>Spain</country></aff>
<aff id="aff2"><sup>2</sup><institution>Department of Ecology and Ecosystem Management, Technische Universit&#x00E4;t M&#x00FC;nchen (TUM)</institution>, <addr-line>Munich</addr-line>, <country>Germany</country></aff>
<aff id="aff3"><sup>3</sup><institution>Departamento de Biodiversidad, Ecolog&#x00ED;a y Evoluci&#x00F3;n, Facultad de Biolog&#x00ED;a, Universidad Complutense de Madrid</institution>, <addr-line>Madrid</addr-line>, <country>Spain</country></aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by"><p>Edited by: Daniel de Paiva Silva, Goiano Federal Institute (IFGOIANO), Brazil</p></fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by"><p>Reviewed by: Guilherme De Oliveira, Federal University of Rec&#x00F4;ncavo da Bahia, Brazil; Tain&#x00E1; Rocha, Rio de Janeiro Botanical Garden, Brazil</p></fn>
<corresp id="c001">&#x002A;Correspondence: Victoria Culshaw, <email>vickycul@hotmail.com</email></corresp>
<corresp id="c002">Isabel Sanmart&#x00ED;n, <email>isanmartin@rjb.csic.es</email></corresp>
<fn fn-type="other" id="fn004"><p>This article was submitted to Biogeography and Macroecology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution</p></fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>21</day>
<month>09</month>
<year>2021</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2021</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>9</volume>
<elocation-id>662092</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>24</day>
<month>02</month>
<year>2021</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>20</day>
<month>08</month>
<year>2021</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x00A9; 2021 Culshaw, Mairal and Sanmart&#x00ED;n.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2021</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Culshaw, Mairal and Sanmart&#x00ED;n</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p></license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>Geographic range shifts are one major organism response to climate change, especially if the rate of climate change is higher than that of species adaptation. Ecological niche models (ENM) and biogeographic inferences are often used in estimating the effects of climatic oscillations on species range dynamics. ENMs can be used to track climatic suitable areas over time, but have often been limited to shallow timescales; biogeographic inference can reach greater evolutionary depth, but often lacks spatial resolution. Here, we present a simple approach that treats them as independent and complementary sources of evidence, which, when used in partnership, can be employed to reconstruct geographic range shifts over deep evolutionary timescales. For testing this, we chose two extreme African disjunctions: <italic>Camptoloma</italic> (Scrophulariaceae) and <italic>Canarina</italic> (Campanulaceae), each comprising of three species disjunctly distributed in Macaronesia and eastern/southern Africa. Using inferred ancestral ranges in tandem with preindustrial and paleoclimate ENM hindcastings, we show that the disjunct pattern was the result of fragmentation and extinction events linked to Neogene aridification cycles. Our results highlight the importance of considering temporal resolution when building ENMs for rare endemics with small population sizes and restricted climatic tolerances such as <italic>Camptoloma</italic>, for which models built on averaged monthly variables were more informative than those based on annual bioclimatic variables. Additionally, we show that biogeographic information can be used as truncation threshold criteria for building ENMs in the distant past. Our approach is suitable when there is sparse sampling on species occurrences and associated patterns of genetic variation, such as in the case of ancient endemics with widely disjunct distributions as a result of climate change.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>biogeographic reconstruction</kwd>
<kwd>deep-time climate change</kwd>
<kwd>ecological niche model</kwd>
<kwd>geographic disjunction</kwd>
<kwd>Rand Flora</kwd>
<kwd>temporal resolution</kwd>
<kwd>truncation threshold criteria</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<contract-sponsor id="cn001">Ministerio de Econom&#x00ED;a, Industria y Competitividad, Gobierno de Espa&#x00F1;a<named-content content-type="fundref-id">10.13039/501100010198</named-content></contract-sponsor>
<contract-sponsor id="cn002">Ministerio de Econom&#x00ED;a, Industria y Competitividad, Gobierno de Espa&#x00F1;a<named-content content-type="fundref-id">10.13039/501100010198</named-content></contract-sponsor>
<counts>
<fig-count count="6"/>
<table-count count="0"/>
<equation-count count="0"/>
<ref-count count="67"/>
<page-count count="15"/>
<word-count count="11467"/>
</counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec sec-type="intro" id="S1">
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>The current concern on anthropogenic-induced climate change and its impact on biodiversity levels has increased the interest in reconstructing organisms&#x2019; responses to past climatic events. Geographic range shifts, where species track their climatic niche under events of rapid climate change, are expected if the rate of environmental change is greater than that of species&#x2019; ability to adapt to the new conditions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Mart&#x00ED;nez-Meyer and Peterson, 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B63">Thuiller et al., 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B65">Waldron, 2010</xref>). These shifts can result in smaller population sizes, reduced genetic diversity, and a higher extinction risk (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B65">Waldron, 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Mairal et al., 2018</xref>). Furthermore, limited gene flow increases inter-population genetic differences and may eventually drive speciation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Dorn et al., 2014</xref>).</p>
<p>Studies on climate change and its effects on species range dynamics have typically focused on recent geological timescales, such as the glacial and interglacial stages of the Pleistocene, the last 2.6 million years (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Hewitt, 2004</xref>), or the last 120,000 years of the Late Pleistocene-Holocene (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Mart&#x00ED;nez-Meyer et al., 2004</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Mart&#x00ED;nez-Meyer and Peterson, 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Esp&#x00ED;ndola et al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Mairal et al., 2018</xref>). However, these shallow timescales are often insufficient to discern how much evolutionary history loss is anthropogenic-induced or a result of the natural cycling of diversification rates in long-term species dynamics (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Moen and Morlon, 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Huang et al., 2015</xref>). In contrast, evolutionary data that spans deeper timescales, e.g., tens of millions of years, is expected to provide a more accurate understanding of organisms&#x2019; persistence and adaptational responses, which are built over generations of genetic changes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B66">Willis and MacDonald, 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B62">Svenning et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Meseguer et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Burke et al., 2018</xref>), and hence, a more accurate prediction on the impact of ongoing and future climate change on a species geographic range (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Mart&#x00ED;nez-Meyer et al., 2004</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Diniz-Filho and Bini, 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B55">Romdal et al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Meseguer et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Burke et al., 2018</xref>). One climate change event of major scientific and societal concern is the current aridification trend that affects areas such as the African continent, the Mediterranean Basin and Arabia-Western Asia (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Berdugo et al., 2020</xref>). Causes are both historical and contemporary: geotectonic changes starting in the Late Neogene, the last 25 million years, introduced a drier climate in the southwest Palearctic, with increasing annual temperatures and decreasing precipitation levels, which led some lineages to extinction (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B64">Trauth et al., 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">Pokorny et al., 2015</xref>) also human-induced greenhouse emissions and deforestation also contributed to this trend by dramatically reducing species ranges (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Mairal et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Berdugo et al., 2020</xref>).</p>
<p>Two approaches are often used to reconstruct the evolutionary signature of climate change on species range dynamics. Biogeographic inferences, based on a time-calibrated phylogeny and associated taxa distributions, can be used to infer ancestral geographic ranges and the sequence of geographic range shifts that led to the current distributions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B53">Ree and Smith, 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">Ronquist and Sanmart&#x00ED;n, 2011</xref>). Ecological niche models (ENM), based on occurrence data, can be used to estimate the environmental preferences (climatic envelope) of species, allowing for spatial exploration of similar climate conditions in the past, present, and future (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Ara&#x00FA;jo and New, 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Meseguer et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Mairal et al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Carboni et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">H&#x00E6;user et al., 2018</xref>). The two approaches have their advantages and shortcomings. Biogeographic inference typically employs pre-defined discrete areas that are represented by abstract units (e.g., A, B, and AB) instead of bounded by geographical coordinates (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">Ree and Sanmart&#x00ED;n, 2009</xref>; but see <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">Quintero et al., 2015</xref>). ENMs implicitly assume that an organism&#x2019;s climatic niche is conserved over evolutionary time, which might be unrealistic under repeated cycles of ciimate change and over long timescales (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Peterson, 2006</xref>). The use of ENMs to hindcast across time is also limited by the availability of paleoclimatic data, and most ENMs have been projected onto the recent geological past (Pleistocene, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Mart&#x00ED;nez-Meyer et al., 2004</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Mairal et al., 2018</xref>; but see <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Meseguer et al., 2015</xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Mairal et al., 2017</xref>).</p>
<p>Biogeographic inference and ENMs are not mutually exclusive; there have been attempts to integrate them, even at deep timescales. For example, some authors used ENMs to inform biogeographic analyses and include climatically suitable areas outside the species current range, i.e., due to extinction or incomplete sampling (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B67">Yesson and Culham, 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B61">Smith and Donoghue, 2010</xref>); in other studies, hindcasted ENMs were used to discover transient climatic corridors that facilitated species geographic movement by connecting patches of suitable habitat (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">Metcalf et al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Meseguer et al., 2015</xref>). These approaches are well suited for medium to large-sized phylogenies (&#x003E;20 taxa) and groups that are well represented in georeferenced datasets (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B61">Smith and Donoghue, 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Meseguer et al., 2015</xref>). However, in cases where the phylogeny is small (&#x003C;10 taxa), these methods can be more difficult to implement because of the uncertainty in the inferred ancestral ranges (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B58">Sanmart&#x00ED;n and Meseguer, 2016</xref>). Building ENMs on taxa with sparse and or biased georeferenced occurrence data, such as rare endemics (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">Rabinowitz, 1981</xref>), is also problematic because of the treatment of pseudoabsences, i.e., creation of pseudoabsences to combat the lack of valid (confirmed) absence data (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Engler et al., 2004</xref>). As well as a quantity problem (i.e., number of records), there is a quality problem (i.e., location accuracy; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Engler et al., 2004</xref>) because rare endemics are often represented in herbaria collections by voucher specimens with imprecise geographic information. If the rarity of species is associated with ancient origins and long phylogenetic internodes, as in the case of historically high extinction rates, uncertainty in biogeographic inference becomes even larger (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B58">Sanmart&#x00ED;n and Meseguer, 2016</xref>).</p>
<p>Here, we present an approach that, unlike previous approaches does not rely on integrating ENMs into biogeographic analysis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B61">Smith and Donoghue, 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Meseguer et al., 2015</xref>), but treats them instead as independent and complementary sources of evidence, which, when used in tandem, can fill their respective information gaps. Our approach is most useful in cases when there is high uncertainty in biogeographic analysis associated to a small-sized phylogeny with deep temporal divergences, and when sparse and/or biased georeferenced records make the treatment of pseudoabsences in presence/absence ENM methods difficult (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Allouche et al., 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Diniz-Filho et al., 2010</xref>). We also introduce a new approach in the selection of truncation threshold values for generating binary ENM models in the distant past, which is based on the use of biogeographic inference information.</p>
<p>To test our approach, we used two species-poor angiosperm genera that exhibit a pattern of continent-wide geographic disjunctions attributed to historical climate change. The Rand Flora (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1</xref>) describes a floristic pattern in which sister-species, or clades of closely related species, are distributed on opposite sides of the African continent (northwest, eastern, and southern Africa) and adjacent archipelagos, Macaronesia and Socotra (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">Sanmart&#x00ED;n et al., 2010</xref>). Recent studies based on phylogenetic and biogeographic data explained this pattern as a result of ecological vicariance and climate-driven extinction linked to an aridification trend that started in the Neogene and continues today (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Mairal et al., 2015</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">Pokorny et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Culshaw et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">Rinc&#x00F3;n-Barrado et al., 2021</xref>). Genus <italic>Camptoloma</italic> (Scrophulariaceae) comprises three species: the southwestern African endemic <italic>C. rotundifolium</italic>, which is sister to a clade formed by Gran Canarian <italic>C. canariense</italic> and <italic>C. lyperiiflorum</italic>, endemic to the Horn of Africa, southern Arabia and Socotra Island (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1A</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Culshaw et al., 2021</xref>). <italic>Canarina</italic> (Campanulaceae) comprises also three species: the locally widespread Canarian endemic <italic>C. canariensis</italic>, which is sister to a clade formed by two Eastern African montane species: <italic>C. eminii</italic> and <italic>C. abyssinica</italic> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1B</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Mairal et al., 2015</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">2018</xref>). In addition to their widely disjunct distribution separated by thousands of kilometers across northern and central Africa, <italic>Camptoloma</italic> and <italic>Canarina</italic> exhibit deep-temporal divergences, dating back to the Miocene and Pliocene, among the three disjunct species as well as with their recent common ancestors (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Mairal et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Culshaw et al., 2021</xref>). The African species of these two genera are also characterized by small and geographically restricted populations, which in the case of <italic>Canarina</italic> species are locally threatened by human action (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Mairal et al., 2018</xref>). Fieldwork and specimen collection in these species is problematic due to political conflict (e.g., Somalia and Yemen) or difficult geographic access (Socotra, Namibian Brandberg Mountains), which likely explain their poor representation in worldwide herbaria and global geographic databases such as GBIF<sup><xref ref-type="fn" rid="footnote1">1</xref></sup>. Thus, <italic>Canarina</italic> and <italic>Camptoloma</italic> fulfill the three criteria defined above to test our in-tandem biogeographic/ENM approach: a small-sized phylogeny (three species) with long internodal branches (ancient divergence times), and a sparse biased geographic sampling, spanning a broad and continent-wide disjunct distribution.</p>
<fig id="F1" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 1</label>
<caption><p>Geographic distribution of species within genera <bold>(A)</bold> <italic>Camptoloma</italic> and <bold>(B)</bold> <italic>Canarina</italic>, depicting the Rand Flora disjunct distribution across Africa. Photographs: Camptoloma rotundifolium: Martin Weigand; Camptoloma lyperiiflorum: Morten Ross; Canarina canariensis: Mario Mairal; Canarina eminii and Canarina abyssinica: Juan Jose Aldasoro.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fevo-09-662092-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>The aims of our study were: (i) to build ENM models for genera <italic>Canarina</italic> and <italic>Camptoloma</italic> using all available georeferenced occurrence data, present-day and paleoclimatic data, and biogeographic information (i.e., ancestral ranges); the latter were used to select the truncation threshold value needed for converting ENM continuous habitat suitability predictions into binary presence/absence maps that are more readily interpretable. (ii) To reconstruct the sequence of range shifts that led to the current distributions using the ancestral ranges inferred through biogeographic analysis, in tandem with preindustrial and paleoclimate ENM hindcasted projections; specifically, ENM paleoclimate projections were used to reduce uncertainty in the biogeographic analysis by providing information on climatically suitable areas at different time points along the long internodal branches that lead to species divergences. (iii) Finally, the two selected Rand Flora genera offer us an opportunity to explore the effects of ancient climate change on species range dynamics.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S2" sec-type="materials|methods">
<title>Materials and Methods</title>
<sec id="S2.SS1">
<title>Biogeographic Inference</title>
<p>We retrieved biogeographic information, i.e., the geographic range of ancestral species and the potential sequence of biogeographic events that led to the current distribution in <italic>Camptoloma</italic> and <italic>Canarina</italic>, from our own published studies: <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Culshaw et al. (2021)</xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Mairal et al. (2015)</xref>, respectively. These studies used molecular phylogenies based on several plastid markers and multi-copy nuclear ITS to reconstruct phylogenetic relationships among the disjunct species and their closely related outgroups. Lineage divergence times were inferred using Bayesian relaxed molecular clocks. Biogeographic inference was performed using two parametric approaches that are based on continuous-time Markov-chain (CTMC) models of range evolution with states representing user-defined, discrete areas of distribution (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B60">Sanmart&#x00ED;n, 2020</xref>). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Mairal et al. (2015)</xref> employed the Bayesian Island Biogeography (BIB) model (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B59">Sanmart&#x00ED;n et al., 2008</xref>), which assumes single-area ancestors and focuses on the sequence of migration events between areas. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Culshaw et al. (2021)</xref> used the Dispersal Extinction Cladogenesis (DEC) model (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B53">Ree and Smith, 2008</xref>), which permits widespread ancestors and focuses on scenarios of range division at nodes. CTMC models were implemented in a Bayesian framework using software BEAST (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Lemey et al., 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Mairal et al., 2015</xref>) and RevBayes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Landis et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Culshaw et al., 2021</xref>), allowing inference of marginal posterior probabilities (mean and 95% high-posterior credibility intervals) for the CTMC parameters and ancestral ranges. In both <italic>Camptoloma</italic> and <italic>Canarina</italic>, the geographic range of the stem ancestor, i.e., the divergence between each genus and its sister-group, was inferred with high uncertainty. This is linked to long internodal branches subtending the stem- and crown-nodes in the two genera (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Mairal et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Culshaw et al., 2021</xref>). More details on these analyses can be found in the original studies.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S2.SS2">
<title>Ecological Niche Models</title>
<p>ENMs for genera <italic>Camptoloma</italic> and <italic>Canarina</italic> were generated <italic>de novo</italic> for this study by following the below steps:</p>
<sec id="S2.SS2.SSS1">
<title>Georeferenced Occurrence Data</title>
<p>Species location data associated with geographical coordinates were obtained individually for <italic>Camptoloma</italic> and <italic>Canarina</italic> using: (i) herbarium sample vouchers from the collections of Real Jard&#x00ED;n Bot&#x00E1;nico (MA), Royal Botanical Garden of Edinburgh (E), Uppsala Museum of Evolution Herbarium (U), and Pretoria National Herbarium (PRE); (ii) samples collected during our fieldwork campaigns between 2013 and 2019, mostly in the Canary Islands (details in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Mairal et al., 2015</xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Culshaw et al., 2021</xref>); and (iii) online georeferenced databases, including GBIF (downloaded for <italic>Camptoloma</italic> from <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.15468/dl.abs9dk">https://doi.org/10.15468/dl.abs9dk</ext-link>; and for <italic>Canarina</italic> from <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.15468/dl.9fcg75">https://doi.org/10.15468/dl.9fcg75</ext-link>), the &#x2018;&#x2018;Flora de Gran Canaria&#x2019;&#x2019;<sup><xref ref-type="fn" rid="footnote2">2</xref></sup>, and &#x2018;&#x2018;Anthos&#x2019;&#x2019;<sup><xref ref-type="fn" rid="footnote3">3</xref></sup>. Sampling was uneven across species within genera: for <italic>Camptoloma</italic>, the denser sampling corresponded to Gran Canarian <italic>C. canariense</italic>, and the least representative to the two African species, especially in regards to georeferenced online records in northern Namibia and Horn of Africa. In <italic>Canarina</italic>, <italic>C. abyssinica</italic> was the least represented species in the occurrence dataset. Nevertheless, we emphasize that for both genera, our geographic sampling covered the entire genus distribution.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S2.SS2.SSS2">
<title>Climatic Data</title>
<p>Present-day climate datasets for the African continent, the Canary Islands, Madagascar, Yemen and Oman, were obtained from the WorldClim database<sup><xref ref-type="fn" rid="footnote4">4</xref></sup> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Fick and Hijmans, 2017</xref>) at intervals of 2.5 x 2.5 min. We obtained two sets of climatic variables (listed in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="TS1">Supplementary Table 1</xref>): (i) the mean of seven monthly variables (minimum, maximum, and mean temperature, precipitation, solar radiation, water vapor pressure, and wind speed), which have been averaged over 30 years (between 1970 and 2000; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Fick and Hijmans, 2017</xref>); and (ii) 17 bioclimatic (BIO) variables, which are derived from the monthly values of precipitation and mean temperature variables mentioned above. This climatic dataset (24 variables in total) was matched against the above referenced geographical coordinates to generate a present-day dataset for the environmental preferences of <italic>Camptoloma</italic> and <italic>Canarina</italic> across their current distribution range in Africa and adjacent regions (datasets found in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SA1">Supplementary Appendix 1</xref>). Note that the bioclimatic variables BIO 2 and BIO 3 (Mean Diurnal Range and Isothermality) were excluded from the ENM projections based on the paleoclimate datasets because it was not possible to calculate them, as paleoclimate data include only monthly values for mean temperature and precipitation (see below).</p>
<p>Paleoclimate datasets for the African continent, southern Arabia, and Macaronesia were obtained from three global Hadley Centre-coupled ocean-atmosphere general circulation models (HadCM3L) that incorporate the effect of changes in atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Beerling et al., 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Beerling et al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Bradshaw et al., 2012</xref>). These paleoclimate datasets consist of monthly values of mean temperature and precipitation, with spatial resolution 225 x 150 min. They represent major climate warming and cooling events worldwide (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Meseguer et al., 2015</xref>), and were used to represent geological intervals (<italic>time slices</italic>) that are considered relevant for the evolution of Rand Flora lineages in Africa (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">Pokorny et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Mairal et al., 2017</xref>). (i) <italic>Time slice</italic> I: the Mid Miocene Climatic Optimum (MMCO, c. 17-14 Ma), a 400 ppm CO<sub>2</sub> simulation on the Late Miocene paleogeography; (ii) <italic>Time slice</italic> II: the Late Miocene Climate Cooling event (LMC, 11.6-5.3 Ma), a 280-ppm CO<sub>2</sub> simulation on Late Miocene paleogeography; (iii) <italic>Time slice</italic> III: the Mid-Pliocene Warming event (MPWE, 3.6-2.6 Ma), a 560-ppm CO<sub>2</sub> simulation on Mid Pliocene paleogeography. We added a fourth period: (iv) <italic>Time slice</italic> IV: the Preindustrial world (up to 1900), a 280 ppm CO<sub>2</sub> simulation of the climate before the industrial revolution; this dataset has a higher resolution of 2.5 x 2.5 min, and is used here to provide a baseline HadCM3L climate. For each <italic>time slice</italic>, we calculated the bioclimatic variables using the <italic>biovars</italic> function (R package <italic>dismo</italic>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Hijmans et al., 2017</xref>).</p>
<p>Each variable in the present-day and paleoclimate datasets were normalized to lie within the closed boundaries [0, 1]: <inline-formula><mml:math id="INEQ1"><mml:mrow><mml:mpadded width="+3.3pt"><mml:msub><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mpadded><mml:mo rspace="5.8pt">=</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>variable</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>min</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x2061;</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>variable</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>max</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x2061;</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>variable</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>min</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mi>variable</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, where <italic>z</italic> is the i<sup>th</sup> normalized data variable.</p>
<p>A potential issue with our datasets is that of spatial correspondence. The geographic range of both <italic>Camptoloma</italic> and <italic>Canarina</italic> spans the northern and southern hemispheres (as seen in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1</xref>). Thus, localities for species such as <italic>Camptoloma lyperiiflorum</italic> and <italic>C. rotundifolium</italic>, or <italic>Canarina canariensis</italic> and <italic>C. eminii</italic> are asynchronous in their warm/cool periods, which could introduce bias if the monthly climatic variables are used in the ENM predictions (e.g., January is &#x201C;winter&#x201D; in the northern hemisphere but &#x201C;summer&#x201D; in the southern hemisphere), which is in fact the rationale for the use of averaged bioclimatic variables in ENMs. To address this issue, we &#x201C;inverted&#x201D; the monthly variables in the present-day and paleoclimate datasets for the southern hemisphere locations, so that the corresponding summer months for the northern and southern hemisphere locations were comparable (e.g., &#x201C;January&#x201D; was renamed as &#x201C;July&#x201D;, &#x201C;February&#x201D; as &#x201C;August&#x201D;, and so on).</p>
<p>Lastly, we partitioned the &#x201C;inverted&#x201D; present-day dataset into three subsets: the &#x201C;full&#x201D; dataset that included all seven monthly variables; a &#x201C;prec-temp&#x201D; dataset composed of only the two monthly variables, mean temperature and precipitation, available in the paleoclimate datasets; and a &#x201C;bioclimatic&#x201D; dataset with the BIO variables. We used the R package <italic>caret</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Max Kuhn, 2021</xref>) and a correlation matrix to reduce the factorial dimension of the full and bioclimatic datasets by removing between-variable correlations and non-informative variables (one correlation matrix per month for the full dataset and one correlation matrix for the bioclimatic dataset, 13 in total). Variables with an absolute correlation of at least 75% were removed. <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="TS2">Supplementary Table 2</xref> shows the selected variables.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S2.SS2.SSS3">
<title>Generating Present-Day ENMs</title>
<p>We used the modeling approach developed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Hengl et al. (2009)</xref> to build ENM models based on the present-day dataset. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Hengl et al. (2009)</xref>&#x2019;s approach, implemented in R, is an extension of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Engler et al. (2004)</xref> to use occurrence and pseudoabsence data to build ENMs for rare and endangered species. Generating pseudoabsences at random over the study area is a common approach in ENMs to explore the reliability of geographic projections. Unfortunately, this is problematic in rare species due to paucity of data and lack of valid (confirmed) absence data (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Chefaoui and Lobo, 2008</xref>). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Hengl et al. (2009)</xref>&#x2019;s approach uses ecological niche factor analysis (ENFA) and weighted pseudoabsences to create a presence/pseudoabsence dataset; the latter is then used to build regression-kriging models for predicting habitat suitability, and hence, the location of individuals across geographical space (further details can be found in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Engler et al. (2004)</xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Hengl et al. (2009)</xref>. We modified <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Hengl et al.&#x2019;s (2009)</xref> R script to allow projection of the ENMs over geographic data that is either spatially or temporally variable, i.e., in our study we projected ENMs over four paleoclimate <italic>time slices</italic>; the modified R script is provided in GitHub<sup><xref ref-type="fn" rid="footnote5">5</xref></sup>.</p>
<p>In our study, we used <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Hengl et al. (2009)</xref> method to build genus-level ENMs for <italic>Camptoloma</italic> and <italic>Canarina</italic>, separately, by pooling all species occurrence data within each genus. Building a single generic ENM, as in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Meseguer et al. (2015)</xref>, rather than species-specific ENMs was preferred because of the sparse and uneven sampling per species, especially between the Canarian and African taxa, which could introduce bias into ENM comparisons; also, we were interested here in the deep evolutionary divergences and not on the extant species niches. For each genus separately, ENMs were built per month for the present-day full and prec-temp datasets, and a single ENM for the present-day bioclimatic dataset, i.e., in total 25 present-day ENMs were built for each genus.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S2.SS2.SSS4">
<title>Assessing Data Bias in Present-Day ENM Projections</title>
<p>Unlike the present-day full dataset that contains seven variables per month (e.g., solar radiation and wind speed), our <italic>time slice</italic> paleoclimate datasets consists of only the monthly mean temperature and precipitation variables. A lower number of environmental variables may introduce bias in the hindcasted ENM projections, if the two variables used to build the paleoclimate datasets &#x2013;monthly precipitation and mean temperature&#x2013; do not contain enough information to describe the genus distribution. To test if data reduction causes bias in hindcasted ENM projections, we compared the present-day ENM projections built on the full climatic dataset with those of the prec-temp dataset and the bioclimatic dataset. Specifically, we projected all our ENMs upon the present-day dataset to generate the continuous suitability maps. In the full and prec-temp ENMs, the projections for each of the twelve months were combined to generate a &#x201C;yearly&#x201D; ENM continuous suitability map by averaging across the monthly continuous suitability maps; thus, for each grid cell, the &#x201C;yearly&#x201D; ENM projection contained the averaged or &#x201C;ensembled&#x201D; (as in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Ara&#x00FA;jo and New, 2007</xref>) value of the twelve monthly ENM projections. Then, we used the truncation threshold criteria described below (see next section and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2</xref>) to create post-truncation absence/presence binary maps. We calculated the goodness of fit for these models&#x2019; post-truncation threshold continuous projections using discrimination indices derived from the confusion matrix: error, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, precision, and the false rate (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Fielding and Bell, 1997</xref>). To measure the strength of association among the ENM projections derived from the three present-day full, prec-temp and bioclimatic datasets, we calculated the Spearman&#x2019;s rho statistic for the continuous, pre-truncation threshold maps, and the Simpson&#x2019;s Similarity Index for the binary, post-truncation threshold maps. If the ENM predictions generated by the prec-temp and the bioclimatic datasets are found to be associated to the ENM predictions generated by the full dataset, we can assume that the prec-temp and bioclimatic datasets contain enough information to describe climatic suitability in <italic>Camptoloma</italic> and <italic>Canarina</italic>, and hence, are appropriate for hindcasting ENMs over the paleoclimatic <italic>time slices</italic>.</p>
<fig id="F2" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 2</label>
<caption><p>The biogeographically informed truncation threshold criteria to select the truncation threshold value for the ENM projections: The upper row shows three paleo-<italic>time slices</italic> I&#x2013;III and one preindustrial <italic>time slice</italic> IV used in our artificial example. (i) The biogeographic inference that represents the stem-, crown-, and node ancestors of an artificial genus example (tree not to scale). Maps at tips show the current distribution of each species, maps at nodes represent the ancestral distributions inferred in the biogeographic analysis (black). For some nodes, there are suggested connections between potential distribution of ancestors (gray shading). (ii) Continuous ENM projections of the artificial genus hindcasted across the four <italic>time slices</italic> before applying the truncation threshold. (iii) The continuous ENM projections are run through different truncation thresholds values, ranging from between [0, 1]. Cells with values that fall below the truncation threshold are colored white (&#x201C;absent&#x201D;); those equal to or greater than the threshold are colored black (&#x201C;present&#x201D;). The red circles represent clusters of connected suitable cells (here, suitable cells are considered connected if the distance between them is &#x2264; one unsuitable cells). (iv) Chosen the truncation threshold: for hindcasted ENMs, we select the value that generates the best match the inferred ancestral distributions in the biogeographic analysis, this was 0.3 for the paleo <italic>time slices</italic> I-III in our artificial example. For the present-day <italic>time slice IV</italic>, we select truncation threshold values that generates an absence/presence map using an established truncation threshold criteria to select the truncation threshold. In this study we consider the minimized distance of the ROC curve truncation threshold criteria (MinROCdist; PresenceAbsence R Package, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Freeman and Moisen, 2008</xref>), here 0.7 in our artificial example.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fevo-09-662092-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="S2.SS2.SSS5">
<title>Hindcasted ENM Projections</title>
<p>To generate the past ENM predictions for both genera, we projected upon each of the four <italic>time slices</italic> the twelve ENMs built on the monthly prec-temp datasets, as well as the single ENM built on the bioclimatic dataset. As described above, the continuous value predictions from the twelve monthly prec-temp ENMs were averaged to calculate a &#x201C;yearly&#x201D; prec-temp ENM projection for each <italic>time slice</italic>. Lastly, we used our truncation threshold method to create post-truncation absence/presence maps for the bioclimatic ENM and the yearly prec-temp ENM projections, as described in the next section (see also <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S2.SS2.SSS6">
<title>Spatial Correspondence Across the Hemispheres</title>
<p>To explore if using monthly values for ENM projections is appropriate when the genus distribution spans the northern and southern hemispheres, we performed an additional analysis with the present-day prec-temp dataset. We built monthly ENMs for both genera based on the original, non-inverted present-day datasets and projected them onto the four inverted paleo- and preindustrial world-<italic>time slices</italic>. We then used our truncation threshold to create post-truncation threshold binary maps. As above, we measured the strength of association between the non-inverted and inverted yearly ENM projections by calculating the Spearman&#x2019;s rho statistic for the pre-truncation maps and the Simpson&#x2019;s Similarity Index for the post-truncation projections.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S2.SS2.SSS7">
<title>Using Biogeographic Information to Select the Truncation Threshold Value</title>
<p>A common practice in ecological niche modeling is to truncate the continuous value predictions returned by ENM projections to produce binary absence/presence maps of habitat suitability that are more readily interpretable (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Diniz-Filho et al., 2010</xref>). This truncation threshold is typically selected by using model fitting techniques and a training dataset, subsetted from the original dataset (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Allouche et al., 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Diniz-Filho et al., 2010</xref>). The same selected truncation threshold is used across all temporal scales. Here, we propose a different truncation threshold method that uses information obtained from biogeographic inference and allows for the grouping of <italic>time slices</italic> at different temporal scales. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2</xref> demonstrates this approach using a theoretical example, a genus with three species distributed in three disjunct regions. First (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2i</xref>): biogeographic analysis, based on distributional and phylogenetic data, is used to infer ancestral ranges at every node in the phylogeny, and these ranges along with current distributions are represented as absence/presence maps; if the ancestral range is composed of disjunct areas, potential connections among these areas are represented as gray shading in the maps. Second (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2ii</xref>): continuous hindcasted ENM projections are generated for each <italic>time slice</italic> crossed by the phylogeny. Third (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2iii</xref>): the resulting continuous ENM projections are run through alternative truncation threshold values, ranging from 0 to 1, to generate binary habitat suitability maps; grid cells with values equal to or greater than the truncation threshold are assigned the value of 1, indicating suitable climatic habitat (black cells in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2iii</xref>); those lower, are assigned a value of 0, i.e., unsuitable habitat (white cells). Next, for each truncation threshold value, the resulting post-truncation ENM is examined to find clusters of connected cells with suitable habitats: suitable cells are considered connected if they are separated by no more than one unsuitable cell (red cells in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2iii</xref>). Fourth (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2iv</xref>): the post-truncation ENMs are compared with the nodal ancestral ranges and the tip distribution maps (i.e., the current species geographic distribution in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2i</xref>); the threshold value that generates ENM projections that best match these ranges is selected as the optimal threshold value. For comparing the post-truncation ENMs projections against the tip species distribution maps, we used an established truncation threshold criterion: the minimized distance of the ROC curve, MinROCdist, as estimated in the <italic>PresenceAbsence</italic> R Package (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Freeman and Moisen, 2008</xref>). This criterion implies finding the threshold value that minimizes the distance between the ROC plot and the upper left corner of the unit square, which represents the probability that the model correctly predicts the observed presences and absences. MinROCdist has been recommended as suitable for general use in the building of ENMs for extant species (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Jim&#x00E9;nez-Valverde and Lobo, 2007</xref>).</p>
<p>We selected a single optimal threshold value for all three paleoclimate <italic>time slices</italic> I, II, and III. The Preindustrial world <italic>time slice</italic> IV had its own optimal threshold value calculated with the MinROCdist method. Allowing for different truncation threshold criteria for the paleoclimate <italic>versus</italic> the Preindustrial <italic>time slices</italic> is justified on the different spatial scale resolution between datasets. Our paleoclimate <italic>time slices</italic> have a coarser spatial resolution than the preindustrial one (100 km vs. 1 km), and, thus, are probably less sensitive for detecting habitat suitability. Furthermore, there is increasing uncertainty in our habitat suitability predictions the further in time we project ENMs. Therefore, a higher, more conservative threshold value is needed for the Preindustrial <italic>time slice</italic>, and a lower, less restrictive threshold value for the paleoclimate <italic>time slices</italic>.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="results" id="S3">
<title>Results</title>
<sec id="S3.SS1">
<title>Present-Day ENM Projections</title>
<p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3A</xref> shows the continuous post-truncation ENM projections for <italic>Camptoloma</italic> and <italic>Canarina</italic> built upon the present-day bioclimatic, full and prec-temp datasets (the latter are presented as the &#x201C;yearly&#x201D; monthly averaged values). <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3B</xref> shows the corresponding post-truncation ENM projections under the truncation threshold value selected under the MinROCdist criterion, which oscillates between a value of 0.93 and 0.99. <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="TS3">Supplementary Table 3</xref> reports the performance statistics (error, accuracy, and precision, etc.) for each model under the selected threshold value. All models performed well for all statistics except for precision, which was consistently low across models. In our study, precision assumes that each genus that we have recorded is present in all possible locations with a suitable habitat, which is clearly not the case. Our presence datasets for <italic>Camptoloma</italic> and <italic>Canarina</italic> are incomplete because, as mentioned in the introduction, data collection is difficult, and the genera that we are modeling have a limited geographic distribution. <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="TS4">Supplementary Table 4</xref> presents the statistics for the strength of association between the full-ENM and the prec-temp and bioclimatic-ENM present-day projections. In the case of the pre-truncation threshold projections, the full and prec-temp datasets showed a &#x201C;strong association&#x201D; (according to the descriptor in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Dancey and Reidy, 2007</xref>) in <italic>Camptoloma</italic> (Spearman&#x2019;s rho = 0.45), and a very strong association in <italic>Canarina</italic> (Spearman&#x2019;s rho = 0.93). The pre-truncation threshold projections based on the present-day full and bioclimatic datasets showed a weak association in <italic>Camptoloma</italic> (Spearman&#x2019;s rho = 0.21), but strong in <italic>Canarina</italic> (Spearman&#x2019;s rho = 0.78). The Simpson&#x2019;s Similarity Index showed a strong to very strong association between the post-truncation threshold present-day projections (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="TS4">Supplementary Table 4</xref>) based on the full dataset and the prec-temp and bioclimatic datasets, suggesting that when an appropriate truncation threshold is used, even projections with weak associations become strong. In all, these results support our contention that the monthly mean temperature and precipitation variables included in the paleoclimate datasets hold enough information to make reliable predictions about habitat suitability, and thus can be used for ENM hindcasting over the paleo and preindustrial <italic>time slices</italic> (see below).</p>
<fig id="F3" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 3</label>
<caption><p>Preindustrial ENMs. <bold>(A)</bold> Continuous, preindustrial geographical projections of the full, bioclimatic and prec-temp ENMs for genus <italic>Camptoloma</italic> and <italic>Canarina</italic>, with the ENMs created on present-day climatic data. For the full and prec-temp ENMs, we present the &#x201C;yearly&#x201D; average of the month ENM projections. <bold>(B)</bold> Absence/presence maps for full, bioclimatic and prec-temp ENMs for genus <italic>Camptoloma</italic> and <italic>Canarina</italic> after applying selected truncation threshold value obtained from MinROCdist, [range = (0.93, 0.99)] to the continuous projections shown in <bold>(A)</bold>. Black indicates habitat suitability and white habitat unsuitability.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fevo-09-662092-g003.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="S3.SS2">
<title>Hindcasted ENM Projections</title>
<p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4</xref> shows the hindcasted ENM projections, both pre-truncation (continuous) and post-truncation (presence/absence), based on the prec-temp dataset in the case of <italic>Camptoloma</italic>, and on the bioclimatic dataset in the case of <italic>Canarina</italic> and for each of the four <italic>time slices</italic>. <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="FS1">Supplementary Figure 1</xref> shows the post-truncation ENM projections for different threshold values in <italic>Camptoloma</italic> (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="FS1">Supplementary Figure 1A</xref>) and <italic>Canarina</italic> (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="FS1">Supplementary Figure 1B</xref>) using the same datasets as above. For the paleoclimate <italic>time slices</italic> I-III, a truncation threshold value of 0.12 was selected for <italic>Camptoloma</italic> and a value of 0.21 for <italic>Canarina</italic>. For the Preindustrial world <italic>time slice</italic> IV, a truncation threshold value of 0.95 was selected for <italic>Camptoloma</italic> and of 0.99 for <italic>Canarina</italic>. In both genera, the hindcasted ENM projections show a much larger extension of suitable habitat in the past compared to the present-day distribution. Furthermore, the paleoclimate projections predicted the existence of suitable habitat corridors connecting the currently disjunct species ranges during the Miocene and Pliocene: these involve central and northern Africa during the LMC for <italic>Canarina</italic>, and the LMC and MPWE for <italic>Camptoloma</italic> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F4" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 4</label>
<caption><p>Hindcasted ENMs. Continuous and geographical projections for the best fitted ENMs for <italic>Camptoloma</italic> and <italic>Canarina</italic> over the four <italic>time slices</italic>: Mid Miocene Climate Optimum (MMCO, 17-14 Ma); Late Miocene Climate Cooling, (LMC, 11.6-5.3 Ma); Mid Pliocene Climate Warming (MPWE, 3.6-2.6 Ma); and preindustrial world (up to 1900). Here we selected the ENM created from the prec-temp dataset for <italic>Camptoloma</italic> and the bioclimatic dataset for <italic>Canarina</italic>. A truncation threshold of 0.12 and 0.22 was selected for <italic>Camptoloma</italic> and <italic>Canarina</italic>, respectively, for the paleo <italic>time slices</italic>, and 0.95 and 0.99 for <italic>Camptoloma</italic> and <italic>Canarina</italic>, respectively, for the preindustrial world. Black/white legend bar: &#x201C;Black&#x201D; indicates suitable habitat and &#x201C;white&#x201D; unsuitable habitat; gray scale legend bar indicates habitat suitability. <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="FS1">Supplementary Figure 1</xref> shows in more detail how the truncation threshold was fine-tuned across the paleo <italic>time slices</italic>.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fevo-09-662092-g004.tif"/>
</fig>
<p><xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="FS2">Supplementary Figure 2</xref> shows the post-truncation hindcasted ENM projections across different threshold values based on the alternative climatic dataset for each genus, that is, ENM projections for the bioclimatic dataset in <italic>Camptoloma</italic> (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="FS2">Supplementary Figure 2A</xref>) and ENM predictions based on the yearly prec-temp dataset in <italic>Canarina</italic> (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="FS2">Supplementary Figure 2B</xref>). Comparisons indicated that for ENM projections based on these particular datasets and genera, it was not possible to find an optimal threshold value across the three paleoclimate <italic>time slices</italic>. Therefore, the bioclimatic and prec-temp ENMs for <italic>Camptoloma</italic> and <italic>Canarina</italic>, respectively, were excluded from further analysis. Finally, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5</xref> demonstrates the need to use a different truncation threshold value for different temporal scales: we compared post-truncation ENM projections for the three paleoclimate <italic>time slices</italic> I-III that were generated using either the threshold value for the Preindustrial <italic>time slice</italic> IV, calculated with the minimized distance ROC curve, versus the post-truncation ENM projections for the three paleoclimate <italic>time slices</italic> I-III that were generated using an independent threshold value calculated with the biogeographically informed truncation method described in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2</xref>. Results, shown here for <italic>Camptoloma</italic> prec-temp and <italic>Canarina</italic> bioclimatic ENMs, respectively, indicate that using the MinROCdist method is too restrictive and fails to recover any spatial distribution pattern in the ENM hindcasts of the paleoclimate <italic>time slices</italic> I-III that fits the biogeographic inference results.</p>
<fig id="F5" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 5</label>
<caption><p>Performance comparison between the biogeographically-informed truncation threshold criterion and minimized distance ROC curve truncation threshold criteria.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fevo-09-662092-g005.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="S3.SS3">
<title>Spatial Correspondence Between Hemispheres</title>
<p><xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="FS3">Supplementary Figure 3</xref> and <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="TS4">Supplementary Table 4</xref> show the results of the comparison between the pre- (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="FS3">Supplementary Figure 3A</xref>) and post-truncation (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="FS3">Supplementary Figure 3B</xref>) ENMs generated with the non-inverted versus the inverted prec-temp dataset for <italic>Camptoloma</italic> (we did not investigate hemisphere effects in <italic>Canarina</italic>, since, as explained above, the prec-temp ENMs for this genus were excluded from further analyses). The truncation threshold value for the non-inverted prec-temp ENM projections was 0.97 for the preindustrial <italic>time slice</italic> and 0.1 for the paleoclimate <italic>time slices</italic>. A very strong association between the non-inverted and inverted prec-temp ENM projections was found for each of the four <italic>time slices</italic> [pre-truncation threshold: Spearman&#x2019;s rho range = [0.72, 0.83]; post-truncation threshold: Simpson&#x2019;s Similarity Index range = (0.78, 0.88)]. Moreover, the non-inverted and inverted post-truncation threshold ENM maps showed a similar history of range shift events, with climatic corridors in the LMC and MPWE <italic>time slices</italic> connecting the currently disjunct species distributions. This suggests that the hemisphere effect did not bias our yearly monthly averaged ENM projections in <italic>Camptoloma</italic>, and therefore had no effect in our predictions.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S3.SS4">
<title>Reconstructing Geographic Range Shifts Using ENM Projections and Biogeographic Inference</title>
<p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure 6iii</xref> reconstructs the history of geographic range shifts in <italic>Camptoloma</italic> and <italic>Canarina</italic> using information provided by the biogeographic inference analysis (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure 6i</xref>) and the hindcasted ENM projections (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure 6iii</xref>). The inferred ancestral ranges in <italic>Camptoloma</italic> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure 6Ai</xref>) matched the climatically suitable areas depicted in the post-truncation ENM projections based on the prec-temp dataset (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure 6Aii</xref>). In <italic>Canarina</italic>, the hindcasted ENMs based on the bioclimatic dataset (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure 6Bii</xref>) also showed a good match to the biogeographic inferences (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure 6Bi</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F6" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 6</label>
<caption><p>Combining information from biogeographic inference and ENM to reconstruct the spatio-temporal evolution of <bold>(A)</bold> <italic>Camptoloma</italic> and <bold>(B)</bold> <italic>Canarina</italic>: The upper rows show three paleoclimate-<italic>time slices</italic> (I&#x2013;III) and preindustrial <italic>time slice</italic> (IV). (i) A summary of the biogeographic inference depicting the species current distribution and inferred ancestral distributions at nodes (tree not to scale; for more details for <bold>(A)</bold> see Figure 4 in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Culshaw et al., 2021</xref> and <bold>(B)</bold> Figure 5A in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Mairal et al., 2015</xref>). (ii) The selected truncation thresholds for hindcasted ENMs (see <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2</xref> for more details). (iii) The post-truncation threshold ENM maps are cleaned up by removing presence locations that do not match those from the biogeographic inference. Then, results provided by the ENMs are used together with those from the biogeographic inference to infer a detailed history of the spatiotemporal evolution or each genus. For <italic>Camptoloma</italic> <bold>(A)</bold> we represent the &#x201C;yearly&#x201D; prec-temp ENM projections with a truncation threshold of 0.12 for the paleoclimate-<italic>time slice</italic> projections and 0.95 for the Preindustrial world <italic>time slice</italic> projection for <italic>Canarina</italic> <bold>(B)</bold> we represent the bioclimatic ENM projections with a truncation threshold of 0.22 for the paleoclimate-<italic>time slice</italic> projections and 0.99 for the Preindustrial world <italic>time slice</italic> projection.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fevo-09-662092-g006.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="discussion" id="S4">
<title>Discussion</title>
<sec id="S4.SS1">
<title>ENMs and Biogeographic Inference Used in Tandem Reconstruct Geographic Range Shifts in Rare Endemics</title>
<p>In the original studies exploring <italic>Canarina</italic> and <italic>Camptoloma</italic> biogeographic history (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Mairal et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Culshaw et al., 2021</xref>), the currently disjunct distribution of the extant species was explained by ecological vicariance and climate-driven extinction linked to Neogene aridification cycles, in agreement with other Rand Flora lineages (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">Pokorny et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">Rinc&#x00F3;n-Barrado et al., 2021</xref>). However, the small phylogenies, with only three species each, and the deep evolutionary divergences, introduced large uncertainty in ancestral range inference; for example, the Western Asian origin of <italic>Canarina</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Mairal et al., 2015</xref>) or the southern African stem-ancestor of <italic>Camptoloma</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Culshaw et al., 2021</xref>), were associated with marginal probabilities lower than 0.1.</p>
<p>In our study, the introduction of additional information provided by hindcasted ENM projections was able to clarify some of these uncertain biogeographic inferences, in particular along the long internodal branches. For example, ENM projections support a restricted distribution of stem-<italic>Camptoloma</italic>, in southwestern Africa in the Early-Mid Miocene (21 Ma), while the crown-ancestor is reconstructed as occupying eastern Africa-southern Arabia and Macaronesia already in the Early Pliocene (4.6 Ma, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure 6Aii</xref>). ENM projections (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure 6Aii</xref>) support also the hypothesis of a northeastward dispersal of the ancestor of <italic>Camptoloma</italic> during the 15-million year branch length separating the stem and crown nodes (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure 6Aiii</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Culshaw et al., 2021</xref>): the ENM predictions for <italic>time slices</italic> I and II showed the presence of suitable habitat corridors over central-eastern Africa during the MMCO (17-14 Ma) and the LMC (12-5 Ma) <italic>time slices</italic> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure 6Aiii</xref>). Similarly, the biogeographic inference of a widespread distribution across northern Africa for the most recent common ancestor of <italic>Camptoloma canariense</italic> and <italic>C</italic>. <italic>lyperiiflorum</italic> (3.4 Ma, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure 6Ai</xref>), <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Culshaw et al., 2021</xref>) is supported by the ENM projection for <italic>time slice</italic> III, which shows climatic corridors with suitable habitat during the MPWE (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure 6Aii</xref>); these disappear in the preindustrial projection (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure 6Aiii</xref>).</p>
<p><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Mairal et al. (2015)</xref> inferred a stem-ancestor of <italic>Canarina</italic> distributed in central Asia around the Mid Miocene (13.9 Ma, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure 6Bi</xref>), which migrated to eastern Africa during the Mid-Late Miocene (11-8 Ma). This scenario is supported by our hindcasted ENM projections (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure 6Bii</xref>), which show suitable habitat in western Asia and central-eastern Africa during the MMCO interval. The ca. 8 million-year branch separating the disjunct sister species <italic>C. canariensis</italic> and <italic>C. eminii</italic> was explained in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Mairal et al. (2015)</xref> by short-range dispersal over climatic corridors across the Sahara during the Late Miocene, followed by climatic extinction in the Pliocene (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure 6Bi</xref>). The ENM projections for <italic>time slices</italic> II and III support these inferences, depicting corridors of suitable habitat across the Sahara during the wetter and colder climates of the LMC (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure 6Bii</xref>), which disappear in the projections of the drier MPWE (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure 6Bi</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S4.SS2">
<title>Using Biogeographical Inference as Truncation Threshold Criteria in ENMs</title>
<p>A known difficulty in building ENMs for rare endemics is the selection of the optimal truncation threshold value (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Diniz-Filho et al., 2010</xref>). The selection of a threshold value often relies upon model fit tests, such as the Kappa statistic (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">Monserud and Leemans, 1992</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Fielding and Bell, 1997</xref>), the true skill statistic (TSS, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Allouche et al., 2006</xref>), or the Receiver Operator Characteristic (ROC). All of these approaches rely on using a training dataset, subsetted from the original data, and evaluating model fit through examination of true and false predictions of species presences and absences (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Liu et al., 2005</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Jim&#x00E9;nez-Valverde and Lobo, 2007</xref>). When the georeferenced data is complete and unbiased, and the ENMs are hindcasted upon shallow timescales, these truncation threshold criteria are reliable. However, when occurrence records are incomplete or biased toward certain regions, or when ENMs are hindcasted upon deep timescales, as in our study, these methods can lead to biased habitat suitability projections, as demonstrated in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5</xref>.</p>
<p>Here, we propose an alternative approach that uses ancestral nodal ranges inferred through biogeographic inference as an independent source of information for selecting the truncation threshold value of ENM projections (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2</xref>). Our approach is particularly suited for ENMs hindcasted into the distant past, where traditional criteria such as the MinROCdist result in very restrictive and conservative truncation threshold values and fail to recover any spatial pattern (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5</xref>). Our study, thus, supports the importance of using an appropriate truncation threshold criterion when using absence/presence ENM models (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">Nenz&#x00E9;n and Ara&#x00FA;jo, 2011</xref>), especially when comparing paleoclimate vs. predindustrial hindcasted projections.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S4.SS3">
<title>The Importance of Temporal Resolution When Building ENMs</title>
<p>There has been recent discussion on the importance of including fine-scale temporal resolution in the environmental data used for building ENMs (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Kearney et al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Gardner et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">Perez-Navarro et al., 2020</xref>). The average-year bioclimatic variables obtained from WorldClim might be too coarse in temporal resolution to capture the climatic niche of short-lived species or species with large geographic ranges and contrasting seasonal regimes, for example, those distributed north and south of the equator (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Kearney et al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">Montalto et al., 2014</xref>). The importance of considering temporal resolution in climatic data has been emphasized also for paleoclimate data. Even if WorldClim bioclimatic variables correlate with physiological predictors, these relationships could break down when results are extrapolated into other time frames (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Elith and Leathwick, 2009</xref>). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Bova et al. (2021)</xref> recently showed that the mismatch between paleoclimate simulations and temperature reconstructions from geological records disappear when seasonal variation over time is employed instead of long-term averages.</p>
<p>In the case of <italic>Camptoloma</italic>, ENM projections built on the yearly averaged, monthly variables of the prec-temp dataset showed a strong association to those built on the full climatic dataset (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="TS4">Supplementary Table 4</xref>), suggesting that monthly mean temperature and precipitation contained enough information to infer ancestral tolerances when projected into the past; in contrast, ENMs built on the annual variables of the bioclimate dataset showed a weak association and we could not find an optimal threshold value for hindcasted projections (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="TS4">Supplementary Table 4</xref> and <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="FS2">Supplementary Figure 2</xref>). For <italic>Canarina</italic>, the opposite pattern was found: the ENM projections built on the annual bioclimatic variables showed a strong association with the full dataset, while the monthly averaged prec-temp projections proved to be less informative (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="TS4">Supplementary Table 4</xref> and <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="FS2">Supplementary Figure 2</xref>). These differences between the two genera may be explained by their different &#x201C;rarity&#x201D; character. <italic>Camptoloma</italic> fits <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">Rabinowitz&#x2019;s (1981)</xref> definition of a &#x201C;narrow rare endemic&#x201D;: a rare species with small populations restricted to climatic microrefugia. <italic>Camptoloma rotundifolium</italic> occurs in moist escarpments in the Namibian Brandberg Mountains, whereas <italic>C. canariense</italic> grows in shaded vertical crevices on the coastal slopes and cliffs of Gran Canaria and <italic>C. lyperiiflorum</italic> inhabits a special wetter microclimate in Socotra Island (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Culshaw et al., 2021</xref>). In contrast, <italic>Canarina</italic> fits the definition of a &#x201C;widespread rare endemic&#x201D; (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">Rabinowitz, 1981</xref>): <italic>Canarina canariensis</italic> occurs in five of the seven Canary Islands, while the geographic range of <italic>C. eminii</italic> extends from Ethiopia in the north to Malawi in the south (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Mairal et al., 2018</xref>). Moreover, <italic>Canarina</italic> species can spend unfavorable seasons throughout the year in a tuber/root form, which could buffer the influence of climate extreme events on species&#x2019; survival, growth and reproductive capacity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Hedberg, 1961</xref>). It might be that the use of fine-temporal resolution environmental data, i.e., the yearly averaged monthly values from the prec-temp dataset, is important for modeling the climatic preferences of a species with restricted habitats and little capacity for behavioral buffering, such as <italic>Camptoloma</italic>, whereas the annual bioclimatic variables from WorldClim work well for the more widespread <italic>Canarina</italic>. Our study thus supports the hypothesis that temporal resolution of environmental data when building ENMs should be at a scale adequate to understand physiological responses to climate change in the organism under study (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Gardner et al., 2020</xref>), or in other words, at a scale over which biological responses directly influence their predicted presences in ENM models (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">Montalto et al., 2014</xref>).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="conclusion" id="S5">
<title>Conclusion</title>
<p>We showed that combining information provided by hindcasted ecological niche models and phylogenetic biogeographic inference can be useful in reconstructing geographic range shifts that resulted from climate change, as found in rare endemics with sparse and biased sampling and ancient origins. Biogeographic inference can be used to select the truncation threshold value to build ENM presence/absence maps for the distant past, whereas hindcasted ENMs can inform biogeographic inference over phylogenetic intervals with no observable diversification events. We additionally demonstrate the importance of temporal resolution in ENMs, especially in narrow rare endemics characterized by limited sampling and with restricted physiological requirements.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="data-availability" id="S6">
<title>Data Availability Statement</title>
<p>The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="FS1">Supplementary Material</xref>, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors. Code to run analyses is provided in the GitHub repository: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://github.com/vickycul">github.com/vickycul</ext-link>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S7">
<title>Author Contributions</title>
<p>VC and IS designed the study. MM and VC collected and sourced samples. VC analyzed the data with help from IS. IS and VC wrote the manuscript, with contributions from MM. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="COI-statement" id="conf1">
<title>Conflict of Interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="disclaimer" id="S8">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s Note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec sec-type="funding-information" id="S88">
<title>FUNDING</title>
<p>VC was funded by Fellowship (BES-2013-065389) from the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (MINECO) and supervised by IS. IS was funded by grant CGL2015-67849-P from MINECO and the European Regional Development Fund (FEDER).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S9" sec-type="supplementary-material">
<title>Supplementary Material</title>
<p>The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fevo.2021.662092/full#supplementary-material">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fevo.2021.662092/full#supplementary-material</ext-link></p>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Data_Sheet_1.zip" id="FS1" mimetype="application/zip" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<label>Supplementary Figure 1</label>
<caption><p>Demonstrating how to select a suitable truncation threshold with the biogeographically-informed truncation threshold criterion for <bold>(A)</bold> the <italic>Camptoloma</italic> prec-temp ENM paleo projections and <bold>(B)</bold> the <italic>Canarina</italic> bioclimatic ENM paleo projections. Black indicates presence, white indicates absence, and red represents the bridge between black cells that are no more than one white cell apart (see <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2</xref> for more details). The biogeographic inference results that were used as the criterion to select the truncation threshold can be seen in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure 6i</xref>.</p></caption>
</supplementary-material>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Data_Sheet_1.zip" id="FS2" mimetype="application/zip" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<label>Supplementary Figure 2</label>
<caption><p>Demonstrating the inability to find a suitable truncation threshold with the biogeographically-informed truncation threshold criterion for <bold>(A)</bold> the Camptoloma bioclimatic ENM paleo projections and for <bold>(B)</bold> the <italic>Canarina</italic> prec-temp ENM paleo projections. Black indicates presence, white indicates absence, and red represents the bridge between black cells that are no more than one white cell value apart (see <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2</xref> for more details). It can be seen that regardless of the threshold, most of the binary maps resemble one another, and more importantly they do not represent the biogeographic inference results (seen in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure 6i</xref>) that are used as a criterion for the selection of the truncation threshold. For example, in <italic>Camptoloma</italic>, the bioclimatic models (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="FS2">Supplementary Figure 2A</xref>) predict high habitat suitability across the Sahara Desert in the MMCO and LMC layers; in <italic>Canarina</italic>, the prec-temp dataset (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="FS2">Supplementary Figure 2B</xref>) does not show connections across northern Africa in the LMC <italic>time slice</italic>, as expected from the biogeographic results.</p></caption>
</supplementary-material>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Data_Sheet_1.zip" id="FS3" mimetype="application/zip" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<label>Supplementary Figure 3</label>
<caption><p>Exploring if the &#x201C;hemisphere&#x201D; effect introduces a bias into the <italic>Camptoloma</italic> binary ENM hindcast projections for the prec-temp dataset, where each projection is a &#x201C;yearly&#x201D; average of the month ENMs results. The ENM prec-temp projections for the non-inverted and inverted binary maps have similar truncation thresholds (0.1 vs. 0.12) and both show absence/presence distributions for each <italic>time slice</italic>.</p></caption>
</supplementary-material>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Data_Sheet_2.zip" id="TS1" mimetype="application/zip" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<label>Supplementary Table 1</label>
<caption><p>Climatic variables from WorldClim2 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Fick and Hijmans, 2017</xref>) with acronyms and units used in the study.</p></caption>
</supplementary-material>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Data_Sheet_2.zip" id="TS2" mimetype="application/zip" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<label>Supplementary Table 2</label>
<caption><p>Variables per month that were retained after the full present-day climatic dataset was run through correlation matrices. Only variables with low absolute correlated attributes (correlation lower than 0.75) were included in the final models.</p></caption>
</supplementary-material>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Data_Sheet_2.zip" id="TS3" mimetype="application/zip" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<label>Supplementary Table 3</label>
<caption><p>ENM performance statistics at selected present-day truncation threshold for genera <italic>Camptoloma</italic> and <italic>Canarina</italic>.</p></caption>
</supplementary-material>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Data_Sheet_2.zip" id="TS4" mimetype="application/zip" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<label>Supplementary Table 4</label>
<caption><p>The strength of association among the three present-day maps calculated as the Spearman&#x2019;s rho statistic for the pre-truncation threshold projections and the Simpson&#x2019;s Similarity Index for the post-truncation threshold projections.</p></caption>
</supplementary-material>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Data_Sheet_2.zip" id="SA1" mimetype="application/zip" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<label>Supplementary Appendix 1</label>
<caption><p>The geographic occurrence and climatic data used for ecological niche modeling in <italic>Camptoloma</italic> and <italic>Canarina</italic>. This data has been normalized to lie within the closed boundaries [0, 1], and the hemispheres were &#x201C;inverted&#x201D; (details in section &#x201C;Materials and Methods&#x201D;) to account for the &#x201C;hemisphere effect.&#x201D;</p></caption>
</supplementary-material>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Allouche</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tsoar</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kadmon</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Assessing the accuracy of species distribution models: prevalence, kappa and the true skill statistic (TSS).</article-title> <source><italic>J. Appl. Ecol.</italic></source> <volume>43</volume> <fpage>1223</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1232</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01214.x</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B2"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ara&#x00FA;jo</surname> <given-names>M. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>New</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Ensemble forecasting of species distributions.</article-title> <source><italic>Trends Ecol. Evol.</italic></source> <volume>22</volume> <fpage>42</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>47</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.tree.2006.09.010</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17011070</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B3"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Beerling</surname> <given-names>D. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Berner</surname> <given-names>R. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mackenzie</surname> <given-names>F. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Harfoot</surname> <given-names>M. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pyle</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Methane and the CH4 related greenhouse effect over the past 400 million years.</article-title> <source><italic>Am. J. Sci.</italic></source> <volume>309</volume> <fpage>97</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>113</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2475/02.2009.01</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B4"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Beerling</surname> <given-names>D. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Taylor</surname> <given-names>L. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bradshaw</surname> <given-names>C. D. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lunt</surname> <given-names>D. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Valdes</surname> <given-names>P. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Banwart</surname> <given-names>S. A.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Ecosystem CO2 starvation and terrestrial silicate weathering: mechanisms and global-scale quantification during the late Miocene.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Ecol.</italic></source> <volume>100</volume> <fpage>31</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>41</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2745.2011.01905.x</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B5"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Berdugo</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Delgado-Baquerizo</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Soliveres</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hern&#x00E1;ndez-Clemente</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yanchuang</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gait&#x00E1;n</surname> <given-names>J. J.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Global ecosystem thresholds driven by aridity.</article-title> <source><italic>Science</italic></source> <volume>367</volume> <fpage>787</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>790</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/science.aay5958</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32054762</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B6"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bova</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rosenthal</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Godad</surname> <given-names>S. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yan</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Seasonal origin of the thermal maxima at the Holocene and the last interglacial.</article-title> <source><italic>Nature</italic></source> <volume>589</volume> <fpage>521</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>522</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B7"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bradshaw</surname> <given-names>C. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lunt</surname> <given-names>D. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Flecker</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Salzmann</surname> <given-names>U.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pound</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Haywood</surname> <given-names>A. M.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>The relative roles of CO2 and paleogeography in determining Late Miocene climate: results from a terrestrial model-data comparison.</article-title> <source><italic>Clim. Past Discuss.</italic></source> <volume>8</volume> <fpage>1257</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1258</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/cp-8-1257-2012</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B8"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Burke</surname> <given-names>K. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Williams</surname> <given-names>J. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chandler</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Haywood</surname> <given-names>A. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lunt</surname> <given-names>D. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Otto-Bliesner</surname> <given-names>B. L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Pliocene and Eocene provide best analogs for near-future climates.</article-title> <source><italic>PNAS.</italic></source> <volume>115</volume> <fpage>13288</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>13293</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.1809600115</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30530685</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B9"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Carboni</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gu&#x00E9;guen</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Barros</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Georges</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Boulangeat</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Douzet</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Simulating plant invasion dynamics in mountain ecosystems under global change scenarios.</article-title> <source><italic>Glob. Change Biol.</italic></source> <volume>24</volume> <fpage>e289</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>e302</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B10"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chefaoui</surname> <given-names>R. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lobo</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Assessing the effects of pseudo-absences on predictive distribution model performance.</article-title> <source><italic>Ecol. Model.</italic></source> <volume>210</volume> <fpage>478</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>486</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2007.08.010</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B11"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Culshaw</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Villaverde</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mairal</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Olsson</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sanmart&#x00ED;n</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Rare and widespread: integrating Bayesian MCMC approaches, Sanger sequencing and Hyb-Seq phylogenomics to reconstruct the origin of the enigmatic Rand Flora genus <italic>Camptoloma</italic> (Scrophulariaceae).</article-title> <source><italic>Am. J. Bot.</italic></source> <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/ajb2.1727</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B12"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dancey</surname> <given-names>C. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Reidy</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <source><italic>Statistics Without Maths for Psychology</italic></source>, <edition>7th Edn</edition>. <publisher-loc>Harlow</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Pearson/Prentice Hall. MLA</publisher-name>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B13"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Diniz-Filho</surname> <given-names>J. A. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bini</surname> <given-names>L. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Macroecology, global change and the shadow of forgotten ancestors.</article-title> <source><italic>Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr.</italic></source> <volume>17</volume> <fpage>11</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>17</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B14"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Diniz-Filho</surname> <given-names>J. A. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ferro</surname> <given-names>V. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Santos</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nabout</surname> <given-names>J. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dobrovolski</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>De Marco</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names> <suffix>Jr.</suffix></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>The three phases of the ensemble forecasting of niche models, geographic range and shifts in climatically suitable areas of <italic>Utetheisa ornatrix</italic> (Lepidoptera, Arctiidae).</article-title> <source><italic>RBE</italic></source> <volume>54</volume> <fpage>339</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>349</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1590/s0085-56262010000300001</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B15"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dorn</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Musilov&#x00E1;</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Platzer</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Reichwald</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cellerino</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>The strange case of East African annual fishes: aridification correlates with diversification for a savannah aquatic group.</article-title> <source><italic>BMC Evol. Biol.</italic></source> <volume>14</volume>:<fpage>210</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>242</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B16"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Elith</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Leathwick</surname> <given-names>J. R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Species distribution models: ecological explanation and prediction across space and time.</article-title> <source><italic>Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst.</italic></source> <volume>40</volume> <fpage>677</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>697</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.110308.120159</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B17"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Engler</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Guisan</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rechsteiner</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>An improved approach for predicting the distribution of rare and endangered species from occurrence and pseudo-absence data.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Appl. Ecol.</italic></source> <volume>41</volume> <fpage>263</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>274</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.0021-8901.2004.00881.x</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B18"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Esp&#x00ED;ndola</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pellissier</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Maiorano</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hordijk</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Guisan</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Alvarez</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Predicting present and future intra-specific genetic structure through niche hindcasting across 24 millennia.</article-title> <source><italic>Ecol. Lett.</italic></source> <volume>15</volume> <fpage>649</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>657</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1461-0248.2012.01779.x</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22515791</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B19"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Fick</surname> <given-names>S. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hijmans</surname> <given-names>R. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>WorldClim 2: new 1-km spatial resolution climate surfaces for global land areas.</article-title> <source><italic>Int. J. Climatol.</italic></source> <volume>37</volume> <fpage>4302</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>4315</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/joc.5086</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B20"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Fielding</surname> <given-names>A. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bell</surname> <given-names>J. F.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1997</year>). <article-title>A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation absence/presence models.</article-title> <source><italic>Environ. Conserv.</italic></source> <volume>24</volume> <fpage>38</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>49</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1017/s0376892997000088</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B21"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Freeman</surname> <given-names>E. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Moisen</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>PresenceAbsence: an R package for presence absence analysis.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Stat. Softw.</italic></source> <volume>23</volume> <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>31</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18637/jss.v023.i11</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B22"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gardner</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Maclean</surname> <given-names>I. M. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gaston</surname> <given-names>K. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>A new system to classify global climate zones based on plant physiology and using high temporal resolution climate data.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Biogeogr.</italic></source> <volume>47</volume> <fpage>2091</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2101</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/jbi.13927</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B23"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>H&#x00E6;user</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dawson</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Thuiller</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dullinger</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Block</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bossdorf</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>European ornamental garden flora as an invasive debt under climate change.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Appl. Ecol.</italic></source> <volume>55</volume> <fpage>2386</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2395</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/1365-2664.13197</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B24"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hedberg</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1961</year>). <article-title>Monograph of the genus <italic>Canarina</italic> L. (<italic>Campanulaceae</italic>).</article-title> <source><italic>Svensk Botanisk Tidskrift.</italic></source> <volume>55</volume> <fpage>17</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>62</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B25"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hengl</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sierdsema</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Radovi&#x0107;</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dilo</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Spatial prediction of species&#x2019; distributions from occurrence-only records: combining point pattern analysis, ENFA and regression-kriging.</article-title> <source><italic>Ecol. Model.</italic></source> <volume>220</volume> <fpage>3499</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2511</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2009.06.038</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B26"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hewitt</surname> <given-names>G. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>Genetic consequences of climatic oscillations in the Quaternary.</article-title> <source><italic>Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci.</italic></source> <volume>359</volume> <fpage>183</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>195</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1098/rstb.2003.1388</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15101575</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B27"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hijmans</surname> <given-names>R. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Phillips</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Leathwick</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Elith</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <source><italic>dismo: Species Distribution Modeling</italic>. <italic>R package version 1.1-4.</italic></source> Available online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=dismo">https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=dismo</ext-link> <comment>(accessed March, 2018)</comment>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B28"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Goldberg</surname> <given-names>E. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Roy</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Fossils, phlogenies, and the challenge of preserving evolutionary history in the face of anthropogenic extinctions.</article-title> <source><italic>PNAS</italic></source> <volume>112</volume> <fpage>4909</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>4914</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.1409886112</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25901313</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B29"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jim&#x00E9;nez-Valverde</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lobo</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Threshold criteria for conversion of probability of species presence to either-or presence-absence.</article-title> <source><italic>Acta Oecol.</italic></source> <volume>31</volume> <fpage>361</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>369</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.actao.2007.02.001</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B30"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kearney</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Matzelle</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Helmuth</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Biomechanics meets the ecological niche: the importance of temporal data resolution.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Exp. Biol.</italic></source> <volume>215</volume> <fpage>922</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>933</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1242/jeb.059634</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22357586</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B31"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Landis</surname> <given-names>J. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Soltis</surname> <given-names>D. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Marx</surname> <given-names>H. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Barker</surname> <given-names>M. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tank</surname> <given-names>D. C.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Impact of whole-genome duplication events on diversification rates in angiosperms.</article-title> <source><italic>Am. J. Bot.</italic></source> <volume>105</volume> <fpage>348</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>363</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/ajb2.1060</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29719043</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B32"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lemey</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rambaut</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Drummond</surname> <given-names>A. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Suchard</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Bayesian phylogeography finds its roots.</article-title> <source><italic>PLoS Comput. Biol.</italic></source> <volume>5</volume>:<issue>e1000520</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000520</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19779555</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B33"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Berry</surname> <given-names>P. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dawson</surname> <given-names>T. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pearson</surname> <given-names>R. G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Selecting thresholds of occurrence in the predictions of species distributions.</article-title> <source><italic>Ecography</italic></source> <volume>28</volume> <fpage>385</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>393</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.0906-7590.2005.03957.x</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B34"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mairal</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Caujap&#x00E9;-Castells</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pellissier</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ja&#x00E9;n-Molina</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>&#x00C1;lvarez</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Heuertz</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>A tale of two forests: ongoing aridification drives population decline and genetic diversity loss at continental scale in Afro-Macaronesian evergreen-forest archipelago endemics.</article-title> <source><italic>Ann. Bot.</italic></source> <volume>122</volume> <fpage>1005</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1017</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/aob/mcy107</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29905771</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B35"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mairal</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pokorny</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Aldasoro</surname> <given-names>J. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Alarc&#x00F3;n</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sanmart&#x00ED;n</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Ancient vicariance and climate-driven extinction explain continental-wide disjunctions in Africa: the case of the Rand Flora genus <italic>Canarina</italic> (Campanulaceae).</article-title> <source><italic>Mol. Ecol.</italic></source> <volume>24</volume> <fpage>1335</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1354</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/mec.13114</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25688489</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B36"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mairal</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sanmart&#x00ED;n</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pellissier</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Lineage-specific climatic niche drives the tempo of vicariance in the Rand Flora.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Biogeogr.</italic></source> <volume>44</volume> <fpage>911</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>923</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/jbi.12930</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B37"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mart&#x00ED;nez-Meyer</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Peterson</surname> <given-names>A. T.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Conservatism of ecological niche characteristics in North American plant species over the Pleistocene-to-recent transition.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Biogeogr.</italic></source> <volume>33</volume> <fpage>1779</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1789</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2699.2006.01482_33_10.x</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B38"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mart&#x00ED;nez-Meyer</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Peterson</surname> <given-names>A. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hargrove</surname> <given-names>W. W.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>Ecological niches as stable distributional constraints on mammal species, with implications for Pleistocene extinctions and climate change projections for biodiversity.</article-title> <source><italic>Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr.</italic></source> <volume>13</volume> <fpage>305</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>314</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1466-822x.2004.00107.x</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B39"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kuhn</surname> <given-names>Max</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <source><italic>caret: Classification and Regression Training. R package version 6.0-88.</italic></source> Available online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=caret">https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=caret</ext-link></citation></ref>
<ref id="B40"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Meseguer</surname> <given-names>A. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lobo</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cornuault</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Beerling</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ruhfel</surname> <given-names>B. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Davis</surname> <given-names>C. C.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Reconstructing deep-time paleoclimate legacies in the clusioid Malpighiales unveils their role in the evolution and extinction of the boreotropical flora.</article-title> <source><italic>Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr.</italic></source> <volume>27</volume> <fpage>616</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>628</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/geb.12724</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B41"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Meseguer</surname> <given-names>A. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lobo</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ree</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Beerline</surname> <given-names>D. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sanmart&#x00ED;n</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Integrating fossils, phylogenies, and niche models into biogeography to reveal ancient evolutionary history: the case of <italic>Hypericum</italic> (Hypericaceae).</article-title> <source><italic>Syst. Biol.</italic></source> <volume>64</volume> <fpage>215</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>232</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/sysbio/syu088</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25398444</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B42"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Metcalf</surname> <given-names>J. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Prost</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nogu&#x00E9;s-Bravo</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>DeChaine</surname> <given-names>E. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Anderson</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Batra</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Integrating multiple lines of evidence into historical biogeography hypothesis testing: a <italic>Bison bison</italic> case study.</article-title> <source><italic>Proc. R. Soc. B</italic></source> <volume>281</volume>:<issue>20132782</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1098/rspb.2013.2782</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24403338</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B43"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Moen</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Morlon</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Why does diversification slow down?</article-title> <source><italic>Trends Ecol. Evol.</italic></source> <volume>29</volume> <fpage>190</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>197</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.tree.2014.01.010</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24612774</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B44"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Monserud</surname> <given-names>R. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Leemans</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1992</year>). <article-title>Comparing global vegetation maps with the Kappa statistic.</article-title> <source><italic>Ecol. Model.</italic></source> <volume>62</volume> <fpage>275</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>293</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0304-3800(92)90003-w</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B45"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Montalto</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sara&#x00CC;</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ruti</surname> <given-names>P. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dell&#x2019;Aquila</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Helmuth</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Testing the effects of temporal data resolution on predictions of the effects of climate change on bivalves.</article-title> <source><italic>Ecol. Model.</italic></source> <volume>278</volume> <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>8</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.01.019</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B46"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Nenz&#x00E9;n</surname> <given-names>H. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ara&#x00FA;jo</surname> <given-names>M. B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Choice of threshold alters projections of species range shifts under climate change.</article-title> <source><italic>Ecol. Model.</italic></source> <volume>222</volume> <fpage>3346</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3354</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2011.07.011</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B47"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Perez-Navarro</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Broennimann</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Estave</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Moya-Perez</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Carre&#x00F1;o</surname> <given-names>M. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Guisan</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Temporal variability is key to modeling the climatic niche.</article-title> <source><italic>Divers. Distrib.</italic></source> <volume>27</volume> <fpage>473</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>484</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/ddi.13207</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B48"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Peterson</surname> <given-names>A. T.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Use and requirements of ecological niche models and related distributional models.</article-title> <source><italic>Biodivers. inform.</italic></source> <volume>3</volume> <fpage>59</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>72</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B49"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Pokorny</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Riina</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mairal</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Meseguer</surname> <given-names>A. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Culshaw</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cendoya</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Living of the edge: timing of Rand Flora disjunctions congruent with ongoing aridification in Africa.</article-title> <source><italic>Front. Genet.</italic></source> <volume>6</volume>:<issue>154</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fgene.2015.00154</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25983742</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B50"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Quintero</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Keil</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jetz</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Crawford</surname> <given-names>F. W.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Historical biogeography using species geographical ranges.</article-title> <source><italic>Syst. Biol.</italic></source> <volume>64</volume> <fpage>1059</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1073</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/sysbio/syv057</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26254671</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B51"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rabinowitz</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1981</year>). &#x201C;<article-title>Seven forms of rarity</article-title>,&#x201D; in <source><italic>The Biological Aspects of Rare Plant Conservation</italic></source>, <role>ed.</role> <person-group person-group-type="editor"><name><surname>Synge</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<publisher-loc>New York NY</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>John Wiley &#x0026; Sons Ltd</publisher-name>), <fpage>205</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>217</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B52"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ree</surname> <given-names>R. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sanmart&#x00ED;n</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Prospects and challenges for parametric models in historical biogeographical inference.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Biogeogr.</italic></source> <volume>36</volume> <fpage>1211</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1220</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2699.2008.02068.x</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B53"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ree</surname> <given-names>R. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Smith</surname> <given-names>S. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Maximum likelihood inference of geographic range evolution by dispersal, local extinction, and cladogenesis.</article-title> <source><italic>Syst. Biol.</italic></source> <volume>57</volume> <fpage>4</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>14</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/10635150701883881</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18253896</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B54"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rinc&#x00F3;n-Barrado</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Olsson</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Villaverde</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pokorny</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Forrest</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Riina</surname> <given-names>R., et al.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Ecological and geological processes impacting speciation modes drive the formation of wide-range disjunctions within tribe Putorieae (Rubiaceae).</article-title> <source><italic>J. Syst. Evol.</italic></source> <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/jse.12747</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B55"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Romdal</surname> <given-names>T. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ara&#x00FA;jo</surname> <given-names>M. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rahbek</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Life on a tropical planet: niche conservatism and the global diversity gradient.</article-title> <source><italic>Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr.</italic></source> <volume>22</volume> <fpage>344</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>350</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B56"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ronquist</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sanmart&#x00ED;n</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Phylogenetic methods in biogeography.</article-title> <source><italic>Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst.</italic></source> <volume>42</volume> <fpage>441</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>464</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B57"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sanmart&#x00ED;n</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Anderson</surname> <given-names>C. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Alarcon</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ronquist</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Aldasoro</surname> <given-names>J. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Bayesian island biogeography in a continental setting: the Rand Flora case.</article-title> <source><italic>Biol. Lett.</italic></source> <volume>6</volume> <fpage>703</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>707</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1098/rsbl.2010.0095</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20335199</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B58"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sanmart&#x00ED;n</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Meseguer</surname> <given-names>A. S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Extinction in phylogenetics and biogeography: from timetrees to patterns of biotic assemblage.</article-title> <source><italic>Front. Genet.</italic></source> <volume>7</volume>:<issue>35</issue>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B59"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sanmart&#x00ED;n</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>van Der Mark</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ronquist</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Inferring dispersal: a Bayesian approach to phylogeny-based island biogeography, with special reference to the Canary Islands.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Biogeogr.</italic></source> <volume>35</volume> <fpage>428</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>449</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2699.2008.01885.x</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B60"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sanmart&#x00ED;n</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <comment>in</comment> <source><italic>Breaking the Chains of Parsimony: the Development of Parametric Approaches in Historical Biogeography in Biogeography: An Ecological and Evolutionary Approach</italic></source>, <edition>10th Edn</edition>, <role>eds</role> <person-group person-group-type="editor"><name><surname>Cox</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ladle</surname> <given-names>R. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Moore</surname> <given-names>P. D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<publisher-loc>HobKen NJ</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Wiley Blackwell</publisher-name>), <fpage>283</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2887</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B61"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Smith</surname> <given-names>S. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Donoghue</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Combining historical biogeography with niche modeling in the <italic>Caprifolium</italic> clade of Lonicera (Caprifoliaceae. Dipsacales).</article-title> <source><italic>Syst. Biol.</italic></source> <volume>59</volume> <fpage>322</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>341</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/sysbio/syq011</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20525639</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B62"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Svenning</surname> <given-names>J.-C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Eiserhardt</surname> <given-names>W. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Normand</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ordonez</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sandel</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>The influence of paleoclimate on present-day patterns in biodiversity and ecosystems.</article-title> <source><italic>Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst.</italic></source> <volume>46</volume> <fpage>551</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>572</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-112414-054314</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B63"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Thuiller</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lavorel</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sykes</surname> <given-names>M. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ara&#x00FA;jo</surname> <given-names>M. B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Using niche-based modelling to assess the impact of climate change on tree functional diversity in Europe.</article-title> <source><italic>Divers. Distrib.</italic></source> <volume>12</volume> <fpage>49</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>60</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1366-9516.2006.00216.x</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B64"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Trauth</surname> <given-names>M. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Larrasoa&#x00F1;a</surname> <given-names>J. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mudelsee</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Trends, rhythms and events in Plio-Pleistocene African climate.</article-title> <source><italic>Quat. Sci. Rev.</italic></source> <volume>28</volume> <fpage>399</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>411</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B65"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Waldron</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Lineages that cheat death: surviving the squeeze on range size.</article-title> <source><italic>Evolution</italic></source> <volume>64</volume> <fpage>2278</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2292</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B66"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Willis</surname> <given-names>K. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>MacDonald</surname> <given-names>G. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Long-term ecological records and their relevance to climate change predictions for a warmer world.</article-title> <source><italic>Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst.</italic></source> <volume>42</volume> <fpage>267</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>287</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-102209-144704</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B67"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yesson</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Culham</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Phyloclimatic modeling: combining phylogenetics and bioclimatic modeling.</article-title> <source><italic>Syst. Biol.</italic></source> <volume>55</volume> <fpage>785</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>802</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/1063515060081570</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17060200</pub-id></citation></ref>
</ref-list>
<fn-group>
<fn id="footnote1">
<label>1</label>
<p><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.gbif.org">www.gbif.org</ext-link></p></fn>
<fn id="footnote2">
<label>2</label>
<p><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.jardincanario.org/flora-de-gran-canaria">www.jardincanario.org/flora-de-gran-canaria</ext-link></p></fn>
<fn id="footnote3">
<label>3</label>
<p><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.anthos.es">www.anthos.es</ext-link></p></fn>
<fn id="footnote4">
<label>4</label>
<p><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://worldclim.org">http://worldclim.org</ext-link></p></fn>
<fn id="footnote5">
<label>5</label>
<p><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://github.com/vickycul">https://github.com/vickycul</ext-link></p></fn>
</fn-group>
</back>
</article>