Think Before You Act: Improving the Conservation Outcomes of CITES Listing Decisions - Cooney, Rosie; Challender, Daniel W. S.; Broad, Steven; Roe, Dilys; Natusch, Daniel J. D. (Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 2021)
The CITES Convention is the major international instrument safeguarding wild plants and animals from overexploitation by trade. CITES is approaching 50 years old, and we contend that it is showing its age. In stark contrast to most environmental policy arenas, CITES does not require, encourage (or even allow for) consideration of the impacts of its key decisions - those around listing species in the CITES Appendices. Decisions to list species in CITES utilise a simplistic set of biological and trade criteria that do not relate to the impact of the decision and require little systematic supporting evidence. We explain the conservation failures that flow from this weakness and propose three key changes to the CITES listing process: (1) development of a formal mechanism for consideration by Parties of the likely consequences of species listing decisions (2) broadening of the range of criteria used to make listing decisions, and (3) amplification of the input of local communities living alongside wildlife in the listing process. Embracing these changes will help to ensure CITES decisions more effectively respond to the needs of wildlife in today’s highly complex and dynamic conservation context.