<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Ecol. Evol.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Ecol. Evol.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">2296-701X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fevo.2016.00142</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Ecology and Evolution</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Study of Fitness Cost in Three Rigid Ryegrass Populations Susceptible and Resistant to Acetyl-CoA Carboxylase Inhibiting Herbicides</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Sabet Zangeneh</surname> <given-names>Hossein</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/368376/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Mohammaddust Chamanabad</surname> <given-names>Hamid R.</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Zand</surname> <given-names>Eskandar</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Asghari</surname> <given-names>Ali</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Alamisaeid</surname> <given-names>Khalil</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/371313/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Travlos</surname> <given-names>Ilias S.</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/308157/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name><surname>Alebrahim</surname> <given-names>Mohammad T.</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn001"><sup>&#x0002A;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/369152/overview"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1"><sup>1</sup><institution>Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili</institution> <country>Ardabil, Iran</country></aff>
<aff id="aff2"><sup>2</sup><institution>Research Scientist Weed Research Department Plant Protection Research Institute</institution> <country>Tehran, Iran</country></aff>
<aff id="aff3"><sup>3</sup><institution>Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Ramin</institution> <country>Ahvaz, Iran</country></aff>
<aff id="aff4"><sup>4</sup><institution>Faculty of Crop Science, Agricultural University of Athens</institution> <country>Athens, Greece</country></aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by"><p>Edited by: Pan Kaiwen, Chengdu Institute of Biology (CAS), China</p></fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by"><p>Reviewed by: Ying Ma, University of Coimbra, Portugal; Nedim Do&#x0011F;an, Adnan Menderes University, Turkey</p></fn>
<fn fn-type="corresp" id="fn001"><p>&#x0002A;Correspondence: Mohammad T. Alebrahim <email>m_ebrahim&#x00040;uma.ac.ir</email></p></fn>
<fn fn-type="other" id="fn002"><p>This article was submitted to Agroecology and Land Use Systems, a section of the journal Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution</p></fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>23</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2016</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2016</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>4</volume>
<elocation-id>142</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>23</day>
<month>08</month>
<year>2016</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>07</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2016</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x000A9; 2016 Sabet Zangeneh, Mohammaddust Chamanabad, Zand, Asghari, Alamisaeid, Travlos and Alebrahim.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2016</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Sabet Zangeneh, Mohammaddust Chamanabad, Zand, Asghari, Alamisaeid, Travlos and Alebrahim</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p></license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>Evaluation of fitness differences between herbicide-resistant and susceptible weed biotypes, allows a better prediction of further dispersal of herbicide-resistance populations and the design of a management strategy in order to achieve a mitigation of the problem in the absence of herbicide. In this study, an evaluation of germination and seedling emergence characteristics of three rigid ryegrass biotypes (one susceptible and two resistant populations with different mutations, namely Ile 1781 Leu and Ile 2041 Asn) and of competition between this weed and wheat using replacement series experiments was conducted. The results showed that when seeds were on the soil surface (0 cm) to depth of 2 cm and again for the depth of 6 cm, there were not any significant differences between the biotypes regarding seed germination percentage. On the contrary, when seeds were sown in 2&#x02013;4 cm depth, R-1781 consistently displayed lower emergence than the S and R-2041 biotypes. Moreover, when seeds were sown at 8 cm depth, final proportions of emerged seedlings were similar for R-2041 and R-1781, while both populations had significantly higher emergence than the S population. The competitive ability of the three biotypes was similar, as determined by a replacement series experiment with wheat. Our results under competitive conditions revealed that <italic>Triticum aestivum</italic> was more competitive than <italic>Lolium rigidum</italic>. Overall, there was no apparent fitness penalty associated to ACCase-inhibitor resistance, while different mutations may impose different competitive ability and therefore require case-specific management strategies.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>1781-Leu</kwd>
<kwd>2041-Asn</kwd>
<kwd>ACCase mutation</kwd>
<kwd>competition</kwd>
<kwd>germination</kwd>
<kwd>soil burial</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<counts>
<fig-count count="6"/>
<table-count count="4"/>
<equation-count count="1"/>
<ref-count count="44"/>
<page-count count="10"/>
<word-count count="6341"/>
</counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec sec-type="intro" id="s1">
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Acetyl-coenzyme A carboxylase (ACCase) inhibitors consist a group of commercially important, very effective and, selective graminicides which are applied postemergence and introduced since 1970s. These herbicides are members of the Group A (1) of herbicides (Mallory-Smith and Retzinger, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">2003</xref>; Anonymous, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">2004</xref>). By inhibiting ACCase activity, fatty acid synthesis is also inhibited, resulting in growth cessation in meristematic tissues and finally plant death (D&#x000E9;lye, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">2005</xref>; Powles and Yu, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">2010</xref>; Ahmad-Hamdani et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">2012</xref>).</p>
<p>The extended and worldwide use of ACCase inhibitors has resulted in resistance evolution in about in 48 different weed species (Heap, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">2016</xref>). It has to be noted that the first reports of resistance to these herbicides have been reported more than 30 years ago (Heap and Knight, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">1982</xref>). An important mechanism that induces ACCase herbicide resistance in grasses is target site mutation (D&#x000E9;lye, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">2005</xref>; Powles and Yu, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">2010</xref>). Nine distinguished aminoacid replacements in the CT domain of plastidic Acetyl-COA carboxylase genes have been identified to cause target-site resistance to certain ACCase inhibiting herbicides in grass weeds (D&#x000E9;lye et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">2005</xref>; Powles and Yu, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">2010</xref>; Collavo et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">2011</xref>). Target site resistance is probably due to critical changes in the optimal binding of the herbicide. Six mutations in the gene encoding ACCase in rigid ryegrass (<italic>Lolium rigidum</italic>) were shown to confer resistance to herbicides inhibiting this enzyme. In particular, they cause amino-acid substitutions at codon positions 1781 (Ile-to-Leu), 2027 (Trp-to-Cys), 2041 (Ile-to-Asn), 2078 (Asp-to-Gly), 2096 (Gly-to-Ala), and 1756 (Gln-Glu; Zhang and Powles, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">2006</xref>). Powles and Yu (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">2010</xref>) declared that resistance level depends on the herbicides, rate, weed species, and number of resistant alleles in individual plants. Menchari et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">2008</xref>) reported that diversity fitness costs could be connected to mutant ACCase alleles.</p>
<p>Fitness can be defined as the ability to reproduce to the next generation. Regarding herbicide resistance (HR), fitness costs can help illustrate the relative abundance of resistance alleles (Menchari et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">2008</xref>; Vila-Aiub et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">2009</xref>). Fitness costs observed in weeds resistant to herbicides because of some mutations have been reported to be lower (Beversdorf et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">1988</xref>; Darmency and Pernes, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">1989</xref>) or even higher that 25% (Tardif et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">2006</xref>). Some resistant biotypes of rigid ryegrass were also shown to be more competitive in terms of seed size compared to the susceptible population (Pedersen et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">2007</xref>). Travlos (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">2013</xref>) showed that there were not any significant fitness differences between ACCase-inhibitor resistant and susceptible biotypes of sterile wild oat (<italic>Avena sterilis</italic>).</p>
<p>Fitness costs play a significant evolutionary role contributing among the others to the maintenance of genetic polymorphism within populations (Yanniccari et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">2016</xref>). However, even if fitness costs associated with plant defensive traits are widely anticipated, they are not commonly detected (Van Etten et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">2016</xref>). Hence, the main purpose of the present study was to compare the competitiveness of a susceptible (S) rigid ryegrass biotype, compared with two resistant (R) biotypes, in terms of several growth parameters. Moreover, 30 biotypes were exerted to determine the possible pleiotropic effects of R-1781 and R-2041 ACCase alleles in greenhouse conditions, in competition with <italic>Triticum aestivum</italic>. Such data could be useful in order to understand fitness cost&#x00027;s sides and implement the optimal resistance management strategies.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="materials and methods" id="s2">
<title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec>
<title>Seed collection</title>
<p>Seeds used in the present study were collected in the spring of 2013 from 29 wheat fields infected with rigid ryegrass and located in the southwestern part of Iran (Khuzestan province) (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">1</xref>). In the specific area, there were often complains on the low efficacy of ACCase herbicides, while there were several reports of herbicide resistance development. Seeds were mainly collected at the beginning of maturity from herbicide-treated wheat fields along with some fields that had never been treated with herbicides (in order to use them as susceptible). Each surveyed field was walked through by the two diagonals seeds were separated, air-dried, and stored at room temperature (22&#x02013;26&#x000B0;C) until their use. Rigid ryegrass seeds were treated with 10 ppm of gibberellic acid (GA) at 5 days before sowing, in order to relieve any seed dormancy.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T1">
<label>Table 1</label>
<caption><p><bold>List of potentially resistant and susceptible (S) ryegrass populations to ACCase inhibitor herbicides obtained from Khuzestan area, Iran</bold>.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead><tr>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Population code</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Collection area</bold></th>
<th valign="top" style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;" align="center" colspan="2"><bold>UTM coordinate (zone 38)</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Area (ha)</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Status of resistance</bold></th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th/>
<th/>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>X</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Y</bold></th>
<th/>
<th/>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">AH1</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Ahvaz</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">240857.70</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3456064.44</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">20</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Potentially resistant</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">AH2</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Ahvaz</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">272347.02</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3500817.47</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Potentially resistant</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">AH3</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Ahvaz (CA)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">245382.12</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3445968.63</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Potentially resistant</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">AH4</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Ahvaz (CA)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">246576.01</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3455925.23</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Potentially resistant</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">AH5</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Ahvaz (CA)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">264054.28</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3469940.39</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">10</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Potentially resistant</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">AH6</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Ahvaz (CA)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">241021.63</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3462717.69</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">20</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Potentially resistant</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">AH7</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Ahvaz</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">258677.41</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3484485.27</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">9</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Potentially resistant</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">AH8</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Ahvaz</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">272347.02</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3500817.48</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">10</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Potentially resistant</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">AH9</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Ahvaz</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">272371.39</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3501926.28</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Potentially resistant</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">BOS1</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Bostan</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">215786.07</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3481127.57</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">20</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Potentially resistant</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">BOS2</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Bostan</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">216676.82</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3478886.90</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">22</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Potentially resistant</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">BOS3</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Bostan</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">217657.95</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3479966.94</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">10</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Potentially resistant</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">BOS4</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Bostan</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">215755.87</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3480018.56</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">10</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Potentially resistant</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">BOS5</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Bostan</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">223393.50</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3480923.15</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">10</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Potentially resistant</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">DA1</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Dashteazadegan (Sus)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">225926.71</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3468649.34</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">30</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Potentially resistant</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">DA2</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Dashteazadegan</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">235334.77</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3463969.08</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">25</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Potentially resistant</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">DA3</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Dashteazadegan</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">226907.63</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3469733.44</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">10</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Potentially resistant</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">DA4</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Dashteazadega</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">236259.29</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3462836.21</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">17</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Potentially resistant</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">HAM1</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Hamidiyeh</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">265205.19</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3478789.33</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">25</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Potentially resistant</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">HAM2</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Hamidiyeh</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">256724.91</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3482311.79</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">20</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Potentially resistant</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">HAM3</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Hamidiyeh</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">250443.55</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3497993.38</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">25</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Potentially resistant</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">HAM4</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Hamidiyeh</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">258677.41</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3484485.27</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">12</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Potentially resistant</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">HAM5</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Hamidiyeh</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">252870.02</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3480183.48</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">10</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Potentially resistant</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">HAM6</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Hamidiyeh</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">252975.11</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3484618.89</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">10</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Potentially resistant</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">HAM7</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Hamidiyeh</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">258677.41</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3484485.27</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Potentially resistant</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">HAM8</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Hamidiyeh</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">250443.55</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3497993.38</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">15</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Potentially resistant</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">GOT</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Gotvand</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">265973.30</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3554212.50</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Potentially resistant</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">KHO</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Khorramshahr</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">231038.35</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3368655.53</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">21</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Potentially resistant</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">RAM</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Ramshir</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">347069.78</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3418507.70</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">10</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Potentially resistant</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">HF (S)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Haftkel</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">342131.32</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3471799.10</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Susceptible</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Assessment of herbicide resistance</title>
<p>Ten germinated seeds of the potentially resistant and susceptible populations were sowed in pots filled with 500 ml of soil. An herbicide-free soil mixed with a common peat substrate (1:1, V/V) was used. Throughout the experiments the pots were uniformly watered as needed. Shortly after emergence, plants were thinned to a final density of seven seedlings per pot. The pots were fertilized as required and kept under conditions set at 20&#x02013;30/10&#x02013;15&#x000B0;C day/night with a 14 h photoperiod and a relative humidity of about 65%. The required amount of light was provided by a combination of fluorescent and incandescent lamps. At 21 DAE<xref ref-type="fn" rid="fn0001"><sup>1</sup></xref> (at the 2&#x02013;3 leaf stage), seedlings were treated with the recommended dose of clodinafop-propargyl (CLD) and pinoxaden (PIN). Particularly, CLD and PIN were applied at rates of 64 and 45 g ai ha<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>, respectively. Plants were harvested at 28 DAT<xref ref-type="fn" rid="fn0002"><sup>2</sup></xref> and the fresh weight of foliage was recorded, with the number of dead and surviving plants also being measured.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>CAPS and dCAPS methods</title>
<p>After the above-mentioned evaluation of efficacy and potential resistance, the populations were used for leaf sampling and subsequent DNA extraction. Particularly, in a CAPS (cleaved amplified polymorphic sequences) analysis, gene-specific primers were applied to reproduce DNA pattern, and SNPs (single nucleotide polymorphisms) were identified. In the dCAPS (Derived cleaved amplified polymorphic sequences) technique, a limitation enzyme identification site, which contains the SNP, was introduced into the PCR amplicon by a primer containing one or more inconformities to the DNA template. The PCR amplicon is then digested by a limitation enzyme, and the presence or absence of the SNP is defined by the resulting digestion restriction template as previously described by Yu et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">2008</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Evaluation of the effect of burial depth on emergence of resistant and susceptible populations</title>
<p>In this study, the effect of sowing depth on emergence of three rigid ryegrass populations (a susceptible population and two resistant populations) was evaluated. Mean seed weight (MSW) was similar for the three populations (MSW of 1.85 &#x000B1; 0.25 mg, <italic>n</italic> &#x0003D; 100) in order to eliminate any side effects. Twenty seeds of each population were sown in 12-cm diameter pots at five depths (0, 2, 4, 6, and 8 cm). Pots were placed in a controlled environment greenhouse with the same conditions as above. The experiment was set up under a completely randomized experimental design with four replicates. Seedling emergence was measured daily for 21 days, while in the case of 0 cm, seedlings were considered emerged when the coleoptile length was 3 mm long (Steadman et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">2003</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Growth of resistant and susceptible populations under non-competitive conditions (monoculture)</title>
<p>Fifteen seeds of each population were sown in a potting soil compound in 12-cm diameter pots. Pots were placed in a controlled environment greenhouse with the same conditions as above and watered uniformly as needed. Shortly after emergence, plants were thinned to a final density of eight seedlings per pot. The experiment was set up under a completely randomized experimental design with four replicates. The experiments were established in October 2014 and 2015. Four wheat and rigid ryegrass plants were harvested at 20-days intervals, from 20 to 160 DAE. Plants were cut in the soil surface and height was also measured. The plants were dried at 74&#x000B0;C for 72 h and dry weight was determined.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Evaluation of competitive ability, growth, and seed production of S and R populations under competitive and non-competitive conditions</title>
<p>These tests were conducted in order to evaluate the competitive ability, growth, and seed production of S and R rigid ryegrass populations and wheat under competitive and non-competitive conditions. For that purpose, pot experiments were conducted in the greenhouse of Agricultural Research Center of Khuzestan province, Iran. Seedlings (after seed placement in Petri dishes and their germination) were transplanted into 12-cm diameter pots filled with 500 ml of a manure-loam-sand mixture in 1:1:1 ratio. Competition between rigid ryegrass populations and wheat was studied by means of a replacement series experiment at five proportions (100:0, 75:25, 50:50, 25:75, and 0:100) at a fixed density of 8 plants (ryegrass/wheat) per pot. The pots were kept under conditions set at 20&#x02013;30/10&#x02013;15&#x000B0;C day/night with a 14-h photoperiod and watered uniformly as needed. The required amount of light was provided by a combination of fluorescent and incandescent lamps. The experiment was set up in a completely randomized experimental design with four replicates. The replacement series experiment was established on October 2014 and repeated on April 2015. The plants were dried at 74&#x000B0;C for 70 h and weighed. Plants from each species were separated into shoots and spikes, while plant height was also measured at harvest.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Statistical analyses</title>
<p>Differences between seed populations were evaluated after data expression as percentage of the untreated control. The percentage of surviving plants was also recorded at 28 DAT.</p>
<p>In order to evaluate the effect of burial depth on the emergence of resistant and susceptible populations regression and curve fitting is considered as a recommended type of analysis. A functional three parameter sigmoid (S) model using nonlinear least squares regression (Curve Fitter) was performed by means of the software SigmaPlot 12 (Systat Software, Inc.) and shown below:</p>
<disp-formula id="E1"><label>(1)</label><mml:math id="M1"><mml:mtable class="eqnarray" columnalign="left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x0002B;</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>e</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>x</mml:mtext><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>t</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>E</mml:mtext><mml:mn>50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>b</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>
<p>In Equation (1), <italic>y</italic> is whole appearance (emergence) on time x, <italic>a</italic> is the highest emergence (percentage), t<sub><italic>E</italic>50</sub> is the time to attain 50% of ultimate seedling emergence (day) and <italic>b</italic> represent the slope around t<sub><italic>E</italic>50</sub>. Emergence values were angular transformed. Parameter estimates were compared by one-way ANOVA and means were separated using least significant difference (LSD) (&#x003B1; &#x0003D; 5%).</p>
<p>A similar procedure as the one mentioned above was also followed for the evaluation of competitive ability, growth, and seed production of S and R populations under competitive and non-competitive conditions. Data on plant height and dry weight were subjected to ANOVA. Total shoot dry weight (SDW) was compared with the theoretical yields for equal competitive ability using 95% confidence interval (CI). For this statistical analysis SAS software was used (SAS Institute, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">1987</xref>).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="results" id="s3">
<title>Results</title>
<sec>
<title>Assessment of herbicide resistance</title>
<p>Assessment of herbicide resistance was conducted by means of the rating system given in Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">1</xref> as described by Moss et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">1999</xref>). The results showed that <italic>L. rigidum</italic> fresh weight and survival were significantly different between populations at 28 DAT with CLD. Populations AH3, AH4, BOS1, BOS2, BOS5, DA1, DA2, HAM1, HAM2, HAM3, HAM4, HAM5, HAM6, HAM7, and KHO showed the lower fresh weight reduction, while other populations were adequately controlled by CLD.</p>
<fig id="F1" position="float">
<label>Figure 1</label>
<caption><p><bold>Star (<sup>&#x0002A;</sup>) and R rating system to distinguish the degree of resistance, according to the response to a single dose of herbicide in resistance screening (Moss et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">1999</xref>)</bold>.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fevo-04-00142-g0001.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>These differences between the several potentially R populations indicate that inadequate control of ryegrass in other locations may be attributed to other reasons like an improper application time or method and not <italic>per se</italic> to herbicide resistance. The results of our screening tests showed that 10 populations of <italic>L. rigidum</italic> have resistance to CLD (34.5% of the total). After confirming the resistance of the populations to this herbicide, they have been used for leaf sampling for DNA extraction as described above.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>CAPS and dCAPS methods</title>
<p>Leaves of these plants were analyzed by CAPS and dCAPS methods for identification of possible mutations occurring in 2088, 2078, 2041, and 1781 locations of ACCase enzyme coding gene which is involved in the resistance of <italic>L. rigidum</italic> to ACCase inhibitors. Finally, there have been recognized two mutations (Ile 1781Leu and Ile 2041Asn) and it was found that the mutation 2041-Asn confers sufficient level of resistance to clodinafop-propargyl. Molecular analyses of resistance confirmed that the Ile 1781 Leu and Ile 2041 Asn mutations in the resistant biotypes endowed resistance to FOPs, but not to DIMs and DEN.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Evaluation of the effect of burial depth on emergence of R and S populations</title>
<p>Our results showed that when seeds were placed on the soil surface (0 cm) and in a depth of 2 cm, the S biotype had slightly higher seed germination percentage than the two R populations (2041-Asn and 1781-Leu), but this difference was not statistically significant (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">2A</xref> and Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">2</xref>). In the case of seeds placed on soil surface, seedlings of the R-2041 population had the lowest appearance (83%) compared with populations R-1781 and S (88 and 91%, respectively). When the seeds were sown in a depth of 2&#x02013;4 cm, R-1781 biotype systematically exhibited lower emergence than S and R-2041 biotypes (Figures <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">2B,C</xref> and Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">2</xref>). On the contrary, seeds sown in a depth of 6 cm had a germination percentage of 60, 61.25, and 62% for R-2041, R-1781, and S biotypes, respectively. This finding indicates no-significant difference in the percentage of germination (parameter <italic>a</italic>) between the three biotypes at this depth (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">2D</xref> and Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">2</xref>). However, when seeds were sown in a depth of 8 cm, final percentage of emerged seedlings was similar for R-2041 and R-1781, while both biotypes had significantly higher emergence than the S biotype (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">2E</xref> and Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">2</xref>). A functional three parameter sigmoid (S) model (equal) presented a significant fit (<italic>P</italic> &#x0003C; 0.001, <italic>R</italic><sup>2</sup> &#x0003D; 0.98&#x02013;0.99) to emergence data for all combinations of population and sowing depth. Values of <italic>t</italic><sub><italic>E</italic>50</sub> were increased with sowing depth (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">2</xref>). R-1781 population exhibited significantly higher <italic>t</italic><sub><italic>E</italic>50</sub> values than the S and R-2041 populations at 0 and 2 cm depths, while R-2041 population had the highest values at depths of 4, 6, and 8 cm (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">2</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F2" position="float">
<label>Figure 2</label>
<caption><p><bold>Effects of sowing depth on the percentage of seedling emergence of the S (circle), R-2041 (square), and ACCase (triangle) populations</bold>. <bold>(A)</bold> Soil surface (0 cm), <bold>(B)</bold> Soil surface (2 cm), <bold>(C)</bold> Soil surface (4 cm), <bold>(D)</bold> Soil surface (6 cm), and <bold>(E)</bold> Soil surface (8 cm).</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fevo-04-00142-g0002.tif"/>
</fig>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T2">
<label>Table 2</label>
<caption><p><bold>Parameter evaluation from sigmoidal model that explains the effect of different sowing depth on seedling emergence percentage for the population S, R-1781, and R-2041</bold>.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead><tr>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Depth (cm)</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center" colspan="3" style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;"><bold>Population</bold> <italic><bold>a</bold></italic></th>
<th valign="top" align="center" colspan="3" style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;"><italic><bold>t</bold></italic><sub><bold>E50</bold></sub></th>
<th valign="top" align="center" colspan="3" style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;"><bold>b</bold></th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th/>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>S</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>R-1781</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>R-2041</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>S</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>R-1781</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>R-2041</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>S</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>R-781</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>R-2041</bold></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">91.02 (1.02)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">87.62 (1.02)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">82.59 (0.86)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.15 (0.09)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.63 (0.11)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.34 (0.09)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.77 (0.081)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.08 (0.09)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.89 (0.08)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">87.80 (1.14)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">73.45 (1.56)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">81.69 (0.84)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7.95 (0.10)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8.72 (0.19)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8.15 (0.08)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.86 (0.09)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.41 (0.17)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.96 (0.07)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">87.41 (1.21)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">69.76 (1.41)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">71.13 (1.81)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8.18 (0.11)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8.38 (0.18)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">9.22 (0.24)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.02 (0.10)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.19 (0.15)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.73 (0.20)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">58.20 (1.36)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">59.39 (0.89)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">60.33 (1.03)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">10.30 (0.20)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">9.77 (0.12)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">9.76 (0.14)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.55 (0.17)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.17 (0.10)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.20 (0.12)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">8</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">14.24 (0.45)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">31.40 (0.67)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">38.13 (0.85)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">13.67 (0.22)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">11.68 (0.17)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">12.22 (0.17)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.90 (0.17)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.65 (0.14)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.84 (0.14)</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p><italic>The numbers in parentheses represent the standard errors of the means</italic>.</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>In all three populations, increasing depth resulted to an emergence reduction. It has also to be noted that at the depth of 0 cm, the highest germination rate was that of S population (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">2</xref>). Some of these findings are in accordance with similar results obtained in the study of Vila-Aiub et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">2015b</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Growth of R and S populations under non-competitive conditions (monoculture)</title>
<p>The results of biomass and plant height data fit to a functional three parameter sigmoid curve for the populations R-781, R-2041, and S under non-competitive conditions as given in Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">3</xref>. The highest biomass and plant height were reached at 80 day after sowing (DAS). Our results showed that biomass of the R-2041 and R-1781 populations was similar to that of the S population. Regarding the maximum dry weight, there were no significant differences (<italic>p</italic> &#x0003E; 0.05) between the resistant and susceptible populations. As anticipated, the data followed a typical sigmoid growth pattern. Similar results have been found by other researchers on resistant and susceptible populations of weeds like kochia and downy brome (Thompson et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">1994</xref>; Christoffoleti et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">1997</xref>; Park et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">2004</xref>). Concerning plant height, our results revealed some significant differences between the rigid ryegrass populations with S population being significantly higher than R-1781 population (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">3</xref>). These findings are not in full agreement with results of previous studies (Thompson et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">1994</xref>; Christoffoleti et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">1997</xref>; Park et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">2004</xref>; Menchari et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">2008</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F3" position="float">
<label>Figure 3</label>
<caption><p><bold>Shoot dry weight (SDW) and plant height of R-1781, R-2041, and S rigid ryegrass populations under noncompetitive conditions</bold>.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fevo-04-00142-g0003.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Seed production of the three studied populations was also within a wide range. As shown in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">3</xref>, R-2041 was the population with highest seed production, 19 and 27% higher than the corresponding value for S and R-1781 population, respectively. However, regarding thousand seeds&#x00027; weight (TSW) there were not significant differences between the several populations.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T3">
<label>Table 3</label>
<caption><p><bold>Seed production (number and weight) for ACCase inhibitor-resistant (R) and -susceptible (S) rigid ryegrass populations under noncompetitive conditions</bold>.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead><tr>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Population</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Total seed number</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center" style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;" colspan="2"><bold>Seed weight</bold></th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th/>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>No. plant<sup>&#x02212;1</sup></bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>g 1000 seeds<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> (TSW)</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>g plant<sup>&#x02212;1</sup></bold></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">S</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">296 (5.64)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.6 (0.09)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.48 (0.011)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">R-1781</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">267 (9.33)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.8 (0.07)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.47 (0.009)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">R-2041</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">365 (12.75)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.7 (0.08)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.63 (0.013)</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p><italic>The numbers in parentheses indicate the standard errors of the means</italic>.</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>Previous studies on several weeds have shown either higher seed production for R compared with the S population (Purrington and Bergelson, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">1997</xref>; Park et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">2004</xref>), or no differences at all between the several biotypes (Alcocer-Ruthling et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">1992</xref>; Thompson et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">1994</xref>; Travlos, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">2013</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Evaluation of competitive ability, growth, and seed production of S and R populations under competitive and non-competitive conditions</title>
<p>Evaluation of the competitive ability of R and S <italic>L. rigidum</italic> populations showed that increasing rigid ryegrass density from 2 to 6 plants pot<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> reduced wheat height compared to the non-competitive conditions (Figures <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">4A,B</xref>). The results showed that interspecific competition (rigid ryegrass-wheat) was more intense than the intraspecific competition (rigid ryegrass-rigid ryegrass or wheat-wheat).</p>
<fig id="F4" position="float">
<label>Figure 4</label>
<caption><p><bold>Effects of rigid ryegrass density on wheat height (A)</bold> and effects of wheat density on rigid ryegrass height <bold>(B)</bold>.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fevo-04-00142-g0004.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>It has to be noted, that in our study wheat emerged 2&#x02013;5 days earlier than rigid ryegrass. Consequently, this early emergence of <italic>Triticum aestivum</italic> allowed its high biomass accumulation, and therefore its competitiveness was high. In Australia, Rerkasem et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">1980</xref>) found that the competitive ability of rigid ryegrass under field conditions was low when rigid ryegrass emerged later or simultaneously with wheat. Early wheat emergence in comparison with weeds is considered to increase wheat competitive ability as previously reported by Kropff et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">1992</xref>) and O&#x00027;Donovan et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">1985</xref>).</p>
<p>Our experiments also showed that a density of 2&#x02013;6 wheat plants pot<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> decreased SDW per plant of rigid ryegrass at different densities (data not shown). As shown in Figures <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">4</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">5</xref>, increased wheat density seems to increase the competition against rigid ryegrass populations which may be due to the dense wheat canopy and reduction of the availability of light, nutrients, and moisture for rigid ryegrass (Tanji et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">1997</xref>). In another study and by using different rigid ryegrass densities in a field in Australia, Medd et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">1981</xref>) found that SDW of rigid ryegrass in the presence of 40 or 74 wheat plants m<sup>&#x02212;2</sup> was twice that obtained in the presence of 200 wheat plants m<sup>&#x02212;2</sup>. These findings agree with the results of our study showing that all densities of rigid ryegrass (2, 4, and 6 plant per pot) reduced SDW of wheat and grain yield per pot<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> (Figures <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">5</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">6</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F5" position="float">
<label>Figure 5</label>
<caption><p><bold>Replacement series diagrams for shoot dry weight of ACCase inhibitor-resistant (R-2041 and R-1781) and -susceptible (S) rigid ryegrass biotypes grown under competitive conditions at different proportions with wheat</bold>.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fevo-04-00142-g0005.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig id="F6" position="float">
<label>Figure 6</label>
<caption><p><bold>Effect of wheat and rigid ryegrass density on wheat grain yield</bold>. Vertical bars indicate standard errors of the mean (data from both years were combined, since there were not significant differences between the years).</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fevo-04-00142-g0006.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>When populations R-1781, R-2041, and S were sown under competitive situations with wheat, their dry weight and height were significantly affected (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">5</xref>). SDW of the S biotype confirmed the theoretically anticipated response showing the fitness cost of R-1781, R-2041, biotypes. Dry weight and plant height of R-1781, R-2041, and S biotypes were different from non-competitive situation, being various in all studied proportions (Figures <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">4A</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">5</xref> and Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T4">4</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T4">
<label>Table 4</label>
<caption><p><bold>Shoot dry weight (SDW), number of tillers, and plant height for ACCase inhibitor-resistant (R) and -susceptible (S) rigid ryegrass biotypes in a replacement series experiment at five proportions (100:0, 75:25, 50:50, 25:75, 0:100) of (ryegrass:wheat)</bold>.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead><tr>
<th/>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Biotype</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center" style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;" colspan="5"><bold>Proportions of mixture (%)</bold></th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th/>
<th/>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>100</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>75</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>50</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>25</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>0</bold></th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th/>
<th/>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>0</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>25</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>50</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>75</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>100</bold></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">SDW (gr per pot)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">S</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7.60 (0.16)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.92 (0.22)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.04 (0.11)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.20 (0.13)</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left">W</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.30 (0.15)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.40 (0.15)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8.10 (0.36)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">11.20 (0.30)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">No. of tillers</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">S</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.70 (0.12)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.08 (0.13)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.62 (0.11)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.51 (0.14)</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left">W</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.00 (0.09)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.14 (0.09)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.15 (0.11)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.70 (0.09)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Plant height(cm)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">S</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">45.50 (1.50)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">42.22 (1.57)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">40.38 (1.15)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">35.85 (1.09)</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;">
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left">W</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">44.40 (1.34)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">46.62 (1.62)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">49.75 (1.49)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">52.31 (1.03)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">SDW (gr per pot)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">R 1781</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7.20 (0.14)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.50 (0.18)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.32 (0.17)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.90 (0.07)</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left">W</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.40 (0.15)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7.00 (0.16)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">9.60 (0.23)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">10.80 (0.24)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">No. of tillers</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">R 1781</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.45 (0.14)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.60 (0.13)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.49 (0.12)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.98 (0.07)</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left">W</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.48 (0.13)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.35 (0.09)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.62 (0.12)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.80 (0.13)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Plant height (cm)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">R 1781</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">36.31 (1.34)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">34.15 (1.32)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">31.30 (1.21)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">30.40 (1.04)</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;">
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left">W</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">46.40 (1.41)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">49.38 (1.21)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">51.60 (1.32)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">54.45 (1.43)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">SDW (gr per pot)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">R 2041</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8.1 (0.16)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.22 (0.16)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.2 (0.20)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.5 (0.16)</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left">W</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.8 (0.16)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.4 (0.16)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8.7 (0.18)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">11.4 (0.16)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">No. of tillers</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">R 1781</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.88 (0.16)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.11 (0.17)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.20 (0.23)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.30 (0.11)</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left">W</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.34 (0.13)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.18 (0.09)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.68 (0.16)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.03 (0.12)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Plant height (cm)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">R 1781</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">42.22 (1.30)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">37.83 (0.99)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">34.00 (0.96)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">32.50 (0.98)</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left">W</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">49.40 (1.68)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">52.44 (1.90)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">54.13 (1.34)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">56.75 (1.18)</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p><italic>The numbers in parentheses represent the standard errors of the means</italic>.</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="discussion" id="s4">
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>Gill et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">1996</xref>) stated that there was not any significant fitness cost of rigid ryegrass resistant to ACCase inhibitor herbicides. A similar result was found in foxtail millet, <italic>Setaria faberi</italic> populations (Wiederholt and Stoltenberg, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">1996</xref>), but in these two studies mechanism of resistance of these grass weeds to herbicides was not identified and this absence of fitness cost can be due to the involvement of several resistance mechanisms. Earlier studies on ACCase herbicide-resistant rigid ryegrass and blackgrass indicated lack of significant difference on the competitiveness between resistant populations with the ACCase 1781-Leu (R-1781) mutation and populations without this mutation (Menchari et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">2008</xref>; Vila-Aiub et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">2015b</xref>). Such studies highlight the need of the detailed knowledge of resistance mechanisms and of any mutations in order to correlate them with fitness cost data.</p>
<p>Our results revealed a significant fitness cost in terms of plant growth and seed production of a R-1781 rigid ryegrass population and this finding is not in agreement with results of previous studies (Vila-Aiub et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">2005</xref>; Yu et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">2010</xref>). Furthermore, Vila-Aiub et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">2005</xref>) correlated fitness cost with increased herbicide metabolism (HM), while there was any further fitness cost in plants with both increased HM and R-1781 mutation.</p>
<p>In our study, S plants grew faster than R-1781 seedlings, matured, and flowered earlier and eventually produced more tillers and more seeds than the R-1781 plants. There was a tradeoff between tiller and seed production on the one hand and seed weight and seedling emergence on the other hand. Moreover, this is the first study with herbicide-resistant plants showing that different mutation can be responsible for the different competitive ability of R plants (2041-Asn plants exhibit better fitness ingredients than S and R-1781-Leu ACCase counterparts in some traits).</p>
<p>So far, only a few studies have been conducted on the evaluation of fitness costs associated with 2041-Asn ACCase. A R-2041 biotype of <italic>Alopecurus myosuroides</italic> showed a fairly decreased enzyme activity (D&#x000E9;lye et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">2003</xref>). R-2041 has been observed in two grasses species: ryegrass (D&#x000E9;lye et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">2003</xref>; Zhang and Powles, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">2006</xref>; Yu et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">2007</xref>) and wild oat (Liu et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">2007</xref>). The results of the present study also confirmed that there was any fitness cost on plant growth or seed production connected with R-2041 in <italic>L. rigidum</italic> plants grown in competition with <italic>Triticum aestivum</italic>.</p>
<p>According to our results, seed size in the susceptible biotype was smaller than that of the resistant biotypes and this can result to lower seed survival and lower emergence rate especially for seeds sown at the 6&#x02013;8 cm depth. This observation can be of high ecological importance, since it seems that R biotypes in some cases do not have any fitness penalty but also can germinate and emerge even from higher soil depths. On the contrary, the lower emergence potential of seeds of S populations is counterbalanced by their higher seed production. In previous studies on the identified R-1781 ACCase mutation, it was shown that the R biotype had slower germination than S plants (Vila-Aiub et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">2015b</xref>).</p>
<p>The present study provides some valuable information that will be useful for predicting the evolutionary dynamics of resistant populations and also for devising appropriate resistance management strategies. More studies on additional R and S rigid ryegrass biotypes need to be conducted, since previous studies on <italic>L. rigidum</italic> have found that high variability occurred in R and S biotypes regarding their relative growth and phenological development (Gill et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">1996</xref>). Furthermore, since these experiments were conducted under well-watered conditions in a greenhouse, extrapolation of the results under field conditions may be limited and should be clearly investigated. In all cases, evaluation of fitness costs associated with herbicide- resistance genes is useful to parameterize modeling herbicide resistance (Gressel and Segel, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">1990</xref>; Maxwell et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">1990</xref>; Yanniccari et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">2016</xref>) and provide an evolutionary frame for answering basic questions about the fitness cost in plants (Vila-Aiub et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">2009</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">2015a</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">b</xref>). Eventually, evaluation of fitness cost status associated with ACCase resistance in <italic>Lolium rigidum</italic> may be exploited in terms of the development weed management strategies.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s5">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>All authors listed, have made substantial, direct and intellectual contribution to the work, and approved it for publication.</p>
<sec>
<title>Conflict of interest statement</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1">
<citation citation-type="web"><person-group person-group-type="author"><collab>Anonymous</collab></person-group>. (<year>2004</year>). <source>Herbicide Resistance Action Committee</source>. Available online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.plantprotection.org">https://www.plantprotection.org</ext-link> (Accessed October 11, 2004).</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ahmad-Hamdani</surname> <given-names>M. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Owen</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Powles</surname> <given-names>S. B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>ACCase inhibiting herbicide resistant wild oat (<italic>Avena fatua</italic> L.) populations from the Western Australian grain belt</article-title>. <source>Weed Technol.</source> <volume>26</volume>, <fpage>130</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>136</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1614/WT-D-11-00089.1</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Alcocer-Ruthling</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Thill</surname> <given-names>D. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shafii</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1992</year>). <article-title>Differential competitiveness of sulfonylurea resistant and susceptible prickly lettuce (<italic>Lactuca serriola</italic>)</article-title>. <source>Weed Technol.</source> <volume>6</volume>, <fpage>303</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>309</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Beversdorf</surname> <given-names>W. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hume</surname> <given-names>D. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Donnelly-Vanderloo</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1988</year>). <article-title>Agronomic performance of triazine-resistant and susceptible reciprocal spring canola hybrids</article-title>. <source>Crop Sci.</source> <volume>28</volume>, <fpage>932</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>934</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2135/cropsci1988.0011183X002800060012x</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Christoffoleti</surname> <given-names>P. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Westra</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Moore</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1997</year>). <article-title>Growth analysis of sulfonylurea-resistant and susceptible kochia (<italic>Kochia scoparia</italic>)</article-title>. <source>Weed Sci.</source> <volume>45</volume>, <fpage>691</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>695</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Collavo</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Panozzo</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lucchesi</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Scarabel</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sattin</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Characterisation and management of <italic>Phalarisparadoxa</italic> resistant to ACCase-inhibitors</article-title>. <source>Crop Prot.</source> <volume>30</volume>, <fpage>293</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>299</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cropro.2010.11.011</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Darmency</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pernes</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1989</year>). <article-title>Agronomic performance of a triazine resistant foxtail millet (<italic>Setaria italica</italic> (L.) Beauv.)</article-title>. <source>Weed Res.</source> <volume>29</volume>, <fpage>147</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>150</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-3180.1989.tb00853.x</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>D&#x000E9;lye</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Weed resistance to acetyl-coenzyme A carboxylase inhibitors: an update</article-title>. <source>Weed Sci.</source> <volume>53</volume>, <fpage>728</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>746</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1614/WS-04-203R.1</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>D&#x000E9;lye</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>X. Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chalopin</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Michel</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Powles</surname> <given-names>S. B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>An isoleucine residue within the carboxyl-transferase domain of multidomain acetyl-coenzyme A carboxylase is a major determinant of sensitivity to aryloxyphenoxypropionate but not to cyclohexanedioneinhibitors</article-title>. <source>Plant Physiol.</source> <volume>132</volume>, <fpage>1716</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1723</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1104/pp.103.021139</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12857850</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>D&#x000E9;lye</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>X. Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Michel</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Matejicek</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Powles</surname> <given-names>S. B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Molecular bases for sensitivity to acetyl-coenzyme A carboxylase inhibitors in blackgrass</article-title>. <source>Plant Physiol.</source> <volume>137</volume>, <fpage>794</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>806</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1104/pp.104.046144</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15579665</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gill</surname> <given-names>G. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cousens</surname> <given-names>R. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Allan</surname> <given-names>M. R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1996</year>). <article-title>Germination, growth, and development of herbicide resistant and susceptible populations of rigid ryegrass (<italic>Lolium rigidum</italic>)</article-title>. <source>Weed Sci.</source> <volume>44</volume>, <fpage>252</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>256</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gressel</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Segel</surname> <given-names>L. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1990</year>). <article-title>Modeling the effectiveness of herbicide rotations and mixtures as strategies to delay or preclude resistance</article-title>. <source>Weed Technol.</source> <volume>4</volume>, <fpage>186</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>198</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25105594</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<citation citation-type="web"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Heap</surname> <given-names>I</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <source>The International Survey of Herbicide Resistant Weeds</source>. Available online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.weedscience.com">http://www.weedscience.com</ext-link> (Accessed July 10, 2016).</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Heap</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Knight</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1982</year>). <article-title>A population of ryegrass tolerant to the herbicide diclofop-methyl</article-title>. <source>J. Aust. Inst. Agric. Sci.</source> <volume>48</volume>, <fpage>156</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>157</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kropff</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Weaver</surname> <given-names>S. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Smiths</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1992</year>). <article-title>Use of ecophysio-logical models for weed-crop interference: relations amongst weed density, relative time of emergence, relative leaf area, and yield loss</article-title>. <source>Weed Sci.</source> <volume>40</volume>, <fpage>296</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>301</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Harrison</surname> <given-names>D. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chalupska</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gornicki</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>O&#x00027;Donnell</surname> <given-names>C. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Adkins</surname> <given-names>S. W.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Single-site mutations in the carboxyl transferase domain of plastid acetyl-CoA carboxylase confer resistance to grass-specific herbicides</article-title>. <source>Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.</source> <volume>104</volume>, <fpage>3627</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>3632</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.0611572104</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17360693</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mallory-Smith</surname> <given-names>C. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Retzinger</surname> <given-names>E. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Revised classification of herbicides by site of action for weed resistance management strategies</article-title>. <source>Weed Technol.</source> <volume>17</volume>, <fpage>605</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>619</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1614/0890-037X(2003)017[0605:RCOHBS]2.0.CO;2</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Maxwell</surname> <given-names>B. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Roush</surname> <given-names>M. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Radosevich</surname> <given-names>S. R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1990</year>). <article-title>Predicting the evolution and dynamics of herbicide resistance in weed populations</article-title>. <source>Weed Technol.</source> <volume>4</volume>, <fpage>2</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>13</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Medd</surname> <given-names>R. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Auld</surname> <given-names>B. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kemp</surname> <given-names>D. R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1981</year>). <article-title>Competitive interactions between wheat and ryegrass. <italic>Proc. Austr</italic></article-title>. <source>Weed Conf.</source> <volume>6</volume>, <fpage>39</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>43</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Menchari</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chauvel</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Darmency</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Delye</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Fitness cost associated with three mutant acetyl-coenzyme A carboxylase alleles endowing herbicide resistance in blackgrass <italic>Alopecurus myosuroides</italic></article-title>. <source>J. Appl. Ecol.</source> <volume>45</volume>, <fpage>939</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>947</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2664.2008.01462.x</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Moss</surname> <given-names>S. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Clarke</surname> <given-names>J. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Blair</surname> <given-names>A. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Culley</surname> <given-names>T. N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Read</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ryan</surname> <given-names>P. J.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>1999</year>). <article-title>The occurrence of herbicide-resistant grass-weeds in the United Kingdom and a new system for designating resistance in screening assay</article-title>, in <source>Proceeding of the Brighton Crop Protection Conference on Weeds</source> (<publisher-loc>Hampshire</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>BCPC</publisher-name>), <fpage>179</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>184</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>O&#x00027;Donovan</surname> <given-names>J. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>de St Remy</surname> <given-names>E. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>O&#x00027;Sullivan</surname> <given-names>P. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dew</surname> <given-names>D. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sharma</surname> <given-names>A. K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1985</year>). <article-title>Influence of the relative time of emergence of wild oat (<italic>Avena fatua</italic>) on yield loss of barley (<italic>Hordeum vulgare</italic>) and wheat (<italic>Triticum aestivum</italic>)</article-title>. <source>Weed Sci.</source> <volume>33</volume>, <fpage>498</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>503</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Park</surname> <given-names>K. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mallory-Smith</surname> <given-names>C. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ball</surname> <given-names>D. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>Ecological fitness of acetolactate synthase inhibitor&#x02013;resistant and &#x02013;susceptible downy brome (<italic>Bromus tectorum</italic>) biotypes</article-title>. <source>Weed Sci.</source> <volume>52</volume>, <fpage>768</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>773</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1614/WS-04-081R</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Pedersen</surname> <given-names>B. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Neve</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Andreasen</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Powles</surname> <given-names>S. B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Ecological fitness of a glyphosate-resistant <italic>Lolium rigidum</italic> population: growth and seed production along a competition gradient</article-title>. <source>Basic Appl. Ecol.</source> <volume>8</volume>, <fpage>258</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>268</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.baae.2006.01.002</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Powles</surname> <given-names>S. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Evolution in action: plants resistant to herbicides</article-title>. <source>Annu. Rev. Plant Biol.</source> <volume>61</volume>, <fpage>317</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>347</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1146/annurev-arplant-042809-112119</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20192743</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Purrington</surname> <given-names>C. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bergelson</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1997</year>). <article-title>Fitness consequences of genetically engineered herbicide and antibiotic resistance in <italic>Arabidopsis thaliana</italic></article-title>. <source>Genetics</source> <volume>145</volume>, <fpage>807</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>814</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">9055089</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rerkasem</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Stern</surname> <given-names>W. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Goodchild</surname> <given-names>N. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1980</year>). <article-title>Associated growth of wheat and annual ryegrass. 1. Effect of varying total density and proportion in mixtures of wheat and annual ryegrass</article-title>. <source>Austr. J. Agric. Res.</source> <volume>31</volume>, <fpage>649</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>658</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1071/A.R.9800649</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><collab>SAS Institute</collab></person-group> (<year>1987</year>). <source>SAS/STATTM Guide for Personal Computers, Version 6.0.</source> <publisher-loc>Cary, NC</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>SAS Institute Inc.</publisher-name>, <fpage>1028</fpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Steadman</surname> <given-names>K. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Crawford</surname> <given-names>A. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gallagher</surname> <given-names>R. S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Dormancy release in <italic>Lolium rigidum</italic> seeds is a function of thermal after-ripening time and seed water content</article-title>. <source>Func. Plant Biol.</source> <volume>30</volume>, <fpage>345</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>352</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1071/FP02175</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tanji</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zimdahl</surname> <given-names>R. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Westra</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1997</year>). <article-title>The competitive ability of wheat (<italic>triticum aestivum</italic>) compared to rigid Ryegrass (<italic>Lolium rigidum</italic>) and Cowcockle (<italic>Vaccaria hispanica</italic>)</article-title>. <source>Weed Sci.</source> <volume>45</volume>, <fpage>481</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>487</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tardif</surname> <given-names>F. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rajcan</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Costea</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>A mutation in the herbicide target site acetohydroxyacid synthase produces morphological and structural alterations and reduces fitness in <italic>Amaranthus powellii</italic></article-title>. <source>New Phytol.</source> <volume>169</volume>, <fpage>251</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>264</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01596.x</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16411929</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Thompson</surname> <given-names>C. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Thill</surname> <given-names>D. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shafli</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1994</year>). <article-title>Growth and competitiveness of sulfonylurea-resistant and -susceptible kochia (<italic>Kochia scoparia</italic>)</article-title>. <source>Weed Sci.</source> <volume>42</volume>, <fpage>172</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>179</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Travlos</surname> <given-names>I. S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Competition between ACC-inhibitor resistant and susceptible sterile wild oat (<italic>Avena sterilis</italic> L.) biotypes</article-title>. <source>Weed Sci.</source> <volume>61</volume>, <fpage>26</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>31</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1614/WS-D-12-00065.1</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Van Etten</surname> <given-names>M. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kuester</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chang</surname> <given-names>S. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Baucom</surname> <given-names>S. R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Fitness costs of herbicide resistance across natural populations of the common morning glory, <italic>Ipomoea purpurea</italic></article-title>. <source>bioRxiv</source> <volume>70</volume>, <fpage>2199</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>2210</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1101/030833</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Vila-Aiub</surname> <given-names>M. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gundel</surname> <given-names>E. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Preston</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015a</year>). <article-title>Experimental methods for estimation of plant fitness costs associated with herbicide-resistance genes</article-title>. <source>Weed Sci.</source> <volume>63</volume>, <fpage>203</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>216</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1614/WS-D-14-00062.1</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B36">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Vila-Aiub</surname> <given-names>M. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Neve</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Powles</surname> <given-names>S. B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Resistance cost of a cytochrome P450 herbicide metabolism mechanism but not an ACCase target site mutation in a multiple resistant <italic>Lolium rigidum</italic> population</article-title>. <source>New Phytol.</source> <volume>167</volume>, <fpage>787</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>796</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01465.x</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16101915</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B37">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Vila-Aiub</surname> <given-names>M. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Neve</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Powles</surname> <given-names>S. B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Fitness costs associated with evolved herbicide resistance alleles in plants</article-title>. <source>New Phytol.</source> <volume>184</volume>, <fpage>751</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>767</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.03055.x</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19825013</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B38">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Vila-Aiub</surname> <given-names>M. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Han</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Powles</surname> <given-names>S. B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015b</year>). <article-title>Effect of herbicide resistance endowing Ile-1781-Leu and Asp-2078-Gly ACCase gene mutations on ACCase kinetics and growth traits in <italic>Lolium rigidum</italic></article-title>. <source>J. Exp. Bot.</source> <volume>66</volume>, <fpage>4711</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>4718</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jxb/erv248</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26019257</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B39">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wiederholt</surname> <given-names>R. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Stoltenberg</surname> <given-names>D. E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1996</year>). <article-title>Absence of differential fitness between giant foxtail (<italic>Setaria faberi</italic>) accessions resistant and susceptible to acetyl-coenzyme A carboxylase inhibitors</article-title>. <source>Weed Sci.</source> <volume>44</volume>, <fpage>18</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>24</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B40">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yanniccari</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vila-Aiub</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Istilart</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Acciaresi</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Castro</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Glyphosate resistance in perennial ryegrass (<italic>Lolium perenne</italic> L.) is associated with a fitness penalty</article-title>. <source>Weed Sci.</source> <volume>64</volume>, <fpage>71</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>79</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1614/WS-D-15-00065.1</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B41">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Collavo</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zheng</surname> <given-names>M. Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Owen</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sattin</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Powles</surname> <given-names>S. B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Diversity of acetyl-coenzyme A carboxylase mutations in resistant <italic>Lolium</italic> populations: evaluation using clethodim</article-title>. <source>Plant Physiol.</source> <volume>145</volume>, <fpage>547</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>558</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1104/pp.107.105262</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17720757</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B42">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Han</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vila-Aiub</surname> <given-names>M. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Powles</surname> <given-names>S. B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Mutations of the ALS gene endowing resistance to ALS-inhibiting herbicides in Lolium rigidum populations</article-title>. <source>Pest Manag. Sci.</source> <volume>64</volume>, <fpage>1229</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1236</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/ps.1624</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18636424</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B43">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Han</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vila-Aiub</surname> <given-names>M. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Powles</surname> <given-names>S. B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>AHAS herbicide resistance endowing mutations: effect on AHAS functionality and plant growth</article-title>. <source>J. Exp. Bot.</source> <volume>61</volume>, <fpage>3925</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>3934</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jxb/erq205</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20627897</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B44">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>X.-Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Powles</surname> <given-names>S. B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>The molecular bases for resistance toacethyl co-enzyme A carboxylase (ACCase) inhibiting herbicides in two targe tbased resistant biotypes of annual ryegrass (<italic>Lolium rigidum</italic>)</article-title>. <source>Planta</source> <volume>223</volume>, <fpage>550</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>557</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00425-005-0095-x</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16133206</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
<fn-group>
<fn id="fn0001"><p><sup>1</sup>Days after emergence.</p></fn>
<fn id="fn0002"><p><sup>2</sup>Days after treatment.</p></fn>
</fn-group>
</back>
</article>