<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3-mathml3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xml:lang="EN" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Earth Sci.</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Earth Science</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Earth Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">2296-6463</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">1732484</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/feart.2026.1732484</article-id>
<article-version article-version-type="Version of Record" vocab="NISO-RP-8-2008"/>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Mechanical degradation and microcrack evolution of weathered basalt under freeze&#x2013;thaw cycles</article-title>
<alt-title alt-title-type="left-running-head">Chen et al.</alt-title>
<alt-title alt-title-type="right-running-head">
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2026.1732484">10.3389/feart.2026.1732484</ext-link>
</alt-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname>
<given-names>Jiayi</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001">&#x2a;</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/3253825"/>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Investigation" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/">Investigation</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; original draft" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/">Writing - original draft</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; review &#x26; editing" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/Writing - review &#x26; editing/">Writing - review and editing</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Conceptualization" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/">Conceptualization</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Data curation" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/">Data curation</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Formal analysis" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/">Formal Analysis</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Methodology" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/">Methodology</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Project administration" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/project-administration/">Project administration</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Resources" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/resources/">Resources</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Software" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/software/">Software</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Supervision" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/">Supervision</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Validation" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/validation/">Validation</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Visualization" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/visualization/">Visualization</role>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>Lianjun</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/3359251"/>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; review &#x26; editing" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/Writing - review &#x26; editing/">Writing - review and editing</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Investigation" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/">Investigation</role>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname>
<given-names>Guang</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; review &#x26; editing" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/Writing - review &#x26; editing/">Writing - review and editing</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Conceptualization" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/">Conceptualization</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Project administration" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/project-administration/">Project administration</role>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>He</surname>
<given-names>Liu</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2587100"/>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Formal analysis" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/">Formal Analysis</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Investigation" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/">Investigation</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; review &#x26; editing" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/Writing - review &#x26; editing/">Writing - review and editing</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Conceptualization" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/">Conceptualization</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Data curation" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/">Data curation</role>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bai</surname>
<given-names>Liwei</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/3359144"/>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Formal analysis" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/">Formal Analysis</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Investigation" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/">Investigation</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; review &#x26; editing" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/Writing - review &#x26; editing/">Writing - review and editing</role>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1">
<label>1</label>
<institution>Faculty of Geosciences and Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University</institution>, <city>Chengdu</city>, <country country="CN">China</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff2">
<label>2</label>
<institution>Zhejiang Geology and Mineral Technology Co. Ltd.</institution>, <city>Hangzhou</city>, <country country="CN">China</country>
</aff>
<author-notes>
<corresp id="c001">
<label>&#x2a;</label>Correspondence: Jiayi Chen, <email xlink:href="mailto:cdxiaochen@163.com">cdxiaochen@163.com</email>
</corresp>
</author-notes>
<pub-date publication-format="electronic" date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2026-02-02">
<day>02</day>
<month>02</month>
<year>2026</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date publication-format="electronic" date-type="collection">
<year>2026</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>14</volume>
<elocation-id>1732484</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>18</day>
<month>11</month>
<year>2025</year>
</date>
<date date-type="rev-recd">
<day>01</day>
<month>01</month>
<year>2026</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>09</day>
<month>01</month>
<year>2026</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#xa9; 2026 Chen, Wang, Wu, He and Bai.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2026</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Chen, Wang, Wu, He and Bai</copyright-holder>
<license>
<ali:license_ref start_date="2026-02-02">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ali:license_ref>
<license-p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY)</ext-link>. The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</license-p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>Freeze-thaw cycles (FTCs) play an important role in the degradation of rock masses and the stability of slopes in cold, high-altitude regions. However, the degradation behaviour of basalt with different weathering degrees under freeze-thaw (F-T) conditions remains insufficiently understood. In this study, basalt samples collected from a bridge foundation slope in an alpine mountainous region were subjected to 100 FTCs in laboratory. The degradation was investigated through measuring the P-wave velocity, porosity, uniaxial compressive strength, and direct shear strength. Microstructural damage in basalt was examined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) at different freeze-thaw stages. The experimental results indicate that moderately weathered basalt exhibits more severe freeze-thaw-induced degradation than slightly weathered basalt. This difference is reflected in larger increases in porosity and greater reductions in P-wave velocity and mechanical strength. SEM observations show the microcracks propagation and structural degradation induced by FTCs. On the basis of the experimental results, an empirical model between strength degradation and easily measurable physical parameters was developed. The experimental evidence obtained in this work contributes to the understanding of freeze-thaw-induced degradation of basalt. It also offers practical support for engineering design and evaluation of rock slopes subjected to repeated freeze&#x2013;thaw effects.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>basalt</kwd>
<kwd>freeze&#x2013;thaw cycles</kwd>
<kwd>SEM</kwd>
<kwd>strength degradation</kwd>
<kwd>weathering</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<funding-group>
<funding-statement>The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support from Southwest Jiaotong University and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41602293).</funding-statement>
</funding-group>
<counts>
<fig-count count="17"/>
<table-count count="7"/>
<equation-count count="8"/>
<ref-count count="44"/>
<page-count count="00"/>
</counts>
<custom-meta-group>
<custom-meta>
<meta-name>section-at-acceptance</meta-name>
<meta-value>Quaternary Science, Geomorphology and Paleoenvironment</meta-value>
</custom-meta>
</custom-meta-group>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec sec-type="intro" id="s1">
<label>1</label>
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>In cold high-altitude regions, rock slopes experience pronounced seasonal temperature fluctuations, resulting in intense freeze-thaw (F-T) weathering effects (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Xiao et al., 2024</xref>). Repeated freeze-thaw cycles (FTCs) gradually degrade the mechanical and physical properties of rock masses. This degradation is a key factor that must be considered during construction and slope stability assessments in alpine regions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Liu et al., 2024</xref>). Therefore, detailed investigations into the mechanical behavior and damage characteristics of rocks under FTCs are essential for improving the understanding of the F-T effects on rock masses (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Shu et al., 2025</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Li et al., 2018</xref>).</p>
<p>Since the early 20th century, the problem of F-T damage in rocks has attracted extensive attention from both engineering and researchers (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Li et al., 2025</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Abdolghanizadeh et al., 2020</xref>). Extensive experimental studies have shown that repeated FTCs can significantly impair the mechanical properties of rock masses, particularly in porous sedimentary rocks such as sandstones (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Pu et al., 2024</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Zhao C. et al., 2024</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Weng et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Ying et al., 2020</xref>). The rate and extent of degradation are strongly controlled by factors including the number of cycles, weathering degree, saturation state and loading conditions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Luo et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Ren et al., 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Jin et al., 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Ullah et al., 2025</xref>). Consequently, various constitutive and damage models have been proposed to describe the phenomenon of freeze-thaw-induced strength degradation in rocks, incorporating alterations in mechanical parameters and internal damage accumulation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Feng et al., 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Jiang et al., 2023a</xref>). Mechanistically, these F-T damage models generally attribute rock degradation to cyclic stresses generated by pore water freezing, including volumetric expansion and ice-related segregation processes acting within fracture networks (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Deprez et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Girard et al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Jiang et al., 2023b</xref>). Although their formulations differ, these models share a common conceptual basis in which repeated freeze&#x2013;thaw-induced pressures progressively weaken rock microstructures, ultimately leading to macroscopic deterioration of physical and mechanical properties (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">Zhao Y. et al., 2024</xref>).</p>
<p>In recent years, researchers have also applied advanced experimental techniques and numerical simulations to further enhance the investigation of freeze-thaw damage mechanisms. For example, micro-CT imaging has been used to characterise pore structure evolution and damage accumulation in igneous rocks (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Gong et al., 2025</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Chen et al., 2023</xref>), while acoustic emission, digital image correlation, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and discrete element modelling have been employed to capture microstructural degradation and simulate freeze-thaw-induced strength loss under controlled conditions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">Zhao Y. et al., 2024</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">Zhu et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Zheng et al., 2024</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Zhang et al., 2025</xref>).</p>
<p>Although these studies have greatly advanced the understanding of crack development and mechanical degradation in rocks under F-T conditions, the majority of existing studies have focused on high-porosity rocks, such as sandstones (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Shi et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Li et al., 2019</xref>). In contrast, the degradation behaviour of low-porosity rocks (e.g., basalt) under FTCs remains insufficiently constrained. The coupled evolution of microstructural damage and macroscopic mechanical response may follow distinct pathways compared with porous rocks (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Zhang K. et al., 2022</xref>). In particular, the roles of initial weathering degree and crack-dominated damage evolution in controlling macroscopic strength degradation of dense basalt remain insufficiently understood. Moreover, many previous studies rely on complex experimental setups, sophisticated monitoring techniques, or parameter-intensive damage models. These methods are valuable for understanding the degradation mechanisms, but their application in engineering practice is limited by data availability and cost (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Li et al., 2021</xref>). In cold regions, basalt is widely encountered as the bedrock material for slopes and foundations, and its long-term performance under freeze-thaw action presents practical challenges for engineering design. Under these conditions, there is a necessity for experimental data and simplified empirical models based on readily measurable parameters to support degradation assessment.</p>
<p>To address the aforementioned issues, the present study selected a bridge bank slope located in an alpine mountainous region as the research object. Basalt samples were subjected to controlled FTCs in the laboratory, and a series of tests was conducted to analyze the damage mechanism of basalt under these cycles. The investigation emphasized relatively rapid and practical indices, such as Primary wave (P-wave) velocity, porosity, uniaxial compressive strength (UCS), and direct shear strength, which can be measured with conventional laboratory equipment. In addition, SEM observations were employed to interpret the microstructural damage underlying the observed macroscopic responses. Based on regression analyses, empirical models linking strength degradation to macroscopic physical parameters were developed for basalts with different weathering degrees. The findings of this study provide a practical reference for simplified degradation assessment and support the parameter selection in cold-region engineering applications.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="materials|methods" id="s2">
<label>2</label>
<title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="s2-1">
<label>2.1</label>
<title>Geological background and material collection</title>
<p>The study area is a section of a major railway line in northwestern Yunnan Province, China, crossing the Tiger Leaping Gorge of the Jinsha River. The region features steep alpine terrain, with Jade Dragon Snow Mountain and Haba Snow Mountain on opposite sides of the gorge. The peak elevation reaches 5,000 m, with a relief of over 2000 m (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1</xref>). According to geological surveys, subsurface strata consist mainly of Permian and Triassic basalts, while bedrock at the bridge crossing comprises green foliated basalt and chloritized basalt. The alpine valley topography generates seasonal and diurnal temperature variations (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2</xref>). The mean annual air temperature ranges between &#x2212;15 &#xb0;C and &#x2b;15 &#xb0;C, and significant F-T action is evident. Field observations also show that shallow rock masses exhibit distinct signs of F-T weathering, including fracturing and loosening near the surface. Four boreholes were drilled on both sides of the planned bridge foundation to obtain the samples for this study.</p>
<fig id="F1" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Geological background of the study area and locations of sample collection.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="feart-14-1732484-g001.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Satellite map showing two panels. The left panel highlights a mountainous region with snow-capped peaks and a red box marking the study area. The right panel depicts a river with four labeled sample collection locations in red: Location 1, Location 2, Location 3, and Location 4, with a blue line indicating a railway bridge. A north directional arrow is present.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<fig id="F2" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 2</label>
<caption>
<p>Annual temperature in the study area.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="feart-14-1732484-g002.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Line graph showing monthly temperature ranges in degrees Celsius. Historical maximum, average maximum, average annual, average minimum, and historical minimum temperatures are plotted from January to December. A dashed line marks zero degrees Celsius.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-2">
<label>2.2</label>
<title>Material classification</title>
<p>Rock samples were collected from four boreholes drilled along the slopes on both sides of the planned bridge site (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1</xref>). In the laboratory, basalt core was prepared as standard cylindrical specimens with a diameter of 50 mm and a height of 100 mm following ISRM (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Lamas, 2018</xref>) recommendations, resulting in 107 specimens in total (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3a</xref>). All specimens consisted of dense basalt, and no vesicular structures were observed during macroscopic inspection. Four fundamental physical parameters such as dry density, porosity, P-wave velocity, and water absorption were measured under the laboratory conditions, and the results are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3b</xref>. The dry density of the basalt specimens range continuously from 2.75 to 3.01 g/cm<sup>3</sup>, whereas porosity and P-wave velocity exhibit noticeable variability. On this basis, the sampled basalts were considered to represent different degrees of weathering, and the average values of the physical parameters are listed in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>.</p>
<fig id="F3" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 3</label>
<caption>
<p>Representative rock specimens and initial physical parameter distributions of the basalt specimens. <bold>(a)</bold> Photographs of the prepared basalt specimens and the dimensions of a cylindrical specimen. <bold>(b)</bold> The distribution of the initial physical parameters, including P-wave velocity, density, and porosity, for Sample 1 and Sample 2.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="feart-14-1732484-g003.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">(a) Multiple cylindrical basalt specimens displayed, each with measurements of 50 millimeters in diameter and 100 millimeters in height. (b) A 3D scatter plot showing P-wave velocity against density and porosity. Red and blue dots represent different sample groups labeled as Sample 1 and Sample 2.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<table-wrap id="T1" position="float">
<label>TABLE 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Initial physical and mechanical parameters of the basalt samples.</p>
</caption>
<table>
<thead valign="top">
<tr>
<th align="center">Sample group IDs</th>
<th align="center">Density (g/cm<sup>3</sup>)</th>
<th align="center">Porosity (%)</th>
<th align="center">P-wave velocity (Km/s)</th>
<th align="center">Water absorption (%)</th>
<th align="center">UCS (MPa)</th>
<th align="center">Number of specimens</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td align="center">Samples 1</td>
<td align="center">2.852 &#xb1; 0.121</td>
<td align="center">1.540 &#xb1; 0.089</td>
<td align="center">4.80 &#xb1; 0.055</td>
<td align="center">0.523 &#xb1; 0.041</td>
<td align="center">57.39 &#xb1; 3.02</td>
<td align="center">52</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">Samples 2</td>
<td align="center">2.962 &#xb1; 0.109</td>
<td align="center">0.827 &#xb1; 0.051</td>
<td align="center">5.80 &#xb1; 0.037</td>
<td align="center">0.278 &#xb1; 0.033</td>
<td align="center">89.31 &#xb1; 2.33</td>
<td align="center">55</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<p>To identify the weathering degree of the basalt samples, three samples were randomly selected from each group and tested for uniaxial compressive strength before the FTCs. The averaged results are also reported in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>. Samples 1 had a higher degree of weathering with the lower strength.</p>
<p>Based on the engineering geological investigation data of the planned bridge and regional engineering experience, the suggested physical and mechanical parameters of fresh basalt in this study area was as follows: UCS ranging from 100 to 140 MPa, porosity of 0.3%&#x2013;1.2%, and P-wave within 6.0&#x2013;7.5 km/s, water absorption around 0.3%. The weathering degree of the basalt samples was evaluated by using the weathering degree criteria in the Code for Investigation of Geotechnical Engineering (GB 50021-2001, China) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People's Republic of China (MOHURD), 2009</xref>). <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref> shows that the basalts fall into two weathering degrees: moderately weathered groups (MG) for samples 1 and slightly weathered groups (SG) for samples 2.</p>
<table-wrap id="T2" position="float">
<label>TABLE 2</label>
<caption>
<p>The weathering degree of the basalt samples.</p>
</caption>
<table>
<thead valign="top">
<tr>
<th rowspan="2" align="left">Weathering degrees</th>
<th rowspan="2" align="left">Indices</th>
<th rowspan="2" align="left">Samples 1</th>
<th rowspan="2" align="left">Samples 2</th>
<th colspan="2" align="center">Code for investigation of geotechnical engineering (GB 50021&#x2013;2001, China)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th align="left">Thresholds</th>
<th align="center">Computational formula</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td rowspan="2" align="left">Slightly weathered</td>
<td align="center">K<sub>v</sub>
</td>
<td align="center">--</td>
<td align="center">0.77&#x2013;0.89</td>
<td align="center">0.8&#x2013;0.9</td>
<td rowspan="4" align="left">
<inline-formula id="inf1">
<mml:math id="m1">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>K</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>u</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>U</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>C</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>S</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>w</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>h</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>d</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>U</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>C</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>S</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>f</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>r</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>s</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>h</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>
<break/>
<inline-formula id="inf2">
<mml:math id="m2">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>K</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>V</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>P</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>w</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>v</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mtext>&#x2009;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mi>v</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>l</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>o</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>c</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>y</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>w</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>h</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>d</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>P</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>w</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>v</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mtext>&#x2009;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mi>v</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>l</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>o</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>c</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>y</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>f</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>r</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>s</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>h</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">K<sub>u</sub>
</td>
<td align="center">--</td>
<td align="center">0.64&#x2013;0.89</td>
<td align="center">0.8&#x2013;0.9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="2" align="left">Moderately weathered</td>
<td align="center">K<sub>v</sub>
</td>
<td align="center">0.64&#x2013;0.73</td>
<td align="center">--</td>
<td align="center">0.6&#x2013;0.8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">K<sub>u</sub>
</td>
<td align="center">0.42&#x2013;0.59</td>
<td align="center">--</td>
<td align="center">0.4&#x2013;0.8</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-3">
<label>2.3</label>
<title>Freeze&#x2013;thaw cycles treatment</title>
<p>The freeze-thaw temperature range and the number of cycles are key parameters in freeze-thaw testing. Existing testing standards and recommendations, such as ISRM (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Lamas, 2018</xref>) and ASTM (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Materials, 2013</xref>), show noticeable differences in the selection of these parameters. The freeze-thaw conditions are often determined by the climatic background and engineering context of the study area.</p>
<p>In this study, meteorological data from the study area (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2</xref>) were used as the primary reference. Considering the potential occurrence of extreme cold conditions at the engineering site, the freeze-thaw temperature range was set from &#x2d7;20 &#xb0;C to &#x2b;20 &#xb0;C. In the laboratory, this study designed a simplified freeze-thaw scheme. The cycling temperature was fixed at &#x2d7; 20 &#xb0;C and &#x2b;20 &#xb0;C, with a total of 100 freeze-thaw cycles applied. Each cycle lasted 24 h, comprising a 12 h freezing stage followed by a 12 h thawing stage. The FTCs were carried out using a combination of an ultra-low-temperature freezer and a thermostatic water bath.</p>
<p>A total of 90 standard cylindrical specimens were selected from the SG and MG basalt groups for freeze-thaw cycle testing (FTCs). For both weathering groups, the specimens were divided into five freeze-thaw levels based on the number of cycles: 0, 25, 50, 75, and 100 cycles. Each freeze-thaw level included both SG and MG specimens, with nine independent specimens in each group. During specimen allocation, the porosity was strictly controlled: the average porosity of specimens in each group was maintained such that the relative deviation from the overall average porosity reported in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref> was within &#xb1;5%, and the coefficient of variation for porosity within each group was limited to below 10%. This screening and grouping criteria ensured good consistency among specimens within and across groups. The allocation of specimens to the cycle levels is summarized in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">Table 3</xref>.</p>
<table-wrap id="T3" position="float">
<label>TABLE 3</label>
<caption>
<p>Experimental matrix of freeze-thaw cycles for basalt.</p>
</caption>
<table>
<thead valign="top">
<tr>
<th rowspan="2" align="center">Group IDs</th>
<th rowspan="2" align="center">F-T cycles</th>
<th rowspan="2" align="center">Specimens per group</th>
<th colspan="3" align="center">Destructive tests per group</th>
<th colspan="3" align="center">Non-destructive measurements</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th align="left">UCS</th>
<th align="left">Direct shear</th>
<th align="left">SEM</th>
<th align="left">Macro image</th>
<th align="left">P-wave velocity</th>
<th align="left">porosity</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td align="center">MG1</td>
<td align="center">0</td>
<td align="center">9</td>
<td align="center">4</td>
<td align="center">4</td>
<td align="center">1</td>
<td align="center">3</td>
<td align="center">4</td>
<td align="center">4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">MG2</td>
<td align="center">25</td>
<td align="center">9</td>
<td align="center">4</td>
<td align="center">4</td>
<td align="center">1</td>
<td align="center">3</td>
<td align="center">4</td>
<td align="center">4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">MG3</td>
<td align="center">50</td>
<td align="center">9</td>
<td align="center">4</td>
<td align="center">4</td>
<td align="center">1</td>
<td align="center">3</td>
<td align="center">4</td>
<td align="center">4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">MG4</td>
<td align="center">75</td>
<td align="center">9</td>
<td align="center">4</td>
<td align="center">4</td>
<td align="center">1</td>
<td align="center">3</td>
<td align="center">4</td>
<td align="center">4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">MG5</td>
<td align="center">100</td>
<td align="center">9</td>
<td align="center">4</td>
<td align="center">4</td>
<td align="center">1</td>
<td align="center">3</td>
<td align="center">5</td>
<td align="center">5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">SG1</td>
<td align="center">0</td>
<td align="center">9</td>
<td align="center">4</td>
<td align="center">4</td>
<td align="center">1</td>
<td align="center">3</td>
<td align="center">4</td>
<td align="center">4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">SG2</td>
<td align="center">25</td>
<td align="center">9</td>
<td align="center">4</td>
<td align="center">4</td>
<td align="center">1</td>
<td align="center">3</td>
<td align="center">4</td>
<td align="center">4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">SG3</td>
<td align="center">50</td>
<td align="center">9</td>
<td align="center">4</td>
<td align="center">4</td>
<td align="center">1</td>
<td align="center">3</td>
<td align="center">4</td>
<td align="center">4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">SG4</td>
<td align="center">75</td>
<td align="center">9</td>
<td align="center">4</td>
<td align="center">4</td>
<td align="center">1</td>
<td align="center">3</td>
<td align="center">4</td>
<td align="center">4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">SG5</td>
<td align="center">100</td>
<td align="center">9</td>
<td align="center">4</td>
<td align="center">4</td>
<td align="center">1</td>
<td align="center">3</td>
<td align="center">5</td>
<td align="center">5</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<p>All specimens were vacuum-saturated and sealed before the FTCs to maintain a consistent moisture condition. During the cycling, the specimens remained in a saturated state. After the specified number of cycles, the specimens were removed and tested for their physical and mechanical parameters. The freeze-thaw testing procedure is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4</xref>.</p>
<fig id="F4" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 4</label>
<caption>
<p>Experimental setup and testing sequence for FTCs.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="feart-14-1732484-g004.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Flowchart illustrating a material testing process in four steps. Step 1: Material characterization with images of physical and mechanical testing equipment. Step 2: Freezing and thawing process with images of equipment and details of 100 cycles at temperatures of minus twenty degrees Celsius and twenty degrees Celsius. Step 3: Non-destructive testing, showing physical parameter testing and image testing setups, measuring parameters like P-wave velocity and crack evolution. Step 4: Destructive testing with mechanical and SEM testing, focusing on mechanical degradation and microcrack evolution. Each step connects sequentially.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-4">
<label>2.4</label>
<title>Test methods</title>
<p>The test program included physical and mechanical strength parameters. Porosity, P-wave velocity, and surface features were measured as non-destructive indicators using an interval-based scheme. At every five FTCs, five specimens were selected from each of the MG5 and SG5 groups, marked and tested for porosity and P-wave velocity. Each measurement was repeated three times and the results were recorded. For the other groups (MG1 to MG4 and SG1 to SG4), four specimens were marked and tested in the same procedure. After every ten cycles, the surface features and macroscopic cracks of the specimens were inspected using a digital camera and an optical microscope. Upon completion of these non-destructive tests, the specimens underwent vacuum saturation again and were subjected to the next FTCs.</p>
<p>When the cumulative number of FTCs reached 25, 50, 75 and 100, nine specimens were extracted from the designated groups for mechanical testing and microscopic inspection. Four of the marked specimens were used for uniaxial compression tests at a loading rate of 0.5 mm/min, and the average uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) was calculated. Another four specimens were subjected to direct shear tests at normal stresses of 0.5, 2.5, 5.0 and 10 MPa, with a shear rate of 0.5 mm/min. Finally, the ninth specimen was examined by SEM to observe microstructural damage.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s3">
<label>3</label>
<title>Experimental results</title>
<sec id="s3-1">
<label>3.1</label>
<title>Microstructural damage evolution</title>
<p>During the FTCs, notable differences in crack development were observed between the MG and SG basalt specimens. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figures 5a,b</xref> present representative appearances and macro-fracture development of specimens with different weathering degrees during 100 cycles, and the labels MG5-1 and SG5-1 denote the 1st specimens within the MG5 and SG5 groups in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">Table 3</xref>, respectively. In the MG specimens (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5a</xref>), new cracks began to appear after 25 cycles, typically initiating at the edges of the cylindrical specimens. Between 50 and 75 cycles, the number of cracks increased significantly, and some fractures propagated from the sample periphery toward the interior. Small fragments of rock or chips were observed to spall off in zones with dense edge cracks in this stage. By 100 cycles, the MG specimens showed an extensive network of interconnected cracks around the outer regions. This crack propagation path was highlighted by the red lines in the left column of <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5a</xref>. The SG specimens showed a slower crack development in the <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5b</xref>. No obvious new cracks appeared in the first 40 cycles. A few peripheral fissures emerged after 50 cycles, but most remained short and discontinuous. After 80 cycles, the tiny fissures in SG gradually extended, and some slight spalling was noted in the edge spots. Even after 100 cycles, the SG specimens presented only few new cracks, primarily as extensions of original defects rather than forming an interconnected fracture network. Thus, the SG basalt specimens retained visually more intact and greater resistance to F-T action.</p>
<fig id="F5" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 5</label>
<caption>
<p>Crack evolution process and mass loss in basalt samples. (MG5-1 denotes the first specimen in the MG5 group, and SG5-&#x2a; denotes the &#x2a;th specimens in the SG5 group. This notation method is used throughout the paper). <bold>(a)</bold> Mac-fracture development of MG. <bold>(b)</bold> Mac-fracture development of SG. <bold>(c)</bold> Mass loss of samples.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="feart-14-1732484-g005.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Images (a) and (b) show cylindrical samples labeled MG5-1 and SG5-1 at various cycle times with visible surface changes over time, outlined in red. Image (c) presents a graph of mass loss over cycles for MG and SG samples, with linear fitted curves and insets of microstructural images at differing cycles, illustrating changes at 0, 50, 80, and 100 cycles for both sample types.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<p>Microscopic observations via a digital microscope at magnifications of 750&#xd7;-900&#xd7; provided additional insights into microcrack propagation (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5c</xref>, insets). In the MG samples, fine microcracks were already present initially and grew significantly with the FTCs. Between 75 and 100 cycles, microcrack coalescence led to the formation of larger discontinuities. Microfragments detached from crack edges and the crack boundaries became blurred and rough. By contrast, the SG samples initially showed almost no microcracks under the microscope. Even after dozens of cycles, only slight cracking was visible. Between 80 and 100 cycles, a few microcracks appeared and slowly grew but remained narrow and isolated. The crack edges in SG specimens remained sharp and clean, indicating minimal material removal along the cracks. These observations show more rapid microstructural degradation in MG specimens and delayed crack initiation in SG specimens.</p>
<p>The average mass-loss curves (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5c</xref>) offered further evidence of cumulative damage. Both the MG and SG groups show a decrease in mass with increasing FTCs, because of the surface spalling and particle detachment. The SG samples display a slow and nearly linear mass-loss trend, while the MG samples show relatively greater mass reduction. In MG, the curve changes slope around 75 cycles, after which the mass-loss rate increases. This change in mass-loss occurs alongside the more extensive cracking and spalling observed in MG during the later stages of cycling. By 100 cycles, the proportion of mass lost in the MG specimens is clearly higher than that in the SG specimens.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-2">
<label>3.2</label>
<title>Changes in physical properties (p-wave velocity and porosity)</title>
<p>The P-wave propagation velocity is highly sensitive to variations in rock integrity and the development of internal defects. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure 6</xref> shows the evolution of saturated and dry P-wave velocities for the MG and SG samples at 5-cycle intervals up to 100 cycles. Before any cycling, the saturated P-wave velocities were higher than the dry velocities for both groups, typically between 5,000 and 6,000 m/s.</p>
<fig id="F6" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 6</label>
<caption>
<p>Average values of P-wave velocity for basalt samples.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="feart-14-1732484-g006.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Graph depicting P-wave velocities (in kilometers per second) over 100 cycles for four conditions: MG Saturated, MG Dried, SG Saturated, and SG Dried. MG Saturated and Dried show decreasing trends, with velocities around 5.5 and 4.8 Km/s respectively. SG Saturated and Dried are higher, around 6.0 and 5.7 Km/s, with slight declines. Error bars indicate variability.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<p>In the FTCs, the saturated P-wave velocity of the MG showed a distinct three-stage evolution: a slow decline from 0 to 25 cycles, a period of accelerated reduction between 25 and 70 cycles, and a gradual leveling off between 70 and 100 cycles. In particular, the decrease in saturated velocity during the intermediate stage indicates rapid damage accumulation and crack development. After 70 cycles, the rate of decrease diminishes, with only minor additional decrease by 100 cycles. A similar pattern is reflected in the dry P-wave velocity of the MG group, although the absolute dry velocities are lower and the early-stage changes are less prominent. By comparison, both the saturated and dry P-wave velocities in the SG samples decline much more gradually and linearly, without a clear multistage pattern. The difference between the saturated and dry velocities in the SG is relatively small, suggesting that fewer pore spaces exist during the initial phase. Over the full 100 cycles, the P-wave velocity of the SG samples decreases steadily but remains modest in magnitude. The absence of distinct stages suggests that in low-porosity basalt, F-T damage accumulates at a relatively constant slow rate.</p>
<p>The evolution of porosity complements the P-wave velocity data. As FTCs generate and enlarge cracks, the connected porosity of the rock mass increases. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">Figures 7a,b</xref> present the average porosities of the MG and SG samples as a function of the number of cycles. Both groups show a linear increase in porosity with increasing cycle count, reflecting the continuous creation of new void spaces. However, the porosity of the MG samples exhibits a noticeably steeper slope, indicating a faster porosity growth rate per cycle, whereas the porosity of the SG samples increases at a slower rate. By 100 cycles, the porosity of the MG basalt samples increased by 0.5&#x2013;0.6 percentage points from the initial average value of 1.54%, corresponding to roughly 30% of the initial porosity. In contrast, the porosity of the SG basalt samples increases by only 0.1&#x2013;0.2 percentage points from an initial average value of 0.85%, which is a relatively minor change. Meanwhile, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">Figure 7c</xref> displays the porosity growth process for both groups at 5-cycle measurement intervals, which shows that MG specimens undergo greater porosity enhancement than SG specimens. These porosity trends are consistent with the P-wave velocity degradation and jointly point to more severe freeze-thaw damage in the MG basalt.</p>
<fig id="F7" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 7</label>
<caption>
<p>Porosity evolution of basalt specimens during freeze-thaw cycling. <bold>(a)</bold> MG specimens. <bold>(b)</bold> SG specimens. <bold>(c)</bold> Porosity growth rate.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="feart-14-1732484-g007.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Graphs illustrating porosity changes over cycles for MG5 and SG5 series. Graph (a) shows increasing porosity percentages for MG5-1 to MG5-5 over 100 cycles. Graph (b) displays porosity trends for SG5-1 to SG5-5, with slight increases over 100 cycles. Graph (c) compares porosity growth for all, showing varied increases with error bars across 100 cycles. Legend differentiates series using colors and patterns.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-3">
<label>3.3</label>
<title>Mechanical strength degradation</title>
<p>The F-T action-induced degradation in the mechanical properties was quantified by UCS and direct shear tests at several intervals. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8">Figures 8a&#x2013;f</xref> illustrate typical UCS failure mode of MG and SG samples, indicating that as damage accumulates, the failure becomes less abrupt, with more split fragments for the MG samples. The stress-strain curves shows in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8">Figures 8g,h</xref> exhibit that, at all freeze-thaw levels, specimens of both weathering grades experience a consistent decrease in peak strength and an increase in peak strain. As summarized in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9">Figure 9</xref>, after 100 cycles, the SG samples retained a relatively high UCS of 62.6 MPa, a 20%&#x2013;25% reduction from their initial strength. whereas the UCS of the MG samples decreased to 25.3 MPa, which is lower than 50% of its initial value. The UCS results reinforce the idea that, compared with the SG basalt samples, the MG basalt samples undergo a much greater relative loss of compressive strength under FTCs.</p>
<fig id="F8" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 8</label>
<caption>
<p>Uniaxial failure modes and the stress-strain curves of specimens after FTCs. <bold>(a)</bold> SG1-2 for 0 cycles. <bold>(b)</bold> SG3-4 for 50 cycles. <bold>(c)</bold> SG5-4 for 100 cycles. <bold>(d)</bold> MG1-1 for 0 cycles. <bold>(e)</bold> MG3-2 for 50 cycles. <bold>(f)</bold> SG5-4 for 100 cycles. <bold>(g)</bold> Stress-Strain curve for MG. <bold>(h)</bold> Stress-Strain curve for SG.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="feart-14-1732484-g008.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">A series of six images (a-f) showing a rock sample undergoing deformation under pressure, with each stage accompanied by a graph inset illustrating strain patterns. The rock progressively cracks and fragments. Two graphs (g and h) display unconfined compressive strength (UCS) versus strain for different material groups. Graph (g) shows cycles labeled from zero to one hundred for materials MG1 to MG5, while graph (h) shows similar data for SG1 to SG5, indicating decreased UCS with increased cycles.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<fig id="F9" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 9</label>
<caption>
<p>UCS of MG and SG specimens with freeze-thaw cycles.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="feart-14-1732484-g009.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Line graph showing the change in Unconfined Compressive Strength (UCS) in megapascals (MPa) over time for SG and MG materials. UCS values for SG decrease from 89.31 MPa at cycle 0 to 62.56 MPa at cycle 100. UCS values for MG decrease from 61.18 MPa at cycle 0 to 25.44 MPa at cycle 100. Error bars are included. SG is represented by a black dashed line with circles, and MG by a red dashed line with circles.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<p>The direct shear strength exhibited a similar decreasing trend. As shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T4">Table 4</xref>, at all normal stress levels (&#x3c3;<sub>n</sub> &#x3d; 0.5, 2.5, 5.0, and 10.0 MPa), peak shear strength decreases monotonically with increasing cycles, with MG specimens exhibiting greater reductions than SG specimens. Under &#x3c3;<sub>n</sub> &#x3d; 10 MPa, the peak shear strength of MG specimens decreases from 26.54 MPa to 12.53 MPa (a 53% reduction), while that of SG specimens decreases from 42.95 MPa to 29.56 MPa (a 31% reduction). These observations mirror the trends seen in UCS and indicate that initial weathering grade significantly influences the extent of freeze-thaw-induced shear strength degradation.</p>
<table-wrap id="T4" position="float">
<label>TABLE 4</label>
<caption>
<p>Direct shear strength of basalt after freeze-thaw cycles.</p>
</caption>
<table>
<thead valign="top">
<tr>
<th rowspan="2" align="center">Group IDs</th>
<th rowspan="2" align="center">Cycles</th>
<th colspan="4" align="center">Direct shear strength (MPa)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th align="center">&#x3c3;<sub>n</sub> &#x3d; 0.5 MPa</th>
<th align="center">&#x3c3;<sub>n</sub> &#x3d; 2.5 MPa</th>
<th align="center">&#x3c3;<sub>n</sub> &#x3d; 5 MPa</th>
<th align="center">&#x3c3;<sub>n</sub> &#x3d; 10 MPa</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td align="center">MG1</td>
<td align="center">0</td>
<td align="center">19.38</td>
<td align="center">20.88</td>
<td align="center">22.77</td>
<td align="center">26.54</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">MG2</td>
<td align="center">25</td>
<td align="center">15.85</td>
<td align="center">17.26</td>
<td align="center">19.02</td>
<td align="center">22.54</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">MG3</td>
<td align="center">50</td>
<td align="center">9.41</td>
<td align="center">10.64</td>
<td align="center">12.18</td>
<td align="center">15.25</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">MG4</td>
<td align="center">75</td>
<td align="center">8.40</td>
<td align="center">9.59</td>
<td align="center">11.08</td>
<td align="center">14.05</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">MG5</td>
<td align="center">100</td>
<td align="center">7.56</td>
<td align="center">8.61</td>
<td align="center">9.91</td>
<td align="center">12.53</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">SG1</td>
<td align="center">0</td>
<td align="center">33.40</td>
<td align="center">35.41</td>
<td align="center">37.93</td>
<td align="center">42.95</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">SG2</td>
<td align="center">25</td>
<td align="center">27.56</td>
<td align="center">29.41</td>
<td align="center">31.73</td>
<td align="center">36.36</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">SG3</td>
<td align="center">50</td>
<td align="center">25.41</td>
<td align="center">27.04</td>
<td align="center">29.07</td>
<td align="center">33.15</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">SG4</td>
<td align="center">75</td>
<td align="center">24.32</td>
<td align="center">25.62</td>
<td align="center">27.25</td>
<td align="center">30.49</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">SG5</td>
<td align="center">100</td>
<td align="center">23.61</td>
<td align="center">24.86</td>
<td align="center">26.43</td>
<td align="center">29.56</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<p>Other mechanical parameters derived from the test results also exhibit systematic reductions with increasing cycle number (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T5">Table 5</xref>). Young&#x2019;s modulus, cohesion, and internal friction angle each decrease to varying degrees, indicating the losses in stiffness and shear resistance.</p>
<table-wrap id="T5" position="float">
<label>TABLE 5</label>
<caption>
<p>Variation in the mechanical parameters of basalt with the number of FTCs.</p>
</caption>
<table>
<thead valign="top">
<tr>
<th align="left">Group</th>
<th align="left">Cycles</th>
<th align="left">Young&#x2019;s modulus (GPa)</th>
<th align="left">Cohesion (MPa)</th>
<th align="left">Friction angle (&#xb0;)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td rowspan="5" align="center">MG</td>
<td align="center">0</td>
<td align="center">8.31</td>
<td align="center">1.90</td>
<td align="center">37.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">20</td>
<td align="center">5.89</td>
<td align="center">1.55</td>
<td align="center">35.14</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">50</td>
<td align="center">4.29</td>
<td align="center">0.91</td>
<td align="center">31.6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">75</td>
<td align="center">3.55</td>
<td align="center">0.81</td>
<td align="center">30.76</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">100</td>
<td align="center">2.18</td>
<td align="center">0.73</td>
<td align="center">27.60</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="5" align="center">SG</td>
<td align="center">0</td>
<td align="center">11.43</td>
<td align="center">3.29</td>
<td align="center">45.15</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">20</td>
<td align="center">9.24</td>
<td align="center">2.71</td>
<td align="center">42.79</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">50</td>
<td align="center">6.95</td>
<td align="center">2.50</td>
<td align="center">39.17</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">75</td>
<td align="center">6.64</td>
<td align="center">2.40</td>
<td align="center">33.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">100</td>
<td align="center">6.11</td>
<td align="center">2.33</td>
<td align="center">32.03</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="discussion" id="s4">
<label>4</label>
<title>Discussion</title>
<sec id="s4-1">
<label>4.1</label>
<title>Degradation mechanism of basalt under freeze-thaw conditions</title>
<p>In nature, rock masses are continuously subjected to weathering. This process leads to that primary pores and microcracks are widely developed in the rock masses. These structural defects provide the fundamental basis for freeze-thaw damage. Previous studies have demonstrated that the phase transition of water in pores and microcracks is accompanied by volumetric expansion. It can generate substantial frost-heave-induced stresses on the order of MPa. As the stresses exceed the local tensile strength of the rock microstructure, they can induce new microcracks and facilitate the propagation of pre-existing cracks (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Huang et al., 2018</xref>). When the temperature drops below 0 &#xb0;C and the water freezes in these voids, the ice exerts compressive stress on the pore walls as well as induces tensile stress concentration at crack tips; upon thawing, the ice melts, and the stresses are released. Each freeze&#x2013;thaw cycle can be regarded as a microscale loading-unloading process, especially in the area with concentrated stress. Under repeated cycling, frost heave stresses enlarge the defects and cause the appearance of new microcracks. This damage results in the cumulative deterioration of physical properties and mechanical strength.</p>
<p>In this study, the experimental results indicate that even the dense basalt with low initial porosity exhibits evident physical and mechanical degradation after FTCs under saturated conditions. This observation confirms that crack propagation induced by the water-ice phase transition plays a governing role in the freeze-thaw damage evolution. In addition, specimens with a higher initial degree of weathering (the MG group) show more severe degradation of physical parameters and more loss of strength during FTCs. This behavior suggests that a higher content of initial defects and more developed migration pathways facilitate water ingress. It can amplify the effects of freezing action. In this section, the accumulation mechanism of freeze-thaw damage in basalt is further discussed.</p>
<sec id="s4-1-1">
<label>4.1.1</label>
<title>Comparative analysis</title>
<p>The basalt specimens examined in this study were collected from <italic>in situ</italic> rock masses at the planned bridge bank slope. The F-T experiments on this basalt contribute to the engineering applications directly. Due to the high cost and difficulty in obtaining basalt, the literature addressing its F-T degradation behaviour remains relatively limited. However, the existing studies have explored its fundamental degradation characteristics under F-T conditions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">He et al., 2025</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Park et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Aral et al., 2021</xref>). In their reports, the basalt&#x2019;s physical parameters exhibit clear correlations with freeze-thaw cycle counts: the porosity increases, and the P-wave velocity decreases progressively. Other researchers investigating freeze-thaw behaviour of igneous rocks have also noted that initial porosity and defect structures play crucial roles in controlling freeze-thaw degradation rates (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">&#xc7;elik et al., 2024</xref>).</p>
<p>
<xref ref-type="table" rid="T6">Table 6</xref> compared the results of this study with the literature on rock porosity evolution from other F-T researchs. Although the igneous rocks differ in their genetic types, they display a consistent increase in porosity during FTCs. This trend reflects progressive damage accumulation in the samples. As shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F10">Figure 10a</xref>, rock samples with higher initial porosity exhibit greater porosity values both at the same cycle numbers and the final stage of FTCs. The red and black dashed lines demarcate different initial porosity intervals. When the initial porosity is below 2.0%, the increase in porosity is not obvious during the damage process. Furthermore, when the initial porosity is lower than 1.0%, the accumulation of F-T damage is difficult to be captured by porosity variation effectively. The experimental results of this study are consistent with this observation. After 100 FTCs, the porosity of the MG specimens increased by 0.5&#x2013;0.6 percentage points, whereas the increase in SG was only 0.1&#x2013;0.2 percentage points. These results suggest that, for the dense rocks with extremely low initial porosity (e.g., SG in this study), using porosity as a single parameter to evaluate the damage induced by F-T has limitations. The assessment should be conducted in combination with integrity indicators such as P-wave velocity and mechanical strength.</p>
<table-wrap id="T6" position="float">
<label>TABLE 6</label>
<caption>
<p>Comparison of porosity under freeze-thaw cycles for different rocks.</p>
</caption>
<table>
<thead valign="top">
<tr>
<th align="left">Material</th>
<th align="left"/>
<th colspan="7" align="center">Porosity under F-T cycles</th>
<th align="left">References</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td rowspan="3" align="left">MG<break/>SG</td>
<td align="left">cycles</td>
<td align="center">0</td>
<td align="center">25</td>
<td align="center">50</td>
<td align="center">75</td>
<td align="center">100</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
<td rowspan="3" align="left">This paper</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Por. (%)</td>
<td align="center">1.45</td>
<td align="center">1.58</td>
<td align="center">1.73</td>
<td align="center">1.87</td>
<td align="center">2.18</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Por. (%)</td>
<td align="center">0.82</td>
<td align="center">0.83</td>
<td align="center">0.85</td>
<td align="center">0.93</td>
<td align="center">0.99</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="2" align="left">Basalt</td>
<td align="left">cycles</td>
<td align="center">0</td>
<td align="center">10</td>
<td align="center">20</td>
<td align="center">30</td>
<td align="center">50</td>
<td align="center">70</td>
<td align="center">100</td>
<td rowspan="2" align="left">
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">He et al. (2025)</xref>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Por. (%)</td>
<td align="center">1.43</td>
<td align="center">1.63</td>
<td align="center">1.65</td>
<td align="center">1.69</td>
<td align="center">1.74</td>
<td align="center">1.77</td>
<td align="center">1.80</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="3" align="left">Diorite basalt</td>
<td align="left">cycles</td>
<td align="center">0</td>
<td align="center">10</td>
<td align="center">20</td>
<td align="center">30</td>
<td align="center">40</td>
<td align="center">50</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td rowspan="3" align="left">
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Park et al. (2015)</xref>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Por. (%)</td>
<td align="center">0.02</td>
<td align="center">0.02</td>
<td align="center">0.021</td>
<td align="center">0.022</td>
<td align="center">0.023</td>
<td align="center">0.025</td>
<td align="left"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Por. (%)</td>
<td align="center">0.108</td>
<td align="center">0.111</td>
<td align="center">0.113</td>
<td align="center">0.114</td>
<td align="center">0.119</td>
<td align="center">0.121</td>
<td align="left"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="2" align="left">Granite</td>
<td align="left">cycles</td>
<td align="center">0</td>
<td align="center">20</td>
<td align="center">40</td>
<td align="center">70</td>
<td align="center">100</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
<td rowspan="2" align="left">
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Weng et al. (2020)</xref>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Por. (%)</td>
<td align="center">0.532</td>
<td align="center">0.578</td>
<td align="center">0.663</td>
<td align="center">0.725</td>
<td align="center">0.744</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="2" align="left">Granite</td>
<td align="left">cycles</td>
<td align="center">0</td>
<td align="center">30</td>
<td align="center">60</td>
<td align="center">90</td>
<td align="center">120</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
<td rowspan="2" align="left">
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Liu et al. (2022)</xref>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Por. (%)</td>
<td align="center">1.97</td>
<td align="center">2.55</td>
<td align="center">3.26</td>
<td align="center">3.57</td>
<td align="center">4.28</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="2" align="left">Granite</td>
<td align="left">cycles</td>
<td align="center">0</td>
<td align="center">25</td>
<td align="center">50</td>
<td align="center">100</td>
<td align="center">150</td>
<td align="center">200</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td rowspan="2" align="left">
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Zhang et al. (2024)</xref>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Por. (%)</td>
<td align="center">3.24</td>
<td align="center">3.4</td>
<td align="center">3.93</td>
<td align="center">4.98</td>
<td align="center">6.06</td>
<td align="center">7.1</td>
<td align="left"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="2" align="left">Andesitic</td>
<td align="left">cycles</td>
<td align="center">0</td>
<td align="center">5</td>
<td align="center">10</td>
<td align="center">15</td>
<td align="center">20</td>
<td align="center">30</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td rowspan="2" align="left">
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Fener and &#x130;nce (2015)</xref>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Por. (%)</td>
<td align="center">5.65</td>
<td align="center">6.03</td>
<td align="center">6.78</td>
<td align="center">7.03</td>
<td align="center">7.34</td>
<td align="center">7.78</td>
<td align="left"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="2" align="left">Basalt</td>
<td align="left">cycles</td>
<td align="center">0</td>
<td align="center">10</td>
<td align="center">20</td>
<td align="center">30</td>
<td align="center">40</td>
<td align="center">50</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td rowspan="2" align="left">
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Aral et al. (2021)</xref>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Por. (%)</td>
<td align="center">0.505</td>
<td align="center">0.636</td>
<td align="center">0.715</td>
<td align="center">0.856</td>
<td align="center">0.866</td>
<td align="center">0.993</td>
<td align="left"/>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<fig id="F10" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 10</label>
<caption>
<p>Comparison of porosity evolution of different rock types under freeze-thaw cycles. <bold>(a)</bold> Porosity variation of different rock types under freeze-thaw cycles. <bold>(b)</bold> Porosity growth rate of different rock types under freeze-thaw cycles.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="feart-14-1732484-g010.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Two graphs display porosity data over cycles. Graph (a) shows porosity percentage versus cycle time, with various materials like MG, SG, and Basalt, detailing initial porosity levels at 1.0% and 2.0%. Graph (b) depicts cumulative growth rate of porosity percentage, showing significant increases with cycles reaching 20, 50, and 100. Each line represents different materials with distinct colors and markers.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<p>At the same time, the comparison covers different rock types, such as granite, basalt, diorite, and andesite. The differences in mineral composition and initial microstructure between these samples also influence the F-T damage process. Granite is mainly composed of coarse-grained minerals such as quartz, feldspar, and mica, and their coefficients of thermal expansion vary significantly. The repeated freeze-thaw cycles generate stress concentration at mineral crystal boundaries easily, and causing microcrack initiation and propagation. As a result, granites reported in these studies show great increases in porosity. In contrast, dense basalt is characterized by fine-grained minerals, a compact matrix structure, and a lack of microcracks, leading to slow accumulation of F-T damage. For the andesite, it exhibits microstructural similarities to basalt, such as fine-grained phenocrysts and fine-grained matrix, but it commonly contains more developed structural planes. As reported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Fener and &#x130;nce (2015)</xref>, the initial porosity of andesite reached 5%. These microstructural defects provided the initial path for the accumulation of F-T damage, which resulted in a cumulative porosity growth rate of up to 50% after only 25 cycles (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F10">Figure 10b</xref>). These observations indicate that mineral composition and initial microstructure play an important role in the F-T damage. Particularly, the microstructural defects exert a dominant damage-amplifying effect. For the basalt tested in this study, its initial microstructural defects are mainly microcracks induced by weathering, which control the degradation of the specimens during FTCs.</p>
<p>In this study, the basalts show a dense structure and the absence of vesicles. Comparison with other studies indicates that this microstructural feature is close to the basalt specimens reported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">He et al. (2025)</xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Park et al. (2015)</xref>. By contrast, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Aral et al. (2021)</xref> investigated the F-T damage behavior of vesicular basalt. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F11">Figure 11a</xref> presents the relationships between porosity and the number of cycles for these basalts. The porosity evolution range of the MG specimens is consistent with that reported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">He et al. (2025)</xref>. The blue dashed lines in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F11">Figure 11a</xref> mark the experimental porosity values at different cycle numbers. It can be seen that the vesicular basalt has an initial porosity lower than that of the SG specimens, but its porosity increased to 0.99% at the 50th F-T cycle, whereas the SG specimens reached the same level after 100 cycles. This comparison demonstrates that vesicular structures in basalt accelerate the damage accumulation during the early stages of cycling. Meanwhile, as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F11">Figure 11b</xref>, the vesicular basalt exhibits strong fluctuations in porosity growth rates during freeze-thaw cycles, and the peak rate exceeds 25% within the first 20 cycles. This indicates that the vesicular structures also enhance the sensitivity of basalt to early freeze-thaw cycles.</p>
<fig id="F11" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 11</label>
<caption>
<p>Comparison of porosity evolution of different basalts under freeze-thaw cycles. <bold>(a)</bold> Variation of porosity. <bold>(b)</bold> Growth rates of porosity.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="feart-14-1732484-g011.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Two graphs depicting porosity and porosity growth rate over cycles. Graph (a) shows porosity (%) increasing across cycles for various materials, with MG and basalt showing significant increases. Graph (b) presents porosity growth rate (%) over cycles, highlighting fluctuations, especially in basalt samples noted by Aral et al., 2021. Color-coded legends differentiate the materials studied.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<p>Meanwhile, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Zhang et al. (2024)</xref> classified microfractures into four categories based on width: microcracks (&#x3c;0.1 &#x3bc;m), small cracks (0.1&#x2013;1 &#x3bc;m), medium cracks (1&#x2013;50 &#x3bc;m), and large cracks (&#x3e;50 &#x3bc;m). Based on this criterion, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">He et al. (2025)</xref> analyzed the distribution of crack types in basalt during freeze-thaw cycles (FTCs). As shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F12">Figures 12a,b</xref>, their results reveal a clear transition among different crack size classes. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Yu et al. (2023)</xref> reported similar findings and suggested that the evolution of medium and large cracks dominates the increase in porosity measured by volumetric methods. These results suggest that F-T damage involves not only an increase in crack quantity, but also a transformation of microcracks and small cracks into medium and large cracks. However, the microcracks and small cracks still account for 70%&#x2013;80% of the total cracks within the rock mass (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F12">Figure 12a</xref>). Owing to the low connectivity of these microcracks and the natural heterogeneity in rocks, variations in these cracks are difficult to measure in porosity by the volumetric methods. Under FTCs, the rock damage related to these microcracks needs to be reflected by indicators of specimen integrity, such as P-wave velocity and mechanical strength. It can be inferred that, in this study, the methods used to examine F-T damage in basalt specimens with different degrees of weathering are effective, and the results presented in <xref ref-type="sec" rid="s3">Section 3</xref> show that the MG group exhibits a clear increase in porosity, while the SG group mainly shows reductions in P-wave velocity and mechanical strength, which reflects the freeze-thaw degradation characteristics of basalt in the study area.</p>
<fig id="F12" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 12</label>
<caption>
<p>Evolution of crack types in basalt under freeze-thaw cycles (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">He et al., 2025</xref>). <bold>(a)</bold> Variation of crack types ratios. <bold>(b)</bold> Growth rates of crack types.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="feart-14-1732484-g012.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Two graphs comparing crack ratios and growth rates over cycles. Graph (a) shows crack ratios for microcracks, small, medium, and large cracks. Microcracks decrease, medium and large cracks increase, and small cracks remain steady around eight percent. Graph (b) displays growth rates, with large cracks showing significant growth, medium cracks moderate, and small cracks stable. Microcracks decrease over time.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s4-1-2">
<label>4.1.2</label>
<title>Microstructural evolution associated with freeze&#x2013;thaw degradation</title>
<p>SEM observations provide microstructural evidence that is consistent with the macroscopic degradation behaviour of basalt subjected to freeze-thaw cycling. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F13">Figure 13</xref> presents a sequence of SEM images acquired at 1,000&#xd7; magnification. Before the FTCs, both MG and SG samples exhibited fine debris and primary microcracks on their surfaces; however, the MG specimens contained a higher density of longer and more interconnected cracks (some exceeding 100 &#x3bc;m), whereas cracks in SG specimens were shorter and more isolated. These initial differences are expected to influence the extent of water penetration and the effective pathways through which phase-change stresses are transmitted within the material.</p>
<fig id="F13" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 13</label>
<caption>
<p>SEM images of basalt specimens at at a magnification of &#xd7;1,000 <bold>(i-v)</bold> MG specimens after 0, 25, 50, 75, and 100 freeze-thaw cycles. <bold>(vi-x)</bold> SG specimens after 0, 25, 50, 75, and 100 freeze-thaw cycles. Microscopic fragments, microfractures, and matrix-phenocryst boundaries are highlighted by yellow dashed outlines, red lines, and blue lines, respectively.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="feart-14-1732484-g013.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Series of ten microscopic images showing microstructural changes in samples labeled as MG and SG over different cycle counts (0, 25, 50, 75, 100). Each image highlights microscopic fragments in yellow, microfractures in red, and matrix-phenocryst boundaries in blue. Images demonstrate increasing damage with more cycles, as seen by more prominent fractures and fragmentations.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<p>As shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F13">Figure 13</xref>, the MG specimens rapidly exhibited significant detachment of mineral grains and matrix fragments. In the early stages, the damage displayed as fine debris and small fragments. After dozens of cycles, the new microcracks preferentially grew along mineral-matrix interfaces and grain boundaries, with an increase in crack width. The fracture pattern in the microstructure shifted from fine flaking to sheet-like and blocky detachment, and local separation between phenocrysts and the surrounding matrix was observed. In contrast, the SG specimens were characterized by gradual crack extension with limited opening. Under identical cycle conditions, mineral-matrix interface separation was less evident in SG specimens, and detached fragments were smaller in size.</p>
<p>The development characteristics of intracrystalline microcracks and secondary microcracks were observed in high-magnification SEM images at 2000&#xd7; (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F14">Figure 14</xref>). In the MG specimens, intracrystalline cracking increased with cycle number, and some mineral grains became traversed by such cracks or even fragmented, resulting in the splitting of larger grains into smaller fragments. This evolution is likely to enhance connectivity among intracrystalline cracks, intergranular cracks, and microcracks at matrix-phenocryst interfaces. This process formed the damage accumulation at the specimen scale.</p>
<fig id="F14" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 14</label>
<caption>
<p>SEM images of basalt specimens at at a magnification of &#xd7;2000. <bold>(i-iii)</bold> MG specimens after 0, 50, and 100 freeze-thaw cycles, respectively; <bold>(iv-vi)</bold> SG specimens after 0, 50, and 100 freeze-thaw cycles, respectively. Microscopic fragments are outlined by yellow dashed lines, and secondary fractures are indicated by red lines.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="feart-14-1732484-g014.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Six SEM images show microscopic fragments and secondary fractures. The first row displays MG for 0, 50, and 100 cycles, indicating fragments outlined in yellow and fractures in red. The second row shows SG for 0, 50, and 100 cycles with similar markings, demonstrating progression in fragment separation and fracture occurrence. A legend indicates yellow outlines for fragments and red dashed lines for fractures.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<p>The SG specimens also exhibited intracrystalline cracking, but with comparatively lower density and slower development. As reported in the literature, secondary microcracks and micropores frequently possess extremely small equivalent radii and contribute minimally to effective porosity measurements. They are difficult to quantify using volumetric porosity methods, but their impact on strength degradation is significant (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Zhang Q. et al., 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Gao et al., 2025</xref>). This consideration provides a reliable explanation for the SG group, wherein porosity increase remained limited while UCS decreased markedly.</p>
<p>The SEM observations in this paper suggest that the degradation pattern of dense basalt under FTCs is strongly influenced by its initial microstructural characteristics, which are determined by its degree of weathering. Unlike high-porosity rocks (e.g., sandstone and schist), the specimens tested in this study are low-porosity dense rocks (initial porosity of 0.8%&#x2013;1.54%), and no obvious vesicular structures were observed. The F-T damage exhibited by the basalts cannot be solely attributed to the rapid expansion of primary microcracks. Instead, the degradation process is more reliably described by the pathway: (a) pre-existing microcracks are activated under water-ice phase-transition loading, during which they expand and transform. (b) crack growth preferentially develops along mineral-matrix boundaries or intergranular interfaces, accompanied by localized detachment and separation. and (c) secondary microcracks and microvoids gradually form within mineral grains and become interconnected, enhancing porosity connectivity and amplifying freeze-thaw damage effects. This pathway implies that, even under low-porosity conditions, saturated dense basalt may still undergo substantial mechanical deterioration provided that water effectively participates in the phase-transition process.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s4-2">
<label>4.2</label>
<title>Empirical strength degradation model under freeze&#x2013;thaw conditions</title>
<p>In this study, a damage variable approach was adopted to characterize the strength loss of basalt due to FTCs quantitatively. The F-T damage coefficient <inline-formula id="inf3">
<mml:math id="m3">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>K</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>f</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> was defined as the ratio of a rock&#x2019;s strength after FTCs of N to its initial strength before cycling, as expressed in <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="e1">Equation 1</xref>:<disp-formula id="e1">
<mml:math id="m4">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>K</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>f</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>&#x3c3;</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>N</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>/</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>&#x3c3;</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
<label>(1)</label>
</disp-formula>where <inline-formula id="inf4">
<mml:math id="m5">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>&#x3c3;</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>N</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> is the UCS after N cycles, and <inline-formula id="inf5">
<mml:math id="m6">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>&#x3c3;</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> is the initial UCS of the rock mass. Using the UCS data for the two weathering groups, the study first examined the general relationship between <inline-formula id="inf6">
<mml:math id="m7">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>K</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>f</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> and N, as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F15">Figure 15</xref>. The test results show that <inline-formula id="inf7">
<mml:math id="m8">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>K</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>f</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> tends to decrease exponentially with the number of FTCs. Simple exponential decay curves can be fitted to the <inline-formula id="inf8">
<mml:math id="m9">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>K</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>f</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> and N comparative data for both MG and SG basalts with high correlation coefficients, indicating that an exponential model is reasonable. However, a straightforward exponential function (<inline-formula id="inf9">
<mml:math id="m10">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>K</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>f</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> vs. N) for some constants has limitations. In particular, the best-fit exponential for the MG samples suggested that <inline-formula id="inf10">
<mml:math id="m11">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>K</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>f</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> might drop below zero if extrapolated beyond the tested range. Obviously, <inline-formula id="inf11">
<mml:math id="m12">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>K</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>f</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> cannot be negative; physically, as N approaches infinity, <inline-formula id="inf12">
<mml:math id="m13">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>K</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>f</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> should approach some residual strength ratio greater than 0. The initial exponential model for the MG basalt did not capture this asymptotic behavior, indicating that it would overpredict damage for an extremely large N.</p>
<fig id="F15" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 15</label>
<caption>
<p>Relationships between <inline-formula id="inf13">
<mml:math id="m14">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>K</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>f</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> and the number of FTCs.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="feart-14-1732484-g015.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Chart showing the relationship between the damage coefficient and cycles over time for MG and SG. Dotted lines represent fitted curves for SG (red), MG (black), and a co-located curve (blue). The graph includes the equation \( K_f &#x3d; A \times e^{(-N/B)} &#x2b; K_0 \) with \( R^2 \ge 0.89 \). Data points for MG and SG are plotted with different markers.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<p>By contrast, the <inline-formula id="inf14">
<mml:math id="m15">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>K</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>f</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> and N values of the SG samples fit the exponential comparison more effectively and presented a gradual decrease in strength, which was in line with the expectation that the SG basalt samples would approach the residual strength more slowly. For the SG basalt samples, experimental data suggest a residual <inline-formula id="inf15">
<mml:math id="m16">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>K</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>f</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> between 0.3 and 0.5. For the MG basalt samples, introducing an asymptote is essential to avoid the nonphysical prediction of negative strength at high N.</p>
<p>The data was combined and nonlinear regression was performed, allowing for an asymptotic value, to create a more robust predictive model applicable to both weathering cases. In this study, a modified exponential decay function of the following form was selected:<disp-formula id="e2">
<mml:math id="m17">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>&#x3c3;</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>N</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="&#x7c;">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#xb7;</mml:mo>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>N</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>/</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>b</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>c</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>&#x3c3;</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
<label>(2)</label>
</disp-formula>
</p>
<p>Where <inline-formula id="inf16">
<mml:math id="m18">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>, <inline-formula id="inf17">
<mml:math id="m19">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>b</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> and <inline-formula id="inf18">
<mml:math id="m20">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>c</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> are fitting constants. Here, <inline-formula id="inf19">
<mml:math id="m21">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>c</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> represents the asymptotic fraction of strength as N approaches infinity (i.e., <inline-formula id="inf20">
<mml:math id="m22">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>K</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>f</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> approaches <inline-formula id="inf21">
<mml:math id="m23">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>c</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>), <inline-formula id="inf22">
<mml:math id="m24">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> represents the initial damage amplitude, and <inline-formula id="inf23">
<mml:math id="m25">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>b</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> controls the rate of decay. The best-fit parameters for basalt were obtained through the utilisation of the experimental UCS data up to 100 cycles in this study: <inline-formula id="inf24">
<mml:math id="m26">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>0.600</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>, <inline-formula id="inf25">
<mml:math id="m27">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>b</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>66.98</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>, and <inline-formula id="inf26">
<mml:math id="m28">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>c</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>0.415</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>. Thus, the combined predictive formula becomes:<disp-formula id="e3">
<mml:math id="m29">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>&#x3c3;</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>N</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="&#x7c;">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>0.600</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#xb7;</mml:mo>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>N</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>/</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>66.98</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>0.415</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>&#x3c3;</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mi>R</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:msup>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>0.980</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
<label>(3)</label>
</disp-formula>
</p>
<p>This empirical formula, given by <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="e2">Equation 2</xref> or <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="e3">Equation 3</xref>, provides a practical way to estimate the remaining UCS of basalt after N FTCs, given its initial strength. This finding suggests that for extremely large N values, the basalt ultimately retains nearly 41.5% of its original strength under the F-T conditions tested. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="e3">Equation 3</xref> yielded a high goodness of fit (<inline-formula id="inf27">
<mml:math id="m30">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mi>R</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:msup>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>0.980</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>) for experimental results, mainly because it sufficiently fits the SG behavior. However, for the MG samples, a single combined curve somewhat overestimates their long-term strength loss, especially since the MG loses more strength at a faster rate compared with the SG. On this basis, the model was further refined by providing separate formulations for the highly weathering degrees: one incorporating porosity growth for the MG.</p>
<p>For the MG basalt samples, since porosity was identified as a crucial factor, a porosity-based strength degradation model was developed. As shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F16">Figure 16a</xref>, the relationship between the UCS and porosity n during freezing or thawing of MG basalt could be sufficiently described by an exponential function following a Weibull distribution. The best-fit equation for the MG, denoted <inline-formula id="inf28">
<mml:math id="m31">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>&#x3c3;</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>h</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>f</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>, is given by:<disp-formula id="e4">
<mml:math id="m32">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>&#x3c3;</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>h</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>f</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="&#x7c;">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>4.68</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#xb7;</mml:mo>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>/</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>0.763</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>0.074</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>&#x3c3;</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mi>R</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:msup>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>0.803</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
<label>(4)</label>
</disp-formula>
</p>
<fig id="F16" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 16</label>
<caption>
<p>Relationship between <inline-formula id="inf29">
<mml:math id="m33">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>K</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>f</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> and porosity. <bold>(a)</bold> Relationship between <inline-formula id="inf30">
<mml:math id="m34">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>K</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>f</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> and porosity for the MG samples. <bold>(b)</bold> Relationship between <inline-formula id="inf31">
<mml:math id="m35">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>K</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>f</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> and porosity for the SG group.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="feart-14-1732484-g016.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Graph (a) shows a scatter plot of damage coefficient \( K_f \) for MG as black dots against porosity, with a red dashed line representing fitted curves. The correlation equation is \( K_f &#x3d; 4.68 \times e^{-n/0.763} &#x2b; 0.074 \), with \( R^2 &#x3d; 0.803 \). Graph (b) displays \( K_f \) for SG as red dots with three fitted curves: exponential (black dash-dotted), linear (red dashed), and polynomial (green dotted) over varying porosity levels.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<p>This equation relates UCS to porosity n for highly weathered basalt under F-T action, with <inline-formula id="inf32">
<mml:math id="m36">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mi>R</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:msup>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>0.803</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> for the MG data. Although the goodness-of-fit is not excellent, this formula accounts for the rapid strength drop as the porosity increases and levels off to a residual value. As n increases, the exponential term decays, and capproaches 0.074, which indicates nearly 7.4% residual strength at extremely high damage.</p>
<p>For the SG basalt samples, a simpler cycle-count-based model was used, as the porosity changes were small and less directly tied to strength loss (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F16">Figure 16b</xref>). Based on the regression relations between the various and the damage coefficient, The SG strength, denoted by <inline-formula id="inf33">
<mml:math id="m37">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>&#x3c3;</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>s</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>f</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>, can be obtained by:<disp-formula id="e5">
<mml:math id="m38">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>&#x3c3;</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>s</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>f</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="&#x7c;">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>0.432</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#xb7;</mml:mo>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>N</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>/</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>47.282</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>0.563</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>&#x3c3;</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mi>R</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:msup>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>0.984</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
<label>(5)</label>
</disp-formula>
</p>
<p>This formula is effectively the same form as <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="e4">Equation 4</xref> and indeed matches the combined fit mentioned earlier. The R<sup>2</sup> was 0.984 for the SG data, indicating an excellent fit, further implying that SG strength degradation is predominantly a function of the number of cycles directly (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="e5">Equation 5</xref>). Notably, the SG model&#x2019;s asymptote (<inline-formula id="inf34">
<mml:math id="m39">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>c</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>0.563</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>) aligns with the idea that 56% of the strength remains after many cycles, similar to what the combined model suggested. By contrast, the MG model (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="e4">Equation 4</xref>) predicts a much lower asymptotic strength (7.4% of the initial value), reflecting the severe damage possible in already weak, cracked material.</p>
<p>In practical terms, these models indicate that for engineering assessments, if the initial weathering degree of basalt is known, one should select the appropriate model. If the basalt is highly weathered, then tracking the porosity increase might be essential to accurately predict strength loss because damage accelerates as new porosity is created. If the basalt is only slightly weathered, then one can reasonably predict the strength after N cycles only from the number of cycles, using an exponential decay with an asymptote as given.</p>
<p>Apart from the UCS, other mechanical parameters can also be expressed in a similar degradation model form. This study applied a dimensionless damage index approach to Young&#x2019;s modulus (<inline-formula id="inf35">
<mml:math id="m40">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>E</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>), cohesion (<inline-formula id="inf36">
<mml:math id="m41">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>C</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>), and friction angle (<inline-formula id="inf37">
<mml:math id="m42">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3c6;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>) for both groups. Each parameter at N cycles (denoted by <inline-formula id="inf38">
<mml:math id="m43">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>E</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>N</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>, <inline-formula id="inf39">
<mml:math id="m44">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>C</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>N</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> and <inline-formula id="inf40">
<mml:math id="m45">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>&#x3c6;</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>N</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>) was normalized by its initial value (<inline-formula id="inf41">
<mml:math id="m46">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>E</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>, <inline-formula id="inf42">
<mml:math id="m47">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>&#x2009;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mi>C</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> and <inline-formula id="inf43">
<mml:math id="m48">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>&#x3c6;</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>), and the decay with N was fitted. The results, shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F17">Figures 17a,b</xref>, indicate that <inline-formula id="inf44">
<mml:math id="m49">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>E</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> and <inline-formula id="inf45">
<mml:math id="m50">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>C</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> follow an exponential decay (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="e6">Equations 6</xref>, <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="e7">7</xref>), whereas <inline-formula id="inf46">
<mml:math id="m51">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3c6;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> exhibits a linear decline with N. The fitting yielded the following formulas:<disp-formula id="e6">
<mml:math id="m52">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>E</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>N</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="&#x7c;">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#xb7;</mml:mo>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>N</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>/</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>b</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>c</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>E</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
<label>(6)</label>
</disp-formula>
<disp-formula id="e7">
<mml:math id="m53">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>C</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>N</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="&#x7c;">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#xb7;</mml:mo>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>N</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>/</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>b</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>c</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>C</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
<label>(7)</label>
</disp-formula>
<disp-formula id="e8">
<mml:math id="m54">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>&#x3c6;</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>N</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")" separators="&#x7c;">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>4</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#xb7;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>N</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>&#x3c6;</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
<label>(8)</label>
</disp-formula>where <inline-formula id="inf47">
<mml:math id="m55">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>, <inline-formula id="inf48">
<mml:math id="m56">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>b</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>, and <inline-formula id="inf49">
<mml:math id="m57">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>c</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>, among other variables, are constants obtained from the regression, and N is the cycle count. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="e8">Equation 8</xref> for the friction angle implies a nearly linear percentage reduction in <inline-formula id="inf50">
<mml:math id="m58">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3c6;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> with increasing number of cycles (with <inline-formula id="inf51">
<mml:math id="m59">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>4</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> being a small negative slope). The exact fitting constants for experimental results are given in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T7">Table 7</xref> along with their <inline-formula id="inf52">
<mml:math id="m60">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mi>R</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> values. In general, these equations can serve to update slope stability model parameters after a specified number of FTCs.</p>
<fig id="F17" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 17</label>
<caption>
<p>Relationships between the mechanical parameters of basalt and the number of FTCs. <bold>(a)</bold> Variation in the Young&#x2019;s modulus with increasing number of FTCs. <bold>(b)</bold> Evolution of cohesion and friction angle during FTCs.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="feart-14-1732484-g017.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Two graphs showing damage coefficient over cycles. (a) Plot with black squares and red circles representing MG and SG, respectively. Lines indicate fitted curves. (b) Plot with black, red, green, and blue markers for different MG and SG parameters, with corresponding fitted curves. Damage coefficient decreases over cycles in both graphs.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<table-wrap id="T7" position="float">
<label>TABLE 7</label>
<caption>
<p>Fitting parameters for the mechanical property degradation models under freeze-thaw conditions.</p>
</caption>
<table>
<thead valign="top">
<tr>
<th align="left">Parameters</th>
<th align="left">Groups</th>
<th align="left">a</th>
<th align="left">b</th>
<th align="left">c</th>
<th align="left">R<sup>2</sup>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td rowspan="2" align="left">Young&#x2019;s modulus E</td>
<td align="left">MG</td>
<td align="left">0.971</td>
<td align="left">76.491</td>
<td align="left">0.022</td>
<td align="left">0.98</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">SG</td>
<td align="left">0.527</td>
<td align="left">44.922</td>
<td align="left">0.472</td>
<td align="left">0.96</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="2" align="left">Cohesion C</td>
<td align="left">MG</td>
<td align="left">0.796</td>
<td align="left">56.174</td>
<td align="left">0.204</td>
<td align="left">0.91</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">SG</td>
<td align="left">0.295</td>
<td align="left">28.914</td>
<td align="left">0.704</td>
<td align="left">0.98</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="2" align="left">Friction angle <italic>&#x3c6;</italic>
</td>
<td align="left">MG</td>
<td align="left">&#x2212;0.0025</td>
<td align="left">--</td>
<td align="left">--</td>
<td align="left">0.96</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">SG</td>
<td align="left">&#x2212;0.0030</td>
<td align="left">--</td>
<td align="left">--</td>
<td align="left">0.92</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<p>The abovementioned empirical models are derived from laboratory findings and are applicable to the tested conditions of saturated F-T action involving complete freezing and thawing in each cycle. As such, they can serve as a practical reference for the engineering-oriented estimation of rock strength degradation over time. However, the predictive capability of these models is inevitably influenced by material heterogeneity and microstructural complexity.</p>
<p>Although the exponential relationship between the UCS damage coefficient and porosity for the MG group exhibits a significant correlation (R<sup>2</sup> &#x3d; 0.803), some scatter is still evident in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F16">Figure 16a</xref>. This scatter indicates that porosity is an important factor in freeze-thaw-induced degradation of MG basalt, but it is not the sole controlling variable.</p>
<p>It should be noted that, although no typical primary vesicles were observed in the basalt samples used in this study, porosity manifests mainly in the form of micropores and microcracks, which are distributed heterogeneously in rock specimens. Such microstructural heterogeneity can exert mechanical effects similar to the randomly distributed vesicles, as it promotes localised frost-heaving stress concentration and preferential crack propagation paths during FTCs. Consequently, even at comparable porosity levels, significant differences may exist among specimens in terms of local pore clustering, crack orientation and connectivity. This leads to fluctuations in UCS (or <inline-formula id="inf53">
<mml:math id="m61">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>K</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>f</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>) under similar porosity conditions.</p>
<p>The scatter induced by microstructural heterogeneity is more pronounced in the SG group (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F16">Figure 16b</xref>), where the overall porosity is relatively low, making it difficult to establish a stable relationship between porosity and macroscopic mechanical degradation. Additionally, variations in initial microcrack density, mineral-matrix interface integrity, and local weathering intensity among MG specimens may interact with pore structure during FTCs, amplifying the scatter in mechanical responses further.</p>
<p>Therefore, the experimental results suggest that porosity can effectively predict the overall trend of weakening in MG basalt as a single parameter. However, for rocks with pronounced microstructural heterogeneity, more accurate strength prediction requires additional parameters to be incorporated, such as crack connectivity and pore-crack structural characteristics, to develop multivariable predictive models. Accordingly, the empirical relationships proposed in this study should be regarded as engineering-oriented estimation models applicable within the tested porosity range and freeze-thaw pathways.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4-3">
<label>4.3</label>
<title>Limitations and future works</title>
<p>Although this study investigates the mechanical responses and microstructural changes of dense basalt with different degrees of weathering under controlled freeze-thaw cycling, it remains necessary to clarify the applicability boundaries associated with the experimental conditions and the scope of the investigation.</p>
<p>The laboratory F-T cycles were conducted under fully saturated conditions following regular and symmetric temperature paths. These conditions represent an idealized and accelerated degradation scenario to a certain extent. Conversely, rock masses in natural cold-region environments are typically in an unsaturated state, and the freezing-thawing process often exhibits asymmetry in cooling and warming rates as well as in holding durations. Such differences result in alterations to the relative contributions of frost-heaving pressure and thermally induced stresses during the evolution of damage. The results presented herein primarily reflect the response of dense basalt to freeze-thaw action under saturated or near-saturated conditions, and their quantitative extrapolation to more complex natural environments should be undertaken with appropriate consideration of site-specific hydrological and thermal conditions.</p>
<p>In the microstructural characterisation, the present study primarily relied on SEM observations to qualitatively and semi-quantitatively analyse the initiation and propagation of microcracks in basalt. This method facilitates the clear identification of damage evolution patterns in two-dimensional sections. However, it does not provide direct quantitative information on the three-dimensional distribution and connectivity of pores and cracks. This limitation imposes constraints on the establishment of more rigorous quantitative relationships between microstructural parameters and macroscopic mechanical degradation.</p>
<p>Based on these considerations, future research could improve the experimental design by accounting for different degrees of rock saturation and asymmetric temperature paths. Other three-dimensional inspection techniques, such as CT and NMR, could be employed to better resolve the spatial distribution and connectivity of damage features. Coupled freeze-thaw and loading tests conducted under confining pressure or disturbance conditions may provide further insight into damage evolution. These additions would strengthen the interpretation of freeze-thaw damage mechanisms and improve the reliability and transferability of the empirical models.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="conclusion" id="s5">
<label>5</label>
<title>Conclusion</title>
<p>Basalt with two different degrees of weathering was selected as the experimental material in this study. A series of tests were performed to investigate the effects of freeze-thaw cycles on the physical and mechanical properties of basalt in the laboratory. The experiment measured porosity, P-wave velocity and UCS of basalt. In addition, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used to examine the microstructural damage during freeze-thaw cycling, and an empirical relationship for strength reduction was developed based on the test results. The following conclusions can be drawn:<list list-type="order">
<list-item>
<p>The degradation of basalt under freeze-thaw cycles is characterized by increased porosity, reduced P-wave velocity, and decreased UCS. Moderately weathered basalt degraded seriously: after 100 freeze-thaw cycles, the average porosity of moderately weathered basalt increased by 44.3%, while its UCS decreased by 58.8%. In contrast, slightly weathered basalt exhibited a smaller increase in average porosity of 20.7%, with the UCS reduction limited to 30.0%.</p>
</list-item>
<list-item>
<p>Microscopic observations show that freeze-thaw degradation mainly consists of the activation and propagation of pre-existing microcracks, together with the formation of secondary microfractures. In moderately weathered basalt, crack development occurs along mineral-matrix interfaces and grain boundaries, with localized detachment of mineral particles, whereas slightly weathered basalt exhibits only limited crack propagation and formation of secondary microfractures.</p>
</list-item>
<list-item>
<p>Empirical relationships were developed to describe the links between strength degradation and physical parameters during freeze-thaw cycles. For slightly weathered basalt, mechanical strength (UCS) shows a clear correlation with the number of freeze-thaw cycles, whereas in moderately weathered basalt, strength degradation is closely related to the porosity. These relationships reflect degradation trends under the tested material types and experimental conditions, and their applicability to other complex environments needs further verification.</p>
</list-item>
</list>
</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec sec-type="data-availability" id="s6">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="author-contributions" id="s7">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>JC: Investigation, Writing &#x2013; original draft, Writing &#x2013; review and editing, Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal Analysis, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization. LW: Writing &#x2013; review and editing, Investigation. GW: Writing &#x2013; review and editing, Conceptualization, Project administration. LH: Formal Analysis, Investigation, Writing &#x2013; review and editing, Conceptualization, Data curation. LB: Formal Analysis, Investigation, Writing &#x2013; review and editing.</p>
</sec>
<ack>
<title>Acknowledgements</title>
<p>We also wish to express our sincere appreciation to the reviewers for their constructive comments and suggestions, which have significantly improved the quality of this manuscript.</p>
</ack>
<sec sec-type="COI-statement" id="s9">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>Author LW was employed by Zhejiang Geology and Mineral Technology Co. Ltd.</p>
<p>The remaining author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="ai-statement" id="s10">
<title>Generative AI statement</title>
<p>The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.</p>
<p>Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="disclaimer" id="s11">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
<fn-group>
<fn fn-type="custom" custom-type="edited-by">
<p>
<bold>Edited by:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/92668/overview">Davide Tiranti</ext-link>, Agenzia Regionale per la Protezione Ambientale del Piemonte (Arpa Piemonte), Italy</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="custom" custom-type="reviewed-by">
<p>
<bold>Reviewed by:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/3289220/overview">Bowen Li</ext-link>, Wuhan University, China</p>
<p>
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/3295816/overview">Xiaoping Wang</ext-link>, Luzhou Construction Project Quality Assurance Center, China</p>
</fn>
</fn-group>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Abdolghanizadeh</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hosseini</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Saghafiyazdi</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Effect of freezing temperature and number of freeze-thaw cycles on mode I and mode II fracture toughness of sandstone</article-title>. <source>Theor. Appl. Fract. Mech.</source> <volume>105</volume>, <fpage>102428</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.tafmec.2019.102428</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Aral</surname>
<given-names>I. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Boy</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Din&#xe7;er</surname>
<given-names>A. R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Effects of freeze-thawing cycles on the physical and mechanical properties of basaltic and dolomitic rocks evaluated with a decay function model</article-title>. <source>Bull. Eng. Geol. Environ.</source> <volume>80</volume>, <fpage>2955</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2962</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10064-021-02132-6</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>&#xc7;elik</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gireson</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>&#xc7;obano&#x11f;lu</surname>
<given-names>&#x130;.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Non-linear loss in flexural strength of natural stone slabs exposed to weathering by freeze-thaw cycles</article-title>. <source>Constr. Build. Mater.</source> <volume>434</volume>, <fpage>136682</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.136682</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Du</surname>
<given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhou</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mao</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Mechanical characteristics and damage evolution of granite under freeze-thaw cycles</article-title>. <source>Front. Energy Res.</source> <volume>10</volume>, <fpage>10</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2022</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fenrg.2022.983705</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Deprez</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>De Kock</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>De Schutter</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cnudde</surname>
<given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>A review on freeze-thaw action and weathering of rocks</article-title>. <source>Earth-Sci. Rev.</source> <volume>203</volume>, <fpage>103143</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.earscirev.2020.103143</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Fener</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>&#x130;nce</surname>
<given-names>&#x130;.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Effects of the freeze-thaw (F-T) cycle on the andesitic rocks (Sille-Konya/Turkey) used in construction building</article-title>. <source>J. Afr. Earth Sci.</source> <volume>109</volume>, <fpage>96</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>106</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2015.05.006.1</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Feng</surname>
<given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jin</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Study on a damage model and uniaxial compression simulation method of frozen-thawed rock</article-title>. <source>Rock Mech. Rock Eng.</source> <volume>55</volume>, <fpage>187</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>211</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00603-021-02645-2</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Gao</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jin</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lei</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lu</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xiao</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2025</year>). <article-title>Mechanical and microstructural properties of schist exposed to freeze-thaw cycles, dry-wet cycles, and alternating actions</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Min. Sci. Technol.</source> <volume>35</volume> (<issue>5</issue>), <fpage>783</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>800</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ijmst.2025.04.003</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Girard</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gruber</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Weber</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Beutel</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Environmental controls of frost cracking revealed through <italic>in situ</italic> acoustic emission measurements in steep bedrock</article-title>. <source>Geophys. Res. Lett.</source> <volume>40</volume> (<issue>9</issue>), <fpage>1748</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1753</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/grl.50384</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Gong</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Song</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2025</year>). <article-title>Pore characteristics and constitutive model of constrained granite under freeze-thaw cycles</article-title>. <source>Constr. Build. Mater.</source> <volume>491</volume>, <fpage>142706</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.142706</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>He</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Huang</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fang</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2025</year>). <article-title>Study on the deterioration mechanisms of basalt with fractures under freeze-thaw cycling</article-title>. <source>Res. Cold Arid Regions</source>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.rcar.2025.01.002</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Huang</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ye</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cheng</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Freezing strain model for estimating the unfrozen water content of saturated rock under low temperature</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Geomech.</source> <volume>18</volume> (<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>04017137</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001057</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Jiang</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lai</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ma</surname>
<given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2023a</year>). <article-title>Mechanical damage model and brittleness index of frozen rocks based on statistical damage theory</article-title>. <source>Acta Geotech.</source> <volume>18</volume>, <fpage>4687</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>4713</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11440-023-01861-0</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Jiang</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lai</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yu</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ma</surname>
<given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jiang</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2023b</year>). <article-title>Mechanical properties investigation and damage constitutive models of red sandstone subjected to freeze-thaw cycles</article-title>. <source>Cold Reg. Sci. Tech.</source> <volume>207</volume>, <fpage>103776</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.coldregions.2023.103776</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Jin</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ma</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liang</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yuan</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Mechanical properties of sandstones after freeze-thaw cycles and models for their strength prediction</article-title>. <source>Adv. Civ. Eng.</source> <volume>2022</volume>, <fpage>4981529</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1155/2022/4981529</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<mixed-citation publication-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lamas</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). &#x201c;<article-title>International society for rock mechanics (ISRM)</article-title>,&#x201d; in <source>Encyclopedia of engineering geology</source>. Editors <person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname>Bobrowsky</surname>
<given-names>P. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Marker</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<publisher-loc>Cham</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Springer International Publishing</publisher-name>), <fpage>535</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>536</lpage>.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhou</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Analysis of the effect of freeze&#x2013;thaw cycles on the degradation of mechanical parameters and slope stability</article-title>. <source>Bull. Eng. Geol. Environ.</source> <volume>77</volume>, <fpage>573</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>580</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10064-017-1013-8</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tang</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Qin</surname>
<given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhou</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Qin</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fan</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Characteristics, formation periods and genetic mechanisms of tectonic fractures in the tight gas sandstones reservoir: a case study of Xujiahe formation in YB area, Sichuan Basin, China</article-title>. <source>J. Pet. Sci. Eng.</source> <volume>178</volume>, <fpage>723</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>735</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.petrol.2019.04.007</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Qin</surname>
<given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ge</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Characteristics of natural fractures in an ultradeep marine carbonate gas reservoir and their impact on the reservoir: a case study of the Maokou formation of the JLS structure in the Sichuan Basin, China</article-title>. <source>Energy Fuels</source> <volume>35</volume> (<issue>16</issue>), <fpage>13098</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>13108</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/acs.energyfuels.1c01581</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Qiu</surname>
<given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rong</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2025</year>). <article-title>Experimental study on mechanical behavior of basalt under different freeze-thaw conditions</article-title>. <source>Bull. Eng. Geol. Environ.</source> <volume>84</volume>, <fpage>222</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10064-025-04242-x</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhu</surname>
<given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Deng</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Effect of cyclic freeze-thaw treatments on the dynamic fracture characteristics of granite: laboratory testing</article-title>. <source>Eng. Fract. Mech.</source> <volume>276</volume>, <fpage>108915</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.engfracmech.2022.108915</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liang</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>The stability issue of fractured rock mass slope under the influences of freeze-thaw cycle</article-title>. <source>Sci. Rep.</source> <volume>14</volume>, <fpage>5674</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41598-024-56346-1</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">38454123</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Luo</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Qu</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Degradation model of the dynamic mechanical properties and damage failure law of sandstone under freeze-thaw action</article-title>. <source>Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng.</source> <volume>132</volume>, <fpage>106094</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.soildyn.2020.106094</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<mixed-citation publication-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Materials</surname>
<given-names>A. S. F.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <source>Standard test method for evaluation of durability of rock for erosion control under freezing and thawing conditions</source>. <publisher-loc>Pennsylvania, USA</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>American Society for Testing and Materials</publisher-name>. <comment>Available online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.astm.org/d5312-04.html">http://www.astm.org/d5312-04.html</ext-link>.</comment>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<mixed-citation publication-type="book">
<collab>Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People&#x2019;s Republic of China (MOHURD)</collab> (<year>2009</year>). <source>Code for investigation of geotechnical engineering (GB 50021-2001)</source>. <publisher-loc>Beijing</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>China Architecture &#x26; Building Press</publisher-name>. <comment>(in Chinese)</comment>.</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Park</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hyun</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Park</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Changes in microstructure and physical properties of rocks caused by artificial freeze&#x2013;thaw action</article-title>. <source>Bull. Eng. Geol. Environ.</source> <volume>74</volume>, <fpage>555</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>565</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10064-014-0630-8</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Pu</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yi</surname>
<given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jivkov</surname>
<given-names>A. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bian</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Effect of dry-wet cycles on dynamic properties and microstructures of sandstone: experiments and modelling</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Min. Sci. Technol.</source> <volume>34</volume>, <fpage>655</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>679</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ijmst.2024.04.008</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ren</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yun</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cao</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liang</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Study on the mechanical properties of saturated red sandstone under freeze-thaw conditions</article-title>. <source>Environ. Earth Sci.</source> <volume>81</volume>, <fpage>376</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s12665-022-10503-9</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Shi</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Study on damage evolution and constitutive model of sandstone under the coupled effects of wetting-drying cycles and cyclic loading</article-title>. <source>Eng. Fract. Mech.</source> <volume>253</volume>, <fpage>107883</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.engfracmech.2021.107883</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Shu</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Deng</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Huang</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2025</year>). <article-title>Stability deterioration and failure analysis of dangerous rock masses in cold regions under the influence of freeze-thaw cycles</article-title>. <source>J. Mt. Sci.</source> <volume>22</volume>, <fpage>4298</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>4315</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11629-025-9540-4</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ullah</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhou</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lin</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2025</year>). <article-title>Investigating the impact of freezing and thawing cycles on the dynamic fracture properties of red sandstone subjected to impact loading</article-title>. <source>Theor. Appl. Fract. Mech.</source> <volume>139</volume>, <fpage>105006</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.tafmec.2025.105006</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Weng</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Taheri</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lu</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Deterioration of dynamic mechanical properties of granite due to freeze-thaw weathering: considering the effects of moisture conditions</article-title>. <source>Cold Reg. Sci. Tech.</source> <volume>176</volume>, <fpage>103092</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.coldregions.2020.103092</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Weng</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chu</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Evolutions of the unfrozen water content of saturated sandstones during freezing process and the freeze-induced damage characteristics</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci.</source> <volume>142</volume>, <fpage>104757</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ijrmms.2021.104757</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Xiao</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fidelibus</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tom&#xe1;s</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lu</surname>
<given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Effects of freeze-thaw cycles on sandstone in sunny and shady slopes</article-title>. <source>J. Rock Mech. Geotech. Eng.</source> <volume>16</volume> (<issue>7</issue>), <fpage>2503</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2515</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jrmge.2023.12.023</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ying</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhu</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ren</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Deng</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Niu</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wan</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Deterioration of dynamic fracture characteristics, tensile strength and elastic modulus of tight sandstone under dry-wet cycles</article-title>. <source>Theor. Appl. Fract. Mech.</source> <volume>109</volume>, <fpage>102698</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.tafmec.2020.102698</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B36">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Yu</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Huang</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cai</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ye</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Quantification of pore structure evolution and its correlation with the macroscopic properties of sandstones under freeze-thaw action</article-title>. <source>Bull. Eng. Geol. Environ.</source> <volume>83</volume>, <fpage>3</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10064-023-03484-x</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B37">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Luo</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>He</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Niu</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Pore structure expansion and evolution in sandstone with prefabricated crack under freeze-thaw cycles based on CT scanning</article-title>. <source>Front. Earth Sci.</source> <volume>12</volume>, <fpage>12</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2024</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/feart.2024.1394731</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B38">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dai</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2025</year>). <article-title>Deterioration of flawed sandstone after freeze-thaw treatment considering frost heave pressure</article-title>. <source>J. Rock Mech. Geotech. Eng.</source> <volume>18</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>92</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>112</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jrmge.2025.01.005</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B39">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cheng</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Han</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>3D visualization of tectonic coal microstructure and quantitative characterization on topological connectivity of pore-fracture networks by Micro-CT</article-title>. <source>J. Pet. Sci. Eng.</source> <volume>208</volume>, <fpage>109675</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.petrol.2021.109675</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B40">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dai</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jiang</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Experimental assessment on the fatigue mechanical properties and fracturing mechanism of sandstone exposed to freeze-thaw treatment and cyclic uniaxial compression</article-title>. <source>Eng. Geol.</source> <volume>306</volume>, <fpage>106724</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.enggeo.2022.106724</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B41">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lei</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jia</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liang</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shi</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Mechanical characteristics of red sandstone subjected to freeze-thaw cycles and increasing amplitude cyclic load</article-title>. <source>Rock Mech. Rock Eng.</source> <volume>57</volume>, <fpage>3237</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3256</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00603-023-03739-9</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B42">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hu</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Han</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lang</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Multifactor-coupled study on freeze-thaw forces of rocks in cold regions</article-title>. <source>Front. Earth Sci.</source> <volume>12</volume>, <fpage>12</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2024</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/feart.2024.1404153</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B43">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zheng</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tang</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pei</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>True triaxial test and DEM simulation of rock mechanical behaviors, meso-cracking mechanism and precursor subject to underground excavation disturbance</article-title>. <source>Eng. Geol.</source> <volume>337</volume>, <fpage>107567</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.enggeo.2024.107567</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B44">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhu</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Huang</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Luo</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xu</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>A DEM-based approach for modeling the damage of rock under freeze-thaw cycles</article-title>. <source>Rock Mech. Rock Eng.</source> <volume>54</volume>, <fpage>2843</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2858</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00603-021-02465-4</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>