Triangle zones are common structures of many fold-and-thrust belts and are formed by linked, oppositely dipping thrusts that sole into one or more detachment levels, mainly near the deformation front (e.g., Price, 1981; McClay, 1992; Jones, 1996; Hagke and Malz, 2018; Gil and Flinch, 2022). The term triangle zone was first used by Gordy et al. (1977) in the Canadian Rocky Mountains. Generally, the triangle zones are interpreted to be associated with tectonic wedging and passive-roof duplex thrusts (e.g., Banks and Warburton, 1986; McClay, 1992; Jones, 1996). The triangle zones with several detachments involved are known also as “fish-tail” or “zig-zag” structures. These structures form when the deeper detachment connects to the uppermost detachment by a ladder of thrust ramps of opposite vergence (e.g., Hagke and Malz, 2018; Gil and Flinch, 2022). According to Hagke and Malz (2018), triangle zones are classified into detachment-dominated (Type I) and ramp-dominated (Type II) triangle zones. Detachment-dominated triangle zones are related to a single ductile detachment and ramp-dominated triangle zones are linked to a secondary detachment and evolve due to bedding parallel slip at the upper ramp edge (Hagke and Malz, 2018). Geometric models of multiple types of triangle zones of fold-and-thrust belts are shown in Figure 1.

Analog and numerical models of triangle zones have been built to try to understand the geometry and kinematics of triangle zones related to one or several detachment levels (e.g., Pichot and Nalpas, 2009; Darnault et al., 2016; Granado et al., 2022).

Presented in this study structural styles along the frontal part of the western Kura foreland fold-and-thrust belt (KFFTB), evidence an evolution of triangle zone geometries like fish-tails. The formation of this triangle zone is related to a difference vergence of double wedge thrusts. In this study, we show the utility of this kinematic approach by matching seismic reflection profiles, and analog and forward kinematic models of triangle zone to gain further insight into the formation of these structures.

The KFFTB is located between the LC and the GC double wedge orogens (Figure 2A), which accommodates the crustal shortening due to far-field effects of the collision between the Arabian and Eurasian plates (e.g., Alania et al., 2021; Gusmeo et al., 2021).

Within our study area, the formation of the complex structure of the LC-GC convergence zone is governed by northward and southward-directed thrusting (e.g., Nemcok et al., 2013; Alania et al., 2021). Like the Pamir-Tien Shan convergence zones (e.g., Fu et al., 2010), the LC–GC convergence zone is a unique example to understand ongoing intracontinental mountain building within the Arabia/Eurasia collision system. In the western part of the study area, the convergence zone of two orogens is introduced by frontal part of the LC retro-wedge and the GC pro-wedge (Figure 2B, C). The frontal part of the LC retro-wedge is represented by two different thrust systems: a shallow triangle zone and a lower structural wedge (e.g., Alania et al., 2021). The study area (Figure 2B) is situated in the frontal part of the western KFFTB in the pro-wedge of the central GC orogen. The western KFFTB is a south-vergent thrust system, most of which is associated with fault-related folds, and the thrust system involves about 2–3 km thick Miocene to Quaternary succession (e.g., Banks et al., 1997; Mosar et al., 2022).

The Kura foreland basin (KFB) developed mainly during the Oligocene-early Miocene through loading by the LC retro-wedge and the GC pro-wedge (Alania et al., 2021). On the basis of growth strata age and detrital apatite fission-track data, the onset of deformation in the KFB started in the Middle-Late Miocene (Alania et al., 2017; Gusmeo et al., 2021). Recent and historical earthquakes indicate that the LC-GC convergence zone is tectonically active (e.g., Tsereteli et al., 2016).

The study area stratigraphy records the evolution from the extensional basins to the KFB of the Arabia-Eurasia collision zone (Alania et al., 2021). More than 7 km thick western KFB sedimentary infill consists of pre-and syn-orogenic sequences and is summarized in a tectonostratigraphic chart (Supplementary Figure S1). The pre-orogenic sequences consist of Jurassic-Late Eocene shallow and deep marine deposits. This series comprises mixed, siliciclastic-carbonate lithologies with an important mudstone level (Alania et al., 2021). The syn-orogenic sequences are composed of the foreland basin (Oligocene-Early Miocene) and syn-tectonic (Middle Miocene-Pleistocene) strata with the dominance of siliciclastic sequences (e.g., Alania et al., 2021). The thickness of the syn-orogenic sequence progressively increases northward and mainly comprises alternation of mudstones, sandstones, siltstones, and conglomerates of shallow marine and continental origin (Nemcok et al., 2013) (For further details see Supplementary Material).

The surface geological information was obtained from a 1:100,000 geological map (Papava, 1967) of the study area (Figure 2B). To constrain the subsurface structure of the western KFFTB frontal part, we used four post-stack depth migrated 2D seismic profiles (Figure 3, Supplementary Figures S2–S4). Fault-related folding and wedge thrust folding theories (Suppe, 1983; Shaw et al., 2005) were used in the interpretation of 2D seismic profiles. For the interpretation of 2D seismic profiles, and building forward kinematic modeling was used the MOVE software. Fault-bend folding kinematic algorithms (cf. Suppe, 1983) were employed for the construction of the forward kinematic model (For further details see Supplementary Material). In the comparative analysis of triangle zone geometry and kinematics deduced from seismic profiles with analog modeling results we used published data (Pichot and Nalpas, 2009; Darnault et al., 2016) (Supplementary Figures S5, S6).

The transition from one type of fold into another (e.g., from the detachment into the fault-propagation fold or from the fault-propagation into the fault-bend fold) has been established in various fold-and-thrust belts (e.g., Hansman and Ring, 2018; Qiu et al., 2019; Jiang et al., 2020). If the fault tip of the fault-propagation fold occurs in the weaker sediments it may propagate along the bed as a detachment, forming a transported fault-propagation fold that subsequently deforms by fault-bend folding (Suppe and Medwedeff, 1990). The internal structure of the western KFFTB is laterally diversified by the rheology of the basal detachment in Late Miocene mudstones and the distribution of the syn-orogenic sediments. Obtained for the study area results fairly differ from previously existing models where the frontal part of the KFFTB was represented as a termination of the Bitsmendi fault-related fold (e.g., Banks et al., 1997; Mosar et al., 2022). The results presented here show that the frontal part of the western KFFTB along-strike Bitsmendi breakthrough fault-propagation fold was transitioned into fault-bend fold structural wedges and a triangle zone was developed in association with two detachment levels (Figure 3D, Supplementary Figure S7). This triangle zone is characterized as imbricated fault-bend fold structural wedges and divided by active and passive wedges (Figure 4F).

Based on the above-mentioned analog models’ examples and forward kinematic modeling, the main parameters controlling the structural evolution of triangle zones are the presence of i) detachment levels, ii) the amount and rate of shortening, and iii) the amount of syn-kinematic sedimentation. Interpreted line-drawing seismic profile BB^I shows that together with high sedimentation rates the early Miocene sediments are duplicated by a south-vergent thrust, which conditions the increase in sediment thickness on the hinterland side (Supplementary Figure S7). The geometry of the structure is highly dependent on the sedimentation/uplift ratio. This implies that more fish-tail structures are developed when the syn-kinematic sedimentation rate is higher. Thus, the analog model’s analysis allows us to compare them with the interpretation of seismic profiles. The seismic profiles interpretation results completely match with analog models of similar triangle zones (Figures 4A–C).

Using end-member modes of a wedge(s) (Martinez-Torres et al., 1994), the fish-tail like triangle zones which are controlled by wedge(s), can be divided into two types: i) simple wedge-dominated triangle zone (Figure 4E), and ii) double wedge-dominated triangle zone (Figure 4F). Simple-wedge triangle zone is composed of an active wedge and passive-backthrust. A double wedge-dominated triangle zone is represented by active, passive wedges, passive-backthrust, and passive-forethrust (Figures 4E, F).

The presence of detachment levels and a high sedimentation rate is a necessary but insufficient condition to produce such fish-tail structures. One example is the Tajik fold-and-thrust belt of the western foreland of the Pamir where theoretically all conditions for the formation of a triangle zone (high sedimentation rates and salt tectonic settings) existed (e.g., Gagala et al., 2020). Another example is the seismic profile across the northern Piedmont of the Tian-Shan range showing triangle zones in a single wedge tectonic setting in a similar geological situation (Qiu et al., 2019). Therefore, it is fair to ask why? In order to solve this problem, it is essential to conduct additional complex studies and hopefully in the future this question will be answered.

The western Kura foreland is a thin-skinned fold-and-thrust belt developed between two orogens, the LC-GC convergence zone. According to interpreted seismic profiles, the most common structures include fault-bend and fault-propagation folds, wedges, duplexes, and triangle zones. The structural styles presented in this study along the frontal part of the central GC pro-wedge, the Bitsmendi breakthrough fault-propagation fold gradually transits into a wedge structure in the EW direction and evidence evolution of triangle zone geometries related to a double wedge thrusts configuration as well as an evolution of triangle zone geometries. We have documented the dominant structural styles of the frontal part of the western KFFTB as the triangle zone and demonstrated how these are related to different vergence structural wedges involving two detachments. These structures form when the deeper detachment connects to the uppermost detachment by a ladder of wedges (passive and active) of opposite vergence. Application of these findings in the frontal part of the western KFFTB, as well as in the similar sub-Andean thrust belt could improve structural models and reduce uncertainty in structural interpretations.