<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="EN" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Earth Sci.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Earth Science</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Earth Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">2296-6463</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">887182</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/feart.2022.887182</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Earth Science</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>The Seismogenic Potential of the Southernmost Ryukyu Subduction Zone as Revealed by Historical Earthquakes and Slow Slip events</article-title>
<alt-title alt-title-type="left-running-head">Chen et al.</alt-title>
<alt-title alt-title-type="right-running-head">Potential Megathrust Earthquake Offshore Taiwan</alt-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname>
<given-names>Sean Kuanhsiang</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001">&#x2a;</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1691923/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname>
<given-names>Yih-Min</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">
<sup>3</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chan</surname>
<given-names>Yu-Chang</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1405735/overview"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
<institution>Department of Geosciences</institution>, <institution>National Taiwan University</institution>, <addr-line>Taipei</addr-line>, <country>Taiwan</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
<institution>Institute of Earth Sciences</institution>, <institution>Academia Sinica</institution>, <addr-line>Taipei</addr-line>, <country>Taiwan</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff3">
<sup>3</sup>
<institution>Research Center for Future Earth</institution>, <institution>National Taiwan University</institution>, <addr-line>Taipei</addr-line>, <country>Taiwan</country>
</aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>
<bold>Edited by:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1008663/overview">Pascal Audet</ext-link>, University of Ottawa, Canada</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>
<bold>Reviewed by:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1714461/overview">Ryuta Arai</ext-link>, Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology (JAMSTEC), Japan</p>
<p>
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/907807/overview">Motoyuki Kido</ext-link>, Tohoku University, Japan</p>
</fn>
<corresp id="c001">&#x2a;Correspondence: Sean Kuanhsiang Chen, <email>sean80254@gmail.com</email>
</corresp>
<fn fn-type="other">
<p>This article was submitted to Solid Earth Geophysics, a section of the journal Frontiers in Earth Science</p>
</fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>27</day>
<month>05</month>
<year>2022</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2022</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>10</volume>
<elocation-id>887182</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>01</day>
<month>03</month>
<year>2022</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>21</day>
<month>04</month>
<year>2022</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#xa9; 2022 Chen, Wu and Chan.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2022</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Chen, Wu and Chan</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>The southernmost Ryukyu subduction zone may have a geodetically inferred M<sub>w</sub> 7.5 to 8.7 megathrust earthquake in a shallow locked region, the Ryukyu fault. Paleoseismological evidence of historical earthquakes available from the last 417 years indicates that only a 1920 M<sub>w</sub> 7.7 earthquake occurred within this magnitude range, near the downdip end of the Ryukyu fault. As slow slip events downdip the locked seismogenic zone may trigger a large subduction earthquake, we investigate how the first observed slow slip events in 2005, 2009, and 2015 initiated downdip in the Ryukyu fault interface affect the occurrence of a megathrust. We establish possible megathrust earthquake cycles from M<sub>w</sub> 7.5 to 8.7 on the Ryukyu fault using constraints from the magnitude-frequency relation based on local historical earthquakes. This analysis shows a b value of 1.2 for magnitudes greater than M<sub>w</sub> 7.0, which is higher than the empirical 1.0 value. This indicates that the recurrence of an event up to M<sub>w</sub> 8.7 is longer than previously thought if the megathrust events follow the observed magnitude-frequency relation. Then, we quantify the influence of slow slip events on the triggering of a potential megathrust earthquake by calculating the static stress increase. We find that stress perturbations caused by the three slow slip events are generally consistent with the values that have triggered the large interplate earthquakes in several subduction zones. However, a large earthquake has not yet been triggered on the Ryukyu fault after a sequence of slow slip events. If the 1920 M<sub>w</sub> 7.7 earthquake is the last rupture of the Ryukyu fault, the earthquake cycle on the Ryukyu fault is very likely in an early stage. However, this is not true if the slow slip events occur toward the end of the earthquake cycle and there has been no megathrust earthquake at the fault interface in the last 417&#xa0;years, as the 2011 M<sub>w</sub> 9.0 Tohoku earthquake. Thus, higher potential for a megathrust earthquake may occur in the southernmost Ryukyu subduction zone.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>slow slip event (SSE)</kwd>
<kwd>megathrust earthquake</kwd>
<kwd>Ryukyu fault</kwd>
<kwd>historical earthquake</kwd>
<kwd>b value</kwd>
<kwd>earthquake cycle</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<contract-sponsor id="cn001">Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan<named-content content-type="fundref-id">10.13039/501100004663</named-content>
</contract-sponsor>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="s1">
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Slow slip events (SSEs) usually occur around a locked seismogenic zone in the updip, downdip, or at similar depths where the plate interface is weakly coupled (e.g., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B53">Schwartz and Rokosky, 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Avouac, 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">B&#xfc;rgmann, 2018</xref>). The regions where SSEs occur have time-dependent transitional friction from velocity weakening to velocity strengthening probably caused by high-pressure interface fluids (e.g., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">Saffer and Wallace, 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">Obara and Kato, 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Behr and B&#xfc;rgmann, 2021</xref>). Recent observations have shown that SSEs in the downdip of the seismogenic zone initiate immediately before seismogenic-zone earthquakes. e.g., the 2011 M<sub>w</sub> 9.0 Tohoku earthquake (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Kato et al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Ito et al., 2013</xref>), the 2014 M<sub>w</sub> 8.1 Iquique earthquake (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">Ruiz et al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Kato et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B55">Socquet et al., 2017</xref>), the 2014 M<sub>w</sub> 7.3 Papanoa earthquake (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Radiguet et al., 2016</xref>), and the 2018 M<sub>w</sub> 6.9 Zakynthos earthquake (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">Saltogianni et al., 2021</xref>). Scientists have interpreted the interaction between aseismic and seismic slip as the stress perturbations caused by the SSEs changing the state of stress in the seismogenic zone beyond the triggering stress threshold of those earthquakes. Generally, the potential of triggering such earthquakes depends on the frictional and stressed conditions at the fault interface (e.g., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Mazzotti and Adams, 2004</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Beeler et al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Kaneko et al., 2018</xref>). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Mazzotti and Adams (2004)</xref> suggested that a large earthquake occurs immediately when the state of stress in the seismogenic zone exceeds the earthquake-triggering stress threshold caused by an SSE. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Beeler et al. (2014)</xref> proposed that a large earthquake is postponed indefinitely after the stress perturbation because the seismogenic zone lacks an earthquake-triggering stress threshold, perhaps due to the earthquake nucleation process. The two hypotheses are opposite depending on whether the earthquake-triggering stress threshold represents the end of an earthquake cycle. The triggering stress threshold can explain why a large earthquake occurs after one local SSE in weeks to a few months during the SSE activity (e.g., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Kato et al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Ito et al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">Ruiz et al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Radiguet et al., 2016</xref>). It means the seismogenic zone is very close to the end of the earthquake cycle, and thus the earthquake can be triggered by the additional stress perturbation from the SSE. If a large earthquake occurs several months to years after the local SSE activity, the seismogenic zone is not yet very close to the end of the earthquake cycle. However, the SSE may have increased the likelihood of a large earthquake when it terminated, even if no earthquake is triggered immediately (e.g., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B63">Voss et al., 2018</xref>). In the southern Hikurangi subduction zone, New Zealand, the 2016 Kapiti SSE downdip the seismogenic zone did not trigger the large earthquake immediately. The stress perturbations caused by the SSE increased the probability of a megathrust earthquake with a maximum moment of M<sub>w</sub> 8.6 on the seismogenic zone (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Kaneko et al., 2018</xref>). The stress perturbations are at least twice that caused by the 2016 M<sub>w</sub> 7.8 Kaik&#x14d;ura earthquake afterslip, which occurred approximately 100&#xa0;km west of the 2016 Kapiti SSE source area. Thus, the occurrence of megathrust earthquakes linked to SSE activity cannot be ignored.</p>
<p>Geodetic evidence of the slip deficit rate of 8.6&#xa0;cm/yr in the southernmost Ryukyu subduction zone reveals the potential of an M<sub>w</sub> 7.5 to 8.7 earthquake in a locked region named the Ryukyu fault (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Hsu et al., 2012</xref>). The occurrence of an M<sub>w</sub> 8.15 megathrust earthquake will cause a tsunami with 7&#xa0;m wave heights in the eastern Taiwan region (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B59">Sun et al., 2018</xref>). The 2002 M<sub>w</sub> 7.1 Hualien offshore earthquake that occurred near the downdip end of the Ryukyu fault produced local destruction in the Taiwan region and a tsunami of 20&#xa0;cm wave heights on Yonaguni Island (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1</xref>). The Ryukyu fault extends from the Ryukyu Trench to the shallow depths of the subducting plate interface (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1</xref>). The convergence rate across the Ryukyu Trench may be 125&#xa0;mm/yr in the NS direction between the Philippine Sea Plate and Yonaguni Island on the Eurasian Plate (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Hsu et al., 2012</xref>). The rate incorporates a back-arc rifting rate of 50&#xa0;mm/yr in the NS direction from the Okinawa Trough relative to the Eurasian Plate (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Nishimura et al., 2004</xref>) in a convergence rate of 80&#xa0;mm/yr in the 310&#xb0; direction between the two plates under Taiwan Island (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Hsu et al., 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Chen et al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">2017</xref>). Considering the high convergence rate across the Ryukyu fault, the plate interface has not produced an earthquake with a magnitude greater than M<sub>w</sub> 7.7 in the last 417&#xa0;years, as revealed by the Taiwan historical earthquake catalog since 1,604 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Cheng and Yeh, 1989</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B60">Theunissen et al., 2010</xref>). The limitation of the earthquake size is atypical of universal observations and may imply the possibility of the seismogenic potential of a much larger event in the future. However, current knowledge of the Ryukyu fault regarding the likelihood of a megathrust event of M<sub>w</sub> 8.7 remains unclear.</p>
<fig id="F1" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Overview of tectonics, SSEs, and seismicity in the southernmost Ryukyu subduction zone. The horizontal surface displacement at each GNSS station (green triangles) from 2007 to 2016 indicates a movement relative to the S01R station (yellow triangle) determined by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Chen et al. (2018)</xref>. The dotted contours show isodepths of the 3D plate interface (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B69">Wu et al., 2009</xref>). The Ryukyu fault is marked with a dotted rectangle indicating its maximum size with a seismogenic potential of M<sub>w</sub> 8.7 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Hsu et al., 2012</xref>). Locations of the peak slip during the 2005, 2009, and 2015 slow slip events (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Chen et al., 2018</xref>) are colored by the SSE-slip scale. Relocated seismicity from 1991 to 2018 based on the Central Weather Bureau earthquake catalog (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B68">Wu et al., 2008</xref>) is colored based on depth.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="feart-10-887182-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Tsunami deposits in the adjacent southernmost Ryukyu subduction zone have provided crucial evidence for tsunami floods from large historical earthquakes. The tsunami deposits in northern Taiwan have shown a possible recurrence interval of 100&#x2013;400 years for the large earthquakes linked to the 1867 and 1,694 local events and the potential far-field events between 1,293 and 1,414, 1,090 and 1,235 (e.g., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Konstantinou et al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Lin et al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B73">Yu et al., 2020</xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B72">2022</xref>). The two local events in 1867 and 1,694 (approximately M<sub>w</sub> &#x223c;7.0) in northern Taiwan are likely associated with normal faulting (e.g., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Cheng et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B58">Sugawara et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B73">Yu et al., 2020</xref>) instead of the subduction-related thrusting in the study area. In the southern Ryukyu Islands, the tsunami deposits indicate a seismic recurrence interval of 150&#x2013;400 years constrained by the 1771 and 1,625 local M &#x223c;8.0 events (e.g., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Araoka et al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Ando et al., 2018</xref>). The tsunami deposits also reveal a possible longer recurrence interval of 600&#x2013;1,000 years that might correlate with the prehistoric tsunami in northern Taiwan (e.g., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Ando et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B73">Yu et al., 2020</xref>). However, the age resolution of Taiwan and southern Ryukyu archives is insufficient for clear evidence of tsunami correlation between those events (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B72">Yu et al., 2022</xref>). So far, no tsunami deposits have been reported in the southernmost Ryukyu subduction zone to constrain the megathrust earthquake cycles.</p>
<p>The 1920 M<sub>w</sub> 7.7 earthquake is the maximum event recorded in this subduction zone and is the only earthquake that satisfies the inferred magnitude over the Ryukyu fault. However, the hypocenter and the source region are poorly resolved and unclear. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Engdahl et al. (1998)</xref> relocated this earthquake using teleseismic travel times at a location of 122.080&#xb0; E, 23.813&#xb0; N, and 35&#xa0;km depth (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1</xref>). Their relocation seems to imply a possible intraplate event of the Philippine Sea Plate. From a local travel-time phase perspective, the earthquake relocation is at 122.0&#xb0; E, 24.0&#xb0; N, and 20&#xa0;km depth (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Cheng and Yeh, 1989</xref>) and is more likely an interplate event (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1</xref>). The relocations from the Central Weather Bureau of Taiwan and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B60">Theunissen et al. (2010)</xref> are a little northeastward and shallower than that of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Cheng and Yeh (1989)</xref> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1</xref>). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B60">Theunissen et al. (2010)</xref> suggested that the 1920 M<sub>w</sub> 7.7 earthquake was likely a rupture along the subducting plate interface with a possible splay fault in the Eurasian Plate. Although the debate regarding the origin of this large historical earthquake remains, the probability of it being an interplate event is high. The previous relocations reveal a possibility that the 1920 M<sub>w</sub> 7.7 earthquake may have nucleated at the downdip end of the Ryukyu fault (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1</xref>). If this earthquake is the last rupture of the Ryukyu fault, it is crucial to the timing of the megathrust earthquake cycle and the fault stress conditions.</p>
<p>Some studies have shown that SSEs can coexist at the edge of a locked fault region where traditional friction may occur (e.g., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Ito et al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Dixon et al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Mallick et al., 2021</xref>). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Chen et al. (2018)</xref> reported repeating SSEs in 2009 and 2015 that occurred deeper than the locked Ryukyu fault region at plate interface depths of 25&#x2013;45&#xa0;km. The SSE cumulative slip is likely complementary to the hypocenters of M<sub>L</sub> &#x2265; 5.0 earthquakes in the last 20 years (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1</xref>). Another SSE in 2005 may have occurred within the Ryukyu fault at the downdip end. The three observed SSEs in the southernmost Ryukyu subduction zone did not trigger a large earthquake at the Ryukyu fault thus far. The question centers around the role of the sequence of SSEs in the seismogenic potential of the Ryukyu fault. In the adjacent southern Ryukyu Islands, the SSEs recurred every 6 to 7&#xa0;months with seismic moments of M<sub>w</sub> 5.6 to 6.8&#xa0;at plate interface depths of 30&#x2013;50&#xa0;km (e.g., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Heki and Kataoka, 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">Nishimura, 2014</xref>). The static stress changes caused by the SSEs are 0.2&#x2013;1.0&#xa0;kPa on the eastern-half Ryukyu fault, which may have activated the very low-frequency earthquakes (VLFEs) at the edge of the Ryukyu fault, likely even on the eastern-half plane (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Nakamura and Sunagawa, 2015</xref>). Onshore Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) observations in northeastern Taiwan revealed that the cumulative energy released by each SSE is equivalent to the seismic moments of M<sub>w</sub> 6.4 to 6.6 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Chen et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Chen S. K. et al., 2022</xref>). The SSE moment may have uncertainties hampered by a lack of near-field observations for offshore SSEs (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1</xref>).</p>
<p>Here we estimate the likelihood of an M<sub>w</sub> &#x2265; 7.5 earthquake with a maximum moment of M<sub>w</sub> 8.7 on the Ryukyu fault and examine how that likelihood is affected by the SSEs activity. We establish possible earthquake cycle scenarios for the locked Ryukyu fault with the earthquake magnitude-frequency relation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Gutenberg and Richter, 1944</xref>) constrained by large historical earthquakes. Then, we calculate the shear stress changes caused by the three SSEs with synthetic SSE moments to simulate the potential of a megathrust earthquake triggered by the SSE downdip of the Ryukyu fault. This study provides insights into how much the stress perturbations from SSEs can affect a locked seismogenic region. The stressed conditions of the Ryukyu fault and its possible rupture behaviors are investigated for the first time.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="materials|methods" id="s2">
<title>Materials and Methods</title>
<p>We estimate the probability of a megathrust earthquake along the plate interface using the method of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Kaneko et al. (2018)</xref> with three steps: 1) calculating stress changes on the Ryukyu fault due to SSEs, 2) establishing a synthetic shear stress earthquake cycle of megathrust events over millions of years for the Ryukyu fault, and 3) combining 1) with 2) to estimate the probability of triggering a megathrust event. First, we calculate static stress changes on the Ryukyu fault due to the observed SSEs from the two source depths in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1</xref> with synthetic moments from M<sub>w</sub> 6.0 to 7.0. In contrast to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Kaneko et al. (2018)</xref>, we use the Coulomb stress criteria (e.g., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">King et al., 1994</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">Stein, 1999</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B61">Toda et al., 2011</xref>), which have been widely used to quantify the stress changes caused by SSEs (e.g., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Radiguet et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B63">Voss et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Cruz-Atienza et al., 2021</xref>). We calculate Coulomb stress changes from 2005, 2009, and 2015 M<sub>w</sub> 6.4 to 6.6 SSEs and use those stress changes to scale the relative stress changes from synthetic M<sub>w</sub> 6.0 to 7.0 SSEs. The fault dimensions and cumulative slip of SSEs on the receiver faults are scaled proportionally with the SSE moments (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Michel et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Dal Zilio et al., 2020</xref>). The moment is proportional to A<sup>3/2</sup>, where A is the source area of each SSE and obeys the earthquake magnitude-frequency relation. The strike, dip, and rake of each SSE are the same as the fault parameters of 2005, 2009, and 2015 SSEs (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Chen et al., 2018</xref>). The computations include 10 &#xd7; 10&#xa0;km spatial grids parallel and perpendicular to the Ryukyu Trench while projecting them on the surface (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1</xref>). We determine the cumulative slip and fault dimensions of each SSE from 200 bootstrap samples in a 0.1 magnitude bin for their mean values and the resulting Coulomb stress changes (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2A</xref>). Note that the fault dimensions are not assigned and are scaled only by the SSE moments (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2B</xref>). We perform a checkerboard test on the interface fault to confirm that the resolution of offshore cumulative slip of SSEs is valid. Here the input slip was assumed as 0.1&#xa0;m homogeneously over the checkerboards of the entire subfault plane (Supplementary Figure S3A) to examine the reproduced slip pattern. We apply the resolution matrix (e.g., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B70">Yabuki and Matsu&#x2019;ura 1992</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B71">Yokota et al., 2016</xref>) as below: <italic>R</italic> &#x3d; (<italic>H</italic>
<sup>
<italic>T</italic>
</sup>
<italic>H</italic> &#x2b;&#x3b1;<sup>2</sup>
<italic>G</italic>
<sup>
<italic>T</italic>
</sup>
<italic>G</italic>)<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>
<italic>H</italic>
<sup>
<italic>T</italic>
</sup>
<italic>H</italic>, where <italic>H</italic> is the static-response-function matrix; <italic>&#x3b1;</italic> is the hyperparameter of smoothness determined by a Bayesian information criterion (ABIC; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Akaike, 1980</xref>); <italic>G</italic> is the spatial smoothness matrix. <italic>T</italic> denotes the transposed matrix. The resolution value as diagonal elements of the resolution matrix shows a poor resolution (&#x3c; 0.15) of the offshore slip when the slip area is 50&#xa0;km away from the coastline (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3</xref>). Thus, we determine the cumulative slip and fault dimensions of each SSE within a 50&#xa0;km distance.</p>
<fig id="F2" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 2</label>
<caption>
<p>Relationship between the moment and fault dimension of SSEs in the southernmost Ryukyu subduction zone. The red and hollow circles represent the means of the observed and synthetic SSEs, respectively, which were derived from all bootstrapped samples. The 95 percent confidence intervals are shown by the blue horizontal bars. <bold>(A)</bold> Scaling of the fault area and moments of SSEs. <bold>(B)</bold> The aspect ratio of the fault area of SSEs.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="feart-10-887182-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig id="F3" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 3</label>
<caption>
<p>Checkerboard test for the offshore cumulative slip distribution of SSEs on the subducting plate interface. The onshore GNSS stations for the checkerboard test in <bold>(A)</bold> are the same as <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1</xref> and are used for the resolution value estimation in <bold>(B)</bold>. The resolution value of less than 0.15 indicates a poor resolution of the offshore slip.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="feart-10-887182-g003.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>The SSE moment greater than M<sub>w</sub> 7.0 will produce an offshore slip 50&#xa0;km away from the coastline. This would cause significant uncertainties in the following analysis, and thus we only determine the cumulative slip and fault dimensions smaller than the SSE moment of M<sub>w</sub> 7.0. The Coulomb stress change &#x394;&#x3b1;<sub>c</sub> is &#x394;&#x330;&#x3c3;<sub>c</sub> &#x3d; &#x394;&#x3c4; - <italic>&#x3bc;</italic>&#x394;&#x3c3;<sub>
<italic>n</italic>
</sub>, where &#x394;&#x3c4; is the shear stress change, &#x394;&#x3c3;<sub>n</sub> is the normal stress change, and <italic>&#x3bc;</italic> is the effective friction coefficient. &#x394;<italic>&#x3c4;</italic> and &#x394;&#x3c3;<sub>n</sub> are estimated from the 3D strain field on the specified receiver faults derived from the SSE cumulative slip on the subducting plate interface (the source fault). The SSE cumulative slip is multiplied by the elastic stiffness to obtain the 3D strain field and &#x394;&#x3c3;<sub>c</sub>. Poisson&#x2019;s ratio (PR) and Young&#x2019;s modulus (E) are 0.25 and 80&#xa0;GPa, respectively. The friction coefficients are 0.4 and 0.2 for the region of the 2005 SSE and the 2009/2015 SSEs, respectively, and are related to their different source depths along the oceanic subducting plate interface (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Kaneki and Hirono, 2019</xref>). Thus, the shear modulus is <italic>G</italic> &#x3d; <italic>E</italic>/[2(1 &#x2b; <italic>PR</italic>)] &#x3d; 30&#xa0;GPa.</p>
<p>We designed a receiver fault where each subfault plane had a specified strike, dip, and rake, and combine them into the source fault model to calculate the SSE static stress transfer. The receiver faults begin from all patches outside of the primary SSE cumulative slip region, and thus the Coulomb stress change is positive on the receiver faults. In addition, the Coulomb failure is estimated from the SSE cumulative slip theoretically for the stress drop: &#x394;&#x3c3; &#x2248; <inline-formula id="inf1">
<mml:math id="m1">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>G</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>D</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>/</mml:mo>
<mml:msqrt>
<mml:mi>A</mml:mi>
</mml:msqrt>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>, where <italic>D</italic> is the average slip on the patch and A is the patch area. Since the 2005 SSE occurred at the downdip end of the Ryukyu fault, the stress changes on the Ryukyu fault caused by the synthetic SSEs may be positive or negative simultaneously on the spatial scales of the 10 &#xd7; 10&#xa0;km grids. A megathrust event may require homogeneous stress accumulation that is strong enough over most of the locked region. Therefore, we follow <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Kaneko et al. (2018)</xref> to calculate the mean stress changes in the entire fault region (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1</xref>) caused by SSEs. In all bootstrap samples, we notice that the shear stress changes seem more significant than the normal stress changes caused by the observed and synthetic SSEs (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4</xref>). The shear stress changes averaged over the entire fault region are distributed approximately from 0.005 to 0.03 MPa, whereas the normal stress changes are mostly lower from 0.003 to 0.01&#xa0;MPa (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4</xref>). A recent study regarding the effective normal stresses during the Boso SSEs in Japan suggests that the normal stress changes on the subducting plate interface were much smaller than the lithostatic pressures (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Kobayashi and Sato, 2021</xref>). For simplicity, we used the shear stress component of each SSE for the resulting probability estimates and only showed the shear stress changes on and around the fault areas of SSEs in the results.</p>
<fig id="F4" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 4</label>
<caption>
<p>Comparison between the shear stress and normal stress changes of the observed and synthetic SSEs estimated from <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2</xref>. The circles and diamonds represent the shear stress and normal stress changes of SSEs, respectively, averaged over the entire fault region in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1</xref>. The dotted isolines of the stress decrease are derived from the empirical circular crack model.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="feart-10-887182-g004.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>To evaluate the probability of a megathrust earthquake on the Ryukyu fault in a given time interval, we need to know the timing of the stressed conditions in the earthquake cycle. Establishing earthquake cycles requires the timing and size of large historical earthquakes. This modeling approach addresses the evolution of shear stress as earthquake cycles of many megathrust events averaged over the locked region. The total seismic moment released by all megathrust events equals the geodetically estimated moment deficit (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Kaneko et al., 2018</xref>). Thus, stress changes caused by SSEs can be regarded as the amplitudes of stress perturbation relative to the stress accumulation and stress decreases in large earthquakes. This simple approach has been used for potential seismic hazard assessments in the Nankai, Himalayas, and Hikurangi subduction zones, where the records of historical earthquakes are incomplete (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">Parsons et al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">Stevens and Avouac, 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Kaneko et al., 2018</xref>). The establishment of a synthetic shear stress earthquake cycle on the Ryukyu fault requires three parameters: the earthquake stress drop (&#x394;&#x3c3;), earthquake recurrence intervals (tr), and the background tectonic stress rate (&#x3c4;). We used three assumptions for parameters to ensure that the synthetic earthquake cycles reproduced the natural characteristics. First, &#x394;&#x3c3; during the earthquake occurrences is a log-normal distribution with a standard deviation log<sub>10</sub>&#x394;&#x3c3; of 0.4 and a mean &#x394;&#x3c3; of 2.0&#xa0;MPa, which is a general estimate of &#x394;&#x3c3; from global subduction earthquakes (e.g., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Allmann and Shearer, 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Kaneko and Shearer, 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Courboulex et al., 2016</xref>). &#x394;&#x3c3; is randomly distributed over time and increases with the earthquake size, which means that the rupture dimension of each earthquake was not assigned and was scaled only by the earthquake size and stress decrease.</p>
<p>Second, tr increases with earthquake size following the GR Law: log10N &#x3d; a - bM (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Gutenberg and Richter, 1944</xref>). The earthquake magnitude-frequency relation means a megathrust earthquake has a longer tr and recurs less frequently than a large earthquake in many earthquake cycles. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Kaneko et al. (2018)</xref> assumed the <italic>b</italic> value to be empirically 1.0 to establish <italic>t</italic>
<sub>
<italic>r</italic>
</sub> for M<sub>w</sub> &#x2265; 7.8 earthquakes in the southern Hikurangi-locked region. It has been shown that b values can change in different subduction zones from 0.7 to 1.4 and possibly vary with the stress state (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">Nishikawa and Ide, 2014</xref>; Scholz, 2015; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">Petruccelli et al., 2019</xref>). <italic>b</italic> values in the subduction locked region have been estimated to be lower than 1.0 in the Nankai Trough due to a higher stress state (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Nanjo and Yoshida, 2018</xref>). However, the subduction zone offshore typically lacks constraints by large historical earthquakes for constraining <italic>b</italic> values in their megathrust earthquake cycles. We construct tr for geodetically estimated M<sub>w</sub> &#x2265; 7.5 earthquakes on the locked Ryukyu fault (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Hsu et al., 2012</xref>) using the past earthquakes in this subduction zone. There are sixteen M<sub>w</sub> &#x2265; 7.0 earthquakes that have occurred in the last 120 years and have been relocated by two local earthquake catalogs: 1) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Cheng and Yeh (1989)</xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B60">Theunissen et al. (2010)</xref> and 2) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Chang et al. (2016)</xref>. The historical earthquake data provide preliminary constraints on the characteristics of the b value for the megathrust earthquake cycle. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5</xref> shows the hypocenters of the past M<sub>w</sub> &#x2265; 7.0 earthquakes relocated from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Cheng and Yeh (1989)</xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B60">Theunissen et al. (2010)</xref>. Most hypocenters are located along the subducting plate interface with a depth difference from the plate interface of fewer than 15&#xa0;km (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5</xref>). Since the difference is within the uncertainty of relocated hypocenters (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Cheng and Yeh, 1989</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B60">Theunissen et al., 2010</xref>), we assume that the earthquakes are almost interplate events that can be used to estimate the <italic>b</italic> value along the subducting plate interface.</p>
<fig id="F5" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 5</label>
<caption>
<p>Earthquake magnitude-frequency relation (<italic>b</italic> value) in the southernmost Ryukyu subduction zone based on two historical earthquake catalogs in the last 120&#xa0;years with magnitudes greater than M<sub>w</sub> 7.0. The circles represent the cumulative number of earthquakes (<italic>y</italic>-axis) equal to/over the earthquake magnitude on the <italic>x</italic>-axis. The solid and dotted lines represent the regression lines and uncertainties of the <italic>b</italic> value, respectively. The extended dotted line from M<sub>w</sub> 7.5 to 8.0 is assumed. The inset shows the earthquake hypocenters from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Cheng and Yeh (1989)</xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B60">Theunissen et al. (2010)</xref>.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="feart-10-887182-g005.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>The b value is estimated by the maximum-likelihood method (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Aki, 1965</xref>), and we quantify the uncertainty following <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">Shi and Bolt (1982)</xref>. The <italic>b</italic> value of the southernmost Ryukyu subduction zone is approximately 1.20&#x2013;1.25, constrained by the historical earthquakes from M<sub>w</sub> 7.0 to 7.4 in the two catalogs (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5</xref>). The regression line of the <italic>b</italic> value is no longer constrained if we involve M<sub>w</sub> &#x2265; 7.5 earthquakes in the <italic>b</italic> value estimation in both catalogs (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5</xref>). We note that the two M<sub>w</sub> 8.0 earthquakes in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Chang et al. (2016)</xref> do not seem to follow the same magnitude-frequency relation as M<sub>w</sub> 7.0 to 7.4 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5</xref>). Since no earthquakes are estimated within the range between M<sub>w</sub> 7.4 to 8.0, we presume the magnitudes of the two M<sub>w</sub> 8.0 earthquakes from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Chang et al. (2016)</xref> may be overestimated. The regression line of the <italic>b</italic> value determined from the <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Cheng and Yeh, (1989)</xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B60">Theunissen et al. (2010)</xref> catalog can explain the data in M<sub>w</sub> 7.7 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5</xref>). The estimated <italic>b</italic> value of 1.2 is higher than the average of 1.0 in the entire Ryukyu subduction zone estimated from magnitudes of M<sub>w</sub> 5.0 to 7.0 (e.g., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">Petruccelli et al., 2019</xref>).</p>
<p>Some studies have pointed out a change in the <italic>b</italic> values for larger earthquake magnitudes (e.g., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B62">Utsu, 1999</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B67">Wiemer and Wyss, 2000</xref>). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Chang et al. (2016)</xref> have shown that b values are approximately 1.0 in the earthquake magnitudes from M<sub>w</sub> 5.0 to 7.0 in their relocated historical catalog. The b values increase to over 1.2 in the earthquake magnitudes greater than M<sub>w</sub> 7.0. It is consistent with our b value estimation for the past M<sub>w</sub> &#x2265; 7.0 earthquakes that indicate a possible difference in earthquake magnitude-frequency relation across the magnitudes of M<sub>w</sub> 7.0 in the southernmost Ryukyu subduction zone. The increase in the b value for larger earthquake magnitudes may result from either the short history of instrumental records or the nucleation process of large earthquakes. A complete historical earthquake catalog in the future will resolve whether the <italic>b</italic> values increase with larger earthquake magnitudes. At this stage, we use the current observations of the 1.2&#xa0;<italic>b</italic> value to establish possible megathrust earthquake cycles on the Ryukyu fault. We assume the locked Ryukyu fault region shares the same earthquake magnitude-frequency relation as we observe in the southernmost Ryukyu subduction zone to establish <italic>t</italic>
<sub>
<italic>r</italic>
</sub> for the M<sub>w</sub> &#x2265; 7.5 earthquakes. M<sub>w</sub> 7.5 is the minimum earthquake size of the Ryukyu fault in our synthetic earthquake cycles. This result is consistent with the geodetically estimated moment deficit for a minimum of M<sub>w</sub> 7.5 in this locked region (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Hsu et al., 2012</xref>). To evaluate the maximum M<sub>w</sub> 8.7 event as suggested (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Hsu et al., 2012</xref>), we assume that earthquakes with magnitudes from M<sub>w</sub> 7.5 to 8.7 follow the same estimated <italic>b</italic> values (dotted line in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5</xref>). Considering the uncertainties of the <italic>b</italic> value are approximately &#xb1; 0.05 to 0.06, the <italic>b</italic> value could range from 1.15 to 1.31 in both catalogs (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5</xref>). However, if the two M<sub>w</sub> 8.0 earthquakes from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Chang et al. (2016)</xref> are not overestimated, the b value will be close to 1.0 with a 0.2 difference compared to our estimates. Thus, we tested the <italic>b</italic> values between 1.0 and 1.4 with an 0.2 interval to establish the <italic>t</italic>
<sub>
<italic>r</italic>
</sub> on the Ryukyu fault.</p>
<p>After determining the <italic>b</italic> values, the <italic>t</italic>
<sub>
<italic>r</italic>
</sub> and &#x3c4; can thus be designed in the earthquake cycles. Here <italic>t</italic>
<sub>
<italic>r</italic>
</sub> is the same as &#x394;&#x3c3; and is randomly distributed in the earthquake cycles, resulting in unpredictability using time and slip. In this sense, &#x3c4; on the Ryukyu fault is the ratio of &#x394;&#x3c3; to <italic>t</italic>
<sub>
<italic>r</italic>
</sub>, and <inline-formula id="inf2">
<mml:math id="m2">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mover accent="true">
<mml:mi>&#x3c4;</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x2d9;</mml:mo>
</mml:mover>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:munderover>
<mml:mstyle displaystyle="true">
<mml:mo>&#x2211;</mml:mo>
</mml:mstyle>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>N</mml:mi>
</mml:munderover>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">&#x394;</mml:mi>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>&#x3c3;</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">&#x2215;</mml:mi>
<mml:munderover>
<mml:mstyle displaystyle="true">
<mml:mo>&#x2211;</mml:mo>
</mml:mstyle>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>N</mml:mi>
</mml:munderover>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>r</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>, where <italic>N</italic> is the total number of simulated earthquakes, assumed to be 50,000 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Kaneko et al., 2018</xref>). Their seismic moments are balanced by the geodetically estimated moment deficit (<italic>M&#x307;</italic>
<sub>
<italic>o</italic>
</sub>). <italic>M&#x307;</italic>
<sub>
<italic>o</italic>
</sub> &#x3d; &#xb5;<italic>V</italic>
<sub>
<italic>pl</italic>
</sub>
<italic>A</italic>, where <italic>M&#x307;</italic>
<sub>
<italic>o</italic>
</sub> is the moment deficit rate, &#xb5; is the shear modulus, and <italic>V</italic>
<sub>
<italic>pl</italic>
</sub> is the geodetic slip deficit rate of the Ryukyu fault estimated from the fault dimension (A; the dotted rectangle in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1</xref>). We use Vpl of 8.6&#xa0;cm/yr (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Hsu et al., 2012</xref>) to estimate the seismogenic potential. However, the Vpl may be overestimated by the onshore GNSS observations. It could also be accommodated by aseismic processes, such as the 2005 SSE, in the northwest-downdip region of the Ryukyu fault (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1</xref>). Seafloor GNSS-acoustic observations in the Nankai Trough also supported the overestimation of 10&#x2013;30 percent of the <italic>V</italic>
<sub>
<italic>pl</italic>
</sub> value, determined from only the onshore GNSS data (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B71">Yokota et al., 2016</xref>). Therefore, we also use a lower, suitable <italic>V</italic>
<sub>
<italic>pl</italic>
</sub> value of 6.0&#xa0;cm/yr for the Ryukyu fault to estimate the seismogenic potential. Under the framework of a 1.2&#xa0;<italic>b</italic> value, we use the constraints of 50&#xa0;years recurrence intervals from M<sub>w</sub> 7.0 historical events (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Cheng and Yeh, 1989</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B60">Theunissen et al., 2010</xref>) and the geodetically inferred recurrence interval of 500 years for an M<sub>w</sub> 8.7 event (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Hsu et al., 2012</xref>) to scale the corresponding recurrence intervals from M<sub>w</sub> 7.5 to 8.7 events. We assume the observed recurrence interval of 150&#x2013;400&#xa0;years in M &#x223c;8.0 events at the adjacent southern Ryukyu Islands (e.g., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Araoka et al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Ando et al., 2018</xref>) is compatible with our study area to help scale the <italic>t</italic>
<sub>
<italic>r</italic>.</sub> Thus, the average <italic>t</italic>
<sub>
<italic>r</italic>
</sub> is approximately 180 years for M<sub>w</sub> &#x2265; 7.5 earthquakes and 280 years for M<sub>w</sub> &#x2265; 8.0 earthquakes. The tested frameworks of 1.0 and 1.4&#xa0;<italic>b</italic> values are scaled similarly as in the 1.2&#xa0;<italic>b</italic> value in the earthquake cycles but with different magnitude frequencies.</p>
<p>As the timing of the downdip SSEs is unknown in the Ryukyu fault earthquake cycle, we calculate the stress change caused by those SSEs in the synthetic earthquake cycles every <italic>t</italic>
<sub>pert</sub> years, where <italic>t</italic>
<sub>pert</sub> is the recurrence interval of the SSEs (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Kaneko et al., 2018</xref>). It has been shown that M<sub>w</sub> 6.0 SSEs recurred every 2&#xa0;years, and M<sub>w</sub> 7.0 SSEs recurred every 6&#xa0;years in the Nankai, Hikurangi, and Guerrero subduction zones (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B64">Wallace et al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">Obara and Kato, 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Radiguet et al., 2016</xref>). Since the recurrence interval of SSEs remains unclear in the study area (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Chen S. K. et al., 2022</xref>), we assume that <italic>t</italic>
<sub>pert</sub> is proportional to the moment of SSEs, as observed in those subduction zones. Note that the resulting probability of a large subduction earthquake is independent of the choice of <italic>t</italic>
<sub>pert</sub> when the number of simulated megathrust events is designed to be large enough (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Kaneko et al., 2018</xref>). As the observed duration of M<sub>w</sub> &#x223c;6.4 to 6.6 SSEs is two to 4&#xa0;months (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Chen et al., 2018</xref>), the M<sub>w</sub> 6.0 to 7.0 SSEs are assumed to last 1&#xa0;week to 6&#xa0;months to agree with that observed in global subduction zones (e.g., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B64">Wallace et al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">Obara and Kato, 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Cruz-Atienza et al., 2021</xref>). Taking <italic>t</italic>
<sub>pert</sub> and SSE duration into consideration for the time resolution of probability estimation, we calculate the probability of an M<sub>w</sub> &#x2265; 7.5 earthquake with a maximum moment of M<sub>w</sub> 8.7 on the Ryukyu fault every year.</p>
<p>For the timing of the earthquake cycle of the Ryukyu fault, there was no paleoseismological evidence for a magnitude greater than our assumed minimum size of M<sub>w</sub> 7.5. Only the 1920 M<sub>w</sub> 7.7 earthquake occurred in proximity to the locked region (e.g., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B60">Theunissen et al., 2010</xref>). Since the hypocenter of historical earthquakes is poorly resolved, the 1920 earthquake cannot be ruled out as an interface slip event. Here, we assume that the 1920 earthquake was the last rupture on the Ryukyu fault. The timing of the first SSE in 2005 is at least 85&#xa0;years into the earthquake cycle to obtain a specific resulting probability. For computing efficiency, we exclude the next 85 years following each &#x394;&#x3c3; from the probability calculations. We note the possibility that the 1920 earthquake was not the last rupture of the Ryukyu fault and the interface remained locked since 1,604. Thus, we also model the timing of the 2005 SSE that was 400&#xa0;years into the earthquake cycle. Since the three SSEs have shown a time-dependent <italic>t</italic>
<sub>pert</sub>, we evaluated whether the stress level of each <italic>t</italic>
<sub>pert</sub> exceeds the triggering stress threshold of the next earthquake in a time interval of one to 2&#xa0;years immediately after each <italic>t</italic>
<sub>pert</sub>. We apply three possible scenarios that consider each <italic>t</italic>
<sub>pert</sub> as positive stress in the timing advance. The closer the timing of the stress perturbation caused by the SSE is to the triggering stress threshold of the next event, the higher the seismogenic probability is. For the details and calculation of the resulting probability and uncertainties, refer to Section 2.3 in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Kaneko et al. (2018)</xref>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3">
<title>Shear Stress Changes on the Ryukyu Fault and the Probability of a Megathrust Earthquake Caused by Slow Slip Event</title>
<p>
<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure 6</xref> shows shear stress changes of M<sub>w</sub> 6.0 to 7.0 SSEs at the two source depths on the subducting plate interface. The regions of the shear stress decrease, i.e., stress drop, in each subfigure approximately correspond to the SSE cumulative slip regions. The size of the stress drop area is proportional to the moment of SSE. The shear stress increase may have occurred around the stress drop region, and the maximum stress increase appears at the edge of the stress drop region. For SSEs that occur downdip of the Ryukyu fault, a shear stress increase of 0.05 &#xb1; 0.02&#xa0;MPa by an M<sub>w</sub> 6.0 SSE is estimated within the downdip region (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure 6A</xref>). There is no shear stress increase on the updip side since the slip dimension of the M<sub>w</sub> 6.0 SSE is insufficient for a broader influence on the shear stress increase. When the moment of the SSE reaches M<sub>w</sub> 6.5, the shear stress increase of 0.2 &#xb1; 0.03&#xa0;MPa is visible within much of the fault region at northwest-downdip depths (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure 6B</xref>). Note that shear stress decreases begin to appear at the downdip depth limit of the Ryukyu fault. This result is not surprising because the slip dimension of the SSE is proportional to the moment of the SSE, which changes the spatial distribution of the shear stress increase and decrease. The shear stress increase in an M<sub>w</sub> 7.0 SSE reaches 0.3 &#xb1; 0.05&#xa0;MPa within much of the fault region at northwest-downdip depths (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure 6C</xref>). The above shear stress increases are less than one-tenth of the estimated values when averaged over the entire fault region (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4</xref>). The results are thus not greater than 0.005&#x2013;0.03&#xa0;MPa, which is broadly consistent with the stress changes on locked faults caused by similar SSE sizes in large subduction zones (e.g., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Nakamura and Sunagawa, 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Radiguet et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B63">Voss et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">Saltogianni et al., 2021</xref>). The shear stress increase is insignificant in each scenario where SSEs occur within much of the Ryukyu fault downdip region. We observed only a shear stress increase of 0.05 &#xb1; 0.04&#xa0;MPa, estimated from an M<sub>w</sub> 6.0 SSE (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure 6D</xref>). Such slight stress increases of 0.10 &#xb1; 0.05 MPa and 0.15 &#xb1; 0.06&#xa0;MPa are determined from M<sub>w</sub> 6.5 and 7.0 SSEs, respectively (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figures 6E,F</xref>). The shear stress increase in the entire locked region does not seem proportional to the moment of the SSE.</p>
<fig id="F6" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 6</label>
<caption>
<p>Examples of shear stress changes on the Ryukyu fault caused by synthetic SSEs with moments from M<sub>w</sub> 6.0 to 7.0. The white arrow indicates the slip direction of each SSE. <bold>(A&#x2013;C)</bold> Scenarios of SSEs from the downdip depths of the Ryukyu fault (black dotted rectangles). <bold>(D&#x2013;F)</bold> SSEs within the downdip region.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="feart-10-887182-g006.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>
<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">Figure 7</xref> shows the annual probability as a function of time since the first 2005 SSE based on each shear stress increase in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure 6</xref>. Here, we demonstrate the probabilities of an M<sub>w</sub> &#x2265; 7.5 earthquake with a maximum moment of M<sub>w</sub> 8.7 and a magnitude frequency relation of a <italic>b</italic> value of 1.2 (blue curves, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">Figures 7A&#x2013;C</xref>). The annual probability in the first year following the SSE in 2005 only increases slightly. The probability change is within the uncertainty of background probability in the 10&#xa0;year sequence. Note that the resulting probability uncertainty is always the largest since the influence of both shear stress decrease and increase on the Ryukyu fault. We observed that the 2009 and 2015 SSEs show a significant probability increase over the uncertainty of background probability (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">Figures 7A&#x2013;C</xref>). In each scenario, the annual probabilities in the first year following the SSEs are approximately 1.1&#x2013;1.2 times the background probability. As expected, the ratio of the probability increase is governed by the amount of shear stress increase over the first year (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Kaneko et al., 2018</xref>). Note that the probability increase looks small because the stress perturbations from the SSE in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure 6</xref> are averaged over the entire fault region in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4</xref>. The annual probability reduces to the background level of 0.45% after 1&#xa0;year in each case because we assumed the durations of all SSEs are less than half of a year. Thus, the probability does not change when the external stress perturbation is absent, relying on the failure criterion that a large earthquake occurs immediately at a stress threshold (e.g., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Mazzotti and Adams, 2004</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F7" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 7</label>
<caption>
<p>Annual probability of an M<sub>w</sub> &#x2265; 7.5 earthquake with a maximum of M<sub>w</sub> 8.7 on the Ryukyu fault following the 2005, 2009, and 2015 SSEs. The blue, green, and red curves represent the scenario of V<sub>pl</sub> &#x3d; 6.0&#xa0;cm/yr, 8.6&#xa0;cm/yr, and 400&#xa0;years into the earthquake cycle, respectively. The vertical bars are the uncertainty of probability. <bold>(A&#x2013;C)</bold> Probabilities under the frame of the observed <italic>b</italic> value of 1.2 in the earthquake cycles. <bold>(D&#x2013;F)</bold> Same as <bold>(A&#x2013;C)</bold> but for a <italic>b</italic> value of 1.0 and <bold>(G&#x2013;I)</bold> for a <italic>b</italic> value of 1.4.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="feart-10-887182-g007.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>We also consider the annual probability for <italic>b</italic> values of 1.0 and 1.4 for the earthquake cycles. In both scenarios, the potential of a large earthquake is the highest over the first year of each SSE, namely the result of <italic>b</italic> values of 1.2. We find that the background probability is affected by the <italic>b</italic> value used for <italic>t</italic>
<sub>
<italic>r</italic>
</sub> in synthetic shear stress earthquake cycles, which was found empirically in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Kaneko et al. (2018)</xref>. In the case of the <italic>b</italic> value of 1.0 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">Figures 7D&#x2013;F</xref>), the background probability increases to 0.60% and then slightly increases with the moments of SSEs. When the b value increases to 1.4, we observed a decrease in background probability to 0.30% and then slightly increases with the same ratios as <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">Figures 7A&#x2013;C</xref>. The background probability is dependent on the choice of the <italic>b</italic> value because &#x3c4; is determined from <inline-formula id="inf3">
<mml:math id="m3">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:munderover>
<mml:mstyle displaystyle="true">
<mml:mo>&#x2211;</mml:mo>
</mml:mstyle>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>N</mml:mi>
</mml:munderover>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">&#x394;</mml:mi>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>&#x3c3;</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">&#x2215;</mml:mi>
<mml:munderover>
<mml:mstyle displaystyle="true">
<mml:mo>&#x2211;</mml:mo>
</mml:mstyle>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>N</mml:mi>
</mml:munderover>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>r</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>. Additionally, the background probability is independent of the assumed &#x394;&#x3c3; because &#x3c4; also decreases linearly with &#x394;&#x3c3; (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Kaneko et al., 2018</xref>). If so, it implies that a higher <italic>b</italic> value is used in the <italic>t</italic>
<sub>
<italic>r,</italic>
</sub> and a lower frequency of megathrust events is a release of the total &#x394;&#x3c3;.</p>
<p>We find that the background probability of an M<sub>w</sub> &#x2265; 7.5 subduction earthquake is small on the Ryukyu fault, between 0.30% and 0.60%, compared to the predictions in the Nankai and southern Hikurangi subduction zones (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Kaneko et al., 2018</xref>). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Kaenko et al. (2018)</xref> assumed that the total seismic moments in the two subduction zones were released by assumed M<sub>w</sub> &#x2265; 7.8 earthquakes with an empirical <italic>b</italic> value of 1.0 in their earthquake cycles. The total &#x394;&#x3c3; is thus balanced by a higher frequency of megathrust events, which leads to a higher background probability than our results. Our results are more robust based on the geodetically estimated minimum earthquakes of M<sub>w</sub> &#x2265; 7.5 on the Ryukyu fault (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Hsu et al., 2012</xref>) and the historical earthquake <italic>b</italic> values. It has been shown that the background probability of a large subduction megathrust is not affected much by the <italic>V</italic>
<sub>
<italic>pl</italic>
</sub> value (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Kaneko et al., 2018</xref>). Although we assumed a higher <italic>V</italic>
<sub>
<italic>pl</italic>
</sub> value than that assumed in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Kaneko et al. (2018)</xref>, our results show that in the case of the <italic>V</italic>
<sub>
<italic>pl</italic>
</sub> &#x3d; 8.6&#xa0;cm/yr (green curves, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">Figure 7</xref>): the background probability will be higher than <italic>V</italic>
<sub>
<italic>pl</italic>
</sub> &#x3d; 6.0&#xa0;cm/yr of only about 0.3%. We find the effect of <italic>V</italic>
<sub>
<italic>pl</italic>
</sub> is secondary to the probability increase compared to that of the timing of SSE into the earthquake cycle (red curves, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">Figure 7</xref>). It could be the case if the <italic>V</italic>
<sub>
<italic>pl</italic>
</sub> is very large enough to produce a similar probability increase in the case of 400 years into the earthquake cycle. However, the present observations in this subduction zone do not support this kind of scenario. Thus, <italic>V</italic>
<sub>
<italic>pl</italic>
</sub> is unlikely to be a critical parameter that results in the difference in background probability.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="discussion" id="s4">
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>The seismogenic potential of an M<sub>w</sub> &#x2265; 7.5 earthquake on the Ryukyu fault is estimated to be very small when considering the fault zone can rupture entirely as an M<sub>w</sub> 8.7 event. The low probability relies on the 1920 M<sub>w</sub> 7.7 earthquake, which was assumed to be the last rupture of the Ryukyu fault. Thus, the timing of the first SSE in 2005 is 85&#xa0;years in the early stage of the earthquake cycle relative to a 500&#xa0;years recurrence of M<sub>w</sub> 8.7 events on the Ryukyu fault. There is a possibility that the 1920 M<sub>w</sub> 7.7 earthquake did not occur on the fault interface, which may imply that the Ryukyu fault has remained locked for at least the last 417&#xa0;years because there are no records of a geodetically estimated minimum magnitude of M<sub>w</sub> 7.5 during that period. The stress level of the Ryukyu fault is higher than this assumption, and the 2005 SSE may have changed into the late stage of the earthquake cycle, much closer to the end of the 500&#xa0;years recurrence of M<sub>w</sub> 8.7 events. In this scenario, we obtained a higher annual probability of the megathrust earthquake with a maximum of M<sub>w</sub> 8.7, perhaps close to 1.2%, with the possibility of &#x3e; 1.2% over the next decade (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">Figure 7</xref>). This scenario highlights the potential of a coming megathrust earthquake of M<sub>w</sub> 7.5 to 8.7 in the next 100&#xa0;years. Thus, we discuss three possible rupture scenarios of the Ryukyu fault (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8">Figure 8</xref>): (A) regular and repeated ruptures with M<sub>w</sub> 7.0 to 7.5 events on several segments of the entire locked region. (B) The Ryukyu fault ruptures separately in two to three main sections, with M<sub>w</sub> 7.5 to 8.2 for each earthquake size in the locked area. (C) The entire Ryukyu fault ruptures coherently as an M<sub>w</sub> 8.7 event (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Hsu et al., 2012</xref>), even if we lack paleoseismological evidence to confirm the existence of such a large M<sub>w</sub> 8.7 event in the past. Types (A) and (C) are the end-member scenarios, and type (B) is a mixture between them.</p>
<fig id="F8" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 8</label>
<caption>
<p>Schematic view of the three possible rupture scenarios of the Ryukyu fault. The black, blue, and red dotted rectangles represent the scenarios from types <bold>(A&#x2013;C)</bold>, respectively (refer to the discussion). The other captions are the same as in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1</xref>.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="feart-10-887182-g008.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>If we consider only the hypocenters of the M<sub>w</sub> &#x2265; 7.0 historical earthquakes in the last 120&#xa0;years, the M<sub>w</sub> 7.0 to 7.2 events occurred almost entirely in the western half of the Ryukyu fault (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5</xref>). It may imply that the fault interface is locked on the western-half plane but not fully locked over the entire fault interface. In contrast, the fault interface of the eastern-half plane may be weakly locked since there were no frequent M<sub>w</sub> &#x2265; 7.0 earthquakes but was replaced by very low frequency earthquakes (VLFEs) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Nakamura and Sunagawa, 2015</xref>). However, considering the uncertainties in the locations, those events in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5</xref> may not all have occurred on the slip interface linked to the Ryukyu fault. If they were, it could imply that the frictional properties on the fault interface exhibited a time-dependent difference in that period between the western and eastern half. Time-dependent frictional variations have been inferred from geodetically observed SSEs along the strike direction of the plate interface at depths of almost 25&#x2013;45&#xa0;km (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Chen et al., 2018</xref>).</p>
<p>The evidence of VLFEs activity on the eastern-half plane only (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Nakamura and Sunagawa, 2015</xref>) also supports the difference in the interface frictional behaviors. Recent seafloor geodetic evidence indicates that the convergence rate is likely to increase along the strike of the Ryukyu fault offshore from 92 to 123&#xa0;mm/yr (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Chen H.Y. et al., 2022</xref>). The new observations may reveal a strain partitioning between the western/eastern-half planes, complementary to the locations of M<sub>w</sub> &#x2265; 7.0 historical earthquakes and VLFEs. If lateral frictional variation exists in the entire locked region, types (A) and (B) are more similar to the possible rupture behaviors of the Ryukyu fault as fault segmentation. The idea of fault segmentation is reasonable for the higher observed <italic>b</italic> value of 1.2 for the M<sub>w</sub> 7.0 to 7.7 historical earthquakes, rather than the empirical 1.0 value. Seafloor geodetic measurements across the entire fault region will help us understand the frictional interface properties regarding possible fault segmentation. We propose that future M<sub>w</sub> 7.0 to 7.5 earthquakes could occur frequently offshore eastern Taiwan, the same as the past events very close to the coastline (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5</xref>). The close epicenter distances to the Taiwan region would lead to local destruction and a potential tsunami threat.</p>
<p>A large earthquake triggered by SSE activity is still an open question and has been extensively investigated in global subduction zones. The first observed cases regarding the triggering or delayed triggering of the large earthquakes were rare. The 2014 M<sub>w</sub> 7.3 Papanoa earthquake was estimated to be triggered by a 0.04&#xa0;MPa ongoing stress perturbation from the downdip SSE 2&#xa0;months before the M<sub>w</sub> 7.3 event (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Radiguet et al., 2016</xref>). The 2018 M<sub>w</sub> 6.9 Zakynthos earthquake was likely triggered by the downdip SSE with a 0.025&#xa0;MPa stress perturbation, which terminated 2&#xa0;months before the M<sub>w</sub> 6.9 event (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">Saltogianni et al., 2021</xref>). In the Costa Rica subduction zone, the 2012 SSE that occurred downdip the 2012 M<sub>w</sub> 7.6 Nicoya earthquake was delayed by at least 6&#xa0;months (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B63">Voss et al., 2018</xref>). The stress perturbation of 0.01&#xa0;MPa caused by the SSE on the entire Nicoya locked region may have been insufficient for the triggering stress threshold of the Nicoya earthquake, as could the delay (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B63">Voss et al., 2018</xref>). The common point is that they were very close to the end of their earthquake cycles. It means the stress levels of the locked faults were high enough, and thus, fault ruptures could have been triggered by small stress perturbations caused by SSEs. In the southernmost Ryukyu subduction zone, our estimated shear stress increase on the Ryukyu fault caused by the 2005, 2009, and 2015 SSEs is similar to those cases when averaged over the entire locked region (less than 0.005&#x2013;0.04&#xa0;MPa).</p>
<p>A megathrust earthquake has not yet been triggered on the Ryukyu fault after a sequence of SSEs; it is therefore very likely that the end of the earthquake cycle is not close as in those cases. However, this is not true if the SSEs are very close to the end of the earthquake cycle and there has been no large earthquake at the fault interface in the past 450 years, as in the case of the 2011 M<sub>w</sub> 9.0 Tohoku earthquake (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Kato et al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Ito et al., 2013</xref>). Our results suggest that the 2009 and 2015 SSEs can produce a significant probability increase in the seismogenic potential of the Ryukyu fault. Since the two SSEs occurred on the same patch, a future SSE recurring there with a similar moment can be expected. Note that our results only show the influence of M<sub>w</sub> 6.0 to 7.0 SSEs on the triggering of the megathrust earthquake. If a future M<sub>w</sub> &#x3e; 7.0 SSE occurs down there and the offshore slip cannot be effectively detected (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3</xref>), such SSE could produce more stress perturbations than our scenarios. We alert the Taiwan region to monitor the local SSE activity and notice the potential of a large earthquake triggered by the SSEs downdip the locked Ryukyu fault. In addition, the 2005 SSE located at the downdip depth limit of the locked Ryukyu fault seems to increase the potential of a large earthquake slightly. Time-dependent frictional variations at the fault interface could be a reason for SSE generation, as observed in the Japan Trench and Costa Rica subduction zones (e.g., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Ito et al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Dixon et al., 2014</xref>). If so, it remains a subject of future work hampered by the limited observations in the southernmost Ryukyu subduction zone for the time-dependent frictional variations.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="conclusion" id="s5">
<title>Conclusion</title>
<p>We report the likelihood of a megathrust earthquake on the Ryukyu fault in the southernmost Ryukyu subduction zone for the first time. The annual probability of an M<sub>w</sub> &#x2265; 7.5 earthquake with a maximum earthquake size of M<sub>w</sub> 8.7 is approximately 0.3 to 0.6%, constrained by the observed local <italic>b</italic> value. The b value for historical earthquakes with magnitudes from M<sub>w</sub> 7.0 to 7.7 is 1.2, higher than the average of 1.0&#xa0;b value derived from M<sub>w</sub> 5.0 to 7.0 earthquakes in the entire Ryukyu subduction zone. It implies that the recurrence of megathrust earthquakes is longer than previously thought on the Ryukyu fault if the megathrust events follow the observed magnitude-frequency relation. We also estimate the stress changes on the Ryukyu fault caused by the SSEs in 2005, 2009, and 2015. The shear stress increases averaged over the entire locked zone for a megathrust event range from 0.005 to 0.04&#xa0;MPa, broadly consistent with the previous observations. Such stress increases have caused the probabilities of a megathrust earthquake triggering over the 2009 and 2015 SSEs 1.1 to 1.2 times relative to the background probability. A future SSE recurring downdip the locked Ryukyu fault should be monitored for the triggering of the large earthquake. It is very likely the earthquake cycle is not close to the end; thus far, there has been no triggered megathrust earthquake after a sequence of SSEs. This work provides unique observation for the critical issue of slow slip-triggered large earthquakes.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec id="s6">
<title>Data Availability Statement</title>
<p>The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s7">
<title>Author Contributions</title>
<p>SC conceptualized the project. SC analyzed the data. Y-MW, Y-CC validated the research. SC wrote the original manuscript. Y-MW, Y-CC edited and reviewed the manuscript.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s8">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>This study was funded by the Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST) in Taiwan under grant number 109-2116-M-002-030-MY3 and by the NTU Research Center for Future Earth from the Featured Areas Research Center Program within the framework of the Higher Education Sprout Project by the Ministry of Education (MOE) in Taiwan.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="COI-statement" id="s9">
<title>Conflict of Interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="disclaimer" id="s10">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s Note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
<ack>
<p>GNSS data are available at <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://gdbweb.earth.sinica.edu.tw/">http://gdbweb.earth.sinica.edu.tw/</ext-link>. Coulomb stress change calculations were performed using Coulomb 3.3 software available from the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) website at <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.usgs.gov/node/279387">https://www.usgs.gov/node/279387</ext-link>. Numerical code for seismogenic probability estimation in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Kaneko et al. (2018)</xref> is available at <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://ftp.gns.cri.nz/pub/ykaneko/Probabilities/">https://ftp.gns.cri.nz/pub/ykaneko/Probabilities/</ext-link>
</p>
</ack>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Akaike</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1980</year>). &#x201c;<article-title>Likelihood and the Bayes Procedure</article-title>,&#x201d; in <source>Bayesian Statistics</source>. Editors <person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname>Bernardo</surname>
<given-names>J. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>De Groot</surname>
<given-names>M. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lindley</surname>
<given-names>D. V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Smith</surname>
<given-names>A. F. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<publisher-loc>Valencia</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>University Press</publisher-name>), <volume>31</volume>, <fpage>143</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>166</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/bf02888350</pub-id>
<source>Trab. Estad. Investig. Oper.</source> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Aki</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1965</year>). <article-title>Maximum Likelihood Estimate of B in the Formula logN&#x3d;a-bM and its Confidence</article-title>. <source>Bull. Seismo. Soc. Am.</source> <volume>43</volume>, <fpage>237</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>239</lpage>. </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Allmann</surname>
<given-names>B. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shearer</surname>
<given-names>P. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Global Variations of Stress Drop for Moderate to Large Earthquakes</article-title>. <source>J. Geophys. Res.</source> <volume>114</volume>, <fpage>B01310</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1029/2008JB005821</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ando</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kitamura</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tu</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ohashi</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Imai</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nakamura</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Source of High Tsunamis along the Southernmost Ryukyu Trench Inferred from Tsunami Stratigraphy</article-title>. <source>Tectonophysics</source> <volume>722</volume>, <fpage>265</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>276</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.tecto.2017.11.007</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Araoka</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yokoyama</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Suzuki</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Goto</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Miyagi</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Miyazawa</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Tsunami Recurrence Revealed by Porites Coral Boulders in the Southern Ryukyu Islands, Japan</article-title>. <source>Geology</source> <volume>41</volume> (<issue>8</issue>), <fpage>919</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>922</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1130/G34415.1</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Avouac</surname>
<given-names>J.-P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>From Geodetic Imaging of Seismic and Aseismic Fault Slip to Dynamic Modeling of the Seismic Cycle</article-title>. <source>Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci.</source> <volume>43</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>233</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>271</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1146/annurev-earth-060614-105302</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Beeler</surname>
<given-names>N. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Roeloffs</surname>
<given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>McCausland</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Re-estimated Effects of Deep Episodic Slip on the Occurrence and Probability of Great Earthquakes in Cascadia</article-title>. <source>Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.</source> <volume>104</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>128</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>144</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1785/0120120022</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Behr</surname>
<given-names>W. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>B&#xfc;rgmann</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>What&#x27;s Down There? the Structures, Materials and Environment of Deep-Seated Slow Slip and Tremor</article-title>. <source>Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A</source> <volume>379</volume>, <fpage>20200218</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1098/rsta.2020.0218</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>B&#xfc;rgmann</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>The Geophysics, Geology and Mechanics of Slow Fault Slip</article-title>. <source>Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.</source> <volume>495</volume>, <fpage>112</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>134</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.epsl.2018.04.062</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chang</surname>
<given-names>W.-Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname>
<given-names>K.-P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tsai</surname>
<given-names>Y. B.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>An Updated and Refined Catalog of Earthquakes in Taiwan (1900-2014) with Homogenized M W Magnitudes</article-title>. <source>Earth Planet Spsp.</source> <volume>68</volume>, <fpage>45</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s40623-016-0414-4</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname>
<given-names>H. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hsu</surname>
<given-names>Y. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ikuta</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tung</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tang</surname>
<given-names>C. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ku</surname>
<given-names>C. S.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Strain Partitioning in the Southern Ryukyu Margin Revealed by Seafloor Geodetic and Seismological Observations</article-title>. <source>Geophys. Res. Lett.</source> <volume>49</volume>, <fpage>e2022GL098218</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1029/2022GL098218</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname>
<given-names>S. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chan</surname>
<given-names>Y.-C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hu</surname>
<given-names>J.-C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kuo</surname>
<given-names>L.-C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Current Crustal Deformation at the Junction of Collision to Subduction Around the Hualien Area, Taiwan</article-title>. <source>Tectonophysics</source> <volume>617</volume>, <fpage>58</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>78</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.tecto.2014.01.014</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname>
<given-names>S. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname>
<given-names>Y.-M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chan</surname>
<given-names>Y.-C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Slow Slip Events Following the Afterslip of the 2002 Mw 7.1 Hualien Offshore Earthquake, Taiwan</article-title>. <source>Earth Planets Space</source> <volume>74</volume>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s40623-022-01629-y</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname>
<given-names>S. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname>
<given-names>Y.-M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hsu</surname>
<given-names>Y.-J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chan</surname>
<given-names>Y.-C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Current Crustal Deformation of the Taiwan Orogen Reassessed by cGPS Strain-Rate Estimation and Focal Mechanism Stress Inversion</article-title>. <source>Geophys. J. Int.</source> <volume>210</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>228</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>239</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/gji/ggx165</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname>
<given-names>S. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname>
<given-names>Y. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chan</surname>
<given-names>Y. C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Episodic Slow Slip Events and Overlying Plate Seismicity at the Southernmost Ryukyu Trench</article-title>. <source>Geophys. Res. Lett.</source> <volume>45</volume> (<issue>19</issue>), <fpage>10369</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>10377</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1029/2018GL079740</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Cheng</surname>
<given-names>S.-N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shaw</surname>
<given-names>C.-F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yeh</surname>
<given-names>Y. T.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Reconstructing the 1867 Keelung Earthquake and Tsunami Based on Historical Documents</article-title>. <source>Terr. Atmos. Ocean. Sci.</source> <volume>27</volume>, <fpage>431</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>449</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3319/tao.2016.03.18.01(tem)</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Cheng</surname>
<given-names>S. N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yeh</surname>
<given-names>Y. T.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1989</year>). <source>Catalog of the Earthquakes in Taiwan from 1604 to 1988Bulletin IES, R-661, 255pp</source>. <publisher-loc>Taipei</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Institute of Earth Sciences</publisher-name>. </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Courboulex</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vall&#xe9;e</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Causse</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chounet</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Stress-Drop Variability of Shallow Earthquakes Extracted from a Global Database of Source Time Functions</article-title>. <source>Seismol. Res. Lett.</source> <volume>87</volume> (<issue>4</issue>), <fpage>912</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>918</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1785/0220150283</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Cruz-Atienza</surname>
<given-names>V. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tago</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Villafuerte</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wei</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Garza-Gir&#xf3;n</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dominguez</surname>
<given-names>L. A.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Short-term Interaction between Silent and Devastating Earthquakes in Mexico</article-title>. <source>Nat. Commun.</source> <volume>12</volume>, <fpage>2171</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41467-021-22326-6</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Dal Zilio</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lapusta</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Avouac</surname>
<given-names>J. P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Unraveling Scaling Properties of Slow-Slip Events</article-title>. <source>Geophys. Res. Lett.</source> <volume>47</volume>, <fpage>e2020GL087477</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1029/2020gl087477</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Dixon</surname>
<given-names>T. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jiang</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Malservisi</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>McCaffrey</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Voss</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Protti</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Earthquake and Tsunami Forecasts: Relation of Slow Slip Events to Subsequent Earthquake Rupture</article-title>. <source>Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.</source> <volume>111</volume>, <fpage>17039</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>17044</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.1412299111</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Engdahl</surname>
<given-names>E. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Van Der Hilst</surname>
<given-names>R. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Buland</surname>
<given-names>R. P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1998</year>). <article-title>Global Teleseismic Earthquake Relocation with Improved Travel Times and Procedures for Depth Determination</article-title>. <source>Bull. Seismo. Soc. Am.</source> <volume>88</volume> (<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>722</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>743</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1785/BSSA0880030722</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Gutenberg</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Richter</surname>
<given-names>C. F.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1944</year>). <article-title>Frequency of Earthquakes in California&#x2a;</article-title>. <source>Bull. Seismo. Soc. Am.</source> <volume>34</volume> (<issue>4</issue>), <fpage>185</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>188</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1785/bssa0340040185</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Heki</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kataoka</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>On the Biannually Repeating Slow-Slip Events at the Ryukyu Trench, Southwestern Japan</article-title>. <source>J. Geophys. Res.</source> <volume>113</volume>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1029/2008JB005739</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hsu</surname>
<given-names>Y.-J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ando</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yu</surname>
<given-names>S.-B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Simons</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>The Potential for a Great Earthquake along the Southernmost Ryukyu Subduction Zone</article-title>. <source>Geophys. Res. Lett.</source> <volume>39</volume>, <fpage>a</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>n</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1029/2012GL052764</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hsu</surname>
<given-names>Y.-J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yu</surname>
<given-names>S.-B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Simons</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kuo</surname>
<given-names>L.-C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname>
<given-names>H.-Y.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Interseismic Crustal Deformation in the Taiwan Plate Boundary Zone Revealed by GPS Observations, Seismicity, and Earthquake Focal Mechanisms</article-title>. <source>Tectonophysics</source> <volume>479</volume>, <fpage>4</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>18</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.tecto.2008.11.016</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ito</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hino</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kido</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fujimoto</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Osada</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Inazu</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Episodic Slow Slip Events in the Japan Subduction Zone before the 2011 Tohoku-Oki Earthquake</article-title>. <source>Tectonophysics</source> <volume>600</volume>, <fpage>14</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>26</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.tecto.2012.08.022</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kaneki</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hirono</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Diagenetic and Shear-Induced Transitions of Frictional Strength of Carbon-Bearing Faults and Their Implications for Earthquake Rupture Dynamics in Subduction Zones</article-title>. <source>Sci. Rep.</source> <volume>9</volume>, <fpage>7884</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41598-019-44307-y</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kaneko</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shearer</surname>
<given-names>P. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Variability of Seismic Source Spectra, Estimated Stress Drop, and Radiated Energy, Derived from Cohesive-Zone Models of Symmetrical and Asymmetrical Circular and Elliptical Ruptures</article-title>. <source>J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth</source> <volume>120</volume>, <fpage>1053</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1079</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/2014JB011642</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kaneko</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wallace</surname>
<given-names>L. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hamling</surname>
<given-names>I. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gerstenberger</surname>
<given-names>M. C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Simple Physical Model for the Probability of a Subduction- Zone Earthquake Following Slow Slip Events and Earthquakes: Application to the Hikurangi Megathrust, New Zealand</article-title>. <source>Geophys. Res. Lett.</source> <volume>45</volume>, <fpage>3932</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3941</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1029/2018GL077641</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kato</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fukuda</surname>
<given-names>J. i.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kumazawa</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nakagawa</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Accelerated Nucleation of the 2014 Iquique, Chile Mw 8.2 Earthquake</article-title>. <source>Sci. Rep.</source> <volume>6</volume>, <fpage>24792</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/srep24792</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kato</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Obara</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Igarashi</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tsuruoka</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nakagawa</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hirata</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Propagation of Slow Slip Leading up to the 2011 M W 9.0 Tohoku-Oki Earthquake</article-title>. <source>Science</source> <volume>335</volume>, <fpage>6069705</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>6069708</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/science.1215141</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>King</surname>
<given-names>G. C. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Stein</surname>
<given-names>R. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lin</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1994</year>). <article-title>Static Stress Changes and the Triggering of Earthquakes</article-title>. <source>Bull. Seis. Soc. Am.</source> <volume>84</volume>, <fpage>935</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>953</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1785/BSSA0840030935</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kobayashi</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sato</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Estimating Effective Normal Stress during Slow Slip Events from Slip Velocities and Shear Stress Variations</article-title>. <source>Geophys. Res. Lett.</source> <volume>48</volume>, <fpage>20e2021GL095690</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1029/2021GL095690</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Konstantinou</surname>
<given-names>K. I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pan</surname>
<given-names>C.-Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lin</surname>
<given-names>C.-H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Microearthquake Activity Around Kueishantao Island, Offshore Northeastern Taiwan: Insights into the Volcano-Tectonic Interactions at the Tip of the Southern Okinawa Trough</article-title>. <source>Tectonophysics</source> <volume>593</volume>, <fpage>20</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>32</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.tecto.2013.02.019</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B36">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lin</surname>
<given-names>J.-Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sibuet</surname>
<given-names>J.-C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hsu</surname>
<given-names>S.-K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname>
<given-names>W.-N.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Could a Sumatra-like Megathrust Earthquake Occur in the South Ryukyu Subduction Zone?</article-title> <source>Earth Planet Sp.</source> <volume>66</volume>, <fpage>49</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/1880-5981-66-49</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B37">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mallick</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Meltzner</surname>
<given-names>A. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tsang</surname>
<given-names>L. L. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lindsey</surname>
<given-names>E. O.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Feng</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hill</surname>
<given-names>E. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Long-lived Shallow Slow-Slip Events on the Sunda Megathrust</article-title>. <source>Nat. Geosci.</source> <volume>14</volume>, <fpage>327</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>333</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41561-021-00727-y</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B38">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mazzotti</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Adams</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>Variability of Near-Term Probability for the Next Great Earthquake on the Cascadia Subduction Zone</article-title>. <source>Bull. Seismo. Soc. Am.</source> <volume>94</volume> (<issue>5</issue>), <fpage>1954</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1959</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1785/012004032</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B39">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Michel</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gualandi</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Avouac</surname>
<given-names>J.-P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Similar Scaling Laws for Earthquakes and Cascadia Slow-Slip Events</article-title>. <source>Nature</source> <volume>574</volume>, <fpage>522</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>526</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41586-019-1673-6</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B40">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Nakamura</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sunagawa</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Activation of Very Low Frequency Earthquakes by Slow Slip Events in the Ryukyu Trench</article-title>. <source>Geophys. Res. Lett.</source> <volume>42</volume>, <fpage>1076</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1082</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/2014GL062929</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B41">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Nanjo</surname>
<given-names>K. Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yoshida</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>A B Map Implying the First Eastern Rupture of the Nankai Trough Earthquakes</article-title>. <source>Nat. Commun.</source> <volume>9</volume>, <fpage>1117</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41467-018-03514-3</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B42">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Nishikawa</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ide</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Earthquake Size Distribution in Subduction Zones Linked to Slab Buoyancy</article-title>. <source>Nat. Geosci.</source> <volume>7</volume>, <fpage>904</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>908</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/ngeo2279</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B43">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Nishimura</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hashimoto</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ando</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>A Rigid Block Rotation Model for the GPS Derived Velocity Field along the Ryukyu Arc</article-title>. <source>Phys. Earth Planet. Interiors</source> <volume>142</volume>, <fpage>185</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>203</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.pepi.2003.12.014</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B44">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Nishimura</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Short-term Slow Slip Events along the Ryukyu Trench, Southwestern Japan, Observed by Continuous GNSS</article-title>. <source>Prog. Earth Planet. Sci.</source> <volume>1</volume>, <fpage>22</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s40645-014-0022-5</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B45">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Obara</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kato</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Connecting Slow Earthquakes to Huge Earthquakes</article-title>. <source>Science</source> <volume>353</volume>, <fpage>253</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>257</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/science.aaf1512</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B46">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Parsons</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Console</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Falcone</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Murru</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yamashina</surname>
<given-names>K. i.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Comparison of Characteristic and Gutenberg-Richter Models for Time-dependent M &#x2265; 7.9 Earthquake Probability in the Nankai-Tokai Subduction Zone, Japan</article-title>. <source>Geophys. J. Int.</source> <volume>190</volume> (<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>1673</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1688</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-246X.2012.05595.x</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B47">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Petruccelli</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schorlemmer</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tormann</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rinaldi</surname>
<given-names>A. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wiemer</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gasperini</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>The Influence of Faulting Style on the Size-Distribution of Global Earthquakes</article-title>. <source>Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.</source> <volume>527</volume>, <fpage>115791</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.epsl.2019.115791</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B48">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Radiguet</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Perfettini</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cotte</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gualandi</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Valette</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kostoglodov</surname>
<given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Triggering of the 2014 Mw7.3 Papanoa Earthquake by a Slow Slip Event in Guerrero, Mexico</article-title>. <source>Nat. Geosci.</source> <volume>911</volume>, <fpage>829</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>833</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/ngeo2817</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B49">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Rogers</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dragert</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Episodic Tremor and Slip on the Cascadia Subduction Zone: the Chatter of Silent Slip</article-title>. <source>Science</source> <volume>300</volume>, <fpage>1942</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1943</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/science.1084783</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B50">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ruiz</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Metois</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fuenzalida</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ruiz</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Leyton</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Grandin</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Intense Foreshocks and a Slow Slip Event Preceded the 2014 Iquique M W 8.1 Earthquake</article-title>. <source>Science</source> <volume>345</volume>, <fpage>62011165</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>62011169</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/science.1256074</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B51">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Saffer</surname>
<given-names>D. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wallace</surname>
<given-names>L. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>The Frictional, Hydrologic, Metamorphic and Thermal Habitat of Shallow Slow Earthquakes</article-title>. <source>Nat. Geosci.</source> <volume>8</volume>, <fpage>594</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>600</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/ngeo2490</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B52">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Saltogianni</surname>
<given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mouslopoulou</surname>
<given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dielforder</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bocchini</surname>
<given-names>G. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bedford</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Oncken</surname>
<given-names>O.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Slow Slip Triggers the 2018 M W 6.9 Zakynthos Earthquake within the Weakly Locked Hellenic Subduction System, Greece</article-title>. <source>Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst.</source> <volume>22</volume>, <fpage>e2021GC010090</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1029/2021GC010090</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B53">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Schwartz</surname>
<given-names>S. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rokosky</surname>
<given-names>J. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Slow Slip Events and Seismic Tremor at Circum-Pacific Subduction Zones</article-title>. <source>Rev. Geophys.</source> <volume>45</volume>, <fpage>a</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>n</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1029/2006RG000208</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B54">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Shi</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bolt</surname>
<given-names>B. A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1982</year>). <article-title>The Standard Error of the Magnitude-Frequency B Value</article-title>. <source>Bull. Seismo. Soc. Am.</source> <volume>72</volume>, <fpage>1677</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1687</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1785/BSSA0720051677</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B55">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Socquet</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Valdes</surname>
<given-names>J. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jara</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cotton</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Walpersdorf</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cotte</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>An 8 Month Slow Slip Event Triggers Progressive Nucleation of the 2014 Chile Megathrust</article-title>. <source>Geophys. Res. Lett.</source> <volume>44</volume>, <fpage>4046</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>4053</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/2017GL073023</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B56">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Stein</surname>
<given-names>R. S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1999</year>). <article-title>The Role of Stress Transfer in Earthquake Occurrence</article-title>. <source>Nature</source> <volume>402</volume>, <fpage>605</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>609</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/45144</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B57">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Stevens</surname>
<given-names>V. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Avouac</surname>
<given-names>J. P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Millenary M W &#x3e; 9.0 Earthquakes Required by Geodetic Strain in the Himalaya</article-title>. <source>Geophys. Res. Lett.</source> <volume>43</volume>, <fpage>1118</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1123</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/2015gl067336</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B58">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sugawara</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yu</surname>
<given-names>N. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yen</surname>
<given-names>J. Y.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Estimating a Tsunami Source by Sediment Transport Modeling: A Primary Attempt on a Historical/1867 Normal-Faulting Tsunami in Northern Taiwan</article-title>. <source>J. Geophys. Res. Earth Surf.</source> <volume>124</volume>, <fpage>1675</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1700</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1029/2018JF004831</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B59">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sun</surname>
<given-names>Y.-S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname>
<given-names>P.-F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname>
<given-names>C.-C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lee</surname>
<given-names>Y.-T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ma</surname>
<given-names>K.-F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname>
<given-names>T.-R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Assessment of the Peak Tsunami Amplitude Associated with a Large Earthquake Occurring along the Southernmost Ryukyu Subduction Zone in the Region of Taiwan</article-title>. <source>Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci.</source> <volume>18</volume>, <fpage>2081</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2092</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/nhess-18-2081-2018</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B60">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Theunissen</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Font</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lallemand</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liang</surname>
<given-names>W.-T.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>The Largest Instrumentally Recorded Earthquake in Taiwan: Revised Location and Magnitude, and Tectonic Significance of the 1920 Event</article-title>. <source>Geophys. J. Int.</source> <volume>183</volume>, <fpage>1119</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1133</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-246X.2010.04813.x</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B61">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Toda</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Stein</surname>
<given-names>R. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sevilgen</surname>
<given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lin</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <source>U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2011&#x2013;1060</source>, <fpage>63</fpage>. <comment>p., available at <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2011/1060">https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2011/1060</ext-link>.</comment>
<article-title>Coulomb 3.3 Graphic-Rich Deformation and Stress-Change Software for Earthquake, Tectonic, and Volcano Research and Teaching&#x2013;User Guide.</article-title> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B62">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Utsu</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1999</year>). <article-title>Representation and Analysis of the Earthquake Size Distribution: A Historical Review and Some New Approaches</article-title>. <source>Pure Appl. Geophys.</source> <volume>155</volume>, <fpage>509</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>535</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s000240050276</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B63">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Voss</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dixon</surname>
<given-names>T. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Malservisi</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Protti</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schwartz</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Do slow Slip Events Trigger Large and Great Megathrust Earthquakes?</article-title> <source>Sci. Adv.</source> <volume>4</volume>, <fpage>10eaat8472</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/sciadv.aat8472</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B64">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wallace</surname>
<given-names>L. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Barnes</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Beavan</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Van Dissen</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Litchfield</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mountjoy</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>The Kinematics of a Transition from Subduction to Strike-Slip: An Example from the Central New Zealand Plate Boundary</article-title>. <source>J. Geophys. Res.</source> <volume>117</volume>, <fpage>a</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>n</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1029/2011JB008640</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B65">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wallace</surname>
<given-names>L. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kaneko</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hreinsd&#xf3;ttir</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hamling</surname>
<given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Peng</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bartlow</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Large-scale Dynamic Triggering of Shallow Slow Slip Enhanced by Overlying Sedimentary Wedge</article-title>. <source>Nat. Geosci.</source> <volume>10</volume>, <fpage>765</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>770</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/ngeo3021</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B66">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wei</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kaneko</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shi</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Numerical Modeling of Dynamically Triggered Shallow Slow Slip Events in New Zealand by the 2016 M W 7.8 Kaikoura Earthquake</article-title>. <source>Geophys. Res. Lett.</source> <volume>45</volume>, <fpage>4764</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>4772</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1029/2018GL077879</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B67">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wiemer</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wyss</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2000</year>). <article-title>Minimum Magnitude of Completeness in Earthquake Catalogs: Examples from Alaska, the Western United States, and Japan</article-title>. <source>Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.</source> <volume>90</volume> (<issue>4</issue>), <fpage>859</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>869</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1785/0119990114</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B68">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname>
<given-names>Y.-M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chang</surname>
<given-names>C.-H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Teng</surname>
<given-names>T.-L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nakamura</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>A Comprehensive Relocation of Earthquakes in Taiwan from 1991 to 2005</article-title>. <source>Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.</source> <volume>98</volume> (<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>1471</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1481</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1785/0120070166</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B69">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname>
<given-names>Y.-M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shyu</surname>
<given-names>J. B. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chang</surname>
<given-names>C.-H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nakamura</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hsu</surname>
<given-names>S.-K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Improved Seismic Tomography Offshore Northeastern Taiwan: Implications for Subduction and Collision Processes between Taiwan and the Southernmost Ryukyu</article-title>. <source>Geophys. J. Int.</source> <volume>178</volume>, <fpage>1042</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1054</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-246X.2009.04180.x</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B70">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Yabuki</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Matsu&#x27;ura</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1992</year>). <article-title>Geodetic Data Inversion Using a Bayesian Information Criterion for Spatial Distribution of Fault Slip</article-title>. <source>Geophys. J. Int.</source> <volume>109</volume>, <fpage>363</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>375</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-246X.1992.tb00102.x</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B71">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Yokota</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ishikawa</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Watanabe</surname>
<given-names>S.-i.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tashiro</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Asada</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Seafloor Geodetic Constraints on Interplate Coupling of the Nankai Trough Megathrust Zone</article-title>. <source>Nature</source> <volume>534</volume>, <fpage>7607374</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>7607377</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nature17632</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B72">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Yu</surname>
<given-names>N.-T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yen</surname>
<given-names>J.-Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yen</surname>
<given-names>I.-C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chu</surname>
<given-names>M.-F.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>An Extended, 2.4-ka Long Record of Western Pacific Tsunamis and Pumice Rafts in Northern Taiwan: Tsunami Recurrence, Pumice Sources, and Drifting Routes</article-title>. <source>Quat. Sci. Rev.</source> <volume>281</volume>, <fpage>107423</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.quascirev.2022.107423</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B73">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Yu</surname>
<given-names>N.-T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yen</surname>
<given-names>J.-Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yen</surname>
<given-names>I.-C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hirakawa</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chuang</surname>
<given-names>C.-M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Tsunami Deposits and Recurrence on a Typhoon-Prone Coast of Northern Taiwan from the Last Millennium</article-title>. <source>Quat. Sci. Rev.</source> <volume>245</volume>, <fpage>106488</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.quascirev.2020.106488</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>