<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="EN" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Earth Sci.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Earth Science</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Earth Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">2296-6463</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">838866</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/feart.2022.838866</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Earth Science</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Modelling Fault Scarp Degradation to Determine Earthquake History on the Muztagh Ata and Tahman Faults in the Chinese Pamir</article-title>
<alt-title alt-title-type="left-running-head">Lu et&#x20;al.</alt-title>
<alt-title alt-title-type="right-running-head">Earthquake History Determined by Scarp Degradation</alt-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lu</surname>
<given-names>Lejun</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1604091/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Zhou</surname>
<given-names>Yu</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001">&#x2a;</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>Peizhen</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Cheng</surname>
<given-names>Xiao</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">
<sup>3</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
<institution>Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Geodynamics and Geohazards</institution>, <institution>School of Earth Sciences and Engineering</institution>, <institution>Sun Yat-Sen University</institution>, <addr-line>Zhuhai</addr-line>, <country>China</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
<institution>Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai)</institution>, <addr-line>Zhuhai</addr-line>, <country>China</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff3">
<sup>3</sup>
<institution>School of Geospatial Engineering and Science</institution>, <institution>Sun Yat-Sen University</institution>, <addr-line>Zhuhai</addr-line>, <country>China</country>
</aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>
<bold>Edited by:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1049001/overview">Daoyang Yuan</ext-link>, Lanzhou University, China</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>
<bold>Reviewed by:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1618565/overview">Shimin Zhang</ext-link>, Ministry of Emergency Management, China</p>
<p>
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/368913/overview">R. Jayangonda Perumal</ext-link>, Wadia Institute of Himalayan Geology, India</p>
</fn>
<corresp id="c001">&#x2a;Correspondence: Yu Zhou, <email>zhouyu36@mail.sysu.edu.cn</email>
</corresp>
<fn fn-type="other">
<p>This article was submitted to Structural Geology and Tectonics, a section of the journal Frontiers in Earth Science</p>
</fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>09</day>
<month>03</month>
<year>2022</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2022</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>10</volume>
<elocation-id>838866</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>18</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2021</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>18</day>
<month>02</month>
<year>2022</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#xa9; 2022 Lu, Zhou, Zhang and Cheng.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2022</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Lu, Zhou, Zhang and Cheng</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these&#x20;terms.</p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>The frequency of earthquakes on active faults is usually revealed by palaeoseismic trenching and geological dating. Nonetheless, field trenching and sampling are sometimes limited by difficulties in logistics, therefore impeding palaeoseismological studies. As surface rupture earthquakes create fault scarps that evolve with time, they may also provide important information about the timing of earthquakes. In this study, we provide a new approach to determine earthquake history based on the morphology of fault scarps. We select the Muztagh Ata and Tahman normal faults in the Chinese Pamir as a test area, on which fault scarps are well preserved but the earthquake history has not been quantified yet. We first simulate fault scarp degradation using a nonlinear transport model to obtain the empirical relationship between scarp width and its evolution time. We then measure 68 fault scarps from high-resolution topographic data derived from WorldView-2 stereo imagery. The measured fault scarps are clustered in four groups, each group possibly representing one earthquake event. Combining the time-width relationship and scarp width measurements, we infer that four earthquakes occurred at 0.1&#xb1;0.4&#xa0;kyrs before the present (BP), 2.1&#xb1;0.5&#xa0;kyrs BP, 2.9&#xb1;0.4&#xa0;kyrs BP and 4.9&#xb1;0.5&#xa0;kyrs BP, respectively. The first event is likely to be the most recent earthquake occurred on the faults, i.e.,&#x20;the 1895 Tashkurgan earthquake ( &#x223c;0.13&#xa0;kyrs BP). Based on the estimated earthquake recurrence intervals and vertical offsets, we obtain a vertical slip rate of 2.2&#xb1;0.3&#xa0;mm/yr on the Muztagh Ata and Tahman faults, conforming to previous geological rate estimates.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>scarp degradation modelling</kwd>
<kwd>scarp width</kwd>
<kwd>Muztagh Ata and Tahman faults</kwd>
<kwd>earthquake history</kwd>
<kwd>1895 earthquake</kwd>
<kwd>Chinese pamir</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<contract-num rid="cn002">41874020</contract-num>
<contract-sponsor id="cn001">Ministry of Science and Technology of the People&#x2019;s Republic of China<named-content content-type="fundref-id">10.13039/501100002855</named-content>
</contract-sponsor>
<contract-sponsor id="cn002">National Natural Science Foundation of China<named-content content-type="fundref-id">10.13039/501100001809</named-content>
</contract-sponsor>
<contract-sponsor id="cn003">Government of Guangdong Province<named-content content-type="fundref-id">10.13039/501100002912</named-content>
</contract-sponsor>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="s1">
<title>1 Introduction</title>
<p>The frequency of earthquakes that have occurred along a fault ultimately determines its seismic potential and is therefore important for hazard assessment. A direct way to reveal the number of surface rupture events is palaeoseismic trenching (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Deng and Liao, 1996</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Marco et&#x20;al., 2005</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Rockwell and Ben-Zion, 2007</xref>), but it is often limited by difficulties in logistics in the field. Since earthquakes are recorded on the earth&#x2019;s surface in the form of offset geomorphic features, such offsets can be used as an alternative method to characterise repeating earthquakes and fault slip behaviour. Under the assumption that similar-aged offset geomorphic features experienced the same number of earthquakes, offset measurements appear as groups, which can be used as an indicator of repeating earthquakes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Sieh, 1978</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">McGill and Sieh, 1991</xref>). This method, now known as &#x201c;cumulative offset probability distribution, COPD&#x201d;, requires a large amount of offset measurements for statistical analysis (e.g., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">Zielke et&#x20;al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Bi et&#x20;al., 2018</xref>). During the last decade, high-resolution remote-sensing data promote the application of the &#x201c;COPD&#x201d; method in various places around the world (e.g., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Zielke et&#x20;al., 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Klinger et&#x20;al., 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Li et&#x20;al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Ren et&#x20;al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Bi et&#x20;al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Choi et&#x20;al., 2018</xref>). For instance, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Zielke et&#x20;al. (2010)</xref> measured 149 offsets along the Carrizo segment of the San Andreas fault using light detection and ranging (LiDAR) data, and identified five peaks (5.3, 9.8, 14.9, 20.1, and 24.5&#xa0;m, respectively) from the offset measurements, with the first peak corresponding to the slip of the 1857&#x20;<italic>M</italic>
<sub>
<italic>w</italic>
</sub> 7.9 Fort Tejon earthquake. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Klinger et&#x20;al. (2011)</xref> measured five slip peaks that are multiples of 6&#xa0;m along the Fuyun fault in the south of the Altay Mountains, Northeastern Xinjiang, China, based on Quickbird images, and concluded that ruptures on the Fuyun fault exhibits characteristic slip behaviour. Nonetheless, a recent study by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Lin et&#x20;al. (2020)</xref> pointed out that the COPD method is only applicable to a few large mature strike-slip faults such as the San Andreas and Fuyun faults.</p>
<p>Surface offsets are important for estimating the magnitude of slip in past earthquakes. Several early studies, e.g., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Arrowsmith et&#x20;al. (1998)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Avouac (1993)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Colman and Watson (1983)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Culling (1960)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Jayangondaperumal et&#x20;al. (2013)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Jayangondaperumal et&#x20;al. (2017)</xref>, have noted that the morphology of a scarp is useful for constraining the evolution time since its formation. However, previous studies based on the COPD method depend solely on the offset itself, and ignore the shape of the geomorphic features. In this study, we propose a new method to constrain earthquake history by modelling scarp degradation. The method is applied to the Muztagh Ata and Tahman faults in the Chinese Pamir, providing new information about regional earthquake records.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2">
<title>2 Tectonic Background of the Kongur Shan Extensional System</title>
<p>The Pamir, located in the western end of the Indo-Asian collision zone, is a tectonically active region in central Asia (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Arnaud et&#x20;al., 1993</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Brunel et&#x20;al., 1994</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Burtman and Molnar, 1993</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Cao et&#x20;al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Schurr et&#x20;al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Sobel et&#x20;al., 2011</xref>) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure&#x20;1</xref>) The deformation of the eastern Pamir is dominated by E-W extension along the Kongur Shan (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Robinson et&#x20;al., 2004</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Yuan et&#x20;al., 2013</xref>), a 250-km-long NW-SE-striking fault system, which can be divided into four segments from north to south: the right-lateral strike-slip Muji fault, the Kongur Shan and Muztagh Ata normal faults, the Tahman normal fault, and the Tashkurgan normal fault (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Robinson et&#x20;al., 2004</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Thiede et&#x20;al., 2013</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F1" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Tectonic setting of the Kongur Shan extensional system (KSES). Base map is a 30-m Advanced Land Observing Satellite (ALOS) DEM. Red lines delineate regional active faults, taken from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Cao et&#x20;al. (2013)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Robinson et&#x20;al. (2004)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Thiede et&#x20;al. (2013)</xref>. MF, Muji fault; KSF, Kongur Shan fault; MAF, Muztagh Ata fault; TF, Tahman fault; TKF, Tashkurgan fault. Coloured dots are the geological slip rates (mm/yr) of faults taken from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Chevalier et&#x20;al. (2015)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Pan et&#x20;al. (2013)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Chevalier et&#x20;al. (2011)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Li (2014)</xref>. Grey dots are historical earthquakes in the region from the USGS earthquake catalogue. Yellow star marks the area where <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Xu et&#x20;al. (2021)</xref> tested the parameters in the scarp degradation&#x20;model.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="feart-10-838866-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>In this study, we focus on the Muztagh Ata and Tahman faults in the southern part of the Kongur Shan extensional system (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure&#x20;1</xref>). The Muztagh Ata fault, a 70-km-long NW-SE-striking normal fault, forms the western boundary of the Muztagh Ata Mountain. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Chevalier et&#x20;al. (2015)</xref> combined geomorphic analysis and <sup>10</sup>
<italic>Be</italic> dating of alluvial terrace risers to determine the late Quaternary vertical slip rate of the southern Muztagh Ata fault. They obtained a rate of &#x223c;1.7&#xa0;mm/yr, corresponding to a NE-SW extension rate of 1.3&#x2013;2.0&#xa0;mm/yr for a fault dip of 35&#xb0;&#x2013;45&#xb0; (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Chevalier et&#x20;al., 2015</xref>) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure&#x20;1</xref>). The Tahman fault, extending 20&#xa0;km north-south, is separated into two segments by a 0.5-km step-over zone (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Li et&#x20;al., 2011</xref>). The vertical slip rate was estimated to be 2.5&#xb1;0.1&#xa0;mm/yr from <sup>10</sup>
<italic>Be</italic> dating of alluvial terraces (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Li, 2014</xref>) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure&#x20;1</xref>).</p>
<p>Both the Muztagh Ata and Tahman faults have been seismically active since the Quaternary (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Yuan et&#x20;al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Li, 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Chevalier et&#x20;al., 2015</xref>). The USGS earthquake catalogue shows that hundreds of <italic>M</italic>
<sub>
<italic>w</italic>
</sub> &#x2265; 2 earthquakes occurred in the region since 1900, including 46&#x20;<italic>M</italic>
<sub>
<italic>w</italic>
</sub> &#x2265; 5 earthquakes. The largest event that occurred in the Tashkurgan Valley is the 1895/07/05&#xa0;<italic>M</italic>
<sub>
<italic>s</italic>
</sub> 7.0 earthquake, which reached a maximum intensity of IX (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Li et&#x20;al., 2011</xref>). Up to now, the fault scarps created by the 1895&#xa0;<italic>M</italic>
<sub>
<italic>s</italic>
</sub> 7.0 Tashkurgan earthquake are well-preserved along the southern Muztagh Ata and Tahman faults (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Li et&#x20;al., 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Chevalier et&#x20;al., 2015</xref>). Nonetheless, due to difficulties in palaeoseismic trenching and sampling in the area, the regional earthquake history remains largely unknown.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3">
<title>3 Modelling Fault Scarp Degradation</title>
<p>The scarps along the Muztagh Ata and Tahman faults are potentially useful for constraining the timing of surface rupture events. We use the well-established scarp degradation model (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Culling, 1960</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">1963</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Kokkalas and Koukouvelas, 2005</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Pelletier and Cline, 2007</xref>) to analyse the relationship between scarp morphology and its age. The derivation of the model can be found in many studies, (e.g., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Andrews and Bucknam, 1987</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Roering et&#x20;al., 1999</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Pelletier and Cline, 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Xu et&#x20;al., 2021</xref>). Here, we briefly introduce the set-up of the&#x20;model.</p>
<p>Sediment flux <italic>S</italic>(<italic>x</italic>) down surface topography <italic>h</italic> is related to local slope <inline-formula id="inf1">
<mml:math id="m1">
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>h</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>x</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> and a diffusion coefficient <italic>f</italic>(<italic>h</italic>):<disp-formula id="e1">
<mml:math id="m2">
<mml:mi>S</mml:mi>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>x</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>f</mml:mi>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>h</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
<mml:mo>&#x22c5;</mml:mo>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>h</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>x</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:math>
<label>(1)</label>
</disp-formula>where we take a nonlinear diffusion coefficient <italic>f</italic>(<italic>h</italic>) that follows the general form (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Andrews and Bucknam, 1987</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Pelletier and Cline, 2007</xref>):<disp-formula id="e2">
<mml:math id="m3">
<mml:mi>f</mml:mi>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>h</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>k</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>min</mml:mi>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>c</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>;</mml:mo>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>h</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>x</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
<mml:mo>/</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>S</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>c</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:math>
<label>(2)</label>
</disp-formula>where <italic>k</italic> is a constant, <italic>S</italic>
<sub>
<italic>c</italic>
</sub> is the critical slope, <italic>n</italic> is an empirical exponent, and <italic>c</italic> is a threshold to limit the maximum ratio between the hillslope and the critical slope&#x20;<italic>S</italic>
<sub>
<italic>c</italic>
</sub>.</p>
<p>The continuity equation is used to relate sediment flux and the evolution of topography with time <inline-formula id="inf2">
<mml:math id="m4">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x2202;</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>h</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x2202;</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>:<disp-formula id="e3">
<mml:math id="m5">
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3c1;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>s</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x2202;</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>h</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x2202;</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3c1;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>s</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x25bd;</mml:mo>
<mml:mo>&#x22c5;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>S</mml:mi>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>x</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3c1;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>r</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>C</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>0</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:math>
<label>(3)</label>
</disp-formula>where <italic>&#x3c1;</italic>
<sub>
<italic>s</italic>
</sub> and <italic>&#x3c1;</italic>
<sub>
<italic>r</italic>
</sub> are the bulk densities of sediment and rock, and <italic>C</italic>
<sub>0</sub> is the subsidence/uplift&#x20;rate.</p>
<p>Combining <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="e1">Equations 1</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="e3">3</xref>, and ignoring the subsidence/uplift term <italic>&#x3c1;</italic>
<sub>
<italic>r</italic>
</sub>
<italic>C</italic>
<sub>0</sub>, we derive the nonlinear model for scarp degradation:<disp-formula id="e4">
<mml:math id="m6">
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x2202;</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>h</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x2202;</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mo>&#x25bd;</mml:mo>
<mml:mo>&#x22c5;</mml:mo>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="[" close="]">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>k</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>min</mml:mi>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>c</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>h</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>x</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
<mml:mo>/</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>S</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>c</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>h</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>x</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:math>
<label>(4)</label>
</disp-formula>The method is best suitable for normal fault scarps, the shape of which is less affected by gravity. Reliable estimates of the geomorphological parameters in the diffusion model (<italic>k</italic>, <italic>S</italic>
<sub>
<italic>c</italic>
</sub>, <italic>n</italic>, and <italic>c</italic>) need to be obtained first by local geological survey. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Xu et&#x20;al. (2021)</xref> have analysed the fluvial terrace riser degradation along the Kongur Shan fault ( &#x223c;130&#xa0;km north of our study area, yellow star in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure&#x20;1</xref>) in great detail. They tested a variety of parameters in the diffusion model, and obtained the best-fit by comparing the ages derived from morphological modelling to those from geological dating. We use their best-fitting parameters (<italic>k</italic>&#x20;&#x3d; 1, <italic>n</italic>&#x20;&#x3d; 2, <italic>c</italic>&#x20;&#x3d; 0.99, <italic>S</italic>
<sub>
<italic>c</italic>
</sub> &#x3d; tan&#x2009;33&#xb0;) in our study because the sediment transport processes should be similar given the close distance. The geometry of a scarp at its formation is determined by the initial slope angle and vertical offset. Also, a scarp degrades faster with a steeper slope. The typical vertical offset is associated with earthquake slip. We use an initial slope angle of 35&#xb0; [average value from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Li. (2014)</xref>] and a typical vertical offset of 2.5&#xa0;m from a single event [from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Li et&#x20;al. (2011)</xref>].</p>
<p>Using <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="e4">Equation 4</xref>, we model the evolution of fault scarp with time. We assume repeating earthquakes every 2&#xa0;kyrs, i.e.,&#x20;earthquakes occur at 0, 2, 4, 6&#xa0;kyr with a vertical offset of 2.5&#xa0;m (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figures&#x20;2A,D,G,J</xref>). This value is chosen based on the geomorphological dating in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Chevalier et&#x20;al. (2015)</xref>, which suggests that the oldest geomorphic surface along the Muztagh Ata fault (&#x223c;20&#xa0;kyrs) may have recorded &#x223c;10 large earthquakes. We calculate the slope (first derivative of topography with respect to horizontal distance, <inline-formula id="inf3">
<mml:math id="m7">
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>h</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>x</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figures&#x20;2B,E,H,K</xref>), as well as the second derivative <inline-formula id="inf4">
<mml:math id="m8">
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
<mml:mi>h</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>x</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> in order to remove the regional topographic gradient of the natural earth&#x2019;s surface (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figures&#x20;2C,F,I,L</xref>). As shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure&#x20;2</xref>, the most significant feature is that the width of the scarp widens. We find that the second derivative of the scarp can be described by a modified Gaussian pulse function:<disp-formula id="e5">
<mml:math id="m9">
<mml:mi>g</mml:mi>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>x</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
<mml:mo>&#x22c5;</mml:mo>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>x</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3c3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
<mml:mo>&#x22c5;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>exp</mml:mi>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>x</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3c3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>4</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
<mml:mo>/</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:math>
<label>(5)</label>
</disp-formula>where <italic>x</italic> is the distance, and <italic>&#x3c3;</italic> is an exponential factor to be determined.</p>
<fig id="F2" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 2</label>
<caption>
<p>Modelling fault scarp degradation. The parameters are: slope &#x3d; 35&#xb0;, critical slope &#x3d; 33&#xb0;, the vertical offset of a single event &#x3d; 2.5&#xa0;m, recurrence interval &#x3d; 2&#xa0;kyrs. We calculate the evolution of the fault scarp from 0 to 7&#xa0;kyrs after its formation. <bold>(A&#x2013;C)</bold> The widths at 0 and 1&#xa0;kyr are 9.3 and 14.9&#xa0;m, respectively. <bold>(D&#x2013;F)</bold> The widths at 2 and 3&#xa0;kyr are 19.0 and 23.7&#xa0;m, respectively. <bold>(G&#x2013;I)</bold> The widths at 4 and 5&#xa0;kyr are 26.9 and 32.0&#xa0;m, respectively. <bold>(J&#x2013;L)</bold> The widths at 6 and 7&#xa0;kyr are 34.7 and 40.1&#xa0;m, respectively. The width of the fault scarp increases with&#x20;time.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="feart-10-838866-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>We use the Gaussian pulse function to define the width of fault scarp: the distance between two points with <inline-formula id="inf89">
<mml:math id="m89">
<mml:mi>g</mml:mi>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>(<italic>x</italic>) equals to 10<sup>&#x2212;4</sup> and &#x2212;10<sup>&#x2212;4</sup> (<inline-formula id="inf83">
<mml:math id="m87">
<mml:mi>g</mml:mi>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>(<italic>x</italic>) &#x3d; 0 gives an infinite <italic>x</italic>, grey line in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure&#x20;2C</xref>). The second derivative is advantageous over topography and slope (the first derivative) because it provides a mathematical description of the scarp morphology and therefore avoids artificial identification of scarp end points. The scarp width (also referred to as the bandwidth of the best-fitting Gaussian pulse function) increases from the initial value of 9.3&#xa0;m after the first event, to 19.0&#xa0;m after the second event, to 26.9&#xa0;m after the third event, and to 34.7&#xa0;m following the fourth event. We plot the bandwidth-time in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure&#x20;3</xref> and find that the changes in scarp widths can be fitted well with a 1st (black dash line) and 2nd order (red solid line) polynomial. We did not use the 1st order polynomial given that the degradation process is unlikely to be at a constant rate, but should slow down with increasing widths.</p>
<fig id="F3" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 3</label>
<caption>
<p>Empirical time-width relationship assuming offset &#x3d; 2.5&#xa0;m and recurrence interval &#x3d; 2&#xa0;kyrs. Black dashed line and red line are the first- and second-order polynomial regressions. Red stars indicate the occurrence of earthquakes.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="feart-10-838866-g003.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s4">
<title>4 Testing the Sensitivity of Scarp Width to Different Earthquake Slip Modes</title>
<p>To investigate how the initial parameters in the model including earthquake recurrence intervals and offsets affect the time-width relationship, we simulated four different earthquake modes: 1) offset &#x3d; 2 m, recurrence interval &#x3d; 2&#xa0;kyrs; 2) offset &#x3d; 2.5&#xa0;m, recurrence interval &#x3d; 2&#xa0;kyrs; 3) offset &#x3d; 2.5&#xa0;m, recurrence interval &#x3d; 3&#xa0;kyrs; 4) offsets &#x3d; 2.5, 3.5, 2.5, and 1.5&#xa0;m, with recurrence intervals of 3, 2, and 1&#xa0;kyr, respectively. The time-width relationships of the four earthquake modes are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure&#x20;4</xref>.</p>
<fig id="F4" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 4</label>
<caption>
<p>Scarp time-width relationships from different earthquake modes. Mode 1 (purple): offset &#x3d; 2&#xa0;m, recurrence interval &#x3d; 2&#xa0;kyrs. Mode 2 (red): offset &#x3d; 2.5&#xa0;m, recurrence interval &#x3d; 2&#xa0;kyrs. Mode 3 (green): offset &#x3d; 2.5&#xa0;m, recurrence interval &#x3d; 3&#xa0;kyrs. Mode 4 (blue): offsets &#x3d; 2.5, 3.5, 2.5, and 1.5&#xa0;m, with corresponding recurrence intervals of 3, 2 and 1&#xa0;kyrs, respectively. Stars indicate the occurrence of earthquakes.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="feart-10-838866-g004.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Comparing modes 2 (red line) and 3 (green line), we noted that scarp width increases more rapidly with shorter recurrence intervals. For a scarp width of 35.2&#xa0;m (the maximum scarp width observed in this study), the inferred ages from modes 2 and 3 are 6.0&#xa0;kyrs before the present (BP) and 7.1&#xa0;kyrs BP, respectively. Given that most scarps in our study area are narrower than 30&#xa0;m, the age uncertainties caused by the initial recurrence interval in the model set-up should be within &#x223c;1&#xa0;kyr. The difference between modes 1 (purple line) and 2 (red line) in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure&#x20;4</xref> shows that larger offsets create wider scarps. Based on the time-width relationships, the age estimates of the widest scarp (35.2&#xa0;m) are 7.6 kyrs BP (mode 1) and 6.0 kyrs BP (mode&#x20;2).</p>
<p>The actual earthquake rupture history is often more complicated, with different slips and recurrence intervals (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">Zielke et&#x20;al., 2015</xref>). To test this scenario, we vary the offsets from 1.5 to 3.5&#xa0;m, and recurrence intervals from 1&#xa0;kyr to 3&#xa0;kyrs. Interestingly, the time-width relationship of mode 4 is similar to that from mode 2, the long-term fault slip rates of which are equal (1.25&#xa0;mm/yr). This means that the change in width of a fault scarp is ultimately determined by the fault slip rate. The simulations also suggest that although the time-width relationship varies with the assumed earthquake offsets and recurrence intervals, the age uncertainty for scarps of narrower than 30&#xa0;m seems to be less than 1.4 kyr. By analysing a large amount of fault scarps, we may further bring down the uncertainty.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s5">
<title>5 Data and Results</title>
<sec id="s5-1">
<title>5.1 Mapping Fault Scarps From High-Resolution Stereo Data</title>
<p>We purchased 0.5&#xa0;m resolution WorldView-2 stereo imagery covering a 30&#xa0;km long segment of the southern Muztagh Ata and Tahman faults to investigate the regional earthquake history, including the 1895&#xa0;<italic>M</italic>
<sub>
<italic>s</italic>
</sub> 7.0 Tashkurgan rupture (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure&#x20;1</xref>). The Leica Photogrammetry Suite in ERDAS was used to process the stereo imagery. We generated 63 tie points automatically and removed those mismatches, yielding a root-mean-square error of &#x223c;0.1 pixels. A pixel-by-pixel matching procedure was performed to produce a dense point cloud with a search window size of 5&#xd7;5 pixels (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Zhou et&#x20;al., 2015</xref>). The extracted point cloud was then gridded with 1-m spacing to derive the WorldView-2 digital elevation model (DEM) (coordinate system: WGS84 UTM 43&#xa0;N). The WorldView-2 images were then orthorectified using the 1-m&#x20;DEM.</p>
<p>Based on the WorldView-2 orthoimage and DEM, we mapped a 26-km-long fault trace (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure&#x20;6A</xref>). We extracted elevation stacking profiles (20-m wide, 100-m long) across the mapped fault scarps (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figures&#x20;5A,B,E,F</xref> for example). To make sure that the offsets are estimated correctly, we removed those profiles that cross different geomorphic surfaces (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Bi et&#x20;al., 2018</xref>). We measured the offsets by fitting two straight lines to each side of the fault, and calculated the minimum and maximum distances between the two lines (see <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figures 5C,G</xref> for example). A total of 68 vertical offsets ranging from 1.2 to 14.8&#xa0;m were obtained (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure&#x20;6E</xref> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table&#x20;1</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F5" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 5</label>
<caption>
<p>Examples of scarp width calculation. <bold>(A)</bold> WorldView-2 panchromatic orthoimage. <bold>(B)</bold> Shaded WorldView-2 DEM of the scarp. The polygon shows the swath profile. <bold>(C)</bold> Estimating the vertical offset of the scarp. Blue solid line shows the topography across the scarp. Green lines are the best-fitting straight lines to each side of the scarp that are used to calculate the vertical offsets. <bold>(D)</bold> Estimating the scarp width by a single Gaussian pulse. Black dots trace the <inline-formula id="inf5">
<mml:math id="m10">
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
<mml:mi>h</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>x</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> profile of the observed scarp. Red solid line is the best-fitting Gaussian pulse function. <bold>(E&#x2013;H)</bold> Same as <bold>(A)-(D)</bold>, but for an older scarp. The positions of the scarps are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure&#x20;1</xref> with green triangles.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="feart-10-838866-g005.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig id="F6" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 6</label>
<caption>
<p>Scarp width probability distribution (SWPD) and cumulative offset probability distribution (COPD). <bold>(A)</bold> WorldView-2 DEM shows the fault trace (black solid lines). Coloured dots are the locations of the scarp measurements. Red star marks the epicentre of the 1895 earthquake, inferred by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Li et&#x20;al. (2011)</xref>. <bold>(B)</bold> SWPD of the southern Muztagh Ata and Tahman faults, showing four peaks at 11.2, 20.7, 24.3 and 33.4&#xa0;m. <bold>(C)</bold> The distribution of scarp width along the faults. Measurements (with 1-<italic>&#x3c3;</italic>) are clustered in four groups (11.2&#xb1;1.9, 20.7&#xb1;2.3, 24.3&#xb1;1.9 and 33.4&#xb1;2.4&#xa0;m). <bold>(D)</bold> The empirical width-offset relationship. <bold>(E)</bold> Along-fault distribution of vertical offsets.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="feart-10-838866-g006.tif"/>
</fig>
<table-wrap id="T1" position="float">
<label>TABLE 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Measurements of 68 fault scarps. Profiles 8 and 25 are the selected examples shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure&#x20;5</xref>.</p>
</caption>
<table>
<thead valign="top">
<tr>
<th align="left">Profile id</th>
<th align="center">Latitude (&#xb0;)</th>
<th align="center">Longitude (&#xb0;)</th>
<th align="center">Distance (km)</th>
<th align="center">Width (m)</th>
<th align="center">1-<italic>&#x3c3;</italic> (m)</th>
<th align="center">Vertical offset (m)</th>
<th align="center">1-<italic>&#x3c3;</italic> (m)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td align="left">1</td>
<td align="char" char=".">38.077&#x2009;20</td>
<td align="char" char=".">75.216&#x2009;02</td>
<td align="char" char=".">1.750</td>
<td align="char" char=".">25.0</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.9</td>
<td align="char" char=".">5.8</td>
<td align="char" char=".">3.0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">2</td>
<td align="char" char=".">38.060&#x2009;38</td>
<td align="char" char=".">75.222&#x2009;49</td>
<td align="char" char=".">3.700</td>
<td align="char" char=".">35.2</td>
<td align="char" char=".">2.3</td>
<td align="char" char=".">11.2</td>
<td align="char" char=".">1.3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">3</td>
<td align="char" char=".">38.052&#x2009;40</td>
<td align="char" char=".">75.226&#x2009;11</td>
<td align="char" char=".">4.678</td>
<td align="char" char=".">21.8</td>
<td align="char" char=".">1.5</td>
<td align="char" char=".">10.1</td>
<td align="char" char=".">1.7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">4</td>
<td align="char" char=".">38.051&#x2009;95</td>
<td align="char" char=".">75.226&#x2009;39</td>
<td align="char" char=".">4.747</td>
<td align="char" char=".">28.1</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.8</td>
<td align="char" char=".">7.7</td>
<td align="char" char=".">2.3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">5</td>
<td align="char" char=".">38.050&#x2009;57</td>
<td align="char" char=".">75.227&#x2009;54</td>
<td align="char" char=".">4.920</td>
<td align="char" char=".">26.3</td>
<td align="char" char=".">1.8</td>
<td align="char" char=".">11.0</td>
<td align="char" char=".">2.6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">6</td>
<td align="char" char=".">38.049&#x2009;19</td>
<td align="char" char=".">75.228&#x2009;73</td>
<td align="char" char=".">5.100</td>
<td align="char" char=".">20.2</td>
<td align="char" char=".">1.0</td>
<td align="char" char=".">8.8</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">7</td>
<td align="char" char=".">38.048&#x2009;75</td>
<td align="char" char=".">75.228&#x2009;92</td>
<td align="char" char=".">5.152</td>
<td align="char" char=".">22.0</td>
<td align="char" char=".">1.7</td>
<td align="char" char=".">9.8</td>
<td align="char" char=".">2.9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">8</td>
<td align="char" char=".">38.047&#x2009;82</td>
<td align="char" char=".">75.229&#x2009;12</td>
<td align="char" char=".">5.245</td>
<td align="char" char=".">32.5</td>
<td align="char" char=".">1.0</td>
<td align="char" char=".">14.8</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">9</td>
<td align="char" char=".">38.023&#x2009;51</td>
<td align="char" char=".">75.242&#x2009;31</td>
<td align="char" char=".">8.100</td>
<td align="char" char=".">24.4</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.8</td>
<td align="char" char=".">5.6</td>
<td align="char" char=".">1.7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">10</td>
<td align="char" char=".">38.022&#x2009;84</td>
<td align="char" char=".">75.243&#x2009;26</td>
<td align="char" char=".">8.265</td>
<td align="char" char=".">14.8</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.4</td>
<td align="char" char=".">4.4</td>
<td align="char" char=".">2.4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">11</td>
<td align="char" char=".">38.022&#x2009;54</td>
<td align="char" char=".">75.243&#x2009;82</td>
<td align="char" char=".">8.321</td>
<td align="char" char=".">11.5</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.4</td>
<td align="char" char=".">3.7</td>
<td align="char" char=".">1.5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">12</td>
<td align="char" char=".">38.022&#x2009;13</td>
<td align="char" char=".">75.244&#x2009;28</td>
<td align="char" char=".">8.398</td>
<td align="char" char=".">9.4</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.4</td>
<td align="char" char=".">5.4</td>
<td align="char" char=".">1.4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">13</td>
<td align="char" char=".">38.021&#x2009;66</td>
<td align="char" char=".">75.244&#x2009;39</td>
<td align="char" char=".">8.446</td>
<td align="char" char=".">21.4</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.5</td>
<td align="char" char=".">9.3</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">14</td>
<td align="char" char=".">38.021&#x2009;21</td>
<td align="char" char=".">75.244&#x2009;69</td>
<td align="char" char=".">8.492</td>
<td align="char" char=".">14.7</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.6</td>
<td align="char" char=".">2.7</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">15</td>
<td align="char" char=".">38.020&#x2009;76</td>
<td align="char" char=".">75.245&#x2009;15</td>
<td align="char" char=".">8.555</td>
<td align="char" char=".">20.4</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.6</td>
<td align="char" char=".">6.1</td>
<td align="char" char=".">1.6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">16</td>
<td align="char" char=".">38.017&#x2009;76</td>
<td align="char" char=".">75.245&#x2009;32</td>
<td align="char" char=".">8.975</td>
<td align="char" char=".">10.4</td>
<td align="char" char=".">1.0</td>
<td align="char" char=".">3.8</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">17</td>
<td align="char" char=".">38.016&#x2009;38</td>
<td align="char" char=".">75.244&#x2009;88</td>
<td align="char" char=".">9.134</td>
<td align="char" char=".">33.6</td>
<td align="char" char=".">2.1</td>
<td align="char" char=".">7.1</td>
<td align="char" char=".">2.7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">18</td>
<td align="char" char=".">38.013&#x2009;84</td>
<td align="char" char=".">75.238&#x2009;58</td>
<td align="char" char=".">9.650</td>
<td align="char" char=".">9.8</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.5</td>
<td align="char" char=".">2.2</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">19-a</td>
<td align="char" char=".">38.013&#x2009;54</td>
<td align="char" char=".">75.237&#x2009;97</td>
<td align="char" char=".">9.710</td>
<td align="char" char=".">10.3</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.5</td>
<td align="char" char=".">3.2</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">19-b</td>
<td align="char" char=".">38.013&#x2009;54</td>
<td align="char" char=".">75.237&#x2009;97</td>
<td align="char" char=".">9.710</td>
<td align="char" char=".">8.2</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.7</td>
<td align="char" char=".">2.1</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">20</td>
<td align="char" char=".">38.012&#x2009;71</td>
<td align="char" char=".">75.237&#x2009;18</td>
<td align="char" char=".">9.770</td>
<td align="char" char=".">12.1</td>
<td align="char" char=".">1.1</td>
<td align="char" char=".">1.2</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">21</td>
<td align="char" char=".">38.012&#x2009;23</td>
<td align="char" char=".">75.236&#x2009;75</td>
<td align="char" char=".">9.836</td>
<td align="char" char=".">12.1</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.7</td>
<td align="char" char=".">1.6</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">22</td>
<td align="char" char=".">38.011&#x2009;78</td>
<td align="char" char=".">75.236&#x2009;47</td>
<td align="char" char=".">9.873</td>
<td align="char" char=".">19.1</td>
<td align="char" char=".">2.1</td>
<td align="char" char=".">4.0</td>
<td align="char" char=".">1.3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">23</td>
<td align="char" char=".">38.011&#x2009;33</td>
<td align="char" char=".">75.236&#x2009;31</td>
<td align="char" char=".">9.925</td>
<td align="char" char=".">25.0</td>
<td align="char" char=".">1.1</td>
<td align="char" char=".">6.7</td>
<td align="char" char=".">1.6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">24</td>
<td align="char" char=".">38.010&#x2009;40</td>
<td align="char" char=".">75.235&#x2009;82</td>
<td align="char" char=".">10.063</td>
<td align="char" char=".">20.6</td>
<td align="char" char=".">1.1</td>
<td align="char" char=".">4.8</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">25</td>
<td align="char" char=".">38.009&#x2009;94</td>
<td align="char" char=".">75.235&#x2009;56</td>
<td align="char" char=".">10.106</td>
<td align="char" char=".">12.1</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.2</td>
<td align="char" char=".">4.2</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">26</td>
<td align="char" char=".">38.008&#x2009;58</td>
<td align="char" char=".">75.235&#x2009;57</td>
<td align="char" char=".">10.241</td>
<td align="char" char=".">23.8</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.6</td>
<td align="char" char=".">5.7</td>
<td align="char" char=".">1.0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">27</td>
<td align="char" char=".">38.008&#x2009;09</td>
<td align="char" char=".">75.235&#x2009;62</td>
<td align="char" char=".">10.291</td>
<td align="char" char=".">23.2</td>
<td align="char" char=".">1.3</td>
<td align="char" char=".">5.3</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">28</td>
<td align="char" char=".">38.007&#x2009;66</td>
<td align="char" char=".">75.235&#x2009;66</td>
<td align="char" char=".">10.365</td>
<td align="char" char=".">9.1</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.2</td>
<td align="char" char=".">3.2</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">29</td>
<td align="char" char=".">38.003&#x2009;23</td>
<td align="char" char=".">75.236&#x2009;51</td>
<td align="char" char=".">10.793</td>
<td align="char" char=".">17.1</td>
<td align="char" char=".">1.1</td>
<td align="char" char=".">4.0</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">30</td>
<td align="char" char=".">38.001&#x2009;47</td>
<td align="char" char=".">75.235&#x2009;86</td>
<td align="char" char=".">11.026</td>
<td align="char" char=".">12.7</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.5</td>
<td align="char" char=".">3.9</td>
<td align="char" char=".">1.1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">31</td>
<td align="char" char=".">37.999&#x2009;18</td>
<td align="char" char=".">75.235&#x2009;48</td>
<td align="char" char=".">11.253</td>
<td align="char" char=".">29.5</td>
<td align="char" char=".">1.0</td>
<td align="char" char=".">12.0</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">32</td>
<td align="char" char=".">37.997&#x2009;95</td>
<td align="char" char=".">75.235&#x2009;10</td>
<td align="char" char=".">11.393</td>
<td align="char" char=".">9.7</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.2</td>
<td align="char" char=".">3.8</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">33-a</td>
<td align="char" char=".">37.997&#x2009;05</td>
<td align="char" char=".">75.234&#x2009;56</td>
<td align="char" char=".">11.472</td>
<td align="char" char=".">18.9</td>
<td align="char" char=".">1.8</td>
<td align="char" char=".">6.2</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">33-b</td>
<td align="char" char=".">37.997&#x2009;05</td>
<td align="char" char=".">75.234&#x2009;56</td>
<td align="char" char=".">11.472</td>
<td align="char" char=".">15.8</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.8</td>
<td align="char" char=".">4.5</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">34</td>
<td align="char" char=".">37.996&#x2009;68</td>
<td align="char" char=".">75.234&#x2009;00</td>
<td align="char" char=".">11.542</td>
<td align="char" char=".">25.0</td>
<td align="char" char=".">1.6</td>
<td align="char" char=".">6.1</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">35</td>
<td align="char" char=".">37.996&#x2009;41</td>
<td align="char" char=".">75.233&#x2009;42</td>
<td align="char" char=".">11.560</td>
<td align="char" char=".">14.8</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.4</td>
<td align="char" char=".">5.5</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">36</td>
<td align="char" char=".">37.996&#x2009;29</td>
<td align="char" char=".">75.232&#x2009;84</td>
<td align="char" char=".">11.610</td>
<td align="char" char=".">13.1</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.6</td>
<td align="char" char=".">2.4</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">37</td>
<td align="char" char=".">37.995&#x2009;93</td>
<td align="char" char=".">75.231&#x2009;70</td>
<td align="char" char=".">11.683</td>
<td align="char" char=".">26.8</td>
<td align="char" char=".">1.9</td>
<td align="char" char=".">6.1</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">38</td>
<td align="char" char=".">37.995&#x2009;09</td>
<td align="char" char=".">75.227&#x2009;40</td>
<td align="char" char=".">11.940</td>
<td align="char" char=".">25.3</td>
<td align="char" char=".">1.2</td>
<td align="char" char=".">4.1</td>
<td align="char" char=".">2.0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">39</td>
<td align="char" char=".">37.995&#x2009;09</td>
<td align="char" char=".">75.227&#x2009;40</td>
<td align="char" char=".">12.692</td>
<td align="char" char=".">23.0</td>
<td align="char" char=".">1.9</td>
<td align="char" char=".">3.8</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">40</td>
<td align="char" char=".">37.989&#x2009;11</td>
<td align="char" char=".">75.220&#x2009;35</td>
<td align="char" char=".">12.792</td>
<td align="char" char=".">11.6</td>
<td align="char" char=".">1.1</td>
<td align="char" char=".">1.4</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">41</td>
<td align="char" char=".">37.986&#x2009;99</td>
<td align="char" char=".">75.218&#x2009;97</td>
<td align="char" char=".">13.048</td>
<td align="char" char=".">18.4</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.4</td>
<td align="char" char=".">3.4</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">42</td>
<td align="char" char=".">37.986&#x2009;55</td>
<td align="char" char=".">75.218&#x2009;78</td>
<td align="char" char=".">13.104</td>
<td align="char" char=".">18.4</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.7</td>
<td align="char" char=".">3.8</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">43</td>
<td align="char" char=".">37.986&#x2009;08</td>
<td align="char" char=".">75.218&#x2009;59</td>
<td align="char" char=".">13.184</td>
<td align="char" char=".">11.7</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.4</td>
<td align="char" char=".">1.7</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">44</td>
<td align="char" char=".">37.982&#x2009;35</td>
<td align="char" char=".">75.217&#x2009;55</td>
<td align="char" char=".">13.594</td>
<td align="char" char=".">13.1</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.6</td>
<td align="char" char=".">3.1</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">45</td>
<td align="char" char=".">37.981&#x2009;88</td>
<td align="char" char=".">75.217&#x2009;34</td>
<td align="char" char=".">13.656</td>
<td align="char" char=".">10.8</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.6</td>
<td align="char" char=".">1.7</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">46</td>
<td align="char" char=".">37.977&#x2009;15</td>
<td align="char" char=".">75.211&#x2009;37</td>
<td align="char" char=".">14.395</td>
<td align="char" char=".">9.1</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.6</td>
<td align="char" char=".">2.4</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">47</td>
<td align="char" char=".">37.976&#x2009;46</td>
<td align="char" char=".">75.210&#x2009;37</td>
<td align="char" char=".">14.536</td>
<td align="char" char=".">9.6</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.6</td>
<td align="char" char=".">2.8</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">48</td>
<td align="char" char=".">37.976&#x2009;09</td>
<td align="char" char=".">75.209&#x2009;79</td>
<td align="char" char=".">14.599</td>
<td align="char" char=".">11.2</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.4</td>
<td align="char" char=".">1.9</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">49</td>
<td align="char" char=".">37.972&#x2009;87</td>
<td align="char" char=".">75.207&#x2009;84</td>
<td align="char" char=".">14.912</td>
<td align="char" char=".">14.6</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.8</td>
<td align="char" char=".">1.6</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">50</td>
<td align="char" char=".">37.971&#x2009;55</td>
<td align="char" char=".">75.207&#x2009;54</td>
<td align="char" char=".">15.108</td>
<td align="char" char=".">20.0</td>
<td align="char" char=".">1.0</td>
<td align="char" char=".">2.3</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">51</td>
<td align="char" char=".">37.971&#x2009;42</td>
<td align="char" char=".">75.205&#x2009;78</td>
<td align="char" char=".">15.222</td>
<td align="char" char=".">10.1</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.5</td>
<td align="char" char=".">1.4</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">52</td>
<td align="char" char=".">37.970&#x2009;26</td>
<td align="char" char=".">75.204&#x2009;73</td>
<td align="char" char=".">15.300</td>
<td align="char" char=".">20.0</td>
<td align="char" char=".">1.2</td>
<td align="char" char=".">3.5</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">53</td>
<td align="char" char=".">37.969&#x2009;33</td>
<td align="char" char=".">75.204&#x2009;53</td>
<td align="char" char=".">15.443</td>
<td align="char" char=".">11.8</td>
<td align="char" char=".">1.3</td>
<td align="char" char=".">1.4</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">54</td>
<td align="char" char=".">37.964&#x2009;95</td>
<td align="char" char=".">75.201&#x2009;25</td>
<td align="char" char=".">15.992</td>
<td align="char" char=".">10.8</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.5</td>
<td align="char" char=".">2.0</td>
<td align="char" char=".">1.1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">55</td>
<td align="char" char=".">37.964&#x2009;48</td>
<td align="char" char=".">75.200&#x2009;68</td>
<td align="char" char=".">16.065</td>
<td align="char" char=".">9.8</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.5</td>
<td align="char" char=".">3.1</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">56</td>
<td align="char" char=".">37.962&#x2009;88</td>
<td align="char" char=".">75.199&#x2009;74</td>
<td align="char" char=".">16.288</td>
<td align="char" char=".">10.9</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.5</td>
<td align="char" char=".">1.7</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">57</td>
<td align="char" char=".">37.962&#x2009;49</td>
<td align="char" char=".">75.199&#x2009;28</td>
<td align="char" char=".">16.331</td>
<td align="char" char=".">10.5</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.8</td>
<td align="char" char=".">1.4</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">58</td>
<td align="char" char=".">37.942&#x2009;10</td>
<td align="char" char=".">75.194&#x2009;37</td>
<td align="char" char=".">18.645</td>
<td align="char" char=".">17.4</td>
<td align="char" char=".">1.3</td>
<td align="char" char=".">3.3</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">59</td>
<td align="char" char=".">37.941&#x2009;18</td>
<td align="char" char=".">75.193&#x2009;94</td>
<td align="char" char=".">18.757</td>
<td align="char" char=".">21.6</td>
<td align="char" char=".">1.5</td>
<td align="char" char=".">3.1</td>
<td align="char" char=".">1.7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">60</td>
<td align="char" char=".">37.941&#x2009;18</td>
<td align="char" char=".">75.193&#x2009;94</td>
<td align="char" char=".">18.858</td>
<td align="char" char=".">24.0</td>
<td align="char" char=".">1.7</td>
<td align="char" char=".">10.0</td>
<td align="char" char=".">2.9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">61</td>
<td align="char" char=".">37.941&#x2009;18</td>
<td align="char" char=".">75.193&#x2009;94</td>
<td align="char" char=".">23.195</td>
<td align="char" char=".">17.2</td>
<td align="char" char=".">2.2</td>
<td align="char" char=".">1.8</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">62</td>
<td align="char" char=".">37.901&#x2009;17</td>
<td align="char" char=".">75.172&#x2009;75</td>
<td align="char" char=".">23.478</td>
<td align="char" char=".">7.1</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.5</td>
<td align="char" char=".">1.7</td>
<td align="char" char=".">1.6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">63</td>
<td align="char" char=".">37.901&#x2009;17</td>
<td align="char" char=".">75.172&#x2009;75</td>
<td align="char" char=".">23.802</td>
<td align="char" char=".">9.3</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.3</td>
<td align="char" char=".">1.6</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">64</td>
<td align="char" char=".">37.901&#x2009;17</td>
<td align="char" char=".">75.172&#x2009;75</td>
<td align="char" char=".">23.859</td>
<td align="char" char=".">10.1</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.2</td>
<td align="char" char=".">2.3</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">65</td>
<td align="char" char=".">37.901&#x2009;17</td>
<td align="char" char=".">75.172&#x2009;75</td>
<td align="char" char=".">24.976</td>
<td align="char" char=".">12.2</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.5</td>
<td align="char" char=".">1.5</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">66</td>
<td align="char" char=".">37.901&#x2009;17</td>
<td align="char" char=".">75.172&#x2009;75</td>
<td align="char" char=".">25.015</td>
<td align="char" char=".">13.1</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.9</td>
<td align="char" char=".">1.7</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.9</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="s5-2">
<title>5.2 Calculating Scarp Width</title>
<p>Based on the elevation stacking profiles extracted from the WorldView-2 DEM, we calculated <inline-formula id="inf6">
<mml:math id="m11">
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
<mml:mi>h</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>x</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> for each of the 68 scarps, and then estimated the scarp width by fitting a Gaussian pulse function. Since some scarps have recorded multiple earthquakes, <inline-formula id="inf7">
<mml:math id="m12">
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
<mml:mi>h</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>x</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> may show more than one peak (as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure&#x20;5H</xref>), in which case we use a double pulses function:<disp-formula id="e6">
<mml:math id="m13">
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>g</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2032;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>x</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x22c5;</mml:mo>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>x</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>b</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3c3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
<mml:mo>&#x22c5;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>exp</mml:mi>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>x</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>b</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3c3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>4</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
<mml:mo>/</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
<mml:mspace width="0.3333em"/>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x22c5;</mml:mo>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>x</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>b</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3c3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
<mml:mo>&#x22c5;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>exp</mml:mi>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>x</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>b</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3c3;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>4</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
<mml:mo>/</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
</mml:math>
<label>(6)</label>
</disp-formula>where <italic>a</italic>
<sub>1</sub>, <italic>b</italic>
<sub>1</sub>, <italic>&#x3c3;</italic>
<sub>1</sub>, <italic>a</italic>
<sub>2</sub>, <italic>b</italic>
<sub>2</sub> and <italic>&#x3c3;</italic>
<sub>2</sub> are the coefficients that can be determined by fitting the equation to the profile.</p>
<p>After solving for the best-fitting pulse function using a least-squares adjustment, we compute the widths of all the scarps along the faults (see <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figures 5D,H</xref> for example). The scarp widths range from 7.1 to 35.2&#xa0;m (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure&#x20;6C</xref>). We use 1-<italic>&#x3c3;</italic> as the uncertainty of the width estimates.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s5-3">
<title>5.3 Probability Density Function of Scarp Widths</title>
<p>We calculated the scarp width probability distribution (SWPD) by summing up the Gaussian probability density of the 68 width measurements. The peak value and uncertainty (1-<italic>&#x3c3;</italic>) are determined by applying a normal distribution function. As shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figures 6B,C</xref>, the SWPD shows four peaks centred at 11.2&#xb1;1.9, 20.7&#xb1;2.3, 24.3&#xb1;1.9 and 33.4&#xb1;2.4&#xa0;m, respectively, indicating that the widths are clustered in four groups. If we assume that the scarps have experienced similar sediment transport processes, the clustering implies that each group of scarps may have been formed at the same time, possibly during the same earthquake. We calculated the ages of the four peaks of scarp widths from our initial empirical time-width relationship (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure&#x20;3</xref>) and obtained: 0.3&#xb1;0.4&#xa0;kyrs BP (peak 1), 2.5&#xb1;0.5&#xa0;kyrs BP (peak 2), 3.3&#xb1;0.5&#xa0;kyrs BP (peak 3) and 5.5&#xb1;0.6&#xa0;kyrs BP (peak 4), respectively (red markers in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">Figure&#x20;7A</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F7" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 7</label>
<caption>
<p>Earthquake history and vertical slip rate of the Muztagh Ata and Tahman faults. <bold>(A)</bold> The corresponding ages of the four peaks in SWPD. Red line is the initial model with assumed offset &#x3d; 2.5&#xa0;m and recurrence interval &#x3d; 2&#xa0;kyrs. Blue line is the refined model with constraints from the initial model (occurrence time: 0.3, 2.5, 3.3, 5.5&#xa0;yrs BP and offsets: 2.5, 3.2, 1.2, 3.1&#xa0;m). <bold>(B)</bold> Estimating vertical slip rate from the inferred earthquake history using the refined&#x20;model.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="feart-10-838866-g007.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s6">
<title>6 Discussion</title>
<sec id="s6-1">
<title>6.1 Earthquake History on the Muztagh Ata and Tahman Faults</title>
<p>Given that the parameters in the initial time-width relationship (recurrence interval &#x3d; 2&#xa0;kyrs and characteristic slip &#x3d; 2.5&#xa0;m) are to some extent random, we refine the relationship using the estimated earthquake timing derived from the initial model. Also, we find that the vertical offsets increase linearly with scarp widths (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure&#x20;6D</xref>), allowing us to estimate the average vertical slip of each earthquake for a given scarp width. With the new constraints on slip and timing, we refined the scarp degradation model (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">Figure&#x20;7A</xref>) and obtained four new ages: 0.1&#xb1;0.4&#xa0;kyrs BP, 2.1&#xb1;0.5&#xa0;kyrs BP, 2.9&#xb1;0.4&#xa0;kyrs BP and 4.9&#xb1;0.5&#xa0;kyrs BP, respectively. The refined model shows a good consistency with the initial model, with a difference of <inline-formula id="inf8">
<mml:math id="m14">
<mml:mo>&#x3c;</mml:mo>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>1&#xa0;kyr.</p>
<p>The SWPD reveals four earthquakes along the southern Muztagh Ata and Tahman faults in the past 6,000&#xa0;years. The inferred most recent event (&#x223c;0.1&#xa0;kyrs BP) is likely to be the 1895 Tashkurgan rupture (&#x223c;0.13 kyrs BP). We use the ages and offsets from the SWPD to estimate the fault slip rate. We excluded the most recent event as it will lead to an overestimate. We obtained a vertical slip rate of 2.2&#xb1;0.3&#xa0;mm/yr for the Muztagh Ata and Tahman faults (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">Figure&#x20;7B</xref>), in agreement with previous geological estimates of 1.7&#x2013;2.5&#xa0;mm/yr from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Chevalier et&#x20;al. (2015)</xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Li. (2014)</xref>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s6-2">
<title>6.2 Distribution of Vertical Displacements Along the Fault and Fault Segmentation</title>
<p>The vertical offsets that we obtained along the fault trace are a mixture of slip from the 1895 Tashkurgan earthquake and older events. Because the scarps formed during the most recent event should have a relatively narrow width given the shorter evolution time, we use this as a criterion to distinguish the 1895 rupture from older ruptures. We considered the scarps with a width of less than 13.1&#xa0;m as the 1895 rupture and plotted the measurements in red in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure&#x20;6E</xref>. We found that the slip of the 1895 earthquake is concentrated along the Tahman fault (between 8&#x2013;26&#xa0;km). The average vertical displacement of the 1895 rupture is 2.4&#xb1;1.2&#xa0;m (1-<italic>&#x3c3;</italic>) (consistent with our initial assumption of 2.5-m characteristic slip) with a maximum displacement of 5.5&#xb1;0.2&#xa0;m (1-<italic>&#x3c3;</italic>). According to the empirical relationships between the moment magnitude and each of the maximum and average displacements in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Wells and Coppersmith. (1994)</xref>, we obtained <italic>M</italic>
<sub>
<italic>w</italic>
</sub> 7.2 and <italic>M</italic>
<sub>
<italic>w</italic>
</sub> 7.3 for the 1895 Tashkurgan earthquake, respectively.</p>
<p>Slip distributions depicted by <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figures 6A,C,E</xref> manifest a remarkable feature of fault rupture segmentation. The surface ruptures associated with the 1895 Tashkurgan earthquake distribute only along the North-northeast-trending Tahman fault. No evident fresh scarps has been found along the North-northwest-trending Muztagh Ata fault. Although old scarps may also record the most recent rupture, it would be extraordinary that earthquake propagates along the entire fault segment without any fresh scarps. Therefore, it is likely that the intersection region acts as a fault segmentation boundary that impedes earthquake rupture from one fault segment to another (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Schwartz and Coppersmith, 1984</xref>). The Tahman fault seems to have experienced less earthquake events than the Muztagh Ata fault as most of the high and wide fault scarps are present along the Muztagh Ata fault (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figures 6C,E</xref>), suggesting different behaviours of different fault segments.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s7">
<title>7 Conclusion</title>
<p>In this study, we proposed a new approach of using fault scarp degradation model to constrain earthquake history, with applications to the Muztagh Ata and Tahman faults in the Chinese Pamir. We mapped fault scarps based on WorldView-2 stereo imagery and determined the widths of the scarps using a modified Gaussian pulse function. The measurements show that the widths of the scarps are clustered in four groups, each group representing a surface rupture event. Given the empirical time-width relationship, we calculated the timing of the earthquakes, with the youngest cluster, 0.1&#xb1;0.4 kyrs BP, corresponding to the 1895 Tashkurgan earthquake. Based on the inferred earthquake recurrence intervals and offsets, we estimated the vertical slip rate (2.2&#xb1;0.3&#xa0;mm/yr) of the Muztagh and Tahman faults, in agreement with the geological estimates of 1.7&#x2013;2.5&#xa0;mm/yr from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Chevalier et&#x20;al. (2015)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Li. (2014)</xref>. The consistent results suggest that the proposed method provides an innovative means for investigating earthquake history and can be potentially applied to other active faults where surface scarps are well-preserved.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec id="s8">
<title>Data Availability Statement</title>
<p>The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s9">
<title>Author Contributions</title>
<p>LL and YZ conceptualised and designed the research. LL performed the simulations, processed and analysed the data. YZ was responsible for the overall supervision of the data processing and analysis. The manuscript was drafted by LL and then reviewed and edited by YZ, PZ, and&#x20;XC.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s10">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>This work was supported by the Second Tibetan Plateau Scientific Expedition and Research Program (STEP) (2019QZKK0901), National Natural Science Foundation of China (41874020), Guangdong Province Introduced Innovative R&#x26;D Team of Geological Processes and Natural Disasters around the South China Sea (2016ZT06N331) and Deep Earth Exploration and Resource Environment (2017ZT07Z066).</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="COI-statement" id="s11">
<title>Conflict of Interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="disclaimer" id="s12">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s Note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Andrews</surname>
<given-names>D. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bucknam</surname>
<given-names>R. C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1987</year>). <article-title>Fitting Degradation of Shoreline Scarps by a Nonlinear Diffusion Model</article-title>. <source>J.&#x20;Geophys. Res.</source> <volume>92</volume>, <fpage>12857</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>12867</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1029/JB092iB12p12857</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Arnaud</surname>
<given-names>N. O.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Brunel</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cantagrel</surname>
<given-names>J.&#x20;M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tapponnier</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1993</year>). <article-title>High Cooling and Denudation Rates at Kongur Shan, Eastern Pamir (Xinjiang, China) Revealed by 40Ar/39Ar Alkali Feldspar Thermochronology</article-title>. <source>Tectonics</source> <volume>12</volume>, <fpage>1335</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1346</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1029/93TC00767</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Arrowsmith</surname>
<given-names>J.&#x20;R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rhodes</surname>
<given-names>D. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pollard</surname>
<given-names>D. D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1998</year>). <article-title>Morphologic Dating of Scarps Formed by Repeated Slip Events along the San Andreas Fault, Carrizo Plain, California</article-title>. <source>J.&#x20;Geophys. Res.</source> <volume>103</volume>, <fpage>10141</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>10160</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1029/98JB00505</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Avouac</surname>
<given-names>J.-P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1993</year>). <article-title>Analysis of Scarp Profiles: Evaluation of Errors in Morphologic Dating</article-title>. <source>J.&#x20;Geophys. Res.</source> <volume>98</volume>, <fpage>6745</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>6754</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1029/92JB01962</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bi</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zheng</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ge</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zeng</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yu</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Constraining the Distribution of Vertical Slip on the South Heli Shan Fault (Northeastern Tibet) from High-Resolution Topographic Data</article-title>. <source>J.&#x20;Geophys. Res. Solid Earth</source> <volume>123</volume>, <fpage>2484</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2501</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/2017JB014901</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Brunel</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Arnaud</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tapponnier</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pan</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1994</year>). <article-title>Kongur Shan normal Fault: Type Example of Mountain Building Assisted by Extension (Karakoram Fault, Eastern Pamir)</article-title>. <source>Geol</source>. <volume>22</volume>, <fpage>707</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>710</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1130/0091-7613(1994)022&#x3c;0707:ksnfte&#x3e;2.3.co;2</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Burtman</surname>
<given-names>V. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Molnar</surname>
<given-names>P. H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1993</year>). <article-title>Geological and Geophysical Evidence for Deep Subduction of continental Crust beneath the Pamir</article-title>. <source>Geol. Soc. America</source> <volume>281</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>76</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1130/spe281-p1</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Cao</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bernet</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>G.-C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>van der Beek</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>K.-X.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Focused Pliocene-Quaternary Exhumation of the Eastern Pamir Domes, Western China</article-title>. <source>Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.</source> <volume>363</volume>, <fpage>16</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>26</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.epsl.2012.12.023</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chevalier</surname>
<given-names>M.-L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pan</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pei</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xu</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Fast Slip-Rate along the Northern End of the Karakorum Fault System, Western Tibet</article-title>. <source>Geophys. Res. Lett.</source> <volume>38</volume>, <fpage>a</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>n</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1029/2011GL049921</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chevalier</surname>
<given-names>M.-L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pan</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Quantification of Both normal and Right-Lateral Late Quaternary Activity along the Kongur Shan Extensional System, Chinese Pamir</article-title>. <source>Terra Nova</source> <volume>27</volume>, <fpage>379</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>391</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/ter.12170</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Choi</surname>
<given-names>J.-H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Klinger</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ferry</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ritz</surname>
<given-names>J.-F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kurtz</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rizza</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Geologic Inheritance and Earthquake Rupture Processes: The 1905&#x20;M &#x2265; 8&#x20;Tsetserleg-Bulnay Strike-Slip Earthquake Sequence, Mongolia</article-title>. <source>J.&#x20;Geophys. Res. Solid Earth</source> <volume>123</volume>, <fpage>1925</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1953</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/2017JB013962</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Colman</surname>
<given-names>S. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Watson</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1983</year>). <article-title>Ages Estimated from a Diffusion Equation Model for Scarp Degradation</article-title>. <source>Science</source> <volume>221</volume>, <fpage>263</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>265</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/science.221.4607.263</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Culling</surname>
<given-names>W. E. H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1960</year>). <article-title>Analytical Theory of Erosion</article-title>. <source>J.&#x20;Geology.</source> <volume>68</volume>, <fpage>336</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>344</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1086/626663</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Culling</surname>
<given-names>W. E. H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1963</year>). <article-title>Soil Creep and the Development of hillside Slopes</article-title>. <source>J.&#x20;Geology.</source> <volume>71</volume>, <fpage>127</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>161</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1086/626891</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Deng</surname>
<given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liao</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1996</year>). <article-title>Paleoseismology along the Range-Front Fault of Helan Mountains, north central China</article-title>. <source>J.&#x20;Geophys. Res.</source> <volume>101</volume>, <fpage>5873</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>5893</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1029/95jb01814</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Jayangondaperumal</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Daniels</surname>
<given-names>R. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Niemi</surname>
<given-names>T. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>A Paleoseismic Age Model for Large-Magnitude Earthquakes on Fault Segments of the Himalayan Frontal Thrust in the central Seismic gap of Northern india</article-title>. <source>Quat. Int.</source> <volume>462</volume>, <fpage>130</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>137</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.quaint.2017.04.008</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Jayangondaperumal</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mugnier</surname>
<given-names>J.&#x20;L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dubey</surname>
<given-names>A. K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Earthquake Slip Estimation from the Scarp Geometry of Himalayan Frontal Thrust, Western Himalaya: Implications for Seismic hazard Assessment</article-title>. <source>Int. J.&#x20;Earth Sci. (Geol Rundsch)</source> <volume>102</volume>, <fpage>1937</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1955</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00531-013-0888-2</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Klinger</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Etchebes</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tapponnier</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Narteau</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Characteristic Slip for Five Great Earthquakes along the Fuyun Fault in China</article-title>. <source>Nat. Geosci</source> <volume>4</volume>, <fpage>389</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>392</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/NGEO1158</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kokkalas</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Koukouvelas</surname>
<given-names>I. K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Fault-scarp Degradation Modeling in central Greece: The Kaparelli and Eliki Faults (Gulf of Corinth) as a Case Study</article-title>. <source>J.&#x20;Geodynamics</source> <volume>40</volume>, <fpage>200</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>215</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jog.2005.07.006</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Van der Woerd</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sun</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Si</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tapponnier</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pan</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Co-seismic and Cumulative Offsets of the Recent Earthquakes along the Karakax Left-Lateral Strike-Slip Fault in Western Tibet</article-title>. <source>Gondwana Res.</source> <volume>21</volume>, <fpage>64</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>87</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.gr.2011.07.025</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Active Tectonics and strong Earthquakes in Tashkurgan Valley in the Northeastern Pamir Plateau</article-title>. <source>Recent Dev. World Seismology</source> <volume>8</volume>, <fpage>35</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>41</lpage>. <comment>
<italic>(in Chinese)</italic>
</comment>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3969/j.issn.0235-4975.2014.08.007</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yuan</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Huang</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yu</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Coseismic Surface Ruptures of Multi Segments and Seismogenic Fault of the Tashkorgan Earthquake in Pamir, 1895</article-title>. <source>Seismology Geology. (in Chinese)</source> <volume>33</volume>, <fpage>260</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>276</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3969/j.issn.0253-4967.2011.02.002</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lin</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu-Zeng</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Weldon</surname>
<given-names>R. J.</given-names>
<suffix>II</suffix>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tian</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ding</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Du</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Modeling Repeated Coseismic Slip to Identify and Characterize Individual Earthquakes from Geomorphic Offsets on Strike-Slip Faults</article-title>. <source>Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.</source> <volume>545</volume>, <fpage>116313</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.epsl.2020.116313</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Marco</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rockwell</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Heimann</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Frieslander</surname>
<given-names>U.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Agnon</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Late Holocene Activity of the Dead Sea Transform Revealed in 3D Palaeoseismic Trenches on the Jordan Gorge Segment</article-title>. <source>Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.</source> <volume>234</volume>, <fpage>189</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>205</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.epsl.2005.01.017</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>McGill</surname>
<given-names>S. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sieh</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1991</year>). <article-title>Surficial Offsets on the central and Eastern Garlock Fault Associated with Prehistoric Earthquakes</article-title>. <source>J.&#x20;Geophys. Res.</source> <volume>96</volume>, <fpage>21597</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>21621</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1029/91JB02030</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Pan</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chevalier</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sun</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pei</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Holocene Slip Rate along the Northern Kongur Shan Extensional System: Insights on the Large Pull-Apart Structure in the NE Pamir</article-title>. <source>AGU Fall Meet. Abstr.</source> <volume>2013</volume>, <fpage>T31A</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>T2495</lpage>. </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Pelletier</surname>
<given-names>J.&#x20;D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cline</surname>
<given-names>M. L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Nonlinear Slope-dependent Sediment Transport in Cinder Cone Evolution</article-title>. <source>Geol</source> <volume>35</volume>, <fpage>1067</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1070</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1130/G23992A.1</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ren</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yan</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yin</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Clustering of Offsets on the Haiyuan Fault and Their Relationship to Paleoearthquakes</article-title>. <source>Geol. Soc. America Bull.</source> <volume>128</volume>, <fpage>B311551</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>18</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1130/B31155.1</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Robinson</surname>
<given-names>A. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yin</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Manning</surname>
<given-names>C. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Harrison</surname>
<given-names>T. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>S.-H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>X.-F.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>Tectonic Evolution of the Northeastern Pamir: Constraints from the Northern Portion of the Cenozoic Kongur Shan Extensional System, Western China</article-title>. <source>Geol. Soc. America Bull.</source> <volume>116</volume>, <fpage>953</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>973</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1130/B25375.1</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Rockwell</surname>
<given-names>T. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ben-Zion</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>High Localization of Primary Slip Zones in Large Earthquakes from Paleoseismic Trenches: Observations and Implications for Earthquake Physics</article-title>. <source>J.&#x20;Geophys. Res.</source> <volume>112</volume>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1029/2006JB004764</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Roering</surname>
<given-names>J.&#x20;J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kirchner</surname>
<given-names>J.&#x20;W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dietrich</surname>
<given-names>W. E.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1999</year>). <article-title>Evidence for Nonlinear, Diffusive Sediment Transport on Hillslopes and Implications for Landscape Morphology</article-title>. <source>Water Resour. Res.</source> <volume>35</volume>, <fpage>853</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>870</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1029/1998WR900090</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Schurr</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ratschbacher</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sippl</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gloaguen</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yuan</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mechie</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Seismotectonics of the Pamir</article-title>. <source>Tectonics</source> <volume>33</volume>, <fpage>1501</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1518</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/2014TC003576</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Schwartz</surname>
<given-names>D. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Coppersmith</surname>
<given-names>K. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1984</year>). <article-title>Fault Behavior and Characteristic Earthquakes: Examples from the Wasatch and San Andreas Fault Zones</article-title>. <source>J.&#x20;Geophys. Res.</source> <volume>89</volume>, <fpage>5681</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>5698</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1029/JB089iB07p05681</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sieh</surname>
<given-names>K. E.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1978</year>). <article-title>Slip along the San Andreas Fault Associated with the Great 1857 Earthquake</article-title>. <source>Bull. Seismological Soc. America</source> <volume>68</volume>, <fpage>1421</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1448</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1785/BSSA0680051421</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sobel</surname>
<given-names>E. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schoenbohm</surname>
<given-names>L. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Thiede</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Stockli</surname>
<given-names>D. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sudo</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Late Miocene-Pliocene Deceleration of Dextral Slip between Pamir and Tarim: Implications for Pamir Orogenesis</article-title>. <source>Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.</source> <volume>304</volume>, <fpage>369</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>378</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.epsl.2011.02.012</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B36">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Thiede</surname>
<given-names>R. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sobel</surname>
<given-names>E. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schoenbohm</surname>
<given-names>L. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Stockli</surname>
<given-names>D. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sudo</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Late Cenozoic Extension and Crustal Doming in the India-Eurasia Collision Zone: New Thermochronologic Constraints from the NE Chinese Pamir</article-title>. <source>Tectonics</source> <volume>32</volume>, <fpage>763</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>779</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/tect.20050</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B37">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wells</surname>
<given-names>D. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Coppersmith</surname>
<given-names>K. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1994</year>). <article-title>New Empirical Relationships Among Magnitude, Rupture Length, Rupture Width, Rupture Area, and Surface Displacement</article-title>. <source>Bull. seismological Soc. America</source> <volume>84</volume>, <fpage>974</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1002</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1785/BSSA0840040974</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B38">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Xu</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Arrowsmith</surname>
<given-names>J.&#x20;R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schoenbohm</surname>
<given-names>L. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yuan</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Evaluating Young Fluvial Terrace Riser Degradation Using a Nonlinear Transport Model: Application to the Kongur normal Fault in the Pamir, Northwest China</article-title>. <source>Earth Surf. Process. Landforms</source> <volume>46</volume>, <fpage>280</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>295</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/esp.5022</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B39">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Yuan</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Owen</surname>
<given-names>L. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hedrick</surname>
<given-names>K. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Caffee</surname>
<given-names>M. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Nature and Timing of Large Landslides within an Active Orogen, Eastern Pamir, China</article-title>. <source>Geomorphology</source> <volume>182</volume>, <fpage>49</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>65</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.geomorph.2012.10.028</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B40">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhou</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Parsons</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Elliott</surname>
<given-names>J.&#x20;R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Barisin</surname>
<given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Walker</surname>
<given-names>R. T.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Assessing the Ability of Pleiades Stereo Imagery to Determine Height Changes in Earthquakes: A Case Study for the El Mayor&#x2010;Cucapah Epicentral Area</article-title>. <source>J.&#x20;Geophys. Res. Solid Earth</source> <volume>120</volume>, <fpage>8793</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>8808</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/2015JB012358</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B41">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zielke</surname>
<given-names>O.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Arrowsmith</surname>
<given-names>J.&#x20;R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ludwig</surname>
<given-names>L. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ak&#xe7;iz</surname>
<given-names>S. O.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Slip in the 1857 and Earlier Large Earthquakes along the Carrizo Plain, San Andreas Fault</article-title>. <source>Science</source> <volume>327</volume>, <fpage>1119</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1122</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/science.1182781</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B42">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zielke</surname>
<given-names>O.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Klinger</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Arrowsmith</surname>
<given-names>J.&#x20;R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Fault Slip and Earthquake Recurrence along Strike-Slip Faults - Contributions of High-Resolution Geomorphic Data</article-title>. <source>Tectonophysics</source> <volume>638</volume>, <fpage>43</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>62</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.tecto.2014.11.004</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
