<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Earth Sci.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Earth Science</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Earth Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">2296-6463</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/feart.2017.00087</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Earth Science</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>The Early Miocene Critical Zone at Karungu, Western Kenya: An Equatorial, Open Habitat with Few Primate Remains</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name><surname>Lukens</surname> <given-names>William E.</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn001"><sup>&#x0002A;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/411187/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Lehmann</surname> <given-names>Thomas</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/462406/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Peppe</surname> <given-names>Daniel J.</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/117432/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Fox</surname> <given-names>David L.</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/484620/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Driese</surname> <given-names>Steven G.</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>McNulty</surname> <given-names>Kieran P.</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1"><sup>1</sup><institution>Terrestrial Paleoclimatology Research Group, Department of Geosciences, Baylor University</institution>, <addr-line>Waco, TX</addr-line>, <country>United States</country></aff>
<aff id="aff2"><sup>2</sup><institution>Messel Research and Mammalogy Department, Senckenberg Research Institute and Natural History Museum Frankfurt</institution>, <addr-line>Frankfurt</addr-line>, <country>Germany</country></aff>
<aff id="aff3"><sup>3</sup><institution>Department of Earth Sciences, University of Minnesota</institution>, <addr-line>Minneapolis, MN</addr-line>, <country>United States</country></aff>
<aff id="aff4"><sup>4</sup><institution>Department of Anthropology, University of Minnesota</institution>, <addr-line>Minneapolis, MN</addr-line>, <country>United States</country></aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by"><p>Edited by: Gary E. Stinchcomb, Murray State University, United States</p></fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by"><p>Reviewed by: Clayton Magill, Heriot-Watt University, United Kingdom; Doris Barboni, UMR7330 Centre Europ&#x000E9;en de Recherche et d&#x00027;enseignement de G&#x000E9;osciences de l&#x00027;environnement (CEREGE), France</p></fn>
<fn fn-type="corresp" id="fn001"><p>&#x0002A;Correspondence: William E. Lukens <email>bill_lukens&#x00040;baylor.edu</email></p></fn>
<fn fn-type="other" id="fn002"><p>This article was submitted to Quaternary Science, Geomorphology and Paleoenvironment, a section of the journal Frontiers in Earth Science</p></fn></author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>25</day>
<month>10</month>
<year>2017</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2017</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>5</volume>
<elocation-id>87</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>12</day>
<month>07</month>
<year>2017</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>06</day>
<month>10</month>
<year>2017</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x000A9; 2017 Lukens, Lehmann, Peppe, Fox, Driese and McNulty.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2017</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Lukens, Lehmann, Peppe, Fox, Driese and McNulty</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p></license>
</permissions>
<abstract><p>Early Miocene outcrops near Karungu, Western Kenya, preserve a range of fluvio-lacustrine, lowland landscapes that contain abundant fossils of terrestrial and aquatic vertebrates. Primates are notably rare among these remains, although nearby early Miocene strata on Rusinga Island contain a rich assemblage of fossilized catarrhines and strepsirrhines. To explore possible environmental controls on the occurrence of early Miocene primates, we performed a deep-time Critical Zone (DTCZ) reconstruction focused on floodplain paleosols at the Ngira locality in Karungu. We specifically focused on a single stratigraphic unit (NG15), which preserves moderately developed paleosols that contain a microvertebrate fossil assemblage. Although similarities between deposits at Karungu and Rusinga Island are commonly assumed, physical sedimentary processes, vegetative cover, soil hydrology, and some aspects of climate state are notably different between the two areas. Estimates of paleoclimate parameters using paleosol B horizon elemental chemistry and morphologic properties are consistent with seasonal, dry subhumid conditions, occasional waterlogging, and herbaceous vegetation. The reconstructed small mammal community indicates periodic waterlogging and open-canopy conditions. Based on the presence of herbaceous root traces, abundant microcharcoal, and pedogenic carbonates with high stable carbon isotope ratios, we interpret NG15 to have formed under a warm, seasonally dry, open riparian woodland to wooded grassland, in which at least a subset of the vegetation was likely C<sub>4</sub> biomass. Our results, coupled with previous paleoenvironmental interpretations for deposits on Rusinga Island, demonstrate that there was considerable environmental heterogeneity ranging from open to closed habitats in the early Miocene. We hypothesize that the relative paucity of primates at Karungu was driven by their environmental preference for locally abundant closed canopy vegetation, which was likely absent at Karungu, at least during the NG15 interval if not also earlier and later intervals that have not yet been studied in as much detail.</p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>paleosol</kwd>
<kwd>hominoid</kwd>
<kwd>paleovegetation</kwd>
<kwd>paleoclimate</kwd>
<kwd>paleoenvironment</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<contract-num rid="cn001">BCS #124812</contract-num>
<contract-num rid="cn001">#1241807</contract-num>
<contract-sponsor id="cn001">National Science Foundation<named-content content-type="fundref-id">10.13039/100000001</named-content></contract-sponsor>
<counts>
<fig-count count="10"/>
<table-count count="4"/>
<equation-count count="0"/>
<ref-count count="111"/>
<page-count count="21"/>
<word-count count="15498"/>
</counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec sec-type="intro" id="s1">
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Early Miocene deposits in the Nyanza rift valley of East Africa preserve a rich assemblage of mammalian remains, with nearly a century of research there focused on the evolutionary context of apes (e.g., Hopwood, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">1933</xref>; Andrews, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">1978</xref>; Walker et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B109">1993</xref>; McNulty et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B74">2007</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B73">2015</xref>). The early Miocene is recognized as a key interval in the development of anatomical and behavioral adaptations fundamental to interpreting the origin of the human lineage (Gebo et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">1997</xref>; Michel et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B75">2014</xref>; Begun, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">2015</xref>; McNulty et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B73">2015</xref>). These include aspects of the axial skeleton and extremities shared between early hominins and the primitive ape <italic>Ekembo</italic> (Lovejoy, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B64">2009</xref>; Lovejoy et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B65">2009a</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B66">b</xref>), frequent use of upright posture in <italic>Morotopithecus</italic> (Sanders and Bodenbender, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B99">1994</xref>; Gebo et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">1997</xref>; MacLatchy et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B68">2000</xref>), advanced subnasal morphology in <italic>Rangwapithecus</italic> (Andrews, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">1978</xref>; McNulty, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B72">2003</xref>), and large body size and prolonged life history in <italic>Afropithecus, Ekembo</italic>, and <italic>Morotopithecus</italic> (Kelley, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">1997</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">2002</xref>). Further, evidence of folivory in <italic>Rangwapithecus</italic> and <italic>Morotopithecus</italic> (Kay and Ungar, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">1997</xref>; MacLatchy et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B69">2010</xref>; McNulty et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B73">2015</xref>) and durophagy in <italic>Afropithecus</italic> (Leakey and Walker, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B62">1997</xref>) suggest specialized dietary adaptations existed between clades and locations. Understanding the variety of paleoenvironments and paleoclimate zones in East Africa in the early Miocene is essential to differentiate the roles of environmental pressures (e.g., vegetation and climate) from biotic factors (e.g., niche partitioning, biogeography, and sexual selection) as selection mechanisms for derived traits in hominoids and apes.</p>
<p>Longstanding interpretations suggest that wooded or forested habitats were pervasive across eastern Africa until the late Miocene at ca. 8&#x02013;10 Ma (Cerling et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">1998</xref>; Jacobs et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">1999</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">2010</xref>; Uno et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B107">2016</xref>), implying that unchanging habitats allowed biotic factors to drive evolution of early hominoid lineages through most of the early and middle Miocene. However, a few studies have indicated the presence of open canopy habitats based on environmental interpretations from paleosols and stable isotopes from early Miocene strata at Karungu and Rusinga Island in western Kenya (Bestland and Krull, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">1999</xref>; Forbes et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">2004</xref>; Driese et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">2016</xref>). A significant proportion of C<sub>4</sub> vegetation, which is characteristic of open canopy habitats today, has been interpreted for middle to late Miocene strata in the Tugen Hills, central Kenya (Kingston et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B59">1994</xref>). These studies suggest that open canopy environments may have been important components of landscapes prior to the late Miocene.</p>
<p>Herein, we investigate the evidence for open canopy environments at Karungu by using paleopedology, sedimentology, and microvertebrate paleontology. Although hundreds of mammalian specimens have been recovered from Karungu (Andrews, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">1911</xref>; Pickford, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B90">1981</xref>), only a small number of the fossils are catarrhine primates, including a tooth of <italic>Dendropithecus</italic> and a few specimens identified as cf. <italic>Ekembo</italic> (Clark and Leakey, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">1951</xref>; McNulty et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B73">2015</xref>). Pickford (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B90">1981</xref>) argued that the mammals represented in the Karungu fauna are generally similar to fauna of Hiwegi Formation on Rusinga Island (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">1</xref>), which contains abundant, well-preserved fossil catarrhine primates including <italic>Dendropithecus, Ekembo, Nyanzapithecus</italic>, and <italic>Limnopithecus</italic>, (Leakey, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B61">1943</xref>; Clark and Leakey, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">1951</xref>; Kelley, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">1986</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B55">1993</xref>; Pickford, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B91">1986</xref>; Walker et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B109">1993</xref>; Harrison, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">2010</xref>; Michel et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B75">2014</xref>; McNulty et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B73">2015</xref>). Based on assessments of the faunas at Karungu and from the entire Hiwegi Formation on Rusinga Island, Nesbit Evans et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B81">1981</xref>) interpreted them to represent similar paleoecological conditions. Driese et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">2016</xref>) argued from analyses of paleosols, sedimentology, stable isotopes, and fauna at the Ngira locality at Karungu, that the paleovegetation and paleoenvironments of Karungu were similar to the Grit and lower Fossil Bed Members of the Hiwegi Formation on Rusinga Island. Based on this similarity, Driese et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">2016</xref>) suggested that faunal differences between Karungu and the lower Hiwegi Formation were unlikely to have been driven by paleoenvironmental differences. Forbes et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">2004</xref>), however, used paleopedology and stable isotope analyses to interpret humid climate conditions for both Karungu and the Wayando Formation, which underlies the Hiwegi Formation on Rusinga Island. In each case, the interpretation of similar paleoenvironments at Karungu, which generally lacks primate fossils, and deposits on Rusinga Island, which preserve abundant primate fossils, suggests differences in the fossil record are due to biotic pressures or preferences rather than abiotic factors such as paleoenvironmental setting.</p>
<fig id="F1" position="float">
<label>Figure 1</label>
<caption><p>Location of study site <bold>(A)</bold> on the African continent, and <bold>(B)</bold> within western Kenya. Red lines indicate the boundary faults of the Nyanza rift. <bold>(C)</bold> Ngira and Kachucku together comprise the Karungu outcrop areas, located roughly 50 km south of Rusinga and Mfangano Islands. Light gray dashed lines are roads. Modified after Bestland et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">1995</xref>), Geraads et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">2016</xref>), and Driese et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">2016</xref>).</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="feart-05-00087-g0001.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>We reexamine the hypothesis that differences in the abundance of primates between Karungu and Rusinga Island are driven by biotic or abiotic factors by studying an interval of paleosols at the Ngira locality in Karungu as a spatio-temporal slice through the dynamic deep-time Critical Zone (DTCZ) from western Kenya in the early Miocene (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">1</xref>). The Critical Zone is the net result of interactions between the lithosphere, atmosphere, hydrosphere, and biosphere, and is preserved as an integrated substrate in the pedosphere (Brantley et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">2007</xref>). The Critical Zone concept has been translated to the terrestrial stratigraphic record through DTCZ analysis, which utilizes tools developed and applied in sedimentology, paleopedology, and paleoecology (Nordt et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B83">2012</xref>; Nordt and Driese, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B82">2013</xref>). Application of DTCZ concepts to Neogene sites in East Africa will advance the interpretive capacity of environmental and climatic variables from strata that preserve hominoid remains.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2">
<title>Geologic setting</title>
<p>Early Miocene deposits at Karungu accumulated in a small graben on the southern flank of the Nyanza Rift system (Drake et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">1988</xref>). Sedimentary deposits associated with the Kisingiri volcanic complex include Mfangano and Rusinga Islands, which are on the north side of the Kisingiri caldera roughly 50 km from Karungu. The Kaniamwia fault separates Miocene deposits around Karungu from Kisingiri volcaniclastics to the north (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">1</xref>; King et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B58">1972</xref>; Drake et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">1988</xref>; Bestland et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">1995</xref>). Precambrian igneous and metamorphic basement surrounds the Nyanza Rift in western Kenya (Smith and Mosley, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B102">1993</xref>).</p>
<p>Fossiliferous deposits at Karungu consist of two distinct outcrop areas: Ngira and Kachuku. In this study, we focus on the Ngira locality. The stratigraphy and sedimentary environments at Ngira were first documented by Oswald (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B86">1914</xref>) and were subsequently reexamined by Forbes et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">2004</xref>) and Driese et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">2016</xref>). We follow the stratigraphic descriptions of Driese et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">2016</xref>), which are generally similar to the previous studies (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">2</xref>). The 50 m of strata at Ngira are divided into units based on major depositional packages. The base of the section is a highly weathered Vertisol with oxisolic properties and is unconformably capped by lacustrine shoreline sandstones (Driese et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">2016</xref>). Fluvial and lacustrine facies are interstratified throughout the section and include fluvial channel sandstones, pedogenically-modified mudstones parented from alluvium and exposed lacustrine mud, and a succession of deep-water lacustrine turbidites that cap the section (Driese et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">2016</xref>). For this study, we focus on unit 15 because it contains pedogenic features, a microfossil assemblage, and carbonate nodules, thus allowing for reconstruction of climatic and ecologic properties through multiple, independent methodologies.</p>
<fig id="F2" position="float">
<label>Figure 2</label>
<caption><p>Stratigraphic section at Ngira (after Driese et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">2016</xref>). The current study focuses on paleosols within unit 15. Driese et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">2016</xref>) previously examined paleosols in units 1, 19, and 20.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="feart-05-00087-g0002.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Geochronologic control for Ngira is based on two K-Ar dates on a biotite tuff (unit 25), which yielded ages of 17.7 &#x000B1; 0.06 and 17.5 &#x000B1; 0.2 Ma (Drake et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">1988</xref>). However, recent geochronologic analyses of ashes erupted from the Kisingiri complex and deposited on Rusinga Island suggest that the K-Ar total fusion method used by Drake et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">1988</xref>) may not be accurate as a result of post-depositional alteration (McCollum et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B71">2013</xref>; Peppe et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B89">2017</xref>). Regardless, numerous analyses of the Karungu fauna are consistent with an early Miocene age (Pickford, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B90">1981</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B91">1986</xref>). Re-dating of the deposits at Karungu is underway as part of the Research on East African Catarrhine and Hominoid Evolution (REACHE) project.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="methods" id="s3">
<title>Methods</title>
<sec>
<title>Field methods</title>
<sec>
<title>Stratigraphy</title>
<p>Each stratigraphic unit at Ngira was identified in the field at the location described by Driese et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">2016</xref>) using field photos, field notes, and GPS coordinates. For this study, unit 15, hereafter referred to as NG15, was identified and traced laterally using sandstone units that demarcate the top and bottom of the unit. In the location described by Driese et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">2016</xref>), NG15 lacked pedogenic features and consisted of interbedded fluvial sand and silt. Roughly 100 m lateral to that position, however, the interval was found to contain abundant microvertebrate fossils in a mudstone with pedogenic features.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Paleontology</title>
<p>Following the systematic surface collection procedure developed in the framework of the REACHE project, the area of interest was surveyed using flagging nails to visualize bone concentration. A 12 m2 grid was established over the area including the microfossil assemblage, centered around 36M 632912, 9904780 (UTM, WGS84). Within this grid, an exhaustive collection of paleontological remains was performed. Sediment on the surface of the squares was swept and sieved, while the immediate area around the grid was surveyed for identifiable specimens (i.e., surface collection). All items were bagged according to their grid cell. The grid was the basis for the ensuing subsurface excavations, and 11 squares (1 &#x000D7; 1 m) of the grid were actually excavated. Squares were excavated in arbitrary 10 cm intervals measured from the overlying sandstone unit (NG16) to a depth of 80 cm. Bulk sediment from each depth interval in each grid cell was then sieved on site (5 and 2 mm opening) and every biological element recovered was bagged and labeled according to its depth interval and grid cell.</p>
<p>Fossils systematically excavated from NG15 were compared to surface collections made at Ngira over multiple field seasons (2010, 2012, 2013, 2015) in the framework of the REACHE project (Lehmann et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B63">2014</xref>), and also to the historical collections housed at the National Museums of Kenya in Nairobi (NMK). These surface collections are assumed to record a time-averaged faunal signal, as they were sampled over 25 stratigraphic meters of fluvial sands, gravels, and fluvio-lacustrine mudstones at Ngira (Driese et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">2016</xref>). Nevertheless, the sample size is large enough to capture the conditions during most of the time of accumulation (Olszewski, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B85">1999</xref>) and can be used in broad comparisons between early Miocene localities. All fossils were identified to the lowest taxonomic level possible with regard to anatomical element and taxon. In order to measure the taxonomic structure and composition of the collected fauna, the number of individual specimens (NISP) was calculated (Lyman, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B67">2008</xref>). For the purpose of the present paper, our comparisons focused on small mammals, whose body size is inferred to be equal to or less than that of <italic>Megapedetes pentadactylus</italic> (a fossil rodent related to the springhare), which was the largest mammal found during excavations of NG15.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Paleopedology</title>
<p>Two paleosol profiles were trenched into fresh rock through NG15. A trench was excavated through the microfossil collection grid (profile NG15-A) after fossil surveys were completed. A second profile was described ca. 3 m lateral to the fossil excavation (profile NG15-B) after initial observations indicated that paleosol horizons appeared to vary laterally. By describing a pair of trenches, we sought to generate a better understanding of the local sedimentologic and pedogenic conditions that lead to the preservation of the microfossil assemblage. Sedimentologic and pedogenic features were described in both profiles using a modification of USDA-NRCS terminology (Schoeneberger, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B100">2002</xref>), and include grain size, horizonation, bounding contacts, ped structure, color, mineralizations, and root traces. Serial bulk and oriented samples were recovered through each horizon of NG15-B, and selected horizons were sampled from NG15-A for comparison.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Laboratory methods</title>
<p>Elemental geochemistry of bulk paleosol samples was characterized using two methods: (1) untreated, whole-sample assays using fused-bead ICP-AES and ICP-MS analysis for major and trace elements, respectively, at ALS Global (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://alsglobal.com">alsglobal.com</ext-link>); and (2) whole-sample assays of decarbonated aliquots of the same samples using X-ray fluorescence (XRF) for major element analysis at Baylor University. Samples sent to ALS Global were also analyzed for loss on ignition (LOI) at 1,000&#x000B0;C. Samples analyzed in-house at Baylor University were powdered and homogenized, decarbonated using 10% HCl, and neutralized using repeated rinsing with de-ionized water. The decarbonated samples were then re-ground, homogenized, fused into glass beads, and analyzed for major element concentrations using a Rigaku ZSK Primus II X-ray fluorescence analyzer. Total and organic carbon content were measured on aliquots from each horizon using an element analyzer (EA) before and after <italic>in situ</italic> decarbonation, respectively. Inorganic carbon content was calculated as the difference between the two measurements.</p>
<p>Thin sections of oriented samples from each horizon were prepared by Spectrum Petrographics (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.petrography.com">http://www.petrography.com</ext-link>) and characterized using a combination of methods from Brewer (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">1964</xref>) and Bullock et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">1985</xref>). Carbonates were analyzed in thin section to identify mineral phases. Nodules and rhizoliths were micro-drilled on paired billets and hand samples after cross-comparison with thin sections. Carbonate powders were analyzed for inorganic carbon (&#x003B4;<sup>13</sup>C) and oxygen (&#x003B4;<sup>18</sup>O) stable isotope composition at Baylor University using a Thermo-Electron dual-inlet gas-source stable isotope ratio mass spectrometer. The delta notation is used in reporting stable isotope compositions (e.g., &#x003B4;<sup>18</sup>O &#x0003D; [R<sub>sample</sub> / R<sub>standard</sub> &#x02212; 1] x 1000), where R is the ratio of the heavy to light isotope (e.g., <sup>18</sup>O/<sup>16</sup>O). All isotope values are reported relative to the Vienna Pee Dee Belemnite (VPDB) standard with analytical precision within 0.03%0 and 0.1%0 for &#x003B4;<sup>13</sup>C and &#x003B4;<sup>18</sup>O, respectively.</p>
<p>Clay mineralogy of parent material and weathered soil horizons was analyzed using oriented clay slides on a Siemens D5000 X-ray diffractometer that uses Cu K&#x003B1; radiation and operates at 40 Kv and 30 mA. The clay-sized fraction (&#x0003C;2 &#x003BC;m equivalent diameter) was separated via centrifugation following the methods of Poppe et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B93">2001</xref>) and oriented clay slides were prepared following the methods of Moore and Reynolds (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B77">1997</xref>). To differentiate possible commonly-occurring clay minerals, four treatments were performed on clay slides (Moore and Reynolds, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B77">1997</xref>): (1) samples were Mg<sup>2&#x0002B;</sup>-saturated using a Mg salt solution, (2) Mg<sup>2&#x0002B;</sup>-saturated samples were glycolated overnight in an airtight chamber, (3) duplicate samples were K<sup>&#x0002B;</sup>-saturated using KCl, and (4) a subset of K<sup>&#x0002B;</sup>-saturated samples were heated for at least 2 h at 550&#x000B0;C. All clay samples were analyzed from 2 to 30&#x000B0; 2&#x00398; with a step size of 0.02&#x000B0; 2&#x00398; and dwell time of 1 s. Clay minerals were identified following the methods of Moore and Reynolds (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B77">1997</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Constitutive mass-balance</title>
<p>Bulk geochemistry of paleosol horizons was compared using mass-balance calculations (Brimhall and Dietrich, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">1987</xref>; Chadwick et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">1990</xref>; Brimhall et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">1991</xref>), without including bulk density due to the effects of compaction on paleosol samples (Driese et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">2000</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">2016</xref>; Driese, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">2004</xref>). Translocation (&#x003C4;, or &#x0201C;tau&#x0201D;) of elements was calculated relative to parent material, where: &#x003C4; &#x0003D; {[(C<sub>j, w</sub> /C<sub>j, p</sub>)]/[(C<sub>i, w</sub> /C<sub>i, p</sub>)] &#x02212; 1} &#x000D7; 100, in which the concentrations (C) of elements (j) in weathered horizons (w) are assessed relative to immobile elements (i) in the parent material (p). Profiles of tau values therefore can be used to show gains (positive values) or losses (negative values) as a result of pedogenic processes or sedimentary additions, assessed as a function of starting parent material composition. The composition of C and BC horizons was averaged to account for minor biases due to grain size-dependent compositional changes and/or incipient weathering of individual C or BC horizons.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Climate and vegetation reconstruction</title>
<p>The elemental composition of paleosol B horizon samples was used to estimate mean annual precipitation (MAP) and temperature (MAT) using a suite of pedotransfer functions (Sheldon et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B101">2002</xref>; Gallagher and Sheldon, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">2013</xref>; Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">1</xref>). The chemical index of alteration minus potassium (CIA-K), which tracks feldspar hydrolysis and base cation leaching (Sheldon et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B101">2002</xref>) was used to estimate MAP. The salinization index (NaK; Sheldon et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B101">2002</xref>) and the paleosol weathering index (PWI; Gallagher and Sheldon, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">2013</xref>), which track thermodynamic controls on silicate dissolution, were used to estimate MAT. The paleosol-paleoclimate model (PPM<sub>1.0</sub>) (Stinchcomb et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B103">2016</xref>) was also used to co-predict MAP and MAT. PPM<sub>1.0</sub> uses eleven elemental oxides as input variables (Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>, Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>, SiO<sub>2</sub>, TiO<sub>2</sub>, ZrO<sub>2</sub>, CaO, MgO, K<sub>2</sub>O, Na<sub>2</sub>O, MnO, and P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub>) to simultaneously model both MAP and MAT using a thin-plate spline drawn through sample scores generated by a partial least squares regression analysis of modern soil B horizon samples. PPM<sub>1.0</sub> calculations were run in SAS statistical software (SAS Institute, Inc., v. 9.2.). Climate results are discussed in terms of climate zones after (Bull, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">1991</xref>), which include MAP zones of arid (&#x0003C;250 mm), semiarid (250&#x02013;500 mm), subhumid (500&#x02013;1,000 mm), and humid (1,000&#x02013;2,000 mm), and MAT zones of frigid (0&#x02013;8&#x000B0;C), mesic (8&#x02013;15&#x000B0;C), thermic (15&#x02013;22.5&#x000B0;C), and hyperthermic (&#x0003E;22&#x000B0;C).</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T1">
<label>Table 1</label>
<caption><p>Paleoclimate proxies.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead><tr>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Model</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Index</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Index Formula</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Model Error<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN1"><sup>a</sup></xref></bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Constraints</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>References</bold></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" colspan="6" style="background-color:#bbbdc0"><bold>MEAN ANNUAL PRECIPITATION</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">CIA-K</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">100 &#x000D7; [Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>/(Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>&#x0002B;CaO&#x0002B;Na<sub>2</sub>O)]</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">221.1e<sup>0.02(x)</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">182 mm</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Bt, Bw horizons</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Sheldon et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B101">2002</xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">PPM</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">NA</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Thin plate spline<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN2"><sup>b</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">512 mm</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Uppermost B horizons</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Stinchcomb et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B103">2016</xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" colspan="6" style="background-color:#bbbdc0"><bold>MEAN ANNUAL TEMPERATURE</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">NaK</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">(Na<sub>2</sub>O&#x0002B;K<sub>2</sub>O)/Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02212;18.52(x) &#x0002B; 17.298</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">4.4&#x000B0;C</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Bt, Bw horizons</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Sheldon et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B101">2002</xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">PWI</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">100 &#x000D7; (4.20Na<sub>2</sub>O &#x0002B; 1.66MgO &#x0002B; 5.54K<sub>2</sub>O &#x0002B;2.05CaO)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02212;2.74 x ln(x) &#x0002B; 21.39</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2.1&#x000B0;C</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Forested Inceptisols, Alfisols, and Ultisols</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Gallagher and Sheldon, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">2013</xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">PPM</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">NA</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Thin plate spline<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN2"><sup>b</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">3.98&#x000B0;C</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Uppermost B horizons</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Stinchcomb et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B103">2016</xref></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p><italic>Elemental inputs for CIA-K, NaK, and PWI are in units of oxide moles; PPM uses wt. % oxide</italic>.</p>
<fn id="TN1">
<label>a</label>
<p><italic>Values used are root mean square errors from regression analysis, except for PPM, where errors are root mean square prediction error based on validation modeling</italic>.</p></fn>
<fn id="TN2">
<label>b</label>
<p><italic>Modeled in SAS statistical software; see Stinchcomb et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B103">2016</xref>) for code and methods</italic>.</p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>We frame our vegetation reconstruction in terms of photosynthetic pathway, which is possible as a result of two broad photosynthetic mechanisms that differentially fractionate atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub>, resulting in plant-respired soil CO<sub>2</sub> with differing carbon isotope signatures (&#x003B4;<sup>13</sup>C). Modern plants that use the Calvin cycle (C<sub>3</sub> pathway) include most trees, shrubs, and cool-season grasses, and have &#x003B4;<sup>13</sup>C signatures between &#x02212;20 to &#x02212;33%0, with a mean of &#x02212;26.7%0 (O&#x00027;Leary, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B84">1988</xref>; Cerling et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">1997</xref>). Water stress is the primary factor that drives the enrichment of C<sub>3</sub> plant &#x003B4;<sup>13</sup>C signatures above ca. &#x02212;24 to &#x02212;25%0 (Ehleringer and Cooper, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">1988</xref>). The Hatch-Slack (C<sub>4</sub>) pathway, which is utilized mostly by modern tropical and warm-season grasses and sedges, is a series of anatomical and biochemical adaptations that allows for closure of stomata without photorespiration (Sage, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B98">2004</xref>). Modern C<sub>4</sub> plants have &#x003B4;<sup>13</sup>C values between &#x02212;9 to &#x02212;11%0, with a mean value of &#x02212;12.5%0 (O&#x00027;Leary, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B84">1988</xref>; Cerling et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">1997</xref>). Carbon isotope values of vegetation are recorded in the isotopic composition of pedogenic carbonates that form in equilibrium with plant-respired soil CO<sub>2</sub> at depth in soils of moderate to high productivity (Cerling et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">1989</xref>).</p>
<p>Endmember &#x003B4;<sup>13</sup>C compositions for C<sub>3</sub>, water-stressed C<sub>3</sub> (wsC<sub>3</sub>), and C<sub>4</sub> vegetation were modeled using nominal fractionation factors for each photosynthetic pathway/plant type and corrected for an average atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> composition of &#x02212;5.8%0 from benthic foraminifera for the interval 17.07&#x02013;17.5 Ma (Tipple et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B104">2010</xref>). Fractionation factors between plants and CO<sub>2</sub> (&#x003B5;<sub>plant&#x02212;CO2</sub>) reported by Passey et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B87">2002</xref>) were used, where &#x003B5;<sub>C3&#x02212;CO2</sub> &#x0003D; &#x02212;19.6%0, &#x003B5;<sub>wsC3&#x02212;CO2</sub> &#x0003D; &#x02212;16.7%0, and &#x003B5;<sub>C4&#x02212;CO2</sub> &#x0003D; &#x02212;4.7%0. A net fractionation of &#x0002B;15%0 between plant-respired soil CO<sub>2</sub> and pedogenic carbonate (Fox et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">2012</xref>, after Cerling and Quade, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">1993</xref>) yielded endmember compositions of &#x02212;10.4%0, &#x02212;7.5%0, and &#x0002B;4.5%0 for carbonates forming under C<sub>3</sub>, wsC<sub>3</sub>, and C<sub>4</sub> vegetation cover, respectively.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="results" id="s4">
<title>Results</title>
<sec>
<title>Stratigraphy and sedimentology</title>
<p>NG15 is bounded by trough cross-stratified fluvial channel sandstones (NG14 and NG16). Across ca. 150 m of lateral outcrop, NG15 varies from thinly-bedded, tan fluvial sandstones to red, calcareous sandy siltstones. The NG15-A and B profiles were described where NG15 occurs as sandy siltstone. A total of five superposed paleosols were identified, most of which were underlain by an alluvial parent material (C or BC) horizon (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">3</xref>). The parent material horizons were more coarse-grained than overlying subsurface horizons, and in some cases retained primary horizontal stratification. Bedding contacts at the base of parent material horizons are inclined from NG15-A to NG15-B with upwards of 10 cm relief.</p>
<fig id="F3" position="float">
<label>Figure 3</label>
<caption><p>Profiles through Ngira unit 15 (NG15). Macro- and micromorphologic descriptions are for profile NG15-B. Numbers before paleosol horizonation indicate separate, superposed paleosols. Effervescence reaction classes (HCl Rxn.) are reported from field tests, with values corresponding to (0) no reaction, (1) very slight, (2) slight, (3) strong, and (4) violent effervescence (after Schoeneberger, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B100">2002</xref>). Pedality classes correspond to (0) massive, (1) weakly formed, (2) moderately formed, and (3) strongly formed peds (after Schoeneberger, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B100">2002</xref>). Clay, carbonate, and Fe indices are based on qualitative assessment of thin sections with numbers corresponding to features being (0) absent, (1) few, (2) common, (3) abundant, or (4) omnipresent.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="feart-05-00087-g0003.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Paleosol descriptions</title>
<p>Detailed descriptions of paleosol macro- and micromorphology are reported in Table <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">A1</xref>, with key observations presented in Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">3</xref>. Horizonation is largely similar between profiles NG15-A and B. The uppermost paleosol is truncated from above and grades laterally from a C1-C2 to a Bw-BC horizon sequence between the profiles, respectively. The second paleosol consists of a Btk-BC horizon sequence with lenses of sand and reworked, hard, gray carbonate nodules variably coated in MnO<sub>2</sub> or Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>. The Btk horizon has well-developed prismatic ped structure, clay-filled root traces, clay coatings on peds, and vertically-oriented hairline root traces (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">4</xref>). With the exception of a thin, truncated Bk horizon that underlies the second paleosol in NG15-A, the rest of the succession consists of alternating couplets of Bw-C horizons, each of which are bounded by erosional contacts. The Bw horizons in the lower portion of the profile have root traces that tend to be &#x0003C;2 mm wide and occur as drab haloes, calcareous rhizoliths, or clay-filled pores.</p>
<fig id="F4" position="float">
<label>Figure 4</label>
<caption><p>Field photographs of profiles of <bold>(A)</bold> NG15-A and <bold>(B)</bold> NG15-B. Note prismatic ped structure in 2Btk horizon. <bold>(C)</bold> Prismatic ped from 2Btk horizon (vertically oriented). Thin, red lines are root traces lined with Fe and clay; white speckles are pedogenic carbonates. <bold>(D)</bold> Close-up of thin root traces from white box in <bold>(C)</bold>. Photo taken with reflected light and a polarizing filter. <bold>(E)</bold> Angular blocky compound ped removed from a prismatic ped in the 2Btk horizon. Photo is the base of the ped, with Fe-coated microvertebrate fossil. <bold>(F)</bold> Close-up of microvertebrate bone from E. Note Fe coating and white pedogenic carbonate. Faint, thin root traces are also present. Photo taken with reflected light and a polarizing filter. <bold>(G)</bold> Angular blocky ped from 2Btk horizon. White arrows indicate fine root traces; DHRT &#x0003D; drab halo root trace. Ped is vertically oriented. <bold>(H)</bold> Base of an irregular angular blocky ped (3Bw horizon), with Fe-stained bone fragment indicated. Note white calcareous rhizoliths, seen in cross section from this view. Photo in box A is used with permission from T. Wenzel.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="feart-05-00087-g0004.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Pedality&#x02014;a measure of ped structure development&#x02014;and reaction to HCl were characterized for profile NG15-B using USDA-NRCS methods (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">3</xref>; Schoeneberger, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B100">2002</xref>). The B horizons tend to have more well-developed pedality than parent material horizons. Effervescence was very strong in both B horizons and parent material horizons.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Micromorphology</title>
<p>Thin sections from all horizons of the uppermost 4 paleosols in NG15-B were studied for a variety of pedogenic and sedimentary properties (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">5</xref>). Surveys of clay, carbonate, and Fe features were converted to qualitative indices with values corresponding to features being (0) absent, (1) few, (2) common, (3) abundant, or (4) omnipresent (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">3</xref>). Pedogenic clay fabric includes grain coatings (granostriated), pore linings (porostriated), and matrix impregnations (argillans). The clay index closely tracks pedality and is highest in B horizons, particularly the 2Btk horizon.</p>
<fig id="F5" position="float">
<label>Figure 5</label>
<caption><p>Photomicrographs of representative features. All samples are upright and in cross-polarized light unless noted. <bold>(A)</bold> Diagenetic sparite overgrowths on detrital quartz grain, on and in a micritic carbonate nodule, and throughout matrix; NG15-B, BC. <bold>(B,C)</bold> Microcharcoal grain in reflected light <bold>(B)</bold> and plane-polarized light (ppl) <bold>(C)</bold>; NG15-B, BC. <bold>(D)</bold> Argillan and granostriated clay fabric on quartz and weathered orthoclase detrital grains; NG15-B, 2Btk. <bold>(E)</bold> Micritic carbonate nodules with sparite filling septarian cracks with pedogenic clay bridges (granostriated fabric); NG15-B, 2Btk. <bold>(F)</bold> Fe concretion nucleated on weathered detrital grain; note clay coatings within and on concretion, and clay-rich matrix; ppl, NG15-A, 2Btk. <bold>(G)</bold> Granostriated clay fabric on bone chip and detrital grains; NG15-A, 2Btk. <bold>(H,I)</bold> Microcharcoal grains in reflected light (H, white arrows) and ppl (I); NG15-B, 2BC. <bold>(J)</bold> Microspar carbonate concretion with sparite filling septarian cracks. Thin clay coats line septarian walls. Note Fe concretion and sparite overgrowths on detrital grains; NG15-A, 3Bw. <bold>(K)</bold> Displacive sparite around and within clay clasts (left) and orange pedogenic clay (right), on detrital grains, and through matrix; NG15-B, 3C. <bold>(K,L)</bold> Bone chip encased in Fe/clay concretion, ppl <bold>(L)</bold> and xpl <bold>(M)</bold>; NG15-B, 4Bw.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="feart-05-00087-g0005.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Carbonates exhibit a range of morphologies in profile NG15-B. Pedogenic micrite is the dominant phase in the 2Btk horizon, though minor amounts of sparite coat septarian shrinkage cracks in some cases. Hard, gray carbonate nodules tend to be micritic with minor quantities of sparite in septarian cracks. Diagenetic calcite spar is pervasive in parent material horizons and cross-cuts pedogenic features, such as fecal pellets and clay fabric. Sparite crystals are nucleated on detrital silicate grains and pedogenic features, with growth axes radiating displacively into the paleosol matrix. The carbonate index includes both pedogenic and diagenetic phases, and therefore tracks increases in pedogenic carbonate content in the Btk horizon, as well as diagenetic sparite that occurs in C horizons.</p>
<p>Fe features primarily occur as concretions in B horizons. Fe concretions are nucleated on weathered detrital grains and microvertebrate bone chips, which typically also have clay coatings (Figures <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">5L,M</xref>). The Fe index is highest in B horizons and closely tracks the clay index and pedality.</p>
<p>Microcharcoal (10&#x02013;500 &#x003BC;m wide) was observed in most thin sections (Figures <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">5B,C,H,I</xref>). Grains of microcharcoal were differentiated from detrital silicates and heavy minerals by their opacity under plane- and cross-polarized light, tattered and irregular edges, and lack of cleavage planes. The concentration of microcharcoal grains was not estimated because, in many instances, grains occurred in a large range of sizes, likely as a result of fragmentation.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Elemental geochemistry</title>
<p>Elemental geochemistry, loss-on-ignition (LOI), and measured organic and inorganic carbon content for the NG15-B profile is reported in Table <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM2">A2</xref>. Untreated samples were compared with samples that were decarbonated before elemental analysis (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">6</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F6" position="float">
<label>Figure 6</label>
<caption><p><bold>(A)</bold> CaO in untreated samples is strongly correlated with loss on ignition (LOI). <bold>(B)</bold> Inorganic C is strongly correlated with LOI (gray regression line); organic C is very low in abundance and not correlated with LOI (black regression line). <bold>(C)</bold> Effect of treatment on oxide abundances. The y-axis is the mass change, calculated as decarbonated sample mass minus untreated mass, plotted against mass of treated (decarbonated) samples. Note that mass change scales with oxide abundance for all constituents except CaO. <sup>&#x0002A;</sup>SiO<sub>2</sub>: Two outlier values with high initial CaO and high SiO<sub>2</sub> mass change, which improve regression statistics when omitted. Black regression was calculated for all samples. Gray regression was calculated omitting two SiO<sub>2</sub> outliers.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="feart-05-00087-g0006.tif"/>
</fig>
<sec>
<title>Effects of HCl treatments</title>
<p>The concentrations of CaO and inorganic carbon from NG15-B are well correlated with loss on ignition (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">6</xref>). Organic carbon is uncorrelated with loss on ignition. Because clay mineralogy is dominated by illite, which holds little structural water (Moore and Reynolds, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B77">1997</xref>), and organic carbon concentrations are low (ca. 0.03 wt.%), the majority of LOI is attributed to calcite.</p>
<p>All major elemental oxides (Na<sub>2</sub>O, MgO, K<sub>2</sub>O, Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>, SiO<sub>2</sub>, P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub>, MnO, Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>, and Ti<sub>2</sub>O) show significant (p &#x0003C; 0.05) correlations with CaO in untreated samples (Table <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM3">A3</xref>). Because many of the oxides are not associated with carbonate minerals, the correlations are interpreted to be a result of CaO diluting the contributions of other elementals to total measured concentrations. In contrast, only SiO<sub>2</sub>, P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub>, MnO, and Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> are correlated with CaO in decarbonated samples, and none of the weatherable bases (MgO, Na<sub>2</sub>O, K<sub>2</sub>O) are correlated with CaO. Most elements, including CaO, show little down-profile variation in decarbonated samples.</p>
<p>The effect of weight percent change induced by removal of carbonate-bound calcium scales linearly with the elemental concentration of each oxide, such that elements with higher concentrations in decarbonated samples receive a proportionately larger share of the relative measured weight occupied by CaO in untreated samples (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">6</xref>). Regression diagnostics were analyzed using the &#x0201C;plot&#x0201D; function in R (R Core Team, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B94">2016</xref>). Two samples with high initial CaO (28.0 and 30.5 wt.% before HCl treatment) were found to be high-leverage points in the linear regression, both of which had a Cook&#x00027;s distance of ca. 1 or more (Cook and Weisberg, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">1982</xref>). For these two samples, decarbonation resulted in disproportionately large increases in SiO<sub>2</sub> (samples with mass change &#x0003E;25 in Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">6C</xref>). When these two samples were omitted from simple linear regression in Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">6C</xref>, the correlation coefficient between treatment effect (oxide mass gain after decarbonation) and decarbonated oxide mass increased from 0.82 to 0.91. No other samples were found to be high-leverage points in regression analyses. The removal of CaO via decarbonation caused substantial increases in CIA-K and PWI index values (Figures <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">7A,B</xref>). Because Na<sub>2</sub>O and K<sub>2</sub>O are minimally affected by the treatment, NaK index values do not change significantly after decarbonation (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">7C</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F7" position="float">
<label>Figure 7</label>
<caption><p>Profiles of weathering indices and constitutive mass-balance results. See Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">1</xref> for weathering index formulae. <bold>(A)</bold> Chemical index of alteration minus potassium (CIA-K) values increase with decarbonation as a result of CaO removal and Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> relative mass increase. <bold>(B)</bold> Paleosol weathering index (PWI) values decrease with decarbonation; note that lower PWI values correspond to more highly weathered, base-poor samples. <bold>(C)</bold> Salinization index (NaK) values are generally inversely correlated before and after treatment due to the relative increase in Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> with removal of CaO. <bold>(D)</bold> Translocation (&#x003C4;) values indicate no down-profile change in TiO<sub>2</sub> or SiO<sub>2</sub> relative to parent material in either untreated or treated samples. Removal of carbonates resulted in a discernible increase in Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> in B horizons, which matches the Fe index (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">3</xref>). <bold>(E)</bold> The apparent CaO losses in B horizons for untreated samples does not appear after HCl treatment. No significant trends in MgO translocation are apparent. <bold>(F)</bold> Na<sub>2</sub>O and K<sub>2</sub>O show inverse translocation behavior, which are not affected by HCl treatment. Na<sub>2</sub>O loss is attributed to mineral weathering.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="feart-05-00087-g0007.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Mass-balance geochemistry</title>
<p>The three oxides commonly used as immobile index constituents in mass-balance calculations are Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>, TiO<sub>2</sub>, and ZrO<sub>2</sub>. The concentrations of these three oxides in untreated samples vary greatly down-profile, but showed little variation in decarbonated samples. Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> was selected as the immobile element for mass-balance calculations because it has the highest concentration of the three candidate oxides.</p>
<p>Results of tau calculations are presented in Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">7</xref>, wherein untreated and decarbonated samples are overlain on mass-balance plots for comparison. TiO<sub>2</sub> and SiO<sub>2</sub> concentrations do not vary relative to Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> in both untreated and decarbonated samples. Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>, however, shows increases in decarbonated samples from B horizons, a trend that was not observable in untreated samples and mirrors the micromorphologic Fe index (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">3</xref>). CaO shows large losses in B horizons relative to parent material in untreated samples (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">7E</xref>). With the exception of gains in the uppermost horizon, CaO concentrations in decarbonated samples vary within ca. 50% of parent material composition. MgO concentrations vary within ca. 25% of parent material for both untreated and decarbonated samples (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">7E</xref>). K<sub>2</sub>O and Na<sub>2</sub>O show inverse trends that are unaffected by the acid treatment (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">7F</xref>).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Clay mineralogy</title>
<p>Samples from the five uppermost horizons of NG15-B profile yielded similar X-ray diffraction results (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8">8</xref>). Primary peaks on each diffractogram of K<sup>&#x0002B;</sup>-saturated samples occur at 10.15, 5.02, and 3.34 &#x000C5;, which are associated with illite/mica 001, 002, and 003 peaks, respectively. Quartz can also contribute to the peak at 3.34 &#x000C5;, but because a secondary peak at 4.26 &#x000C5; is absent, quartz is either absent in the clay-sized fraction or contributing very little to the illite 003 peak. Peaks associated with smectite (17.5 &#x000C5;) and kaolinite (7.18 and 5.38 &#x000C5;) were not observed. The lack of change with Mg<sup>2&#x0002B;</sup> saturation, glycolation, or heat treatments further supports an interpretation of exclusively illitic clay mineralogy. The calcite peak corresponding to a d-spacing of 3.03 &#x000C5; is present in all samples, and is sharpest in the Btk horizon. Peaks occurring at 4.51 and 3.52 &#x000C5; may indicate minor quantities of detrital palygorskite and kaolinite, respectively (e.g., Myers et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B80">2011</xref>), though no secondary peaks associated with either mineral is present.</p>
<fig id="F8" position="float">
<label>Figure 8</label>
<caption><p>X-ray diffractograms of the &#x0003C;2 &#x003BC;m fraction from the first five horizons in NG15-B: <bold>(A)</bold> Bw, <bold>(B)</bold> BC, and <bold>(C&#x02013;E)</bold> three samples from the 2Btk horizon. Four treatments were applied to all samples: K-saturation, heating to 550&#x000B0;C of K-saturated samples, Mg-saturation, and ethylene glycolation of Mg-saturated samples. Illite is identified by the presence of peaks at 10.15, 5.02, and 3.34 &#x000C5;. Peaks associated with smectite (17.5 &#x000C5;) and kaolinite (7.18 and 5.38 &#x000C5;) were not observed, and the lack of change with glycolation or heat treatments further supports an interpretation of exclusively illitic clay mineralogy.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="feart-05-00087-g0008.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Paleoclimate</title>
<p>Two approaches were used to estimate MAP and MAT values: pedotransfer functions using weathering index proxies for MAP or MAT, and a multivariate spline model that uses 11 elemental oxides as input values to co-predict MAP and MAT (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9">9</xref>). The CIA-K proxy for MAP yields arid to semiarid values (&#x0003C;500 mm) for untreated samples and mostly subhumid values (500&#x02013;1,000 mm) for decarbonated samples. MAP values calculated using PPM<sub>1.0</sub> range from arid to humid for untreated samples, and, interestingly, range from arid to subhumid for treated samples&#x02014;substantially lower than CIA-K predicted MAP. Decarbonation resulted in no detectable change in MAT values predicted by NaK and PWI, which were within the frigid (&#x0003C;8&#x000B0;C) and mesic zones (8&#x02013;15&#x000B0;C), respectively. The PPM<sub>1.0</sub> model yielded mesic to thermic MAT values (ca. 8&#x02013;18&#x000B0;C) for untreated samples and frigid to mesic values (ca. 5&#x02013;14&#x000B0;C) for treated samples.</p>
<fig id="F9" position="float">
<label>Figure 9</label>
<caption><p>Cross-plots of climate estimations for decarbonated and untreated samples. See Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">1</xref> for details of each proxy. <bold>(A)</bold> Mean annual precipitation (MAP) estimates using CIA-K and PPM<sub>1.0</sub> show disparate results. MAP estimates using CIA-K are likely underestimated in untreated samples and overestimated in decarbonated samples, suggesting a dry subhumid climate (800&#x02013;1,000 mm), within error of PPM<sub>1.0</sub> estimates. <bold>(B)</bold> Mean annual temperature (MAT) estimates using NaK, PWI, and PPM<sub>1.0</sub>. Decarbonation had little effect on NaK and PWI estimates, but reduced PPM<sub>1.0</sub> output values. All estimates are interpreted to be too low for the geologic setting and sampled flora and fauna.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="feart-05-00087-g0009.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Stable isotopes and pedogenic carbonates</title>
<p>Pedogenic carbonate &#x003B4;<sup>13</sup>C and &#x003B4;<sup>18</sup>O results are presented in Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F10">10</xref>; raw values are reported in Table <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM4">A4</xref>. Values for &#x003B4;<sup>13</sup>C span approximately 9%0, ranging from &#x02212;7.3 &#x000B1; 0.1 to &#x02212;1.9 &#x000B1; 0.2%0 VPDB, and the majority of samples are more positive than the calculated endmember of water-stressed C<sub>3</sub> vegetation. Previously analyzed carbonate nodules from units 19 and 20 by Driese et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">2016</xref>) fall within the range of samples presented in this study, with the exception of a single nodule close to the C<sub>3</sub> endmember composition. Samples of lacustrine oncoid carbonate reported by Driese et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">2016</xref>) fall in the middle of the isotope space and mirror the overall negative correlation between &#x003B4;<sup>13</sup>C and &#x003B4;<sup>18</sup>O. This suggests that lacustrine carbonates carried an isotope signal that sampled a mixture of local vegetation, similar to Pleistocene riverine tufa from Karungu and Rusinga Island (Beverly et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">2015</xref>). Mean &#x003B4;<sup>18</sup>O values reported in this study range from &#x02212;4.6%0 to &#x02212;8.0%0, which are similar to pedogenic carbonate values ranging between ca. &#x02212;5%0 to &#x02212;8%0 reported from middle Miocene sites at Fort Ternan and West Turkana in Kenya (Cerling, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">1992</xref>), and thus likely did not form from highly evaporitic waters.</p>
<fig id="F10" position="float">
<label>Figure 10</label>
<caption><p>Stable isotopic compositions of pedogenic carbonates from Ngira. <bold>(A)</bold> Profiles in NG15-B of pedogenic carbonates, coded by morphology and phase (see <bold>B</bold> for key). Each sample is the mean of triplicate analysis; 1 &#x003C3; error bars about the mean are shown when error is greater than symbol size. <bold>(B)</bold> Cross-plot of &#x003B4;<sup>13</sup>C vs. &#x003B4;<sup>18</sup>O values, with calculated endmember compositions for C<sub>3</sub> and water-stressed C<sub>3</sub> (C<sub>3</sub>-ws) vegetation. The C<sub>4</sub> endmember is &#x0002B;4.5%0. Data for units NG19 and NG20, as well as lacustrine oncoid carbonates, are also plotted (from Driese et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">2016</xref>).</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="feart-05-00087-g0010.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Measured &#x003B4;<sup>13</sup>C values show limited correlation with carbonate morphology. Micritic, hairline rhizoliths from Bw horizons in the NG15-B profile have the highest &#x003B4;<sup>13</sup>C values (up to &#x02212;1.9%0). Mixed samples containing both rhizoliths and nodules are variable across the sample space. The composition of hard, gray nodules interpreted to be detrital is not unique; those occurring the 4Bw horizon have relatively high &#x003B4;<sup>13</sup>C and low &#x003B4;<sup>18</sup>O values, whereas those found in the 2Btk horizon have lower &#x003B4;<sup>13</sup>C and higher &#x003B4;<sup>18</sup>O values.</p>
<p>Using the calculated C<sub>3</sub> and C<sub>4</sub> endmembers of carbonate compositions, 21&#x02013;57% of the standing biomass associated with NG15 was C<sub>4</sub> vegetation. If a water-stressed C<sub>3</sub> endmember is used, 2&#x02013;47% C<sub>4</sub> biomass is required to account for the observed &#x003B4;<sup>13</sup>C values, which on the upper end at least is a considerable and possibly surprising amount of C<sub>4</sub> biomass for an interval of this age.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Microfossil assemblage results</title>
<p>Faunal composition of the excavated NG15 site is given in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">2</xref>. NISP for the excavation grid at NG15 was 415, including surface collections within the grid boundaries. Mammals are the dominant taxon in the excavated grid, with 81.1% of the total abundance (83.6% when including the indeterminate Mammalia). Aquatic taxa are present, but not very common, and include crocodiles (1.7%), turtles (1.2%), and fish (1.2%). In contrast, crocodiles and turtles collectively represent almost a third of the total NISP recovered through surface collections at Ngira as a whole.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T2">
<label>Table 2</label>
<caption><p>Faunal composition of the excavated NG15 site.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead><tr>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Taxon</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center" colspan="2" style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;"><bold>NG15 Excavation</bold></th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th/>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>NISP</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>%</bold></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Artiodactyla</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">13</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Carnivora</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Hyracoidea</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Lagomorpha</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">23</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>6.6</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Lipotyphla</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Macroscelidea</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">21</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>6.1</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Rodentia</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">219</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>63.1</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Crocodilia</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Gastropoda</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">15</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Osteichthyes</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Potamoidea</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">14</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Squamata</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">23</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>6.6</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Testudines</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Identified NISP</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">347</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">83.6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Total Mammalia</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">281</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">81.1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Indet. Mammalia</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">66</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">15.9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Indet. Vertebrata</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.5</td>
</tr>
<tr style="border-top: thin solid #000000;">
<td valign="top" align="left">Total NISP</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">415</td>
<td/>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p><italic>Only specimens recovered during the excavations and the surface sweep of the grid are taken into account. The most abundant taxa are highlighted. NISP, Number of Individual Specimen; % &#x0003D; relative abundance</italic>.</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>Only 152 of the 347 mammal specimens are sufficiently well-preserved to be identified at the genus level (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">3</xref>). By comparison, the surface collections made at Ngira include over 3,000 fossils, but only 482 belong to small mammals (i.e., body size of the rodent <italic>M. pentadactylus</italic> or smaller) identifiable to the genus level. The taxonomic composition of the NG15 excavation includes 10 genera, and surface collections from throughout Ngira yielded 18 genera of comparable size ranges. Both samples show seven genera in common, whereas three genera are unique to the NG15 excavation sample and 11 to the surface collections (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">3</xref>). Accordingly, the Jaccard similarity coefficient and the S&#x000F8;rensen&#x02013;Dice index are very low (33.3 and 50% respectively; see Lyman, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B67">2008</xref>), which indicate that the overall surface collection is quite different from the NG15 excavation in their taxonomic composition.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T3">
<label>Table 3</label>
<caption><p>Composition of the small mammal fauna from Ngira, recovered from the NG15 excavations and from surface collections (including REACHE surveys in 2010, 2012, 2013, 2015 and historical collections housed at the NMK).</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead><tr>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Taxon</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="left" colspan="2" style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;"><bold>NG15 Excavation</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center" colspan="2" style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;"><bold>Ngira Surface Collections</bold></th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th/>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>NISP</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>%</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>NISP</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>%</bold></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">RODENTIA</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">95</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">54.9</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">61</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">12.7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x000A0;&#x000A0;&#x000A0;&#x000A0;&#x000A0;<italic>Bathyergoides</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x000A0;&#x000A0;&#x000A0;&#x000A0;&#x000A0;<italic>Diamantomys</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x000A0;&#x000A0;&#x000A0;&#x000A0;&#x000A0;<italic>Epiphiomys</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x000A0;&#x000A0;&#x000A0;&#x000A0;&#x000A0;<italic>Kenyamys</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x000A0;&#x000A0;&#x000A0;&#x000A0;&#x000A0;<italic>Paraphiomys</italic><xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN3"><sup>&#x0002A;</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">89</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><bold>51.4</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">53</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>11.0</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x000A0;&#x000A0;&#x000A0;&#x000A0;&#x000A0;Pedetidae<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN3"><sup>&#x0002A;</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2.3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">LAGOMORPHA</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">23</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">13.3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">33</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7.2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x000A0;&#x000A0;&#x000A0;&#x000A0;&#x000A0;<italic>Kenyalagomys</italic><xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN3"><sup>&#x0002A;</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">23</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><bold>13.3</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">33</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7.2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">MACROSCELIDEA</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">20</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">11.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">128</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">27.8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x000A0;&#x000A0;&#x000A0;&#x000A0;&#x000A0;<italic>Miorhynchocyon</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.7</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x000A0;&#x000A0;&#x000A0;&#x000A0;&#x000A0;<italic>Myohyrax</italic><xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN3"><sup>&#x0002A;</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">17</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><bold>9.8</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">128</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>27.8</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">LIPOTYPHLA</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x000A0;&#x000A0;&#x000A0;&#x000A0;&#x000A0;<italic>Amphechinus</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x000A0;&#x000A0;&#x000A0;&#x000A0;&#x000A0;<italic>Galerix</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x000A0;&#x000A0;&#x000A0;&#x000A0;&#x000A0;<italic>Gymnurechinus</italic><xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN3"><sup>&#x0002A;</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">ARTIODACTYLA</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">12</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">7.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">244</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">52.9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x000A0;&#x000A0;&#x000A0;&#x000A0;&#x000A0;<italic>Diamantohyus</italic><xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN3"><sup>&#x0002A;</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">30</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x000A0;&#x000A0;&#x000A0;&#x000A0;&#x000A0;<italic>Dorcatherium</italic><xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN3"><sup>&#x0002A;</sup></xref></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">11</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">6.4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">209</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>45.3</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x000A0;&#x000A0;&#x000A0;&#x000A0;&#x000A0;<italic>Walangania</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">TUBULIDENTATA</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x000A0;&#x000A0;&#x000A0;&#x000A0;&#x000A0;<italic>Myorycteropus</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">CARNIVORA and HYAENODONTA</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x000A0;&#x000A0;&#x000A0;&#x000A0;&#x000A0;<italic>Anasinopa</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x000A0;&#x000A0;&#x000A0;&#x000A0;&#x000A0;<italic>Stenoplesictis</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">PRIMATE</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x000A0;&#x000A0;&#x000A0;&#x000A0;&#x000A0;<italic>Dendropithecus</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x000A0;&#x000A0;&#x000A0;&#x000A0;&#x000A0;<italic>Ekembo</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x000A0;&#x000A0;&#x000A0;&#x000A0;&#x000A0;<italic>Nyanzapithecus</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.2</td>
</tr>
<tr style="border-top: thin solid #000000;">
<td valign="top" align="left">Total NISP</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">152</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">482</td>
<td/>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p><italic>Included are all specimens identified to the genus level from taxa smaller or equal in size with M. pentadactylus. Pedetidae regroups the genera Megapedetes and Rusingapedetes. For each collection, the three most abundant taxa are highlighted. NISP, Number of Individual Specimen; %, relative abundance;</italic></p>
<fn id="TN3">
<label>&#x0002A;</label>
<p><italic>, genera in common in both samples</italic>.</p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>The small mammal community at Ngira is dominated by artiodactyls (especially the genus <italic>Dorcatherium</italic>) in the overall surface collection sample. In contrast, the NG15 excavation fauna is dominated by rodents, especially the genus <italic>Paraphiomys</italic>. Lagomorphs are equally well represented in both samples, whereas macroscelids (especially the genus <italic>Myohyrax</italic>) are more abundant in the surface collection sample. The NISP of each genus in common between surface collected and excavated samples at NG15 differ significantly in terms of taxonomic abundance (chi-square &#x0003D; 220.27; <italic>p</italic> &#x0003C; 0.001) and are not correlated (Spearman&#x00027;s rho &#x0003D; 0.36; <italic>p</italic> &#x0003E; 0.10), which suggests that the fauna recovered by the NG15 excavation may represent a separate ecosystem, or at least&#x02014;taking into account time averaging for the surface collections&#x02014;a specific ecosystem within an environmental mosaic that varied spatially and temporally at Ngira. Notably absent from NG15 are carnivorous mammals and primates, which are also rare in the surface and historical collections from Ngira.</p>
<p>Notable taxonomic differences were also observed within the NG15 profile (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T4">4</xref>). The depth interval from 5&#x02013;50 cm, which includes the C1, C2, and 2Btk horizons, is dominated by <italic>Paraphiomys</italic> and lacks remains of <italic>Dorcatherium</italic> and Pedetidae. The depth interval from 50 to 80 cm yields a moderate abundance of <italic>Dorcatherium</italic> and Pedetidae, but lacks the rodent <italic>Kenyamys</italic>. Although the taxonomic abundance of each depth interval is not significantly different (chi-square &#x0003D; 9.43; <italic>p</italic> &#x0003E; 0.32), the taxonomic composition does differ between the upper and lower portions of the profile (Jaccard similarity coefficient of 33.3%; S&#x000F8;rensen&#x02013;Dice index of 50%).</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T4">
<label>Table 4</label>
<caption><p>Faunal composition of the excavated NG15 site by depth interval, omitting surface collections.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead><tr>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Taxon</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center" colspan="4" style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;"><bold>NG15 Excavation</bold></th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th/>
<th valign="top" align="center" colspan="2" style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;"><bold>5&#x02013;50 cm (2Btk)</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center" colspan="2" style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;"><bold>50&#x02013;80 cm (2BC)</bold></th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th/>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>NISP</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>%</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>NISP</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>%</bold></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Kenyamys</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">3.2</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Paraphiomys</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">22</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><bold>71.0</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">54</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><bold>58.1</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Pedetidae</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">4</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">4.3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Kenyalagomys</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">5</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><bold>16.1</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">15</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><bold>16.1</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Myohyrax</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">3</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><bold>9.7</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">7</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">7.5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Miorhynchocyon</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Galerix</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Diamantohyus</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Dorcatherium</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">10</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><bold>10.8</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr style="border-top: thin solid #000000;">
<td valign="top" align="left">Total NISP</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">31</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left">93</td>
<td/>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p><italic>Included are all specimens identified to the genus level. For each interval, the three most abundant taxa are highlighted. NISP, Number of Individual Specimen; %, relative abundance</italic>.</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="discussion" id="s5">
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>Two profiles through stacked paleosols in unit 15 at Ngira preserve a unique assemblage of physical, biotic, and climatic elements of the Critical Zone in western Kenya during the early Miocene. The following discussion frames field and laboratory observations into interpretations of Critical Zone components, and subsequently ties inter-related processes together.</p>
<sec>
<title>Lithosphere</title>
<p>The stratigraphic interval of NG15 transitions laterally from small fluvial channels (Driese et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">2016</xref>) to pedogenically modified floodplain siltstones. Microtopography observed across the ca. 3 m described in the current study includes dipping sedimentary and paleosol horizon contacts that are overlain by coarser sediment, reworked carbonate nodules, and microvertebrate skeletal elements. We interpret these features to be the result of cut-and-fill episodes that were subsequently overprinted by pedogenic alteration.</p>
<p>The mineral assemblage reflects granitic basement sources in the surrounding uplands (Smith and Mosley, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B102">1993</xref>), and lacks evidence of drainage connection to the Kisingiri volcanic complex to the northwest. The detrital grains observed in thin section consist of dominantly poly- and mono-crystalline quartz, with accessory orthoclase, microcline, and plagioclase feldspars. This mineral assemblage is likely derived from a granitic source rather than the mafic-alkaline volcanic source at Kisingiri, due primarily to the lack of tuffaceous material, volcanic rock fragments, and paucity of mafic minerals observed in thin section. Amphiboles and pyroxenes are rare in NG15 thin sections and are highly weathered. The Fe released by decomposition of these mafic minerals was conserved as concretions in B horizons.</p>
<p>The clay mineral assemblage in NG15 is composed of illite, and volcanic grains are notably absent. Illite is most likely a detrital rather than diagenetic mineral for two reasons. First, unaltered smectite was observed in the lowest unit at Ngira (NG01) and contains no illite (Driese et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">2016</xref>). If the illite observed in NG15 were an alteration product of smectite, one would expect that NG01 would also have been illitized. The unconformity above NG01 coincides with a change in sediment composition and geomorphology, which accounts for the lack of detrital illite in NG01. Second, mass-balance calculations after removal of calcite from NG15 revealed that relatively little elemental variation was present between paleosol horizons. Significant production of pedogenic clay in B horizons would have been evident as increases in Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> relative to SiO<sub>2</sub> (Retallack, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B96">2008</xref>), which was not observed. Therefore, we interpret micromorphologic clay fabric and macroscopic clay coatings to be reworking of detrital clay.</p>
<p>Forbes et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">2004</xref>) previously described the stratigraphy and selected paleosols at Ngira. Their KU-3 paleosol is almost certainly the same interval as NG15, as their description includes clay-lined columnar peds in a Bt horizon underlain by thin couplets of siltstone and sandstone (see Figure 3 in Forbes et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">2004</xref>). The ped structure in the Btk horizon is actually prismatic, forming as a result of clay translocation and stabilization by herbaceous roots, rather than columnar peds, which form as a result of clay flocculation in sodic soils (Brady and Weil, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">2008</xref>). Forbes et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">2004</xref>) calculated constitutive mass-balance for samples equivalent to the Btk horizon of NG15 relative to a granitic parent material and found losses of 80&#x02013;90% for SiO<sub>2</sub>, Na<sub>2</sub>O, and K<sub>2</sub>O. This result led to the interpretation that the paleosols formed under subhumid to humid conditions. However, the parent material for the NG15 paleosol was fine-grained alluvium&#x02014;originally sourced from granitic basement&#x02014;and had significant additions of CaO associated with diagenetic calcite (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">6</xref>). Pre-weathering and reworking of alluvium before deposition at NG15 led to the overestimation of mass loss calculated by Forbes et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">2004</xref>). After removing carbonate-associated CaO, we found that only moderate <italic>in situ</italic> weathering occurred and the climate was more likely dry subhumid.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Hydrosphere</title>
<p>The NG15 paleosols show evidence of variable drainage conditions. The 2Btk horizon contains prismatic ped structure, macro- and micro-scopic illuvial clay coatings, pedogenic carbonate, and oxidized color, all of which form during well-drained conditions (Birkeland, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">1999</xref>). In contrast, isolated zones of Fe depletion are also present in both hand sample and thin section and are the result of saturated conditions. Hematite concretions are present in all B horizons and require intervals of water saturation to reduce and mobilize Fe from the surrounding soil matrix, and subsequent intervals of well-drained conditions to oxidize and stabilize Fe<sup>2&#x0002B;</sup> to Fe<sup>3&#x0002B;</sup> (Vepraskas, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B108">2001</xref>). Taken together, these features indicate that the paleosols in NG15 were episodically waterlogged, but the predominance of oxidized features is consistent with well-drained conditions for relatively longer durations.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Atmosphere: climate state</title>
<p>Mean annual precipitation estimations using CIA-K are bounded by underestimates associated with untreated samples containing artificially high CaO, and overestimates from decarbonated samples containing artificially low CaO due to the removal of small quantities of pedogenic carbonate. The best estimate for paleo-MAP is likely subhumid (500&#x02013;1,000 mm), which falls between the values calculated for untreated (&#x0003C;500 mm) and decarbonated samples (800&#x02013;1,200 mm). Previous MAP estimates from paleosol B horizons in NG19 and NG20, which occur &#x0007E;5 m stratigraphically above NG15 and showed no evidence of diagenetic calcite, also yielded subhumid MAP estimates (Driese et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">2016</xref>). Results from the PPM<sub>1.0</sub> model are variable with high error that encompasses all values calculated using CIA-K, and therefore offer less practical utility than the CIA-K estimates. The presence of illuvial clay and pedogenic carbonate is an indication of seasonally-variable precipitation.</p>
<p>Estimations of MAT using NaK, PWI, and PPM<sub>1.0</sub> are all clearly too low given the equatorial setting of the locality and presence of taxa that currently inhabit thermic to hyperthermic climate zones (e.g., crocodilians and turtles). Instead we suggest that MAT was probably considerably warmer and similar to fossil leaf estimates from Rusinga Island of 23&#x02013;35&#x000B0;C (Michel et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B75">2014</xref>). Paleosol studies frequently find the results from elemental proxies for MAT are below reasonable values, primarily because MAT is much less important in controlling soil weathering compared to other variables, such as MAP (e.g., Stinchcomb et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B103">2016</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Biosphere</title>
<sec>
<title>Flora</title>
<p>Multiple lines of evidence suggest that paleosols in NG15 formed under open canopy conditions with predominantly herbaceous vegetation. Root traces are abundant and occur in multiple morphologies, including calcareous rhizoliths, clay- and Fe-lined root pores, and as drab haloes. Drab halo root traces do not preserve original root dimensions (Retallack, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B96">2008</xref>); however, calcareous rhizoliths and clay- and Fe-lined pores likely record primary root diameters. All observed root traces are less than ca. 5 mm, consistent with herbaceous roots.</p>
<p>Further, &#x003B4;<sup>13</sup>C values of pedogenic carbonates are surprisingly high, and cannot be explained by water-stressed C<sub>3</sub> vegetation under the boundary conditions of modern terrestrial vegetation &#x003B4;<sup>13</sup>C values (Kohn, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B60">2010</xref>). The weak, negative relationship between &#x003B4;<sup>13</sup>C and &#x003B4;<sup>18</sup>O values (<italic>r</italic> &#x0003D; &#x02212;0.58) negates the possibility that high &#x003B4;<sup>13</sup>C values (i.e., water stressed vegetation) are associated with evaporative enrichment of soil water in <sup>18</sup>O, a circumstance observed in some lacustrine settings (Ufnar et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B105">2008</xref>). The most parsimonious explanation of highly enriched &#x003B4;<sup>13</sup>C signatures of pedogenic carbonates is the presence of C<sub>4</sub>-photosynthesizing biomass. Most of the measured &#x003B4;<sup>13</sup>C values fall within the range of modern wooded grassland (roughly &#x02212;2.4%0 to &#x02212;6.9%0), with only three samples within the range of woodland/bushland/shrubland biomes (roughly &#x02212;6.9%0 to &#x02212;12%0) (Cerling et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">2011</xref>).</p>
<p>Forbes et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">2004</xref>) reported organic carbon stable isotope analyses for the NG15 paleosol interval (interpreted to be their unit KU-3), with all values between ca. &#x02212;22%0 to &#x02212;25%0. Total organic matter measured in the paleosol was between 0.08 to 0.02 wt.%, which is far less than typical soil organic matter contents (e.g., Wynn, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B111">2007</xref>). These organic carbon isotope signatures are within the range for early Miocene C<sub>3</sub> vegetation. However, given the very low organic contents of the paleosols, we contend that the stable isotope signatures of pedogenic carbonates are better indicators of aboveground biomass in this setting.</p>
<p>Modern hydromorphic Vertisols have been shown to precipitate carbonate during a range of hydrologic conditions, from fully saturated to well-drained (Mintz et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B76">2011</xref>). In such soils, &#x003B4;<sup>13</sup>C values of authigenic carbonate phases tend to be more positive when calcite precipitates during well-drained conditions as a result of actively growing C<sub>4</sub> biomass and higher rates of atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> diffusion into soil pore space (Cerling, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">1991</xref>). Though NG15 does not contain Vertisols, occasional waterlogging may simulate the poorly drained phase common in Vertisols. The Mintz et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B76">2011</xref>) model of carbonate precipitation is in line with our interpretation of a C<sub>4</sub> biomass isotopic signature on the &#x003B4;<sup>13</sup>C values measured for NG15: specifically, that the carbonates in NG15 formed during well-drained conditions in equilibrium with fully terrestrial aboveground biomass. If, however, bicarbonate-fixing semi-aquatic vegetation were present at the time of carbonate precipitation, C<sub>4</sub> vegetation would not be necessary to account for the very positive values observed (e.g., Rascio, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B95">2002</xref>). To our knowledge, there is no diagnostic method for independently identifying such vegetation from the set of observations available in this study (e.g., root morphology). Thus, we acknowledge the possibility that the observed &#x003B4;<sup>13</sup>C values for pedogenic carbonates in NG15 could be the result of bicarbonate fixation by C<sub>3</sub> vegetation during water-saturated conditions. Given that the NG15 paleosols appear to be predominantly well-drained, with only occasional waterlogging, it is most plausible that the pedogenic carbonates measured in this study formed during well-drained conditions in equilibrium with a mixture of C<sub>3</sub> and C<sub>4</sub> biomass.</p>
<p>The &#x003B4;<sup>13</sup>C values measured for NG15 are similar to those previously reported by Driese et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">2016</xref>) for paleosols in NG19 and NG20 (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F10">10B</xref>). Because NG19 and NG20 were interpreted to be redoximorphic Vertisols, soil forming conditions were generally similar to that of NG15&#x02014;a fine grained substrate subjected to occasional waterlogging on a low-lying fluvial landscape. These similarities suggest that the open canopy biome interpreted for NG15 was recurrent throughout the stratigraphic section at Ngira, and that C<sub>4</sub> vegetation inhabited a marginal habitat within a narrow range of landscape positions in the early Miocene.</p>
<p>The microcharcoal reported in this study suggests that wildfires occurred in seasonally dry landscapes at or near Karungu in the early Miocene, though we note that cellular structure and stomata were not observed in our samples. Seasonal aridity is independently recorded as micromorphologic interlayering of translocated clay and carbonate in pedogenic concretions (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">5</xref>), with intervals of carbonate precipitation representing seasonal water deficiency. The microcharcoal grains are small enough to have been deposited from eolian or fluvial deposition. However, because most environmental reconstructions for early Miocene sites are for forested or woodland environments (Jacobs et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">1999</xref>), it is more likely that the charcoal originated locally in association with the open canopy land cover at NG15. Fire is one of the key ecological variables that can facilitate the maintenance of open-canopy landscapes (Bond and Keeley, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">2005</xref>; Keeley and Rundel, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B53">2005</xref>), and may have been an important property of the paleolandscapes preserved in NG15.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Fauna</title>
<p>The dominance of terrestrial fauna, paucity of aquatic taxa, and down-profile variations in faunal composition within NG15-A are consistent with sedimentologic and paleopedologic interpretations. The depth interval of 50-80 cm (2BC horizon) contains a larger NISP and taxonomic diversity than the overlying 45 cm (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T4">4</xref>), suggesting that fluvial reworking mixed microvertebrates from the local area and deposited them with detrital parent material. The depth interval from 5 to 50 cm is predominantly the 2Btk horizon and either contains a more local faunal signal unique to the position of NG15 on a floodplain, or a depositional fining-upward pattern caused taphonomic filtering toward smaller specimens higher in the profile.</p>
<p>The NG15 fauna differs both in taxonomic composition and abundance compared to the Ngira locality overall, with a predominance of <italic>Paraphiomys</italic> and a relative scarcity of artiodactyls (<italic>Dorcatherium</italic>), primates, and carnivores. Lagomorphs (<italic>Kenyalagomys</italic>) and elephant-shrews form an important proportion of the small mammal fauna at the NG15 site, but the highly specialized <italic>Myohyrax</italic> (Macroscelidea) is less abundant than in the overall Ngira assemblage. The small proportion of microfossils in surface collections can be attributed to multiple factors, including their relatively higher erodibility from outcrop and the inherent bias toward sampling larger fossils in surface collection (Rogers et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B97">2017</xref>). Microfossil assemblages are therefore particularly important to assess relative taxonomic abundance and species richness as they help to recover otherwise underrepresented small-bodied taxa (Lyman, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B67">2008</xref>). As a result of the NG15 excavations, the faunal list for Ngira has been expanded to now include the rodent <italic>Kenyamys</italic>, the Macroscelid <italic>Miorhynchocyon</italic>, and the Galericine <italic>Galerix</italic>, all of which are also known from Rusinga Island.</p>
<p>The paleoecology of the fossil genera observed in this study is not well understood and still relies mostly on comparison with modern analogs. The rodent genus <italic>Paraphiomys</italic> for instance, belongs to the family Thryonomyidae, whose extant representatives (endemic to Africa) live in long grass savanna, swamps and reed beds, do not dig burrows nor climb trees, and feed on coarse grass (Happold, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">2013a</xref>). Interestingly, these rodents tend to live in small groups, which may explain the concentration of 89 NISP at the NG15 excavation site, though more than half of these occur in the 2BC horizon that is interpreted to contain reworked specimens.</p>
<p>The two extinct genera of the rodent family Pedetidae, <italic>Megapedetes</italic> and <italic>Rusingapedetes</italic>, are morphologically similar to the extant springhares (<italic>Pedetes</italic>) (Pickford and Mein, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B92">2011</xref>; Butynski, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">2013a</xref>). Extant springhares are notorious saltatorial rodents, but are also good diggers. They feed primarily on grasses, live in arid and semiarid, relatively flat and open areas with short grass, with little or no woody vegetation (Butynski, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">2013b</xref>). The highest density of extant springhares is found near floodplains, lakes, and swamps (Butynski, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">2013b</xref>), which are within the plausible environments for NG15 based on sedimentary and paleosol evidence.</p>
<p>A recent study of the dental microwear of <italic>Dorcatherium</italic> species from Rusinga Island and Songhor (Ungar et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B106">2012</xref>) showed that, contrary to extant chevrotains, the fossil tragulids were ecologically diverse in their diet, ranging from variable grazers (<italic>D. chappuisi</italic>) and mixed feeders (<italic>D. parvum</italic>) to browsers/generalists (<italic>D. pigotti</italic>). These authors also suggested that the presence of grazing animals implied that there was at least some grass locally available. At Ngira, both in the NG15 excavations and in the surface collections, all three of these <italic>Dorcatherium</italic> species have been found.</p>
<p><italic>Kenyalagomys</italic> belongs to the family Ochotonidae, known from Africa from the early to the middle Miocene, and now only living in Eurasia and North America (Happold, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">2013b</xref>). The Leporidae migrated to Africa not before the late Miocene (Happold, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">2013b</xref>). Extant members of the Ochotonidae (i.e., pikas) are smaller than extant Leporidae of Africa, are terrestrial herbivorous animals, and are usually associated with rocks and talus slopes (Happold, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">2013b</xref>). Interestingly, a recent study showed that pikas have a strong preference for C<sub>3</sub> plants, whereas leporids are more attracted by C<sub>4</sub> plants (especially Poaceae; Ge et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">2013</xref>). The authors suggested also that the expansion of C<sub>4</sub> plants induced the extinction of ochotonids in Africa to the profit of leporids. We note, however, that the decrease in ochotonid genera began before the C<sub>4</sub> origination date (Ge et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">2013</xref>: Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">1</xref>).</p>
<p>Finally, the genus <italic>Myohyrax</italic> is more enigmatic, as they exhibit highly specialized, ungulate-like hypsodont teeth that are unique among macroscelids (Andrews et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">1979</xref>). Cranial, dental and postcranial features led several authors to suggest a tough diet (e.g., seeds), possibly a saltatorial locomotion, and a predilection for savannah (or &#x0201C;veldt&#x0201D;) habitat (Whitworth, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B110">1954</xref>; Patterson, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B88">1965</xref>).</p>
<p>None of these taxa represents a strict indicator for a forested environment. On the contrary, the reconstructed NG15 small mammal community supports an open floodplain environment with little wood cover. The observations of herbaceous roots and isotopic evidence for at least some C<sub>4</sub> grass imply the availability of fodder for animals adapted to grazing (e.g., hypsodont teeth) and open spaces suitable for fast moving animals (e.g., saltatorial locomotion). The spatially restricted and stratigraphically limited NG15 assemblage does not represent the entirety of the faunal community from Karungu. Hence, further studies are necessary to understand the faunal and environmental variations within the stratigraphic record preserved at Karungu.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Comparison to paleoenvironments of the Hiwegi formation on Rusinga Island</title>
<p>Previous investigations have often treated early Miocene deposits at Karungu and Rusinga Island, specifically the fauna of the Hiwegi Formation, as comparable (Nesbit Evans et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B81">1981</xref>; Pickford, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B90">1981</xref>). However, the results of this study and the work of Driese et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">2016</xref>) call this assumption into question for a number of reasons. First, lithostratigraphic and paleopedologic analyses of the entire sequence indicate a variety of depositional environments (Driese et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">2016</xref>). Additionally, our results, which document differences in the faunal assemblages between surface collections at Ngira and the excavation at NG15, also support the interpretation of multiple paleoenvironments within Ngira. Second, paleoenvironmental interpretations for the Hiwegi Formation on Rusinga Island indicate multiple environments ranging from more open shrubland to riparian woodland to closed-canopy tropical seasonal forest (Collinson et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">2009</xref>; Conrad et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">2013</xref>; Maxbauer et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B70">2013</xref>; Michel et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B75">2014</xref>). Third, the paleoenvironmental reconstructions for nearly every Critical Zone component reconstructed for NG15 are different from most recent environmental and climatic reconstructions of the Hiwegi Formation. While the stratigraphy at Ngira consists of interbedded fluvial and lacustrine strata (Driese et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">2016</xref>), sedimentation in the Hiwegi Formation is a mixture of fluvial, palustrine, and primary and reworked volcaniclastic material (e.g., ash fallout and lahars; Bestland and Krull, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">1999</xref>; Maxbauer et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B70">2013</xref>; Michel et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B75">2014</xref>). This indicates that there were substantial differences in physical sedimentary environments between Karungu and the Hiwegi Formation. We reconstruct the NG15 interval as an open canopy environment, ranging from an open riparian woodland to a wooded grassland biome. This is similar to, though perhaps more open than, environmental reconstructions for the Grit Member and lower Fossil Bed Member of the Hiwegi Formation, which are reconstructed as a patchwork of woodland and forested biomes within a riparian habitat in a warm and highly seasonal climate in which evaporitic conditions were recurrent (Collinson et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">2009</xref>; Conrad et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">2013</xref>; Maxbauer et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B70">2013</xref>). Likewise, the interpretations for the NG15 interval are considerably different from the paleoenvironmental reconstruction for the Kibanga Member of the Hiwegi Formation, which is reconstructed to be a closed-canopy, tropical seasonal forest (Michel et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B75">2014</xref>). Fourth, there are notable differences in the fauna recovered from Karungu and that of the Hiwegi Formation, particularly in the composition and abundance of small mammals and especially primates.</p>
<p>These differences between Karungu and Rusinga Island draw into question the reliability of wholesale comparisons of faunal composition and abundances between early Miocene sites before detailed geologic analyses are performed. For example, Pickford (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B90">1981</xref>) suggested that the Karungu fauna was most similar to that of the Hiwegi Formation from Rusinga Island (i.e., his faunal Set II). Perhaps the most conspicuous difference between Karungu and the Hiwegi Formation is the rarity of primate taxa at Karungu, in comparison to the relatively common primates found in the Hiwegi Formation. Coupled with evidence for variability in paleoenvironment and paleovegetation through the deposits at Karungu and through the Hiwegi Formation (e.g., this study; Collinson et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">2009</xref>; Maxbauer et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B70">2013</xref>; Michel et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B75">2014</xref>; Driese et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">2016</xref>), the differences in the faunal abundance and occurrences between Karungu and Rusinga Island are likely related to true faunal differences, possibly as a result of paleoenvironment differences.</p>
<p>Compared to the 34 genera (smaller or equal in size with <italic>M. pentadactylus</italic>) recorded from the Hiwegi formation at Rusinga Island (e.g., Pickford, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B91">1986</xref>), the small mammal collections of both the NG15 excavation (10 genera) and the Ngira surface collections (18 genera) are less taxonomically diverse. This could be an artifact of sampling bias, but we have exhaustively collected the Ngira deposits at Karungu over the last several years and small mammals are uncommon and carnivore and primate taxa are very rare. Thus, we hypothesize that the difference in small mammal diversity and abundance between Karungu and the Hiwegi Formation on Rusinga Island reflect true differences in the fauna. When our results are coupled with recent paleoenvironmental reconstructions from Karungu and the Hiwegi Formation (e.g., Collinson et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">2009</xref>; Conrad et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">2013</xref>; Maxbauer et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B70">2013</xref>; Michel et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B75">2014</xref>; Driese et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">2016</xref>), we conclude that a substantial heterogeneity of environments and climates existed in western Kenya in the early Miocene, and the paucity of primates at Karungu is not likely the result of biotic factors alone.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Paleoenvironmental context in East Africa</title>
<p>In general, early Miocene environments across East Africa are interpreted to have been dominated by tropical forest or woodland vegetation (Andrews and Van Couvering, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">1975</xref>; Edwards et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">2010</xref>). Stable isotope analyses of compound-specific biomarkers (Uno et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B107">2016</xref>), pedogenic carbonate (Cerling, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">1992</xref>), and fossil tooth enamel (Cerling et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">1998</xref>) suggest that C<sub>4</sub> vegetation was not common across East Africa until ca.10 Ma, with a gradual rise of C<sub>4</sub>-dominated grasslands starting in the late Miocene at ca. 8 Ma. Nevertheless, several lines of evidence suggest that a patchwork of environments existed in the early Miocene, at least in some parts of the region.</p>
<p>Sediment cores from the Niger River delta show evidence of grass pollen and charred grass cuticle appearing in low abundance at ca. 16 Ma, which is interpreted to signify the initiation of seasonally dry savannahs (Morley and Richards, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B79">1993</xref>). A review of Cenozoic vegetation across East Africa by Bonnefille (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">2010</xref>) provides strong evidence for a patchwork of dry, seasonal woodlands to humid forest habitats across the tropical belts of the African continent as early as the late Eocene. Pedogenic carbonates from the Tugen Hills succession near Lake Baringo in Kenya have &#x003B4;<sup>13</sup>C values consistent with mixed C<sub>3</sub> and C<sub>4</sub> vegetation from 15 Ma to Recent (Kingston et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B59">1994</xref>). Contemporaneous mammals from the same strata in the Tugen Hills also have tooth enamel &#x003B4;<sup>13</sup>C values that are higher than expected for a pure C<sub>3</sub> endmember, and in the absence of vegetation with extreme water stress, those mammals with high &#x003B4;<sup>13</sup>C values likely consumed some portion of C<sub>4</sub> vegetation in their diets (Morgan et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B78">1994</xref>). Based on the tendency of C<sub>4</sub> vegetation to exist in open canopy conditions in modern ecosystems, it is likely that the Tugen Hills succession contained at least a patchwork of woodland/shrubland to woody grassland environments.</p>
<p>Our observations supporting the presence of open canopy, dry woodland to woody grassland at Karungu are consistent with previous faunal analyses by Andrews et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">1979</xref>), who compared the composition of modern faunas with that of early Miocene sites. These included a total of 15 species (including microvertebrates) (Andrews, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">1974</xref>) from Karungu recovered from excavations and sieving from Oswald&#x00027;s (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B86">1914</xref>) Bed 16. According to our fieldwork, this stratigraphic interval corresponds to units 20&#x02013;22 of Driese et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">2016</xref>), 3&#x02013;5 m above NG15. In Andrews&#x00027; et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">1979</xref>) analysis, the fauna from Karungu stood out because: (1) its ecological diversity patterns as well as its locomotor adaptations resemble those of non-forest faunas; (2) its taxonomic composition closely resembles that of woodland-bushland faunas (except for the lack of carnivorous species); (3) the smallest size categories predominate the assemblage; and (4) interpreted feeding patterns of the community overall were unlike those in any modern community. Interestingly, unlike the NG15 excavation, this faunal assemblage was dominated by <italic>Kenyalagomys</italic> and <italic>Myohyrax</italic> (74% of the total NISP; Andrews, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">1974</xref>). But because both taxa have no living relatives in Africa today, Andrews et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">1979</xref>) considered that this faunal assemblage may either represent a habitat type that is no longer represented in Africa, or was a limited sample from a larger community. Based on similarities in pedogenic carbonate &#x003B4;<sup>13</sup>C values and paleoclimate estimates between NG15 and NG19-NG20, we hypothesize that the fauna recovered from NG20-NG22 also represent open canopy conditions. These environments may not be comparable to any known modern landscape due to the possibly ephemeral and unique nature of early C<sub>4</sub> savannahs or grasslands.</p>
<p>Finally, we posit a possible explanation for the lack of records of C<sub>4</sub> vegetation in recently studied marine cores. Uno et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B107">2016</xref>) present a compound-specific isotope record from cores taken from the Somali Basin, Gulf of Aden, and Red Sea. Their data offer a large-scale picture of vegetation types in East Africa, but necessarily sample externally-drained continental basins. However, the Ngira locality was potentially an endorheic basin, given the rapid lake level fluctuations documented in the stratigraphy (Driese et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">2016</xref>), and therefore is very unlikely to have contributed to the record of Uno et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B107">2016</xref>). This finding underscores the fact that, while a major turnover from C<sub>3</sub> to C<sub>4</sub> vegetation occurred in the late Miocene, much work remains for documenting landscape heterogeneity earlier in the geologic history of East Africa.</p>
<p>Taken together, the observations of pedogenic carbonate &#x003B4;<sup>13</sup>C signatures, paleosol morphology, microcharcoal, and microvertebrate fauna presented in this and previous studies support an interpretation of open canopy conditions within an overall diverse environmental mosaic in the early Miocene of western Kenya.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="conclusions" id="s6">
<title>Conclusions</title>
<p>Early Miocene deposits at Ngira show substantial environmental differences compared to the reconstructions for other contemporaneous primate-bearing deposits in Western Kenya. Climate and vegetation reconstructed for the NG15 stratigraphic interval is consistent with a dry, seasonal subhumid setting with open habitats likely ranging from open riparian woodland to wooded grassland, in which C<sub>4</sub> vegetation may have been an important ecosystem component. These findings differ from previous reconstructions for deposits at Karungu and suggest that either depositional processes or habitat preference are the root causes of differences between the faunal communities at Karungu and Rusinga Island.</p>
<p>The findings presented in this study allow us to present a number of testable hypotheses to explain the scarcity of primate remains at Karungu:</p>
<list list-type="simple">
<list-item><p>(H1) Early Miocene primates did not inhabit the open-canopy environments at Ngira;</p></list-item>
<list-item><p>(H2) Fluvial deposition on relatively low-relief floodplains was less likely to preserve primate remains than volcanic and volcaniclastic sedimentation on higher-relief slopes at Rusinga and Mfangano Islands;</p></list-item>
<list-item><p>(H3) The age for deposits at Karungu are incorrect, and strata are not directly comparable to formations on Rusinga Island.</p></list-item>
</list>
<p>To test H1, additional early Miocene sites that lack primate remains should be investigated. Because the focus on sedimentary environments of sites in Western Kenya has largely been in conjunction with faunal sites, there is clearly much to learn regarding non-fossiliferous strata. To test H2, taphonomic studies of primate fossils on Rusinga Island and mammalian fossils at Karungu should be compared. Further geochronologic control is needed to test H3, although overall similarities in non-primate fauna suggested that deposits at Karungu are similar in age to the Hiwegi Formation on Rusinga Island (Pickford, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B90">1981</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B91">1986</xref>). Pending further investigations, we tentatively favor H1&#x02014;that early Miocene primates did not favor the environments at Karungu&#x02014;due to the lack of canopy cover in a more open woodland to woody grassland biome in early Miocene times. While some hominoid primates were clearly adapted to open-canopy conditions by the Pliocene (Cerling et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">2011</xref>), it is yet unknown whether primates exploited non-forested ecosystems where they occurred in the early Miocene. Future investigations of early Miocene paleoclimate and paleoenvironments should include localities that lack primate fossils in order to test the relative importance of biotic vs. environmental controls on the occurrence of primates in the fossil record.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s7">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>WL and TL designed the study, collected field data, and performed laboratory analyses. WL, TL, DP, DF, SD, and KM wrote the manuscript.</p>
<sec>
<title>Conflict of interest statement</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<ack>
<p>Funding for this research was provided by the National Science Foundation (BCS &#x00023;124812 to SD and DP, and BCS &#x00023;1241807 to KM and DF), by the Karl und Marie Schack-Stiftung to TL, by the Vereinigung von Freunden und F&#x000F6;rderern der Goethe-Universit&#x000E4;t Frankfurt to TL, and the Baylor University Department of Geosciences. We are grateful to the Kenyan government and National Museums of Kenya and Dr. F. Kyalo Manti for facilitating our work. Invaluable field assistance was provided by K. Jenkins, D. Aketch, T. Cicak, M. Fuchs, C. Hemm, R. Henning, U. Menz, S.N. Muteti, S.O. Oloo, D. Obura, C. Ochieng, J. Ouma, T. Rumpf, J. Tausch, T. Wenzel, W. Odhiambo, S. Odhiambo, B.A. Obonyo, J.L. Otieno, F. Odeny, J.O. Orembe., K. Ogondo, and J. Shaduma. Logistical support was provided by J. Siembo. We thank associated editor G.E. Stinchcomb and C. Magill and D. Barboni for careful and constructive reviews. This manuscript is publication &#x00023;6 supporting Research on East African Catarrhine and Hominoid Evolution (REACHE).</p>
</ack>
<sec sec-type="supplementary-material" id="s8">
<title>Supplementary material</title>
<p>The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feart.2017.00087/full#supplementary-material">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feart.2017.00087/full#supplementary-material</ext-link></p>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Table1.xlsx" id="SM1" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Table2.xlsx" id="SM2" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Table3.xlsx" id="SM3" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Table4.xlsx" id="SM4" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Andrews</surname> <given-names>C. W.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1911</year>). <article-title>On a new species of Dinotherium (<italic>Dinotherium hobleyi</italic>) from British East Africa</article-title>. <source>Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond.</source> <volume>81</volume>, <fpage>943</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>945</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1096-3642.1911.tb01964.x</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B2">
<citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Andrews</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1974</year>). <source>Report on the Karungu 1973 Expedition</source>. <publisher-loc>Nairobi</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Kenya National Museum</publisher-name>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B3">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Andrews</surname> <given-names>P. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1978</year>). <article-title>A revision of the Miocene Hominoidea of East Africa</article-title>. <source>Bull. Br. Mus. Nat. Hist.</source> <volume>30</volume>, <fpage>85</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>224</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B4">
<citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Andrews</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Van Couvering</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1975</year>). <article-title>Palaeoenvironments in the East African Miocene</article-title>, in <source>Approaches to Primate Paleobiology</source>, <volume>Vol. 5</volume>, ed <person-group person-group-type="editor"><name><surname>Szalay</surname> <given-names>F. S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<publisher-loc>Basel</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Karger publisher</publisher-name>), <fpage>62</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>103</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B5">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Andrews</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lord</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nesbit Evans</surname> <given-names>E. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1979</year>). <article-title>Patterns of ecological diversity in fossil and modern mammalian faunas</article-title>. <source>Biol. J. Linn. Soc</source>. <volume>11</volume>, <fpage>177</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>205</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1095-8312.1979.tb00034.x</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B6">
<citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Begun</surname> <given-names>D. R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Fossil record of Miocene hominoids</article-title>, in <source>Handbook of Paleoanthropology</source>, eds <person-group person-group-type="editor"><name><surname>Henke</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tattersall</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name></person-group> (<publisher-loc>Berlin; Heidelberg</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Springer</publisher-name>), <fpage>1261</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1332</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B7">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bestland</surname> <given-names>E. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Krull</surname> <given-names>E. S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1999</year>). <article-title>Palaeoenvironments of Early Miocene Kisingiri volcano Proconsul sites: evidence from carbon isotopes, palaeosols and hydromagmatic deposits</article-title>. <source>J. Geol. Soc</source>. <volume>156</volume>, <fpage>965</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>976</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1144/gsjgs.156.5.0965</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B8">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bestland</surname> <given-names>E. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Thackray</surname> <given-names>G. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Retallack</surname> <given-names>G. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1995</year>). <article-title>Cycles of doming and eruption of the Miocene Kisingiri Volcano, Southwest Kenya</article-title>. <source>J. Geol</source>. <volume>103</volume>, <fpage>598</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>607</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1086/629779</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B9">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Beverly</surname> <given-names>E. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Driese</surname> <given-names>S. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Peppe</surname> <given-names>D. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Johnson</surname> <given-names>C. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Michel</surname> <given-names>L. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Faith</surname> <given-names>J. T.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Recurrent spring-fed rivers in a Middle to Late Pleistocene semi-arid grassland: implications for environments of early humans in the Lake Victoria Basin, Kenya</article-title>. <source>Sedimentology</source> <volume>62</volume>, <fpage>1611</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1635</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/sed.12199</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B10">
<citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Birkeland</surname> <given-names>P. W.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1999</year>). <source>Soils and Geomorphology, 3rd Edn.</source> <publisher-loc>New York, NY</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Oxford University Press</publisher-name>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B11">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bond</surname> <given-names>W. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Keeley</surname> <given-names>J. E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Fire as a global &#x0201C;herbivore&#x0201D;: the ecology and evolution of flammable ecosystems</article-title>. <source>Trends Ecol. Evol</source>. <volume>20</volume>, <fpage>387</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>394</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.tree.2005.04.025</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16701401</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B12">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bonnefille</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Cenozoic vegetation, climate changes and hominid evolution in tropical Africa</article-title>. <source>Global Planet. Change</source> <volume>72</volume>, <fpage>390</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>411</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.gloplacha.2010.01.015</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B13">
<citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Brady</surname> <given-names>N. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Weil</surname> <given-names>R. C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <source>The Nature and Properties of Soils, 14th Edn.</source> <publisher-name>Pearson Education, Inc</publisher-name>. <publisher-loc>Upper Saddle River, NJ</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Pearson Prentice Hall</publisher-name>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B14">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Brantley</surname> <given-names>S. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Goldhaber</surname> <given-names>M. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ragnarsdottir</surname> <given-names>K. V.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Crossing disciplines and scales to understand the critical zone</article-title>. <source>Elements</source> <volume>3</volume>, <fpage>307</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>314</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2113/gselements.3.5.307</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B15">
<citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Brewer</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1964</year>). <source>Fabric and Mineral Analysis of Soils</source>. <publisher-loc>New York, NY</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Wiley</publisher-name>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B16">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Brimhall</surname> <given-names>G. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dietrich</surname> <given-names>W. E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1987</year>). <article-title>Constitutive mass balance relations between chemical composition, volume, density, porosity, and strain in metasomatic hydrochemical systems: results on weathering and pedogenesis</article-title>. <source>Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta</source> <volume>51</volume>, <fpage>567</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>587</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0016-7037(87)90070-6</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B17">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Brimhall</surname> <given-names>G. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ford</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bratt</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Taylor</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Warin</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1991</year>). <article-title>Quantitative geochemical approach to pedogenesis: importance of parent material reduction, volumetric expansion, and eolian influx in lateritization</article-title>. <source>Geoderma</source> <volume>51</volume>, <fpage>51</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>91</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0016-7061(91)90066-3</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B18">
<citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bull</surname> <given-names>W. B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1991</year>). <source>Geomorphic Responses to Climatic Change.</source> <publisher-loc>New York, NY</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Oxford University Press</publisher-name>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B19">
<citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bullock</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fedoroff</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jungerius</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Stoops</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tursina</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1985</year>). <source>Handbook of Soil Thin Section Description</source>. <publisher-loc>Albrighton</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Waine Research Publications</publisher-name>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B20">
<citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Butynski</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013a</year>). <article-title>Family Pedetidae</article-title>, in <source>Mammals of Africa</source>, eds <person-group person-group-type="editor"><name><surname>Kingdon</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Happold</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Butynski</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hoffmann</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Happold</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kalina</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<publisher-loc>London</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Bloomsbury Publishing</publisher-name>), <fpage>618</fpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B21">
<citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Butynski</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013b</year>). <article-title>Species profile: pedetes capensis</article-title>, in <source>Mammals of Africa</source>, eds <person-group person-group-type="editor"><name><surname>Kingdon</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Happold</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Butynski</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hoffmann</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Happold</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kalina</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<publisher-loc>London</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Bloomsbury Publishing</publisher-name>), <fpage>619</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>624</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B22">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cerling</surname> <given-names>T. E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1992</year>). <article-title>Development of grasslands and savannas in East Africa during the Neogene</article-title>. <source>Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol</source>. <volume>97</volume>, <fpage>241</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>247</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0031-0182(92)90211-M</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B23">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cerling</surname> <given-names>T. E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1991</year>). <article-title>Carbon dioxide in the atmosphere: evidence from Cenozoic and Mesozoic paleosls</article-title>. <source>Am. J. Sci.</source> <volume>291</volume>, <fpage>377</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>400</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2475/ajs.291.4.377</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B24">
<citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cerling</surname> <given-names>T. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Quade</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1993</year>). <article-title>Stable carbon and oxygen isotopes in soil carbonates</article-title>, in <source>Climate Change in Continental Isotopic Records</source>, eds <person-group person-group-type="editor"><name><surname>Swart</surname> <given-names>P. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lohmann</surname> <given-names>K. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mckenzie</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Savin</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<publisher-loc>Washington, DC</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>American Geophysical Union</publisher-name>), <fpage>217</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>231</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1029/GM078p0217</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B25">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cerling</surname> <given-names>T. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ehleringer</surname> <given-names>J. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Harris</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1998</year>). <article-title>Carbon dioxide starvation, the development of C4 ecosystems, and mammalian evolution</article-title>. <source>Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci</source>. <volume>353</volume>, <fpage>159</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>171</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1098/rstb.1998.0198</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">9507562</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B26">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cerling</surname> <given-names>T. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Harris</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>MacFadden</surname> <given-names>B. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Leakey</surname> <given-names>M. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Quade</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Eisenmann</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>1997</year>). <article-title>Global vegetation change through the Miocene/Pliocene boundary</article-title>. <source>Nature</source> <volume>389</volume>, <fpage>153</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>158</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/38229</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B27">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cerling</surname> <given-names>T. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Quade</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bowman</surname> <given-names>J. R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1989</year>). <article-title>Carbon isotopes in soils and palaeosols as ecology and palaeoecology indicators</article-title>. <source>Nature</source> <volume>341</volume>, <fpage>138</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>139</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/341138a0</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B28">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cerling</surname> <given-names>T. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wynn</surname> <given-names>J. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Andanje</surname> <given-names>S. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bird</surname> <given-names>M. I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Korir</surname> <given-names>D. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Levin</surname> <given-names>N. E.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Woody cover and hominin environments in the past 6 million years</article-title>. <source>Nature</source> <volume>476</volume>, <fpage>51</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>56</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nature10306</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21814275</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B29">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chadwick</surname> <given-names>O. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Brimhall</surname> <given-names>G. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hendricks</surname> <given-names>D. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1990</year>). <article-title>From a black to a gray box &#x02014; a mass balance interpretation of pedogenesis</article-title>. <source>Geomorphology</source> <volume>3</volume>, <fpage>369</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>390</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0169-555X(90)90012-F</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B30">
<citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Clark</surname> <given-names>W. E. L. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Leakey</surname> <given-names>L. S. B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1951</year>). <article-title>The miocene hominoidea of east africa</article-title>, in <source>Fossil Mammals of Africa</source>, <volume>Vol. 1</volume> (<publisher-loc>London</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Natural History</publisher-name>).</citation></ref>
<ref id="B31">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Collinson</surname> <given-names>M. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Andrews</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bamford</surname> <given-names>M. K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Taphonomy of the early Miocene flora, Hiwegi Formation, Rusinga Island, Kenya</article-title>. <source>J. Hum. Evol</source>. <volume>57</volume>, <fpage>149</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>162</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jhevol.2009.02.010</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19576619</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B32">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Conrad</surname> <given-names>J. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jenkins</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lehmann</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Manthi</surname> <given-names>F. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Peppe</surname> <given-names>D. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nightingale</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>New specimens of &#x0201C;<italic>Crocodylus</italic>&#x0201D; <italic>pigotti</italic> (Crocodylidae) from Rusinga Island, Kenya, and generic reallocation of the species</article-title>. <source>J. Vertebr. Paleontol</source>. <volume>33</volume>, <fpage>629</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>646</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/02724634.2013.743404</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B33">
<citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cook</surname> <given-names>R. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Weisberg</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1982</year>). <source>Residuals and Influence in Regression</source>. <publisher-loc>New York, NY</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Chapman &#x00026; Hall</publisher-name>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B34">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Drake</surname> <given-names>R. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Van Couvering</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pickford</surname> <given-names>M. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Curtis</surname> <given-names>G. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Harris</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1988</year>). <article-title>New chronology for the Early Miocene mammalian faunas of Kisingiri, Western Kenya</article-title>. <source>J. Geol. Soc</source>. <volume>145</volume>, <fpage>479</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>491</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1144/gsjgs.145.3.0479</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B35">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Driese</surname> <given-names>S. G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>Pedogenic Translocation of Fe in Modern and Ancient Vertisols and Implications for Interpretations of the Hekpoort Paleosol (2.25 Ga)</article-title>. <source>J. Geol</source>. <volume>112</volume>, <fpage>543</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>560</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1086/422665</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B36">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Driese</surname> <given-names>S. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mora</surname> <given-names>C. I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Stiles</surname> <given-names>C. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Joeckel</surname> <given-names>R. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nordt</surname> <given-names>L. C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2000</year>). <article-title>Mass-balance reconstruction of a modern Vertisol: implications for interpreting the geochemistry and burial alteration of paleo-Vertisols</article-title>. <source>Geoderma</source> <volume>95</volume>, <fpage>179</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>204</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0016-7061(99)00074-9</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B37">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Driese</surname> <given-names>S. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Peppe</surname> <given-names>D. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Beverly</surname> <given-names>E. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>DiPietro</surname> <given-names>L. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Arellano</surname> <given-names>L. N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lehmann</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Paleosols and paleoenvironments of the early Miocene deposits near Karungu, Lake Victoria, Kenya</article-title>. <source>Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol</source>. <volume>443</volume>, <fpage>167</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>182</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.palaeo.2015.11.030</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B38">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Edwards</surname> <given-names>E. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Osborne</surname> <given-names>C. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Str&#x000F6;mberg</surname> <given-names>C. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Smith</surname> <given-names>S. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Consortium</surname> <given-names>C. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bond</surname> <given-names>W. J.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>The origins of C4 grasslands: integrating evolutionary and ecosystem science</article-title>. <source>Science</source> <volume>328</volume>, <fpage>587</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>591</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/science.1177216</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20431008</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B39">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ehleringer</surname> <given-names>J. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cooper</surname> <given-names>T. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1988</year>). <article-title>Correlations between carbon isotope ratio and microhabitat in desert plants</article-title>. <source>Oecologia</source> <volume>76</volume>, <fpage>562</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>566</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/BF00397870</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28312408</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B40">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Forbes</surname> <given-names>M. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bestland</surname> <given-names>E. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Krull</surname> <given-names>E. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dicker</surname> <given-names>D. G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>Palaeoenvironmental mosaic of Proconsul habitats: geochemical and sedimentalogical interpretation of Kisingiri fossil sites, Western Kenya</article-title>. <source>J. Afr. Earth Sci</source>. <volume>39</volume>, <fpage>63</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>79</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2004.04.003</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B41">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Fox</surname> <given-names>D. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Honey</surname> <given-names>J. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Martin</surname> <given-names>R. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pel&#x000E1;ez-Campomanes</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Pedogenic carbonate stable isotope record of environmental change during the Neogene in the southern Great Plains, southwest Kansas, USA: carbon isotopes and the evolution of C4-dominated grasslands</article-title>. <source>Geol. Soc. Am. Bull</source>. <volume>124</volume>, <fpage>444</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>462</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1130/B30401.1</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B42">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gallagher</surname> <given-names>T. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sheldon</surname> <given-names>N. D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>A new paleothermometer for forest paleosols and its implications for Cenozoic climate</article-title>. <source>Geology</source> <volume>41</volume>, <fpage>647</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>650</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1130/G34074.1</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B43">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ge</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wen</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xia</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Erbajeva</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Evolutionary history of lagomorphs in response to global environmental change</article-title>. <source>PLoS ONE</source> <volume>8</volume>:<fpage>e59668</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0059668</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23573205</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B44">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gebo</surname> <given-names>D. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>MacLatchy</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kityo</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Deino</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kingston</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pilbeam</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1997</year>). <article-title>A hominoid genus from the early Miocene of Uganda</article-title>. <source>Science</source> <volume>276</volume>, <fpage>401</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>404</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/science.276.5311.401</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">9103195</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B45">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Geraads</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lehmann</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Peppe</surname> <given-names>D. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>McNulty</surname> <given-names>K. P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>New Rhinocerotidae from the Kisingiri localities (lower Miocene of western Kenya)</article-title>. <source>J. Vertebr. Paleontol</source>. 36:e1103247. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/02724634.2016.1103247</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B46">
<citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Happold</surname> <given-names>D. C. D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013a</year>). <article-title>Family thryonomyidae</article-title>, in <source>Mammals of Africa</source>, eds <person-group person-group-type="editor"><name><surname>Kingdon</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Happold</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Butynski</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hoffmann</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Happold</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kalina</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<publisher-loc>London</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Bloomsbury Publishing</publisher-name>), <fpage>685</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>690</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B47">
<citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Happold</surname> <given-names>D. C. D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013b</year>). <article-title>Order Lagomorpha</article-title>, in <source>Mammals of Africa</source>, eds <person-group person-group-type="editor"><name><surname>Kingdon</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Happold</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Butynski</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hoffmann</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Happold</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kalina</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<publisher-loc>London</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Bloomsbury Publishing</publisher-name>), <fpage>693</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>717</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B48">
<citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Harrison</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Dendropithecoidea, proconsuloidea, and hominoidea</article-title> in <source>Cenozoic Mammals of Africa</source>, eds <person-group person-group-type="editor"><name><surname>Werdelin</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sanders</surname> <given-names>W. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<publisher-loc>Berkeley, CA</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>University of California Press</publisher-name>), <fpage>429</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>469</lpage></citation></ref>
<ref id="B49">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hopwood</surname> <given-names>A. T.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1933</year>). <article-title>XI.&#x02014;Miocene Primates from British East Africa</article-title>. <source>J. Nat. Hist</source>. <volume>11</volume>, <fpage>96</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>98</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/00222933308673629</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B50">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jacobs</surname> <given-names>B. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kingston</surname> <given-names>J. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jacobs</surname> <given-names>L. L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1999</year>). <article-title>The Origin of Grass-Dominated Ecosystems</article-title>. <source>Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard</source>. <volume>86</volume>, <fpage>590</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2307/2666186</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B51">
<citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jacobs</surname> <given-names>B. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pan</surname> <given-names>A. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Scotese</surname> <given-names>C. R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>A review of the Cenozoic vegetation history of Africa</article-title>, in <source>Cenozoic Mammals of Africa</source>, eds <person-group person-group-type="editor"><name><surname>Werdelin</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sanders</surname> <given-names>W. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<publisher-loc>Berkeley, CA</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>University California Press</publisher-name>), <fpage>57</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>72</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B52">
<citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kay</surname> <given-names>R. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ungar</surname> <given-names>P. S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1997</year>). <article-title>Dental evidence for diet in some <italic>Miocene catarrhines</italic> with comments on the effects of phylogeny on the interpretation of adaptation</article-title>, in <source>Function, Phylogeny, and Fossils</source>, eds <person-group person-group-type="editor"><name><surname>Begun</surname> <given-names>D. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ward</surname> <given-names>C. V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rose</surname> <given-names>M. D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<publisher-loc>New York, NY</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Springer; Plenum Publishing Co.</publisher-name>), <fpage>131</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>151</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B53">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Keeley</surname> <given-names>J. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rundel</surname> <given-names>P. W.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Fire and the Miocene expansion of C4 grasslands: Miocene C4 grassland expansion</article-title>. <source>Ecol. Lett</source>. <volume>8</volume>, <fpage>683</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>690</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00767.x</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B54">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kelley</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1986</year>). <article-title>Species recognition and sexual dimorphism in Proconsul and Rangwapithecus</article-title>. <source>J. Hum. Evol</source>. <volume>15</volume>, <fpage>461</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>495</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0047-2484(86)80028-8</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B55">
<citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kelley</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1993</year>). <article-title>Taxonomic implications of sexual dimorphism in Lufengpithecus</article-title>, in <source>Species, Species Concepts and Primate Evolution</source>, eds <person-group person-group-type="editor"><name><surname>Kimbel</surname> <given-names>W. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Martin</surname> <given-names>L. B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<publisher-loc>New York, NY</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Springer</publisher-name>; <publisher-name>Plenum Press</publisher-name>), <fpage>429</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>458</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B56">
<citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kelley</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1997</year>). <article-title>Paleobiological and phylogenetic significance of life history in Miocene hominoids</article-title>, in <source>Function, Phylogeny, and Fossils</source>, eds <person-group person-group-type="editor"><name><surname>Begun</surname> <given-names>D. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ward</surname> <given-names>C. V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rose</surname> <given-names>M. D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<publisher-loc>New York, NY</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Springer; Plenum Publishing Co.</publisher-name>), <fpage>173</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>208</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B57">
<citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kelley</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>The hominoid radiation in Asia</article-title>, in <source>The Primate Fossil Record</source>. ed <person-group person-group-type="editor"><name><surname>Hartwig</surname> <given-names>W. C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<publisher-loc>Cambridge</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Cambridge University Press</publisher-name>).</citation></ref>
<ref id="B58">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>King</surname> <given-names>B. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Le Bas</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sutherland</surname> <given-names>D. S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1972</year>). <article-title>The history of the alkaline volcanoes and intrusive complexes of eastern Uganda and western Kenya</article-title>. <source>J. Geol. Soc</source>. <volume>128</volume>, <fpage>173</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>205</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1144/gsjgs.128.2.0173</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B59">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kingston</surname> <given-names>J. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Marino</surname> <given-names>B. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hill</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1994</year>). <article-title>Isotopic evidence for Neogene hominid paleoenvironments in the Kenya Rift Valley</article-title>. <source>Science</source> <volume>264</volume>, <fpage>955</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>958</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/science.264.5161.955</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17830084</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B60">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kohn</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Carbon isotope compositions of terrestrial C3 plants as indicators of (paleo)ecology and (paleo)climate. <italic>Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci</italic></article-title>. <source>U.S.A.</source> <volume>107</volume>, <fpage>19691</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>19695</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.1004933107</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B61">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Leakey</surname> <given-names>L. S. B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1943</year>). <article-title>A Miocene anthropoid mandible from Rusinga, Kenya</article-title>. <source>Nature</source> <volume>152</volume>, <fpage>319</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>320</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/152319a0</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B62">
<citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Leakey</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Walker</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1997</year>). <article-title>Afropithecus</article-title>, in <source>Function, Phylogeny, and Fossils</source>, eds <person-group person-group-type="editor"><name><surname>Begun</surname> <given-names>D. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ward</surname> <given-names>C. V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rose</surname> <given-names>M. D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<publisher-loc>New York, NY</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Springer; Plenum Publishing Co.</publisher-name>), <fpage>225</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>239</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B63">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lehmann</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Peppe</surname> <given-names>D. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Driese</surname> <given-names>S. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jenkins</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sanders</surname> <given-names>W. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>McNulty</surname> <given-names>K. P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>New fieldwork at Karungu (early Miocene; Lake Victoria, Kenya): preliminary paleontological and geological results</article-title>. <source>J. Vertebr. Paleontol. Progr. Abstr</source>. A168.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B64">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lovejoy</surname> <given-names>C. O.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Reexamining human origins in light of Ardipithecus ramidus</article-title>. <source>Science</source> <volume>326</volume>, <fpage>74</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>74e</lpage>8. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/science.1175834</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19810200</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B65">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lovejoy</surname> <given-names>C. O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Simpson</surname> <given-names>S. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>White</surname> <given-names>T. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Asfaw</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Suwa</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2009a</year>). <article-title>Careful climbing in the Miocene: the forelimbs of <italic>Ardipithecus ramidus</italic> and humans are primitive</article-title>. <source>Science</source> <volume>326</volume>, <fpage>70</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>70e</lpage>8. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/science.1175827</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19810196</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B66">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lovejoy</surname> <given-names>C. O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Suwa</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Simpson</surname> <given-names>S. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Matternes</surname> <given-names>J. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>White</surname> <given-names>T. D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2009b</year>). <article-title>The great divides: <italic>Ardipithecus ramidus</italic> reveals the postcrania of our last common ancestors with African apes</article-title>. <source>Science</source> <volume>326</volume>, <fpage>73</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>106</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/science.1175833</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19810199</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B67">
<citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lyman</surname> <given-names>R. L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <source>Quantitative Paleozoology</source>. <publisher-loc>Cambridge</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Cambridge University Press</publisher-name>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B68">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>MacLatchy</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gebo</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kityo</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pilbeam</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2000</year>). <article-title>Postcranial functional morphology of <italic>Morotopithecus bishopi</italic>, with implications for the evolution of modern ape locomotion</article-title>. <source>J. Hum. Evol</source>. <volume>39</volume>, <fpage>159</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>183</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1006/jhev.2000.0407</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10968927</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B69">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>MacLatchy</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rossie</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Smith</surname> <given-names>T. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tafforeau</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Evidence for dietary niche separation in the miocene hominoids morotopithecus and afropithecus</article-title>. <source>Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. Supplement.</source> <volume>48</volume>:<fpage>181</fpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B70">
<citation citation-type="web"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Maxbauer</surname> <given-names>D. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Peppe</surname> <given-names>D. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bamford</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>McNulty</surname> <given-names>K. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Harcourt-Smith</surname> <given-names>W. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Davis</surname> <given-names>L. E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>A morphotype catalog and paleoenvironmental interpretations of early Miocene fossil leaves from the Hiwegi Formation, Rusinga Island, Lake Victoria, Kenya</article-title>. <source>Palaeontol. Electron</source>. 16.3.28A. Available online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://palaeo-electronica.org/content/2013/547-rusinga-island-flora">http://palaeo-electronica.org/content/2013/547-rusinga-island-flora</ext-link></citation></ref>
<ref id="B71">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>McCollum</surname> <given-names>M. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Peppe</surname> <given-names>D. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>McNulty</surname> <given-names>K. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dunsworth</surname> <given-names>H. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Harcourt-Smith</surname> <given-names>W. E. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Andrews</surname> <given-names>A. L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Magnetostratigraphy of the early miocene hiwegi formation (Rusinga Island, Lake Victoria, Kenya)</article-title>. <source>Geol. Soc. Am. Abst. Prog.</source> <volume>44</volume>:<fpage>241</fpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B72">
<citation citation-type="thesis"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>McNulty</surname> <given-names>K. P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <source>Geometric Morphometric Analyses of Extant and Fossil Hominoid Craniofacial Morphology</source>, Unpublished PhD. Thesis, <publisher-name>University of New York</publisher-name>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B73">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>McNulty</surname> <given-names>K. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Begun</surname> <given-names>D. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kelley</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Manthi</surname> <given-names>F. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mbua</surname> <given-names>E. N.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>A systematic revision of Proconsul with the description of a new genus of early Miocene hominoid</article-title>. <source>J. Hum. Evol</source>. <volume>84</volume>, <fpage>42</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>61</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jhevol.2015.03.009</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25962549</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B74">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>McNulty</surname> <given-names>K. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Harcourt-Smith</surname> <given-names>W. E. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dunsworth</surname> <given-names>H. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>New primate fossils from rusinga island, kenya</article-title>. <source>Am. J. Phys. Anthropol.</source> <volume>132</volume>:<fpage>170</fpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B75">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Michel</surname> <given-names>L. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Peppe</surname> <given-names>D. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lutz</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Driese</surname> <given-names>S. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dunsworth</surname> <given-names>H. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Harcourt-Smith</surname> <given-names>W. E. H.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Remnants of an ancient forest provide ecological context for Early Miocene fossil apes</article-title>. <source>Nat. Commun.</source> <volume>5</volume>:<fpage>3236</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/ncomms4236</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24549336</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B76">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mintz</surname> <given-names>J. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Driese</surname> <given-names>S. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Breecker</surname> <given-names>D. O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ludvigson</surname> <given-names>G. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Influence of changing hydrology on pedogenic calcite precipitation in Vertisols, Dance Bayou, Brazoria County, Texas, U.S.A.: implications for estimating paleoatmospheric pCO<sub>2</sub></article-title>. <source>J. Sediment. Res.</source> <volume>81</volume>, <fpage>394</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>400</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2110/jsr.2011.36</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B77">
<citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Moore</surname> <given-names>D. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Reynolds</surname> <given-names>R. C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1997</year>). <source>X-ray Diffraction and the Identification and Analysis of Clay Minerals</source>. <publisher-loc>Oxford</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Oxford University Press Oxford</publisher-name>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B78">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Morgan</surname> <given-names>M. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kingston</surname> <given-names>J. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Marino</surname> <given-names>B. D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1994</year>). <article-title>Carbon isotopic evidence for the emergence of C4 plants in the Neogene from Pakistan and Kenya</article-title>. <source>Nature</source> <volume>367</volume>, <fpage>162</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>165</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/367162a0</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B79">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Morley</surname> <given-names>R. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Richards</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1993</year>). <article-title>Gramineae cuticle: a key indicator of Late Cenozoic climatic change in the Niger Delta</article-title>. <source>Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol</source>. <volume>77</volume>, <fpage>119</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>127</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0034-6667(93)90060-8</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B80">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Myers</surname> <given-names>T. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tabor</surname> <given-names>N. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jacobs</surname> <given-names>L. L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Late Jurassic paleoclimate of central Africa</article-title>. <source>Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol.</source> <volume>311</volume>, <fpage>111</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>125</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.palaeo.2011.08.013</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B81">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Nesbit Evans</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Van Couvering</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Andrews</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1981</year>). <article-title>Palaeoecology of Miocene sites in western Kenya</article-title>. <source>J. Hum. Evol</source>. <volume>10</volume>, <fpage>99</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>116</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0047-2484(81)80027-9</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B82">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Nordt</surname> <given-names>L. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Driese</surname> <given-names>S. G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Application of the Critical Zone Concept to the Deep-Time Sedimentary Record Lee C</article-title>. <source>Sediment. Rec</source>. <volume>11</volume>, <fpage>4</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>9</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2110/sedred.2013.3.4</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B83">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Nordt</surname> <given-names>L. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hallmark</surname> <given-names>C. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Driese</surname> <given-names>S. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dworkin</surname> <given-names>S. I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Atchley</surname> <given-names>S. C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Biogeochemical characterization of a lithified paleosol: implications for the interpretation of ancient Critical Zones</article-title>. <source>Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta</source> <volume>87</volume>, <fpage>267</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>282</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.gca.2012.03.019</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B84">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>O&#x00027;Leary</surname> <given-names>M. H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1988</year>). <article-title>Carbon isotopes in photosynthesis</article-title>. <source>Bioscience</source> <volume>38</volume>, <fpage>328</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>336</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2307/1310735</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B85">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Olszewski</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1999</year>). <article-title>Taking advantage of time-averaging</article-title>. <source>Paleobiology</source> <volume>25</volume>, <fpage>226</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>238</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1017/S009483730002652X</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B86">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Oswald</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1914</year>). <article-title>The Miocene Beds of the Victoria Nyanza and the geology of the country between the lake and the Kisii Highlands</article-title>. <source>Q. J. Geol. Soc</source>. <volume>70</volume>, <fpage>128</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>159</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1144/GSL.JGS.1914.070.01-04.10</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B87">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Passey</surname> <given-names>B. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cerling</surname> <given-names>T. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Perkins</surname> <given-names>M. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Voorhies</surname> <given-names>M. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Harris</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tucker</surname> <given-names>S. T.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>Environmental Change in the Great Plains: an Isotopic Record from Fossil Horses</article-title>. <source>J. Geol</source>. <volume>110</volume>, <fpage>123</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>140</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1086/338280</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B88">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Patterson</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1965</year>). <article-title>The fossil elephant shrews (Family Macroscelididae)</article-title>. <source>Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool.</source> <volume>133</volume>, <fpage>297</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>335</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B89">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Peppe</surname> <given-names>D. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Deino</surname> <given-names>A. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Driese</surname> <given-names>S. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dunsworth</surname> <given-names>H. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fox</surname> <given-names>D. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Harcourt-Smith</surname> <given-names>W. E. H.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Revised geochronology of the early miocene faunas from Rusinga Island and Mfangano Island (Lake Victoria, Kenya): implications for miocene hominoid evolution and faunal succession</article-title>. <source>Am. J. Phys. Anthropol.</source> <volume>162</volume>:<fpage>313</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/ajpa.23210</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B90">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Pickford</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1981</year>). <article-title>Preliminary Miocene mammalian biostratigraphy for western Kenya</article-title>. <source>J. Hum. Evol</source>. <volume>10</volume>, <fpage>73</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>97</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0047-2484(81)80026-7</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B91">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Pickford</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1986</year>). <article-title>Sedimentation and fossil preservation in the Nyanza Rift System, Kenya</article-title>. <source>Geol. Soc. Lond. Spec. Publ</source>. <volume>25</volume>, <fpage>345</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>362</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1144/GSL.SP.1986.025.01.29</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B92">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Pickford</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mein</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Nuevos Pedetidae (Rodentia: Mammalia) del Mio-Plioceno de Africa</article-title>. <source>Estud. Geol.</source> <volume>67</volume>, <fpage>455</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>469</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3989/egeol.40714.202</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B93">
<citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Poppe</surname> <given-names>L. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Paskevich</surname> <given-names>V. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hathaway</surname> <given-names>J. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Blackwood</surname> <given-names>D. S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2001</year>). <source>A Laboratory Manual for X-Ray Powder Diffraction.</source> <publisher-name>US Geological Survey</publisher-name> Open-File Report 01-041.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B94">
<citation citation-type="web"><person-group person-group-type="author"><collab>R Core Team</collab></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <source>R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing:</source> <publisher-loc>Vienna</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>R Foundation for Statistical Computing</publisher-name>. Available online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.R-project.org/">https://www.R-project.org/</ext-link></citation></ref>
<ref id="B95">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rascio</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>The underwater life of secondarily aquatic plants: some problems and solutions</article-title>. <source>Crit. Rev. Plant Sci</source>. <volume>21</volume>, <fpage>401</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>427</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/0735-260291044296</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B96">
<citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Retallack</surname> <given-names>G. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <source>Soils of the Past: An Introduction to Paleopedology.</source> <edition>2nd Edn.</edition>, (<publisher-loc>Oxford, UK</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Blackwell Science Ltd.</publisher-name>), <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/9780470698716</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B97">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rogers</surname> <given-names>R. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Carrano</surname> <given-names>M. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rogers</surname> <given-names>K. A. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Perez</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Regan</surname> <given-names>A. K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Isotaphonomy in concept and practice: an exploration of vertebrate microfossil bonebeds in the Upper Cretaceous (Campanian) Judith River Formation, north-central Montana</article-title>. <source>Paleobiology</source> <volume>43</volume>, <fpage>248</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>273</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1017/pab.2016.37</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B98">
<citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sage</surname> <given-names>R. F.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>The evolution of C4 photosynthesis</article-title>. <source>New Phytol</source>. <volume>161</volume>, <fpage>341</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>370</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.00974.x</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B99">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sanders</surname> <given-names>W. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bodenbender</surname> <given-names>B. E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1994</year>). <article-title>Morphometric analysis of lumbar vertebra UMP 67-28: implications for spinal function and phylogeny of the Miocene Moroto hominoid</article-title>. <source>J. Hum. Evol</source>. <volume>26</volume>, <fpage>203</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>237</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1006/jhev.1994.1012</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B100">
<citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Schoeneberger</surname> <given-names>P. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <source>Field Book for Describing and Sampling Soils</source>. <publisher-loc>Lincoln, NE</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Government Printing Office</publisher-name>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B101">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sheldon</surname> <given-names>N. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Retallack</surname> <given-names>G. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tanaka</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>Geochemical climofunctions from North American soils and application to paleosols across the Eocene-Oligocene boundary in Oregon</article-title>. <source>J. Geol</source>. <volume>110</volume>, <fpage>687</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>696</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1086/342865</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B102">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Smith</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mosley</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1993</year>). <article-title>Crustal heterogeneity and basement influence on the development of the Kenya Rift, East Africa</article-title>. <source>Tectonics</source> <volume>12</volume>, <fpage>591</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>606</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1029/92TC01710</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B103">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Stinchcomb</surname> <given-names>G. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nordt</surname> <given-names>L. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Driese</surname> <given-names>S. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lukens</surname> <given-names>W. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Williamson</surname> <given-names>F. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tubbs</surname> <given-names>J. D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>A data-driven spline model designed to predict paleoclimate using paleosol geochemistry</article-title>. <source>Am. J. Sci</source>. <volume>316</volume>, <fpage>746</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>777</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2475/08.2016.02</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B104">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tipple</surname> <given-names>B. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Meyers</surname> <given-names>S. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pagani</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Carbon isotope ratio of Cenozoic CO<sub>2</sub>: a comparative evaluation of available geochemical proxies</article-title>. <source>Paleoceanography</source> <volume>25</volume>:<fpage>PA3202</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1029/2009PA001851</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B105">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ufnar</surname> <given-names>D. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gr&#x000F6;cke</surname> <given-names>D. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Beddows</surname> <given-names>P. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Assessing pedogenic calcite stable-isotope values: can positive linear covariant trends be used to quantify palaeo-evaporation rates?</article-title> <source>Chem. Geol</source>. <volume>256</volume>, <fpage>46</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>51</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.chemgeo.2008.07.022</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B106">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ungar</surname> <given-names>P. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Scott</surname> <given-names>J. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Curran</surname> <given-names>S. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dunsworth</surname> <given-names>H. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Harcourt-Smith</surname> <given-names>W. E. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lehmann</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Early Neogene environments in East Africa: evidence from dental microwear of tragulids</article-title>. <source>Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol</source>. <volume>342</volume>, <fpage>84</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>96</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.palaeo.2012.05.005</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B107">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Uno</surname> <given-names>K. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Polissar</surname> <given-names>P. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jackson</surname> <given-names>K. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>deMenocal</surname> <given-names>P. B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Neogene biomarker record of vegetation change in eastern Africa. <italic>Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci</italic></article-title>. <source>U.S.A.</source> <volume>113</volume>, <fpage>6355</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>6363</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.1521267113</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B108">
<citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Vepraskas</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2001</year>). <article-title>Morphological features of seasonally reduced soils</article-title>, in <source>Wetland Soils: Genesis, Hydrology, Landscapes, and Classification</source>, eds <person-group person-group-type="editor"><name><surname>Richardson</surname> <given-names>J. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vepraskas</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<publisher-loc>Washington, DC</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Lewis Publishers</publisher-name>), <fpage>163</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>182</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B109">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Walker</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Teaford</surname> <given-names>M. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Martin</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Andrews</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1993</year>). <article-title>A new species of <italic>Proconsul</italic> from the early Miocene of Rusinga/Mfangano Islands, Kenya</article-title>. <source>J. Hum. Evol</source>. <volume>25</volume>, <fpage>43</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>56</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1006/jhev.1993.1037</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B110">
<citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Whitworth</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1954</year>). <article-title>The miocene hyracoids of east africa</article-title>, in <source>Fossil mammals of Africa</source>, <volume>Vol. 7</volume>, British Museum (<publisher-loc>London</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Natural History</publisher-name>), <fpage>1</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>58</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B111">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wynn</surname> <given-names>J. G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Carbon isotope fractionation during decomposition of organic matter in soils and paleosols: implications for paleoecological interpretations of paleosols</article-title>. <source>Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol.</source> <volume>251</volume>, <fpage>437</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>448</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.palaeo.2007.04.009</pub-id></citation></ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>