<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="EN">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Conserv. Sci.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Conservation Science</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Conserv. Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">2673-611X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fcosc.2025.1537563</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Conservation Science</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Embryo reintroduction to enhance genetic diversity in a Marsh deer population: first attempt, outcomes, challenges, and future perspectives</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Galindo</surname>
<given-names>David Javier</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn001">
<sup>*</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2910484"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/visualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Peres</surname>
<given-names>Pedro Henrique de Faria</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1410456"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/visualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zanetti</surname>
<given-names>Eveline dos Santos</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/funding-acquisition/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>de Oliveira</surname>
<given-names>M&#xe1;rcio Leite</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">
<sup>3</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1532442"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/funding-acquisition/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/visualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Rola</surname>
<given-names>Luciana Diniz</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2994778"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/visualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Duarte</surname>
<given-names>Jos&#xe9; Maur&#xed;cio Barbanti</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn001">
<sup>*</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2441367"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/funding-acquisition/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/project-administration/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/resources/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
<institution>Deer Research and Conservation Center (NUPECCE), Animal Science Department, School of Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences, S&#xe3;o Paulo State University (UNESP)</institution>, <addr-line>Jaboticabal, Sao Paulo</addr-line>, <country>Brazil</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
<institution>Laboratory of Animal Reproduction, Animal Production Department, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, National University of San Marcos</institution>, <addr-line>San Borja, Lima</addr-line>, <country>Peru</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff3">
<sup>3</sup>
<institution>Department of Biological Sciences and Health, University of Araraquara</institution>, <addr-line>Araraquara, Sao Paulo</addr-line>, <country>Brazil</country>
</aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>Edited by: Jos&#xe9; Luis Ros-Santaella, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Czechia</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>Reviewed by: Benjamin James Pitcher, Macquarie University, Australia</p>
<p>Vicente Freitas, State University of Cear&#xe1;, Brazil</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="corresp" id="fn001">
<p>*Correspondence: Jos&#xe9; Maur&#xed;cio Barbanti Duarte, <email xlink:href="mailto:mauricio.barbanti@unesp.br">mauricio.barbanti@unesp.br</email>; David Javier Galindo, <email xlink:href="mailto:dgalindoh@unmsm.edu.pe">dgalindoh@unmsm.edu.pe</email>
</p>
</fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>14</day>
<month>03</month>
<year>2025</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2025</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>6</volume>
<elocation-id>1537563</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>01</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2024</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>24</day>
<month>02</month>
<year>2025</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#xa9; 2025 Galindo, Peres, Zanetti, de Oliveira, Rola and Duarte</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2025</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Galindo, Peres, Zanetti, de Oliveira, Rola and Duarte</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<sec>
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>The loss of genetic diversity is a critical factor in the extinction process, exacerbated by anthropogenic pressures and demographic stochasticity, particularly in small populations. Traditional population restoration methods, such as individual translocation and ecological corridors, present challenges, including high costs, adaptation difficulties, pathogen introduction, and outbreeding risks. Embryo reintroduction has emerged as a potential strategy for genetic rescue. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of embryo transfer as a genetic rescue tool in the marsh deer (<italic>Blastocerus dichotomus</italic>), a species classified as Vulnerable by the IUCN.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Methods</title>
<p>Following the construction of the S&#xe9;rgio Motta Hydroelectric Power Plant (UHSM) in 1998, a population of over 1,000 marsh deer was impacted, leading to the capture of 93 individuals for <italic>ex situ</italic> (82) and <italic>in situ</italic> (11) conservation efforts. Between 1998 and 2001, an experimental reintroduction program established a new population in a 2,000-hectare wetland near the Jata&#xed; Ecological Station (EEJ) in Luis Ant&#xf4;nio, S&#xe3;o Paulo, Brazil. Over time, this population reached a carrying capacity of 25 individuals but experienced genetic diversity loss. To address this, we conducted an embryo transfer experiment using a female from the reintroduced population as a receipt for embryos from the captive population. The female, captured during late pregnancy, was subjected to estrous cycle synchronization for embryo transfer after giving birth and being apart from its fawn. Two embryos from a captive population were implanted, and the female was re-released after 10 days. Monitoring was conducted via radio transmitter collar (GPS&#x2013;GSM) and helicopter tracking.</p>
</sec> <sec>
<title>Results</title>
<p>The female did not give birth to the implanted embryos but was recaptured nine months later for an ultrasonographic evaluation, which indicated a six-month pregnancy. This suggests that the implanted embryos were lost early in gestation, but natural fertilization occurred approximately three months post-release.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>This study demonstrates the technical feasibility of embryo reintroduction as a genetic rescue strategy, even though pregnancy was not carried to term. The ability to capture, temporarily hold, and successfully reintroduce a free-ranging female suggests minimal disruption to natural behaviors. Future improvements in embryo quality, hormonal protocols, and pregnancy confirmation prior to release could enhance the success rate of this method. Embryo reintroduction presents a promising alternative to traditional reintroduction methods, offering a novel approach to mitigating genetic risks in small, isolated populations.</p>
</sec>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>
<italic>Blastocerus dichotomus</italic>
</kwd>
<kwd>conservation program</kwd>
<kwd>assisted reproductive techniques</kwd>
<kwd>genetics</kwd>
<kwd>ecology</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<contract-num rid="cn001">001</contract-num>
<contract-num rid="cn002">043/2013</contract-num>
<contract-sponsor id="cn001">Coordena&#xe7;&#xe3;o de Aperfei&#xe7;oamento de Pessoal de N&#xed;vel Superior<named-content content-type="fundref-id">10.13039/501100002322</named-content>
</contract-sponsor>
<contract-sponsor id="cn002">Brazilian Biodivesity Fund<named-content content-type="fundref-id">10.13039/501100015997</named-content>
</contract-sponsor>
<counts>
<fig-count count="6"/>
<table-count count="2"/>
<equation-count count="0"/>
<ref-count count="59"/>
<page-count count="13"/>
<word-count count="6539"/>
</counts>
<custom-meta-wrap>
<custom-meta>
<meta-name>section-in-acceptance</meta-name>
<meta-value>Animal Conservation</meta-value>
</custom-meta>
</custom-meta-wrap>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="s1" sec-type="intro">
<label>1</label>
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Reintroduction programs are crucial for conserving species at risk of extinction, but their success depends on several factors, with genetic concerns playing a central role. A major challenge in reintroductions is the potential loss of genetic diversity, often exacerbated by the small number of individuals typically involved. This can lead to inbreeding and the founder effect. Inbreeding may lead to inbreeding depression and, along with genetic drift, results in the loss of genetic variability, negatively affecting fertility, survival, and overall population viability (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Falconer, 1989</xref>). The founder effect occurs when a small subset of individuals is separated from the larger population, carrying only a fraction of the genetic diversity, which over time leads to allele loss, reduced heterozygosity, and decreased population fitness (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">Shorrock, 1980</xref>). Genetic and demographic founder effects can have long-term consequences for the colonizing populations, compounding the risks of inbreeding depression and hindering the population&#x2019;s recovery (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">Sz&#x171;cs et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>). These genetic challenges are particularly concerning for species like the marsh deer (<italic>Blastocerus dichotomus</italic>), given its restricted distribution and the risk of future genetic bottlenecks, that threaten its survival.</p>
<p>The marsh deer is the largest deer species in South America, reaching up to 100&#xa0;kg for females and 130&#xa0;kg for males (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Piovezan et&#xa0;al., 2010</xref>). It inhabits floodplains and wetland areas, historically ranging from the southern Amazon Rainforest to northeastern Argentina (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Piovezan et&#xa0;al., 2010</xref>). Several populations are currently at risk of extinction due to poaching, livestock disease exposure, floodplain drainage for agricultural expansion, and the construction of hydroelectric dams; therefore, the species is categorized as vulnerable by the IUCN (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">Szab&#xf3; et&#xa0;al., 2003</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Piovezan et&#xa0;al., 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Duarte et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>). These factors may cause severe population declines and reduced genetic variability due to inbreeding and genetic drift, impairing reproductive performance and limiting adaptive potential (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Roldan et&#xa0;al., 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Duarte et&#xa0;al., 2012</xref>).</p>
<p>In the early 1990s, following the construction of the Tr&#xea;s Irm&#xe3;os Hydroelectric Power Plant on the Tiet&#xea; River by Companhia Energ&#xe9;tica de S&#xe3;o Paulo (CESP), 45 marsh deer were rescued and placed in captivity. This led to the creation of the Marsh Deer Captive Management Program, currently managed by Tijo&#xe1; Energia. The program was operated at the Marsh Deer Conservation Center (CCCP) in Promiss&#xe3;o, S&#xe3;o Paulo, and the Ilha Solteira Zoo in Ilha Solteira, S&#xe3;o Paulo. Then within the same decade, the construction of the Porto Primavera Hydroelectric Power Plant (UHSM) on the Paran&#xe1; River in 1998 brought the last significant population of marsh deer in S&#xe3;o Paulo to the brink of extinction. In response, the Porto Primavera Marsh Deer Project was established to study and conserve the affected population through <italic>ex situ</italic> conservation efforts, including the reintroduction of animals into remnant floodplain areas in S&#xe3;o Paulo (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">Zanetti and Duarte, 2008</xref>).</p>
<p>In late 1998, the Marsh Deer Conservation Program was initiated by researchers from the Deer Research and Conservation Center (NUPECCE) at S&#xe3;o Paulo State University (UNESP-Jaboticabal) to study the impact of the UHSM on the local marsh deer population. The project aims to conserve the species through <italic>ex situ</italic> programs to preserve genetic diversity and provide animals for reintroduction efforts, such as those performed at the Jata&#xed; Ecological Station (EEJ) in S&#xe3;o Paulo (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Figueira et&#xa0;al., 2005</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">Zanetti and Duarte, 2008</xref>). Despite initial challenges, a reintroduced population at the EEJ was established from eight individuals (three males and five females) between 1998 and 2001. Then, between July 2004 and June 2007, individuals from this population were captured for transmitter ear-tag placement, biological material collection, and monitoring, estimating the population size between 20 and 25 individuals (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Ferreira, 2011</xref>). Although the loss of genetic diversity and inbreeding were not yet concerns, simulations indicated that long-term genetic diversity could only be maintained by introducing new individuals every four generations (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Ferreira, 2011</xref>).</p>
<p>Given the challenges of translocation efforts, including high mortality rates and diseases risks (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">Warne and Chaber, 2023</xref>), embryo translocation (ET) offers a promising alternative for genetic management and disease risk reduction in reintroduced populations (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Rola et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">2023</xref>). However, to fully utilize ET for species conservation, it is crucial to develop effective superovulation protocols for generating embryos from captive animals. Reproductive studies on marsh deer provide important insights into their breeding biology, which can help to develop and adapt these protocols. Female marsh deer reach sexual maturity at around two years of age, with an average estrous cycle of 21.3 &#xb1; 1.3 days. They are polystric and uniparous, with an average pregnancy length of 253 &#xb1; 4 days and no reproductive seasonality, as evidenced by postpartum estrus (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Polegato et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>). Males display individual variation in antler cycles, with minimal synchronization and no apparent photoperiod influence, indicating year-round fertility (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Ramos, 2004</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Pereira, 2010</xref>). These basic reproductive characteristics are crucial for optimizing ET techniques and enhancing genetic management in conservation programs (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Comizzoli, 2020</xref>).</p>
<p>Despite progress, the program faces challenges in maintaining optimal population sizes and genetic diversity, particularly concerning male management and institution capacity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Ferreira, 2011</xref>). The original population of 82 animals distributed in 18 Brazilian institutions had decreased to 67 individuals distributed in 12 institutions by 2020 (considering only the UHSM population). These challenges highlight the need for a genomic embryo bank to enhance genetic management and ensure the long-term success of the conservation program (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Comizzoli, 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Rola et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>).</p>
<p>This study aimed to bridge captive populations with wild counterparts by collecting embryos from the Brazilian captive population to establish a cryogenic bank for the species and developing an embryo reintroduction technique to assist the wild EEJ population.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2" sec-type="materials|methods">
<label>2</label>
<title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="s2_1">
<label>2.1</label>
<title>Animals</title>
<p>Our captivity experimental group to develop an embryo bank consisted of ten adult females and four fertile males of marsh deer from the Brazilian captive populations, both of the populations of Tr&#xea;s Irm&#xe3;os Hydroelectric Power Plant and the Porto Primavera Hydroelectric Power Plant (UHSM). This group was subdivided into three different treatments (n = 3, <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>), and one free-living female captured for the embryo transfer. The animals were maintained in two installations. The first one was the Marsh Deer Conservation Center (Centro de Conserva&#xe7;&#xe3;o do Cervo-do-Pantanal, CCCP), Promiss&#xe3;o, S&#xe3;o Paulo, Brazil. Animals were maintained individually in paddocks (40&#xa0;m x 100&#xa0;m) and were fed with a diet consisting of a pelleted ration (Essence Traditional &#x2013; Presence<sup>&#xae;</sup>), approximately 500 g/deer/day of fresh abobra (<italic>Abobra tenuifolia</italic>), 250 g/deer/day of fresh roselle (<italic>Hibiscus sabdariffa</italic>) and water <italic>ad libitum</italic>. The second one was the Deer Research and Conservation Center (N&#xfa;cleo de Pesquisa e Conserva&#xe7;&#xe3;o de Cerv&#xed;deos, NUPECCE), S&#xe3;o Paulo State University (UNESP), Jaboticabal, S&#xe3;o Paulo, Brazil. Animals were maintained individually in stalls (4&#xa0;m x 4&#xa0;m) and were placed in paddocks (20&#xa0;m x 60&#xa0;m) when estrus detection was performed. Animals were fed with a diet consisting of a pelleted ration (Equi Tech 12MA &#x2013; Presence<sup>&#xae;</sup>), approximately 2 kg/deer/day of fresh perennial soybean (<italic>Neonotonia wightii</italic>), ramie (<italic>Boehmeria n&#xed;vea</italic>), or mulberry branches (<italic>Morus alba</italic>), and water <italic>ad libitum</italic>. All animals maintained auditory and olfactory contact with conspecific males and females and were exposed to normal fluctuations in the photoperiod. All animal procedures were approved by the Ethics Committee on Animal Use (CEUA) of the School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences from S&#xe3;o Paulo State University (approval N&#xb0; 13721/15), in accordance with the ethical principles adopted by the Brazilian College of Animal Experimentation (COBEA).</p>
<table-wrap id="T1" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;1</label>
<caption>
<p>Characteristics of 13 deer of the species <italic>Blastocerus dichotomus</italic> that comprised the experimental groups.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Deer</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Age (years)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Reproductive history</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Treatment</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Origin</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">F358</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">2 (08/12/2011)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Nulliparous</td>
<td valign="middle" rowspan="4" align="center">A</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">CCCP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">F375</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">4 (04/07/2012)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Nulliparous</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">CCCP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">F381</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">2 (03/09/2012)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Nulliparous</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">CCCP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">M372</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">2 (19/05/2012)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Fertile</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">CCCP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">M373</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">2 (23/05/2012)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Fertile</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">A &amp; B</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">CCCP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">F210</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">12 (29/11/2001)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Multiparous</td>
<td valign="middle" rowspan="4" align="center">B</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">CCCP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">F261</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">11 (24/11/2002)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Nulliparous</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">CCCP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">F344</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">3(08/03/2011)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Primiparous</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">CCCP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">M325</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">5 (11/02/2009)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Fertile</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">CCCP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">F61</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">15 (16/05/2000)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Multiparous</td>
<td valign="middle" rowspan="4" align="center">C</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">NUPECCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">F315</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">7 (14/07/2008)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Multiparous</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">NUPECCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">F366</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">3 (04/04/2012)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Nulliparous</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">NUPECCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">M292</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">5 (~/10/2009)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Fertile</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">NUPECCE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">NN</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Unknown</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Multiparous</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">No treatment/embryo transfer</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">EEJ</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>CCCP, Marsh Deer Conservation Center; NUPECCE, Deer Research and Conservation Center; EEJ, Jata&#xed; Ecological Station; NN, No number.</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_2">
<label>2.2</label>
<title>Hormonal treatment and estrus detection for <italic>in vivo</italic> embryo production</title>
<p>We conducted three equine chorionic gonadotropin (eCG-based) superovulation (SOV) protocols for <italic>B. dichotomus</italic> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>). An adaptative system was adopted, and adjustments were made after each treatment until a superovulatory response was obtained. The treatments did not take into consideration the seasons of the year, because marsh deer hinds are non-seasonal breeders (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Polegato et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>).</p>
<fig id="f1" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;1</label>
<caption>
<p>Treatments for superovulation and ovulation induction in <italic>Blastocerus dichotomus</italic>. Treatment A: CIDR<sup>&#xae;</sup> (7 days) + 1 mg EB (D0) + 1,200IU eCG (D3) + 530 &#xb5;l PGF<sub>2&#x3b1;</sub> (D7); Treatment B: CIDR<sup>&#xae;</sup> (8 days) + 1 mg EB (D0) + 1,200IU eCG (D4) + 530 &#xb5;l PGF<sub>2&#x3b1;</sub> (D8) + 2.5 mg LH soon after estrus detection; Treatment C: CIDR<sup>&#xae;</sup> (8 days) + 0.5 mg EB + 0.11 mg GnRH (D0) + 1,200IU eCG (D5) + 530 &#xb5;l PGF<sub>2&#x3b1;</sub> (D8) + 2.5 mg LH between 12-18&#xa0;h after estrus detection.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fcosc-06-1537563-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Treatment A. In June 2014, three adult females (n = 3) (weighing 70.0 to 80.0&#xa0;kg) and two males (weighing 90.0 to 100.0&#xa0;kg) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>) were housed in the CCCP. On a random day of the estrous cycle (D0), females received a single intravaginal device containing 0.33&#xa0;g of progesterone (CIDR<sup>&#xae;</sup>-type T; Pfizer<sup>&#xae;</sup>; USA) for seven days. Still on D0, they received 1 mg of estradiol benzoate (EB) (Sincrodiol<sup>&#xae;</sup>; Ourofino Sa&#xfa;de Animal Ltda., Brazil) by intramuscular (i.m.) injection. They also received 1, 200 IU eCG (Folligon<sup>&#xae;</sup>; Intervet<sup>&#xae;</sup> Schering-Plough Animal Health, Brazil) by i.m. injection on day 3 following CIDR<sup>&#xae;</sup> insertion, and 530 &#xb5;g of cloprostenol (PGF2&#x3b1;; Ciosin<sup>&#xae;</sup>; Intervet<sup>&#xae;</sup> Schering-Plough Animal Health, Brazil) by i.m. injection the day CIDR<bold>
<sup>&#xae;</sup>
</bold> was removed (D7).</p>
<p>Treatment B. In July 2014, three adult females (n = 3) (weighing 80.0 to 95.0&#xa0;kg) and two males (weighing 90.0 to 110.0&#xa0;kg) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>) were housed in the CCCP. On a random day of the estrous cycle (D0), females received a CIDR<sup>&#xae;</sup> for eight days. Still on D0, they received 1 mg of EB by i.m. injection. They also received 1,200 IU of eCG by i.m. injection on day 4 following CIDR<sup>&#xae;</sup> insertion and 530 &#xb5;g of PGF2&#x3b1; by i.m. injection the day the device was removed (D8). Soon after estrus detection, they received 2.5 mg of luteinizing hormone swine pituitary (LH) (LUTROPIN<sup>&#xae;</sup>-V - Bioniche<sup>&#xae;</sup> - Canada) by i.m. injection.</p>
<p>Treatment C. Between May and June 2015, three adult females (n = 3) (weighing 70.0 to 95.0&#xa0;kg) and one male (weighing 110.0&#xa0;kg) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>) were housed in NUPECCE. On a random day of the estrous cycle (D0), females received a CIDR<sup>&#xae;</sup> for eight days, 0.5 mg of EB and 0.11 mg of gonadorelin diacetate tetrahydrate (GnRH) (Cystorelin<sup>&#xae;</sup>; Merial<sup>&#xae;</sup>, USA) by i.m. injection. They also received 1,200 IU of eCG by i.m. injection on day 5 following CIDR<sup>&#xae;</sup> insertion and 530 &#xb5;g of PGF2&#x3b1; by i.m. injection the day the device was removed (D8). Between 12 and 18&#xa0;h after estrus detection, they also received 2.5 mg of LH by i.m. injection.</p>
<p>CIDR<sup>&#xae;</sup> insertion and removal, as well as EB and PGF2&#x3b1; applications were performed during chemical immobilization with an association between 1 mg/kg of azaperone (Stresnil<sup>&#xae;</sup>, Janssen Pharmaceutica, B&#xe9;lgica) and 0.5 mg/kg of xilazine hydrochloride (Sedomin<sup>&#xae;</sup>, K&#xf6;nig Brazil Ltda., Brazil) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Carregaro et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>) i.m. dart injection, that was applied at a distance by a blowgun. The eCG application was also performed by i.m. dart injection. In treatment C, the eCG and PGF2&#x3b1; applications, as well as CIDR<sup>&#xae;</sup> removal were carried out with the aid of a box with a small window to restrict and manipulate the animals (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Duarte et&#xa0;al., 2010</xref>).</p>
<p>Behavioral estrus was defined as the period in which females permitted mating (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Pereira et&#xa0;al., 2006</xref>) and was determined by grouping a female with a male in the paddock (10 &#x2013; 20 minutes every 12&#xa0;h) from one day after CIDR<sup>&#xae;</sup> removal, until the moment that the female no longer accepted copulation (end of estrus).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_3">
<label>2.3</label>
<title>Assessment of ovarian stimulation and embryo collection</title>
<p>SOV response was evaluated by counting <italic>corpus luteum</italic> (CL) on both ovaries. Total follicular stimulus was evaluated by counting CL and persistent follicles (large anovulatory follicles) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Blanco et&#xa0;al., 2003</xref>). Counting was performed 8 days after the first mating by ventral midline laparotomy. Thus, females with two or more CL were classified as superovulated (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">Zanetti et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>). For surgical procedure, females were submitted to food and water fasting for 24 hours. Chemical restraint was done with a pharmacological combination of 7.0 mg/kg of ketamine hydrochloride and 1 mg/kg of xylazine hydrochloride at a distance by a dart gun (JM-standard, Dan-Inject) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Favoretto et&#xa0;al., 2012</xref>). Then, intubation was performed with an endotracheal catheter n&#xb0; 9 and maintained under inhalation anesthesia with isoflurane (Generic Isoflurane - Instituto Biochimico Ind. Farm, Ltda. - Brazil). Cannulation of the cephalic vein was performed for the administration of fluid therapy at a rate of 10 ml/kg/h with 0.9% NaCl solution. Embryo collection was performed by oviduct and uterine flushing (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Duarte and Garcia, 1995</xref>). The flushing medium used for embryo recovery was phosphate buffered saline (PBS) solution (Nutricell Nutrientes Celulares<sup>&#xae;</sup> - Campinas - Brazil) associated with 1% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (Nutricell Nutrientes Celulares<sup>&#xae;</sup> - Campinas - Brazil), heated to 37&#xb0;C. At the end of the procedure, the surgical wound was sutured with nylon thread 2.0. In the immediate postoperative period, hinds received 40,000 IU/Kg of benzathine penicillin i.m. and 500 mg of phenylbutazone, i.v. They also received an i.m. application of 530 &#x3bc;g of PGF2&#x3b1; to induce luteolysis of the multiple CL and, eventually, prevent the implantation of embryos that remained after collection.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_4">
<label>2.4</label>
<title>Embryo evaluation and vitrification</title>
<p>For embryo evaluation, flushing medium collected was analyzed using a stereo microscope at 10x. The collected embryos were washed in PBS plus 10% FBS for removal of cell debris and classified (with 50x magnification) according to the developmental stage (number of cells and morphology) and structural integrity, following the standards used for bovine embryos (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">Stringfellow and Seidel, 1999</xref>). All embryos were vitrified using commercial medium (Bioclone, Jaboticabal, S&#xe3;o Paulo), stored in labeled vitrification straws, and subsequently preserved in liquid nitrogen.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_5">
<label>2.5</label>
<title>Capture of free-living female from Jata&#xed; Ecological Station</title>
<p>In order to perform the embryo transfer into the reintroduced population at the Jata&#xed; Ecological Station, Luis Ant&#xf4;nio, S&#xe3;o Paulo, one adult female (weight = 84&#xa0;kg) was captured and brought into captivity during July 2015. The animal was captured using the &#x2018;Bulldogging&#x2019; method (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Duarte, 2008</xref>), with the assistance of a Robinson 44 helicopter. After physical restraint, chemical sedation was administered via i.v. injection with a pharmacological combination of 0.05 mg/kg acepromazine, 5 mg/kg ketamine, and 0.5 mg/kg midazolam. A transrectal ultrasound examination (linear transducer, 7.5 MHz) was then conducted to confirm pregnancy and estimate gestational age (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">Zanetti et&#xa0;al., 2010a</xref>) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>). Following the decision to remove the animal from its original location and transport it to NUPECCE for embryo transfer procedures, the animal was airlifted by helicopter to the outer edge of the floodplain, where a vehicle was stationed to transport it to NUPECCE. The female was kept at the NUPECCE facilities with minimal handling to avoid its adapting to captivity. As a result, human contact was highly restricted.</p>
<fig id="f2" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;2</label>
<caption>
<p>The animal was physically restrained after capture, and a transrectal ultrasound was performed, showing the fetus in an advanced stage of development.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fcosc-06-1537563-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_6">
<label>2.6</label>
<title>Synchronization protocol and embryo transfer into a wild female</title>
<p>One month after parturition, late October 2015, and considering the postpartum estrus in the species (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Polegato et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>), the wild female marsh deer was synchronized for embryo transfer. On a random day (D-8) of the estrous cycle the females received a CIDR<sup>&#xae;</sup> for eight days and an i.m. injection of 0.5 mg of EB. On the day of CIDR removal (D0), i.m injections of 530 &#xb5;g of PGF2&#x3b1; and 450 IU of eCG were administered (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B58">Zanetti et&#xa0;al., 2009</xref>; modified).</p>
<p>Nine days after CIDR removal (D9), chemical restraint was administered, and the female underwent a laparoscopic procedure to assess the presence of the CL (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B59">Zanetti et&#xa0;al., 2010b</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B55">Zanetti and Duarte, 2012</xref>) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3A</bold>
</xref>), followed by embryo transfer (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3B</bold>
</xref>). At the end of the procedure, the incisions were sutured, and the female received an i.m. injection of 40,000 IU/kg of benzathine penicillin. Before recovery from anesthesia, the animal was fitted with a Wild CellMG<sup>&#xae;</sup> radio transmitter collar (Lotek Wireless<sup>&#xae;</sup>, Canada - pre-programmed to send the animal&#x2019;s geographic coordinates via GSM). The collar weighed 950&#xa0;g, which corresponds to 1.13% of the animal&#x2019;s body weight.</p>
<fig id="f3" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;3</label>
<caption>
<p>Embryo transfer surgery. <bold>(A)</bold> Exploratory laparoscopy to confirm the presence of a <italic>corpus luteum</italic>. <bold>(B)</bold> Exposure of the uterus for embryo inoculation.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fcosc-06-1537563-g003.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_7">
<label>2.7</label>
<title>Female reintroduction into the wild and monitoring</title>
<p>Ten days after embryo transfer, in November 2015, the female was anesthetized and transported to its natural habitat, into the EEJ, in a transport box. Monitoring of the female after release was conducted using the GPS &#x2013; GSM system of the radio transmitter collar. Two types of sampling were scheduled: (1) continuous location collection every hour to obtain information on the animal&#x2019;s area use and survival, and (2) intensive sampling every 15 minutes for 3 days following release and for another 4 days throughout gestation (one day per week) to track the animal&#x2019;s exact movements. We analyzed data from the first 2 months of monitoring to investigate the release process. During this period the GPS data resulted in 1514 localities collected from which 1427 (94%) were with high quality coordinates (DOP&lt;10) and were used for area and movements estimations. Information was sent by the GSM-collar every 5 locations collected, thus resulting in a daily real-time monitoring, which was also used to recapture procedures. Nine months after the reintroduction of the female, a recapture was scheduled, in August 2016, with the expectation of finding female with a fawn at its side. The same capture protocol previously described was followed, with the help of the coordinates of its recent location transmitted via GSM.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_8">
<label>2.8</label>
<title>Statistical analysis</title>
<p>Descriptive statistics, including the mean and standard deviation, were calculated for the number of CL, anovulatory follicles (AF), and total follicular stimulus (TFS) across treatments. Data normality was assessed using the Shapiro-Wilk test. For non-normal data (Treatment B), the Friedman rank test was applied, while data from Treatments A and C were analyzed using ANOVA. <italic>Post-hoc</italic> comparisons were conducted using Tukey&#x2019;s HSD or equivalent pairwise tests, depending on data distribution. A significance level of p &lt; 0.05 was set for all analyses.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s3" sec-type="results">
<label>3</label>
<title>Results</title>
<sec id="s3_1">
<label>3.1</label>
<title>Superovulation protocols and embryo recovery</title>
<p>Results for SOV response are presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">
<bold>Table&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>. For Treatment A, all females displayed behavioral signs of estrus, with subsequent mating with males after CIDR<sup>&#xae;</sup> removal, 61.33 &#xb1; 7.06&#xa0;h (&#xb1; SEM, ranged 48 &#x2013; 72&#xa0;h) after the end of treatment. Only females F375 and F381 ovulated, presenting 1 CL each, giving a mean rate of total follicle stimulus of 5.33 &#xb1; 1.33 and an ovulation rate of 12.5% (2/16). However, the mean rate of anovulatory follicles was 4.67 &#xb1; 1.2. Therefore, no SOV was obtained with this treatment.</p>
<table-wrap id="T2" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;2</label>
<caption>
<p>Data of the estrus and ovarian response of nine hinds of the species <italic>Blastocerus dichotomus</italic>, submitted to three different superovulation treatments.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="center"/>
<th valign="top" align="center">Hind</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Heat (h*)</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Mating</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Buck</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">CL</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">AF</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">TFS**</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Embryo</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<th valign="top" colspan="9" align="left">Treatment A</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" rowspan="5" align="left">
<bold>CIDR ovis + 1mg Sincrodiol (D0); 1,200 IU Folligon (D3); CIDR removal + 0.53mg Ciosin (D7)</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">F375</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Yes (64h)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Yes</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">M372</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">01</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">07</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">08</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">F358</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Yes (72h)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Yes</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">M372</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">00</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">04</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">04</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">F381</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Yes (48h)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Yes</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">M373</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">01</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">03</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">04</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">01<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="fnT2_1">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" colspan="4" align="center">Mean</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.67<sup>A</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.67<sup>A</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.33<sup>A</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" colspan="4" align="center">Standard deviation</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.58</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.08</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.31</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="top" colspan="9" align="left">Treatment B</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" rowspan="5" align="left">
<bold>CIDR ovis + 1 mg Sincrodiol (D0); 1,200 IU Folligon (D4); CIDR removal + 0.53 mg Ciosin (D8). 2.5 mg Lutropin-V (immediately after heat detection).</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">F210</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">No</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">F261</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Yes (64h)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Yes</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">M325</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">00</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">02</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">02</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">F344</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Yes (42h)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Yes</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">M373</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">02</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">00</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">02</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">01<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="fnT2_2">
<sup>b</sup>
</xref>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" colspan="4" align="center">Mean</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.00<sup>A</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.00<sup>A</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.00<sup>B</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" colspan="4" align="center">Standard deviation</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.41</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.41</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.00</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="top" colspan="9" align="left">Treatment C</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" rowspan="5" align="left">
<bold>CIDR ovis + 0.5 mg Sincrodiol + 0.11 mg Cystorelin (D0); 1,200 IU Folligon (D5); CIDR removal + 0.53 mg Ciosin (D8). 2.5 mg Lutropin-V (16 hours after heat detection).</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">F315</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Yes (32h)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Yes</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">M292</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">10</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">00</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">10</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">02<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="fnT2_1">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">F61</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Yes (24h)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Yes</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">M292</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">03</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">01</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">04</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">02<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="fnT2_2">
<sup>b</sup>
</xref>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">F366</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Yes (40h)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Yes</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">M292</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">11</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">05</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">16</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">05<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="fnT2_3">
<sup>c</sup>
</xref>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" colspan="4" align="center">Mean</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8.00<sup>B</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.00<sup>B</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">10.00<sup>C</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" colspan="4" align="center">Standard deviation</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.36</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.65</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.00</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.73</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>*Period between CIDR<sup>&#xae;</sup> removal and estrus detection.</p>
</fn>
<fn>
<p>**Sum of the number of corpora lutea and the number of anovulatory follicles.</p>
</fn>
<fn id="fnT2_1">
<label>a</label>
<p>Embryo developmental arrest.</p>
</fn>
<fn id="fnT2_2">
<label>b</label>
<p>Degenerate embryos.</p>
</fn>
<fn id="fnT2_3">
<label>c</label>
<p>2 viable embryos, 1 regular embryo and 2 degenerate embryos.</p>
</fn>
<fn>
<p>CL, <italic>Corpus luteum</italic>; AF, anovulatory follicles; TFS, total follicular stimulus.</p>
</fn>
<fn>
<p>Superscript letters indicate statistical differences: Values with different capital letters (A, B, and C) are significantly different (p &lt; 0.05) according to <italic>post-hoc</italic> comparisons.</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>For Treatment B, estrous synchronization failed in female F210. Females F261 and F344 displayed behavioral signs of estrus, with subsequent mating with males after CIDR<sup>&#xae;</sup> removal, 53 &#xb1; 11&#xa0;h (&#xb1; SEM, ranged 42 &#x2013; 64&#xa0;h) after the end of treatment. Only female F344 presented 2 CLs, and the total follicle stimulus was 1.33 &#xb1; 0.67.</p>
<p>Treatment C was successful in generating SOV response and estrous synchronization in all females. Behavioral signs of estrus were displayed 32 &#xb1; 4.62&#xa0;h (&#xb1; SEM, ranged 24 &#x2013; 40&#xa0;h) after the end of treatment. The mean rate of anovulatory follicles was 2 &#xb1; 1.53 and the mean rate of CL was 8 &#xb1; 2.52 (&#xb1; SEM, ranged 3 &#x2013; 11). This treatment showed a total follicle stimulus of 10 &#xb1; 3.46 and an ovulation rate of 80% (24/30) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;4</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<fig id="f4" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;4</label>
<caption>
<p>Horns, uterine body, and left ovary of the hind F366, of the species <italic>Blastocerus dichotomus</italic> after Treatment C: CIDR<sup>&#xae;</sup> (8 days) + 0.5 mg EB + 0.11 mg GnRH (D0) + 1,200UI eCG (D5) + 530 &#xb5;l PGF2&#x3b1; (D8) + 2.5 mg LH, 12-18&#xa0;h after detection of estrus. The presence of anovulatory follicles (white arrows) and corpora lutea (black arrows) are observed.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fcosc-06-1537563-g004.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>To evaluate the effectiveness of superovulation treatments, we analyzed the number of CL, anovulatory follicles (AF), and total follicular stimulus (TFS) across Treatments A, B, and C. The Shapiro-Wilk test indicated that Treatment B data were non-normal (p &lt; 0.05), while Treatments A and C followed a normal distribution (p &gt; 0.05). Consequently, we applied the Friedman rank test for non-normal data and ANOVA for normal data. The ANOVA revealed a statistically significant difference for Treatment C compared to the other treatments (p = 0.045). <italic>Post-hoc</italic> comparisons confirmed a significant difference between Treatments B and C (p = 0.0332), while no significant differences were observed between Treatments A and B or A and C (p &gt; 0.05).</p>
<p>Embryo recovery was successful in all treatments. However, only one embryo was recovered in Treatments A and B, with the former exhibiting developmental arrest and the latter showing degeneration. As a result, the recovery rate for both treatments was 50% (1/2). In contrast, nine embryos were recovered in Treatment C, which also achieved an ovulation rate of 80% (24/30). Overall, the embryo recovery rate for <italic>B. dichotomus</italic> females was 37.5% (9/24). Of the nine embryos collected, only two were viable (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;5</bold>
</xref>). Of the remaining embryos, one was of fair quality, four were degenerated, and two exhibited developmental arrest, following the standards used for bovine embryos (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">Stringfellow and Seidel, 1999</xref>).</p>
<fig id="f5" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;5</label>
<caption>
<p>Structures recovered from hind F366, of the species <italic>Blastocerus dichotomus</italic> after Treatment C: CIDR<sup>&#xae;</sup> (8 days) + 0.5 mg EB + 0.11 mg GnRH (D0) + 1,200UI eCG (D5) + 530 &#xb5;l PGF2&#x3b1; (D8) + 2.5 mg LH, 12-18&#xa0;h after detection of estrus. The black arrows indicate two viable structures for embryo transfer.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fcosc-06-1537563-g005.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_2">
<label>3.2</label>
<title>Embryo transfer</title>
<p>Before embryo transfer, fawning occurred in October 2015 and the fawn was separated from its mother and transitioned to artificial feeding, subsequently becoming part of the <italic>ex situ</italic> Marsh Deer Conservation Program as a founding female. Then, nine days after the end of synchronization protocol, and upon confirming the presence of the CL through laparoscopic procedure, the uterine horn was exteriorized via median ventral laparotomy (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3B</bold>
</xref>), and two high-quality vitrified embryos were re-warmed and surgically transferred using a &#x201c;tom cat&#x201d; catheter.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_3">
<label>3.3</label>
<title>Female marsh deer reintroduction into Jata&#xed; Ecological Station and monitoring</title>
<p>Once the female was released, monitoring began using a GPS collar with data transmission via GSM on a daily basis (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;6</bold>
</xref>). The data collection and transmission schedule functioned perfectly, enabling real-time monitoring of the animal. As expected for open monitoring, the majority (94%) of locations obtained were of high quality. In addition to the planned 9-month monitoring period, tracking continued for an additional 6-month period without any battery issues. During the first three days post-release, the female exhibited notably greater movement, averaging 124 meters per hour (approximately 3&#xa0;km per day). In contrast, movement during the remaining fine-scale sampling (n=4) averaged 50 m/h (approximately 1.2 km/day), with increased movement observed in early January. Throughout the entire monitoring period, the female occupied an area of 2.4 km&#xb2; (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;6</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<fig id="f6" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;6</label>
<caption>
<p>Paths taken by the monitored female marsh deer during the first 25 days of return to the wild (yellow), location of the female&#x2019;s capture in July (red), and release in November (blue).</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fcosc-06-1537563-g006.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>In August 2016, nine months after female reintroduction into EEJ, a second capture for parturition confirmation was performed. After physical restraint, the female deer underwent an ultrasound to confirm parturition, as female deer typically leave their fawns in secluded areas, hidden in the grass, while they feed to avoid predation. The ultrasonographic evaluation revealed a pregnancy of approximately six months, indicating the loss of the transferred embryos and suggesting natural fertilization three months after reintroduction. After the procedure the female was released at the same point of capture.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s4" sec-type="discussion">
<label>4</label>
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>The establishment of the Marsh Deer Conservation Program represents a significant milestone in Brazil and South America&#x2019;s conservation efforts, being one of the first fully local conservation programs. Over the course of two decades, the program has navigated challenges, setbacks, and successes, underscoring the complexities of implementing such a comprehensive initiative with the collaboration of all stakeholders. Despite notable advancements, the marsh deer remains at risk across its range, highlighting the critical importance of integrating reproductive management strategies and biotechnologies to support both at-risk wild and captive populations. While considerable progress has been made in animal reproductive sciences, continued research is essential to furthering our understanding of the reproductive physiology of Neotropical deer species. Based on previous studies of superovulation (SOV) in species such as the brown brocket deer (<italic>Subulo gouazoubira</italic>) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Duarte and Garcia, 1995</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B55">Zanetti and Duarte, 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">Zanetti et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>) and the red brocket deer (<italic>Mazama americana</italic>) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Cursino et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>), this study aims to evaluate the application of SOV and embryo transfer techniques as potential tools for advancing the conservation of the marsh deer.</p>
<p>Due to the limited number of captive marsh deer, we could not use a standard experimental design as used with non-endangered species. Instead, we developed an adaptive system with sequential experiments, making small adjustments between trials based on earlier outcomes. In Treatment A, the inadequate superovulatory response may have resulted from several factors, including handling-induced stress, which affects oocyte maturation, suppress the preovulatory LH surge, and may influence adrenal progesterone production (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Monfort et&#xa0;al., 1990</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Brann and Mahesh, 1991</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Gonz&#xe1;lez et&#xa0;al., 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">Zanetti et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>). The absence of an ovulation inducer may have contributed to the lack of ovulation, as the proper timing and type of inducer are critical for follicle maturation and ovulation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B53">Xu et&#xa0;al., 1995</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">D&#x2019;Occhio et&#xa0;al., 1997</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Liu and Sirois, 1998</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">D&#x2019;Occhio et&#xa0;al., 1999</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Kaim et&#xa0;al., 2003</xref>). Insufficient LH receptor development in ovarian follicles can lead to follicular luteinization without ovulation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Brann and Mahesh, 1991</xref>). Common inducers include LH, GnRH and human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">Zanetti et&#xa0;al. (2014)</xref> observed multiple anovulatory follicles following SOV protocols based on eCG and FSH in brown brocket deer (4.5 &#xb1; 1.7 and 7.6 &#xb1; 0.9, respectively). Elevated fecal glucocorticoid levels during the SOV period further supported this hypothesis. To address these issues in Treatment B, we added an additional day of exogenous progesterone, adjusted the timing of eCG administration, and included LH as an ovulation inducer after estrus detection.</p>
<p>Modifications made in Treatment B did not effectively induce a superovulatory response in marsh deer females, and female F210 showed no response at all. We suggest that F210&#x2019;s lack of response may be related to stress from the management procedures during treatment, which could have disrupted her reproductive physiology (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Monfort et&#xa0;al., 1990</xref>). However, glucocorticoid hormone levels were not measured to confirm this hypothesis. For the other females, we hypothesize that a delayed eCG application may have interfered with the timing of follicular development. By the time eCG was administered, a dominant follicle had already begun to suppress the development of subordinate follicles, which are still FSH-dependent at the recruitment stage (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Castilho and Garcia, 2005</xref>). Although female F261 developed two ovulatory follicles, there was a lack of synchronicity between follicular maturation and the ovulation inducer. In contrast, female F344 exhibited two CL, which might be considered a superovulatory response, but the overall follicular response was suboptimal due to the limited number of follicles (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">
<bold>Table&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<p>After the unsatisfactory response to Treatment B, further adjustments were made to the SOV protocol in Treatment C, including lowering the EB dose to 0.5 mg, adding GnRH (0.11 mg), administering eCG on day 5, and delaying LH application until 12-18 hours after estrus detection. These modifications successfully induced an adequate superovulatory response in marsh deer females. Previous studies support the effectiveness of a lower EB dose during progesterone implant insertion (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Kumar et&#xa0;al., 2003</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B55">Zanetti and Duarte, 2012</xref>). Additionally, GnRH improved dominant follicle ovulation, and combining EB with CIDR<sup>&#xae;</sup> promoted follicular atresia in subordinate follicles, aiding estrus synchronization (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Bo et&#xa0;al., 1995</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Diskin et&#xa0;al., 2002</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">McCorkell et&#xa0;al., 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">Zanetti et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>). The delayed eCG application was aimed at optimizing follicular growth, with studies indicating follicular wave emergence occurs 4-5 days after estradiol-17&#x3b2; and progesterone treatment (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Burke et&#xa0;al., 2000</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">McCorkell et&#xa0;al., 2008</xref>), and selection occurs 3-4 days after GnRH (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">Twagiramungu et&#xa0;al., 1995</xref>). The delayed LH application allowed for proper follicular maturation, making them more responsive to the LH peak stimulus (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">D&#x2019;Occhio et&#xa0;al., 1997</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">1999</xref>). Despite being 15 years old, female F61 responded to Treatment C, showing 3 CL and 1 anovulatory follicle. Similar to Zebu cattle, older ruminants typically have a reduced ovarian follicle reserve (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Peixoto et&#xa0;al., 2006</xref>), with a decrease in CL and recovered structures. This suggests that the treatment may be more effective in younger females, as seen with F315 (6 years) and F366 (3 years) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">
<bold>Table&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>). The superior response in Treatment C was characterized by higher CL counts and an improved total follicular stimulus (mean CL = 8, TFS = 10) compared to Treatments A and B (mean CL = 0.67 and 1, TFS = 5.33 and 2, respectively). These results suggest that the protocol used in Treatment C significantly enhances follicular development and superovulation outcomes compared to the less effective protocols employed in Treatments A and B.</p>
<p>Embryo recovery was successfully performed in all treatments, with Treatment C yielding the highest recovery rate. The embryo recovery rate in Treatment C was 37.5% (9/24), which is consistent with rates reported in other deer species, such as <italic>Elaphurus davidianus</italic> (29.3%) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Argo et&#xa0;al., 1994</xref>); <italic>Cervus elaphus</italic> (43.1%) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Argo et&#xa0;al., 1994</xref>), (32.7%) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Asher et&#xa0;al., 1995</xref>); and <italic>Dama dama</italic> (30.6%) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Asher et&#xa0;al., 1995</xref>). Of the nine embryos recovered in Treatment C, four were degenerated, and two showed developmental arrest. Only two of the remaining embryos were of sufficient quality for transfer and were subsequently used in this study (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;5</bold>
</xref>). Both viable embryos came from female F366, who exhibited the best response in terms of follicular development within Treatment C. This suggests that females of optimal reproductive age may respond more favorably to the SOV protocol used in Treatment C, further supporting the importance of age in reproductive success. The results presented here represent an opportunity to adjust the protocol for the implementation of a genetic resource bank for the species. This will be of vital importance for supporting both the captive population and the free-ranging population in the Marsh Deer Conservation Program.</p>
<p>The decision to transfer the only two viable embryos into the same female was a difficult one, made with the intention of maximizing the chances that at least one of them would implant. Although this species is considered uniparous and twin or multiple births have not been observed (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Piovezan et&#xa0;al., 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Polegato et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>), unfortunately, nine months later, during recapture, it was discovered that the female had lost both embryos. Suggesting that approximately three months after her reintroduction into the wild, it displayed estrus and had the opportunity to mate, eventually showing signs of pregnancy with approximately six months of gestation at the time of the ultrasound evaluation. While this was disappointing in terms of potential genetic diversity enhancement for the EEJ population, it nonetheless provided hope regarding the entire procedure conducted since the female&#x2019;s capture from the wild. It indicates that the surgical procedures for embryo transfer did not negatively affect its physiological reproductive capacity, which is crucial for the viability of this procedure in other wild females.</p>
<p>This attempt demonstrated the feasibility of holding a free-ranging animal in captivity for four months and successfully reintroducing it to the wild, offering valuable insights into the potential of <italic>ex situ</italic> conservation techniques. It is important to note, however, that the female was reintroduced to an area very close (100 meters) to her original capture site, minimizing environmental variations and ensuring she was familiar with the surroundings. The successful reintroduction of this female marsh deer supports findings on the positive effects of longer acclimation periods on site fidelity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Mertes et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>). Consistent with studies on elk (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">Ryckman et&#xa0;al., 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Bleisch et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>), the marsh deer remained near the release site without signs of stress or displacement, suggesting that the extended captivity period facilitated proper acclimation. In contrast, shorter captive holding periods (4&#x2013;11 days), as seen in elk, led to greater dispersal from the release site (22.6&#x2013;26 km) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">Ryckman et&#xa0;al., 2010</xref>). This case highlights the importance of controlled acclimation in familiar environments to improve reintroduction success and reduce risks such as post-release dispersal (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Parker et&#xa0;al., 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">Tuberville et&#xa0;al., 2008</xref>). Besides, it is important to consider that deer are prey species in the wild and are highly susceptible to stress stimuli. For this reason, their release must be carefully planned to ensure that the animal can adequately adapt and return to its natural habitat. Proper planning of reintroduction strategies, including minimizing handling and environmental stressors, is essential for the success of wildlife restoration efforts (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Fischer and Lindenmayer, 2000</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Seddon et&#xa0;al., 2007</xref>). Moreover, stress during reintroduction can negatively impact animal health and survival rates, further highlighting the need for a thorough, well-managed release process (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">Teixeira et&#xa0;al., 2007</xref>).</p>
<p>The use of GPS-GSM technology to monitor the reintroduced female marsh deer provided invaluable insights into her post-release behavior, survival, and adaptation to the wild. Successful reintroduction programs, as highlighted by previous studies, depend on tracking released animals to assess their integration into the environment (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Parker et&#xa0;al., 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Mertes et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>). In this study, the GPS collar with GSM data transmission was crucial for understanding the female&#x2019;s movements and habitat use post-release. It enabled two types of data sampling: continuous hourly location tracking for broader area uses and survival, and intensive 15-minute intervals to monitor fine-scale movements during the immediate post-release period and some days of gestation. This dual approach provided comprehensive data on both daily behavior and long-term adaptation, aligning with findings from other reintroduction studies where detailed movement data is essential for evaluating habitat selection (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">Ryckman et&#xa0;al., 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Bleisch et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>). Initially, the female showed higher mobility, moving an average of 124 meters per hour (3 km/day) during the first three days, typical of post-release behavior as animals re-establish home ranges (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Mertes et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>). Afterward, the female&#x2019;s movement slowed to 50 meters per hour (1.2 km/day), indicating stabilization and adaptation. Therefore, GPS tracking proves a valuable tool for wildlife managers, supporting informed decisions on habitat suitability, release strategies, and the effectiveness of <italic>ex situ</italic> conservation efforts.</p>
<p>This study demonstrates the potential of embryo transfer as a viable strategy for enhancing genetic diversity in natural marsh deer populations, particularly those threatened by low genetic variability (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Rola et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">2023</xref>). Traditional reintroduction programs often face challenges related to inbreeding depression, which can lead to reduced fitness, lower reproductive success, and heightened disease susceptibility (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Seddon et&#xa0;al., 2007</xref>). By introducing genetically diverse embryos sourced from <italic>ex situ</italic> conservation programs, this technique offers a controlled and scientifically grounded approach to mitigating these issues. The findings highlight key advancements, including improvements in hormonal protocols, optimized embryo collection techniques from the captive population, and the refinement of transfer methods. The success achieved in obtaining viable embryos and performing transfers indicates that these methods can significantly contribute to conservation programs to sustain healthy and diverse populations. Continued research and technological refinement are necessary to enhance the effectiveness of this approach and adapt it to the specific reproductive physiology of marsh deer and other threatened Neotropical deer species. By integrating embryo transfer into broader conservation strategies, this method holds promise as a valuable tool for addressing genetic bottlenecks and improving the long-term viability of wildlife populations facing environmental and genetic challenges.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec id="s5" sec-type="data-availability">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s6" sec-type="ethics-statement">
<title>Ethics statement</title>
<p>The animal study was approved by Ethics Committee on Animal Use (CEUA). The study was conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. Written informed consent was obtained from the individual(s) for the publication of any identifiable images or data included in this article.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s7" sec-type="author-contributions">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>DG: Conceptualization, Investigation, Visualization, Writing &#x2013; original draft. PP: Conceptualization, Investigation, Visualization, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing. EZ: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing. MO: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Visualization, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing. LR: Conceptualization, Investigation, Visualization, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing. JD: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Writing &#x2013; original draft.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s8" sec-type="funding-information">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This research was supported by Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior – Brasil (CAPES) – Finance Code 001, FUNEP/TFCA/FUNBIO (043/2013), and CNPq (302495/2022-3).</p>
</sec>
<ack>
<title>Acknowledgments</title>
<p>The authors are grateful to Joaquim Mansano Garcia, PhD, and Marina Susuki Cursino, PhD, for their assistance with the design of protocols and FUNBIO&#x2019;s project, as this study is part of it. To Maria E. Franco Oliveira, PhD, Gabriela Martins Siqueira, PhD., and Lincy Camacho Orjuela, MSc., for their assistance with the surgical procedures. To Marina Ragagnin de Lima, PhD, for her valuable support with the vitrification and thawing of embryos. To Pedro Nacib Jorge-Neto, PhD, and DVM Let&#xed;cia Alecho Requena for their support with the embryo transfer technique. To Adriano Bonfim Carregaro PhD, Rozana Wenlder da Rocha, PhD, Andr&#xe9; Nicolai Elias, PhD, and B&#xe1;rbara Ferrari, MSc. for their support with the anesthetic procedures. The authors are also grateful to each one of the institutions that allowed the use of animals belonging to their establishments, such as the Marsh Deer Conservation Center, the Sorocaba Zoo, F&#xe1;bio Barreto Forest and Zoo, and the Piracicaba Municipal Zoo.</p>
</ack>
<sec id="s9" sec-type="COI-statement">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s10" sec-type="ai-statement">
<title>Generative AI statement</title>
<p>The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s11" sec-type="disclaimer">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Argo</surname> <given-names>C. M. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jabbour</surname> <given-names>H. N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Goddard</surname> <given-names>P. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Webb</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Loudon</surname> <given-names>A. S. I.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1994</year>). <article-title>Superovulation in red deer (Cervus elaphus) and Pere David&#x2019;s deer (Elaphurus davidianus), and fertilization rates following artificial insemination with Pere David&#x2019;s deer semen</article-title>. <source>J. Reprod. Fertility</source> <volume>100</volume>, <fpage>629</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>636</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1530/jrf.0.1000629</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Asher</surname> <given-names>G. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jabbour</surname> <given-names>H. N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Thompson</surname> <given-names>J. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tervit</surname> <given-names>H. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Morrow</surname> <given-names>C. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1995</year>). <article-title>Superovulation of farmed red deer (Cervus elaphus) and fallow deer (Dama dama): Incidence of ovulation and changes in plasma hormone concentrations during the pre-ovulatory period in relation to ova recovery and fertilisation</article-title>. <source>Anim. Reprod. Sci.</source> <volume>38</volume>, <fpage>137</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>154</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0378-4320(94)01351-L</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Blanco</surname> <given-names>M. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Simonetti</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rivera</surname> <given-names>O. E.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Embryo production and progesterone profiles in ewes superovulated with different hormonal treatments</article-title>. <source>Small Ruminant Res.</source> <volume>47</volume>, <fpage>183</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>191</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0921-4488(02)00245-6</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bleisch</surname> <given-names>A. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Keller</surname> <given-names>B. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bonnot</surname> <given-names>T. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hansen</surname> <given-names>L. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Millspaugh</surname> <given-names>J. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Initial movements of re- introduced elk in the missouri ozarks</article-title>. <source>Am. Midland Nat.</source> <volume>178</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>16</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1674/0003-0031-178.1.1</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bo</surname> <given-names>G. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Adams</surname> <given-names>G. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pierson</surname> <given-names>R. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mapletoft</surname> <given-names>R. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1995</year>). <article-title>Exogenous control of follicular wave emergence in cattle</article-title>. <source>Theriogenology</source> <volume>43</volume>, <fpage>31</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>40</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0093-691X(94)00010-R</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Brann</surname> <given-names>D. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mahesh</surname> <given-names>V. B.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1991</year>). <article-title>Role of corticosteroids in female reproduction</article-title>. <source>FASEB journal: Off. Publ. Fed. Am. Societies Exp. Biol.</source> <volume>5</volume>, <fpage>2691</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2698</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1096/fasebj.5.12.1655548</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Burke</surname> <given-names>C. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Day</surname> <given-names>M. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bunt</surname> <given-names>C. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Macmillan</surname> <given-names>K. L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2000</year>). <article-title>Use of a small dose of estradiol benzoate during diestrus to synchronize development of the ovulatory follicle in cattle</article-title>. <source>J. Anim. Sci.</source> <volume>78</volume>, <fpage>145</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>151</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2527/2000.781145x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Carregaro</surname> <given-names>A. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ferrari</surname> <given-names>B. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Silva</surname> <given-names>A. N.E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xavier</surname> <given-names>N. V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Duarte</surname> <given-names>J. M. B.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Azaperone and xylazine: A pharmacological combination to facilitate captive deer management for red brocket deer (Mazama americana)</article-title>. <source>PLoS One</source> <volume>14</volume>, <elocation-id>e0220288</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0220288</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Castilho</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Garcia</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Diverg&#xea;ncia no crescimento folicular: efeito na compet&#xea;ncia oocit&#xe1;ria para produ&#xe7;&#xe3;o <italic>in vitro</italic> de embri&#xf5;es - revis&#xe3;o</article-title>. <source>Arch. Veterinary Sci.</source> <volume>10</volume>, <fpage>17</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>23</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5380/avs.v10i3.5124</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Comizzoli</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Integrating fertility preservation and cryo-banking into the conservation of rare and endangered deer species</article-title>. <source>Anim. Production Sci.</source> <volume>60</volume>, <fpage>1227</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1071/AN18674</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Cursino</surname> <given-names>M. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Salviano</surname> <given-names>M. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Abril</surname> <given-names>V. V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zanetti</surname> <given-names>E. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Duarte</surname> <given-names>J. M. B.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>The role of chromosome variation in the speciation of the red brocket deer complex: the study of reproductive isolation in females</article-title>. <source>BMC evolutionary Biol.</source> <volume>14</volume>, <elocation-id>40</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/1471-2148-14-40</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>D&#x2019;Occhio</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sudha</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jillella</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Whyte</surname> <given-names>T</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Maclellan</surname> <given-names>L. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Walsh</surname> <given-names>:&#xa0;</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>1997</year>). <article-title>Use of a GnRH agonist to prevent the endogenous LH surge and injection of exogenous LH to induce ovulation in heifers superstimulated with FSH: a new model for superovulation</article-title>. <source>Theriogenology</source> <volume>47</volume>, <fpage>601</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>613</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0093-691X(97)00018-6</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>D&#x2019;Occhio</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jillella</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lindsey</surname> <given-names>B. R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1999</year>). <article-title>Factors that influence follicle recruitment, growth and ovulation during ovarian superstimulation in heifers: opportunities to increase ovulation rate and embryo recovery by delaying the exposure of follicles to LH</article-title>. <source>Theriogenology</source> <volume>51</volume>, <fpage>9</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>35</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0093-691X(98)00228-3</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Diskin</surname> <given-names>M. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Austin</surname> <given-names>E. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Roche</surname> <given-names>J. F.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>Exogenous hormonal manipulation of ovarian activity in cattle</article-title>. <source>Domest. Anim. Endocrinol.</source> <volume>23</volume>, <fpage>211</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>228</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0739-7240(02)00158-3</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Duarte</surname> <given-names>J. M. B.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>A technique for the capture of free-ranging marsh deer (Blastocerus dichotomus)</article-title>. <source>J. Zoo Wildlife Med.</source> <volume>39</volume>, <fpage>596</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>599</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1638/2005-056.1</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Duarte</surname> <given-names>J. M. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Braga</surname> <given-names>F. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vogliotti</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Abril</surname> <given-names>V. V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Piovezan</surname> <given-names>U</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Reis</surname> <given-names>M. L.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2012</year>). <source>
<italic>Plano de A&#xe7;&#xe3;o Nacional para a Conserva&#xe7;&#xe3;o dos Cerv&#xed;deos Amea&#xe7;ados de Extin&#xe7;&#xe3;o</italic>, <italic>Esp&#xe9;cies de Cerv&#xed;deos Brasileiros N&#xe3;o Amea&#xe7;adas de Extin&#xe7;&#xe3;o.</italic>
</source> (<publisher-loc>Bras&#xed;lia</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Instituto Chico Mendes de Conserva&#xe7;&#xe3;o da Biodiversidade (ICMBio)</publisher-name>). Available at: <uri xlink:href="http://www.icmbio.gov.br/portal/faunabrasileira/plano-de-acao-nacional-lista/860-plano-de-acao-nacional-para-conservacao-dos-cervideos">http://www.icmbio.gov.br/portal/faunabrasileira/plano-de-acao-nacional-lista/860-plano-de-acao-nacional-para-conservacao-dos-cervideos</uri> (Accessed <access-date>May 22, 2024</access-date>).</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Duarte</surname> <given-names>J. M. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Varela</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Piovezan</surname> <given-names>U.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Beccaceci</surname> <given-names>M. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Garcia</surname> <given-names>J. E.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <source>Blastocerus dichotomus</source>. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. (<publisher-loc>Cambridge, UK</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>IUCN</publisher-name>), <fpage>e.T2828A22160916</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2305/IUCN.UK.2016-1.RLTS.T2828A22160916.en</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Duarte</surname> <given-names>J. M. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Garcia</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1995</year>). <article-title>Assistant reproduction in Brazilian cervidae</article-title>. <source>Rev. Bras. Reprodu&#xe7;&#xe3;o Anim.</source> <volume>19</volume>, <fpage>111</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>121</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Duarte</surname> <given-names>J. M. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Uhart</surname> <given-names>M. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Galvez</surname> <given-names>C. E. S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2010</year>). &#x201c;<article-title>Capture and physical restraint</article-title>,&#x201d; in <source>Neotropical Cervidology</source>. Eds. <person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname>Duarte</surname> <given-names>J. M. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gonz&#xe1;lez</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<publisher-name>FUNEP</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>S&#xe3;o Paulo</publisher-loc>), <fpage>218</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>227</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Falconer</surname> <given-names>D. S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1989</year>). <source>Introduction to quantitative genetics</source>. <edition>3rd edn</edition> (<publisher-loc>Harlow: Longman</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Scientific &amp; Technical</publisher-name>).</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Favoretto</surname> <given-names>S. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zanetti</surname> <given-names>E. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Duarte</surname> <given-names>J. M. B.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Cryopreservation of red brocket deer semen (Mazama americana): comparison between three extenders</article-title>. <source>J. Zoo wildlife medicine: Off. Publ. Am. Assoc. Zoo Veterinarians</source> <volume>43</volume>, <fpage>820</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>827</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1638/2011-0195R1.1</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ferreira</surname> <given-names>P. R. S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <source>Gene&#x301;tica da reintroduc&#x327;&#xe3;o: O caso do cervo-do-pantanal (Blastocerus dichotomus) na Estac&#x327;&#xe3;o Ecolo&#x301;gica de Jata&#x131;&#x301;</source>. (master's thesis). <publisher-name>S&#xe3;o Paulo State University (UNESP)</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>S&#xe3;o Paulo, Brazil</publisher-loc>. Available online at <uri xlink:href="http://hdl.handle.net/11449/92542">http://hdl.handle.net/11449/92542</uri>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Figueira</surname> <given-names>C. J. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pires</surname> <given-names>J. S. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Andriolo</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Costa</surname> <given-names>M. J. R. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Duarte</surname> <given-names>J. M. B.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Marsh deer (Blastocerus Dichotomus) reintroduction in the Jata&#xed; Ecological Station (Lu&#xed;s Ant&#xf4;nio, SP): spatial preferences</article-title>. <source>Braz. J. Biol.</source> <volume>65</volume>, <fpage>263</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>270</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1590/S1519-69842005000200009</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Fischer</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lindenmayer</surname> <given-names>D. B.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2000</year>). <article-title>An assessment of the published results of animal relocations</article-title>. <source>Biol. Conserv.</source> <volume>96</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>11</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0006-3207(00)00048-3</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Gonz&#xe1;lez</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Berlinguer</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Espeso</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ariu</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Del Olmo</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Garde</surname> <given-names>J. J.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Use of a neuroleptic in assisted reproduction of the critically endangered Mohor gazelle (Gazella dama mhorr)</article-title>. <source>Theriogenology</source> <volume>70</volume>, <fpage>909</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>922</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.theriogenology.2008.05.052</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kaim</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bloch</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wolfenson</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Braw-Tal</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rosenberg</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Voet</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Effects of GnRH administered to cows at the onset of estrus on timing of ovulation, endocrine responses, and conception</article-title>. <source>J. Dairy Sci.</source> <volume>86</volume>, <fpage>2012</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2021</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)73790-4</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kumar</surname> <given-names>P. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Saravanan</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rajasundaram</surname> <given-names>R. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Selvaraju</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kathiresan</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Serum oestradiol and progesterone profiles and their relationship with superovulatory responses in Tellicherry goats treated with eCG and FSH</article-title>. <source>Small Ruminant Res.</source> <volume>49</volume>, <fpage>69</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>77</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0921-4488(03)00071-3</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sirois</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1998</year>). <article-title>Follicle size-dependent induction of prostaglandin G/H synthase-2 during superovulation in cattle</article-title>. <source>Biol. Reprod.</source> <volume>58</volume>, <fpage>1527</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1532</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1095/biolreprod58.6.1527</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>McCorkell</surname> <given-names>R. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Woodbury</surname> <given-names>M. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Adams</surname> <given-names>G. P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Induction of ovarian follicular wave emergence in wapiti (Cervus elaphus)</article-title>. <source>Theriogenology</source> <volume>70</volume>, <fpage>1017</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1023</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.theriogenology.2008.04.030</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mertes</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Stabach</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Songer</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wacher</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Newby</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chuven</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Management background and release conditions structure post-release movements in reintroduced ungulates</article-title>. <source>Front. Ecol. Evol.</source> <volume>7</volume>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fevo.2019.00470</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Monfort</surname> <given-names>S. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wemmer</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kepler</surname> <given-names>T. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bush</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Brown</surname> <given-names>J. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wildt</surname> <given-names>D. E.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1990</year>). <article-title>Monitoring ovarian function and pregnancy in Eld&#x2019;s deer (Cervus eldi thamin) by evaluating urinary steroid metabolite excretion</article-title>. <source>J. Reprod. fertility</source> <volume>88</volume>, <fpage>271</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>281</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1530/jrf.0.0880271</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Parker</surname> <given-names>I. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Watts</surname> <given-names>D. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lopez</surname> <given-names>R. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Silvy</surname> <given-names>N. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Davis</surname> <given-names>D. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>McCleery</surname> <given-names>R. A.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Evaluation of the efficacy of florida key deer translocations</article-title>. <source>J. Wildlife Manage.</source> <volume>72</volume>, <fpage>1069</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1075</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2193/2007-025</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Peixoto</surname> <given-names>M. G. C. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bergmann</surname> <given-names>J. A.G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fonseca</surname> <given-names>C. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Penna</surname> <given-names>V. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pereira</surname> <given-names>C. S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Effects of environmental factors on multiple ovulation of zebu donors</article-title>. <source>Arquivo Brasileiro Medicina Veterin&#xe1;ria e Zootecnia</source> <volume>58</volume>, <fpage>567</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>574</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1590/S0102-09352006000400019</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Pereira</surname> <given-names>R. J. G.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2010</year>). &#x201c;<article-title>Male reproduction</article-title>,&#x201d; in <source>Neotropical Cervidology: Biology and Medicine of Latin American Deer</source>. Eds. <person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname>Duarte</surname> <given-names>J. M. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gonz&#xe1;lez</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<publisher-name>FUNEP/IUCN</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>Jaboticabal</publisher-loc>), <fpage>39</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>50</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Pereira</surname> <given-names>R. J. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Polegato</surname> <given-names>B. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Souza</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Negr&#xe3;o</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Duarte</surname> <given-names>J. M. B.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Monitoring ovarian cycles and pregnancy in brown brocket deer (Mazama gouazoubira) by measurement of fecal progesterone metabolites</article-title>. <source>Theriogenology</source> <volume>65</volume>, <fpage>387</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>399</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.theriogenology.2005.02.019</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B36">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Piovezan</surname> <given-names>U.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tiepolo</surname> <given-names>L. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tomas</surname> <given-names>W. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Duarte</surname> <given-names>J. M. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Varela</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Filho</surname> <given-names>J. S. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2010</year>). &#x201c;<article-title>Marsh deer Blastocerus dichotomus (Illiger 1815)</article-title>,&#x201d; in <source>Neotropical Cervidology: Biology and Medicine of Latin American Deer</source>. Eds. <person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname>Duarte</surname> <given-names>J. M. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gonz&#xe1;lez</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<publisher-name>FUNEP/IUCN</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>Jaboticabal, S&#xe3;o Paulo</publisher-loc>), <fpage>66</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>76</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B37">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Polegato</surname> <given-names>B. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zanetti</surname> <given-names>E. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Duarte</surname> <given-names>J. M. B.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Monitoring ovarian cycles, pregnancy and post-partum in captive marsh deer (Blastocerus dichotomus) by measuring fecal steroids</article-title>. <source>Conserv. Physiol.</source> <volume>6</volume>, <elocation-id>cox073</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/conphys/cox073</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B38">
<citation citation-type="thesis">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ramos</surname> <given-names>H. G. C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <source>
<italic>O ciclo do chifre do cervo-do-pantanal: Aspectos ecolog&#x301; icos e reprodutivos</italic>
</source>. (master&#x2019;s thesis). <publisher-name>S&#xe3;o Paulo State University (UNESP)</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>S&#xe3;o Paulo, Brazil</publisher-loc>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B39">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Rola</surname> <given-names>L. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Buzanskas</surname> <given-names>M. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Melo</surname> <given-names>L. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chaves</surname> <given-names>M. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Freitas</surname> <given-names>V. J. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Duarte</surname> <given-names>J. M. B.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Assisted reproductive technology in neotropical deer: A model approach to preserving genetic diversity</article-title>. <source>Animals: an Open Access J. MDPI</source> <volume>11</volume>, <elocation-id>1961</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/ani11071961</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B40">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Rola</surname> <given-names>L. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Galindo</surname> <given-names>D. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Freitas</surname> <given-names>V. J.F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Duarte</surname> <given-names>J. M. B.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2023</year>). &#x201c;<article-title>The South American deer</article-title>,&#x201d; in <source>Assisted Reproduction in Wild Mammals of South America.</source> (<publisher-name>CRC Press</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>Boca Raton</publisher-loc>), <fpage>7</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>28</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1201/9781003231691-3</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B41">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Roldan</surname> <given-names>E. R. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gomendio</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Garde</surname> <given-names>J. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Espeso</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ledda</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Berlinguer</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Inbreeding and reproduction in endangered ungulates: preservation of genetic variation through the Organization of Genetic Resource Banks</article-title>. <source>Reprod. Domest. Anim. = Zuchthygiene</source> <volume>41 Suppl 2</volume>, <fpage>82</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>92</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1439-0531.2006.00772.x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B42">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ryckman</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rosatte</surname> <given-names>R. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>McIntosh</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hamr</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jenkins</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Postrelease dispersal of reintroduced elk (Cervus elaphus) in Ontario, Canada</article-title>. <source>Restor. Ecol.</source> <volume>18</volume>, <fpage>173</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>180</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1526-100X.2009.00523.x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B43">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Seddon</surname> <given-names>P. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Armstrong</surname> <given-names>D. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Maloney</surname> <given-names>R. F.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Developing the science of reintroduction biology</article-title>. <source>Conserv. Biol.</source> <volume>21</volume> (<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>303</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>312</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00627.x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B44">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Shorrock</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1980</year>). <source>
<italic>A Origem da Diversidade as Bases Geneticas da Evolu&#xe7;&#xe3;o.</italic> TA Queiroz</source> (<publisher-loc>Sao Paulo</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Editora da Universidade de Sao Paulo</publisher-name>).</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B45">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Stringfellow</surname> <given-names>D. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Seidel</surname> <given-names>S. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1999</year>). <source>Manual da Sociedade Internacional de Transfer&#xea;ncia de Embri&#xf5;es: um guia de procedimento e informa&#xe7;&#xe3;o geral para uso da tecnologia de transfer&#xea;ncia de embri&#xf5;es, enfatizando precau&#xe7;&#xf5;es sanit&#xe1;rias</source>. <edition>3rd edn</edition> (<publisher-loc>Uberl&#xe2;ndia</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Sociedade Brasileira de Transfer&#xea;ncia de Embri&#xf5;es</publisher-name>).</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B46">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sz&#x171;cs</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Melbourne</surname> <given-names>B. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tuff</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Weiss-Lehman</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hufbauer</surname> <given-names>R. A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Genetic and demographic founder effects have long-term fitness consequences for colonising populations</article-title>. <source>Ecol. Lett.</source> <volume>20</volume> (<issue>4</issue>), <fpage>436</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>444</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/ele.12743</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B47">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Szab&#xf3;</surname> <given-names>M. P. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Labruna</surname> <given-names>M. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pereira</surname> <given-names>M. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Duarte</surname> <given-names>J. M. B.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Ticks (Acari: Ixodidae) on wild marsh-deer (Blastocerus dichotomus) from Southeast Brazil: infestations before and after habitat loss</article-title>. <source>J. Med. Entomology</source> <volume>40</volume>, <fpage>268</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>274</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jmedent/40.3.268</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B48">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Szab&#xf3;</surname> <given-names>M. P. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Castro</surname> <given-names>M. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ramos</surname> <given-names>H. G.C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Garcia</surname> <given-names>M. V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Castagnolli</surname> <given-names>K. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pinter</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Species diversity and seasonality of free-living ticks (Acari: Ixodidae) in the natural habitat of wild Marsh deer (Blastocerus dichotomus) in Southeastern Brazil</article-title>. <source>Veterinary Parasitol.</source> <volume>143</volume>, <fpage>147</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>154</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.vetpar.2006.08.009</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B49">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Teixeira</surname> <given-names>C. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Azevedo</surname> <given-names>C. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mendl</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cipreste</surname> <given-names>F. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Young</surname> <given-names>R. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Revisiting translocation and reintroduction programmes: the importance of considering stress</article-title>. <source>Anim. Behav.</source> <volume>73</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>13</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.06.002</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B50">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Tuberville</surname> <given-names>T. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Norton</surname> <given-names>T. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Todd</surname> <given-names>B. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Spratt</surname> <given-names>J. S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Long-term apparent survival of translocated gopher tortoises: A comparison of newly released and previously established animals</article-title>. <source>Biol. Conserv.</source> <volume>141</volume>, <fpage>2690</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2697</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.biocon.2008.08.004</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B51">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Twagiramungu</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Guilbault</surname> <given-names>L. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dufour</surname> <given-names>J. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1995</year>). <article-title>Synchronization of ovarian follicular waves with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist to increase the precision of estrus in cattle: a review</article-title>. <source>J. Anim. Sci.</source> <volume>73</volume>, <fpage>3141</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3151</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2527/1995.73103141x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B52">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Warne</surname> <given-names>R. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chaber</surname> <given-names>A. L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Assessing disease risks in wildlife translocation projects: A comprehensive review of disease incidents</article-title>. <source>Animals</source> <volume>13</volume> (<issue>21</issue>), <fpage>3379</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/ani13213379</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B53">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Garverick</surname> <given-names>H. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Smith</surname> <given-names>G. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Smith</surname> <given-names>M. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hamilton</surname> <given-names>S. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Youngquist</surname> <given-names>R. S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. (<year>1995</year>). <article-title>Expression of follicle-stimulating hormone and luteinizing hormone receptor messenger ribonucleic acids in bovine follicles during the first follicular wave</article-title>. <source>Biol. Reprod.</source> <volume>53</volume>, <fpage>951</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>957</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1095/biolreprod53.4.951</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B54">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zanetti</surname> <given-names>E. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Duarte</surname> <given-names>J. M. B.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <source>Livro de registro geneal&#xf3;gico da popula&#xe7;&#xe3;o cativa de cervo-do-pantanal (Blastocerus dichotomus).</source> (<publisher-loc>Jaboticabal</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Funda&#xe7;&#xe3;o de Apoio a Pesquisa, Ensino e Extens&#xe3;o (FUNEP)</publisher-name>).</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B55">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zanetti</surname> <given-names>E. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Duarte</surname> <given-names>J. M. B.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Comparison of three protocols for superovulation of brown brocket deer (Mazama gouazoubira)</article-title>. <source>Zoo Biol.</source> <volume>31</volume>, <fpage>642</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>655</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/zoo.20428</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B56">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zanetti</surname> <given-names>E. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Duarte</surname> <given-names>J. M.B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Polegato</surname> <given-names>B. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Garcia</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Canola</surname> <given-names>J. C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2010</year>a). &#x201c;<article-title>Assisted reproductive technology</article-title>,&#x201d; in <source>Neotropical Cervidology: Biology and Medicine of Latin American Deer</source>. Eds. <person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname>Duarte</surname> <given-names>J. M. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gonzales</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<publisher-name>FUNEP/IUCN</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>Jaboticabal, S&#xe3;o Paulo</publisher-loc>), <fpage>255</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>270</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B57">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zanetti</surname> <given-names>E. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Munerato</surname> <given-names>M. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cursino</surname> <given-names>M. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Duarte</surname> <given-names>J. M. B.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Comparing two different superovulation protocols on ovarian activity and fecal glucocorticoid levels in the brown brocket deer (Mazama gouazoubira)</article-title>. <source>Reprod. Biol. endocrinology: RB&amp;E</source> <volume>12</volume>, <elocation-id>24</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/1477-7827-12-24</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B58">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zanetti</surname> <given-names>E. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Polegato</surname> <given-names>B. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Duarte</surname> <given-names>J. M. B.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2009</year>). &#x201c;<article-title>Primeiro relato de insemina&#xe7;&#xe3;o artificial com tempo fixo em Veado-mateiro (Mazama americana)</article-title>,&#x201d; in <source>Palestras apresentadas no XVIII Congresso Brasileiro de Reprodu&#xe7;&#xe3;o Animal.</source>(<publisher-loc>Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais</publisher-loc>: <publisher-loc>Col&#xe9;gio Brasileiro de Reprodu&#xe7;&#xe3;o Animal</publisher-loc>), <fpage>14</fpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B59">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zanetti</surname> <given-names>E. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Polegato</surname> <given-names>B. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Duarte</surname> <given-names>J. M. B.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2010</year>b). <article-title>Comparison of two methods of synchronization of estrus in brown brocket deer (Mazama gouazoubira)</article-title>. <source>Anim. Reprod. Sci.</source> <volume>117</volume>, <fpage>266</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>274</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.anireprosci.2009.05.010</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>