Front. Conserv. Sci.Frontiers in Conservation ScienceFront. Conserv. Sci.2673-611XFrontiers Media S.A.10.3389/fcosc.2021.664303Conservation ScienceCorrectionCorrigendum: Assessing Raspberry Shake and Boom Sensors for Recording African Elephant Acoustic VocalizationsLambOliver D.1*ShoreMichael J.1LeesJonathan M.1LeeStephen J.2HensmanSean M.31Department of Geological Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States2U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Army Research Office, Durham, NC, United States3Adventures With Elephants, Bela Bela, South Africa
Edited and reviewed by: Ronald R. Swaisgood, San Diego Zoo Global, United States
*Correspondence: Oliver D. Lamb olamb@email.unc.edu
This article was submitted to Animal Conservation, a section of the journal Frontiers in Conservation Science
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
A Corrigendum on Assessing Raspberry Shake and Boom Sensors for Recording African Elephant Acoustic Vocalizations by Lamb, O. D., Shore, M. J., Lees, J. M., Lee, S. J., and Hensman, S. M. (2021). Front. Conserv. Sci. 1:630967. doi: 10.3389/fcosc.2020.630967seismicLoxodonta africanaRaspberry Piacousticwildlife monitoring
In the original article, there was a mistake in Figure 2 as published. Panel D from Figure 3 was mistakenly placed in Figure 2, instead of the correct panel. The corrected Figure 2 appears below.
Acoustic waveforms (top panel) and their spectrograms (bottom panel) as recorded by acoustic sensors at three different stations during Reunion 2 for stations P5 (A), P3 (B), and P7 (C). The sensors and distances to the reunion of each station are indicated in the top right of each spectrograms. Note the differing y-axes for the spectrograms due to different sampling rates across sensors. Red stars in (A,B) indicate the timing of an individual elephant vocalization identified in the spectrogram. (C) Estimated magnitude squared coherence for 10 s sliding windows between acoustic signals at stations P5 and P3.
The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.