“Local” microcircuits, the building blocks of the cerebral cortex of mammalian species, are embedded in larger networks, and thus their functions, rather than being intrinsic, strongly depend on interactions with various other parts within these networks. These intricate network structures pose great challenges when studying the role of local microcircuits in cognition. Computational modeling provides an effective way to study how the local microcircuits contribute to the brain's high-level functions (e.g., perception and decision-making). Lee et al. and Wagatsuma, Shimomura et al. in this Research Topic involve computational modeling focusing on the functional roles of inhibitory neuron types.

One of the essential tasks for visual perception is to distinguish two bordering objects. Border ownership sensitive (BOS) neurons have been known to contribute to this task, but the precise underlying mechanism remains poorly understood. Wagatsuma, Shimomura et al. created a biologically realistic model, which contains somatostatin (SST) and vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) expressing inhibitory neurons, to study how selective attention modulates BOS neuron responses. Their simulation results suggest that the disinhibitory control of VIP neurons receiving top-down signals can explain the experimental observation that selective attention enhances the firing rate of BOS neurons but reduces the synchrony between them.

Lee et al. explored potential roles of two major inhibitory neuron types in integrating sensory evidence, which is essential for perceptual decision-making. They built a biologically plausible circuit, in which parvalbumin (PV) and SST expressing inhibitory neurons target specific neuron types in accord with experimental findings. The reported simulation raised the possibility that the brain uses the location of highly active neurons (“bump activity”) in the cortical networks to store sensory evidence. Specifically, the model has two modes, the integration mode, in which the bump activity propagates, and the retention mode, in which the bump activity remains stationary. With these two modes, the newly proposed model can integrate and retain sensory evidence, and SST inhibitory neurons are responsible for switching between these two modes.

DL has been developed to perform complex functions similar to our cognition. DL's notable success in multiple domains including computer vision and language models suggests that deep neural networks (DNNs) and the brain could rely on similar mechanisms when processing sensory inputs. With this possibility in mind, Wagatsuma, Hidaka et al. compared the internal representations of monkey visual cortices and AlexNet [a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), a type of DNN]. Neural responses in the earlier layers of AlexNet were correlated with those of the primary visual cortex, whereas the responses in later layers were correlated either with those of V4 or the inferior temporal cortex, supporting the possibility that the brain and DNNs rely on similar hierarchical signal processing for visual object classification and detection. This work is representative of how advances in neuroscience can help building more efficient DL algorithms, as well as how advances in DL can help to better understand brain circuit function and operation.

Emerging “NeuroAI” seeks to leverage biological mechanisms to improve DL (Zador et al., 2022), and a line of studies (see Clopath et al., 2010, for example) uses biological spike-time-dependent plasticity (STDP) to train spiking neural networks (SNNs), a form of power-efficient biological neural networks. Haşegan et al. proposed a novel evolutionary strategy for SNNs, which is more efficient than traditional STDP-based learning algorithms when training a SNN to play a cart-pole game. As the building blocks of the brain, SNNs can naturally be better platforms for NeuroAI than current DNNs are. However, SNNs utilize discrete “spikes” for their functions, and backpropagation (the backbone of DL) cannot be directly used to train them, suggesting the need for stronger collaboration between neuroscience and deep learning communities.

All authors listed have made a substantial, direct, and intellectual contribution to the work and approved it for publication.