Front. Commun.Frontiers in CommunicationFront. Commun.2297-900XFrontiers Media S.A.10.3389/fcomm.2023.1120237CommunicationCorrectionCorrigendum: Are early social communication skills a harbinger for language development in infants later diagnosed autistic?—A longitudinal study using a standardized social communication assessmentRaviShruthi1*BradshawAllison1AbdiHervé1MeeraShoba Sreenath2Parish-MorrisJulia3YankowitzLisa4PatersonSarah5DagerStephen R.6BurrowsCatherine A.7ChappellChad8St.JohnTanya6EstesAnnette M.6PivenJoseph8†SwansonMeghan R.1†The IBIS Network1Department of Psychology, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX, United States2Department of Speech Pathology & Audiology, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bangalore, India3Center for Autism Research, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, United States4Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States5The James S. McDonnell Foundation, St. Louis, MO, United States6Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States7Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States8Department of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
Approved by: Frontiers Editorial Office, Frontiers Media SA, Switzerland
*Correspondence: Shruthi Ravi ✉ Shruthi.Ravi1@utdallas.edu
This article was submitted to Language Sciences, a section of the journal Frontiers in Communication
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
A corrigendum on Are early social communication skills a harbinger for language development in infants later diagnosed autistic?—A longitudinal study using a standardized social communication assessment by Ravi, S., Bradshaw, A., Abdi, H., Meera, S. S., Parish-Morris, J., Yankowitz, L., Paterson, S., Dager, S. R., Burrows, C. A., Chappell, C., St.John, T., Estes, A. M., Piven, J., Swanson, M. R., and the IBIS Network. (2022). Front. Commun. 7:977724. doi: 10.3389/fcomm.2022.977724autismlanguagesocial communicationlongitudinalinfancy
In the published article, there were two errors in Table 4, Post-hoc cross-sectional analysis exploring the main effect for group, as published. There is a missing “ < ” symbol for understanding scores at 24-months, and an incorrect “ < ” symbol for object use scores at 24 months under the post-Hoc comparisons column. The corrected Table 4, Post-hoc cross-sectional analysis exploring the main effect for group, appears below.
Post-hoc cross-sectional analysis exploring the main effect for group.
CSBS scores
HL-ASD (a)
HL-Neg (b)
LL-Neg (c)
Overall group comparison
Post-Hoc comparisons
EMM
SE
EMM
SE
EMM
SE
df
SS
F
q
f2
12-months
Emotion eye gaze (N = 378)
9.63
0.44
10.95
0.23
12.06
0.33
2
213.90
9.88
< 0.01*
0.07
a < b < c
Communication (N = 396)
9.07
0.56
11.80
0.29
12.89
0.42
2
549.60
15.17
< 0.01*
0.10
a < b, c
Gestures (N = 396)
6.57
0.47
8.53
0.24
9.92
0.35
2
415.30
16.45
< 0.01*
0.10
a < b < c
Sounds (N = 396)
3.52
0.59
6.34
0.31
5.73
0.44
2
375.50
9.32
< 0.01*
0.06
a < b, c
Words (N = 396)
0.40
0.24
1.00
0.13
0.95
0.18
2
17.86
2.62
0.25
0.02
a, b, c
Understanding (N = 262)
1.04
0.54
1.62
0.29
2.07
0.41
2
25.26
1.67
0.42
0.01
a, b, c
Object use (N = 334)
4.84
0.47
5.91
0.26
6.29
0.36
2
69.90
3.14
0.05
0.02
a, b, c
24-months
Emotion and eye gaze (N = 410)
9.96
0.38
14.49
0.19
14.34
0.27
2
1,016.00
60.18
< 0.01*
0.30
a < b, c
Communication (N = 432)
13.40
0.43
17.50
0.22
16.70
0.31
2
853.30
37.03
< 0.01*
0.19
a < b, c
Gestures (N = 432)
9.08
0.45
12.59
0.23
12.53
0.32
2
651.90
26.63
< 0.01*
0.14
a < b, c
Sounds (N = 432)
13.00
0.69
19.60
0.36
19.20
0.50
2
2,246.90
37.73
< 0.01*
0.19
a < b, c
Words (N = 432)
9.55
0.99
17.75
0.51
18.78
0.71
2
4,008.20
33.43
< 0.01*
0.18
a < b, c
Understanding (N = 289)
8.27
1.03
17.44
0.54
19.70
0.66
2
3,745.00
45.39
< 0.01*
0.36
a < b < c
Object use (N = 413)
10.20
0.56
13.60
0.28
13.70
0.41
2
608.00
16.72
< 0.01*
0.10
a < b, c
*Significant interaction that survived adaptive FDR procedure.
The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions made in the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.