Front. Chem.
Frontiers in Chemistry
Front. Chem.
2296-2646
Frontiers Media S.A.
1477202
10.3389/fchem.2024.1477202
Chemistry
Retraction
Retraction: Evaluation of Pt,Pd-doped, NiO-decorated, single-wall carbon nanotube-ionic liquid carbon paste chemically modified electrode: an ultrasensitive anticancer drug sensor for the determination of daunorubicin in the presence of tamoxifen
Frontiers Editorial Office
10.3389/fchem.2024.1477202
Frontiers Editorial Office
*
Approved by: Frontiers Editorial Office, Frontiers Media SA, Switzerland
*Correspondence: Frontiers Editorial Office, research.integrity@frontiersin.org
14
08
2024
2024
12
1477202
07
08
2024
07
08
2024
Copyright © 2024 Frontiers Editorial Office.
2024
Frontiers Editorial Office
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
A Retraction of the Original Research Article Evaluation of Pt,Pd-Doped, NiO-decorated, single-wall carbon nanotube-ionic liquid carbon paste chemically modified electrode: an ultrasensitive anticancer drug sensor for the determination of daunorubicin in the presence of tamoxifen by Alizadeh M, Azar PA, Mozaffari SA, Karimi-Maleh H and Tamaddon A-M (2020). Front. Chem. 8:677. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2020.00677
section-at-acceptance
Electrochemistry
The journal retracts the 19 August 2020 article cited above.
Following publication, the publisher found evidence of multiple undisclosed conflicts of interest that undermined the integrity of the peer review process. As the scientific integrity of the article cannot be guaranteed, and in adherence to the recommendations of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), the article is retracted.
This retraction was approved by the Chief Executive Editor of Frontiers. The authors received a communication regarding the retraction and had a chance to respond. This communication has been recorded by the publisher.