<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="EN" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Chem.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Chemistry</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Chem.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">2296-2646</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">859095</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fchem.2022.859095</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Chemistry</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Coherent Control of Molecular Dissociation by Selective Excitation of Nuclear Wave Packets</article-title>
<alt-title alt-title-type="left-running-head">L&#xf3;pez Pe&#xf1;a et al.</alt-title>
<alt-title alt-title-type="right-running-head">Coherent Control of Molecular Dissociation</alt-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>L&#xf3;pez Pe&#xf1;a</surname>
<given-names>Hugo A.</given-names>
</name>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Shusterman</surname>
<given-names>Jacob M.</given-names>
</name>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ampadu Boateng</surname>
<given-names>Derrick</given-names>
</name>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lao</surname>
<given-names>Ka Un</given-names>
</name>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1689588/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Tibbetts</surname>
<given-names>Katharine Moore</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001">&#x2a;</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1526572/overview"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff>
<institution>Department of Chemistry</institution>, <institution>Virginia Commonwealth University</institution>, <addr-line>Richmond</addr-line>, <addr-line>VA</addr-line>, <country>United States</country>
</aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>
<bold>Edited by:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1218455/overview">Andre Bandrauk</ext-link>, Universit&#xe9; de Sherbrooke, Canada</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>
<bold>Reviewed by:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/528524/overview">Riccardo Conte</ext-link>, University of Milan, Italy</p>
<p>
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/899544/overview">Chaoyuan Zhu</ext-link>, National Chiao Tung University, Taiwan</p>
</fn>
<corresp id="c001">&#x2a;Correspondence: Katharine Moore Tibbetts, <email>kmtibbetts@vcu.edu</email>
</corresp>
<fn fn-type="other">
<p>This article was submitted to Physical Chemistry and Chemical Physics, a section of the journal Frontiers in Chemistry</p>
</fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>05</day>
<month>04</month>
<year>2022</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2022</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>10</volume>
<elocation-id>859095</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>20</day>
<month>01</month>
<year>2022</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>18</day>
<month>03</month>
<year>2022</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#xa9; 2022 L&#xf3;pez Pe&#xf1;a, Shusterman, Ampadu Boateng, Lao and Tibbetts.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2022</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>L&#xf3;pez Pe&#xf1;a, Shusterman, Ampadu Boateng, Lao and Tibbetts</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>We report on pump-probe control schemes to manipulate fragmentation product yields in <italic>p</italic>-nitrotoluene (PNT) cation. Strong field ionization of PNT prepares the parent cation in the ground electronic state, with coherent vibrational excitation along two normal modes: the C&#x2013;C&#x2013;N&#x2013;O torsional mode at 80&#xa0;cm<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> and the in-plane ring-stretching mode at 650&#xa0;cm<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>. Both vibrational wave packets are observed as oscillations in parent and fragment ion yields in the mass spectrum upon optical excitation. Excitation with 650&#xa0;nm selectively fragments the PNT cation into <inline-formula id="inf1">
<mml:math id="m1">
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>C</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>7</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>H</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>7</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>, whereas excitation with 400&#xa0;nm selectively produces <inline-formula id="inf2">
<mml:math id="m2">
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>C</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>5</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>H</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>5</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> and <inline-formula id="inf3">
<mml:math id="m3">
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>C</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>H</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>. In both cases the ion yield oscillations result from torsional wave packet excitation, but 650 and 400&#xa0;nm excitation produce oscillations with opposite phases. Ab initio calculations of the ground and excited electronic potential energy surfaces of PNT cation along the C&#x2013;C&#x2013;N&#x2013;O dihedral angle reveal that 400&#xa0;nm excitation accesses an allowed transition from D<sub>0</sub> to D<sub>6</sub> at 0&#xb0; dihedral angle, whereas 650&#xa0;nm excitation accesses a strongly allowed transition from D<sub>0</sub> to D<sub>4</sub> at a dihedral angle of 90&#xb0;. This ability to access different electronic excited states at different locations along the potential energy surface accounts for the selective fragmentation observed with different probe wavelengths. The ring-stretching mode, only observed using 800&#xa0;nm excitation, is attributed to a D<sub>0</sub> to D<sub>2</sub> transition at a geometry with 90&#xb0; dihedral angle and elongated C&#x2013;N bond length. Collectively, these results demonstrate that strong field ionization induces multimode coherent excitation and that the vibrational wave packets can be excited with specific photon energies at different points on their potential energy surfaces to induce selective fragmentation.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>coherent control</kwd>
<kwd>strong field ionization</kwd>
<kwd>mass spectrometry</kwd>
<kwd>pump-probe</kwd>
<kwd>nuclear wave packet</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<contract-sponsor id="cn001">Army Research Office<named-content content-type="fundref-id">10.13039/100000183</named-content>
</contract-sponsor>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="s1">
<title>1 Introduction</title>
<p>Chemists have sought to control molecular dissociation with lasers for decades. Tunable monochromatic laser light was believed to enable &#x201c;bond-selective chemistry&#x201d; through resonant energy absorption at the vibrational frequency of the targeted bond <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Bloembergen and Yablanovitch (1978)</xref>. However, early attempts to control bond-cleavage by tuning the laser frequency failed due to rapid intramolecular vibrational energy redistribution (IVR) across coupled vibrational modes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Bloembergen and Zewail (1984)</xref>. Effective control of unimolecular dissociation was only achieved with the development of high-intensity ultrashort pulsed lasers and coherent control techniques that operate on timescales faster than IVR.</p>
<p>Coherent control over molecular dissociation has primarily been achieved by the &#x201c;closed-loop&#x201d; scheme of optimally designing shaped laser pulses with automated learning algorithms, initially proposed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Judson and Rabitz (1992)</xref>. Gerber and co-workers reported the first experimental implementation of closed-loop control over ionization and dissociation of CpFe(CO)<sub>2</sub>Cl (Cp &#x3d; cyclopentadienyl) into CpFeCOCl<sup>&#x2b;</sup> or FeCl<sup>&#x2b;</sup> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Assion et al. (1998)</xref>. This success spurred the application of closed-loop control to selectively dissociate various molecules including halogenated alkanes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Damrauer et al. (2002)</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Langhojer et al. (2005)</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Plenge et al. (2011)</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Moore Tibbetts et al. (2013)</xref> and acetones <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Langhojer et al. (2005)</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Cardoza et al. (2006)</xref>. However, shaped pulse control fails to enhance specific dissociation pathways in certain molecules including <italic>p</italic>-nitrotoluene <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Lozovoy et al. (2008)</xref>. Moreover, the &#x201c;black box&#x201d; nature of closed-loop control makes it difficult to fully understand the physical mechanisms by which an optimal pulse shape achieves product selectivity, even using additional specialized pulse shaping procedures <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Xing et al. (2017)</xref>.</p>
<p>Understanding the physical mechanisms underlying coherent control of molecular dissociation can be achieved using two-pulse &#x201c;pump-probe&#x201d; excitation schemes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Tannor and Rice (1985)</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Zewail (1988)</xref>. Pump-probe measurements with complementary quantum chemical calculations of the relevant electronic potential energy surfaces (PESs) have revealed bond-cleavage mechanisms facilitated by coherent vibrational motions in numerous organic cations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Moore Tibbetts (2019)</xref>. For instance, coherent excitation of the I&#x2013;C&#x2013;Br bending mode in CH<sub>2</sub>IBr<sup>&#x2b;</sup> upon strong-field ionization facilitates dissociation into CH<sub>2</sub>Br<sup>&#x2b;</sup> upon excitation of the D<sub>0</sub>&#x2192;D<sub>3</sub> transition at a specific point on the D<sub>0</sub> PES <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Nichols et al. (2009)</xref>. Similarly, coherent vibrational motions along the phenyl&#x2013;substituent torsional coordinate in the molecular cations of acetophenone <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Bohinski et al. (2014)</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Tibbetts et al. (2015)</xref> and nitrobenzene <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">L&#xf3;pez Pe&#xf1;a et al. (2021)</xref> facilitate CH<sub>3</sub> and NO<sub>2</sub> loss, respectively, upon excitation of the vibrational wave packet at 90&#xb0; phenyl&#x2013;substituent dihedral angle. Although pump-probe measurements advance understanding of molecular dissociation facilitated by coherent vibrational dynamics, they enable only limited control over relative fragment yields because the probe wavelength typically excites resonantly to a single electronic excited state. As a result, one preferential fragment or a specific distribution of fragments is usually observed.</p>
<p>In this work, we demonstrate selective coherent excitation to three different electronic excited states from ground-state <italic>p</italic>-nitrotoluene (PNT) cation using probe pulses at 800, 650, and 400&#xa0;nm. This selective excitation results in different relative yields of the <inline-formula id="inf4">
<mml:math id="m4">
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>C</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>7</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>H</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>7</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>, <inline-formula id="inf5">
<mml:math id="m5">
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>C</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>5</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>H</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>5</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>, and <inline-formula id="inf6">
<mml:math id="m6">
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>C</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>H</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> fragment ions depending on the probe wavelength. Strong field adiabatic ionization prepares a superposition of two vibrational wave packets in the D<sub>0</sub> PES of PNT cation: the first along the C&#x2013;C&#x2013;N&#x2013;O torsional coordinate identified in earlier work <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Ampadu Boateng et al. (2018)</xref> and the second along the in-plane phenyl ring-stretching mode that includes C&#x2013;N bond stretching. The torsional wave packet can be selectively excited to D<sub>4</sub> at a C&#x2013;C&#x2013;N&#x2013;O dihedral angle of 90&#xb0; with 650&#xa0;nm photons to produce primarily <inline-formula id="inf7">
<mml:math id="m7">
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>C</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>7</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>H</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>7</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>, or to D<sub>6</sub> at a 0&#xb0; dihedral angle with 400&#xa0;nm photons to produce <inline-formula id="inf8">
<mml:math id="m8">
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>C</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>5</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>H</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>5</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> and <inline-formula id="inf9">
<mml:math id="m9">
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>C</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>H</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>. The ring-stretching wave packet can be selectively excited to D<sub>2</sub> at a geometry with slightly elongated C&#x2013;N bond length and 90&#xb0; dihedral angle using 800&#xa0;nm photons, producing exclusively <inline-formula id="inf10">
<mml:math id="m10">
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>C</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>7</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>H</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>7</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>. These results indicate that careful choice of excitation wavelengths in two-pulse schemes can effectively control dissociation pathways in a complex organic molecule.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2">
<title>2 Materials and Methods</title>
<sec id="s2-1">
<title>2.1 Experiments</title>
<p>Portions of the experimental setup have been described in our previous works <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Ampadu Boateng et al. (2018)</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Ampadu Boateng et al. (2019a)</xref>. Briefly, a commercial Ti:sapphire regenerative amplifier (Astrella, Coherent, Inc.) producing 30&#xa0;fs, 800&#xa0;nm, 2.2&#xa0;mJ pulses was used to pump an optical parametric amplifier (OPA, TOPAS Prime) to produce sub-20&#xa0;fs 1,300&#xa0;nm or 1,500&#xa0;nm pump pulses. The pump wavelength was 1,300&#xa0;nm for measurements with the 400 and 650&#xa0;nm probes, whereas the pump wavelength was 1,500&#xa0;nm for measurements with the 800&#xa0;nm probe for reasons that will be discussed in the Results section. The 650&#xa0;nm probe pulse was obtained from OPA output split with a 50:50 (r:t) beam splitter and frequency doubled with a <italic>&#x3b2;</italic>-barium borate (BBO) crystal. The 800&#xa0;nm probe pulse was obtained from the transmitted portion of the incident laser beam from a 90:10 (r:t) beam splitter prior to the OPA and down-collimated using a reflective telescope with reduction factor 2. The 400&#xa0;nm probe pulse was obtained by down-collimating the 800&#xa0;nm beam with a telescope with reduction factor 3.33 comprised of a plano-convex lens (<italic>f</italic> &#x3d; 250&#xa0;mm) and a plano-concave lens (<italic>f</italic> &#x3d; &#x2212;75&#xa0;mm) placed on a linear translation stage, followed by frequency doubling with a BBO crystal. The transmissive telescope geometry was necessary to allow for fine adjustment of the focal spot of the 400&#xa0;nm probe beam to overlap with the focal spot of the 1,300&#xa0;nm pump beam when both are focused with the same plano-convex lens (<italic>f</italic> &#x3d; 200&#xa0;mm). Both the 800 and 650&#xa0;nm probe pulses have duration of &#x223c;25&#xa0;fs as measured by frequency-resolved optical gating <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Ampadu Boateng et al. (2018)</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Ampadu Boateng et al. (2019a)</xref>. The 400&#xa0;nm probe pulse duration was estimated at 70&#xa0;fs as measured by the cross-correlation of the O<sub>2</sub> signal from air in the mass spectrometer with 1,300&#xa0;nm pump/400&#xa0;nm probe excitation (<xref ref-type="sec" rid="s10">Supplementary Figure S1</xref>). PNT (Sigma Aldrich, 99%) was introduced into the time-of-flight mass spectrometer (Jordan TOF) <italic>via</italic> an effusive inlet under gentle heating. Pump-probe measurements were taken over the delay range of &#x2212;500&#xa0;fs (probe before pump) to &#x2b;2,500&#xa0;fs (pump before probe) in steps of 5&#xa0;fs for the 800&#xa0;nm probe and 10&#xa0;fs otherwise. Mass spectra were recorded at each pump-probe delay and averaged over 1,000 laser shots with a 1&#xa0;GHz digital oscilloscope (LeCroy WaveRunner 610Zi).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-2">
<title>2.2 Computations</title>
<p>Density functional theory (DFT) calculations were conducted using Gaussian 16 software <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Frisch et al. (2016)</xref> employing the restricted Kohn-Sham formalism for neutral species and the unrestricted formalism for cationic species. A previous work on PNT from our group <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Ampadu Boateng et al. (2018a)</xref> has identified the hybrid generalized gradient approximation (GGA) B3LYP functional <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Becke (1993)</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Stephens et al. (1994)</xref> in combination with the def2-TZVPP <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Weigend and Ahlrichs (2005)</xref> basis set as an adequate level of theory to describe this molecular system. Both the neutral and cation geometries of PNT were optimized within this level of theory. The convergence threshold for total energy was set to 10<sup>&#x2013;8</sup>&#xa0;eV while the force threshold was set to 10<sup>&#x2013;3</sup>&#xa0;eV/&#xc5;. Each geometric optimization was followed by harmonic frequency computations in order to confirm the stationary character of the state obtained.</p>
<p>To determine the excited-state energies of the PNT cation at different geometries, we performed single-point time-dependent DFT (TDDFT) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Bauernschmitt and Ahlrichs (1996)</xref> calculations using Gaussian 16. For each cation geometry, we calculated the first 10 doublet-doublet transitions at the B3LYP/def2-TZVPP level of theory. In <xref ref-type="sec" rid="s3-2">section 3.2</xref> we will present TDDFT excited-state calculations for PNT radical cation at the B3LYP/def2-TZVPP level but those calculations will be further supported with selected calculations at the equation-of-motion excitation-energies coupled-cluster singles and doubles (EOM-EE-CCSD) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Krylov, (2008)</xref> level. Due to the high computational cost of EOM methods, we employ the smaller 6&#x2212;311&#x2b;G&#x2a; basis set. These EOM calculations were performed using Q-Chem 5.3 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Epifanovsky et al. (2021)</xref>. It is important to clarify that both TDDFT and EOM calculations on the cation are done under field-free conditions, i.e., after the strong-field pump pulse is over (see further discussion on <xref ref-type="sec" rid="s3-1">Section 3.1</xref>).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s3">
<title>3 Results</title>
<sec id="s3-1">
<title>3.1 Pump-Probe Measurements</title>
<p>Pump-probe measurements were conducted with pump intensity of 6 &#xd7; 10<sup>13</sup>&#xa0;W cm<sup>&#x2212;2</sup>. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1A</xref> shows the mass spectra of PNT<sup>&#x2b;</sup> taken with only the 1,300&#xa0;nm pump pulse (bottom) and with pump-probe excitation using 6 &#xd7; 10<sup>12</sup>&#xa0;W cm<sup>&#x2212;2</sup> probe pulses at 800, 650, and 400&#xa0;nm (top). The pump-only spectrum is dominated by the intact PNT<sup>&#x2b;</sup> cation at <italic>m</italic>/<italic>z</italic> 137, with minor contribution from the <inline-formula id="inf11">
<mml:math id="m11">
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>C</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>7</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>H</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>7</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> fragment at <italic>m</italic>/<italic>z</italic> 91. The greatest depletion in PNT<sup>&#x2b;</sup> signal was observed at pump-probe delays of &#x2b;160&#xa0;fs for 800&#xa0;nm probe, &#x2b;200&#xa0;fs for 650&#xa0;nm probe, and &#x2b;60&#xa0;fs for 400&#xa0;nm probe. As seen in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1A</xref>, a substantial depletion in PNT<sup>&#x2b;</sup> signal and concomitant rise in fragment ion signals occurs at the selected pump-probe delay for each probe wavelength. Whereas both the 800 and 650&#xa0;nm probe wavelengths primarily enhance the yield of <inline-formula id="inf12">
<mml:math id="m12">
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>C</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>7</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>H</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>7</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> and to a lesser extent <inline-formula id="inf13">
<mml:math id="m13">
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>C</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>5</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>H</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>5</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> (<italic>m</italic>/<italic>z</italic> 65), the 400&#xa0;nm probe enhances only <inline-formula id="inf14">
<mml:math id="m14">
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>C</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>5</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>H</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>5</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> and <inline-formula id="inf15">
<mml:math id="m15">
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>C</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>H</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> (<italic>m</italic>/<italic>z</italic> 39). This change in fragmentation pattern with different probe wavelengths indicates that selective fragmentation is possible using pump-probe excitation.</p>
<fig id="F1" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 1</label>
<caption>
<p>
<bold>(A)</bold> Mass spectrum of PNT<sup>&#x2b;</sup> taken with 1,300&#xa0;nm pump only (dark red) and the difference spectra relative to the pump-only spectrum taken with 800&#xa0;nm (magenta), 650&#xa0;nm (orange), and 400&#xa0;nm (blue) probe pulses at the indicated delays. <bold>(B)</bold> Transient ion signals for PNT<sup>&#x2b;</sup>, <inline-formula id="inf16">
<mml:math id="m16">
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>C</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>7</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>H</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>7</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>, <inline-formula id="inf17">
<mml:math id="m17">
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>C</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>5</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>H</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>5</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>, and <inline-formula id="inf18">
<mml:math id="m18">
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>C</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>H</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> taken at each probe wavelength. Each signal is normalized to its yield at negative pump-probe delay.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fchem-10-859095-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>
<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1B</xref> displays the transient ion signals of the PNT<sup>&#x2b;</sup>, <inline-formula id="inf19">
<mml:math id="m19">
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>C</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>7</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>H</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>7</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>, <inline-formula id="inf20">
<mml:math id="m20">
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>C</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>5</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>H</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>5</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>, and <inline-formula id="inf21">
<mml:math id="m21">
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>C</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>H</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> fragments as a function of pump-probe delay using 800&#xa0;nm (magenta), 650&#xa0;nm (orange), and 400&#xa0;nm (blue) probe wavelengths. Each ion signal is normalized to its respective yield at negative pump-probe delay. The large-amplitude oscillations in the PNT<sup>&#x2b;</sup> and fragment ion signals with period 420&#xa0;fs arise from the vibrational wave packet along the C&#x2013;C&#x2013;N&#x2013;O torsional coordinate in PNT<sup>&#x2b;</sup>, which we previously reported from pump-probe measurements with only 800&#xa0;nm probe wavelength <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Ampadu Boateng et al. (2018a)</xref>. The present results show that the 650&#xa0;nm probe wavelength produces larger-amplitude oscillations in PNT<sup>&#x2b;</sup> with the same phase, which indicates that 650&#xa0;nm more effectively excites the PNT<sup>&#x2b;</sup> torsional wave packet than 800&#xa0;nm. In contrast, the PNT<sup>&#x2b;</sup> oscillations with the 400&#xa0;nm probe have the opposite phase, which indicates 400&#xa0;nm probe selectively excites the PNT<sup>&#x2b;</sup> torsional wave packet at a different location on the PES along the torsional coordinate than the lower-energy probe wavelengths. Finally, additional low-amplitude fast oscillations with a period of &#x223c;55&#xa0;fs are observed in the PNT<sup>&#x2b;</sup> and <inline-formula id="inf22">
<mml:math id="m22">
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>C</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>7</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>H</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>7</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> signals only for the 800&#xa0;nm probe. These oscillations were best resolved using a 1,500&#xa0;nm pump wavelength (shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1B</xref>), although they are also visible using a 1,300&#xa0;nm pump wavelength (<xref ref-type="sec" rid="s10">Supplementary Figure S2</xref>).</p>
<p>To further interpret the oscillatory dynamics, transient ion signals as a function of pump-probe delay, <italic>&#x3c4;</italic>, were fit to the equation<disp-formula id="e1">
<mml:math id="m23">
<mml:mi>S</mml:mi>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3c4;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>&#x3c4;</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>/</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>T</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
<mml:mo>&#x2061;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>cos</mml:mi>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
<mml:mi>&#x3c0;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
<mml:mi>&#x3c4;</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>&#x3d5;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>b</mml:mi>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>&#x3c4;</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>/</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>T</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>c</mml:mi>
</mml:math>
<label>(1)</label>
</disp-formula>where <italic>a</italic> and <italic>b</italic> are amplitude coefficients, <italic>t</italic> is the oscillation period, <italic>T</italic>
<sub>1</sub> is the coherence lifetime, <italic>T</italic>
<sub>2</sub> is a second lifetime not associated with oscillations, and <italic>c</italic> is the ion yield as <italic>&#x3c4;</italic>&#x2192;<italic>&#x221e;</italic>. Each transient signal at <italic>&#x3c4;</italic> &#x2265; 70&#xa0;fs (i.e., after the pump pulse is over so the instrument response function can be ignored) was fit to <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="e1">Eq. 1</xref> using nonlinear least-squares curve fitting in MATLAB. A full description of the extracted coefficients can be found in the Supplementary Material, <xref ref-type="sec" rid="s10">Supplementary Figure S3</xref> and <xref ref-type="sec" rid="s10">Supplementary Tables S1&#x2013;S3</xref>. Although the strong-field pump pulse can populate multiple electronic states of the cation, it is reasonable to assume that, when the probe beam arrives after a delay <inline-formula id="inf23">
<mml:math id="m24">
<mml:mo>&#x2265;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>70</mml:mn>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>&#xa0;fs, it will find the cation in the ground electronic state after electronic relaxation. The validity of this assertion can be supported with the work of Kraus and coworkers <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Kraus et al. (2015)</xref>, in which charge migration processes leading to relaxation of the electronic wave packet in iodoacetylene occur within 5&#xa0;fs, well below the initial measurement of dynamics at 70&#xa0;fs delay used for our analysis. The fit coefficients corresponding to the oscillatory dynamics shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref> confirm both that each fragment ion oscillates <italic>&#x3c0;</italic> radians out of phase with respect to PNT<sup>&#x2b;</sup> and that the phase of the PNT<sup>&#x2b;</sup> signal shifts from approximately 0 radians for 650&#xa0;nm excitation to <italic>&#x3c0;</italic> radians for 400&#xa0;nm excitation. The oscillation period is &#x223c;420&#xa0;fs for both 650 and 400&#xa0;nm probes, whereas the somewhat longer &#x223c;460&#xa0;fs oscillation period using the 800&#xa0;nm probe arises from a poorer fit quality (<xref ref-type="sec" rid="s10">Supplementary Figure S3</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap id="T1" position="float">
<label>TABLE 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Curve fitting coefficients for coherent dynamics of ion signals: oscillation amplitude (<italic>a</italic>), coherent lifetime (<italic>T</italic>
<sub>1</sub>), oscillation period (<italic>t</italic>), and phase (<italic>&#x3d5;</italic>).</p>
</caption>
<table>
<thead valign="top">
<tr>
<th align="left">
<italic>&#x3bb;</italic>
<sub>
<italic>probe</italic>
</sub> (nm)</th>
<th align="center">Ion</th>
<th align="center">
<italic>a</italic>
</th>
<th align="center">
<italic>T</italic>
<sub>1</sub> (fs)</th>
<th align="center">
<italic>t</italic> (fs)</th>
<th align="center">
<italic>&#x3d5;</italic> (rad)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td align="left">400</td>
<td align="center">PNT<sup>&#x2b;</sup>
</td>
<td align="char" char="plusmn">0.10 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
<td align="char" char="plusmn">345 &#xb1; 33</td>
<td align="char" char="plusmn">410 &#xb1; 7</td>
<td align="char" char="plusmn">3.1 &#xb1; 0.1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2014;</td>
<td align="center">
<inline-formula id="inf24">
<mml:math id="m25">
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>C</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>5</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>H</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>5</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>
</td>
<td align="char" char="plusmn">0.03 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
<td align="char" char="plusmn">370 &#xb1; 120</td>
<td align="char" char="plusmn">421 &#xb1; 20</td>
<td align="char" char="plusmn">0.3 &#xb1; 0.3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">650</td>
<td align="center">PNT<sup>&#x2b;</sup>
</td>
<td align="char" char="plusmn">0.25 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
<td align="char" char="plusmn">308 &#xb1; 15</td>
<td align="char" char="plusmn">425 &#xb1; 4</td>
<td align="char" char="plusmn">0.05 &#xb1; 0.04</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2014;</td>
<td align="center">
<inline-formula id="inf25">
<mml:math id="m26">
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>C</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>7</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>H</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>7</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>
</td>
<td align="char" char="plusmn">0.15 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
<td align="char" char="plusmn">290 &#xb1; 12</td>
<td align="char" char="plusmn">417 &#xb1; 3</td>
<td align="char" char="plusmn">3.1 &#xb1; 0.03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2014;</td>
<td align="center">
<inline-formula id="inf26">
<mml:math id="m27">
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>C</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>5</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>H</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>5</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>
</td>
<td align="char" char="plusmn">0.09 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
<td align="char" char="plusmn">252 &#xb1; 17</td>
<td align="char" char="plusmn">438 &#xb1; 9</td>
<td align="char" char="plusmn">3.3 &#xb1; 0.1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">800</td>
<td align="center">PNT<sup>&#x2b;</sup>
</td>
<td align="char" char="plusmn">0.15 &#xb1; 0.02</td>
<td align="char" char="plusmn">210 &#xb1; 16</td>
<td align="char" char="plusmn">464 &#xb1; 11</td>
<td align="char" char="plusmn">0.45 &#xb1; 0.07</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2014;</td>
<td align="center">
<inline-formula id="inf27">
<mml:math id="m28">
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>C</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>7</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>H</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>7</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>
</td>
<td align="char" char="plusmn">0.13 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
<td align="char" char="plusmn">212 &#xb1; 12</td>
<td align="char" char="plusmn">438 &#xb1; 7</td>
<td align="char" char="plusmn">3.3 &#xb1; 0.1</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<p>Subtraction of the incoherent dynamics (second and third terms in <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="e1">Eq. 1</xref>) allows for clearer visualization of the oscillatory dynamics and frequency analysis via fast Fourier Transform (FFT). <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2A</xref> displays the coherent transient ion dynamics of PNT<sup>&#x2b;</sup> and oscillatory fragment ions for each probe wavelength. A clear <italic>&#x3c0;</italic> phase shift in the PNT<sup>&#x2b;</sup> signals (red) between the 400&#xa0;nm probe and 650&#xa0;nm or 800&#xa0;nm probes is visible, as indicated by the dotted lines at 200, 620, and 1,040&#xa0;fs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2B</xref> displays the FFT amplitude of the signals shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2A</xref>. For all probe wavelengths the FFT spectra exhibit a strong peak at 80&#xa0;cm<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> assigned to the previously reported C&#x2013;N&#x2013;N&#x2013;O torsional mode of PNT<sup>&#x2b;</sup> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Ampadu Boateng et al. (2018)</xref>. A closer inspection of the oscillations using the 800&#xa0;nm probe (bottom panel of <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2A</xref>) reveals what seems to be the superposition of two coherent oscillations: one corresponding to the torsional mode already discussed and smaller amplitude oscillations corresponding to a faster vibrational mode. In line with these observations is the presence of two frequencies, at 80 and 650&#xa0;cm<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>, in the FFT of the 800&#xa0;nm probe signal (bottom panel of <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2B</xref>). Additionally, it is worth noting that the superposition of vibrational modes is more evident around the first minimum of the oscillatory ion signal in PNT<sup>&#x2b;</sup>. This fact will be further discussed in <xref ref-type="sec" rid="s3-3">Section 3.3</xref> with the aid of computational results.</p>
<fig id="F2" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 2</label>
<caption>
<p>
<bold>(A)</bold> Oscillatory ion signals for PNT<sup>&#x2b;</sup> and selected fragment ions obtained by subtracting off the incoherent contributions to signal fitting <italic>via</italic> <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="e1">Eq. 1</xref>. <bold>(B)</bold> FFT amplitudes obtained from the signals in <bold>(A)</bold> with indicated frequencies at 80&#xa0;cm<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> and 650&#xa0;cm<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> (for 800&#xa0;nm probe).</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fchem-10-859095-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>In order to motivate forthcoming computational results, we present the optimized structures of neutral and cationic PNT at the B3LYP/def2-TZVPP level of theory in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3</xref>. The corresponding coordinates are available within the Supplementary Material (<xref ref-type="sec" rid="s10">Supplementary Tables S4, S5</xref>). Relevant to this work are the following changes after electron detachment: the C&#x2013;C&#x2013;N&#x2013;O dihedral angle goes from 0.1 to 52.7&#xb0; and a moderate distortion of the ring occurs. Additionally, the frequencies and corresponding intensities of the normal modes for PNT<sup>&#x2b;</sup> are presented in the Supplementary Material (<xref ref-type="sec" rid="s10">Supplementary Table S6</xref>). A careful analysis of these vibrational modes shows that the C&#x2013;C&#x2013;N&#x2013;O torsional mode has a calculated frequency of 58.96 cm<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>, in reasonable agreement with the experimental frequency of 80&#xa0;cm<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2B</xref>). <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3B</xref> shows the 12th normal mode calculated for the PNT cation. The relevance of this ring-stretching mode will be further discussed in <xref ref-type="sec" rid="s3-3">Section 3.3</xref>. At this moment, it is enough to say that the calculated frequency of 604.32 cm<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> fairly matches the experimental frequency of 650&#xa0;cm<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2B</xref> for the 800&#xa0;nm probe.</p>
<fig id="F3" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 3</label>
<caption>
<p>
<bold>(A)</bold> Geometrical structures for optimized neutral and cationic PNT. Bond lengths are in &#xc5; and torsional angles in degrees. <bold>(B)</bold> Normal mode at 604.32&#xa0;cm<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> for the optimized PNT cation. The calculations were performed at the B3LYP/def2-TZVPP level of theory.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fchem-10-859095-g003.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-2">
<title>3.2 Coherent Control of Torsional Wave Packet Excitation</title>
<p>As mentioned in the previous section, a former work from our group has assigned the main coherent oscillations of PNT<sup>&#x2b;</sup> to a torsional wave packet involving the C&#x2013;C&#x2013;N&#x2013;O dihedral angle <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Ampadu Boateng et al. (2018)</xref>. In order to explain the observation of different fragment distributions and ion yield dynamics depending on the wavelength of the probe beam, we used the following approach: starting from the optimized cation geometry with a C&#x2013;C&#x2013;N&#x2013;O dihedral angle of 52.7&#xb0; we performed a relaxed scan of this torsional mode using the ModRedundant keyword in Gaussian 16. This procedure generated a collection of geometries that span all the torsional mode, which were used to perform single-point TDDFT calculations. The resulting potential energy surfaces (PESs) can be seen in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4A</xref>. In line with previous findings on the closely related nitrobenzene cation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">L&#xf3;pez Pe&#xf1;a et al. (2021)</xref>, we found that the PESs can be classified into two groups: the first one comprising from D<sub>1</sub> to D<sub>4</sub> with all the surfaces showing a marked dependence on the dihedral angle, and a second group comprising from D<sub>5</sub> to D<sub>7</sub> with a less marked dependence on the dihedral angle. The influence of the dihedral angle on the excitation probability, quantified by means of a harmonic estimate of the oscillator strength, can be observed in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4B</xref>. It is noteworthy that the oscillator strength for the D<sub>0</sub>&#x2192;D<sub>4</sub> transition (<italic>f</italic>
<sub>04</sub>) is particularly high and dependent on the geometry, reaching its maximum value at 90&#xb0;. Moreover, this transition is the only one that has a substantial oscillator strength at 90&#xb0;. Also notable is the parabolic shape of <italic>f</italic>
<sub>06</sub> centered at 90&#xb0; dihedral angle. As a consequence, there is higher probability for the D<sub>0</sub>&#x2192;D<sub>6</sub> transition at geometries where PNT<sup>&#x2b;</sup> is nearly planar, i.e., near the neutral PNT geometry. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4A</xref> also shows the energies corresponding to 400, 650, and 800&#xa0;nm photons for comparison (3.1, 1.91, and 1.55&#xa0;eV respectively). A careful evaluation of all the information contained in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4</xref> as a whole reveals that the 400&#xa0;nm probe can selectively access an allowed transition from D<sub>0</sub> to D<sub>6</sub> at dihedral angles close to 0&#xb0;, whereas the 650&#xa0;nm probe can selectively access a strongly allowed transition from D<sub>0</sub> to D<sub>4</sub> at a dihedral angle of 90&#xb0;. This ability to access different electronic excited states at different locations along the potential energy surface accounts for the selective fragmentation observed with different probe wavelengths at different time delays. Additionally, the 800&#xa0;nm probe should be capable of promoting the D<sub>0</sub>&#x2192;D<sub>
<italic>n</italic>
</sub>, <italic>n</italic> &#x3d; 1, 2 transitions at any dihedral angle.</p>
<fig id="F4" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 4</label>
<caption>
<p>Computed potential energy surfaces <bold>(A)</bold> and oscillator strengths <bold>(B)</bold> for PNT<sup>&#x2b;</sup> along the C&#x2013;C&#x2013;N&#x2013;O dihedral angle.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fchem-10-859095-g004.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>In order to support our TDDFT calculations we also performed single-point computations at three selected geometries calculated at the B3LYP/def2-TZVPP level using the EOM-EE-CCSD method. The geometries considered were the optimized neutral and cationic species (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3A</xref>; <xref ref-type="sec" rid="s10">Supplementary Tables S4, S5</xref>) and the geometry with a dihedral angle of 87.4&#xb0; obtained by means of the relaxed scan previously described (<xref ref-type="sec" rid="s10">Supplementary Table S7</xref>). <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref> shows the excitation energies and harmonic estimates of oscillator strengths calculated at both levels of theory for PNT cation with a C&#x2013;C&#x2013;N&#x2013;O dihedral angle of 87.4&#xb0;. These methodologies produced qualitatively similar results but there are some differences that are worth noting: EOM calculations introduce a larger energetic gap between D<sub>1</sub> and D<sub>2</sub> states of &#x223c;1.2&#xa0;eV. Consequently, states D<sub>2</sub>, D<sub>3</sub>, and D<sub>4</sub> from EOM computations are shifted upwards when compared with TDDFT results. Also, according to the oscillator strength values, EOM method points towards D<sub>3</sub> as the bright state while TDDFT locates the D<sub>4</sub> state as the bright one. Despite this disagreement in the ordering of states, the relevant fact is that both methodologies confirm the presence of an excited state with substantial oscillator strength at 90&#xb0; dihedral angle and with excitation energy around 2&#xa0;eV. Possible sources for the disagreement between both levels of theory will be briefly discussed on <xref ref-type="sec" rid="s4">Section 4</xref>. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="s10">Supplementary Tables S8, S9</xref> of Supplementary Material show analogous comparisons between the two methodologies for PNT<sup>&#x2b;</sup> at the optimized neutral and cation geometries respectively.</p>
<table-wrap id="T2" position="float">
<label>TABLE 2</label>
<caption>
<p>Excitation energies (EE) and oscillator strengths (<italic>f</italic>) for PNT<sup>&#x2b;</sup> with a C&#x2013;C&#x2013;N&#x2013;O dihedral angle of 87.4&#xb0; at the B3LYP/def2-TZVPP and EOM-EE-CCSD/6-311&#x2b;G&#x2a; levels of theory.</p>
</caption>
<table>
<thead valign="top">
<tr>
<th rowspan="2" align="left"/>
<th colspan="2" align="center">B3LYP/</th>
<th colspan="2" align="center">EOM-EE-CCSD/</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th colspan="2" align="center">def2-TZVPP</th>
<th colspan="2" align="center">6&#x2212;311 &#x2b; G&#x2a;</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td align="left">Transition</td>
<td align="center">EE (eV)</td>
<td align="center">
<italic>f</italic> (a.u.)</td>
<td align="center">EE (eV)</td>
<td align="center">
<italic>f</italic> (a.u.)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">D<sub>0</sub>&#x2192;D<sub>1</sub>
</td>
<td align="char" char=".">1.02</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.0000</td>
<td align="char" char=".">1.12</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.000049</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">D<sub>0</sub>&#x2192;D<sub>2</sub>
</td>
<td align="char" char=".">1.44</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.0007</td>
<td align="char" char=".">2.35</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.000654</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">D<sub>0</sub>&#x2192;D<sub>3</sub>
</td>
<td align="char" char=".">1.92</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.0000</td>
<td align="char" char=".">2.59</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.132253</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">D<sub>0</sub>&#x2192;D<sub>4</sub>
</td>
<td align="char" char=".">2.04</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.1201</td>
<td align="char" char=".">2.87</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.000112</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">D<sub>0</sub>&#x2192;D<sub>5</sub>
</td>
<td align="char" char=".">3.09</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.0001</td>
<td align="char" char=".">3.49</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.000003</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">D<sub>0</sub>&#x2192;D<sub>6</sub>
</td>
<td align="char" char=".">3.53</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.0055</td>
<td align="char" char=".">3.56</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.000051</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">D<sub>0</sub>&#x2192;D<sub>7</sub>
</td>
<td align="char" char=".">3.71</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.0004</td>
<td align="char" char=".">3.84</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.001330</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-3">
<title>3.3 Assignment of 650&#xa0;cm<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> Wave Packet</title>
<p>In <xref ref-type="sec" rid="s3-1">Section 3.1</xref> we showed experimental evidence of the superposition of two vibrational wave packets and identified the associated frequencies as 80 and 650&#xa0;cm<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>. The 80&#xa0;cm<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> has previously been assigned to the C&#x2013;C&#x2013;N&#x2013;O torsional mode but the identity of the vibrational mode associated with the 650&#xa0;cm<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> frequency remains to be fully elucidated. The match between the experimental frequency of 650&#xa0;cm<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2B</xref>) and the computationally calculated frequency of 604.32 cm<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3B</xref> and <xref ref-type="sec" rid="s10">Supplementary Table S6</xref>) lays the foundation for the hypothesis that this ring-stretching mode is the one supporting the additional nuclear wave packet found in this work.</p>
<p>In order to test this hypothesis we simulated the superposition of the two vibrational modes by considering three geometries within the torsional mode with 0.1, 52.7, and 87.4 C&#x2013;C&#x2013;N&#x2013;O dihedral angles. Then, from these three geometries we performed frequency calculations to identify the ring-stretching mode in each case. The geometry with 0.1&#xb0; torsional angle corresponds to the vertical cation, i.e., the cation under the optimized neutral geometry, while the structure with 52.7&#xb0; dihedral angle corresponds to the optimized cation with a ring-stretching mode at 604.32 cm<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> (<xref ref-type="sec" rid="s10">Supplementary Table S6</xref>). Having identified the ring-stretching modes for each of the three geometries we made the additional hypothesis that the D<sub>0</sub>&#x2192;D<sub>2</sub> transition is the one allowing the observation of the ring-stretching wave packet. This hypothesis is supported by our TDDFT calculations showing that 800&#xa0;nm is nearly resonant with the D<sub>0</sub>&#x2192;D<sub>2</sub> transition at any dihedral angle (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4A</xref>) and by the experimental fact that the superposition of vibrational wave packets is only observable with 800&#xa0;nm excitation. With these ideas in mind we took five &#x201c;snapshots&#x201d; within each of the three ring-stretching modes and retrieve the corresponding geometries. Those 15 geometries, five per each ring-stretching mode, served as the basis for single-point TDDFT calculations to obtain the D<sub>0</sub>&#x2192;D<sub>2</sub> excitation energies and the corresponding harmonic estimates for the oscillator strengths.</p>
<p>The results of these calculations are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5</xref>. It is important to offer some clarification regarding the abscissa axis of this figure: since the ring-stretching mode involves the collective motion of many atoms as can be seen in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3B</xref>, the description of the mode in terms of a single parameter is not an easy task. Due to this complication we show the C&#x2013;N bond distance as a signature of the mode, but it should be kept in mind that the abscissa axis represents the whole ring-stretching mode, as highlighted in the structures shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5</xref>. This being said, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5A</xref> shows the excitation energy for the D<sub>0</sub>&#x2192;D<sub>2</sub> transition as a function of the C&#x2013;N bond distance for three different torsional geometries with 0.1, 52.7, and 87.4 dihedral angles. The figure also shows that 800&#xa0;nm (1.55&#xa0;eV) provides enough energy to promote the D<sub>0</sub>&#x2192;D<sub>2</sub> transition for all the C&#x2013;N bond lengths under all torsional geometries. Additionally, 800&#xa0;nm is nearly resonant with the excitation energy corresponding to the torsional geometry of 87.4&#xb0; at all C&#x2013;N bond distances. This last observation might explain why the superposition of vibrational modes is more evident around the first minimum of PNT<sup>&#x2b;</sup> and the first maximum of <inline-formula id="inf28">
<mml:math id="m29">
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>C</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>7</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>H</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>7</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> oscillatory ion signals (bottom panel of <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2A</xref>). The reasons behind the association of the minimum in the oscillatory ion signal of PNT<sup>&#x2b;</sup> with a dihedral angle &#x223c;90&#xb0; are two-fold: first, our TDDFT calculations show that there is a strong probability of a D<sub>0</sub>&#x2192;D<sub>4</sub> transition as the dihedral angle approaches 90&#xb0; (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4</xref>). While it is true that 800&#xa0;nm excitation is not capable of promoting the D<sub>0</sub>&#x2192;D<sub>4</sub> at all dihedral angles it is also true that it can promote such transition at different torsional angles. The second reason is motivated by a previous work from our group regarding an analogous torsional wave packet within nitrobenzene cation, a cation closely related to PNT<sup>&#x2b;</sup>. In that work we estimated the time taken for the wave packet to reach a 90&#xb0; dihedral angle as approximately 200&#xa0;fs by means of classical wave packet trajectory calculations and pump-probe measurements. This finding is consistent with the maximum depletion of PNT<sup>&#x2b;</sup> at 160&#xa0;fs pump-probe delay with 800&#xa0;nm excitation (the maximum depletion with 650&#xa0;nm excitation occurs at a delay of 200&#xa0;fs). <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5B</xref> shows the oscillator strength for the D<sub>0</sub>&#x2192;D<sub>2</sub> transition (<italic>f</italic>
<sub>02</sub>) as a function of the C&#x2013;N bond under the same torsional geometries as panel A. Here we can observe a sharp increase in <italic>f</italic>
<sub>02</sub> at an elongated C&#x2013;N bond lenth of 1.54&#xa0;&#xc5; (the equilibrium bond length is 1.46&#xa0;&#xc5; for the optimized cation, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3A</xref>). This increase is very large for the geometry with 87.4&#xb0; dihedral angle but it is also visible, although to a lesser extent, for the geometry with dihedral angle of 52.7&#xb0;. All this facts as a whole strengthen the assignment of the additional wave packet found in this work to the ring-stretching vibrational mode.</p>
<fig id="F5" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 5</label>
<caption>
<p>Computed potential energy surfaces <bold>(A)</bold> and oscillator strengths <bold>(B)</bold> for PNT<sup>&#x2b;</sup> along C&#x2013;N bond distance under different C&#x2013;C&#x2013;N&#x2013;O dihedral angles.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fchem-10-859095-g005.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s4">
<title>4 Discussion</title>
<p>This study represents the first demonstration of selective excitation to different electronic excited states upon coherent vibrational motion in a large organic cation. The motion of the two nuclear wave packets in PNT<sup>&#x2b;</sup> produces three distinct transient electronic transitions amenable to optical excitation: 1) D<sub>0</sub>&#x2192;D<sub>6</sub> transition with energy 3.1&#xa0;eV at C&#x2013;C&#x2013;N&#x2013;O dihedral angle of 0&#xb0;, 2) D<sub>0</sub>&#x2192;D<sub>4</sub> (or D<sub>3</sub>) transition with energy 2.0&#xa0;eV at a 90&#xb0; dihedral angle, and 3) D<sub>0</sub>&#x2192;D<sub>2</sub> transition with energy 1.6&#xa0;eV at 90&#xb0; dihedral angle with elongated C&#x2013;N bond length of 1.54&#xa0;&#xc5;. The electronic structure of PNT<sup>&#x2b;</sup> along both the torsional and ring-stretching coordinates enables selective excitation to different excited states at specific geometries. The electronic structure was mainly explored by means of TDDFT calculations and further supported at the EOM-CCSD level. The upwards energetic shift observed for the D<sub>2</sub>, D<sub>3</sub>, and D<sub>4</sub> states at the EOM level when compared with TDDFT results can be rationalized by the small 6&#x2212;311&#x2b;G&#x2a; basis set being used for EOM computations (in contrast with the def2-TZVPP basis set for TDDFT calculations). Different groups had found that, as the basis set is expanded by adding diffuse and polarization functions, the excitation energies computed at the EOM-CCSD level decrease <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Cristian and Krylov (2003)</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Laurent et al. (2015)</xref>. Therefore, a closer match between the excitation energies predicted by both levels of theory would be expected if a bigger basis set is employed for EOM calculations. Additionally, the discrepancy in which EOM identifies D<sub>3</sub> as the bright state while TDDFT points to D<sub>4</sub> has been previously observed for various systems <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Grimme and Parac (2003)</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Lopata et al. (2011)</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Prlj et al. (2015)</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Prlj et al. (2016)</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Acharya et al. (2018)</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">L&#xf3;pez Pe&#xf1;a et al. (2021)</xref> Nevertheless, both levels of theory confirm the presence of an excited state with substantial oscillator strength at 90&#xb0; dihedral angle and with excitation energy around 2&#xa0;eV. Overall, we conclude that the computationally inexpensive TDDFT level of theory is adequate enough for aiding and rationalizing the design of pump-probe control schemes.</p>
<p>The finding that 400&#xa0;nm excitation of PNT<sup>&#x2b;</sup> selectively produces <inline-formula id="inf29">
<mml:math id="m30">
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>C</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>5</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>H</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>5</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> and <inline-formula id="inf30">
<mml:math id="m31">
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>C</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>H</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>, whereas 650&#xa0;nm or 800&#xa0;nm excitation produces <inline-formula id="inf31">
<mml:math id="m32">
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>C</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>7</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>H</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>7</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1</xref>) indicates that population of the higher-energy D<sub>6</sub> state causes more extensive fragmentation than population of the lower D<sub>2</sub>&#x2013;D<sub>4</sub> states. This finding is consistent with the reported higher dissociation energy of <inline-formula id="inf32">
<mml:math id="m33">
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>C</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>5</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>H</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>5</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> and its formation by further dissociation of <inline-formula id="inf33">
<mml:math id="m34">
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>C</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>7</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>H</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>7</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Zhang et al. (2012)</xref>. We can quantify the selectivity to <inline-formula id="inf34">
<mml:math id="m35">
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>C</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>7</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>H</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>7</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>, <inline-formula id="inf35">
<mml:math id="m36">
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>C</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>5</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>H</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>5</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>, or <inline-formula id="inf36">
<mml:math id="m37">
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>C</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>H</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> formation by examining the fractional yield of a specific target ion relative to the sum of the ion yields,<disp-formula id="e2">
<mml:math id="m38">
<mml:mi>Y</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>target&#x2009;ion</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>PNT</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>C</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>7</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>H</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>7</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>C</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>5</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>H</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>5</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>C</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>H</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:math>
<label>(2)</label>
</disp-formula>for each probe wavelength at the pump-probe delay producing the greatest PNT<sup>&#x2b;</sup> signal depletion identified in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1</xref>. The fractional yields for each ion at a series of probe intensities from 2 to 15&#xa0;TW cm<sup>&#x2212;2</sup> are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure 6</xref>. Although greater enhancement of fragment ion yields is observed at higher probe intensities, 15&#xa0;TW cm<sup>&#x2212;2</sup> represents a practical upper limit because at higher intensity the probe pulse creates ions even in the absence of the pump pulse. Examination of <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure 6</xref> shows that <inline-formula id="inf37">
<mml:math id="m39">
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>C</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>7</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>H</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>7</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> is selectively enhanced using 650 and 800&#xa0;nm, whereas <inline-formula id="inf38">
<mml:math id="m40">
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>C</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>H</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> is selectively enhanced using 400&#xa0;nm. Hence, we can conclude that population of D<sub>2</sub>&#x2013;D<sub>4</sub> selectively produces <inline-formula id="inf39">
<mml:math id="m41">
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>C</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>7</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>H</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>7</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> whereas population of D<sub>6</sub> selectively produces <inline-formula id="inf40">
<mml:math id="m42">
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>C</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>H</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>. Although the <inline-formula id="inf41">
<mml:math id="m43">
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>C</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>5</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>H</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>5</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> yield is most enhanced by 400&#xa0;nm excitation, its weaker dependence on the probe wavelength suggests that it can be formed by excitation to any of the excited states and is therefore less amenable to selective enhancement with pump-probe control. Overall, pump-probe excitation is found to enable a similar degree of control over the <inline-formula id="inf42">
<mml:math id="m44">
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>C</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>7</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>H</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>7</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>/<inline-formula id="inf43">
<mml:math id="m45">
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>C</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>H</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> ion ratios as attained using shaped 800&#xa0;nm pulses <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Lozovoy et al. (2008)</xref>: the maximum <inline-formula id="inf44">
<mml:math id="m46">
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>C</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>7</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>H</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>7</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>/<inline-formula id="inf45">
<mml:math id="m47">
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>C</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>H</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> ratio of 5.6 attained with 800&#xa0;nm, 5&#xa0;TW cm<sup>&#x2212;2</sup> probe pulses is 40% higher than the maximum ratio of &#x223c;4 obtained with transform-limited 800&#xa0;nm pulses, although the minimum ratio of 0.8 attained with 400&#xa0;nm, 15&#xa0;TW cm<sup>&#x2212;2</sup> is somewhat higher than the minimum ratio of &#x223c;0.2 reported with pulse shaping.</p>
<fig id="F6" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 6</label>
<caption>
<p>Fractional yields of PNT<sup>&#x2b;</sup>, <inline-formula id="inf46">
<mml:math id="m48">
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>C</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>7</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>H</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>7</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>, <inline-formula id="inf47">
<mml:math id="m49">
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>C</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>5</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>H</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>5</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>, and <inline-formula id="inf48">
<mml:math id="m50">
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>C</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>H</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> from <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="e2">Eq. 2</xref> obtained using 800&#xa0;nm, 650&#xa0;nm, and 400&#xa0;nm probe wavelengths at intensities from 2&#x2013;15&#xa0;TW cm<sup>&#x2212;2</sup>.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fchem-10-859095-g006.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Finally, the observation that strong field ionization of PNT launches nuclear wave packets along two distinct vibrational modes is of particular interest. Numerous previous pump-probe studies of other substituted benzenes including nitrobenzene <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">L&#xf3;pez Pe&#xf1;a et al. (2021)</xref>, <italic>o</italic>-nitrotoluene <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Ampadu Boateng et al. (2019a)</xref>, azobenzene <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Munkerup et al. (2017)</xref> and alkyl phenyl ketones <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Konar et al. (2014)</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Bohinski et al. (2014)</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Tibbetts et al. (2015)</xref> have observed only torsional wave packet motion upon strong-field ionization. To the best of our knowledge, the only previous study to definitively observe multimode coherent vibrational motion in a cation prepared by strong field ionization found a superposition of the C&#x2013;I stretch and I&#x2013;CH<sub>3</sub> umbrella modes in CH<sub>3</sub>I<sup>&#x2b;</sup> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Wei et al. (2017)</xref>. Although in a previous work we had proposed multimode coherent excitation in diisopropyl methylphosphonate ion to explain observed ion yield oscillations at two different frequencies <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Ampadu Boateng et al. (2019b)</xref>, no PES calculations were performed to confirm distinct excitation pathways. Hence, we recommend the combined strategy of pump-probe measurements with multiple probe wavelength and PES computations along possible coherently excited coordinates as performed in this work to identify possible multimode coherent excitation in other organic cations prepared by strong-field ionization.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec id="s5">
<title>Data Availability Statement</title>
<p>The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/<xref ref-type="sec" rid="s10">Supplementary Material</xref>, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s6">
<title>Author Contributions</title>
<p>KT designed and directed the research. HL, JS, and DA conducted the experiments. HL performed the calculations with input from KL. KL contributed calculation codes. HL, JS, and KT analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript with input from all authors.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s7">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>This work was supported by the U.S. Army Research Office through Contract W911NF-19-1-0099. DA and HL acknowledge generous financial support from Altria Graduate Research Fellowships.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="COI-statement" id="s8">
<title>Conflict of Interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="disclaimer" id="s9">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s Note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
<ack>
<p>High Performance Computing resources provided by the High Performance Research Computing (HPRC) Core Facility at Virginia Commonwealth University (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://chipc.vcu.edu">https://chipc.vcu.edu</ext-link>) were used for conducting portions of the research reported in this work.</p>
</ack>
<sec id="s10">
<title>Supplementary Material</title>
<p>The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fchem.2022.859095/full#supplementary-material">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fchem.2022.859095/full&#x23;supplementary-material</ext-link>
</p>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="DataSheet1.pdf" id="SM1" mimetype="application/pdf" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/>
</sec>
<sec id="s11">
<title>Abbreviations</title>
<p>BBO, <italic>&#x3b2;</italic>-barium borate; DFT, density functional theory; EOM-EE-CCSD, equation-of-motion excitation-energies coupled cluster singles and doubles; OPA, optical parametric amplifier; PES, potential energy surface; PNT, <italic>p</italic>-nitrotoluene; TDDFT, time-dependent density functional theory; IVR, intramolecular vibrational energy redistribution.</p>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Acharya</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chaudhuri</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Batista</surname>
<given-names>V. S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Can Tddft Describe Excited Electronic States of Naphthol Photoacids? a Closer Look with EOM-CCSD</article-title>. <source>J. Chem. Theor. Comput.</source> <volume>14</volume>, <fpage>867</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>876</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/acs.jctc.7b01101</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ampadu Boateng</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gutsev</surname>
<given-names>G. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jena</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tibbetts</surname>
<given-names>K. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Dissociation Dynamics of 3- and 4-nitrotoluene Radical Cations: Coherently Driven C-NO<sub>2</sub> bond Homolysis</article-title>. <source>J. Chem. Phys.</source> <volume>148</volume>, <fpage>134305</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1063/1.5024892</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ampadu Boateng</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Word</surname>
<given-names>M. K. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gutsev</surname>
<given-names>L. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jena</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tibbetts</surname>
<given-names>K. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019a</year>). <article-title>Conserved Vibrational Coherence in the Ultrafast Rearrangement of 2-nitrotoluene Radical Cation</article-title>. <source>J. Phys. Chem. A.</source> <volume>123</volume>, <fpage>1140</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1152</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/acs.jpca.8b11723</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ampadu Boateng</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Word</surname>
<given-names>M. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tibbetts</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019b</year>). <article-title>Probing Coherent Vibrations of Organic Phosphonate Radical Cations with Femtosecond Time-Resolved Mass Spectrometry</article-title>. <source>Molecules</source> <volume>24</volume>, <fpage>509</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/molecules24030509</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Assion</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Baumert</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bergt</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Brixner</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kiefer</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Seyfried</surname>
<given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>1998</year>). <article-title>Control of Chemical Reactions by Feedback-Optimized Phase-Shaped Femtosecond Laser Pulses</article-title>. <source>Science</source> <volume>282</volume>, <fpage>919</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>922</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/science.282.5390.919</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bauernschmitt</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ahlrichs</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1996</year>). <article-title>Treatment of Electronic Excitations within the Adiabatic Approximation of Time Dependent Density Functional Theory</article-title>. <source>Chem. Phys. Lett.</source> <volume>256</volume>, <fpage>454</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>464</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0009-2614(96)00440-X</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Becke</surname>
<given-names>A. D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1993</year>). <article-title>Density&#x2010;functional Thermochemistry. III. The Role of Exact Exchange</article-title>. <source>J. Chem. Phys.</source> <volume>98</volume>, <fpage>5648</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>5652</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1063/1.464913</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bloembergen</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yablonovitch</surname>
<given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1978</year>). <article-title>Infrared&#x2010;laser&#x2010;induced Unimolecular Reactions</article-title>. <source>Phys. Today</source> <volume>31</volume>, <fpage>23</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>30</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1063/1.2995035</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bloembergen</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zewail</surname>
<given-names>A. H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1984</year>). <article-title>Energy Redistribution in Isolated Molecules and the Question of Mode-Selective Laser Chemistry Revisited</article-title>. <source>J. Phys. Chem.</source> <volume>88</volume>, <fpage>5459</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>5465</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/j150667a004</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bohinski</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Moore Tibbetts</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tarazkar</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Romanov</surname>
<given-names>D. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Matsika</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Levis</surname>
<given-names>R. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Strong Field Adiabatic Ionization Prepares a Launch State for Coherent Control</article-title>. <source>J. Phys. Chem. Lett.</source> <volume>5</volume>, <fpage>4305</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>4309</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/jz502313f</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Cardoza</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pearson</surname>
<given-names>B. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Baertschy</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Weinacht</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Charge-transfer as a Mechanism for Controlling Molecular Fragmentation</article-title>. <source>J. Photochem. Photobiol. A: Chem.</source> <volume>180</volume>, <fpage>277</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>281</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jphotochem.2006.02.007</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Cristian</surname>
<given-names>A.-M. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Krylov</surname>
<given-names>A. I.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Electronic Structure of the &#x3c0;-bonded Al-C<sub>2</sub>H<sub>4</sub> Complex: Characterization of the Ground and Low-Lying Excited States</article-title>. <source>J. Chem. Phys.</source> <volume>118</volume>, <fpage>10912</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>10918</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1063/1.1576212</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Damrauer</surname>
<given-names>N. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dietl</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Krampert</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lee</surname>
<given-names>S.-H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jung</surname>
<given-names>K.-H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gerber</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>Control of Bond-Selective Photochemistry in CH<sub>2</sub> BrCl Using Adaptive Femtosecond Pulse Shaping</article-title>. <source>Eur. Phys. J. D - At. Mol. Opt. Phys.</source> <volume>20</volume>, <fpage>71</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>76</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1140/epjd/e2002-00101-8</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Epifanovsky</surname>
<given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gilbert</surname>
<given-names>A. T. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Feng</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lee</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mao</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mardirossian</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Software for the Frontiers of Quantum Chemistry: An Overview of Developments in the Q-Chem 5 Package</article-title>. <source>J. Chem. Phys.</source> <volume>155</volume>, <fpage>084801</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1063/5.0055522</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<citation citation-type="book">
<comment>[Dataset]</comment> <person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Frisch</surname>
<given-names>M. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Trucks</surname>
<given-names>G. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schlegel</surname>
<given-names>H. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Scuseria</surname>
<given-names>G. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Robb</surname>
<given-names>M. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cheeseman</surname>
<given-names>J. R.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <source>Gaussian 16 revision c.01</source>. <publisher-loc>Wallingford CT</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Gaussian Inc</publisher-name>. </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Grimme</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Parac</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Substantial Errors from Time-dependent Density Functional Theory for the Calculation of Excited States of Large &#x3c0; Systems</article-title>. <source>ChemPhysChem</source> <volume>4</volume>, <fpage>292</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>295</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/cphc.200390047</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Judson</surname>
<given-names>R. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rabitz</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1992</year>). <article-title>Teaching Lasers to Control Molecules</article-title>. <source>Phys. Rev. Lett.</source> <volume>68</volume>, <fpage>1500</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1503</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevLett.68.1500</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Konar</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shu</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lozovoy</surname>
<given-names>V. V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jackson</surname>
<given-names>J. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Levine</surname>
<given-names>B. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dantus</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Polyatomic Molecules under Intense Femtosecond Laser Irradiation</article-title>. <source>J. Phys. Chem. A.</source> <volume>118</volume>, <fpage>11433</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>11450</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/jp505498t</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kraus</surname>
<given-names>P. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mignolet</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Baykusheva</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rupenyan</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Horn&#xfd;</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Penka</surname>
<given-names>E. F.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Measurement and Laser Control of Attosecond Charge Migration in Ionized Iodoacetylene</article-title>. <source>Science</source> <volume>350</volume>, <fpage>790</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>795</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/science.aab2160</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Krylov</surname>
<given-names>A. I.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Equation-of-Motion Coupled-Cluster Methods for Open-Shell and Electronically Excited Species: The Hitchhiker&#x27;s Guide to Fock Space</article-title>. <source>Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem.</source> <volume>59</volume>, <fpage>433</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>462</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1146/annurev.physchem.59.032607.093602</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Langhojer</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cardoza</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Baertschy</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Weinacht</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Gaining Mechanistic Insight from Closed Loop Learning Control: The Importance of Basis in Searching the Phase Space</article-title>. <source>J. Chem. Phys.</source> <volume>122</volume>, <fpage>014102</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1063/1.1826011</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Laurent</surname>
<given-names>A. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Blondel</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jacquemin</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Choosing an Atomic Basis Set for TD-DFT, SOPPA, ADC(2), CIS(D), CC2 and EOM-CCSD Calculations of Low-Lying Excited States of Organic Dyes</article-title>. <source>Theor. Chem. Acc.</source> <volume>134</volume>, <fpage>76</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00214-015-1676-9</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lopata</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Reslan</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kowalska</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Neuhauser</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Govind</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kowalski</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Excited-state Studies of Polyacenes: A Comparative Picture Using EOMCCSD, CR-EOMCCSD(T), Range-Separated (LR/RT)-TDDFT, TD-PM3, and TD-ZINDO</article-title>. <source>J. Chem. Theor. Comput.</source> <volume>7</volume>, <fpage>3686</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3693</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/ct2005165</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>L&#xf3;pez Pe&#xf1;a</surname>
<given-names>H. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ampadu Boateng</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>McPherson</surname>
<given-names>S. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tibbetts</surname>
<given-names>K. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Using Computational Chemistry to Design Pump-Probe Schemes for Measuring Nitrobenzene Radical Cation Dynamics</article-title>. <source>Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.</source> <volume>23</volume>, <fpage>13338</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>13348</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1039/D1CP00360G</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lozovoy</surname>
<given-names>V. V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhu</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gunaratne</surname>
<given-names>T. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Harris</surname>
<given-names>D. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shane</surname>
<given-names>J. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dantus</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Control of Molecular Fragmentation Using Shaped Femtosecond Pulses</article-title>. <source>J. Phys. Chem. A.</source> <volume>112</volume>, <fpage>3789</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3812</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/jp071691p</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Moore Tibbetts</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xing</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rabitz</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Optimal Control of Molecular Fragmentation with Homologous Families of Photonic Reagents and Chemical Substrates</article-title>. <source>Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.</source> <volume>15</volume>, <fpage>18012</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>18022</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1039/C3CP52664J</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Moore Tibbetts</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Coherent Vibrational and Dissociation Dynamics of Polyatomic Radical Cations</article-title>. <source>Chem. Eur. J.</source> <volume>25</volume>, <fpage>8431</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>8439</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/chem.201900363</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Munkerup</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Romanov</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bohinski</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Stephansen</surname>
<given-names>A. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Levis</surname>
<given-names>R. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>S&#xf8;lling</surname>
<given-names>T. I.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Conserving Coherence and Storing Energy during Internal Conversion: Photoinduced Dynamics of Cis- and Trans-azobenzene Radical Cations</article-title>. <source>J. Phys. Chem. A.</source> <volume>121</volume>, <fpage>8642</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>8651</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/acs.jpca.7b09185</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Nichols</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Weinacht</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rozgonyi</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pearson</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Strong-field Phase-dependent Molecular Dissociation</article-title>. <source>Phys. Rev. A.</source> <volume>79</volume>, <fpage>043407</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/physreva.79.043407</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Plenge</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wirsing</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wagner-Drebenstedt</surname>
<given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Halfpap</surname>
<given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kieling</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wassermann</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Coherent Control of the Ultrafast Dissociative Ionization Dynamics of Bromochloroalkanes</article-title>. <source>Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.</source> <volume>13</volume>, <fpage>8705</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>8714</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1039/C0CP02742A</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Prlj</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Curchod</surname>
<given-names>B. F. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fabrizio</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Floryan</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Corminboeuf</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Qualitatively Incorrect Features in the TDDFT Spectrum of Thiophene-Based Compounds</article-title>. <source>J. Phys. Chem. Lett.</source> <volume>6</volume>, <fpage>13</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>21</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/jz5022087</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Prlj</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sandoval-Salinas</surname>
<given-names>M. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Casanova</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jacquemin</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Corminboeuf</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Low-Lying &#x3c0;&#x3c0;&#x2a; States of Heteroaromatic Molecules: A Challenge for Excited State Methods</article-title>. <source>J. Chem. Theor. Comput.</source> <volume>12</volume>, <fpage>2652</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2660</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/acs.jctc.6b00245</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Stephens</surname>
<given-names>P. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Devlin</surname>
<given-names>F. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chabalowski</surname>
<given-names>C. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Frisch</surname>
<given-names>M. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1994</year>). <article-title>Ab Initio calculation of Vibrational Absorption and Circular Dichroism Spectra Using Density Functional Force fields</article-title>. <source>J. Phys. Chem.</source> <volume>98</volume>, <fpage>11623</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>11627</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/j100096a001</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Tannor</surname>
<given-names>D. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rice</surname>
<given-names>S. A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1985</year>). <article-title>Control of Selectivity of Chemical Reaction via Control of Wave Packet Evolution</article-title>. <source>J. Chem. Phys.</source> <volume>83</volume>, <fpage>5013</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>5018</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1063/1.449767</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Tibbetts</surname>
<given-names>K. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tarazkar</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bohinski</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Romanov</surname>
<given-names>D. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Matsika</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Levis</surname>
<given-names>R. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Controlling the Dissociation Dynamics of Acetophenone Radical Cation through Excitation of Ground and Excited State Wavepackets</article-title>. <source>J. Phys. B: Mol. Opt. Phys.</source> <volume>48</volume>, <fpage>164002</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1088/0953-4075/48/16/164002</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B36">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wei</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>See</surname>
<given-names>S. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jhon</surname>
<given-names>M. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Elucidating the Origins of Multimode Vibrational Coherences of Polyatomic Molecules Induced by Intense Laser fields</article-title>. <source>Nat. Commun.</source> <volume>8</volume>, <fpage>735</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41467-017-00848-2</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B37">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Weigend</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ahlrichs</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Balanced Basis Sets of Split Valence, Triple Zeta Valence and Quadruple Zeta Valence Quality for H to Rn: Design and Assessment of Accuracy</article-title>. <source>Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.</source> <volume>7</volume>, <fpage>3297</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3305</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1039/B508541A</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B38">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Xing</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rey-de-Castro</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rabitz</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Gaining Mechanistic Insight with Control Pulse Slicing: Application to the Dissociative Ionization of CH2BrI</article-title>. <source>J. Phys. Chem. A.</source> <volume>121</volume>, <fpage>8632</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>8641</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/acs.jpca.7b08835</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B39">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zewail</surname>
<given-names>A. H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1988</year>). <article-title>Laser Femtochemistry</article-title>. <source>Science</source> <volume>242</volume>, <fpage>1645</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1653</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/science.242.4886.1645</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B40">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fang</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xie</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cao</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shan</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Photoionization and Dissociation Study of P-Nitrotoluene: Experimental and Theoretical Insights</article-title>. <source>J. Mol. Struct.</source> <volume>1020</volume>, <fpage>105</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>111</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.molstruc.2012.03.059</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>