The most common receptors employed for lithium separation are β-diketones. Benzoyl-1,1,1-trifluoroacetone (HBTA, 1), 4,4,4-trifluoro-1-(2-thienyl)-1,3-butanedione (HTTA, 2), and α-acetyl-m-dodecylacetophenone as the major component of LIX 54 (3) are widely used for lithium extraction (Figure 1) (Healy, 1968; Nguyen and Lee, 2018; Zhang et al., 2018; Wang et al., 2019; Zhang et al., 2020; Zhang et al., 2021a; Zhang et al., 2021; Hanada and Goto, 2021; Masmoudi et al., 2021; Zhang et al., 2022). Neutral co-ligands, such as trioctylphosphine oxide (TOPO, 4), tributylphosphine oxide (TBPO, 5), tributylphosphate (TBP, 6), or mixtures of trialkylphosphine oxides (Cyanex 923, 7) are also required in the application of β-diketone extraction systems (Figure 1). These co-ligands can generally saturate the coordination sphere of lithium ions, and the resulting complexes are less hydrophilic, which promotes their transfer into the organic phase (Atanassova and Kurteva, 2016).

Healy (1968) studied the synergistic effect of using HTTA with various co-ligands (TOPO, TBP, etc.) for extracting alkali metal ions (Li⁺, Na⁺, K⁺, and Cs⁺). The results showed much higher extraction ability for Li⁺ than for Na⁺, K⁺, and Cs⁺. Slope analyses suggested that the extracted species can best be described as [M(TTA)S₂] (M = Li⁺, Na⁺, K⁺, Cs⁺; S = co-ligands). Zhang et al. (2020) introduced deprotonated HBTA using a 2 M NaOH saponification reaction into a kerosene system in the presence of co-ligand TOPO and achieved 90% lithium extraction by a three-stage countercurrent. The loaded Li⁺ was stripped by 6 M HCl to obtain a lithium-rich solution. Pranolo et al. (2015) investigated a synergistic liquid–liquid extraction system containing LIX 54 and Cyanex 923 in ShellSol D70 for separating lithium from an aqueous solution containing a high concentration of sodium. More than 97% of the lithium was transferred to the organic phase, while less than 3% of the sodium present was co-extracted at pH 11 in a single extraction stage, demonstrating high lithium selectivity using the LIX 54 and Cyanex 923 synergistic system.

Ionic liquids (ILs) are considered to be effective reagents or “green solvents” for metal separation due to advantages such as negligible vapor pressure, high thermal stability, and tunable molecular structures (Sun et al., 2012). Various ILs have been extensively studied in recent years for the extraction of lithium (Shi et al., 2017a; Shi et al., 2017b; Cui et al., 2019; Wang et al., 2020; Bai et al., 2021; Cai et al., 2021; Zhang et al., 2021c; Hanada and Goto, 2021; Yu et al., 2021; Ole et al., 2022). Wang et al. (2020) investigated synergistic extraction systems containing diketonate-based ionic liquid extractants and a trialkylphosphine oxide—presumably Cyanex 923—for lithium separation in the presence of sodium. The ILs combined different deprotonated β-diketone anions, such as [BTA]⁻ or [TTA]⁻, with trialkylmethylammonium ([A336]⁺) cation. Experiments showed that 83% of lithium can be extracted with the mixture of [A336][TTA] (8, Figure 2) and the phosphine oxide from a basic aqueous solution (pH = 10.2), which was higher than that of HTTA (72%) (Wang et al., 2020).

Hanada and Goto (2021) investigated a new synergistic deep eutectic solvent (DES) system containing a β-diketone (HBTA or HTTA) and a neutral extractant such as TOPO. Therefore, HBTA can act as a hydrogen bond donor (HBD) and TOPO as a hydrogen bond acceptor (HBA), and their mixture exhibited a high extraction power for lithium ions and good selectivity for lithium ions over sodium and potassium ions.

Overall, the various studies employing the β-diketones HTTA and HBTA showed a high binding affinity and selectivity for lithium ions over other alkali metal ions. However, there are still some issues that need to be addressed. For example, the β-diketones generally require saponification pretreatment that employs a strong base such as NaOH, or they need a very basic aqueous solution (pH > 11) for effective extraction of lithium ions. Consequently, a large amount of base is consumed, and it also results in the severe corrosion of equipment. Moreover, it is reported that β-diketones tend to have high dissolution in aqueous solutions under basic conditions, which may lead to loss of ligands (Xu et al., 2021). Nevertheless, high partition coefficients (D) of lithium and separation factors (ß) of lithium toward sodium, potassium, and cesium are obtained, as summarized and compared with other receptors in Table 1.

Acidic organophosphorus compounds such as di-(2-ethylhexyl) phosphoric acid (D2EHPA, 9) (Hano et al., 1992; Song et al., 2020; Meng et al., 2021; Mahmoudi et al., 2022), 2-ethylhexyl phosphonic acid mono-2-ethylhexyl ester (PC-88A, 10) (Hano et al., 1992; Zushi et al., 2000; Virolainen et al., 2017), di(2-ethylhexyl) phosphinic acid (P227, 11) (L et al., 2022), and bis(2,4,4-trimethylpentyl) phosphinic acid (Cyanex 272, 12) (Swain et al., 2010; Nguyen and Lee, 2018; Lu et al., 2021) were also probed for the extraction of lithium ions (Figure 3). Their application generally required the presence of neutral co-ligands such as TOPO, TBP, or Cyanex 923 (Hano et al., 1992; Lu et al., 2021; Meng et al., 2021). The synergistic effect provided by these co-ligands is the same as the mechanism mentioned earlier. Hano et al. (1992) studied the extraction of lithium ions using D2EHPA or PC-88A from alkali and alkaline earth metal ions (Li⁺, Na⁺, K⁺, Mg²⁺, and Ca²⁺). Both extractants exhibited higher selectivity for Li⁺ over Na⁺ and K⁺, but much higher extraction powers were observed for the divalent cations Mg²⁺ and Ca²⁺. An apparent synergistic effect was observed for lithium ion extraction after the addition of TBP as co-ligand. Shi et al. (2020) employed a saponified D2EHPA–kerosene system to remove Ca²⁺ and Mg²⁺ from Li⁺ concentrated solution. The process they proposed can remove 99% of Ca²⁺ and 98% of Mg²⁺ in a three-stage extraction, while the loss of Li⁺ was approximately 5% (Shi et al., 2020). Liu et al. (2022) found that 11 exhibited a superior separation ability of Ca²⁺ and Mg²⁺ from Li⁺. In a multi-element system, Ca²⁺ and Mg²⁺ were removed quantitatively, while only 0.7% Li⁺ was extracted. The purity of Li⁺ in aqueous solutions can reach more than 99% in the simulated system. Liu et al. (2022) investigated the efficiency of lithium ion extraction in the presence of Co²⁺ using the Cyanex272/TBP/kerosene system. The experiments showed that Co²⁺ was extracted almost quantitatively at a pH of 5.5, whereas at a lower pH no transfer of Li⁺ into the organic phase was observed. This pH was thus sufficient to separate the two metal ions. However, at a pH of 8, no more than 40% of the Li⁺ was extracted, and further increasing the pH did not result in higher extraction yields (Lu et al., 2021). These findings demonstrated that D2EHPA, PC-88A, P227, and Cyanex 272 have a much stronger coordination ability for divalent cations than monovalent lithium ions. Thus, organophosphorus compounds can be employed as strong chelating reagents to remove divalent cations from a solution containing mono- and divalent cations under acidic conditions.

D2EHPA-based ILs including tetrabutylammonium bis(2-ethylhexyl)-phosphate (13, [N₄₄₄₄][D2EHPA]) and tetraoctyl-ammonium bis(2-ethylhexyl)-phosphate (14, [N₈₈₈₈][D2EHPA]) (Figure 4) were synthesized by Shi et al. (2017b). Comparative studies with D2EHPA showed their suitability for extracting lithium ions in the absence of additional hydrochloric acid. While up to 90% of the Li⁺ present was transferred to the organic phase by 13, D2EHPA showed only negligible extraction activity. In addition, these experiments revealed that increasing the length of the alkyl chain of the used ammonium cation led to a decrease in their extraction ability. The authors attributed this to an increase in steric hindrance. Probing the lithium distribution ratio dependence on the IL concentration suggested the formation of 1:1 complexes, where one molecule of IL formed a complex with a single lithium ion during the extraction process. Competitive studies involving alkali metal ions showed a preferred extraction of Li⁺ over Na⁺, K⁺, Rb⁺, and Cs⁺ (Shi et al., 2017b).

The TBP/FeCl₃ extraction system is very commonly used for the separation of Li⁺ from a high concentration of Mg²⁺ (Zhou et al., 2012; Su et al., 2020a; Li and Binnemans, 2021a; Li and Binnemans, 2021b; Su et al., 2022; Sun et al., 2022). The typical extraction mechanism can be explained by Eqs 1−3 (Shi et al., 2019a): Extraction  Li aq + + FeCl 4 aq − + n TBP org ↔ LiFeCl 4 ∙ n TBP org (1) Stripping  LiFeCl 4 ∙ n TBP org + HCl aq ↔ HFeCl 4 ∙ n TBP org + LiCl aq (2) Saponification  HFeCl 4 ∙ n TBP org + NaOH aq ↔ NaFeCl 4 ∙ n TBP org + H 2 O aq (3)

These equations show that FeCl₃ is a necessary source for forming an anionic species in the presence of a large excess of Cl⁻. Li⁺ can be transferred to the organic phase as a counterion to neutralize the complex of [FeCl₄]^- and TBP. A very high concentration of Cl⁻ (> 6 M) is required to form [FeCl₄]^- in this system. In addition, a high HCl concentration is commonly required in the stripping process to prevent the loss of Fe³⁺ (Shi et al., 2019b; Su et al., 2020b). NaOH or Mg(OH)₂ is usually utilized as a saponification agent to neutralize the proton in the organic phase after stripping (Zhou et al., 2020). The binding affinity of TBP toward cations followed the order H⁺ > Li⁺ > Na⁺ > Mg²⁺ ≈ K⁺ (Zhou et al., 2020); therefore, Na⁺ can be replaced by Li⁺ in the reuse cycle of extraction. Shi et al. (2019b) investigated the separation of Li⁺ from Mg²⁺ using a TBP/kerosene–FeCl₃ system. With a TBP concentration of 75%, a molar ratio of 1.3/1 of Fe/Li, and an acid concentration of 0.01 mol/L in brine, 68% of lithium was extracted in a single stage. Subsequently, the loaded Li⁺ phase was stripped with 6 M HCl, and the organic phase was regenerated with 2 M NaOH (Shi et al., 2019b). Zhou et al. (2020) used HCl+MgCl₂, HCl+NaCl, Mg(OH)₂, or MgCO₃ as washing, stripping, and regeneration reagents, respectively. Li⁺ extraction of about 65% was achieved, and the separation factor between Li⁺ and Mg²⁺ was 350 after a single-stage extraction (Zhou et al., 2020). Despite the high separation factor, there are two main problems to be solved in the TBP/kerosene–FeCl₃ system: first, the easy formation of a third phase and, second, the difficult removal of loaded Li⁺ from the organic phase (Zhou et al., 2021).

To avoid the use of a high concentration of HCl in the stripping process, Su et al. (2020c) introduced PC-88A (10) into the TBP/kerosene organic phase. Slope analysis revealed that Li⁺ is extracted in the form of [Li·2TBP·FeCl₄], indicating that 10 was not involved in the coordination during the Li⁺ extraction process. However, 10 can coordinate Fe³⁺ in the form of [FeCl₂(10-H)·(10)·2TBP] once the loaded organic phase is washed by H₂O. Consequently, Li⁺ was stripped from the extracted species by H₂O instead of HCl solution, which dramatically increased the stripping efficiency more sustainably (Su et al., 2020c).

Based on the advantages of ILs, attempts have been made in recent years to replace FeCl₃ with an IL to provide an anion for the extraction of lithium ions. Wang et al. (2019) introduced 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium phosphotungstate ([Bmim]₃PW₁₂O₄₀) as a co-extraction reagent in the TBP system. The experiments showed that selectivity under optimized conditions follows the order Li⁺ > Na⁺ > K⁺ ≈ Mg²⁺. Proton NMR spectroscopy analysis demonstrated that Li⁺ was extracted by a cation exchange mechanism: one [Bmim]⁺ cation was transferred to the aqueous phase for each Li⁺ extracted into the organic phase (Wang et al., 2019). Li et al. (2021) synthesized 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium tetraphenylboron ([Bmin]BPh₄) and prepared the organic phase in CH₂BrCl solvent containing TBP and ([Bmin]BPh₄). After a four-stage cross-flow extraction, 99% of Li⁺ was extracted. The loaded Li⁺ was completely removed using 2.0 mol/L Na₂CO₃ solution as the stripping agent, and the organic phase was reused directly without a regeneration process (Li et al., 2021). In order to avoid the loss of valuable IL cations such as [Bmim]⁺ during lithium ion extraction, Zhou et al. (2021) introduced sodium hexafluorophosphate (NaPF₆) as a co-extraction reagent. The experiments showed that NaPF₆ exhibits comparable efficiency as [Bmim][PF₆] for lithium ion extraction (79%) from magnesium ion-rich solution by TBP. In addition, the studies revealed a more efficient stripping of Li⁺ from the loaded organic phase by HCl than by Na₂CO₃. However, Na₂CO₃ is also a potential stripping reagent since the Li⁺ can be stripped as Li₂CO₃ in the aqueous solution, and the organic phase can be directly reused for the next cycle (Zhou et al., 2021).

Acylpyrazolones, which are members of the β-diketone family, are widely used for the coordination of various metal ions (Figure 5) (Marchetti et al., 2005; Marchetti et al., 2015; Taydakov et al., 2020). Jensen et al. (1959) reported an improved method for synthesizing 1-phenyl-3-methyl-4-acyl-pyrazolones-5 and its use for the extraction of metal ions. Thereafter, acylpyrazolones have been used extensively as effective chelating reagents for various applications, such as the determination of metals in trace amounts; in coordination studies with various metal ions including transition metals, lanthanoids, and actinoids; and in the separation of metals (Marchetti et al., 2005; Marchetti et al., 2015; Taydakov et al., 2020). Bukowsky et al. (1992) synthesized two acylpyrazolone derivatives by the condensation reactions of 1-phenyl-3-methylpyrazol-5-one with the corresponding acid chlorides based on the method of Jensen et al. (1959). Liquid–liquid extraction studies employing 1-phenyl-3-methy1-4-stearoylpyrazol-5-one (15) or 1-phenyl-3-methy1-4-lauroylpyrazol-5-one (16) in a pH range of 4–7 showed high extraction of Mg²⁺ and Ca²⁺, whereas the determined distribution rate for Li⁺ was low. By adding TOPO, the authors observed a significant increase in the extraction of Li⁺. Therefore, the high separation factors for the alkaline earth metal ions were drastically diminished. However, other alkali metal ions were extracted to only a minor extent.

In addition, much higher extraction of Li⁺ than of Na⁺, K⁺, and Cs⁺ was observed when 1-phenyl-3-methy1-4-benzoylpyrazol-5-one (17) and a phosphine oxide were used as an extractant and co-ligand, respectively (Bukowsky et al., 1992). Li et al. employed 17 and Cyanex 923 (7) to remove magnesium ions from lithium ion-rich brine. All Mg²⁺ from a synthetic solution containing 24 g/L Li⁺ and 0.24 g/L Mg²⁺ was removed, while only 0.6% Li⁺ was co-extracted. The slope analyses showed that Mg²⁺ was extracted as [Mg(17)₂(7)₂], while Li⁺ was extracted as a mixture of [Li(17)_x(7)₂] (x = 1, 2) (Li and Binnemans, 2020).

Based on the results obtained, it appears that higher binding affinity or extraction enhancement of acylpyrazolones toward metal cations can be obtained when phosphine oxides or phosphate esters are present in the extraction process. Matt et al. (1992) first introduced a phosphinoyl fragment into the pyrazolone moiety to synthesize 4-diphenylphosphinoyl pyrazolone (18) and investigated the binding properties for Fe³⁺ (Figure 6). However, very few follow-up studies on the synthesis and application of this type of P-containing pyrazolone ligands have since been reported.

Consequently, the Weigand group developed a series of new 4-phosphorylpyrazolone receptors by inserting a more tunable and versatile phosphoryl moiety into the pyrazolone backbone (Figure 7) (Zhang et al., 2022; Zhang et al., 2023). The lipophilicity of ligands depends on the properties of substituents in positions R¹ and R² (Figure 7). The bite size of the two O-donors of the ligands plays an important role in metal ion binding and selectivity and is highly tunable by the substituents at the R² position. As shown in Figure 7, the bite size can be characterized by the distance between two O-donors (O∙∙∙O). Herein, we have listed the O∙∙∙O distance for each receptor in Table 2. Moreover, the electronic properties of the ligands are strongly influenced by the substituents at the R³ position (Figure 7). Zhang et al. (2022) synthesized different 4-phosphorylpyrazolone derivatives 19–21 by altering substituents at the R² positions, while the substituents at the R¹ and R³ positions were fixed with an isopropyl and a nitro group, respectively. X-ray crystallographic analysis of free ligands and their tetrabutylammonium salts revealed that the bite size between the chelating O-donor atoms of the phosphoryl and azole moieties is highly influenced by the R² substituents, in which the smallest O···O distance is obtained in 21. Of the substituents studied, the phenyl group has a higher steric requirement and exhibits the smallest bite size between the chelating O-donor atoms. The ligands were successfully used to coordinate with lithium cation and various co-ligands (4, 5, and 6). The lithium complexes involved exhibited diverse coordination modes, such as dimer and trimer, which represent the first clear evidence for the synergistic role of these co-ligands on a molecular level (Figure 8). Sophisticated solution studies employing ¹H, ³¹P, and ⁷Li NMR exhibit reversible interconversion between dimeric and trimeric species. Furthermore, mass spectrometry and liquid–liquid extraction studies also provide evidence for the presence of such multinuclear lithium complexes in solution. The highest Li⁺ extraction (78%) was obtained for 21 in a single element liquid–liquid extraction experiment at pH 8.2, which reflects the influence of bite size on lithium ion capture. Multi-element extraction studies confirm that 19–21 represent a new class of receptors that selectively extracted Li⁺ from high concentrations of Na⁺, K⁺, and Cs⁺ under mild conditions (pH = 8.3). Hence, up to 77% of Li⁺ was transferred into the organic phase, whereas 6% of Cs⁺ was extracted, while Na⁺ and K⁺ were extracted in trace amounts (< 1%).

As an extension of this study, the Weigand group further modified the 4-phosphorylpyrazolone receptors and synthesized derivatives 22–25 by changing R³ substituents (Figure 7) (Zhang et al., 2023). Electron-neutral (R³ = H, 22), electron-donating (R³ = Me, 23), and electron-withdrawing (R³ = Cl, 24; R³ = CF₃, 25) substituents were introduced to the R³ position, as the acid dissociation properties of this type of ligand are strongly influenced by the electronic nature of such groups (Zhang et al., 2023). Receptors 22–25 proved to be soluble in nonpolar solvents such as n-octane than 19–21, which is beneficial for real-world applications. Currently, kerosene (mainly composed of alkanes), as a nonpolar solvent, is the most common diluent for metal ion extraction in industry due to its low toxicity and cost. Therefore, the good solubility of receptors 22–25 in n-octane (C₈H₁₈) provides a good hint of their industrial application.

X-ray crystallographic analysis of magnesium and calcium complexes shed light on the coordination behavior of these metals, particularly for the co-ligands 4 and 5 involved complexes. Single-element liquid–liquid extraction experiments using an aqueous phase at a pH of 5 showed that the highest Li⁺ extraction (77%) was observed for 25, in which a strong electron-withdrawing group CF₃ was introduced to the R³ position. Multi-element (including Li⁺, Na⁺, K⁺, Mg²⁺, and Ca²⁺) extraction experiments demonstrated that the phase transfer of Mg²⁺ and Ca²⁺ is much higher than Li⁺ at equilibrium pH 4.2. Mg²⁺ and Ca²⁺ were extracted quantitatively, while only 29% of Li⁺ was extracted and no Na⁺ and K⁺ were transferred into the organic phase using 25. Interestingly, a stepwise liquid–liquid extraction of Ca²⁺, Mg²⁺, and Li⁺ by pH regulation in an acidic pH range was achieved: the majority of Ca²⁺ (64%) was removed at pH 2 and most Mg²⁺ (93%) was extracted at pH 3, while all Ca²⁺ was already removed following several reiterations of the first step. The required pH (> 4.2) for the effective Li⁺ extraction (> 50%) is obviously higher than that observed for the extraction of Mg²⁺ and Ca²⁺. At equilibrium pH 6, 94% of Li⁺ was extracted and less than 4% of Na⁺ and K⁺ extractions were observed. The findings of the Weigand group demonstrated that 4-phosphorylpyrazolones can be employed as pH-regulated receptors for the stepwise separation of Ca²⁺, Mg²⁺, and Li⁺ from the alkali and alkaline earth metals (Zhang et al., 2023), which is probably most easily realized by using standard devices such as a mixer-settlers, in which the pH is adjusted before each mixer. The study indicated a way to separate lithium ion from acidic brine or spent LIB leaching solutions. This supports a more environmentally friendly future supply of lithium.

Macrocyclic receptors, particularly crown-4 derivatives, are another type of widely studied ligands for selective lithium ion recognition (Tagne kuate et al., 2010; TSE et al., 2021; Kim et al., 2022a; Gomez-Vega et al., 2022; Munasinghe et al., 2022; Yang et al., 2022). Charles J. Pedersen was the first to synthesize a series of crown ethers and study their coordination behavior with various metal salts (Pedersen, 1967). He shared the 1987 Nobel Prize in chemistry with Donald J. Cram and Jean-Marie Lehn for the development of supramolecular chemistry (Pedersen, 1967; Lehn, 1988). His detailed studies on the coordination behavior of crown ethers containing five to ten oxygen atoms with some alkali, alkaline earth, and lanthanoid metal ions such as Li⁺, Na⁺, K⁺, Rb⁺, Cs⁺, Ca²⁺, Sr²⁺, Ba²⁺, La³⁺, and Ce³⁺ provided very valuable clues for later extensive studies (Pedersen, 1967; Gokel et al., 2004a; Ge et al., 2009; Nisola et al., 2020; Yan et al., 2020; Docker et al., 2022). According to the “hard and soft acid and base” (HSAB) theory, the oxygen atoms of polyethers are hard bases that can form stable complexes with hard Lewis acids such as alkali metal ions Li⁺, Na⁺, and K⁺ through electrostatic interactions (Pearson, 1963; Gokel et al., 2004b; Sambe et al., 2021). The coordinated cations are generally located in the center of the crowns and, in some cases, sandwich structures are observed if the cation is too large to fit in the cavity (Sambe et al., 2021). Therefore, the size of the cavity of the crown ether is crucial for selective binding with different metal ions, and this parameter can be tuned by adjusting the oxygen atoms by introducing suitable substituents (Liu et al., 2019). It is known that 12- to 14-membered crown ether rings (cavity size in the range of 1.2–1.8 Å), such as 12-crown-4 (12C4, 26) (Figure 9), show the most selective preference for lithium ions (Pedersen, 1967; Olsher et al., 1991; Ali et al., 2018; Luo et al., 2018). There has been much effort to improve the selectivity of crown ethers toward coordination of the lithium cation by maintaining the overall cavity size; modification of those have also led to isotope separation of ⁶Li and ⁷Li (Cui et al., 2021). Kobiro and colleagues (Kazuya et al., 1988; Kobiro, 1996) and Buchanan et al. (1988) have already investigated the influence on extraction by modified 14-crown-4 ethers in the last century, using the dibenzo-derivative 27 and the dicyclohexyl derivative 28 (Figure 9). Furthermore, incorporation of bulky decalin units in 29 strongly enhanced the extraction power toward Li⁺ due to an increase in the lipophilicity of the corresponding lithium complexes in organic medium. The latter showed quantitative extraction of lithium picrate into chloroform at a receptor-to-cation ratio of 10:1, but 20% Na⁺ was also extracted under these conditions (Kobiro, 1996). In contrast, using the mono-substituted decalino-14-crown-4 ether 30, the Li⁺ extractions decreased to 81%, but the Li⁺/Na⁺ selectivity improved, as only 5% of Na⁺ was transferred into the organic phase. Furthermore, for the larger alkali metals K⁺, Rb⁺, and Cs⁺, extraction yields below 1% were observed, proving the receptor to be highly selective for Li⁺.

Gohil et al. (2019) synthesized the macrocyclic ionophore 31 (Figure 10), which selectively bound Li⁺ in the presence of other alkali and alkaline earth metal ions. Single crystals suitable for X-ray analysis confirmed that up to two metal centers are coordinated by the ligand. Competitive solid–liquid extraction experiments revealed that up to 69% of 31 was loaded by LiCl, whereas less than 5% of NaCl, KCl, MgCl₂, and CaCl₂ were loaded to the receptor in nitrobenzene if the salt mixtures were present in 50 times molar excess. Liquid–liquid extractions employing the same solvent showed a loading of the receptor of 26% when 1 M LiCl was used as the aqueous phase. The loading of Li⁺ marginally increased to 27% if NaCl, KCl, MgCl₂, and CaCl₂ were also present, while their loading was negligible (Gohil et al., 2019).

Calix[4]arene bearing different substituents at the lower rim (32–34; Figure 11) have been synthesized and employed for lithium ion extraction (Yaftian et al., 1997; Lukin and Vysotsky, 2001). Yaftian et al. (1997) studied the hybrid diamide-di(phosphine oxide) (32) functionalized calix[4]arenes for the recognition, extraction, and transport of alkali metal picrates. The authors found an extraction order of Li > Na > K > Rb > Cs, with no pronounced selectivity observed (65% Li⁺, 58% Na⁺, 45% K⁺, 20% Rb⁺, and 5% Cs⁺ extraction). Lukin and Vysotsky (2001) found that a calix[4]-arene derivative with four phosphoryl groups on the lower rim, such as diethoxyphosphoryl in 33, showed high lithium ion extraction and selectivity over other alkali metal ions.

Otho and colleagues studied p-t-octylcalix[4]arene derivatives for the extraction of lithium ions (Sadamatsu et al., 2016; Steven kurniawan et al., 2019; Kurniawan et al., 2021). A series of derivatives with propyl or acetic acid groups were therefore synthesized and investigated for the extraction of alkali metal ions (Sadamatsu et al., 2016). The authors observed that only monoacetic acid calix[4]arene 34 exhibited lithium ion selectivity over sodium ions. The same group studied 34 extensively in a microreactor system for the selective extraction of lithium ions from alkali and alkaline earth metal ions (Steven kurniawan et al., 2019). The kinetics of lithium extraction was significantly improved to 2.0 s compared to 24 h in a batch system. Recently, they developed a new concept regarding the fluid dynamics of lithium ion extraction employing 34 in T-type microreactor systems; they observed that the larger specific surface area, shorter diffusion distance, and the faster vortex velocity in the organic droplets dramatically enhanced the extraction kinetics (Kurniawan et al., 2021).